alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,009
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,690
<PP&E>                                         4,053,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,806,119)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,454,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,940
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,448,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,454,549
<SALES>                                        228,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,708
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  91,916<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23





                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-88518 and 33-88520) of Rouge Steel Company of our
report dated January 29, 1997 appearing on page 31 of the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.  We also consent to the application
of such report to the Financial Statement Schedules for the three years ended
December 31, 1996 listed under Item 14(a) of Rouge Steel Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 when such schedules are read
in conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our report.  The
audits referred to in such report also included these schedules.




PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Detroit, Michigan
February 10, 1997
William J. BARNES Jr., Petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 19-5319

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.
EXHIBIT 18

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-19 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 269
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-19 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
Page 2 

https://www.t-mobile.com/support/home-internet/connect/google-nest-wifi-route

IEEE 802.11 – 2020 IEEE 802.11 – 2020 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-19 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 2
Page 3 

IEEE 802.11 - 2020 

10[a] a wireless transceiver to send and receive data; and 

APs include a wireless transceiver to send and receive data. IEEE 802.11 - 2020 IEEE 802.11 - 2020 

10[b] a clock, APs include a clock, such as the TSF timer. 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-19 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 2
Page 4 

IEEE 802.11 - 2020 

10[c] said first access point to: The APs sold by T-Mobile are configured to perform as described in limitations 10[d] transmit a beacon signal, said beacon signal comprising a value of the clock of the first access point at a time when the first access point transmits that beacon signal, 

Beacon frames comprise the value of the TSF timer at the time of transmission. IEEE 802.11 - 2020 

10[e] such that a second access point operating in the multichannel radio system synchronizes a clock of that second access point by extracting the time data from the beacon signal of the first access point and adjusting the clock of the second access point in accordance with that time data from the beacon signal of the first access point. 

In mesh networks, the mesh STA examines the reception time of the Beacon fram

most delayed neighbor STA. IEEE 802.11 – 2020 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-19 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 2
John G. CURRY, Petitioner, v. Mark Joseph LOPEZ, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County, et al.

No. 18-9750.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2296

AN ACT

To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to provide that the number of members on

the legislature of the Virgin Islands and thenumber of such members constituting a quorumshall be determined by the laws of the Virgin Islands, and for other purposes.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2296

AN ACT

To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands

to provide that the number of members on the legislature

of the Virgin Islands and the number of such members

constituting a quorum shall be determined by the laws

of the Virgin Islands, and for other purposes.
2

•HR 2296 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SIZE OF LEGISLATURE.

4 Section 5(b) of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin

5 Islands (48 U.S.C. 1571(b)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘fifteen’’; and

7 (2) by inserting after the first sentence the fol8 lowing: ‘‘The number of such senators shall be de9 termined by the laws of the Virgin Islands.’’.

10 SEC. 2. NUMBER CONSTITUTING QUORUM.

11 The first sentence of section 9(a) of the Revised Or12 ganic Act of the Virgin Islands (48 U.S.C. 1575(a)) is

13 amended to read as follows: ‘‘The number of members of

14 the legislature needed to constitute a quorum shall be de15 termined by the laws of the Virgin Islands.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali REHAIF, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 11, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.
Theodore Michael BREWSTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7568.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Xiu Jian SUN, Petitioner, v. Michael P. KELLY, et al.

No. 19-803

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Earl King

No. 06-17-00171-CR

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 15, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 6:23-cv-00434

Rocky Dwayne Hill,

Plaintiff,

v.

Gregg County Sheriff’s Office, et al., 

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Rocky Hill, an inmate of the Gregg County Jail proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining about alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. 

On September 5, 2023, the magistrate judge ordered plaintiff 

to file an amended complaint setting out a short and plain statement of his claims. Doc. 5. Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of 

time to comply with the order. Doc. 9. The court granted plaintiff’s motion, extending the deadline to November 17, 2023. Doc. 

10. To date, however, plaintiff has not complied with the order, 

nor has he responded in any way. 

Accordingly, on November 30, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending dismissal of the lawsuit without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the court. Doc. 

11. A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at his last known 

address, but no objections have been received. The Fifth Circuit 

has explained that where a letter is properly placed in the United 

States mail, a presumption exists that the letter reached its destination in the usual time and was actually received by the person 

to whom it was addressed. Faciane v. Sun Life Assurance Company 

of Canada, 931 F.3d 412, 420-21 (5th Cir. 2019). 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’nccc, 79 F.3d 

Case 6:23-cv-00434-JCB-KNM Document 12 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 36
- 2 -

1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s 

report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s lawsuit is 

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an 

order of the court. 

So ordered by the court on April 15, 2024.

J. CA MPBE LL BAR KE R

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00434-JCB-KNM Document 12 Filed 04/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 37
HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hi-Shear Technology Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1, I, Jan L. Hauhe, Chief Financial Officer of Hi-Shear Technology Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear Technology Corporation.











by:
/s/ Jan L. HauheJan L. HauheChief Financial OfficerDate:
September 25, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and will be retained by
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-20727)  pertaining to  the  1995  Stock Option  Plan  of Kellstrom
Industries, Inc.  of  our report  dated  March 21,  1996,  with respect  to  the
combined  financial statements of International  Aircraft Support as of December
31, 1995 and for the year then ended included in this Form 10-KSB.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Francisco, California
March 28, 1997

<PAGE>

<PAGE>
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 33-75750) of Kellstrom Industries, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated March 21, 1996, with respect to the combined
financial statements of International Aircraft Support as of December 31, 
1995 and for the year then ended included in this Form 10-KSB.

                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 28, 1997


<PAGE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

LISA MICHELLE BALLENGER

vs.

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

§

§

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23cv441-JCB

§

§ 

§

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint seeking judicial review of the 

Commissioner’s unfavorable decision concerning her entitlement to disability insurance benefits

under Title II of the Social Security Act. ECF 1. The case is referred to the undersigned pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Commissioner filed an Unopposed Motion to Reverse with Remand. ECF 

12. 

The Commissioner’s motion seeks a remand for further administrative proceedings 

pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which states:

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the 

record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a 

rehearing.

The Commissioner asserts that Plaintiff does not oppose the requested relief.

RECOMMENDATION

It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Unopposed Motion to Reverse with Remand and 

Enter Judgment (ECF 12) be GRANTED. The Commissioner’s final administrative decision 

Case 6:23-cv-00441-JCB-KNM Document 13 Filed 02/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

668
2

should be REVERSED and the matter REMANDED to the Commissioner for further 

administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and 

file written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b). Written objections shall not exceed eight pages. Local Rule CV-72(c).

A party’s failure to file written objections to the findings, conclusions and 

recommendations contained in this Report within fourteen days after service shall bar that party 

from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions and recommendations 

and, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed 

factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. 

United Servs. Auto. Assn., 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir.1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on 

other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen 

days).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of February, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00441-JCB-KNM Document 13 Filed 02/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

669
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.A., A.M.V., N.A.V., J.A.V., children

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00709

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 02310J

Trial court: 313th Distri ct Court of Harris County

This appeal involves the termination of the parent

- child relationship

. Ap pellant

, K

. G.V.,
has filed a n unopposed motion to exten d time to file h er brief . The motion is GRAN TED

. Appellant ’ s brief is due on Decembe r 28, 2020

.

B e cause this is a termination case, the Court is required to bring this appeal to final disp osition within 180 days of the date of the notice of appeal was filed so far as reasonably possible. See T EX

. R

. J UD

. A DMI N

. 6. 2 , reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T C OD E A NN

. , tit. 2, subtit. F app. For this reason, no additional extensions of time to file a brief will b e gra nted absent

extraor dinary circumstances

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

It is s o ORDERED.

Judge’s signat ure:

___________ /s/ Ju lie Countiss

_____ ______________ Acting individually

Date: December 10, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TONY WASHINGTON, SR., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-211

§

OFFICER SOWELL, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Tony Washington, Sr., an inmate confined at the United States Penitentiary

located in Florence, Colorado, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit against prison officials. 

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge,

at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The

magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice. To date, the parties have

not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00211-MAC-ZJH Document 13 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 25
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 556 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 556

 Expressing the sense of the Senate that foreign assistance funding to 
   the Governments of Libya and Egypt should be suspended until the 
  President certifies to Congress that both governments are providing 
 proper security at United States embassies and consulates pursuant to 
              the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2012

 Mr. Inhofe submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Senate that foreign assistance funding to 
   the Governments of Libya and Egypt should be suspended until the 
  President certifies to Congress that both governments are providing 
 proper security at United States embassies and consulates pursuant to 
              the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that foreign 
assistance funding to the Governments of Libya and Egypt should be 
suspended until the President certifies to Congress that both 
governments are providing, and will provide in the future, security 
necessary to protect United States personnel in and around the United 
States embassies and consulates in these two countries, pursuant to the 
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963.
                                 <all>
```
Carlos Hernandez MACHIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8892

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00467

- CV

IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF GARY NOLAN

On Appeal from the 290th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019CI23476

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No costs are assessed, as appellant
filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Au gust 10, 2023
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2313

To restrict United States assistance for reconstruction efforts in Kosova

to United States-produced articles and services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To restrict United States assistance for reconstruction efforts

in Kosova to United States-produced articles and services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE

4 FOR RECONSTRUCTION EFFORTS IN KOSOVA

5 TO UNITED STATES-PRODUCED ARTICLES

6 AND SERVICES.

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, United States assistance for reconstruction

9 efforts in Kosova due to the armed conflict or atrocities

10 that have occurred in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
2

•HR 2313 IH

1 since March 24, 1999, may only consist of articles pro2 duced in the United States, services provided by United

3 States persons, or any other related form of United States

4 in-kind assistance.

5 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—A determination as

6 to whether or not an article is produced in the United

7 States in accordance with subsection (a) shall be con8 sistent with the opinions, decisions, rules, or any guidance

9 issued by the Federal Trade Commission regarding the

10 use of unqualified ‘‘Made in U.S.A.’’ or ‘‘Made in Amer11 ica’’ claims in labels on products introduced, delivered for

12 introduction, sold, advertised, or offered for sale in com13 merce.

14 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

15 (1) ARTICLE.—The term ‘‘article’’ includes any

16 agricultural commodity, steel, construction material,

17 communications equipment, construction machinery,

18 farm machinery, or petrochemical refinery equip19 ment.

20 (2) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA.—The

21 term ‘‘Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’’ means the

22 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Monte23 negro) and includes Kosova.

24 (3) MADE IN AMERICA.—The term ‘‘Made in

25 America’’ has the meaning given unqualified ‘‘Made
3

•HR 2313 IH

1 in U.S.A.’’ or ‘‘Made in America’’ claims for pur2 poses of laws administered by the Federal Trade

3 Commission.

4 (4) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term

5 ‘‘United States person’’ means any United States

6 national, including any United States corporation,

7 partnership, other legal entity, organization, or asso8 ciation that is beneficially owned by United States

9 nationals or controlled in fact by United States na10 tionals.

11 (4) PRODUCED.—The term ‘‘produced’’, with

12 respect to an item, includes an item mined, manu13 factured, made, assembled, grown, or extracted.

14 (5) SERVICE.—The term ‘‘service’’ includes any

15 engineering, construction, telecommunications, or fi16 nancial service.

Æ