alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

8/28/23

Eastern District of Texas

IMPLICIT, LLC

4:23-cv-770

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP., CAPITAL ONE,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

c/o its Registered Agent

Corporation Service Company

251 Little Falls Drive

Wilmington, DE 19808

James M. Lennon

Devlin Law Firm LLC

1526 Gilpin Avenue, Wilmington, Delaware 19806

Telephone: (302) 449-9010

jlennon@devlinlawfirm.com

Case 4:23-cv-00770-SDJ Document 5 Filed 08/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 76
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-770

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00770-SDJ Document 5 Filed 08/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 77
Michael Allen CHANNEL, Sr., Petitioner, v. David SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6919

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
SOON YOUNG KIM, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6168.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to
     U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carl Spana, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  November 14, 2003 | /s/ Carl SpanaCarl SpanaPresident and Chief Executive
     Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian E. HARRISS, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 19-954

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glas-Aire  Industries Group,
Ltd.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2006 (the
"Report")  I, Linda  Kwan,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 18,2006


\s\ Linda Kwan
-----------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ALTONIO DEMARCUS BROWN (1)

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00190 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Altonio Demarcus 

Brown GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1) - Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cr-00190-ALM-AGD Document 69 Filed 10/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 150
Case 4:23-cr-00190-ALM-AGD Document 69 Filed 10/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 151
Aaron Jonathon ZEMKE, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-6704.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132847 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132847 COA: 270220 Wayne CC: 01-010433-01 ROBERT SIMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2015
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 14, 2016

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Chief Financial Officer
Randy Lee CARNEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1476

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
SPORTSWEAR, INC., dba Prep Sportswear, petitioner, v. SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN, INC.

No. 17-1316.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### MINNEAPOLIS THRESHING MACHINE COMPANY v. FRIEDRICH PETERS and Another.1

May 7, 1909.

Nos. 16,115—(88).

Action in the district court for Swift county to recover $500 upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Qvale, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*John I. Davis*and *Thomas E. Davis,*for appellant.

*Young & MeElligott,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 120 N. W. 1134.

Peb Curiam.

Plaintiff and respondent brought action against defendant and appellant to recover on a promissory note. The defense interposed and submitted to the jury was that plaintiff’s agent, Curtiss, had induced defendant to sign a note by fraud. The jury returned a verdict for defendant. The court granted a new trial because of the insufficiency of the evidence. The briefs of counsel suggest that the issue was erroneously limited to fraud. The assignments of error, however, present as the only question, whether the court abused its discretion in granting a new trial upon the evidence which the record presents. That record discloses a controversy between the two defendants on the one side, and the agent of plaintiff, Curtiss, on the other side. The ease is of a type frequently presented. The record discloses no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.
Ashley OWENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6995.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/16/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      356,401
COMMITMENTS
  97,135  128,731   78,883  159,741  123,939  335,759  331,553   20,642   24,848

CHANGES FROM 07/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,474)
  -2,803    9,228    4,347   24,704    9,898   26,248   23,473   -5,774   -2,999

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.3     36.1     22.1     44.8     34.8     94.2     93.0      5.8      7.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      166)
      45       76       75       33       35      126      144
```

----

Updated July 19, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

ANDRE’A D. JOHNSON §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-143

USP BEAUMONT, et al., §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff, Andre’a D. Johnson, an inmate currently confined at USP Beaumont in Beaumont,

Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this Bivens-type action1 against Defendants USP Beaumont, USP

Beaumont Medical Dept., I Benitez, FNU Hernandez, and FNU Carson. 

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the LocalRules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case. 

Discussion

Venue in a Bivens-type action is determined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). When, as in

this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides

that venue is proper only in the judicial district where all the defendants reside or in which a

substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. Venue is proper in the

Eastern District of Texas. 

Plaintiff’s complaint, however, pertains to incidents that occurred during his confinement

at USP Beaumont, located in the Beaumont Division of the Eastern District of Texas. A district

1

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Case 9:23-cv-00143-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 10
court has the authority to transfer a case in the interest of justice to another district or division in

which the action might have been brought. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404, 1406. USP Beaumont is located

in Jefferson County, Texas which lies within the jurisdiction of the Beaumont Division of the

Eastern District of Texas. Therefore, in the interest of justice, and for the convenience of the parties

and witnesses, all claims against the defendants should be transferred to the Beaumont Division of

the Eastern District of Texas. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 30th day of August, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00143-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 08/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11
EXHIBIT 99.7












CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fabiana Chubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









March 27, 2015                      /s/ Fabiana Chubbs


Fabiana Chubbs


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eldorado Gold Corporation and will be retained by Eldorado Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 460 

Designating the week of May 20 through May 26, 2012, as ‘‘National Public 

Works Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2012 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mr. INHOFE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of May 20 through May 26, 2012, 

as ‘‘National Public Works Week’’. 

Whereas public works infrastructure, facilities, and services 

are of vital importance to the health, safety, and wellbeing of the people of the United States; 

Whereas the public works infrastructure, facilities, and services could not be provided without the dedicated efforts 

of public works professionals, including engineers and administrators, who represent State and local governments 

throughout the United States; 

Whereas public works professionals design, build, operate, 

and maintain the transportation systems, water infrastructure, sewage and refuse disposal systems, public 

buildings, and other structures and facilities that are 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 460 ATS 

vital to the people and communities of the United States; 

and 

Whereas understanding the role that public infrastructure 

plays in protecting the environment, improving public 

health and safety, contributing to economic vitality, and 

enhancing the quality of life of every community of the 

United States is in the interest of the people of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week of May 20 through May 

3 26, 2012, as ‘‘National Public Works Week’’; 

4 (2) recognizes and celebrates the important 

5 contributions that public works professionals make 

6 every day to improve— 

7 (A) the public infrastructure of the United 

8 States; and 

9 (B) the communities that public works 

10 professionals serve; and 

11 (3) urges individuals and communities through12 out the United States to join with representatives of 

13 the Federal Government and the American Public 

14 Works Association in activities and ceremonies that 

15 are designed— 

16 (A) to pay tribute to the public works pro17 fessionals of the United States; and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•SRES 460 ATS 

1 (B) to recognize the substantial contribu2 tions that public works professionals make to 

3 the United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Thomas P. Maun,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 
| Dated:  May 7, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Thomas P. Maun                                               |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Thomas P. Maun  Chief Financial Officer Chief Accounting Officer |

----