alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ Jason M. Wietholter Jason M. Wietholter CA Bar No. 337139

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 jwietholter@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

Verizon Communications Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 465
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           2,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,925
<INVENTORY>                                     60,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,361
<PP&E>                                         243,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                (134,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,555
<BONDS>                                        152,227
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,690
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,436
<SALES>                                         97,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,395
<CGS>                                           86,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    518
<INCOME-TAX>                                       198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                320
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.189
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.189
        

</TABLE>
Kelly J. CHAVEZ, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 18-6382.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

LEMAR MASHAWN COHEN (16)

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00014 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, 

in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, 

Defendant Lemar Mashawn Cohen is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment, 

charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) - Conspiracy to Engage in Monetary 

Transactions with Criminally Derived Property. 

Case 4:23-cr-00014-SDJ-AGD Document 608 Filed 04/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2254
Shanta G. PHILLIPS-BERRY, Petitioner, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al.

No. 18-9727

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00485

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISCOVERY ORDER AND DOCKET CONTROL 

ORDER

The parties jointly move for entry of the attached Discovery Order and Docket Control 

Order.

Dated: April 8, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 132
/s/ Richard L. Rainey

Richard L. Rainey

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

One CityCenter

850 Tenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001-4956

(202) 662-6000

rrainey@cov.com

Melissa R. Smith

GILLAM & SMITH LLP

303 S. Washington Ave.

Marshall, TX 75670

(903) 934-8450

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., 

LTD. AND SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Marc A. Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Christian W. Conkle

CA State Bar No. 306374

Jonathan Ma

CA State Bar No. 312773

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com

Email: jma@raklaw.com

Qi Tong

TX State Bar No. 24119042

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

4925 Greenville Ave, Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75206

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: ptong@raklaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

REDSTONE LOGICS, LLC

. 

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 133
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 8th day of April, 2024, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by 

electronic mail on this same date.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 134
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that counsel complied with the requirements of Eastern District 

of Texas Local Rule CV-7(h). The parties are in agreement on filing the Discovery Order and 

Docket Control Order.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie____

Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 25 Filed 04/08/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 135
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MediaNews Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Dean
Singleton, Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the
            dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the
            periods indicated.

                                    /s/ WILLIAM DEAN SINGLETON
                                        ----------------------
                                        William Dean Singleton,
                                        Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Director
                                        September 26, 2003
Frank Elroy VENNES, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5353

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/26/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      562,073
COMMITMENTS
 115,042   24,028  159,727  264,447  342,824  539,216  526,579   22,857   35,494

CHANGES FROM 11/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,589)
   6,024    1,211      283  -14,749  -18,850   -8,442  -17,356      853    9,767

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.5      4.3     28.4     47.0     61.0     95.9     93.7      4.1      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      149)
      44       31       55       68       59      139      121
```

----

Updated December 2, 2013
Valentina L. O'CONNOR, AS NEXT FRIEND and Guardian OF Michael W. O'CONNOR, petitioner, v. Arthur WRIGHT, et al.

No. 19M114.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/23/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      158,611
COMMITMENTS
  36,820   36,210   17,154   86,554   81,847  140,527  135,211   18,083   23,399

CHANGES FROM 04/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,403)
     413    1,752   -1,690   -2,495   -2,574   -3,772   -2,512      370     -890

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.2     22.8     10.8     54.6     51.6     88.6     85.2     11.4     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      176)
      44       41       39       68       74      131      138
```

----

Updated April 26, 2013
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/03/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       44,868
COMMITMENTS
   1,768    3,802    4,252   38,555   36,511   44,575   44,565      293      303

CHANGES FROM 11/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -19,055)
    -895     -932     -570  -17,881  -17,851  -19,346  -19,353      291      298

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.9      8.5      9.5     85.9     81.4     99.3     99.3      0.7      0.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       6        9        8       13       22       23       35`

---

Updated December 6, 2013
Guy PHILIPPE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6058

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

COREY JOSEPH SCHUFF, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-390

§

OWIGHOWOTO ODUEME, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Corey Joseph Schuff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit

against several defendants. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack

Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the claim against Case

Bellows be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B).

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections. After careful consideration,

the court is of the opinion the objections are without merit. Plaintiff alleges defendant Bellows

denied him due process in connection with a prison disciplinary hearing. As the punishment

imposed as a result of the disciplinary conviction did not result in the loss of good conduct time

credits and did not subject plaintiff to an atypical and significant hardship in connection with the

ordinary incidents of prison life, the punishment plaintiff received did not implicate a protected

liberty interest. Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995). Plaintiff was therefore not entitled

to due process and the magistrate judge correctly concluded the claim against defendant Bellows

should be dismissed.

Case 1:23-cv-00390-MAC-ZJH Document 15 Filed 08/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 64
ORDER

Accordingly, the objections filed by plaintiff in this matter (#13) are OVERRULED. The

findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the report of the magistrate judge (#11) are

correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. The claim against defendant

Bellows is DISMISSED.

2

Case 1:23-cv-00390-MAC-ZJH Document 15 Filed 08/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 65
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PETER KOSTYSHYN

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF WILMINGTON

,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§ No. 187, 2015

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ C .A. Nos. N13J

- 01723 and

§ N13J

- 01724

§

§

Submitted: May 21 , 2015

Decided: June 5 , 2015

O R D E R

This 5 th day of June 2015 , it appears to the Court that, on May 7 , 201 5 , the

Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to appellant to show cause why t his appeal

should not be dismissed for his failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not

complying with the Court’s April 17, 2015 directive to pay the filing fee or file a

motion to proceed in forma pauperis

. The appellan t has failed to respond to the

notice to show cause within the required ten

- day period; therefore, dismissal of this

action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme

Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Anmarie CALGARO, Petitioner, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA, et al.

No. 19-127

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      139,251
COMMITMENTS
  35,963   29,962    9,709   76,228   76,382  121,900  116,053   17,351   23,198

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,500)
    -400    2,174      812    1,926   -1,877    2,338    1,109      162    1,391

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.8     21.5      7.0     54.7     54.9     87.5     83.3     12.5     16.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      39       37       31       53       68      115      118
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
Valerie ARROYO, Petitioner v. Daniel J. ZAMORA, et al.

No. 18-9021

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,151
<INVENTORY>                                     15,106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,514
<PP&E>                                          93,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,587
<BONDS>                                         16,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,636
<SALES>                                         47,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,247
<CGS>                                           28,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   490
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,881
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

AT&T SERVICES INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC, AND AT&T CORP., 

 Defendants. 

ERICSSON INC., 

 Intervenor. 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

OF INTERVENOR ERICSSON INC.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, the undersigned counsel for Intervenor 

Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”) certify that: 

1. Ericsson Inc. is a Delaware corporation that is wholly-owned by Ericsson Holding 

II Inc., which is also a Delaware corporation. Ericsson Holding II Inc. is wholly-owned by 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. 

2. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“LME”) is publicly held and has no parent 

corporation. LME has Class A and Class B shares that are listed on Nasdaq Stockholm in Sweden. 

In the United States, the Class B shares are listed on NASDAQ New York in the form of American 

Depositary Shares (ADS) evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADR). Each ADS 

represents one Class B share. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of LME’s stock, 

which comprises Class A and Class B shares. However, as of 31 December 2022, Investor AB 

and AB Industrivärden each own shares in LME representing 10% or more of the voting rights. 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 799
 2 

Dated: December 12, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553) 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 

821 ESE Loop 323 

Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: 903.705.1117 

Facsimile: 903.581.2543 

Email: ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Email: msyungwirth@duanemorris.com 

John R. Gibson 

Email: jrgibson@duanemorris.com 

Alice E. Snedeker 

aesnedeker@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404) 253-6900 

Counsel for Intervenor Ericsson Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 12, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

 Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 800
Charles Anthony BALL, Petitioner v. Mike SLAGLE

No. 19-5142

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
SCWC-14-0001184
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

KAHUKU PLANTATION RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION, ALLAN TEJADA, RAMONA TEJADA, et al., Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs. WILLIAM AILA, personally, as State Historical Preservation Officer, also as Chairman of Board of Land and Natural Resources and Director of Department of Land and Natural Resources, et al., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001184; CIV. NO. 13-1-2936)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of McKenna, J., recused) Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ application for writ of certiorari filed on October 13, 2015, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 20, 2015. Anthony P. Locricchio for petitioners Lex R. Smith and Jesse W. Schiel for respondent Continental Pacific Paul S. Aoki and Nicolette Winter for respondents City and County of Honolulu, et al. Crystal K. Rose and Matthew C. Shannon for respondents Lex. R. Smith and Kobayashi Sugita and Goda /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Bert I. Ayabe Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001184 20-NOV-2015 10:25 AM