alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC,

5:23-cv-112

CHICK-FIL-A, INC.,

Chick-fil-A, Inc. 

c/o CT Corporation System 

1999 Bryan St., Ste. 900 

Dallas, TX 75201

ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP 

4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450 

Houston, TX 77006 

(713) 581-3000 

10/13/2023

Case 5:23-cv-00112-RWS Document 3 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 17
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

5:23-cv-112 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 5:23-cv-00112-RWS Document 3 Filed 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18
Kai Uwe THIER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5163.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Wilfredo TORRES, Petitioner, v. BELLEVUE SOUTH ASSOCIATES LLP, et al.

No. 19-6974

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership. |

Date:May 16, 2005

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R.McAuliffe, Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief FinancialOfficer and Director

----
INDIEZONE, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Todd ROOKE, et al.

No. 18-233.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Michael LAMBERT, Petitioner, v. ESTATE OF Kevin BROWN, by its Successor in Interest Rebecca Brown, et al.

No. 19-541

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 1

in Support of 

General Saltzman’s Motion to Dismiss

Case 4:23-cv-00876-ALM Document 28-1 Filed 02/12/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 551
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

,,. UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS SPACE OPERATIONS COMMAND 

MEMORANDUM FOR Major Jace R. Yarbrough, USAFR 

FROM: SpOC/S3/6R 

SUBJECT: Letter of Admonishment 

25 Aug 2021 

1. An investigation has disclosed that on 11 June 2021 you delivered a speech in uniform during

the military retirement ceremony for SMSgt Fish in a public setting on the U.S.S. Missouri

where you made comments that you fear what is happening in the military relative to "radical

political factions" and how the military is fostering a culture of "incompetence and cowardice."

Additionally, you criticized DOD-wide extremism training as a "thinly veiled flex of political

power." Furthermore, you delivered rhetoric exhorting the audience to "let the lie come, but not

through me" and challenge the "cancel culture" being pushed down through the ranks. Military

members are to remain apolitical and must respect the chain of command. Your comments were

insubordinate, disrespectful, and unbecoming for an officer in the military.

2. You are hereby admonished! Your lack of judgement resulted in several military members

expressing displeasure with the content of your speech. This speech could have resulted in

unwanted high profile media attention for you and the unit based on the content of the second

half of your speech. As a military member you have the right and duty as an American citizen to

voice your opinions concerning political matters, but you cannot imply those beliefs are

representative of the Air Force, and your statements cannot be contemptuous. In the future I

expect you to exercise better judgement and use appropriate venues for expressing personal

views that align and comport with AFI 51-508 and AFI 1-1 for exercising your free speech

rights. Your conduct is completely unacceptable and further deviation may result in more severe

action.

3. The following information required by the Privacy Act is provided for your information.

AUTHORITY: 10 USC§ 9013. PURPOSE: To obtain any comments or documents you desire

to submit (on a voluntary basis) for consideration concerning this action. ROUTINE USES:

Provides you an opportunity to submit comments or documents for consideration. If provided,

the response you submit becomes a part of the record. DISCLOSURE: Your written

acknowledgment of receipt and signature are mandatory. Any other comments or documents

you provide are voluntary.

4. You will acknowledge receipt of this Letter of Admonishment immediately by signing the

first indorsement. Within 45 calendar days from the day you received this letter, you will

provide your response by signing the second indorsement below. Any comments or documents

you wish to be considered concerning this letter must be submitted at that time, and will become

part of the record, consistent with AFI 36-2907, Adverse Administrative Actions, paragraph

SEMPER SUPRA 

Scanned with CamScanner 

Case 4:23-cv-00876-ALM Document 28-1 Filed 02/12/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 552
Alan Matthew CHAMPAGNE, Petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 19-7091

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
(Marshall Division)

9/5/23

Case 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP   Document 5   Filed 09/05/23   Page 1 of 2 PageID #:  103

Case 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP   Document 5   Filed 09/05/23   Page 2 of 2 PageID #:  104
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

2:23-cv-583

MACY’S, INC.,

Macy's, Inc. 

c/o Corporation Service Company 

2711 Centerville Rd. 

Wilmington, DE 19808

Randall Garteiser 

Garteiser Honea - IP Trial Attorneys 

119 W Ferugson St. 

Tyler, TX 75702

12/08/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 3 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 95
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-583 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 3 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 96
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TERRELL JUSTIN ROGERS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-159

§

RHONDA MICHELLE WINEBRENNER, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Terrell Justin Rogers, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge,

at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The

magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#3) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of October, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00159-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 9
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2310

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ion-exchange resin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. SUNUNU introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ion-exchange

resin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN ION-EX4 CHANGE RESIN.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new subheading:
2

•HR 2310 IH

‘‘ 9902.39.30 Ion-exchange

resin, comprising

a copolymer of 2-

propenenitrile

with

diethenylbenzene,

ethenylethylbenzene and 1,7-octadiene, hydrolyzed

(CAS No.

130353-60-5)

(provided for in

subheading

3914.00.60) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

4 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0325. MARCUS SAMUEL v. MARTY ALLEN, WARDEN.

In 2005, Marcus Samuel pled guilty to two counts of kidnapping, two counts

of armed robbery, burglary, possession of a firearmduring the commission of a crime,

and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In 2014, Samuel filed a petition for

a writ of habeas corpus. After the superior court denied his petition, Samuel filed an

appeal to this Court.

The Supreme Court, however, has appellate jurisdiction over all cases

involving habeas corpus. See Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4). This

appeal is thus TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/12/2016

April 12, 2016
Cleo HINES, Petitioner, v. Cindy GRIFFITH, Warden

No. 19-5195

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2021

No. 04-20-00450-CV

IN RE Robert L. MARSHALL, III;

Marshall Shredding, LLC; and MedSharps, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On September 11, 2020, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On November 30, 

2020, the real party in interest filed a response. We conditionally grant the petition for writ of 

mandamus in part and order the Honorable Norma Gonzales to, within fifteen days of this order, 

(1) vacate that portion of her June 19, 2020, “Order on Plaintiff Robert L. Marshall, II’s Motion to 

Compel Documents from Trilogy MedWaste, Inc. and Motion for Protective Order” sustaining the 

real party in interest’s objections to requests for documents ten, eleven, thirteen through nineteen, 

and twenty-two, and (2) and enter an order granting relators’ motion to compel as to these 

document requests. Because we order the trial court to grant relators’ motion to compel requests 

for documents ten, eleven, thirteen through nineteen, and twenty-two, we remand for the trial court 

to reconsider whether relators’ request for a protective order is appropriate. In all other respects, 

relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(c). 

The writ will issue only in the event we are informed Judge Gonzales has failed to comply 

with this order.

It is so ORDERED on January 27, 2021.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of January, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-16836, styled Robert L. Marshall, II, et. al v. William Jewett, III, 

pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. The Honorable Norma Gonzales signed the order 

at issue in this original proceeding.
Mohammed KWANING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7294

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/27/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       82,380
COMMITMENTS
  27,821    2,481    3,614   44,019   73,916   75,454   80,011    6,926    2,369

CHANGES FROM 08/20/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -570)
    -419       27       32      278     -907     -109     -848     -461      278

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.8      3.0      4.4     53.4     89.7     91.6     97.1      8.4      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      15        4        1       39       39       54       44
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/27/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      237,497
COMMITMENTS
  67,166   45,668    9,820  144,832  170,558  221,818  226,046   15,679   11,451

CHANGES FROM 08/20/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     13,421)
     297    4,946    7,999    4,115   -3,623   12,411    9,322    1,010    4,099

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.3     19.2      4.1     61.0     71.8     93.4     95.2      6.6      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      169)
      39       32       13       67       61      114       98
```

----

Updated August 30, 2013
Curtis J. HILL, petitioner, v. Joe A. LIZARRAGA, Warden.

No. 18-6786.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Barton Joseph ADAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M97

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal denied.
Raghvendra SINGH, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18-6922.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William Dean Singleton, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNewsGroup, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004
/S/William Dean SingletonWilliam Dean SingletonVice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director