alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
John P. STOKES, et ux., petitioners, v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF MONTANA, INC., et al.

No. 17-8913.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
Rogelio VILLARREAL-ESTEBIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7457

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE, et al., 

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Case No. 6:23-cv-609-JDK

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DEADLINE

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to temporarily suspend deadline to 

answer the complaint “in light of the parties’ forthcoming Rule 26(f) conference and 

Rule 16(b) submission proposing a schedule” for the case. Docket No. 57 at 1. 

Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion. Id.

Accordingly, the Court finds that good cause exists to temporarily suspend 

the deadline for Defendants to answer pending entry of a scheduling order in this 

case. The motion is hereby GRANTED. 

Also before the Court are three motions for leave to file excess pages. Docket 

Nos. 31, 42, 44. The Court hereby GRANTS the motions. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20th May, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 58 Filed 05/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1990
EX-10.5(c)



 Exhibit 10.5(c) 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 TRANSITION AND SUCCESSION AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO TRANSITION AND SUCCESSION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 15th day of October, 2009, by and between Mylan Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and Anthony Mauro (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Transition and Succession Agreement, as amended to date (the
“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, as permitted by Section 13(a) of the Agreement, the Company and Executive desire to
amend the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as
follows: 
 1. The second to last sentence of Section 4(c) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety. For the
avoidance of doubt, such sentence hereby deleted begins “Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding . . .” 
 2. This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 

3. Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.

  

			
	MYLAN INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph F. Haggerty
	Name:	 	Joseph F. Haggerty
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President and General Counsel


  

	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	/s/ Anthony Mauro
	Name: Anthony Mauro
aedcex101.htm










Exhibit 10.1


 





 




  





1











  











  





2











  











  





3











  











  





4











  











  





5











  











  





6











  











  





7











  











  





8











  











  





9











  











  





10











  











  





11











  











  





12











  











  





13











  











  





14











  






 







  





15











  











  





16











  











  





17











  











  





18











  











  





19











  











  





20











  











  





21











  











  





22











  











  





23











  











  





24











  











  





25











  











  





26











  











  





27











  











  





28











  











  





29











  











  





30











  











  





31











  











  





32











  











  





33











  











  





34











  






 







  





35











  










 




  





36











  








 




37
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3576-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-3576-EM), dated December 13, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on May 16, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Leda M. Khoury, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

This action terminates the appointment of Robert A. Haywood as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11905 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Salvatore LEONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jesse MENDEZ, petitioner, v. Gary SWARTHOUT, Warden, et al.

No. 18-6753.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Tony Lee HORTON, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-8930.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
# FILED February 20, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE WILLIAM JEFFREY TARKINGTON, ) Davidson Circuit ) No. 96D-1512 Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) VS. ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9706-CV-00270 REBECCA JUANITA TARKINGTON, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )



## O R D E R Theappellant has filed a respectful petition to rehear which has been duly considered and is respectfully denied. ENTER ________________

___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDL E SECTION

___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

___________________________________ WILLIA M C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF STATE et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-00609 (JDK) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Having considered Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Extend Document Production 

Deadline and Related Deadlines, the Court determines that good cause exists for Defendants’ request. 

It is: 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED; and 

ORDERED that the following deadlines shall apply in this litigation and shall supersede the 

corresponding deadlines identified in the Court’s June 13, 2024 Preliminary Injunction Scheduling 

Order: 

October 21, 2024 All documents and privilege logs from Expedited RFPs 

Produced. 

October 31, 2024 Plaintiffs provide Defendants notice of intent to seek depositions 

or additional third-party subpoenas for preliminary injunction. 

November 7, 2024 Deadline to file any motions concerning Plaintiffs’ notice of intent 

to seek depositions or additional third-party subpoenas for 

preliminary injunction. 

Lead counsel for each party must meet and confer as required by 

Local Rule CV-7(h) either in person or by telephone before 

filing any motions. 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 79-2 Filed 09/16/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2220
2 

November 12, 2024 Deadline for responses to any motions concerning Plaintiffs’ notice 

of intent to seek depositions or additional third-party subpoenas 

for preliminary injunction. 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 79-2 Filed 09/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2221
No. 6:23-cv-00559

Bryan Scott Cavett,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bobby Lumpkin et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Bryan Scott Cavett, a prisoner of the Texas Department 

of Criminal Justice, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed 

this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 3. 

On November 20, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) 

and 1915(e)(2). Doc. 5. Plaintiff filed written objections. Doc. 15.

The court reviews the objected-to portions of a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended 

dismissal because plaintiff’s complaint concerns the loss of his personal property, which cannot establish any violation of plaintiff’s 

federal rights in light of the adequate state remedy available to him. 

Doc. 5. 

Plaintiff objects that the magistrate judge was “erroneous” and 

“overzealous” in recommending dismissal without first permitting 

him to amend his complaint or supplement it in a hearing or questionnaire responses. He repeats the magistrate judge’s explanation 

that these procedural steps are unnecessary when it is clear that 

plaintiff’s claim would remain frivolous. And he acknowledges that 

a prisoner’s loss of property does not create a federal claim where, 

Case 6:23-cv-00559-JCB-KNM Document 16 Filed 01/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
- 2 -

as in Texas, there is an adequate remedy in state law. Doc. 15 at 2–3. 

But he does not assert any facts or law that would save his claim from 

the scope of that law. His assertion that the state has not “tried to 

offer any type of settlement agreement for his loss,” Doc. 15 at 3, 

does not establish that the state remedies are inadequate, for the reasons explained by the magistrate judge. Doc. 5 at 4–5.

Moreover, the court has reviewed the amended complaint submitted by plaintiff after entry of the report. Doc. 12. It simply rehashes the loss of his property. For the same reasons explained in the 

report, that claim fails as a matter of law. Any further amendment in 

this case would be futile. Plaintiff fails to state a claim for which relief 

can be granted in either pleading.

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report de novo, and being satisfied that it contains no error, the court overrules plaintiff’s 

objection and accepts the report’s findings and recommendation. 

This case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon 

which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b) and 

1915(e)(2).

So ordered by the court on January 12, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00559-JCB-KNM Document 16 Filed 01/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
Robert RICKS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5614

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROADCOM, INC., 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 5-23-cv-00134 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

CAME ON CONSIDERATION, Defendant CA, Inc. (“CA”)’s Motion to Dismiss First 

Amended Complaint. Having considered the Motion and corresponding briefs and related papers, 

the Motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc.’s claims of pre-suit willful 

infringement and pre-suit indirect infringement are dismissed, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 29-4 Filed 03/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 545
Syed K. RAFI, petitioner, v. YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, et al.

No. 18-5977.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jerry Preston MCNEIL, Petitioner v. OKLAHOMA

No. 18-1575

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma denied.
Freddie L. MORRIS, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-9097.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2230 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2230

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit the 
 inclusion in the adjusted community rate for Medicare+Choice plans of 
   costs that would be unallowable under Medicare principles or the 
                    Federal Acquisition Regulation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit the 
 inclusion in the adjusted community rate for Medicare+Choice plans of 
   costs that would be unallowable under Medicare principles or the 
                    Federal Acquisition Regulation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISALLOWING COSTS THAT ARE UNALLOWABLE UNDER MEDICARE 
              PRINCIPLES OR THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION IN 
              COMPUTING THE ADJUSTED COMMUNITY RATE FOR MEDICARE+CHOICE 
              PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1854(f) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-24(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(5) Exclusion of certain costs in determining adjusted 
        community rate.--In determining the adjusted community rate for 
        an organization, there shall not be included any costs of the 
        organization which would not be allowable costs under cost-
        reimbursement principles applied under this title or under the 
        Federal Acquisition Regulation. Specifically, in carrying out 
        this paragraph, the Secretary shall not permit inclusion of 
        costs of lobbying, political contributions, or communications 
        with plan members to urge them to lobby or to carry out other 
        political activities.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to determinations of adjusted community rates made after June 15, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 430 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 430

 Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the founding of Ducks Unlimited, 
     Incorporated, the achievements of the organization in habitat 
conservation, and the support of the organization for the waterfowling 
                     heritage of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2012

   Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Boozman, Mr. 
 Inhofe, and Mr. Tester) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 75th anniversary of the founding of Ducks Unlimited, 
     Incorporated, the achievements of the organization in habitat 
conservation, and the support of the organization for the waterfowling 
                     heritage of the United States.

Whereas Ducks Unlimited, Incorporated (referred to in this preamble as ``Ducks 
        Unlimited'') was founded in 1937, when the drought-plagued waterfowl 
        populations of North America plunged to unprecedented lows;
Whereas, after decades of commitment to conserving waterfowl habitats, Ducks 
        Unlimited has become the largest private organization for waterfowl and 
        wetlands conservation worldwide and one of the most effective private 
        organizations dedicated to that cause;
Whereas, since the founding of Ducks Unlimited, the organization has conserved 
        and protected more than 4,500,000 acres of waterfowl habitat in the 
        United States and more than 12,600,000 acres of waterfowl habitat in 
        North America;
Whereas Ducks Unlimited has nearly 750,000 members internationally, including 
        550,000 members in the United States;
Whereas, since the founding of Ducks Unlimited, the organization has raised more 
        than $3,400,000,000 for waterfowl conservation and education, leveraging 
        public support to obtain more than half of its contributions from 
        private sources;
Whereas Ducks Unlimited provides support to local projects that are important to 
        waterfowlers in each State of the United States; and
Whereas Ducks Unlimited maintains the vital mission of conserving, restoring, 
        and managing wetlands and associated habitats for the waterfowl of North 
        America, a mission that also benefits other wildlife and people: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the important contributions of 
Ducks Unlimited, Incorporated and its members across the United States 
to the conservation of habitats and the preservation of the waterfowl 
of North America during the past 75 years.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         369,407                 451,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,327,860               2,885,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,644                  18,992
<INVENTORY>                                    269,796                 136,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,506,016               3,726,348
<PP&E>                                      10,046,316               3,467,063
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,969,428)               1,094,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,326,200               7,929,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,763,920               3,213,366
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     7,463,931               6,158,584
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,326,200               7,929,711
<SALES>                                     19,009,645              10,234,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,009,645              10,234,403
<CGS>                                       10,881,556               4,727,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,535,113              10,136,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             532,322                  99,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,525,468)                  98,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (401,762)               (322,566)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,117,125)               (436,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,117,125)               (436,808)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.58)                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)                  (0.14)


</TABLE>
Jennie NICASSIO, Petitioner v. VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.

No. 19-560

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.