alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wilson J. Soto NIEVES, et al., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF the FAMILY OF the COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, et al.

No. 18-1444

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.24







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: November 18, 2011







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO:  William Hanby







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On November 18, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with William W. Hanby, a key advisor, pursuant to which the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $130,000 as an incentive bonus. These were issued on November 18, 2011.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

TRAVIS CHARLES SMITH III 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00115-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Travis Charles 

Smith Iii GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3rd April, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00115-JDK-JDL Document 33 Filed 04/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 103
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan



### December 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 137051 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

### JODI P. HEERINGA, Trustee of the Jodi P. Heeringa Trust, dated May 7, 1985, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices



### v SC: 137051 COA: 274852 Ottawa CC: 04-050689-CH GLEN E. PETROELJE and MARILYN C. PETROELJE, as Trustee of the Marilyn C. Petroelje Living Trust, dated November 2, 1999, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

1215 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 30, 2008

Clerk
K. S., Petitioner, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES BUREAU;

K. S., Petitioner, v. California.

No. 19M2

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND
AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000911317
<NAME> LAS VEGAS AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,957
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,957)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

Date:    November 14, 2005

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

----
IN RE WEI ZHOU, Petitioner.

No. 19-6564

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

136617 Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r 136653 Marilyn Kell y 136983 Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH, J ustices a Protected Person, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136617 COA: 274709 Kent CC: 06-000982-NM BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D., GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF MANSOUR, M.D., VASC ULAR ASSOCIATES, P.C., and SPECTRUM HEALTH BUTTERWORTH CAMPUS, Defendants, and

JOHN CHARLES HEISER , M.D., and WEST MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _________________________/

GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH, a Protected Person, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136653 COA: 274708 Kent CC: 06-000982-NM BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D., Defendant-Appellant, and

JOHN CHARLES HEIS ER, M.D., WEST MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS, GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF MANSOUR, M.D., VASC ULAR ASSOCIATES, P.C., and SPECTRUM HEALTH BUTTERWORTH CAMPUS, Defendants.

_____________ _______________ _____________/_______________________________________ __ 2

GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH, a Protected Person, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136983 COA: 274726 Kent CC: 06-000982-NM BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D., JOHN CHARLES HEIS ER, M.D., WEST MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS, GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF MANSOUR, M.D., an d VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendants, and

SPECTRUM HEALTH BUTTERWORTH CAMPUS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On November 19, 2008, the Court heard oral argument on the applications for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the applications are again consider ed, and they are GRAN TED, limited to the issues: (1) whether the plaintiff’s defectiv e notice of intent as to defendants West Michigan Cardiovascular Surgeons and Spectr um Health tolled the period of limitations pursuant to MCL 600.5856(c), as amended by 2004 PA 87, effective April 22, 2004; and (2) whether defendant Shabahang’ s defective response to the plaintiff’s notice of intent, MCL 600.2912b(7), was presumed valid such that the plaintiff was required to wait the full 182-day period before filing his medical malpractice action.

K ELLY , J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the order granting leav e to appeal. However, I would welcome briefing and argument on all issues raised in th e three cases in which leave to appeal has been granted.

1215 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             108                   10065
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    63363                   49503
<ALLOWANCES>                                       609                     483
<INVENTORY>                                      82553                   69331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                147533                  140490
<PP&E>                                           34997                   38273
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  215853                  210084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            51856                   38661
<BONDS>                                         116517                  129297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            62                      61
<OTHER-SE>                                       46898                   42065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    215853                  210084
<SALES>                                         359217                  302789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                359217                  302789
<CGS>                                           307443                  264861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   363345                  316067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8582                    8339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12710)                 (21617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4703)                  (8470)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8007)                 (13147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  12776                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4769                 (13147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .78                  (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78                  (2.15)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
     10-Q, for the quarterly period ending June 30,1999 and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         65,028,453
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65,426,638
<PP&E>                                         50,771,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,703,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,494,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,242,642
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000,451
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,251,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,494,947
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,553,611
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,461,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20,462,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,462,364)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .20




</TABLE>
Michael Anthony JEFFERSON, Petitioner, v. David SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6869

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF the ENVIRONMENT.

No. 19-592

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BROADCOM INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING BROADCOM, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION, Defendant Broadcom Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss. 

Dkt. No. 13. Having considered the Motion, it is hereby DENIED as moot.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 24-1 Filed 02/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 410
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MELVIN BUCKINGHAM, JR. (2)

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00055-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count Three of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Melvin 

Buckingham, Jr. GUILTY of Count Three of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1st May, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00055-JDK-KNM Document 67 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 169
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 15a



                   Acknowledgment of Independent Accountants


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Horizon Group, Inc.


We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(FormS-3 No. 33-95174, No. 333-09315 and No. 33-95730; and Form S-4 No.
33-91236) of Horizon Group, Inc. of our report dated August 13, 1997, relating
to the unaudited consolidated condensed interim financial statements of Horizon
Group, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 1997.

We are also aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-79784) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993
Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock
Bonus Arrangement; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-89152)
pertaining to the Profit Sharing/401(K) Plan; and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-95308) pertaining to the McArthur/Glen Realty Corp. 1993
Long-Term Incentive Plan of Horizon Group, Inc. of our report dated August 13,
1997, relating to the unaudited consolidated condensed interim financial
statements of Horizon Group, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1997.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our report is not a part
of the aforementioned registration statements prepared or certified by
accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of
1933.


Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
August 13, 1997
Arie Robert REDEKER, Petitioner v. Dwight NEVEN, Warden, et al.

No. 18-9773

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32-A**




**FARO
      Technologies, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Solely
      for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chairman
      of
      the Board, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director of FARO Technologies, Inc.,
      (the Company) hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies
      with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/
                S
                / Simon RaabSimon
                RaabJune
                29, 2006
Juan PEREZ, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8815.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.