alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Optimizing Digital Mental Health Interventions 
(R01).
    Date: June 22, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Erin E. Gray, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard NSC 
6152B, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8152, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e6f1eaedade4f1e2fac3edeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8eebfce7e0a0e9fceff7cee0e7e6a0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Non-Pharmacological Clinical Trials.
    Date: June 23, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Regina Dolan-Sewell, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive BLVD, Room 4154, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#067463616f68672862696a67682b756371636a6a46686f6e28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="166473717f78773872797a77783b657361737a7a56787f7e38717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 24, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11454 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2641
<SECURITIES>                                     59564
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 62205
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   78252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              618
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                       77530
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     78252
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       44
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2474
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2474
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

DAVID IGNACIO LOPEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10193 

D.C. No. 

4:14-cr-00220-JGZ-JR-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 8, 2020**

San Francisco, California

Before: MILLER and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges, and SCHILTZ,*** District 

Judge.

Defendant-Appellant David Ignacio Lopez appeals from the district court’s 

revocation of his supervised release and the imposition of an additional 60 months 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the 

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Lopez argues for the first time on appeal that the supervised release 

conditions imposed in his original sentence and in his revocation sentence 

prohibiting him from having contact with minors are unconstitutionally vague. We 

disagree, concluding that there was no error, let alone plain error. United States v. 

Johnson, 626 F.3d 1085, 1088–89 (9th Cir. 2010). We construe release conditions

as not prohibiting unintentional conduct or incidental contacts. See, e.g., United 

States v. Vega, 545 F.3d 743, 750 (9th Cir. 2008); United States v. Napulou, 593 

F.3d 1041, 1045 (9th Cir. 2010). Thus, there was no error in imposing the nocontact conditions because a person of “common intelligence” would understand 

what they prohibit: knowingly being around or having contact with a minor that is 

more than incidental. United States v. King, 608 F.3d 1122, 1128 (9th Cir. 2010). 

Nor did the district court plainly err in failing to consider the effect of the nocontact conditions on Lopez’s relationship with his brother because the conditions

did not “target[]” Lopez’s sibling relationship, United States v. Wolf Child, 699 

F.3d 1082, 1090 (9th Cir. 2012), and Lopez failed to show that they infringe his 

right to familial association. 

Finally, Lopez contends that his sentence is procedurally unsound and 

substantively unreasonable. We conclude there was no procedural plain error, as 

described above. We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion 
3 

and impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. United States v. Blinkinsop, 606 

F.3d 1110, 1114 (9th Cir. 2010). The record reveals that Lopez’s sentence

reasonably relates to the statutory goal the district court identified—protecting the 

public—given the underlying conviction and the nature of the supervised release 

violation. See United States v. Rudd, 662 F.3d 1257, 1261 (9th Cir. 2011); 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-74-3-MAC

'

JOHNATHON LEE BUSH '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Johnathon Lee Bush, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 -

Case 1:23-cr-00074-MAC-CLS Document 39 Filed 11/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

169
2

Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute and Distribution of a Controlled Substance 

Analogue.

Case 1:23-cr-00074-MAC-CLS Document 39 Filed 11/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

170
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of April 20, 2012, is made by and between TransDigm Group Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Bernt Iversen (the “Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the parties are parties to an Employment Agreement dated February 24, 2011 (the “Employment Agreement”);

 WHEREAS, the parties realized that there was a mutual mistake in the definition of “Good Reason” contained in the
Employment Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties would like to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein to correct
such mistake. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the respective covenants and agreements set forth
below, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 Paragraph (o) of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “Good Reason” shall mean the occurrence of any of
the following: (i) a material diminution in the Executive’s title, duties or responsibilities, without his prior written consent, or (ii) a reduction of the Executive’s aggregate cash compensation (including bonus opportunities),
benefits or perquisites, without his prior written consent, (iii) the Company requires the Executive, without his prior written consent, to be based at any office or location that requires a relocation greater than 30 miles from Liberty, South
Carolina, or (iv) any material breach of this Agreement by the Company. 
 Except as amended herein, the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and
year first above written. 
  

			
	TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ W. Nicholas Howley
		 	  

	 Name:
	 	W. Nicholas Howley
	 Title:
	 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	 EXECUTIVE

	
	 /s/ Bernt Iversen

	 Bernt Iversen
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: 7677 Group, L.P. v. SMS Financial JDC, LP, as assignee of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, R eceiver of First National Bank (Edinburg, Texas)

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 376

- C V

Trial court case number: 201 6

- 05379

Trial court: 2 15 th District Court of Harris County



### This appeal was previously abated for mediation on September 23, 2021. On
November 22

, 2021

, the parties filed a joint motion, inform ing this Court that mediation
was unsuccessful and requesting that we reinstate the appea l and set the briefing schedule. Because the appellate record appears to be complete, we order the following:

We reinstate the appeal on the Court’s active docket.
Appellant and cross

- appellant ’s brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days
from the date of this order. See T EX



### . R. A PP



### . P . 38.6(a).
Appellee and cross

- appellee ’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appellant and cross

- appellant ’s brief. See T EX



### . R. A PP



### . P . 38 .6(b).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Sherry Radack

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ December 2, 2021

____
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket No. USCG-2022-0379]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of enforcement of regulation.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the City of Bayfield Fireworks in Bayfield, WI. This action is necessary to protect participants and spectators during the City of Bayfield Fireworks. During the enforcement period, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth or designated on-scene representative.

# DATES:

The regulations in 33 CFR 165.943(b) will be enforced from 9 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2022, for the City of Bayfield Fireworks safety zone, § 165.943.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this document, call or email LTJG Joe McGinnis, telephone (218)-725-3818, email                         *DuluthWWM@uscg.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the annual City of Bayfield 4th of July Fireworks Display in 33 CFR 165.943 from 9 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2022. All waters of the Lake Superior North Channel in Bayfield, WI within the arc of a circle with a radius of no more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°48′40″ N, 090°48′32″ W.

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth or their designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port's designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

                    This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.943 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    , the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance notification of the enforcement of this safety zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.                

Dated: May 17, 2022.

F.M. Smith,

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.

[FR Doc. 2022-11714 Filed 5-31-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
Gary DRESSLER, petitioner, v. Bradford RICE, et al.

No. 18-591.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, based on such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i)   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
               the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with
               the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
               applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.


Date:    August 15, 2005                             /s/ Anthony J. Simonetta
         ---------------                             --------------------------
                                                     Anthony J. Simonetta
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RANDY WILLIAM SHARP, #06706 §

VS § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23cv121-JRG-RSP

UPSHUR COUNTY MEDICAL, ET AL. §

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff Randy William Sharp, a prisoner now confined within the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice (TDCJ), filed this civil rights lawsuit complaining of alleged violations of his 

constitutional rights while incarcerated at the Upshur County Jail. The case was referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and 

recommendations for the disposition of the case. 

On July 30, 2024, Judge Payne issued a Report, (Docket No. 35), recommending that

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 31), be granted and that this lawsuit be 

dismissed with prejudice. A copy of this Report was mailed to Plaintiff at his last-known address. 

To date, however, Plaintiff neither filed objections nor otherwise communicated with the Court 

since February 2024. 

Because objections to Judge Payne’s Report have not been filed, Plaintiff is barred from 

de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, 

except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual 

findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United 

Services Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See 

Case 2:23-cv-00121-JRG-RSP Document 36 Filed 09/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 228
2

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 

(1989) (holding that where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of 

review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, (Docket No. 35), is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Further, it is 

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 31), is 

GRANTED and Plaintiff’s lawsuit is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby 

DENIED.

So Ordered this

Sep 11, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00121-JRG-RSP Document 36 Filed 09/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 229
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, based on such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
               the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
               with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
               applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.


Date: May 16, 2005                                   /s/ Anthony J. Simonetta
      ------------                                   ------------------------
                                                     Anthony J. Simonetta
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT (10)(B)



 EXHIBIT 10(b) 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Prospectus and to the use of our reports: (1) dated
March 29, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company, (2) dated April 23, 2012, with respect to the financial statements of Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate Account B in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 34 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 33-45379) under the Securities Act of 1933, and the related Prospectus Merrill Lynch Retirement Plus. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 23, 2012