alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Joseph James ROE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7404

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2008 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Acting Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  May 20, 2008


\s\ Edward L. Torres
------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Acting Chief Financial Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT (10)(B)



 EXHIBIT 10(b) 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Prospectus and to the use of our reports:
(1) dated March 29, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company, (2) dated April 23, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity
Separate Account A in Post-Effective Amendment No. 35 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 33-43773) under the Securities Act of 1933, and the related Prospectus of the Merrill Lynch Retirement Plus. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 23, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES and STATE OF TEXAS 

ex rel. DANIEL W. ELLIOTT, M.D. and 

LISA A. MINSLOFF, M.D.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS MEDICAL 

ASSOCIATES, LLP; STEWARD HEALTH 

CARE SYSTEM; ONPOINT LAB, L.L.C.; 

BAPTIST HOSPITALS OF SOUTHEAST 

TEXAS; MUHAMMAD AZIZ, M.D.;

JAMES HOLLY, M.D.; MARY CASTRO, 

M.D.; VIJAY KUMAR, M.D.; MICHAEL 

THOMAS, M.D.; SYED ANWAR, M.D., 

CAESAR DEIPARINE, M.D.; RONALD 

PALANG, M.D.; ABSAR QURESHI, M.D.; 

and DEAN HALBERT, M.D.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-329-MJT

ORDER ON RELATORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITIED CONSIDERATION (Doc. #117)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules of Court for the Assignment of Duties to 

United States Magistrate Judges, the district court referred Relators’ Motion to Compel and 

Request for Expedited Consideration (doc. #117) to the undersigned for consideration and 

disposition. (Doc. #119.) This motion concerns a discovery request within the context of the 

court’s stay of “[a]ll discovery, except discovery related to the pending dispositive motions.” 

(Docs. #114, #132.) On March 22, 2024, however, the court granted the withdrawal of the pending 

dispositive motions. (Doc. #134.) As there are no more pending dispositive motions, there can 

no longer be “discovery related to the pending dispositive motions” and all discovery is stayed. 

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 135 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1225
2

The Relator’s Motion to Compel (doc. #117) is, therefore, DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 26th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 135 Filed 03/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1226
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

LOWER, LLC

 Plaintiff,

:

:

:

:

Judge Amos L. Mazzant III

Case No. 4:23-cv-00685

:

v.

AMCAP MORTGAGE, LTD., et al.

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

PLAINTIFF LOWER, LLC’S NOTICE OF 

FILING AFFIDAVITS OF SERVICE OF 

PROCESS 

Plaintiff Lower, LLC (“Lower”), through counsel, hereby gives notice that it has served 

the Summons, Complaint, and a copy of this Court’s Order (Dkt. 41) on Defendants Kristen 

Mastrorilli and Ron Hankins, via electronic mail, through the services of a process server as 

Ordered by the Court (see Order, Dkt. 41). The Affidavit of Service showing service on Kristen 

Mastrorilli is attached as Exhibit A. The Affidavit of Service showing service on Ron Hankins is 

attached as Exhibit B.

By: /s/ Sanna-Rae Taylor

STEPHEN D. HENNINGER

Texas Bar No. 00784256

shenninger@fhmbk.com 

JOHN F. ROEHM, III

Texas Bar No. 17157500

jroehm@fhmbk.com

FANNING HARPER MARTINSON

BRANDT & KUTCHIN

8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 200

Dallas, Texas 75231

(214) 369-1300 (office)

(214) 987-9649 (telecopier)

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LOWER, LLC

SANNA-RAE TAYLOR

Ohio Bar No. 0091302

Case 4:23-cv-00685-ALM Document 42 Filed 12/15/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 442
2

srtaylor@taftlaw.com

ALEX E. WALLIN

Ohio Bar No. 0091289

awallin@taftlaw.com

JULIAN P. JOHNSON

Ohio Bar No. 0101554

jjohnson@taftlaw.com

Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP

425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Phone: (513) 381-2838

Fax: (513) 381-0205

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LOWER, LLC

Case 4:23-cv-00685-ALM Document 42 Filed 12/15/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 443
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on December 15, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, via the 

Court’s electronic case management/case filing system (CM/ECF), and that it reported that it was 

delivered to and served upon all parties and/or counsel of record. 

/s/ Sanna-Rae Taylor

SANNA-RAE TAYLOR

Case 4:23-cv-00685-ALM Document 42 Filed 12/15/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 444
Joseph SMITH, et al., Petitioners, v. Pamela MOTLEY, et al.

No. 19-881

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Order entered September 29, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 14
- 00565
- CV
JW GST EXEMPT TRUST , ET AL. , Appellant s V. WRENO S. WYNNE, ET A L. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 84117
- 86 

### O RDER A 2,562 page clerk’s record was filed on June 4, 2014. On August 20, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion in the trial court seeking to correct numerous errors and omissions in the clerk’s record. On Aug ust 21, 2014, we received a corrected clerk’s record. The corrected
clerk’s record did not correct the errors and omissions set forth in the parties’ joint mo tion. For this reason, in an order dated August 25, 2014, we struck the clerk’s records filed on June 4, 2014 and August 21, 2014. We ordered Rhonda Hughey, Kaufman County District Clerk, to
file , by September 25, 2014 , a clerk’s record correcting each error and omission set forth in the parties’ joint motion. On August 25, 2014, a supplemental cle rk’s record was filed containing a corrected index , apparently pertaining to the corrected clerk’s record filed on August 21, 2014 , and the documents omitted from both of the previously filed clerk’s records. Because we struckthe June 4, 2014 and August 21, 2014 clerk’s records, the supplemental clerk’s record does not cure the problems previously identified. On the Court’s own motion, we STRIKE the supplemental clerk’s record filed on August 25, 2014.
We ORDER Rhonda Hughey to file by OCTOBER 10 , 201 4 , a complete and accurately indexed clerk’s record containing all requested documents. Appellants’ brief will be due fifteen days after the clerk’s record is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic
transmission to the Honorable Howard Tygrett, Judge of the 86th Judicial District Court of Kaufman County, Texas, Rhonda Hughey, and all counsel of record.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Piper Lakay Ellis SNOWTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-7267.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE CHANNEL
PARTNER AGREEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is entered into
as of this 13th day of September, 2011 and serves to amend the Exclusive Channel Partner Agreement entered into by and
between Intrexon Corporation (“Intrexon”) and ZIOPHARM Oncology, Inc. (“ZIOPHARM”), on January 6, 2011
(the “Agreement”).


 


WHERAS, both Intrexon and ZIOPHARM
have a mutual interest in amending the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the first sentence
of Section 2.3(a) of the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“For the JSC, each party
shall designate an equal number of representatives who are employees of such Party or an Affiliate of such Party (not to exceed
four (4) for each party) with appropriate expertise to serve as members of the JSC. For Committees other than the JSC, each Party
shall designate an equal number of representatives who are employees of such Party or an Affiliate of such Party (not to exceed
three (3) for each Party) with appropriate expertise to serve as members of such Committee; provided, however, the Parties may,
from time to time, increase the total number of representatives of one or more of such Committees by one (1) additional representative
per Party (not to exceed four (4) for each Party) by agreement in writing, without further amendment of this Agreement. Third Security
shall be deemed to be an Affiliate of Intrexon solely for purposes of this Section 2.3.”


 


All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full
force and effect.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed
this First Amendment to Exclusive Channel Partner Agreement by authorized representatives as of the date written above.


 


INTREXON CORPORATION


 


 


	By:  /s/ Glenn Nedwin  
	
        Name: Glenn Nedwin, Ph.D.

        Title: President, Human Therapeutics Division



 


 


ZIOPHARM ONCOLOGY, INC.


 


 


	By:  /s/ Jonathan Lewis  
	
        Name: Jonathan Lewis, M.D., Ph.D.

        Chief Executive Officer
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2307

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1999

Received

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the building of the United States Postal Service

located at 5 Cedar Street in Hopkinton, Massachusetts,

as the ‘‘Thomas J. Brown Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2307 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The building of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 5 Cedar Street in Hopkinton, Massachusetts,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas J. Brown

5 Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Thomas J. Brown Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Scott PETERS, petitioner, v. John BALDWIN, et al.

No. 18-6134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
kpmg.htm


 



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


 


The Board of Directors


Kansas City Life Insurance Company:







We consent to the use of our report dated February 29, 2012 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Life Insurance Company (the Company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011; and to the use of our report dated April 27, 2012 with respect to the statement of net assets of Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account (comprising individual subaccounts as listed in note 1 to the financial statements) as of December 31, 2011, and the related statement of operations for the period or year then ended; the statement of changes in net assets for each of the periods or years in the two-year period then ended; and financial highlights for each of the periods or years in the five-year period then ended, which reports appear in the Statement of Additional Information accompanying the Prospectus of Century II Single Premium Affinity Variable Annuity, included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 (File No. 333-165116) on Form N-4 and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts”, also in the Statement of Additional Information.


 


 


/s/ KPMG LLP


 


Kansas City, Missouri


April 27, 2012
Amendment No. 4 to Retirement Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE 
 AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. 

RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) is the Plan Sponsor of the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Plan Section 7.01 the Plan may be amended at anytime; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to update Exhibit I to include three new eligible hourly locations. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Exhibit I is amended as attached hereto to include three new locations effective as of the following dates: 


Cartersville, Georgia – March 1, 2012; 

Long Beach, California – February 1, 2012; and 

McIntosh, Alabama – April 1, 2012. 

 

	 	2.	In all other respects the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its Senior Vice President- Human Resources and Communications to execute this Fourth Amendment to the Plan on this
                    day of April 2012. 
  

							
		 		 	AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	  

		 		 		 	 Senior Vice President- Human Resources
 and Communications









 EXHIBIT I 
 ELIGIBLE NONUNION HOURLY LOCATIONS DESIGNATED 
 BY VICE PRESIDENT-HUMAN
RESOURCES 
 EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL 10, 2012: 

 

					
	 	  	 Designated Terminal
	  	 
	 	  	 For 125% of Base Salary
	  	 
			
	 ASHLAND, KY
	  	YES	  	
	 BETHLEHEM, PA
	  	YES	  	
	 BOUNTIFUL, UT
	  	YES	  	
	 BURNS HARBOR, IN
	  	NO	  	
	 BUTLER, IN
	  	YES	  	
	 CAMDEN, SC
	  	YES	  	
	 CARTERSVILLE, GA

CHANDLER, AZ
	  	 YES
 YES
	  	
	 CONVENT, LA
	  	NO	  	
	 CONVENT, LA (Drivers)
	  	YES	  	
	 CONYERS, GA
	  	YES	  	
	 CREIGHTON, PA
	  	YES	  	
	 DECATUR, AL
	  	YES	  	
	 DEER PARK, TX
	  	NO	  	
	 EAGAN, MN
	  	YES	  	
	 GLENMONT, NY
	  	YES	  	
	 GRAY, TN
	  	YES	  	
	 LANCASTER, PA
	  	YES	  	
	 LANCASTER, PA (Express Services)
	  	NO	  	
	 LAPORTE, TX
	  	YES	  	
	 LASALLE, IL
	  	YES	  	
	 LIBERAL, KS
	  	YES	  	
	 LONG BEACH, CA

MANALAPAN, NJ
	  	 YES
 NO
	  	
	 MCINTOSH, AL

MIDLOTHIAN, TX
	  	 YES
 YES
	  	
	 MOORELAND, OK
	  	YES	  	
	 NEW MARTINSVILLE, WV
	  	YES	  	
	 NIAGARA FALLS, NY
	  	YES	  	
	 OAK CREEK, WI
	  	YES	  	
	 ORLANDO, FL
	  	YES	  	
	 PACE, FL
	  	YES	  	
	 PARKERSBURG, WV
	  	YES	  	
	 PRYOR, OK
	  	YES	  	
	 PUYALLUP, WA
	  	YES	  	
	 REIDSVILLE, NC
	  	YES	  	
	 SHAKOPEE, MN
	  	YES	  	
	 SMITHVILLE, MO
	  	NO	  	
	 SPARROWS POINT, MD (Drivers)
	  	YES
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911649
<NAME> STRATEGIC DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,477
<PP&E>                                           3,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,441
<BONDS>                                          7,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         28
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,959
<SALES>                                          8,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,394
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  89
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,005)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,037)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
Dianne M. CARTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M65.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Ben Gary TRIESTMAN, petitioner, v. Barbara D. UNDERWOOD, Attorney General of New York.

No. 18-387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Evan Marshall Roberts, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 19691B.

Vs. No. 11-15-00138-CR * July 16, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Evan Marshall Roberts’s motion to dismiss his 

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

OCEAN DUKE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2011-1597 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of International 

Trade in case no. 11-CV-0140, Senior Judge Judith M. 

Barzilay. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

NED H. MARSHAK, Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, 

Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, of New York, New York, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were 

ROBERT B. SILVERMAN, JOSEPH M. SPRARAGEN and 

FRANCES P. HADFIELD. 

STEPHEN C. TOSINI, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial 

Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States 

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TONY 

WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, 

Director, and PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY, Assistant Director. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 10, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
Craig J. SPITZER, petitioner, v. Trisha A. ALJOE, et al.

No. 18-655.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Paul TOOLY, Petitioner, v. John F. SCHWALLER.

No. 19-7199

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.