alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jerry L. CARR, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-818

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-117

'

DANIEL JAMES LEATHERWOOD, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One and Two of the 

Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Daniel James Leatherwood 

(1), is adjudged guilty as to Counts One and Two of the Indictment charging violations of 8

Case 1:23-cr-00117-MAC-CLS Document 38 Filed 02/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 109
2

U.S.C. §§ 1951 & 2 (Hobbs Act Robbery; Aiding and Abetting), and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 

(Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence).

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 14th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00117-MAC-CLS Document 38 Filed 02/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 110
Tom JENSEN, Petitioner, v. Hannah BLUMENSTIEL, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, et al.

No. 19-890.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

COMMSCOPE HOLDING COMPANY, 

INC. et al., 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Cobblestone 

Wireless, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and CommScope Holding Company, Inc., CommScope Inc., ARRIS 

US Holdings, Inc., Arris Solutions, Inc., ARRIS Technology, Inc., Arris Enterprises LLC, ARRIS 

International Limited, and ARRIS Global Ltd. (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 27.) In the Motion, the 

parties represent that the above-captioned case has been resolved and request dismissal of the 

above-captioned action WITHOUT prejudice. (Id. at 1.)1

Regarding dismissal, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff and Defendants in the 

above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own 

costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case 

not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to 

CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or claims remain. 

1 The Court notes that the parties have stipulated between themselves for the two conditions previously denied

without prejudice. See Dkt. No. 28; Dkt. No. 29 at 1.

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 155
____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of April, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00455-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 04/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 156
Lamar LOVETT, Petitioner v. TEXAS

No. 19-6257

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Jerry Steven PACKARD.

No. D-3048.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Jerry Steven Packard, of Wooster, Ohio, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT E 

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-6 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1566
Top fligh

Ranked based on price and convenience Prices include required taxes + fees for 1 adult. Optional charges

and may apply. info.

Track prices Jun 27 Any dates

Other fligh

One way 1 Economy

Atlanta Shreveport Thu, Jun 27

All filters Stops Airlines Bags Price Times Emissions Con

Cheapest Starts from $244

Additional options based primarily on price

bag fees Passenger assistance

Sort by:

9:26 AM

ATL

10:14 AM

SHV

$244

Nonstop · 1 hr 48 min · Delta · Operated by Endeavor Air DBA Delta Connection 125 kg CO2e

-37% emissions

9:56 PM

ATL

10:43 PM

SHV

$244

Nonstop · 1 hr 47 min · Delta · Operated by Endeavor Air DBA Delta Connection 125 kg CO2e

-37% emissions

5:25 PM

ATL

6:15 PM

SHV

$269

Nonstop · 1 hr 50 min · Delta · Operated by Endeavor Air DBA Delta Connection 125 kg CO2e

-37% emissions

1:15 PM

ATL

2:00 PM

SHV

$299

Nonstop · 1 hr 45 min · Delta · Operated by Endeavor Air DBA Delta Connection 125 kg CO2e

-37% emissions

Prices are currently typical View price history

Date grid Price graph

Best

Based on price and convenience

Skip to main content Accessibility feedback

5/26/24, 1:38 PM Atlanta to Shreveport | Google Flights

https://www.google.com/travel/flights/search?tfs=CBwQAhopEgoyMDI0LTA2LTI3agwIAhIIL20vMDEzeXFyDQgCEgkvbS8wMTNkN3RAAUgBcAGCAQsI____... 1

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-6 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1567
70 more flights

About Privacy Terms Join user studies Feedback Help Center

Displayed currencies may differ from the currencies used to purchase flights.

8:13 PM

ATL

12:03 AM

SHV

$252

1 stop · 4 hr 50 min · American · Operated by PSA Airlines as American Eagle, PSA... 257 kg CO2e

+29% emissions

+1

6:00 AM

ATL

9:46 AM

SHV

$253

1 stop · 4 hr 46 min · American · Operated by Envoy Air as American Eagle 193 kg CO2e

Avg emissions

2:33 PM

ATL

5:52 PM

SHV

$253

1 stop · 4 hr 19 min · American · Operated by Envoy Air as American Eagle 193 kg CO2e

Avg emissions

5:45 PM

ATL

10:35 PM

SHV

$253

1 stop · 5 hr 50 min · United · Operated by Commuteair DBA United Express 221 kg CO2e

+11% emissions

5:45 PM

ATL

9:34 PM

SHV

$306

1 stop · 4 hr 49 min · United · Operated by Commuteair DBA United Express 221 kg CO2e

+11% emissions

4:08 PM

ATL

7:12 PM

SHV

$418

1 stop · 4 hr 4 min · United · Operated by Mesa Airlines DBA United Express, Comm... 211 kg CO2e

+6% emissions

Language · English (United States) Location · United States Currency · USD

Learn more

5/26/24, 1:38 PM Atlanta to Shreveport | Google Flights

https://www.google.com/travel/flights/search?tfs=CBwQAhopEgoyMDI0LTA2LTI3agwIAhIIL20vMDEzeXFyDQgCEgkvbS8wMTNkN3RAAUgBcAGCAQsI____... 2

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 44-6 Filed 06/07/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1568
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CADLEROCK JOINT VENTURE II, L.P.,

 Appellant,

v.

BRAKEISHA TATUM,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-10-00129-CV

Appeal from the

342nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 342-238233-09)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues in

this dispute. To effectuate their settlement agreement, they ask that we reverse the trial court’s order

granting summary judgment and render an agreed judgment in favor of Appellant, Cadlerock Joint

Venture II, L.P., that Appellant recover $30,974 in actual damages from Appellee, BrakeishaTatum,

and that we order each party to pay one-half of the mediator’s fees. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2)(A). We grant the motion. Therefore, without reference to the merits, the judgment of the

trial court is reversed and an agreed judgment is rendered in favor of Appellant. Further, it is ordered

that Appellant recover $30,974 in actual damages from Appellee and that each party pay one-half

of the mediator’s fees. As the motion does not recite any agreement as to the costs of this appeal,

those costs are taxed against Appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

July 14, 2010

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 596 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 596

 Permitting the solicitation of donations in Senate buildings for the 
                 relief of victims of Superstorm Sandy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2012

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Coons, Mr. 
 Carper, Mr. Menendez, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Durbin, 
Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Reed, Mr. Warner, Mr. Wyden, 
Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Enzi) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Permitting the solicitation of donations in Senate buildings for the 
                 relief of victims of Superstorm Sandy.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SOLICITATION FOR SUPERSTORM SANDY RELIEF.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules or regulations of 
the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may solicit another Senator, officer of the Senate, or 
        employee of the Senate within Senate buildings for nonmonetary 
        donations for the relief of victims of Superstorm Sandy during 
        the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the Senate 
        agrees to this resolution; and
            (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may work with a nonprofit organization with respect to 
        the delivery of donations described in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
Leslie Ann HAYMOND, petitioner, v. HELMAND INVESTMENT, LLC.

No. 18-7891.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 5 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 5

Electing Gary B. Myrick, of Virginia, as Secretary for the Majority of 
                              the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Reid submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Electing Gary B. Myrick, of Virginia, as Secretary for the Majority of 
                              the Senate.

    Resolved, That Gary B. Myrick of Virginia be, and he is hereby, 
elected Secretary for the Majority of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Capital Contribution Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15 
 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 
 THIS CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
is made and entered into as of this 20th day of April, 2012, by and between (i) Macho Uno Racing Corporation (“Raceco”) and (ii) Golden Pegasus Racing Incorporated (“Golden Pegasus”). 

W I T N E S S E T H: 
 1. Capital Contribution. Golden Pegasus is currently the sole shareholder of Raceco and in connection with the anticipated initial public offering (the “IPO”) of common shares of Raceco,
Golden Pegasus hereby agrees to pay any and all commissions and expense reimbursements paid to selling agents in connection with the IPO through an additional capital contribution to Raceco. No additional shares are to be issued in consideration for
any such additional capital contribution. Any such additional capital contribution will be paid no later than the closing date of the IPO. 
 2. Representations and Warranties of Golden Pegasus. Golden Pegasus represents and warrants to Raceco: 
 (a) Binding Obligation. This Capital Contribution Agreement is a valid, binding obligation of Golden Pegasus, enforceable in accordance with its terms; and 

(b) No Violation. The execution, delivery and performance of the Capital Contribution Agreement by Golden Pegasus do not violate
any laws, regulations, orders, decrees or agreements binding upon or affecting Golden Pegasus or this transaction; 
 3.
Representations and Warranties of Raceco. Raceco represents and warrants to Golden Pegasus that the execution, delivery and performance of this Capital Contribution Agreement by Raceco do not violate any laws, regulations, orders, decrees or
agreements binding upon or affecting Raceco or this transaction. 
 4. Governing Law. The Capital Contribution Agreement
was entered into and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been signed by Golden Pegasus and Raceco as of the
date first above written. 
  

			
	 MACHO UNO RACING

CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	     /s/ Lyle Strachan

	Name:	 	Lyle Strachan
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	GOLDEN PEGASUS RACING INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	     /s/ Michael Rogers

	Name:	 	Michael Rogers
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer



  
 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALTON GRANT MILLER, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:24-CV-8

§

SHERIFF, SHELBY COUNTY, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Dalton Grant Miller, a prisoner confined at the Shelby County Jail, proceeding

pro se, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. On May 23, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the petition

without prejudice for want of prosecution. Proper notice was given to Petitioner at his last known

address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(C). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the

report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 9:24-cv-00008-MAC-CLS Document 7 Filed 06/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#6) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

2

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 25th day of June, 2024.

Case 9:24-cv-00008-MAC-CLS Document 7 Filed 06/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
King BUSH, Petitioner, v. Kannika SAY.

No. 19-6990

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,895,616
<SECURITIES>                                   201,320
<RECEIVABLES>                                  937,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,716,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,042,487
<PP&E>                                       8,376,093
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,060,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,663,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,120,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,010
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,583,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,663,262
<SALES>                                        486,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               519,955
<CGS>                                          632,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,052,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,940,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,052,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,052,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
Barry BAYS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5110

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS,

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC. and

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

Intervenors. 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP

LEAD CASE

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY LLC; 

AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC. and

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 878
2

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC. and

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION, 

Intervenors.

MEMBER CASE

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC dba Vivato Technologies (“Vivato”) hereby notifies

the Court that it has served Preliminary Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement 

Contentions on counsel for Defendants and Intervenors in each of the above captioned cases via

electronic mail on January 4, 2024.

Dated: January 4, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie

rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Paul A. Kroeger (CA SBN 229074)

pkroeger@raklaw.com

Philip X. Wang (CA SBN 262239)

pwang@raklaw.com

James N. Pickens (CA SBN 307474)

jpickens@raklaw.com

Jacob Buczko 

jbuczko@raklaw.com

Minna Y. Chan

mchan@raklaw.com

Christian Conkle

cconkle@raklaw.com

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 879
3

12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Phone: (310) 826-7474

Attorneys for Plaintiff XR Communications 

LLC dba Vivato Technologies

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 01/04/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 880
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served on January 4, 2023, with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail 

on this same date.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 01/04/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 881
Tony HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. Darlene S. SIMS, et al.

No. 18-8271.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CA, INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CA, Inc.

(“Defendant”) have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant and Defendant’s

counterclaims for relief, if any, against Plaintiff asserted in this case.

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their attorneys of record, request 

this Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendant with prejudice and Defendant’s 

claims, defenses or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff without prejudice, and with all 

attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses borne by the party incurring same. 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 44 Filed 06/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 615
Dated: June 21, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

Counsel for Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc. 

/s/ Daniel P. Hipskind

Dorian S. Berger (CA SB No. 264424)

Daniel P. Hipskind (CA SB No. 266763)

Erin E. McCracken (CA SB No. 244523)

BERGER & HIPSKIND LLP

9538 Brighton Way, Ste. 320

Beverly Hills, CA 90210

Telephone: 323-886-3430

Facsimile: 323-978-5508

E-mail: dsb@bergerhipskind.com

E-mail: dph@bergerhipskind.com

E-mail: eem@bergerhipskind.com

Elizabeth L. DeRieux

State Bar No. 05770585

Capshaw DeRieux, LLP

114 E. Commerce Ave.

Gladewater, TX 75647

Telephone: 903-845-5770

E-mail: ederieux@capshawlaw.com

Counsel for Defendant CA, Inc.

/s/ Kristopher L. Reed

Kristopher L. Reed 

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 4400

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: (214) 922-7143

Facsimile: (214) 922-7101

kreed@ktslaw.com

Russell A. Korn

Joshua H. Lee

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1100 Peachtree Street NE, Ste. 2800

Atlanta, GA, USA, 30309

Telephone: (404) 815-6500

Facsimile: (404) 815-6555

rkorn@ktslaw.com

jlee@ktslaw.com

Edward J. Mayle

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

1400 Wewatta St., Ste. 600

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 571-4000

Facsimile: (303) 571-4321

tmayle@kilpatricktownsen.com

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that counsel for Plaintiff met and conferred with counsel for Defendant 

and this motion is joint.

/s/ Daniel P. Hipskind 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 44 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 616