alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Vf~) 

### SIGINAL 

# /2ZS-IS iH-QQ /raff6^ 

### A ,, + RECEIVED IN

: SEP 18 m

FILEDIN

### 7/g S/^e J Ttya.% CQURT0Fcriminalappeals yWA* / SEP 18 2S15 Abel Acosta, Cierk Pehh'on tor Rwie.u> in Cnu^e /i/o. Q5~H~ OO^ll- IK 

### This is a Petition tor Lbisa'e.iionzryJ ftevieujj fevitu/mg the Averse. decKion/opinion of tJne. I±xas 

### Courtd-f Cncnm'dl Appeals in fhetr affirmation of tht trial Courts qu'ilty vtrdict. 

### Appellant ujou/J state; after tafci^j Me tria.1 tf&nscr.pts &rd trial Exh)hlts C.dllecti*?i\,; M/3 Monofable Court ^Aou/d Atrerse. snd Re/na^J tAis (\aus&jQfter granting the Certinr,} 6&c£ to 1~Ae

g-Xfri Cnmrt or Criminal AppealSj uulfA instructions to" thdf Honorable Court -ha ron and this, wa'tfer hstk fp the Trial Court for full adjudication rtf the facts Consistent \jo\th this •HonoraAU Courts Mandate, naweL ft) &t fye. evidence adduced 

### -at fn'af ma.s Uf&l/j/ insufficient to sustain a Zibnyi eti b'n..

-I -

### .Appall,a/of tAJQuld Submit that SCtorJinj Jjho fjie p6hrP Report^ Elaine Sai/y 5/af<vi #>*f /W 

### vehicle, /lad V-A^-ee £0 /^ scratchts~ fft f/U right S<^g;' iajAjcA oaurrfr/ u)/><v? fye appplla^ Lz\\?jec\lyl Collided uuth her, please te-e ;W ref-tr to ^faH'-S fyhlhils S; Uand 8. 

### AC(l0jLd/_aj_Tb_J^^5m^^ jiisxr^/^jiy_is_5AftuJ-p^tf^^ LJa'0-e_6_a.L/j?y

-"c^r)i£d^_a^.J_i>o^.ux^l/ao.s./-^LD./7jiluj,b.ea^ .a±Jr!^;j^_^AiA_wj^ .her 1/^.Aiflg. /)cfnr*j;/->j fn+hp Ra/v-Um Ha^p D<V-<-;noa/-/i/J.

J-o^sJ:dle—OMS-e^.i/4^rL.wL/.M

### t-0Lcu_u.(_w2pa.c.Lj-Cf3s£ 

### jLoj?JY3ry_J_Ms,J^Bj/jL)L^

._ ^/}.fMka.tls_car:.

___ _ 

### fLuLty^m££-)Jy—/-oAkLOj^ Vou'/I notice fkat f//e pht>f6jrdph< prodused _dj>_r?o£_ 

### Supp-orJljfild^i:hw.Djo^-yij^en^f:o-^.fi '£>aJhs—C-o^nl/- hJjLt^cp-&rjM£ni„Elagj.e_r£fc^


### ' a-ih.^CQj£^L6.&£)Jkz-Suppj)^ fb^Jb^±&A^^Jz^n.<L£no

-23 sloA.dn\ju of adnaAt, Mat rki<. incident did naf QCCUr trial Court; itxat Court d? fnmi/iJ Jaoed/j Zs?r/ Aeorr 

### this HonnrAiy/p Court^iooujP) evide^nre to proi/e 'ujMouf *uxJJ&Ljn&m*Lj6dLM^ sd/s-Jj-cLd,. 3:&m£ly.J-ll&—CoJltSj-on-,J).oJ^ pldcinri in imminentAanoesj inhere Me State \ JAhrritJJ :had tb fear for t)cr lift. 

### yJJoirrfoj^AtCEkJji^JL^ 

### tonfenJuMxsLj^jLjiaLjtidiusl^ C^ort-^h^^i^JL^f—t^rj±Q/ZL J~-n %c r-psc dm Aefore tliis ftnnoraA/* Pourf, apae/laif 

### JS-\t* emphasis on line J7; "... /tf/r G*W«rA fried ¥o Ait Vour vehicle with his vehicle... ' Please note. 

### that Me witness AneS not std-h appellant tSe</crJ m?de Content u/ith her irehide. 

### BaW On tkt States fjrtness Lo^nl testimony, 

### appellant never made contact ujirh he'ye-hiJe. fhi/s all fe?Jonp/)/e inference that Tire nfcorde>d h ttie 

### SHte are nullified. Tn f»ct} Hie Sjde\ \Alitr)eSS 

## \A)ho initially fi/pfJ the Complaint(Pullet Report) recanted hoth prior to tri^l TinJ A u

ring hrid/} 

### tJr]eo_ui\rocg/lv statinj appellant Aid not fJ/lJe uf&k the rthide tke. State \ l/ttneSfeS ujes*

-5"
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2831

_____________________________

CDC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS,

LLC as Trustee,

Appellant,

v.

PNC BANK, NA, et al.,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

June 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Ian P. Hudson of King Hudson, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for 

Appellant.

Richard S. McIver and H. Michael Muñiz of Kass Shuler, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellees.
> 96 bo - oi y

Plaintiffs name and ID Number

( . 5 P- 7

Place of Confinement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DIVISION

CASE NO.

(Clerk will assign the number)

v.

BfiNTtezr ji.oJgo ac< 3o

Defendant s name and address

APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

i, tW declare, depose, and say I am the Plaintiff in the above entitled case. In

support of my motion to proceed without being required to prepay fees, costs, or give security therefor, I state

because of my poverty, I am unable to pay in advance the filing fee for said proceedings or to give security for

the filing fee. I believe I am entitled to relief.

I, further declare the responses which I h ve made to the questions and instructions below are true.

1. Have you received, within the last 12 months, any money from any of the following

sources?

a. Business, profession or from self-employment

b. Rent payments, interest or dividends?

c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance payments?

d. Gifts or inheritances?

e. Family or friends?

f. Any other sources?

YesQ Non

Yesn NoO

Yesa Non

YesH Non

Yesn Non

Yesu Non

If you answered YES to any of the questions above, describe each source of money

and state the amount received from each during the past 12 months.

Qllurcl i 

2. Do you own cash, or do you have money in a checking or savings account, including any funds in

prison accounts?

YesB Non

If you answered YES, state the total value of the items owned.
YesQ N

3. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, notes, automobiles, or other valuable property,

excluding ordinary household furnishings and clothing?

If you answered YES, describe the property and state its approximate value.

I understand a false st tement in answer to any question in this affidavit will subject me to penalties for

perjury. I declare (certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct

(28 U.S.C. §1746).

., 2o' _.

ignature of Plaintiff

Signed this the <7- day of

ID Number

YOU MUST ATTACH A CURRENT SIX (6) MONTH HISTORY OF

YOUR INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT. YOU CAN ACQUIRE THE

APPROPRIATE INMATE ACCOUNT CERTIFICATE FROM THE

LAW LIBRARY AT YOUR PRISON UNIT.

Revised 6/97
Thomas H. OUTLAND, Petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 19-6956

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document










































 
 

  Exhibit 4.15    
    


 Schedule of Material Differences  


        The only material difference between the General Credit Facility Grant Contract, dated as of September 15, 2010, between Bank of
Beijing, Chaowai Branch and Bona Film Group Co., Ltd (PRC) and the General Credit Facility Grant Contract, dated as of October 19, 2011, between Bank of Beijing, Chaowai Branch
and Bona Film Group Co., Ltd (PRC) is the date of the respective contract. 


        The
only material difference between the Guarantee, dated as of September 15, 2010, between Bank of Beijing, Chaowai Branch and Mr. Dong Yu and the Guarantee, dated as of
October 19, 2011, between Bank of Beijing, Chaowai Branch and Mr. Dong Yu is the date of the respective guarantee. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-04-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-07-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-04-2000
<CASH>                                             468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,954
<PP&E>                                          21,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 431,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,761
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   431,312
<SALES>                                        506,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               506,289
<CGS>                                          362,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  362,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,881
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.05


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

§

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-53 §

BILL PAUL MCDANIEL

VS.

ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff, Bill Paul McDaniel, a pre-trial detainee currently held at the Orange County

Correctional Facility, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

against the Defendant the Orange County Correctional Facility. 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a

claim [Dkt. 4]. 

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to 

the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.1

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance 

with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

1

Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on April 3, 2023 [Dkt. 6].

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 6th day of June, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00053-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 40
Samuel EDELMAN, et ux., Petitioners v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, et al.

No. 18-1570

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
Fredesvindo RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Fior Pichardo DE VELOZ, et al.

No. 18-1510

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/26/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      424,499
COMMITMENTS
  51,011   23,869  102,402  250,435  282,675  403,848  408,946   20,651   15,553

CHANGES FROM 06/19/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,951)
  -6,336     -249      997    5,830    3,767      491    4,515    3,460     -564

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.0      5.6     24.1     59.0     66.6     95.1     96.3      4.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      32       24       47       64       62      120      115
```

----

Updated June 29, 2012
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff

v.

SMOOTHIE KING 

FRANCHISEES, INC.

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00436-JRG

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Symbology 

Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. (“Defendant”) 

hereby stipulate and agree:

1. All claims asserted by Plaintiff in the above-captioned action are hereby 

dismissed with prejudice.

2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in 

connection with this action.

Dated: December 6, 2023

/s/ Christopher A. Honea

Christopher A. Honea

Texas Bar No. 24059967

chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

Texas Bar No. 24036607

rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: 903-705-7420

Facsimile: 903-405-3999

/s/ Eric Pinker, P.C.

Eric Pinker, P.C

Texas State Bar No. 16016550

epinker@lynnllp.com

Greg Brassfield 

Texas State Bar No. 24079900

gbrassfield@lynnllp.com

LYNN PINKER HURST & 

SCHWEGMANN, LLP

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2700

Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: 214-981-3800 

Case 2:23-cv-00436-JRG Document 9 Filed 12/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 111
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Facsimile: 214-981-3839 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy has been electronically filed using the 

CM/ECF filing system on December 6, 2023, which automatically sends email notifications to 

all counsel of record and which will permit viewing and downloading of same from the CM/ECF 

system.

/s/ Christopher A. Honea

 Christopher A. Honea

Case 2:23-cv-00436-JRG Document 9 Filed 12/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 112
<PAGE>
 
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.30(c)
                                AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                      TO
                            VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.
                            EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN
                          __________________________

Pursuant to the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on October 15,
1997, the Vastar Resources, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan (the "Plan") is amended
effective as of November 1, 1997.

A new Section 8 is added to Article II to read as follows:

     "SECTION 8.  SPECIAL TRANSFER

     8.1  A Participant's lump sum benefit pursuant to Article XI of the Vastar
     Resources, Inc. Supplementary Executive Retirement Plan shall be
     transferred to the Plan and governed by the Plan provisions applicable to
     Deferred Compensation, including without limitation distribution 
     elections."

Executed This 30th day of December, 1997.


ATTEST                                 VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.



BY: /s/ JONATHAN D. EDELFELT           BY: /s/ JEFFREY M. BENDER
    -------------------------             ---------------------
    JONATHAN D. EDELFELT                  JEFFREY M. BENDER
    Associate Secretary                   Vice President
                                          Human Resources
In Re Earnest Cassell WOODS, II, petitioner.

No. 17-9480.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Samuel Rivera ROSADO, Petitioner, v. LUCID ENERGY, INC.

No. 19-5299

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER and Paul Home, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-431

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Motion of petitioner in No. 19-454 to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated:  May 9, 2007

/s/ Stephen T. Wills
Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, David Hackett, Chief Financial Officer of Diversinet Corp., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diversinet Corp.





/s/ David Hackett

Name: David Hackett

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

March 9, 2006



This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Gerardo Tajonar CORTES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6042

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Laureano Chirino RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5810.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      376,488
COMMITMENTS
  85,269  157,519   86,101  180,082  104,515  351,452  348,135   25,036   28,353

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,269)
    -143   -9,835    9,771    9,986   18,562   19,614   18,498      655    1,771

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.6     41.8     22.9     47.8     27.8     93.4     92.5      6.6      7.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      170)
      59       58       77       37       37      140      139
```

----

Updated October 28, 2013
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., applicants, v. Aiden STOCKMAN, et al.

No. 18A627.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Application for stay presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court granted, and the District Court's December 22, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government's appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government's petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.

Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER, Justice SOTOMAYOR, and Justice KAGAN would deny the application.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-38035) of our report dated August 11, 1999, on our audits
of  the  consolidated   financial   statements  of  Prophet  21,  Inc.  and  its
Subsidiaries  as of June 30,  1999 and for each of the two  years in the  period
ended June 30, 1999, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August 11,
1999 relating to the financial  statement schedule as of and for each of the two
years in the period ended June 30, 1999, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 27, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1
                                                                    ------------
                          ACT Teleconferencing, Inc.

                               Power of Attorney
                         of Directors and/or Officers


     The undersigned directors and/or officers of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc., a
Colorado corporation, hereby make, constitute, and appoint Gerald D. Van
Eeckhout and Gavin Thomson, and either of them, the undersigned's true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in
the undersigned's names, place, and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned's
names as such directors and/or officers of said corporation to an Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB or other applicable form, and all amendments to it, to be filed
by said corporation in March, 1999 with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, with all
exhibits and other supporting documents, with the SEC, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact, and either of them, full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and
execution of the powers expressly granted in this power of attorney.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set the undersigned's hand this
August 6, 1999.



                              /s/ Ronald J. Bach
                              ---------------------------
                              Ronald J. Bach

                              /s/ James F. Seifert
                              ---------------------------
                              James F. Seifert

                              /s/ Donald Sturtevant
                              ---------------------------
                              Donald Sturtevant

                              /s/ Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout
                              ---------------------------
                              Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout