alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 614 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 614

  Celebrating the World Peace Corps Mission and the World Peace Prize.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2012

   Mr. Menendez (for himself and Ms. Snowe) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Celebrating the World Peace Corps Mission and the World Peace Prize.

Whereas the World Peace Corps Mission is an international organization that 
        operates according to the core spirit of advancing peace, justice, and 
        inter-religious collaborations;
Whereas the World Peace Prize is a prestigious award presented by the World 
        Peace Corps Mission that celebrates individuals who have contributed 
        tremendously to peace and enlightenment for humanity;
Whereas past recipients of the World Peace Prize include President Ronald Reagan 
        of the United States, President Abdurrahman Wahid of Indonesia, and 
        President Nakamura of Palau;
Whereas in 2010, the World Peace Prize Awarding Council recognized His Holiness 
        Dorje Chang Buddha III (referred to in this preamble as ``H.H. Dorje 
        Chang Buddha III'') for his devotion to an immensely wide scope of 
        humanitarian activities directed at individuals from different 
        communities throughout the world;
Whereas H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III has received numerous awards, including the 
        United States Presidential Gold Award, which the Chairman of the 
        President's Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders 
        presented on behalf of President George W. Bush to H.H. Dorje Chang 
        Buddha III for the outstanding contributions of H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha 
        III to the arts, medicine, ethics, Buddhism, spiritual leadership, and 
        United States society; and
Whereas in 2010, the World Peace Prize Awarding Council also recognized the 
        Honorable Benjamin A. Gilman for being a life-long champion of human 
        rights who has fought world hunger, narcotics abuse, and narcotics 
        trafficking: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the World Peace Corps Mission for advancing 
        peace, justice, and inter-religious collaborations; and
            (2) celebrates the World Peace Award and the recipients of 
        the World Peace Award.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,596,856
<SECURITIES>                                13,856,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,099,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,117,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,056,468
<PP&E>                                       8,039,310
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,189,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,191,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,577,789
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       133,996
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,164,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,191,506
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,325,992
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  921,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,738,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,082,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,082,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,082,734)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.30)
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WING HO and KAREN HO
, Appellant s ,

v.

NORTHLAND LUGANO, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2763

[ June 30, 2022 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Richard Oftedal , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 502019CA008355

.

Wing Ho and Karen Ho, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Ronald D. Edwards, Jr.

, of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Or lando, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH
, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.20







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: October 24, 2011







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO:  Gerry Bedore







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On October 24, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Dr. Gerry L. Bedore, Jr., a key advisor, pursuant to which the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock


valued at $200,000 as an incentive bonus. These were issued on October 24, 2011







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

SHAWN LEWIS WASHINGTON

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:23-CR-00241-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court 

having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant’s supervised 

release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court 

has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to its order. With Defendant having waived allocution before the 

Court as well as his right to object to the report of the Magistrate Judge, the Court 

is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are 

correct.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United 

States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s supervised release is hereby 

REVOKED.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the 

Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of six (6) months, with a three-year

term of supervised release to follow. All prior conditions imposed in the original 

judgment are reimposed here.

Case 4:23-cr-00241-SDJ Document 20 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 91
2

The Court also recommends that Defendant be housed in a Bureau of Prisons 

facility in Bastrop or Houston, Texas if appropriate.

Case 4:23-cr-00241-SDJ Document 20 Filed 06/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 92
Jeffrey FAIRBANKS, Petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 19-141

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
Exhibit 2

Redacted in its entirety

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-3 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1817
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

WILLIAM LOGAN JAMES § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-cv-126

POLK COUNTY JAIL, ET AL. §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

William Logan James, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. This

matter was referred to the undersigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636

and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United

States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the

disposition of the case.

Discussion

The court previously entered a Preliminary Filing Fee Order . (Doc. #6.) A copy of the 

Order was sent to Plaintiff at the Polk County Jail, the address Plaintiff provided to the court. 

The copy of the Order sent to Plaintiff was returned to the court with a notation stating Plaintiff is 

no longer at that address. (Doc. #7.) Plaintiff has not supplied the court with a new address or 

otherwise contacted the court.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action for

want of prosecution sua sponte whenever necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious

disposition of cases. Anthony v. Marion Cnty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1167 (5th Cir. 1980). 

See also McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988). Eastern District of Texas

Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants such as Plaintiff to provide the court with a physical

address and keep the clerk advised in writing of a current address.

By not providing the court with his current address, Plaintiff has prevented the court from

communicating with him and moving this case towards resolution. He has therefore failed to

Case 9:23-cv-00126-MAC-CLS Document 8 Filed 10/31/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
diligently prosecute this case. As a result, this case should be dismissed without prejudice for want

of prosecution.

Recommendation

This civil rights lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved

party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and

recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by

the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d

1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 31st day of October, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00126-MAC-CLS Document 8 Filed 10/31/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
Therian WIMBUSH, Petitioner, v. Willie Sue MICKENS, Warden.

No. 19-6836.

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,439                   2,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,745                   2,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         535,303                 332,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,306                  27,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 599,753                 371,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           185                     131
<OTHER-SE>                                     371,403                 226,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   599,753                 371,986
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,005                  36,623
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,136                  15,556
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,856                   5,868
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,585                  16,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,585                  16,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,940                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,293                  16,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38<F1>                1.50<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36                    1.50
<FN>
<F1>Primary earnings per share are Basic earnings per share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Don FERGUSON, Petitioner v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9605

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 25, 2015

No. 04-14-00060-CR

John DONOHUE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3514

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DEREK CLINTON WARD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-193

§

JASON BRIDGES, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Derek Clinton Ward, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. 

The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#4) is 

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

.

 ________________________________________

 MARCIA A. CRONE

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of August, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00193-MAC-ZJH Document 6 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 27
Thomas P. GANNON, Petitioner, v. RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNERS' ASSN., et al.

No. 18-1380

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ROCHE DIABETES CARE, LTD., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP 

PATENT CASE 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT 

ROCHE DIABETES CARE LIMITED’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(e), Roche Diabetes Care Limited (“RDC Limited”) submits 

this notice of non-opposition regarding its pending Motion to Dismiss, which was filed on May 8, 

2024. See Dkt. No. 21. Plaintiff’s response was due May 23, 2024, but no response was filed and 

no extension was requested. Plaintiff has also failed to serve its infringement contentions, which 

were due on May 15, 2024. See Dkt. No. 13. RDC Limited thus respectfully requests the Court 

deem its Motion unopposed and dismiss the case. See Local Rule CV-7(e) (“(e) Time to File 

Response. A party opposing a motion has fourteen days (twenty-one days for summary judgment 

motions) from the date the motion was served in which to file a response and any supporting 

documents, after which the court will consider the submitted motion for decision.”). 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 05/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 880
2

Dated: May 28, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Aaron P. Pirouznia 

 Terry J. Stalford 

Texas Bar No. 24011686 

stalford@fr.com 

Aaron P. Pirouznia 

Texas Bar No. 24098958 

pirouznia@fr.com 

Noel F. Chakkalakal 

Texas Bar No. 24053676 

chakkalakal@fr.com 

Alexander H. Martin 

Texas Bar No. 24091828 

martin@fr.com 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 747-5070 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

ROCHE DIABETES CARE, LIMITED

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on May 28, 2024, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Aaron P. Pirouznia 

Aaron P. Pirouznia 

Case 2:23-cv-00585-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 05/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 881
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CHARLES EDWARD HALEY, JR.,

Plaintiff,

versus

CITY OF DAYTON,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-328

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to the applicable laws and orders of this court. On 

April 30, 2024, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation (#29) in which she 

recommended denying Defendant City of Dayton’s Motion to Dismiss (#7). To date, the parties 

have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available 

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law 

of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

(#29) is ADOPTED. Defendant City of Dayton’s Motion to Dismiss (#7) is DENIED. 

Signed this date

May 22, 2024

Case 1:23-cv-00328-MAC-CLS Document 31 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 129
Hazhar A. SAYED, Petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 19-7270

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chairman of theBoard and Chief Executive Officer and Lou Fatica, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Associated Estates Realty Corporation (the"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.         The Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008, which thiscertification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman                                                                                                                                      |
| Jeffrey I. Friedman                                                                                                                                          |
|                                                               |
|                                                               |
| /s/ Lou Fatica                                                                                                                                               |
| Lou Fatica                                                                                                                                                   |
|                            |
| August 5, 2008                                                                                                                                               |
| Date                                                                                                                                                         |

A signed original of this written statement has beenprovided to Associated Estates Realty Corporation and will be retained byAssociated Estates Realty Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Gregory RAYFORD, Petitioner v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9612

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.