alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

2:23-00457

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 10/09/2023 /s/ Qi Tong Qi Tong CA SBN 330347

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ET Al.,

Case 2:23-cv-00457-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 10/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 65
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY, LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00397 

LEAD CASE

JURY TRIAL

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00398 

JURY TRIAL

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY, LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants.

DEFENDANTS’ CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, and 

AT&T Services Inc. (“Defendants”) provide the following Disclosures: 

AT&T Corp., a New York corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T Inc.; 

AT&T Mobility LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is owned by the following

companies: SBC Long Distance, LLC; AT&T Investment & Tower Holdings, LLC; BellSouth

Mobile Data, Inc.; and New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.;

AT&T Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T Inc.

None of the foregoing companies other than AT&T Inc. is a publicly traded company. 

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 341
2

All of the foregoing companies other than AT&T Inc. are direct or indirect subsidiaries of 

AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a publicly traded company on the New York 

Stock Exchange. To the best of AT&T Inc.’s knowledge, there is no one person or group that owns 

10% or more of the stock of AT&T Inc. AT&T Inc. has no parent corporation.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 342
Dated: November 13, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Nicholas Mathews

Nicholas Mathews (Lead Counsel) 

Texas State Bar No. 24085457 

nmathews@McKoolSmith.com 

Alexander J. Chern 

Texas State Bar No. 24109718 

achern@McKoolSmith.com 

Clare Churchman

Texas State Bar No. 24132041 

cchurchman@mckoolsmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

300 Crescent Court Suite 1500 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 978-4000 

Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 

Kevin Hess

Texas State Bar No. 

khess@mckoolsmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

303 Colorado Street, Suite 2100 

Austin, TX 78701 

Telephone: (512) 692-8752 

Kaylee E. Hoffner

Texas State Bar No. 24127036 

khoffner@McKoolSmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

600 Travis Street Suite 7000 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 485-7300 

Telecopier: (713) 485-7344 

Deron R. Dacus 

State Bar No. 00790553 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, PC

821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430 

Tyler, TX 75701 

Telephone: (903)705-1117 

Facsimile: (903) 581-2543 

AT&T CORP., AT&T INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY LLC, AND AT&T 

SERVICES INC.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/13/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 343
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been 

served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on November 13, 2023. 

/s/ Nicholas Mathews

Nicholas Mathews

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/13/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 344
In the Senate of the United States,

April 7, 2000.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1832) entitled ‘‘An Act to reform unfair and anticompetitive practices in the professional boxing industry.’’, do

pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 6, after line 17, insert:

2 ‘‘(c) PROTECTION FROM COERCIVE CONTRACTS WITH

3 BROADCASTERS.—Subsection (a) of this section applies to

4 any contract between a commercial broadcaster and a

5 boxer, or granting any rights with respect to that boxer,

6 involving a broadcast in or affecting interstate commerce,

7 regardless of the broadcast medium. For the purpose of this

8 subsection, any reference in subsection (a)(1)(B) to ‘pro9 moter’ shall be considered a reference to ‘commercial broad10 caster’.
2

HR 1832 EAS

1 Ω2æPage 17, after line 24, insert:

2 (1) in paragraph (9) by inserting after ‘‘match.’’

3 the following: ‘‘The term ‘promoter’ does not include

4 a hotel, casino, resort, or other commercial establish5 ment hosting or sponsoring a professional boxing

6 match unless—

7 ‘‘(A) the hotel, casino, resort, or other com8 mercial establishment is primarily responsible

9 for organizing, promoting, and producing the

10 match; and

11 ‘‘(B) there is no other person primarily re12 sponsible for organizing, promoting, and pro13 ducing the match.’’;

14 Ω3æPage 18, line 1, strike out ø(1)¿ and insert: (2)

15 Ω4æPage 18, line 4, strike out ø(2)¿ and insert: (3)

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1832

AMENDMENTS
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94994; File No. SR-PEARL-2022-09]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX PEARL Options Fee 
Schedule To Remove Certain Credits and Increase Trading Permit Fees

May 26, 2022.
    On March 30, 2022, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl'') filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 
19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to remove certain credits 
and increase trading permit fees. The proposed rule change was 
published for comment in the Federal Register on April 18, 2022.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94696 (April 12, 
2022), 87 FR 22987. Comments on the proposed rule change can be 
found at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-pearl-2022-09/srpearl202209.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 17, 2022, MIAX Pearl withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-
PEARL-2022-09).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11787 Filed 6-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 10.27
 BROOKE CAPITAL CORPORATION
 2007 BROOKE CAPITAL CORPORATION EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED SHARES AGREEMENT
 THIS AMENDMENT
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Section I(E) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
  Incorporation of Other Provisions.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF




---



##### 



RECIPIENT:
    
    BROOKE CAPITAL CORPORATIONWILLIAM R. MORTON, JR.
    
    By:
    
    KYLE GARST(Signature of Recipient)
    
    Kyle Garst, PresidentWilliam R. Morton, Jr.(Printed or Typed Name of Recipient)###-##-####

(Social Security Number)
 2
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph J. Lodovic, IV, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: September 26, 2006     /S/ Joseph J. Lodovic, IV Joseph J. Lodovic, IV  President
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of XDOGS, Inc., ("the Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Kent A. Rodriguez, as
President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  July 11, 2005




/s/  Kent A. Rodriguez
----------------------------------
     Kent A. Rodriguez
     President and Principal Executive Officer
FST-03.31.2012-EX-10.5




AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made this ___ day of _________, 2010, by and between Forest Oil Corporation, a New York corporation (the “Company”), and ___________________ (“Executive”).  
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have heretofore entered into that certain Severance Agreement dated ______________, _______ (as may have been amended from time to time, the “Severance Agreement”); 
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has extended the term of the Severance Agreement to December 17, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Severance Agreement in certain respects in order to comply with new guidance promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the Company and Executive hereby agree that the Severance Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided, effective as of the date first set forth above:
1.    The first sentence of Paragraph 3(a) of the Severance Agreement shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:
“Pay Executive the Monthly Severance Amount on the first day of each month throughout the Severance Period; provided, however, that (i) the first such payment shall be made on the date that is 60 days after the date of Executive’s Involuntary Termination and shall include all payments that would have otherwise been made during the first 60 days after such termination if this clause (i) did not apply and (ii) in the event that Executive obtains new employment during the Severance Period, each such monthly payment shall be reduced by 50% beginning with the payment next due after the date Executive obtains such new employment.”
2.    Paragraph 4(a) of the Severance Agreement shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:
“(a)    Pay Executive a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to the Severance Amount on the date that is 60 days after the date of Executive’s Involuntary Termination.”
3.    As amended hereby, the Severance Agreement is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
[Signatures begin on the following page.]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment effective as herein provided.
	
				
	FOREST OIL CORPORATION
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Name:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Title:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2328 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2328

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 2000

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                          Clean Lakes Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANTS TO STATES

    Section 314(c)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1324(c)(2)) is amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' the first 
place it appears and all that follows through ``1990'' and inserting 
``$50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 314(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1324(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2) by inserting ``Otsego Lake, New York; 
        Oneida Lake, New York; Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania; Swan Lake, 
        Itasca County, Minnesota;'' after ``Sauk Lake, Minnesota;'';
            (2) in paragraph (3) by striking ``By'' and inserting 
        ``Notwithstanding section 3003 of the Federal Reports 
        Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 
        Stat. 734-736), by''; and
            (3) in paragraph (4)(B)(i) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS; REQUIREMENT REGARDING NOTICE.

    (a) Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products.--In the case 
of any equipment or products that may be authorized to be purchased 
with financial assistance provided under this Act, it is the sense of 
the Congress that entities receiving such assistance should, in 
expending the assistance, purchase only American-made equipment and 
products.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the head of each Federal agency shall 
provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice describing the 
statement made in subsection (a) by the Congress.
    (c) Notice of Report.--Any entity which receives funds under this 
Act shall report any expenditures on foreign-made items to the Congress 
within 180 days of expenditure.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Edward Nathan WING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5147.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Amnon Ami LEVI, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9523

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

AUTOSCRIBE CORPORATION 

v. 

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al.

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 2:23-cv-0349-JRG 

(Lead Case) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

AUTOSCRIBE CORPORATION 

v. 

FORTIS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, LLC 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 2:23-cv-0364-JRG 

(Member Case) 

DEFENDANT FORTIS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, LLC’S 

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE 

Defendant Fortis Payment Systems, LLC respectfully notifies this Court that Fortis has 

complied with the Local Rules, the governing Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 34), and the 

governing Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 35) in this case by serving its Initial and Additional 

Disclosures, with its accompanying document production, on all counsel of record for Plaintiff 

Autoscribe Corporation via electronic mail on January 16, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 42 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1313
2 

Dated: January 16, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ C. Erik Hawes 

C. Erik Hawes 

Texas Bar No. 24042543 

erik.hawes@morganlewis.com 

Cullen G. Pick 

Texas Bar No. 24098260 

cullen.pick@morganlewis.com

Robert Ehrlich 

Texas Bar No. 24116318 

robert.ehrlich@morganlewis.com 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 890-5000 

Facsimile: (713) 890-5001 

Elizabeth M. Chiaviello 

Texas Bar No. 24088913 

elizabeth.chiaviello@morganlewis.com 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP 

1717 Main Street, Suite 3200 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Telephone: (214) 466-4000 

Facsimile: (214) 466-4001 

Attorneys for Defendant Fortis Payment 

Systems, LLC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that on January 16, 2024, a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff was served via electronic mail to counsel 

of record for Plaintiff. 

/s/ C. Erik Hawes

C. Erik Hawes

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 42 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1314
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000911503
<NAME>                             Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                 153,983,471
<SECURITIES>                             4,855,141
<RECEIVABLES>                              495,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       159,334,291
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         159,334,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,274,689
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                             157,059,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           159,334,291
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       (2,344,169)
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         3,154,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (5,498,724)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (5,498,724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (43.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51033 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SUSANO PEREZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Jose Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-732-1

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Susano PerezGonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.