alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,074
<INVENTORY>                                     15,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,227
<PP&E>                                          80,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,846
<BONDS>                                         19,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,091
<SALES>                                        133,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,949
<CGS>                                           82,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,805
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. 

Plaintiff 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. 

T-Mobile USA, Inc.; T-Mobile US, Inc.; 

Sprint Corp; OnePlus Technology 

(Shenzen) Co., Ltd. and OnePlus Mobile 

Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. 

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23cv444 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

JURY DEMAND 

Pursuant to Local Rule CV-38(a), Plaintiffs respectfully demand a jury trial on all issues 

so triable. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew G. Berkowitz by permission Claire 

Henry 

Matthew G. Berkowitz – LEAD ATTORNEY 

Patrick R. Colsher 

Aaron L. Morris 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Tel: (650) 623-1401 

mberkowitz@reichmanjorgensen.com 

pcolsher@reichmanjorgensen.com 

amorris@reichmanjorgensen.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 317
Khue V. Hoang 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

400 Madison Avenue, Suite 14D 

New York, NY 10017 

Tel: (212) 381-1965 

khoang@reichmanjorgensen.com 

Of Counsel: 

Andrea L. Fair 

Texas Bar No. 24078488 

Claire Abernathy Henry 

Texas State Bar No. 24053063 

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC 

1507 Bill Owens Pkwy. 

Longview, TX 75604 

Tel: (903) 757-6400 

andrea@wsfirm.com 

claire@wsfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 318
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service on this 27 day of September, 2023. 

/s/ Claire Henry 

Claire Henry 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 3 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 319
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       48,606
COMMITMENTS
   1,725    5,765    2,982   43,859   39,833   48,566   48,580       40       26

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,896)
     168   -1,676      -55   -6,994   -5,142   -6,881   -6,873      -15      -23

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.5     11.9      6.1     90.2     82.0     99.9     99.9      0.1      0.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       5       11        7       21       22       31       37`

---

Updated June 7, 2013
William F. HOLDNER, Petitioner v. Katy COBA, et al.

No. 19-113

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jerome BURGESS, Petitioner v. Phil HALL, Warden

No. 19-87

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/08/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      160,922
COMMITMENTS
  55,132   21,086   18,769   67,071   96,079  140,972  135,934   19,950   24,988

CHANGES FROM 10/01/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -283)
   2,225   -4,315     -533   -2,426    4,195     -734     -653      451      370

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.3     13.1     11.7     41.7     59.7     87.6     84.5     12.4     15.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      195)
      60       49       51       55       68      147      144
```

----

Updated October 28, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP 

 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Austin office location for the law firm Duane Morris 

LLP has changed to the following: 

Duane Morris LLP 

Terrace 7 

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 200 

Austin, TX 78746-7567 

Please direct all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, correspondence, and other material 

related to this litigation to the new address. The telephone number, facsimile number and email 

address for the undersigned counsel will remain the same. 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 48 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 252
Dated: January 29, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Holly Engelmann 

Holly Engelmann 

Texas Bar No. 24040865 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Terrace 7 

2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 200 

Austin, Texas 78746-7567 

Telephone: 214.257.7226 

Facsimile: 214.292.9454 

Email: HEngelmann@duanemorris.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on January 29, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of 

record. 

/s/ Holly Engelmann 

Holly Engelmann 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 48 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 253
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of EarthShell Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Houston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By:                                                  | /s/SCOTT HOUSTON
|---------------------------------------------------- | ----------------
|Scott Houston Chief Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2002

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Glas-Aire Industries Group, Ltd., a Nevada
corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: November 14, 2003            /s/ Craig Grossman
                                    ------------------
                                    Craig Grossman
                                    President  and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 14, 2003            /s/ Linda Kwan
                                    --------------
                                    Linda Kwan
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Harold WADE, et ux., Petitioners, v. KREISLER LAW, P.C.

No. 19-320

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             766
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,023
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               165,242
<PP&E>                                       1,843,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,843,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,072
<BONDS>                                      1,224,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        101
<COMMON>                                           434
<OTHER-SE>                                     484,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,808,493
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,841
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)


</TABLE>
Sharma ROSS, Petitioner v. Christopher MILLER, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

No. 18-9067

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Robert W. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Colleen MCMAHON, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, et al.

No. 19-7110

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Troy BENNETT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6370.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DAVID ALLEN JONES, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-412

§

JAMES PAYNE, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff David Allen Jones, a prisoner confined at the Shelby County Jail, proceeding pro

se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. On December 4, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action

without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To

date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#7) is

Case 1:23-cv-00412-MAC-CLS Document 8 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 50
ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. 

2

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00412-MAC-CLS Document 8 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 51
Kimberly COX, Petitioner v. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 18-1536

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

NAKIA L. DERRICK,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, 

ET. AL.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-498-RWS-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific Railroad’s Motion to Dismiss Based on 

Statute of Limitations (Docket No. 3) and the Magistrate Judge’s1 order requiring Plaintiff to 

complete service on Defendant Power Secure, Inc. by May 15, 2024 (Docket No. 7).

The present action, which was removed from state court, was filed on September 19, 2023. 

Docket No. 1. The report found that Plaintiff’s negligence claim arises from an accident that 

occurred on June 29, 2019 but the statute of limitations for negligence is 2 years. See Docket No. 

9 at 1; see also, e.g., Docket No. 1-1 ¶¶ 3.1, 4.3. Further, Plaintiff failed to comply with an order 

requiring the timely completion of service on Defendant Power Secure, Inc. Id. Based on these 

facts, the Magistrate Judge issued a report recommending that Union Pacific Railroad’s motion to 

dismiss be granted and further recommending dismissal of the Defendant Power Secure for failure 

to prosecute. Docket No. 9.

Because no objections have been received, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the 

District Judge of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and, 

1 The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne.

Case 2:23-cv-00498-RWS-RSP Document 10 Filed 07/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 61
Page 2 of 2

except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings 

and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville,

Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203-

RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined the report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (where 

no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, 

abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 9) is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad’s Motion to Dismiss Based on Statute 

of Limitations (Docket No. 3) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s case against Defendant Union Pacific 

Railroad is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case against Defendant Power Secure is DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

4(m).

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of July, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00498-RWS-RSP Document 10 Filed 07/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 62
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911583
<NAME> STEINWAY MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,682
<INVENTORY>                                     84,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,069
<PP&E>                                          75,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,895
<BONDS>                                        130,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,911
<SALES>                                        143,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,501
<CGS>                                           96,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   322
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,902
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/15/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      613,156
COMMITMENTS
  84,856   27,740  187,606  324,031  377,904  596,493  593,250   16,663   19,906

CHANGES FROM 10/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,055)
    -319  -10,433    9,911   -1,858    6,140    7,734    5,618      321    2,437

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.8      4.5     30.6     52.8     61.6     97.3     96.8      2.7      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      150)
      35       37       58       70       65      140      129
```

----

Updated October 30, 2013
Mark MILNER, et al., Petitioners, v. Vincent MARES, Executive Director, New Mexico Racing Commission, et al.

No. 19-56

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Guillermo HERRERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7149

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
BLANCA TELEPHONE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-134

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Tecumseh Mondez MAYES, Petitioner, v. Mary WINDOM, et al.

No. 19M111.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.