alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 24, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

APRIL DUPREE ADESHILE, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00980-CV V.

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, 

Appellee

________________________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, April 

Dupree Adeshile. We grant the motion for rehearing and order that this court’s 

former judgment of January 16, 2014 be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We 

further order this court’s Memorandum Opinion of January 16, 2014 withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Metropolitan 

Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, signed August 10, 2012, was heard on 

the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, April Dupree Adeshile, to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence J. Madden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company

                            /s/ Lawrence J. Madden
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Lawrence J. Madden,
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6871

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DWAYNE BURMELL ARTIS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:06-cr-00004-H-1) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009 

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dwayne Burmell Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, 

Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Dwayne Burmell Artis appeals the district court’s 

order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence 

filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no 

reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. United States v. Artis, No. 5:06-cr-00004-

H-1 (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certificate is being filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification is included solely for the purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is
not intended to be used for any other purpose. In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2009, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Nexxus Lighting, Inc. that to such officers knowledge:

1. such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. for
the year ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Nexxus Lighting, Inc.



|               |  |                                      
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|               |  | NEXXUS LIGHTING, INC.                
|               | 
|March 29, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael A. Bauer                 
|               |  | Michael A. Bauer                     
|               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|               |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|               | 
|               |  | /s/ Gary R. Langford                 
|               |  | Gary R. Langford                     
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|               |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Richard Joseph CRANE, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 18-5764.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ricardo Rene SANDERS, petitioner, v. Ron DAVIS, Warden.

No. 18-6214.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2262

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the deduction

for the cost of demolishing structures other than certified historic structures and other than historically residential structures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1999

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. SHAYS, and Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the deduction for the cost of demolishing structures other

than certified historic structures and other than historically residential structures.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2262 IH

1 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF DEDUCTION FOR COSTS OF

2 DEMOLISHING STRUCTURES OTHER THAN

3 CERTIFIED HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND

4 OTHER THAN HISTORICALLY RESIDENTIAL

5 STRUCTURES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—So much of section 280B of the

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to demolition of

8 structures) as precedes paragraph (1) is amended to read

9 as follows:

10 ‘‘SEC. 280B. DEMOLITION OF CERTIFIED HISTORIC STRUC11 TURES AND HISTORICALLY RESIDENTIAL

12 STRUCTURES.

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the demolition of

14 any certified historic structure or historically residential

15 structure—’’.

16 (b) CERTIFIED HISTORIC STRUCTURE; HISTORI17 CALLY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.—Section 280B of such

18 Code is amended by adding at the end the following new

19 subsection:

20 ‘‘(b) CERTIFIED HISTORIC STRUCTURE; RESIDEN21 TIAL STRUCTURE.—For purposes of this section—

22 ‘‘(1) CERTIFIED HISTORIC STRUCTURE.—The

23 term ‘certified historic structure’ means—

24 ‘‘(A) a certified historic structure (as de25 fined in section 47(c)(3)), and
3

•HR 2262 IH

1 ‘‘(B) any building (and its structural com2 ponents) which is designated as a certified his3 toric structure by the appropriate agency of a

4 State or local government.

5 ‘‘(2) HISTORICALLY RESIDENTIAL STRUC6 TURE.—The term ‘historically residential structure’

7 means any building (other than a certified historic

8 structure) and its structural components if the first

9 use of such building after its initial construction was

10 for residential purposes.’’

11 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to

12 section 280B in the table of sections for part IX of sub13 chapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended to read

14 as follows:

‘‘Sec. 280B. Demolition of certified historic structures and historically residential structures.’’

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply to demolitions commencing after

17 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2182

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel VICTORY OF BURNHAM.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mrs. FOWLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

VICTORY OF BURNHAM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106

6 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 2182 IH

1 trade for the vessel VICTORY OF BURNHAM (United

2 States official number 663780).

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2133 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2133

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Cibacron Brilliant Blue FN-G.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Cibacron Brilliant Blue FN-G.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.88      4, 11-              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         Triphenodioxazine                                                  31/2003          ''.
                         disulfonic acid,
                         6, 13-dichloro-3,
                         10-bis[[2-[[-[[4-
                         fluoro-6-[(2-
                         sulfophenyl)
                         amino] -1,3,5-
                         triazin-2-yl]
                         amino] propyl]
                         amino]- lithium
                         sodium salt (CAS
                         No. 163062-28-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3204.16.30.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

No. 18-1067

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Cedrick SAMS, petitioner, v. Daniel QUINN, et al.

No. 17-7640.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      558,802
COMMITMENTS
  98,940   24,360  153,561  281,645  363,411  534,146  541,332   24,656   17,470

CHANGES FROM 12/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,879)
 -18,279    2,414  -13,283   27,011   14,716   -4,551    3,847   -9,328  -17,726

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.7      4.4     27.5     50.4     65.0     95.6     96.9      4.4      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      40       35       58       73       61      145      125
```

----

Updated December 19, 2013
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2065

To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.37.01 Instant print film for color

photography (provided for

in subheading

3701.20.0030) ..................... 2.4% No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•HR 2065 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Joseph C. GARCIA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6898 (18A579).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Evelyn PERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7076.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4076

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PEYTON BARBER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (5:07-cr-00024-FPS-1)

Submitted: October 9, 2008 Decided: November 18, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brendan S. Leary, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Wheeling, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Sharon L. Potter, United States Attorney,

Randolph J. Bernard, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Peyton Barber pled guilty pursuant to a written plea

agreement to one count of possession with intent to distribute

cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)

(2000). She was sentenced to thirty months in prison. Barber

sought a departure or variance sentence based upon the sentencing

disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine in the

applicable advisory guidelines, but the district court found that

Barber’s request was foreclosed by United States v. Eura, 440 F.3d

625 (4th Cir. 2006). Barber timely appealed.

After the judgment was entered and while the appeal was

pending, the Supreme Court issued Kimbrough v. United States, 128

S. Ct. 558 (2007). The Court held “it would not be an abuse of

discretion for a district court to conclude when sentencing a

particular defendant that the crack/powder disparity yields a

sentence ‘greater than necessary’ to achieve § 3553(a)’s purposes,

even in a mine-run case.” Id. at 574. Accordingly, the Court

remanded to permit the district court to consider the 100-to-1

ratio of crack cocaine to powder cocaine in sentencing. Barber

argues, and the Government concedes, that this case should be

remanded for resentencing in light of Kimbrough.

Because the district court did not have the benefit of

Kimbrough when sentencing Barber, we vacate Barber’s sentence and

remand for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument because
3

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITY EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,680                   5,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,377                   4,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)                    (50)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,252                  10,252
<PP&E>                                         226,487                 226,487
<DEPRECIATION>                               (110,354)               (110,354)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,589                 126,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,154                   8,154
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            87                      87
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,526                  64,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,589                 126,589
<SALES>                                          5,717                  11,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,085                  12,591
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,083                  14,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36                      39
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 875                   1,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,825)                 (3,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (796)                 (1,385)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,029)                 (1,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)                  (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)                  (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
XITRONIX CORPORATION, Petitioner v. KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, dba KLA-Tencor, Incorporated.

No. 18-1170

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/13/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      471,240
COMMITMENTS
  45,073   29,255  114,011  288,545  307,041  447,629  450,306   23,611   20,934

CHANGES FROM 03/06/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     18,823)
     890    6,443    1,543   18,524   12,843   20,957   20,829   -2,134   -2,006

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.6      6.2     24.2     61.2     65.2     95.0     95.6      5.0      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      29       26       48       64       61      121      112
```

----

Updated March 16, 2012