alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 587 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 587

    Supporting ``Lights On Afterschool'', a national celebration of 
                         afterschool programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 21), 2012

Mrs. Boxer (for herself, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Whitehouse) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting ``Lights On Afterschool'', a national celebration of 
                         afterschool programs.

Whereas high-quality afterschool programs provide safe, challenging, engaging, 
        and fun learning experiences that help children and youth develop 
        social, emotional, physical, cultural, and academic skills;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs support working families by ensuring 
        that the children in those families are safe and productive after the 
        regular school day ends;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs build stronger communities by 
        involving students, parents, business leaders, and adult volunteers in 
        the lives of children in the United States, thereby promoting positive 
        relationships among children, youth, families, and adults;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, schools, and diverse 
        community partners in advancing the well-being of children in the United 
        States;
Whereas ``Lights On Afterschool'', a national celebration of afterschool 
        programs held on October 18, 2012, highlights the critical importance of 
        high-quality afterschool programs in the lives of children, their 
        families, and their communities;
Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States have parents who work 
        outside the home and approximately 15,100,000 children in the United 
        States have no place to go after school; and
Whereas nearly 2 in 5 afterschool programs report that their budgets are in 
        worse condition today than at the height of the recession in 2008, and 
        more than 3 in 5 afterschool programs report that their level of funding 
        is lower than it was 3 years ago, making it difficult for afterschool 
        programs across the United States to keep their doors open and their 
        lights on: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports ``Lights On Afterschool'', a 
national celebration of afterschool programs held on October 18, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-84726, 33-84728,333-25981, and 333-114019 of Gaming Partners InternationalCorporation (formerly known as Paul-Son Gaming Corporation) and Subsidiaries onForm S-8 and Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-86010of Gaming Partners International Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-3of our report dated March 31, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph on the Gaming PartnersInternational Corporation adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”), appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gaming Partners InternationalCorporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.

DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, NevadaMarch 31, 2005

----
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.,
Appellant

v.

ECHELON FITNESS MULTIMEDIA, LLC,
Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1586

, 20 22

- 1588

______________________
Appeal s from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020

- 01186, IPR2020

- 01187

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding s are D ISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). Case: 22-1586 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 12/02/2022P ELOTON I NTERACTIVE

, I NC

. V

. E CHELON F ITNESS
M ULTIMEDIA

, LLC 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 2, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 2, 2022 Case: 22-1586 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 12/02/2022
No.

-1-

 

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 99-60485 

Summary Calendar

__________________

AMIN AMIR ALI,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,,

 Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A73-188-551

--------------------

April 24, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Amin Amir Ali petitions this court to review an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal

seeking reversal of an order of removal and denying his

applications for political asylum and voluntary departure. We

have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the

BIA’s denial of Ali’s applications for asylum and voluntary 

departure is supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v. INS,

37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994).

The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 1

Redacted in its entirety

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-2 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1816
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-26-2-MAC

'

JARVIS BRATCHETT, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count Three of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jarvis Bratchett, is adjudged 

Case 9:23-cr-00026-MAC-CLS Document 67 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 180
2

guilty as to Count Three of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 2—

Possession or Sale of Stolen Firearm/Aiding and Abetting.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of March, 2024.

Case 9:23-cr-00026-MAC-CLS Document 67 Filed 03/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 181
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.29


                          Amendment to Promissory Note

     Reference is made to the Promissory Note in the principle amount of
$460,000 dated March 27, 2001 (the "Note") of which UroMed Corporation, a
Massachusetts corporation, is the Maker and Philip Heintz is the Payee.

     Clause I (a)(i) of Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows: "the first installment shall be in the amount of $250,000 and shall be
payable on April 29,2002."

     Except as amended hereby, the Note is hereby confirmed in all respects.

     This Amendment may be executed in counterparts.

UROMED CORPORATION d/b/a
ALLIANT Medical Technologies

By: /s/ DMuscatello
    ----------------------------
    Daniel Muscatello, President

Date Signed: March 27, 2002



By: /s/ PHeintz
    ----------------------------
    Philip Heintz

Date Signed: March 26, 2002
Konstantin RUDENKO, Petitioner, v. Raymond SHANLEY, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility.

No. 19-7447.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 448 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist 

Organization of America, Inc. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of Hadassah, the 

Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc. 

Whereas Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of 

America, Inc. (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘Hadassah’’) was established by Henrietta Szold on February 

24, 1912; 

Whereas Hadassah is now the largest Zionist organization for 

Jewish women, with more than 300,000 active members; 

Whereas Hadassah celebrated the 100th anniversary of its 

founding on February 24, 2012; 

Whereas, since its founding, Hadassah has consistently promoted the unity of the Jewish people and worked for the 

betterment of communities in the United States and what 

is now present-day Israel; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 448 IS 

Whereas Hadassah was nominated for the 2005 Nobel Peace 

Prize for its ongoing initiatives to use medicine as a 

bridge to peace; 

Whereas Hadassah conducts a wide variety of training programs for medical personnel and students throughout the 

world; 

Whereas, in Israel, Hadassah initiates and supports pace-setting health care, education, and youth institutions; 

Whereas the world-class Hadassah Medical Organization in 

Israel is renowned for cutting-edge medical research; 

Whereas the Hadassah Medical Organization is constructing 

the Sarah Wetsman Davidson Hospital Tower at Hadassah Medical Center as a gift to Israel, to be officially 

dedicated at the Hadassah Centennial Convention in October 2012; 

Whereas, in the United States, Hadassah— 

(1) enhances the quality of American and Jewish life 

through education and Zionist youth programs; 

(2) promotes health awareness; and 

(3) provides personal enrichment and growth for 

members; and 

Whereas Hadassah helps support young people by providing 

scholarships for students and educating disadvantaged 

children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates Hadassah, the Women’s Zion3 ist Organization of America, Inc. on its 100th anni4 versary; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 448 IS 

1 (2) recognizes the important contributions that 

2 Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of 

3 America, Inc. has made to medical research and 

4 care, the health of communities, the relationship be5 tween the United States and Israel, and the con6 tinuity of Jewish heritage. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32





The undersigned, Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer and Lou Fatica, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Associated Estates Realty
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
31, 2006, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman

Jeffrey I. Friedman



/s/ Lou Fatica

Lou Fatica





May 2, 2006

Date

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Associated Estates
Realty Corporation and will be retained by Associated Estates Realty Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Charles Allen RICHARDS, petitioner, v. CITY OF DES MOINES POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 18-630.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                       589
<INVENTORY>                                     33,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,938
<PP&E>                                          83,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,876
<BONDS>                                        156,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,088
<SALES>                                         94,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,964
<CGS>                                           60,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    72
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 620 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 620

    To authorize Harry Reid, a Senator from the State of Nevada, to 
administer the oath of office of President of the Senate pro tempore to 
         Patrick J. Leahy, a Senator from the State of Vermont.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 17, 2012

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Durbin) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To authorize Harry Reid, a Senator from the State of Nevada, to 
administer the oath of office of President of the Senate pro tempore to 
         Patrick J. Leahy, a Senator from the State of Vermont.

    Resolved, That Harry Reid, a Senator from the State of Nevada, is 
hereby authorized to administer the oath of office of President of the 
Senate Pro Tempore to Patrick J. Leahy, a Senator from the State of 
Vermont.
                                 <all>
```
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC AT&T SERVICES INC., ET AL 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 09/06/2023 /s/ Neil A. Rubin Neil A. Rubin SBN 250761

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 80
Frank D. MONSEGUE, Sr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19M3

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Anica ASHBOURNE, petitioner, v. Donna HANSBERRY, et al.

No. 18-426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Order filed, July 3, 2018.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-18-00315-CV

LUXURKEY MANAGEMENT LLC, Appellant

V.

ELENI ANTONELLOS FULLER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 20177-52683

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 04/20/2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

On 05/29/2018, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been 

filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order. 
No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The 

trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is 

timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If the reporter does not timely file the record 

as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Opinion issued July 26 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 00 471
- CV

——————————— LATOYA SMITH AND MELVIN SMITH , Appellant s V. U.S. BANK NATIONAL A SSOCIATION, AS SUCCE SSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A ., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERG ER TO LASALLE BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTE E FOR THE CERTIFICAT E HOLDERS OF THE MLMI TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET
- BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2006
- RMI , Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 12
- C CV
- 047150

MEMORANDUM OPINION2

Appellant s , LaToya Smith and Melvin Smith, h a ve neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.” ), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial P anel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 ( Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R.
A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on
June 4 , 2012

. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee , appellant s did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee

. We dismi ss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7472

RICKY ALONZO EVANS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00023-JCC-IDD)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 11, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Alonzo Evans, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Alonzo Evans seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Evans has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED