alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-111

'

MICHAEL ALAN DAVIS (3), '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count Five of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Michael Alan Davis (3), is 

Case 1:23-cr-00111-MAC-CLS Document 62 Filed 02/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 200
2

adjudged guilty as to Count Five of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) -

Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Crime.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 5th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00111-MAC-CLS Document 62 Filed 02/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 201
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      101,316
COMMITMENTS
  21,524    2,990    2,989   70,348   89,922   94,861   95,901    6,455    5,415

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,045)
  -2,548   -1,075      904   13,131   10,690   11,487   10,519      558    1,526

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.2      3.0      3.0     69.4     88.8     93.6     94.7      6.4      5.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      13        5        4       40       36       53       45
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      262,992
COMMITMENTS
  69,505   42,580    2,509  165,688  202,882  237,702  247,971   25,290   15,021

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,876)
   1,231    3,304   -5,280   21,096   19,738   17,047   17,762    3,829    3,114

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.4     16.2      1.0     63.0     77.1     90.4     94.3      9.6      5.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      40       23       12       71       58      118       86
```

----

Updated June 21, 2013
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00158-CR

Jose Lopez Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

272nd District Court of Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-01722-CRF-272

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 27, 2022
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00454

(LEAD CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE

COMPANY; ARUBA NETWORKS, LLC

Case No. 2:23-cv-00457

(MEMBER CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE 

INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Pending before the Court is Cobblestone Wireless, LLC (“Cobblestone”) Unopposed 

Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. The Court, having 

considered the unopposed motion, and for good cause shown, finds that the motion should be 

GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines are extended for Cobblestone to comply 

with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 and serve contentions to Cisco Systems, Inc. to December 4, 2023 and the 

deadline for Cisco Systems, Inc. to comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 to February 12, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 20-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 80
2

All other deadlines shall remain in place absent further Order of the Court.

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 20-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 81
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of ScanSource, Inc.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to § 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ScanSource, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |  |  |                                                                                           
|--------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 28, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard P. Cleys                                                                      
|                |  |  |  | Richard P. Cleys, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the provisions of § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the accompanying Report, including for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written certification required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written certification required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be rendered by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
R. Howe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairy presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/S/ KENNETH R. HOWE
-------------------------------------
Kenneth R. Howe
Chief Financial Officer

December 7, 2007
Trevonte JENKINS, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-7825.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
     10-Q, for the quarterly period ending September 30, 1999 and is qualified
     in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         51,286,663
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51,596,163
<PP&E>                                         51,799,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,155,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 99,757,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,896,717
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000,451
<OTHER-SE>                                     91,860,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   99,757,197
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35,672,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                32,850,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            32,854,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   32,854,189
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .33



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 1 

Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 402
Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 31-2 Filed 02/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 403
Heather MARLOWE, Petitioner, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 19-116

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Miguel ALCANTAR, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-1548

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
H. F., Petitioner v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK.

No. 18-9209

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
In Re William Edward CLONINGER, petitioner.

No. 18-8170.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Letter Amendment to the Development Agreement (February 8, 2008)



 Exhibit 10.1.7 
 February 8, 2008 
 Mr. Raymond Kaesbauer 

Qualcomm Incorporated 
 5775 Morehouse Drive

 San Diego, CA 
 92121 USA 

 

	 	Re:	Development Agreement dated as of September 4, 2007 (the “Development Agreement”) by and between Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) and Aircell
LLC (“Aircell”). 

 Dear Mr. Kaesbauer, 
 The purpose of this letter is to confirm our understanding with you regarding the current status of Qualcomm’s design and development of the Aircard (hardware and software) and CSM software under the
Development Agreement, and our further agreement as to the amendment of the Development Agreement. [***]. 
 [***]: 

1. Qualcomm agrees on or prior to February 29, 2008 to provide Aircell with a written proposal of a revised schedule and plan for
the Aircard development that will outline a development time schedule, alternative or new designs for the Aircard, and additional support or other items of consideration for Aircell. The parties agree that they shall promptly meet and confer, no
later than March 7, 2008, to review the terms of the revised plan and to determine if the new schedule and plan is mutually acceptable to both parties, or that a modified plan or an another alternative is agreeable (the “Revised
Plan”). 
 2. Qualcomm agrees that any payment that is currently due, or scheduled to be paid by Aircell under the
Development Agreement, will be held in abeyance until the parties mutually agree to the Revised Plan. Such Revised Plan will detail such revised payment amounts and schedule payment dates[***]. Consummation of the Revised Plan shall occur on or
before March 14, 2008 
 3. Each party will pay its own expenses incurred in connection with the Revised Plan, including,
without limitation, all expenses incident to the negotiation, preparation and performance of the amended Development Agreement. 

4. The parties agrees not to disclose or otherwise communicate the existence or terms and provisions of this letter of amendment, or the
existence of discussions or negotiations between the parties, or the Revised Plan itself, at any time, to any other party, without the prior written consent of Aircell. 







 5. That certain Mutual Nondisclosure Agreement among the parties dated February 7, 2007
(“Confidentiality Agreement”) shall continue to be binding upon the parties in accordance with its terms. 
 If the
terms and conditions outlined in this amendment letter reflect our discussions to date, and are acceptable to you, please so indicate by executing and returning the enclosed duplicate original to Aircell by 5:00 p.m. Central Time on February l4,
2008. 
 Very truly yours, 

Aircell LLC 
  

			
	By:	 	Joe Cruz
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President and CTO

 ACCEPTED AND AGREED this 25th day of February 2008: 
  

			
	Qualcomm Incorporated
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Raymond Kaesbauer

		
	Title:	 	Sr. Director – Bus. Dev.


  
 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-75-MAC

'

CHARLES VERNON ROBERTS, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Counts Two and Four of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Charles Vernon Roberts, is 

adjudged guilty as to Counts Two and Four of the Indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C. 

Case 1:23-cr-00075-MAC-CLS Document 21 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 62
2

§ 1029(a)(3)—Possession of Fifteen or More Unauthorized Access Devices and 18 U.S.C. § 

1028A—Aggravated Identity Theft.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00075-MAC-CLS Document 21 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 63
Chris SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

LOW TEMP INDUSTRIES, INC., 

Appellant

v.

DUKE MANUFACTURING CO., 

Appellee

______________________

2022-2198, 2022-2199, 2022-2236

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-

00413, IPR2021-00414, IPR2021-00415.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceedings are DISMISSED under Fed. R. 

App. P. 42 (b).

Case: 22-2198 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 01/30/2023
2 LOW TEMP INDUSTRIES, INC. V. DUKE MANUFACTURING CO.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

January 30, 2023

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 30, 2023

Case: 22-2198 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 01/30/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES INC., 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC and AT&T CORP. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00468 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT AT&T SERVICES, INC.’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. 

(“AT&T Services”) hereby states the following: 

1. The following is the owner of AT&T Services: AT&T Inc. 

2. AT&T Services is not a publicly traded company. 

3. AT&T Inc. has no parent corporation and is itself a publicly held corporation. No 

one person or group owns 10% or more of the stock of AT&T Inc. 

Dated: December 11, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew Sean Yungwirth 

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street, NE 

Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309-3929 

Telephone: 404.253.6935 

Facsimile: 404.253.6901 

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553) 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 

821 ESE Loop 323 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 723
2 

Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: 903.705.1117 

Facsimile: 903.581.2543 

William Andrew Liddell 

waliddell@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP

900 S. Capital of Texas Hwy 

Suite 300 

Austin, TX 78746 

Telephone: 512.277.2272 

Facsimile: 512.227.2301 

Counsel for Defendant AT&T Services, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 11, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 21 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 724
# EXHIBIT 99.3SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Palatin Technologies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Carl Spana             
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                    |  | principal executive officer
|                    |  |                            
|Dated: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Stephen T. Wills       
|                    |  | principal financial officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of a separate disclosure document.
Reginald L. LOMAX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7032.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,006
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,432
<PP&E>                                           3,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,183
<BONDS>                                          2,558
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,771
<SALES>                                         10,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,564
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    936
<INCOME-TAX>                                       367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       569
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>