alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pitkin Furniture Company, Appellant, *v.*Willie M. Jackson, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate- Term, Second Department,

March 12, 1973.

*Ira H. Subin*for appellant. *John G. Gray, Jr.,*and *Douglas J. Kramer*for respondent.

Judgment and order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs. No opinion.

Concur — Croat, J. P., Sohwabtzwald and Cone, JJ.
EXHIBIT 11-.1

                              WIRELESS ONE, INC.
                  EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION INFORMATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       1995                   1996                    1997
                                                   --------------        ----------------        ---------------
<S>                                                <C>                   <C>                     <C>
Net loss                                           $  (7,692,474)        $ (39,670,395)          $ (89,139,841)
Preferred stock dividend and
   discount accretion                                   (786,389)                   -                       -
                                                   --------------        ----------------        ---------------
Net loss applicable to common stock                   (8,478,863)          (39,670,395)            (89,139,841)
                                                   ==============        ================        ===============
   Basic and diluted weighted average common
      shares outstanding                               4,187,736            14,961,934              16,940,374
                                                   ==============        ================        ===============
   Basic and diluted loss per common share         $       (2.02)        $       (2.65)          $       (5.26)
                                                   ==============        ================        ===============

</TABLE>


The  above  earnings  per  share (EPS) calculations are submitted in accordance
with SFAS No. 128..  An EPS  calculation in accordance with Regulation S-K item
601 (b) (11) is not shown above  because  it  produces  an antidilutive result.
The  following  information  is  disclosed  for  purposes  of  calculating  the
antidilutive EPS:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                              <C>                     <C>                     <C>

Basic and diluted weighted average common
     shares outstanding                              4,187,736              14,961,934              16,940,374

Shares issuable upon exercise
     of options and warrants                           306,815                 507,407               8,036,231
                                                 --------------          --------------          ---------------
Weighted average shares
     outstanding                                     4,494,551              15,469,341              24,976,605
                                                 ==============          ==============          ===============

Net loss per common share                        $       (1.71)          $       (2.56)          $       (3.57)
                                                 ==============          ==============          ===============
</TABLE>
KT CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. ABS HOLDINGS, LTD., et al.

No. 19-761

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Percy JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7381

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11504]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) will submit 
the following information collection request to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before June 27, 2022 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission may be 
obtained by contacting Dawn Wolfgang at (703) 548-2279, emailing 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e4e4c5f5d7173737b706a6d5e707d6b7f30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90c0c2d1d3fffdfdf5fee4e3d0fef3e5f1bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>, or viewing the entire information collection 
request at www.reginfo.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Number: 3133-NEW.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Title: NCUA Template: Large Credit Union Data Collection.
    Abstract: The NCUA issued regulation under 12 CFR part 702, subpart 
E, ``Capital Planning and Stress Testing'' regarding capital planning 
and stress testing for federally insured credit unions with $10 billion 
or more in assets and supervised by Office of National Examinations and 
Supervision (covered credit unions). The rule authorizes covered credit 
unions to conduct stress tests in accordance with the NCUA's 
requirements.
    Section 702.506 provides for the necessary requirements for those 
credit unions to conduct supervisory stress tests. The ``NCUA Template: 
Large Credit Union Data Collection'' was developed for the credit 
unions to provide NCUA with the specific data needed to evaluate their 
internal assessments of capital adequacy and to ensure their capital 
resources are sufficient.
    Affected Public: Private Sector: Not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,447.
    By Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, the National 
Credit Union Administration, on May 24, 2022.

    Dated: May 24, 2022.
Dawn D. Wolfgang,
NCUA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-11504 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Sara Ann EDMONDSON, Petitioner, v. LILLISTON FORD INC., et al.

No. 19-582.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

### **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS REQUIRED BY**

# **SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Steinway Musical Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis M. Hanson, SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifythat to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   |   |   | /s/ Dennis M. Hanson                 |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |                                 |
|   |   |   |   | Senior Executive Vice  President and |
|   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer              |
|   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial  Officer)       |
|   |   |   |   |                                 |

 

November 10, 2008

 

----
John Gregory Alexander HERRIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M31.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 00-51258

Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIA SOCORRO MAGALDE,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-97-CR-647-ALL-DB)

____________________________________________________________

July 20, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury convicted Maria Socorro Magalde on both counts of an

indictment charging her with possession with intent to distribute

marijuana and a related conspiracy. Magalde claims the

prosecutor’s remarks in closing argument improperly shifted the

burden of proof to her and invited the jury to convict her on the

basis of evidence outside the record.

As Magalde concedes, because her counsel did not object

contemporaneously to those comments, we review only for plain
2

error. See United States v. Andrews, 22 F.3d 1328, 1341 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 941 (1994); see also United States v.

Munoz, 150 F.3d 401, 415 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S.

1112 (1999). In assessing whether the statements were improper, it

is, of course, necessary to look at them in context. United States

v. Washington, 44 F.3d 1271, 1278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 514

U.S. 1132 (1995). “The burden of showing plain error is a heavy

one, and this court will notice plain error only in exceptional

circumstances.” Andrews, 22 F.3d at 1341 (internal quotation

marks, brackets, and citation omitted). 

In any event, review of the comments in their proper context

reveals that none were improper. In short, there was no error,

much less plain error.

 AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.6

 

March 30, 2012

 

American General Life and Accident Insurance Company

c/o SunAmerica Financial Group, Inc.

458 N. American General Center

Nashville, Tennessee 37250

Attention:  Chief Financial Officer

 

American General Life and Accident Insurance Company

c/o SunAmerica Financial Group, Inc.

1999 Avenue of the Stars

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Attention:  General Counsel

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to that certain Unconditional Capital Maintenance Agreement dated as of March 30, 2011 (the “Capital Maintenance Agreement”) by and between American International Group, Inc. and American General Life and Accident Insurance Company (the “Company”).  Capitalized terms, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings set forth in the Capital Maintenance Agreement.

 

Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Capital Maintenance Agreement, the undersigned parties hereby agree that effective as of March 30, 2012, the Specified Minimum Percentage shall equal 435%.  Accordingly, Schedule 1 to the Capital Maintenance Agreement shall be restated as follows:

 

“The Specified Minimum Percentage shall equal 435% of the Company’s Company Action Level RBC.”

 











 

	
 
    	
Yours sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ David   L. Herzog
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   David L. Herzog
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Executive Vice President and
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief Financial Officer
    


 

Acknowledged and agreed:

 

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT

INSURANCE COMPANY

 

	
By:
    	
/s/ Don   W. Cummings
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name: Don   W. Cummings
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Senior Vice President
```

```

----

Updated June 28, 2013
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 01/03/2024 /s/ Amy Hayden Amy Hayden CA Bar No. 287026

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 ahayden@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 798
- 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiff

v.

BOOT BARN, INC., 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-526

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Boot Barn, Inc., 

by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby discloses that it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of 

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., which is a publicly traded company (NYSE: BOOT). BlackRock, Inc., 

a publicly traded company (NYSE: BLK), owns 10% or more of the stock of Boot Barn Holdings, 

Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00526-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 01/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 199
- 2 -

Dated: January 23, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

McGUIREWOODS LLP

/s/ Matthew W. Cornelia

Jason W. Cook

Texas Bar No. 24028537

Matthew W. Cornelia

Texas Bar No. 24097534

2601 Olive Street, Suite 2100

Dallas, Texas 75201

Tel: (214) 932-6400

Fax: (214) 932-6499

jcook@mcguirewoods.com

mcornelia@mcguirewoods.com

Counsel for Defendant

Boot Barn, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served with a copy of the foregoing document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

on January 23, 2024. 

/s/ Matthew W. Cornelia

Matthew W. Cornelia

Case 2:23-cv-00526-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 01/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 200
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11799]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Early-stage Development of Data 
Science Technologies for Infectious and Immune-mediated Diseases 
(U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed); Exploratory Data Science Methods 
and Algorithm Development in Infectious and Immune-mediated 
Diseases.
    Date: June 23-24, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Thomas F. Conway, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-507-9685, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 26, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11799 Filed 6-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-28-MAC

'

JEREMY PATE, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jeremy Pate, is adjudged 

Case 9:23-cr-00028-MAC-CLS Document 65 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 180
2

guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846—Conspiracy 

to Possess and Possess with the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine.

Case 9:23-cr-00028-MAC-CLS Document 65 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 181
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 24, 2007

Mr. O. Rey Rodriguez

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. James A. Rasmussen

Rasmussen Law Office

1101 Scott Avenue, Suite 17

Wichita Falls, TX 76307-8185

RE:Case Number:  06-0677

Court of Appeals Number:  02-05-00203-CV

Trial Court Number:  CCL-634-04-E

Style:BOBBY ELLEDGE D/B/A ELLEDGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND/OR ELLEDGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

v.

FRIBERG-COOPER WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-0677Page 1**
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION

¦ Complete items 1,2, and 3.

¦ Print your name and address on the reverse

so that we can return the card to you.

¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpieoe,

or on the front if space permits. 

1. Article Addressed to:

iiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii

9590 9402 7337 2028 6830 41

2. Article Number (Transfer from se vice label)

7021 0150 0000 LTfll 0 54

PS Form 3811 . July 2020 PS 7530-02-000-9053

COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY

DEC 2 0 2023

3. Service ®h6RK, U.S. U IKlk-[5te rltyM l Express®

Adult SigndlrfdHSfel bSiter ! Registered Mail Restricte 

Certified all® Delivery

Certified ail Restricte Delivery Si nature ConfirmationTM

Collect on Delivery Signature Confirmation

Collect on Delivery Restricted Deliver Restricted Delivery

' sured all

sured all Restricted Delivery

er $500) 

Domestic Return Receipt

Case 4:23-cv-00401-ALM-KPJ Document 35 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 172
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DECLARATION OF DARIO A. MACHLEIDT IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 

I, Dario A. Machleidt, hereby declare as follow: 

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton. I am 

counsel for Valve Corporation (“Valve”). I am admitted to practice before this Court, and I have 

personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. If called as a witness, I could and would 

testify competently thereto. 

2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of Valve’s objections and 

responses to Plaintiff’s venue interrogatories, served on January 22, 2024. 

3. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Valve’s objections and 

responses to Plaintiff’s requests for production of venue related documents, served on January 

22, 2024. 

4. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of an email from Randall 

Garteiser to counsel for Valve, sent on April 15, 2024. 

5. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of an email from Randall 

Garteiser to counsel for Valve, sent on November 16, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-1 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1814
2 

6. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter from counsel for Valve 

to Randall Garteiser, sent on October 2, 2023. 

7. Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of a letter from counsel for Valve 

to Randal Garteiser, sent on November 15, 2023. 

8. Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a letter from counsel for Valve 

to Randall Garteiser, sent on March 20, 2024. 

9. Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and accurate depiction of the website 

https://search.docketnavigator.com/patent/attorney/72043/0, captured on April 22, 2024. 

10. Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and accurate depiction of the website 

https://ghiplaw.com/victories/, captured on April 22, 2024. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on April 22, 2024 

/s/ Dario A. Machleidt 

 Dario A. Machleidt

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 90-1 Filed 08/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1815
Murphy J. PAINTER, Petitioner v. Shane EVANS.

No. 19-63

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2 — Certification of Chief Financial Officer — Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Triad Guaranty Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.      Date:     November 9, 2006           By: /s/ Kenneth W. Jones