alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 617 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 617

   Congratulating the recipient of the 2012 Heisman Memorial Trophy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2012

  Mrs. Hutchison (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           December 20, 2012

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Congratulating the recipient of the 2012 Heisman Memorial Trophy.

Whereas, for the 78th time, the Heisman Memorial Trophy has been awarded to the 
        most outstanding collegiate football player in the United States;
Whereas Johnny Manziel overcame intense competition and defied expectations 
        during Texas A&M University's first year in the Southeastern Conference;
Whereas Manziel led the 2012 Texas A&M Aggie football team to a regular season 
        record of 10 wins and 2 losses;
Whereas Manziel was awarded the Davey O'Brien National Quarterback Award as the 
        top quarterback in the National Collegiate Athletic Association;
Whereas Manziel became the first freshman, and only the fifth player ever, in 
        National Collegiate Athletic Association Football Bowl Subdivision 
        history to achieve 3,000 passing yards and 1,000 rushing yards in a 
        season;
Whereas Manziel became the first player in the Football Bowl Subdivision to pass 
        for 300 yards and rush for 100 yards in the same game 3 times in his 
        career;
Whereas Manziel holds the freshman record for quarterback rushing yards (1,114) 
        and total yards in a season (4,600);
Whereas Manziel was assisted by the leadership of Southeastern Conference Co-
        Coach of the Year Kevin Sumlin, the exceptional protection of the 
        offensive line anchored by Outland Trophy winner Luke Joeckel, and Texas 
        A&M's 12th Man;
Whereas Manziel became the second Heisman Trophy winner at Texas A&M, preceded 
        by John David Crow in 1957;
Whereas Manziel started the development of his athletic capabilities before 
        attending Texas A&M in the cities of Tyler, Texas, and Kerrville, Texas;
Whereas 2012 marks the eighth time a player at a university in Texas has won the 
        Heisman Trophy and back-to-back years of keeping the award in Texas;
Whereas the hullabaloo of Manziel becoming the first freshman to win the Heisman 
        Trophy is another testament to the strength and skill of Texas football; 
        and
Whereas Manziel has combined incredible talent with hard work and a good heart: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the recipient of the 2012 
Heisman Memorial Trophy.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DONNIE RAY PEOPLES,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00306-CR

Appeal from

143rd District Court

of Ward County, Texas 

(TC# 19-10-25230-CVW)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right 

of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with the trial 

court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s right of 

appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall prepare a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no later than 

March 13, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of January, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Specimen Common Stock certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 
 



 
  
 MacDermid
Group, Inc. 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN JERSEY CITY, NJ, NEW YORK, NY AND PITTSBURGH, PA 

COMMON STOCK 
 CUSIP 554270 10 8 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF 
 FULLY PAID AND
NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF $0.01 PER SHARE OF 
 Transferable on the books of the
corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate, properly endorsed. 
 This certificate not valid until countersigned and registered by the transfer agent and registrar 
 Witness the facsimile seal of the corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
 Dated: 
 Countersigned and registered: 

Mellon investor services llc 
 Transfer agent and registrar 
 By 

Authorized officer 
 Secretary president and chief executive officer 

© security-custodian united stated banknote company1060 SEAL 







 



 
  
 The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 

TEN COM —as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian 

TEN ENT —as tenants by the entireties (cust) (minor) 

JT TEN —as joint tenants with right of survivor ship and not as tenants in common under Uniform Gifts to Minors

 Act (state) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER identifying number of assignee 

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 

Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of
substitution in the premises. 
 Dated, 
 NOTICE- THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR. WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER. 
 SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ORDER

 AND NOW, this __ day of _______________________, 2024, having considered 

DEFENDANT MACY’S INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 

CLAIM PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6), and all 

subsequent briefing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion.

 Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MACY’S, INC., 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action 

No. 2:23-cv-00583-JRG 

Judge Rodney Gilstrap 

Case 2:23-cv-00583-JRG Document 15-1 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 197
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/15/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       55,463
COMMITMENTS
   1,723   13,712    5,475   47,521   35,315   54,719   54,502      744      961

CHANGES FROM 01/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,708)
  -1,926    1,087    1,250    4,440    1,204    3,764    3,541      -56      167

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.1     24.7      9.9     85.7     63.7     98.7     98.3      1.3      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
       4        8        9       23       19       34       30`

---

Updated January 18, 2013
John Francis LECHNER, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5227

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2278 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2278

  To require the National Park Service to conduct a feasibility study 
regarding options for the protection and expanded visitor enjoyment of 
 nationally significant natural and cultural resources at Fort Hunter 
                          Liggett, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 1999

    Mr. Farr of California introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the National Park Service to conduct a feasibility study 
regarding options for the protection and expanded visitor enjoyment of 
 nationally significant natural and cultural resources at Fort Hunter 
                          Liggett, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEASIBILITY STUDY REGARDING PROTECTION OF NATURAL AND 
              CULTURAL RESOURCES AT FORT HUNTER LIGGETT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Study Required.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
the Director of the National Park Service, shall undertake a 
feasibility study regarding options for the near- and long-term 
protection and expanded visitor enjoyment of nationally significant 
natural and cultural resources by the National Park Service or other 
agencies as appropriate at Fort Hunter Liggett, California.
    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary of the Interior shall consult with 
all other affected or interested agencies, including the Department of 
the Army, in the preparation of the study.
    (c) Completion and Submission.--Not later than August 30, 2000, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall submit to Congress a report containing 
the results of the study, along with such protection and visitor access 
recommendations as the Secretary of the Interior considers appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
Clifford Marcus WINKLES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9724

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
BOSTON FINANCIAL TAX CREDIT FUND VIII, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII
(the "Fund") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


                                       /s/Gary Mentesana
                                       -------------------------------------
                                          Gary Mentesana
                                          Principal Executive Officer and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
                                          Arch Street VIII, LP, as
                                          Managing General Partner of
                                          Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VIII,
                                          A Limited Partnership


                                                      Date:  August 14, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 31250 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. TR O YLY N N FO R D , al so know n as W hi t e Boy, D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 1: 03- C R

- 10014- 1
B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder al Pu bl i c D ef ender appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent Troy Lyn n F or d has m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U
. S. 73 8 ( 19 67 )
. For d has no t f i l e d a r e s po ns e . O uri nde pe nde nt r e v ie w o f th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s issu e for ap p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , co u n s e l ’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 26, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Yuzef ABRAMOV, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-256

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997             APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,942,997                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  788,884                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    803,301                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,736,687                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,316,201                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,418                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,017,470                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          793,255                       0
<BONDS>                                        180,710                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        16,124                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,027,381                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,017,470                       0
<SALES>                                      1,195,641                 787,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,195,641                 787,363
<CGS>                                          814,617                 507,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               327,833                 232,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,191                  47,510
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,097                  15,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,094                  31,967
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,094                  31,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03                     .03
        





</TABLE>
WOODCREST HOMES, INC., Petitioner, v. CAROUSEL FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT.

No. 19-607.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Roger E. Gower, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

 

c) disclosed in this reportany changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:   August  6, 2004 | By:                                    | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                    | Roger E.  Gower                        |
|                                    | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 01/03/2024 /s/ Kristopher Davis Kristopher Davis CA Bar No. 329627

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 kdavis@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 11 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 795
Wendy Alison NORA, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

No. 19-698

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
Honorable GeorgeH. Sheppard Comptroller

of Public

Aooounfs Austin, Teas Dear sin

Opinion No. O-714 Be: Autherity of Ccmptroller~ to issue narrutt to pay funeralexpeness of deoeesedjamiter

of State Senate. Your letter of Arpil 26, lSS9 requeata of thi8 Department

an opinionas to vðer yo~Depa&aent f6 authorised to iasu4 a mxmmt in pymmt of the aaooomtof H. H. Fuller,FuneralDireotor, for the fInera expemes of Tom Rmton, wh4 mm6 011 the payrollof the State Senate as Janitorat the tinu,

of his death. To your kttei..tia~attaah&d ths~olk~1wW4~ ii~rbtklm&l-to-Jou'hemth. Seotion-9

of Artiole 8 of the Tsxms Constitution prmides.me f@ollons: Vkues shall bs levied and oolleotsd‘by generallam and for publio pllzpses

OBly.' Seotion 61 of Artiole 9 of the Texas Comtituticm providesin part a8 f4114mt "Th4 Legi6lature

shall have no power to make any grant or authorize the Beking of any grant of public money to any indlrldual,aeaoaiation of individuals, mmicipal or other aorporations wbatsower',...' Seotioa.

6 of Artiole 16 of the 'Texas Constitution

provides

a8 follarsr "No appropriation

for prioateor &dividukl purposea shall be made. A regularstatement, nuder oath, and an aoootmtr of the rsoeipts

and expenditures

of all publicmoney ahallbe published annually,

in suohxuumer as shall Bs pr4aor0md by 1111."Bon. Gaorge H. Sheppard, May 1, 1939, Page 2. O-714

Upcrm the authority

of the citations

from the Texas Constitution above quoted,you are advised that it ia our opinionthat your Daparbnent ir not authorized

to issue a mrrant in payment of this oleim. Your6very *ly ATTORNEYG?JNl!XkL

OF TEXAS S/R. TH.

Fairohild

% R. II.

Fairchild Assistant mmPBP:LDYi ENcLosuEN APPROVED: s/ Gerald C. Mann % Gerald C..Mann AT'NXNNYGENE% OF TFJAS