alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 6:23-cv-00377

Matthew Wayne Britt,

Plaintiff,

v.

Gregg County Sheriff Office,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Matthew Wayne Britt, proceeding pro se, filed this civil 

rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while he was an inmate of the 

Gregg County Jail. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On November 9, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure 

to comply with the court’s order to pay an initial, partial filing fee. 

Doc. 9. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, but it was returned as undeliverable, indicating that plaintiff is no longer in the 

jail. Doc. 10. Plaintiff did not file written objections and has not notified the court of his new address.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

So ordered by the court on December 20, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00377-JCB-KNM Document 11 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 48
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

BORIS DANIEL DE LEON-LOPEZ

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00088

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance 

with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant is adjudged guilty 

as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) -

Reentry of a Deported Alien.

Case 4:23-cr-00088-ALM-AGD Document 24 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 42
Case 4:23-cr-00088-ALM-AGD Document 24 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 43
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Earl King

No. 06

- 17

- 00171

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss,

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition

.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 15, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, William Dean Singleton, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group,Inc.;  2. Based an my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure matmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:March 27, 2008       /S/ William Dean Singleton        William Dean Singleton    Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
JONNA CORPORATION, dba Premier Recycling Company, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA

No. 19-65

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

##  

## **CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

##  

## I,Roger E. Gower, certify that:

##  

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation.

 

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: November 5, 2004 | By:                                   |  /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    | Roger E. Gower                        |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11863]



[[Page 33706]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-42-2022]


Approval of Subzone Status, Sandvik Mining and Construction 
Logistics Limited, Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania

    On March 28, 2022, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Eastern 
Distribution Center, Inc., grantee of FTZ 24, requesting subzone status 
subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 24, on behalf of 
Sandvik Mining and Construction Logistics Limited, in Clarks Summit, 
Pennsylvania.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (87 FR 19474-19475, April 4, 2022). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish 
Subzone 24G was approved on May 26, 2022, subject to the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject 
to FTZ 24's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: May 26, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11863 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries



|                                                          |  |             
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                                                      |  | Jurisdiction
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes Financial Services, Ltd.                   |  | Ohio        
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Structural Warranty Company, LLC                 |  | Ohio        
|                                                          | 
|Resolution Property Company, LLC                          |  | Ohio        
|                                                          | 
|Alliance Title Agency of Kentucky, LLC                    |  | Kentucky    
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes of Kentucky, Ltd. (d/b/a Dominion Homes) |  | Kentucky    
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC                        |  | Kentucky    
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes Realty, LLC                                |  | Kentucky    

All listed subsidiaries are wholly-owned, except for Dominion Homes of Kentucky, Ltd.
(DHK). DHK is a Kentucky limited liability partnership whose general partner is Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC and whose limited partner is Dominion Homes, Inc. DHK is 99% owned by Dominion Homes, Inc. and 1% owned by Dominion Homes
of Kentucky GP, LLC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,719
<PP&E>                                       1,173,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,158,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,982
<BONDS>                                        310,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    211,328 
<COMMON>                                           335
<OTHER-SE>                                     734,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,158,269
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,527
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,183
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00449-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Lenovo Group Limited’s (“LGL”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 

No. 18). Having considered LGL’s Motion, the Court holds that the Motion to Dismiss should be 

and is hereby DENIED.

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 23-8 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 751
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2297 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2297

            To suspend temporarily the duty on ferroniobium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1999

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on ferroniobium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON FERRONIOBIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.72.02    Ferroniobium      Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     (provided for                                                           31/2002          ''
                     in subheading                                                                             .
                     7202.93.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 6:23-cv-00486

Rickey L. McGee,

Plaintiff,

v.

FNU Mitchell et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Rickey L. McGee, an inmate of the Texas Department 

of Criminal Justice proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this

civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 

On June 10, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 21)

be granted and this case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Doc. 25. Plaintiff filed a written objection to the 

report. Doc. 28.

The court reviews the objected-to portions of a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended 

dismissal because defendants submitted evidence of plaintiff’s grievance history that established that he did not exhaust his administrative remedies about the alleged incidents underlying his lawsuit. 

Doc. 21-1. In his objection, plaintiff simply repeats his allegations 

that a grievance coordinator thwarted his efforts to exhaust by destroying or mishandling grievances he submitted on or about July 7, 

2023. Doc. 28. But plaintiff presents no evidence or facts to support 

this conclusory allegation, which is contradicted by the record showing that his claims were carefully documented, investigated, and processed. Doc. 21-1. No reasonable factfinder could conclude based on 

Case 6:23-cv-00486-JCB-JDL Document 33 Filed 07/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 246
- 2 -

the record before the court that plaintiff exhausted all administrative 

remedies on his claims. 

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report de novo, and being satisfied that it contains no error, the court overrules plaintiff’s 

objections and accepts the report’s findings and recommendation. 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 21), which applies 

equally to all moving and non-moving defendants, is granted. This 

case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

So ordered by the court on July 18, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00486-JCB-JDL Document 33 Filed 07/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 247
Exhibit 18.1

          May 14, 1999



          Board of Directors
          Associated Estates Realty Corporation
          5025 Swetland Court
          Richmond Heights, Ohio 44143-1467

          Dear Directors:

          We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit
          to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

          We have been provided a copy of the Company's Quarterly Report on
          Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1999.  Note No. 12
          therein describes a change in accounting principle for a change
          in the method of capitalizing certain expenditures, which have
          previously been expensed.  It should be understood that the
          preferability of capitalizing these expenditures which were
          previously expensed has not been addressed in any authoritative
          accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we
          have relied on management's determination that this change in
          accounting principle is preferable.  Based on our reading of
          management's stated reasons and justification for this change in
          accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with
          management as to their judgment about the relevant business
          planning factors relating to the change, we concur with
          management that such change represents, in the Company's
          circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle
          in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

          We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of
          any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 1998. 
          Accordingly, our comments are subject to change upon completion
          of an audit of the financial statements covering the period of
          the accounting change.

          Very truly yours,



          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
David HOLLENBACK, Jr., petitioner, v. Michael CLARK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Albion, et al.

No. 18-6631.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/10/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       43,139
COMMITMENTS
   1,296    1,497        0   37,766   39,413   39,062   40,910    4,077    2,229

CHANGES FROM 01/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,278)
    -563      624        0    1,465      430      902    1,054      376      224

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.0      3.5      0.0     87.5     91.4     90.5     94.8      9.5      5.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       2        4        0       25       31       27       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/10/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       66,618
COMMITMENTS
   5,924   20,692      240   54,729   43,707   60,893   64,639    5,725    1,979

CHANGES FROM 01/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        181)
     571     -558        0     -569      717        2      159      179       22

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.9     31.1      0.4     82.2     65.6     91.4     97.0      8.6      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       71)
       9        6        1       36       28       45       35
```

----

Updated January 13, 2012
Rodney B. BENSON, Petitioner v. UTAH LABOR COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-9802

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.