alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE 9 MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                           30,395
<SECURITIES>                                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    10,955 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        261 
<INVENTORY>                                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                119,634 
<PP&E>                                                            2,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      294 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   71,716 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            18,342 
<BONDS>                                                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             5,000 
<PREFERRED>                                                           0 
<COMMON>                                                            123 
<OTHER-SE>                                                       48,109 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     71,716 
<SALES>                                                          54,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 54,240 
<CGS>                                                            41,570 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    51,178 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  420 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   2,931 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      1,390 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               1,541 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                      1,316 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       .14 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .14 
        

</TABLE>
**DM** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0079 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CODY R. SACKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including April 8 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2021

01/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0079
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 14, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0120. TEVIN YOUNG v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 09CR136
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (i)    | the      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period      ended March 31, 2009 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (ii)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                                  |

|                         |                         |   |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      May 15,      2009 | /s/      Francis M. DiNuzzo  |   |
|                         | Francis      M. DiNuzzo      |   |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
Matthew Lane DURHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6854.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Angela JAMES, et al., Petitioners, v. JW GAMING DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company.

No. 19-971.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.3****CERTIFICATION**I, Ronald A. Mayo, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: September 26, 2006     /S/ Ronald A Mayo   Ronald A. Mayo  Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           668,634
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  469,220
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,407,170
<CASH>                                         971,561
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             132,382
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,224,462
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                927,282
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             40,998
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,013,060
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       805,996
<OTHER-SE>                                    (67,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,224,462
<PREMIUMS>                                   8,682,616
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            124,950
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  19,287
<BENEFITS>                                   8,013,748
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,654,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,747,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (594,175)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,153,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,153,398)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.67)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               3,208,334
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           1,167,334
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             7,827,106
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              2,940,342
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Harold B. ROTTE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6481

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                                  Section 1350
                                  CERTIFICATION


The  undersigned  officer  hereby  certifies  that,  to his  knowledge,  (1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Productivity Technologies Corp. for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information  contained in such
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of Productivity Technologies Corp..

Date: May 20, 2004

/s/ Samuel N. Seidman
--------------------------------------------
Samuel N. Seidman,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

RSB SPINE, LLC,

4:23-cv-00959-ALM

ORTHOFIX MEDICAL, INC., SEASPINE

HOLDINGS CORP., SEASPINE, INC., and

SEASPINE ORTHOPEDICS CORP.,

SeaSpine Orthopedics Corporation

c/o Corporation Service Company

251 Little Falls Drive

Wilmington, DE 19808

Mark D. Siegmund

Cherry Johnson Siegmund James, PLLC

400 Austin Ave., 9th Floor

Waco, TX 76701

10/27/2023

Case 4:23-cv-00959-ALM Document 7 Filed 10/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 388
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00959-ALM

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00959-ALM Document 7 Filed 10/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 389
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 24, 2016

a0516

Order 

Clerk

May 24, 2016

151898

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151898

COA: 326565

Genesee CC: 82-031720-FC

KENNETH WOODYARD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC COS., LTD, and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that Nicholas A. Gallo, of the law firm Fish & Richardson P.C.,

enters his appearance in this matter for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. and consents to electronic services of all papers in this action.

Dated: September 12, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Nicholas A. Gallo

Nicholas A. Gallo

GA Bar No. 546590

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1180 Peachtree St NE, 21st Fl.

Atlanta, GA 30309

Phone: (404) 892-5005

Email: gallo@fr.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 139 Filed 09/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5865
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on September 12, 2024 to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

/s/ Nicholas A. Gallo

Nicholas A. Gallo

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 139 Filed 09/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5866
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/11/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       36,683
COMMITMENTS
   7,349    3,712    1,418   17,952   22,516   26,719   27,646    9,964    9,037

CHANGES FROM 06/04/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,827)
    -990     -170       35     -298   -1,166   -1,253   -1,301     -574     -526

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.0     10.1      3.9     48.9     61.4     72.8     75.4     27.2     24.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
      12        8        7       32       26       48       38
```

----

Updated June 14, 2013
Brian DECOITO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19M15

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/30/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      562,933
COMMITMENTS
 109,780   34,041  142,833  294,149  368,445  546,762  545,319   16,171   17,614

CHANGES FROM 04/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     19,237)
  12,492   -3,016    7,979      958   15,228   21,429   20,191   -2,192     -954

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.5      6.0     25.4     52.3     65.5     97.1     96.9      2.9      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      50       38       72       59       61      142      144
```

----

Updated May 3, 2013
Mike DU TRIEU, Petitioner v. Michael MARTEL, Warden.

No. 18-9595

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           STRATEGIC DIAGNOSTICS INC.

                           CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
            RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strategic Diagnostics Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, STANLEY J. MUSIAL, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, in connection with Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, that based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Stanley J. Musial
-------------------------
Stanley J. Musial
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 14, 2003
       ------------------


                                       26
EXHIBIT B 

Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 83
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 84
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 85
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 86
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 87
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 88
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 89
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 90
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-2 Filed 03/22/24 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 91