alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,Thomas P. Maun, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro ComponentTechnology, Inc.:

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

 

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 
| Dated:  November  3, 2003 | By:                       |  /s/ Thomas P. Maun |   |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                | Thomas P.  Maun           |
|                                | Chief  Financial Officer  |
|                                | Chief  Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MALIK OGLETREE (2)

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00281-SDJ

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for 

administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The 

Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The 

Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea 

and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts 

Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review 

of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant 

Malik Ogletree GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of 

Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 and 2 - Hobbs Act Robbery, Aiding and Abetting.

Case 4:23-cr-00281-SDJ-BD Document 67 Filed 11/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

336
2

Case 4:23-cr-00281-SDJ-BD Document 67 Filed 11/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

337
Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP   Document 37   Filed 05/23/24   Page 1 of 1 PageID #:  370
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      367,704
COMMITMENTS
  81,098  122,141   94,619  156,572  118,421  332,289  335,181   35,415   32,523

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        -98)
  -1,679  -28,696    3,390     -488   25,220    1,223      -86   -1,321      -12

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.1     33.2     25.7     42.6     32.2     90.4     91.2      9.6      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      172)
      50       75       75       33       32      134      139
```

----

Updated June 21, 2013
Seifullah ABDUL-SALAAM, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6872.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
SAFETY COMPONENTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  Exhibit 21.1 - Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  Name of Subsidiary(1)                                           Jurisdiction Where Organized

<S>                                                                               <C>
Safety Components Fabric Technologies, Inc.                                                Delaware

Automotive Safety Components International, Inc.                                           Delaware

ASCI Holdings Germany (DE), Inc.                                                           Delaware

ASCI Holdings Mexico (DE), Inc.                                                            Delaware

ASCI Holdings UK (DE), Inc.                                                                Delaware

ASCI Holdings Czech (DE), Inc.                                                             Delaware

Automotive Safety Components International GmbH & Co. KG                                   Germany

Automotive Safety Components International Verwaltungs GmbH                                Germany

Automotive Safety Components International S.A. de C.V.                                    Mexico

Automotive Safety Components International Limited                                         United Kingdom

Automotive Safety Components International, s.r.o.                                         Czech Republic

Automotive Safety Components International RO S.R.L.                                       Romania

ASCI Holdings Asia-Pacific, LLC                                                            Delaware

SCI China Investment Company, Limited(2)                                                   Hong Kong

Automotive Safety Components International (Changshu) Co., Ltd.                            People's Republic of China

Automotive Safety Components International GT (Proprietary) Limited(3)                     South Africa
</TABLE>

(1)   Unless  otherwise  indicated,  each  subsidiary  is  wholly  owned  by the
      Registrant and/or its other wholly owned subsidiaries.

(2)   ASCI Holdings Asia-Pacific owns 65% of this entity.

(3)   Automotive Safety Components  International GmbH & Co. KG owns 75% of this
      entity.

                                        1
John M. MARSHALL, et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 19-969

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David Zachary MORGAN, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 19-494

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion of Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
George Djura JAKUBEC, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9673

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 33806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11913]



[[Page 33806]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4601-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4601-DR), dated May 8, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on May 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Leda M. Khoury, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Robert A. Haywood as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-11913 Filed 6-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor, 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOVANT-INTERVENOR ERICSSON INC.’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 57-1 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 402
Before the Court are Movant-Intervenor Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”)’s Unopposed Motions 

to Intervene. (Dkt. No. ); (Dkt. No. ); (Dkt. No. ). Ericsson moved to intervene 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b). Having 

considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that 

the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, Ericsson is permitted to intervene 

in theses actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive pleading in intervention on or 

before . 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 57-1 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 403
Kouwanii BRUNSTORFF, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5134

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00449-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

AND INFORMATION BY NON-PARTY ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

WHEREAS, prior to the disclosure in this matter of its confidential information, non- party 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) seeks protections in addition to those set forth in the 

Protective Order previously stipulated to by the Parties and entered by the Court. [Dkt. No. 32 (the 

“Protective Order”)]

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated among the Parties and ORDERED pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(c) that:

A. Scope

1. This Supplemental Protective Order sets forth additional restrictions governing

the disclosure of Protected Material that constitutes or includes confidential or proprietary 

information or trade secrets of AMD (“AMD Protected Material”).

2. Except as supplemented or amended herein, the provisions of the Protective

Order will apply to AMD Protected Material. In the event of a conflict between the Protective 

Order and this Supplemental Protective Order, the terms of this Supplemental Protective Order

will govern.

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 60-1 Filed 11/25/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:

1143
-2-

3. Except as expressly stated otherwise, all terms used in this Supplemental 

Protective Order have the same meaning as used in the Protective Order.

B. Modifications to the Protective Order

4. Amend the final sentence in paragraph 1(a) as follows:

For the avoidance of doubt, the producing Party may designate as source 

code make files, link files, algorithms, pseudocode, and other humanreadable files used in the generation, building or compiling of software or 

firmware; RTL, VHDL, Verilog, netlists, design databases, schematics, 

layout files, mask files, and other human-readable or machine-readable files 

used in the design, generation, building, synthesis, layout, or manufacture of 

integrated circuits; and electronic or hard copy prints or excerpts of any of 

these files.

5. With regard to Paragraph 11 of the Protective Order, the patent prosecution bar 

applies with respect to receipt of AMD’s Protected Material.

SO ORDERED this ____ day of ______________, 20__.

_________________________________

 [Judge]

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 60-1 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:

1144
-3-

Exhibit A

CERTIFICATION OF OUTSIDE CONSULTANT 

REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER

I, , state:

1. I have read the Supplemental Protective Order for AMD Protected Material and 

understand and will abide by its terms.

I state under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct.

Executed on ___________________, 20____. ____________________________

Signature

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 60-1 Filed 11/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:

1145
Herichie PAUL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9643

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/16/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       34,656
COMMITMENTS
   2,858    6,332    2,116   28,992   25,624   33,966   34,072      690      584

CHANGES FROM 07/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        513)
      -2    1,682     -356    1,747      221    1,389    1,547     -876   -1,034

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.2     18.3      6.1     83.7     73.9     98.0     98.3      2.0      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       41)
       9        7        5       20       19       31       29`

---

Updated July 19, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      30,740,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,152,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               52,431,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (8,718,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           131,827,000
<PP&E>                                     652,158,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             790,156,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       69,964,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       74,008,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   251,575,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               790,156,000
<SALES>                                     84,991,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           184,991,000
<CGS>                                      114,419,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              556,470,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (49,862,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          52,576,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (386,970,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (386,970,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (386,970,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (9.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.95)


</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

ROCKY DWAYNE HILL, #0102088, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

GREGG COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-383-JDK-KNM 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Rocky Dwayne Hill filed this pro se civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole 

Mitchell for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On January 2, 2024, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the 

Court dismiss this case without prejudice for want of prosecution. Docket No. 15. A 

copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff. However, no objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Case 6:23-cv-00383-JDK-KNM Document 16 Filed 02/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 67
2 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 15) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of 

prosecution. 

Signed this

Feb 14, 2024

Case 6:23-cv-00383-JDK-KNM Document 16 Filed 02/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 68
P. HANNAH, Petitioner, v. Joseph MAGUIRE, Acting Director, Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

No. 19-549.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Navarre
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2005 (the "Quarterly
Report"), I, Eric H. Paulson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78o(d)); and

      2.    The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered
            by the Quarterly Report.

February 14, 2005                              By /s/ Eric H. Paulson
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Eric H. Paulson
                                               Chairman of the Board, President
                                               and Chief Executive Officer

                                       3