alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2035 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2035

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To correct errors in the authorizations of certain programs 
  administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2035

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To correct errors in the authorizations of certain programs 
  administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) Motor Vehicle Safety.--Section 30104 of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``$81,200,000'' and inserting 
``$98,313,500''.
    (b) Motor Vehicle Information.--Section 32102 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$6,200,000'' and inserting 
``$9,562,500''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Demetrius Terrence FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-8670

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,948
COMMITMENTS
  28,747    2,166    3,580   44,012   75,402   76,339   81,148    7,609    2,800

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,186)
     539     -657       51    1,494    2,211    2,084    1,605      102      581

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.2      2.6      4.3     52.4     89.8     90.9     96.7      9.1      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      16        4        1       36       38       52       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      226,281
COMMITMENTS
  68,889   39,965    1,818  140,200  177,078  210,907  218,861   15,374    7,420

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,141)
   1,204   -5,134      207       76    7,284    1,487    2,357    1,654      784

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.4     17.7      0.8     62.0     78.3     93.2     96.7      6.8      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      159)
      41       24       12       66       58      114       87
```

----

Updated August 16, 2013
INVERSIONES Y PROCESADORA TROPICAL INPROTSA, S.A., Petitioner v. DEL MONTE INTERNATIONAL GMBH

No. 19-117

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

V.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.; 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF E-DISCOVERY ORDER

The parties jointly move for entry of the attached E-Discovery Order.

Dated: Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Marc A. Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Christian W. Conkle

CA State Bar No. 306374

Jonathan Ma

CA State Bar No. 312773

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com

Email: jma@raklaw.com

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/30/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 371
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

/s/ Iman Lordgooei

Kevin Hardy 

D.C. Bar No. 473941 (admitted in E.D. Tex.) 

kevinhardy@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

1300 I Street, N.W., Suite 900 

Washington, DC 20005 

Tel: 202.538.8000 

Fax: 202.538.8100 

Victoria F. Maroulis 

California Bar No. 202603 (admitted in E.D. 

Tex.) 

victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Tel : 650-801-5000 

Fax: 650-801-5100 

Sean Pak 

California Bar No. 219032 (pro hac vice 

forthcoming) 

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 

Iman Lordgooei 

California Bar No. 251320 (admitted in E.D. 

Tex.) 

imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com 

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Tel: 415-875-6600 

Fax: 415-875-6700 

Melissa R. Smith 

Texas State Bar No. 24001351 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/30/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 372
303 South Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Phone: (903) 934-8450 

Fax: (903) 934-9257 

Counsel for Defendants

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/30/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 373
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 30th day of November, 2023, with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that counsel complied with the requirements of Eastern District

of Texas Local Rule CV-7(h). The parties are in agreement on filing the E-Discovery Order 

/s/ Reza Mirzaie____

Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/30/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 374
Bernardo COSTA, Petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 19-7048

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEXCOM, INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00473-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT DEXCOM, INC.’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORAL HEARING

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(g), Defendant DexCom, Inc. (“DexCom”), by and through 

its undersigned counsel, respectfully requests an oral hearing on its Renewed Motion for Judgment 

on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (Dkt. No. 25, “Motion”). In 

support of the present motion, DexCom states:

• Briefing with respect to DexCom’s Motion is completed. DexCom filed its Motion on 

February 16, 2024. (Dkt. No. 25.) Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Symbology”)

filed its Response on March 8, 2024. (Dkt. No. 27.) DexCom filed its Reply on April 2, 

2024 (Dkt. No. 30) and Symbology filed its Sur-Reply on April 9, 2024 (Dkt. No. 31). 

• The parties have not yet appeared before the Court with respect to the Motion.

• DexCom believes that oral argument will assist the Court in understanding the issues set 

forth in the Motion.

For the reasons stated, DexCom respectfully requests that the Court set an oral hearing at 

the Court’s convenience with respect to DexCom’s Motion.

Case 2:23-cv-00473-JRG Document 32 Filed 05/16/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 719
Counsel for DexCom has conferred with counsel for Symbology regarding the present 

motion, and Symbology does not oppose this motion.

Dated: May 16, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ricardo J. Bonilla

Neil J. McNabnay

Texas Bar No. 24002583 

Ricardo J. Bonilla 

Texas Bar No. 24082704

Rodeen Talebi 

Texas Bar No. 24103958

Alexander H. Martin

Texas Bar No. 24091828

mcnabnay@fr.com

rbonilla@fr.com

talebi@fr.com

martin@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 747-5070 (Telephone)

(214) 747-2091 (Facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

DEXCOM, INC.

Case 2:23-cv-00473-JRG Document 32 Filed 05/16/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 720
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy has been electronically filed using the CM/ECF 

filing system on May 16, 2024, which automatically sends email notifications to all counsel of 

record and which will permit viewing and downloading of same from the CM/ECF system.

/s/ Ricardo J. Bonilla 

 Ricardo J. Bonilla

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-7(i), counsel has complied with the 

meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h). Counsel for DexCom conferred with Counsel 

for Symbology on May 16, 2024, concerning the relief sought in this Motion. Counsel for 

Symbology is unopposed.

/s/ Ricardo J. Bonilla 

 Ricardo J. Bonilla

Case 2:23-cv-00473-JRG Document 32 Filed 05/16/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 721
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

RAVENWHITE LICENSING, LLC,

2:23-cv-00423

THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and HOME DEPOT 

U.S.A., INC.

The Home Depot, Inc. c/o 

Corporation Service Company, 

251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808

The Dacus Firm, P.C. 

Deron R. Dacus Texas Bar No. 00790553 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430 

Tyler, TX 75701

9/18/23

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 110
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00423 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 6-1 Filed 09/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 111
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.01D

                                   AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                         GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
        1993 EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION AND RESTRICTED SHARE PLAN, AS AMENDED

         This Amendment to the Guilford Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1993 Employee
Share Option and Restricted Share Plan (this "Amendment") is made as of
February 18, 1997 by Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the "Corporation").

         SECTION 14 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as
follows:

                 "14.1  General.  Except as provided in Section 14.2, during
                 the lifetime of an Optionee, only such Optionee or grantee
                 (or, in the event of legal incapacity or incompetency, the
                 guardian or legal representative of the Optionee or grantee)
                 may exercise the Option.  No Restricted Shares shall be
                 assignable or transferable, other than by will or the laws of
                 descent and distribution, before the satisfaction of
                 applicable performance and service requirements with respect
                 to such Shares, as set forth in the applicable Restricted
                 Share Agreement.

                 "14.2  Family Transfers.  The Committee may, in its
                 discretion, authorize all or a portion of the Options granted
                 to an Optionee to be on terms which permit transfer by such
                 Optionee to (i) the spouse, children or grandchildren of the
                 Optionee ("Immediate Family Members"), (ii) a trust or trusts
                 for the exclusive benefit of such Immediate Family Members, or
                 (iii) a partnership in which such Immediate Family members are
                 the only partners, provided that (x) there may be no
                 consideration for any such transfer, (y) the Stock Option
                 Agreement pursuant to which such Options are granted must be
                 approved by the Committee, and must expressly provide for
                 transferability in a manner consistent with this Section, and
                 (z) subsequent transfers of transferred Options shall be
                 prohibited except those in accordance with Section 14.2 or by
                 will or the laws of descent and distribution.  Following
                 transfer, any such Options shall continue to be subject to the
                 same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior
                 to transfer, provided that for purposes of Sections 12.7
                 hereof the term "Optionee" shall be deemed to refer the
                 transferee.  The events of termination of employment of
                 Section 12 hereof shall continue to be applied with respect to
                 the original Optionee, following which the Options shall be
                 exercisable by the transferee only to the extent, and for the
                 periods specified in Section 12."
Leeton Jahwanza THOMAS, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7063

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
Lee Dale LOFTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 19-6928

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2063 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2063

To provide for a study of marketing practices of the firearms industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a study of marketing practices of the firearms industry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY OF MARKETING PRACTICES OF THE FIREARMS INDUSTRY.

    (a) In General.--The Federal Trade Commission and the Attorney 
General shall jointly conduct a study of the marketing practices of the 
firearms industry with respect to children.
    (b) Issues Examined.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), 
the Commission and the Attorney General shall examine the extent to 
which the firearms industry advertises and promotes its products to 
minors, including in media outlets in which minors comprise a 
substantial percentage of the audience.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Commission and the Attorney General shall submit to 
Congress a report on the study conducted under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: May 15, 2009

|                                                                                                                 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Stephen T. Wills                                                                                             | 
|Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President - Operations andChief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
- 1 -

No. 6:23-cr-00112

United States of America

v.

Steven Duane Chandler

ORDER 

The court referred this matter to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 

and issued findings of fact and recommendation on the guilty plea. 

Doc. 40. The magistrate judge recommended the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one 

of the indictment. Id. Defendant waived his right to object to the 

magistrate judge’s findings. Id. at 2.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The 

court also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Steven Duane Chandler guilty of count one of the indictment, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) – Possession 

of a Firearm by a Prohibited Person. 

So ordered by the court on December 4, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00112-JCB-JDL Document 46 Filed 12/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

166
Clara Lewis BROCKINGTON, Petitioner v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security

No. 19-6157

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/01/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      604,026
COMMITMENTS
  84,659   30,994  183,881  318,869  370,579  587,409  585,454   16,617   18,572

CHANGES FROM 09/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     11,186)
  -5,621    2,534   10,544    8,594     -564   13,517   12,514   -2,331   -1,328

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.0      5.1     30.4     52.8     61.4     97.2     96.9      2.8      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      149)
      34       44       59       65       66      134      135
```

----

Updated October 25, 2013
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-99-MAC

'

ROCKY WAYNE MORGAN, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that the 

court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Rocky Wayne Morgan, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00099-MAC-ZJH Document 29 Filed 02/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 68
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) 

– Failure to Register as a Sex Offender.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 8th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00099-MAC-ZJH Document 29 Filed 02/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 69
Jim FEEHAN, Petitioner v. Rick MARCONE, et al.

No. 18-1470

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.