alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________
No. 95-3532

___________ Timothy H. Joeckel; Dawn L. * Joeckel; Kenneth E. Thorne; * Linda Secora; Frank Secore; * Roy Nuttleman; Cecilia * Nuttleman; Reynold J. Spulak; * Gordon D. Whitten; Barbara A. * Whitten; Marvin Eugene Simon; * Frank Dahlstrom; Earle C. * Baillie; Steve Tolstedt; Don * Offenbacker; Marilyn A. * Offenbacker; Leslie Cornwell; * Cleve W. Stutzman; Arlene M. * Stutzman; Edwin L. Johnson; * Maxine M. Johnson; Laverne H. * Meints; Chris L. Meints; * James A. Davis, Jr.; Joan B. * David; Lloyd Francis; Kenneth * E. Schroeder; Norma L. * Appeal from the United States Schroeder; James L. Gustafson;* District Court for the Janis A. Gustafson; Edward J. * District of Nebraska. Axmann; Donna J. Axmann; * Wilfred Wagher; Charlie * [UNPUBLISHED] Crofutt; Denise Crofutt; Ray * E. Muhlbach; Louise M. Miller; * Dale L. Mattley; Erlyn M. * Mattley; Dorothy Bredthauer; * Ted Daggett; Mona Daggett; * Robert J. Jones; Robert E. * Spurgeon; Barbara M. Spurgeon; * Andrew M. Jaskiewicz; Larry S. * Riederer; Orlan Meske; Ladonna * Meske; Jeanne M. Thorne; * William J. Fritz; Craig R. * Ditzen, * * Appellants, * *

v. * * Internal Revenue Service, * Collector; John Does, 1 * through 10, * * Appellees. *

### The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge 1 

### for the District of Nebraska.

Appellants' motion to amend the caption is denied

. 2 

### Appellees' motion for sanctions is also denied.

___________ Submitted: July 1, 1996

Filed: July 5, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM.

Appellant s are a group of Nebraska citizens who claim that they are
neit her citizens nor residents of the United States and are thus no t require d to pay federal income taxes, and assert that defendants hav e wrongful ly refused to recognize their status. The district court 1
dismissed their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. W e
conclude the judgment of the district court was correct and that an opinio n would lack precedential value. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly we affirm the district court's judgment. 2

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

REDSTONE LOGICS LLC

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00485-JRG

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE, ANSWER OR

OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND 

WAIVER OF FOREIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENT

Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Defendants

herein, without waiving any defenses described or referred to in Rule 12 F.R.C.P., move the Court 

to extend the time within which Defendants are required to move, answer or otherwise respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint. In support of their Motion, Defendants state as follows:

1. On October 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Complaint alleging patent infringement 

against Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

2. On October 20, 2023, Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. was served 

with Plaintiff’s Complaint. Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. has not yet been served. 

3. Counsel for Defendants has agreed to waive service under the Hague Convention 

for Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., a foreign entity, in exchange for a 90-day extension of 

time for all defendants to answer or otherwise plead by February 8, 2024. 

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 10 Filed 10/31/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 83
2

4. Defendants’ agreement with Plaintiff should not be construed as a waiver of any 

other rights or defenses, including, for instance, Defendants’ right to file counterclaims, 

affirmative defenses, or to otherwise challenge the validity of the subject patents.

WHEREFORE, Defendants Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and Samsung Electronics 

America, Inc. respectfully request that the time in which they are required to move, answer or 

otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint be extended up to and including February 8, 2024.

Dated: October 31, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Melissa R. Smith 

Melissa R. Smith 

State Bar No. 24001351

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257

Email: melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

Attorney for Defendants

Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 10 Filed 10/31/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 84
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 31st day of October 2023.

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

 Melissa R. Smith

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel for Defendants met and conferred with

counsel for Plaintiff. Counsel for Plaintiff indicated that it is unopposed to this motion.

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

 Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00485-JRG Document 10 Filed 10/31/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 85
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff, 

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et 

al., 

 Defendants, 

ERICSSON INC., NOKIA OF AMERICA 

CORPORATION, 

 Intervenors. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00470-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00469-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by Movant-Intervenor 

Ericsson Inc., Dkt. No. 18, and the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Intervene filed by MovantIntervenor Nokia of America Corporation, Dkt. No. 20. Both Motions were filed in Member Case 

No. 2:23-cv-469 prior to the order consolidating, 2:23-cv-469 Dkt. No. 25. 

Nokia and Ericsson moved to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) or, 

in the alternative, pursuant to Rule 24(b). Having considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, 

and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED.

Accordingly, Nokia and Ericsson are permitted to intervene in member case 2:23-cv-469 and are 

GRANTED LEAVE to file responsive pleadings in intervention in the Lead Case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00469-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 12/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 870
EXHIBIT B 

Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 22
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 23
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 24
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 25
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 26
# Designation of Colombia as a Major Non-NATO Ally

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 517 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2321k) (the “Act”), I hereby designate Colombia as a Major Non-NATO Ally of the United States for the purposes of the Act and the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751*et seq.*).                    

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2022-11809

Billing code 4710-10-P
Rickey NEWSOME, Applicant, v. RSL FUNDING, LLC, et al.

No. 19A132 (19-22)

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Application for stay addressed to Justice Sotomayor and referred to the Court denied.
William MAULDIN, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Pauline Gibson, Deceased, Petitioner v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 18-1456

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IMPERIUM IP HOLDINGS (CAYMAN), LTD., Petitioner v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.

No. 19-101

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-10017, 333-58403, and 333-49916) pertaining to the ACT
Teleconferencing, Inc. Stock Option Plans, of our report dated March 21, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of ACT
Teleconferencing, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.


                                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 25, 2002
Allan Leslie SINANAN, Jr., Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 19-7533.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
Jonathan DURAN, petitioner, v. Jason B. MUSE, et al.

No. 17-8922.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
MICHAEL B., Petitioner v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES

No. 18-1422

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES and STATE OF TEXAS 

ex rel. DANIEL W. ELLIOTT, M.D. and 

LISA A. MINSLOFF, M.D.,

 Plaintiffs,

V.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS MEDICAL 

ASSOCIATES, LLP; STEWARD 

HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; ONPOINT 

LAB, L.L.C.; BAPTIST HOSPITALS OF 

SOUTHEAST TEXAS; MUHAMMAD 

AZIZ, M.D.; JAMES HOLLY, M.D.; 

MARY CASTRO, M.D.; VIJAY KUMAR, 

M.D.; MICHAEL THOMAS, M.D.; SYED 

ANWAR, M.D., CAESAR DEIPARINE, 

M.D.; RONALD PALANG, M.D.; ABSAR 

QURESHI, M.D.; and DEAN HALBERT, 

M.D.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-00329

 JUDGE MICHAEL J. TRUNCALE

ORDER GRANTING RELATORS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION 

Before the Court is Relators’ Notice of Withdrawal of Motion. [Dkt. 115]. On October 5, 

2023, Relators filed a Motion to Compel Defendants’ Compliance with Initial Mandatory 

Disclosures. [Dkt. 102]. Thereafter, on October 20, 2023, the Court entered an Order Granting in 

Part Defendants’ Joint Motion for a Temporary Stay of Discovery. [Dkt. 114]. The Court’s Order 

stayed all discovery, except discovery related to pending dispositive motions, until January 19, 2024. 

In light of the Court’s Order, Relators give notice of their withdrawal of the Motion to Compel 

Defendants’ Compliance with Initial Mandatory Disclosures. [Dkt. 102]. After considering the 

Relators’ notice and reviewing the pleadings on file and all applicable law, the Court grants the 

same.

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 116 Filed 11/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1080
2

It is therefore ORDERED that Relators’ Notice of Withdrawal of Motion [Dkt. 115] is 

hereby GRANTED. The Clerk is INSTRUCTED to note Relators’ withdrawal of its Motion to 

Compel Defendants’ Compliance with Initial Mandatory Disclosures [Dkt. 102] on the docket of 

this matter.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 7th day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 116 Filed 11/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1081
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
               under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Productivity Technologies Corp. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002 as to which this Certification is an exhibit
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information
contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Productivity Technologies Corp.


Signed this 18/th/ day of November, 2002.

By:  /s/ Samuel N. Seidman
--------------------------
Samuel N. Seidman
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

By:  /s/ Jesse A. Levine
-------------------------
Jesse A. Levine
Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

                                       17
Exhibit 31.2




            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Mark T. Taggatz, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of  Aquentium, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: December 29, 2003       /s/ Mark T. Taggatz
                              ____________________________________
                              Mark T. Taggatz
                              Principal Financial Officer
Steven Kurt BAUGHMAN, Petitioner, v. Michael SEALE, et al.

No. 19-6812

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/27/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,538
COMMITMENTS
  10,062    1,629    1,293   20,152   30,177   31,507   33,099   10,031    8,439

CHANGES FROM 11/20/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,852)
     469      -43     -319     -998     -724     -847   -1,085   -1,005     -767

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.2      3.9      3.1     48.5     72.6     75.9     79.7     24.1     20.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      15        3        8       28       26       48       34
```

----

Updated December 5, 2012
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, John C. Goff, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent
Real Estate Equities Company (the "Company"), has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date: March 11, 2005                                    /s/ John C. Goff
                                                --------------------------------
                                                        John C. Goff
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Crescent Real Estate Equities Company and will be retained by
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



<PAGE>




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned, Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company (the "Company"), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date: March 11, 2005                              /s/ Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                                  Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr.
                                                  Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Crescent Real Estate Equities Company and will be retained by
Crescent Real Estate Equities Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP 

 § (Lead Case) 

YUM! BRANDS, INC. § 

 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00402-JRG-RSP 

 § (Member Case) 

INSPIRE BRANDS, INC. § 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00401. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

Case 2:23-cv-00402-JRG-RSP Document 7 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
- 2 - So Ordered this

Nov 2, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00402-JRG-RSP Document 7 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      132,771
COMMITMENTS
  35,445   23,002   16,188   58,830   66,175  110,463  105,365   22,308   27,406

CHANGES FROM 03/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,353)
     642   -1,341    1,275   -3,990      -47   -2,073     -113    3,426    1,466

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.7     17.3     12.2     44.3     49.8     83.2     79.4     16.8     20.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      155)
      36       42       31       51       58      105      117
```

----

Updated March 23, 2012