alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00449-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL 

PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR NON-PARTY TEXAS INSTRUMENTS

Plaintiff Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc. (“UCT”) respectfully submits the 

attached proposed stipulated supplemental Protective Order for non-party Texas Instruments, for 

the Court’s consideration and approval. Non-party Texas Instruments has requested the 

supplemental protective order for its production in response to UCT’s subpoena. Defendant

Lenovo Group Limited (“LGL”) does not oppose this motion.

Dated: November 20, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brett E. Cooper 

Brett E. Cooper (NY SBN 4011011) 

bcooper@bc-lawgroup.com

Seth Hasenour (TX SBN 24059910)

shasenour@bc-lawgroup.com

Jonathan Yim (TX SBN 24066317)

jyim@bc-lawgroup.com

Drew B. Hollander (NY SBN 5378096)

dhollander@bc-lawgroup.com

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 57 Filed 11/20/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1106
2

BC LAW GROUP, P.C. 

200 Madison Avenue, 24th Floor

New York, NY 10016 

Phone: 212-951-0100

Attorneys for Plaintiff Universal Connectivity 

Technologies Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 20, 2024 all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Brett Cooper

Brett Cooper

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The Parties have complied with the meet and confer requirement and the motion is 

submitted as unopposed. 

/s/ Brett Cooper

Brett Cooper

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 57 Filed 11/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1107
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, William Dean Singleton, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results
of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. /s/ WILLIAM DEAN SINGLETONWilliam Dean Singleton,Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and DirectorApril 29, 2005
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2049

AN ACT

To rename Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts as ‘‘Wolf Trap National Park for

the Performing Arts’’.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2049

AN ACT

To rename Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts

as ‘‘Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2049 EH

1 SECTION 1. RENAMING.

2 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the establish3 ment of the Wolf Trap Farm Park in Fairfax County, Vir4 ginia, and for other purposes’’, Public Law 89–671 (16

5 U.S.C. 284) is amended in the first section and in section

6 11(2) by striking ‘‘Wolf Trap Farm Park’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts’’. Any

8 reference to such park in any law, regulation, map, docu9 ment, paper, or other record of the United States shall

10 be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Wolf Trap National

11 Park for the Performing Arts’’.

12 SEC. 2. USE OF NAME.

13 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the establish14 ment of the Wolf Trap Farm Park in Fairfax County, Vir15 ginia, and for other purposes’’, Public Law 89–671 (16

16 U.S.C. 284) is amended by adding at the end the fol17 lowing:

18 ‘‘SEC. 14. Any reference to the park other than by

19 the name ‘Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing

20 Arts’ shall be prohibited.’’.

21 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAWS.

22 Any laws, rules, or regulations that are applicable

23 solely to units of the National Park System that are des24 ignated as a ‘‘National Park’’ shall not apply to ‘‘Wolf

25 Trap National Park for the Performing Arts’’ nor to any
3

•HR 2049 EH

1 other units designated as a ‘‘National Park for the Per2 forming Arts’’.

3 SEC. 4. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

4 Section 4(c)(3) of ‘‘An Act to provide for the estab5 lishment of the Wolf Trap Farm Park in Fairfax County,

6 Virginia, and for other purposes’’, Public Law 89–671 (16

7 U.S.C. 284) is amended by striking ‘‘Funds’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘funds’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 15,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RICH MEDIA CLUB LLC, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

DMG MEDIA LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-388-JRG

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED DISCOVERY ORDER

In accordance with the Order regarding the scheduling conference (D.I. 19), Plaintiff Rich 

Media Club, LLC and Defendant DMG Media Limited jointly move for entry of the agreed 

Discovery Order, filed together with this Motion as a proposed order. 

The parties have not made any changes to the Court’s proposed order.

 Dated: April 8, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

Attorneys for Plaintiff Rich Media Club, LLC Attorneys for Defendant DMG Media Limited

/s/ Alison A. Richards

Alison Aubry Richards

IL Bar # 6285669 (also admitted in ED Texas)

arichards@giplg.com

David Berten (to be admitted in ED Texas)

IL Bar # 6200898

dberten@giplg.com

Global IP Law Group, LLC

55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3400

Chicago, IL 60603

Telephone: (312) 241-1500

/s/ Geoffrey R. Miller

Michael J. Sacksteder (Admitted E.D. Texas)

FENWICK & WEST LLP

555 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: 415.875.2300

Facsimile: 415.281.1350

Email: msacksteder@fenwick.com

Geoffrey R. Miller

(Texas State Bar No. 24094847)

FENWICK & WEST LLP

902 Broadway, Suite 18

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 399
2

New York, NY 10010

Telephone: 212.430.2600

Facsimile: 650.938.5200

Email: gmiller@fenwick.com

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 400
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have conferred on April 8, 2024 and have agreed to 

the filing of this proposed Docket Control Order.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 8, 2024, the foregoing was electronically filed with the 

Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing to all counsel of record.

/s/ Alison A. Richards

Alison Aubry Richards

 

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 401
EXHIBIT 20

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 286
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 2 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 3 

https://www.oneplus.com/us/9/specshttps://www.qualcomm.com/content/dam/qcomm-martech/dmassets/documents/prod brief qcom sd888 plus 5g final.pdf

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 4 

https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101433/0102/Functional-description/In

Security in an ARMv8-A System (https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100A-systems-?lang=en) 

[1] (A) receiving a request from a software program to access a specified one of the plurality of resources;

The system receives a request from a software program (such as a software appli

resource, such as a normal world resource or a secure world resource. 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 5 

Security in an ARMv8-A System at 5 

[1] (B) determining whether the specified one of the plurality of resources is a protected resource;

A determination is made whether the specified one of the plurality of resources is example, whether the resource is in secure world or normal world. 

Security in an ARMv8-A System at 5 

[1] (C) if the specified one of the plurality of resources is a 

If the specified one of the plurality of resources is a protected resource (e.g., in se

performed. 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 6 

protected resource, performing steps of:[1(C)] (1) if the computer system is operating in a protected mode of operation, then denying the request regardless of access rights associated with the software program including software programs having a mostprivileged level; and

If the computer system is operating in a protected mode of operation, then the req

access rights associated with the software program including software programs hFor example, if the Secure Monitor Disable bit is set to disable, Secure Monitor Cto access secure world resources, are disabled. Arm Architecture Reference Manual for A-Profile Architecture at D19.2.29 (https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0487/latest/) 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 7 

Arm Architecture Reference Manual for A-Profile Architecture at D19-6959. Arm Architecture Reference Manual for A-Profile Architecture at G1-9748-49. 

[1(C)] (2) processing the request based on the access 

If the computer system is not operating in the protected mode of operation (e.g., Sis processed based on access rights associated with the software program. 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 8 

rights associated with the software program if the computer system is not operating in the protected mode of operation.

Security in an ARMv8-A System at 5 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-21 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,424
<PP&E>                                         521,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                 339,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       135,132
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,488,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,349
<SALES>                                        232,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,874
<CGS>                                        1,104,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,478,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,509,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,509,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,509,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                       443
<INVENTORY>                                     11,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,285
<PP&E>                                           3,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                     823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,856
<SALES>                                         20,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,099
<CGS>                                           14,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    91
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                       667
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<FN>
<F1>The Company presents primary earnings per share (EPS) on the face of its income
statement. Fully diluted EPS is within 97% of primary EPS. The figures
presented above are primary EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Christopher EVERSON, Petitioner, v. Theresa LANTZ, et al.

No. 19-6537

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                  17,919
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                 801,551
<DEPRECIATION>                        (111,367)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         774,857 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                                224,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                 10
<COMMON>                                   156
<OTHER-SE>                             276,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           774,857
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        36,963
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           26,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       6,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          8,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      8,427
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             8,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.47
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  Exhibit 21
                   Subsidiaries of Maxwell Shoe company Inc.


Sprague Company
101 Sprague Street
P.O. Box 37
Readville (Boston), Massachusetts 02137

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization--Delaware

Ownership by Maxwell Shoe Company Inc.--100%


Maxwell Retail Inc.
101 Sprague Street
P.O. Box 37
Readville (Boston), Massachusetts 20137

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization--Delaware

Ownership by Maxwell Shoe Company Inc.--100%


Maxwell Footwear, Inc.
870 Market Street, Room 1210
San Francisco, California 94102

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization--Delaware

Ownership by Maxwell Shoe Company Inc.--100%


MSC Holdings LLC
23455 Cloverdale Court
Newall, CA 91321

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization--Delaware

Ownership by Maxwell Shoe Company Inc.--100%
Neil GRENNING, petitioner, v. James KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center, et al.

No. 18-9052.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 426 

Congratulating the Lady Bears of Baylor University on winning the 2012 

National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Women’s Basketball 

Championship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2012 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Lady Bears of Baylor University on winning the 2012 National Collegiate Athletic Association 

Division I Women’s Basketball Championship. 

Whereas the Baylor University women’s basketball team, the 

Lady Bears, won its second National Collegiate Athletic 

Association Division I Women’s Basketball Championship 

by defeating the University of Notre Dame by a score of 

80 to 61, becoming the only team in men’s and women’s 

college basketball to finish the season with a perfect 

undefeated record of 40–0; 

Whereas the Lady Bears’ 2011–2012 season marked only the 

7th undefeated season in the history of Division I women’s college basketball; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 426 ATS 

Whereas Coach Kim Mulkey is the only woman in women’s 

basketball history to have played on and coached a national championship team; 

Whereas Coach Mulkey brought the Lady Bears its 2d national championship since 2005, with a starting lineup 

that included Brittney Griner, Destiny Williams, Odyssey 

Sims, Kimetria Hayden, and Jordan Madden; 

Whereas All-American junior Brittney Griner led the Lady 

Bears to victory with 26 points, 13 rebounds, and 5 

blocks in a dominating performance over the University 

of Notre Dame and finished the 2011–2012 season with 

more than 920 points; 

Whereas the members of the Lady Bears basketball team 

should all be commended for their teamwork, dedication, 

and athletic prowess; 

Whereas Baylor University as 2011–2012 women’s basketball 

national champions, has continued to demonstrate excellence in both athletics and academics; 

Whereas the Lady Bears basketball team has significantly 

advanced the sport of women’s basketball by demonstrating character and sportsmanship; 

Whereas the Lady Bears overcame significant adversity and 

competition by defying expectations to finish the season 

with a dominating performance in the final title game 

and a perfect undefeated record of 40–0; 

Whereas the accomplishments of the Lady Bears are another 

testament to the strength and will of women across the 

State of Texas; and 

Whereas the Lady Bears basketball team is the pride of its 

loyal fans, current and former students, and the Lone 

Star State: Now, therefore, be it 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 426 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Lady 

2 Bears of Baylor University on winning the 2012 National 

3 Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Women’s Bas4 ketball Championship and completing the 2011–2012 sea5 son with an undefeated record of 40 wins and 0 losses. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

QUINTON RUSSO § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-316

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Quinton Russo, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

This matter was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636 and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the

United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for

the disposition of the case.

Discussion

The court previously entered a Preliminary Filing Fee Order. (Doc. #2.) A copy of the Order

was sent to Petitioner at the Hardin County Jail, the address Petitioner provided to the court. The

copy of the Order sent to Petitioner was returned to the court with a notation stating Petitioner is no

longer at that address. Petitioner has not supplied the court with a new address or otherwise

contacted the court.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action for

want of prosecution sua sponte whenever necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious

disposition of cases. Anthony v. Marion Cnty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1167 (5th Cir. 1980). 

See also McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988). Eastern District of Texas

Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants such as Petitioner to provide the court with a physical

address and keep the clerk advised in writing of a current address.

By not providing the court with his current address, Petitioner has prevented the court from

communicating with him and moving this case towards resolution. He has therefore failed to

Case 1:23-cv-00316-MAC-CLS Document 4 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5
diligently prosecute this case. As a result, this case should be dismissed without prejudice for want

of prosecution.

Recommendation

This Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved

party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and

recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by

the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d

1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 4th day of October, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00316-MAC-CLS Document 4 Filed 10/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 6