alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTES, THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                    6,862
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            31,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              1,234
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         62,269
<PP&E>                                                                    7,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            1,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           81,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    67,569
<BONDS>                                                                   2,492
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                               1,000
<COMMON>                                                                    142
<OTHER-SE>                                                                9,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             81,057
<SALES>                                                                 165,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        165,339
<CGS>                                                                   154,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           181,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (16,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (16,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          (30,415)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (47,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDREW LYNN SULLIVAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4609-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4609-DR), dated August 23, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on May 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Leda M. Khoury, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Robert A. Haywood as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-11915 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7481
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANDRE GERARD LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-99-314, CA-01-88-3) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 4, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Gerard Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Andre Gerard Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice Lewis’ motion, styled as a motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, after construing it as an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. Lewis’ motion to amend is tantamount to a successive § 2255 motion, for which Lewis must obtain authorization from this court to file. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lewis , Nos. CR99-134; CA-01-883 (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Roy Dar, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatedto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ Roy Dar     Roy Dar  Vice President, Controller  (Principal Accounting Officer)Dated: May 15, 2006
Reginald LACEY, Petitioner, v. David GOMEZ, Warden.

No. 18-9588

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                           STRATEGIC DIAGNOSTICS INC.

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Diagnostics Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, STANLEY J. MUSIAL, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, in connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, that based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stanley J. Musial
---------------------------------------
Stanley J. Musial
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 14, 2003
       -----------------
Exhibit 32.1   Aquentium, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Aquentium, Inc. (the Company) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  January 12, 2009/s/ Mark T. Taggatz
Mark T. Taggatz
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Isaac Decurtis HARRIS, Petitioner v. MICHIGAN.

No. 19-5055

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      15,112,642
<SECURITIES>                                13,651,861
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,583,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,260,274
<PP&E>                                     970,421,113
<DEPRECIATION>                             178,124,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             853,904,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      647,676,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 56,250,000
<COMMON>                                     2,274,385
<OTHER-SE>                                 147,702,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               853,904,172
<SALES>                                     35,360,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,246,646
<CGS>                                       15,662,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,236,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,965,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,617,263)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO. 5:23-cr-22

§

ANTONIO TIMMINS §

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable J. Boone Baxter, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Baxter conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 30). Judge 

Baxter recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and conditionally approve the 

plea agreement. He further recommended that the Court finally adjudge Defendant as guilty of 

Count 1 of the Indictment. Count 1 of the Indictment charges a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), 

possession with intent to distribute Fentanyl. The Court is of the opinion that the Report and 

Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 30) is ADOPTED. It is 

further

ORDERED that the Defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. 

Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence 

report. It is finally 

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant’s amended plea agreement, the Court finds the 

Defendant GUILTY of Count 1 of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a

JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count 1 of the Indictment.

Case 5:23-cr-00022-RWS-JBB Document 33 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 86
2

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNED this 17th day of April, 2024.

Case 5:23-cr-00022-RWS-JBB Document 33 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 87
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/17/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      614,441
COMMITMENTS
  93,526   28,779  185,067  316,019  376,377  594,612  590,223   19,829   24,218

CHANGES FROM 09/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     11,563)
  -4,017   -9,756    9,795    5,214    7,721   10,992    7,760      571    3,803

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.2      4.7     30.1     51.4     61.3     96.8     96.1      3.2      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      36       34       58       63       64      131      128
```

----

Updated September 20, 2013
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 01/03/2024 /s/ Neil A. Rubin Neil A. Rubin CA Bar No. 250761

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 794
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CA, INC, 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Notice is hereby given that Edward J. Mayle of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 

enters his appearance in this matter as counsel on behalf of Defendant CA, Inc. 

Edward J. Mayle may receive all communications from the Court and from other parties at 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, 1400 Wewatta Street Suite 600, Denver, CO 80202, 

Telephone (303) 571-4000; Facsimile: (303) 571-4321; tmayle@kilpatricktownsend.com. 

Dated: April 26, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Edward J. Mayle 

Edward J. Mayle 

 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 

 1400 Wewatta Street Suite 600 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 571-4000 

Facsimile: (303) 571-4321 

tmayle@kilpatricktownsend.com 

 

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 37 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 588
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on April 26, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court via CM/ECF, which will send notification of this filing to all counsel of record. 

 /s/ Edward J. Mayle 

29815767V.1 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 37 Filed 04/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 589
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      608,139
COMMITMENTS
 107,790   35,636  181,431  305,827  372,199  595,048  589,266   13,091   18,873

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -14,914)
  13,588    4,194  -11,281  -15,710   -5,402  -13,403  -12,489   -1,511   -2,425

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.7      5.9     29.8     50.3     61.2     97.8     96.9      2.2      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      163)
      50       34       62       66       71      142      144
```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
FILED IN12th COURT OF APPEALS        TYLER, TEXAS  9/8/2015 4:03:02 PM            PAM ESTES                Clerk
Emilio TREVINO, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-6683

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ZACHARY L. MOYE §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv351

ANGELA N. CHEVALIER, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Zachary L. Moye, an inmate at the Stiles Unit, proceeding pro se, brought this

civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action for failing to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted based on plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing

this action. 

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. A copy of the report and recommendation was mailed to plaintiff at the address

provided to the court. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge have been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct and the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A separate

Case 1:23-cv-00351-MJT-ZJH Document 5 Filed 10/16/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendations.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 16th day of October, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00351-MJT-ZJH Document 5 Filed 10/16/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22