alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1846 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1846

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the Attorney 
General to deem that an applicant for naturalization has taken an oath 
of renunciation and allegiance in certain cases where the applicant is 
                   medically unable to take the oath.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1999

 Ms. Lofgren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit the Attorney 
General to deem that an applicant for naturalization has taken an oath 
of renunciation and allegiance in certain cases where the applicant is 
                   medically unable to take the oath.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING ATTORNEY GENERAL TO DEEM THAT THE OATH OF 
              RENUNCIATION AND ALLEGIANCE HAS BEEN TAKEN IN CERTAIN 
              CASES WHEN APPLICANT IS MEDICALLY UNABLE TO TAKE THE 
              OATH.

    (a) In General.--Section 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1448(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``The Attorney General may deem that the oath has been taken if the 
applicant has fulfilled all other requirements for naturalization and 
became medically unable to take the oath, as determined by the Attorney 
General, after fulfilling the requirements of section 312(a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
applications for naturalization filed on or after such date and to such 
applications pending on such date.
                                 <all>
```
Emmanuel E. UBINAS-BRACHE, Petitioner, v. SURGERY CENTER OF TEXAS, LP.

No. 19-866

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District denied.
Exhibit 10.06





November 9, 2009




Mr. Gerald W. Koslow


10325 Canyon Valley Avenue


Las Vegas, NV  89145





Dear Jerry:





On behalf of Gaming Partners International USA, Inc. (“GPI USA”), I am pleased to offer you the Controller position. This letter clarifies and confirms the terms of your employment with GPI USA. This position is classified as "at-will” employment, and neither this offer of employment nor any other writing is to be construed as a contract for your employment.





As the Controller, you will report directly to the Chief Financial Officer. You are also entitled, during the term of your employment, to such vacation, medical and other employee benefits as GPI USA may offer from time to time, subject to applicable eligibility requirements. GPI USA reserves the right to make any modifications in its benefits package that it deems appropriate.





Compensation


·
Starting annual salary -$132,000($5076.92 earned and paid biweekly)


·
Bonus – Discretionary bonus of up to 25% of salary


·
Benefits -As provided by GPI USA to all positions. GPI USA pays 100% for the employee’s Health, Dental, Vision and Life Insurance policies.  Family coverage and additional life and disability insurance are available at group rates.


·
401 (k) - Eligible to participate in the GPI USA 401(k) retirement plan after six months of fulltime employment.  The Company matches 50% of the first 4% contributed by the employee.


·
Vacation - The amount of paid vacation time the first year is 15 days.  First year vacation time will accrue on a pro rata basis over the year.


·
Personal Time Off – Three days per calendar year to use for personal reasons and/or sick days as per the GPI USA handbook.


Start Date – Monday, November 16, 2009


Reviews -A performance review may be performed after the first 90 days.   A review is to ensure that mutual expectations relating to the position are discussed.





We are very excited about your joining our team at GPI USA.I hope that you will accept this offer and look forward to a productive and mutually beneficial working relationship. Please let me know if Ican answer any questions for you about any of the matters outlined in this letter.





Sincerely,




David W. Grimes


Chief Financial Officer





Acceptance:  By signing and dating this letter, I accept the job offer for the Controller position at GPI USA.





Signature


Date
Exhibit KK

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 552
343

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 553
344

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: 554
345

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: 555
346

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: 556
347

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: 557
348

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: 558
349

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: 559
350

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: 560
351

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: 561
352

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: 562
353

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: 563
354

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: 564
355

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: 565
356

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: 566
357

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: 567
 

358

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: 568
359

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: 569
360

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 11-38 Filed 02/06/24 Page 19 of 19 PageID #: 570
Calvin Ray CASH, Petitioner, v. John RUPERT, et al.

No. 19-7210.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Michael T. RIVERA, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9366

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Clifford ABSHIRE, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS.

No. 18-9486.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SMOOTHIE KING FRANCHISEES, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00436-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of All Claims With Prejudice (the 

“Stipulation”) filed jointly by Plaintiff and Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Dkt. No. 9.) In the Stipulation, the parties stipulate to dismiss “[a]ll claims

asserted by Plaintiff in the above-captioned action ... with prejudice.” (Id. at 1.)

Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that 

all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned case 

are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and 

attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted 

herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims 

remain.

So Ordered this

Dec 8, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00436-JRG Document 10 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 113
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MYCHOICE, LLC

v.

TAIV, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-CV-0507-JRG-RSP

Motion Hearing

MAG. JUDGE ROY PAYNE PRESIDING

November 15, 2024

OPEN: 3:00 pm ADJOURN: 4:04 pm 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: Mike Gilleran

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS: Phil Haack

Ryan Marton

LAW CLERK: Nathan Gershengorin

COURT REPORTER: Shelly Holmes

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Becky Andrews

Court opened. Case called. Michael Gilleran introduced himself and announced ready. Phil 

Haack introduced co-counsel and announced ready.

Mike Gilleran argued Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Compliance with Orders and Production of 

Documents (Dkt. No. 37). Phil Haack responded.

After the break to meet and confer, Mr. Gilleran informed the Court of the agreements. Mr. 

Haack read the agreements into the record. 

Mr. Gilleran then argued the issue with the source code. Ryan Marton responded. 

The Court took the motion under submission. Court adjourned.

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 11/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

656
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       35,276
COMMITMENTS
   5,598    4,014    1,360   17,424   20,162   24,382   25,536   10,894    9,740

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,407)
  -1,751      302      -58     -528   -2,354   -2,337   -2,110      930      703

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.9     11.4      3.9     49.4     57.2     69.1     72.4     30.9     27.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      12       10        7       27       21       43       35
```

----

Updated June 21, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20768

YOUSRY GEORGE SALAMA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

WESTERN WIND ENERGY CORP., WESTERN 

SOLARGENICS, INC., 

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CV-3535

Before JOLLY and COSTA, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL, District 

Judge.*

PER CURIAM:**

The district court’s opinion granting summary judgment sets out the 

facts and the applicable law in this breach-of-contract case. See Salama v. 

Western Wind Energy Corp., No. 4:12-cv-03535, 2013 WL 6079548 (S.D. Tex. 

Nov. 19, 2013). We have studied the briefs, heard argument, and reviewed the 

* District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-20768 Document: 00512861003 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2014
No. 13-20768

record. We affirm for essentially the reasons set out in the district court’s careful and thorough opinion. 

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-20768 Document: 00512861003 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2014
United States District Court 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

ELSIE AKANNO,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MEDICAL CITY MCKINNEY,

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

§

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-01054

Judge Mazzant/Judge Davis 

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On August 28, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered the report recommending that Defendant

Medical City McKinney’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Original Complaint (Dkt. #4) be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections 

being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge 

are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Medical City McKinney’s Motion to Dismiss 

Plaintiff’s Original Complaint (Dkt. #4) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff Elsie Akanno’s claims 

are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff Akanno has fourteen (14) days after entry 

of this Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation to timely file an amended complaint 

or else Plaintiff’s claims for disparate treatment based on race and religion and hostile work 

environment based on race and religion will be dismissed with prejudice. 

Case 4:23-cv-01054-ALM-BD Document 6 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 40
2 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-01054-ALM-BD Document 6 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 41
Patsy N. SAKUMA, petitioner, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS OF WAIKELE, et al.

No. 18-5424.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Paul Ross EVANS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-836

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, INC., 2:23-00455 COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 10/09/2023 /s/ Neil A. Rubin Neil A. Rubin SBN 250761

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 11 Filed 10/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 78
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2004, I, George W.
Trahan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Co-chairman of Hi-Shear
Technology Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2004,
         fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
         the year ended May 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear
         Technology Corporation.


                           /s/ George W. Trahan
                           --------------------
                           George W. Trahan
                           President, Chief Executive Officer and Co-chairman

August 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hi-Shear Technology Corporation
and will be retained by Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

ROBINSON, FARUQ, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, PETER 

WAPNER, PHELAN HALLINAN, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 70 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary and/or 

King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6935

HENDERSON MCLEE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-1152-2)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William P. Robinson, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Wirt

Peebles Marks, IV, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. McLee v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1152-2 (E.D. Va. June 11,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2021
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 15, 2022

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Chief Financial Officer
Mahmoud ALDISSI, et ux., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5805

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
NUMBER 13-09-00100-CV AND 13-09-00231-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

INGRAM READYMIX, INC. AND 

SOUTHERN CONTRACTING, INC., Appellants,

v.

BENNETT, MARTIN, SOLKA AND 

TORNO, INC., GOVIND & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND 

W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., Appellees. 

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Garza and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc.(“SCI”), perfected

an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas,

in cause number 08-6125-G. SCI, Bennett, Martin, Solka & Torino, Inc.(“BMST”), and
2

Govind & Associates, Inc. (“Govind”), have filed a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice.

SCI, BMST, and Govind have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that

they have resolved their disputes at mediation and request that this Court dismiss with

prejudice all of the claims in this case asserted by SCI against BMST and Govind. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss

with prejudice claims by SCI against BMST and Govind, is of the opinion that the motion

should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted,

and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with the

agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

The appeal with respect to claims made by SCI against BMST and Govind is

ordered SEVERED from the remainder of the appeal. The Clerk shall create Cause No.

13-09-00231-CV styled Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc.

and Govind & Associates, Inc. The remainder of the parties remain under this original

cause number, 13-09-00100-CV. 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered 

and filed this the 7th day of May, 2009.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      204,578
COMMITMENTS
  64,836   69,514   18,906  100,056   98,141  183,798  186,561   20,780   18,017

CHANGES FROM 02/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,976)
  21,155    8,288   -8,121  -12,342   -2,570      692   -2,403   -5,668   -2,573

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.7     34.0      9.2     48.9     48.0     89.8     91.2     10.2      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      30       26       25       26       28       70       71
```

----

Updated February 24, 2012