alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1606990868

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE HOME DEPOT, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WALMART INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00418-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE 

Defendants Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, The Home Depot, Inc. and Home 

Depot U.S.A., Inc. hereby notify the Court that they have served their Invalidity Contentions 

pursuant to P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 and pursuant to the Court’s Order (ECF No. 18) on counsel for the 

Plaintiff via electronic mail on January 29, 2024.

Dated: January 30, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Kathryn R. Grasso 

Kathryn Riley Grasso (pro hac vice) 

Henry R. Fildes (pro hac vice) 

DLA Piper LLP (US) 

500 Eighth Street NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Tel: (202) 799-4000 

Fax: (202) 799-5000 

Kathryn.Riley@us.dlapiper.com 

Henry.Fildes@us.dlapiper.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 467
2 

1606990868

Clayton Thompson (pro hac vice) 

DLA Piper LLP (US) 

1201 W. Peachtree St. NW, Suite 2900 

Atlanta, GA 30309-3800 

Tel: (404) 736-7800 

Fax: (4040 682-7800 

Clayton.thompson@us.dlapiper.com 

Benjamin Yaghoubian (pro hac vice) 

Tessa Duxbury (pro hac vice) 

DLA Piper LLP (US) 

2000 Avenue of the Stars 

Ste. 400, N. Tower 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

Tel: (310) 595-3160 

Fax: (310) 595-3360 

Benjamin.Yaghoubian@us.dlapiper.com 

Tessa.duxbury@us.dlapiper.com 

Eric H. Findlay 

State Bar No. 00789886 

Brian Craft 

State Bar No. 04972020 

Findlay Craft, P.C. 

7270 Crosswater Avenue, Suite b 

Tyler, TX 75703 

Tel: (903) 534-1100 

Fax: (903) 534-1137 

bcraft@findlaycraft.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

WALMART INC. AND WAL-MART 

STORES TEXAS, LLC 

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 468
3 

1606990868

By: /s/ Nicholas G. Papastavros 

Nicholas G. Papastavros 

Safraz W. Ishmael 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

33 Arch Street, 26th Floor 

Boston, MA 02110-1447 

Telephone: 617.406.6000 

Facsimile: 617.406.6119 

nick.papastavros@dlapiper.com 

safraz.ishmael@us.dlapiper.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS THE 

HOME DEPOT, INC. AND HOME 

DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 01/30/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 469
4 

1606990868

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 30th day of January 2024 with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail on this same date. 

/s/ Kathryn Riley Grasso 

Kathryn Riley Grasso 

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 01/30/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 470
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
NN, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.









Date:  April
      14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ James
      H. DortonJames
      H. DortonVice
      President – Corporate Development and Chief Financial
    Officer








[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NN, Inc. and will be retained by NN, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Michael HELMS, Petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 19-6804

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until March 16, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
IN RE Michael Dewayne SEIBERT, Petitioner.

No. 19-7564.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 4.38

 

SHARE TRANSFER AGREEMENT

 

This SHARE TRANSFER AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) is executed on December 26, 2011 in Shanghai by and between the following Parties:

 

Transferor:  Yin Hao (hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)

Address: Department of Computer Science and Technology, No. 1 Tsinghua Park, Haidian District, Beijing

I.D. Number: 420111197410107375

 

Transferee: Mei Xiuli (hereinafter referred to as “Party B”)

Address: Room 601, No. 6 Lane 1564, Linfen Road, Zhabei District, Shanghai

I.D. Number: 330622197003080026

 

The registered capital of Shanghai JNet Telecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Target Company”) is RMB1,000,000.  Based on friendly negotiations, the Parties agreed on the following terms in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.

 

1.                                  Party A agrees to transfer 1% of the equity interests of the Target Company owned by Party A to Party B free of charge, which represents 1% of the total equity interests of the Target Company.

 

2.                                  After this transfer of equity interests, Party B shall own 1% equity interests of the Target Company.

 

3.                                  Other rights attached to the transferred equity interests shall be transferred together with such equity interests.

 

4.                                  This Agreement is executed in three copies. Each of the Parties shall hold one copy, and the Target Company shall hold one copy for the handling of relevant procedures.

 

5.                                  This Agreement shall become effective upon execution.

 

 

	
Transferor:
    	
 
    	
Transferee:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Yin Hao
    	
 
    	
Mei Xiuli
    
	
/s/ Yin Hao
    	
 
    	
/s/ Mei Xiuli
    


 

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

 Defendant. 

ERICSSON INC., 

 Intervenor. 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

OF INTERVENOR ERICSSON INC.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, the undersigned counsel for Intervenor 

Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”) certify that: 

1. Ericsson Inc. is a Delaware corporation that is wholly-owned by Ericsson Holding 

II Inc., which is also a Delaware corporation. Ericsson Holding II Inc. is wholly-owned by 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. 

2. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“LME”) is publicly held and has no parent 

corporation. LME has Class A and Class B shares that are listed on Nasdaq Stockholm in Sweden. 

In the United States, the Class B shares are listed on NASDAQ New York in the form of American 

Depositary Shares (ADS) evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADR). Each ADS 

represents one Class B share. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of LME’s stock, 

which comprises Class A and Class B shares. However, as of 31 December 2022, Investor AB 

and AB Industrivärden each own shares in LME representing 10% or more of the voting rights. 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 785
 2 

Dated: December 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553) 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 

821 ESE Loop 323 

Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: 903.705.1117 

Facsimile: 903.581.2543 

Email: ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Email: msyungwirth@duanemorris.com 

John R. Gibson 

Email: jrgibson@duanemorris.com 

Alice E. Snedeker 

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 253-6900 

Counsel for Intervenor Ericsson Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 12, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 786
Annette SHANDS, Petitioner, v. LAKELAND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 19-817

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Matthew DERYAN, Petitioner, v. EAST VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 18-9229

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
EXHIBIT 10.22

DOMINION HOMES, INC.

2007 Director Compensation Plan



|1. | Director Fees (paid quarterly in advance)*
|-- | ------------------------------------------



| | (a) | $40,000 annual fee for each outside director ($10,000 per quarter)
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | Additional $5,000 annual fee ($1,250 per quarter) for:
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | each Audit Committee member (other than Audit Committee Chair)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | the Compensation Committee Chair, and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------

| |  |  | the Governance Committee Chair
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| | (c) | Additional $10,000 annual fee for the Audit Committee Chair ($2,500 per quarter)
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Annual award of options to purchase 2,500 common shares of the Company (non-qualified).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Reimbursement of expenses incurred in personal financial planning of up to $7,500 in any calendar year.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Participation in Executive Deferred Compensation Plan  allows directors to defer receipt of their director fees and receive a matching contribution of 25% with respect to
those fees, not to exceed $2,500 in any year.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|* | Directors receive 50% of their director and committee fees otherwise payable to them in common shares of the Company under the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Equity Plan, and may
elect to receive up to 100% of their director and committee fees in common shares.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. HARRINGTON, petitioner, v. Thomas WINN, Warden.

No. 17-8961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of CIBER, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, David C. Peterschmidt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 25, 2011

 

 
| By                      | /s/   David C. Peterschmidt |   |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
| David C. Peterschmidt   |                        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |                        |   |

 

----
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Jacqueline CARR.

No. D-3066

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Jacqueline Carr, of Slidell, Louisiana, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
## Board Certified in Criminal and Criminal Appellate Law

By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization

www.TheJacksonLawFirm.org | (903) 595

- 6070

PO Box 8355 , Tyler, TX 75711The Jackson Law Firm, PLLC

January 22, 2018

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St Ste 354

Tyler TX 75702

- 7854

Re: Juan Salinas, III

12

- 17

- 00239

- CR

To The Honorable Clerk of the Court:

Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding his right to file a PDR

along with a copy of the certified return receipt showing the mailing of the same.

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson ACCEPTED

12-17-00239-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/22/2018 1:34 PM

Pam Estes

CLERK

## Board Certified in Criminal and Criminal Appellate Law

By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization

www.TheJacksonLawFirm.org | (903) 595

- 6070

PO Box 8355, Tyler, TX 75711The Jackson Law Firm, PLLC

January 22, 2018

Juan Salinas, III

Inmate 02145798

Bradshaw Unit

PO box 9000

Henderson

, TX 75653

Re: Opinion

Mr. Salinas :

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in your case. The

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file

your petition prior to the expiration of thirty day s from the date of the court’s opinion.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me

know.

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, Petitioner, v. Xavier BECERRA, Attorney General of California.

No. 19-255

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Dalton CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Patrick Jackson, aka Patrick Jones, Petitioner, v. United States;

Joseph Kemmerling, Petitioner, v. United States;

DeMarcus Rogers, Petitioner, v. United States;

Owen Lewis Finch, Petitioner, v. United States;

Teddy Norris, Petitioner, v. United States;

Marcus Mann, Petitioner, v. United States;

Jermel Franklin Williams, Petitioner, v. United States;

Kevous Ramon McKinney, Petitioner, v. United States;

Larry Eugene Ammons, Petitioner, v. United States;

Michael R. Lemons, Petitioner, v. United States;

Michael Roberts, Petitioner, v. United States;

Darryl Merriweather, Petitioner, v. United States;

Richard Hughes, Petitioner, v. United States;

Azavius Shondale Justice, Petitioner, v. United States;

Keith Keglar, Petitioner, v. United States;

Timothy Wayne Bohannon, Petitioner, v. United States;

Leo Bearden, Petitioner, v. United States;

Michael Dewayne Cox, Petitioner, v. United States;

Wilson Jones, Petitioner, v. United States; and

Dereck Dawson, Petitioner, v. United States.

No. 19-7313

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

*1234Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

RICHARD DAVID PETERSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

GREGG COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-471-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Richard David Peterson, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights 

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge John D. Love for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and 

recommendations for disposition. 

On October 31, 2023, Judge Love issued a Report recommending that the Court 

dismiss this case with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted. Docket No. 8. Even with the benefit of an extension to file objections, no 

objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:23-cv-00471-JDK-JDL Document 9 Filed 01/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 60
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff has not filed objections. The Court therefore reviews the 

Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews the legal 

conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. 

Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding 

that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review 

is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 8) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to 

state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17th January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00471-JDK-JDL Document 9 Filed 01/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 61
Danny R. MEEKS, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al.

No. 18-6440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
General P. HAYMON, Petitioner, v. Michael JOHNSON.

No. 19-7142.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, Appellate Division denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30277 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. TYRE JERMAINE WILLIAMS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-20099-2 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tyre Jermaine Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Williams has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Jaime Rene LOPEZ-VAAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EX-10.4



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 DIRECTORS FEES 
 PLAN FOR PAYMENT OF FEES IN DCB FINANCIAL CORP COMMON STOCK

 It is the desire of the Boards of both DCB Financial Corp (DCBF) and The Delaware County Bank and Trust Company to receive shares of DCBF
common stock in payment of Director fees owed to the Directors. In order to accomplish this, the members of each Board desire to institute a plan that would have the same effect as a 10b5-1 trading plan by creating a safe harbor or affirmative
defense for Directors who receive shares of DCBF stock in payment of Directors fees. The plan is not intended to be utilized for any other purchase or sale of shares by Directors, and is solely for the purpose of paying Directors fees in stock of
DCBF. 
 PROCEDURE 

Management of DCB&T will keep records of all meetings attended by Directors during a calendar quarter. On the first business day following the end of
each quarter, Management shall determine the amount owed to each Director, and the Directors hereby instruct Management to deliver the necessary funds to Sweney Cartwright and Co., 17 South High St., Columbus, OH 43215, (or such other business
address of the company), which shall be authorized to purchase whole shares of stock on the open market at market price on the first business day following the end of each calendar quarter. No Director or any member of Management shall attempt to
exercise any subsequent authority, influence or control over any purchases of shares contemplated under this plan. The shares of stock shall be registered in the Directors name, and delivered to the Director. The value of any fractional shares shall
be paid to the Directors in cash. 
 Prior to the initial purchase of the shares under this plan for each Director, the Director shall have the
option to instruct Management in writing to register the shares in the name of the Director and/or other persons or entities for the purpose of estate planning, or to deliver the shares electronically to an account in the name of the Director.
Management shall continue to register the shares as instructed until it receives a written notice from the Director to change the registration for future purchases of shares. 
 Each Director acknowledges and understands that this plan will remain in full force and effect for a period of one year, or until altered, amended, or discontinued by the Board, and that no such
alteration, amendment, or discontinuance may be effected during the time that the Directors are subject to a blackout. The Board will review this plan each year beginning in June of 2012. 
 Management is authorized to begin the payment of Directors’ fees earned for the third quarter 2011, in shares of DCBF stock in accordance with this plan.
Steven D. BURKE, petitioner, v. Neil TURNER, Warden.

No. 18-6493.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.