alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2259

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the dependent

care credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1999

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. ABERCROMBIE,

Mr. HILLIARD, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand

the dependent care credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Relief for Parents

5 Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DEPENDENT CARE TAX CREDIT.

7 (a) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF EMPLOYMENT-RE8 LATED EXPENSES ELIGIBLE FOR CREDIT.—
2

•HR 2259 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 21(c) of the Internal

2 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar limit on

3 amount creditable) is amended—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘$2,400’’ in paragraph (1)

5 and inserting ‘‘$4,000’’, and

6 (B) by striking ‘‘$4,800’’ in paragraph (2)

7 and inserting ‘‘$8,000’’.

8 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2)

9 of section 21(d) of such Code is amended—

10 (A) by striking ‘‘$200’’ in subparagraph

(A) and inserting ‘‘1 11 ⁄12 of the amount contained

12 in subsection (c)(1)’’, and

13 (B) by striking ‘‘$400’’ in subparagraph

(B) and inserting ‘‘1 14 ⁄12 of the amount contained

15 in subsection (c)(2)’’.

16 (b) INCREASE IN PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYMENT17 RELATED EXPENSES ALLOWED AS CREDIT.—Paragraph

18 (2) of section 21(a) of such Code (defining applicable per19 centage) is amended to read as follows:

20 ‘‘(2) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE DEFINED.—For

21 purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘applicable per22 centage’ means 50 percent reduced (but not below

23 zero) by 1 percentage point for each $1,500, or frac24 tion thereof, by which the taxpayers’s adjusted gross

25 income for the taxable year exceeds $30,000.’’.
3

•HR 2259 IH

1 (c) MINIMUM CREDIT ALLOWED FOR STAY-AT-HOME

2 PARENTS.—Subsection (e) of section 21 of such Code (re3 lating to special rules) is amended by adding at the end

4 the following:

5 ‘‘(11) MINIMUM CREDIT ALLOWED FOR STAY6 AT-HOME PARENTS.—Notwithstanding subsection

7 (d), in the case of any taxpayer with one or more

8 qualifying individuals described in subsection

9 (b)(1)(A) under the age of 4 at any time during the

10 taxable year, such taxpayer shall be deemed to have

11 employment-related expenses with respect to such

12 qualifying individuals in an amount equal to the

13 greater of—

14 ‘‘(A) the amount of employment-related ex15 penses incurred for such qualifying individuals

16 for the taxable year (determined under this sec17 tion without regard to this paragraph), or

18 ‘‘(B) with respect to each such qualifying

individual, 1 19 ⁄12 of the amount contained in sub20 section (c)(1) for each month in such taxable

21 year during which such qualifying individual is

22 under the age of 4.’’.
4

•HR 2259 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section apply to taxable years beginning after Decem3 ber 31, 1999.

Æ
EXHIBIT A 

Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 74
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 75
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 76
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 77
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 78
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 79
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 80
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 81
Case 2:23-cv-00370-JRG Document 17-1 Filed 03/22/24 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 82
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2149 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2149

                     To prohibit certain abortions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Greenwood, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
Kind, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Vento, Mr. Baldacci, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Hinchey, 
    Mr. Wynn, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Luther, Ms. Sanchez, Ms. 
  McCarthy of Missouri, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
 Kolbe, Mr. Boehlert, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. 
 Abercrombie, Mr. Bentsen, and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition 
  to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     To prohibit certain abortions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Late Term Abortion Restriction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ABORTIONS.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful, in or affecting interstate 
or foreign commerce, knowingly to perform an abortion after the fetus 
has become viable.
    (b) Exception.--This section does not prohibit any abortion if, in 
the medical judgment of the attending physician, the abortion is 
necessary to preserve the life of the woman or to avert serious adverse 
health consequences to the woman.
    (c) Civil Penalty.--A physician who violates this section shall be 
subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000. The civil penalty 
provided by this subsection is the exclusive remedy for a violation of 
this section.
                                 <all>
```
Mary McDONALD, petitioner, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS.

No. 18-662.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6415

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AMANDA ATKINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Charleston. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (2:18-cr-00225-17)

Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amanda Atkinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Amanda Atkinson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district 

court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Atkinson, No. 2:18-cr-00225-17 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 11, 2021). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Robert Alan FRATTA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6298.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                CEO CERTIFICATION



I,  Patrick  J.  O'Dea,  certify  that:

     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Peet's Coffee &
Tea,  Inc.;  and

     2.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report does not contain any
untrue  statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to  make  the  statements  made,  in light of the circumstances under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual  report.



Date:  March  15,  2004              /s/  Patrick  J.  O'Dea
                                     -----------------------
                                     Patrick  J.  O'Dea
                                     President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
Denzel CHISHOLM, aka Den, aka Din, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7234

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/22/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      425,350
COMMITMENTS
  94,623  182,685   63,606  235,698  144,742  393,927  391,033   31,423   34,317

CHANGES FROM 01/15/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -36,820)
     694    6,390  -16,532  -22,909  -32,128  -38,747  -42,270    1,927    5,450

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.2     42.9     15.0     55.4     34.0     92.6     91.9      7.4      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      189)
      69       63       73       42       38      151      145
```

----

Updated January 25, 2013
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Estate of Peggy Elaine Jaynes,
Deceased

No. 06

- 22

- 00009

- CV Appeal from the County Court at Law of
Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 42899CCL; 20C1504

- CCL ). Memorandum
O pinion deli vered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Stevens and Justice Carter participating

. *Justice Carter, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal s hould be grant ed. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that costs shall be borne by the party incurring same

.

RENDERED MARCH 22, 2022
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autr ey , Clerk
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 6:23-cv-00175

Thomas Earl Criner, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Helen Bowman et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Thomas Earl Criner, a former inmate of the Henderson 

County Jail proceeding pro se, filed this civil action in the form of a 

motion for injunctive relief complaining of alleged deprivations of 

his rights. The case has been referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell.

Plaintiff stated that he is a chronic diabetic with low blood sugar 

and sought a court order for bedside aid protein supplements or 

sugar aid. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss stating that plaintiff is no longer in the Henderson County Jail. Doc 19. The defendants therefore argued that plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief be 

dismissed as moot. 

On October 10, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed as moot. A copy of this 

order was sent to plaintiff’s last known address but no objections 

have been received. The Fifth Circuit has explained that where a letter is properly placed in the United States mail, a presumption exists 

that the letter reached its destination in the usual time and was actually received by the person to whom it was addressed. Faciane v. Sun 

Life Assurance Co. of Can., 931 F.3d 412, 420–21 & n.9 (5th Cir. 

2019). 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate 

Case 6:23-cv-00175-JCB-KNM Document 24 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 98
- 2 -

judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, 

the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The abovestyled civil action is dismissed without prejudice as moot. 

So ordered by the court on December 4, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00175-JCB-KNM Document 24 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 99
Walter COLLINS, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 18-6554.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/31/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      165,052
COMMITMENTS
  52,464   11,441   15,472   73,369  108,804  141,305  135,718   23,747   29,334

CHANGES FROM 07/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,490)
     803    1,037      212   -1,810   -2,654     -795   -1,405     -695      -85

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.8      6.9      9.4     44.5     65.9     85.6     82.2     14.4     17.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      65       19       36       61       77      136      126
```

----

Updated August 3, 2012
EXHIBIT
10.1


 


WRITTEN
CONSENT OF DIRECTORS TO CORPORATE ACTION


WITHOUT
MEETING OF PHI GROUP, INC.


 


The
undersigned, being at least a majority of all of the directors of the Board of Directors of PHI Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) and thus constituting a quorum, hereby adopt the following resolutions in lieu of a meeting on this
23rd day of March 2019.


 


WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of this Corporation has determined that it is in the best interests of the Corporation to reacquire certain
shares of its common stock from the open market from time to time, and to thereafter retire said shares as non-voting Treasury
stock, be it:


 


RESOLVED,
that the Corporation hereby begin to repurchase its own shares of common stock from the open market from time to time in accordance
with the terms mentioned below:


 


	1.	Purpose
    of Repurchase: To enhance future shareholder returns.
	2.	Details of Repurchase:
	 	a.
    	Class
    of shares to be repurchased: Common Stock of PHI Group, Inc.
	 	b.	Total
    number of repurchasable shares: 5.3 billion shares, or more as may be needed.
	 	c.	Total
    repurchase amount: To be determined by prevalent market prices at times of transaction.
	 	d.	Method
    of repurchase: Open market purchase.
	 	e.	Repurchase
    period: April 15, 2019 to March 13, 2020.
	3.	Remarks:
	 	a.	PHI
    Group, Inc. will fund the proposed share repurchase program with the proceeds from the disposal of a portion of certain non-core
    assets and from future earnings of the Company.
	 	b.	The
    share repurchase program will be in full compliance with state and federal laws and certain covenants with the Company’s
    note-holders.


 


FURTHER
RESOLVED that in addition to and without limiting the foregoing, each officer of the Company be and hereby is authorized and
directed to take, or cause to be taken, such further action, and to execute and deliver, or cause to be delivered, for and in
the name and on behalf of the Company, all such instruments and documents as such officer may deem necessary, appropriate or in
the best interests of the Company to effectuate the intent of the foregoing resolutions and the transactions contemplated thereby
(as conclusively evidenced by the taking of such actions or the execution and delivery of such instruments and documents, as the
case may be) and all action heretofore taken by such officer in connection with the subject of the foregoing recitals and resolutions
be, and it hereby is, approved, ratified and confirmed in all respects as the act and deed of the Company.


 


By
their signatures below, the above resolutions have been duly authorized and adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors.


 


Dated:
March 23, 2019


 


	/s/
    Tam Bui	 	/s/
    Frank Hawkins
	Tam
    Bui, Director	 	Frank
    Hawkins, Director
	/s/
    Henry Fahman	 	 
	Henry
    Fahman, Director
**EXHIBIT 21.01**

**GAMINGPARTNERS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**
| **Name**                                         | ** ** | **State/Country of Incorporation** | ** ** | **Parent**                                 |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Gaming Partners  International SAS(1)            |       | France                             |       | Gaming Partners  International Corporation |
| Gaming Partners  International USA, Inc.(1) |       | Nevada                             |       | Gaming Partners  International Corporation |
| GPI Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.(2)                    |       | Mexico                             |       | Gaming Partners International Corporation  |

----

(1)          Effective date of namechange was September 1, 2004.

(2)          Effective date of name changewas January 22, 2005.

----
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC T-MOBILE USA, INC. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 09/06/2023 /s/ Matthew D. Aichele Matthew D. Aichele VA SBN 77821

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

800 Main Avenue, SW, Suite 200 

Washington, DC 20024

maichele@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 73
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

AT&T INC. et al., 

 Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case) 

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Withdraw their Motion to Stay 

Pending Resolution of Inter Partes Review and Manufacturer Cases (Dkt. No. 69). Dkt. No. 81.

Having considered the Motion, and noting its unopposed nature, it is GRANTED. 

It is ORDERED that Dkt. No. 69. is WITHDRAWN.

.

____________________________________

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012. SIGNED this 13th day of November, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 84 Filed 11/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

3239
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Pointe Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, R. Carl Palmer,
Jr., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
         Report.






Date:  March 17, 2003                 By:  /s/ R. Carl Palmer, Jr.
       ---------------                     ------------------------------------
                                           R. Carl Palmer, Jr., Chairman of the
                                           Board, President and Chief
                                           Executive Officer
John J. TATAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-611.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY, PHILADELPHIA 3.0, JORDAN STRAUSS, BRIAN KRISCH, AND KATHERINE
RIVERA,

Petitioners

v.

THE HONORABLE SHEILA A. WOODS

SKIPPER, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY

AS PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE COURT

OF COMMON PLEAS OF
PHILADELPHIA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 36 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of April, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the Application for Leave to Intervene are GRANTED

. T he Prothonotary is

DIRECTED to docket the City Commissioners’ preliminary objections , as well as

Petitioners’ answer and supporting brief.

The Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus is DENIED . The Application

to Expedite and the City Commissioners’ preliminary objections are DISMISSED

.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Justice Dougherty did not participate in the consideration or decision of thi s

matter.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

JESUS JOSE LUJAN-SANCHEZ,

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00215-SDJ

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in 

accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant Jesus 

Jose Lujan-Sanchez is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation 

of Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) - Reentry of a Deported Alien. 

Case 4:23-cr-00215-SDJ-KPJ Document 27 Filed 04/29/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 49