alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               4,040
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26,452
<PP&E>                                             482,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                      48,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     460,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30,899
<BONDS>                                            318,777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             51
<COMMON>                                                96
<OTHER-SE>                                         110,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       460,792
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    41,281
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       42,174<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,577
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (1,017)<F2>
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
<FN>
<F1>Includes a non-recurring charge of $6,131 related to a binding loan
    commitment that the Company obtained on June 5, 1996.
<F2>Represents an extraordinary loss of $1,017 (net of minority interests in
    the amount of $3,263) on early extinguishment of debt.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00419-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(3) for Improper Venue (Dkt. Nos. 11, 37) filed by Valve Corporation and the Motions to 

Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. Nos. 31, 36) filed by Gearbox 

Software, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Motions to Dismiss”). In the Motions to Dismiss, Defendants

Valve Corporation and Gearbox Software, L.L.C. seek the dismissal of Plaintiff Symbology 

Innovations, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) and First Amended Complaint 

(Dkt. No. 35) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6). Since the filing of the

Motions to Dismiss, Plaintiff has filed a Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 40). 

It is well established that a later-filed amended complaint moots a motion asking the Court 

to dismiss an earlier-filed complaint. See Griffin v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co., 697 F. App’x 793, 797 (5th 

Cir. 2017) (“Once filed, that amended complaint rendered all earlier motions ... moot.”); see also 

Bishop Display Tech LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00139-JRG, Dkt. No. 40 (E.D. 

Tex. Oct. 4, 2021) (“Once Plaintiff filed its amended complaint, the Motion became moot.”); 

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Eaton Corp. PLC, No. 2:19-CV-00290-JRG, 2019 WL 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 46 Filed 03/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 873
2

11250161, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2019) (“Accordingly, the filing of an amended complaint moots 

a motion to dismiss the original complaint.”).

Accordingly, the Court finds that the Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 11, 31, 36, 37) should 

be and hereby are DENIED-AS-MOOT.

So Ordered this

Mar 2, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 46 Filed 03/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 874
Carl LEEPER, Petitioner, v. HAMILTON COUNTY COAL, LLC, et al.

No. 19-935.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Inger L. JENSEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7492

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Gregory Alan MCKOWN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6361.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/23/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       42,096
COMMITMENTS
   2,098   17,902    2,013   35,844   19,795   39,955   39,710    2,141    2,386

CHANGES FROM 10/16/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -454)
   1,131   -1,759     -254   -1,243      583     -366   -1,430      -88      976

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     5.0     42.5      4.8     85.1     47.0     94.9     94.3      5.1      5.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       40)
       5       11        7       19       20       27       36`

---

Updated October 26, 2012
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

6$0681*(/(&7521,&6&2/7'DQG6$0681*(/(&7521,&6$0(5,&$,1&

 Eastern District of Texas

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC

 2:23-cv-0485-JRG

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

02/02/2024 /s/ Richard L. Rainey

Attorney’s signature

Richard L. Rainey DC Bar No. 452996

Printed name and bar number

Covington & Burling LLP

One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street NW 

Washington, DC 20001

Address

RRainey@cov.com

(202) 662-5565

(202) 778-5565

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 13 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 91
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 56 Filed 05/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1984
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                     
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         20,885,903
<SECURITIES>                                   16,445,339
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,163,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,148,405
<PP&E>                                         2,449,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                 897,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,406,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,074,751
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       46,509
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,069,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   53,406,741
<SALES>                                        49,283,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               49,283,426
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  23,974,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,835,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,441,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,137,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,303,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,303,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .67
        


</TABLE>
I, Lou Fatica, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, of
Associated Estates Realty Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:August 3, 2004		/s/ Lou Fatica

Lou Fatica, Chief Financial Officer

G:\2004Q\2q04\lf302cer.wpd
No. 6:23-cv-00507

Robert Duane Hafner,

Plaintiff,

v.

Unknown DeLaura et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Robert Duane Hafner, a prisoner proceeding pro se and 

in forma pauperis, filed this civil suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The case was transferred to this court for proper venue and referred 

to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b).

On May 20, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order to file an amended 

complaint. Doc. 20. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, who 

did not file written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

So ordered by the court on July 16, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00507-JCB-JDL Document 24 Filed 07/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 258
Christopher Benjamin BLANTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7771.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer - Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906








Pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








August 11, 2010

/s/ Kenneth W. JonesKenneth W. Jones

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Harshadkumar Nanjibhai JADAV, Petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 19-7167

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Jacqueline C. MELCHER, Petitioner v. John W. RICHARDSON

No. 18-9831

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 1 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 847
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 848
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 849
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 850
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 851
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 852
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 853
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 854
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 855
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 856
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 857
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 28-1 Filed 03/15/24 Page 12 of 12 PageID #: 858
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0043. IN RE: CYNTHIA LAIN.

On April 4, 2018, the State Court of Henry County issued a bench warrant for

Cynthia Lain arising from her failure to appear. Lain then filed a motion for

supersedeas, seeking to have the state court stay its order pending Lain’s appeal of

the state court’s contempt order. The trial court did not grant the supersedeas motion.

Lain then filed the instant emergency motion under OCGA § 9-11-62 (e) and Court

of Appeals Rule 40 (b).

After reviewing the exhibits filed with Lain’s motion, we conclude that Lain

is entitled to the relief sought. The emergency motion for supersedeas is hereby

GRANTED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 26, 2018

04/26/2018
D.B., Petitioner, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES.

No. 19-6457

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

STA GROUP LLC,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.,

 Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Case No. 2:23-CV-00030-JRG-RSP

ORDER

STA Group LLC previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims ( "th e

Motion"). (Dkt. No. 52.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation 

(Dkt. No. 107) in which he recommended granting the Motion. Motorola has now filed 

Objections (Dkt. No. 111). 

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, the 

Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Motorola’s Objections, the Court agrees 

with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the 

Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. 

Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Motorola’s Objections, ADOPTS the Report and 

Recommendation, and orders that the Motion (Dkt. No. 52) is GRANTED. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of March, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00030-JRG-RSP Document 116 Filed 03/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2582
Joseph Michael GUARASCIO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7552.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      334,343
COMMITMENTS
  81,163  125,644   45,736  185,818  139,915  312,717  311,295   21,626   23,048

CHANGES FROM 07/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -291)
  -4,357    4,100    2,302    6,354   -3,165    4,299    3,237   -4,590   -3,528

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.3     37.6     13.7     55.6     41.8     93.5     93.1      6.5      6.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      141)
      38       56       58       33       37      109      121
```

----

Updated July 13, 2012
Marvin Eugene JONES, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-9553

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
REFUGIO QUINTANAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5926.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/22/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      619,083
COMMITMENTS
  76,908   43,601  175,936  345,158  377,320  598,001  596,856   21,081   22,227

CHANGES FROM 01/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -21,027)
  -1,359   -1,889  -15,502   -5,359   -4,493  -22,221  -21,884    1,193      857

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.4      7.0     28.4     55.8     60.9     96.6     96.4      3.4      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      148)
      38       35       58       68       64      137      130
```

----

Updated January 25, 2013
Priscilla Daydee VALDEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6062.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.