alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      45,388,000
<SECURITIES>                                35,272,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,085,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,043,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,454,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           177,815,000
<PP&E>                                     825,215,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (82,919,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,134,721,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      106,337,000
<BONDS>                                  1,034,957,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       65,603,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   240,212,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (449,389,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,134,721,000
<SALES>                                    127,604,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           127,604,000
<CGS>                                       75,293,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              174,394,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (4,991,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          56,036,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (97,835,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (97,835,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (97,835,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.76)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00419-JRG 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER 

Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Gearbox Software, L.L.C. (“Gearbox”) to 

Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim (the “Motion”). Having considered the 

Motion and supporting documents thereof, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be 

and hereby is GRANTED. 

It is therefore ordered that Defendant Gearbox’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and 

Plaintiff’s Complaint as to Plaintiff’s claims against Gearbox in this action is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 31-1 Filed 01/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 263
Peter BALOV, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-693

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/26/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      148,478
COMMITMENTS
  46,046   16,613   12,258   71,777   93,982  130,082  122,853   18,397   25,625

CHANGES FROM 06/19/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -14,897)
   3,944   -7,396   -6,173   -3,919   10,090   -6,149   -3,479   -8,748  -11,418

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.0     11.2      8.3     48.3     63.3     87.6     82.7     12.4     17.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      161)
      43       31       36       59       69      124      120
```

----

Updated June 29, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PETER KOSTYSHYN,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF WILMINGTON,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 187, 2015

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ C.A. Nos. N13J-01723 and

§ N13J-01724

§

§

Submitted: May 21, 2015

 Decided: June 5, 2015

O R D E R

This 5

th day of June 2015, it appears to the Court that, on May 7, 2015, the 

Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to appellant to show cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for his failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not 

complying with the Court’s April 17, 2015 directive to pay the filing fee or file a 

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The appellant has failed to respond to the 

notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this 

action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme 

Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Antolin Torres ABONZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5448.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

SERGEY LAQUEY

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 4:23-CR-00251

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for 

administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate 

Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings

of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the 

Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count Two of the 

Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty 

Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but 

defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Sergey Laque

GUILTY of Count Two of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 

2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2) - Possession of Child Pornography. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cr-00251-ALM-BD Document 32 Filed 10/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 95
Case 4:23-cr-00251-ALM-BD Document 32 Filed 10/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 96
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment Agreement
is made as of April 20, 2012 (“Amendment”), between Ironwood Gold, Corp., a Nevada
corporation (the “Company”) and Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Alpha”) regarding the note
issued by the Company to Alpha dated August 16, 2011 in the original principal amount of $550,000 (the “Note”)
and a warrant to purchase 27,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock issued by the Company to Alpha dated August 16,
2011 (the “Warrant”)


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and Alpha have agreed to modify certain terms of the Note and Warrant as described herein.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby consent and agree as follows:


 


1.          Subject
to adjustment as provided in the Note and Subscription Agreement, the Conversion Price of the Note shall be $0.08.


 


2.          As
a result of the reduction of the Conversion Price of the Note described in Section 1 above and subject to further adjustment as
provided in the Warrant and Subscription Agreement, the Purchase Price of the Warrant is $0.08 and the number of shares purchasable
pursuant to the Warrant is increased to 10,312,500.


 


3.          The
Lender agrees to cancel 4,312,500 shares purchasable pursuant to the Warrant, so that after giving effect to this Agreement the
Lender shall have the right to purchase 6,000,000 shares pursuant to the Warrant.


 


4.          A
copy of this Agreement annexed to the Note or Warrants shall be sufficient to reflect the amendment thereto.


 


5.          Except
as set forth herein the Note and Warrant remain in full force and effect without any modification.


 


6.          This
Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement
and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to any other party, it being understood
that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or
electronically, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature
is executed) with the same with the same force and effect as if such facsimile signature were an original thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	IRONWOOD GOLD, CORP.	 	ALPHA CAPITAL ANSTALT
	 	 	 
	/s/	 	/s/
	By: Behzad Shayanfar	 	By: Konrad Ackerman
	Its: Chief Executive Officer	 	Its: Director
(110 So. 644)

No. 28159.

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Buster KYLE.

(Nov. 2, 1926.)

Appeal'from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union; S. D. Pearce, Judge.

S. L. Digby, of Farmerville, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Pércy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Wm. J. Hammon, Dist. Atty., of Jonesboro (Herbert Dawkins, of Farmerville, and E. R. Schowalter, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

BRUNOT, J.

This ease presents no other issues than those disposed of in State v. Dison (No. 28160) 110 So. 642,1 this day decided, and, for the same reasons, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID E. WOOD,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00109-CR

Appeal from the

358th District Court 

of Ector County, Texas1

(TC# D-17-1994-CR)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Wood has filed an appeal from an order revoking his community supervision and 

adjudicating him guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. We affirm.

FRIVOLOUS APPEAL

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is 

supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and 

applicable law and concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel has provided 

Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, a copy of the clerk’s record 

and the reporter’s record, and an explanatory letter. Counsel advised Appellant of his right to 

review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his 

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Eleventh Court of Appeals. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3
2

right to file a petition for discretionary review in order to seek review by the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals. See TEX.R.APP.P. 68. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 

(Tex.Crim.App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008); and Stafford v. 

State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (en banc).

After carefully reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error that 

might arguably support the appeal, and accordingly, we conclude that the appeal is wholly 

frivolous and without merit. As such, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s 

motion to withdraw.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

December 17, 2020

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
John GARCIA, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-8928.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/17/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      544,871
COMMITMENTS
 103,192   17,584  144,361  274,911  368,082  522,464  530,027   22,407   14,844

CHANGES FROM 12/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,931)
   4,252   -6,776   -9,200   -6,734    4,671  -11,682  -11,305   -2,249   -2,626

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.9      3.2     26.5     50.5     67.6     95.9     97.3      4.1      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      143)
      42       27       53       69       62      135      120
```

----

Updated December 20, 2013
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0619

_____________________________

TIMOTHY DONALD HELTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

David Rimmer, Judge.

June 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Scott W. Tatum of the Office of Candice K. Brower Regional 

Conflict Counsel, Milton, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 40319 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Carlos Hernandez -**  **Torres,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16 - CR - 682 - 1

**______________ ________________**  Before **Higginbotham, Stewart,** and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Hernandez - Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez - Torres has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 2, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40319 Document: 00517017951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2024No. 23 - 40319

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from fu rther responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-40319 Document: 00517017951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,426
<PP&E>                                         522,299
<DEPRECIATION>                               (122,463)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 649,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,543
<BONDS>                                        213,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           294
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   649,465
<SALES>                                        237,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               237,205
<CGS>                                          214,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,508
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Jon Jason KING, Petitioner, v. BENTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al.

No. 19-7384.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/17/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      182,977
COMMITMENTS
  57,669    9,550   22,166   79,117  125,626  158,951  157,342   24,025   25,635

CHANGES FROM 05/10/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,099)
   1,050   -1,249    1,223   -4,355   -2,319   -2,082   -2,345   -1,018     -755

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.5      5.2     12.1     43.2     68.7     86.9     86.0     13.1     14.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      194)
      59       25       51       65       80      149      139
```

----

Updated May 20, 2011
Blanca ARIZMENDI, Petitioner, v. Patrick GABBERT

No. 19-308

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                       
<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               213,538
<SECURITIES>                                         1,562,948
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       25,417,131<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           24,961,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         25,417,131<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     81,772<F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     279,241<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,567,863)<F5>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (42.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Total   assets  include   Investments  in  Local  Limited   Partnerships  of
$23,619,828,  Organizational  costs,  net of $1,667 and Other  assets of $19,150
<F2>Total  liability  and equity  includes  Accounts  payable to  affiliates  of
$414,435 and Accrued expenses of $41,525 <F3>Total  revenue includes  Investment
of $74,207 and Other of $7,565 <F4>Other Expenses include Asset Management fees,
related  party  of  $152,295,   General  and   administrative   of  $96,988  and
Amortization of $29,958. <F5>Net loss includes Equity in losses of Local Limited
Partnerships of $1,370,394. 
</FN> 
         

</TABLE>