alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30839 Summary Calendar

WILLIE LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ORYX ENERGY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(94-CV-744)

_________________________________________________________________ September 3, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant Willie Lewis appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his race and age discrimination lawsuit. He argues that there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the reasons the defendant proffered for terminating him. In order for Lewis to avoid summary judgment here, the evidence taken as a whole must create a fact issue as to whether each of the employee’s stated reasons was what actually motivated the employee and must create a reasonable inference that age or racewas a determinative factor in his termination. This he has

failed to do. See Brown v. CSC Logic, Inc. , 82 F.3d 651, 654 (5th Cir. 1996); LaPierre v. Benson Nissan, Inc. , 86 F.3d 444, 447-48. (5th Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the record and the briefs and conclude that summary judgment was properly awarded in favor of Appellee Oryx Energy Company. AFFIRMED.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 573 

Designating the third week of January 2013 as ‘‘Teen Cancer Awareness 

Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the third week of January 2013 as ‘‘Teen 

Cancer Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas cancer among adolescents is rare, but is still the 

leading cause of death from disease for teenagers between 

the ages of 15 and 19; 

Whereas teenage cancer patients receive treatment at various 

types of medical establishments, including pediatric hospitals, pediatric oncology centers, and adult cancer facilities; 

Whereas teenage cancer patients may feel out of place in any 

of these settings if their clinical and psychosocial needs 

are not met; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 573 IS 

Whereas 40 percent of cancer patients aged 14 and younger 

are enrolled in clinical trials, compared with only 9 percent of cancer patients between the ages of 15 and 24; 

Whereas teenagers with cancer have unique concerns about 

their education, social lives, body image, and infertility, 

among other concerns, and their needs may be misunderstood or unacknowledged; 

Whereas many adolescent cancer survivors have difficulty readjusting to school and social settings, experience anxiety, and in some cases face increased learning difficulties; and 

Whereas it is important to understand the biological and clinical needs of teenagers with cancer, seek the prevention 

of cancer in teenagers, and increase awareness in the 

general public of the unique challenges facing teenagers 

with cancer: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the third week 

2 of January 2013 as ‘‘Teen Cancer Awareness Week’’ to 

3 promote awareness of teenage cancer and the unique med4 ical and social needs of teenagers with cancer. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-9346

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
  32.2



Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to
    18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the Company)
    hereby certifies, based on such officers knowledge, that:


| |  | (i)  | the
        accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
        ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
| |  | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| |  | (ii) | the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                   

The foregoing
    certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
    to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
    18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated
    by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after
    the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
    filing.


|      |                      | /s/ Stanley
    J. Musial                         | 
|----- | -------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | 
|      |                      |                                                   | 
|      |                      | Stanley
    J. Musial
    Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date: | November
    5, 2004 |                                                   | 
|      |                      |                                                   | 

24

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11748]


Revocation of the Designations of Mohad Moalim, Farah Mohamed 
Shirdon, Musa Abu Dawud, Aliaskhab Kebekov, Ibrahim al-Rubaysh, and Abu 
al-Wardah as-Syarqi (and Their Respective Aliases) as Specially 
Designated Global Terrorists

    I hereby revoke the designations of the following persons as 
Specially Designated Global Terrorists, under E.O. 13224: Mohad Moalim, 
Farah Mohamed Shirdon, Musa Abu Dawud, Aliaskhab Kebekov, Ibrahim al-
Rubaysh, and Abu al-Wardah as-Syarqi (and their respective aliases).
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 1, 2022.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-10825 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
Antonio DeJesus PEREZ-MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6855.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David Hackett, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Diversinet Corp.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 23, 2007

---------------------



/s/ David Hackett

Name:

David Hackett
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COREY D. LEWIS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 48 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 9th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Nicholas YOUNG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1443

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Lana K. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. TACO BELL.

No. 19-7017

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 24, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 24, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0322. AVERY TUCKER v. LEWANNA TUCKER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV297573
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glas-Aire  Industries Group,
Ltd.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2005 (the
"Report")  I, Linda  Kwan,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006


\s\ Linda Kwan
-----------------------------------------------------
Linda Kwan, Chief Financial Officer,

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00449-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Lenovo Group Limited’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Stay 

Pending Disposition of its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion”). 

(Dkt. No. 45.) In the Motion, Defendant requests to stay the case pending resolution of Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 18) (the “Motion to Dismiss”). 

(Dkt. No. 45 at 1.) On October 17, 2024, the Court issued an order denying Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 47.) 

Accordingly, the Court finds that the Motion (Dkt. No. 45) should be and hereby is 

DENIED AS MOOT. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of October, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 48 Filed 10/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1060
James Paul ARLOTTA, petitioner, v. David Anthony HERATY, et al.

No. 18-8669.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7627

ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DENNIS M. HENDERSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-3753-DKC)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 25, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Elisabeth Ann Sachs, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

second motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Mills v. Henderson, No. CA-96-

3753-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AND
STATE OR JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION


       Wm. Cameron & Co. (Georgia)
       Ashley Aluminum, LLC (Georgia)
       Cameron Ashley Financial Services, Inc. (Texas)
       CABP, Inc. (Arizona)
       Cameron Ashley Canada, Inc. (Canada)
       CAFS Financial Services Inc. (Canada)
       Demers Express Inc. (Quebec)
       Ibex Industries, Inc. (District of Columbia)

       NAMES UNDER WHICH EACH SUBSIDIARY DOES BUSINESS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

       Wm. Cameron & Co.                             Ashley Aluminum, LLC
       -----------------                             --------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
       Cameron Ashley Building Products                Cameron Ashley Building Products
       CABP                                            CABP
       Southwest Express                               Bright Aluminum
       Southwest Roofing Supply                        Zaglin Wholesale
       United Wholesale Distribution, Inc.             Glaco
       Mid America Siding Supply                       Greater Louisville Aluminum Co.
       Metro Roofing Supply                            Southland
       Midwest Insulation & Roofing                    Southland Building Products
       California Roofers Supply                       Vinyl Wholesale
       Jett Supply Co.                                 DMG Supply
       Mile High Roofing & Exterior Supply             Ashley Division
       Atlantic Building Products
       C. A. Company                                   Cameron Ashley Financial Services, Inc.
       WhiteWater Building Products                    ---------------------------------------
       Chesapeake Building Supply                      CAFS
       Contractors Supply                              CAFS Financial Services, Inc.
       Albuquerque Door Company                        PROJX Financial
       Thunderbird Steel           
       Wholesale Building Supply                       Cameron Ashley Canada, Inc.
       New York Building Products                      ---------------------------
       NC Enterprises                                  Cameron Ashley Building Products
       States Dealer Supply                            CABP
       Westar Building Materials                       Boyd Distributors
       PK Supply Company                               Boyd Division
       Lafayette Woodworks                             Daigle Lumber Ltd.
       Ozark Construction Supply                       Bois Daigle Ltee.
       Millwork Specialties                            Oakmont Industries
       Washington Roofing Products Co.                 Gerard Demers
       J&L Services                   
       Cameron Division               
</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 22, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A2402. DONALD BRIAN CHYBICKI, AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF SANDRA KAY COTHERN CHYBICKI et al. v. ALFRED WALTER MAZUR et al.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
I, Jeffrey I. Friedman, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 of
Associated Estates Realty Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 31, 2003		/s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman

Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chief Executive Officer

C:\2003q\2q03\jif302ce.wpd
Ada A. GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. Alfredo Ernesto GONZALEZ.

No. 18-8334.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Arthur L. HAIRSTON, Sr., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

No. 19M104

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Howard GRANT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M44.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Dwayne STOUTAMIRE, Applicant, v. Christopher LA ROSE, Warden.

No. 18A718

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Application for certificate of appealability addressed to Justice Breyer and referred to the Court denied.