alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADNAN UMAIR JANJUA-VESSEL and 

UZMA JANJUA-VESSEL

V.

JAY BRAY, et al.

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23CV766 

JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On July 9, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #61) that 

Plaintiffs Adnan Umair Janjua-Vessel and Uzma Janjua-Vessel’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Default 

Judgment (Dkt. #19) and Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants (Dkt. #54) 

(collectively, the “Motions for Default Judgment”) (Dkts. #19; #54) be denied. 

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections 

being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge 

are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions for Default Judgment 

(Dkts. #19, #54) are DENIED. 

Case 4:23-cv-00766-ALM-KPJ Document 68 Filed 07/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 420
Tommy Dean BULLCOMING, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9675

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2273

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that certain small

businesses are permitted to use the cash method of accounting even

if they use merchandise or inventory.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1999

Mr. TALENT (for himself and Mr. ENGLISH) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

that certain small businesses are permitted to use the

cash method of accounting even if they use merchandise

or inventory.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF CASH ACCOUNTING RULES

4 FOR SMALL BUSINESS.

5 Section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

6 (relating to general rule for methods of accounting) is

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section:
2

•HR 2273 IH

1 ‘‘(g) SMALL TAXPAYERS PERMITTED TO USE CASH

2 ACCOUNTING METHOD WITHOUT LIMITATION.—A tax3 payer shall not be required to use an accrual method of

4 accounting for any taxable year by reason of using mer5 chandise or inventory, if the average annual gross receipts

6 of such taxpayer (or any predecessor) for the 3-year-period

7 ending with such prior taxable year does not exceed

8 $5,000,000. The rules of paragraphs (2) and (3) of section

9 448(c) shall apply for purposes of the preceding sentence.

10 In the case of a C corporation or a partnership which has

11 a C corporation as a partner, the first sentence of this

12 subsection shall apply only if such C corporation or part13 nership meets the requirements of section 448(b)(3).’’

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

16 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Omar FOLK, Petitioner, v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, et al.

No. 19-7010

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, 

INC. et al, 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by Cobblestone Wireless, LLC 

and CommScope Holding Company, Inc., CommScope Inc., ARRIS US Holdings, Inc., Arris 

Solutions, Inc., ARRIS Technology, Inc., Arris Enterprises LLC, ARRIS International Limited, 

and ARRIS Global Ltd. (Dkt. No. 27.) In the Motion, the parties represent that the abovecaptioned case has been resolved and request dismissal of the above-captioned action without 

prejudice. However, the parties also seek two conditions, (1) “this dismissal shall not count 

against the two-dismissal limit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B)” and (2) “this 

dismissal shall be not used against Plaintiff in any jury trial against Defendants.” While the 

parties can stipulate between themselves for these conditions, this Court will not try to bind 

any court where this claim might be refiled. Therefore, the conditions are DENIED without 

prejudice. 

The parties may refile the motion without the conditions, or make clear that the 

conditions are just a stipulation between the parties rather than an order of this Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 03/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 148
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  EarthShell  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

Dated May 16, 2005

By: /s/ Simon K. Hodson
    -----------------------
    Simon K. Hodson
    Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ D. Scott Houston
    -----------------------
    D. Scott Houston
    Chief Financial Officer
Gilbert SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 19-7120

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Eric Michael VERWIEBE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.06

AMENDMENT TO  EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment to that Executive Employment Agreement ("Agreement") dated September 12, 2002, between Paul-Son Gaming Corporation (together
with its successors and assigns as permitted under that Agreement, the "Company") and Eric P. Endy (the "Executive"), is made and entered into this 27th day of March, 2003, by and between the Company
and Executive.

WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement to change Executive's position from Executive Vice President to Consultant, to permit Executive to relocate his office
outside the Company's office building, to permit Executive to engage in other employment and business ventures and to affirm all other terms of the Agreement.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:









---





2

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed the Agreement as of the date first written above.

|     |  | "Company"                                         |  | "Executive"                
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|     |  |                                                   |  |                            
|     |  | PAUL-SON GAMING CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation |  |                            
|     |  |                                                   |  | /s/ERIC P. ENDYEric P. Endy
|By:  |  | /s/GERARD CHARLIERGerard Charlier                 |  |                            
|Its: |  | President and CEO                                 |  |                            

3

---

QuickLinks
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               nov-02-1996
<CASH>                                         550,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,806,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,971,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,210,000
<PP&E>                                      10,009,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,747,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,034,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,783,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,747,000
<SALES>                                     37,359,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       15,966,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,598,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              -732,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,236,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,743,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,120,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,623,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,623,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP21-788-001.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Operational Purchase and Sales 
Report 2021--Revised to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 5/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220525-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-858-001.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Operational Purchase and Sales 
Report 2022--Amendment to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 5/25/22.
    Accession Number: 20220525-5026.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/22.
    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date. The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary 
system (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by 
querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: May 25, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11725 Filed 5-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF SLOANE KYRAZIS

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Sloane Kyrazis, enters her 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 183
-2-

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp. (collectively, “AT&T” or “Defendants”). Defendants

respectfully request that the court take note of this Notice of Appearance and makes Sloane 

Kyrazis their counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies of all communications and other 

documents filed in the above-referenced proceedings that are not filed via ECF should be 

emailed or faxed to Sloane Kyrazis at the address set forth below.

Dated: December 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Sloane Kyrazis

Sloane Kyrazis (GA Bar No. 878240) 

 Sloane.kyrazis@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 184
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of December, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such 

filing upon Counsel of Record. 

/s/ Sloane Kyrazis

Sloane Kyrazis (GA Bar No. 878240) 

 Sloane.kyrazis@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 12/01/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 185
EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors
Wireless One, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-12449),  Form S-3 (No. 333-15475) and Form S-8 (No. 333-
11563) of  Wireless  One,  Inc. of  our  report  dated  February 21, 1997, 
relating to  the  consolidated balance sheets  of Wireless  One, Inc.  and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of  operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of 
the years in the  three-year  period  ended December 31, 1996, and related 
schedule which  report appears in Amendment No. 1 to the December 31, 1996 
annual  report on Form 10-K of  Wireless One, Inc.
                               
                               KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New Orleans, Louisiana
April 10, 1997
Jimmy Lee ALLRED, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7326

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Mitchell TAEBEL, Petitioner v. Douglas A. DUCEY, Governor of Arizona, et al.

No. 19-5906

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40577

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUADALUPE VELASQUEZ-MAZARIEGOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CR-9-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Guadalupe Velasquez-Mazariegos appeals his sentence

following conviction for transporting illegal aliens. He argues

that the district court erred in assessing a three-point

enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5) for a substantial risk

of injury to another.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and conclude that the district court did not clearly err in 
No. 98-40577 

-2-

applying this guideline. The evidence was sufficient to find

that the defendant transported twenty-one aliens in the back of a

rental truck without padding or restraints and that this

transportation endangered the safety and lives of these

individuals. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

HARMAN BENITEZ, JR., §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-25

§

BOBBY LUMPKIN, §

§

Respondent. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS AND

ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Harman Benitez, Jr., a prisoner confined at the Diboll Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United

States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and

orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the petition without prejudice.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Petitioner filed

objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and

the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes

the objections are without merit. Petitioner’s claims concerning the calculation of his federal

sentence are premature because Petitioner is not in federal custody at this time.

Case 9:23-cv-00025-MAC-ZJH Document 11 Filed 06/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 14
ORDER

Accordingly, Petitioner’s objections (#10) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#8)

is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. 

2

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of June, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00025-MAC-ZJH Document 11 Filed 06/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Balance Sheet, and Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          36,914,197
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,606,298
<PP&E>                                           4,794,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,833,977
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,649,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,468,246
<BONDS>                                            150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           132,101
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,049,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,649,931
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,440,025
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,250,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   613,439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (969,254)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,454,541)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42,274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,496,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,496,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

GEONNA THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SOUTHGATE APARTMENTS, LLC

et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00970-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this Motion having been referred to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 9, 2024, the Report of 

the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #28), was entered containing proposed findings of fact 

and recommendation that Defendant HLC Southgate, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss, or in 

the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement (Dkt. #7) be denied; that the 

Defendants Cope Equities, LLC, Billy Peck Construction, LLC, and Southgate 

Apartments, LLC’s (the “Cope Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) be denied; 

and that Defendants’ Joint Motion to Stay (Dkt. #13) be denied as moot.

On September 23, 2024, the Cope Defendants filed timely objections to the 

Report (Dkt. #29). The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Cope Defendants’

objections and the portions of the Report to which the Cope Defendants specifically 

object. Having done so, the Court is of the opinion that the findings of the Magistrate 

Case 4:23-cv-00970-SDJ-AGD Document 30 Filed 09/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 448
2

Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings of the

Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant HLC Southgate, LLC’s Motion to 

Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement (Dkt. #7) is 

DENIED; that the Cope Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) is DENIED; and 

that Defendants’ Joint Motion to Stay (Dkt. #13) is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is further ORDERED that any request for relief not addressed by the Report 

(Dkt. #28) is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case 4:23-cv-00970-SDJ-AGD Document 30 Filed 09/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 449
Autrey CANADATE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5008.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
The ESTATE OF Swannie HER, et al., Petitioners, v. Craig HOEPPNER, et al.

No. 19-826

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.