alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies Verizon Communications, Inc., et al. 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies 05/24/2023 /s/ Philip X. Wang Philip X. Wang (CA SBN 262239)

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP Document 16 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 863
Andrew J. HUNTER, Jr., Petitioner v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-9716

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

SOCIAL POSITIONING INPUT SYSTEMS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX SOFTWARE, 

LLC 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-422-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE RE 

KATHLEEN R. GEYER 

 To the Honorable Court and all parties, please take notice the following attorney hereby 

enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for Defendant Valve Corporation, and is 

authorized to received service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the above 

captioned matter on behalf of Defendant Valve Corporation. 

Dated: December 13, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Kathleen R. Geyer 

Michael E. Jones (SBN: 10929400) 

Shaun W. Hassett (SBN: 24074372) 

Potter Minton 

102 North College, Ste. 900 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

(903)597-8311 (telephone) 

mikejones@potterminton.com 

shaunhassett@potterminton.com 

Kathleen R. Geyer 

Christopher P. Damitio 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP 

1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700 

Seattle, WA 98101 

(206) 467-9600 (telephone) 

kgeyer@kilpatricktownsend.com 

cdamitio@kilpatricktownsend.com 

Attorneys for Defendant, Valve Corporation

78065833v.1 

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 98
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CRIMINAL NO. 1:23-CR-10

§

AHMED ALLAM §

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Ahmed Allam, Defendant, and files this his Notice of Appeal to the Fifth 

Circuit Court of Appeals from the judgment and sentence in the above styled and numbered 

cause as entered by the Court on January 30, 2024. 

Respectfully submitted,

THE GERTZ KELLEY LAW FIRM 

Attorneys at Law

2630 Liberty

Beaumont, Texas 77702

P: (409) 833-6400

F: (409) 833-6401 

E: rgertz@gertzlawyers.com

E: tkelley@gertzlawyers.com

/s/ Ryan W. Gertz

_________________________________

RYAN W. GERTZ

STATE BAR NUMBER: 24048489

Attorney for Ahmed Allam

/s/ Thomas W. Kelley

_________________________________

THOMAS W. KELLEY

STATE BAR NUMBER: 24072891

Attorney for Ahmed Allam

Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 71 Filed 02/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1322
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 1st day of February, 2024. 

/s/ Ryan W. Gertz

_________________________________

RYAN W. GERTZ

/s/ Thomas W. Kelley

_________________________________

THOMAS W. KELLEY

Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 71 Filed 02/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1323
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/16/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,028
COMMITMENTS
   4,276    4,190    1,718   20,696   22,337   26,690   28,245   11,338    9,783

CHANGES FROM 04/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,279)
     239     -459     -147   -2,833   -2,565   -2,741   -3,171      462      892

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.2     11.0      4.5     54.4     58.7     70.2     74.3     29.8     25.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      10       10        7       27       20       39       36
```

----

Updated April 19, 2013
allegations." O'Guinn v. State, 118 Nev. 849, 851-52, 59 P.3d 488, 489-90

(2002) (footnotes omitted). As Burchett has not alleged that either of these exceptions apply, we decline to consider this contention on direct appeal. Having concluded that Burchett is not entitled to relief, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Douglas cc: Hon. Leon Aberasturi, District Judge Paul G. Yohey Attorney General/Carson City Lyon County District Attorney District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
EXHIBIT 11

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 190
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 
Page 5 

P-CSCF I-CSCF HSS 

1. Register

2. Register

3. Cx-Query/Cx-Select-Pull

UE 

Visited Network Home Netwo

4. Cx-Query Resp/Cx-Select-

7. Cx

5. Register

9. 200 OK

10. 200 OK

11. 200 OK

6. Cx

Figure 5.1: Registration – User not registe

1. After the UE has obtained IP connectivity, it can perform the 

the UE sends the Register information flow to the proxy (PubUser Identity, home network domain name, UE IP address, InSupport Indication). 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 
Page 9 

[7f] identifying a particular protocol specific registration process from a number of protocol specific registration processes; 

The interoperability node identifies a particular protocol specific renumber of protocol specific registration processes. As discussed in [7d] above, the protocol specific registration procesaccess that the station has. “3.2.1 VoLTE UE Attachment and IMS Registration 3.2.1.1 General A VoLTE UE, under LTE coverage, shall automatically perform an 

IMS registration for VoLTE, if the network supports VoLTE (for fuconditions for IMS registration see section 2.2.1 of GSMA IR.92 [5VoLTE UE shall be available for VoLTE services (i.e. incoming casupplementary services), similar to the voice experience in today's CSource: https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads

Service-Description-and-Implementation-Guidelines-Version-2.0.p“3.2.1.3 Detailed Description VoLTE UE Attach .... The MME sends an Attach Accept to the eNodeB with the IMS-AP

QoS parameters, PCO, IMS Voice over PS supported indication, TAcontainer, etc. The eNodeB communicates with the UE to update thincludes the information received from the core network as part of t

The UE sends the Attach Complete message to the eNodeB, which this time, the UE is capable of sending uplink packets. The MME inRequest to the SGW including the EPS Bearer Identity, eNodeB adThe SGW acknowledges the request to the MME and is capable of At this stage, the VoLTE UE is attached to the network via a defaulfor IMS Signalling.” Source: https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads

Service-Description-and-Implementation-Guidelines-Version-2.0.p

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:
Lawrence Keith JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6847

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 2, 2014

No. 04-13-00739-CR

Andres R. CISNEROS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR0183

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to June 3, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DEMETRIUS SHERMAN JOSEPH, SR., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-188

§

JOHN DICKERSON, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Demetrius Sherman Joseph, Sr., a prisoner confined at the Polunsky Unit of the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

On December 20, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed

objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#6) is

Case 9:23-cv-00188-MAC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 40
ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. 

2

Case 9:23-cv-00188-MAC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 41
Patrick R. SMITH, Petitioner, v. Barbara D. UNDERWOOD, Attorney General of New York, et al.

No. 19-6839

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas P. Maun, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation.

 

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: November 5, 2004 | By:                                               | /s/ Thomas P. Maun |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                    | Thomas P. Maun                                    |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer  Chief Accounting Officer |

 

----
Michael J. AGUON, Petitioner, v. Warren L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, et al.

No. 19-7485.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Perry Alexander TAYLOR, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6735.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies, to the best of their knowledge, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.



Date: April 30, 2003



By:

/s/ GERALD D. VANEECKHOUTGerald D. VanEeckhout Chairman and Chief Executive Officer






By:

/s/ GAVIN J. THOMSONGavin J. Thomson Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Eastern District of Texas

✔

2:23-cv-335 7/18/2023 Eastern District of Texas

Patent Armory Inc. Bose Corporation

7,130,430 10/31/2006 Patent Armory Inc.

Patent Armory Inc.

Patent Armory Inc.

Patent Armory Inc.

Patent Armory Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00335-JRG Document 4 Filed 07/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 58
Attorney or Party without Attorney:

Reza Mirzaie (SBN 246953)

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone No: 310-826-7474

Attorney For: Plaintiff Ref. No. or File No.:

3746-003X

For Court Use Only

Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL

DIVISION

Plaintiff: XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Defendant: AT&T SERVICES INC., et al.,

PROOF OF SERVICE Hearing Date: Time: Dept/Div: Case Number:

2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP

1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2. I served copies of the Summons in a Civil Action; Complaint; Civil Cover Sheet; Report on the Filing or Determination of an

Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark; Jury Trial Demanded; Plaintiff's Notice of Related Cases

3. a. Party served: AT&T SERVICES INC.

b. Person served: George Martinez, authorized to accept for CT Corporation System, agent for service of process

authorized to accept served under F.R.C.P. Rule 4.

4. Address where the party was served: 1999 Bryan St Suite 900, Dallas, TX 75201

5. I served the party:

a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive

process for the party (1) on: Thu, Oct 05, 2023 (2) at: 02:40 PM

6. Person Who Served Papers:

a. Kim Shaw  d. The Fee for Service was:    $483.97

b. FIRST LEGAL

1517 W. Beverly Blvd.

LOS ANGELES, CA 90026

c. (213) 250-1111

7. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

(Date) (Signature)

PROOF OF

SERVICE

9700270

(5466387)

10/6/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 10/09/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 696
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors
Kellstrom Industries, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-20727, No. 333-41159, No. 333-62247 and No. 333-80015) on Form S-8 and in
the registration statements (No. 333-10313, No. 333-44019 and No. 333-52917) on
Form S-3 of Kellstrom Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
February 18, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Kellstrom
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1999, and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Kellstrom Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries.


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 28, 2000
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
No. 33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No. 333-03452, No. 333-03454, No.
333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No. 333-33893, No. 333-37273, No.
333-37553, No. 333-37565, No. 333-38071, No. 333-41049, No. 333-42417, No.
333-47563, No. 333-57863, No. 333-64377, No. 333-64379, and No. 333-77941 of
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company of our report dated January 31, 2003, with
respect to the Individual and Combined financial statements of The Woodlands
Land Development Company, L.P., The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company,
L.P., and The Woodlands Operating Company included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 24, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VALTRUS INNOVATIONS LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00443-JRG

(Lead Case)

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., T-MOBILE US, 

INC., SPRINT CORP., 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00444-JRG

(Member Case)

v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00445-JRG

(Member Case)

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Second Amended Docket Control 

Order (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 97.) In the Motion, the parties move to amend the Docket Control 

Order in this case to extend the Deadlines for Defendants to comply with certain claim 

construction-related deadlines, including to comply with Local Patent Rules 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, and 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 98 Filed 07/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2792
2

4-5(a) and (b). (Id.) However, the parties attached to the Motion a non-final draft of a Proposed 

Docket Control Order (a pdf with redline edits still included). (Id.) The Motion is therefore 

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is ORDERED that the parties may refile their Motion, 

with an attached Protective Order that the Court may enter, within three (3) business days. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of July, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 98 Filed 07/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2793
Johnathan HAWTHORNE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8148

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Larry Antonio SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7172

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Frank CONDEZ, Petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-781

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.