alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, Jeffrey I. Friedman, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 of
Associated Estates Realty Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 3, 2004		/s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman

Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chief Executive Officer

G:\2004Q\2q04\jif302ce.wpd
Josette BUENDIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6117.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


                                        /s/Gary Mentesana
                                         -------------------------------------
                                           Gary Mentesana
                                           Principal Executive Officer and
                                           Principal Financial Officer
                                           Arch Street VIII, LP, as
                                           Managing General Partner of
                                           Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
                                           A Limited Partnership


                                           Date:  November 14, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/11/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       50,517
COMMITMENTS
   1,597    6,188    3,570   45,214   40,572   50,381   50,330      136      187

CHANGES FROM 06/04/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,911)
    -128      423      588    1,355      739    1,815    1,750       96      161

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.2     12.2      7.1     89.5     80.3     99.7     99.6      0.3      0.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       6        9        8       22       26       33       40`

---

Updated June 14, 2013
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      815,539
COMMITMENTS
  86,633   27,057  255,150  456,444  515,003  798,227  797,210   17,311   18,329

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,036)
     374    6,355   -2,995   11,136    5,938    8,515    9,298     -479   -1,262

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.6      3.3     31.3     56.0     63.1     97.9     97.8      2.1      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      154)
      41       34       65       70       69      144      139
```

----

Updated October 28, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending
September 30, 2007 (the  "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Acting Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 19, 2007


\s\ Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The  undersigned  officers  hereby  certifies  that, to his  knowledge,  (1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Productivity Technologies Corp. for the quarter
ended  December  31,  2003 as to which this  Certification  is an exhibit  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a)  or  78o(d))  and (2) the  information
contained  in  such  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and results of  operations  of  Productivity  Technologies
Corp..

Date: March 11, 2004

/s/ Jesse A. Levine
---------------------------------------
Jesse A. Levine,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Michelle Stopyra YANEY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, San Bernardino County.

No. 19-5165

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
KANSAS, Petitioner v. Charles GLOVER.

No. 18-556

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 627 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 627

  Designating the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2012

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations.

    Resolved, That the following Senator is designated as chairman of 
the following committee:
    Committee on Appropriations: Ms. Mikulski, of Maryland.
                                 <all>
```
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 570 

Designating November 8, 2012, as ‘‘National Parents as Teachers Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2012 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 8, 2012, as ‘‘National Parents as 

Teachers Day’’. 

Whereas all 50 States and 7 other countries provide services 

through the Parents as Teachers evidence-based home 

visiting model for nearly 260,000 children annually, 

which offers a multifaceted approach to building strong 

families and promoting a positive parent-child interaction 

so children are healthy, safe, and ready to learn; 

Whereas Parents as Teachers provides evidence- and research-based training that assists parent educators in developing proficiencies in— 

(1) family support and parenting education; 

(2) child and family development; 

(3) human diversity within family systems; 

(4) health, safety, and nutrition; and 

(5) relationships between families and communities; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 570 ATS 

Whereas the Parents as Teachers evidence-based home visiting model is an essential component to prepare children 

to be school ready and narrows the achievement gap between children in poverty and nonpoverty households; and 

Whereas there are more than 3,000 organizations offering 

Parents as Teachers services across the United States 

and around the world, which give parents of young children the support and information necessary so all children will learn, grow, and develop to realize their full potential: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the November 8, 2012, as ‘‘Na3 tional Parents as Teachers Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of parent edu5 cation and the role the education plays in the devel6 opment of a child; and 

7 (3) commends Parents as Teachers for its work 

8 with families across the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 1 322 LT Case No. 2022

- D P

- 000954

_____________________________ J.H., M OTHER of K.R.B. and A.M.U., C HILDREN , Appellant,

v. K.B., F ATHER of K.R.B., a C HILD , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appeal fro m the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Kelly J. McKib bin, Judge

. Richard F. Jo yce, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, fo r Appellant.
Valarie Linnen, Jacksonville, for Appellee. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Vic toria Glass, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for the Guardian ad Litem Program. February 6 , 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

.2

M AKAR , J AY , and S OUD , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




Tennessee Valley Authority

Coal Supply & Origination

1101 Market Street, MR 2A

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801




CONTRACT SUPPLEMENT



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	TO:

	 	Armstrong Coal Company, Inc.
	 	Supplement No.
	 	10	 
	 

	 	7733 Forsyth Boulevard -  Suite 1625
	 	Date
	 	September 20, 2011

	 

	 	St. Louis, Missouri 63105
	 	Group-Contract No.
	 	612-40668	 
	 

	 	 	 	Plant
	 	Widows Creek,

	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Paradise, Kingston






Attention: Mr. Martin Wilson



This confirms my August 29, 2011, agreement with Kenny Allen, representing Armstrong Coal Company,
Inc. (“Armstrong”).





	 	1.	 	Effective September 1, 2011, Armstrong’s Kronos Underground Mine (“Kronos Mine”)
shall become one of the Approved Source Mines under Section 5.1
of Group-Contract
No. 612-40668 (the “Contract”) for the remaining Contract delivery term.
	 
	 	2.	 	All 5.0# SO2 coal delivered from the Kronos Mine shall conform to the
quality
specifications set forth in Section 9.0 of the Contract.
	 
	 	3.	 	The Base Price for coal delivered from the Kronos Mine shall be the 2011 Base Price
of $40.57 and the 2012 Base Price of $41.68 per Supplement No. 7 of the Contract. The
price of the coal delivered from the Kronos Mine shall be subject to adjustment pursuant
to Section 10 of the Contract.
	 
	 	4.	 	The sampling and weighing requirements will not change.
	 
	 	5.	 	Coal delivered from the Kronos Mine under this Contract, will apply against the 2011
Annual Contract Tonnage delivery requirement of 1.0 million tons.




All other conditions of the Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



Please complete the acceptance below and return the duplicate original of this contract
supplement to this office. You should keep the original for your file.



In the event Contractor fails to execute this Supplement in the acceptance space provided below or
fails to return such executed Supplement to TVA, shipment of coal to TVA following the date of
Contractor’s receipt of this Supplement shall constitute an acceptance by Contractor of all the
terms and conditions of this Supplement, unless within five (5) business days of the date of
receipt of this Supplement, Contractor notifies TVA, both orally and in writing that this
Supplement is not accepted.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Accepted
	 	Armstrong Coal Co.	 	Tennessee Valley Authority	 	 
	 

	 	 

                    (Company)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By
	 	/s/ Martin D. Wilson	 	By 	/s/ Connie S. Gazaway	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 

	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	Connie S. Gazaway	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	Asset Management Specialist	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title
	 	President	 	 	/s/	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 

Manager, Coal Acquisition
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 






TVA RESTRICTED INFORMATION
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

RAVEN LANHAM

vs.

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

§

§

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23cv513-JDK

§

§ 

§

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint seeking judicial review of the 

Commissioner’s unfavorable decision concerning her entitlement to supplemental security income 

and child disability benefits. The case is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

The Commissioner filed an Unopposed Motion to Remand (ECF 9). 

The Commissioner’s motion seeks a remand for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which states:

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the 

record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a 

rehearing.

The Commissioner asserts that further review of Plaintiff’s case resulted in a determination that a 

remand for further administrative proceedings is warranted. The Commissioner asserts that 

Plaintiff does not oppose the requested relief.

RECOMMENDATION

It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further 

Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (ECF 9) be 

Case 6:23-cv-00513-JDK-KNM Document 10 Filed 02/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

3539
2

GRANTED. The Commissioner’s final administrative decision should be REVERSED and the 

matter REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the 

fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and 

file written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b). 

A party’s failure to file written objections to the findings, conclusions and 

recommendations contained in this Report within fourteen days after service shall bar that party 

from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions and recommendations 

and, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed 

factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. 

United Servs. Auto. Assn., 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir.1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on 

other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen 

days).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14th day of February, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00513-JDK-KNM Document 10 Filed 02/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

3540
exh10_297.htm




EXHIBIT 10.29.7







PROMISSORY NOTE


















	
$12,866,960.66

	
April 5, 2012



























Mission West Properties, L.P., Mission West Properties, L.P. I, Mission West Properties, L.P. II, Mission West Properties, L.P. III, Mission West Properties, L.P. IV and Mission West Properties, L.P. V (collectively referred to herein as “Mission”)








	
promises to pay to

	
The Berg Group












the principal sum of Twelve Million Eight Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars and 66 Cents ($12,866,960.66),







plus interest at the rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.75 percent per annum (compounded on the basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 5th day of April 2012.







Should interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States.







Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than June 30, 2012.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash available from any other financing sources.













	
Signed By:

	
/s/ Raymond V. Marino

	  	
4/5/12


	  	
Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

	  	
Date


	  	
Mission West Properties, Inc.

	  	  
	  	
Its General Partner

	  	  











	
Acknowledged:

	
/s/ Carl E. Berg

	  	
4/5/12


	  	
Carl E. Berg

	  	
Date
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00419-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to Respond 

to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC

(“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 14). In the Motion, Plaintiff requests a fourteen-day extension of time to

file its response to Defendant Valve Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (the 

“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 11). (Dkt. No. 14 at 1). The requested extension would move the 

deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss from November 20, 2023 up to and 

including December 4, 2023. (Id.). The Motion is unopposed. (Id. at 1, 2).

Having considered the Motion, and noting its unopposed nature, the Court finds that it 

should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for 

Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss is extended up to and including December 4, 2023.

So Ordered this

Dec 4, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 20 Filed 12/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 177
Javis WILSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8447

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Case 4:23-cv-00770-SDJ Document 9 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 84