alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.1.1

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
           AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

                              JUST FOR FEET, INC.


    WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Just For Feet, Inc. (the "Company") has
previously adopted, and the stockholders of the Corporation have approved, the
1997 Employee Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan") pursuant to which various
types of incentive awards may be issued to eligible directors, officers,
employees, consultants and advisors of the Corporation; and

    WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems it desirable to
amend the Plan so as to increase the number of shares available for issuance
pursuant to awards granted under the Plan;

    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended upon the terms, and subject to the
conditions, set forth herein:

                                   ARTICLE I

                               AMENDMENT TO PLAN

    1.1  Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the first sentence
such section in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:

         "The total number of shares of stock reserved and available for
         distribution under the Plan shall be 2,900,000."


                                   ARTICLE II

                          EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT

    2.1  The amendment effected hereby shall be effective for options granted
under the Plan to eligible employees on or after the date this amendment is
approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, but subject to approval
of a majority of the shares of Common Stock of the Corporation entitled to vote
thereon represented in person and by proxy at a meeting of stockholders.  In the
event stockholder approval of adoption of this amendment is not obtained within
twelve months of the date this amendment is approved by the Board of Directors
of the Corporation, then any option granted in the intervening period to
eligible employees shall be void.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glas-Aire  Industries Group,
Ltd. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2005
(the "Report") I, Linda Kwan, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The  information   contained  in  the  Report  fairly
                           presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006


\s\ Linda Kwan
-----------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 Date: May 8, 2009
    /s/ Steven G. BungerSteven G. BungerChief Executive Officer, Mobile Mini, Inc. Date: May 8, 2009
    /s/ Mark E. FunkMark E. FunkExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Mobile Mini, Inc.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/09/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       61,196
COMMITMENTS
   6,547    4,203        0   50,236   54,035   56,783   58,238    4,413    2,958

CHANGES FROM 10/02/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        155)
  -1,589    1,870      -40    2,462   -1,404      833      426     -678     -271

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.7      6.9      0.0     82.1     88.3     92.8     95.2      7.2      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       70)
       7        6        0       37       31       44       37
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/09/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      115,242
COMMITMENTS
  22,370   20,328      777   79,515   89,804  102,662  110,909   12,580    4,333

CHANGES FROM 10/02/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         32)
     768      756      -99   -1,196   -1,021     -527     -364      559      396

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.4     17.6      0.7     69.0     77.9     89.1     96.2     10.9      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      112)
      34        9        3       49       37       84       48
```

----

Updated October 12, 2012
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MACY’S, INC.,

Defendant.

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00583-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC, files this Unopposed Motion for Entry of this Docket 

Control Order. The Parties have conferred and agreed upon this Docket Control Order. Therefore, 

Symbology Innovationsrespectfully requests that the Court approve and enter same, a copy of which 

is attached hereto for the Court’s entry.

Dated: April 8, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Christopher A. Honea

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 11 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 131
Vincent Curtis CONYERS, Petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 19M5

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Edward SPEARS, petitioner, v. R & R CLEANING SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-8342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MACY’S, INC.,

Defendant.

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00583-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC, files this Unopposed Motion for Entry of this

Discovery Order. The Parties have conferred and agreed upon this Discovery Order. Therefore, 

Symbology Innovationsrespectfully requests that the Court approve and enter same, a copy of which 

is attached hereto for the Court’s entry.

Dated: April 8, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Christopher A. Honea

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 10 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 123
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      173,278
COMMITMENTS
  41,335   40,042   24,847   88,442   82,217  154,624  147,106   18,653   26,172

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,446)
   1,624   -1,297      272      227    2,951    2,124    1,927    1,323    1,520

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.9     23.1     14.3     51.0     47.4     89.2     84.9     10.8     15.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      198)
      52       46       45       64       76      141      152
```

----

Updated March 22, 2013
Robert W. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 19-6559

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petitions for rehearing denied.
Rodolfo PEREZ-JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7427

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Louis TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al.

No. 19-756.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Rodrigo Pablo LOZANO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5979

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Destyn David FREDERICK, Petitioner, v. Bryan COLLIER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

No. 18-9634

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/22/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      177,330
COMMITMENTS
  38,049   24,335   23,343   95,537  102,668  156,929  150,346   20,401   26,984

CHANGES FROM 01/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,912)
    -606      255      -85    2,274    4,096    1,583    4,266      329   -2,354

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.5     13.7     13.2     53.9     57.9     88.5     84.8     11.5     15.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      181)
      49       38       41       59       73      128      134
```

----

Updated January 25, 2013
Frederick R. COTE, Petitioner v. Debbie ASUNCION, Warden.

No. 18-8993

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

BENEFICIENT and BRAD HEPPNER, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ALEXANDER GLADSTONE and DOW 

JONES & CO., INC., 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: 6:23-cv-00376-JDK 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Before the Court is Defendant Dow Jones & Co., Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 12(b)(6) For Failure to State a Claim (“Motion”). Having reviewed the Motion and related 

briefing, the Court is of the opinion that it should be GRANTED. It is therefore 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Dow Jones & Co., Inc. are 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Case 6:23-cv-00376-JDK Document 72-15 Filed 11/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

1817
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2647

___________ Charles Armstrong, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States State of Missouri; Mel Carnahan; * District Court for the Eastern City of Vinita Park; Virginia Bira; * District of Missouri. Vinita Park Police Department; 911 * Emergency System of St. Louis * (UNPUBLISHED) County; Robert Hartz; Richard Aites; * St. Louis County; St. Louis County * Correctional/Justice Department Center * and Jail Personnel; the 21 stJudicial * Circuit of Missouri, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 22, 2000 Filed: January 5, 2001

___________ BeforeMcMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. -2- PER CURIAM. Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against multiple defendants. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic , 506 U.S. 263, 267-68 (1993); Westv. Atkins , 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,937
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,226
<PP&E>                                       1,822,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                 213,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,799,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,561
<BONDS>                                      1,220,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        101
<COMMON>                                           436
<OTHER-SE>                                     468,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,799,491
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,529
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)


</TABLE>
BAY POINT PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-798.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT B 

Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 224
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 225
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 226
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 227
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 228
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 229
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 230
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 231
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 232
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 10 of 21 PageID #: 233
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 11 of 21 PageID #: 234
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 12 of 21 PageID #: 235
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 13 of 21 PageID #: 236
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 14 of 21 PageID #: 237
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 15 of 21 PageID #: 238
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 16 of 21 PageID #: 239
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 17 of 21 PageID #: 240
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 18 of 21 PageID #: 241
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 19 of 21 PageID #: 242
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 20 of 21 PageID #: 243
Case 4:23-cv-00865-SDJ Document 27-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 21 of 21 PageID #: 244
In Re Gerald Phillip WOOTEN, petitioner.

No. 18-6537.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Joseph TOTORO, II, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7265

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
|March 31, 2008
|--------------

CONSENT OF FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Eldorado Gold Corporation

I consent to:

|1. | The incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of March 31, 2008 for the year ended December 31, 2007, of the description of the reports titled:                                                                                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|   | Addendum to a review of operations at Sao Bento Mineracao, Brazil for Eldorado Gold Corporation dated April 27, 2000 and revised May 10, 2000;                                                                                                                                       
|  
|   | Review of Operations at Sao Bento Mineracao, Brazil for Eldorado Corporation Ltd., dated May 13, 1996; and                                                                                                                                                                           
|  
|   | Review of Ore Reserves and Metallurgical Operations at Sao Bento Mineracao , Brazil for Omar Muhtadi Inc., dated February 5, 1996 (the Reports);                                                                                                                                   
|  
|2. | The information that forms the summary of the Reports and the description of certain mineral reserve estimates and other information pertaining to the Sao Bento Mine and to the use of our
firm's name, Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited, under this annual report as a named expert.
|  



|Dated as of the 31 day of March 2008.
|-------------------------------------

Sincerely,

WATTS, GRIFFIS AND McOUAT LIMITED



|Per: | Michael Kociumbas, P.Geo.
|---- | -------------------------
|     | Vice-President           

|WATTS, GRIFFIS AND McOUAT LIMITED                                         | Suite 400 - 8 King Street East, Toronto, Canada, M5C 1B5
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------
|TEL: (416) 364-6244 FAX: (416) 864-1675 EMAIL: wgm@wgm.ca WEB: www.wgm.ca

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,354
<PP&E>                                         497,030
<DEPRECIATION>                               (100,793)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 647,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,432
<BONDS>                                        258,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   647,266
<SALES>                                        273,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               273,198
<CGS>                                          238,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
Robert W. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Kevin S. PORTNOY, et al.

No. 19-7111

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.