alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2133

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cibacron Brilliant Blue FN–G.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cibacron Brilliant Blue

FN–G.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.88 4, 11-Triphenodioxazinedisulfonic

acid, 6, 13-dichloro-3, 10-bis[[2-[[-

[[4-fluoro-6-[(2-sulfophenyl) amino]

-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl] amino] propyl]

amino]- lithium sodium salt (CAS

No. 163062–28–0) (provided for in

subheading 3204.16.30 ..................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•HR 2133 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment

5 of this Act.

Æ
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/17/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       43,333
COMMITMENTS
   5,708    8,167    1,142   23,342   21,668   30,192   30,977   13,141   12,356

CHANGES FROM 09/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,740)
     417       28       32      534    1,629      982    1,689    1,757    1,050

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.2     18.8      2.6     53.9     50.0     69.7     71.5     30.3     28.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       67)
       8       16        7       39       25       50       46
```

----

Updated September 20, 2013
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/03/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       80,533
COMMITMENTS
  25,696    2,524    3,643   44,737   72,230   74,076   78,397    6,457    2,136

CHANGES FROM 08/27/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,847)
  -2,125       43       29      718   -1,686   -1,378   -1,614     -469     -233

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.9      3.1      4.5     55.6     89.7     92.0     97.3      8.0      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       79)
      14        4        1       39       38       53       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/03/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      248,619
COMMITMENTS
  71,744   43,623   13,949  148,284  181,904  233,977  239,476   14,642    9,143

CHANGES FROM 08/27/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     11,122)
   4,578   -2,045    4,129    3,452   11,346   12,159   13,430   -1,037   -2,308

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.9     17.5      5.6     59.6     73.2     94.1     96.3      5.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      169)
      42       30       14       67       61      117       97
```

----

Updated September 6, 2013
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Dennis M. Hanson, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 5, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Dennis  M. Hanson                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Dennis M.  Hanson                    |
|   | Senior  Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer             |

 

1

----
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Bruce B. McLEOD, III.

No. D-3045.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Bruce B. McLeod, III, of Dallas, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 228 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 228

   To amend the Black Lung Benefits Act to provide for equity in the 
             treatment of benefits for eligible survivors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mr. Rahall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Black Lung Benefits Act to provide for equity in the 
             treatment of benefits for eligible survivors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Black Lung Benefits Survivors Equity 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EQUITY FOR CERTAIN ELIGIBLE SURVIVORS.

    Section 422(l) of the Black Lung Benefits Act is amended by 
striking ``, except with respect to a claim filed under this part on or 
after the effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 
1981''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6495

ALVIN PONSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; EUGENE M. NUTH,

Warden; ASRESAHEGN GETACHEW, MD, EMS; VINCENT

OKEKE, Doctor, EMS; ANY UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-

2033-L)

Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Ponson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Ponson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Ponson v. Filbert, No. CA-00-2033-L (D.

Md. Mar. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Vidya SAGAR, Petitioner v. Steven T. MNUCHIN, Secretary of the Treasury.

No. 19-133

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
# Official Journal L 114/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 114 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 662 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 114

English edition

Legislation

Volume 662 May 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2023/888 of 28 April 2023 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/889 of 25 April 2023 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘De Voerendaalse Bergen’ (PDO) | 12 |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/890 of 28 April 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 13 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 of 28 April 2023 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova | 15 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/892 of 28 April 2023 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria | 22 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2023/888 of 28 April 2023 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/889 of 25 April 2023 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘De Voerendaalse Bergen’ (PDO)

12

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/890 of 28 April 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

13

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 of 28 April 2023 concerning restrictive measures in view of actions destabilising the Republic of Moldova

15

*

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/892 of 28 April 2023 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

22

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Kebreab ZERE, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 19-925

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BARCO, INC. et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

YEALINK (USA) NETWORK 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions and 

Disclosures field by Defendants Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Yealink (USA) 

Network Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Yealink”). Dkt. No. 33. Yealink represents that the 

motion is unopposed. Id. at 2, 3. After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion 

is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that Defendants’ deadline to serve their invalidity contentions and 

accompanying document disclosure in accordance with P.R. 3-4 and 3-4 is May 28, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 34 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 364
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 51034

Summary Calendar

CHRISTOPHER LEVERSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

JEAN SULLIVAN; MITCHELL SOLOMON,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13

- CV

- 764

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined th at this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH

C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

April 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk Case: 13-51034 Document: 00512612231 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2014
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014

AN ACT

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory

commuter tax on nonresidents.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014

AN ACT

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory

commuter tax on nonresidents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2014 EH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING DISCRIMINATORY

2 COMMUTER TAX ON NONRESIDENTS.

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—A State may not impose a tax on

4 the income earned in the State by nonresidents unless the

5 tax is of substantial equality of treatment for the citizens

6 of the State and the nonresidents so commuting.

7 (b) STATE.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term

8 ‘‘State’’ includes the District of Columbia and any political

9 subdivision of a State.

Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Christopher R. GRANTON, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY.

No. 17-1321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated February 21, 2002 included in
Registration Statements File No. 33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No.
333-03452, No. 333-03454, No. 333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No.
333-33893, No. 333-37273, No. 333-37553, No. 333-37565, No. 333-38071, No.
333-41049, No. 333-42417, No. 333-47563, No. 333-57863, No. 333-64377, No.
333-64379, and No. 333-77941. It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the company subsequent to December 31, 2001 or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Dallas, Texas
     March 13, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JOHN ROBERT HORNER §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv49

WARDEN BANTLETT, ET AL. § 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff John Robert Horner, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The Court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge. The magistrate judge recommends the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation, along with the

record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct

and the report of the magistrate judge [Dkt. 7] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. A final 

judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 8th day of June, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00049-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 28
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/28/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       55,502
COMMITMENTS
   1,557    7,441    3,037   50,853   44,975   55,447   55,453       55       49

CHANGES FROM 05/21/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        683)
    -276      392      653      326     -224      703      821      -20     -138

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.8     13.4      5.5     91.6     81.0     99.9     99.9      0.1      0.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
       5       10        8       22       27       32       42`

---

Updated May 31, 2013
Latefah SHAMPINE, Petitioner, v. SARVER'S REALTY, et al.

No. 19-7302.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

6$0681*(/(&7521,&6&2/7'DQG6$0681*(/(&7521,&6$0(5,&$,1&

 Eastern District of Texas

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC

 2:23-cv-0485-JRG

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

02/01/2024 /s/ Ali Mojibi

Ali Mojibi CA Bar No. 265332

Covington & Burling LLP

1999 Avenue of the Stars,

Los Angeles, CA 90067

amojibi@cov.com

(424) 332-4803

(424) 332-4749

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 12 Filed 02/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 90
In Re Archie CABELLO, petitioner.

No. 18-8724.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
SCPW-13-0000530

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY,

Petitioner,

vs.

TED SAKAI, FRANCIS X. SEQUEIRA, AHN UDOI, JACKIE LINDSAY,

MICHAEL CHUN, ROCHELLE NIETO, NOEL VILLANUEVA, TOMMY LIU,

and SAT MAESAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI#I,

 Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Michael C. Tierney’s petition for

a writ of mandamus, which was filed on April 29, 2013, and the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, it

appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that respondents owe

him a duty to reinstate his work furlough status or strike the

misconduct from his record, and petitioner has alternative means

to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to

mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982

P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary

remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a

clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0000530

23-MAY-2013

01:06 PM
2

means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the

requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929

P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (mandamus relief is available to compel an

official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only

if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s

duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from

doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 23, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
IN RE Eugene FRENCH, Petitioner

No. 19-7555

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.