alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/04/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,690
COMMITMENTS
   9,263    1,008      887   21,846   28,743   31,996   30,638    8,694   10,052

CHANGES FROM 08/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,513)
   1,266      803       57      952    1,155    2,275    2,014     -761     -501

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.8      2.5      2.2     53.7     70.6     78.6     75.3     21.4     24.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
      14        4        5       30       19       47       26
```

----

Updated September 4, 2012
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/27/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,961
COMMITMENTS
  10,298    1,629      938   19,799   30,080   31,035   32,647    9,926    8,314

CHANGES FROM 11/20/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,424)
     382      -21      -88     -772     -641     -478     -750     -946     -674

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.1      4.0      2.3     48.3     73.4     75.8     79.7     24.2     20.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      16        2        7       28       26       48       33
```

----

Updated December 5, 2012
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2319

To make the American Battle Monuments Commission and the World War

II Memorial Advisory Board eligible to use nonprofit standard mail

rates of postage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To make the American Battle Monuments Commission and

the World War II Memorial Advisory Board eligible to

use nonprofit standard mail rates of postage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR NONPROFIT STANDARD MAIL

4 RATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The American Battle Monuments

6 Commission and the World War II Memorial Advisory

7 Board (as referred to in Public Law 103–32 (40 U.S.C.

8 1003 note; 107 Stat. 90)) shall each be considered to qual9 ify for the rates of postage currently in effect under
2

•HR 2319 IH

1 former section 4452 of title 39, United States Code, for

2 third-class mail matter mailed by a qualified nonprofit or3 ganization.

4 (b) RESTRICTION.—Rates of postage afforded by sub5 section (a) shall be available only with respect to official

6 mail sent for the furtherance of the purpose of section

7 2(c)(1) or 3 of Public Law 103–32, as applicable.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER SEAN LYTLE §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv61

AMY CLARK MEACHUM, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Christopher Sean Lytle, an inmate at the Powledge Unit of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for

Declaratory Judgment against Amy Clark Meachum and Ken Paxton.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff brings this Petition for Declaratory Judgment against Amy Clark Meachum, Judge

of the 201st Civil District Court in Austin, Texas, and Ken Paxton, the AttorneyGeneral for the State

of Texas. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that Texas Senate Bill No. 34 is unconstitutional. 

Analysis

When, as here, jurisdiction is not founded solelyon diversityof citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391

provides generally that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. When public officials are parties to an action in their official capacities, they

reside for venue purposes in the county where they perform their official duties, which in this case

is Travis County. Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150, 153 n.3 (5th Cir. 1982). In accordance with

Case 9:23-cv-00061-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 22
28 U.S.C. § 124, Travis County, Texas is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United

States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. Accordingly, plaintiff has

failed to establish a jurisdictional basis for his claims to proceed in the Eastern District of Texas. 

As Travis County, Texas is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United 

States District Court for the Western District of Texas, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not 

proper. When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, 

transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 

1406(a). This case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Texas, Austin Division. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the 

undersigned.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 30th day of March, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00061-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 03/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 23
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I,  James L. Holbrook, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information related to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

 

|   |   |   | /s/ James L. Holbrook, Jr.                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | James L. Holbrook, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

Dated: May 15, 2007
Jose HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 18-9666

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, et al.

No. 18-1514.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 20, 2019.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The case is consolidated, and will be set for argument in the second week of the October 2019 argument session.

Parties challenging the First Circuit's ruling on the Appointment Clause issue shall file an opening brief on that issue on or before Thursday, July 25, 2019. The briefs are to bear a light blue cover and is limited to 15,000 words.

Parties supporting the First Circuit's ruling on the Appointment Clause issue and challenging the ruling on the *de facto* officer doctrine issue shall file a consolidated opening brief on or before Thursday, August 22, 2019. The briefs are to bear a light red cover and is limited to 20,000 words.

Parties challenging the First Circuit's ruling on the Appointment Clause issue and supporting the ruling on the *de facto* officer doctrine issue shall file a consolidated opening brief and reply on or before Thursday, September 19, 2019. The briefs are to bear a yellow cover and is limited to 13,000 words.

Parties challenging the First Circuit's ruling on the *de facto* officer doctrine issue shall file with the Clerk and serve upon counsel a reply brief limited to that issue on or before 2 p.m., Tuesday, October 8, 2019. The briefs are to bear a tan cover and is limited to 6,000 words.

*Amicus curiae* briefs challenging the First Circuit's ruling on the Appointments Clause issue and/or supporting the ruling on the l facto *officer doctrine issue is to be filed on or before Thursday, August 1, 2019. The briefs are to bear a light green cover and is limited to 9,000 words.* Amicus curiae *briefs supporting the First Circuit's ruling on the Appointments Clause issue and/or challenging the ruling on the l facto* officer doctrine issue is to be filed on or before Thursday, August 29, 2019. The briefs are to bear a dark green cover *2738and is limited to 9,000 words. An *amicus curiae* shall file only a single brief.
Airrington L. SYKES, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8988

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/09/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       84,027
COMMITMENTS
  24,022    3,258      738   53,089   77,439   77,849   81,435    6,178    2,592

CHANGES FROM 04/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,397)
  -2,529      963      -10      235   -3,906   -2,304   -2,953      -93      556

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.6      3.9      0.9     63.2     92.2     92.6     96.9      7.4      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      12        5        1       40       34       52       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/09/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      198,596
COMMITMENTS
  66,539   36,666    1,483  115,862  155,688  183,884  193,837   14,712    4,759

CHANGES FROM 04/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,435)
  -2,633    3,560      -47    3,752   -2,144    1,072    1,369      363       66

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.5     18.5      0.7     58.3     78.4     92.6     97.6      7.4      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      38       17        9       68       50      112       70
```

----

Updated April 17, 2013
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that: 

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

 

|               |   |   |                                                                          |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 15, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Anthony J. Simonetta                                                      |
|               |   |   |  

 

 

Anthony J. Simonetta Chief Financial Officer 

  |
EXHIBIT 99.12




CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 28, 2013
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Michael Warren, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled the “White Mountain Project, Jilin Province, China” dated October 10, 2007 and of extracts from or a summary of  the technical report and other information pertaining to the project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
  By:
/s/ Michael WarrenMichael Warren, FAusIMMSRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd.
Robert C. DENHAM, Jr., Petitioner, v. James DZURENDA, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7002

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jason CAISSIE, aka Jason Cullen Caissie, Petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-1480.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
Julius Darius JONES, petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA.

No. 17-6943.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.1



                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, based on such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i)   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
               the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with
               the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
               applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.


Date:    August 15, 2005                             /s/ Matthew H. Knight
         ---------------                             ---------------------------
                                                     Matthew H. Knight
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
No. 6:23-cv-00437

Richard David Peterson,

Plaintiff,

v.

Gregg County Sheriff Office,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Richard David Peterson, an inmate of the Gregg County 

Jail proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b). Doc. 2. 

On January 8, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 1915(e). 

Doc. 10. A copy of the report was mailed to the plaintiff, who did not 

file written objections. 

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en 

banc). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. The court dismisses this case with prejudice.

So ordered by the court on February 27, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00437-JCB-JDL Document 11 Filed 02/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 61
AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., petitioner, v. PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC.

No. 17-1497.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Seidy M. TIBURCIO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19M18

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4184

_____________________________

RICKY CHITTY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

January 11, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Ricky Chitty, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.