alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Douglas KESSLER, petitioner, v. Michael OVERMYER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Forest.

No. 17-8808.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      528,245
COMMITMENTS
  81,381   54,712  124,304  303,423  332,450  509,108  511,466   19,137   16,779

CHANGES FROM 02/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,710)
   8,268   -1,531   -1,646   -5,349    6,187    1,273    3,010   -2,983   -4,720

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.4     10.4     23.5     57.4     62.9     96.4     96.8      3.6      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      156)
      41       36       61       68       68      141      139
```

----

Updated February 22, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

DEVON TERENCE CAPLICKI

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00220

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Devon Terence 

Caplicki GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1708 

– Possession of Stolen Mail.

Case 4:23-cr-00220-SDJ-AGD Document 30 Filed 04/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 66
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00285-JRG-RSP

LIMITED INTERVENTION ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Intervene filed by Movant-Intervenors TMobile USA Inc., AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., and Cellco 

Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (collectively, the “Carrier Intervenors”). Dkt. No. 45. The 

Carier Intervenors move to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 solely to 

object to Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC’s Motion to Modify Protective Order (Dkt. No. 45). 

Id. at 3. After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that the Carrier Intervenors are permitted a limited intervention in the

above-captioned case, 2:23-cv-285, solely for purposes of objecting to Cobblestone Wireless’s 

Motion, Dkt. No. 45. The Court notes that the opposition was concurrently filed and is docketed 

at Dkt. No. 46. After the motion has been resolved, the Carrier Intervenors will be dismissed from 

this case.

.

____________________________________

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012. SIGNED this 13th day of March, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 48 Filed 03/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 836
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 223

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the disclosure of certain information by persons conducting polls by telephone

during campaigns for election for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. GIBBONS, and

Mr. PICKERING) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

require the disclosure of certain information by persons

conducting polls by telephone during campaigns for election for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Push Poll Disclaimer

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 223 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION BY PERSONS CON2 DUCTING POLLS DURING FEDERAL ELEC3 TION CAMPAIGNS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Federal Election

5 Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended

6 by adding at the end the following new section:

7 ‘‘DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION BY PERSONS

8 CONDUCTING POLLS BY TELEPHONE

9 ‘‘SEC. 323. Any person who conducts a poll by tele10 phone or electronic means to interview individuals on opin11 ions relating to any election for Federal office shall dis12 close to each respondent to the poll the following informa13 tion:

14 ‘‘(1) The person’s identity.

15 ‘‘(2) The identity of the person sponsoring the

16 poll or paying the expenses associated with the

17 poll.’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur20 ring after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Hector MEDINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6156.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Guy BOUDREAUX, Jr., petitioner, v. Timothy HOOPER, Warden.

No. 18-6506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated June 14, 2013
July 2 4 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

APRIL DUPREE ADESHIL E , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00980

- CV V.

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, April Dupree Adeshile. We grant the motion for rehearing and order that this court’s former judgment of January 16, 2014 be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s M emorandum O pinion of January 16, 2014 withdrawn. This cause, an appeal from the j udgment in favor of appellee, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, signed August 10 , 201 2 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court belo w AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, April Dupree Adeshile , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
ex4-14.htm





Exhibit 4.14


 



Summary of Agreement between Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. and Guilin City Yan Shan District Tuo Mu Township Wei Jia Du Village Committee to construct enclosure wall in the Guilin facility







Guilin Jun Tai Fu Construction and Development Co. Ltd. (“Guilin JTF”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with the Guilin City Yan Shan District Tuo Mu Township Wei Jia Du Village Committee (“Village Committee”) on October 9th, 2011 for the construction of an enclosure wall for the Guilin JTF’s Green Energy Smart Grid Plant, which is located within the Guilin Tie Shan Industrial Park.  Pursuant to the Agreement, the Village Committee shall be responsible for the supply of materials and the construction of the enclosure wall.  The construction time is 25 days.  The total contract price is RMB 620,380.  Guilin JTF shall pay the Village Committee 70% of the contract price upon completion of the body and foundation of the enclosure wall.  Upon the completion, inspection, and acceptance of the constructed structure, Guilin JTF shall make payment to the Village Committee to bring the total amount paid to 95% of the contract price.  Guilin JTF shall hold the remaining 5% as quality assurance payment for a period of one year.  If within one year of acceptance, the enclosure wall did not sink, crack, or have other quality problems, then Guilin JTF shall pay the 5% to the Village Committee.
Mitra RANGARAJAN, petitioner, v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 18-1453.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00233-CV

JLMH INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant

V.

FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF TEXAS,

LLC, ARCP FDCCC1403 LLC, 7B

BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

TRIPLE C DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

BURKHARDT ENGINEERING 

COMPANY, AND M&S UTILITY 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 342nd District Court

of Tarrant County (342-316818-20)

June 13, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We reverse that portion of the trial 

court’s judgment that dismissed JLMH’s request for injunctive relief and remand this 

case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm 

the remainder of the trial court’s judgment. 
It is further ordered that all parties shall bear the costs of their appeal, for 

which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Exhibit 32
 LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
 th
 /s/ Scott C. Petersen
Scott C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Gary H. Ritondaro

Gary H. Ritondaro
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7091

RICARDO ST. AUBIN GREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID CHESTER,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-144-5-BO)

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.
2

Ricardo St. Aubin Green, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Appleton Reeves,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo St. Aubin Green, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We dismiss the appeal of the district

court’s denial of Green’s § 2254 petition for lack of jurisdiction

because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed as to

that order.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order denying Green’s § 2254 petition was

entered on the docket on April 10, 2001. Appellant’s notice of

appeal was filed on April 28, 2002. Because Appellant failed to

file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or

reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

Green’s notice of appeal is timely, however, as to the

district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to

reconsider. We review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse
4

of discretion. NOW v. Operation Rescue, 47 F.3d 667, 669 (4th Cir.

1995). Because Green’s motion stated no viable ground for relief

under the rule, we find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we

affirm the ruling of the district court. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART

AND AFFIRMED IN PART
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      187,813
COMMITMENTS
  38,808   31,873   29,137   98,075   97,227  166,020  158,237   21,793   29,576

CHANGES FROM 02/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,619)
    -242      534    2,421     -133   -3,325    2,046     -370     -427    1,989

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.7     17.0     15.5     52.2     51.8     88.4     84.3     11.6     15.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      192)
      50       42       51       61       74      140      147
```

----

Updated February 15, 2013
ZAREMBA FAMILY FARMS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. ENCANA OIL & GAS (USA) INC.

No. 18-475.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC 

 Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

RE DARIO A. MACHLEIDT 

 To the Honorable Court and all parties, please take notice the following attorney hereby 

enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for Defendant Valve Corporation, and is 

authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the above 

captioned matter on behalf of Defendant Valve Corporation. 

Dated: February 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Dario A. Machleidt 

Michael E. Jones (SBN: 10929400) 

Shaun W. Hassett (SBN: 24074372) 

Potter Minton 

102 North College, Ste. 900 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

903-597-8311 (telephone) 

mikejones@potterminton.com 

shaunhassett@potterminton.com 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 38 Filed 02/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 459
2 

Dario A. Machleidt 

Kathleen R. Geyer 

Christopher P. Damitio 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP 

1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700 

Seattle, WA 98101 

(206) 467-9600 (telephone) 

DMachleidt@ktslaw.com 

KGeyer@ktslaw.com 

CDamitio@ktslaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant, Valve Corporation

78130880v.1 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 38 Filed 02/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 460
Curtis Dee PACKARD, petitioner, v. Barry GOODRICH, Warden, et al.

No. 18-5910.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

LOREN MICHAEL HEAD

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00044-JDK

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON 

GUILTY PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), this matter has been referred by the District Court for 

administration of a plea of guilty under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

On April 25, 2023, this cause came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge 

for a plea of guilty to an Information charging Defendant Loren Michael Head in Count One with 

a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 371 - Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1343. After conducting said proceeding in the form and manner prescribed by FED. R. CRIM. P.

11, the undersigned finds that:

a. Defendant, after consultation with counsel of record, has knowingly and voluntarily 

consented to the administration of the Guilty Plea in this cause by a United States Magistrate Judge, 

subject to a final acceptance and imposition of sentence by the District Judge;

b. Defendant and the government have entered into a plea agreement which has been 

filed and disclosed in open court pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(2);

c. Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the 

defendant is aware of the nature of the charges, the maximum penalties, and the consequences of 

the plea, and that the plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea supported by an independent 

Case 6:23-cr-00044-JDK-KNM Document 15 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

43
2

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense; and

d. Defendant understands each of the constitutional and statutory rights enumerated 

in Rule 11(b) and wishes to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the District Court accept the Plea 

Agreement and the Guilty Plea of the defendant and that LOREN MICHAEL HEAD should be 

finally adjudged guilty of that offense.

Defendant has waived his right to object to the findings of the Magistrate Judge in this 

matter, and the Government also waived its right to object, so the Court will present this Report 

and Recommendation to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle for adoption immediately upon 

issuance.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of April, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00044-JDK-KNM Document 15 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

44
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
NN, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.











Date: 
      March 31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Roderick
      R. BatyRoderick
      R. BatyChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NN, Inc. and will be retained by NN, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 286
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

Autoscribe Corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Fortis Payment Systems, LLC, 

Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

 Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00364-JRG 

 Jury Trial Demanded 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FORTIS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, LLC’S OPPOSED 

MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

Before the Court is Defendant Forits Payment Systems, LLC’s Opposed Motion to Transfer 

Venue to the Eastern District of Michigan under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Having considered the 

briefing, the Court GRANTS this Motion. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case be TRANSFERRED to the Eastern 

District of Michigan. 

Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 77
Exhibit 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


         The  undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three  months  ended  December  31,  2007 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




                                                     /s/ David J. Bursic
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     David J. Bursic
                                                     President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 07, 2008


Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.



                                      E-3
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      161,736
COMMITMENTS
  38,025   14,983   21,180   84,403  102,174  143,608  138,336   18,127   23,399

CHANGES FROM 12/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,591)
  -3,809     -515    1,009    2,399   -2,311     -401   -1,817   -1,190      226

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.5      9.3     13.1     52.2     63.2     88.8     85.5     11.2     14.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      46       32       36       65       83      131      134
```

----

Updated December 28, 2012