alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.01

PAUL-SON GAMING CORPORATION        LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|Name                                 |  | State/Country of
Incorporation |  | Parent                              
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Establissements Bourgogne et Grasset |  | France                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation         
|Paul-Son Gaming Supplies, Inc.       |  | Nevada                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation         
|Paul-Son Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.      |  | Mexico                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Supplies, Inc. (99%)
|                                     |  |                                |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation (1%)    
|Authentic Products, Inc.             |  | Nevada                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation         

---

QuickLinks
Maria I. SANUTTI-SPENCER, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-6616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00061-CR

EX PARTE TRAVIS TODMAN §

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1570584)

August 3, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michael S. Nitta, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report (the Report) on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:September 17, 2007By:/s/Michael S. NittaMichael S. Nitta, Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         $48,334,406
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,173,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,767,273)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,807,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,079,915
<PP&E>                                         258,324,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (12,407,179)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,946,114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,288,720
<BONDS>                                        213,853,569
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          124,456,840
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000,000
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,008,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,946,114
<SALES>                                         47,908,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,908,833
<CGS>                                           36,340,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,605,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (8,184,259)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,818,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (38,311,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (38,311,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (38,417,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
Wilson C. ORTEGA, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 18-6466.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Rick Wall, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report (the Report) on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:September 17, 2007By:/s/Rick WallRick Wall, Chief Executive Officer and Director
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       37,175
COMMITMENTS
   3,984    7,241      570   21,648   18,074   26,202   25,885   10,973   11,290

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -426)
     -92      974      -25   -1,785   -2,031   -1,902   -1,082    1,476      656

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.7     19.5      1.5     58.2     48.6     70.5     69.6     29.5     30.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
       8       14        7       30       21       43       38
```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
Milton HEMANS, Petitioner v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-9607

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Roosevelt BIGBEE, Jr., Petitioner, v. Jonathan LEBO, Warden.

No. 19-7653.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50815

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUSTAVO ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-00-CR-210-1-FB

- - - - - - - - - -

April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gustavo Alvarez-Hernandez appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alvarez argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Alvarez acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348

(2000). 
No. 00-50815

- 2 -

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Alvarez’s

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Keith D. NELSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5568

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132582 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132582 

 COA: 272373 

Muskegon CC: 05-051798-FH

DANIEL GLEN HORAN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Muskegon Circuit Court and 

we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. It is undisputed that OV 13 

(Continuing Pattern of Criminal Behavior) was incorrectly scored, and that correcting the 

score reduces the applicable guidelines range. The trial court departed upward from the 

guidelines, but did not declare that it would impose the same sentence regardless of the 

offense variable scoring. Rather, the court based the extent of the departure on the 

guidelines range. It is unclear that the trial court would have departed to the same extent 

under the correctly scored guidelines. Therefore, People v Mutchie, 468 Mich 50, 51 

(2003), does not apply. On remand, the court may again depart from the appropriate 

sentencing guidelines range by articulating a substantial and compelling reason for the 

departure in accordance with People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 268 (2003). In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

p0328 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 28, 2007 

 Clerk
Sherri JEFFERSON, Petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.

No. 19-6916

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN 

DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP 

Jury Trial Requested 

JOINT (AGREED) MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER 

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations LLC (“Symbology”) and Defendants Valve Corporation 

(“Valve”) and Gearbox Software, LLC (“Gearbox”) (collectively, “Defendants”) file this Joint Motion for 

Entry of Discovery Order. The parties have agreed on all provisions contained in the attached 

Discovery Order. 

Having agreed upon the terms included therein and shown good cause, the parties respectfully 

request the Court grant this Motion and enter the proposed Discovery Order, attached to this Joint 

Motion below. 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C., 

Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 26 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 199
2 

Dated: December 19, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Christopher A. Honea 

Texas Bar No. 24059967 

chonea@ghiplaw.com 

Randall Garteiser 

Texas Bar No. 24038912 

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com 

M. Scott Fuller

Texas Bar No. 24036607

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC 

119 W. Ferguson Street 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Telephone: (903) 705-7420 

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC. 

/s/ Michael E. Jones, with permission for Kathleen 

R. Geyer

Mike Jones 

Potter Minton 

102 North College, Ste. 900 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

903-597-8311 (telephone)

mikejones@potterminton.com

Kathleen R. Geyer 

Christopher P. Damitio 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton 

1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 467-9600 

Facsimile: (206) 623-6793 

KGeyer@kilpatricktownsend.com 

CDamitio@kilpatricktownsend.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Valve Corp. 

/s/ Jessica M. Kaempf 

Michael J. Sacksteder, CSB No. 191605 

Email: msacksteder@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 26 Filed 12/19/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 200
3 

Geoffrey R. Miller, Texas Bar No. 24094847 

Email: gmiller@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

902 Broadway, 18th Floor 

New York, NY 10010 

Telephone: (212) 321-2001 

Jessica M. Kaempf (WSBN No. 51666) 

jkaempf@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

401 Union Street, 5th Floor 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 389-4510 

Attorneys for Gearbox Software, L.L.C. 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 26 Filed 12/19/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 201
4 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

The undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h) that the relief requested 

in this motion is agreed. 

/s/ Michael E. Jones

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 26 Filed 12/19/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 202
Juan Alberto LUCIO-RAYOS, petitioner, v. Matthew G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General.

No. 18-64.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Kenneth THOMAS, Petitioner, v. Robert MARSH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Benner Township.

No. 18-9555

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Blitz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cadus Corporation and will be retained by Cadus Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ David BlitzDavid
      BlitzPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive
      Officer and Principal Financial Officer)August
      12, 2010





The
foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Matthew DAVIS, aka Sealed Defendant 1, aka Matt, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6842.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2231 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2231

 To amend section 107 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
  1974 to authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
make grants from community development block grant amounts to the City 
of Youngstown, Ohio, for the construction of a community center and the 
              renovation of a sports complex in such city.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 107 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
  1974 to authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
make grants from community development block grant amounts to the City 
of Youngstown, Ohio, for the construction of a community center and the 
              renovation of a sports complex in such city.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Youngstown Community Center 
Development Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. CDBG SPECIAL PURPOSE GRANTS.

    Section 107(a)(1) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1974 (42 U.S.C. 5307(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``$60,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$75,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``subsection (b)'' and inserting 
                ``this section''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (G) and inserting the 
        following new subparagraph:
                    ``(G) in fiscal year 2000--
                            ``(i) $15,000,000 shall be available for a 
                        grant to the City of Youngstown, Ohio, for the 
                        construction of a community center in such 
                        city; and
                            ``(ii) $2,000,000 shall be available for a 
                        grant to the City of Youngstown, Ohio, for the 
                        renovation and refurbishing of the Sports 
                        Complex (formerly known as South Field House) 
                        in such city;''.
                                 <all>
```