alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE

GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

2005 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT ADOPTED ON MARCH 24, 2009

 

THIS IS AN AMENDMENT to Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company 2005 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Adoption Agreement adopted on March 24, 2009 (the “Adoption Agreement”).

 

The Adoption Agreement is amended to implement certain changes. This Amendment No. 1 is effective January 1, 2012.

 

1.

Section III of the Adoption Agreement is amended by deleting in its entirety the existing provision and by substituting the following:

 

III.           Eligibility

 

The Plan is intended to be “a plan which is unfunded and is maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees” within the meaning of §§201(2) and 301(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The Plan Sponsor should consult with counsel regarding eligibility under the “select group” standard.

 

An individual shall be an Eligible Individual as follows (select one or more):

 

(a)                                  x                                  If he or she is designated as an Eligible Individual by resolution of the President and C.E.O.

 

(b)                                 o                                    If he or she is designated, in writing, as an Eligible Individual by the Plan Administrator.  The Plan Administrator will not vote or act on any matter regarding eligibility that relates solely to himself or herself.

 

(c)                                  x                                  If he or she occupies one of the following positions:

 

Great-West Life & Annuity Company Vice Presidents and above (O level job grades); Sales Management employees (MS level job grades); High level sales independent contributors (ES4 and above job grades, ES3 job grade earning over 150k); Sr. level Management Employees (M and MI grades 42 and above).

 











 

(d)                                 o                                    If his or her Compensation for a Taxable Year is expected to be greater than $                 

 

(e)                                  o                                    If he or she is an Eligible Individual, as defined in III (a), (b) (c) or (d) above, of an Additional Adopting Plan Sponsor as listed on Exhibit A attached to this Adoption Agreement and is otherwise defined as an Eligible Individual under the Plan

 

This Amendment No.1 is signed to be effective as set forth herein.

 

Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company

 

	
By:   
    	
/s/   Graham McDonald
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Glen Derback
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:   
    	
Graham   McDonald
    	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Glen   Derback
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:   
    	
SVP,   Corporate Resources
    	
 
    	
Title:   
    	
SVP &   Controller
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Rick Wall, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Amended Annual Report (the Report) on Form 10-KSB/A-1 of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:November 7, 2007By:/s/Rick WallRick Wall, Chief Executive Officer and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0237 

NICK LENIER WILSON, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

FEED 

MAY 0 9 2023 

C I Be rsOI C oetfens3 prm 

n

er :or n:ear:Cc:Lodu r t 

ORDER 

Representing himself Nick Lenier Wilson has filed a verified Petition for an 

Out-of-Time Appeal, indicating that he failed to file a timely Notice of Appeal because the 

final judgment was sent to the wrong address. He includes supporting documents. 

Wilson explains that the Clerk of the District Court mailed the Ravalli County 

District Court's Opinion and Order for his petition for postconviction relief to a home 

address on record, prior to his arrest. He states that he has not lived there since March 18, 

2018. He adds that after his July 2019 sentencing, he has been incarcerated in the Montana 

State Prison. Following his March 2023 placement in the pre-release center in Butte, he 

contacted the Clerk of District Court about his petition for relief there. 

M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant .an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the 

infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross 

miscarriage of justice[J" 

Wilson includes a copy of the January 17, 2023 Opinion and Order denying and 

dismissing his petition for postconviction relief. He also attaches a copy of the March 21, 

2023 letter noting that the clerk's office had received the returned Opinion and Order for 

failure to deliver because of a wrong address. We conclude that Wilson has demonstrated 

extraordinary circumstances. 

05/09/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0237
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Wilson's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal 

is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Wilson shall prepare, file, and serve a Notice of 

Appeal on or before Thursday, June 8, 2023. 

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel 

of record and to Nick Lenier Wilson along with a copy of this Court's Appellate Handbook. 

DATED this -I day of May, 2023. 

Chief Justice
Elisha Paul HARLEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7521.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Warren F. Neely, /s



# Fourth Court of A **ppeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 13, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00518

- CV

Jeanne Cook,

Appellant

v.

Warren F. Neely, MD,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- CI

- 10774

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Pres iding



### ORDER

On November 7, 2014, Appellant Jeanne Cook filed her second motion for extension of

time to file her brief, requesting an additio nal five day extension. The extension is GRANTED.

Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this court no later than November 12, 2014.

___________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of November, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FILED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN
FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000917821
<NAME>                        UROMED CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                               5,974
<SECURITIES>                                         4,259
<RECEIVABLES>                                          788
<ALLOWANCES>                                           134
<INVENTORY>                                            684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12,062
<PP&E>                                               1,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,488
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,256
<BONDS>                                             14,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           108,138
<OTHER-SE>                                        (110,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        13,668
<SALES>                                              4,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,307
<CGS>                                                4,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       10,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (993)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (6,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (1,259)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (5,017)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.97)



</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      705,698
COMMITMENTS
  92,375   40,101  182,366  412,312  459,930  687,053  682,397   18,644   23,301

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,926)
  -6,899    1,976    2,722   21,140   10,338   16,963   15,036   -1,036      890

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.1      5.7     25.8     58.4     65.2     97.4     96.7      2.6      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      143)
      39       38       58       59       61      128      129
```

----

Updated June 7, 2013
Marianne E. BURKE, Mother of Abigail E. Caudle, Deceased, Petitioner, v. RAVEN ELECTRIC, INC., et al.

No. 18-8191

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alaska denied.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SIRIUS XM RADIO INC., 

Defendant.

 CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00591-JRG-RSP

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

On March 4, 2024, Defendant Sirius XM Radio Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss under F.R.C.P. 

12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 13) (“MTD”). Plaintiff Display Technologies, LLC has filed an Amended 

Complaint (Dkt. No. 18).

It is well established that a later-filed amended complaint moots a motion asking the Court 

to dismiss an earlier-filed complaint. See Griffin v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co., 697 F. App’x 793, 797 (5th 

Cir. 2017) (“Once filed, that amended complaint rendered all earlier motions ... moot.”); see also 

Bishop Display Tech LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00139-JRG, Dkt. No. 40 (E.D. 

Tex. Oct. 4, 2021) (“Once Plaintiff filed its amended complaint, the Motion became moot.”); 

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Eaton Corp. PLC, No. 2:19-CV-00290-JRG, 2019 WL

Case 2:23-cv-00591-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 04/01/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 278
11250161, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2019) (“Accordingly, the filing of an amended complaint

moots a motion to dismiss the original complaint.”).

Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is now moot.

Dated: April 1, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00591-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 04/01/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 279
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing using the Court’s Case Management 

and Electronic Case Filing system, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record 

in this action registered with the Court’s system. Those counsel not registered with the Court’s 

system will receive service via electronic and U.S. Mail.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser 

Case 2:23-cv-00591-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 04/01/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 280
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY

                               OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that OLYMPIC STEEL, INC., an Ohio
corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby constitute and
appoint Michael D. Siegal and Richard T. Marabito their attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on behalf of
Olympic Steel, Inc. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Olympic Steel,
Inc., and each of such Directors and officers, to sign Olympic Steel, Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, any or all
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with
such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact
and agents or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

        This Power of Attorney of Olympic Steel, Inc., and the Directors and
officers of Olympic Steel, Inc. may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland,
Ohio this 28th day of March, 2003.

                                     OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

                                     By: /s/ Richard T. Marabito
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard T. Marabito, Chief Financial
                                        Officer

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:

/s/ Martin H. Elrad                  /s/ Michael D. Siegal
-----------------------------        -------------------------------------------
Martin H. Elrad, Director            Michael D. Siegal, Chairman of the Board
                                     and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Thomas M. Forman                 /s/ David A. Wolfort
-----------------------------        -------------------------------------------
Thomas M. Forman, Director           David A. Wolfort, President, Chief
                                     Operating Officer and Director

/s/ Suren A. Hovsepian               /s/ Richard T. Marabito
-----------------------------        -------------------------------------------
Suren A. Hovsepian, Director         Richard T. Marabito, Chief Financial
                                     Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ James B. Meathe
-----------------------------
James B. Meathe, Director



                                       51
Barbara FAWCETT, Petitioner, v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.

No. 19-295

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 233 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 233

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 1999

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio 
Street in El Paso, Texas, as the ``Richard C. White Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio Street in El 
Paso, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Richard C. White 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard C. White 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Mark A. SUMNER

No. 18-1367

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 505 

Congratulating His Holiness Dorje Chang Buddha III and The Honorable 

Benjamin A. Gilman on being awarded the 2010 World Peace Prize. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating His Holiness Dorje Chang Buddha III and 

The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman on being awarded 

the 2010 World Peace Prize. 

Whereas the World Peace Prize Awarding Council has recognized His Holiness Dorje Chang Buddha III (referred to 

in this preamble as ‘‘H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III’’) for 

his devotion to an immensely wide scope of humanitarian 

activities directed at people from communities throughout 

the world; 

Whereas, through his wisdom and benevolence, H.H. Dorje 

Chang Buddha III embraces people of all races, 

ethnicities, cultures, and religions through an approach of 

kindness, peace, and equality toward all people; 

Whereas H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III has received numerous awards, including the United States Presidential 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 505 IS 

Gold Medal Award that the Chairman of the President’s 

Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders presented on behalf of President George W. Bush 

to H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III for the outstanding 

contributions of H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III to the 

arts, medicine, ethics, Buddhism, spiritual leadership, 

and United States society; 

Whereas the World Peace Prize Awarding Council has recognized The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman for being a 

life-long champion of human rights who has fought world 

hunger, narcotics abuse, and narcotics trafficking; 

Whereas The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman has helped facilitate prisoner exchanges that have freed citizens of the 

United States who were being held in East Germany, 

Mozambique, Cuba, and several other countries; and 

Whereas The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman served 15 

terms in the United States House of Representatives, 

during which time he served— 

(1) as Chairman of the Committee on International 

Relations of the United States House of Representatives; 

(2) as a congressional delegate to the United Nations under Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick; 

(3) on the United States Commission on the 

Ukraine Famine; and 

(4) as Chairman of the House Select Committee on 

Missing Persons in Southeast Asia: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) congratulates His Holiness Dorje Chang 

3 Buddha III and The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman 

4 on being awarded the 2010 World Peace Prize; and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 505 IS 

1 (2) commends His Holiness Dorje Chang Bud2 dha III and The Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman for 

3 their humanitarian contributions to society in the 

4 United States. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Robert W. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. LAW OFFICES OF JENNIFER S. ADAMS, et al.

No. 19-7206.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Michael Anthony STEEL, Petitioner v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-9603

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.