alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX 1 

Case 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ Document 17-1 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 138
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MAXX LYMAN, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF 

AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GLOBE LIFE INC. 

Defendant. 

Case No. 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ 

PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES 

The following actions shall be completed by the dates indicated.1

January 31, 2024 Deadline for motions to transfer. 

March 6, 2024 

 

 

Deadline to add parties. 

March 20, 2024 Deadline for Plaintiff to file amended pleading. (A 

motion for leave to amend is required.) 

April 17, 2024 Deadline for Defendant’s final amended pleadings.2 (A 

motion for leave to amend is required.) 

May 16, 2024 Deadline to complete fact discovery 

June 6, 2024 Deadline for Plaintiff to disclose expert testimony 

July 11, 2024 Deadline for Defendant to disclose expert testimony 

August 8, 2024 Deadline for completion of depositions of experts 

1 If a deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday as defined in FED. R. CIV. P. 6, the 

effective date is the first federal court business day following the deadline imposed. 

2 Except as otherwise provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4).

Case 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ Document 17-1 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 139
2 

September 5, 2024 Deadline for Plaintiff to file any class certification motion 

October 3, 2024 Deadline for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff’s 

class certification motion(s). 

October 17, 2024 Deadline for Plaintiff to file a reply in support of class 

certification, if any. 

After the class certification issue has been resolved, the Court will enter a more 

comprehensive scheduling order for the disposition of the merits of the case. 

Case 4:23-cv-00911-SDJ Document 17-1 Filed 01/03/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 140
Bruce A. SHEAR, petitioner, v. MAZ PARTNERS, LP, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated.

No. 18-403.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Lannon Lavar BURDUNICE, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 19-7587.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6495

ALVIN PONSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; EUGENE M. NUTH, Warden; ASRESAHEGN GETACHEW, MD, EMS; VINCENT OKEKE, Doctor, EMS; ANY UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 2033-L) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alvin Ponson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General,Baltimore, Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alvin Ponson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ponson v. Filbert , No. CA-00-2033-L (D. Md. Mar. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Melvin PRYOR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7409.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00309-CR

Issac Joseph Pantoja

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1511029D)

October 26, 2017

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       40,392
COMMITMENTS
   1,163    9,848    2,239   36,289   27,625   39,691   39,712      701      680

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        313)
    -428  -13,085      -26      446   13,109       -8       -2      321      315

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.9     24.4      5.5     89.8     68.4     98.3     98.3      1.7      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       6        9        7       21       23       30       37`

---

Updated November 26, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4522-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine (FEMA-4522-DR), dated April 4, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on May 17, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lori A. Ehrlich, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Paul F. Ford as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-11910 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000911503
<NAME>                       SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                      134,617,931
<SECURITIES>                                                   (729,084)
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   424,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            134,313,035
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              134,313,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         3,101,516
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  131,211,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                134,313,035
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             (6,526,890)
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              2,299,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (8,826,823)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (8,826,823)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (77.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        

</TABLE>
Alexander CASTELLANO-BENITEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DONNELL DEAN BENSON , a/k/a Dizzy
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr
- 00122

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Donnell Dean Benson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donnell Dean Benson appeals the district court’s order denying relief o n his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow , 844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016) (reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the d ecisional process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1
STATE OF ALABAMA

COUNTY OF ____________

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Randall L. Haines, a Director of
JUST FOR FEET, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do constitute and
appoint Harold Ruttenberg and Eric L. Tyra, and each of them, my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, on my behalf and in
my stead pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (i) a Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to register additional shares for issuance pursuant to the Just For
Feet, Inc. 1997 Employee Incentive Plan; (ii) post-effective amendments to the
following Registration Statements: 33-80578, 33-96588, 333-06531, 333-28041,
333-96584, 333-26345 and 333-28039; and (iii) the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1999, and to file the same with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Registration Statements
or Reports, incorporating such changes as the said attorneys-in-fact deem
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or
their substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 4th day of
March, 1999.


                                     /s/ Randall L. Haines
                                    -------------------------------
                                    Randall L. Haines


                                ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
                                ---------------

     BEFORE me this 4th day of March, 1999, came Randall L. Haines, personally
known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power
of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                                     /s/ Deborah B. Partridge
                                    -------------------------------
                                    NOTARY PUBLIC

                                    State of Alabama

                                    My Commission Expires:

                                           2/28/2000
                                    -------------------------------
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)

of the Exchange Act, as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael L. Baur,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ScanSource, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael L. BaurMichael L. Baur, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: January 31, 2014
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2329

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of

the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and for other purposes’’ to

clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to accept donations

of lands that are contiguous to the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. VISCLOSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the establishment of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and

for other purposes’’ to clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to accept donations of lands that

are contiguous to the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indiana Dunes Na5 tional Lakeshore Corrections Act’’.
2

•HR 2329 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONTIGUOUS LANDS.

2 Section 19 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460u–19) is

3 amended by designating the existing text of the section

4 as subsection (a), and by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(b) For purposes of subsection (a), lands may be

6 considered contiguous to other lands if the lands touch

7 the other lands, or are separated from the other lands by

8 only a public or private right-of-way, such as a road, rail9 road, or utility corridor.’’.

10 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE LANDS BY PAYMENT OF

11 DELINQUENT TAXES.

12 Section 2(a) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460u–1(a)) is

13 amended in the first sentence by inserting before the pe14 riod the following: ‘‘, including acquisition from units of

15 State or local government by satisfaction of delinquent

16 State or local taxes’’.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et 

al,

T-MOBILE US, INC., ET AL.

AT&T, INC., ET AL.

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00352-JRG-RSP

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00379-JRG-RSP

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00397-JRG-RSP

Markman Hearing

MAG. JUDGE ROY PAYNE PRESIDING

November 19, 2024

OPEN: 9:04 am ADJOURN: 10:38 am

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: See attached

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS: See attached

TECHNICAL ADVISOR: Mike Paul

LAW CLERK: Greg Saltz

COURT REPORTER: Shelly Holmes

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Becky Andrews

Court opened. Case called. Andrea Fair introduced co-counsel and announced ready. Deron 

Dacus introduced co-counsel and announced ready.

The Court heard argument on a term by term basis. Philip Wang and Kris Davis presented 

argument on behalf of Plaintiff. Celine Crowson, Kate Dominguez, Rob Vincent and Kevin 

Hess presented argument on behalf of Defendants.

The Court took the claim construction matters under submission.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 86 Filed 11/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

3257
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF John T. LYNCH, Jr.

No. D-3043.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

John T. Lynch, Jr., of Scottsdale, Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

GEORGE COZART, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 

MARTIN O’MALLEY,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

No. 9:23-cv-190

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending is the Plaintiff, George Cozart’s, Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees 

Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice.1 (Doc. No. 21.) Counsel’s attachment to the 

application for attorney fees includes a recitation of legal services performed and time required. 

After an independent review of the record, the court finds that this amount of time was 

reasonable and not in excess of the statutory maximum when cost of living adjustments are 

calculated. 

Therefore, the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge recommends that:

1. Plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees be granted;

2. The Commissioner of Social Security pay George Cozart, in care of his attorney,

George Piemonte, an attorney fee in the amount of $4,040.82. Payment should be

mailed to: George Cozart, in care of his attorney, George C. Piemonte, 123 N.

McDonough Street, Decatur, GA 30030.

3. This award be subject to any beneficial, contractual and/or assignment-based

interests held by the Plaintiff’s attorney; and

4. If successful at the administrative level, the Plaintiff be granted an extension of

thirty days from receipt of the Notice of Award from the Social Security

Administration to file a motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

1 Plaintiff’s certificate of conference indicates that counsel for the Commissioner is unopposed to the request. 

Case 9:23-cv-00190-MAC-ZJH Document 22 Filed 07/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

4320
2

A copy of these findings, conclusions and recommendation shall be served on all parties 

in the manner provided by law. Any party who objects to any part of these findings, conclusions 

and recommendation must file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with 

a copy. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). An objection must identify the specific 

finding or recommendation to which objection is made, the basis for the objection, and the place 

in the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions and recommendation the disputed determination 

is found. An objection that merely incorporates by reference or refers to the briefing before the 

magistrate judge is not specific. Failure to file specific written objections will bar the aggrieved 

party from appealing the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are 

accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error. See Douglass v.

United Servs. Automobile Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996).

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 12th day of July, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00190-MAC-ZJH Document 22 Filed 07/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

4321
Order entered September 26, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00156-CR

THOMAS LINZ JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-58525-S

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s September 22, 2022 first motion to extend the 

time to file the State’s brief. Although the State’s motion states it is unopposed and 

contains a certificate of conference, appellant has filed an objection to the proposed 

extension. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER the State’s brief filed 

by November 8, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
TU MY TONG, petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO, et al.

No. 18-5131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Brian CAPUTO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M40.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record denied.