alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2151 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2151

          To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.28.01    Thionyl           Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     chloride, used                                                          31/2002          ''
                     as imaging                                                                                .
                     chemical for
                     photographic
                     applications
                     (CAS No. 007719-
                     09-7) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2812.10.50)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HP INC., fka Hewlett-Packard Company, petitioner, v. Steven E. BERKHEIMER.

No. 18-415.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2307

AN ACT

To designate the building of the United States

Postal Service located at 5 Cedar Street inHopkinton, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Thomas J.Brown Post Office Building’’.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2307

AN ACT

To designate the building of the United States Postal Service

located at 5 Cedar Street in Hopkinton, Massachusetts,

as the ‘‘Thomas J. Brown Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2307 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The building of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 5 Cedar Street in Hopkinton, Massachusetts,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas J. Brown

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Thomas J. Brown Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.16







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: October 24, 2011







From: Steve Carlson, CEO







TO:  Gerald Sullivan







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On October 24, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Gerald F. Sullivan, Chairman, pursuant to which the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock valued at


$40,000, as an incentive bonus. These were issued on October 24, 2011.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ STEVE CARLSON


Steve Carlson


CEO
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Uromed Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael F. Manion, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael F. Manion

Michael F. ManionChief Financial OfficerDated: June 27, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Uromed Corporation and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
Frankie BEQIRAJ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7467

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Bill of Sale



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FORM OF BILL OF SALE 
 For valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, PACER STACKTRAIN, INC. (“Seller”), owner of the full legal and beneficial title to the intermodal cars described on the attached Schedule (the “Cars”), does hereby sell, grant, transfer and deliver all its right,
title and interest in and to the Cars free and clear of all claims, liens, attachments and rights of others (“Liens”) to PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC (“Purchaser”), to have and to hold the Cars forever. Seller hereby warrants to
Purchaser, and its successors and assigns, that there is hereby conveyed to Purchaser good and marketable title to the Cars, free and clear of any Liens. 
 Except as otherwise provided herein, the Cars are sold “AS-IS” and “WHERE-IS”. 

This Bill of Sale is governed by the laws of the State of Ohio. 
 IN WITNESS whereof, Seller has caused this Bill of Sale to be duly executed as of this 28th day of February, 2012. 
  

			
	PACER STACKTRAIN, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ John J. Hafferty
		
	Name:	 	John J. Hafferty
		
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JEROME FRANKS

,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 593 , 2015

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ Cr. ID No. 89K O 1032DI

§

§

§

Submitted: November 25 , 2015

Decided: January 11 , 2016

Before HOLLAND

, VALIHURA

, and SEITZ

, Justices

.

ORDE R

This 11 th day of January 2016

, after careful consideration of the parties’

respective positions, the Court concludes that the judgment below should be

affirmed for reasons stated in the Superior Court’s decision dated October 15,

2015. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the appellant’s seventh

motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that the motion failed

to satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2) in

order to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS O RDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

Trademarks or Patents. ( the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

Amendment Answer Cross Bill Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:23-cv-00259-JRG-RSP Document 2 Filed 05/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 11
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-89-MAC

'

MARCIA NICKETTE REMEDIES, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Marcia Nickette Remedies, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00089-MAC-CLS Document 24 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 82
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. ' 1343—

Wire Fraud.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00089-MAC-CLS Document 24 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 83
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

HECTOR REYES (23)

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:22-CR-00110

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the First Superseding 

Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Hector Reyes

GUILTY of Count One of the First Superseding Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 

U.S.C. § 1349 - Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27th November, 2024.

Case 4:22-cr-00110-JDK-AGD Document 738 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

2823
H. R. 2302

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the building of the United States Postal Service located at 307 Main

Street in Johnson City, New York, as the ‘‘James W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The building of the United States Postal Service located at

307 Main Street in Johnson City, New York, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘James W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James

W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A 

VERIZON WIRELESS

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Case No. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP 

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Cobblestone Wireless, LLC's (“Cobblestone”) 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. The 

Court, having considered the unopposed motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the 

motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Cobblestone to serve contentions 

pursuant to P.R. 3-1 & 3.2 is extended to December 4, 2023 and the deadline for AT&T Mobility 

LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Corp. (“AT&T”), Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless 

(“Verizon”), and T-Mobile USA, Inc., (“T-Mobile”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) to 

serve contentions pursuant to P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 is extended to January 29, 2024. 

All other deadlines shall remain in place absent further leave of Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 138
Ralph CURRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-229.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michael VILLECCO, Petitioner, v. Daniel W. STARK, et al.

No. 19-5784

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 21.01

PAUL-SON GAMING CORPORATION
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|Name                            |  | State/Country of
Incorporation |  | Parent                              
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Paul-Son Gaming Supplies, Inc.  |  | Nevada                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation         
|Paul-Son Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Supplies, Inc. (99%)
|                                |  |                                |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation (1%)    
|Authentic Products, Inc.        |  | Nevada                         |  | Paul-Son Gaming Corporation         

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-114035, 333-119492and 333-123017) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-75390, 33-87420, 333-44097, 333-92425, 333-52370, 333-75410, 33-75392, 333-18519, 333-119486 and 333-132022) and the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-38668) ofNeurobiological Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated September 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a matter of emphasisparagraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting because of a material weakness) of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007. 

 

/s/ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLP 

 

San Francisco, California 

September 12, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending
September 30, 2007 (the  "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Acting Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 9, 2008


\s\ Edward L. Torres
-----------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Nathaniel PEMBROOK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8608.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 18 Filed 10/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 358
Mario Alberto RECINOS, petitioner, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM.

No. 18-1332.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Pervis PAYNE, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 17-8543.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
Darwin ZOCH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8309

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32-B

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company), and the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the
Company for the period covered the Report, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     
|---------------------
|                     
|/s/     Keith S. Bair
|Keith S. Bair        
|February 28, 2012
Albert C. BURGESS, Jr., petitioner, v. John D. ELLIOTT, et al.

No. 17-8991.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and *100petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)*(per curiam )* .
Erin DALY, Petitioner, v. CITIGROUP, INC., et al.

No. 19-788

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Demetrius FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. Jefferson S. DUNN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

No. 19-6531

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.