alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP.,

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP.,

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORP.,

Intervenor. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOVANT-INTERVENOR NOKIA OF AMERICA 

CORP.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 300
Before the Court are Movant-Intervenor Nokia of America Corporation (“Nokia”)’s 

Unopposed Motions to Intervene. (Dkt. No. ); (Dkt. No. ); (Dkt. No. ). Nokia moved to 

intervene pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

24(b). Having considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, and the relevant authorities, the 

Court finds that the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, Nokia is 

permitted to intervene in theses actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive pleading 

in intervention on or before . 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 301
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify asfollows:

 

1.             This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2010 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.             The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.             The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 

Date:  August 13, 2010

 

 
|   | /s/  Thomas F. Wolfe                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas  F. Wolfe                                   |
|   | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

v. Civ. No. ________________________

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

I hereby certify that I am the plaintiff or the attorney of record for the plaintiff in the above

cause, and that defendant ________________________________ was served by the following

method:

I further certify that the defendant has failed to serve an answer or other responsive pleading;

no extension has been granted or any extension has expired; the defendant is neither an infant (under

age 21) nor an incompetent person; the defendant is not in the active military service of the 

United States of America or its officers or agents or was not six months prior to the filing of the 

case.	

				
	
	

 	

					


	 		!"
			

		

Date:

___________________

__________________________________________

Plaintiff or Attorney for Plaintiff

__________________________________________

Bar No.

__________________________________________

Address

__________________________________________

TOUCHPOINT PROJECTION

INNOVATIONS, LLC,

CDNETWORKS CO., LTD

2:23-cv-00233-JRG

CDNetworks Co., Ltd.

Service via the Texas Secretary of State at 1019 Brazos, Austin, TX 78701

on July 12, 2023, with affidavit of service filed at Dkt. 4.

10/03/2023

Randall Garteiser

TX 24038912

119 W. Ferguson St., Tyler, TX 75702

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 6-1 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 79
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated February 26, 2009, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-124021, effective April 21, 2005 and File No. 333-121919, effective January 14, 2005) andon Forms S-8 (File No. 333-125021, effective May, 18, 2005, File No. 333-41115, effective November 26, 1997, File No. 333-41125, effective November 26, 1997, File No. 333-41131, effective November 26, 1997 and File No. 333-41135, effective, November26, 1997). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Orlando, Florida

February 26, 2009
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 Case No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A JOINT DISCOVERY ORDER

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) respectfully submits this unopposed Motion 

for entry of a joint protective order.

Dated: January 5, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with opposing 

counsel prior to filing this Motion, and counsel indicated its agreement with the relief requested herein.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 32 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 268
/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document has been 

served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 32 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 269
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-419

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 

Defendant Valve Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss, 

GRANTS the Motion. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for the Plaintiff to submit its Response shall 

be extended up to and including December 8, 2023. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 32 Filed 01/05/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 270
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

Before the Court is Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Lindsay M. Cooper as 

counsel for Defendants. The Court, having considered same, is of the opinion the motion should 

be GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate all CM/ECF notifications as to Lindsay 

M. Cooper for this action. 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 120-1 Filed 08/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5111
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-04263 and No. 333-05943 on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statements No.
333-14149 and No. 333-12577 on Form S-4 of Heartland Wireless Communications,
Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 24, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996, which reports appear in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K/A
of Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries.

As discussed in note 1(d) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for the direct costs and installation fees
related to subscriber installations in 1995.


                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 25, 1997
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed March 27, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-00081-CR MOLLY ORTIZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-30318-I 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Myers, and Justice Pedersen , III Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant Molly Ortiz waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine in an amount less than one gram. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on three years’ c ommunity supervision, and assessed a $1,500 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief i n which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requir ements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief prese nts a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets require ments of Anders ). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appella nt of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex.–2– Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se res ponse to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the reco rd and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s dut y in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 180081F.U05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
MOLLY ORTIZ, Appellant
No. 05-18-00081-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-30318-I. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Myers and Pedersen, III participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of t his date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered March 27, 2019.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                       671
<INVENTORY>                                      7,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,143
<PP&E>                                           4,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,194
<SALES>                                         23,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,796
<CGS>                                           17,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    71
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                       385
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE FIGURES PRESENTED ABOVE HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128
AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY
DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS, 

LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendants

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-425-JRG-RSP

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(3) FOR IMPROPER VENUE

Before the Court is Valve Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(3) for Improper Venue. After consideration of said motion, the Court finds that 

it is well-taken and should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above referenced litigation is hereby dismissed 

in its entirety.

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 8-3 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 125
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ARLAN SPEER § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-33

TOM MADDOX, ET AL. §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Arlan Speer, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. This matter was

referred to the undersigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the

Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States

Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition

of the case.

Discussion

The court previously entered an Order (doc. #5) directing Plaintiff to pay an initial partial

filing fee. A copy of the Order was sent to Plaintiff at the Jasper County Jail, the address Plaintiff

provided to the court. The copy of the Order sent to Plaintiff was returned to the court, indicating

Plaintiff is no longer at the jail. (Doc. #6.) Plaintiff has not supplied the court with a new address

or otherwise contacted the court.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action for

want of prosecution sua sponte whenever necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious

disposition of cases. Anthony v. Marion Cnty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1167 (5th Cir. 1980). 

See also McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988). Eastern District of Texas

Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants such as Plaintiff to provide the court with a physical

address and keep the clerk advised in writing of a current address.

By not providing the court with his current address, Plaintiff has prevented the court from

communicating with him and moving this case towards resolution. He has therefore failed to

Case 1:23-cv-00033-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
diligently prosecute this case. As a result, this case should be dismissed without prejudice for want

of prosecution.

Recommendation

This civil rights lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved

party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and

recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by

the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d

1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 11th day of July, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00033-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 07/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

BENEFICIENT and BRAD HEPPNER, 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ALEXANDER GLADSTONE, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil No. 6:23-CV-00376 

ORDER

The Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Disclosures file by Plaintiffs 

Beneficient and Brad Heppner having come before this Court and good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion is GRANTED, and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall provide their Initial Disclosures by 

July 19, 2024. 

Case 6:23-cv-00376-JDK Document 37 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1215
Jack CODY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, et al.

No. 18-629.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Erwin Haitzmann, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Century  Casinos,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this  quarterly  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  disclosed  in this  quarterly  report  any  change in the  registrant's
internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to  materially  affect,   the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
reporting;

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October, 28, 2004

/s/ Erwin Haitzmann
--------------------------------
Erwin Haitzmann
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer