2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 2-20-2008 

# W i l li ams v . Ame ri s uit es P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-3359

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " W i l l i am s v . Ame r i s uit e s " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1568. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/1568Honora ble L ouis H. Poll ak, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the * Easter n District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 07- 3359 T E R R Y W I L L I A M S; R A Y M O N D W I L L I A M S, hus band and w i fe, A p p e llan ts v. AM E RI S UI T E S ; HYAT T CO RP OR AT I ON; GL OB AL HYAT T CO RP OR AT I ON,

O n A p p e a l o f

a D e c isio n o f

th e U n ited S tate s D istric t C o u rt fort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey( N o. 07- cv- 02755) D i s t r i ctJ udge: R obertB . K ugl er Subm i t t ed underT hi r d C i r cui tL . A . R . 34. 1( a)

February1, 2008 B e f o re : R E N D E L L a n d C H A G A R E S , C i r cui tJudges , a n d P OL L AK, D is tr i ct Judge . * ( Fi l ed: February20, 2008 ) OP I NI ON P O L L A K , D is tr i ct

Judge2

O n Ju n e 1 3 , 2 0 0 7 , p lain tiff -a p p e llan ts T e rrya n d R a ym o n d W ill iam s in stitu ted th is a c tio n b yf

ili n g a c o m p lain t ag a in st A m e risu ites , H y a tt C o rp o ra tio n , an d G lo b a l H y a tt C orpor at i on. O n i t s ow n m ot i on, t he D i s t r i ctC our tdi s m i s s ed the compl ai ntw i t hout pr ej udi ce be caus e the compl ai ntas s er t ed j ur i s di ct i on under28 U . S. C . § 1332 butdi d not pr oper l yal l ege the ci t i zens hi p of ea ch part y . T he pl ai nt i ffs fi l ed an a m ended c om pl ai nt on J une 29, 2007, t hatcorr ect ed s om e of the omi s s i ons , buts t i l l fai l ed pr oper l yt o al l ege t he ci t i zens hi p of R aym ond W i l l i ams. A ccor di ngl y , t he D i s t r i ctC our tdi s m i s s ed the a m e n d e d c o m p lain t o n Ju ly5 , 2 0 0 7 . O n Ju ly1 8 , 2 0 0 7 , the p lain tiff s f iled a m o tio n to r ei ns t at e the compl ai ntand forl eave t o fi l e a s econd a m ended c om pl ai nt . T he D i s t r i ct C o u rt c o n stru e d th is m o tio n a s o n e f o r re lief f ro m ju d g m e n t u n d e r F e d e ra l R u le o f C iv il Pr ocedur e 60( b) , or , al t ernat i vel y , forr econs i der at i on underD i s t r i ctof N ew J er s eyL ocal C i vi l R ul e 7. 1( i ) , and deni ed the mot i on beca us e the pl ai nt i ffs had notadvanc ed any caus e forr el i ef c ogni zabl e underei t herrul e. I n i t s deci s i on, t he D i s t r i ctC our tnot ed thatt he pl ai nt i ffs fi l ed a ba r e mot i on w i t houtanyacc om pany i ng s t at ement of w hyt he mot i on s houl d be gr ant ed. T hi s w as unw i s e, beca us e ar gum ent s ar e onl ypr es er ved forappea l i f theyar e fi r s tm ade t o t he D is tr ic t C o u rt . See, e. g. , D I R E C TV , I nc. v. Sei j as , 5 0 8 F .3 d 1 2 3 , 1 2 5 n .1 (3 d C ir . 2 0 0 7 ). In c h o o sin g n o t to m a k e a n ya rg u m e n ts to th e D istric t C o u rt, th e p lain tiff s f a iled to pr es er ve anyar gum ent s forappea l . M or eover , w hethert he pl ai nt i ffs ’ m ot i on i s cons t rued as one to reconsi der, al t er, or grantrel i ef from an o t herw i se fi nal j ud gm ent, t he p l ai nti ffs,3

a s th e m o v in g p a rt ie s , b o re th e b u rd e n o f d e m o n s tr a tin g th e ire n title m e n t to re lie f. B eca us e the pl ai nt i ffs fai l ed t o advanc e anyr eas on fordi s turbi ng t he j udgm ent , w e ca nnot f a u lt th e D is tr ic t C o u rt f o r d e c lin in g to d o s o .

* * * * * For t he for egoi ng r eas ons , w e w i l l aff i r m t he D i s t r i ctC our t ’ s or derdeny i ng t he p lain tiff s’ m o tio n to re in sta te th e c o m p lain t an d to f ile a se c o n d a m e n d e d c o m p lain t.