alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for
the quarterly period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. Bonczek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|/s/ ROBERT R. BONCZEK                    
|Robert R. Bonczek Chief Financial
Officer

May 10, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be
retained by Trimeris, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES                             STATE OF ORGANIZATION

TruVision Wireless, Inc.                         Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Chattanooga, Inc.           Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Flippin, Inc.               Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Gadsden, Inc.               Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Memphis, Inc.               Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Jacksonville, Inc.          Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Lawrenceburg, Inc.          Delaware
TruVision Wireless - Huntsville, Inc.            Delaware
Wireless One Operating Company, L.L.C.           Texas
Wireless One Operating Company, Inc.             Delaware
Wireless One of Bryan, Tx., Inc.                 Delaware
Gulf Coast Wireless, Inc.                        Texas
Wireless One of Fort Walton, Inc.                Delaware
Wireless One of Gainesville, Inc.                Delaware
PAN Wireless Communication, Inc.                 Delaware
Wireless One PCS, Inc.                           Delaware
Shoals Wireless, Inc.                            Tennessee
Phipps Wireless, Inc.                            Florida
SWCC, Inc.                                       Georgia
Wireless One of Florida, Inc.                    Delaware
Wireless One of Georgia, Inc.                    Delaware
Wireless One of Louisiana, LLC                   Texas
Wireless One of Natchez, Inc.                    Delaware
Wireless One of Tennessee, Inc.                  Delaware
Wireless One of Texas, Inc.                      Delaware
Wireless One of Texas Leasing, LP                Texas
Wireless One of Georgia Leasing Co., Inc.        Delaware
Wireless One of Louisiana Leasing Co., LLC       Texas
Wireless One of Alabama Leasing Co., Inc.        Alabama
Wireless One of Florida Leasing Co., Inc.        Delaware
Wireless One of Arkansas Leasing Co., Inc.       Delaware
Wireless One of Kentucky Leasing Co., Inc.       Delaware
Wireless One of Tennessee Leasing, LP            Tennessee
Wireless One of Texas, G.P., Inc.                Delaware
Wireless One of Tennessee, G.P., Inc.            Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217,454
<PP&E>                                          37,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 289,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   289,604
<SALES>                                         58,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,697
<CGS>                                           32,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,999
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,667
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.16
        

</TABLE>
Gilbert Demetrius AGUILAR, petitioner, v. Aaron D. FORD, Attorney General of Nevada, et al.

No. 18-8917.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael T. WILLAN, petitioner, v. PETITIONER.

No. 18-6339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District IV denied.
MICHIGAN, Petitioner, v. Michael FREDERICK, et al.

No. 18-1513

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of St. Lawrence Energy
Corp.  (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, W. Benjamin Garst, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      May 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ W. Benjamin Garst,
      Jr.W.
      Benjamin Garst, Jr.Chief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification accompanies this report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to St. Lawrence Energy Corp. and will be
retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 08/23/2023 /s/ Philip Wang Philip Wang CA Bar No. 262239

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 08/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 281
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2230

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit the inclusion

in the adjusted community rate for Medicare+Choice plans of costs

that would be unallowable under Medicare principles or the Federal

Acquisition Regulation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1999

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit

the inclusion in the adjusted community rate for

Medicare+Choice plans of costs that would be unallowable under Medicare principles or the Federal Acquisition

Regulation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2230 IH

1 SECTION 1. DISALLOWING COSTS THAT ARE UNALLOW2 ABLE UNDER MEDICARE PRINCIPLES OR THE

3 FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION IN

4 COMPUTING THE ADJUSTED COMMUNITY

5 RATE FOR MEDICARE+CHOICE PLANS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1854(f) of the Social Se7 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–24(f)) is amended by adding

8 at the end the following new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(5) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COSTS IN DETER10 MINING ADJUSTED COMMUNITY RATE.—In deter11 mining the adjusted community rate for an organi12 zation, there shall not be included any costs of the

13 organization which would not be allowable costs

14 under cost-reimbursement principles applied under

15 this title or under the Federal Acquisition Regula16 tion. Specifically, in carrying out this paragraph, the

17 Secretary shall not permit inclusion of costs of lob18 bying, political contributions, or communications

19 with plan members to urge them to lobby or to carry

20 out other political activities.’’.

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

22 subsection (a) applies to determinations of adjusted com23 munity rates made after June 15, 1999.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                          Subsidiaries of the Company
                          ---------------------------

     Norton McNaughton of Squire, Inc., a New York corporation ("Squire"), is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Miss Erika, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Jeri-Jo Knitwear,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company,
Norty's Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Squire,
McNaughton Apparel Holdings Inc., a South Carolina corporation, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company.
T‘HEATITORNEYGENE~ 

OF TEXAS 

February 21, 1957. 

Honorable W. G Woods, Jr. OPINION NO, Ww-36 

County Attorney 

Liberty County, 

Liberty, Texas. 

Re: Is It legal for a sheriff 

to work prisoners outside of the county jail 

on his private ranch operations even if the 

labor is voluntary and 

the prisoners are paid 

Dear Mr. ‘Woods : 

out of the sheriff’s 

personal funds? 

This opinion is in response to your letter of February 

12, 1957, in which you asked the following question: 

“lIs it legal for a sheriff to work prisoners 

outside of the County Jail on his private ranch 

operations whether or not such prison labor Is 

voluntary on the part of the prisoners and whether 

or not such prisoners are paid for thytlr labor out 

of the personal funds of the sheriff? 

Article 793 of Vernon’s Code of Criminal procedure reads 

in part: 

in part: 

“When a defendant is convicted of a misdemeanor 

and his punishment is assessed at a pecuniary fine, 

if he is unable to pay the fine and costs adjudged 

against him, he may for such time as will satisfy the 

judgment be put to work in the workhouse, or on the * 

county farm, or public improvements of the county, as 

provided in the succeeding article; or if there be 

no such workhouse farm or improvements, he shall be 

Imprisoned in jail for a sufficient length of time to 

discharge the full,,amount of fine and costs ad judged 

against him; . . . 

Article 794 of Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure reads 
Honorable W. G Woods, Jr., - Page 2 - ww-36 

‘lwhere the punishment assessed in a conviction 

for misdemeanor is confinement in jail for more 

than one day, or where in such conviction the punlshment is assessed only at a pecuniary fine and the 

party so convicted Is unable to pay the fine and 

costs ad judged agalns t him, those so convicted shall 

be required to don manual labor in accordance with 

the provisions of this article under the following 

rules and regulations: . . . 

“5. They shall be put to labor upon the public 

roads, bridges or ,other public works of the county 

when their labor cannot be utilieed in the county 

workhouse or county farm. . .’ 

Attorney General’s Opinions O-1061 and O-3809, copies of 

which are herewith enclosed, hold that the above mentioned Articles 

require that county prisoners be worked only on county pro,jects. 

The fact situation involved in your request Is clearly of 

a private nature and In accord with the above Attorney General’s 

Opiniohs, we are of the opinion that Articles 793 and 794, V.C .C.P 

designate the excltislve projects upon which county prisoners may be 

employed. Your question Is therefore answered in the negative. 

SUMMARY 

It is illegal for a sheriff to work prisoners 

outside of the county jail on his private ranch 

operations even if the labor is voluntary and the 

prisoners are paid out of 

funds . 

the sheriff’s bersonal 

K!R: jl 

~Encl. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WIISON 

ATTORNEY GENERAL - 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTE 

By Ii. @rzr;yApndler
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon
Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: September 30, 2014 | By: | /s/ Kent Rodriguez                                                                    | 
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                         |     | Kent Rodriguez                                                                        | 
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer, President,
        Secretary and Principal Financial Officer |
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/03/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      146,885
COMMITMENTS
  54,859   31,453   16,528   60,979   72,202  132,366  120,183   14,519   26,702

CHANGES FROM 11/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,305)
     289   -2,697    1,108   -2,503     -561   -1,106   -2,150   -2,199   -1,155

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    37.3     21.4     11.3     41.5     49.2     90.1     81.8      9.9     18.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      55       44       46       51       57      132      129
```

----

Updated December 6, 2013
Exhibit 23.1

kpmg



KPMG LLP



Chartered Accountants

Telephone

(416) 228-7000

Yonge Corporate Centre

Telefax

(416) 228-7123

4100 Yonge Street Suite 200

www.kpmg.ca

North York ON M2P 2H3

Canada







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

Diversinet Corp.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-128975) on Form F-1/A, the registration statement (No. 333-122284) on Form F-1/A, the registration statement (No. 333-122284) on Form F-3 (which was amended by the aforementioned registration statement on Form F-1/A), the registration statement (No. 333-113646) on Form F-3, the registration statement (No. 333-107251) on Form F-3, the registration statement (No. 333-125085) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-114674) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-103356) on Form S-8 of Diversinet Corp. of our report dated February 22, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Diversinet Corp. as at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and deficit and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2005, Annual Report on Form 20-F of Diversinet Corp.  Our report dated February 22, 2006, includes additional comments for U.S. readers that states that conditions and events exist that cast substantial doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP





Toronto, Canada

March 9, 2006
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-141944 of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc.,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of a new accounting standard), appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008. 

/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHELLP

San Francisco, California 

March 12, 2009
Webster Douglas WILLIAMS, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7023.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,937
COMMITMENTS
   7,705    4,985    1,289   19,099   22,942   28,093   29,216   10,844    9,721

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        -66)
      84      203      -45      153     -525      192     -367     -258      301

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.8     12.8      3.3     49.1     58.9     72.1     75.0     27.9     25.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      11        8        6       33       26       47       37
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
Letter Agreement Dated May 17, 2010



 Exhbit 10.50 

 
 



 
 May 17, 2010 
 Achim, 
 As you know the shares in Research Services Germany 234 GmbH will be transferred to a
German affiliate of eResearch Technology, Inc., presumably at the end of this month. 
 We are pleased to inform you that we as the new
shareholder will safeguard that your salary to be received from Research Services Germany 234 GmbH will be 

                         
       200,000 Euro gross per year, 

                         
       To be paid in 12 monthly installments of 16,667 Euro gross, 
 as of the month following the transfer
of the shares. All other benefits will remain as defined in your employment agreement. 
 Further you will become eligible for the ERT 2010
Bonus plan (attachment), which provides for bonus payments subject to company agreements and fulfillment of the agreed upon targets. The bonus payment may amount as much as 50% of the annual gross salary, if all targets are reached. The payment for
calendar year 2010 will be based on as much as 50% of the total salaries paid under the ERT 2010 Bonus plan in 2010. 
 Please note that this
offer is subject to the condition precedent that the transfer of the shares is effective. Should, due to any reason, the closing not occur, there will be no obligation on our side. 
 We are very excited about the future of combining ERT and Research Services, and look forward to your leadership as part of the ERT Senior Management Team. We believe that together the two firms will
provide an unparalleled level of service to clients in clinical trials. 







 Please confirm your agreement with this offer by returning a countersigned copy of this letter to me.

  

			
	Best regards
	
	/s/ Michael McKelvey
	
	Michael McKelvey

  

			
	
		
	Signed:	 	/s/ Joachim Schulke
		 	Hans-Joachim Schulke