alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER 

### Appellate case narne: J Frederick Welling & 57 Memorial Apartments LP v. Harris County Appraisal District 8,: Appraisal Review Board of Harris County Appraisal District Appellate case number: 01-11-00874-CV Trial court case number: 2010-68613 Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas On November 20, 2012,this Court abated this appeal, remanded the case to the trial court for entry of additional findings of fact and conclusions of law, and requested the written findings and conclusions of the trial court be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed with this Court; however, it does not contain the signed order with the additional findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. 

### The District Court Clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record \vith the Clerk of this Court that contains the following document: a signed order with the additional findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. The supplemental clerk’s record is to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within fifteen days from the entry of this order.



### It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature:/s/Rebeca Huddle

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court



### Date: December 20, 2012
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6836

CHARLES GARY SINGLETARY, III ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WARDEN JACKSON, Warden ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 9:22

- cv
- 04362

- HMH )

Submitted : October 31 , 2023 Decided: November 3, 2023

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Charles Gary Singletary, III , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6836 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM : Charles Gary Singletary, III , seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action.
We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely

filed.
In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final
judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal peri od under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)( 6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order on March 28, 2023. Singletary filed the notice
of appeal on August 18, 2023. ∗ Because Singletary failed to file a timely notice of appeal
or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED

∗ For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date Singletary could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 23-6836 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                       551
<INVENTORY>                                     38,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,838
<PP&E>                                          90,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,938
<BONDS>                                        154,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,144)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,692
<SALES>                                         41,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,620
<CGS>                                           28,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,063)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Irma ROSAS, Petitioner, v. SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 19-707

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

10/5/2023

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

KATHRYN SNEED and SNEED

EQUESTRIAN ESTATES, LLC,

4:23-cv-00871

JEFFREY GIBBS, CALLI ROUSE,

GIBBS SHOW HORSES, CALLI ROUSE

SHOW HORSES, BLACK BIRD RANCH,

THE BONAPARTE FAMILY LIVING

Calli Rouse Show Horses

c/o Calli Rouse

9017 Chisholm Trail

Crossroads, Texas 76227

Charles S. North

KEARNEY, MCWILLIAMS & DAVIS, PLLC

1235 South Main, #280

Grapevine, Texas 76051

Case 4:23-cv-00871-ALM Document 5 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 24
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00871

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00871-ALM Document 5 Filed 10/05/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 25
Dennis William ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Ashley MOODY, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

No. 18-9771

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**Section 302Certification

I, Gerard Charlier,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Gaming Partners InternationalCorporation;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              [Reserved]

c)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

| Date: March 31, 2006 | By:    | /s/ GÉRARD  CHARLIER                                      |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Gérard Charlier, *President and Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
## **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                   | /s/ Dennis  M. Hanson                                                                        |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |                                                                                         |
|                   | Senior  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|                   |                                                                                         |
|                   |                                                                                         |
| November 7,  2003 |                                                                                         |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. and will be retained by SteinwayMusical Instruments, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Bill of Sale



 Exhibit 10.6 
 THIS BILL OF SALE is given by PACER STACKTRAIN, INC. (herein the “Seller”) to BB&T EQUIPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, its successors and assigns (herein the “Buyer”). 

WITNESSETH: 

THAT FOR TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Seller does hereby bargain, sell, assign, transfer and set over to Buyer, its successors and assigns, the railcars listed on the schedule attached hereto (being referred to herein as the “Cars”). 

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said Cars, unto Buyer, its successors and assigns, forever. 

Seller represents and warrants that it has good and marketable title to said Cars conveyed hereunder and does hereby transfer valid title
thereto free and clear of any and all encumbrances, liens, charges or defects. Seller further represents and warrants that the Cars sold hereunder is transferable by Seller by its sole act and deed and that all corporate action required to
authorize, approve and validate such transfer has been duly and lawfully taken. 
 AND Seller covenants that it will from time
to time on demand execute any and all such further instruments which Buyer, and its successors and assigns, may deem necessary, desirable or proper to effect the complete transfer of the Cars or any interest therein unto Buyer, and its successors
and assigns, or better to evidence the right, title and interest of Buyer, its successors and assigns. 
 AND Seller does hereby
make, constitute and appoint Buyer, its successors and assigns, its true and lawful attorneys, irrevocably in its name or otherwise, to have, use and take all lawful ways and means for the recovery of any of said property or right or interest
therein herein assigned to Buyer which Seller may have or could take if this Bill of Sale had not been made. 
 AND THIS BILL OF
SALE AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER, SHALL IN ALL RESPECTS BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES OF SUCH STATE (OTHER
THAN SECTIONS 5-1401 AND 5-1402 OF THE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW)), INCLUDING ALL MATTERS OF CONSTRUCTION, VALIDITY AND PERFORMANCE, REGARDLESS OF THE LOCATION OF THE CARS. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the 27th day of March, 2012. 

 

			
	PACER STACKTRAIN, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ John J. Hafferty
	Name:	 	John J. Hafferty
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY, LLC AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00397

LEAD CASE

JURY TRIAL

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00398

JURY TRIAL

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY, LLC AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that Kevin P. Hess is entering an appearance for AT&T Services, Inc., 

AT&T Mobility, LLC, and AT&T Corp., (collectively “AT&T” or “Defendants”) in the above 

numbered and entitled causes: 

Kevin P. Hess

Texas State Bar No. 24087717

khess@McKoolSmith.com

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

303 Colorado Street Suite 2100

Austin, TX 78701

Telephone: (512) 692-8700

Telecopier: (512) 692-8744

Mr. Hess is currently admitted to practice in the Eastern District of Texas. 

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 345
2

Dated: November 20, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kevin P. Hess

Kevin P. Hess

Texas State Bar No. 24087717

khess@McKoolSmith.com

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

303 Colorado Street Suite 2100

Austin, TX 78701

Telephone: (512) 692-8700

Telecopier: (512) 692-8744

ATTORNEY FOR AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AND 

AT&T CORP. 

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 346
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been 

served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on November 20, 2023.

/s/ Kevin P. Hess

Kevin P. Hess

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 31 Filed 11/20/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 347
Brian TUTTLE, petitioner, v. ALLIED NEVADA GOLD CORP., et al.

No. 18-5548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.Date: May 9, 2007         By:       /s/ Kenneth W. Jones    Kenneth W. Jones    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Blayne D. WILLIAMS, Sr., Petitioner, v. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, et al.

No. 18-9518

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated November 1, 2013
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

November 12, 2004

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BARCO, INC. and BARCO NV,

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

YEALINK (USA) NETWORK

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

YEALINK NETWORK

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:23-cv-521

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Plaintiffs Barco, Inc and Barco NV. hereby notify the Court that pursuant to the Court’s 

Docket Control Order [Dkt. 23], they served their P.R. 4-1 on counsel for Defendants via electronic 

mail on November 6, 2024.

Dated: November 6, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Melissa R. Smith 

Melissa R. Smith

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

TX State Bar No. 24001351

303 S. Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

Christopher Centurelli (pro hac vice)

christopher.centurelli@klgates.com 

Anna E. L’Hommedieu (pro hac vice)

Anna.lhommedieu@klgates.com

Joshua N. Andrews (pro hac vice)

Joshua.Andrews@klgates.com

Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 11/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

482
K&L GATES LLP 

1 Congress Street, Suite 2900

Boston, MA 02114-2023

Telephone: (617) 261-3100

Erik J. Halverson 

(admitted to practice before this Court) 

erik.halverson@klgates.com 

K&L GATES LLP

Four Embarcadero Ctr, Suite 1200

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 882-8238

Counsel for Plaintiffs Barco, Inc. and Barco N.V.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 6th day of November 2024.

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

 Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 11/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

483
Nancy DELANEY, Petitioner, v. SAN ANDREAS REGIONAL CENTER, et al.

No. 19-7453.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Antwan Bernard WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9547

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.