alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC, d/b/a 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Notice is hereby given that William Andrew Liddell with the law firm of Duane Morris 

LLP, admitted to practice in this Court, hereby enters his appearance as counsel of record for 

Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. to accept service of all pleadings, discovery, orders, notices, 

correspondence, and other material related to this litigation on behalf of Defendant. Mr. Liddell’s 

contact information is in the signature block below. 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 693
Page 2 of 2 

Dated: November 27, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ William Andrew Liddell 

William Andrew Liddell 

State Bar No. 24070145 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

Las Cimas IV 

900 S. Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 300 

Austin, Texas 78746 

Telephone: (512) 277-2300 

Fax: (512) 277-2301 

E-mail: WALiddell@duanemorris.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 27, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

counsel of record. 

/s/ William Andrew Liddell_____ 

 William Andrew Liddell 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 694
Casey O'DELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6557.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Larry BELL, Petitioner v. Kevin RANSOM, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

No. 19-7119

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000911503
<NAME>                               SMITH BARNEY DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                    138,611,787
<SECURITIES>                                                5,043,601
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 513,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          144,168,986
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            144,168,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       3,240,451
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                140,928,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              144,168,986
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           (3,434,699)
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,301,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (4,736,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (4,736,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (41.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas P. Maun, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

 

c) disclosed in this reportany changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:   August  6, 2003 | By:                                                | /s/ Thomas P. Maun |   |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                    | Thomas P.  Maun                                    |
|                                    | Chief  Financial Officer  Chief Accounting Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON DIVISION

SHANE YEAGIN,

(Polk County Jail #18476), 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ONALASKA POLICE 

DEPARTMENT and 

SIMMON PRINCE,

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO

4:23-cv-02592

JUDGE CHARLES ESKRIDGE

MEMORANDUM ON TRANSFER

Pending is a complaint under 42 USC § 1983 filed by 

Plaintiff Shane Yeagin. Dkt 1.

Plaintiff is an inmate of the Polk County Jail. He 

proceeds here pro se and brings this action against law 

enforcement officials in Polk County. He sues for violations 

of civil rights that allegedly occurred there.

The interests of justice and the convenience of parties 

and witnesses support transfer of this action to the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, 

Lufkin Division. 28 USC §§ 1391, 1404(a).

This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin 

Division.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the 

motion for counsel are DENIED without prejudice to 

reconsideration after transfer. Dkts 3 & 7.

United States District Court

Southern District of Texas

ENTERED

October 12, 2023

Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

Case 9:23-cv-00181-MAC-CLS Document 8 Filed 10/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 27
2

SO ORDERED.

Signed on , at Houston, Texas.

__________________________

Hon. Charles Eskridge

United States District Judge

October 12, 2023

Case 9:23-cv-00181-MAC-CLS Document 8 Filed 10/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 28
Kimberly WATSO, et al., Petitioners, v. Jodi HARPSTEAD, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al.

No. 19-550

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
James R. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 19-7186

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Maronick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 11, 2011
By: /s/ James R. MaronickJames R. Maronick
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30280

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN OWENS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:10-CR-238-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Having pleaded guilty to mail fraud, Juan Owens appeals his 14-month

sentence. Owens argues that the district court erroneously assumed that the

Sentencing Guidelines in his case did not authorize a split sentence consisting

of part imprisonment and part probation or supervised release with home

confinement. He urges that his within-guidelines sentence must be vacated

because the sentencing court committed a procedural error by incorrectly

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 17, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30280 Document: 00511668885 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2011
No. 11-30280

concluding that granting his request for a split sentence would constitute a

downward departure.

Our authority to review sentences is limited by 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we

lack jurisdiction to review a discretionary decision not to impose a split sentence. 

United States v. Garcia-Ortiz, 310 F.3d 792, 793 (5th Cir 2002). As the record

in this case shows that the sentencing court was aware that it had the discretion

to impose a split sentence, but declined to do so, we lack statutory jurisdiction

under § 3742. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Christianson v. Colt

Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 818 (1988). 

2

Case: 11-30280 Document: 00511668885 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

Valtrus Innovations Ltd. 

Plaintiff 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

v. 

T-Mobile USA, Inc.; T-Mobile US, Inc.; 

Sprint Corp; OnePlus Technology 

(Shenzen) Co., Ltd. and OnePlus Mobile 

Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. 

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23cv444 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Valtrus Innovations 

Ltd. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Key Patent Innovations Limited and no publicly held 

company owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew G. Berkowitz by permission Claire 

Henry 

Matthew G. Berkowitz – LEAD ATTORNEY 

Patrick R. Colsher 

Aaron L. Morris 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

Tel: (650) 623-1401 

mberkowitz@reichmanjorgensen.com 

pcolsher@reichmanjorgensen.com 

amorris@reichmanjorgensen.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 4 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 320
Khue V. Hoang 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

400 Madison Avenue, Suite 14D 

New York, NY 10017 

Tel: (212) 381-1965 

khoang@reichmanjorgensen.com 

Of Counsel: 

Andrea L. Fair 

Texas Bar No. 24078488 

Claire Abernathy Henry 

Texas State Bar No. 24053063 

WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC 

1507 Bill Owens Pkwy. 

Longview, TX 75604 

Tel: (903) 757-6400 

andrea@wsfirm.com 

claire@wsfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 4 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 321
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service on this 27 day of September, 2023. 

/s/ Claire Henry 

Claire Henry 

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 4 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 322
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         547,088                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,460,428                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    902,362                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,210,678                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,020,472                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,998,588                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,123,565                       0
<BONDS>                                        546,872                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        25,654                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,302,497                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,998,588                       0
<SALES>                                      4,927,599               4,213,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,927,599               4,213,276
<CGS>                                        3,474,934               2,841,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,205,745                 989,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,742)                (59,428)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                440,000                 441,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                    90,521                 156,851
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   349,479                 284,276
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16                    0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.23




CONSENT OF EXPERT


March 30, 2012
  Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re:
Eldorado Gold Corporation
 I, Tony Jackson, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled the “Certej Updated Definitive Feasibility Study” dated February 26, 2009 and the description of all mineral resources of the Certej property and of extracts from or a summary of  the technical report and other information pertaining to the project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   By:
/s/ Tony JacksonTony Jackson, FIMMM
Aloeng Kelly VANG, petitioner, v. Tom ROY, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections.

No. 18-6621.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Mark T. Taggatz, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aquentium, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date: September 9, 2008/s/ Mark T. Taggatz
Mark T. Taggatz
Chief Executive Officer
XIU JIAN SUN, Petitioner, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States, et al.

No. 19-804

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
John Henry YABLONSKY, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-7318

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
CONSENT OF EXPERT

March 30, 2017



Eldorado Gold Corporation



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation



I, Antony Francis, do hereby consent to the
filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical reports entitled (i) the “Skouries Cu/Au Project, Greece –
NI43-101 Technical Report” dated July 14, 2011, and (ii) the “Technical Report on the Olympias Project, Au Pb Zn Ag
Deposit, Northern Greece” dated July 14, 2011 and of extracts from or a summary of the technical reports and other information
pertaining to these projects, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado
Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 and any amendments thereto and any Registration
Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.



| | By: | /s/A.D. Francis      
| | --- | ---------------------
| |     | Antony Francis, FIMMM
| |     |                      
| |     |                      
| |     |