alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## **EXHIBIT 31.1**

##  

## **CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

##  

## I, Roger E. Gower, certify that:

##  

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Component Technology,Inc.:

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

 

c) disclosed in this report any changes inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweakness in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated:   May  9, 2005 | By:                                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                            | Roger E. Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32435-32436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Retromer Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease.
    Date: June 23, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 32436]]

    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Reymundo Dominguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Branch, NIA, Bg Gwy, Rm. 2C230, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 
20814, (301) 555-1212, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#beccdbc790dad1d3d7d0d9cbdbc4fed0d7d690d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d4f58441359525054535a4858477d535455135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 25, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11594 Filed 5-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/16/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      455,094
COMMITMENTS
 109,747  199,445   70,943  244,699  150,900  425,389  421,288   29,705   33,806

CHANGES FROM 04/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,379)
 -14,007    6,038    2,369   25,776    4,770   14,138   13,177    2,241    3,202

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.1     43.8     15.6     53.8     33.2     93.5     92.6      6.5      7.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      58       72       81       37       34      145      146
```

----

Updated April 19, 2013
Lony Tap GATWAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9019

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
James Earvin SANDERS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7498

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kenneth Randale DOOR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5647

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00021-CV

Jose Manuel PELAYO,

Appellant

v.

Adriana C. PelayoAppellee

Adriana C. PELAYO,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CVG000070 C1

Honorable Alvino (Ben) Morales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 16, 2014

DISMISSED

Both appellant and appellee are pro se in this appeal. On April 2, 2014, the parties filed a 

joint letter with this court asking that certain portions of their divorce decree be changed or 

“affirmed,” and asking this court to grant their divorce on the terms mentioned in the letter and to 

change appellee’s last name. We will treat this letter as a motion to dismiss based on the parties 

reaching an agreement regarding their divorce decree.

We dismiss the appeal. However, rather than enter the divorce decree on the terms 

requested by the parties, we instead remand this cause to the trial court to enter a decree pursuant 
04-14-00021-CV

to the parties’ agreement. The parties should submit their letter-agreement to the trial court for 

further proceedings.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 91-7685
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, versus RAPHAEL MENDEZ, Respondent - Appellant.

On Petition to Recall the Mandate. Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: April 15, 1996 Before RUSSELL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.* Denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________ * Senior Judge Sprouse participated in the consideration of the original appeal but retired prior to the time of this decision. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).2 PER CURIAM: The district court for the Eastern District of North Carolina committed Raphael Mendez to the Federal Correctional Institute in Butner, North Carolina, under 18 U.S.C. § 4246. Mendez has petitioned this court to recall the mandate we issued in United States v. Mendez , No. 91-7685 (4th Cir. July 9, 1992), in which we affirmed the district court's order. We decline to exercise our power to recall in these circumstances and deny Mendez's petition. If Mendez wishes to challenge his on-going commitment, he should file a new p etition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Opinion issued January 14, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 01046
- CV

——————————— IN RE HANDS OF HEALI NG RESIDENTIAL TREAT MENT CENTER , INC. AND ALL OCCUPAN TS , Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, Hands of Healing Residential Treatment Center , Inc. and All Other Occupants , filed a n emergency petition for writ of mandamus, contending that respondent, the Honorable Theresa Chang , abused h er discretion in failing to set a supersedeas bond and stay proceedings under section 24.007 of the Texas Property2

Code

. 1 Relators have filed a motion to dismi ss their petition stating that respondent
has set a supersedeas bond and requesting that their petition be dismissed

. Al though relators’ motion does not include a certificate of conference, it contains a certificate of service stating that the motion was s erved on respondent and real part y in interest and has been on file with the Court for more than ten days. Neither real part y in interest nor respondent ha s expressed opposition to the motion. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No opinion has issu ed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(c). We grant relators’ motion to dismiss and dismiss the petition for writ of
mandamus.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.

1 The petition identifies the underlying case a s John Havenar v. Hands of Healing Residential Treatment Center , Inc. and All Occupants , Cause No. 974802 , in the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Theresa Chang , presiding. Real party in interest in th is original proceeding is John Havenar.
## T‘HEATITORNEYGENE~ OF TEXAS

February 21, 1957.
Honorable W.G Woods, Jr. OPINIONNO,

## Ww-36 County Attorney Liberty County, Liberty, Texas. Re: Is It legal for asheriff to work prisoners outside of the county jail onhis private ranch operations even if the labor is voluntary and the prisoners are paid Dear Mr.‘Woods: out of the sheriff ’s personal funds? This opinion is in response to your letter of February 12, 1957, in which you asked the following question:

“lIs it legal for a sheriff to work prisoners outside of the County Jail onhis private ranch operations whether or not such prison labor Is voluntary on the part of the prisoners andwhether or not such prisoners are paid for thytlr labor out of the personal funds of the sheriff? Article 793 of Vernon’s Code of Criminal procedure reads in part:

in part: “Whena defendant is convicted of amisdemeanor

andhis punishment is assessed at a pecuniary fine, if he is unable to pay the fine and costs adjudged against him, he mayfor such time as will satisfy the judgment be put to work in the workhouse, or on the * county farm, or public improvements of the county, as provided in the succeeding article; or if there be nosuch workhouse farm or improvements, he shall be Imprisoned in jail for asufficient length of time to discharge the full,,amount of fine and costs adjudged against him;

. . . Article 794 of Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure readsHonorable W. G Woods, Jr., - Page 2 - 

## ww-36

‘lwhere the punishment assessed in a conviction for misdemeanor is confinement in jail for more than one day, or where in such conviction the punlshment is assessed only at a pecuniary fine and the party so convicted Is unable to pay the fine and costs adjudged agalns thim, those so convicted shall be required to donmanual labor in accordance with the provisions of this article under the following rules andregulations:

. . . 

## “5.They shall be put to labor upon the public roads, bridges or ,other public works of the county when their labor cannot be utilieed in the county workhouse or county farm.

. .’ Attorney General’s Opinions O-1061 and O-3809, copies of which are herewith enclosed, hold that the above mentioned Articles require that county prisoners be worked only on county pro,jects.

The fact situation involved in your request Is clearly of a private nature and In accord with the above Attorney General’s Opiniohs, weare of the opinion that Articles 

## 793and 794, V.C.C.P designate the excltislve projects upon which county prisoners maybe employed. Your question Is therefore answered in the negative.
SUMMARY It is illegal for asheriff to work prisoners outside of the county jail onhis private ranch operations even if the labor is voluntary and the prisoners are paid out of funds

. the sheriff ’s bersonal

K!R:jl ~Encl. Yours very truly, WILLWIISON ATTORNEY

GENERAL -

APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTE By Ii. @rzr;yApndler
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454

(LEAD CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 

COMPANY; ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00457-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE 

INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Pending before the Court is Cobblestone Wireless, LLC (“Cobblestone”) Unopposed 

Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. The Court, having 

considered the unopposed motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the motion should be 

GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines are extended for Cobblestone to comply 

with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 and serve contentions to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Aruba 

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 74
2

Networks, LLC to December 4, 2023 and the deadline for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company 

and Aruba Networks, LLC to comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 to February 12, 2024.

All other deadlines shall remain in place absent further Order of the Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 19-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 75
<PAGE>

Exhibit 24.1
------------
                           ACT Teleconferencing, Inc.

                               Power of Attorney
                          of Directors and/or Officers


     The undersigned directors and/or officers of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc., a
Colorado corporation, hereby make, constitute, and appoint Gerald D. Van
Eeckhout and Gavin Thomson, and either of them, the undersigned's true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in
the undersigned's names, place, and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned's
names as such directors and/or officers of said corporation to an Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB or other applicable form, and all amendments to it, to be filed
by said corporation in March, 1999 with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, with all
exhibits and other supporting documents, with the SEC, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact, and either of them, full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and
execution of the powers expressly granted in this power of attorney.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set the undersigned's hand this 2nd
day of July 1999.



                              /s/ Ronald J. Bach
                              ------------------------------
                              Ronald J. Bach

                              /s/ James F. Seifert
                              ------------------------------
                              James F. Seifert

                              /s/ Donald Sturtevant
                              ------------------------------
                              Donald Sturtevant

                              /s/ Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout
                              ------------------------------
                              Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/15/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       49,051
COMMITMENTS
  10,322    6,880    1,012   23,506   30,336   34,840   38,228   14,211   10,823

CHANGES FROM 10/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        145)
     303     -798      257     -593      348      -33     -193      178      338

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.0     14.0      2.1     47.9     61.8     71.0     77.9     29.0     22.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       75)
      15       17       10       37       27       58       48
```

----

Updated October 30, 2013
William N. LUCY, Personal Representative of Annie D. Fox, Deceased, petitioner, v. DIALYSIS ASSOCIATES, et al.

No. 18-8180.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with Amendment No. 4 to the Annual Report of Extensions, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10K, for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Crawford  Shaw, the chief executive officer of the company hereby certify as
of  the  date  hereof, solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my  knowledge:


     (i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K, of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  October 7, 2009

/s/  Crawford  Shaw
-------------------
Crawford  Shaw
Principal  Executive  Officer  and  Director
Robert Travis JENKINS, Petitioner v. KANSAS.

No. 18-9637

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JONATHAN LOPEZ-SANTIAGO

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00119-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Jonathan LopezSantiago GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 8 U.S.C. § 

1326(a) – Illegal Reentry Following Removal.

Signed this

Mar 14, 2024

Case 6:23-cr-00119-JDK-KNM Document 27 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 58
Translation of Subrogation Agreement



 Exhibit 4.58 
 Subrogation Agreement 
 Transferor (hereinafter referred to as Part A): Zhongshan Mingyang
Electrical Appliance Co., LTD. 
 Location: Daling Administration Zone, Torch Development Park, Zhongshan, Guangdong 

Transferee (hereinafter referred to as Party B): Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Industry Group Co., LTD. 

Location: Mingyang Industrial Park, Jianye Road, Torch Development Zone, Zhongshan, Guangdong Province 

WHEREAS, Party B being actual executor of the Inner Mongolia Damaoqi Wind Power Farm, an agreement is hereby entered into by and between Party A and
Party B through amicable consultation, to transfer the right as a creditor of RMB43,973,755.15 from Party A to Party B. 
  

	1.	Party A will transfer its right to Party B to collect an aggregate of RMB 43,973,775.15, including interests and late payment penalty, outstanding amount payable by
Shanxi Zhangze Electric Power CO., LTD. arising from the Inner Mongolia Damaoqi Wind Power Project. 

  

	2.	After signing this Agreement, Party B, substituting Party A, assumes creditor’s right under the Inner Mongolia Damaoqi Wind Power Farm project. Party A shall
inform Shanxi Zhangze Electric Power CO., LTD. about the transfer within 30 days after signing this Agreement. 

  

	3.	This Agreement is prepared in triplicate, with Party A and Party B each holding one copy and one copy as attachment of notice sent by Party A to Shanxi Zhangze Electric
Power CO., LTD. 

  

	4.	This Agreement shall enter into force as of the date of signing and sealing. 


 

			
	 Party A: Zhongshan Mingyang Electrical Appliance CO., LTD.
 Signature of Representative:
  
 




	  	 Party B: Guangdong Mingyang Wind Power Group CO., LTD.
 Signature of Representative:
  
 






 Date: June 16, 2011