alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1 , 2013

p0626 

# Order

Clerk July 1 , 2013

146520 & (88)

LEON V. BONNER and

MARILYN E . BONNER,

Plaintiffs/Counter

- Defendants

- Appellees,

v SC: 146520

COA: 302677

Livingston CC: 09

- 024680

- CZ

CITY OF BRIGHTON,

Defendant/Counter

- Plaintiff

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The Brighton

Code of Ordinances § 18

- 59 creates a presumption that an unsafe structure shall be

demolished as a public nuisance if the cost to repair the structure would exceed 100% of

the structure’s true cash value as reflected in assessment tax rolls before the structure

became unsafe and does not afford the owner of such a structure an option to repair as a

matter of right. The parti es shall address whether § 18

- 59 is facially unconstitutional on

the basis that the ordinance violates: (1) substantive due process; and/or (2) procedural

due process. These issues are to be briefed separately by the parties.

The motion for leave to fi le brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The Public

Corporation Law and the Real Property Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan are

invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the

determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to

file briefs amicus curiae.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1791
CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA; PENELOPE A. GROSS, Supervisor of Mason District; LERNER CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-706-A) Submitted: October 23, 2003 Decided: October 29, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles W. Levy appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Levy’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeLevy v. County of Fairfax , No. CA-03-706-A (E.D. Va. June 11, 2003; filed June 13, 2003 & entered June 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-22-00060-CR 

________________________

PAULA JO READ, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 251st District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 77,317-C-CR; Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding 

 

April 19, 2022 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ. 

In 2020, Appellant, Paula Jo Read, was placed on deferred adjudication 

community supervision for three years for the offense of possession of a controlled 

substance.

1 By order of January 28, 2022, the trial court modified the terms of Appellant’s

community supervision, extending the period by one year and requiring Appellant to 

1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(c).
2

participate in a substance abuse felony punishment facility program for thirty days. 

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s January 28 order. We dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We have jurisdiction in a criminal case to consider an appeal from a judgment of 

guilt or where jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271 

S.W.3d 694, 697-98 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). The trial court’s order modifying the 

conditions of Appellant’s deferred adjudication community supervision is neither a 

judgment of guilt nor an appealable order. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1977) (holding that there is no constitutional or statutory authority permitting 

a direct appeal from an order modifying or refusing to modify conditions of community 

supervision); Castaneda v. State, No. 07-19-00049-CR, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 6994, at 

*3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 9, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)

(dismissing appeal from order modifying conditions of community supervision for want of 

jurisdiction).

2

By letter of March 17, 2022, we directed Appellant’s counsel to show how we have 

jurisdiction over the appeal by March 31. Counsel has not filed a response to date.

Because Appellant has not presented this court with a judgment of guilt or 

appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2 An extension of community supervision or the modification of the terms and conditions thereof is 

reviewable through the habeas corpus process. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 17.072.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, William A. Priddy, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Corporate VicePresident of Administration and Secretary of RF Micro Devices, Inc. (the“Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

(1)        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

     /s/William A. Priddy, Jr.                                  William A. Priddy, Jr.          Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice           President of Administration and Secretary               February 11, 2010

 

 

                                                                              

                                                                              

 

                                                                              

 

** **

** **

** **

 

 

----

 

** **
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 12, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Utility Broadband Alliance, Inc. (“UBBA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Thales, Bellevue, WA; Baicells Tech, Plano, TX; Ceragon Networks, Richardson, TX; Cambridge Consultants, Boston, MA; Netscout, Westford, MA; Aclara (Hubbell), St. Louis, MO; and Streamwide, Lyndhurst, NJ, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and UBBA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 4, 2021, UBBA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 10, 2021 (86 FR 30981).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 28, 2022. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 11, 2022 (87 FR 14043).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-11508 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report), I,
Donald A. Kurz, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company

/s/ Donald A. KurzDonald A. KurzChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


Dated: November 14, 2003
Exhibit
      32.3


Certification
      of Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.










Date:
      May
      9, 2007








/s/
      Larry Hannappel


Larry
      Hannappel


Senior
      Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00373-CV

Robert ZAYAS dba Clinic Services Providers P.A.,

Appellant

v.

Dolly R. DENSON,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI16539

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 25, 2018

DISMISSED

A filing fee of $205.00 was due when appellant filed his notice of appeal, but it was not 

paid. See TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN 

CIVIL CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 159158, Aug. 28, 2015). We issued an order on June 29, 2018, 

notifying appellant that the filing fee had not been paid. We ordered appellant to show cause in 

writing by July 9, 2018, that either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal 

without paying the filing fee. Appellant was advised that if he failed to respond within the time 
04-18-00373-CV

- 2 -

provided, this appeal would be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 

42.3(c). Appellant did not respond. 

This appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the filing fee. See id.

PER CURIAM
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DANIEL J. DOCZY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

VERIFONE SYSTEMS, INC., VERIFONE, INC.
, Defendants

- Appellees

______________________

2017

- 2571

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 0:16

- cv

- 62370

- WPD, Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K EVIN N. M ALEK , Malek Moss, PLLC, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

R YAN J. M ARTON , Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants

- appellees. Also represented by H ECTOR J ULIAN R IBERA

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

August 23, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11.1

CAMERON ASHLEY BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    YEARS ENDED
                                     1998                              1997                                 1996
                     --------------------------------   -------------------------------    ----------------------------------
                      INCOME       SHARES     PER-SHARE   INCOME        SHARES     PER-SHARE    INCOME    SHARES       PER-SHARE
                    (NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR)  AMOUNT   (NUMERATOR)  (DENOMINATOR)  AMOUNT   (NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT
                    ----------- ------------- --------- -----------  ------------- --------- ----------- ------------- ---------
<S>                 <C>          <C>          <C>       <C>          <C>           <C>       <C>         <C>           <C>
BASIC EPS
Income available
to common           $ 15,294       9,250      $ 1.65     $ 11,319        9,195     $ 1.23     $ 11,824     8,879       $  1.33
                                              ======                               ======                              =======
stockholders

EFFECT OF DILUTIVE
SECURITIES                           251                                   252                               370
                                     ---                                   ---                               ---
DILUTED EPS 
Income available
to common
stockholders
assuming dilution   $ 15,294       9,501      $ 1.61     $ 11,319        9,447     $ 1.20     $ 11,824     9,249       $  1.28
                    ========      ======      ======     ========       ======     ======     ========    ======       =======
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00449-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for the Issuance of Letter Rogatory to Request 

the Production of Documents by Realtek Semiconductor Corp. (Taiwan) (Dkt. No. 63), Unopposed 

Motion for the Issuance of Letter Rogatory to Request the Production of Documents by Parade 

Technologies, Ltd. (Taiwan) (Dkt. No. 64), and Unopposed Motion for the Issuance of Letter 

Rogatory to Request the Production of Documents by VIA Labs, Inc. (Taiwan) (Dkt. No. 65) 

(collectively, the “Motions”) filed by Plaintiff Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.

(“Plaintiff”). In the Motions, Plaintiff requests the Court to issue Requests for Judicial Assistance 

(“Letters Rogatory”) addressed to judicial authorities in Taiwan requesting that the Taiwanese 

authority assist in obtaining documents from Realtek Semiconductor Corp., Parade Technologies, 

Ltd., and VIA Labs, Inc. (Dkt. No. 63 at 1; Dkt. No. 64 at 1; Dkt. No. 65 at 1.) The Motions are

unopposed. (Id. at 1.)

Having considered the Motions, and noting their unopposed nature, the Court finds that 

they should be and hereby are GRANTED. The Court APPROVES the proposed Letters 

Rogatory, which are attached to the Motions as Exhibit A. (Dkt. Nos. 63-1, 64-1, 65-1.) 

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 66 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1228
2

Accordingly, the Court will execute the Letters Rogatory with original signatures, to which the 

Clerk of the Court shall affix original seals.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5th day of December, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 66 Filed 12/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1229
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 526 

Designating November 2012 as ‘‘Stomach Cancer Awareness Month’’ and 

supporting efforts to educate the public about stomach cancer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2012 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating November 2012 as ‘‘Stomach Cancer Awareness 

Month’’ and supporting efforts to educate the public 

about stomach cancer. 

Whereas stomach cancer is one of the most difficult cancers 

to detect and treat in the early stages of the disease, 

which contributes to high mortality rates and human suffering; 

Whereas stomach cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer 

mortality in the world; 

Whereas, in 2011, an estimated 21,520 new cases of stomach 

cancer were diagnosed in the United States; 

Whereas, in 2011, it was estimated that more than 10,000 

people in the United States would die from stomach cancer; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 526 IS 

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 28 percent; 

Whereas approximately 1 in 114 individuals will be diagnosed 

with stomach cancer during their lifetimes; 

Whereas an inherited form of stomach cancer carries a 67- 

to 83-percent risk that an individual will be diagnosed 

with stomach cancer by 80 years of age; 

Whereas, in the United States, stomach cancer is more prevalent among racial and ethnic minorities; 

Whereas better education for patients and health care providers is needed for the timely recognition of stomach 

cancer risks and symptoms; 

Whereas more research into effective early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for stomach cancer is needed; and 

Whereas November 2012 is an appropriate month to observe 

Stomach Cancer Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates November 2012 as ‘‘Stomach 

3 Cancer Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) supports efforts to educate the people of the 

5 United States about stomach cancer; 

6 (3) recognizes the need for additional research 

7 into early diagnosis and treatment for stomach can8 cer; and 

9 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

10 and interested groups to observe and support No11 vember 2012 as Stomach Cancer Awareness Month 

12 through appropriate programs and activities to proVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:36 Jul 25, 2012 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR526.IS SR526

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 526 IS 

1 mote public awareness of, and potential treatments 

2 for, stomach cancer. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Tyler T. HEAGY, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-5420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OCT 31, 1997
10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000911212
<NAME> LEADING EDGE EARTH PRODUCTS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,057
<ALLOWANCES>                                   244,375
<INVENTORY>                                     30,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,059
<PP&E>                                          40,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          942,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,026,365
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,606,718)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,825
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (269,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (269,465)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
ARGENTINE REPUBLIC, petitioner, v. PETERSEN ENERGIA INVERSORA S.A.U., et al.

No. 18-581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
Jake Paul HEINEY, Petitioner v. OHIO.

No. 18-1528

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lucas County denied.