alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2290 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2290

To suspend temporarily the duty on the chemical 2 Chloro Amino Toluene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1999

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on the chemical 2 Chloro Amino Toluene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.29.21      2 Chloro Amino      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         Toluene (CAS No.                                                   31/2004          ''.
                         95-74-9)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2921.43.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
MEDTRICA SOLUTIONS L TD.,

A CANADA CORPORATION , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CYGNUS MEDICAL, LLC, A CONNECTICUT LIMITE D LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendant

- Appellant

v.
STERIS CORPORATION, AN OHIO CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2014

- 1400

______________________ Appeal from the United St ates District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:12

- cv

- 00538

- RSL, Judge Robert S. Lasnik.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
R OD S TEVEN B ERMAN , Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Ma rmaro, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellee
,defendant -appellee. Also represented by J ESSICA B ROMALL S PARKMAN for plaintiff

- appelle; M ICHAEL J OHN E STOK , Lindsay Hart, LLP, Portland, OR, for defendant

- appellee

.
B ENJAMIN J. L EHBERGER , St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens, LLC, Stamford, CT, argued for defendant

appellant. Also represented by W ESLEY W. W HITMYER , S TEPHEN B ALL

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (T ARANTO , M AYER , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 6 , 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
David RAPOPORT, Petitioner, v. Robert GILMORE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al.

No. 19-7146

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1 

 

 
|   | **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** |  
 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 
 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 
 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, James L. Holbrook, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ James L. Holbrook, Jr.

 

 

 

James L. Holbrook, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

Dated: August 22, 2006

 

 

 

  |
|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 11

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 188
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 
Page 6 

P-CSCF I-CSCF HSS 

1. Register

2. Register

3. Cx-Query/Cx-Select-Pull

UE 

Visited Network Home Netwo

4. Cx-Query Resp/Cx-Select-

7. Cx

5. Register

9. 200 OK

10. 200 OK

11. 200 OK

6. Cx

Figure 5.1: Registration – User not registe

1. After the UE has obtained IP connectivity, it can perform the 

the UE sends the Register information flow to the proxy (PubUser Identity, home network domain name, UE IP address, InSupport Indication). 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 
Page 10 

[7f] identifying a particular protocol specific registration process from a number of protocol specific registration processes; 

The interoperability node identifies a particular protocol specific renumber of protocol specific registration processes. As discussed in [7d] above, the protocol specific registration procesaccess that the station has. “3.2.1 VoLTE UE Attachment and IMS Registration 3.2.1.1 General A VoLTE UE, under LTE coverage, shall automatically perform an IMS registration for VoLTE, if the network supports VoLTE (for fuconditions for IMS registration see section 2.2.1 of GSMA IR.92 [5VoLTE UE shall be available for VoLTE services (i.e. incoming casupplementary services), similar to the voice experience in today's C

Source: https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads

Service-Description-and-Implementation-Guidelines-Version-2.0.p“3.2.1.3 Detailed Description VoLTE UE Attach .... The MME sends an Attach Accept to the eNodeB with the IMS-AP

QoS parameters, PCO, IMS Voice over PS supported indication, TAcontainer, etc. The eNodeB communicates with the UE to update thincludes the information received from the core network as part of tThe UE sends the Attach Complete message to the eNodeB, which this time, the UE is capable of sending uplink packets. The MME inRequest to the SGW including the EPS Bearer Identity, eNodeB adThe SGW acknowledges the request to the MME and is capable of At this stage, the VoLTE UE is attached to the network via a defaulfor IMS Signalling.” Source: https://www.gsma.com/futurenetworks/wp-content/uploads

Service-Description-and-Implementation-Guidelines-Version-2.0.p

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-12 Filed 09/27/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:
Darryl JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Anthony D. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. Bonita HOFFNER, Warden.

No. 18-8132

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Back to Contents

Exhibit 32.1


Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”)
  hereby certifies, based on such officer's knowledge, that:


| | (i)  | the accompanying
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the period ended June
        30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                                                        
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is
      not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.


|Date:March
    16, 2006 |  | /s/ | Matthew H. Knight      
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|                        |  |     |                        
|                        |  |     | Matthew H. Knight      
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |     |                        

27

---
MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Petitioners v. Elizabeth DEAL, et al.

No. 18-1487

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Willie Frank WRIGHT, Jr., petitioner, v. Shawn CARTER, aka Jay-Z, et al.

No. 18-6125.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's unaudited consolidated financial statements for the nine month
period ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
those financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           5,497,252
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,563,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,513,383
<PP&E>                                           1,566,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                     855,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,400,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,579,309
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          7,348
<COMMON>                                            78,377
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,314,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,400,708
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,187,690
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,472,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,017,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,017,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,017,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.82)


</TABLE>
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 8 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 335
Alan STRATTAN, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7440

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

*1243Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Carol M. KAM, Petitioner v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, et al.

No. 19-31

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


The  undersigned  officer  hereby  certifies  that,  to his  knowledge,  (1) the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Productivity Technologies Corp. for the quarter
ended  December  31,  2004 as to which this  Certification  is an exhibit  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 (15  U.S.C.  78m(a)  or  78o(d))  and (2) the  information
contained  in  such  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial  condition  and results of  operations  of  Productivity  Technologies
Corp..


Date: February 18, 2005


/s/ Samuel N. Seidman
---------------------
Samuel N. Seidman,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
IN RE Adrean FRANCIS, Petitioner

No. 19-7420

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Integrated Preclinical/Clinical AIDS 
Vaccine Development Program (IPCAVD) (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: June 30, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G34, Rockville, 
MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Vishakha Sharma, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of 
Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G34, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-
7036, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37415e445f565c5f5619445f56455a5677595e5f19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66100f150e070d0e0748150e07140b0726080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, 
Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and 
Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 26, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11798 Filed 6-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40756 c/w 00-40830 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANTOS CEJA-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. L-00-CR-127-1 &

L-00-CR-26-1 00-CR-26-ALL

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * In this consolidated appeal, Santos Ceja-Campos appeals his guilty-plea convictions and sentences for attempted illegal reentry following deportation and possession with the intent to distribute marijuana. Ceja-Campos first argues that a prior felony conviction is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 that must bealleged in the indictment rather than a sentencing factor. CejaCampos acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by theNo. 00-40756 c/w 00-40830 -2- Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Ceja-Campos also challenges the 16-level increase to his base offense level for attempted illegal reentry pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Ceja-Campos’s argument that his Texas conviction for possession of cocaine does not qualify as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). Ceja-Campos argues that this issue is not foreclosed by Hinojosa-Lopez because he raises it as a rule-of-lenity argument. “The rule of lenity . . . applies only when, after consulting traditional canons of statutory construction, [a court is] left with an ambiguous
statute.” United States v. Shabani , 513 U.S. 10, 17 (1994) (emphasis added). It follows from our decision in Hinojosa-Lopez that the term “aggravated felony” is not so ambiguous as to require an application of the rule of lenity. See HinojosaLopez , 130 F.3d at 693-94. Ceja-Campos does not assign any error to his guilty-pleaconviction and sentence stemming from the possession-with-intentto-distribute charge. Thus, he has abandoned any challenge to his conviction and sentence for possession with intent toNo. 00-40756 c/w 00-40830 -3- distribute marijuana. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Michael BAZAN, Petitioner, v. Robert WHITFIELD, et al.

No. 18-9102

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Orane NELSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6264

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.