alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ivan STAMPS, Petitioner, v. Michael MILLER.

No. 19-5004

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11805]

[[Page 33152]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice of Open Meeting of the Advisory 
Committee of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM)

TIME AND DATE: Monday, June 13th, 2022, from 2:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m. ET.

PLACE: Hybrid meeting--811 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20571 and 
Virtual. The meeting will be conducted in person for committee members, 
EXIM's Board of Directors, and support staff, and virtually for all 
other participants.

STATUS: Virtual Public Participation: The meeting will be open to 
public participation virtually and time will be allotted for questions 
or comments submitted online. Members of the public may also file 
written statements before or after the meeting to [email protected]. 
Interested parties may register for the meeting at: https://teams.microsoft.com/registration/PAFTuZHHMk2Zb1GDkIVFJw,5M1LfonJMEi2VFUgYRv6oQ,i145n2l9vkmDj5btNlkuGw,VTUQOf0ElEOQNCL5M1TaFQ,K2OcDrV0J02pkcm6-gM0Jg,uuGSaQQTnkC8jMnni1JJ8w?mode=read&tenantId=b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Discussion of EXIM policies and programs to 
provide competitive financing to expand United States exports and 
comments for inclusion in EXIM's Report to the U.S. Congress on Global 
Export Credit Competition.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, contact 
India Walker, External Enagagement Specialist, at 202-480-0062 or at 
[email protected].

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11805 Filed 5-27-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/17/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,657
COMMITMENTS
   5,948    8,331      607   22,524   21,046   29,079   29,984   12,578   11,673

CHANGES FROM 09/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,616)
     461       20      -50      478    1,663      889    1,633    1,727      983

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.3     20.0      1.5     54.1     50.5     69.8     72.0     30.2     28.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       67)
       7       17        6       38       23       49       43
```

----

Updated September 20, 2013
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6789
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES BENNIE HUNT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-177-C-P, CA-92-70-3-P) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider a prior order, entered in 1993, denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hunt , Nos. CR-88-177-C-P; CA-92-70-3-P (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/11/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      367,802
COMMITMENTS
  82,777  150,837   91,229  157,060   93,201  331,066  335,267   36,736   32,535

CHANGES FROM 06/04/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,991)
  -9,469  -13,045    1,048    4,147    4,814   -4,274   -7,183     -717    2,192

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.5     41.0     24.8     42.7     25.3     90.0     91.2     10.0      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      44       73       78       36       33      134      140
```

----

Updated June 14, 2013
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2320

To allow States to use a portion of their welfare block grants for general

education spending.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. GARY MILLER of California (for himself and Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To allow States to use a portion of their welfare block

grants for general education spending.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF STATE AUTHORITY TO USE 10

4 PERCENT OF WELFARE BLOCK GRANT FUNDS

5 FOR TITLE XX PROGRAMS; AUTHORITY TO

6 USE PORTION OF SUCH FUNDS FOR GENERAL

7 EDUCATION SPENDING.

8 Section 404(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

9 604(d)) is amended—

10 (1) in paragraph (1)—
2

•HR 2320 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘provisions of law’’ and in2 serting ‘‘laws’’; and

3 (B) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(C) State laws relating to education.’’;

5 (2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(2) LIMITATIONS ON AMOUNTS TRANSFER8 ABLE TO CERTAIN STATE PROGRAMS.—For fiscal

9 year 2001 and each succeeding fiscal year:

10 ‘‘(A) TITLE XX PROGRAMS.—From the

11 amount of any grant made to a State under

12 section 403(a) for the fiscal year, the State may

13 use for State programs pursuant to title XX

14 not more than the amount by which—

15 ‘‘(i) 10 percent of the amount of the

16 grant; exceeds

17 ‘‘(ii) the amount (if any) used by the

18 State under subparagraph (B) for the fis19 cal year.

20 ‘‘(B) STATE EDUCATION PROGRAMS.—

21 From the amount of any grant made to a State

22 under section 403(a) (except section 403(a)(5))

23 for the fiscal year, the State may use for State

24 programs pursuant to State education laws not
3

•HR 2320 IH

1 more than 5.75 percent of the amount of the

2 grant.’’; and

3 (3) in paragraph (3)(A)—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘provision of law specified’’

5 and inserting ‘‘law referred to’’; and

6 (B) by striking ‘‘provision of law to’’ and

7 inserting ‘‘law to’’.

Æ
Jerry Allen HORN, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 18-8147.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Nicholas D. WEIR, Petitioner v. MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

No. 18-9007

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,787,636
<SECURITIES>                                 7,091,140
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,436,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,375,076
<PP&E>                                     918,784,234
<DEPRECIATION>                           (149,433,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             814,041,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       50,394,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 56,250,000
<COMMON>                                     2,262,195
<OTHER-SE>                                 209,064,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               814,041,127
<SALES>                                     95,773,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,788,401
<CGS>                                       41,790,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,914,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,890,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,160,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,160,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                124,895
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,035,780
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
PRIME RETAIL, INC.

                 EXHIBIT 12.1: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
    TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DISTRIBUTIONS AND DIVIDENDS

              (Amounts in thousands, except for ratio information)

                                               Nine Months Ended September 30
                                          ------------------------------------
                                                  2000                  1999
                                          -----------------     ---------------
 Income (loss) before minority interests     $   (31,797)          $   23,427
 Interest incurred                                75,877               70,100
 Amortization of capitalized interest                  -                    -
 Amortization of debt issuance costs               2,557                2,364
 Amortization of interest rate
   protection contracts                               56                   63
 Less capitalized interest                        (3,087)              (3,387)
                                             -----------           ----------
      Earnings                                    43,606               92,567
                                             -----------           ----------

 Interest incurred                                75,877               70,100
 Amortization of debt issuance costs               2,557                2,364
 Amortization of interest rate
   protection contracts                               56                   63
 Preferred stock distributions and dividends      17,005               18,607
                                             -----------           ----------
   Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred
   Stock Distributions and Dividends              95,495               91,134
                                             -----------           ----------

 Excess of Combined Fixed Charges
      and Preferred Stock Distributions
      and Dividends over Earnings            $   (51,889)          $        -
                                             ===========           ==========

 Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed
      Charges and Preferred Stock
      Distributions and Dividends                                       1.02 X
                                                                   ==========
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<CIK>   0000917259
<NAME>   ML PRINCIPAL PROTECTION L.P.

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,423                     328
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,124,594               8,878,706
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         94,651,930              72,815,648
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,777,947              81,694,682
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                   1,736,029               2,082,851
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 102,041,918              79,611,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,777,947              81,694,682
<TRADING-REVENUE>                            6,496,283               8,641,843
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                         4,873,872               4,545,186
<COMMISSIONS>                                4,833,598               4,775,116
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,420,245               7,223,364
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,420,245               7,223,364
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,420,245               7,223,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.62                    9.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.62                    9.57


</TABLE>
Court ttf Appeals

Jfltftlj district of Qtexaa at Dallas

JUDGMENT

THOMAS WAYNE WILLIAMS, Appellant

No. 05-98-01113-CR V.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of

Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F98-

45083-PH).

Opinion Per Curiam before Justices Ovard,

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Moseley, and O'Neill.

f?0

We VACATE our judgment and opinion dated May 25,2000. Based upon the joint motion

ofthe parties and in the interest ofjustice, we REVERSE the trial court's judgment ofJune 16,

1998, and we REMAND this cause for further proceedings.

Judgment entered June 7, 2000.

(JOHN OVARD

JUSTICE

r~

~^A/fX-^.-^fJ
VACATE, REVERSE, REMAND; Opinion Filed June 7, 2000

In The

(ftmtrt of Appeals

Jfiftlj district nf Qtexas at Dallas

No. 05-98-01113-CR

No. 05-98-01114-CR

THOMAS WAYNE WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F98-45083-PH and F98-45084-NH

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before Justices Ovard, Moseley, and O'Neill

On June 1, 2000, the parties filed a joint Motion for Rehearing and Remand requesting that

in the interest ofjustice the Court vacate its opinion and judgment in this case and remand the cause

to the trial court for further proceedings. We grant the parties' motion. See TEX. R. App. P. 2.

Accordingly, based on the joint motion ofthe parties and in the interest ofjustice, weVACATE our

judgment and opinion dated May 25,2000, REVERSE the trial court's judgment of June 16,1998,
and REMAND this cause for further proceedings. Our mandate shall issue forthwith.

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47

-2-

PER CURIAM
Fifth Court of Appeals

Case Attorney Address List

Page: 1

Date Printed: 06/07/2000

Case Number: 05-98-01113-CR Date Filed: 07/06/1998

Style: Williams, Thomas Wayne

v.

The State of Texas

Trial Judge: Warder, Janice

Trial Court Reporter: Belton, Mary

Trial Court: CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT # 1 Trial County: DALLAS

APP Sue Korioth

ATT 011681975

P.O. Box 600103

Dallas, TX 75360-0103

Phone 214/384-3864

Fax 214/821-2519

STA Anne Wetherholt

ATT 021235300

Assistant Distrtict Attorney

Frank Crowley Courts Building

133 North Industrial Blvd. LB 19

Dallas, TX 75207-4399

Phone 214/653-3642

Fax 214/653-3643
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of Brightpoint, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Lisa M. Kelley, Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting
Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                    /s/ Lisa M. Kelley
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Lisa M. Kelley
                                    Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller,
                                    Chief Accounting Officer and acting Chief
                                    Financial Officer

Date: May 9, 2005
B.T.D., Petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 19-7198

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
Rufus JONES, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, et al.

No. 18-5903.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 1 

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 11-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 121
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP 

DECLARATION OF TIMOTHEE YERAMIAN IN SUPPORT 

OF VALVE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(3) FOR IMPROPER VENUE 

1. My name is Timothee Yeramian. I am over the age of twenty-one years, of sound 

mind, and competent in all respects to make this declaration. 

2. I make this declaration based on my own knowledge. I could and would 

competently testify to the accuracy of this declaration if called upon to testify regarding its 

contents. 

3. I am an artist. 

4. I am an employee at Valve Corporation (“Valve”). 

5. I have been employed by Valve since October 31, 2022. 

6. I live in Bellevue, Washington. 

7. I moved to Washington state in October 2022, shortly before I began working for 

Valve. 


				

	 Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 11-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 122 Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 11-2 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 157
2 

8. Until October 19, 2023, I had not updated my location on my LinkedIn page. 

Before then, it therefore incorrectly reflected my previous Texas residence. 

I affirm that the forgoing is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 

Dated November 2, 2023 

________ 

 Timothee Yeramian 


				

	 Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 11-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 123 Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 11-2 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 158
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-23689 and Form S-8 No.333-32007) pertaining to the Super Vision International, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of our report dated February 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Super Vision International, Inc. which is incorporatedin the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ Gallogly, Fernandez & Riley LLP 

 

Orlando, Florida 

February 13, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      447,969
<SECURITIES>                                4,205,732
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,345,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                (167,100)
<INVENTORY>                                 766,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,227,446
<PP&E>                                      6,352,746
<DEPRECIATION>                              (222,854)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,936,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       5,727,077
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    2,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  9,495,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,936,052
<SALES>                                     17,812,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,883,533
<CGS>                                       13,482,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,482,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,798,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          396,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             207,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                85,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         122,145
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                122,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.02
        

</TABLE>