alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS RESTATED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 
3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS SCHEDULE HAS BEEN
RESTATED TO REFLECT THE EFFECT OF FASB #128, EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,891
<PP&E>                                       1,024,617
<DEPRECIATION>                               (180,473)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 987,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,745
<BONDS>                                        484,121
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                     400,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   987,035
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,060
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-28597, 333-38855, 333-67457, 333-93427, 333-48730, 333-52158,
333-86140, 333-103789, 333-115015, 333-124513, 333-146770 and 333-159516) of
Rambus Inc., of our report dated February 25, 2010 relating to the financial
statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 10-K.











/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose,
California


February
25, 2010
Donald R. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY.

No. 19-7468.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

'

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-109

'

BRYAN ALAN MELANCON, JR., '

'

'

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count Five of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Bryan Alan Melancon, Jr. 

Case 1:23-cr-00109-MAC-CLS Document 77 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 237
2

(3), is adjudged guilty as to Count Five of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense Methamphetamine (Actual).

.

 ________________________________________

 MARCIA A. CRONE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of August, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00109-MAC-CLS Document 77 Filed 08/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 238
Michele BUCKNER, Warden, Petitioner v. Robert W. ALLEN

No. 19-91

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Southern District denied.
PApp 027

Case 4:23-cv-00838-ALM Document 30-3 Filed 07/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 285
PApp 028

Case 4:23-cv-00838-ALM Document 30-3 Filed 07/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 286
Jennifer PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Paul Grant DWYER

No. 19-5019

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

# **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

#  

The undersignedhereby certify that this report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Dated: November 13,  2007 | By:                                    | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|--------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   |                      | Roger E. Gower                         |
|   |                      | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                      |                                   |
|   |                      |                                   |
|   | Dated: November 13,  2007 | By:                                    | /s/ Bruce R. Ficks |   |
|   |                      | Bruce R. Ficks                         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32120-32121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Emerging Technology Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Emerging Technology Technical Advisory Committee (ETTAC) will 
meet on June 16, 2022, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern

[[Page 32121]]

Daylight Time. The meeting will be available via teleconference. The 
Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export 
Administration on the identification of emerging and foundational 
technologies with potential dual-use applications as early as possible 
in their developmental stages both within the United States and abroad.

Agenda

Open Session

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Introduction by the Bureau of Industry and Security Leadership.
    3. Presentation: Assessing Emerging Technologies (by Daniel M. 
Gerstein, Ph.D.).
    4. Questions and Answers.
    5. Public Comments/Announcements.

Closed Session

    6. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 10(a)(1) 
and 10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#38614e5d4c4c5d166b484a51565f5d4a785a514b165c575b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="326b44574646571c6142405b5c55574072505b411c565d511c555d44">[email protected]</span></a> no later than June 9, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements 
at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate 
distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the 
Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation 
materials prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on February 1, 
2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 10(d)), that the portion of the meeting 
dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and 
the U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions 
relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 10(a)(1) and 
10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the 
public.
    For more information, please contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-11492 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
W.A. GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. AETNA HEALTH INC., et al.

No. 18-613.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Amendment to Exclusive Supply Agreement, dated December 16 2011



 Exhibit 10.4 

 
 



 
  

					
	December 16, 2011	 		 	 LANXESS, Inc.
 1265 Vidal
Street South
 Samia, Ontario Canada N7T 7M2
 Fax (519) 339-7723

		 		 	
	 GEVO, Inc.
 345 Inverness Drive
South,
 Building C, Suite 130,

Englewood, CO 80112
 USA
	 		 	 A.J. (Sandy) Marshall

Presidient & Managing Director
 Fax
(519) 339-7752


  

	Attention:	General Counsel 

  

	Dear	Sirs: 

  

	Re:	Amendment to Exclusive Supply Agreement between LANXESS Inc. (“LANXESS”), LANXESS Corporation and GEVO, Inc. (“GEVO”) dated effective
January 14, 2011 (the “Agreement”) 

 Further to our recent discussions regarding this matter, this letter is
to confirm our mutual agreement to amend the Agreement by: 
  

	 	(i)	changing all references to the date “December 30, 2011” in Article III(4) and Article IV of the Agreement to “December 31, 2012”;


  

	 	(ii)	changing the reference to the date “December 30, 2013” in Article III(4)(v) of the Agreement to “December 31, 2014”;


  

	 	(iii)	deleting Article III(3) in its entirety and deleting all references to “Polyisobutylene”, “Polyisobutylene Arrangements”, “Polyisobutylene
Exclusivity”, and “Polyisobutylene Notification”; and 

  

	 	(iv)	adding the following provision “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, none of the provisions of this Agreement shall apply to isobutylene
produced at GEVO’s Pilot Plants, and GEVO shall be permitted to use or sell isobutylene produced at such Pilot Plants for any purpose or use. A “Pilot Plant” shall mean a plant producing less than 500 tons per year of isobutylene,
including but not limited to GEVO’s pilot plant at South Hampton Resources in Silsbee, TX. 








 Please confirm GEVO’s acceptance of this Amendment by signing and returning this letter to the
attention of the undersigned by December 31, 2011. We will mutually accept execution by an email exchange of signed copies. 
  

			
	 Yours truly,
  

LANXESS Inc.

		
	Per:	 	/s/ Alexander J. Marshall
		 	 Alexander J. Marshall

President & Managing Director

		
	c.c.	 	 Chris Ryan, GEVO

		 	 Bruce Cusack, LANXESS
 Mark
Peters, LANXESS

	
	Acknowledged & agreed by GEVO, Inc.
		
	Per:	 	/s/ Brett Lund
		 	Signature
		
	Name:	 	/s/ Brett Lund
		 	(please print)
		
	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President and General Counsel

		 	(please print)
		
	Date:	 	December 19, 2011
		 	(please print)
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-7183



# 
C LEAMON A NDERSON , a/k/a Carmel,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-94-163-2-11) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 2, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Cleamon Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OFTHE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Cleamon Anderson pled guilty in 1995 to conspiracy with intent to distribute and possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (1994). He was sentenced to 210 months in prison. He did not file a direct appeal. In June 2000, he filed a motion under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000), seeking a reduction in his sentence. Anderson alleged that he was sentenced based ona sentencing range that was subsequently lowered and that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). The district court denied relief, and Anderson timely appealed. On appeal, Anderson asserts only that his sentence violates Apprendi . This claim is more appropriately construed as a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). This court has held that Apprendi does not apply to a judge’s exercise of sentencing discretion within a statutory range, so long as a defendant’s sentence is not set beyond the maximum term specified in the substantive statute. United States v. Kinter , 235 F.3d 192, 201-02 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Lewis , 235 F.3d 215, 219 (4th Cir. 2000). Because Anderson’s sentence of 210 months does not exceed the statutory maximum set out in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(C) for core offenses without enhancement for drug quantity, we find that his sentence is permissible under Apprendi

. United States v. Aguayo-Delgado , 220 F.3d 926, 933 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 600 (2000). Consequently, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. A NDERSON
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/17/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      378,966
COMMITMENTS
  95,832  158,469   97,164  163,837  100,352  356,833  355,985   22,133   22,981

CHANGES FROM 12/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,376)
 -10,047  -20,742      837    2,781   13,585   -6,429   -6,320   -1,947   -2,056

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.3     41.8     25.6     43.2     26.5     94.2     93.9      5.8      6.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      48       68       68       33       36      126      138
```

----

Updated December 20, 2013
NCEX10.1Q12012






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 
TO THE KITCHEN COLLECTION, LLC
EXCESS RETIREMENT PLAN
(EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2008)
The Kitchen Collection, LLC hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to The Kitchen Collection, LLC Excess Retirement Plan (Effective January 1, 2008), effective January 1, 2013.  Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.
Section 1
Section 2.9(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(a)  For purposes of Sections 3.1 through 3.3 of the Plan, the term Participant shall mean a participant in the Savings Plan (i) who is unable to make all of the Salary Deferral Contributions that he has elected to make to the Savings Plan, or unable to receive the maximum amount of Matching Company Contributions under the Savings Plan or unable to receive the maximum amount of Profit Sharing Contributions under the Savings Plan because of the limitations imposed under Section 402(g), 401(a)(17), 401(k)(3), 401(m) or 415 of the Code or as a result of his deferral of Compensation under this Plan and (ii) who is classified as a highly compensated employee under the Code.”


EXECUTED this 2nd day of March, 2012.


THE KITCHEN COLLECTION, LLC


/s/ Randy L. Sklenar
By: Randy L. Sklenar 
Title: VP of Field Operations/HR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1998 FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1998
<CASH>                                             999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,239
<INVENTORY>                                      7,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,178
<PP&E>                                         257,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,436
<BONDS>                                        504,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   639,643
<SALES>                                        414,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,306
<CGS>                                          145,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  355,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



The following is the certification required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark J. Cocozza, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Mark J. Cocozza                     
|----------------------------------------
|Chief Executive Officer January 16, 2004



The following is the certification
required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Bakos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Richard J. Bakos                    
|----------------------------------------
|Chief Financial Officer January 16, 2004



The certifications set forth above
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company.
Desmond BOWEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7293

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steven CRAIN, petitioner, v. NEVADA, et al.

No. 18-693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,394
COMMITMENTS
   4,446    2,859    2,567   21,711   24,373   28,723   29,799   10,671    9,595

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,556)
    -747      116       -8   -1,479   -1,537   -2,233   -1,429   -1,323   -2,127

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.3      7.3      6.5     55.1     61.9     72.9     75.6     27.1     24.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
       8        8        8       32       26       44       41
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013