T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e S t e phe n M . M c N a m e e , S e ni orD i s tr i c tC ourtJ udge f or ** the D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J E R R Y J A M G O T C H I A N , I n d iv id u a lly a n d o n B e h a lf

o f a ll O th e r s S im ila r ly S i tua t e d, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. S C I E NT I F I C GA ME S C OR P OR AT I ON , aD e la w a r e C o rp o r a tio n ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 56896 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 5 1 2 1 - GH KCW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge H . K i ng, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 5, 2010 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia Be f o r e : RYM ERa n d W ARDLAW , Ci r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n dM CNAM EE , D i stri ct ** Judg e. 

# FI LED MA R 23 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJe rry J am go t chi an appeal s the di stri ctcourt ’ s grantof S ci ent i fi c G am es

C o rp o ra ti o n ’s (“S cien ti fic G am es ”) R u le 1 2 (b )( 6 ) m o ti o n to d ism iss J am g o tch ian ’s c o m p l a i n t . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U. S . C . § 1 3 3 2 ( d ) ( 2 ) , a n dwe a f f irm . T he di stri ctcourtcorr ec t l y c on cl ud ed thatJam go t chi an’ s c l ai m s are barr ed byC a l i f orni a ’ s publ i c pol i c ya ga i ns tj udi c i a l r e s ol ut i on of c i vi l c l a i m s a r i s i ng out o f g a m b lin g c o n tr a c ts o rtr a n s a c tio n s . Se e Ke l l yv . Fi rs t A s tr iC or

p. , 72 C a l . A pp. 4 th 4 6 2 , 4 9 0 ( 1 9 9 9 ) . J a m g o tc h ia n u s e dS c ie n tif ic G a m e s ’ m a c h in e s to p la c e p a r im u tu el h o rse racing b et s th atw ere t o b e ran d o m i zed b y S ci en t i fi c G am es’ s o f tw a r e , b u t w e r e n o t, d u e to ad e f e c t in th e s o f

tw a r e . J a m g o tc h ia n d e s ir e s to undo the s e be tt i ng tr a ns a c t i ons a nd r e c ove rl os s e s s t e m m i ng f r om pa y m e nt s f

or tic k e ts th a t w e r e s u p p o s e d to b e r a n d o m iz e d . A lth o u g h h e a r g u e s th a t h is s u it is n o t o n e to r e c o v e rg a m b lin g lo s s e s , w e a g r e e w ith th e d is tr ic t c o u rt th a t “as u it to be pl ac ed i n the exan te pos i t i on a f t e rl os i ng abe ti s ” j us ttha t , a nd i s ba rr e d by Ke lly , w hi c h he l d tha t“ C a l i f orni a ’ s publ i c pol i c ya ga i ns tj udi c i a l r e s ol ut i on of ci vi l cl ai m s ari si ng ou tof gam bl i ng contra ct s or transac t i on s absenta s t atut ory r i ghtt o br i ng s uc h c l a i m s , appl i e s t o a l l f orm s of gam bl i ng, w he the rl e ga l or i l l egal . ” I

d. W e m ustappl y the Kel l

y d e c is io n ab s e n t “c o n v in c in g e v id e n c e th a t th e s ta te suprem e c ou rtw ou l d d ec i de di ff er ent l y. ” V

es tar D ev . II

, L L Cv. G en. D

ynam i csC or

p. , 2 4 9 F .3 d 9 5 8 , 9 6 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) . J a m g o tc h ia n p o in ts o n lyto th e C a lif o rn iaC o u rt o f

A p p e a l’s o b s e rv a tio n— in di c t a— i n N

ev Cal E nter prises, Inc. v. Cal-N

ev a L od ge, Inc. th atC al i fo rn i a “ h a[s] re vers ed th[e pub l i c] po l i cyw i th res pectt o such g am bl i ng do ne up on the l i ce nsed p r e m is e s o f

ar a c in g a s s o c ia tio n a n dth r o u g h p a r i- m u tu e l m a c h in e s .” 1 9 4 C a l. A p p . 2 d 1 7 7 , 1 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 6 1 ) . Kel l y w as deci ded aft er N

e v Cal , how e ve r , a nd expres sl y r ej ec t ed the ar gu m entthatC al i forni a has re vers ed i t s pub l i c pol i cy a ga i ns tj udi c i a l r e s ol ut i on of c i vi l c l a i m s a r i s i ng outof ga m bl i ng c ontr a c t s or tr a ns a c t i ons a s t o a nyf

orm of ga m bl i ng. 72 C a l . A pp. 4th a t472, 476- 90. T he C a l i f o rn i aS u p r e m e C o u rtd e n i e dth e p e t i t i o n t o r e v i e w Ke lly . Ke lly , 72 C a l . A pp. 4 th 4 6 2 , re vi ew deni ed , N o . S 0 8 0 0 8 1 ( C a l. S e p t. 1 , 1 9 9 9 ) . T h u s , J a m g o tc h ia n f a ils to p r e s e n t c o n v in c in g e v id e n c e th a t th e C a lif o rn iaS u p r e m e C o u rt w o u ldo v e rru le the C a l i f orni aC ourtof

A ppe a l ’ s de c i s i on i n Ke lly . AF F I RME D.