alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Proposed Order Granting Defendants’ Emergency Motion for

Expedited Response Period – Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE §

COMMISSION §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

V . §

§ C.A. NO.: 4:23-cv-00885-SDJ

GOPALA KRISHNAN, MANIVANNAN §

SHANMUGAM, SAKTHIVEL PALANI §

GOUNDER, NANBAN VENTURES LLC, §

GSM ETERNAL LLC (A/K/A NORTHSTARS §

FINTECH), HIMALAYAN FINTECH LLC, §

AND CENTUM FINTECH LLC (A/K/A §

SUNSHINES FINTECH), §

§

Defendants. §

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION

FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE PERIOD

Defendants Gopala Krishnan, Manivannan Shanmigam, Sakthivel Palani Gounder, 

Nanban Ventures LLC, GSM Eternal LLC (k/a/a Northstars Fintech), Himalayan Fintech LLC, 

and Centrum Fintech LLC (a/k/a Sunshines Fintech) filed their Emergency Motion for Expedited 

Response Period. Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be 

GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have three (3) days from the date of 

this Order to respond to the Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Dissolve, or Alternatively, 

Modify the Court’s Asset Freeze Order. 

Case 4:23-cv-00885-SDJ Document 66-1 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2983
Proposed Order Granting Defendants’ Emergency Motion for

Expedited Response Period – Page 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants shall have three (3) days from the date 

of the filing of Plaintiff’s Response to reply to the Response to Defendants’ Emergency Motion 

to Dissolve, or Alternatively, Modify the Court’s Asset Freeze Order. 

Judge Presiding

Case 4:23-cv-00885-SDJ Document 66-1 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2984
IN RE Charlene ROSA, Petitioner

No. 19-7050

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Angela ARMENTA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6873.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                              875,501
<SECURITIES>                        2,661,476
<RECEIVABLES>                       5,409,767
<ALLOWANCES>                        (45,500)
<INVENTORY>                         651,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    18,942,678
<PP&E>                              8,863,670
<DEPRECIATION>                      (724,131)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      30,374,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               6,120,213
<BONDS>                             0
<COMMON>                            2,425
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                          9,997,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        30,374,632
<SALES>                             29,786,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    29,995,301
<CGS>                               21,515,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       21,515,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    6,605,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  825,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (1,819,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (619,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,200,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,868,059
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,200,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
ex4-11.htm





Exhibit 4.11


 



Summary of Agreement between Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. and Zhe Jiang Qing Ye Construction Design Co. Ltd. to design factory buildings, roads, and associated networks in the Guilin facility







Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. (“Guilin JTF”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Zhe Jiang Qing Ye Construction Design Co. Ltd. (“QYC Design”) on February 1, 2011 for the design of four factory buildings, roads, and associated network facilities for Guilin JTF’s Green Energy Smart Grid Industrial Plant, located within the Guilin Tie Shan Industrial Park.  Guilin JTF shall provide to QYC Design documents on government authorization, property survey, geological survey reprot, work flow layout, and design requirements.  QYC Design shall deliver to Guilin JTF construction plans and drawings and documents for the application of government approval.  The total contract price is RMB 457,788.  Gulin JTF shall pay QYC Design 30% of the contract price within seven (7) days of signing of the Agreement, 30% of the contract price within seven (7) days of the delivery of the construction plans and drawings, 30% of the contract price within seven (7) days of the issuance of the construction plans and drawings inspection report, and the remaining 10% within seven (7) days of the completion, inspection and acceptance of the construction of the designed buildings and structures.
11/15/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 11/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 194
Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 11/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 195
Therian Cornelia WIMBUSH, Applicant, v. Willie Sue MICKENS, Warden.

No. 19A141 (19-5209)

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Application for bail addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court denied.
Exhibit 4.25

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

I, Liang Sheng, citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), PRC ID card number 440102197811104017, hereby irrevocably authorize Zhou Juan (“Ms. Zhou”) to exercise the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Business Operations Agreement entered into among Beijing Wole Technology Co., Ltd.  (“Wole”), Guangzhou Qianjun Technology Co., Ltd. (“Qianjun”), Ms. Zhou and me on October 26, 2011 (the “Operations Agreement”) :

 

I hereby authorize and designate Ms. Zhou to vote on my behalf at the shareholders’ meetings of Qianjun and exercise the full voting rights as its shareholder as granted to me by law and under the Articles of Association of Qianjun, including but not limited to, the right to propose the holding of shareholders’ meeting, to accept any notification about the holding and discussion procedure of the meeting, to attend the shareholders’ meeting of Qianjun and exercise the full voting rights (such as, to serve as my authorized representative on the shareholders’ meeting of Qianjun, to designate and appoint the executive director or directors of the Board and the general manager and to decide the allotment of the profits, etc.), to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest in Qianjun, etc.

 

The above authorization and designation are based upon the fact that Ms. Zhou is acting as an employee of Wole and Wole has appointed and authorized Ms. Zhou as its authorized representative in accordance with the Operations Agreement. Once Ms. Zhou loses her title or position in Wole or Wole issues a written notice to dismiss or replace Ms. Zhou with another person as its authorized representative, this Power of Attorney shall become invalid immediately and I will withdraw such authorization to her immediately and designate/authorize another individual(s) designated by Wole to exercise all the rights mentioned above. I will sign another Power of Attorney in form and substance satisfactory to Wole.

 

The term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10) years from its date of execution, unless the Operations Agreement is terminated early for any reason or the relevant events as outlined above occur.

 

This Power of Attorney shall, upon becoming effective, replace all the previous POAs I had signed previously.

 

 

	
 
    	
Liang   Sheng
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Liang Sheng
    
	
 
    	
Date:   October 26, 2011
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, David Hackett, Chief Financial Officer of Diversinet Corp., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diversinet Corp.





/s/ David Hackett

Name: David Hackett

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

February 29, 2008



This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glas-Aire  Industries Group,
Ltd. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  September 30, 2005
(the "Report") I, Craig Grossman,  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President,
and  Secretary  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

                  (1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The  information   contained  in  the  Report  fairly
                           presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2006


\s\ Craig Grossman
-------------------------------------------------
Craig Grossman, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Secretary

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Junior VAZQUEZ-SUAREZ, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7340.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:    November 14, 2007

/s/ Jerry Pascucci
Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

---
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 442 

Celebrating the 140th anniversary of Arbor Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. JOHANNS (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 140th anniversary of Arbor Day. 

Whereas Arbor Day was founded in Nebraska City, Nebraska 

on April 10, 1872, to recognize the importance of planting trees; 

Whereas it is estimated that on the first Arbor Day, more 

than 1,000,000 trees were planted in the State of Nebraska alone; 

Whereas Arbor Day is observed in all 50 States and across 

the world; 

Whereas participating in Arbor Day activities promotes civic 

participation and highlights the importance of planting 

and caring for trees and vegetation; 

Whereas those activities provide an opportunity to convey to 

future generations the value of land and stewardship; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 442 ATS 

Whereas National Arbor Day is observed on the last Friday 

of April each year; and 

Whereas April 27, 2012, marks the 140th anniversary of 

Arbor Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes April 27, 2012, as National 

3 Arbor Day; 

4 (2) celebrates the 140th anniversary of Arbor 

5 Day; 

6 (3) supports the goals and ideals of Arbor Day; 

7 and 

8 (4) encourages the people of United States to 

9 participate in Arbor Day activities. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 472 

Designating October 7, 2012, as ‘‘Operation Enduring Freedom Veterans 

Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2012 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. BEGICH) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 22 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 21), 2012 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 7, 2012, as ‘‘Operation Enduring 

Freedom Veterans Day’’. 

Whereas the initial volley of Operation Enduring Freedom 

took place in Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, and October 7, 2012, marks the eleventh anniversary of the war; 

Whereas Operation Enduring Freedom, launched in response 

to the terrorist attacks committed against the United 

States on September 11, 2001, targeted al-Qaida and the 

Taliban protectors of al-Qaida in Afghanistan; 

Whereas Operation Enduring Freedom is the longest ongoing 

war in which the United States is involved; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 472 ATS 

Whereas the wounded warriors who have served in Operation 

Enduring Freedom carry the scars of war, both seen and 

unseen; 

Whereas some 2,000 patriots in the United States Armed 

Forces have made the ultimate sacrifice while serving in 

Afghanistan; 

Whereas the war in Afghanistan should not fade from the 

hearts and minds of the people of the United States; and 

Whereas the ongoing sacrifices made by the men and women 

of the Armed Forces should be recognized and honored: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates October 7, 2012, as ‘‘Operation 

3 Enduring Freedom Veterans Day’’; 

4 (2) honors the brave men and women who gave 

5 their lives while serving the United States in Oper6 ation Enduring Freedom; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to salute the more than half a million men and 

9 women who have served bravely in Afghanistan to 

10 preserve our shared security and freedom. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
David DELGADO, petitioner, v. Salvador GODINEZ, et al.

No. 17-7832.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Richard Michael MATHISEN, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5275

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TEXAS, Plaintiff v. NEW MEXICO.

No. 65, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Form 10-Q for
the six months ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             154,981,641
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                      0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                        0
<EQUITIES>                                        16,412,403
<MORTGAGE>                                                 0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                              0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   183,437,161
<CASH>                                                22,359
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                     1,249
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            18,215,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   214,458,505
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                   14,671,267
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                6,942,775
<POLICY-OTHER>                                             0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                      0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   34,459,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             132,927
<OTHER-SE>                                       145,022,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     214,458,505
<PREMIUMS>                                        30,446,761
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                5,086,226
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 1,032,240
<OTHER-INCOME>                                         9,444
<BENEFITS>                                         4,270,040
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        3,469,262
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               7,278,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   20,161,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                       6,137,785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               14,024,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      14,024,184
<EPS-BASIC>                                           1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           1.03
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                             0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                        0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                          0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                         0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                           0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                            0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                    0


</TABLE>
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-00468AT&T Services Inc., et al✔

10/5/2023 ✔ 45 12/11/2023 Deron R. Dacus 00790553 The Dacus Firm, P.C. 821 ESE Loop 323 Suite 430 Tyler, Texas 75701 903.705.1117 903.581.2543 ddacus@dacusfirm.com

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 10/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 699
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Maurice Lamont DAVIS and Andre Levon Glover.

No. 18-431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 4, 2019.

Motions of respondents for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1624

MELVIN M. FARMER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY LLC; CLAYTON PARKS, Utility Service 

Leader; MATTHEW KELLEY, Service Leader,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-00179-WO-LPA)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin M. Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin M. Farmer appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Farmer v. Campbell Soup Co., No. 

1:14-cv-00179-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. May 22, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED