alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Board Certified in Criminal and Criminal Appellate Law

By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization

www.TheJacksonLawFirm.org | (903) 595-6070

PO Box 8355, Tyler, TX 75711 The Jackson Law Firm, PLLC

January 22, 2018

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 W Front St Ste 354

Tyler TX 75702-7854

Re: Juan Salinas, III

 12-17-00239-CR

To The Honorable Clerk of the Court:

Please find enclosed a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding his right to file a PDR 

along with a copy of the certified return receipt showing the mailing of the same. 

Sincerely,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

ACCEPTED

12-17-00239-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/22/2018 1:34 PM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/22/2018 1:34:23 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
Board Certified in Criminal and Criminal Appellate Law

By the Texas Board of Legal Specialization

www.TheJacksonLawFirm.org | (903) 595-6070

PO Box 8355, Tyler, TX 75711 The Jackson Law Firm, PLLC

January 22, 2018

Juan Salinas, III

Inmate 02145798

Bradshaw Unit

PO box 9000

Henderson, TX 75653

Re: Opinion 

 

Mr. Salinas: 

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in your case. The 

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file 

your petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me 

know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

HENRY MOORE, #224662

VS. 

JUDGE FNU MCFARLING, ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23cv1026

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who 

issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiff’s lawsuit should be dismissed 

without prejudice for want of prosecution. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such 

action, has been presented for consideration. No objections having been timely filed,1 the Court 

concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the 

same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s amended complaint is DISMISSED without 

prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.

1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #15) was returned as undeliverable on March 22, 2024, and marked, 

“Return to Sender-Not in Denton County Jail.” (Dkt. #16). Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court.

Case 4:23-cv-01026-ALM-KPJ Document 17 Filed 04/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 47
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

ASUS TECHNOLOGY LICENSING INC. 

and CELERITY IP, LLC, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., and SAMSUNG RESEARCH 

AMERICA, 

 Defendants. 

Civil No. 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., and SAMSUNG RESEARCH 

AMERICA, 

 Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ASUS TECHNOLOGY LICENSING INC. 

and CELERITY IP, LLC, 

 Counterclaim-Defendants. 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Notice is hereby given that Michael D. Karson of Winstead PC, 2728 N. Harwood Street, 

Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75201 enters his appearance as counsel of record for Plaintiffs ASUS 

Technology Licensing Inc. and Celerity IP, LLC in the above-numbered and styled cause for 

purposes of receiving notices and orders from the Court. 

Case 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 527
2 

Dated: March 22, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Michael D. Karson 

 Jamie H. McDole 

 State Bar No. 24082049 

Phillip B. Philbin 

 State Bar No. 15909020 

Michael D. Karson 

 State Bar No. 24090198 

Miranda Y. Jones 

 State Bar No. 24065519 

Grant Tucker 

 State Bar No. 24121422 

Matthew L. Vitale 

 State Bar No. 24137699 

WINSTEAD PC 

2728 N. Harwood Street 

Suite 500 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Tel.: 214.745.5400 

Fax: 214.745.5390 

Email: jmcdole@winstead.com

pphilbin@winstead.com

mkarson@winstead.com

 mjones@winstead.com

gtucker@winstead.com 

mvitale@winstead.com 

 

Attorneys for ASUS Technology Licensing 

Inc. and Celerity IP, LLC

 

Case 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 03/22/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 528
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that, on March 22, 2024, I electronically submitted the foregoing 

document with the clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 

using the electronic case management CM/ECF system of the Court which will send notification 

of such filing to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. 

/s/ Michael D. Karson 

 Michael D. Karson 

Case 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 03/22/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 529
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE

COMPANY; ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Case No. 2:23-cv-00457-JRG-RSP

(MEMBER CASE) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE 

INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Pending before the Court is Cobblestone Wireless, LLC (“Cobblestone”) Unopposed 

Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. The Court, having 

considered the unopposed motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the motion should be 

GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines are extended for Cobblestone to comply 

with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 and serve contentions to Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett Packard 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 25-1 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 93
2

Enterprise Company, and Aruba Networks, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) to December 11, 

2023 and the deadline for Defendants to comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 to February 26, 2024.

All other deadlines shall remain in place absent further Order of the Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 25-1 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 94
<PAGE>   1
                                                               Exhibit 10.52 (b)


                   [Letterhead of Empire Carpet Corporation]
                        
                                                February 17, 1981

Miss Erika, Inc.
1410 Broadway
New York, New York

Attention:  Mr. David Guttman

Dear Mr. Guttman:

            This letter is to be a new Agreement of Lease between Empire Carpet
as Landlord and Miss Erika, Inc. as Tenant on the space presently occupied by
Tenant for a period of five years commencing April 1, 1981.

            The first years rent will be Sixty-Four Thousand Eight Hundred
($64,800.00) DOLLARS payable in equal monthly installments of Five Thousand Four
Hundred ($5,400.00) DOLLARS.

            On each April 1st of the lease period this rent will increase by
one-half the percentage increase in the Metropolitan New York cost-of-living
index for the past twelve months but in no case shall the increase be less than
5% each year.

            All other conditions of the previous lease shall remain in effect
except:

            1.    There shall be no smoking in the warehouse area.

            2.    Either two sprinkler heads or drop out ceiling panels shall be
                  installed in the office area by Tenant. 

            You may execute this lease by signing below and returning the
original and two copies to the undersigned.

                                                Very truly yours,


                                                /s/ Frank G. Hoylman

                                                Frank G. Hoylman
                                                President

MISS ERIKA, INC.


By /s/ Stuart Alpert
   ---------------------

Title President
      ------------------
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report EarthShell Corporation (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





**Dated
      November 14, 2006**





/s/ Vincent
              J. Truant
            
            
            /s/ D.
              Scott HoustonVincent
              J. Truant
            
            
            D.
              Scott HoustonChief
                Executive Officer
            
            
            Chief
                Financial Officer









23
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/20/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       39,198
COMMITMENTS
   2,364    5,422    2,742   34,008   30,903   39,114   39,067       84      131

CHANGES FROM 08/13/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,665)
    -324     -446      186   -1,587   -1,465   -1,725   -1,725       60       60

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.0     13.8      7.0     86.8     78.8     99.8     99.7      0.2      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       38)
       7        8        7       17       17       28       28`

---

Updated August 23, 2013
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS, 

LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendants

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-425-JRG-RSP

DECLARATION OF DARIO A. MACHLEIDT IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO

VALVE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE

I, Dario A. Machleidt, hereby declare as follow:

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton. I am counsel for

Valve Corporation (“Valve”). I am admitted to practice before this Court, and I have personal 

knowledge of the matters set forth herein. If called as a witness, I could and would testify

competently thereto.

2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an email sent by Randall Garteiser to 

counsel for Valve, dated April 15, 2024.

3. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an email sent by counsel for Valve to 

Randall Garteiser, dated April 15, 2024.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on April 29, 2024

/s/ Dario A. Machleidt

Dario A. Machleidt

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 43-1 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 690
Marcus ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Les PARISH, Warden.

No. 19-6807

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I,Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity Group, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.             This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.             The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.             The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

 

Date:  August 8, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Michael A. Schneider             |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Michael  A. Schneider                 |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AUTOBRILLIANCE LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY and KIA 

MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00458-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff AutoBrilliance LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Joint Motion for Extension 

of Time to Serve Infringement Contentions, and for Defendants Hyundai Motor Company and Kia 

Motors Corporation (“Defendants”) to Serve Invalidity Contentions and Subject-Matter Eligibility 

Contentions (the “Motion”). Dkt. No. 12. 

Having considered the Motion, and noting its joint nature, the Court finds that it should be 

and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for Plaintiff to 

comply with P.R. 3-1 and 3-2 (Infringement Contentions) is extended up to and including January 

18, 2024. It is further ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to comply with P.R. 3-3 and 

3-4 (Invalidity Contentions) and the Standing Order Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility 

Contentions is extended up to and including March 14, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00458-JRG Document 12-1 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 52
Ronnie BARNES, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, et al.

No. 18-9337

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

INFOGATION CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v. 

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, 

TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, 

INC., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & 

MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, 

INC., TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., 

INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-359-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (the 

“Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Defendants Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North 

America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., and Toyota 

Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (collectively “Toyota” or “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 12). In the Motion

to Dismiss, Defendants request that the Court dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiff’s Complaint 

(Dkt. No. 1) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failing to satisfy the requirements 

of Rule 8(a)(2). (Dkt. No. 12 at 1). Subsequently to the filing of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, 

Plaintiff Infogation Corporation (“Plaintiff”) filed its Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss 

and Request for Voluntary Dismissal of Counts II and III Without Prejudice (the “Request for 

Dismissal”). In the Request for Dismissal, Plaintiff states that “[i]n light of Defendant’s Motion 

and absence of counterclaim, and in the interest of streamlining the litigation as it currently stands, 

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court voluntarily dismiss Counts II and III, and keep active 

Case 2:23-cv-00359-JRG Document 30 Filed 03/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 337
2

Counts I and IV, of the Complaint without prejudice.” (Dkt. No. 27 at 2). In reply, Defendants 

indicate that they do not oppose Plaintiff’s request to voluntarily dismiss Counts II and III of the 

Complaint. (Dkt. No. 29).

Having considered the Request for Dismissal, the Court ACCEPTS AND 

ACKNOWLEDGES that Counts II and III of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) in the 

above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Accordingly, the Motion to 

Dismiss (Dkt. No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to MAINTAIN AS 

OPEN the above-captioned case as additional claims remain.

So Ordered this

Mar 28, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00359-JRG Document 30 Filed 03/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 338
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1745 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1745

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the removal 
             of aliens who associate with known terrorists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 1999

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the removal 
             of aliens who associate with known terrorists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF ALIENS WHO ASSOCIATE WITH KNOWN TERRORISTS.

    Section 237(a)(4)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1227(a)(4)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) Terrorist activities.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Any alien who has 
                        engaged, is engaged, or at any time after 
                        admission engages in terrorist activity (as 
                        defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iii)) is 
                        deportable.
                            ``(ii) Association with known terrorists.--
                        Any alien who at any time after admission 
                        associates with an individual who the alien 
                        knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is 
                        designated as a terrorist in the Department of 
                        State publication entitled `Patterns of Global 
                        Terrorism' is deportable. For the purposes of 
                        the preceding sentence, an alien shall be 
                        considered to have associated with such an 
                        individual if the alien engaged in a pattern of 
                        conduct that, with respect to both the 
                        frequency and the nature of the conduct, gives 
                        rise to a reasonable suspicion that the alien 
                        knowingly aided and abetted such an individual 
                        to engage in terrorist activity (as defined in 
                        section 212(a)(3)(B)(iii)).''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-126-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON WEB 

SERVICES,INC.,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-123-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

BROADCOM INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-150-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

F5, INC.

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-26-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING SECOND AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

AND CONTINUATION OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 27-1 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 417
Before the Court is Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc.’s Second Agreed Motion for Extension of 

Deadlines and Continuation of Scheduling Conferences. The Court, having considered the motion

and noting it is unopposed, is of the opinion the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED.

Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the scheduling conferences in the 5:23-cv126, 5:23-cv-123, 5:23-cv-134, 5:23-cv-150, and 5:24-cv-26 matters until further Order of the 

Court. The Court will set a joint scheduling conference after the final defendant, F5, Inc., answers 

or otherwise responds to the Complaint in 5:24-cv-26. This will allow all Parties to participate in 

the meet and confer process and propose a joint case schedule to the Court.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 27-1 Filed 03/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 418
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

SOCIAL POSITIONING INPUT SYSTEMS, 

LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, LLC 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-422-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF 

APPEARANCE RE DARIO A. MACHLEIDT 

 To the Honorable Court and all parties, please take notice the following attorney hereby 

enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for Defendant Valve Corporation, and is 

authorized to received service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the above 

captioned matter on behalf of Defendant Valve Corporation. 

Dated: February 9, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Dario A. Machleidt 

Michael E. Jones (SBN: 10929400) 

Shaun W. Hassett (SBN: 24074372) 

Potter Minton 

102 North College, Ste. 900 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

(903)597-8311 (telephone) 

mikejones@potterminton.com 

shaunhassett@potterminton.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 02/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 143
Dario A. Machleidt 

Kathleen R. Geyer 

Christopher P. Damitio 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP 

1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700 

Seattle, WA 98101 

(206) 467-9600 (telephone) 

dmachleidt@ktslaw.com 

kgeyer@ktslaw.com 

cdamitio@ktslaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Valve Corporation

78236593v.1 

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 02/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 144