alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ALEXIS LEWIS (21)

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:22-CR-00110

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the First Superseding 

Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Alexis Lewis

GUILTY of Count One of the First Superseding Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 

U.S.C. § 1349 - Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27th November, 2024.

Case 4:22-cr-00110-JDK-AGD Document 742 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

2827
John ROGERS, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-6435.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.23



Dominion Homes, Inc. 2005 Director Compensation Plan



|1. | $40,000 annual fee for each outside director ($10,000 per quarter)
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Additional $5,000 annual fee for each Audit Committee member (other than Audit Committee Chair) and each committee Chair (other than Audit Committee Chair) ($1,250 per quarter)
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Additional $10,000 annual fee for Audit Committee Chair ($2,500 per quarter)
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Additional $20,000 annual fee for the Lead Director ($5,000 per quarter)
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



Director and Committee Fees shall be paid quarterly in advance.



|5. | Each outside director also receives, on the first day after the annual meeting, a grant of non-qualified stock options to purchase 2,500 common shares at an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 11-3520

___________________________

Lori Irish

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

N. C. English, Warden

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: September 14, 2012

Filed: September 25, 2012

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Lori Irish appeals the district court’s1

 denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition,

in which she challenged the Bureau of Prisons’ denial of her request for a 12-month

placement in a Residential Reentry Center (RRC). The appeal is moot, however,

because Irish was transferred to an RRC during the pendency of this appeal, and thus

the court can no longer grant her the relief she requested. See Calderon v. Moore, 518

U.S. 149, 150 (1996) (per curiam) (when event occurs during pendency of appeal that

renders it impossible for court to grant effective relief, court should dismiss appeal as

moot). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50611

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENJAMIN SALERNO,

 Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-92-CR-83

---------------------

December 20, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benjamin Salerno moves this court for leave to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the denial of his motion for

modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). 

We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and

find no reversible error. Salerno's other claims were not

presented to the district court and are not preserved for appeal.
No. 95-50611

-2-

Salerno fails to raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. 

Accordingly, Salerno's motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED

and the appeal is DISMISSED.

We caution Salerno that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Salerno is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
No. 6:23-cr-00059

United States of America

v.

Brandon Dyess Greer

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 33. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count two of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Brandon Dyess Greer guilty of count two of the indictment, 

charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) – Felon in Possession 

of Ammunition.

So ordered by the court on March 27, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00059-JCB-JDL Document 36 Filed 03/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 106
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF MICHAEL C. DEANE

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Michael C. Deane, enters his 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 165
-2-

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp. (collectively, “AT&T” or “Defendants”). Defendants

respectfully request that the court take note of this Notice of Appearance and makes Michael C. 

Deane their counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies of all communications and other documents 

filed in the above-referenced proceedings that are not filed via ECF should be emailed or faxed 

to Michael C. Deane at the address set forth below.

Dated: November 29, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael C. Deane

Michael C. Deane (GA Bar No. 497195)

 michael.deane@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404)881-7000

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/29/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 166
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 29th day of November, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such filing 

upon Counsel of Record.

/s/ Michael C. Deane

Michael C. Deane (GA Bar No. 497195)

 michael.deane@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404)881-7000

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 11/29/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 167
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2762

PHILIP M. COOPER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. C. SPRADLIN, Officer; L. M. WETZEL, Officer; VIRGINIA COCHRAN, Judge; W. S. HUMPHREY,

Officer; CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH; LONDON BRIDGE

MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-94-1106-2)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip M. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michael Golski,

CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lee Melchor

Turlington, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia; Jeff Wayne Rosen, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia

Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Cooper v. Spradlin, No. CA-94-1106-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6,

1995; June 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1541

___________

Elinda J. Stribling, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Arkansas State Hospital, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 7, 2012

Filed: March 12, 2012

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Elinda Stribling appeals the district court’s dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 1

of her employment-discrimination action. We conclude the dismissal was not an

abuse of discretion: after being warned that failure to comply with the court’s

discovery order could result in dismissal of her action, Stribling failed to provide full

and complete discovery responses and failed to appear for her deposition; and the

defendant demonstrated prejudice. See Sentis Grp., Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., 559 F.3d

888, 898-99 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); cf. Aziz v. Wright, 34 F.3d 587,

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas.
588-89 (8th Cir. 1994) (affirming dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) where pro se

plaintifffailed to complywith court’s order to allow deposition; finding that violation

was willful where plaintiff was warned dismissal would be consequence of continued

noncompliance). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by

denying reconsideration, see Schoffstall v. Henderson, 223 F.3d 818, 827 (8th Cir.

2000), and we reject Stribling’s argumentsthat the court erred by appointing specific

counsel, cf. Taylor v. Dickel, 293 F.3d 427, 431 (8th Cir. 2002) (no constitutional or

statutory right to effective assistance of counsel in civil case), and by failing to

“remand” her case to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
-1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382 

v. (Lead Case) 

 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON 

WIRELESS., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendants, 

 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380 

v. (Member Case) 

 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendants, 

 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381 

(Member Case) 

v. 

 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

Defendants. 

 

ERICSSON INC., 

Intervenor, 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADAM AHNHUT

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Adam Ahnhut, enters his 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendant/Intervenor Ericsson Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 87 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 715
-2-

(“Ericsson” or “Defendant/Intervenor”). Ericsson respectfully requests that the court take note 

of this Notice of Appearance and makes Adam Ahnhut its counsel of record in this lawsuit. 

Copies of all communications and other documents filed in the above-referenced proceedings 

that are not filed via ECF should be emailed or faxed to Adam Ahnhut at the address set forth 

below. 

Dated: January 16, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Adam Ahnhut 

Adam Ahnhut (TX Bar No. 24106983) 

adam.ahnhut@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

Chase Tower 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Email: adam.ahnhut@alston.com 

Telephone: 214-922-3400 

Facsimile: 214-922-3899 

Counsel for Defendant Ericsson Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 87 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 716
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 16th day of January, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such filing 

upon Counsel of Record. 

/s/ Adam Ahnhut 

Adam Ahnhut (TX Bar No. 24106983) 

adam.ahnhut@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

Chase Tower 

2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2300 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Email: adam.ahnhut@alston.com 

Telephone: 214-922-3400 

Facsimile: 214-922-3899 

Counsel for Defendant Ericsson Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 87 Filed 01/16/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 717
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2195

To provide for the establishment of a national cemetery on a portion of

Fort Gordon, Georgia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. NORWOOD (for himself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of a national cemetery

on a portion of Fort Gordon, Georgia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND TRANSFER FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF NA4 TIONAL CEMETERY, FORT GORDON, GEOR5 GIA.

6 (a) TRANSFER OF LAND FOR NATIONAL CEME7 TERY.—The Secretary of the Army may transfer, without

8 reimbursement, to the administrative jurisdiction of the

9 Secretary of Veterans Affairs a parcel of real property,
2

•HR 2195 IH

1 including any improvements thereon, at Fort Gordon,

2 Georgia, for the purpose of permitting the Secretary of

3 Veterans Affairs to establish a national cemetery on the

4 parcel.

5 (b) USE OF PROPERTY.—The Secretary of Veterans

6 Affairs shall use the real property transferred under sub7 section (a) as a national cemetery under chapter 24 of

8 title 38, United States Code.

9 (c) RETURN OF UNUSED PORTION.—If the Secretary

10 of Veterans Affairs determines that any portion of the real

11 property transferred under subsection (a) is not needed

12 for use as a national cemetery, the Secretary of Veterans

13 Affairs shall return such portion to the administrative ju14 risdiction of the Secretary of the Army.

15 (d) LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—The exact acreage and

16 legal description of the real property to be transferred

17 under this section shall be determined by a survey satis18 factory to the Secretary of the Army. The cost of the sur19 vey shall be borne by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

20 (e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

21 Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms

22 and conditions in connection with the transfer under this

23 section as the Secretary of the Army considers appropriate

24 to protect the interests of the United States.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AUTOSCRIBE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

M&A VENTURES, LLC. 

Defendant. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00349-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Extend the P.R. 4-3 Joint Construction Statement 

Deadline to August 2, 2024 (the “Joint Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Autoscribe Corporation and 

Defendant M&A Ventures, LLC (collectively, the “Parties”). (Dkt. No. 95). In the Joint Motion, 

the Parties request an extension of time to comply with the P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction 

Statement) deadline. (Id. at 1). The requested extension would move the deadline for the Parties

to comply with P.R. 4-3 from July 29, 2024 up to and including August 2, 2024. (Id). 

Having considered the Joint Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for the Parties to comply with 

P.R. 4-3 is extended up to and including August 2, 2024. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of July, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 97 Filed 07/29/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2829
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                             Vastar Resources, Inc.
 
               Statement Setting Forth Detail of Computation of 
                      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          For the years ended
                                                              December 31,
                                                          --------------------
                                                           1998   1997   1996
                                                          ------ ------ ------
                                                             (in millions)
<S>                                                       <C>    <C>    <C>
Income from continuing operations before income taxes,
 minority interest and cumulative effect of change in
 accounting principle(1)................................. $ 51.2 $234.6 $212.7
Fixed charges
  Interest expense charged to income, and portion of
   rental representative of interest(2)..................   63.5   47.8   52.3
Capitalized interest.....................................     --     --     --
                                                          ------ ------ ------
    Total fixed charges.................................. $ 63.5 $ 47.8 $ 52.3
                                                          ------ ------ ------
Earnings (1)+(2)......................................... $114.7 $282.4 $265.0
                                                          ====== ====== ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......................   1.81   5.91   5.07
                                                          ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-86-4-MAC

'

SARA LYNN MEYER, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Sara Lynn Meyer, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00086-MAC-ZJH Document 88 Filed 02/16/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 250
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 -

Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine.

Signed this date

Feb 16, 2024

Case 1:23-cr-00086-MAC-ZJH Document 88 Filed 02/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 251
Kevin K. McALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., petitioners, v. Martin Jonathan Batalla VIDAL, et al.

No. 18-589.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari in No. 18-587 granted. Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 18-588 and No. 18-589 granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Morris Lavon BROWN, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8989.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.