alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 

 

|   | **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   | **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Roy Dar, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

 

 

|   |   |   | /s/ Roy Dar                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Roy Dar

Senior Vice President, Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

 

 

Dated: May 15, 2008
##### 



|LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation | Form 10-Q
|---------------------------------- | ---------

Exhibit 32

LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Each of the undersigned, Scott C. Petersen and Gary H. Ritondaro, the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of
LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation (the Company), individually and not
jointly has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the Report).

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | Ø |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                               
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | Ø |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
Certification as of the 5th day of
August 2003.



| | /s/ Scott C. Petersen

Scott C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Gary H. Ritondaro

Gary H. Ritondaro
Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

June 30, 2003

Page 31
### NUMBER 13

- 15

- 00 391

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

CELESTINO VIVANCO

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its Criminal District Attorney, the

Honorable Mark Skurka , has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal pursuant to Rule

42.2 of the Texas Rul es of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). No

decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion and dismiss the2

appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will

be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

22nd day of October, 2015

.
Lenin GARCIA, petitioner, v. Gina PICKETT, et al.

No. 17-8919.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*94Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
BLAKE J. WATTERSON;

Plaintiff,

v.

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES; 

STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his 

official capacity as Director of the 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE; 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States; and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00080

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw

Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #65). It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion 

is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment (Dkt. #6) is hereby WITHDRAWN.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00080-ALM Document 67 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1110
UNITED STATEST DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendant.

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP

[[PROPOSED]] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY THE 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 46-1 Filed 03/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 659
INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify the Protective Order (Dkt. 43). After 

considering the briefing, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 46-1 Filed 03/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 660
Wendy A. NORA, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN OFFICE OF LAWYER REGULATION.

No. 18-538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC; and AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION and 

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’/Intervenors’ Motion to Withdraw their pending Motion to 

Stay Proceedings Pending Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. 83.) The Court finds that 

Defendants’/Intervenors’ Motion is hereby GRANTED.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 84 Filed 07/30/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2117
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITY EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,120
<PP&E>                                         222,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                (106,873)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,622
<SALES>                                          6,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,506
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (589)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

'

v. ' NO. 9:23-CR-22

'

'

HANNAH CLAIR POWER '

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred a petition alleging violations of supervised release conditions to the 

Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for 

consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and 

considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along 

with the record, pleadings and all available evidence.

At the close of the revocation hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn 

recommended:

1. finding the Defendant violated the third allegation in the petition that she failed to 

follow a special condition of release; 

2. revoking the Defendant’s supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583; and

3. sentencing the defendant to a term of 11 months’ imprisonment, to be served at the 

Federal Correctional Institute in Bryan, Texas, if the Bureau of Prisons can 

accommodate such request with one year of supervised release to follow. The court 

adopts the magistrate judge’s findings for the imposition of the same standard, 

mandatory, and special conditions of supervised release previously imposed when the 

Defendant was originally sentenced.

At the close of the revocation hearing, the Defendant, defense counsel and counsel for 

the Government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed 

findings and recommendations contained in the magistrate judge’s report, consenting to 

Case 9:23-cr-00022-MAC-ZJH Document 14 Filed 11/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 62
2

revocation of supervised release and imposition of the sentence recommended. The Defendant 

also waived her right to be present with counsel and to speak at sentencing before the court 

imposes the recommended sentence. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are 

correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition is GRANTED and Hannah Clair 

Power’s supervised release is REVOKED. 

Judgment and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the magistrate 

judge’s recommendations.

Case 9:23-cr-00022-MAC-ZJH Document 14 Filed 11/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 63
Exhibit 23

                       Consent of Independent Accountants


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No.  33-95828,  No. 333-03843 and No.  333-19581) and on
Form S-8 (No.  33-98262  and No.  33-98264)  of our report dated March 27, 2001,
relating to the financial  statements and financial  statement  schedule,  which
appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 2, 2001

                                       55
<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6537

ANTHONY GREEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director; ROBERT E. WARD,

Warden; PHILLIP MCLEOD, Associate Warden;

JAMES STUCKEY, Major; SERGEANT LEDBETTER; DAVE

J. EVANS, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-97-918-4-22BE)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Green, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS &

MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. Green’s case

was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief

be denied and advised Green that failure to file timely objections

to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district

court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning,

Green failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Green has waived appellate review by

failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Purina Mills, LLC (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Robert DeGregorio,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



                                                 By  /s/ Robert DeGregorio
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     Robert DeGregorio
                                                         President
                                                        and Manager
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

RAYFORD EARL KING JR. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00082-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count Two of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Rayford Earl 

King Jr. GUILTY of Count Two of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10th January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00082-JDK-JDL Document 29 Filed 01/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 75
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each director and/or officer of Dominion Homes, Inc. (the "Corporation")
whose signature appears below hereby appoints Douglas G. Borror and Peter J.
O'Hanlon as the undersigned's attorneys, or either of them individually as the
undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's name and behalf and in any
and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and
likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and all amendments to the Form
10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such persons as its
attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority
to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto granting to each such
attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying
all that any such attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by
virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 15th day of
March, 2004.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                  Title
---------                                  ------
<S>                                        <C>
/s/ Donald A. Borror                       Chairman Emeritus
-------------------------------
Donald A. Borror

/s/ Douglas G. Borror                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-------------------------------            (Principal Executive Officer)
Douglas G. Borror

/s/ Jon M. Donnell                         President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
-------------------------------
Jon M. Donnell

/s/ Peter J. O'Hanlon                      Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief
-------------------------------            Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
Peter J. O'Hanlon                          and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ David S. Borror                        Corporate Executive Vice President and Director
-------------------------------
David S. Borror

                                           Director
-------------------------------
Pete A. Klisares

/s/ Gerald E. Mayo                         Director
-------------------------------
Gerald E. Mayo

/s/ Carl A. Nelson, Jr.                    Director
-------------------------------
Carl A. Nelson, Jr.

/s/ Zuheir Sofia                           Director
-------------------------------
Zuheir Sofia

/s/ C. Ronald Tilley                       Director
-------------------------------
C. Ronald Tilley
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(a)

 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 


We consent to the incorporation by reference
in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 to Registration Statement No. 333-142592 on Form N-1A of our report dated February 28,
2012, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Emerging Market Debt Portfolio, BlackRock International
Bond Portfolio, and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities, each a series of BlackRock Funds II, appearing in the Annual Report
on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds II for the year ended December 31, 2011, and to the references to us under the headings
“Financial Highlights” in the Prospectus and “Financial Statements” and “Independent Registered
Public Accountant” in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement. 


	 
	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
	 
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 April 26, 2012
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/11/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      645,368
COMMITMENTS
  58,001   49,990  200,804  365,521  377,432  624,326  628,226   21,042   17,142

CHANGES FROM 09/04/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     50,761)
  17,681    3,256   29,943    5,097   16,358   52,721   49,558   -1,960    1,203

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.0      7.7     31.1     56.6     58.5     96.7     97.3      3.3      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      33       30       53       64       62      127      121
```

----

Updated September 14, 2012