alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2192

To require that jewelry boxes imported from another country be indelibly

marked with the country of origin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. MCGOVERN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To require that jewelry boxes imported from another country

be indelibly marked with the country of origin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKING OF IMPORTED JEWELRY BOXES.

4 (a) MARKING REQUIREMENT.—By no later than the

5 date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this

6 Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe and im7 plement regulations that require that all jewelry boxes de8 scribed in subsection (b) that enter, or are withdrawn from

9 warehouse for consumption, into the customs territory of

10 the United States have the English name of the country
2

•HR 2192 IH

1 of origin indelibly marked in a conspicuous place on such

2 jewelry boxes by cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping,

3 or some other permanent method. The exceptions from

4 marking requirements provided for in section 304 of the

5 Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) shall not apply to

6 jewelry boxes subject to this section.

7 (b) JEWELRY.—The jewelry boxes referred to in sub8 section (a) are jewelry boxes provided for in headings

9 4202.92.60, 4202.92.90, and 4202.99.10 of the Har10 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

Æ
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/30/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      138,182
COMMITMENTS
  37,346   41,433    7,773   75,661   67,289  120,780  116,495   17,402   21,687

CHANGES FROM 07/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,509)
     564     -761     -843   -1,950    1,379   -2,229     -225      720   -1,284

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.0     30.0      5.6     54.8     48.7     87.4     84.3     12.6     15.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      175)
      39       46       35       63       67      123      131
```

----

Updated August 2, 2013
**EXHIBIT 99.8**

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors of Eldorado Gold Corporation

 

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of:

|   | **•** | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 17, 2010 on the consolidated balance sheets of Eldorado Gold Corporation (“the Company”) as at December 31, 2009, and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit, cash flows, and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2009;                        and |
|--------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 17, 2010 on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 |
|--------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

each of which is incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our report dated March 17, 2010, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that management has excluded Sino Gold Mining Limited’s internal controls over financial reporting from        its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports in the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement (SEC File No. 333-160349).

 

**KPMG LLP (signed)**

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

March 31, 2010

 

 

***KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG***

***network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative***

***(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.***

***KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.***

----
Kendall THRIFT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6875.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
KELLSTROM INDUSTRIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                        463
<SECURITIES>                                  426
<RECEIVABLES>                              13,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  336
<INVENTORY>                                35,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           53,333
<PP&E>                                      5,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            134,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      19,096
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        8
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 49,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              134,361
<SALES>                                    79,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           79,439
<CGS>                                      42,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              61,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            13,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                5,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         8,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                8,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .95
        




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

CURTIS JAMES MCGUIRE §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-313

SAN SABA UNIT CORRECTIONAL §

SECURITY STAFF

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff, Curtis James McGuire, an inmate currentlyincarcerated at the San Saba Unit in San

Saba, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the

defendants, unit correctional security staff at the San Saba Unit. 

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Venue in a civil rights action is determined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). When, as in

this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides

that venue is proper only in the judicial district where all the defendants reside or in which a

substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. 

Plaintiff’s complaint pertains to events at the San Saba Unit in San Saba, Texas. San Saba

is located in the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. It is clear that all of the events or

omissions giving rise to his claims occurred in the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. 

Venue, therefore, is not proper in the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.

Case 1:23-cv-00313-MJT-CLS Document 2 Filed 08/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 3
When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice,

transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 

1406(a). Plaintiff’s claims should be transferred to the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. 

An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 23rd day of August, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00313-MJT-CLS Document 2 Filed 08/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 4
<PAGE>

Exhibit No. 11. Statement Re: Computation of Per Share and Pro Forma Per Share
Loss

                               UROMED CORPORATION

                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                   1994       1995       1996
                                                 --------   --------   --------
                                                         (In thousands)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders     $ (7,993)  $ (9,712)  $(47,660)
                                                 ========   ========   ========


Per Share Loss:

Weighted average shares outstanding:
   Common stock                                    17,520     21,262     25,544
   Shares issuable pursuant to SAB 83
    using the treasury stock method:
     Series D convertible perferred stock            --         --         --
     Common stock options and warrants               --         --         --

                                                 --------   --------   --------
Total weighted average shares outstanding          17,520     21,262     25,544
                                                 ========   ========   ========

Net loss per share                               $   (.46)  $   (.46)  $  (1.87)
                                                 ========   ========   ========

Pro Forma Per Share Loss:

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:
   Common stock                                    17,520
    Additional shares deemed outstanding from
     the assumed conversion of preferred stock      2,046

                                                 --------
Total pro forma weighted average shares            19,566
outstanding
                                                 ========

Pro forma net loss per share                     $   (.41)
                                                 ========


                                      -6-
Frank Le'Dell OWENS, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-5293

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-95-MAC

'

GERALD JOSEPH ARDOIN '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Gerald Joseph Ardoin, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 13th day of September, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00095-MAC-ZJH Document 18 Filed 09/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 48
In the Senate of the United States,

October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 209) entitled ‘‘An Act to improve the ability of

Federal agencies to license federally owned inventions.’’, do

pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

1 Page 21, after line 2, insert:

2 SEC. 11. TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS OMBUDSMAN.

3 (a) APPOINTMENT OF OMBUDSMAN.—The Secretary of

4 Energy shall direct the director of each national laboratory

5 of the Department of Energy, and may direct the director

6 of each facility under the jurisdiction of the Department

7 of Energy, to appoint a technology partnership ombudsman

8 to hear and help resolve complaints from outside organiza9 tions regarding the policies and actions of each such labora10 tory or facility with respect to technology partnerships (in11 cluding cooperative research and development agreements),

12 patents, and technology licensing.
2

HR 209 EAS

1 (b) QUALIFICATIONS.—An ombudsman appointed

2 under subsection (a) shall be a senior official of the national

3 laboratory or facility who is not involved in day-to-day

4 technology partnerships, patents, or technology licensing,

5 or, if appointed from outside the laboratory or facility,

6 function as such a senior official.

7 (c) DUTIES.—Each ombudsman appointed under sub8 section (a) shall—

9 (1) serve as the focal point for assisting the pub10 lic and industry in resolving complaints and disputes

11 with the national laboratory or facility regarding

12 technology partnerships, patents, and technology li13 censing;

14 (2) promote the use of collaborative alternative

15 dispute resolution techniques such as mediation to fa16 cilitate the speedy and low-cost resolution of com17 plaints and disputes, when appropriate; and

18 (3) report quarterly on the number and nature

19 of complaints and disputes raised, along with the om20 budsman’s assessment of their resolution, consistent

21 with the protection of confidential and sensitive infor22 mation, to—

23 (A) the Secretary;

24 (B) the Administrator for Nuclear Security;
3

HR 209 EAS

1 (C) the Director of the Office of Dispute

2 Resolution of the Department of Energy; and

3 (D) the employees of the Department re4 sponsible for the administration of the contract

5 for the operation of each national laboratory or

6 facility that is a subject of the report, for consid7 eration in the administration and review of that

8 contract.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 209

AMENDMENT
William Paul COX, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9572

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00368

Christian Blanchard,

Plaintiff,

v.

City of Tyler Police Department et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER 

Plaintiff Christian Blanchard, proceeding pro se, filed this 

lawsuit against defendants on July 25, 2023. Doc. 1. This case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. Doc. 2. 

On October 31, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s claims against the City of Tyler Police 

Department be dismissed without prejudice. Doc. 15. Plaintiff 

acknowledged receipt of the report on November 1, 2023. Doc. 

18. Plaintiff did not file objections to the report and the timeframe 

for doing so has passed. 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation. Doc. 15. Plaintiff’s 

claims against the City of Tyler Police Department are dismissed 

without prejudice. The clerk of court is directed to terminate defendant City of Tyler Police Department from this action. 

So ordered by the court on December 6, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00368-JCB-JDL Document 21 Filed 12/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 92
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/26/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       90,152
COMMITMENTS
   8,379    4,732       12   76,185   83,240   84,576   87,984    5,576    2,168

CHANGES FROM 02/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,235)
   1,709     -341      -32     -289    1,845    1,388    1,472     -153     -237

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.3      5.2      0.0     84.5     92.3     93.8     97.6      6.2      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       73)
      11        4        2       37       34       48       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/26/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      188,307
COMMITMENTS
  47,060   23,517    1,222  122,637  159,096  170,919  183,835   17,388    4,472

CHANGES FROM 02/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,457)
   3,322   -1,408       43   -3,965    1,628     -600      263    2,057    1,194

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.0     12.5      0.6     65.1     84.5     90.8     97.6      9.2      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      142)
      41       15        4       66       41      110       57
```

----

Updated March 1, 2013
H. R. 2296

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to provide that the number

of members on the legislature of the Virgin Islands and the number of such

members constituting a quorum shall be determined by the laws of the Virgin

Islands, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIZE OF LEGISLATURE.

Section 5(b) of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands

(48 U.S.C. 1571(b)) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘fifteen’’; and

(2) by inserting after the first sentence the following: ‘‘The

number of such senators shall be determined by the laws of

the Virgin Islands.’’.

SEC. 2. NUMBER CONSTITUTING QUORUM.

The first sentence of section 9(a) of the Revised Organic Act

of the Virgin Islands (48 U.S.C. 1575(a)) is amended to read as

follows: ‘‘The number of members of the legislature needed to constitute a quorum shall be determined by the laws of the Virgin

Islands.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/08/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      162,698
COMMITMENTS
  38,721   21,133   19,450   84,913   95,335  143,084  135,918   19,614   26,780

CHANGES FROM 12/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,297)
   1,412    4,474       97    1,035   -2,866    2,544    1,705    1,753    2,592

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.8     13.0     12.0     52.2     58.6     87.9     83.5     12.1     16.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      52       36       33       59       74      126      131
```

----

Updated January 15, 2013
Exhibit 5

Redacted in its entirety

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 30-7 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 586