alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM JAMES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 15287

D.C. No. 2:10

- cv

- 00664

- MCE

- AC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017 **

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON,

Circuit Judges.

William James appeals pro se from the district court’ s order sua sponte

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with the district

court’s order

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion, Pagta lunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002), and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FI LED

MAY 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 15287

we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its di scretion in dismissing James’ action

after James failed to comply with court orders and meet deadlines. See id. at 642

-

43 (setting forth the factors to consider before dismissing for failure to comply

with a court order).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying James’ motion for

appointment of counsel because James failed to demonstrate exceptional

circumstances. See Cano v. Taylor , 739 F.3d 1214, 1218 (9th Cir. 2014) (setting

forth standard of review and requirements for appointment of counsel).

AFFIRMED

.
Ortino Garcia LICON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6952.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Samuel T. PITTS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-6977

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
William James TRUESDALE, Petitioner v. FLORIDA

No. 19-5981

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Gareth Evan LOMAX, Petitioner v. MASSACHUSETTS, et al.

No. 19M47

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,752
<SECURITIES>                                     2,290
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,591
<PP&E>                                          15,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,861
<BONDS>                                          3,011
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.16)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000917823
<NAME>                        PROPHET 21, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,520
<SECURITIES>                                   1,661
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (261)
<INVENTORY>                                    666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,034
<PP&E>                                         5,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,677)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,728
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       42
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,475
<SALES>                                        51,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               51,987
<CGS>                                          24,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (286)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,393
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.85


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. N I LESH BH A RA TK U M A R K U M A R, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50227 D. C . No . 8 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 1 3 2 - R GK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R . G a ryK l aus ne r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 18, 2013 ** B e f o r e : T A L L M A N , M . S M I T H , an dH U R W I T Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . N i l e s h B ha r a tkum a rK um arappe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c h a lle n g e s h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rc o n s p ir a c yto u s e a n dp o s s e s s c o u n te r f e it ac ce ss devi ce s, i n v i ol at i on of 18 U . S . C . § 1 02 9(b)(2). W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm . 

# FI LED JU N 24 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50227 2 K u m ar co n t en d s th ath i s g u i l ty p l ea w as n o tk n o w i n g an dv o l u n t ary b ecau se h e received i n effecti v e assi st an ce fro m tri al co u n sel , w h o fai l edp ro p erl y t o ad v i se hi m aboutthe i m m i gr a t i on c ons e que nc e s of hi s gui l typl e a . “ C l a i m s of i ne f f e c t i ve as si st ance of coun se l ar e genera l l y i napp ropri at e on d i re ctappeal . ” See U ni ted States v . McKe nna , 3 2 7 F .3 d8 3 0 , 8 4 5 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 3 ). C o n trary to K u m ar ’s c ont e nt i on, the r e c or d on appe a l i s nots uf f i c i e nt l yde ve l ope d t o e va l ua t e the e f f e c tiv e n e s s o f

tr ia l c o u n s e l. Se e id . AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 521 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 521

 Designating September 2012 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2012

Mr. Rubio submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating September 2012 as ``National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas the estimated 1,275,000 individuals in the United States who live with a 
        spinal cord injury cost society billions of dollars in health care costs 
        and lost wages;
Whereas an estimated 100,000 of those individuals are veterans who suffered the 
        spinal cord injury while serving as members of the United States Armed 
        Forces;
Whereas accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries;
Whereas motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause of spinal cord and 
        traumatic brain injuries;
Whereas 70 percent of all spinal cord injuries that occur in children under the 
        age of 18 are a result of motor vehicle accidents;
Whereas every 48 minutes a person will become paralyzed, underscoring the urgent 
        need to develop new neuroprotection, pharmacological, and regeneration 
        treatments to reduce, prevent, and reverse paralysis; and
Whereas increased education and investment in research are key factors in 
        improving outcomes for victims of spinal cord injuries, improving the 
        quality of life of victims, and ultimately curing paralysis: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2012 as ``Spinal Cord Injury 
        Awareness Month'';
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of Spinal Cord Injury 
        Awareness Month;
            (3) continues to support research to find better 
        treatments, therapies, and a cure for paralysis;
            (4) supports clinical trials for new therapies that offer 
        promise and hope to those persons living with paralysis; and
            (5) commends the dedication of local, regional, and 
        national organizations, researchers, doctors, volunteers, and 
        people across the United States that are working to improve the 
        quality of life of people living with paralysis and their 
        families.
                                 <all>
```
Gibron LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7261

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Briand WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6416.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  Subsidiaries


Name                                                                Jurisdiction
----                                                                ------------

Dominion Homes Financial Services, Ltd.                             Ohio

Dominion Structural Warranty Company, LLC                           Ohio

Resolution Property Company, LLC                                    Ohio

Alliance Title Agency of Kentucky, LLC                              Kentucky

Dominion Homes of Kentucky, Ltd. (d/b/a "Dominion Homes")           Kentucky

Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC                                  Kentucky

Dominion Homes Realty, LLC                                          Kentucky

All listed subsidiaries are wholly-owned, except for Dominion Homes of Kentucky,
Ltd. ("DHK"). DHK is a Kentucky limited liability partnership whose general
partner is Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC and whose limited partner is
Dominion Homes, Inc. DHK is 99% owned by Dominion Homes, Inc. and 1% owned by
Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report), I,
Lawrence J. Madden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company



| | /s/ Lawrence J. Madden
Lawrence J. Madden
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 14, 2002
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/24/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      368,232
COMMITMENTS
  94,026  175,560   70,149  180,476   95,725  344,651  341,434   23,581   26,798

CHANGES FROM 09/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -58,833)
  -2,259  -11,742   -4,229  -50,007  -40,290  -56,495  -56,261   -2,338   -2,572

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.5     47.7     19.1     49.0     26.0     93.6     92.7      6.4      7.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      51       69       62       32       29      117      132
```

----

Updated September 27, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00449-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc.’s (“UCT” or

“Plaintiff”) Unopposed Motion for the Issuance of Letter Rogatory (the “Motion”). Having 

considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.

Accordingly, the Court will execute the Request for Judicial Assistance attached as Exhibit

A to UCT’s Motion. The Clerk is DIRECTED to authenticate, under seal of this Court, the Court’s 

signature on the Request for Judicial Assistance and prepare two certified copies of the signed and 

sealed letter. Counsel for UCT is hereby ORDERED to arrange receipt of the materials from the 

Court by contacting the Clerk’s Office and to deliver the issued Request for Judicial Assistance to 

the proper authority in Taiwan.

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 65-2 Filed 12/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

1227
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP 

 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Notice is hereby given that Jayla C. Grant with the law firm of Duane Morris LLP, admitted 

to practice in this Court, enters her appearance as counsel of record for Defendant Cisco Systems, 

Inc. to accept service of all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, correspondence, and other 

material related to this litigation on behalf of Defendant. Ms. Grant’s contact information is in the 

signature block below. 

Dated: November 21, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jayla C. Grant 

Jayla C. Grant 

Georgia Bar No. 312669 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309-3929 

Telephone: 404.253.6932 

Facsimile: 404.393.4611 

Email: JCGrant@duanemorris.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 84
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 21, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel 

of record. 

/s/ Jayla C. Grant 

Jayla C. Grant 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 85
Omar VALDIVIA, petitioner, v. S. FRAUENHEIM, Warden.

No. 17-8725.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MJM REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS,

Plaintiff,

versus

GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE and 

ALACRITY SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-416

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff MJM Real Estate Investments filed suit in Texas state court on September 13, 

2023 (#2). On November 16, 2023, Defendants removed this suit to federal court and Defendant 

Great Lakes elected to accept whatever liability Defendant Alacrity might have under Texas 

Insurance Code §542.006(a) (#1). Under Texas state court procedure, Defendant Alacrity’s 

dismissal would be automatic. The court referred this matter for pretrial management to the 

Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, who advised the parties to file an 

appropriate motion on the dismissal of Defendant Alacrity. On February 16, 2024, Defendant 

Alacrity filed the instant Unopposed Motion to Dismiss which is now pending before the court 

(#12). Judge Stetson entered a Report and Recommendation advising the court to adopt the 

unopposed motion on March 19, 2024 (#19). To date, no objections have been filed. 

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available 

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of 

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 1:23-cv-00416-MAC-CLS Document 20 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 113
2

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#19) 

is ADOPTED. Defendant Alacrity’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss (#12) is 

GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Alacrity are considered to be claims 

against Defendant Great Lakes, and Defendant Alacrity is, hereby, DISMISSED from this 

action. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 3rd day of April, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00416-MAC-CLS Document 20 Filed 04/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 114
Amendment Number One to Savings Restoration Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE SUNCOKE ENERGY, INC. SAVINGS RESTORATION PLAN 
 WHEREAS, SunCoke
Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) is the sponsor of the SunCoke Energy, Inc. Savings Restoration Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is desirable to make certain corrective and administrative amendments to the Plan, effective January 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), to
facilitate Plan administration. 
 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as of the Effective Date:

  

	 	1.	A new Section IV.3.D is added as follows: 

 “D. Forfeitures: In the event a participant separates from service prior to becoming vested under Section IV.3.B of the Plan, any Matching Employer Contribution and Additional Employer
Contribution amounts that are forfeited by the Participant shall be credited to the Plan’s forfeiture account and may be used to offset future Company contributions or Plan expenses.” 

 

	 	2.	The first sentence of Section V.1. is amended by replacing the words “on the first day of the seventh month following the termination of employment” with
“within the seventh calendar month following the termination of employment”. 

  

	 	3.	The second and fourth sentences of Section V.2 are in each case amended by replacing the words “on the first day of the seventh month following the
participant’s Retirement” with “within the seventh calendar month following the participant’s Retirement”. 

  

	 	4.	Section V.3 is amended by replacing the date of “January 1, 2016” in the penultimate sentence with “January 1, 2017”. 


 

	 	5.	Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment One to the Plan to be executed on the date shown below, but effective as of the
Effective Date. 
  

			
	SUNCOKE ENERGY, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Gary P. Yeaw
	Name:	 	Gary P. Yeaw
	Title:	 	Vice President, Human Resources
		
	Date:	 	April 24, 2012