alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 31 AND 32 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,737
<SECURITIES>                                    48,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                       591
<INVENTORY>                                     30,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               153,155
<PP&E>                                          30,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,038
<SALES>                                        155,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,833
<CGS>                                           84,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,733
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   255
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,381
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R I C HA R DO L OE R A- C AR DO S A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 10247 D. C. No . 2 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 4 8 3 - GEB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E . B urr e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d J une 18, 2013 ** B efo re: T A L L M A N , M . S M IT H , an d H U R W IT Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R i c ha r do L oe r a - C a r dos aappe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c ha l l e nge s the 63- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f or b e in g ad e p o rte d a lie n f o u n d in th e U n ite d S ta te s , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . W e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED JU N 21 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10247 2 L oe r a - C a r dos aa r gue s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d byf a i l i ng t o e xpl a i n the s e n te n c e . T h e g o v e rn m e n t c o n te n d s th a t th e ap p e a l is b a rr e d b yav a lidw a iv e r . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o w h e th e rad e f e n d a n t h a s w a iv e d h is r ig h t to ap p e a l. See U ni ted Stat es v. B i bl er , 495 F . 3d 621, 623 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . U nde rthe t e rm s of the un cond i t i on al appeal w ai ver i n the part i es ’ pl eaagre em ent , L oera -C ar do saagre ed

“ t o vol unt a r i l y gi ve up the r i ghtt o appe a l the c onvi c t i on a nd the r i ghtt o appe a l a ny as pectof the se nt ence i m po se d i n thi s c as e. ” T he l angu age of the w ai ver r ea ches th e p r e s e n t ap p e a l. L oe r a - C a r dos aa r gue s tha tthe w a i ve ri s none the l e s s une nf or c e abl e , a s the c ourt ’ s f a i l ur e t o e xpl a i n the s e nt e nc e r e nde r e d the s e nt e nc e i l l e ga l . T hi s a r gum e nt f a ils b e c au s e L o e r a - C a r d o s a ’s s e n te n c e d o e s n o t “e x c e e d [ ] th e p e rm is s ib le st atut ory penal ty f

or the cr i m e or vi ol at e[ ] the C on st i tut i on . ” B i bl er , 49 5 F . 3d at 6 2 4 . DI S MI S S E D.
Anthony THOMAS, Petitioner, v. KENMARK VENTURES, LLC.

No. 19-7073

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until March 23, 2020, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule *126238(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC,

5:23-cv-110-RWS

ARBY’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.,

Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc. 

c/o Corporation Service Company 

211 E. 7th Street, Ste. 620 

Austin, TX 78701

ANTONELLI, HARRINGTON & THOMPSON LLP 

4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450 

Houston, TX 77006 

(713) 581-3000 

10/13/2023

Case 5:23-cv-00110-RWS Document 3 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 17
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

5:23-cv-110-RWS 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 5:23-cv-00110-RWS Document 3 Filed 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18
CONSENT OF EXPERT



March 30, 2017



Eldorado Gold Corporation



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation



I, Stephen Juras, do hereby consent to the
filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical reports entitled (i) the “Technical Report for Kişladağ
Gold Mine, Turkey” dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 2010 and (ii) the “Technical Report on the Efemçukuru
Project” dated September 17, 2007 and of extracts from or a summary of the respective technical reports and other information
pertaining to these projects, and the description of all mineral resources, with the exception of the Sapes Project, of Eldorado
Gold Corporation (the “Company”) in the Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “AIF”)
being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Company’s Form 40-F Annual Report for
the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”), and the use of my name in the AIF and the Form 40-F and any amendments
thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF and Annual Report on Form
40-F.



| | By: | /s/ Stephen Juras           
| | --- | ----------------------------
| |     | Stephen Juras, P.Geo        
| |     | Eldorado Gold Corporation   
| |     | Director, Technical Services
| |     |
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF DARIO A. MACHLEIDT IN SUPPORT OF

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO

VALVE’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE

I, Dario A. Machleidt, hereby declare as follow:

1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton. I am counsel for

Valve Corporation (“Valve”). I am admitted to practice before this Court, and I have personal 

knowledge of the matters set forth herein. If called as a witness, I could and would testify

competently thereto.

2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an email sent by Randall Garteiser to 

counsel for Valve, dated April 4, 2024.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on April 30, 2024

/s/ Dario A. Machleidt

Dario A. Machleidt

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 66-1 Filed 04/30/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1572
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7627
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DENNIS M. HENDERSON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-3753-DKC) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 25, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Elisabeth Ann Sachs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his second motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mills v. Henderson , No. CA-96- 3753-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                       1,353,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,446,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    83,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,470,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,313,000
<PP&E>                                      18,691,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,282,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,230,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,073,000
<BONDS>                                      5,925,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,065,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,230,000
<SALES>                                     23,767,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,463,000
<CGS>                                       10,357,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,162,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (36,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             671,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,334,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,334,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,334,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Section 1350Certifications**

** **

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)        theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the periodended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| Date:  | May 12, 2008 |                                       | /s/ Matthew H. Knight |
|--------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |              | Matthew H. Knight  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,757
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,104,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,107,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        587,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           238
<OTHER-SE>                                     362,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,107,814
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,926)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (429)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
James L. MILLER, petitioner, v. Amir KASHANI, et al.

No. 18-6106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,346
COMMITMENTS
  23,548    2,896    1,745   54,684   78,607   79,977   83,248    5,369    2,098

CHANGES FROM 04/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        758)
     -26      532     -182    1,307      700    1,099    1,050     -341     -292

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.6      3.4      2.0     64.1     92.1     93.7     97.5      6.3      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       75)
      11        4        1       39       35       50       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/23/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      199,130
COMMITMENTS
  65,033   37,748    1,187  117,041  153,396  183,261  192,331   15,869    6,799

CHANGES FROM 04/16/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,826)
     469   -3,019     -185   -2,253     -186   -1,969   -3,390   -1,857     -436

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.7     19.0      0.6     58.8     77.0     92.0     96.6      8.0      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      147)
      34       16        8       70       51      109       70
```

----

Updated April 26, 2013
Leslie RUTLEDGE, Attorney General of Arkansas, Petitioner, v. PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-540

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal granted.
Order filed, June 22, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00419

- CV

____________ GEORGA A. MORAN, JR AND SUSAN K., MORAN , Appellant

V.

MEMORIAL POINT PROPE RTY OWNERS ASSOCIATI ON, INC , Appellee

On Appeal from th e 411th District Court

Polk County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CIV 24596



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 10, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed
timely, we issue the following order.

We order Laura Wells , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/17/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      147,690
COMMITMENTS
  50,825   35,145   11,780   67,650   77,799  130,255  124,724   17,435   22,966

CHANGES FROM 09/10/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,594)
     653       94    2,612      -13      578    3,252    3,284    1,342    1,310

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.4     23.8      8.0     45.8     52.7     88.2     84.4     11.8     15.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      48       45       41       57       55      128      128
```

----

Updated September 20, 2013
IN RE Samuel H. WILLIAMS, Petitioner.

No. 18-8907

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-00470Verizon Communications Inc., et al ✔

10/5/2023 ✔ 45 12/11/2023 Deron R. Dacus 00790553 The Dacus Firm, P.C. 821 ESE Loop 323 Suite 430 Tyler, Texas 75701 903.705.1117 903.581.2543 ddacus@dacusfirm.com

Case 2:23-cv-00470-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 10/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 693
Delmer M. ACKELS, petitioner, v. Randy M. OLSEN, et al.

No. 18-6477.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.