alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  February 8, 2006 | /s/ Stephen T. WillsStephen T. WillsExecutive Vice President
     and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133142 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

v SC: 133142 

 COA: 271579 

Macomb CC: 05-004049-FC 

MARY ANN MCBRIDE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On November 8, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the December 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the 

Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave 

to appeal, we REVERSE IN PART the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND 

this case to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. The 

trial court erred in determining that the prosecutor failed to prove by a preponderance of 

the evidence that defendant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of her Miranda1 

rights. The totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation reflects that 

defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived her Miranda rights. Moran v 

Burbine, 475 US 412 (1986). 

WEAVER, J., concurs and states as follows: 

I concur with the majority’s partial reversal of the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals and with the majority’s order remanding this case to the trial court for further 

proceedings because the totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation 

reflects that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived her Miranda 

rights. See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966). 

I write separately because viewing the defendant’s videotaped confession is 

integral to evaluating whether the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

1 Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966). 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

waived her Miranda rights. Although the defendant’s confession tape should not be 

posted on the Court’s website before the trial in this matter, the Court should post the 

tape after the conclusion of the trial and all possible appeals. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

d0129 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 1, 2008 

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Donald
A. Kurz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company

                               /s/ Donald A. Kurz
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Donald A. Kurz,
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 15, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

THE DAILY WIRE, LLC,

FDRLST MEDIA, LLC; and

THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through its 

Attorney General, Ken Paxton, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et. al.

Defendants. 

Civil Action No.: 6:23-cv-00609

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants’ motion to transfer venue, it is hereby: 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is DENIED.

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 25-8 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 781
Exhibit 2

Case 2:23-cv-00599-JRG-RSP Document 1-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 22
Preliminary Claim Chart

US7046252B2

vs

Renesas TW2864

Case 2:23-cv-00599-JRG-RSP Document 1-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 23
US7046252B2 Renesas TW2864

1. A method for adaptive color contrast

of an image displayed on a display

device, comprising:

Analyst Comment: TW 2864 (i.e., display device) adjusts the

brightness and contrast of the picture and adopts image enhancement

techniques (i.e., adaptive color contrast).

Source: https://www.renesas.com/us/en/products/analog

separating input data into luma and

chroma components;

Analyst Comment: The composite video signal (i.e., input data) is

separated into luma (Y) (i.e., brightness of the image) and chroma (C)

(i.e., color information) by TW2864.

Source: https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/tw2864-

datasheet

collecting luma distribution data; Analyst Comment: This element is infringed literally, or in the 

Case 2:23-cv-00599-JRG-RSP Document 1-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 24
analyzing the luma distribution data;

generating appropriate contrast control

response based upon the analyzed

luma distribution data;

alternative, under the doctrine of equivalents.

The information about the brightness and contrast (i.e., luma

distribution data) of the video signal is collected and analyzed by

TW2864 through luminance processing. Based upon the analyzed

information of brightness and contrast (i.e., analyzing luma distribution

data) of the video signal the brightness and contrast of the picture are

adjusted accordingly (i.e., contrast control response). TW2864 has a

brightness control register for controlling brightness and contrast

control register for controlling the contrast of the video. 

Source: https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/tw2864-

datasheet

modifying the incoming luma

component based upon the contrast

control response;

Analyst Comment: This element is infringed literally, or in the

alternative, under the doctrine of equivalents.

The brightness of the composite video signal (i.e., incoming luma

component) is adjusted by TW2864.

Case 2:23-cv-00599-JRG-RSP Document 1-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 25
Source: https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/tw2864-

datasheet

analyzing the modified luma

component; and generating a nonlinear chroma correction factor based

upon the analyzed modified luma

component.

Analyst Comment: This element is infringed literally, or in the

alternative, under the doctrine of equivalents.

The adjusted brightness of the composite video signal (i.e., modified

luma component) is analyzed and based upon the adjusted brightness

of the composite signal, the hue and saturation of the video signal can

be adjusted independently (i.e., generating a non-linear chroma

correction factor) according to adjusted brightness (i.e., modified luma

component).

Case 2:23-cv-00599-JRG-RSP Document 1-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 26
Source: https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/tw2864-

datasheet

Case 2:23-cv-00599-JRG-RSP Document 1-2 Filed 12/13/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 27
Michael Scott SMITH, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-6200

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

§ 

V. § Case No. 4:23-CR-225 

§ Judge Mazzant

KYLE CARTER §

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE

The Court having considered the United States of America’s Motions in Limine and 

being of the belief that they should be granted, hereby ORDERS that the limine(s) are 

GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 4:23-cr-00225-ALM-AGD Document 122 Filed 08/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1481
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5 
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               191,248
<SECURITIES>                                         1,594,774
<RECEIVABLES>                                        000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         000
<INVENTORY>                                          000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     000
<PP&E>                                               000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       25,878,205<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                000
<BONDS>                                              000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                000
<PREFERRED>                                          000
<COMMON>                                             000
<OTHER-SE>                                           25,479,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         25,878,205<F2>
<SALES>                                              000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     49,767 <F3>
<CGS>                                                000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     179,379<F4>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      000
<CHANGES>                                            000
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,059,951)<F5>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (28.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        000
<FN>
<F1>Total   assets  include   Investments  in  Local  Limited   Partnerships  of
$24,067,369,  Organizational  costs,  net of $4,167 and Other assets of $20,647.
<F2>Total  liability  and  equity  includes  Accounts  payable to  affiliate  of
$363,294 and Accrued expenses of $35,600 <F3>Total  revenue includes  Investment
of $48,317 and Other of $1,450.  <F4>Other  Expenses  include  Asset  Management
fees,  related  party of  $101,530,  General and  administrative  of $57,877 and
Amortization of $19,972. <F5>Net loss includes Equity in losses of Local Limited
Partnerships of $930,339. </FN>          
</TABLE>
Enamiden Celestine OKON, Petitioner, v. Nate KNUTSON, Warden.

No. 19-7353.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       34,762
COMMITMENTS
   2,963    6,074    2,160   29,405   26,312   34,528   34,546      234      216

CHANGES FROM 07/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        106)
     105     -258       44      413      688      562      474     -456     -368

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.5     17.5      6.2     84.6     75.7     99.3     99.4      0.7      0.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       42)
       9        6        5       22       20       33       30`

---

Updated July 26, 2013
Koran McKinley ALLEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9467

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
KELLSTROM INDUSTRIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         154
<SECURITIES>                                 1,830
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,376
<PP&E>                                       3,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,641
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         3
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,621
<SALES>                                     24,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,922
<CGS>                                       16,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,646
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,646
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.45
        



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

CHRIS REMLEY

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00263-ALM

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Information.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Chris 

Remley GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

922(a)(1)(A) – Engaging in the Business Without a License (Firearms).

Case 4:23-cr-00263-ALM-AGD Document 12 Filed 01/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 29
Case 4:23-cr-00263-ALM-AGD Document 12 Filed 01/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 30
Andrew S. HANGO, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-9683

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                       458
<INVENTORY>                                     42,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,427
<PP&E>                                          78,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               75
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,749
<SALES>                                        205,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,407
<CGS>                                          180,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,537
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,537
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70


</TABLE>
Jose Candelario PEREZ-CRUZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7484.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 15

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 234
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 2

On information and belief, Lenovo Moto G Power mobile phones contain a Micron MT29

046 multi-chip module with LPDDR4 SDRAM (Z11N die), 3D NAND Flash (B16A die)controller (PS8226 die). A 3D NAND flash array is a cubic memory array. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 3

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of horizontal select lines; 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of wordlines, which are horizonal select lines. 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 5

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of vertical select lines; 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of vertical select lines. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of memory cells, each memory cell adjacent to a horizontal select line and adjacent to a vertical select line; and 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of floating gate memory cells, each memory cehorizontal select line and adjacent to a vertical select line. 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 6

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 8

orthogonal to each other. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2
David Lee SMITH, Petitioner, v. Rick JACKSON.

No. 19-7528.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 14, 2018

NO. 03-18-00459-CV

J. E., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on July 11, 2018. Having reviewed the 

record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not comply with 

a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of 

prosecution. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court 

below.