##### Table of Contents




---




SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





---




FORM 10-K





|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 OF THE SECURITIES
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------

| | EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | --------------------




For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002





OR





| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




For the transition period from to





Commission file number: 0-23280





---




NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)





Delaware (State of
Incorporation)

94-3049219 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)





3260 Blume Drive Suite 500, Richmond, California 94806


(Address of Principal Executive Offices)





(510) 262-1730


(Registrants telephone number, including area code)





Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:


None





Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:


Common stock, $.001 Par Value


(Title of Class)





---




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.  Yes  x  No  ̈





Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x





As of August 29, 2002, the issuer had outstanding 17,783,571 shares of common stock and the aggregate market
value of the shares of common stock held by non-affiliates on that date was $37,946,009 based upon the last sale price of the issuers common stock reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market on that date.





DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE





Portions of Item 10 and Items 11, 12 and 13 of Part III incorporate by reference information from the issuers Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 14,
2002 (the Proxy Statement).





---



---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS





Part IItem 1

Business

3Item 2

Properties

12Item 3

Legal Proceedings

12Item 4

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

12Part IIItem 5

Market for Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters

13Item 6

Selected Financial Data

13Item 7

Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

16Item 7a

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

21Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

22Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

37Part IIIItem 10

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

37Item 11

Executive Compensation

39Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

39Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

39Part IVItem 14

Exhibits, Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

40




2




---

##### Table of Contents




PART I





ITEM 1.    
BUSINESS





This report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are based on our current expectations about our business and industry. In some cases, these statements may be identified by terminology such as may, will, should, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, or continue or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements involve known and unknown
risk and uncertainties that may cause our results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to such differences
include, among others, those discussed under Factors that May Affect Future Results. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this report.





OVERVIEW





Neurobiological Technologies, Inc., alternatively referred to in this report as NTI, we, us, our, or the Company, is an emerging drug development company focused on
the clinical development and regulatory approval of neuroscience drugs. We develop neuroprotective and neuromodulatory agents to treat progressive neurological impairments characteristic of various nervous system disorders, including diabetic
neuropathy and brain cancer.





Our strategy is to in-license and develop early stage drug candidates that target
major medical needs and that can be rapidly commercialized. Our experienced management team oversees the human clinical trials necessary to establish preliminary evidence of efficacy and seeks partnerships with pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies for late-stage development and marketing of our product candidates. We currently have two product candidates that have completed or are in Phase II or Phase III human clinical testing. Theses candidates, Memantine and XERECEPT  , are described below.





MEMANTINE





Memantine is an orally-dosed compound that
appears to restore the function of impaired neurons by modulation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate or NMDA receptor, integral to the membranes of these cells. Restoration of this function inhibits injured or damaged neurons from firing abnormally, a
pathological process associated with many neurological conditions, including dementia, Alzheimers disease and neuropathic pain (persistent pain resulting from abnormal signals to the brain).





In April 1998, we entered into a strategic research and marketing cooperation agreement with Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH and Childrens
Medical Center Corporation to further the clinical development and commercialization of Memantine. Pursuant to this agreement, NTI and Merz share scientific, clinical and regulatory information about Memantine to facilitate regulatory review and
marketing approval by the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and foreign regulatory authorities. Pursuant to this agreement, we will share in future revenues from sales of Memantine for all indications. Memantine has been marketed by Merz in
Germany since 1989 with the labeling dementia syndrome.





In June 2000, Merz entered into an agreement
with Forest Laboratories, Inc. for the development and marketing of Memantine in the United States for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, neuropathic pain and AIDS-related dementia. In August 2000, Merz entered into a strategic license and
cooperation agreement with H. Lundbeck A/S of Copenhagen, Denmark for the further development and marketing of Memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, neuropathic pain and AIDS-related dementia. Lundbeck acquired exclusive rights to
Memantine in certain European markets, Canada, Australia and South Africa, as well as semi-exclusive rights to co-market Memantine with Merz in other markets worldwide, excluding the United States, and Japan, where Merz has granted development
rights to Forest and Suntory Ltd., respectively.




3




---

##### Table of Contents




In July 2001, Forest initiated the second of two trials necessary for
registration of an NDA to the FDA for diabetic neuropathy. This is a large-scale, multi-center, double-blind placebo controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Memantine in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy and is expected to have
results in the first half of calendar 2003. We conducted the first such trial with an enrollment of 400 patients and reported positive results in January 2000.





In September 2002, Forest completed a placebo-controlled Phase III study in which a significant benefit was observed when Memantine was combined with donepezil in patients with moderately-severe to
severe Alzheimers disease. Forest voluntarily withdrew its previously filed New Drug Application, or NDA, and announced that it expected to file a new NDA incorporating the results of this Phase III study by the end of 2002.





Forest is presently conducting three additional placebo-controlled studies in either mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe
Alzheimers disease. The results are expected no earlier than 2003, and are expected to be used as additional evidence of efficacy.





In May 2002, Merz announced that Memantine (Ebixa ® )
was approved by the regulatory authorities in the European Union for the treatment of Alzheimers disease. In July 2002, Merz received a payment from Lundbeck relating to this approval. This triggered a $1.4 million payment to NTI in August
2002 from Merz under our 1998 strategic research and marketing cooperation agreement. NTI will receive royalty payments from certain European countries and the United States once sales commence.





XERECEPT 





We are also developing XERECEPT, a synthetic preparation of the natural human
peptide, Corticotropin-Releasing Factor, as a treatment for brain swelling due to brain tumors (peritumoral brain edema). XERECEPT received orphan drug designation for this indication by the FDA. Orphan drug designation provides NTI with seven years
market exclusivity and makes NTI eligible to receive Orphan Drug Grants to fund clinical research. We are currently planning a second Phase IIB trial of XERECEPT for peritumoral brain edema, while completing longer term animal toxicity studies as
required by the FDA.





In August 2000, we announced that we had signed an option with the University of California,
Berkeley to license its patents on corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) analogues. The option agreement includes a work plan that will encompass in-vivo models of the hormones to screen CRH-analogues to arrive at the optimum CRH-analogue for
clinical purposes.




4




---

##### Table of Contents




PRODUCT CANDIDATES





Product/Indication

Development Status

Primary Benefit SoughtMEMANTINEDiabetic Neuropathic Pain

Phase IIB trial completed by NTI. Results showed statistically significant improvement of 40mg of Memantine over placebo in reducing chronic pain. The FDA
accepted trial as one of two pivotal trials. Forest initiated a year-long Phase III trial in July 2001. Results are expected in the first half of calendar 2003.

Treatment of chronic pain associated with diabetic neuropathy.Mild-to-Moderate Vascular Dementia

Phase III trials completed by Merz in the United Kingdom and France. Results showed significantly improved cognitive abilities compared to patients who
received placebo as demonstrated by the Activities of Daily Living and cognitive performance evaluations.

Functional and cognitive improvement.Moderate-to-Severe Dementia and Alzheimers Disease

Phase III trial completed by Merz in the United States showing improvement in functional independence and reduction in required level of care. Forest
initiated an additional Phase III trial program in July 2001, which is expected to be completed in 2003.  Merz and Lundbeck obtained drug
approval in Europe in May 2002.

Functional and cognitive improvement.XERECEPT(CORTICOTROPIN-RELEASING FACTOR)Peritumoral Brain Edema

Phase IIB trial is expected to start in the first half of calendar 2003.

Stabilization or improvement of neurological function with substantial dexamethasone sparing.




5




---

##### Table of Contents




SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND





Our therapeutic focus is neuroprotection and neuromodulation: the prevention and treatment of neurological impairment by preserving or restoring neurological function of
damaged neurons. We are developing neuroprotective and neuromodulatory agents that may slow or reverse the progressive neurological impairment associated with multiple nervous system disorders, including diabetic neuropathy and brain cancer.





Because neuronal impairment contributes significantly to functional impairment in many nervous system disorders,
scientists believe that neuroprotective compounds are potentially powerful and flexible therapeutic agents. There has been much interest in the business and academic communities to develop such agents.





Mechanisms common to progressive neuronal impairment in various medical conditions are thought to result in multiple neurologic symptoms
such as chronic pain, motor difficulties, memory loss and other cognitive deficits. By modulating such mechanisms, neuroprotective agents may prevent or restore loss of neurological function. Our current scientific focus is on two mechanisms
contributing to progressive neuronal impairment: excitotoxicity and edema. There is evidence that Memantine prevents or reduces excitotoxicity, a cascade of neuronal cell injury and death associated with the release of abnormal levels of excitatory
neurotransmitters. XERECEPT has the potential to prevent the progressive neuronal impairment resulting directly from cerebral edema (swelling of the brain), damage that more frequently results in clinical impairment than the damage resulting from
the presence of a tumor.





PRODUCTS IN DEVELOPMENT





Memantine





Memantine is an orally-available neuromodulatory
agent that has been marketed in Germany by Merz since 1989 with the labeling dementia syndrome. It is one of a class of agents referred to as NMDA-receptor antagonists. Scientific research has indicated that modulating the NMDA receptor
may protect against the neuronal impairment and death associated with a number of medical conditions. Accumulating evidence from various studies indicates that overstimulation of NMDA receptors contributes to the impairment and death of neurons.
This occurs in a variety of chronic neurodegenerative diseases, including neuropathic pain, dementia, Alzheimers disease, and Huntingtons disease. There are currently no approved neuroprotective treatments for any of the pathologies
associated with NMDA-receptor overstimulation.





Estimates are that approximately 1,000,000 patients in the United
States suffer from intractable neuropathic pain. Nerve cells in the brain communicate by sending signals to excite or inhibit each other. These signals are initiated by compounds known as neurotransmitters. The principal excitatory neurotransmitter,
glutamate, binds to the NMDA receptor embedded in the cell membrane of the neuron. When glutamate binds to the receptor, a channel in the neuron opens which enables charged calcium molecules to flow freely into the neuron. Normally, the influx of
calcium triggers chemical reactions that cause the neuron to change its electrical charge and fire a message to neighboring neurons. This basic function of the NMDA receptor is essential for normal movement, sensation, memory, and cognition. In
certain medical conditions, glutamate levels surrounding neurons are elevated, which results in overstimulation of the NMDA receptor. In these situations, excessive amounts of calcium enter the neuron, releasing internally stored glutamate into the
surrounding area. This glutamate further stimulates NMDAreceptors on neighboring neurons, causing a cascade of neuronal cell impairment and/or death throughout the area, referred to as excitotoxicity.





Neuroscientists have been developing ways to prevent the damaging influx of excess calcium into neurons. One approach is to prevent
glutamate from binding to the receptor. This can be accomplished by using either a competitive NMDA-receptor antagonist which prevents glutamate from binding to the receptor, or a closed NMDA-receptor channel blocker, which binds to the entrance of
the closed channel. However, if such compounds prevent the channel from opening for too long, they may impede the normal functioning of the NMDA receptor, causing side effects including hallucinations, paranoia, delirium, and amnesia.




6




---

##### Table of Contents




Scientists affiliated with Childrens Hospital of Boston, Massachusetts
working on understanding the function of the NMDA receptor found Memantine to modulate the NMDA receptors calcium ion channel. Memantine binds uncompetitively to the NMDA receptor and appears to interfere relatively little with normal
functioning, while reducing abnormal signals associated with excessive calcium influx. Rather than blocking the NMDA receptor for long periods of time, Memantine appears to restore regulation of the channel to near normal activity, while permitting
routine neurotransmission.





The profound psychotic side effects associated with other NMDA receptor antagonists
previously evaluated in human clinical trials were virtually absent with Memantine. Merz has carefully documented Memantines history of safe clinical use in Germany over years of post-launch clinical experience and active surveillance. In a
post-marketing surveillance study sponsored by Merz with 1,420 dementia outpatients treated for up to more than one year, Memantine was rated as having very good to good tolerability in 93.8% of the cases at the end of the observation period.





Product Development Status





The Neuropathic Pain of Diabetes





Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disorder that affects an estimated 16 million Americans. One of its most common complications is nerve damage, particularly damage to peripheral nerves that send sensory signals from the extremities to
the central nervous system, or CNS. This condition, referred to as peripheral diabetic neuropathy, or PDN, is a large, unmet medical need. This condition most frequently damages nerves in the feet, making walking or standing painful and difficult.
We estimate that approximately 800,000 patients in the United States currently receive treatments for the symptoms of PDN, including severe, chronic pain known as neuropathic pain (persistent pain in the absence of an obvious stimulus). As the
neuropathy progresses, the sensation of pain may become more intense, encompass more areas, and become increasingly difficult to treat with available therapeutic agents.





Peripheral nerve damage disrupts pain pathways in the nervous system, causing nerves to send abnormal signals that the brain interprets as pain. In effect, neurons in the
CNS are bombarded with abnormal signals until their ability to process pain signals is compromised. This leads to hyper-sensitization of neurons to pain impulses and results in progressive neuronal impairment in the CNS. Although the precise
mechanisms of these events are not completely understood, there is evidence that overactivation of NMDA receptors in the CNS plays an important role.





Memantine has been shown to inhibit abnormal pain signals by modulating the NMDA receptor in several animal models of neuropathic pain. Based on the results of these studies, we sponsored and completed
in approximately 1998, a 122-patient placebo-controlled Phase IIA human clinical trial of Memantine in patients with neuropathic pain due to diabetes or post-herpetic neuralgia (a complication of shingles). No treatment benefit was observed in
patients with post-herpetic neuralgia. However, trends indicating efficacy of Memantine were observed in patients with PDN. The strongest efficacy trend was the reduction of nocturnal pain associated with PDN. Nocturnal pain is a major problem for
these patients, frequently leading to insomnia and other associated health and psychological problems. After eight weeks of treatment in our clinical trial, the Memantine-treated subjects had 42% less nocturnal pain than those treated with placebo.
The results for the other primary variables of daytime pain and pain relief, although not statistically significant, exhibited consistent trends representative of analgesic benefit with Memantine compared to placebo.





In July 2001, Forest initiated an additional year-long, large-scale, multi-center, double-blind placebo controlled trial to assess the
safety and efficacy of Memantine in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Results of this trial are expected in the first half of calendar 2003.




7




---

##### Table of Contents

Agreement with Merz and Additional Indications





In April 1998, we entered into a strategic research and marketing cooperation agreement with Merz and a new revenue sharing partnership with Childrens Medical Center
Corporation to further the clinical development and commercialization of Memantine. Pursuant to this agreement, Childrens Medical Center Corporation terminated our existing license for AIDS-related dementia and neuropathic pain and granted
exclusive rights to Merz. NTI and Merz share scientific, clinical and regulatory information about Memantine, particularly safety data, to facilitate regulatory review and marketing approval by the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities. Pursuant to
the agreement with Merz, NTI will share in future revenues from sales of Memantine for all indications.





XERECEPT (Human
Corticotropin-Releasing Factor)





XERECEPT is our synthetic preparation of the human peptide
Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (hCRF) which we are developing as a treatment for brain swelling due to brain tumors (peritumoral brain edema). There is clinical evidence that XERECEPT may be a safer treatment than synthetic corticosteroids, which
are associated with serious adverse side effects including muscle wasting, weight gain, immunosuppression, osteoporosis, hyperglycemia, glaucoma and psychosis. Results from our preclinical studies and pilot human clinical trials have demonstrated
the compounds potential to reduce swelling in brain tissue and to be well-tolerated and apparently safe. Thus, XERECEPT has the potential to significantly improve the quality of life for brain cancer patients with dysfunction due to brain
swelling. In the United States, approximately 30,000 patients are diagnosed every year with brain tumors. Patients with this condition are in need of a safe alternative to corticosteroids, which have serious adverse effects at the high, chronic
doses required for efficacy.





The FDA has approved our application for orphan drug designation for XERECEPT to
treat this unmet medical need. Orphan drug designation provides us with seven years market exclusivity and makes us eligible to receive federal funds for clinical research under the Orphan Drug Grant Program.





hCRF is a natural neuroendocrine peptide hormone found in humans both centrally (within the brain) and peripherally (outside the brain).
Researchers discovered anti-edema effects of hCRF through systemic administration. Additionally XERECEPT has been shown to have anti-neoplastic properties. Research by our scientific collaborators has revealed that XERECEPT significantly reduces
edema, or swelling of damaged tissue, in animal models. Edema is a condition characterized by swelling after tissue injury when fluid, plasma proteins, and white blood cells flow from small blood vessels into the surrounding tissues, further
contributing to the destruction of these tissues. Our preclinical studies have shown that XERECEPT reduces the flow of fluid through blood vessels at sites of traumatic tissue injury. Specifically, these studies have shown that XERECEPT injected
systemically into animals can reduce brain edema after injury, brain edema associated with cancer tumors, and swelling in muscle tissue following surgical trauma.





Product Development Status





Peritumoral Brain Edema





We have been evaluating XERECEPT for the treatment of cerebral
edema caused by brain tumors. In these patients, the tumor promotes increased permeability of the small blood vessels in the brain, which results in the excess flow of fluids into the brain, swelling of brain tissue, and a consequent impairment of
neurological function. Current treatment of peritumoral brain edema, primarily corticosteroids, results in serious adverse side effects at the high chronic doses required for efficacy. Reactions can include muscle wasting, weight gain,
immunosuppression, osteoporosis, hyperglycemia, glaucoma, psychosis and other potentially dose-limiting side effects.





Additional benefits of hCRF in patients with brain tumors have been demonstrated in laboratory testing. To date six pre-clinical studies with CRF have demonstrated an anti-cancer effect by inhibiting new cell growth. One




8




---

##### Table of Contents

recent publication has shown that CRF induces programmed cell death which may represent one of the underlying mechanisms for the anti-neoplastic effects observed with CRF. It is of interest to
note that dexamethasone, the drug of choice for peritumoral brain edema, has been shown to interfere with this programmed cell death in malignant glioma (brain) cells making them less resistant to chemotherapy and radiation.





Although endogenous hCRF is involved in stimulating the release of natural corticosteroids, studies sponsored by us have shown that
XERECEPT exerts its anti-edema action independent of cortisol release when administered systemically.





Based on
the pharmacologic profile of XERECEPT, there is evidence that the compound may be efficacious without the adverse side effects associated with current therapies. There is also evidence that XERECEPT may enhance radiation therapy, whereas cortisols
appear to interfere with this conventional brain tumor therapy. XERECEPT has been safely administered to several hundred healthy volunteers and patients according to numerous studies published by third parties. In human clinical trials sponsored by
us, XERECEPT was well tolerated and appeared to be safe in more than 230 courses of treatment.





Results from pilot
human clinical trials previously sponsored by us demonstrated the potential of XERECEPT to reduce swelling of brain tissue and to be well-tolerated and apparently safe. We are currently planning a Phase IIB trial of XERECEPT for peritumoral brain
edema, which is expected to begin in the first half of fiscal 2003.





COMPETITION





Competition in the biopharmaceutical industry is intense and is expected to increase. There are other therapies under development for each
of our therapeutic targets and the development and sale of drugs for the treatment of the therapeutic targets that we and our collaborative partners are pursuing is highly competitive. We may not be able to develop products that will be as
efficacious or as cost-effective as currently-marketed products and, because our license to certain XERECEPT  patent rights is non-exclusive, others may develop competing products using the same compound. Consequently, others may develop, manufacture and market products that could compete with those that we are developing.





We and our collaborative partners will face intense competition from pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology
companies both in the United States and abroad. Companies that complete clinical trials, obtain required regulatory approvals and first commence commercial sales of their products before their competitors may achieve a significant competitive
advantage. In addition, significant levels of research in biotechnology and medicine occur in universities and other nonprofit research institutions. These entities have become increasingly active in seeking patent protection and licensing revenues
for their research results.





SUPPLIERS





Merz and Forest have the responsibility of supplying Memantine for their clinical trials.





XERECEPT has been manufactured by established methods using chemical synthesis to our specifications. We performed audits on our contractors who supplied XERECEPT to assess compliance with the current Good Manufacturing
Practice, or cGMP, regulations. Alternative cGMP suppliers of the bulk drugs and of finished dosage form products are available to us. We currently have no plans to build or develop an in-house manufacturing capability.





We face certain risks by outsourcing manufacturing, including:





| |  | the delay of our preclinical and human clinical testing if our contractors are unable to supply sufficient quantities of product candidates manufactured in
accordance with cGMP on acceptable terms;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



9




---

##### Table of Contents




| |  | the delay of market introduction and subsequent sales if we encounter difficulties establishing relationships with manufacturers to produce, package and
distribute products; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | adverse effects on FDA pre-market approvals of potential products and contract manufacturers if they do not adhere to cGMP regulations.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Because of these risks, our dependence on third parties for the manufacture of products may adversely affect
our results of operations and our ability to develop and deliver products on a timely and competitive basis.





PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY
TECHNOLOGY





In April 1998, in connection with our agreement with Merz, our exclusive license from
Childrens Medical Center Corporation to a series of patents and patent applications relating to certain non-ophthalmic uses of Memantine was terminated. Merz holds rights to those uses under licenses from Childrens Medical Center
Corporation.





We hold non-exclusive worldwide licenses to four issued U.S. patents covering the composition of
matter of XERECEPT and various analogues, together with certain foreign patents and patent applications. Because of the non-exclusivity of the four issued U.S. patents, others may develop, manufacture and market products that could compete with
those we develop. We also have exclusive rights to four issued patents and one patent application covering certain uses of XERECEPT and analogues. We are responsible for the costs of prosecuting the patent applications related to XERECEPT for which
we have exclusive rights. In addition to the patents and pending applications we have licensed from others, we hold U.S. Patent No. 5,870,430 which covers certain liquid formulations of hCRF and hCRF-related peptides.





In August 2000, we signed an option with the University of California, Berkeley for its patents on corticotropin-releasing hormone
analogues. The option agreement includes a work plan that will encompass in- vivo models of the hormones to screen CRH-analogues to arrive at the optimum CRH-analogue for clinical purposes.





The patent position of biotechnology firms generally is highly uncertain because:





| |  | patents involve complex legal and factual issues that have recently been the subject of much litigation;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | no consistent policy has emerged from the United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding the breadth of claims allowed or the degree of protection afforded
under biotechnology patents; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | others may independently develop similar products, duplicate any of our potential products, or design around the claims of any of our potential patented
products.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




In addition, because of the time delay in patent approval and the secrecy afforded
United States patent applications, we do not know if other applications, which might have priority over our applications, have been filed.





As a result of all of these factors, there can be no assurance that patent applications relating to our potential products or processes will result in patents being issued, or that patents, if issued, will provide protection
against competitors who successfully challenge our patents, obtain patents that may have an adverse effect on our ability to conduct business, or be able to circumvent our patent position.





A number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and research institutions have developed competing technologies and may have patent rights that conflict with our
patent rights. If such a conflict were to develop, the scope of our patent rights could be limited and we may be unable to obtain additional patent rights needed to permit the continuing use of the subject technologies.




10




---

##### Table of Contents




In addition to patent protection, we rely upon trade secret protection for our
confidential and proprietary information. It is our policy that each employee enter into a confidentiality agreement which contains provisions generally prohibiting the disclosure of confidential information to anyone outside NTI and requiring
disclosure to us of ideas, developments, discoveries or inventions conceived during employment and assignment to us of proprietary rights to such matters related to our business and technology. However, it is possible that these agreements could be
breached. In addition, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or disclose such technology.





GOVERNMENT REGULATION





In order to clinically
test, produce, and market products for therapeutic use, a company must comply with mandatory procedures and safety standards established by the FDA and comparable agencies in foreign countries.





A company generally must conduct preclinical testing on laboratory animals of new pharmaceutical products prior to commencement of clinical studies involving humans.
These studies evaluate the potential efficacy and safety of the product. The company then submits the results of these studies to the FDA as part of an investigational new drug application, or IND, which must become effective before clinical testing
in humans can begin.





Typically, human clinical evaluation involves a time-consuming and costly three-phase
process:





| |  | In Phase I, a company conducts clinical trials with a small number of subjects to determine a drugs early safety profile and its pharmacokinetic pattern.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | In Phase II, a company conducts clinical trials with groups of patients afflicted with a specific disease in order to determine preliminary effectiveness,
optimal dosages and further evidence of safety.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | In Phase III, a company conducts large-scale, multi-center, comparative trials with patients afflicted with a target disease in order to provide enough data to
demonstrate the effectiveness and safety required by the FDA prior to commercialization.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The
FDA closely monitors the progress of each phase of clinical testing. The FDA may, at its discretion, re-evaluate, alter, suspend, or terminate testing based upon the data accumulated to that point and the FDAs assessment of the risk/benefit
ratio to patients.





The results of the preclinical and clinical testing are submitted to the FDA in the form of a
new drug application, or NDA, for approval prior to commercialization. In responding to an NDA, the FDA may grant marketing approval, request additional information, or deny the application. Failure to receive approval for any of our potential
products would have a material adverse effect on us. Among the requirements for product approval is the requirement that each domestic manufacturer of the product conform to the FDAs current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, regulations,
which must be followed at all times. Compliance with the cGMP regulations requires that manufacturers continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to ensure full technical compliance.





Once the sale of a product is approved, FDA regulations continue to govern the manufacturing process and marketing activities.
A post-marketing testing and surveillance program may be required to continuously monitor a products usage and effects in patients. Product approvals may be suspended or withdrawn if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained.





Foreign regulatory approval of a product must also be obtained prior to marketing the product internationally.
Foreign approval procedures vary from country to country. The time required for approval may delay or prevent marketing in certain countries. In certain instances, the Company or its collaborative partners may seek approval to market and sell
certain products outside of the United States before submitting an




11




---

##### Table of Contents

application for United States approval to the FDA. The clinical testing requirements and the time required to obtain foreign regulatory approvals may differ from those required for FDA approval.





Fulfillment of regulatory requirements for marketing human therapeutics typically takes many years and varies
substantially based on the type, complexity, and novelty of the drug for which approval is sought. Government regulation may:





| |  | delay for a considerable period of time or prevent marketing of any product that we may develop; and/or
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | impose costly procedures upon our activities.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------




Either of these effects of government regulation may provide an advantage to our competitors.





For products we develop, we may not receive FDA or other regulatory approval on a timely basis or at all. Any delay in obtaining, or failure to obtain, required approvals would adversely affect the marketing of our proposed products
and our ability to earn product revenues or royalties.





In addition, success in preclinical or early stage
clinical trials does not assure success in later-stage clinical trials. As with any regulated product, additional government regulations may be instituted which could delay regulatory approval of our potential products. Additional government
regulations that might result from future legislation or administrative action cannot be predicted.





EMPLOYEES





As of June 30, 2002, we employed 11 people, 5 of whom are full-time employees.





We use consultants to complement our staffing. Our employees are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements, and we regard our
relations with employees to be good.





ITEM 2.     
PROPERTIES





Our executive offices occupy approximately 4,333 square feet in Richmond,
California, pursuant to a lease that will expire July 2003. The lease is renewable for two additional one-year periods. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.





ITEM 3.    
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





Currently we are not a party to any legal proceedings.





ITEM 4.    
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS





No matters were submitted to a vote
of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.




12




---

##### Table of Contents

PART II.





ITEM 5.    
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS





Our common stock commenced
trading on Nasdaq Stock Markets Over-the-Counter (OTC) Bulletin Board in February 1998. In July 2000, our common stock ceased trading on the OTC Bulletin Board and began trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbol NTII.
The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices of our common stock as reported by OTC Bulletin Board and the Nasdaq SmallCap Market for the two most recent fiscal years.





Fiscal 2001

High

LowFirst Quarter

$
11.00

$
5.94Second Quarter

$
7.88

$
3.47Third Quarter

$
5.00

$
1.84Fourth Quarter

$
3.44

$
1.56





Fiscal 2002

High

LowFirst Quarter

$
4.53

$
2.57Second Quarter

$
5.32

$
2.90Third Quarter

$
5.14

$
3.74Fourth Quarter

$
5.00

$
2.10





As of June 30, 2002, there were approximately 252 holders of record
of our common stock and 17,783,571 shares of common stock outstanding. No dividends have been paid on the common stock since our inception, and we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.




13




---

##### Table of Contents




ITEM 6.    
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA





The following table sets forth certain financial data with
respect to our business. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Item 7 and the financial statements and related notes thereto in Item 8.





Year Ended June 30,


Period from August 27, 1987 (inception) through2002


2001


2000


1999


1998


June 30, 2002(in thousands, except per share data)Statement of Operations Data:Total revenue

$



$
4,781


$



$
100


$
2,100


$
7,031Expenses:Research and development


2,013



1,194



1,896



2,780



2,026



30,172General and administrative


2,637



2,556



1,380



1,059



2,347



17,970Total expenses


4,650



3,750



3,276



3,839



4,373



48,142Operating income (loss)


(4,650
)


1,031



(3,276
)


(3,739
)


(2,273
)


(41,111
)Interest income, net


342



599



161



47



100



3,281Income (loss) before income tax


(4,308
)


1,630



(3,115
)


(3,692
)


(2,173
)


(37,830
)Income tax benefit (provision)


42



(42
)














Net income (loss)

$
(4,266
)

$
1,588


$
(3,115
)

$
(3,692
)

$
(2,173
)

$
(37,830
)Basic net income (loss) per share

$
(.24
)

$
.10


$
(.27
)

$
(.49
)

$
(.32
)Diluted net income (loss) per share

$
(.24
)

$
.08


$
(.27
)

$
(.49
)

$
(.32
)Weighted average shares of common stock outstandingbasic


17,570



16,532



11,461



7,555



6,862Weighted average shares of common stock outstandingdiluted


17,570



21,071



11,461



7,555



6,862





June 30,2002


2001


2000


1999


1998(in thousands)Balance Sheet Data:Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

$
5,694


$
10,182


$
8,554


$
201


$
2,021Working capital (deficit)


5,043



9,806



7,886



(890
)


1,582Total assets


7,665



11,458



8,683



249



2,133Total current liabilities


1,052



762



769



1,135



498Deficit accumulated during development stage


(37,830
)


(33,564
)


(35,152
)


(32,037
)


(28,345
)Stockholders equity (deficit)


6,613



10,696



7,913



(886
)


1,636




14




---

##### Table of Contents




Selected quarterly financial information is summarized below:





Fiscal 2002September 30


December 31


March 31


June 30


Total(in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)Quarterly Results of OperationsTotal revenue

$



$



$



$



$
Research and development


(256
)


(361
)


(504
)


(892
)


(2,013
)General and administrative


(500
)


(529
)


(657
)


(951
)


(2,637
)Interest income


117



93



72



60



342Loss before income taxes


(639
)


(797
)


(1,089
)


(1,783
)


(4,308
)Income tax benefit










42







42Net loss

$
(639
)

$
(797
)

$
(1,047
)

$
(1,783
)

$
(4,266
)Basic and diluted net loss per share

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.05
)

$
(0.06
)

$
(0.10
)

$
(0.24
)Weighted average shares of common stock outstandingbasic and diluted


17,504



17,508



17,565



17,691



17,570





Fiscal 2001September 30


December 31


March 31


June 30


Total(in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)Quarterly Results of OperationsTotal revenue

$



$
2,531


$



$
2,250


$
4,781Research and development


(236
)


(318
)


(451
)


(189
)


(1,194
)General and administrative


(529
)


(591
)


(808
)


(628
)


(2,556
)Interest income


147



166



152



134



599Loss before income taxes


(618
)


1,788



(1,107
)


1,567



1,630Income tax expense














(42
)


(42
)Net loss

$
(618
)

$
1,788


$
(1,107
)

$
1,525


$
1,588Basic net loss per common share

$
(0.04
)

$
0.11


$
(0.07
)

$
0.09


$
0.10Diluted net loss per common share

$
(0.04
)

$
0.08


$
(0.07
)

$
0.08


$
0.08Weighted average shares of common stock outstandingbasic


16,104



16,104



16,506



17,328



16,532Weighted average shares of common stock outstandingdiluted


16,104



21,649



16,506



20,108



21,071




15




---

##### Table of Contents




ITEM 7.    
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS





Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under the caption Factors that May Affect Future Results below and
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Actual results may differ materially from those projected. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events after the date of this
report.





OVERVIEW





We are an emerging drug development company focused on the clinical development and regulatory approval of neuroscience drugs. We are developing neuroprotective and neuromodulatory agents to treat
progressive neurological impairments characteristic of various nervous system disorders, including diabetic neuropathy and brain cancer. Our strategy is to in-license and develop early-stage drug candidates that target major medical needs and that
may be rapidly commercialized.





Except for fiscal 2001, we have incurred significant losses each year since our
inception. As of June 30, 2002, our deficit accumulated during the development stage was $37.8 million and total stockholders equity was $6.6 million. We expect to incur additional operating losses over at least the next year as we continue to
expand our research and development efforts.





CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES





We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and use of estimates to be critical policies.





Revenue recognition





Revenue related to license fees with non-cancelable, non-refundable terms and no future performance obligations are recognized when collection is assured. Such revenues are deferred and recognized over the performance period
if future performance obligations exist. Non-refundable up-front payments received in connection with research and development activities are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the relevant periods specified in the agreement,
generally the research term. Revenue associated with milestones are recognized as earned, based on completion of development milestones, either upon receipt, or when collection is assured.





Use of estimates





The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates in the financial statements include, but are not limited to, accrued but unbilled expenses in clinical trials, outside experts and consultants and useful lives of property and
equipment for depreciation calculations.





RESULTS OF OPERATIONS





REVENUES.    In fiscal 2002, we had no revenue. In fiscal 2001, we had revenue of $4,781,000, which consisted of license fee payments from Merz
Pharmaceuticals GmbH representing our portion of the payments received by Merz pursuant to its agreements with its marketing partners. In fiscal 2000, we had no revenue. We expect near-term revenues to fluctuate depending upon the ability of Merz to
market Memantine, to enter into additional agreements with marketing partners and the amounts of payments related to such agreements.




16




---

##### Table of Contents




RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES.    Research and
development expenses were $2,013,000 in fiscal 2002, compared to $1,194,000 in fiscal 2001 and $1,896,000 in fiscal 2000. The increase in fiscal 2002 was primarily due to cost associated with the initiation of toxicology studies and manufacturing of
XERECEPT. The decrease from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001 was primarily due to the absence of any ongoing clinical costs other than the remaining cost for patient data analysis relating to our Memantine clinical trials. We expect that our research and
development expenditures will increase in future years to support product development activities and clinical trials. The rate of increase will depend on a number of factors, including the results of our research and development efforts and clinical
trials.





Our two product candidates, Memantine and XERECEPT  , have completed or are in Phase II or Phase III human clinical testing. Set forth in Item 1 of this Report is a complete description of the
status and anticipated timing of the clinical trials for each of these candidates. To date, we have incurred costs of approximately $8.8 million in the development of Memantine and $13.9 million in the development of XERECEPT. All future costs for
the development and commercialization of Memantine will be borne by Merz and its marketing partners, Forest and Lundbeck. We are currently unable to estimate the costs of completing human clinical trials for XERECEPT due to the uncertainties
inherent in conducting clinical trials and seeking regulatory approval for a drug candidate.





Research and
development expenditures are charged to operations, as incurred. Research and development expenses, including direct and allocated expenses, consist of independent research and development costs and costs associated with sponsored research and
development.





GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.    General and administrative
expenses were $2,637,000 in fiscal 2002, compared to $2,556,000 in fiscal 2001, and $1,380,000 in fiscal 2000. The increase from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002 was primarily due to an increase in employee cost and professional services expense. The
increase from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001 was primarily due to an increase in rent expense, employee bonuses, and activities relating to seeking financing and corporate partnerships.





INTEREST INCOME.    Interest income was $343,000 in fiscal 2002, compared to $599,000 in fiscal 2001 and $161,000 in fiscal 2000. The decrease
from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002 was primarily due to lower average interest rates and lower average invested cash balances. The increase from fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2001 was due to higher average cash balances as a result of a private placement of
our securities in November 1999 and April 2000 and revenue payments received from Merz in fiscal 2001.





LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES





Since our founding in 1987, we have applied a majority of our resources to research and development
programs and have generated only limited operating revenue. Except for fiscal 2001, we have incurred losses in each year since our inception and we expect to continue to incur losses in the future due to ongoing research and development efforts.





We believe that our available cash and cash equivalents and investments of $7,259,000 as of June 30, 2002 are
adequate to fund our operations through at least the next twelve months. In addition, we received $1,400,000 in August 2002, which represented a license fee payment from Merz pursuant to Merzs agreement with its marketing partner in Europe. We
expect to incur ongoing costs in fiscal 2003 primarily for Phase IIB and Phase III clinical trials of XERECEPT  and CRH-analogues and related administrative support. Merz and Merzs marketing partners will pay all future development costs of Memantine.





Our operating activities (used) provided cash of $(3,234,000) in fiscal 2000, $1,372,000 in fiscal 2001 and $(3,913,000) in fiscal 2002. Sources and uses of cash in
operating activities were primarily derived from net operating income (losses).





Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities was $(1,256,000) in fiscal 2000, $(6,213,000) in fiscal 2001 and $452,000 in fiscal 2002. The cash provided in fiscal 2002 primarily represented maturities of




17




---

##### Table of Contents

investments of $1,700,000, less purchases of investments of $1,248,000. The cash used in 2001 and 2000 primarily represented purchases of investments, less maturities of investments.





Financing activities provided cash of $11,617,000 in 2000, $1,140,000 in fiscal 2001 and $111,000 in fiscal 2002.
The amounts primarily consist of the net proceeds we received from the sale of common stock and issuances of common stock upon exercise of stock options and warrants.





We may seek to raise additional funds when market conditions permit. However, there can be no assurance that funding would be available or that, if available, on acceptable
terms. Our future capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including:





| |  | the amount of payments received from marketing agreements for Memantine;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | the amount of royalties received from Merz for future sales of Memantine;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | the progress of our clinical development programs;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------




| |  | the time and cost involved in obtaining regulatory approvals;
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending, and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | the acquisition or licensing of new drug candidates;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------




| |  | competing technological and market developments;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------




| |  | our ability to establish collaborative relationships; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------




| |  | the development of commercialization activities and arrangements.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------




Our future contractual obligations are related to our facility lease. Effective August 1, 2002, we entered into a lease agreement for the Companys current premises.
The minimum payment is approximately $89,000 for the one year term of the lease, which will expire July 2003. The lease is renewable for two additional one year periods.





RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS





In July 2001, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS 141, Business Combinations (FAS 141). FAS 141 supersedes APB 16, Business Combinations, and FAS 38, Accounting for Preacquisition Contingencies of Purchased
Enterprises. FAS 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. FAS 141 also includes guidance on the initial recognition and
measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets arising from business combinations completed after June 30, 2001.





In July 2001, the FASB issued FAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142). FAS 142 supersedes APB 17, Intangible Assets, and requires the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, FAS
142 includes provisions regarding the reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill, reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles, reclassification of certain intangibles out of previously reported
goodwill and the testing for impairment of existing goodwill and other intangibles. FAS 142 is required to be applied for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, with certain early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption
of FAS 142 to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.





In October 2001, the
FASB issued FAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets (FAS 144), which supersedes FAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of (FAS
121). FAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. However, FAS 144 retains the




18




---

##### Table of Contents

fundamental provisions of FAS 121 for: 1) recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used; and 2) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by
sale. FAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 144 to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.





FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS





Our product candidates are based on new technologies and therefore are subject to numerous inherent risks of failure.





Our product candidates are based on new and relatively unproven technologies. As a result, these candidates face numerous risks of failure, including the possibility that these candidates may:





| |  | be found to be unsafe, ineffective or toxic;
| | - | --------------------------------------------




| |  | fail to receive necessary regulatory clearances;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------




| |  | if approved, be difficult to manufacture on a large scale or be uneconomical to market;
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | be precluded from marketing by us or our marketing partners due to the proprietary rights of third parties; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | not be successful because third parties market or may market superior or equivalent products.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Further, our development activities may not result in any commercially viable products. Although Merz has received approval to market
Memantine for the treatment of Alzheimers disease in Europe, Merz and its marketing partners may not receive approval to market Memantine for Alzheimers disease in the United States or elsewhere, or to market Memantine for other
indications. Recently, Forest announced the voluntary withdrawal of its previously filed NDA for the use of Memantine in treating Alzheimers disease. Although Forest stated that it expects to file a new NDA incorporating the results of an
additional Phase III study by the end of 2002, further delays or the failure to obtain regulatory approvals would adversely affect our revenues.





We are dependent on Merz and its marketing partners Forest and Lundbeck for the successful commercialization of Memantine.





We had no revenues in fiscal 2002. All of our revenues in fiscal 2001 and to date in fiscal 2003 have been license fees from Merz related to our portion of payments received by Merz pursuant to its
agreements with Forest and Lundbeck, its marketing partners. The only revenues that we expect to receive in the foreseeable future are our share of payments received by Merz from Forest and Lundbeck, and royalties on Memantine sales made by Merz or
its marketing partners. Although Merz has received approval to market Memantine for Alzheimers disease in Europe, we are not entitled to receive royalty payments for Memantine sales for Alzheimers disease in certain European countries
and any commercialization efforts in these markets would not directly benefit the Company. If Merz is unable to successfully commercialize Memantine, or if Memantine is not commercialized for indications or in markets where we are entitled to
royalty payments, our revenues would be adversely affected.





Under certain circumstances, Merz can terminate our
agreement upon six months notice. The termination of our agreement with Merz or any failure by Merz or its partners to successfully commercialize Memantine after its development would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
conditions and results of operations.





Other than Memantine, we have one potential product that is in clinical development and we
may not develop another candidate product that will receive required regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized.





We are still a development-stage company and, except for Memantine which was recently approved for marketing in Europe for the treatment of Alzheimers disease, we have only one product, XERECEPT, in clinical




19




---

##### Table of Contents

development. The results of our pre-clinical studies and early-stage clinical trials are not necessarily indicative of those that will be obtained upon further clinical testing of XERECEPT in
later-stage clinical trials. It is possible that XERECEPT will not receive regulatory approval or will not be successfully commercialized.





We have relied and will continue to rely on others for research, development, manufacture and commercialization of our potential products.





We have entered into various contractual arrangements (many of which are non-exclusive) with consultants, academic collaborators, licensors, licensees and others, and we
are dependent upon the level of commitment and subsequent success of these outside parties in performing their responsibilities. Certain of these agreements place significant responsibility for preclinical testing and human clinical trials and for
preparing and submitting submissions for regulatory approval for potential products on the collaborator, licensor or contractor. If the collaborator, licensor or contractor fails to perform, our business, financial conditions and results may be
adversely affected.





We have also relied on scientific, mechanical, clinical, commercial and other data supplied
and disclosed by others in entering into these agreements. We have relied on this data in support of applications for human clinical trials for our potential products. Although we have no reason to believe that this information contains errors or
omissions of fact, it is possible that there are errors or omissions of fact that would change materially to our view of the future likelihood of FDA approval or commercial viability of these potential products.





We have agreements and licenses with third parties that require us to meet certain due diligence obligations, provide regular reports and
make royalty and other payments to such parties. Our failure to satisfy these obligations could cause us to lose rights to technology or data under these agreements.





Clinical trials or marketing of any of our potential products may expose us to liability claims from the use of such products which our insurance may not cover.





We currently have a limited amount of product liability insurance only to cover liabilities arising from clinical trials. It is possible
that our current insurance may not be adequate to cover liabilities arising from our clinical trials.





Our current
product liability insurance does not cover commercial sales of products. We cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain product liability insurance covering commercial sales or, if such insurance is obtained, that sufficient coverage can be
acquired at a reasonable cost. An inability to obtain insurance at acceptable cost or otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit commercialization of any products we develop.




20




---

##### Table of Contents




Further reductions in our staff might delay the achievement of planned development objectives.





Each person currently employed by us serves an essential function. We currently employ five persons
full-time and six persons part-time. Any further reduction in force could impair our ability to manage ongoing clinical trials and may have a material adverse effect on our operations.





The market price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, highly volatile.





The average daily trading volume of our common stock during fiscal 2002 has been low compared to that of other biopharmaceutical companies. Because of our relatively low trading volume, our stock price
can be highly volatile.





Factors that may affect the volatility of our stock price include:





| |  | the results of pre-clinical studies and clinical trials by us, Merz or its marketing partners or our competitors;
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | other evidence of the safety or efficacy of our products, or those of Merz or its marketing partners or our competitors;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | announcements of technological innovations or new therapeutic products by us or our competitors;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | developments in patent or other proprietary rights of us or our competitors, including litigation;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  | fluctuations in our operating results;
| | - | --------------------------------------




| |  | government regulation and health care legislation; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------




| |  | market conditions for life science companies stocks in general.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------




ITEM 7a.    
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK





In the normal course of
business, our financial position is subject to a variety of risks, including market risk associated with interest rate movements. We regularly assess these risks and have established policies and business practices to protect against these and other
exposures. As a result, we do not anticipate material potential losses in these areas.





The primary objective for
our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. This is accomplished by investing in widely diversified short-term investments, consisting primarily of investment grade securities. As
of June 30, 2002, the fair value of our investments was $7.0 million and approximately 78% of our total portfolio will mature in one year or less, with the remainder maturing in less than two years. A hypothetical 50 basis point increase in interest
rates would not result in a material decrease or increase in the fair value of our available-for-sale securities. We have no investments denominated in foreign country currencies and therefore our investments are not subject to foreign currency
exchange risk. We do not use or hold derivative financial instruments.




21




---

##### Table of Contents




ITEM 8.    
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors and Stockholders


Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.





We have audited the
accompanying balance sheets of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. ( a development stage company) as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended June 30, 2002, and for the period from August 27, 1987 (inception) through June 30, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.





We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended June 30, 2002, and for the period from August 27, 1987 (inception) through June 30, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.





/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP





Palo Alto, California


August 9, 2002




22




---

##### Table of Contents




NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





BALANCE SHEETS





June 30,2002


2001ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
277,062


$
3,626,700Short-term investments


5,417,434



6,555,575Interest receivable


155,896



132,044Prepaid expenses and other current assets


244,534



253,827Total current assets


6,094,926



10,568,146Long-term investments


1,564,598



861,313Property and equipment, net


5,456



28,820$
7,664,980


$
11,458,279LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable

$
611,021


$
92,008Accrued expenses


441,256



628,210Income taxes payable






41,831Total current liabilities


1,052,277



762,049CommitmentsStockholders equity:Convertible Series A Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 2,332,000 issued in series,
1,372,000 and 1,582,000 outstanding at June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively (aggregate liquidation preference of $686,000 at June 30, 2002)


686,000



791,000Common stock, $.001 par value, 35,000,000 shares authorized, 17,783,571 and 17,503,699 outstanding at June 30, 2002 and
2001, respectively


43,876,705



43,660,557Deferred stock compensation


(136,876
)


(191,626
)Deficit accumulated during development stage


(37,830,056
)


(33,563,701
)Accumulated other comprehensive income


16,930



Total stockholders equity


6,612,703



10,696,230$
7,664,980


$
11,458,279





See accompanying notes.




23




---

##### Table of Contents

NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS





Year ended June 30,


Period from August 27, 1987 (inception) through June 30, 20022002


2001


2000REVENUES:License

$



$
4,781,250


$



$
6,881,250Grant














149,444Total revenue






4,781,250







7,030,694EXPENSES:Research and development


2,013,403



1,193,731



1,896,023



30,171,843General and administrative


2,637,332



2,556,272



1,379,708



17,969,884Total expenses


4,650,735



3,750,003



3,275,731



48,141,727Operating income (loss)


(4,650,735
)


1,031,247



(3,275,731
)


(41,111,033
)Interest income, net


342,549



598,975



160,999



3,280,977Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit


(4,308,186
)


1,630,222



(3,114,732
)


(37,830,056
)Income tax (expense) benefit


41,831



(41,831
)






NET INCOME (LOSS)

$
(4,266,355
)

$
1,588,391


$
(3,114,732
)

$
(37,830,056
)BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

$
(0.24
)

$
0.10


$
(0.27
)Shares used in basic net income (loss) per share calculation


17,569,923



16,531,649



11,460,599DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

$
(0.24
)

$
0.08


$
(0.27
)Shares used in diluted net income (loss) per share calculation


17,569,923



21,070,598



11,460,599











See accompanying notes.







24




---

##### Table of Contents

NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)





Convertible Preferred
Stock


Common Stock

Deferred Stock Compensation

Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Total Stockholders Equity (Deficit)Shares


Amount


Shares

AmountPeriod from August 27, 1987 (inception) through June 30, 1999Issuance of common stock




$



740,863

$
1,616,706

$


$



$


$
1,616,706Issuance of warrants to purchase 304,786 shares of common stock











43,290












43,290Issuance of common stock and warrants at $0.55 per unit








1,010,410


555,725












555,725Issuance of common stock for services and license rights








88,248


120,875












120,875Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants








232,119


296,421












296,421Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan








75,023


164,974












164,974Issuance of 2,332,000 shares of Series A preferred stock and warrants at $2.50 per unit, net of issuance
costs

2,332,000



1,166,000


















1,166,000Issuance of 5,691,000 shares of Series A preferred stock, net of issuance costs

5,691,000



5,573,194


















5,573,194Issuance of 2,657,881 shares of Series B preferred stock, net of issuance costs

2,657,881



1,653,888


















1,653,888Conversion of preferred stock in connection with the initial public offering

(8,348,881
)


(7,227,082
)

1,046,912


7,227,082












Issuance of common stock at $8.00 per share in connection with initial public offering net of issuance
costs








1,840,000


12,817,000












12,817,000Issuance of common stock at $3.25 per share in connection with public offering net of issuance costs








2,530,000


7,143,279












7,143,279Net loss and comprehensive loss

















(32,037,360
)





(32,037,360
)Balances at June 30, 1999

2,332,000



1,166,000


7,563,575


29,985,352





(32,037,360
)





(886,008
)





(continued on following page)




25




---

##### Table of Contents




NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY (DEFICIT)(Continued)


Convertible Preferred
Stock


Common Stock

Deferred Stock Compensation


Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Total Stockholders Equity (Deficit)Shares


Amount


Shares

AmountBalances at June 30, 1999

2,332,000


$
1,166,000


7,563,575

$
29,985,352

$



$
(32,037,360
)




$
(886,008
)Issuance of common stock and warrants at $4.00 per unit, net of issuance costs








5,434,700


4,051,898













4,051,898Issuance of common stock at $5.30 per unit, net of issuance costs








1,200,000


5,727,400













5,727,400Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants








1,357,278


2,017,635













2,017,635Options granted to consultants for services rendered











70,200













70,200Deferred stock compensation











273,750


(273,750
)









Amortization of deferred stock compensation














27,374










27,374Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

(50,000
)


(25,000
)

50,000


25,000













Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan








41,844


19,583













19,583Net loss and comprehensive loss


















(3,114,732
)





(3,114,732
)Balances at June 30, 2000

2,282,000



1,141,000


15,647,397


42,170,818


(246,376
)


(35,152,092
)





7,913,350Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options and warrants








1,129,925


1,115,945













1,115,945Amortization of deferred stock compensation














54,750










54,750Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

(700,000
)


(350,000
)

700,000


350,000













Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan








26,377


23,794













23,794Net income and comprehensive income


















1,588,391






1,588,391Balances at June 30, 2001

1,582,000



791,000


17,503,699


43,660,557


(191,626
)


(33,563,701
)





10,696,230Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants








58,000


80,500













80,500Amortization of deferred stock compensation














54,750










54,750Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

(210,000
)


(105,000
)

210,000


105,000













Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan








11,872


30,648













30,648Comprehensive loss:Net loss


















(4,266,355
)





(4,266,355
)Unrealized gain on securities






















16,930


16,930Total comprehensive loss

























(4,249,425
)Balances at June 30, 2002

1,372,000


$
686,000


17,783,571

$
43,876,705

$
(136,876
)

$
(37,830,056
)

$
16,930

$
6,612,703


See accompanying notes.







26




---

##### Table of Contents




NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS





2002


2001


2000


Period from August 27, 1987 (inception) through June 30, 2002Operating ActivitiesNet income (loss)

$
(4,266,355
)

$
1,588,391


$
(3,114,732
)

$
(37,830,056
)Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:Depreciation and amortization


23,364



22,481



6,018



690,069Gain on sale of property and equipment






(1,500
)






(1,500
)Amortization of deferred stock compensation


54,750



54,750



27,374



136,874Issuance of common stock, options and warrants for license rights and services










70,200



209,975Changes in assets and liabilities:Interest receivable


(23,852
)


(73,424
)


(58,620
)


(155,896
)Prepaid expenses and other current assets


9,293



(211,530
)


1,536



(244,534
)Accounts payable and accrued expenses


290,228



7,344



(165,446
)


1,052,277Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities


(3,912,572
)


1,371,824



(3,233,670
)


(36,142,791
)Investing ActivitiesPurchase of investments


(1,248,214
)


(11,742,170
)


(1,225,592
)


(48,055,654
)Maturities of investments


1,700,000



5,550,874







41,090,552Purchases of property and equipment






(23,523
)


(30,000
)


(412,463
)Proceeds from sale of property and equipment






1,500







1,500Additions to patents and licenses














(283,062
)Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities


451,786



(6,213,319
)


(1,255,592
)


(7,659,127
)Financing ActivitiesPayment of note payable










(200,000
)


(200,000
)Proceeds of short-term borrowings














435,000Issuance of common stock, net


111,148



1,139,739



11,816,516



35,685,898Issuance of preferred stock, net














8,158,082Net cash provided by financing activities


111,148



1,139,739



11,616,516



44,078,980Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents


(3,349,638
)


(3,701,756
)


7,127,254



277,062Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period


3,626,700



7,328,456



201,202



Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
277,062


$
3,626,700


$
7,328,456


$
277,062Supplemental Disclosures:Conversion of short-term-borrowings to Series A preferred stock

$



$



$



$
235,000Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

$
105,000


$
350,000


$
25,000


$
7,707,082Deferred stock compensation related to options granted

$



$



$
273,750


$
273,750





See accompanying notes.




27




---

##### Table of Contents




NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Note 1.    Description of Business And Summary of Significant Accounting Policies





Description of Business





Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. (NTI ® ,
we, or the Company) is an emerging drug development company focused on the clinical evaluation and regulatory approval of neuroscience drugs. The Companys strategy is to in-license and develop early-stage drug
candidates that target major medical needs and which can be rapidly commercialized. The Companys experienced management team oversees the human clinical trials necessary to establish preliminary evidence of efficacy and seeks partnerships with
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to complete development and marketing of our product candidates.





The
Companys principal activities to date involve research and development of drug delivery systems using proprietary technology, in-licensing of a product candidate, recruiting key personnel, establishing a manufacturing process and raising
capital to finance its development operations. The Company is classified as a development stage company.





In the
course of our development activities, we have incurred significant losses and, although the Company was profitable in the year ended June 30, 2001, it will likely incur additional losses in the year ending June 30, 2003. The Company may seek to
raise additional funds whenever market conditions permit. However, there can be no assurance that funding will be available from any of these sources, or, if available, that it will be available on acceptable terms. If the Company is not able to
raise adequate funds, it may be required to delay, scale back, or terminate its clinical trials or to obtain funds through entering into arrangements with collaborative partners or others.





Revenue Recognition





Revenue
related to license fees with non-cancelable, non-refundable terms and no future performance obligations are recognized when collection is assured. Such revenues are deferred and recognized over the performance period if future performance
obligations exist. Non-refundable up-front payments received in connection with research and development activities are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the relevant periods specified in the agreement, generally the research
term. Revenue associated with milestones are recognized as earned, based on completion of development milestones, either upon receipt, or when collection is assured.





Research and Development





Research and development expenditures are charged to operations, as incurred. Research and development expenses, including direct and allocated expenses, consist of independent research and development costs and costs associated with
sponsored research and development.





Use of Estimates





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.





Cash Equivalents and Investments





The Company considers all
highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. All of the Company's investment securities are classified as available for sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at estimated fair
value, based on available market information, with unrealized




28




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)




gains and losses reported as a component of stockholders equity. Realized gains or losses, amortization of premiums, accretion of discounts and earned interest are included in investment
income. The cost of securities when sold is based upon specific identification.





Property and Equipment





Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective asset, generally two to seven years.





Net Income (loss) per Share





Basic and diluted earnings per share is calculated using the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase. Diluted earnings per share includes the impact of potentially dilutive securities. As the Companys potentially dilutive
securities (stock options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock) were anti-dilutive for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2000, they have been excluded from the computation of weighted-average shares used in computing diluted net loss per share
for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2000.





The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net
loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):





Year ended December 31,2002


2001

2000Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders

$
(4,266
)

$
1,588

$
(3,115
)Weighted-average shares outstanding:Denominator for basic earnings per share


17,570



16,532


11,461Common stock equivalents:stock options






779


warrants






1,682


convertible preferred stock






2,078


Denominator for diluted earnings per share


17,570



21,071


11,461Net income (loss) per share:Basic

$
(0.24
)

$
0.10

$
(0.27
)Diluted

$
(0.24
)

$
0.08

$
(0.27
)





Stock-Based Compensation





The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at
the date of the grant. The Company accounts for stock option grants in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related Interpretations because the alternative fair value
accounting provided under FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123) requires the use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 25,
when the exercise price of our employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense is recognized.





Stock-based compensation arrangements to non-employees are accounted for in accordance with FAS 123, EITF 96-18, and related Interpretations, using a fair value approach,
and the compensation costs of such arrangements are subject to re-measurement over their vesting terms, as earned.




29




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)







Comprehensive Income (Loss)





In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (FAS 130), we are
required to display comprehensive income (loss) and its components as part of our complete set of financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income
(loss) includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from our net income (loss), specifically, the unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. For the years ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, our comprehensive income (loss) was
the same as net income (loss) as there were no adjustments reported in stockholders equity that were included in the computation. For the year ended June 30, 2002, the components of comprehensive income (loss) have been included in the
Statement of Stockholders Equity (Deficit).





Impairment of Long-Lived Assets





The Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition is less than its carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is assessed using discounted cash flows. Through June 30, 2002, there have been no such losses.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements





In July 2001, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS 141, Business Combinations(FAS 141). FAS 141 supersedes APB 16, Business Combinations, and FAS 38, Accounting for Preacquisition Contingencies of Purchased
Enterprises. FAS 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. FAS 141 also includes guidance on the initial recognition and
measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets arising from business combinations completed after June 30, 2001.





In July 2001, the FASB issued FAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142). FAS 142 supersedes APB 17, Intangible Assets, and requires the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, FAS
142 includes provisions regarding the reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill, reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles, reclassification of certain intangibles out of previously reported
goodwill and the testing for impairment of existing goodwill and other intangibles. FAS 142 is required to be applied for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, with certain early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption
of FAS 142 to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.





In October 2001, the
FASB issued FAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets (FAS 144), which supersedes FAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of(FAS 121).
FAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. However, FAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of FAS 121 for: 1) recognition and measurement of the
impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used; and 2) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. FAS 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 144 to
have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.




30




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)




Note 2.    Investments





Available-for-sale securities were as follows (in thousands):





Cost

Gross Unrealized
Gains

Market ValueJune 30, 2002Corporate debt obligations:Maturing within 1 year

$
4,895

$
2

$
4,897Maturing between 1-2 years


1,550


15


1,565U.S. Government obligations:Maturing within 1 year


520





520Total investments

$
6,965

$
17

$
6,982June 30, 2001Corporate debt obligations:Maturing within 1 year

$
3,735

$


$
3,735Maturing between 1-2 years


861





861U.S. Government obligations:Maturing within 1 year


2,821





2,821Total investments

$
7,417

$


$
7,417





Estimated fair value is based upon quoted market prices for these
or similar instruments. There were no realized gains or losses during the years ended June 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000.





Note
3.    Property and Equipment





Property and equipment consisted of the following (in
thousands):





2002


2001Machinery and equipment

$
187,347


$
187,347Furniture and fixtures


145,426



145,426332,773



332,773Less accumulated depreciation


(327,317
)


(303,953
)$
5,456


$
28,820





Note 4.    Operating Lease Commitments





On April 1, 2001 the Company entered into an assignment and assumption of lease of its executive offices in Richmond, California. The
master lease commenced in July 1997 and expired in July 2002. Rent expense for the years ending June 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $91,000, $92,000 and $52,000 respectively. The Company received $26,000 of sublease income on its former premises for
the year ending June 30, 2000.





Effective August 1, 2002, the Company entered into a new lease agreement. The term
of the lease is one year (expires July 2003) and rental payments are approximately $7,400 per month. The lease is renewable for two additional one year periods.







31




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)




Note 5.    Stockholders Equity





Convertible Preferred Stock





At June 30, 2002, the Company has 1,372,000 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding. The holders of the Series A convertible preferred stock are entitled to receive annual noncumulative dividends of 8% per share
per annum, when and if declared by the Board of Directors. These dividends are in preference to any declaration or payment of any dividend on the common stock of the Company. As of June 30, 2002, no dividends had been declared.





Each share of Series A preferred stock is convertible, at the holders option, subject to antidilution provisions, into
one share of common stock. Additionally, each share of the preferred stock will be automatically converted into one share of common stock upon the election of more than 50% of the Series A preferred stock to convert into common stock. The holders of
preferred stock are entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which their preferred stock is convertible.





In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the holders of the Series A preferred stock have a liquidation preference, over holders of common stock, of $0.50 per share
plus any declared but unpaid dividends. After payment has been made to the holders of Series A preferred stock, the entire remaining assets and funds of the Company legally available for distribution, if any, would be distributed ratably among the
holders of common stock.





Warrants to Purchase Common Stock





At June 30, 2002, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common stock as follows:





Number of Shares

Exercise Price

Issue Date

Expiration Date603,200

$1.00

April 1999

April 20041,784,880

$1.75

November 1999

November 2004431,000

$4.40

November 1999

November 20042,819,080





Stock Option Plan





The Company has elected to follow APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock option awards because, as
discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided under SFAS 123 requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. Under APB 25, when the exercise price of the Companys
employee stock option equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.





The Board of Directors adopted the Companys first stock option plans in 1989. In November 1993, the Board combined the plans and adopted the 1993 Stock Plan. The 1993 Stock Plan was subject to amendment and/or
restatement in February 1994, November 1994, October 1996, November 1997, November 1999 and November 2001. Under the 1993 Stock Plan, 2,700,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance. In general, options are granted at fair market
value on the date of the grant, have a term of 10 years and become exercisable over a period of up to 48 months.







32




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)




A summary of the Companys stock option activity, and related information for the three years ended June
30, 2002 follows:





Shares Authorized


Number of Shares Subject to
Options


Weighted Average Exercise
PriceBalance at June 30, 1999

140,392


1,803,798


$
1.93Options granted

(553,500
)

553,500



3.96Options canceled

36,349


(36,349
)


2.66Options exercised




(604,957
)


2.51Options authorized

500,000






Balance at June 30, 2000

123,241


1,715,992



2.38Options granted

(111,500
)

111,500



3.00Options canceled

62,624


(62,624
)


3.11Options exercised




(85,910
)


1.00Balance at June 30, 2001

74,365


1,678,958



2.52Options granted

(111,500
)

111,500



3.08Options canceled

1,071


(1,071
)


3.73Options authorized

200,000






Balance at June 30, 2002

163,936


1,789,387


$
2.49





At June 30, 2002 and 2001, options to purchase 163,936 and 74,365
shares of common stock remained available for grant, respectively, and options to purchase 1,158,285 and 966,272 shares of common stock were exercisable, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of options exercisable at June 30, 2002 was
$2.38. The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $4.65, $2.10 and $3.23, respectively.





The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options:





Options Outstanding

Options ExercisableRange of Exercise Prices

Shares Outstanding

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Shares Exercisable

Weighted Average Exercise Price$0.01-1.99

878,483

6.22

$
0.92

599,087

$
0.882.00-3.99

583,076

6.02


2.97

368,659


2.874.00-5.99

11,228

4.10


4.70

9,929


4.736.00-8.00

316,600

7.86


6.22

180,610


6.221,789,387

5.98


2.55

1,158,285


2.38





Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and net income
(loss) per share is required by SFAS 123, which requires that the information be determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to June 30, 1995 under the fair value method. The fair value of each option
grant has been estimated as of the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for 2000, 2001 and 2002: Expected volatility calculations based on historical data (.846),
expected option lives of five years, and no dividend yield. Risk free interest rates assumptions were based on U.S. government bonds with maturities equal to the expected option lives of 6.50%, 5.32% and 4.08% for 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively.




33




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)







The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility and
expected life of the option. Because the Companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of employees options.





For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized over the options vesting period. The Companys pro forma information follows (in thousands, except
per share amounts):





Year ended June 30,2002


2001

2000Net income (loss)as reported

$
(4,266
)

$
1,588

$
(3,115
)Net income (loss)pro forma


(4,784
)


1,065


(3,363
)Basic net income (loss) per shareas reported


(0.24
)


0.10


(0.27
)Diluted net income (loss) per shareas reported


(0.24
)


0.08


(0.27
)Basic net income (loss) per sharepro forma


(0.27
)


0.06


(0.29
)Diluted net income (loss) per sharepro forma


(0.27
)


0.05


(0.29
)





In connection with the grant of certain stock options to senior
management, we recorded deferred compensation of $274,000 in 2000. Deferred compensation represents the difference in the market value of the stock on the date granted and the exercise price of these options. Deferred compensation is presented as a
reduction of stockholders equity and is amortized over the vesting period of the option using a straight-line method. We recognized deferred stock compensation expense of $55,000 in 2002, $55,000 in 2001 and $27,000 in 2000.





Stock Purchase Plan





Effective February 1994, the Company established an employee stock purchase plan under which the employees may purchase common stock at 85% of the lower of the share price at the beginning or end of a
designated period. In November 1996, the amount of shares reserved for issuance under the plan was increased by 50,000 to 100,000. In November 1999 the amount of shares were increased an additional 50,000 to 150,000. In November 2000 the amount of
shares were increased an additional 150,000 to 300,000. Under the plan, 144,890 shares remain available for issuance at June 30, 2002.





Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance





At June 30, 2002, the Company has
reserved shares of common stock for future issuance as follows:


Conversion of preferred stock into common stock

5,000,0001993 Stock Plan

1,953,323Warrants

2,819,080Employee stock purchase plan

144,8909,917,293




34




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)







Note 6.    Income Taxes





The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes as required by FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rules and laws that will be in effect
when the differences are expected to reverse.





The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended June
30, 2002 and 2001 consists of the following (in thousands):





2002


2001Current:Federal

$
(40
)

$
40State


(2
)


2Total

$
(42
)

$
42





The current income tax provision (benefit) for 2002 and 2001 is a
result of the federal alternative minimum tax. The benefit in 2002 is primarily due to a change in federal tax law. There was no deferred income tax expense for the years ended June 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000.





A reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) at the federal statutory rate to the income tax provision (benefit) at the
effective tax rate is as follows (in thousands):





Year Ended June 302002


2001


2000Provision (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate

$
(1,508
)

$
571


$
(1,090
)Unbenefited loss (utilization of net operating loss)


1,508



(591
)


1,090Alternative minimum tax


(42
)


42



Other






20



Total

$
(42
)

$
42


$






Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
(in thousands) are as follows:





June 30,2002


2001Net operating loss carryforward

$
5,100


$
13,292Research and development carryforward


1,300



955Other


340



180Gross deferred tax assets


6,740



14,427Valuation allowance


(6,740
)


(14,427
)Net deferred tax assets

$



$






Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon future
taxable income, if any, the amount and timing of which are uncertain. Accordingly, the net deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation




35




---

##### Table of Contents



NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(a development stage company)





NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)




allowance. The net valuation allowance decreased by approximately $7,687,000 and $310,000, and increased by $1,817,000 during the years ended June 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.





As of June 30, 2002, the Company had federal operating loss carryforwards of approximately $12,000,000. The
Company also had federal research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $900,000. The net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates beginning in 2006, if not utilized.





Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and credits may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership
change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits before utilization.





Note 7.    Collaboration Agreement





In April 1998, we entered into a strategic research and marketing cooperation agreement with Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH and Childrens Medical Center Corporation to further the clinical development
and commercialization of Memantine. Pursuant to this agreement, NTI and Merz share scientific, clinical and regulatory information about Memantine, particularly safety data, to facilitate regulatory review and marketing approval by the Food and Drug
Administration and foreign regulatory authorities. Pursuant to this agreement, we will share in future revenues from sales of Memantine for all indications.





In June 2000, Merz entered into an agreement with Forest Laboratories, Inc. for the development and marketing of Memantine in the United States for the treatment of Alzheimers disease,
neuropathic pain and AIDS-related dementia. In August 2000, Merz entered into a strategic license and cooperation agreement with H. Lundbeck A/S of Copenhagen, Denmark for the further development and marketing of Memantine for the treatment of
Alzheimers disease, neuropathic pain and AIDS-related dementia. Lundbeck has acquired exclusive rights to Memantine in certain European markets, Canada, Australia and South Africa and semi-exclusive rights to co-market Memantine with Merz in
other markets worldwide, excluding the United States, where Forest has development rights, and Japan, where Merz has granted development rights to Suntory Ltd., respectively. In October 2000, we received $2.5 million and in April 2001 we received
$2.3 million from Merz under our 1998 strategic research and marketing cooperation agreement, representing our portion of the payments received by Merz pursuant to Merzs agreements with Forest and Lundbeck.





Note 8.    Subsequent Events





In August 2002, the board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to 500,000 shares of our common stock. Depending on market conditions and other factors, repurchases will be made from
time to time in the open market and in negotiated transactions, including block transactions and may be discontinued at any time.





In August 2002, we received a $1.4 million payment from Merz related to the marketing launch of Memantine in Europe.





In July 2002 Forest submitted a New Drug Application to the Food and Drug Administration to market Memantine for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimers disease. In September 2002, Forest withdrew the
application to add additional data from recently completed clinical trials.




36




---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE





None.





PART III.





ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT





The
directors and executive officers of the Company, their ages and positions as of September 10, 2002 are as follows:





Name

Age

PositionPaul E. Freiman

68

President and Chief Executive Officer and DirectorLisa U. Carr, M.D., Ph.D.

47

Vice President, Medical AffairsAbraham E. Cohen

66

Chairman of the Board of DirectorsEnoch Callaway, M.D.

78

DirectorTheodore L. Eliot, Jr.

74

DirectorAbraham D. Sofaer

64

DirectorJohn B. Stuppin

69

Director





Paul E. Freimanjoined the Company as a director in April
1997 and was elected President and Chief Executive Officer in May 1997. He is the former chairman and chief executive officer of Syntex Corporation, where he had a long and successful career and was instrumental in the sale of Syntex to Roche
Holdings for $5.3 billion. He is credited with much of the marketing success of Syntexs lead product Naprosyn and was responsible for moving the product to over-the-counter status, marketed by Proctor & Gamble as Aleve. Mr. Freiman
currently serves as chairman of the boards of Digital GeneTechnologies, Inc., a private genomics company, and SciGen Pte. Ltd. Mr. Freiman currently serves on the boards of Penwest Pharmaceutical Co., Calypte Biomedical Corporation, PHYTOS Inc., and
Otsuka America Pharmaceuticals, Inc. He has been chairman of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of America (PhARMA) and has also chaired a number of key PhARMA committees. Mr. Freiman is also an advisor to Burrill & Co., a San
Francisco merchant bank. Mr. Freiman holds a B.S. degree from Fordham University and an honorary doctorate from the Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy.





Lisa U. Carr, M.D., Ph.D. was appointed Vice President of Medical Affairs in September 1998. Prior to joining the Company in June 1998 as Director of Medical
Affairs, Dr. Carr was Associate Medical Director at the Institute of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases at Syntex Development Research in Palo Alto, California. Dr. Carr has more than eight years of international industry experience in
conducting clinical drug trials in immunosuppression, nephrology, neurology, gastroenterology and cardiovascular disorders. She was Lead Clinical Research Physician at Syntex, directing a pivotal clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil (IND and NDA
approved for solid organ transplantation). Dr. Carr holds a medical degree and a Ph.D. degree magna cum laude from the University of Munich in Germany.





Abraham E. Cohen has been a director of the Company since March 1993 and has been Chairman of the Board since August 1993. From 1982 to 1992, Mr. Cohen served as Senior Vice President of Merck
& Co. and from 1977 to 1988 as President of the Merck Sharp & Dohme International Division (MSDI). While at Merck, he played a key role in the development of Mercks international business, initially in Asia, then in Europe
and, subsequently, as President of MSDI, which manufactures and markets human health products outside the United States. Since his retirement from Merck and MSDI in January 1992, Mr. Cohen has been active as an international business consultant. He
was a director of Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. until its merger with Warner-Lambert Company. He is currently a director of six other public companies: Akzo Nobel N.V., Axonyx, Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Kramex Corporation, Teva Pharmaceutical
Industries, Ltd. and Vasomedical, Inc.




37




---

##### Table of Contents




Enoch Callaway, M.D.is a founder and former employee of the Company and
has served as a director of the Company since September 1987. Dr. Callaway previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company from September 1987 to November 1990, as Co-Chairman of the Board of the Company from November 1990
until August 1993, as Vice President of the Company from September 1988 until August 1993 and as Secretary of the Company from September 1988 until September 1991. Dr. Callaway has been Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry at the University of
California, San Francisco since 1986, where he also served as Director of Research at the Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute from 1959 to 1986. Dr. Callaway was Staff Psychiatrist, SFVAMC, 1996-1997. He is a member of the Institutional Review
Board for SAM Technologies, Inc. and Abratek, Inc. Dr. Callaway is a Director of Phytos, Inc. He holds A.B. and M.D. degrees from Columbia University.





Theodore L. Eliot, Jr. has served as a director of the Company since August 1992. Previously, he served as a director of the Company from September 1988 until April 1992, and as a Vice President
of the Company from September 1988 until September 1991. Mr. Eliot retired from the United States Department of State in 1978, after a 30-year career in which he held senior posts in Washington and was Ambassador to Afghanistan. He was Dean of the
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy from 1978 to 1985 and a Director of Raytheon Co. from 1983 to 1998. He is currently a director of Fiberstars, Inc. and of several non-profit organizations. Mr. Eliot holds B.A. and M.P.A. degrees from Harvard
University.





Abraham D. Sofaer has served as a director of the Company since April 1997. Mr. Sofaer is the
first George P. Shultz Distinguished Scholar & Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, appointed in 1994. He has also been a Professor of Law (by courtesy) at Stanford Law School since 1997. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Sofaer
was a partner at the legal firm of Hughes, Hubbard and Reed in Washington, D.C., where he represented several major U.S. public companies. From 1985 to 1990, he served as the Legal Adviser to the United States Department of State, where he was
principal negotiator on several international disputes. From 1979 to 1985, he served as a federal judge in the Southern District of New York. Mr. Sofaer is registered as a qualified arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association and is a
member of the National Panel of the Center for Public Resolution of Disputes (CPR), a leading organization in the area of resolution of disputes outside litigation. He has mediated major commercial cases. Additionally, he acts regularly as an
arbitrator in merger-acquisition disputes, commercial cases involving valuation of technology, and securities class action suits. Mr. Sofaer is on the International Advisory Board of Chugai Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., a director of American Friends of
the Koret Israel Economic Development Fund and the Koret Foundation and a Trustee of the National Museum of Jazz. Mr. Sofaer holds a B.A. degree from Yeshiva College and a L.L.B. degree from New York University.





John B. Stuppinis a founder and employee of the Company and has served as a director of the Company since September 1988. From
September 1987 until October 1990, Mr. Stuppin served as President of the Company, from November 1990 to August 1993 as Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors, from October 1990 until September 1991 as Executive Vice President, and from April 1991
until July 1994 as Treasurer. He also served as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company from the Companys inception through December 1993. Mr. Stuppin is an investment banker and a venture capitalist. He has over 25 years experience in
the start up and management of companies active in emerging technologies and has been the president of a manufacturing company. He is chairman of the board of Fiberstars, Inc. Mr. Stuppin holds an A.B. degree from Columbia College.





Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance





The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is hereby incorporated by reference to the Section entitled Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held November 14, 2002.




38




---

##### Table of Contents




ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION





The information required by
this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the section entitled Executive Compensation in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held November 14, 2002.





ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT





The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the section entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held November 14, 2002.





ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS





The
information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held November 14, 2002.




39




---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV.





ITEM 14.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES AND


REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K





(a)Financial Statements and
Schedules:    Financial Statements for the three years ended June 30, 2002 are included in Item 8. All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or
notes thereto.





(b)    Reports on Form 8-K: None





(c)    Exhibits:





The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or filed as part of this report.





Exhibit Number

Description3.1

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. (1)3.2

Bylaws of Registrant. (1)3.3

Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock of Registrant. (5)4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate. (1)4.2

Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. (5)10.1

1993 Stock Plan of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. (8)*10.2

Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and its directors and officers. (1)*10.3

License Agreement between the Company and Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. dated May 30, 1990.
(1)+10.4

License Agreement between the Company and The Salk Institute for Biological Studies dated March 31, 1989, as
amended. (1)+10.5

License Agreement between the Company and the Regents of the University of California dated June 13, 1990, as
amended. (1)+10.6

Option Agreement between the Company and the Regents of the University of California dated December 1, 1992.
(1)+10.7

Amended and Restated Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (6)*10.8

Cooperative Agreement among Company, Merz + Co. GmbH & Co. and Childrens Medical Center Corp., effective as
of April 16, 1998. (4)+10.9

Payment Agreement between the Company and Childrens Medical Center Corp., effective as of April 16, 1998.
(4)+10.10

Sublease Agreement between the Company and Ladbroke Racing Corp. dated May 1, 2000. (7)10.11

Employment Agreement between the Company and Paul E. Freiman dated June 10, 2002. *23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.24.1

Powers of Attorney. (Contained on Signature Page)99.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002




40




---

##### Table of Contents

Exhibit Number

Description99.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


---

|(1) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to Issuers Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 33-74118-LA) and is incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1995 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1996 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1998 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1999 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Number 333-92425) filed December 9, 1999 and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | This exhibit is filed as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(8) | This exhibit is filed as Appendix A to Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October
9, 2001 and is incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|+ | Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of these agreements.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|* | This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



41




---

##### Table of Contents




Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





NEUROBIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:

/s/    PAUL E. FREIMANPaul E. Freiman President, Chief
Executive Officer





Dated: September 30, 2002





POWERS OF ATTORNEY AND SIGNATURES





KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Paul E. Freiman as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.





Signature

Title

Date/S/ PAUL E. FREIMAN Paul E. Freiman

President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer) and Director

September 30, 2002/S/    ABRAHAM E.
COHEN Abraham E. Cohen

Chairman of the Board

September 30, 2002/S/    ENOCH CALLAWAY Enoch Callaway

Director

September 30, 2002/S/    THEODORE L. ELIOT,
JR. Theodore L. Eliot, Jr.

Director

September 30, 2002/S/    ABRAHAM D.
SOFAER Abraham D. Sofaer

Director

September 30, 2002/S/    JOHN B.
STUPPIN John B. Stuppin

Director

September 30, 2002







42