alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 March 9, 2012 
 William Stern 
 Dear William: 
 I am pleased to congratulate you on your compensation change as approved on
February 13, 2012 based on your continuing role as General Counsel for Ancestry.com Inc. (the “Company”), based in our Corporate office in Provo, Utah, reporting to the Chief Operating Officer / Chief Financial Officer. In recognition
of this role, we propose the following adjustment to your compensation. 
  

	Salary:	 $250,000 annualized, payable semi-monthly according to normal company payroll policy. This salary increase will be  effective retroactive to January 1,
2012. 

  

	Bonus:	 A target of 50% of salary based upon company and individual performance goals per the terms and conditions of the  Company’s Performance Incentive
Program. 

 Other than the salary adjustment indicated above, this letter does not change any terms or conditions of your
employment arrangement as addressed in the June 2009 letter and the July 2010 amendment. 
 Please signify your acceptance of these adjustments
to your compensation package by signing below and by signing and returning the attached Agreement to Protect Company Property. 
 If you have
any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at (801) 705-7000. 
 Sincerely, 

/s/ Tim Sullivan 
  

							
	 Tim Sullivan

CEO
	 		 		 	/s/ William Stern
	Ancestry.com Inc.	 		 		 	William Stern
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED March 31, 1999 AND
AS OF March 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000911317
<NAME> LAS VEGAS AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         423
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,727
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          992,929
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,957
<OTHER-SE>                                     (454,463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,423
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  259,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (259,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (259,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (638,758)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (949,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.24)


</TABLE>
Leslie T. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 19-744

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                         AQUENTIUM, INC.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                ---------------------------------
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      I, Mark T. Taggatz, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of
Aquentium, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

*     the amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal
      year ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

*     the information contained in the amended Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.



Date:   September 8, 2003
                                   /s/ Mark T. Taggatz
                                   _________________________________________
                                   Mark T. Taggatz
                                   Principal Executive and Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

ALI KAFI FORD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-349

§

NEDERLAND CHEMICAL, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Ali Kafi Ford, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#4) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00349-MAC-CLS Document 6 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 21
John THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6862.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Richard L. BRYANT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7430

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

 Eastern District of Texas ✔

8/25/2023 Eastern District of Texas

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC T-MOBILE USA, INC.

7,924,802 4/12/2011 COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 08/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 61

10/18/2024

Case 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 10/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 80
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT 

CORP.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

JURY DEMANDED

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT 

CORP.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY DEMANDED

DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

FOCUSING ASSERTED PATENT CLAIMS AND PRIOR ART

Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint LLC (together, “T-Mobile”) file this 

Unopposed Motion for Entry of an Order Focusing Asserted Patent Claims and Prior Art. The 

parties were able to agree on all aspects of this proposed order.

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 89 Filed 10/07/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4954
2

Dated: October 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

________________________

Katherine Q. Dominguez (Lead Attorney)

kdominguez@gibsondunn.com

Josh A. Krevitt

jkrevitt@gibsondunn.com

Brian Rosenthal

brosenthal@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10166-0193

Telephone: (212) 351-4000

Facsimile: (212) 351-4015

Robert Vincent

rvincent@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 2100

Dallas, Texas 75201-2923

Telephone: (214) 698-3100 

Facsimile: (214) 571-2900 

Andrew Robb

arobb@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

310 University Avenue

Palo Alto, CA 94301

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Melissa R. Smith

Texas Bar No. 24001351

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

GILLIAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: 903-934-8450

Facsimile: 903-934-9257

Attorneys for Defendants

/s/ Katherine Q. Dominguez

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 89 Filed 10/07/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4955
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for the T-Mobile met and conferred with 

counsel for Headwater to discuss the substance of this Motion pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h). 

Counsel for Headwater indicated that Headwater is unopposed to the relief sought in this Motion. 

________________________

Melissa R. Smith 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on October 7, 2024. 

________________________

Melissa R. Smith 

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 89 Filed 10/07/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4956
Bobby MINNIS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5223

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Gaming Partners International Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gregory S. Gronau, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Alain Thieffry, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



1.	The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and



2.	The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                     | Gaming Partners International Corporation
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2015 | By:                                      
|Date: March 20, 2015 | By:
{A72/07130/0014/W1872652.1 }

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

OPTIMORPHIX, INC. §

§

v. § CASE NO. 5:23-cv-00134 [RWS/JBB]

§

BROADCOM INC. §

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT 

Defendant CA, Inc. file this Notice of Appearance of Counsel and hereby notifies the Court 

that Shaun W. Hassett of the law firm Potter Minton, P.C., 102 N. College Ave., Suite 900, Tyler, 

Texas 75702 is appearing as counsel for Defendant CA, Inc. All pleadings, discovery, 

correspondence and other material should be served upon counsel at the address referenced above.

Dated: March 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Shaun W. Hassett 

Shaun W. Hassett

State Bar No. 24074372 

shaunhassett@potterminton.com

POTTER MINTON, P.C.

102 N. College Ave., Suite 900

Tyler, Texas 75702

Tel: (903) 597-8311

Fax: (903) 593-0846

Attorneys for Defendant CA, Inc.

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 28 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 419
Jeffrey ISAACS, Petitioner v. TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, et al.

No. 18-1411

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
IN RE R.C.

No. 19-481

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

"Rick" Lussy, petitioner. Motion of petitioner for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
Fernando A. RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Dave HOGUE, et al.

No. 19-876.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00693

- CR

IN RE John Michael POPE , Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 16, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asks th is court to compel the trial
court to dismiss his underlying case on the grounds that his right to a speedy trial has been viola ted.
Relator is represented by trial counsel below ; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation.

Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid

representation means relator’s pro se mandamus pet ition will be treated as presenting nothing for

this court’s review. See id .; see also Gray v. Shipley , 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.

— Houston

[1 st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM
Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018

- CR

- 12867, styled The State of Texas v. John Michael Pope, Jr.
, pending in the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valen zuela presiding.
Anibal DEL VALLE-HIRALDO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9529

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
First Quarter 1997 Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                        723,929 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,791,966 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                   730,965 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,260,992       
<PP&E>                                     15,483,337      
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,107,025    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             16,852,448      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3,932,720    
<BONDS>                                    11,490,965  
<COMMON>                                       35,451 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,393,312       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               16,852,448         
<SALES>                                     6,381,279          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            6,381,279          
<CGS>                                       3,935,819          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,935,819          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              561,590       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            123,638       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               267,994       
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           267,994      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                  267,994 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.08 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.08 
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

KERNELIUS MARQUIS SHEPHERD, SR. §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv397

TDCJ, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr., an inmate at the Stiles Unit, proceeding pro

se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action without prejudice for

want of prosecution. 

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address

provided to the Court. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the Report on April 18, 2024. No

objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A separate 

Case 1:23-cv-00397-MJT-CLS Document 16 Filed 08/16/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 54
Final Judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendations. The dismissal of this action is without prejudice to plaintiff’s ability to

reinstate the above-styled action on the court’s active docket by paying the filing fee or submitting

a proper Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within thirty days from the date set forth

below.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 16th day of August, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00397-MJT-CLS Document 16 Filed 08/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 55
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that: 

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

 

|                  |   |   |                                                             |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 15, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Matthew H. Knight                                            |
|                  |   |   |  

 

 

Matthew H. KnightChief Executive Officer |
Cheryl Lynn JOSSIE, petitioner, v. CVS PHARMACY.

No. 18-6354.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Dwight BROWN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9836

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 6:23-cv-00553

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

National Labor Relations Board et al.,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

It is declared that enforcement against plaintiffs or their members of the rule issued by the National Labor Relations Board on 

October 27, 2023, entitled Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status, 88 Fed. Reg. 73,946, would be contrary to law as to 

the rule’s addition of a new 29 C.F.R. § 103.40 and arbitrary and 

capricious as to its removal of the existing 29 C.F.R. § 103.40 

(2020). In both respects, the rule is hereby vacated.

All other relief prayed for is denied without prejudice, except 

for attorneys’ fees and costs, which may be moved for after this 

final judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d).

The clerk of court is directed to enter this document on the 

docket as a final judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

So ordered by the court on March 8, 2024.

J. Campbell Barker

United States District Judge