alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

SARAH SOAPE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MAXIMUS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-247-JDK-KNM 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Sarah Soape filed this lawsuit alleging violations of the Fair Labor 

Standards Act by Defendant Maximus, Inc. The case was referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for approval of settlement 

agreement and dismissal with prejudice. Docket No. 19. On October 13, 2023, Judge 

Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the Court deny the motion as to 

settlement approval and grant the parties’ request to dismiss this case. Docket 

No. 22. No objections have been filed. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:23-cv-00247-JDK-KNM Document 23 Filed 11/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 106
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, no party objected in the prescribed period. The Court therefore reviews 

the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews the 

legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States 

v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) 

(holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard 

of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 22) as the findings of this Court. The 

parties’ motion (Docket No. 19) is DENIED as to the request for settlement approval. 

Further, the Court construes the parties’ request for dismissal with prejudice as a 

stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the 

parties’ stipulation. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1st November, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00247-JDK-KNM Document 23 Filed 11/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 107
Arthur Luther MCKINNEY, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

No. 19-7203.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Iris MCCLAIN, Petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et al.

No. 19-5086

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Physical Activity and Cognitive Health.
    Date: June 21, 2022.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of 
Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0b041f190506002d000c040143030405430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbbdb2a9afb3b0b69bb6bab2b7f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 25, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11597 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/01/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,827
COMMITMENTS
   7,386    8,149      725   25,134   26,324   33,245   35,198   13,582   11,629

CHANGES FROM 09/24/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,319)
     -90   -1,033       73    1,723    2,495    1,706    1,535      613      784

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.8     17.4      1.5     53.7     56.2     71.0     75.2     29.0     24.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       70)
      11       18        7       36       23       52       44
```

----

Updated October 25, 2013
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/05/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      683,912
COMMITMENTS
  72,821   52,441  195,141  393,467  415,242  661,430  662,824   22,482   21,088

CHANGES FROM 01/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,479)
   2,892    1,987    2,501   12,247   14,890   17,640   19,378    2,839    1,102

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.6      7.7     28.5     57.5     60.7     96.7     96.9      3.3      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      41       37       60       67       66      139      135
```

----

Updated February 8, 2013
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP 

 § (Lead Case) 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. § 

 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00457-JRG-RSP 

 § (Member Case) 

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE § 

COMPANY, et al § 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00454. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 62
- 2 - So Ordered this

Nov 2, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 63
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

October 3, 2019

Order 

Clerk

October 3, 2019

159443(17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 159443

v COA: 347375

Wayne CC: 18-006163-FC

MARCUS WAYNE MARTIN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for 

filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before November 20, 2019.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/15/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      640,110
COMMITMENTS
  78,267   45,489  191,438  350,517  381,813  620,222  618,740   19,888   21,370

CHANGES FROM 01/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,878)
  -2,683    2,932   12,524    8,873    1,228   18,714   16,684    2,163    4,194

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.2      7.1     29.9     54.8     59.6     96.9     96.7      3.1      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      152)
      39       35       61       66       66      138      135
```

----

Updated January 18, 2013
Bryan A. KRUMM, CNP, Petitioner, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION

No. 18-1582

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Marvin BELSER, petitioner, v. Jeffrey WOODS, et al.

No. 18-8548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation be reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No. 333-03452, No. 333-03454, No.
333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No. 333-33893, No. 333-37273, No.
333-37553, No. 333-37565, No. 333-38071, No. 333-41049, No. 333-42417, No.
333-47563, No. 333-57863, No. 333-64377, No. 333-64379, and No. 333-77941 of
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company of our report dated February 19, 2002
relating to the consolidated financial statements of AmeriCold Corporation
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crescent Real Estate Equities
Company for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
October 16, 2002
Luis ROJAS-MARCELENO, Petitioner, v. KANSAS

No. 19-5149

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

GARY ANDERSON (1)

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00106-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Gary Anderson

GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) -

Possession with Intent to Distribute a Quantity of a Mixture or Substance Containing a Detectable 

Amount of N,N-Diethyl-2-(5-nitro-2-(4-propoxybenzyl)-1H-benzimidazol-1-yl)ethan-1-amine 

(Protonitazene).

Case 6:23-cr-00106-JDK-KNM Document 32 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 94
Signed this

Mar 14, 2024

Case 6:23-cr-00106-JDK-KNM Document 32 Filed 03/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 95
Bobby Ray DEVERS, Petitioner v. IOWA.

No. 18-9580

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
John TEDESCO, petitioner, v. MONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 18-6509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 627 

Designating the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed 

to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the Chairman of the Senate Committee on 

Appropriations. 

1 Resolved, That the following Senator is designated as 

2 chairman of the following committee: 

3 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Ms. Mikulski, of 

4 Maryland. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with
SCPW-13-0000530
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs. TED SAKAI, FRANCIS X. SEQUEIRA, AHN UDOI, JACKIE LINDSAY, MICHAEL CHUN, ROCHELLE NIETO, NOEL VILLANUEVA, TOMMY LIU, and SAT MAESAKA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By : R eck ten wal d, C.J ., Nak ayama, Ac oba , M cKe nna , a nd Pol lac k, JJ. )

Upon consideration of Michael C. Tierney’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on April 29, 2013, and the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that respondents owe him a duty to reinstate his work furlough status or strike the misconduct from his record, and petitioner has alternative means to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000530 23-MAY-2013 01:06 PM2

means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai # i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, May 23, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Exhibit 1 

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 8-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 122
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP 

DECLARATION OF TIMOTHEE YERAMIAN IN SUPPORT 

OF VALVE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(3) FOR IMPROPER VENUE 

1. My name is Timothee Yeramian. I am over the age of twenty-one years, of sound 

mind, and competent in all respects to make this declaration. 

2. I make this declaration based on my own knowledge. I could and would 

competently testify to the accuracy of this declaration if called upon to testify regarding its 

contents. 

3. I am an artist. 

4. I am an employee at Valve Corporation (“Valve”). 

5. I have been employed by Valve since October 31, 2022. 

6. I live in Bellevue, Washington. 

7. I moved to Washington state in October 2022, shortly before I began working for 

Valve. 


				

	 Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 8-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 123 Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 11-2 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 157
2 

8. Until October 19, 2023, I had not updated my location on my LinkedIn page. 

Before then, it therefore incorrectly reflected my previous Texas residence. 

I affirm that the forgoing is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 

Dated November 2, 2023 

________ 

 Timothee Yeramian 


				

	 Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 8-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 124 Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 11-2 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 158
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
           pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, the undersigned, as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Prime Retail, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1.       the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
         30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;

2.       the information contained in the Company's quarterly report on Form
         10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


         Date: August 14, 2003                       /s/ Glenn D. Reschke
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Glenn D. Reschke
                                                     Chairman and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Prime Retail, Inc. and will be retained by Prime Retail, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

GILBERTO PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00284 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in 

accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant 

Gilberto Perez-Rodriguez is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a 

violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) - Reentry of a Deported Alien. 

Case 4:23-cr-00284-SDJ-AGD Document 23 Filed 04/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 43
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-10017 and 333-58403) pertaining to the ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc. Stock Option Plans of 1991 and 1996, of our report dated February 8, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ACT
Teleconferencing, Inc. included in Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form
10-KSB-A) for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
May 18, 2000
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/29/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       52,542
COMMITMENTS
  12,261    5,759    1,103   26,361   35,043   39,725   41,905   12,817   10,637

CHANGES FROM 10/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,143)
     985   -1,040      424    1,524    2,151    2,933    1,535     -790      608

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.3     11.0      2.1     50.2     66.7     75.6     79.8     24.4     20.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       72)
      20       10       11       33       27       57       45
```

----

Updated November 6, 2013
PFIZER INC., Petitioner, v. Alida ADAMYAN, et al.

No. 18-1578

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.