alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

32077 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 103 

Friday, May 27, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 10402 of May 24, 2022 

Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy in Uvalde, Texas 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence 

perpetrated on May 24, 2022, by a gunman at Robb Elementary School 

in Uvalde, Texas, by the authority vested in me as President of the United 

States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, 

I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at halfstaff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at 

all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal 

Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States 

and its Territories and possessions until sunset, May 28, 2022. I also direct 

that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at 

all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities 

abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth 

day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

forty-sixth. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11601 

Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PREZ DOC 1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.

No. 17-1453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2013
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 15, 2014

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Chief Financial Officer
Bobbie LONDON, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6785

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondents

v.

MICHAEL FORREST,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 440 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of February, 2020

, the Application for Leave to Amend

and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED

.
Anthony James MERRICK, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-6558.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*825Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,250
<PP&E>                                          67,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,876
<BONDS>                                         95,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,391
<SALES>                                         89,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,925
<CGS>                                           74,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,666)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,666)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,666)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.494)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.494)
        

</TABLE>
Jamaar Danglo HAYES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5923

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ernesto BENAVIDES Jr., Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-7190.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       54,433
COMMITMENTS
  12,293    7,578    1,185   27,736   35,065   41,214   43,828   13,219   10,605

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,891)
      32    1,819       82    1,375       22    1,489    1,923      402      -32

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.6     13.9      2.2     51.0     64.4     75.7     80.5     24.3     19.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       81)
      20       12       12       40       28       64       49
```

----

Updated November 8, 2013
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

SAMUEL FRANK MCCREARY 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00108-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that the 

Court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the Court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The Court orders that 

the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are adopted. The Court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement 

until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ordered that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Samuel Frank McCreary, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00108-MJT Document 23 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) 

- Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00108-MJT Document 23 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

REGINALD WHITE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-425

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 22, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge. 

Reginald White, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC; and AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Intervenor.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS,

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Intervenor.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Intervenor.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 48-7 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1308
2

ORDER GRANTING NOKIA’S MOTION TO INTERVENE 

Before the Court is Intervenor Nokia of America Corporation’s (“Nokia”) Motion to 

Intervene (the “Motion”). Nokia moved to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

24(a) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Rule 24(b). Having considered the Motion, and the relevant 

authorities, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, 

Nokia is permitted to intervene in these actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive 

pleading in intervention within forty-eight (48) hours of entry of this Order.

SO ORDERED.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 48-7 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1309
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1559 

(Opposition Nos. 91/176,217, 91/177,038, 91/176,218, and 91/177,039) 

CIPRIANI GROUP, INC., 

Appellant, 

v. 

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS INC. 

and HOTEL CIPRIANI SrL, 

Appellees. 

Marvin S. Gittes, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., of New 

York, New York, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Timur E. Slonim. Of 

counsel were Joseph M. DiCioccio, and Geri L. Haight. 

George B. Snyder, Troutman Sanders LLP, of New York, New York, argued for 

appellees. Of counsel was Bennet J. Moskowitz. 

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office 

 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-1559 

(Opposition Nos. 91/176,217, 91/177,038, 91/176,218, and 91/177,039) 

CIPRIANI GROUP, INC., 

 Appellant, 

v. 

ORIENT-EXPRESS HOTELS INC. 

and HOTEL CIPRIANI SrL, 

 Appellees. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, 

 TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD 

in CASE NO(S). 91/176,217, 91/177,038, 91/176,218, and 91/177,039 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (SCHALL, PLAGER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.) 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED August 11, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

____________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

Patent Armory Inc.

2:23-cv-464

Chicken Express, Inc.

Chicken Express, Inc.

c/o Richard L Stuart II

1898 Ranger Highway Weatherford, TX 76088

Rabicoff Law LLC

600 Mamaroneck Ave STE 400, Harrison, NY 10528

7736694590

10/4/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00464-JRG Document 5 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 347
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00464-JRG Document 5 Filed 10/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 348
Michael SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*784Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.A., A.M.V., N.A.V., J.A.V., children

Appellate case number: 01-20-00709-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-02310J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

This appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship. Appellant, K.G.V.,

has filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file her brief. The motion is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on December 28, 2020.

Because this is a termination case, the Court is required to bring this appeal to final

disposition within 180 days of the date of the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably 

possible. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. 

For this reason, no additional extensions of time to file a brief will be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss___________________

Acting individually

Date: December 10, 2020
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

FRANCIS T. KHUONG, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND 

SOCIETY FSB,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00684-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 3, 2024, the Report of 

the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #28), was entered containing proposed findings of fact 

and recommendation that Defendant’s Motion for Default Judgment against 

Plaintiffs (Dkt. #17) be granted; that Defendant should be entitled to foreclose the 

security instrument and sell the property at a non-judicial foreclosure sale upon 

providing to Plaintiffs the notice of sale required by Texas Property Code §§ 51.002(b) 

and 51.0025(2); and that Defendant be granted leave to file a motion for attorneys’

fees and costs within fourteen (14) days of the Court’s entry of default judgment 

against Plaintiffs if it desires.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no 

timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and 

Case 4:23-cv-00684-SDJ-AGD Document 29 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 371
2 

conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s 

Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED Defendant’s Motion for Default Judgment against 

Plaintiffs (Dkt. #17) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant 

is entitled to foreclose the security instrument and sell the property at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale upon providing to Plaintiffs the notice of sale required 

by Texas Property Code §§ 51.002(b) and 51.0025(2). It is further ORDERED that 

Defendant is GRANTED leave to file a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs within 

fourteen (14) days of the Court’s entry of default judgment against Plaintiffs if it 

desires. 

Case 4:23-cv-00684-SDJ-AGD Document 29 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 372
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Lewis P. HANNAH, III

No. D-3059

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Lewis P. Hannah, III, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring *1257him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/02/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       42,218
COMMITMENTS
   1,702    4,428    2,137   36,653   33,620   40,492   40,185    1,726    2,033

CHANGES FROM 03/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,660)
     -65     -899      299  -12,129  -11,458  -11,895  -12,058      235      398

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     4.0     10.5      5.1     86.8     79.6     95.9     95.2      4.1      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       5        8        7       20       25       30       35`

---

Updated April 5, 2013
Randy A. JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M21.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Health
Power, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-91956), Form S-8 (File No. 33-91958), Form
S-8 (33-91852), Form S-8 (File No. 333-20535), and Form S-3 (File No. 33-80035)
of our report dated March 5, 1997, except for Note 13 for which the date is
March 20, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Health Power, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Columbus, Ohio                                /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
March 28, 1997                                    Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


                                     - 79 -