alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/03/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       80,533
COMMITMENTS
  25,696    2,524    3,643   44,737   72,230   74,076   78,397    6,457    2,136

CHANGES FROM 08/27/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,847)
  -2,125       43       29      718   -1,686   -1,378   -1,614     -469     -233

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.9      3.1      4.5     55.6     89.7     92.0     97.3      8.0      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       79)
      14        4        1       39       38       53       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/03/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      248,619
COMMITMENTS
  71,744   43,623   13,949  148,284  181,904  233,977  239,476   14,642    9,143

CHANGES FROM 08/27/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     11,122)
   4,578   -2,045    4,129    3,452   11,346   12,159   13,430   -1,037   -2,308

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.9     17.5      5.6     59.6     73.2     94.1     96.3      5.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      169)
      42       30       14       67       61      117       97
```

----

Updated September 6, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

T-MOBILE’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant T- Mobile USA, Inc., by and 

through its undersigned counsel, hereby disclose that: 

T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned, direct subsidiary of TMobile US, Inc. T-Mobile US, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ Global 

Select Market of NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”). 

No other company owns 10% or more of T-Mobile USA, Inc. 

Dated: December 11, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew Sean Yungwirth 

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street, NE 

Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309-3929 

Telephone: 404.253.6935 

Facsimile: 404.253.6901 

William Andrew Liddell 

waliddell@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP

900 S. Capital of Texas Hwy 

Suite 300 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 709
 2 

Austin, TX 78746 

Telephone: 512.277.2272 

Facsimile: 512.227.2301 

Melissa Richards Smith (TBN 24001351) 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

GILLAM & SMITH LLP 

303 S. Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Telephone: 903.934.8450 

Facsimile: 903.934.9257 

Counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 11, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 710
Lonnie HANEY, Petitioner, v. Shane JACKSON, Warden.

No. 18-9543

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph J. Lodovic, IV, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control overfinancial reporting.Date:March 27, 2008     /S/ Joseph J. Lodovic. IV     Joseph J. Lodovic, IV  President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00457-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Aruba Networks, LLC 

(“Aruba”) makes the following disclosure:

Aruba is an indirectly, wholly owned subsidiary of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, 

which is a publicly traded corporation. 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 124
ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT – Page 2

Dated: December 8, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jennifer H. Doan

Jennifer H. Doan

Texas Bar No. 08809050

Joshua R. Thane

Texas Bar No. 24060713

HALTOM & DOAN

6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100

Texarkana, TX 75503

Tel: (903) 255-1000

Fax: (900) 255-0800

Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com

Email: jthane@haltomdoan.com

Matthew S. Yungwirth

GA State Bar No. 783597

Louis N. Jameson 

GA State Bar No. 003970

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700

Atlanta, GA 30309

Tel: (404) 253-6915

Fax: (404) 253-6901

WJameson@duanemorris.com 

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

Tyler Marandola

PA State Bar No. 313585

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

30 S. 17th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: (215) 979-1000

Fax: (215) 979-1020

tmarandola@duanemorris.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 125
ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT – Page 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document

has been served via the Court’s ECF system on December 8, 2023.

/s/ Jennifer H. Doan

Jennifer H. Doan

 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 12/08/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 126
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC,

v.

THE HOME DEPOT, INC., et al

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC,

v.

WALMART INC., et al

Case No. 2:23-cv-00418-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

EXTEND CERTAIN DEADLINES

Before this Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Certain Discovery 

Deadlines by 14 days. 

After consideration, the Court GRANTS the Motion. The schedule will be modified as 

follows:

Event Old Deadline Proposed New Deadline

Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 

(Infringement Contentions)

November 20, 2023 December 4, 2023

Join Additional Parties December 11, 2023 December 11, 2023

File Proposed Docket Control 

Order and Proposed 

Discovery Order

December 18, 2023 December 18, 2023

File Proposed Protective 

Order and Comply with 

Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the 

Discovery Order (Initial and 

Additional Disclosures)

December 26, 2023 January 9, 2024

Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 

(Invalidity Contentions)

January 15, 2024 January 29, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 15-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 131
-2-

Comply With Standing Order 

Regarding Subject-Matter 

Eligibility Contentions 

January 15, 2024 January 29, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 15-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 132
Vertis ANTHONY, petitioner, v. Louis BOYD, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7248.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Donny MARIN, et al., petitioners, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK.

No. 18-711.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/26/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,862
COMMITMENTS
   3,625    4,186    2,075   23,331   24,472   29,031   30,733   10,831    9,129

CHANGES FROM 03/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        118)
      21      848     -190     -176     -388     -345      270      463     -152

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.1     10.5      5.2     58.5     61.4     72.8     77.1     27.2     22.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
       9       10        8       27       23       38       40
```

----

Updated March 29, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARYL J. KOLLMAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

CELL TECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a

Delaware corporation,

 Plaintiff-intervenor -

Appellee,

 v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH,

PENNSYLVANIA, a foreign corporation,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-36017

D.C. No. 1:04-cv-03106-PA

MEMORANDUM*

DARYL J. KOLLMAN,

 Plaintiff,

 and

CELL TECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a

Delaware corporation,

No. 08-36019

D.C. No. 1:04-cv-03106-PA

FILED

OCT 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
 Plaintiff-intervenor -

Appellant,

 v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH,

PENNSYLVANIA, a foreign corporation,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Owen M. Panner, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 8, 2013**

Portland, Oregon

Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

National Union Fire Insurance Company appeals the district court’s grant of

partial summary judgment in favor of Cell Tech International, Inc. and Daryl

Kollman. Cell Tech cross appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary

judgment in favor of National Union. We affirm.

The district court correctly held that the insured-versus-insured policy

exclusion did not apply because Kollman was not an insured under the policy. 

Kollman was not a past executive of a subsidiary of Cell Tech. Rather, he was a

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

2
past executive of two entities before they were subsidiaries. Except for HumaScan,

as specified in Endorsement 12, the policy did not insure past executives of

previous corporate entities of Cell Tech or its subsidiaries that existed before

August 6, 1999. 

The district court also correctly ruled that National Union did not have a

duty to defend Cell Tech under the policy’s Securities Claims coverage. The

complaint alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, and

similar claims, not violations of securities laws. Vague references to potential

securities violations are not enough, and the fact that Kollman may have been able

to amend the complaint to state securities claims (which he never sought to do) is

irrelevant. Oregon law requires that we consider whether the complaint’s

allegations, without amendment, could impose liability for conduct covered by the

policy. Bresee Homes, Inc. v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 293 P.3d 1036, 1039 (Or. 2012). 

AFFIRMED.

3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

MYCHOICE, LLC 

 v. 

TAIV, INC.

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

 Case No. 2:23-CV-0507-JRG-RSP 

CORRECTED JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ESI ORDER 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Plaintiff MyChoice, LLC and Defendant TaiV, Inc. jointly file this Corrected Joint Motion 

for Entry of ESI Order and request that the proposed ESI Order filed herewith be adopted by the 

Court and used in the above-styled matter. The Parties do not seek to modify the Court’s default 

ESI Order. 

Dated: June 12, 2024 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s / Michael C. Gilleran 

Michael C. Gilleran 

(Mass. BBO No. 192210) 

Pro hac vice allowed 

michael.gilleran@fisherbroyles.com 

FISHERBROYLES, LLP 

75 State Street, Suite 100, PMB 4418 

Boston, Massachusetts 02109 

Direct: 781.489.5680 

Mobile: 339.237.1384 

LEAD ATTORNEY 

 

/s/ Chris P. Perque___ 

Chris P. Perque 

Texas State Bar No. 24005828 

FisherBroyles, LLP 

2925 Richmond Ave., Suite 1200 

Houston, TX 77098 

Phone: 832.604.4417 

Facsimile: 832.377.5929 

Email: chris.perque@fisherbroyles.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 524
2 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, 

MYCHOICE LLC

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Phil Haack ___ 

Ryan J. Marton (Admitted E.D. Tex.) 

ryan@martonribera.com 

Phil Haack (Admitted E.D. Tex.) 

phaack@martonribera.com 

Hector Ribera (Admitted E.D. Tex.) 

hector@martonribera.com 

Carolyn Chang (Admitted E.D. Tex.)

carolyn@martonribera.com 

MARTON RIBERA SCHUMANN & 

CHANG LLP 

548 Market Street, Suite 36117 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

415-360-2514 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

TAIV, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

Counsel for the parties conferred via email regarding the above motion in accordance with 

Local Rule CV-7(i), and the motion is unopposed. 

/s/Chris P. Perque 

Chris P. Perque 

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 06/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 525
```

```

----

Updated October 25, 2013
William N. LUCY, Petitioner v. Mary COOKS

No. 19-6345

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Timothy Paul MALONE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9739

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
HPE’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT – Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00457-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY’S

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Hewlett Packard 

Enterprise Company makes the following disclosure:

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (“HPE”) is a publicly held corporation. HPE has 

no parent corporation, and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 121
HPE’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT – Page 2

Dated: December 8, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jennifer H. Doan

Jennifer H. Doan

Texas Bar No. 08809050

Joshua R. Thane

Texas Bar No. 24060713

HALTOM & DOAN

6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100

Texarkana, TX 75503

Tel: (903) 255-1000

Fax: (900) 255-0800

Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com

Email: jthane@haltomdoan.com

Matthew S. Yungwirth

GA State Bar No. 783597

Louis N. Jameson 

GA State Bar No. 003970

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700

Atlanta, GA 30309

Tel: (404) 253-6915

Fax: (404) 253-6901

WJameson@duanemorris.com 

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

Tyler Marandola

PA State Bar No. 313585

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

30 S. 17th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: (215) 979-1000

Fax: (215) 979-1020

tmarandola@duanemorris.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY, ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 122
HPE’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT – Page 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served via the Court’s ECF system on December 8, 2023.

/s/ Jennifer H. Doan

Jennifer H. Doan

 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 12/08/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 123
Fernando LUVIANO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8064

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Leonard MOORE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9705

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 27, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00450

- CV

IN RE Robert L. MARSHALL

, III;

Marshall Shredding, LLC; and MedSharps, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On September 11, 2020, r elators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On November 30, 2020, the real party in interest filed a response. We conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus in part and order the Honorable Norma Gonzales to, within fif teen days of this order, (1) vacate that portion of her June 19, 2020, “Order on Plaintiff Robert L. Marshall, II’s Motion to Compel Documents from Trilogy MedWaste, Inc. and Motion for Protective Order” sustaining the real party in interest’s objections t o requests for documents ten, eleven , thirteen through nineteen, and twenty

- two, and (2) and enter an order granting relators’ motion to compel as to these document requests. Because we order the trial court to grant relators’ motion to compel requests
fo r documents ten, eleven, thirteen through nineteen, and twenty

- two, we remand for the trial court to reconsider whether relators’ request for a protective order is appropriate. In all other respects, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(c).

The writ will issue only in the event we are informed Judge Gonzales has failed to comply

with this order.

It is so ORDERED on January 27, 2021.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of January, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019

- 16836 , styled Robert L. Marshall, II, et. al v. William Jewett, III

, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas . T he Honorable Norma Gonzales signed the order at issue in this original pr oceeding

.
EXHIBIT 23.02

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 and Form S-3 under the Securities
Act of 1933 of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries ("Paul-Son") of our report dated March 22, 2002 insofar as such report relates to the financial statements of
Etablissements Bourgogne et Grasset S.A. contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Paul-Son as of December 31,
2002.

/s/
Mazars LLP

New
York, N.Y.
March 22, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Landry ROUNTREE, petitioner, v. Troy DYSON, et al.

No. 18-329.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.