alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Bruce Ficks,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

c) disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.
| Dated:   August  14, 2007 | By:                                  | /s/ Bruce Ficks |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|                                     | Bruce Ficks  Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/27/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      173,713
COMMITMENTS
  54,621   15,963   21,350   75,457  112,894  151,428  150,207   22,285   23,506

CHANGES FROM 11/20/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,036)
    -992       34    2,182    5,758    4,361    6,948    6,577    1,088    1,459

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.4      9.2     12.3     43.4     65.0     87.2     86.5     12.8     13.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      190)
      64       27       32       57       86      136      131
```

----

Updated December 5, 2012
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DARLENE C. BALISTRERI-AMRHEIN, 

et al.

v. 

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

OF NORTH AMERICA, et al.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00776- 

ALM-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 26, 2024, the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #11), was 

entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendation that Plaintiffs’ Motions (Dkt. 

#3, #5, #6, #7) be denied as moot and Plaintiffs’ case be dismissed with prejudice. 

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections 

being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge 

are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED Plaintiffs’ Motions (Dkt. #3, #5, #6, #7) are DENIED 

AS MOOT and Plaintiffs’ case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 4:23-cv-00776-ALM-AGD Document 12 Filed 09/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1724
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 436TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 22, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

In the Matter of G.L.R., Jr., a juvenile, Appellant

V.

No. 04-14-00708-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014-JUV-01095

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant G.L.R. Jr. because

he is indigent.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 30, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00708-CV

In the Matter of G.L.R., Jr., a juvenile

v.

(NO. 2014-JUV-01095 IN 436TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING $195.00 EXEMPT

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this September 30, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2330

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic under construction at 2900 Veterans Way, Melbourne, Florida, as the ‘‘Jerry O’Brien

Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. STEARNS, Ms.

BROWN of Florida, Mr. GOSS, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. YOUNG of Florida,

Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr. MICA, Mr. SHAW, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. BOYD, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. CANADY of

Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms.

ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. DEUTSCH, and Mr.

WEXLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic under construction at 2900 Veterans Way, Melbourne,

Florida, as the ‘‘Jerry O’Brien Department of Veterans

Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2330 IH

1 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

2 OUTPATIENT CLINIC, MELBOURNE, FLORIDA.

3 The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic

4 under construction at 2900 Veterans Way, Melbourne,

5 Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Jerry O’Brien Depart7 ment of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. Any ref8 erence to such outpatient clinic in any law, regulation,

9 map, document, record, or other paper of the United

10 States shall be considered to be a reference to the Jerry

11 O’Brien Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clin12 ic.

Æ
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Eastern District of Texas

✔

2:23-cv-00199-JRG 6/21/2023 Eastern District of Texas

Patent Armory Inc. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

7,130,430 10/31/2006 Patent Armory Inc.

8,275,413 9/25/2012 Patent Armory Inc.

8,825,112 9/2/2014 Patent Armory Inc.

Patent Armory Inc.

Patent Armory Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00199-JRG Document 10 Filed 06/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 344
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,660
<SECURITIES>                                    10,679
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,250
<PP&E>                                          15,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,870
<BONDS>                                          4,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,919
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,609
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,865)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,865)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.01**
**GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS INC.**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Craig R. Smith, M.D., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Guilford PharmaceuticalsInc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; (b) [Paragraph reserved pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2004
/s/ Craig R. Smith, M.D.Craig R. Smith, M.D.
```

```

----

Updated January 15, 2013
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00304-CV

Bradley L. CROFT,

Appellant

v.

AMS SA MANAGEMENT, LLC, dba Association Management Services,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CI-15857

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 9, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

This is an appeal of a trial court’s order imposing sanctions against Bradley Croft. By 

order dated January 7, 2013, this appeal was abated based on an automatic stay arising from a 

bankruptcy petition filed by Croft. On August 5, 2015, appellee AMS SA Management, LLC d/b/a 

Association Management Services filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, asserting it had purchased 

all of Croft’s rights in this appeal. Attached to the appellee’s motion was a bankruptcy order 

approving the sale of Croft’s rights in this appeal to “Clifton L. Lowry, on behalf of Lowry 

Creditors,” not to AMS SA Management, LLC. 
04-11-00304-CV

- 2 -

Because the bankruptcy court’s order conveyed Croft’s appellate rights, Croft’s appeal was 

no longer subject to the bankruptcy court’s automatic stay. Therefore, on August 10, 2015, this 

court issued an order reinstating this appeal on the docket of this court. In that same order, 

however, we ordered that appellee AMS SA Management, LLC’s motion to dismiss be held in 

abeyance to allow AMS SA Management, LLC the opportunity to provide this court with proof 

that it purchased all of Croft’s rights in this appeal and to show it has authority to move to dismiss 

Croft’s appeal.

On August 20, 2015, Clifton L. Lowry filed a Motion for Substitution of Party and to 

Dismiss Appeal. Attached to the motion is the bankruptcy trustee’s Report of Sale of Personal 

Property to Clifton L. Lowry.

We grant the motion. Clifton L. Lowry is substituted for Bradley Croft as appellant in this 

appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(b). The appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(A).

PER CURIAM
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS RF LLC, petitioner, v. PPC BROADBAND, INC.

No. 18-395.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

AUTHOR J. MANNING, JR., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

PARAMOUNT, et al., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-444-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN PART 

Plaintiff Author J. Manning, Jr. brought this pro se copyright action against 

Defendant Paramount in state court on May 9, 2023. Paramount subsequently 

removed the case to federal court. The case was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for 

the disposition of the case. On September 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended 

complaint adding several new defendants. Docket No. 11. 

On February 4, 2024, Judge Love issued a Report sua sponte recommending 

that the Court dismiss the Plaintiff’s remaining claims in this case for failure to 

prosecute, lack of proper service, and failure to comply with the Court’s previous 

orders to serve the remaining Defendants in this case. Docket No. 49. No objections 

to the Report were filed, and the period in which to do so has passed. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Case 6:23-cv-00444-JDK-JDL Document 52 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 284
2 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 49) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that all of Plaintiff’s remaining claims against all Defendants 

in this case are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute, lack of proper 

service, and failure to comply with a Court order. 

Case 6:23-cv-00444-JDK-JDL Document 52 Filed 03/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 285
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES and STATE OF 

TEXAS ex rel. DANIEL W. ELLIOTT, 

M.D. and LISA A. MINSLOFF, M.D.,

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 1:23-cv-00329-MJT

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. )

)

SOUTHEAST TEXAS MEDICAL 

ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., et al.,

)

)

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT STEWARD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM LLC’S NOTICE OF 

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO ITS INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Defendant Steward Health Care System LLC (“Steward”) gives notice that on October 17, 

2023, it produced documents to all counsel of record pertaining to its Initial Disclosures that were

previously served on August 21, 2023. 

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 110 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1063
2

Dated: October 17, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Nicholas S. Graber

Thomas G. Yoxall

 State Bar No. 00785304

 tyoxall@lockelord.com

Nicholas S. Graber

 State Bar No. 24122918

 nick.graber@lockelord.com

LOCKE LORD LLP

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800

Dallas, Texas 75201-6776 

(214) 740-8000 – Telephone 

(214) 740-8800 – Facsimile

Ryan M. DiSantis*

 State Bar No. (Mass.) 654513

 ryan.disantis@lockelord.com

Locke Lord LLP

111 Huntington Avenue, 9th Floor

Boston, MA 02199-7613

(617) 239-7613 – Telephone

(617) 227-4420 – Facsimile

* Admitted pro hac vice

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on October 17, 2023, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be filed 

and set for service on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF filing system.

/s/ Nicholas S. Graber

Nicholas S. Graber

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 110 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1064
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 197

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

at 410 North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, as

the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 197 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 410 North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas,

4 is hereby designated as the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Of5 fice’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be a ref10 erence to the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.