alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COLLISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Plaintiffs,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00594-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO 

SERVE L. R. 3-1 AND 3-2 PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND 

FOR DEFENDANT TO SERVE L.R. 3.3 AND 3.4 PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY 

CONTENTIONS AND COMPLY WITH STANDING ORDER REGARDING SUBJECTMATTERELIGIBILITY CONTENTIONS

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to extend the time within which (1) Plaintiff 

is required to serve L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 Preliminary Infringement Contentions; and (2) Defendant is

required to serve L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Comply With Standing 

Order Regarding Subject Matter Eligibility Contentions. The following chart sets out the Parties’ 

agreement:

Event Current Deadline Parties’ Agreed Deadline

Plaintiff’s L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 

Preliminary Infringement 

Contentions

July 5, 2024 July 12, 2024

Defendant’s L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 

Preliminary Invalidity 

Contentions

August 29, 2024 September 19, 2024

Comply with Standing Order 

Regarding Subject-Matter 

Eligibility Contentions

August 29, 2024 September 19, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00594-JRG Document 23-1 Filed 07/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 502
Having considered the parties’ joint request, the Court GRANTS the Motion. IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline: (1) for the Plaintiff to serve L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 Preliminary 

Infringement Contentions is July 12, 2024; and (2) for the Defendant to serve L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 

Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Subject Matter Eligibility Contentions is September 19, 

2024

Case 2:23-cv-00594-JRG Document 23-1 Filed 07/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 503
Jerry CARTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7228

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA v. Taiwan SMART.

No. 18-625 (R46-09/OT 2018).

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 5, 2019.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed on February 1, 2019, pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Rick Allen RHOADES, Petitioner v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-9614

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Bryan WHITEHEAD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7242

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# FILED
October 20, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON OC

TOBER 1997 SESSION

RAY DARRIS THOM PSON, ) C.C.A. No. 02C01-9608- CC-00249 Appellant, ) ) Lake County V. ) ) Honorable Joe G . Riley, Jr., Judge ) FRED J. RANEY, WARDEN, ) ) (Habeas Corpus-Rape) Appellee. )

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Mark A. Mesler John Knox Walkup Ballin, Ballin & Fishman, P.C. Attorney General & Reporter 200 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 1250 Memphis, TN 38103 Elizabeth T. Ryan Assistant Attorney Gener al 450 James Robertson Parkwa y Nashville, TN 37243-0493 C. Phillip Bivens District Attorney General P.O. Drawer E Dyersburg, TN 38024

OPINION FILED: ___________________
AFFIRMED
PAUL G. SUMM ERS, Judge

O P I N I O N-2- In May 1975 the appellant, Ray Darris Thompson, was convicted by a jury of rape. He received a sev enty-five year sent

ence. In June of 1996 he filed a petition for writ of habeas c orpus. The trial court di smissed the petition finding that the conviction w

as not void and that the appell ant’s sentence had not expired. He appeals thi s dismissal. Upon rev iew, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The appellan t contends tha t his conviction is void because the tria l judge failed to exercise his du ty as thirteenth juror . He claims that after the jur y found him guilty of rape the tr ial judge approved the v erdict after stating that he disagreed with the j ury’s decision.
We first note that habeas corpus relief is li mited to cases where the judgement is void or t he petitioner’s sentence has expired. Passarella v. State , 891 S.W.2d 619, 626 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). Even if we assume the appellant’s allegations true, his conviction would not be void. If a trial judge fails to exercise his rol e as thirteenth juror, the appellant’s conviction would be voidable and he would be e ntitled to a new trial . Therefore, the appellant fails to allege a cognizabl e claim for habeas corpus reli ef.
Furthermore, the appellant has failed to provide this Co urt with a transcri pt of the proceedings in whi ch the trial judge ex pressed dissatisfaction w ith the jury’s verdict . Without a transcript it is impossi ble for this Court to determi ne the merits of the appellant’s clai m. Tenn. Ct. Crim. App. Rule 10.
Accordingly, w

e find no error of law mandating reversal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.-3- __________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, Ju dge
CONCUR:

__________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

__________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Jud ge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             803
<SECURITIES>                                     3,690
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                       180
<INVENTORY>                                      1,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,980
<PP&E>                                           1,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                     764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         22
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,214
<SALES>                                          5,506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,272
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    460
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 40 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-49 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1503
About

Over a 15 years of marketing & promotions experience in the music industry both in the UK... see more

Activity

Experience & Education

View Melissa’s full profile

See who you know in common

Get introduced

Contact Melissa directly

Melissa Thomas

New York, New York, United States

809 followers · 500+ connections

See your mutual connections

Join to view profile

Sony Music Entertainment

The University of Western Ontario

- Richard Ivey School of Business

Being a working parent is infinitely harder than working without having kids. I look back at

my leadership before being a parent and want to...

Liked by Melissa Thomas

Sony Music Entertainment

View Melissa’s full experience

See their title, tenure and more.

Sign in

or

By clicking Continue, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie

Policy.

Continue with Google

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-49 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1504
EXHIBIT “1” 

Case 6:23-cv-00542-JCB Document 1-1 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

SHUNDA “RENAY” EVERETT,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TARGET STORES, INC. 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

 CIVIL ACTION NO. __________________ 

(State Cause No. 2023-1512-B)

LIST OF PARTIES AND STATUS 

PARTY TYPE NAME OF PARTY CURRENT STATUS 

 

Plaintiff Shunda “Renay” Everett Pending 

Defendant Target Corporation, improperly named Target Stores, Inc. Pending 

Case 6:23-cv-00542-JCB Document 1-1 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 7
David Lee ROBERTS, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-5837.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      186,194
COMMITMENTS
  39,050   31,339   26,716   98,208  100,552  163,974  158,607   22,220   27,587

CHANGES FROM 01/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,030)
    -406    4,891    1,614      869   -3,462    2,077    3,043    1,953      987

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.0     16.8     14.3     52.7     54.0     88.1     85.2     11.9     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      47       43       49       63       72      138      142
```

----

Updated February 8, 2013
# C_2017032EN.01001501.xml

| 1.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/15

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Contracting Entity — Extension of deadline

(2017/C 32/08)

On 16 January 2015 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 19 January 2015.

1

This request is made by Flughafen Wien and concerns activities relating to the exploitation of a geographical area for the purposes of provision of airports or other terminal facilities to carriers by air on the territory of Austria. The relevant notices were published in the OJ C 93, 20.3.2015, p. 22; OJ C 217, 2.7.2015, p. 23; and OJ C 282, 4.8.2016, p. 18.

Pursuant to the fourth subparagraph of paragraph 1 of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU, the deadline may be extended by the Commission with the agreement of those having made the request. Given that the need to obtain and analyse additional information, and with the agreement of the applicant, the period available to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended until 31 January 2017.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents

v.

MICHAEL FORREST,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 440 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2020, the Application for Leave to Amend 

and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ROBERT DEMISON, III, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-177

§

BRYIAN COLLIER, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Robert Demison, III, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, CorrectionalInstitutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine

L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to

applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action

with prejudice as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. To date, the parties have not filed

objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

Case 9:23-cv-00177-MAC-CLS Document 30 Filed 09/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 237
Order entered January 10, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01123 - CR MICHAEL MARSENE WALK ER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12 - 23751 - K



### O RDER The Court GRANTS appellant’s December 30, 2013 motion to supplement the appellate record

. We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record, within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS from the date of this o rder, that contains State’s Exhibit #1

- Probation File. We ORDER appellant to file the brief within FORTY - FIVE (45) DAYS from the date of this order. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Gary FitzSimmons, Dallas County District Cl erk.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, BachThuy T. Vo, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

c) disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweakness in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Dated:    August 10, 2006 | By:                                             | /s/ BachThuy T. Vo |   |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                     | BachThuy T. Vo  Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      146,237
COMMITMENTS
  35,888   28,807   14,548   77,745   78,712  128,182  122,067   18,056   24,170

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,535)
    -438    2,019      999    1,903   -1,979    2,465    1,038       70    1,497

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.5     19.7      9.9     53.2     53.8     87.7     83.5     12.3     16.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      171)
      42       36       36       60       73      125      127
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
Charles BORDEN, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5410

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Martin Anthony NINO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5487.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IV 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 100 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the enactment of the Civil Rights Act 

of 1964. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2014 

Ms. FUDGE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the 

enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL FOR 

4 CEREMONY TO COMMEMORATE THE 50TH AN5 NIVERSARY OF THE ENACTMENT OF THE 

6 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. 

7 The rotunda of the United States Capitol is author8 ized to be used on June 24, 2014, for a ceremony to com9 memorate the 50th anniversary of the enactment of the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 100 IH 

1 Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the significant impact the 

2 Act had on the Civil Rights movement. Physical prepara3 tions for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried out 

4 in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed 

5 by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION—CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John B. Poindexter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.
| Date:  March 30, 2007 | By     |  /s/ John B.  Poindexter              |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                            |   | John B. Poindexter, Chairman of the Board, |
|                            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer      |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part ofthe Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      521,168
COMMITMENTS
  66,454   56,436  132,635  301,221  312,135  500,310  501,206   20,858   19,962

CHANGES FROM 01/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,137)
   2,091    1,575      -92   10,638   12,817   12,637   14,300    2,500      837

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.8     10.8     25.4     57.8     59.9     96.0     96.2      4.0      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      152)
      36       40       57       67       66      136      134
```

----

Updated February 8, 2013