alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and statements of income of Paul-Son Gaming
Corporation, as of and for the year ended May 31, 1997, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                       269
<INVENTORY>                                      5,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,542
<PP&E>                                          10,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,397
<SALES>                                         24,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,914
<CGS>                                           17,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,134
<INCOME-TAX>                                       762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-104-MAC

'

ANQUINETTE MITCHELL HINSON, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Anquinette Mitchell Hinson, 

Case 1:23-cr-00104-MAC-CLS Document 19 Filed 12/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 51
2

is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

Case 1:23-cr-00104-MAC-CLS Document 19 Filed 12/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 52
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC; 

FDRLST MEDIA, LLC; and

THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through its 

Attorney General, Ken Paxton, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE;

GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT CENTER;

ANTONY BLINKEN, in his official capacity as 

Secretary of State;

LEAH BRAY, in her official capacity as Deputy 

Coordinator of the State Department’s Global 

Engagement Center;

JAMES P. RUBIN, in his official capacity as 

Coordinator for the Global Engagement Center of the 

State Department;

DANIEL KIMMAGE, in his official capacity as the 

Principal Deputy Coordinator for the Global 

Engagement Center at the State Department;

ALEXIS FRISBIE, in her official capacity as Senior 

Technical Advisor of the Technology Engagement 

Team for the Global Engagement Center at the State 

Department;

PATRICIA WATTS, in her official capacity as the 

Director of the Technology Engagement Team at the 

Global Engagement Center at the State Department,

Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: 6:23-cv-00609 

EXHIBIT 8

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 26-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 779
DECLARATION OF SEAN DAVIS

I, Sean Davis, hereby declare and state:

1. I, Sean Davis, am over the age of 18 and make this Declaration in support of 

Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Transfer.

2. I am the CEO and co-founder of The Federalist and I make this Declaration based 

on my personal knowledge and experience.

3. The Federalist has two (2) full-time employees in the State of Texas.

4. The Federalist has multiple paid subscribers within the Tyler Division of the U.S. 

District Court’s Eastern District of Texas.

5. The Federalist website has hundreds of thousands of users within the State of Texas.

6. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct to the best of 

my knowledge and belief.

Executed on March 14, 2024.

/s/ Sean Davis

 Sean Davis

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 26-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 780
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 04/06/2023 /s/ Philip Wang Philip Wang CA Bar No. 262239

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 04/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 860
Dean A. SCHWARTZMILLER, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-9285

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-97-MAC

'

DEREK KELLY, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Derek Kelly, is adjudged 

Case 1:23-cr-00097-MAC-CLS Document 27 Filed 01/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 75
2

guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon 

in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 12th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00097-MAC-CLS Document 27 Filed 01/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 76
Michael LEDET, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS.

No. 18-1378.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Blitz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cadus Corporation and will be retained by Cadus Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ David BlitzDavid
      BlitzPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (ChiefExecutive
      Officer and Chief Financial Officer)May
      17, 2010





The
foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
IN RE Lexter K. KOSSIE, Petitioner

No. 19-7524

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,452
COMMITMENTS
  23,569    2,428      390   56,352   80,053   80,311   82,871    5,141    2,581

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -22,255)
  -1,819   -2,363   -1,402  -18,084  -17,954  -21,305  -21,719     -950     -536

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.6      2.8      0.5     65.9     93.7     94.0     97.0      6.0      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       69)
       9        4        1       38       32       47       37
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      191,044
COMMITMENTS
  62,501   31,601    1,041  112,040  154,517  175,582  187,159   15,462    3,885

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -38,489)
  -1,367    3,184   -9,773  -16,496  -21,275  -27,636  -27,864  -10,853  -10,625

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.7     16.5      0.5     58.6     80.9     91.9     98.0      8.1      2.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      38       15        7       65       46      106       65
```

----

Updated March 22, 2013
##### 



|                                   |  |          
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------
|LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation |  | Form 10-Q

Exhibit 99.1

LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Each of the undersigned, Scott C. Petersen and Gary H. Ritondaro, the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation (the Company), individually and not
jointly has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| |  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                               
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
Certification as of the 8 day of May 2003.



| | /s/ Scott C. Petersen
Scott C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Gary H. Ritondaro
Gary H. Ritondaro
Chief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation and
will be retained by LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

March 31, 2003

Page 25
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         235,399
<SECURITIES>                                 5,533,032
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,772,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,215,872
<PP&E>                                     583,146,215
<DEPRECIATION>                           (120,632,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             487,270,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,460,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 56,250,000
<COMMON>                                     1,532,244
<OTHER-SE>                                  94,039,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               487,270,075
<SALES>                                     48,103,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,622,038
<CGS>                                       19,670,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,691,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,897,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,625,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,625,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,625,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER SCOT TAYLOR §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-411

JAMES PAYNE, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Christopher Scot Taylor, an inmate confined at the Shelby County Jail, proceeding

pro se, brings this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Analysis

Plaintiff complains that he has been deprived of life and liberty without due process of law,

in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Additionally, Plaintiff complains the Defendants have denied

him a speedy trial for the charges against him and have suppressed his Petitions for Writ of Habeas

Corpus, in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Finally, Plaintiff complains that the

Defendants’ conduct amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth

Amendment. The Defendants are all employed in Shelby County, Texas. 

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not

contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28

U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bales, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th

Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28

U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the Defendants reside

or in which the claim arose. 

Case 9:23-cv-00210-MAC-CLS Document 6 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 53
The claims which form the basis of Plaintiff’s complaint occurred in ShelbyCounty, Texas. 

Additionally, all of the Defendants appear to reside in ShelbyCounty, Texas. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 124, Shelby County is located in the Eastern District of Texas. As a result, venue is proper in the

Eastern District of Texas. 

While Shelby County is in the Eastern District of Texas, it is in the Lufkin Division of the

district, rather than the Beaumont Division. When a case is filed in the wrong district or division,

the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or

division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 

For the reasons set forth above, this case should be transferred to the Lufkin Division of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. A separate Transfer Order shall be

entered in accordance with this Memorandum.

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 17th day of November, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00210-MAC-CLS Document 6 Filed 11/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 54
Michael MCCLAIN, et al., Petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION, et al.

No. 18-1512.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
exhibit10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


with respect to


LEASE AGREEEMENT


DATED AS OF JULY 4, 2010


BETWEEN V.I.E.C. LTD. AND VISHAY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LTD







This Amendment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of March, 2012 by and between V.I.E.C. Ltd., as Lessor (the “Lessor”), on the one hand, and Vishay Advanced Technologies Ltd., as Lessee (the “Lessee”), on the other hand.  Reference is made to the Lease Agreement dated as of July 4, 2010 by and between Lessor and Lessee (the “Lease Agreement”).







RECITALS







WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee are parties to the Lease Agreement under which Lessor leases to Lessee a space at Lessor’s facility in Beer-Sheva, Israel;  and







WHEREAS, Lessee has requested to lease an additional space at the facility referenced above and Lessor has accepted Lessee’s request subject to the terms and conditions of this Amendment.







AGREEMENT







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee agree as follows:







I.                 AMENDMENTS







1. In accordance with Section 10.05 of the Lease Agreement, the Lease Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:








	
(a)  

	
 “Appendix A” referenced in the third “WHEREAS” paragraph of the Lease Agreement is hereby supplemented and amended by including the additional area shown in red in Exhibit A attached to this Amendment.  For the avoidance of doubt, the term “Premises” referenced in the Lease Agreement will include the area shown in red in Appendix A attached to the Lease Agreement and the additional area shown in red in Exhibit A attached herein.













	
(b)  

	
Section 2.01 to the Lease Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:












 


“2.01           In consideration for the Lease, the Lesee shall pay theLessor annual rent in the amount of Eighty Seven Thousand U.S.Dollars (US$87,000) (hereinafter the “Rent”).







The annual Rent during the Term and during the extended term asin section 1.03, should the Term be extended, shall be linked toU.S. CPI (“CPI”).  The base index for such calculation should bethe CPI known on the date of this Agreement.”







II.      MISCELLANEOUS







2. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Lease Agreement shall remainunmodified and in full force and effect.







3. Capitalized terms used herein without definitions shall have the meaningsassigned to them in the Lease Agreement.


 


4. This Amendment shall become effective as of March 1, 2012.







5. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by a duly authorized officer or representative of each of Lessor and Lessee as of the date set forth above.







V.I.E.C. LTD







By:  /s/ Ita Goldberg


Name:  Ita Goldberg












VISHAY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LTD







By:  /s/ Ziv Shoshani


Name:  Ziv Shoshani
















  





  











  













 


EXHIBIT A


 


 


[Drawing of leased premises]
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 9 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 309