alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 539 

Designating October 13, 2012, as ‘‘National Chess Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2012 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, and Mr. LEVIN) submitted 

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 13, 2012, as ‘‘National Chess Day’’. 

Whereas there are more than 80,000 members of the United 

States Chess Federation (referred to in this preamble as 

the ‘‘Federation’’), and an unknown number of additional 

people in the United States who play chess without joining an official organization; 

Whereas approximately 1⁄2 of the members of the Federation 

are members of scholastic chess programs, and many of 

those members join the Federation by the age of 10; 

Whereas the Federation is very supportive of scholastic chess 

programs and sponsors a Certified Chess Coach program 

that provides the coaches involved in the scholastic chess 

programs with training and ensures schools and students 

can have confidence in the programs; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 539 ATS 

Whereas many studies have linked scholastic chess programs 

to the improvement of students’ scores in reading and 

math, as well as improved self-esteem; 

Whereas the Federation offers guidance to educators to help 

incorporate chess into the school curriculum; 

Whereas chess is a powerful cognitive learning tool that can 

be used to successfully enhance students’ reading skills 

and understanding of math concepts; and 

Whereas chess engages students of all learning styles and 

strengths and promotes problem-solving and higher-level 

thinking skills: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 13, 2012, as ‘‘National 

3 Chess Day’’ to enhance awareness and encourage 

4 students and adults to play chess, a game known to 

5 enhance critical-thinking and problem-solving skills; 

6 and 

7 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe National Chess Day with appropriate pro9 grams and activities. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00449-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF ASHLEY RATYCZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT LENOVO GROUP LIMITED’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 23-1 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 693
1

I, Ashley Ratycz, hereby declare under the penalty of perjury as follows: 

1. I am an attorney and partner at BC Law Group, P.C., counsel of record for Plaintiff 

Universal Connectivity Technologies (“UCT”). I am one of the attorneys responsible for 

representing UCT in this matter. I have personal knowledge of all facts stated in this declaration 

and if called as a witness, could and would competently testify to these facts. I respectfully submit 

this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant Lenovo Group 

Limited’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 18).

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the webpage 

https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/pc/. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the webpage 

https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/about/who-we-are/our-leadership/. 

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the webpage 

https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/about/locations/.

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of excerpts of Lenovo Group 

Limited’s 2022-23 Annual Report. 

6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the LinkedIn profile of

Laura G. Quatela. 

7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the LinkedIn profile of

Kirk Skaugen. 

I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United 

States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on this 7th day of June in Westlake, OH.

/s/ Ashley Ratycz

Ashley Ratycz

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 23-1 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 694
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
on Form S-8 (File No.  333-38035)  of our  reports  dated  August 3, 2001,  with
respect to the consolidated  balance sheets of Prophet 21, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of June  30,  2001 and  2000,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and
related  schedule,  which  reports  appear in the June 30, 2001 annual report on
Form 10-K of Prophet 21, Inc.


KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 26, 2001
EXHIBIT 99.8




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   
  To the Board of Directors of Eldorado Gold Corporation
   We consent to the use of our reports, each dated February 19, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this annual report on Form 40-F.
  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports into the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-103898, 333-107138, 333-122683, 333-145854, 333-153894, 333-160349, 333-176184, 333-180504, and 333-197861) on Form S-8 of Eldorado Gold Corporation filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
  
 
 
 //s// KPMG LLP
  Chartered Accountants
 
 March 27, 2015
 Vancouver, Canada
  
 
  KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMGnetwork of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
 (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
 KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  Subsidiaries

                         Name                              Jurisdiction

Dominion Homes Financial Services, Ltd.                      Ohio

Dominion Structural Warranty Company, LLC                    Ohio

Resolution Property Company, LLC                             Ohio

Alliance Title Agency of Kentucky, LLC                       Kentucky

Dominion Homes of Kentucky, Ltd. (d/b/a "Dominion Homes")    Kentucky

Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC                           Kentucky

Dominion Homes Realty, LLC                                   Kentucky

     All listed subsidiaries are wholly-owned, except for Dominion Homes of
Kentucky, Ltd. ("DHK"). DHK is a Kentucky limited liability partnership whose
general partner is Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC and whose limited partner
is Dominion Homes, Inc. DHK is 99% owned by Dominion Homes, Inc. and 1% owned by
Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC.
Letter Amendment to the Development Agreement (December 19, 2007)



 Exhibit 10.1.4 
 December 19, 2007 
 Qualcomm Inc. 
 5775 Morehouse Drive 
 San Diego, CA 
 92121-1714 USA 
  

	Re:	Amendment - Development Agreement dated as of September 4, 2007 by and between Qualcomm, Inc. (“Qualcomm”) and Aircell LLC (“Aircell”).


 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 We wish to confirm our understanding with you regarding the first amendment to the terms and conditions of the above referenced Development Agreement. This letter of amendment (the “Amendment”)
sets forth the amended and additional terms that the parties have agreed to with regard to the Development Agreement; particularly related to matters regarding Milestone 4 as set forth in Section 2.2 of the Development Agreement and
Section 2.2 of Exhibit A. 
 (1) Qualcomm hereby agrees that on or before [***] it shall deliver approximately [***]
Aircards to Aircell for testing and certification, in lieu of the [***] Aircards specified in the Development Agreement in connection with Milestone 4. A quantity of approximately [***] such Aircards shall be P3 type and the balance of Aircards
shall be P4 type. 
 (2) [***]. 
 (3) [***] Aircell shall inform Qualcomm of its acceptance, thereafter Qualcomm may invoice Aircell for the Milestone 4 payments as it relates to the Aircards. 

(4) In addition, Qualcomm shall incorporate new features listed below into the Aircard for delivery in accordance with Milestone 3, to
occur [***]. The parties agree that the cost of the new features inclusion shall be [***] which shall be added to the Milestone 3 payment, subject to testing and acceptance as set forth above. Such additional features shall include: 

(a) [***] 
 (b)
[***] 
 (c) [***] 
 (d) [***] 
 (e) [***] 







 (5) Aircell agrees that the Aircards delivered in [***] for testing and Milestone 4 shall be
[***]. 
 (6) Qualcomm agrees [***]. 
 (7) The parties acknowledge and agree that the problems found during testing such as Doppler/RTD lockup problem will be mutually addressed and corrected by the joint cooperation of the parties and is not
subject of this letter. 
 (8) The parties acknowledge that there may be additional changes or feature requests to the Aircard
and/or CSM software and the parties agree to proceed in good faith and determine such modifications and any additional costs as soon as possible and to agree to such changes. 
 If the terms and conditions of the Amendment as set forth in this letter reflect our discussions to date and are acceptable to you, please indicate your confirmation and acceptance of the Amendment by
executing and returning the enclosed duplicate original of this letter to AirCell. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	AirCell LLC
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/

	 Title:
	 	  


 ACCEPTED AND AGREED this          day of December 2007: 

 

			
	Qualcomm, Inc.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/

	 Title:
	 	  



  
 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

WINTERSPRING DIGITAL LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARVELL INTERNATIONAL LTD. and 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00024-JRG-RSP

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Winterspring Digital LLC 

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Marvell International Ltd. and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 

(collectively, “Defendants”) (the “Parties”), represented by their attorneys, hereby stipulate and 

agree to as follows: 

The Parties have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in this litigation. 

Accordingly, the Parties respectfully request that all claims for relief asserted against Defendants

by Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice; and the Parties further request that all attorneys’ fees, 

costs of court and expenses be borne by each Party incurring the same. 

So agreed and stipulated. 

A proposed order is attached.

Dated: May 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III 

Alfred R. Fabricant

NY Bar No. 2219392

Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com

Peter Lambrianakos

NY Bar No. 2894392

Case 2:23-cv-00024-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 05/09/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 40
Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com

Vincent J. Rubino, III

NY Bar No. 4557435

Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com

FABRICANT LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South

Rye, New York 10580

Telephone: (212) 257-5797

Facsimile: (212) 257-5796

Justin Kurt Truelove

Texas Bar No. 24013653

Email: kurt@truelovelawfirm.com

TRUELOVE LAW FIRM, PLLC

100 West Houston Street

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 938-8321

Facsimile: (903) 215-8510

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

WINTERSPRING DIGITAL LLC

/s/ Harper S. Batts (with permission)

Harper S. Batts

CA Bar No. 242603

Email: hbatts@sheppardmullin.com

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & 

HAMPTON LLP

1540 El Camino Real, Suite 120 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 815-2600

Facsimile: (650) 815-2601

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS

MARVELL INTERNATIONAL LTD. and 

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD.

Case 2:23-cv-00024-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 05/09/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 41
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that, on May 9, 2023, all counsel of record who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via 

the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III

 Vincent J. Rubino

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Plaintiff has met and conferred with 

counsel for Defendants, and all parties have agreed to the proposed order submitted herewith. 

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III

 Vincent J. Rubino

Case 2:23-cv-00024-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 05/09/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 42
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

BLAKE J. WATTERSON,

Plaintiff,

 v. No. 4:23-cv-80-ALM

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time to

Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under 5 U.S.C. § 705 or, Alternatively, for a Preliminary 

Injunction (Dkt. #11).

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion for 

Extension of Time by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 9, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00080-ALM Document 12 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 315
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      151,294
COMMITMENTS
  36,025   22,772   27,554   68,641   76,413  132,220  126,739   19,074   24,554

CHANGES FROM 01/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,921)
  -1,203    3,215      -90    3,964      -52    2,671    3,073    1,250      849

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.8     15.1     18.2     45.4     50.5     87.4     83.8     12.6     16.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      166)
      50       32       46       59       60      129      124
```

----

Updated January 27, 2012
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date here of (the Report), I, Zohar Ziv, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company /s/ Zohar ZivZohar ZivDated: May 19, 2005
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
In the MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF Justin Alan TORRES

No. D-3060

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Justin Alan Torres, of Alexandria, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
**EXHIBIT 31.3****CERTIFICATION**I, Ronald A. Mayo, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: September 26, 2005/S/ Ronald A Mayo
1

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 93-2882.

NATEC, INC. and Natec Resources, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DETER COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

DETER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee,

v.

BENETECH, Defendant-Appellant.

Aug. 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Texas.

Before KING, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

I.

Appellants, Natec, Inc., Natec Resources, Inc., and Benetech,

hold licenses to operate a patent owned by appellee, Deter Company.

The license agreements were entered into following settlement of

separate patent infringement lawsuits in courts other than the

Southern District of Texas, where this suit was filed. The instant

suit sought various types of relief, including a declaration that

the license agreements were unenforceable. This particular claim

for relief alleged that the patent, which is the subject of the

license agreements, expired before the termination date of the

license agreement, and that Deter could not enforce the license

agreement after expiration of the patent. Deter filed motions for

summary judgment urging the district court to give res judicata
2

effect to the earlier consent judgments and settlements. The

district court essentially agreed with appellee's plea of res

judicata and dismissed plaintiffs' suit.

II.

We are persuaded that we lack jurisdiction to consider this

appeal. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a), the Federal Circuit has

exclusive jurisdiction of an appeal where the district court's

jurisdiction was based, in whole or in part, on 28 U.S.C. § 1338.

Section 1338(a) provides: "The district courts shall have original

jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress

relating to patents...."

The district court's jurisdiction in this case was based in

part on § 1338. The right of the patent holder, Deter, to enforce

the settlement agreements and obtain royalties for use of the

patent after it expires is a substantial question of federal patent

law. See Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29, 85 S.Ct. 176, 13

L.Ed.2d 99 (1964); Hemstreet v. Spiegel, Inc., 851 F.2d 348

(Fed.Cir.1988). Because the plaintiffs' right to relief depends

upon resolution of a substantial question of federal patent law,

exclusive jurisdiction over this appeal is vested in the Federal

Circuit. See Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S.

800, 809, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 2174, 100 L.Ed.2d 811 (1988); Wang

Laboratories v. Applied Computer Sciences, 926 F.2d 92, 94 (1st

Cir.1991).

We therefore transfer this appeal to the Federal Circuit

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The clerk of this court is directed
3

to transmit the record, briefs, and other documents relating to

this appeal to the clerk of the Federal Circuit.

APPEAL TRANSFERRED.
EXHIBIT 99.1

FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC. PROPERTIES



|    |  |                                                                         |  |         |  |              |  |                                                                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|No. |  | Location                                                                |  | Sq. Ft. |  | Owned/Leased |  | Purposes                                                                      
|1   |  | 125 Technology Park, Lake Mary, Florida                                 |  | 35,000  |  | Leased       |  | Manufacturing, research and development, service                              
|2   |  | 250 Technology Park, Lake Mary                                          |  | 46,000  |  | Leased       |  | Headquarters, sales, marketing, administration                                
|3   |  | 222 Gale Lane, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania                             |  | 36,800  |  | Leased       |  | Manufacturing, research and development, service                              
|4   |  | Ingersheimer Str.12, D-70499 Stuttgart-Weilmdorf, Germany               |  | 62,300  |  | Leased       |  | European headquarters, manufacturing, sales, research and development, service
|5   |  | Wiesengasse 20 CH-8222
Beringen Switzerland                             |  | 15,930  |  | Leased       |  | Manufacturing                                                                 
|6   |  | 716 Kumada Nagakute-cho, Nagoya,
Aichi 465-0015, Japan                  |  | 17,200  |  | Leased       |  | Sales, service                                                                
|7   |  | 798 Zhaojiabang Road, Shanghai, China                                   |  | 11,500  |  | Leased       |  | Sales, service                                                                
|8   |  | No. 3 Changi South St 2 #01-01
Xilin Districentre Building B, Singapore |  | 22,000  |  | Leased       |  | Asia headquarters, manufacturing, sales, service
Sharonell FULTON, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 19-123

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.