alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF JOHN D. HAYNES

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, John D. Haynes, enters his appearance in 

the above-referenced proceedings for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile” or “Defendant”). 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 38 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 174
-2-

Defendant respectfully requests that the court take note of this Notice of Appearance and makes John D. 

Haynes its counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies of all communications and other documents filed in 

the above-referenced proceedings that are not filed via ECF should be emailed or faxed to John D. 

Haynes at the address set forth below.

Dated: December 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John D. Haynes

John D. Haynes (GA Bar No. 340599) 

 john.haynes@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777 

Counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 38 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 175
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of December, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such 

filing upon Counsel of Record. 

//s/ John D. Haynes

John D. Haynes (GA Bar No. 340599)

 John.haynes@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 38 Filed 12/01/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 176
In Re Charles A. DREAD, petitioner.

No. 18-7063.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00108

- CV

In The Interest Of N

. I

. V

. S . And M

. C

. V

. S
., Mi nor Children
,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 20008 Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On February 18, 2014, appellant filed two motions in this court. In the first, he asks this court to issue temporary orders pending resolution of th e appeal. More specifically, he asks that we issue orders: (1) instituting a standard possession order so that appellant may have visitation with the children; (2) enjoining appellee “from institution an adoption cause of action pending the appeal of this case ” ; and (3) mandating therapy for appellant and the children . Appellant contends these orders are necessary to preserve his rights, and thus are appropriate under rule 24.4(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. After review, we DENY appellant’ s motion for temporary orders.

In his second motion, appellant asks that we give this appeal precedence. In support of this request, appellant cites section 56.01(h) of the Texas Family Code. However, that provision is not applicable to this appeal. Rather, the section relied upon by appellant is applicable to cases involving juveniles who have been involved in delinquency matters in the juvenile court. Accordingly, we also DENY appellant’s motion asking that we give this appeal precedence.

We o rder the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Alice C. TRAPPLER, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 19-7376

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

(Note: Stockholders are requested to sign, date and return this Proxy promptly
in the enclosed stamped envelope, addressed to Secretary, Remington Arms
Company, Inc., 870 Remington Drive, Madison, North Carolina 27025.

                               RACI HOLDING, INC.
                                      PROXY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints Leon J. (Bill) Hendrix, Jr., Chairman and Thomas L. Millner, President
and CEO, or either of them, with power of substitution, attorneys and proxies to
appear and vote all of the shares of stock standing in the name of the
undersigned, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of RACI Holding, Inc., to be
held at the offices of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc., located at 375 Park
Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, New York 10152, on Wednesday, January 24, 2001
commencing at 8:00 a.m., and at any and all adjournments thereof; and the
undersigned hereby instructs said proxies to vote:

(1)     To elect the following twelve (12) Directors to serve until the next
        Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly
        elected and qualified: Leon J. (Bill) Hendrix, Thomas L. Millner, Joseph
        L. Rice, III, Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr., Richard A. Gilleland, Richard E.
        Heckert, Hubbard C. Howe, Bobby R. Brown, Michael G. Babiarz, H. Norman
        Schwarzkopf, B. Charles Ames and Dr. Ulrich Middelmann

|_|  FOR all nominees                             |_|  WITHHOLD
        AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees
                  |_| FOR all nominees except for the following:
                       _________________________________

(2)     To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. as the
        Company's independent auditors for the current fiscal year.

                  |_|  FOR          |_|  AGAINST              |_|  ABSTAIN

None of the above identified matters, which are proposed by RACI Holding, Inc.,
are conditioned on the approval of other matters.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION
IS GIVEN, "FOR" ITEMS 1 AND 2. IF ANY OTHER MATTERS ARE PRESENTED FOR ACTION,
THE PROXIES NAMED HEREIN WILL VOTE UPON SUCH MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR
DISCRETION.

By executing this proxy, the undersigned represents that he or she is a
Stockholder of record and this proxy constitutes a valid and binding instrument
enforceable against the undersigned.

Dated this ____ day of ____________, 2001.


------------------------------------
(Signature)

------------------------------------
Name of Stockholder (please print)

------------------------------------
Name and title of signatory (if Stockholder
is a corporation, partnership, trust or other
entity)

No. of Shares:  ____________

               THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE MANAGEMENT
                              OF RACI HOLDING, INC.
Joe Lewis FINLEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-7114

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:

I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown* v. *United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2007, I, George W.
Trahan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Hi-Shear Technology
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2007,
         fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
         the year ended May 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear
         Technology Corporation.


                                      /S/ GEORGE W. TRAHAN
                           -----------------------------------------------
                           George W. Trahan
                           President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

August 10, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hi-Shear Technology Corporation
and will be retained by Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1.1(D)


                           Magnesium Corporation of America
                              238 North 2200 West Street
                               Salt Lake City, UT 84116


July 22, 1998


Mr. Lee R. Brown
C/O Magnesium Corporation of America
238 North 2200 West Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Dear Lee:

Reference is made to your Employment Agreement with this Corporation dated
September 1, 1989 (the "Agreement").

This will confirm our agreement with you as follows:

The base salary provided in Section 2(a) of the agreement is increased from
$76,000 to $96,000, effective this date.

The parties reaffirm the Agreement as amended hereby.

Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing and returning the
enclosed copy.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             MAGNESIUM CORPORATION
                                                  OF AMERICA


                                             By  /s/ Michael H. Legge



CONFIRMED AND AGREED TO:




/s/ Lee R. Brown
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 24-0050 

CHAD ALLEN MILLER, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

CAPTAIN JASON KOWALSKI, 

Respondent. 

GRANT OF MOTION TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT 

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE 

Motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee in this matter is 

GRANTED. 

DATED January 24, 2024. 

, BOWEN GREENWOOD 

Clerk of the Supreme Court 

01/24/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0050
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit (10)(x)



The CIT Group/
Equipment Financing
650 CIT Drive
PO Box 490
Livingston, NJ 07039-0490

                                January 20, 1999


Mr. John Sole
Cold Metal Products Inc.
8526 South Avenue
PO Box 6078
Youngstown, Ohio 44501

Dear Mr. Sole:

         In regards to the amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement,
dated as of November 22, 1996, (Loan Agreement), by and between cold Metal
Products Inc. (Debtor) and the CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. (Lender).
Debtor has advised CIT that Cold Metal Products was not in compliance with its
Cash Flow covenant contained in Section 8.10 of the Agreement for the period
ended December 31, 1998.

         Cash Flow Covenant: Cash Flow coverage shall be greater than or equal
         to 1.50x. Cash Flow is defined as net income after taxes plus
         depreciation and amortization divided by CPLTD and capital leases
         (calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis).

Debtor has requested that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the
Agreement, that CIT waive the above instance of noncompliance from the period
above through the period ending December 31, 1999. CIT hereby waives, as of this
date and through the period ending December 31, 1999, the above instances of
noncompliance under Section 8.10 of the Agreement subject to the following
condition:

         receipt by CIT of a $3,500 processing fee.

                                      Sincerely
                                      The CIT Group Equipment Financing, Inc.
                                      By: /s/ Anthony Joseph
                                         ----------------------
                                      Title: Vice President
                                         ----------------------



Agreed and Accepted By:

Cold Metal Products, Inc.

By: /s/ J. E. Sloe

Title: VP-CFO
Antonio Medrano ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. George T. SOLOMON, et al.

No. 19-7140

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Bray and Senior Judge Hodges Argued at Alexandria, Virginia

JAY JEFFREY BROWN MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2138-96-4 JUDGE WILLIAM H. HODGES APRIL 1, 1997 LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION Laurie D. Waters (Jack T. Burgess & Associates, on brief), for appellant. Susan A. Evans (Siciliano, Ellis, Dyer & Boccarosse, on brief), for appellee.

Jay Jeffrey Brown (claimant) contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in deciding that a notation of "probable HTN" (hypertension) on his pre-employment physical notes was sufficient to conclude that Code § 65.2-402(B) was inapplicable. We hold that because claimant was not free of hypertension at his pre-employment physical, the presumption of Code § 65.2-402(B) was not applicable. Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision denying benefits. Claimant is 6'3" tall and weighs approximately 330 pounds. In June or July, 1989, claimant applied for a part-time position of advanced life support specialist with Loudoun County. As part of the application process, claimant underwent a pre-employment physical examination. The July 13, 1989 physical examination

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 report reflected blood pressure readings of 162/88, 150/94, 144/104, and 144/98. In this report, Dr. John Hatala listed a diagnosis of "probable HTN" (hypertension). Code § 65.2-402(B) provides a rebuttable presumption that, absent a preponderance of evidence to the contrary, a causal connection exists between certain public service jobs and hypertension. However, Code § 65.2-402(D) states, in part, that the presumption that hypertension is a work-related occupational disease applies to persons who have "undergone preemployment physical examinations that . . . (iv) found such persons free of . . ., hypertension, . . . at the time of such examinations." Dr. Hatala diagnosed the claimant as having "probable" hypertension. "A statement that a certain condition is probably present means there is a reasonable likelihood of the condition's existence, and this is sufficient to permit a trier of fact to accord the statement probative weight." Cook v. City of Waynesboro Police Dep't , 225 Va. 23, 30, 300 S.E.2d 746, 749 (1983). "Where reasonable inferences may be drawn from the evidence in support of the commission's factual findings, they will not be disturbed by this Court on appeal." Hawks v. Henrico County School Bd. , 7 Va. App. 398, 404, 374 S.E.2d 695, 698 (1988). The diagnosis of "probable" hypertension at claimant's pre-employment physical examination supports the conclusion that claimant was not free of hypertension at the time he was hired.3 Therefore, pursuant to Code § 65.2-402(D), the presumption afforded under Code § 65.2-402(B) is not applicable. The commission did not err by denying claimant compensation for his work-related hypertension claim. We affirm the commission's

decision.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 8



SUBSIDIARIES



Our wholly-owned subsidiaries are:

•

Caradas, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

•

DSS Software Technologies, a California corporation, (inactive)

•

Diversinet Corporation of America, a Delaware corporation, (inactive)

•

Diversinet Inc., an Ontario corporation, (inactive)

•

Diversinet (Israel) Ltd., an Israeli corporation (inactive)

•

The Instant Publisher Ltd., a Barbados corporation, (inactive)



Our joint venture is:

Atria Limited, a 50% owned joint venture that operated in Hong Kong, (inactive)
Reginal SWINTON, petitioner, v. Steven RACETTE, Superintendent, Great Meadows Correctional Facility.

No. 17-9500.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ketut PUJAYASA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7276

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Raymond BAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6351.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 46 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 46

Requiring that legislation considered by the Senate to be confined to a 
                             single issue.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2011

    Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Barrasso) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Requiring that legislation considered by the Senate to be confined to a 
                             single issue.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SINGLE-ISSUE REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
consider a bill or resolution that is not confined to a single subject.
    (b) Supermajority Waiver and Appeals.--
            (1) Waiver.--This section may be waived or suspended in the 
        Senate only by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the 
        Members, duly chosen and sworn.
            (2) Appeals.--Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of 
        the Chair relating to any provision of this section shall be 
        limited to 30 minutes, to be equally divided between, and 
        controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the bill or 
        joint resolution. An affirmative vote of two-thirds of the 
        Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required 
        to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of 
        order raised under this section.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-126-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC. AND AMAZON WEB 

SERVICES, INC.,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-123-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CA, INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

F5, INC.

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-26-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 42-1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 611
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE STAY

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION, the Parties’ in the above-captioned cases Joint 

Motion to Continue the Stays Pending Settlement.

Having considered the Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned actions 

shall remain stayed until June 24, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 42-1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 612
Leon STAMBLER, petitioner, v. MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INC.

No. 17-1140.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      413,877
COMMITMENTS
 102,532  182,675   67,482  217,456  135,385  387,470  385,542   26,407   28,335

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,771)
   8,841   -6,205   -4,368    4,420   17,062    8,893    6,489   -4,122   -1,718

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.8     44.1     16.3     52.5     32.7     93.6     93.2      6.4      6.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      59       59       68       36       33      133      131
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/09/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       51,727
COMMITMENTS
   2,426    4,399    2,166   45,127   42,919   49,719   49,484    2,008    2,243

CHANGES FROM 04/02/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,509)
     724      -29       29    8,474    9,299    9,227    9,299      282      210

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     4.7      8.5      4.2     87.2     83.0     96.1     95.7      3.9      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       5        8        7       23       24       33       34`

---

Updated April 17, 2013
EXHIBIT 23.2 

 

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS****

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-83438, 333-55723 and 333-54244) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Incentive Planof Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. and (Form S-8 No. 333-69008) pertaining to the Stock Option and Registration Rights Agreement dated January 26, 1994, of our report dated December 17, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

January 16, 2004