alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, INC., 

COMMSCOPE INC., ARRIS US HOLDINGS, INC., 

ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, 

INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, ET AL.,

ARRIS GLOBAL LTD., 

12 New Fetter Lane, London, United Kingdom, EC4A 1JP Reza Mirzaie 

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025

2:23-cv-00455

10/2/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 55
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 10/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 56
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,937
<INVENTORY>                                    275,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,572
<PP&E>                                         316,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                     459,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,887
<SALES>                                      1,163,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,163,189
<CGS>                                        1,090,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,110,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 549 

Designating September 2012 as ‘‘Campus Fire Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2012 as ‘‘Campus Fire Safety 

Month’’. 

Whereas, each year, States across the United States formally 

designate the month of September as ‘‘Campus Fire 

Safety Month’’; 

Whereas, since January 2000, at least 152 people, including 

students, parents, and children, have died in campus-related fires; 

Whereas 85 percent of those deaths occurred in off-campus 

residences; 

Whereas a majority of college students in the United States 

live in an off-campus residence; 

Whereas many fatal fires have occurred in a building in 

which the occupants had compromised or disabled the 

fire safety system; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 549 ATS 

Whereas automatic fire alarm systems provide the early 

warning of a fire that is necessary for occupants of a 

building and the fire department to take appropriate action; 

Whereas automatic fire sprinkler systems are a highly effective method of controlling or extinguishing a fire in the 

early stages, thus protecting the lives of building occupants; 

Whereas many college students live in an off-campus residence, fraternity or sorority housing, or a residence hall 

that is not adequately protected by automatic fire sprinkler systems and automatic fire alarm systems; 

Whereas fire safety education is an effective method of reducing the occurrence of fires and the resulting loss of life 

and property damage; 

Whereas college students do not routinely receive effective 

fire safety education while in college; 

Whereas educating young people in the United States about 

the importance of fire safety is vital to help ensure that 

young people engage in fire-safe behavior during college 

and after college; and 

Whereas developing a generation of adults who practice fire 

safety may significantly reduce future loss of life from 

fires: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2012 as ‘‘Campus 

3 Fire Safety Month’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 549 ATS 

1 (2) encourages administrators of institutions of 

2 higher education and municipalities across the 

3 United States— 

4 (A) to provide educational programs to all 

5 college students in September and throughout 

6 the school year; 

7 (B) to evaluate the level of fire safety 

8 being provided in both on-campus and off-cam9 pus student housing; and 

10 (C) to ensure fire-safe living environments 

11 through fire safety education, the installation of 

12 fire suppression and detection systems, and the 

13 development and enforcement of applicable 

14 codes relating to fire safety. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Garry Randall WEST, Petitioner, v. Jason BRYANT, Warden.

No. 19-5248

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 9 Filed 10/24/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 80
Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 9 Filed 10/24/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 81
Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 9 Filed 10/24/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 82
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

 Defendant. 

ERICSSON INC. and 

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

 Intervenors. 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ALICE SNEDEKER 

Notice is hereby given that Alice Snedeker of the law firm Duane Morris LLP, admitted to 

practice in this Court, enters her appearance as counsel of record for T-Mobile USA, Inc. and 

Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation and Ericsson Inc. Ms. Snedeker will accept service of 

all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, correspondence, and other material related to this 

litigation on their behalf at her contact information below. 

Dated: December 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Alice Snedeker 

Alice Snedeker 

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 253-6900 

Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc., Intervenors 

Ericsson Inc. and Nokia of America Corporation

 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 864
 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 12, 2023. 

/s/ Alice Snedeker 

 Alice Snedeker 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 865
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

HANSHOW TECHNOLOGY CO., 

LTD., AND SHANGHAI HANSHI 

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

CO., LTD

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SES-IMAGOTAG SA, SESIMAGOTAG GMBH AND 

CAPTANA GMBH

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP

JURY DEMAND

Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant VusionGroup 

SA (fka SES-imagotag SA), by and through their counsel, hereby requests a trial by jury on all 

triable issues currently or later raised in this case. 

Subject to VusionGroup GmbH and Captana GmbH’s (“Moving Defendants”) Motion to 

Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 38), and to the extent that the court finds 

personal jurisdiction is proper over those Defendants, the Moving Defendants demand a jury as to 

all triable issues currently or later raised in this case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 05/09/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 514
Dated: May 9, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Matthew C. Acosta 

Matthew C. Acosta

Texas State Bar No. 24062577 

PLATT RICHMOND PLLC

1201 N. Riverfront Blvd., Suite 150 

Dallas, TX 75207 

Tel. (214) 559-2700 

Fax: (214) 559-4390 

Grant E. Kinsel 

Washington State Bar No. 49576 

Perkins Coie LLP 

1201 Third Avenue Suite 4900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Tel: (206) 359-3516 

Fax: (206) 359-9000 

Matthew J. Moffa 

New York State Bar No. 5045067 

Perkins Coie LLP 

1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd Floor 

New York, NY 10036 

Eric H. Findlay 

State Bar No. 00789886 

Findlay Craft, P.C. 

7270 Crosswater Avenue 

Suite B

Tyler, Texas 75703 

Tel: (903) 534-1100 

Fax: (903) 534-1137 

Attorneys for Defendants VusionGroup SA, 

VusionGroup GmbH, and Captana GmbH. 

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 05/09/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 515
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel for Defendants does hereby certify that this pleading was served 

on all counsel of record on May 9, 2024 by the Court’s ECF system. 

/s/ Matthew C. Acosta 

MATTHEW C. ACOSTA

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 46 Filed 05/09/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 516
No. 6:23-cr-00074

United States of America

v.

Pedro Perez-Gonzalez

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on defendant’s guilty plea. 

Doc. 27. The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept 

defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of 

the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the 

magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the magistrate judge. The court also accepts 

defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until 

after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Pedro Perez-Gonzalez guilty of count one of the indictment 

charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) – Illegal Reentry Following 

Removal.

So ordered by the court on August 11, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00074-JCB-JDL Document 28 Filed 08/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 52
Christian Vazquez CAPISTRAN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9502

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, 

INC. et al, 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines filed by 

Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC and Defendants CommScope Holding Company, Inc., 

CommScope Inc., ARRIS US Holdings, Inc., ARRIS Solutions, ARRIS Technology, Inc., 

ARRIS Enterprises LLC, ARRIS International Limited, ARRIS Global Ltd. Dkt. No. 

25. After consideration, and noting its joint nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to file a proposed docket control order and a 

proposed discovery order is extended to February 29, 2024. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline to file a proposed protective order and 

comply with paragraphs 1 & 3 of the discovery order is extended to March 7, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 02/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 141
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

CATERRION BACKUS, §

§

Plaintiff,

versus

KENT GLASSEL, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-180

§

§

§

§

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Caterrion Backus, a prisoner confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

On August 3, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without prejudice

for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties

have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#7) is

Case 9:23-cv-00180-MAC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 08/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23
ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. 

2

Case 9:23-cv-00180-MAC-ZJH Document 8 Filed 08/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,586
<INVENTORY>                                     11,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,304
<PP&E>                                           8,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,716
<SALES>                                         83,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,468
<CGS>                                           65,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,733
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,599
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
# C_2017145EN.01001001.xml

| 9.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/10

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 145/11)

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Olbia-Milan Linate and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | A period of four years starting on 27 October 2017 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | Two months after the date of publication of this notice |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | For more information:





  Autonomous Region of Sardinia |
| Department of Transport |
| Directorate-General for Transport |
| Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity |
| Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41 |
| 09123 Cagliari |
| ITALIA |
| Tel. +39 0706067331 |
| Fax +39 0706067309 |
| Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it |
| email | : | trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
  trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
  trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Olbia-Milan Linate and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

A period of four years starting on 27 October 2017

Deadline for submission of tenders

Two months after the date of publication of this notice

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

For more information:

Autonomous Region of Sardinia

Department of Transport

Directorate-General for Transport

Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity

Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 41

09123 Cagliari

ITALIA

Tel. +39 0706067331

Fax +39 0706067309

Website: http://www.regione.sardegna.it

email

:

trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it

trasporti@regione.sardegna.it

trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it

---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

___________________

NO. 09-11-00602-CV

___________________

IN RE COMMITMENT OF JAMES A. RUBIO

_________________________________________________________________ _

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-04-04400 CV

________________________________________________________________ _

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State filed a motion to dismiss James A. Rubio’s appeal of a civil 

commitment that the trial court ordered after a jury found him to be a sexually 

violent predator. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.001-.151 (West 2010 

& Supp. 2012) (SVP statute). The SVP commitment order was not stayed pending 

appeal. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.081(a) (West 2010). The State 

alleged that on October 1, 2012, Rubio violated the terms of the SVP order by 

leaving his court-ordered residence without prior written authorization from the 

trial court, and that Rubio did not voluntarily return to his residence. 
2

On December 6, 2012, we ordered that the appeal would be dismissed with 

prejudice unless, within ten days, Rubio complied with the trial court’s SVP 

commitment order by returning to the Travis County Residential Center or by 

surrendering himself to an officer with the power to execute the warrant for his 

arrest. On January 14, 2013, the State notified the Court that on January 7, 2013, 

Rubio was apprehended without having voluntarily surrendered. On January 31, 

2013, Rubio filed a motion to retain the appeal and reinstate the briefing schedule. 

He contends that he is no longer a flight risk. 

Rubio failed to demonstrate that he complied with the trial court’s order 

within the time specified in this Court’s order of December 6, 2012. Rubio failed 

to comply with a court order. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). We provided an 

opportunity to explain why the appeal should not be dismissed, but Rubio failed to 

establish good cause for retaining the appeal. The appeal is dismissed with 

prejudice.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 

______________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

Opinion Delivered February 14, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Doug LAIR, et al., petitioners, v. Jeff MANGAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Political Practices, et al.

No. 18-149.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Kent Glen WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. BROOKS, et al.

No. 19-7060

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.