alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017029EN.01001201.xml

| 28.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/12

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2017/C 29/10)

Decisions granting an authorisation

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2016) 8596 | 3 January 2017 | Trichloroethylene
  EC No 201-167-4
  CAS No 79-01-6 | Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Netherlands (Filtration & Separation) BV, Oude Kerkstraat 4, 4870 AG Etten-Leur, Netherlands | REACH/16/7/0 | Industrial use as a process solvent for the manufacturing of modules containing hollow fibre gas separation membranes | 21 April 2028 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility. |

Reference of the decision (2)

2

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2016) 8596

3 January 2017

Trichloroethylene

EC No 201-167-4

CAS No 79-01-6

Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Netherlands (Filtration & Separation) BV, Oude Kerkstraat 4, 4870 AG Etten-Leur, Netherlands

REACH/16/7/0

Industrial use as a process solvent for the manufacturing of modules containing hollow fibre gas separation membranes

21 April 2028

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health arising from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies in terms of their technical and economic feasibility.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

2

---
Martin A. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 19-392.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Devell SHORT, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENSBURG, et al.

No. 19-7690.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 570 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 570

 Designating November 8, 2012, as ``National Parents as Teachers Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 2012

    Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. Murray) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating November 8, 2012, as ``National Parents as Teachers Day''.

Whereas all 50 States and 7 other countries provide services through the Parents 
        as Teachers evidence-based home visiting model for nearly 260,000 
        children annually, which offers a multifaceted approach to building 
        strong families and promoting a positive parent-child interaction so 
        children are healthy, safe, and ready to learn;
Whereas Parents as Teachers provides evidence- and research-based training that 
        assists parent educators in developing proficiencies in--

    (1) family support and parenting education;

    (2) child and family development;

    (3) human diversity within family systems;

    (4) health, safety, and nutrition; and

    (5) relationships between families and communities;

Whereas the Parents as Teachers evidence-based home visiting model is an 
        essential component to prepare children to be school ready and narrows 
        the achievement gap between children in poverty and nonpoverty 
        households; and
Whereas there are more than 3,000 organizations offering Parents as Teachers 
        services across the United States and around the world, which give 
        parents of young children the support and information necessary so all 
        children will learn, grow, and develop to realize their full potential: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the November 8, 2012, as ``National Parents 
        as Teachers Day'';
            (2) recognizes the importance of parent education and the 
        role the education plays in the development of a child; and
            (3) commends Parents as Teachers for its work with families 
        across the United States.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40796

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WALTER ERNESTO ESCOBAR-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-112-1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Walter Ernesto EscobarMendoza raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. 

Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), which held that the 

sentence enhancement provided for in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a 

conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to commit a federal drug 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40796 Document: 00512946936 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 14-40796

trafficking offense. The unopposed motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-40796 Document: 00512946936 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICERSection 302 Certification

I,
David W. Grimes, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gaming Partners International Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|                     |  |     |  |                                                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ DAVID W. GRIMES David W. Grimes Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
Bobbie Lee ADAMS, III, petitioner, v. NETFLIX, INC.

No. 18-6443.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION—CFO

In connection with the Annual Report of J.B. Poindexter & Co., Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert S. Whatley, Vice President Finance of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: September 5, 2007 | By /s/ Robert S. Whatley |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                    | Robert S. Whatley,       |
|                    | Vice President Finance   |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part ofthe Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00449-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL 

PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR NON-PARTY ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

Plaintiff Universal Connectivity Technologies Inc. (“UCT”) respectfully submits the 

attached proposed stipulated supplemental Protective Order for non-party Advanced Micro 

Devices, Inc., for the Court’s consideration and approval. Non-party Advanced Micro Devices, 

Inc. has requested the supplemental protective order for its production in response to UCT’s 

subpoena. Defendant Lenovo Group Limited (“LGL”) does not oppose this motion.

Dated: November 25, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brett E. Cooper 

Brett E. Cooper (NY SBN 4011011) 

bcooper@bc-lawgroup.com

Seth Hasenour (TX SBN 24059910)

shasenour@bc-lawgroup.com

Jonathan Yim (TX SBN 24066317)

jyim@bc-lawgroup.com

Drew B. Hollander (NY SBN 5378096)

dhollander@bc-lawgroup.com

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 60 Filed 11/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1141
2

BC LAW GROUP, P.C. 

200 Madison Avenue, 24th Floor

New York, NY 10016 

Phone: 212-951-0100

Attorneys for Plaintiff Universal Connectivity 

Technologies Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 25, 2024 all counsel of record who are deemed 

to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system.

/s/ Brett Cooper

Brett Cooper

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The Parties have complied with the meet and confer requirement and the motion is 

submitted as unopposed. 

/s/ Brett Cooper

Brett Cooper

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 60 Filed 11/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1142
Exhibit 10.10.1

ADDENDUM TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

THIS ADDENDUM TO
THE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT(the Addendum) is effective as of the date set forth below, by and between International Textile Group, Inc. (the Company), and
                                 (the Executive).

RECITALS:

A.
Company and Executive have previously entered into a Severance Agreement effective                      (the Agreement); and

B. Company and Executive seek to amend the Agreement in order to comply with the provisions of Internal Revenue Code section 409A;

IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:



|1. | Page 2, Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2) A pro-rata share of any incentive or bonus payment earned for performance results for the plan year during which your employment is
terminated. Such a pro-rata payment must be approved by the Board of Directors or designate when all bonus payments for all participants are approved.



|2. | The first two sentences of the first paragraph of Page 3 of the Agreement are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Except as set forth in the previous sentence, all payments due hereunder as a result of the termination of your employment shall be paid in
such installments established by the Company for all salaried employees; however, subject to the payment of certain installments in accordance with the short-term deferral exception of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), severance
payments will not commence earlier than the date that is six month after the date of the your separation from service, as defined under Internal Revenue Code section 409A (or, if earlier, the date of your death).



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the date written below.



|                                  |  | 
|--------------------------------- |  | 
|INTERNATIONAL TEXTILE GROUP, INC.
|                                  | 
|By:                               |  | 
|                                 
|Agreed and accepted:             
|                                 
|                                 
|Name                              |  | 
|                                  | 
|Dated:                            |  |
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

2:23-cv-589

DEXCOM, INC.,

Dexcom, Inc. 

c/o Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company 

211 E. 7th Street, Suite 620 

Austin, TX 78701 USA

Randall Garteiser 

Garteiser Honea - IP Trial Attorneys 

119 W Ferugson St. 

Tyler, TX 75702

12/13/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00589-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 30
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-589 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00589-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 12/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 31
Carlos David LOPEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-5545.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
**EXHIBIT32**

# **SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned herebycertify that this report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:   August 14, 2007 | By:                                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                    | Roger E. Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                    |                                                  |
|                                    |                                                  |
| Dated:   August 14, 2007 | By:                                                   | /s/ Bruce Ficks    |   |
|                                    | Bruce Ficks  Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                                         |                                                       |                    |        |  |

 

1

----
Demetrius Darrell DAVIS, aka Meatman, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7392.

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       86,424
COMMITMENTS
  26,551    2,295      748   52,854   81,345   80,153   84,388    6,271    2,036

CHANGES FROM 03/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,445)
   1,903   -2,680      358   -5,690      204   -3,429   -2,118      -16   -1,327

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.7      2.7      0.9     61.2     94.1     92.7     97.6      7.3      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      14        3        1       38       36       52       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      197,161
COMMITMENTS
  69,172   33,106    1,530  112,110  157,832  182,812  192,468   14,349    4,693

CHANGES FROM 03/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,541)
   6,039    1,279      313   -3,519      584    2,833    2,176     -292      365

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    35.1     16.8      0.8     56.9     80.1     92.7     97.6      7.3      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      140)
      39       14        7       65       46      109       62
```

----

Updated April 5, 2013
Nicholas PAGLIUCA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5216

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### Ilmar Rank, Appellant, *v.*Colonial Sand & Stone Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 11, 1973.

*Harry Ruderman*for appellant. *Darby, Healey, Stonebridge & Whelan (Thomas H. Healey*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The rights of the parties must be determined by Federal law *(Garrett*v. *Moore-McCormack Co.,*317 U. S. 239 [1942]; *Riley*v. *Agwilines,*296 N. Y. 402 [1947]). The defendant must sustain the burden of proving that the prior recovery in the seaman’s negligence action included the claim for maintenance and cure asserted here *(Bartholomew*v. *Universe Tankships,*279 F. 2d 911, 916 [2d Cir., 1960]). The court below confessed to an inability to decide if the prior verdict included maintenance and cure elements due to a failure of proof and then erroneously dismissed the complaint. * *‘*The test to be applied * * * is a simple one: the items of damages specified and included in the instructions to the jury are presumed to be included in the general verdict ”. *(Bartholomew*v. *Universe Tankships, supra,*pp. 915-916.)

*20The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to abide the event.

Concur — Markowitz, P. J., Quinn and Frank, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
Darrell Lamar MARSHALL, petitioner, v. George Caram STEEH, et al.

No. 19-6470

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.