alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       79,886
COMMITMENTS
  26,986    3,142    3,808   42,991   70,656   73,785   77,606    6,101    2,280

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -826)
    -518       29       39      184   -1,269     -295   -1,201     -531      375

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.8      3.9      4.8     53.8     88.4     92.4     97.1      7.6      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      15        4        1       42       39       57       44
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      246,941
COMMITMENTS
  84,932   28,945    2,207  146,252  210,367  233,391  241,519   13,550    5,422

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,034)
    -286    1,611      240     -933   -3,883     -979   -2,032   -1,055       -2

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.4     11.7      0.9     59.2     85.2     94.5     97.8      5.5      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      49       22       11       75       51      128       80
```

----

Updated October 28, 2013
Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners, v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-454

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Motion of petitioner in No. 19-454 to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Nicholas HARRIS, petitioner, v. Linda FULLER.

No. 18M90.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ADVENTURINE ONE, LLC §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:23-CV-451-RSP

§

THE CITY OF MARSHALL, TEXAS §

Defendant. §

MEDIATOR’S REPORT

In accordance with the Court’s Order, a mediation conference was held on May 1, 2024. The

mediation resulted in SETTLEMENT.

SIGNED this the 15th day of May, 2024.

 /S/ Randy Akin 

MEDIATOR

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certified that the foregoing instrument was filed electronically on this the 15th

day

of May, 2024.

 /S/ Randy Akin 

MEDIATOR

Case 2:23-cv-00451-RSP Document 25 Filed 05/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 157
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/27/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      138,668
COMMITMENTS
  48,264   33,774    6,174   68,572   78,240  123,010  118,188   15,658   20,480

CHANGES FROM 08/20/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -500)
   2,713     -723   -1,208   -1,493    2,705       12      774     -512   -1,274

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.8     24.4      4.5     49.5     56.4     88.7     85.2     11.3     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      176)
      51       39       31       62       62      125      124
```

----

Updated August 30, 2013
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, David  Blitz,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cadus  Corporation  and will be retained  by Cadus  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ David Blitz
---------------------------------------------
David Blitz
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
May 15, 2006

The foregoing  certification is furnished  solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

INC.; and SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO. LTD., 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that Harry L. Gillam, Jr. of Gillam & Smith, LLP enters his

appearance in this matter as additional counsel on behalf of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc and Samsung Display Co., Ltd.

Harry L. Gillam, Jr. may receive all communications from the Court and from other 

parties at Gillam & Smith, LLP, 303 South Washington Avenue, Marshall, Texas 75670; 

Telephone: (903) 934- 8450; Facsimile: (903) 934-9257; Email: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com.

Dated: January 23, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

State Bar No. 07921800

GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P.

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 

Email: gil@gillamsmithlaw.com

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 69 Filed 01/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2053
- 2 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 23rd day of January 2024, with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(b)(1).

/s/ Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Harry L. Gillam, Jr.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 69 Filed 01/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2054
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON 

WIRELESS.,

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

ORDER

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 65 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 528
Before the Court are Movant-Intervenor Ericsson Inc.’s Unopposed Motions to Intervene.

(Dkt. No. 56); (Dkt. No. 57); (Dkt. No. 58). Ericsson moved to intervene pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 24(a)(2) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b). Having considered the

Motions, their unopposed nature, and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that the Motions 

should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, Ericsson is permitted to intervene in these

actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive pleading in intervention on or before 

January 6, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 65 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 529
Exhibit 32.1 

 

 

|   | **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** |  
 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 
 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 
 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, James L. Holbrook, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

 

 

/s/ James L. Holbrook, Jr.

James L. Holbrook, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

Dated: August 14, 2007

 

  |
|--------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 4.9

 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
 OF
 ALLSTATE FINANCING X

 

THIS Certificate of Trust of Allstate Financing X (the “Trust”) is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et  seq.) (the “Act”).

 

1.                                      Name.  The name of the statutory trust formed by this Certificate of Trust is Allstate Financing X.

 

2.                                      Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware are U.S. Bank Trust National Association, 300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801.

 

3.                                      Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

 

 

	
 
    	
/s/   Mary J. McGinn
    
	
 
    	
Mary   J. McGinn, as Administrative Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Mario Rizzo
    
	
 
    	
Mario   Rizzo, as Administrative Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Steven E. Shebik
    
	
 
    	
Steven   E. Shebik, as Administrative Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
U.S.   BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Delaware Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Vice President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
U.S.   BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Property Trustee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Carolina D. Altomare
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Vice President
    


 

2
Adelbert H. WARNER, II, petitioner, v. James F. McLAUGHLIN.

No. 17-8894.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Serge NAYSHTUT, petitioner, v. COMERCIALIZADORA TRAVEL ADVISORY, S.A. DE C.V., et al.

No. 18-6071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 10, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: JARETH CARDENAS,

 

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00034-CR

Appeal from

394th District Court

of Culberson County, Texas 

(TC# 5684)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

April 10, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

JARED D. MCCULLOUGH §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-cv-183

BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL. § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jared D. McCullough, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. This matter was

referred to the undersigned United State magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for findings

of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that his case be voluntarily dismissed (doc. #9).

Neither an answer nor a motion for summary judgment has been filed in this matter. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff is entitled to dismiss his lawsuit

prior to the filing of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. His motion requesting voluntary

dismissal should therefore be granted and this case dismissed without prejudice. 

Recommendation

Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal should be granted and this lawsuit should be

dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Objections

Objections must be (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served and filed within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72(b).

Case 9:23-cv-00183-MAC-CLS Document 10 Filed 02/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

12
A party’s failure to object bars that party from (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district

judge of proposed findings and recommendations, Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th

Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of unobjected-to factual

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 5th day of February, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00183-MAC-CLS Document 10 Filed 02/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

13
Exhibit 8 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-9 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1830
 

 

A Page Vault 

 

Document title: Docket Navigator - Binder

Capture URL: https://search.docketnavigator.com/patent/attorney/72043/0?intro=true

Page loaded at (UTC): Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:20:54 GMT

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:57:59 GMT

Capture tool: 10.46.0

Collection server IP: 54.145.42.72

Browser engine: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) 

Chrome/122.0.6261.130 Safari/537.36

Operating system: Linux (Node 20.9.0)

PDF length: 2

Capture ID: cP3Pp3KskYXbF876Q3MspR

User: sbassett

PDF REFERENCE #: 7SvScUPyjVgEpyKvSR9DS6

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-9 Filed 08/06/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1831
le Randall T Garteiser  

FQ Add New Tab PRINT Overview 

Table of Contents . | ATTORNEY PROFILE ; 4DocketNavigator 

eee Randall T Garteiser 

tle Clients 

Attorney Alignment Cases (600) ; EXPERIENCE IN PARTY ROLE @ Use the selector below to display statistics for Patent Cases 

tls Opposing Firms where Randall T Garteiser represented Patentee or Patent Patent Ghalienger: « marenkes © | Remedies (30) Challenger or both. 

aeration (v Patentee ) Patent Challenger Both 

RECENT FIRMS TOTAL e JURY e BENCH @ ASSERTED a 

. CASES TRIALS TRIALS PATENTS Garteiser Honea 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 559 2 O 195 

United States District Court for the 

 

Northern District of Ca © & @ 

TOP COURTS PATENT CASES BY YEAR 

EDTX 315 106 Forum 

WDTX 141 —e USDC 

NDCA 42 

CDCA 18 

DN} 9 

NDTX 6 

SDCA 5 

DDE 4 

WDWA 3 

EDWI 2 

Show More 

PATENT TECHNOLOGIES TOP CLIENTS 

Computers 180 Blue Spike LLC 172 

Transportation 154 Caselas, LLC 35 

Networking 153 Decapolis Systems, LLC 33 

Semiconductors/Memory 127 GreatGigz Solutions, LLC 29 

Mechanical 34 Intercurrency Software LLC 24 

Central Reexamination Unit 6 Cypress Lake Software, Inc. 19 

Biotechnology 3 CellSpin Soft, Inc. 19 

Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC 14 

Beteiro, LLC 12 

Speech Transcription, LLC 12 

DigitalDoors Inc. 11 

Show More 

PATENT DETERMINATIONS @ REMEDIES FAVORING CLIENTS @ 

[=] infringed | 33 | Not Infringed AGGREGATE DAMAGES $ . INJUNCTIONS 

© Binder information Le) Nerimvane Le mens $22, 166 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS/TRO < [ o | Not Unenforceable [ o | Unenforceable LARGEST DAMAGES AWARD 0 

EEE Sn 

 

Document title: Docket Navigator - Binder

Capture URL: https://search.docketnavigator.com/patent/attorney/72043/0?intro=true

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:57:59 GMT Page 1 of 1

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-9 Filed 08/06/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1832
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 14

- 00727

- CR

ALPHONSO SMITH , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 239th District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 71088).

TO THE 239TH DISTRIC T COURT OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, GREETINGS :

Before this Court, on the 2nd day of July 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or to

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on August 28, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there was error in the portion of the trial court’s judgment that assesses attorneys’ fees agains t Alphonso Smith. Accordingly, the

Court modifies the trial court’s judgment, striking the assessment of attorneys’ fees against Alphonso Smith.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment as herein modified

.The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for obs ervance.

Judgment rendered July 2, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to ha ve it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

November 6, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
Shafia M. JONES, Petitioner v. WISCONSIN

No. 19-6246

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 4:23-cv-00770 Document 2 Filed 08/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 71

for the Eastern District of Texas ✔

4:23-cv-770 8/25/2023 for the Eastern District of Texas

IMPLICIT, LLC CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP., CAPITAL ONE, 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 

US 7,774,740 10/7/2014 Implicit, LLC US 8,056,075 11/8/2011 Implicit, LLC US 6,976,248 12/13/2005 Implicit, LLC Print Save As... Reset

Case 4:23-cv-00770-SDJ Document 2 Filed 08/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 73
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. 

Under Contract No. F A8903-06-D-8505 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59195 

Anthony J. Calamunci, Esq. 

Special Counsel for Chapter 7 Trustee, 

Alfred T. Giuliano 

FisherBroyles, LLP 

Toledo, OH 

Col Matthew J. Mulbarger, USAF 

Air Force Chief Trial Attorney 

Anna F. Kurtz, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to an agreement approved by United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

District of Delaware, this appeal has been settled by the government and the Chapter 7 

Trustee. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. 

Dated: 9 August 2016 

~c-;U~- MARK N. STEMPLER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59195, Appeal ofLakeshore 

Engineering Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
David P. MORAN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7176

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.