alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32





The undersigned, Jeffrey I. Friedman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer and Lou Fatica, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Associated Estates Realty
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.	The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June
30, 2003, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey I. Friedman		/s/ Lou Fatica

Jeffrey I. Friedman					Lou Fatica



July 31, 2003

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Associated Estates
Realty Corporation and will be retained by Associated Estates Realty Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.11




CONSENT OF EXPERT


March 30, 2012
  Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re:
Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Roberto Costa, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled the “Technical Report on Vila Nova Iron Ore Project” dated July 31, 2007 and the description of all mineral reserves and resources of the Vila Nova property and of extracts from or a summary of  the technical report and other information pertaining to the project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   By:
/s/ Roberto CostaRoberto CostaRoberto Costa Engenharia Ltda
Attorney or Party without AIorney: For Court use Only

Marc Fenster (SBN 181067)

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Tlelephone No: 310-826-7474

AttomeyFor.. Plaintiff

I:/o:-06;:"€IVO..

Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

P/crJ.nfl#.. Headwater Research LLC

De/endcrnf.. AT&T lnc., et al.

PROOF OF SERVICE Hearing Date: Time: Dept/Div: Case Number:2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP

1. AI the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2. I served copies of the Summons in a Civil Action; Complaint; Civil Case Cover Sheet; Plaintiff's Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement;

Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark; Notice of Related Cases; Notice of

Designation of Lead Counsel

3. a. Poro/served.. AT&Tservices,lnc.

b. Person Served.. George Martinez, authorized to accept for cT Corporation system, agent for service of process

served under F.R.C.P. Rule 4.

4. Address where thepcrrtywosserved.. 1999 Bryan st ste 900, Dallas, TX 75201

5. Iservedthe party:

a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive

process for the party (1 ) on: Thu, Sep 07 2023 (2) at: 02:45 PM

6. Person who served papers:

a. Tony collins d. The Fee/or serv/.ce wai5.. $207.29

b. FIRST LEGAL

1517 W. Beverly Blvd.

LOS ANGELES, CA 90026

c. (213) 250-1111

7. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the un.Ited states of America that

09/08/2023

(Date)

PROOF OF

SERVICE

(Signature)

9519531

(5433047)

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 09/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 287
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

'

'

' NO. 1:23-CR-110-MAC

'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

versus

KENNETH RAY EGLIN, SR. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION 

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Superseding Indictment filed against the Defendant. 

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Kenneth Ray Eglin, Sr., is 

Case 1:23-cr-00110-MAC-ZJH Document 41 Filed 07/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 114
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Superseding Indictment charging a violation of 18 

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of July, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00110-MAC-ZJH Document 41 Filed 07/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 115
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2019

No. 04-18-00990-CV

IN RE TBT, ET AL.,

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-2619-CV-C

Honorable Thomas Nathaniel Stuckey, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 17, 2019. On January 16, 2019, 

appellant filed a motion requesting a twenty-day extension of time to file the brief.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is 

required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 

filed. Id. 

The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s brief must be filed no later than February 6, 

2019. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
William A. SALZWEDEL, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-552.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for rehearing denied.
Steve ZINNEL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8854.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 1

FILED UNDER

SEAL PURSUANT TO

PROTECTIVE ORDER

To Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 1 of 15 PageID

#: 916
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 2 of 15 PageID

#: 917
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 3 of 15 PageID

#: 918
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 4 of 15 PageID

#: 919
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 5 of 15 PageID

#: 920
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 6 of 15 PageID

#: 921
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 7 of 15 PageID

#: 922
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 8 of 15 PageID

#: 923
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 9 of 15 PageID

#: 924
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 10 of 15 PageID

#: 925
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 11 of 15 PageID

#: 926
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 12 of 15 PageID

#: 927
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 13 of 15 PageID

#: 928
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 14 of 15 PageID

#: 929
Case 2:23-cv-00617-RWS-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 08/14/24 Page 15 of 15 PageID

#: 930
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

INTERNATIONAL TEXTILE GROUP, INC.

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of International Textile Group, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary L. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Gary L. Smith                                   
|Gary L. Smith                                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CA, INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-134-RWS-JBB

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY

CAME ON FOR CONSIDERATION, Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) and 

Defendant CA, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Joint Motion To Stay All Deadlines And Notice Of 

Settlement.

Having considered the Motion, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is stayed for thirty 

(30) days.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 40-1 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 603
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-641-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or 

Otherwise Respond filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics 

America, Inc. Dkt. No. 21. After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion is 

GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff 

Headwater Research LLC’s complaint is extended to April 22, 2024. The Court notes that service 

of process for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. has been waived.

Case 2:23-cv-00641-JRG-RSP Document 22 Filed 01/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 811
EXHIBIT A 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 13-2 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 218
Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 13-2 Filed 01/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 219
Michael Zachariah GOMEZ, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9804

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 579 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 579

  Designating the week of September 24 through September 28, 2012, as 
    ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 21), 2012

  Mr. Graham (for himself, Mrs. Hagan, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
  Boozman, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Burr, Mr. Casey, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. 
Coburn, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Coons, Mr. Corker, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. Hutchison, 
 Mr. Isakson, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Manchin, Mrs. McCaskill, Ms. Mikulski, 
   Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Portman, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
Warner, Mr. Webb, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Cardin) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of September 24 through September 28, 2012, as 
    ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 105 historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide the quality 
        education essential to full participation in a complex, highly 
        technological society;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and 
        have played a prominent role in the history of the United States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities allow talented and diverse 
        students, many of whom represent underserved populations, to attain 
        their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 24 through September 
        28, 2012, as ``National Historically Black Colleges and 
        Universities Week''; and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies, 
        activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DAVID RUSSELL REYNOLDS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:08-hc-02157-BR) 

Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: September 30, 2009 

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Diana Pereira, Research and 

Writing Specialist, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, David T. Huband, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 David Russell Reynolds appeals the district court’s 

order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General 

under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). Reynolds asserts that the 

district court erred in concluding that he posed a substantial 

risk of danger to others as a result of his mental disorder 

because the court based its conclusion on conjecture and 

speculation. We affirm. 

 After a hearing, the district court found by clear and 

convincing evidence that Reynolds “is presently suffering from a 

mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would 

create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or 

serious damage to property of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d). 

Our thorough review of the record leads us to conclude that the 

district court did not clearly err in finding that Reynolds met 

this standard. United States v. LeClair, 338 F.3d 882, 885 (8th 

Cir. 2003) (stating standard of review); see United States v. 

Robinson, 404 F.3d 850, 856 (4th Cir. 2005) (reviewing for clear 

error court’s decision regarding defendant’s competency to stand 

trial and citing United States v. Cox, 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th 

Cir. 1992)); see also United States v. Harvey, 532 F.3d 326, 

336-37 (4th Cir. 2008) (stating that a finding is clearly 

erroneous “when, although there is evidence to support it, the 

reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite 

2 
3 

and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”) 

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district 

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
Travis WELSH, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7532.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 6, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,373
<INVENTORY>                                     17,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,222
<PP&E>                                         107,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,746
<BONDS>                                         15,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,502
<SALES>                                         52,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,773
<CGS>                                           32,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
ex10-31.htm


Exhibit 10.31










 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


With Philip Calamia


 


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective December 19, 2011, is between AuthenTec, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Philip L. Calamia (“Employee”), and amends that certain Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and Employee and having an effective date of May 4, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”).







In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
The first paragraph of Section 2(b)(ii)(B)(I) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:







 


“Payment in an aggregate amount equal to twelve (12) months of Employee’s then-applicable annual Base Compensation, plus a pro-rata portion of his target bonus opportunity under AuthenTec’s annual bonus plan for the year in which his termination occurs (with the pro-ration based on the portion of the fiscal year for which he was employed and either (i) an assessment by the Compensation Committee of the actual level of achievement of the performance goals relating to the Target Bonus Opportunity through the date of termination, or (ii) if Employee’s employment is terminated during the twelve (12) months following the effective date of a Change of Control, then the Company shall be deemed to have fully achieved the performance goals relating to the Target Bonus Opportunity at target levels, and no assessment of the actual level of achievement by the Compensation Committee shall be necessary), which pro-rata amount will be paid to Employee in a single lump sum on the 60th day after his termination of employment.”




 



	
  

	
2.

	
As amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.







 


AUTHENTEC, INC.


 


By: /s/ Lawrence J. Ciaccia, Jr.


Lawrence J. Ciaccia, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer












EMPLOYEE:


 


/s/ Philip L. Calamia


Philip L. Calamia
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Uromed Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael F. Manion, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael F. Manion

Michael F. ManionChief Financial OfficerDated: June 22, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Uromed Corporation and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.