alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | (i) the technical report entitled the “Technical Report for Jinfeng Gold Mine, China” dated January 13, 2012 and effective March 15, 2011, (ii) the description of all scientific or technical information relating to the Kisladag, Efemcukuru, Jinfeng, Olympias and Skouries properties and (iii) certain technical information, mineral reserve estimates of the Efemcukuru Gold Mine, the Jinfeng (underground) Mine, the Eastern Dragon Gold Development Project, the White Mountain Mine, Olympias, Skouries (underground) and Stratoni (reserves) in Eldorado Gold Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “AIF”); and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | All scientific and technical information contained in the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “MD&A”), |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Norman Pitcher                |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Norman Pitcher, P. Geo.                                                                                           |
|   |   | Eldorado Gold Corporation                                                                                         |
|   |   | President                                                                                                         |

----
IN RE Corey Devon EATON, Petitioner

No. 19-7154

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAREEM ROBINSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 169 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of October, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 28, 1996 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended December 28, 1996
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,592
<INVENTORY>                                    122,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               271,226
<PP&E>                                         690,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                 303,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 691,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,233
<BONDS>                                        685,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (308,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   691,356
<SALES>                                        342,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               342,986
<CGS>                                          260,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,685)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,918)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
YANKTON COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1417

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Mike CARPENTER, Interim Warden, petitioner, v. Patrick Dwayne MURPHY.

No. 17-1107.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1088

In re: JIMMY RICHARD HUSBAND , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 3:18

- cv
- 00271

- JAG

- RCY )

Submitted : February 20, 2020 Decided: February 26, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WILKINSON , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Jimmy Richard Husband , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Richard Husband petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act . Our revie w of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court dismissed Husband’s petition for lack of jurisdiction on January 28, 2020. A ccordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Louis CHARLTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5983.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
State of TEXAS, Plaintiff v. State of NEW MEXICO

No. 65, Original

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of the River Master for fees and expenses granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $22,924.06, for the period July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019, to be paid equally by the parties.
Order filed, May 3, 2022.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-22-00183-CV

TRITON CONSULTING INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS TRITON 

CONSULTING LLC, Appellant

V.

SIMON VANDYK, LAURA VANDYK, TOUCHSTONE DISTRICT SERVICES, 

LLC, COLEEN CULPEPPER, MICHAEL WILLETT AND CALEP ESTES, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2020-13091

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 8, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has 

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order Amanda King, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record 

in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 32**

# **SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned herebycertify that this report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 6, 2006 |   | By:                                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                    |   | Roger E. Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   |                                                  |
|                    |   |                                                  |
|                    |   |                                                  |
| Dated: November 6, 2006 |   | By:                                                   | /s/ BachThuy T. Vo |
|                    |   | BachThuy T. Vo  Interim Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
Malcolm WILLIAM, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7183

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-25 (7)

'

BRANDON JAMES CORLEY, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Brandon James Corley (7), is 

Case 9:23-cr-00025-MAC-ZJH Document 153 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 620
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 -

Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine (Actual).

Case 9:23-cr-00025-MAC-ZJH Document 153 Filed 03/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 621
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2187 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2187

    To prohibit reconstruction assistance (other than humanitarian 
assistance) for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (other than Kosovo) 
until Slobodan Milosevic and the four other officials of the Government 
 of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia named in the indictment of the 
  International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia have been 
            arrested and placed in custody of the Tribunal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 1999

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit reconstruction assistance (other than humanitarian 
assistance) for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (other than Kosovo) 
until Slobodan Milosevic and the four other officials of the Government 
 of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia named in the indictment of the 
  International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia have been 
            arrested and placed in custody of the Tribunal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RECONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE FOR THE FEDERAL 
              REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reconstruction 
assistance (other than humanitarian assistance) may not be provided for 
the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (other than Kosovo) until Slobodan 
Milosevic and the four other officials of the Government of the Federal 
Republic of Yugoslavia named in the indictment of the International 
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (Case IT-99-37) have been 
arrested and placed in custody of the Tribunal.
                                 <all>
```
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

June 18, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00490-CV

IN RE EDWARD R. NEWSOME, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On June 5, 2013, relator Edward R. Newsome filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator appears to ask this court to compel “Doctor Uy” and 

others to appoint counsel on appeal.
2

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the 

Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus 

jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or 

county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to 

enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. Doctor 

Uy is not a party against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus. Nor has relator

demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to enforce our 

jurisdiction. Thus, we have no jurisdiction to grant relator the relief he apparently 

seeks. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and McCally.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC

Cisco Systems, Inc.

2:23-cv-00454

Cisco Systems, Inc.

06/28/2024 /s/ Kyrie Kimber Cameron

Kyrie Kimber Cameron; Texas Bar No. 24097450

24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1600

Houston, Texas 77046

kcameron@pattersonsheridan.com

(713) 576-5026

(713) 623-4846

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 53 Filed 06/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 306
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff, 

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T 

MOBILITY LLC; and AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC., NOKIA OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION, 

Intervenors. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00468-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Intervenor Nokia of America Corporation’s Motion to Intervene. 

(Dkt. No. 24.) Having considered the Motion, and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that the 

Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, Nokia is permitted to intervene 

in these actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive pleading in intervention 

promptly

.

____________________________________

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012. SIGNED this 13th day of December, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 885
John DOE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M110.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
```

```

----

Updated November 22, 2013
Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC, d/b/a 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Notice is hereby given that William Andrew Liddell with the law firm of Duane Morris 

LLP, admitted to practice in this Court, hereby enters his appearance as counsel of record for 

Defendants Verizon Communications, Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless to 

accept service of all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, correspondence, and other material 

related to this litigation on behalf of Defendants. Mr. Liddell’s contact information is in the 

signature block below. 

Dated: November 27, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ William Andrew Liddell 

William Andrew Liddell 

State Bar No. 24070145 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Las Cimas IV 

900 S. Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 300 

Austin, Texas 78746 

Telephone: (512) 277-2300 

Fax: (512) 277-2301 

E-mail: WALiddell@duanemorris.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS 

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 696
Page 2 of 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 27, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

counsel of record. 

/s/ William Andrew Liddell_____ 

 William Andrew Liddell 

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 697
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      154,141
COMMITMENTS
  57,077   29,015   14,372   64,568   81,552  136,017  124,939   18,124   29,202

CHANGES FROM 11/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -584)
  -1,108    5,226    1,058   -1,327   -7,539   -1,377   -1,255      793      671

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    37.0     18.8      9.3     41.9     52.9     88.2     81.1     11.8     18.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      194)
      60       41       52       57       65      145      143
```

----

Updated November 22, 2013
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 25, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 0006 0

- CR

John DONOHUE

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3514

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25t h day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN RE Samuel Lewis SURLES, petitioner.

No. 18-8872.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
JASMINE F., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, et al.

No. 19-6959

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin A. Mattingly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARTIN A. MATTINGLY                    
|Martin A. Mattingly Chief Executive
Officer

August 8, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Tavaris Jemario HUNTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7105

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.