alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LACY DAVIS, III, a/k/a Lacey Davis,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-94-411-A)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lacy Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lacy Davis, III, appeals the district court’s denying his

motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Davis, No. CR-94-411-A (Jan. 12,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE §1350

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31,
2004 of Lincoln Benefit Life Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Lincoln Benefit Life Company.

|Date: May 6, 2004 | /s/CASEY J. SYLLACasey J. Sylla
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
|----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  | /s/STEVEN E. SHEBIKSteven E. Shebik
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

E-4

---
Arthur LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. The IRVINE COMPANY APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC., et al.

No. 19-5238

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 12

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 199
Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 2 

Source: https://www.verizon.com/support/knowledge-base-201653/ 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 3 

Source: https://www.verizon.com/support/wifi-calling-legal/ See also 16[a]-16[c] below. 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 4 

16[a] a shared component; The Verizon system includes a shared component, for example, at leas

Source: VoWiFi Service Description, Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GS

Official Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description. 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 5 

Source: VoLTE Service Description and Implementation Guidelines VOctober 2014 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 6 

16[b] a first environment access module that communicates with the shared component to enable access to a first network using a first wireless access technology; and 

The Verizon system includes a first environment access module, for exMME, that communicates with the shared component to enable access using a first wireless access technology (such as cellular access). 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description, Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GS

Official Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description. 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 7 

Source: VoLTE Service Description and Implementation Guidelines VOctober 2014 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 8 

16[c] a second environment access module that communicates with the shared component to enable access to a second network using a second wireless access technology that differs from the first wireless access technology. 

The Verizon system includes a second environment access module, fo3GPP AAA Server, that communicates with the shared component to second network using a second wireless access technology (such as Wthe first wireless access technology (such as cellular). 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description, Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GS

Official Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description. 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 9 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description _Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GOfficial Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description 

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 1-13 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:
Scott A. SELDIN, Petitioner, v. Theodore M. SELDIN, et al.

No. 19-944

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.