alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 219
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 2

On information and belief, Lenovo Moto G Power mobile phones contain a Micron MT29046 multi-chip module with LPDDR4 SDRAM (Z11N die), 3D NAND Flash (B16A die)controller (PS8226 die). A 3D NAND flash array is a cubic memory array. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 3

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of horizontal select lines; 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of wordlines, which are horizonal select lines. 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 5

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of vertical select lines; 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of vertical select lines. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of memory cells, each memory cell adjacent to a horizontal select line and adjacent to a vertical select line; and 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of floating gate memory cells, each memory cehorizontal select line and adjacent to a vertical select line. 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 6

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 8

select lines orthogonal to each other. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-15 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
  Subsidiary
    
    State of IncorporationNorthwest New Mexico Publishing Company
    
    DelawareNew Mexico-Texas MediaNews LLC (33.8% ownership percentage in
Texas-New Mexico Newspapers Partnership, which includes: Las Cruces
Sun-News, The Deming Headlight, Alamogordo Daily News, Ruidoso
News, The Daily Times (Farmington), Carlsbad Current-Argus, El Paso
Times)
    
    DelawareLos Angeles Daily News Publishing Company, (Daily News)
    
    DelawareLong Beach Publishing Company, (Press-Telegram)
    
    DelawareGraham Newspapers, Inc., (The Graham Leader, KSWA, KWKQ, KLXK, KROO)
    
    DelawarePennsylvania Newspapers Publishing Company (York Daily Record, The
York Dispatch, The Evening Sun (Hanover), Lebanon Daily News)
    
    DelawareYork Newspapers Holdings, L.P.
    
    DelawareYork Newspapers Holdings LLC
    
    DelawareThe York Newspaper Company
    
    DelawareYork Dispatch LLC
    
    DelawareYork Daily Record  York Sunday News, LLC
    
    DelawareNew England Newspapers, Inc. (North Adams Transcript, Brattleboro
Reformer, Bennington Banner, The Berkshire Eagle (Pittsfield)
    
    DelawareNew England Internet Media Publishing, Inc.
    
    DelawareLowell Publishing Company, (The Sun)
    
    DelawareLowell Internet Media Publishing Company, Inc.
    
    DelawareFitchburg Internet Media Publishing Company, Inc.
    
    DelawareThe Denver Post Corporation, (The Denver Post)
    
    DelawareEastern Colorado Production Facilities, Inc.
    
    DelawareEastern Colorado Publishing Company, (Fort Morgan Times,
Journal-Advocate (Sterling), Lamar Daily News)
    
    DelawareMediaNews Group Interactive, Inc.
    
    DelawareRate Watch, Inc.
    
    DelawareMNG/PowerOne Media Holding Company, Inc.
    
    DelawareNew Mexico-Texas MediaNews Group Interactive, Inc.
    
    DelawareWest Coast MediaNews LLC (54.23% Ownership percentage in California
Newspapers Partnership which includes: The Oakland Tribune,
Tri-Valley Herald (Pleasanton), The Argus (Fremont), The Daily
Review (Hayward), Alameda Times-Star, San Mateo County Times,
Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Ontario), Enterprise-Record (Chico),
San Gabriel Valley Tribune, Whittier Daily News, Pasadena
Star-News, Times-Standard (Eureka), Mercury-Register (Oroville),
Times-Herald (Vallejo), Marin Independent Journal, Lake County
Record-Bee (Lakeport), The Daily Democrat (Woodland), Ukiah Daily
Journal, Redlands Daily Facts, Red Bluff Daily News, The Sun (San
Bernardino), Paradise Post, The Reporter (Vacaville), Original
Apartment Magazine, LA.com)
    
    DelawareCalifornia Newspapers Partnership
    
    DelawareCalifornia Newspapers Limited Partnership
    
    DelawareKearns-Tribune, LLC, (The Salt Lake Tribune)
    
    DelawareConnecticut Newspapers Publishing Company, (Connecticut Post)
    
    DelawareAlaska Broadcasting Company, Inc., (Northern Television, Inc. KTVA)
    
    AlaskaMediaNews Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareUtah Media, Inc., (The Park Record)
    
    DelawareThe Detroit News, Inc., (The Detroit News)
    
    MichiganCharleston Publishing Company
    
    DelawareNimitz Paper Company
    
    Delaware
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/14/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       54,185
COMMITMENTS
   1,862    8,161    2,123   50,105   43,759   54,090   54,043       95      142

CHANGES FROM 05/07/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,965)
     290      257       87    2,535    2,493    2,912    2,837       53      128

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.4     15.1      3.9     92.5     80.8     99.8     99.7      0.2      0.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       44)
       3       11        6       24       24       31       38`

---

Updated May 17, 2013
Shawn PINSON, Petitioner v. TEXAS.

No. 18-9650

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Steven Anthony LANG.

No. D-3051.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Steven Anthony Lang, of Chicago, Illinois, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

DOUGLAS KEITH CASEY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-452

WAYNE REAUD, CIA, FBI, et al., §

ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff, Douglas Keith Casey, a federal prisoner currently confined at the Metropolitan

Detention Center in Los Angeles, California, proceedingpro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this case as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) [Dkt. 20]. 

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections

to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.1

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the report of the magistrate judge is PARTIALLY ADOPTED to the extent it recommends 

1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable with the notation, “RTS

not in custody.” [Dkt. 21]. Plaintiff has yet to update the Court with his address. 

Case 1:23-cv-00452-MJT-ZJH Document 22 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8
dismissal. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the

magistrate judge.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 22nd day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00452-MJT-ZJH Document 22 Filed 03/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9
Donato AMAYA-RIVAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7617.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Theresa SEEBERGER, Petitioner v. DAVENPORT CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-1445

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Iowa denied.
Pickering 

also Fritz Hansen A/S v. Dist. Court., 116 Nev. 650, 6 P.3d 982 (2000). 

Accordingly, we deny both the petition and its accompanying motion for a 

stay. 

It is so ORDERED. 

J. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Feldman Graf 

McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk
Mario VILLENA, et al., petitioners, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 18-1223.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gerard Cliston ELLIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7549.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 30, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Cedric MCDONALD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9652

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,998
COMMITMENTS
   3,453    3,352    2,557   23,831   25,171   29,841   31,080   11,157    9,917

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        380)
    -882      516     -150    1,453      -40      421      326      -41       54

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.4      8.2      6.2     58.1     61.4     72.8     75.8     27.2     24.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
       7       11        8       28       25       39       41
```

----

Updated March 22, 2013
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jeffrey Allen Lindsay

,

Appellant,

v.

The Estate of Roy Orey Lindsay, Sr., Roy

A. Lindsay, Rainey L. Lindsay, Susan

Lindsay Thomas, Joni K. Lindsay, Roy A.

("Sonny") Lindsay, and Hanging H.

Ranch, Inc.

,

Appellee s

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 212

- C V

Appeal from the

143 rd District Court

of Reeves C ounty, Texas

(TC# 13

- 12

- 20542 P3137 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a joint second motion to abate the appeal. T he motion is

GRANTED , and the appeal is abated until J anuary 1 , 20 20 to give the parties an opportunity to

settle the dispute

. The appellate timetable will be suspended during the abatement. The parties

are directed to notify the Court whether the dispute has been resolved and to file the motion

necessary to dispose of the appeal. See T EX .R .A PP .P. 42.1(a)(1), (2). If the parties are unsuccessful

in resolving the appeal by agreement, the appeal will be reinstated and the r eporter’s r ecord will

be due 10 days from the date of the reinstatement order.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 19 th day of July

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                          176,691,528
<SECURITIES>                                                     32,943,894
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    27,922,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     (3,734,573)
<INVENTORY>                                                         734,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                247,333,032
<PP&E>                                                          529,567,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (37,770,201)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                1,219,078,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            67,467,814
<BONDS>                                                         966,579,964
<COMMON>                                                        237,648,634
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            58,087,902
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (255,356,958)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   1,219,078,642
<SALES>                                                          69,571,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 69,571,078
<CGS>                                                            48,549,911
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   121,010,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (71,873,595)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               46,525,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (26,091,832)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (26,091,832)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (26,091,832)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             0
        

</TABLE>
Dustin WASHINGTON, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9775

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

11/1/2023

Eastern District of Texas

BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.,

4:23-cv-00985

PARI'S MEDSPA and SYED NAJAM JAFFRI,

Syed Najam Jaffri

450 Lakecrest Drive

Lakewood Village, Texas 75068

Ryan D. Levy

Patterson Intellectual Property Law, P.C.

1600 Division Street, Suite 500

Nashville, Tennessee 37203

rdl@iplawgroup.com

Case 4:23-cv-00985-ALM Document 5 Filed 11/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 177
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00985

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00985-ALM Document 5 Filed 11/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 178
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       80,533
COMMITMENTS
  26,055    5,195    2,120   46,480   69,842   74,655   77,157    5,878    3,376

CHANGES FROM 06/25/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,239)
   1,705    2,454       11      177      -37    1,893    2,428    1,346      811

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.4      6.5      2.6     57.7     86.7     92.7     95.8      7.3      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       73)
      10        6        1       36       36       46       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/02/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      237,837
COMMITMENTS
  54,684   50,053    1,206  170,640  177,998  226,530  229,257   11,307    8,580

CHANGES FROM 06/25/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,608)
 -10,433      417     -413   33,230   20,183   22,384   20,187   -1,776      421

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.0     21.0      0.5     71.7     74.8     95.2     96.4      4.8      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      32       25       10       60       62       96       93
```

----

Updated July 8, 2013
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joshua Ogle, * From the 244th District Court

 of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C-139,276-D.

Vs. No. 11-16-00273-CV * November 10, 2016

CSI Inspection, LLC; Dupré Energy * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Services, LLC; and Ralph Frazier, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Joshua Ogle’s motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.
Peter B. ROJAS, Petitioner, v. Jay LANE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

No. 18-9066

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Terence C. POWELL, Petitioner, v. LAB CORPORATION, et al.

No. 19-7202.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC., et al. v. MIAMI FIRE FIGHTERS, et al.

No. 17-1056 (R46-04 / OT 2018).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 27, 2018.

*590The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
```

```

----

Updated August 16, 2013
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      144,227
COMMITMENTS
  41,688   33,446   15,165   70,055   73,678  126,908  122,288   17,319   21,939

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,192)
   3,336   -3,392     -145   -5,434      991   -2,243   -2,547     -949     -646

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.9     23.2     10.5     48.6     51.1     88.0     84.8     12.0     15.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      184)
      52       42       45       63       74      135      146
```

----

Updated August 16, 2013
Larey Douglas BROWN, Petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-5212.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.