alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4650-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Washington (FEMA-4650-DR), dated March 29, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

The amendment was issued May 17, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident for this declared disaster has been changed to severe winter storms, snowstorms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11921 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Glenn DAMOND, Petitioner v. LOUISIANA

No. 18-9747

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC

Cisco Systems, Inc.

2:23-cv-00454

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC

01/26/2024 /s/ Andrea L. Fair

Andrea L. Fair; Texas Bar No. 24078488

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, Texas 75604

andrea@wsfirm.com

(903) 757-6400

(903) 757-2323

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 251
Deante DRAKE, aka Panama, aka Shawn, aka Papa Bear, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5058.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/03/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      152,639
COMMITMENTS
  55,077   30,914   19,807   62,233   73,937  137,117  124,658   15,522   27,981

CHANGES FROM 11/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,892)
     396   -2,800    1,321   -2,542     -385     -825   -1,864   -2,066   -1,028

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    36.1     20.3     13.0     40.8     48.4     89.8     81.7     10.2     18.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      189)
      59       43       49       56       58      140      133
```

----

Updated December 6, 2013
Kenin L. EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. Michael L. ATTERBERRY, et al.

No. 19-965

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

 

MAIKEL VIGIL,

v. 

FCI TEXARKANA WARDEN

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

NO. 5:23-CV-139-RWS-JBB

ORDER

Before the Court is Petitioner Maikel Vigil’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 

28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the legality of his conviction. Docket No. 1. The case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge J. Boone Baxter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c). 

On August 30, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a report recommending the above 

application for the writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Docket 

No. 3. A copy of the report and recommendation was sent to Petitioner at his last known 

address, return receipt requested, but no objections have been received. An unsigned 

acknowledgement card was received on September 12, 2024.1

 Docket No. 4. 

Because no objections have been received, Petitioner is barred from de novo review 

by the District Judge of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions and 

recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the 

unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District 

1 The Fifth Circuit has explained that where a letter is properly placed in the United States mail, a 

presumption exists that the letter reached its destination in the usual time and was actually received 

by the person to whom it was addressed. Faciane v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 931 

F.3d 412, 420-21 and n.9 (5th Cir. 2019). 

Case 5:23-cv-00139-RWS-JBB Document 5 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 10
Page 2 of 2

Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. 

Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203- RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 

2021). 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined the report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (where no objections to a 

Magistrate Judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of 

discretion and contrary to law”). Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 3) is ADOPTED as 

the opinion of the District Court. It is further 

ORDERED the above-captioned petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court.

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of September, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00139-RWS-JBB Document 5 Filed 09/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11
Bobby JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA

No. 18-1542

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN
RESTATED TO REFLECT THE EFFECT OF FASB #128, EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,275
<PP&E>                                       1,238,417
<DEPRECIATION>                               (198,517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,213,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,312
<BONDS>                                        664,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,213,212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,427
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,306
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
MICRO COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                    FORM 10-Q
                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE AND
                             COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED       SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                             -------------------     -------------------
                                                             DEC. 27,    DEC. 28,    DEC. 27,    DEC. 28,
                            BASIC                              1997        1996        1997       1996
                          --------                           --------    --------    --------    -------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>     
Net income (loss)                                            $   (520)   $   (679)   $   (504)   $(1,807)
                                                             ========    ========    ========    =======

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
        during the period                                       7,181       7,031       7,118      7,026
                                                             ========    ========    ========    =======

Net income (loss) per share - basic                          $   (.07)   $   (.10)   $   (.07)   $  (.26)
                                                             ========    ========    ========    =======


                           DILUTED
                         -----------

Net income (loss)                                            $   (520)   $   (679)   $   (504)   $(1,807)
                                                             ========    ========    ========    =======

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
        during the period                                       7,181       7,031       7,118      7,026

Shares issuable on exercise of stock options and warrants
        less shares repurchaseable from the proceeds             --          --          --         --
                                                             --------    --------    --------    -------

Common and common equivalent shares - diluted                   7,181       7,031       7,118      7,026
                                                             ========    ========    ========    =======

Net income (loss) per share -  diluted                       $   (.07)   $   (.10)   $   (.07)   $  (.26)
                                                             ========    ========    ========    =======

</TABLE>
Jamaar Jerome WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. Jo GENTRY, Warden, et al.

No. 19-7329

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Form of Common Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 

 
 



 
 COMMON 
 Number Shares 
 void 

servicenow 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 SEE REVERSE SIDE 
 FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

 CUSIP 81762P 10 2 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 is the owner of 

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF 

ServiceNow, Inc. 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly 

endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of
its duly 
 authorized officers. 
 Dated: 
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND PRESIDENT 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 
 TRANSFER AGENT 
 AND REGISTRAR 

BY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
 AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING
INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were 
 written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: 
 TEN COM – as tenants in common UTMA –Custodian 

(Cust) (Minor) 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors 
 JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act 
 and not as tenants in common (State) 
 Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in above list. 
 For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer
unto 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 

Shares 
 of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, 
 and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

Attorney 
 to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named 
 Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated X 
 X 

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE 

OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 
 ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH 
 AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES 
 TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK 
 STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR 
 THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT 
 BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On May 23, 2022, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the District of Montana entitled 
                    *United States and the State of Delaware*
                     v. 
                    *Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. and Montana Rail Link, Inc.,*
                     Civil Action No. 6:22-cv-00035-SEH. The United States filed this lawsuit under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The complaint alleges that the defendants are liable in connection with the releases of hazardous substances at the East Helena Superfund Site (the “Site) in East Helena, Montana. Under the consent decree, the defendants will expend an estimated $852,200 to remediate an active railyard within the Site boundaries. They will also reimburse EPA's costs of overseeing their work. In return, the United States and Delaware agree not to sue the defendants under sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. and Montana Rail Link, Inc.,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-08633/7. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov*.By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the consent decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the consent decree without the exhibits upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $10.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Jeffrey Sands, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2022-11489 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 2, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

125594 & (43) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

DANIEL MAGUSIN, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 125594 

v CoA: 248663 

 WCAC: 01-0098 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and 

SECOND INJURY FUND, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED without costs and 

without prejudice to its being reinstated at the request of either party in the event 

redemption proceedings fail to resolve the case. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 2, 2006 

Clerk
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 327
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 328
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-77882,  No. 33-77884, No. 33-77888 and 333-2133),
of DT Industries,  Inc. of our report dated August 8, 1997, appearing on page 19
of the fiscal 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders  of DT Industries,  Inc. (which
report and  consolidated  financial  statements are incorporated by reference in
this  Annual  Report on Form  10-K).  We also  consent to the  incorporation  by
reference of our report on the Financial  Statement  Schedule,  which appears on
page S-1 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
September 29, 1997