alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Reptron Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Michael L. Musto, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 15, 2003



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL L. MUSTO                               
|Michael L. Musto Chief Executive Officer, and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF
THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO REPTRON ELECTRONICS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY REPTRON ELECTRONICS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba, 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00204-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to Serve Initial and Additional Disclosures. After consideration of the same, the Court is of 

the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 

serve its Initial and Additional Disclosures is extended up to and including September 14, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP Document 17-1 Filed 08/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 885
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      602,878
COMMITMENTS
  97,543   38,535  175,272  310,805  368,656  583,620  582,463   19,258   20,415

CHANGES FROM 09/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,676)
   4,237    6,362   -2,827     -870   -3,787      540     -252    1,136    1,928

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.2      6.4     29.1     51.6     61.1     96.8     96.6      3.2      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      38       33       58       65       65      134      129
```

----

Updated September 13, 2013
| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                         |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 22, 2013 | By:    | /s/Kent Rodriguez                                                            |   |
|                      |   | Kent Rodriguez                                                               |   |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer, President,Secretary and Principal Financial Officer |   |
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

East District of Texas

Case Numben 4:23-CV-00871

Plaintiff:

Kathryn Sneed and Sneed Equestrlan Estates, LLC

vs.

Defendant:

Jeffrey Gibbs, Calti Rouse, Gibbs Show Horses, Calli Rouee Show

Horses, Black Bird Ranch, The Bonaparte Family Living

For:

Charles S. North

Keamey, McWiltiams & Davis, pllc

1235 South Main, #280

Grapevine, TX 76051

Received by David Moore on the gth day of October,2023 at 9:15 am to be served on Bonaparte Family

Living Trust clo Frank Bonapafte or Patricia Bonaparte, 1623 Mockingbird Lane, Southlake, TX

76092.

f , David Moore, being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 9th day of October, 2023 at l0:S0 am, l:

served an AUTHORIZED individual by hand delivering a true copy of the Summons In A Clvll Action and Plaintiffs Orlglnal Complaint to:Patrlcla Bonaparte as Trustei at the address of: 1623 Mocklngbird

Lane, Southlake, TX 76092, who are authorized to accept service for Bonaparte Family Llving Tiust.

I certify that I am approved by the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) to deliver citations and

stice Courts in and for the State of Texas. I am competent to

years ofage, I am not a party to the above_referencdd cause,

ime involving moralturpitude, and I am not interested in the

Subscribed and Sworn to before me on the 13th day

of October, 2023 by the affiant who is personalty

PSC-171 84 Exp-l0/31/25

Interaction Civil Process lnvestigationg

5773 Woodway Dr. #125

Houston, TX 77057

(832) 606-89s8

Our Job Serial Number: RJG-2023000709

known to me.

Davld Moore

0'U!"

NOTARY PUBLIC

TIIARIA APIJUOO

My ilobry lD # 190448716

Explns lbvombcr 23,29n

CopytEhl O 1992-2023 OreamButlt Softwarc, lm . Pr@6s Soruoft Toolbor VB 2r

Case 4:23-cv-00871-ALM Document 19 Filed 10/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 45
EXHIBIT 16

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 243
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 
Page 6 

a plurality of cache memory blocks; 

A plurality of cache memory blocks exists in the L3 cache shared by all ARM cores in a partitioned into groups of 4 cache ways (blocks). 

Arm® DynamIQTM Shared Unit, Revision r3p0, Technical Reference Manua

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 
Page 11 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-17 Filed 09/27/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:
Tynisha Latrice REINERIO, nka Akosua Tanisha Aaebo, petitioner, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.

No. 18-8523.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, to
the best of his knowledge, that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Date: April 15, 2005



By:

/s/    Edward J. BernicaEdward J. Bernica Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00158

- CR
Jose Lopez Jr. v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 272nd District Court of Brazos County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18

- 01722

- CRF

- 272

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 27, 2022
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 16

- 00093

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 2012

- 53837

Style: Marcelle Guimaraes

v

. Christopher Scott Brann

Date motion filed * : September 21, 2018

Type of motion: Motion for En Banc Reconsideration

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent ext raordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

_____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s / Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Brown, a nd L loyd

.

Justice Keyes, dissenting from denial of en banc reconsideration.

Justice s Bland, Massengale, and Caughey not participating.

Date: 12/20/18
Michael Deangelo LOWERY, Petitioner v. Rick WHITTEN, Warden.

No. 18-9524

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Jack FERRANTI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6812.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         369,407                 451,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,327,860               2,885,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,644                  18,992
<INVENTORY>                                    269,796                 136,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,506,016               3,726,348
<PP&E>                                      10,046,316               3,467,063
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,969,428)               1,094,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,326,200               7,929,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,763,920               3,213,366
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     7,463,931               6,158,584
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,326,200               7,929,711
<SALES>                                     19,009,645              10,234,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,009,645              10,234,403
<CGS>                                       10,881,556               4,727,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,535,113              10,136,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             532,322                  99,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,525,468)                  98,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (401,762)               (332,566)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,117,125)               (436,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,117,125)               (436,808)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.58)                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)                  (0.14)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TERRELL COSTNER, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 81 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, INC., 

COMMSCOPE INC., ARRIS US HOLDINGS, INC., 

ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, 

INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, ET AL.,

ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, 

United Agent Group Inc., 

3411 Silverside Road, Tatnall Building #104 

Wilmington, DE, 19810

Reza Mirzaie 

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90025

2:23-cv-00455

10/2/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 6 Filed 10/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 53
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 6 Filed 10/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 54
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We have issued our report dated March 31, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of International Textile Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of International Textile Group on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-143426, effective May 31, 2007 and File No. 333-143427, effective May 31, 2007).





/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Charlotte, North Carolina


March 31, 2011
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, DavidJ. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

Date:    May 12, 2006

/s/David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

----
- 1 -

No. 6:23-cr-00123-1

United States of America

v.

Adrian Castro-Diaz

ORDER

The court referred this matter to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for administration of a guilty plea under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 

and issued findings of fact and recommendation on the guilty plea. 

Doc. 65. The magistrate judge recommended the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one

of the indictment. Id. Defendant waived his right to object to the 

magistrate judge’s findings. Id at 2.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The 

court also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Adrian Castro-Diaz guilty of count one of the indictment, 

charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) – Conspiracy 

to Transport Illegal Aliens.

So ordered by the court on November 27, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00123-JCB-KNM Document 80 Filed 11/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

303
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group Reproduction, Andrology, and 
Gynecology Study Section.
    Date: June 28, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 2125D, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Assisted 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jagpreet Singh Nanda, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes 
of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2125D, Bethesda, MD 20892 
(301) 451-4454, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1cbc0c6d1d3c4c4d58fcfc0cfc5c0e1cfc8c98fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff959e988f8d9a9a8bd1919e919b9ebf919697d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.865, 
Research for Mothers and Children, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS).

    Dated: May 23, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11334 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20768

YOUSRY GEORGE SALAMA

,

Plaintiff

- Appell ant

v.

WESTERN WIND ENERGY CORP., WESTERN SOLARGENICS, INC.

,

Defendant s

- Appell ees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CV

- 3535

Before JOLLY and COSTA, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM: **

The district court’s opinion granting summary judgment sets out the

facts and the applicable law in this breach

- of

- contract case

. See Salama v.

Western Wind Energy Corp. , No. 4:12

- cv

- 03535, 2013 WL 6079548 (S.D. Tex.

Nov. 19, 2013)

. We have studied the briefs, heard argument, and reviewed the

* District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
December 8, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20768 Document: 00512861003 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2014No. 13

- 20768

record. We affirm f or essentially the reasons set out in the district court’s careful and thorough opinion

. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-20768 Document: 00512861003 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2014