alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE DIS TRICT OF COLUM BIA MUHAM MAD A HMAD ABDA LLAH : AL ANSI, et al. , : : P etitioner s, :

: v. : Civil Action No. 08-1923 (G K) : BARACK

H. OBAMA, et al. , : : Defendan ts. :

ORDER On May 27, 2010, Petitioner filed an Emerg ency Motion to Compel Compli ance Wit h This Court’s Orde r of November 19, 2009 and For TRO and Injunction Ag ainst Transf er of Petitioner to Alg eria

. On J une 2, 2010, the Gover nment filed its Opposition. The Court is waiting for Petitioner’s R ep ly , which is not yet due. Given the seriousness of the issues raised in this Motion, t h e C o u rt here by ORDERS an Administrative Stay until the Moti on is decided.

J une 3, 2010 /s/ Glady s Kessler United States District J udg e Copies via ECF t o all couns el of recor d
Exhibit 99.01

                                                              Company's Form 8-K
                                                              November 9, 1993

                                                              Page 2

     In October 1993, several purported class action lawsuits were filed in the
Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York naming Smith
Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Incorporated ("SBS") as defendant. The cases arise
from SBS's participation as lead or co-underwriter in the initial public
offerings of three separate funds managed by Hyperion Capital Management Inc.
The plaintiffs have also named as defendants the funds' directors and the
co-underwriters and their representatives. Plaintiffs allege that the
registration statements and prospectuses by which the offerings were made
between June 1992 and October 1992 were materially false and misleading, and are
seeking unspecified damages in claims brought under the Federal securities laws.
The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these actions and intends to
defend against them vigorously.



<PAGE>

                                                             Company's Form 10-K
                                                             December 31, 1995

                                                             Page 10

     For information concerning several purported class action lawsuits filed
against SBI in connection with three funds managed by Hyperion Capital
Management Inc., see the description that appears in the third paragraph on page
2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 9, 1993, which
description is incorporated by reference herein. A copy of the pertinent
paragraph of such filing is included as an exhibit to this Form 10-K. The
actions were consolidated under the title In re: Hyperion Securities Litigation.
SBI's motion to dismiss the claims was granted in July 1995. In August 1995, an
appeal was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jason HENDERSHOTT, Petitioner, v. Kelly STRONG, Warden, et al.

No. 19-5054

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Troy SIERRA, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7873.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### NUMBER 13-0 9-00 100- CVAND 13-09-0 0231 -CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ING RAM READYMIX , I NC. AND SO U T H ER N C ON T RAC T IN G, IN C ., Ap pe l l an ts, v . BENNETT, MARTIN, SO LKA AND TORNO, INC., GOVI ND & ASSOCI ATES, INC., AND W .R . G RAC E & C O. -C ON N ., Ap pe l l ee s.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ On a pp ea l from th e 31 9t h D i str i ct C ou rt of N ue ce s C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and G ar za and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am Appel lan ts, Ing ra m R eady mix , I nc. and Southe rn C ontract ing , I nc. ( “ S C I ” ) , p e r fected an a ppe al f rom a judgmen t ent ered bythe 319 th District Court of Nu eces Coun ty, T exas, in caus e number

08- 6125- G. SC I, Bennett, Ma rt in, Sol ka & Tor ino , I nc. (“ BM ST”) , and2

Gov ind & Ass oci ates , I nc. ( “G ov ind ”) , have fil ed a joi nt mot ion to dis mis s w it h preju dic e. SC I, BM ST, and Gov ind hav e fil ed a joi nt mot ion to dis mis s t he appe al on g ro unds that they hav e resolved the ir

di sput es at medi ati on and re q uestthatthi s C our t di smi ssw it h preju dic e al l of the c lai ms i n thi s c ase ass erted b y SC I ag ain st BM ST and G ov ind
. T he Cou rt, having consid ered the docu me nts on f ile and the jointmot ion to dismiss w it h preju dic e c lai ms by SC I aga ins t BMST and Gov ind , is of the opini on that t he moti on should b e gra n te d. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( a)
. The jo intmoti on todi smi ssi s g ra nted, and t he appe al ish e re b y DISMI SSED W ITH PR EJU DI CE
. In ac cordance w it h the agre e m e n t o f the par

ti es, co stsare taxed ag ain st the p arty i ncur ri ng sa me. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2 .1 (d ). H av ing di smi ss ed th e appea l at t he par ti es’ req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. T he a ppe a l wit h respect to claims ma de b y SCI against BMSTand Govi nd is ordered SE VER ED from t he remaind er of the a ppeal
. The Cl er k shal l create Cau se No. 13-0 9-00 231 -CV sty led So uth ern Cont racting, Inc. v. Be nn ett, M ar ti n, S ol ka and To rno, In c. and G ov ind & Ass oci ates , I nc. The remainde r of the par ti es re main under

thi s o ri g ina l caus e number , 13- 09- 00100- CV
. PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and fil ed th isthe 7th d ay of Ma y , 200 9.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 11/29/2023 /s/ Adam S. Hoffman Adam S. Hoffman CA Bar No. 218740

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

(310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Address

 ahoffman@raklaw.com

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 62 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1986
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Acting Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 19, 2008


\s\ Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

GRIFFIN CAMPBELL

PETITION OF: GEORGE HENRY NEWMAN, ESQUIRE :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 66 EM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15 th day of December , 2021, in consideration of the Application to

Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Griffin Campbell’s present

counsel should be permitted to withdraw, as well as any related questions, including

whether to appoint new counsel for Griffin Campbell

.

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is ORDERED to enter its order

regarding this remand within 90 days and to notify this Court promptly of its determin ation.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50297

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE DOMINGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-01-CR-1843-ALL-DB

--------------------

October 17, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court appointed counsel for Jose Dominguez (“Dominguez”),

the Federal Public Defender, has moved for leave to withdraw from

this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dominguez has received a copy

of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
No. 02-50297

-2-

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-92034) pertaining to the Ride Snowboard Company 1994 Stock Option
Plan and Ride Snowboard Company 1994 Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-81029) pertaining to the
Ride, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Ride, Inc. foreign Subsidiary
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated March 3, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ride, Inc.
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Seattle, Washington
March 12, 1998                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Aleksandr BIBLE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7588.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-84726, 33-84728, and 333-25981 of
Paul-Son Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated July 20, 2001 (except for the effects of the restatements discussed in
Note 12, as to which the date is January 15, 2002) (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatements described in
Note 12), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2001.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las
Vegas, Nevada
January 22, 2002

---
Sam CHINN, aka Sam Chinn, III, petitioner, v. Joseph NOETH, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

No. 18-8229.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00467

Larry Hicks,

Plaintiff,

v.

Attorney Gary A. Udashen

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Larry Hicks, a prisoner of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice proceeding pro se, filed this civil lawsuit without 

paying the filing fee. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

On September 19, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the court bar the plaintiff from proceeding in forma 

pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and dismiss this case subject to reopening if the plaintiff pays the filing fee within fifteen days

of judgment. Doc. 3. A copy of the report was mailed to the plaintiff, 

who has not filed written objections or paid the filing fee.

In addition to the bar of § 1915(g), the plaintiff is subject to a 

sanction imposed in a previous case, which requires him to obtain 

representation by counsel for any pleading filed in this court. See Order Imposing Sanctions at 2, Hicks v. Skeen, No. 6:18-cv-400 (E.D. 

Tex. Jan. 14, 2020) (“The Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of 

Texas shall not accept from Plaintiff Larry Coleman Hicks any further lawsuits, documents, pleadings, correspondence, letters, notices, or motions in any suit, including previous and newly filed 

cases—that do not bear the signature of a licensed attorney admitted 

to practice before the Bar of the Eastern District of Texas.”).

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Case 6:23-cv-00467-JCB-JDL Document 4 Filed 10/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
- 2 -

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied 

that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation as modified. The plaintiff is denied leave to proceed 

as a pauper, and this case is dismissed with prejudice for purposes of 

proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)—but without prejudice as to the refiling of the lawsuit by a licensed attorney 

and with payment of the full filing fee.

So ordered by the court on October 20, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00467-JCB-JDL Document 4 Filed 10/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
Alice HOWELL, petitioner, v. NUCAR CONNECTION, INC., et al.

No. 18-6487.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC. §

§

V. § No. 5:23CV134-RWS-JBB

§

BROADCOM, INC. §

ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge

for pre-trial purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court is the following pending

motion: Defendant Broadcom Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13). The Court, having reviewed

the relevant briefing and noting that Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint for Patent

Infringement (Dkt. No. 23), is of the opinion the motion to dismiss the original complaint should be

denied as moot. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that Defendant Broadcom Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED

AS MOOT.

.

____________________________________

J. Boone Baxter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SIGNED this the 4th day of March, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 26 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 412
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Nagy Moustafa, Chief Executive Officer of Diversinet Corp., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diversinet Corp.





/s/ Nagy Moustafa

Name: Nagy Moustafa

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

February 23, 2007



This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. 

Plaintiff 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. 

Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco 

Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless. 

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23cv445 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

JURY DEMAND 

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-38(a), Plaintiffs respectfully demand a jury trial on all issues 

so triable. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew G. Berkowitz by permission Claire 

Henry 

Matthew G. Berkowitz – LEAD ATTORNEY 

Patrick R. Colsher 

Aaron L. Morris 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Tel: (650) 623-1401 

mberkowitz@reichmanjorgensen.com 

pcolsher@reichmanjorgensen.com 

amorris@reichmanjorgensen.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 292
Khue V. Hoang 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

400 Madison Avenue, Suite 14D 

New York, NY 10017 

Tel: (212) 381-1965 

khoang@reichmanjorgensen.com 

Of Counsel: 

Andrea L. Fair 

Texas Bar No. 24078488 

Claire Abernathy Henry 

Texas State Bar No. 24053063 

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC 

1507 Bill Owens Pkwy. 

Longview, TX 75604 

Tel: (903) 757-6400 

andrea@wsfirm.com 

claire@wsfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 293
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service on this 27 day of September, 2023. 

/s/ Claire Henry 

Claire Henry

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 294
Valentin SPATARU, Petitioner, v. Rick RAMSAY.

No. 18-9492

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2181

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire and equip fishery survey

vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. SAXTON) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire and

equip fishery survey vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fisheries Survey Ves5 sel Authorization Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF FISHERY SURVEY VESSELS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, subject to the

8 availability of appropriations, may in accordance with this

9 section acquire, by purchase, lease, lease-purchase, or
2

•HR 2181 IH

1 charter, and equip up to 6 fishery survey vessels in accord2 ance with this section.

3 (b) VESSEL REQUIREMENTS.—Any vessel acquired

4 and equipped under this section must—

5 (1) be capable of—

6 (A) staying at sea continuously for at least

7 30 days;

8 (B) conducting fishery population surveys

9 using hydroacoustic, longlining, deep water, and

10 pelagic trawls, and other necessary survey tech11 niques; and

12 (C) conducting other work necessary to

13 provide fishery managers with the accurate and

14 timely data needed to prepare and implement

15 fishery management plans; and

16 (2) have a hull that meets the International

17 Council for Exploration of the Sea standard regard18 ing acoustic quietness.

19 (c) AUTHORIZATION.—To carry out this section there

20 are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary

21 $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002,

22 2003, 2004, and 2005.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.4

Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jean Hu, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of QLogic Corporation for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2016; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

| By:    | /s/ Jean Hu             |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Jean Hu                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date: July 1, 2016