alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 6:23-cr-000122

United States of America

v.

Antonio Moises Ramirez

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for administration of a guilty plea under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 

and issued findings of fact and recommendation on the guilty plea. 

Doc. 27. The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept 

defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one

of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to 

the magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as to the guilty plea. 

The court also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of 

the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Antonio Moises Ramirez guilty of count one of the indictment, charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) –

Conspiracy to Transport Illegal Aliens.

So ordered by the court on September 10, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00122-JCB-KNM Document 29 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 83
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Cellco Partnership d/b/a 

Verizon Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to File

Under Seal. (Dkt. No. 81.) The Court, having considered the same, is of the opinion that the 

motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP INC.,

Defendants,

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 82 Filed 09/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6095
Matthew Davonn WEATHERSPOON, Petitioner, v. COLORADO.

No. 19-7195.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
EXHIBIT 23.3


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Diversinet Corp.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-11776) on Form S-8 and in the post-effective amendment no. 1 to the
registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-12792/POS) pertaining to the Amended
and Restated Stock Option Plan of Diversinet Corp. of our report dated November
26, 2001, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Diversinet Corp. as
of October 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of loss
and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended
October 31, 2001, which report appears in the October 31, 2001 Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Diversinet Corp.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Toronto, Canada
April 17, 2002


                                      103
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       739
<INVENTORY>                                     20,141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,641
<PP&E>                                           3,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,179
<SALES>                                        134,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,211
<CGS>                                           98,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,030
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,030
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNews Group, Inc.
(the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William Dean Singleton, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the
periods indicated. /s/
    
    WILLIAM DEAN SINGLETONWilliam Dean Singleton,
Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
March 29, 2004
Exhibit 3

Redacted in its entirety

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 30-5 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 575
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      102,815
<SECURITIES>                                1,466,675
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,980,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                (45,500)
<INVENTORY>                                 497,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,672,445
<PP&E>                                      8,428,922
<DEPRECIATION>                              (445,144)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,084,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,030,860
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    2,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,131,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,084,597
<SALES>                                     9,352,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            9,352,486
<CGS>                                       6,635,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               6,635,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,267,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          291,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             276,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                110,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         88,845
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             77,000
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                165,845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.03
        

</TABLE>
Makandi L. TERRY, petitioner, v. Larry ABRAHAM, Chief, Dillon County Detention Center.

No. 18-6158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Gamada A. HUSSEIN, petitioner, v. Matthew G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, et al.

No. 18-619.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.02

                                                             Company's Form 10-Q
                                                             September 30, 1994

                                                             Page 16

          In June 1994, several actions relating to trading practices on the
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system were filed
against a number of major broker/dealers, including SBI, in various federal
courts. In October 1994, the actions were consolidated in the Federal District
Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs purport to represent
a class of purchasers of stock trading in that system over the last four years.
The claims generally allege price-fixing violations under the federal antitrust
laws and violations of the federal securities laws relating to the use of
even-eighth price quotes instead of odd-eighth bid and asked quotes. A
consolidated amended complaint is expected to be filed in mid-December 1994. The
Company is reviewing these allegations, believes that it has meritorious
defenses and intends to vigorously defend against these claims.
<PAGE>

                                                             Company's Form 10-K
                                                             December 31, 1995

                                                             Page 10

          For information concerning actions filed against a number of
broker-dealers, including SBI, relating to trading practices on the National
Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system, see the
description that appears in the third paragraph of page 16 of the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form l0-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1994, which
description is incorporated by reference herein. A copy of the pertinent
paragraph is included as an exhibit to this Form 10-K. A consolidated amended
complaint was filed in December 1994. In August l995, the defendants' motion to
dismiss was granted with leave to replead, and a consolidated amended complaint
was filed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2890

_____________________________

MERVIN G. RHODES

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

July 2, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Mervin G. Rhodes, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Woods, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

JACOB DURST, #153446 §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23cv283

SMITH COUNTY §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Jacob Durst, an inmate confined at the Smith County Jail, proceeding pro se, filed 

the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was referred for findings of 

fact, conclusions of law and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

On June 8, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. #4). The 

order was mailed to Plaintiff at his last known address, which was the Smith County Jail. As of 

today, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint nor has he filed a motion for extension of time 

to file an amended complaint. In the Order, Plaintiff was warned that the failure to comply with 

the Order may result in the dismissal of the complaint. He has failed to prosecute this case. 

The exercise of the power to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute or obey a court order is 

committed to the sound discretion of the Court and appellate review is confined solely in whether 

the Court’s discretion was abused. Green v. Forney Eng’g Co., 589 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1979); Lopez 

v. Aransas Cnty. Indep. Sch. Dist., 570 F.2d 541 (5th Cir. 1978). Not only may a district court 

dismiss for want of prosecution upon motion of a defendant, but it may also, sua sponte, dismiss 

Case 6:23-cv-00283-JCB-KNM Document 6 Filed 09/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
2

an action whenever necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases. Anthony 

v. Marion Cnty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164 (5th Cir. 1980). 

 Recommendation

It is therefore recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for want of 

prosecution. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

Within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the Magistrate Judge’s Report, any party may 

serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations contained in the report.

A party’s failure to file written objections to the findings, conclusions and 

recommendations contained in this Report within fourteen days after being served with a copy 

shall bar that party from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions and 

recommendations and, except on grounds of plain error, from appellate review of unobjected-to 

factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. 

United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on 

other grounds, 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen 

days).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of September, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00283-JCB-KNM Document 6 Filed 09/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17
2011 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-6-2011 

# U S A v . N el son D i a z

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 10-3337

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2011 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . N e l s on Di a z " (2011). 2011 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 1178. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011/1178

### PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________

No 10

- 3337

_________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

NELSON LUIS DIAZ,

Appellant

________ On Appeal from the United States District Cou rt for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 1

- 07

- cr

- 00147

- 001 ) District Judge: Honorable John E. Jones, III

_______ Argued March 22, 2011

Before: SLOVITER, FUENTES

, and SMITH

, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the sli p opinion in the above case, filed May 5, 2011 be amended as follows:

Page 3, first full paragraph, line 10 , “360 years to life” should be deleted and replaced by “360 months to life.”

By the Court /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge Dated: May 6, 2011 trg/cc: Michael A. Consiglio, Esq.

Ronald A. Krauss, Esq.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
30,  2009 (the  "Report")  I,  Edward L.  Torres,  Chief  Executive  Officer and
President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:    November 23, 2009


/s/ Edward L. Torres
-------------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Chief Executive Officer and President

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Simon K. Hodson, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EarthShell Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:


     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;


     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):


     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and


     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.


Date: November 11, 2003                     By: /s/ Simon K. Hodson
                                                --------------------
                                                  Simon K. Hodson
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Darrell Wayne BELL, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-6987

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jessie Livell PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-9214.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

 Defendant. 

ERICSSON INC. and 

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

 Intervenors. 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF MATTHEW S. YUNGWIRTH 

Notice is hereby given that Matthew S. Yungwirth of the law firm Duane Morris LLP, 

admitted to practice in this Court, enters his appearance as counsel of record for Intervenor 

Ericsson Inc. and lead counsel of record for Intervenor Nokia of America Corporation. Mr. 

Yungwirth will accept service of all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, correspondence, and 

other material related to this litigation on their behalf at his contact information below. 

Dated: December 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Email: msyungwirth@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 253-6900 

Counsel for Intervenors Ericsson Inc. 

and Nokia of America Corporation

 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 862
 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 12, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 863
Kenda KIRBY, petitioner, v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-305.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.