alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2322

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to terminate Federal milk

marketing orders.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. OBEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to terminate

Federal milk marketing orders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF MILK MARKETING ORDERS.

4 (a) TERMINATION.—Section 8c of the Agricultural

5 Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amend6 ments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of

7 1937, is amended by striking paragraphs (5) and (18) re8 lating to milk and its products.
2

•HR 2322 IH

1 (b) PROHIBITION ON SUBSEQUENT ORDERS RE2 GARDING MILK.—Paragraph (2) of such section is

3 amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘Milk, fruits’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘Fruits’’; and

6 (2) by inserting ‘‘milk,’’ after ‘‘honey,’’ in sub7 paragraph (B).

8 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section 2(3) of

9 such Act (7 U.S.C. 602(3) is amended by striking ‘‘, other

10 than milk and its products,’’.

11 (2) Section 8c of such Act (7 U.S.C. 608c) is

12 amended—

13 (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘, other than

14 milk and its products,’’;

15 (B) in paragraph (7)(B), by striking ‘‘(except

16 for milk and cream to be sold for consumption in

17 fluid form)’’;

18 (C) in paragraph (11)(B), by striking ‘‘Except

19 in the case of milk and its products, orders’’ and in20 serting ‘‘Orders’’;

21 (D) in paragraph (13)(A), by striking ‘‘, except

22 to a retailer in his capacity as a retailer of milk and

23 its products’’; and

24 (E) in paragraph (17), by striking the second

25 proviso, which relates to milk orders.
3

•HR 2322 IH

1 (3) Section 8d(2) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 608d(2)) is

2 amended by striking the second sentence, which relates to

3 information from milk handlers.

4 (4) Section 10(b)(2) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 610(b))

5 is amended—

6 (A) by striking clause (i);

7 (B) by redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as

8 clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; and

9 (C) in clause (i) (as so redesignated), by strik10 ing ‘‘other commodity’’ in the first sentence and in11 serting ‘‘commodity’’.

12 (5) Section 11 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 611) is amended

13 by striking ‘‘and milk, and its products,’’.

14 (6) Section 715 of the Agriculture, Rural Develop15 ment, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agen16 cies Appropriations Act, 1994 (Public Law 103–111; 107

17 Stat. 1079; 7 U.S.C. 608d note), is amended by striking

18 the third proviso, which relates to information from milk

19 handlers.

20 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 this section shall take effect on llllllll.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         855,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  448,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                    49,371
<INVENTORY>                                  1,381,584
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,922,395
<PP&E>                                       1,673,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,883,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,859,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1560
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,120,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,122,061
<SALES>                                        215,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,786
<CGS>                                          128,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  884,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               316,022
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                49,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             231,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (985,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (94,586)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (891,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (891,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00485

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned counsel of 

record for Plaintiff Redstone Logics LLC certifies that Granite IP, LLC owns 100% of Redstone, 

and Bedrock IP Co., Ltd. owns 100% of Granite IP, LLC.

Dated: September 23, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Marc A. Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Christian W. Conkle

CA State Bar No. 306374

Jonathan Ma

CA State Bar No. 312773

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 39 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 275
2

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com

Email: jma@raklaw.com

Qi (Peter) Tong

TX State Bar No. 24119042

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

4925 Greenville Ave, Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75206

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: ptong@raklaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

REDSTONE LOGICS, LLC.

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 39 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 276
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served on September 23, 2024 with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 39 Filed 09/23/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 277
The HONORABLE DONALD J. STOHR, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-2946

___________

Douglas Edward Wade, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Otis Elevator Company, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: August 5, 1996

 Filed: August 12, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Douglas E. Wade appeals pro se from the district court's grant of

1

judgment as a matter of law in favor of Otis Elevator Company following

trial of his personal injury claim. Wade argues that the trial judge did

not allow Wade to explain answers during his trial testimony, and that his

trial lawyer "was derelict in his duty." However, in a civil case, these

contentions do not provide a basis for reversing the ruling that Wade's

evidence was insufficient as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Ahmadou SANKARA, Applicant, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19A56 (19-5005)

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Application for stay of removal addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court denied.
THE HONORABLE J. CAMPBELL BARKER

Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 5 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 49
Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 5 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 50
So ordered by the court.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00553-JCB Document 5 Filed 11/13/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 51
The DUTRA GROUP, petitioner, v. Christopher BATTERTON.

No. 18-266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Michael S. BARTH, Petitioner, v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, New Jersey, et al.

No. 19-806

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1900

To expand the use of competitive bidding under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. STARK (for himself and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To expand the use of competitive bidding under the Medicare

Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Competitive

5 Bidding Expansion Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE USE OF COMPETITIVE BIDDING

7 UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

8 (a) EXPANSION OF CURRENT DEMONSTRATION

9 PROJECT AUTHORITY.—
2

•HR 1900 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—On and after January 1,

2 2004, the Secretary of Health and Human Services

3 may exercise authority under section 4011 of the

4 Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (relating to medicare

5 prepaid competitive pricing demonstration project)

6 and under section 1847 of the Social Security Act

7 (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3), inserted by section 4319(a) of

8 the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, without regard

9 to—

10 (A) any limitation on the number of

11 projects, sites, or areas served, the population

12 served, or the period of authorization; and

13 (B) the need for any further monitoring or

14 reports under 4011(d) of the Balanced Budget

15 Act of 1997 or any termination otherwise re16 quired under section 1847(e) of the Social Se17 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3(e)).

18 (2) USE OF FISCAL INTERMEDIARIES AND CAR19 RIERS.—In implementing paragraph (1), the Sec20 retary, to the extent feasible, shall provide for ad21 ministration of competitive bidding through the use

22 of local fiscal intermediaries and carriers and con23 sortia of contractors. Such projects may cover com24 bined payments under parts A and B of title XVIII

25 of the Social Security Act.
3

•HR 1900 IH

1 (3) PRICE AND QUALITY.—Any authority exer2 cised under this subsection shall take into account

3 both the price and quality of items and services pro4 vided.

5 (b) COVERAGE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the authority

7 provided under subsection (a), the Secretary of

8 Health and Human Services is authorized to provide

9 for payment under the medicare program on the

10 basis of competitive bidding for services not covered

11 under the demonstration projects referred to in sub12 section (a). Such projects may cover services such as

13 organ transplant services, lithotripsy services, diag14 nostic imaging, and non-emergency ambulance serv15 ices.

16 (2) EXTRA WEIGHT FOR QUALITY.—In con17 ducting demonstration projects under this sub18 section, the Secretary shall provide additional weight

19 when considering providers with a demonstrated

20 quality of services.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          23,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,068
<PP&E>                                         671,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,231
<BONDS>                                        428,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         53
<COMMON>                                           273
<OTHER-SE>                                     301,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,577
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,924
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,475
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   748
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,061)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Agustin MARTINEZ-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7470.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   May 15, 2008

/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the use of our report dated January 25, 1998 included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Northwest Airlines Corporation.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Northwest
Airlines Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-41579) of Northwest Airlines Corporation and
Northwest Airlines, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-85220, 333-2652, 333-14445,
333-12571 and 333-46045) of our reports dated January 25, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Northwest Airlines Corporation.


                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,252
<INVENTORY>                                      6,170
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,579
<PP&E>                                         178,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,301
<BONDS>                                        337,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,431
<SALES>                                        302,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,902
<CGS>                                          106,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,092
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (8,772)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 552 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 552

Recognizing the month of October 2012 as ``National Principals Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2012

   Mr. Franken (for himself, Mr. Lugar, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
 Akaka, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Begich, Mr. Webb, and Mr. Levin) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the month of October 2012 as ``National Principals Month''.

Whereas the National Association of Secondary School Principals and the National 
        Association of Elementary School Principals have declared the month of 
        October 2012 to be ``National Principals Month'';
Whereas principals are educational visionaries, instructional and assessment 
        leaders, disciplinarians, community builders, budget analysts, 
        facilities managers, and administrators of legal and contractual 
        obligations;
Whereas principals work collaboratively with teachers and parents to develop and 
        implement a clear mission, high curriculum standards, and performance 
        goals;
Whereas principals create school environments that facilitate great teaching and 
        learning and continuous school improvement;
Whereas the vision, actions, and dedication of principals provide the mobilizing 
        force behind any school reform effort; and
Whereas the celebration of National Principals Month would honor elementary 
        school, middle school, and high school principals, and recognize the 
        importance of principals in ensuring that every child has access to a 
        high-quality education: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the month of October 2012 as ``National 
        Principals Month''; and
            (2) honors the contribution of principals in the elementary 
        schools, middle schools, and high schools of the United States 
        by supporting the goals and ideals of National Principals 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
11056285 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA, 

INC., and SPRINT CORP., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP 

JURY DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Robert Christopher Bunt 

and Parker Bunt & Ainsworth as counsel for Plaintiff. The Court, having considered same, is of 

the opinion the motion should be GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate all CM/ECF notifications as to Robert 

Christopher Bunt for this action. 

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 65-1 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 810
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-4115

_____________________________

SLOBODAN NIKOLIC,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

September 9, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and John Villafrate, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 2 

Case 1:23-cv-00431-MJT-CLS Document 5-2 Filed 12/15/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 32
Case 1:23-cv-00431-MJT-CLS Document 5-2 Filed 12/15/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 33
Case 1:23-cv-00431-MJT-CLS Document 5-2 Filed 12/15/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 34