IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BROADCOM, INC., 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 5-23-cv-00134 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT CA, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND CASE CAPTION

Defendant CA, Inc. (“CA”) respectfully moves the Court to amend the case caption in 

the above-captioned case to reflect that CA, Inc. has been substituted for Broadcom, Inc. as the 

sole Defendant in the above-captioned case, and shows as follows: 

1. On November 20, 2023, Plaintiff OptiMorphix, Inc. (“OptiMorphix”) filed the 

Original Complaint in the above-captioned case, which named Broadcom Inc. (“Broadcom”) as 

the sole Defendant. See Dkt. 1. 

2. On January 26, 2024, Broadcom filed a motion to dismiss that Original Complaint 

on various grounds, including, but not limited to, both improper venue under Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(b)(3) and insufficient service of process under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5). See Dkt. 13. 

3. In response thereto, on February 23, 2024, OptiMorphix filed an Unopposed 

Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint “to substitute CA for Broadcom.” Dkt. 22. 

4. On February 23, 2024, OptiMorphix also filed a First Amended Complaint for 

Patent Infringement, in which OptiMorphix identified CA as the sole Defendant. Dkt. 23. 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 30 Filed 03/08/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 546
2 

5. On February 26, 2024, the Court granted OptiMorphix’s Unopposed Motion for 

Leave to File a First Amended Complaint. Dkt. 25. 

6. In view of the foregoing, CA respectfully requests (and OptiMorphix does not 

oppose) that the case caption in the above-captioned case be amended as shown below: 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

OPTIMORPHIX, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CA, INC., 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 5-23-cv-00134 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 30 Filed 03/08/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 547
3 

Dated: March 8, 2024 

Respectfully submitted, 

KILPATRICK, TOWNSEND & 

STOCKTON LLP 

/s/ Kristopher L. Reed 

Kristopher L. Reed 

2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 4400 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 922-7143 

Facsimile: (214) 922-7101 

kreed@ktslaw.com 

Russell A. Korn 

1100 Peachtree Street NE, Ste. 2800 

Atlanta, GA, USA, 30309 

Telephone: (404) 815-6500 

Facsimile: (404) 815-6555 

rkorn@ktslaw.com 

Joshua H. Lee 

1100 Peachtree Street NE, Ste. 2800 

Atlanta, GA, USA, 30309 

Telephone: (404) 815-6500 

Facsimile: (404) 815-6555 

jlee@ktslaw.com 

Edward J. Mayle 

1400 Wewatta St., Ste. 600 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 571-4000 

Facsimile: (303) 571-4321 

tmayle@kilpatricktownsen.com 

Counsel for Defendant CA, Inc. 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 30 Filed 03/08/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 548
4 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

Pursuant to LR CV-7(h) counsel for Defendant CA, Inc. (“CA”) has complied with the 

meet and confer requirement of this rule. Counsel for Defendant CA further states that Kristopher 

Reed met and conferred with Daniel Hipskind, counsel for the Plaintiff, and Plaintiff does not 

oppose the motion submitted herewith. 

/s/ Kristopher L. Reed 

 Kristopher L. Reed 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic service are being served with a copy of the foregoing via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on March 8, 2024. 

/s/ Kristopher L. Reed 

Kristopher L. Reed 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00134-RWS-JBB Document 30 Filed 03/08/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 549