alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       93,246
COMMITMENTS
  25,958    3,425    4,493   56,510   83,146   86,961   91,064    6,285    2,182

CHANGES FROM 12/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,799)
   2,112    1,288      720    1,105    2,302    3,937    4,310     -138     -511

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.8      3.7      4.8     60.6     89.2     93.3     97.7      6.7      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       93)
      16        5        2       49       43       65       50
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      260,882
COMMITMENTS
  71,196   27,191    4,037  170,570  223,348  245,803  254,576   15,079    6,306

CHANGES FROM 12/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,966)
  -9,238      853    1,997   23,225   12,185   15,984   15,035   -3,018   -2,069

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.3     10.4      1.5     65.4     85.6     94.2     97.6      5.8      2.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      59       19       15       79       62      144       90
```

----

Updated December 19, 2013
Michael GOODRUM, Petitioner, v. Kenneth D. HUTCHISON, Warden.

No. 19-7301.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 23, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
SANDRA R., et al., Petitioners, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY.

No. 19-853

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

WAPP TECH LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP and 

WAPP TECH CORP., 

 Plaintiffs, 

§

§

§

§

§ 

v. 

§

§

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-1137 

JP MORGAN CHASE 

BANK, N.A. 

 Defendant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, R. Allan Bullwinkel, enters his 

appearance in this matter as counsel for Plaintiffs Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech 

Corp. He may receive communications from the Court and all parties at: 

R. Allan Bullwinkel 

HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, LLP 

609 Main Street, Suite 3200 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 221-2000 

Fax: (713) 221-2021 

E-mail: abullwinkel@hpcllp.com 

Case 4:23-cv-01137 Document 3 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 47
2 

DATED: December 22, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ R. Allan Bullwinkel 

Leslie V. Payne 

State Bar No. 0784736 

lpayne@hpcllp.com 

R. Allan Bullwinkel 

State Bar No. 24064327 

abullwinkel@hpcllp.com 

Alden G. Harris 

State Bar No. 24083138 

aharris@hpcllp.com 

Christopher L. Limbacher 

State Bar No. 24102097 

climbacher@hpcllp.com 

HEIM PAYNE & CHORUSH, LLP 

609 Main Street, Suite 3200 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 221-2000 

Facsimile: (713) 221-2021 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 

WAPP TECH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and 

WAPP TECH CORP.

Case 4:23-cv-01137 Document 3 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 48
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rules CV-5(a) on December 22, 2023. 

As such, this document was served on all counsel of record pursuant to Local Rules CV-5(a)(3)(A) 

and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

/s/ R. Allan Bullwinkel 

 R. Allan Bullwinkel 

Case 4:23-cv-01137 Document 3 Filed 12/22/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 49
<PAGE>

Exhibit 24.1

                          ACT Teleconferencing, Inc.

                               Power of Attorney
                         of Directors and/or Officers


     The undersigned directors and/or officers of ACT Teleconferencing, Inc., a
Colorado corporation, hereby make, constitute, and appoint Gerald D. Van
Eeckhout and Gavin Thomson, and either of them, the undersigned's true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in
the undersigned's names, place, and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned's
names as such directors and/or officers of said corporation to an Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB or other applicable form, and all amendments to it, to be filed
by said corporation in March, 1999 with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, with all
exhibits and other supporting documents, with the SEC, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact, and either of them, full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and
execution of the powers expressly granted in this power of attorney.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set the undersigned's hand this
February 24, 2000.



                                        /s/ Ronald J. Bach
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ronald J. Bach

                                        /s/ James F. Seifert
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James F. Seifert

                                        /s/ Donald Sturtevant
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Donald Sturtevant

                                        /s/ Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Carolyn R. Van Eeckhout

                                    Page 50
Emmanuely GERMAIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8773

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DOSHA SHAMAR GILDER,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CR-00094-MJT

JUDGE MICHAEL TRUNCALE

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Zack Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. The court ORDERS the 

Defendant’s attorney to read and discuss the presentence report with the Defendant and file any 

objections to the report BEFORE the date of the sentencing hearing. 

Case 1:23-cr-00094-MJT Document 19 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 53
It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Dosha Shamar Gilder, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) 

- Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 20th day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00094-MJT Document 19 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 54
May 3, 2012


  


 


Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC


440 North Wells, Suite 620


Chicago, IL 60654


Attn: Josh Scheinfeld/Jonathan Cope


 


RE:Company Termination Notice Pursuant to Section 11(d)
of the Purchase Agreement


 


Dear Josh & Jonathan:


 


Pursuant to Section 11(d) of our Purchase
Agreement dated May 27, 2011, we are electing to terminate our Purchase Agreement by providing you with this Company Termination
Notice dated May 3, 2012.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Bacterin International Holdings, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 /s/ Guy Cook, CEO
	 	
	 	By:  Guy Cook, CEO
John BUCSEK, Petitioner, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 19-180

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Edmond McCLINTON, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 17-9578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit AE

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-6 Filed 06/18/24 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1755
	
 


 
!"#$

%$	&&&##'(($
)))*)))

)) )))
+,!-,


. 


/01203045657899:;< =66>3

?@ABCDEFGEHDIJFKLMNFODEPQCGFRS

TFUVG

5W6XY;<Z [VHF\E]H^JF_DFHGSF`ES]^C@EFRS a0Z3<Z3b9c3<d9e2c<393b0fg g9d2Y3Y9dZ KFUVG

5W5XY;<Z [VHF`EHShiHjEDPF_D k9X<3b0fgl0ZcZc0; LnoNFOpqmNnNTFOp mTFUVG

  5r7  

s<Z30cb0d3Z t93<;Z 80ZZ303Y9dZu0bvYd:w93Z /9b<

=66Yd2b9Z<<W5=6lu;0d9l=6573976ub<Z39ds2lu;0d9l=657 xyz{|}~z|z

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-6 Filed 06/18/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1756
3/20/24, 2:41 PM 7500 Windrose Ave., Plano, TX 75024 to 101 E Pecan St, Sherman, TX 75090 - Google Maps

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/7500+Windrose+Ave.,+Plano,+TX+75024/101+E+Pecan+St,+Sherman,+TX+75090/@33.3584328,-97.0398121,10... 1/1

Map data ©2024 Google 5 mi

Explore nearby 101 E Pecan St

49 min

48.4 miles

via US-75 N

Fastest route now, avoids

construction on US-75 N

This route has tolls.



57 min

48.7 miles

via Sam Rayburn Tollway and

US-75 N

Construction on US-75 N causing 10-min delay



1 hr 4 min

46.9 miles

 via N Preston Rd



Restaurants



Hotels



Gas stations



Parking Lots



More

7500 Windrose Ave., Plano, TX 75024 to 101 E Drive 48.4 miles, 49 min

Pecan St, Sherman, TX 75090

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-6 Filed 06/18/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1757
3/20/24, 2:39 PM 7500 Windrose Ave., Plano, TX 75024 to 100 E Houston St, Marshall, TX 75670 - Google Maps

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/7500+Windrose+Ave.,+Plano,+TX+75024/100+E+Houston+St,+Marshall,+TX+75670/@32.7546721,-96.2579282,9... 1/1

Map data ©2024 Google 10 mi

Explore nearby 100 E Houston St

2 hr 44 min

176 miles

via I-20 E

Fastest route now, avoids crash on

I-635 E

This route has tolls.



2 hr 49 min

168 miles

 via I-635 E and I-20 E

1 hr

from $487

 Dallas, TX—Shreveport, 



Restaurants



Hotels



Gas stations



Parking Lots



More

7500 Windrose Ave., Plano, TX 75024 to 100 E Houston St, Drive 176 miles, 2 hr 44 min

Marshall, TX 75670

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-6 Filed 06/18/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1758
3/20/24, 2:41 PM 7500 Windrose Ave., Plano, TX 75024 to 101 E Pecan St, Sherman, TX 75090 - Google Maps

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/7500+Windrose+Ave.,+Plano,+TX+75024/101+E+Pecan+St,+Sherman,+TX+75090/@33.3584328,-97.0398121,10... 1/1

Map data ©2024 Google 5 mi

Explore nearby 101 E Pecan St

49 min

48.4 miles

via US-75 N

Fastest route now, avoids

construction on US-75 N

This route has tolls.



57 min

48.7 miles

via Sam Rayburn Tollway and

US-75 N

Construction on US-75 N causing 10-min delay



1 hr 4 min

46.9 miles

 via N Preston Rd



Restaurants



Hotels



Gas stations



Parking Lots



More

7500 Windrose Ave., Plano, TX 75024 to 101 E Drive 48.4 miles, 49 min

Pecan St, Sherman, TX 75090

Case 2:24-cv-00021-JRG Document 48-6 Filed 06/18/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1759
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6510

STEVEN HENRY TROTMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRUCE BRYANT, York County Sheriff; ALLEN

BRANDON, Sheriff; RUSSELL YEAGER, Deputy, York

County Sheriff’s Department; YORK COUNTY,

SOUTH CAROLINA, City, Town and Municipality;

DAVID FORTSON, JR., Chief of Police; CHARLES

CABANISS, Captain, Rock Hill Police

Department; CITY OF ROCK HILL; YORK COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; ROCK HILL POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.

(0:03-cv-02729-RBH)

Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 2, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Henry Trotman, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B.

MILLAR, L.L.C., Rock Hill, South Carolina; Barton Jon Vincent,

David Leon Morrison, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Steven Henry Trotman appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We deny

Trotman’s motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Trotman v. Bryant, No. 0:03-cv02729-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/03/13          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      381,272
COMMITMENTS
 100,810  162,860  103,715  152,902   90,541  357,427  357,116   23,845   24,156

CHANGES FROM 11/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -32,597)
 -11,220   -9,194   -8,420  -13,402  -14,369  -33,042  -31,983      445     -614

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.4     42.7     27.2     40.1     23.7     93.7     93.7      6.3      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      175)
      44       75       71       37       37      129      147
```

----

Updated December 6, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         20,082
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,932
<PP&E>                                         687,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                 63,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,314
<BONDS>                                        534,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    53
<COMMON>                                       158
<OTHER-SE>                                     164,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,810
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               30,162
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                902
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            902
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Gregory Tarrel BROWN, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA, et al.

No. 18-9036.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 5, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v- §

§

§

§

WILLIAM MCKINNLEY GARLAND §

(1) §

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00268

ORDER

The Court set a hearing to consider the matter of Defendant s detention pending trial and

Defendant waived the right to a detention hearing by the execution of waiver.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant is detained pending trial without prejudice to

re-raising the issue of pretrial detention at any time.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this December 21,2023.

Case 4:23-cr-00268-SDJ-KPJ Document 39 Filed 12/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 95
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-50150

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JOSE MACIAS-CASTRO, also

known as Martin Sotel-Hernandez,

also known as Rogelio Martinez-Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CR-106-All

_________________________________________________________________

November 25, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Jose Macias-Castro appeals his conviction and sentence

for being a previously deported alien who reentered the United

States without permission and for falsely representing himself to

be a United States citizen. the primary issue at trial was where

Macias was born. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable

to the jury’s verdict, was sufficient to allow a rational trier of

fact to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Macias was born2

in Mexico. S ee United States v. Resio-Trejo

, 45 F.3d 907, 910 (5th

Cir. 1995); United States v. Martinez

, 975 F.2d 159, 160-61 (5th

Cir. 1992).

The d istrict court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Macias’s motion for a new trial. Macias did not meet his burden of

showing that the whereabouts of his father could not have been

ascertained prior to trial with due diligence. U nited States v.

Freeman

, 77 F.3d 812, 817 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.

Mulderig , 120 F.3d 534, 545 (5th Cir. 1997).

The district court di d not commit plain error in raising

Macias’s base offense level by 16 levels because of his previous

convi ction for retaliation. U nited States v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d

160 , 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). Macias argues, without

support, that he did not receive a one-year sentence for the crime

and that it thus did not meet the definition of an aggravated

felony as set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F). Macias’s

presentence report (“PSR”) indicates that Macias served two years

for the offense. The PSR is considered reliable and may be

considered as evidence by the court when making sentenc ing

determination. U nited States v. Gonzalez

, 76 F.3d 1339, 1346 (5th

Cir. 1996); United States v. Lghodaro

, 967 F.2d 1028, 1030 (5th

Cir. 1992).

This court does not consider Macias’s arguments that his

sentence was imposed in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause and

that the government presented improperly cumulative evidence3

because these arguments were raised for the first time in Macias’s

reply brief. S ee United States v. Jackson

, 50 F.3d 1335, 1340 n.7

(5th Cir. 1995).

A F F I R M E D.
Carlos Arturo PATINO-RESTREPO, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.

No. 18-9651

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 1 

Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1020
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 12 PageID #: 1021
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 3 of 12 PageID #: 1022
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 4 of 12 PageID #: 1023
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 5 of 12 PageID #: 1024
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 6 of 12 PageID #: 1025
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 7 of 12 PageID #: 1026
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 8 of 12 PageID #: 1027
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 9 of 12 PageID #: 1028
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 10 of 12 PageID #: 1029
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 11 of 12 PageID #: 1030
Case 6:23-cv-00609-JDK Document 33-1 Filed 03/25/24 Page 12 of 12 PageID #: 1031