IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RICH MEDIA CLUB LLC, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

DMG MEDIA LIMITED,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-388-JRG

DISCOVERY ORDER

After a review of the pleaded claims and defenses in this action, in furtherance of the 

management of the Court’s docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, and after receiving 

the input of the parties to this action, it is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Initial Disclosures. In lieu of the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

26(a)(1), each party shall disclose to every other party the following information:

(a) the correct names of the parties to the lawsuit;

(b) the name, address, and telephone number of any potential parties;

(c) the legal theories and, in general, the factual bases of the disclosing party’s claims 

or defenses (the disclosing party need not marshal all evidence that may be offered 

at trial);

(d) the name, address, and telephone number of persons having knowledge of relevant 

facts, a brief statement of each identified person’s connection with the case, and a 

brief, fair summary of the substance of the information known by any such person;

(e) any indemnity and insuring agreements under which any person or entity carrying 

on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy part or all of a judgment entered 

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 402
- 2 -

in this action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the 

judgment;

(f) any settlement agreements relevant to the subject matter of this action; and

(g) any statement of any party to the litigation.

2. Disclosure of Expert Testimony.1 A party must disclose to the other parties the identity 

of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 

703 or 705, and:

(a) if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in 

the case or one whose duties as the party’s employee regularly involve giving expert 

testimony, provide the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

26(a)(2)(B) and Local Rule CV-26; and

(b) for all other such witnesses, provide the disclosure required by Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(a)(2)(C).

3. Additional Disclosures. Without awaiting a discovery request,2 each party will make the 

following disclosures to every other party:

(a) provide the disclosures required by the Patent Rules for the Eastern District of 

Texas with the following modifications to P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-3:

i. If a party claiming patent infringement asserts that a claim element is a 

software limitation, the party need not comply with P.R. 3-1 for those claim 

elements until 30 days after source code for each Accused Instrumentality 

1 All expert reports should be written such that the report is organized with discrete 

paragraph numbers.

2

 The Court anticipates that this disclosure requirement will obviate the need for requests 

for production.

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 403
- 3 -

is produced by the opposing party. Thereafter, the party claiming patent 

infringement shall identify, on an element-by-element basis for each 

asserted claim, what source code of each Accused Instrumentality allegedly 

satisfies the software limitations of the asserted claim elements.

ii. If a party claiming patent infringement exercises the provisions of 

Paragraph 3(a)(i) of this Discovery Order, the party opposing a claim of 

patent infringement may serve, not later than 30 days after receipt of a 

Paragraph 3(a)(i) disclosure, supplemental “Invalidity Contentions” that 

amend only those claim elements identified as software limitations by the 

party claiming patent infringement.

(b) produce or permit the inspection of all documents, electronically stored 

information, and tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the party 

that are relevant to the pleaded claims or defenses involved in this action, except to 

the extent these disclosures are affected by the time limits set forth in the Patent 

Rules for the Eastern District of Texas; and

(c) provide a complete computation of any category of damages claimed by any party 

to the action, and produce or permit the inspection of documents or other 

evidentiary material on which such computation is based, including materials 

bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered, except that the disclosure of 

the computation of damages may be deferred until the time for Expert Disclosures

if a party will rely on a damages expert.

4. Protective Orders. The Court will enter the parties’ Agreed Protective Order.

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 404
- 4 - 

5. Discovery Limitations. The discovery in this cause is limited to the disclosures described 

in Paragraphs 1-3 together with: 

a) Interrogatories: Each side shall have 25 interrogatories.

b) Requests for Admissions: Each side shall have 25 requests for admission. These 

limitations do not apply to requests for admission for admissibility of documents; 

parties may serve unlimited requests for admission for authentication of documents. 

However, the parties will work together in good faith to agree on a stipulation as to the 

authenticity of their own documents. 

c) Third-Party Subpoenas: The parties may serve subpoenas for third-parties to produce 

documents or testify. The parties will serve each other with copies of any third-party 

subpoenas on the same day the subpoena or notice is served on the third-party. The 

parties will promptly serve each other with copies of any documents produced by thirdparties pursuant to subpoena or otherwise within 5 days of receipt of the documents, 

or, if the documents are received less than 5 days from the date of any deposition of the 

third-party, within 24 hours of receipt. 

d) Fact depositions: Each side shall have a total of 60 hours for party fact witness 

depositions including both 30(b)(6) and 30(b)(1) depositions. Each side shall have a 

total of 20 hours for non-party fact witness depositions including both 30(b)(6) and 

30(b)(1) depositions.

e) Experts: Each side shall have up to 3 testifying expert witnesses. 

f) Claim Construction depositions: A party may offer a fact or expert witness declaration 

in support of its claim construction positions without counting towards the above limits, 

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 405
- 5 -

and the opposing party may depose that witness for up to 7 hours without counting 

against the time limits expressed in subsections (d).

g) Any party may later move to modify these limitations for good cause.

6. Privileged Information. There is no duty to disclose privileged documents or 

information. However, the parties are directed to meet and confer concerning privileged 

documents or information after the Status Conference. By the deadline set in the Docket 

Control Order, the parties shall exchange privilege logs identifying the documents or 

information and the basis for any disputed claim of privilege in a manner that, without 

revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the other parties to assess 

the applicability of the privilege or protection. Any party may move the Court for an order 

compelling the production of any documents or information identified on any other party’s 

privilege log. If such a motion is made, the party asserting privilege shall respond to the 

motion within the time period provided by Local Rule CV-7. The party asserting privilege 

shall then file with the Court within 30 days of the filing of the motion to compel any proof 

in the form of declarations or affidavits to support their assertions of privilege, along with 

the documents over which privilege is asserted for in camera inspection. However, if the 

party asserting privilege seeks an in camera review by the Court, such party shall first 

obtain leave from the Court prior to delivery of documents to the Court.

7. Signature. The disclosures required by this Order shall be made in writing and signed by 

the party or counsel and shall constitute a certification that, to the best of the signer’s 

knowledge, information and belief, such disclosure is complete and correct as of the time 

it is made. If feasible, counsel shall meet to exchange disclosures required by this Order; 

otherwise, such disclosures shall be served as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 406
- 6 -

5. The parties shall promptly file a notice with the Court that the disclosures required under 

this Order have taken place.

8. Duty to Supplement. After disclosure is made pursuant to this Order, each party is under 

a duty to supplement or correct its disclosures immediately if the party obtains information 

on the basis of which it knows that the information disclosed was either incomplete or 

incorrect when made, or is no longer complete or true.

9. Discovery Disputes.

(a) Except in cases involving claims of privilege, any party entitled to receive 

disclosures (“Requesting Party”) may, after the deadline for making disclosures, 

serve upon a party required to make disclosures (“Responding Party”) a written 

statement, in letter form or otherwise, of any reason why the Requesting Party

believes that the Responding Party’s disclosures are insufficient. The written 

statement shall list, by category, the items the Requesting Party contends should be 

produced. The parties shall promptly meet and confer. If the parties are unable to 

resolve their dispute, then the Responding Party shall, within 14 days after service 

of the written statement upon it, serve upon the Requesting Party a written 

statement, in letter form or otherwise, which identifies (1) the requested items that 

will be disclosed, if any, and (2) the reasons why any requested items will not be 

disclosed. The Requesting Party may thereafter file a motion to compel.

(b) An opposed discovery related motion, or any response thereto, shall not exceed 7

pages. Attachments to a discovery related motion, or a response thereto, shall not 

exceed 5 pages. No further briefing is allowed absent a request or order from the 

Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 407
- 7 -

(c) Prior to filing any discovery related motion, the parties must fully comply with the 

substantive and procedural conference requirements of Local Rule CV-7(h) and (i). 

Within 72 hours of the Court setting any discovery motion for a hearing, each 

party’s lead attorney (see Local Rule CV-11(a)) and local counsel shall meet and 

confer in person or by telephone, without the involvement or participation of other 

attorneys, in an effort to resolve the dispute without Court intervention. 

(d) Counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the results of that meeting by filing a 

joint report of no more than two pages. Unless excused by the Court, each party’s 

lead attorney shall attend any discovery motion hearing set by the Court (though 

the lead attorney is not required to argue the motion).

(e) Any change to a party’s lead attorney designation must be accomplished by motion 

and order.

(f) Counsel are directed to contact the chambers of the undersigned for any “hot-line” 

disputes before contacting the Discovery Hotline provided by Local Rule CV26(e). If the undersigned is not available, the parties shall proceed in accordance 

with Local Rule CV-26(e).

10. No Excuses. A party is not excused from the requirements of this Discovery Order because 

it has not fully completed its investigation of the case, or because it challenges the 

sufficiency of another party’s disclosures, or because another party has not made its 

disclosures. Absent court order to the contrary, a party is not excused from disclosure 

because there are pending motions to dismiss, to remand or to change venue.

11. Filings. Only upon request from chambers shall counsel submit to the court courtesy 

copies of any filings.

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 408
- 8 -

12. Proposed Stipulations by the Parties Regarding Discovery. 

a) Electronic Service: All discovery requests and discovery responses shall be served via 

electronic mail only.

b) Electronic Discovery Order: The parties shall negotiate in good faith a separate 

Electronic Discovery Order. The parties shall file the agreed Electronic Discovery 

Order with the Court. To the extent any provisions are disputed, the parties shall follow

the Court’s procedures relating to resolution of discovery disputes.

c) Expert Reports and Discovery: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4), draft expert reports, 

notes, outlines, and any other writings leading up to expert final reports in this case are 

exempt from discovery and testifying experts shall not be subject to discovery on any 

draft of their reports in this case nor any other writings leading up to an issued report 

or filed declaration in this litigation. In addition, all communications to and from a 

retained testifying expert, and all materials generated by a testifying expert with respect 

to that person’s work in this case, are exempt from discovery unless relied upon by the 

expert in forming any opinions in this litigation. If an expert produces a report, the 

expert must also produce all materials on which the expert relied. No discovery can be 

taken from any consulting expert except to the extent that the consulting expert has 

provided information, opinions, or other materials to a testifying expert, who then relies 

upon such information, opinions, or other materials in forming his or her final report, 

declaration, trial or deposition testimony, or any opinion in this case. Materials, 

communications, and other information exempt from discovery under this Paragraph 

shall be treated as attorney work product for the purposes of this litigation.

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 409
- 9 - 

d) Privilege Logs: Neither party is required to log privileged materials dated after August 

29, 2023, which was the filing date of the complaint. The parties reserve the right to 

request logs of specific kinds of privileged materials otherwise excluded by the 

foregoing where good cause exists. 

13. Standing Orders. The parties and counsel are charged with notice of and are required to 

fully comply with each of the Standing Orders of this Court. Such are posted on the Court’s 

website at http://www.txed.uscourts.gov/?q=court-annexed-mediation-plan. The substance 

of some such orders may be included expressly within this Discovery Order, while others 

(including the Court’s Standing Order Regarding Protection of Proprietary and/or 

Confidential Information to Be Presented to the Court During Motion and Trial Practice) 

are incorporated herein by reference. All such standing orders shall be binding on the 

parties and counsel, regardless of whether they are expressly included herein or made a 

part hereof by reference.

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25-1 Filed 04/08/24 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 410