alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      529,955
COMMITMENTS
  73,113   56,243  125,950  308,772  326,263  507,835  508,456   22,120   21,499

CHANGES FROM 02/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,787)
   6,659     -193   -6,685    7,551   14,128    7,525    7,250    1,262    1,537

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.8     10.6     23.8     58.3     61.6     95.8     95.9      4.2      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      152)
      42       34       60       64       65      137      134
```

----

Updated February 15, 2013
Exhibit 7 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-16 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1143
Case 2:23-cv-00576-JRG-RSP Document 26-16 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1144
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/28/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,608
COMMITMENTS
   7,717    4,469    1,479   18,498   22,612   27,694   28,560   10,914   10,048

CHANGES FROM 05/21/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -329)
      12     -516      190     -601     -330     -399     -656       70      327

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.0     11.6      3.8     47.9     58.6     71.7     74.0     28.3     26.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      13        7        7       31       26       47       38
```

----

Updated May 31, 2013
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 

Plaintiff/ Petitioner: Case No: 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC 2:23-cv-419 

Defendant I Respondent: DECLARATION OF SERVICE 

VALVE CORPORATION 

The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says: That they are now and at all times herein mentioned 

was a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years, not a party to or interested in the above entitled action 

and competent to be a witness therein. 

That on Friday, September 1 S 2023 at 1 :20 PM, at the address of 1001 4th Ave #4500, within Seattle, WA, the undersigned 

duly served the following documents: Jury Trial Demanded-Complaint, and Summons in a Civil Action in the above entitled 

action upon Valve Corporation c/o CorpServe, Inc., Registered Agent, by then and there personally delivering 1 true and 

correct copy of the above documents into the hands of and leaving same with Jennifer Roberson, Assistant Secretary 

at CorpServe, Inc.. 

Description: 

Age: 30's Ethnicity: Caucasian Gender: Female Weight:140Ibs Height: 5'6" Hair: Black Eyes: Brown 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct:

Date: q 121- Its 

·- I /G 

Mary (;;?ert

Process License #2120690 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 4-1 Filed 10/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 127
Alvaun THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8050.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RONALD LEROY FELTS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10261

D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00347-DAE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

 Ronald Leroy Felts appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 300-month sentence for receiving child

pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1); and possession of

child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4) and (b)(2). Pursuant to

FILED

MAY 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10261

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Felts’s counsel has filed a brief stating

that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided Felts the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. 

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Felts’s conviction. We

accordingly affirm Felts’s conviction. 

Felts waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record discloses

no arguable issue as to the validity of the sentencing waiver, we dismiss Felts’s

appeal as to his sentence. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th

Cir. 2009). 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
YPF S.A., petitioner, v. PETERSEN ENERGIA INVERSORA S.A.U., et al.

No. 18-575.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
Victor NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. Sean BOWERMAN, Warden.

No. 19-7482.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Patricia GILL, Petitioner, v. NYACK COLLEGE, et al.

No. 18-9552

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 491 

Commending the participants in the 44th International Chemistry Olympiad 

and recognizing the importance of education in the fields of science, 

technology, engineering, and mathematics to the future of the United 

States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2012 

Mr. COONS (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. ALEXANDER, and 

Ms. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the participants in the 44th International 

Chemistry Olympiad and recognizing the importance of 

education in the fields of science, technology, engineering, 

and mathematics to the future of the United States. 

Whereas the global economy of the future will require a workforce that is educated in the fields of science, technology, 

engineering, and mathematics (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘STEM’’); 

Whereas the science of chemistry is vital to the improvement 

of human life because chemistry has the power to transform; 

Whereas chemistry improves human lives by providing critical 

solutions to global challenges involving safe food, water, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 491 ATS 

transportation, and products, alternate sources of energy, 

improved health, and a healthy and sustainable environment; 

Whereas the International Chemistry Olympiad is an annual 

competition for the most talented secondary school chemistry students in the world that seeks to stimulate interest in chemistry through creative problem solving; 

Whereas the 44th International Chemistry Olympiad will be 

held at the University of Maryland, College Park from 

July 21 through 30, 2012; 

Whereas more than 70 countries and nearly 300 students will 

compete in the 44th International Chemistry Olympiad in 

theoretical and practical examinations covering analytical 

chemistry, biochemistry, inorganic chemistry, organic 

chemistry, physical chemistry, and spectroscopy; 

Whereas the objective of the International Chemistry Olympiad is to promote international relationships in STEM 

education (particularly in chemistry), cooperation among 

students, and the exchange of pedagogical and scientific 

experience in STEM education; 

Whereas STEM education at the secondary school level is 

critically important to the future of the United States; 

and 

Whereas the students who will compete in the International 

Chemistry Olympiad deserve recognition and support for 

their efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) welcomes the 44th International Chemistry 

3 Olympiad to the United States; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 491 ATS 

1 (2) recognizes the need to encourage young peo2 ple to pursue careers in the fields of science (includ3 ing chemistry), technology, engineering, and mathe4 matics; and 

5 (3) commends the University of Maryland, Col6 lege Park for hosting and the American Chemical 

7 Society for organizing the 44th International Chem8 istry Olympiad. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Eric C. MILLER, Petitioner v. Randy GIBBS, Warden

No. 19-7177

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      359,429
COMMITMENTS
  94,898  154,053   75,119  168,762  105,610  338,779  334,782   20,650   24,647

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,028)
  -2,237   25,322   -3,764    9,021  -18,329    3,020    3,229        8     -201

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.4     42.9     20.9     47.0     29.4     94.3     93.1      5.7      6.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      166)
      46       76       71       33       30      123      139
```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
Lamont Bernard HEARD, Petitioner, v. Rick SNYDER, et al.

No. 19-6811

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

*1142Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROADCOM, INC., 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 5-23-cv-00134 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT BROADCOM INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Broadcom Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). 

The Court has considered the Motion, it supporting papers, and all briefing related thereto, and 

finds that the Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed for both improper venue 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) and insufficient service of process, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5), 

and the Court also dismisses OptiMorphix’s claims of direct infringement, pre-suit willful 

infringement, and pre-suit indirect infringement for failure to state a claim upon which relief may 

be granted, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

SIGNED this _______ day of _______________________, 2024. 

 

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER, III 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 13-8 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 336
Troy BEEMER, Petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-29

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

p0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

138014 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138014 

 COA: 280085 

Wayne CC: 07-007244-01 

PHILLIP McCRARY, a/k/a 

PHILLIP LAMAR McCRARY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

HATHAWAY, J., not participating. Justice Hathaway recuses herself and will not 

participate in this case as she was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
Kimberly D. COLLINS, Petitioner, v. Gwendolyn THORNTON.

No. 19-898

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and statements of operation of Paul-Son Gaming
Corporation, as of and for the year ended May 31, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                             656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,310
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                      4,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,762
<PP&E>                                          14,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,128
<SALES>                                         23,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,309
<CGS>                                           18,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (305)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (681)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas - Marshall Division

S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC

2:23-cv-345

FIVE BELOW, INC.

Five Below, Inc. 

by and through its Registered Agent 

Corporation Service Company d/b/a 

CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company 

211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620 

Austin, TX 78701-3218 

Charles Ainsworth 

Parker Bunt & Ainsworth, PC 

100 E. Ferguson, Suite 418 

Tyler, Texas 75702

7/24/23

Case 2:23-cv-00345-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 07/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 219
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-345 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00345-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 07/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 220
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 233

To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio Street

in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Richard C. White Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. REYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San

Antonio Street in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Richard C.

White Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 700 East San Anto5 nio Street in El Paso, Texas, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Richard C. White Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal
2

•HR 233 IH

1 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

2 a reference to the ‘‘Richard C. White Federal Building’’.

Æ
Jonathan Edward MEIER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9722

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
----

| Subsidiaries of NN, Inc.                   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| The Delta Rubber Company                   | Connecticut                                   |
| Industrial Molding Corp.                   | Tennessee                                     |
| NN Europe ApS                              | Denmark                                       |
| Kugelfertigung Eltmann GmbH                | Germany                                       |
| NN Europe, S.p.a.                          | Italy                                         |
| NN Euroball Ireland, Ltd.                  | Ireland                                       |
| NN Netherlands B.V.                        | The Netherlands                               |
| NN Holdings B.V.                           | The Netherlands                               |
| NN Slovakia, s.r.o.                        | Slovak Republic                               |
| NN Precision Bearing Products Company Ltd. | The People’s Republic of China          |
| Whirlaway Corporation                      | Ohio                                          |
| Triump, LLC                                | Arizona                                       |
| NN International B.V.                      | The Netherlands                               |
Jill Andras LEBLANC, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9672

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1.1(A)
                          Magnesium Corporation of America
                             238 North 2200 West Street
                              Salt Lake City, UT 84116
July 22, 1998

Mr. Michael H. Legge
C/O Magnesium Corporation of America
238 North 2200 West Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Dear Mike:

Reference is made to your Employment Agreement with this Corporation dated
January 1, 1993 (the "Agreement").

This will confirm our agreement with you as follows:

The base salary provided in Section 2(a) of the agreement is increased from
$120,000 to $220,000, effective this date.

The parties reaffirm the Agreement as amended hereby.

Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing and returning the
enclosed copy.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  MAGNESIUM CORPORATION
                                                       OF AMERICA

                                                  By  /s/ Roger L. Fay
CONFIRMED AND AGREED TO:




/s/ Michael H. Legge
Anthony ALLEN, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-7633.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.