alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 103 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 
2 

•HCON 103 EH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

2 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

3 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

4 On October 3, 2014, or on such other date as the 

5 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Com6 mittee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may 

7 jointly designate, the 29th annual District of Columbia 

8 Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this 

9 resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through 

10 the Capitol Grounds to carry the Special Olympics torch 

11 to honor local Special Olympics athletes. 

12 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

13 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

14 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

15 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA16 TIONS. 

17 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

18 for physical preparations for the event. 

19 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

20 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce21 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

22 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise23 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 
3 

•HCON 103 EH 

1 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

2 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 103 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

forcement Torch Run. District of Columbia Special Olympics Law En-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      45,388,000
<SECURITIES>                                35,272,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,085,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,043,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,454,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           177,815,000
<PP&E>                                     826,786,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (82,919,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,136,292,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      106,337,000
<BONDS>                                  1,034,957,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       65,603,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   240,212,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 447,818,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,136,292,000
<SALES>                                    147,464,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           147,464,000
<CGS>                                       91,690,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              192,683,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (4,991,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          56,036,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (96,284,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (96,284,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (96,284,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.71)


</TABLE>
Timothy Matthew JACOBY, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-8198.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
Jimmy Lawrence NANCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7048.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305(1992) (*per curiam* ).
# C_2017023EN.01001001.xml

| 24.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/10

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU

Request made by a Member State

(2017/C 23/10)

On 2 November 2016 the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 3 November 2016.

1

This request, made by the Czech Republic, concerns activities in the market for retail of electricity and gas in the Czech Republic.

Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that ‘contracts intended to enable an activity mentioned in Articles 8 to 14 to be carried out shall not be subject to this Directive if the Member State or the contracting entities having introduced the request pursuant to Article 35 can demonstrate that, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted; nor shall design contests that are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographic area be subject to this Directive’. The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of Directive 2014/25/EU is without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.

The Commission is allowed a period of 105 working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 6 April 2017.

According to Article 35(5) of Directive 2014/25/EU, further requests concerning retail of electricity and gas in the Czech Republic before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---

(1)  OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243.

1

---
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/24/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      790,416
COMMITMENTS
  91,584   20,085  243,864  434,805  505,472  770,253  769,421   20,162   20,994

CHANGES FROM 09/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -46,305)
  -1,409     -875  -12,809   -7,337   -5,679  -21,555  -19,363  -24,750  -26,943

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.6      2.5     30.9     55.0     64.0     97.4     97.3      2.6      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      38       32       60       63       63      130      127
```

----

Updated September 27, 2013
Mark Anthony RIOS, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6681.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 597 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 597

To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during 
    the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2012

    Mrs. Murray (for herself and Mr. Burr) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To permit the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during 
    the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND HOUSEWARES DURING 
              THE HOLIDAY SEASON FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 
              BUILDINGS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of the rules 
or regulations of the Senate--
            (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may collect from another Senator, officer of the Senate, 
        or employee of the Senate within Senate buildings nonmonetary 
        donations of clothing, toys, food, and housewares for 
        charitable purposes related to serving persons in need or 
        members of the Armed Forces and the families of those members 
        during the holiday season, if the charitable purposes do not 
        otherwise violate any rule or regulation of the Senate or of 
        Federal law; and
            (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the 
        Senate may work with a nonprofit organization with respect to 
        the delivery of donations described under paragraph (1).
    (b) Expiration.--The authority provided by this resolution shall 
expire at the end of the second session of the 112th Congress.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JOE DANIEL ADAMS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv406

LORI OLVIER, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Joe Daniel Adams, an inmate confined at the Shelby County Jail, proceeding pro

se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants.

Discussion

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, under which this case is brought, does not contain

a specific venue provision. As a result, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391.

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendant reside or in

which the claim arose. However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and

witnesses and in the interests of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other

district or division where it could have been brought.

The actions allegedly taken by the defendants took place in Shelby County, Texas, which

is located in the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. 

Plaintiff’s claims therefore arose in the Lufkin Division. The defendants also appear to reside in the

Lufkin Division. However, this case was filed in the Beaumont Division. 

Case 9:23-cv-00223-MAC-CLS Document 4 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 17
The court has considered the circumstances and determined that the interest of justice would

be served if the complaint were transferred to the division in which the claims arose. It is

accordingly

ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 7th day of December, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00223-MAC-CLS Document 4 Filed 12/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 18
Howard Aron WASHINGTON, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7681.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Schedule of Omitted Concession Agreement



 Exhibit 4.07 
 SCHEDULE OF OMITTED STANDARD CONCESSION AGREEMENT FOR DOMESTIC LONG-DISTANCE, SWITCHED, FIXED-LINE TELEPHONE SERVICE 
 As these agreements are identical in every case except for their reference number and the Region and sectors covered by them, we have, for ease of reference, filed only the relevant standard concession
agreement approved by ANATEL and provided this schedule to indicate the concession agreement that we have omitted from filing as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F. 

 

	1.	Concession Agreement for Domestic Long-Distance, Switched, Fixed-Line Telephone Service between ANATEL and Telemar Norte Leste S.A., No. 125/2011, dated
June 30, 2011.
THE HONORABLE J. CAMPBELL BARKER

Case 6:23-cv-00564-JCB Document 2 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 25
Case 6:23-cv-00564-JCB Document 2 Filed 11/17/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 26
So ordered by the court.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00564-JCB Document 2 Filed 11/17/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 27
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 24.1
------------
                           ACT Teleconferencing, Inc.

                               Power of Attorney
                          of Directors and/or Officers


          The undersigned directors and/or officers of ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc., a Colorado corporation, hereby make, constitute, and appoint Gerald D. Van
Eeckhout and Gavin Thomson, and either of them, the undersigned's true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in
the undersigned's names, place, and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned's
names as such directors and/or officers of said corporation to an Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB or other applicable form, and all amendments to it, to be filed
by said corporation in March, 1999 with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, with all
exhibits and other supporting documents, with the SEC, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact, and either of them, full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and
execution of the powers expressly granted in this power of attorney.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set the undersigned's hand
this 22nd day of March 1999.



                              /s/ Ronald J. Bach
                              -----------------------------------------
                              Ronald J. Bach

                              /s/ James F. Seifert
                              -----------------------------------------
                              James F. Seifert

                              /s/ Donald Sturtevant
                              -----------------------------------------
                              Donald Sturtevant

                              /s/ Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout
                              -----------------------------------------
                              Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout

                                    Page 34
Ella W. HORN, Petitioner v. CRC HEALTH GROUP, INC.

No. 18-9628

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Madeleine CONNOR, petitioner, v. Eric CASTRO, et al.

No. 18-249.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
SHREVEPORT CHAPTER #237 OF the UNITED DAUGHTERS OF THE CONFEDERACY, Petitioner, v. CADDO PARISH COMMISSION

No. 19-80

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32**
**      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**
     The  undersigned,  Norman W. Gayle,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Vesta Insurance Group,  Inc. (the "Company"),  andHopson B.  Nance,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to  Section 906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
     (1)           the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
     (2)           the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of         operations of the Company.
Dated: August 13, 2003                                                                                                                                 */s/   Norman W. Gayle, III*                                                                                                                                    Norman W. Gayle, III                                                                                                                        *President and Chief Executive Officer*
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/25/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      138,279
COMMITMENTS
  32,252   38,613   12,017   75,638   63,598  119,908  114,229   18,372   24,051

CHANGES FROM 06/18/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,128)
  -1,202   -2,970   -2,493   -1,047      653   -4,742   -4,810     -386     -318

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.3     27.9      8.7     54.7     46.0     86.7     82.6     13.3     17.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      171)
      45       40       34       68       62      132      123
```

----

Updated June 28, 2013
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

MYCHOICE, LLC

2:23-cv-00507

TAIV, INC.

Taiv, Inc.

195 McPhillips Street

Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba, Canada

Chris P. Perque

FisherBroyles, LLP

2925 Richmond Ave., Suite 1200

Houston, TX 77098

11/3/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 11/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00507 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00507-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 11/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 32