alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH CORPORATION
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                       145
<INVENTORY>                                     50,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,843
<PP&E>                                          50,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,501
<BONDS>                                         15,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,671
<SALES>                                        215,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,005
<CGS>                                          185,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES
F- AND F- OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      19,368,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,103,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,347,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,141,108
<PP&E>                                      48,972,623
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,675,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             122,300,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,587,146
<BONDS>                                     67,501,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       25,198,630
<PREFERRED>                                  3,222,753
<COMMON>                                        40,160
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,750,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               122,300,454
<SALES>                                     28,980,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,980,564
<CGS>                                       18,723,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,723,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,765,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (2,508,639)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (6,585,317)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,438,636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,438,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,438,636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.40)


</TABLE>
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/29/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,407
COMMITMENTS
  27,259    2,386    3,805   46,087   75,105   77,151   81,296    6,256    2,111

CHANGES FROM 10/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,966)
     617     -279       39    2,237    3,412    2,893    3,172       73     -206

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.7      2.9      4.6     55.3     90.0     92.5     97.5      7.5      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       91)
      17        5        1       45       41       62       47
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/29/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      271,998
COMMITMENTS
  88,843   34,313    1,140  169,103  232,579  259,086  268,032   12,912    3,966

CHANGES FROM 10/22/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,251)
    -589   -1,510       60    5,553    6,312    5,024    4,862     -773     -611

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.7     12.6      0.4     62.2     85.5     95.3     98.5      4.7      1.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      184)
      56       21       10       81       59      143       84
```

----

Updated November 6, 2013
Cheryl Lynn HAGER-REILLY, Petitioner v. Thomas REILLY.

No. 18-1568

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
Paul HILL, petitioner, v. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SERVICES, LLC.

No. 18-482.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
(111 So. 421)

No. 28343.

#### STATE v. QUEBADEAUX.

(Jan. 3, 1927.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1927.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

I. Criminal law <&wkey;95 — Amendment does not deprive state court of jurisdiction over offense of possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes (Const. U. S. Amend. 18).

Const. U. S. Amend. 18 does not render offense of possession of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes cognizable only by federal courts, but state court has jurisdiction.

*10612. Crimina! law @=>201 — Defendant may be convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes in both federal and state courts.

That defendant has been convicted of possession of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes in the United States courts, does not prevent his conviction for the same offense in state court.

3. Criminal law @=1213—Punishment for possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes is not cruel or excessive, where within limits o,f statute (Act No. 39 of 1921 [Ex. Sess.]).

Where punishment inflicted for possession of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, contrary to Act No. 39 of 1921 (Ex. Sess.) is within limits of statute, punishment is not cruel or excessive.

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial Disl.rict Court, Parish of Acadia; W. W. Bailey, Judge.

Lessin Quebadeaux was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Thomas Arthur Edwards, of Lake Charles, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., James A. Gremillion, Dist. Atty., of Crowley (E. R. Sehowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

ST. PAUL, J.

The defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes.

1.

[1] He complains that since the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States such offense is cognizable only by the United States and the federal courts.

This same contention was made in State v. Venezia, 151 La. 349, 91 So. 761, and was rejected as unsound by this court. It was also rejected by the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Lanza, 260 U. S. 377, 43 S. Ct. 141, 67 L. Ed. 314.

II.

[2] He also complains that having already been convicted of said offense before the United States courts, he cannot again be convicted before the state courts for the same offense.

The same contention was made in State v. Hebert, 158 La. 209, 103 So. 742, and was also rejected as unsound by this court. It was also rejected by the Supreme Court of the United States in Hebert v. Louisiana, 47 S. Ct. 103, 71 L. Ed.-.

III.

[3] He further complains that the punishment inflicted on him was cruel and excessive.

The penalty inflicted was within the limits of the statute (Act No. 39 of 1921 [Ex. Sess.]: and this court has already held that the penalties imposed by said statute are not cruel or excessive. State v. Jackson, 152 La. 656, 94 So. 150; State v. Sharp, 156 La. 531, 100 So. 707.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0379]


Safety Zones; Recurring Events in Captain of the Port Duluth--
City of Bayfield 4th of July Fireworks Display

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the City of 
Bayfield Fireworks in Bayfield, WI. This action is necessary to protect 
participants and spectators during the City of Bayfield Fireworks. 
During the enforcement period, entry into, transiting, or anchoring 
within the safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain 
of the Port Duluth or designated on-scene representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.943(b) will be enforced from 9 
p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2022, for the City of Bayfield 
Fireworks safety zone, Sec.  165.943.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
document, call or email LTJG Joe McGinnis, telephone (218)-725-3818, 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7b3829b82839fa0a0bab782849490d99a9e9b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bffbcad3cacbd7e8e8f2ffcaccdcd891d2d6d3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone 
for the annual City of Bayfield 4th of July Fireworks Display in 33 CFR 
165.943 from 9 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2022. All waters of 
the Lake Superior North Channel in Bayfield, WI within the arc of a 
circle with a radius of no more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at 
position 46[deg]48'40'' N, 090[deg]48'32'' W.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth or their 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port's 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
    This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.943 and 5 
U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this publication in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with 
advance notification of the enforcement of this safety zone via 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

    Dated: May 17, 2022.
F.M. Smith,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2022-11714 Filed 5-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Gregory T. ACKERMAN, et ux., petitioners, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON.

No. 17-8816.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 451 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 451

Recognizing the goals of National Travel and Tourism Week and honoring 
 the valuable contributions of travel and tourism to the United States 
                              of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2012

Mr. Begich (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Akaka, 
Mr. Graham, Mr. Heller, Ms. Landrieu, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. 
 Warner) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the goals of National Travel and Tourism Week and honoring 
 the valuable contributions of travel and tourism to the United States 
                              of America.

Whereas National Travel and Tourism Week was established in 1983 when Congress 
        passed the Joint Resolution entitled ``Joint Resolution to designate the 
        week beginning May 27, 1984, as `National Tourism Week''', approved 
        November 29, 1983 (Public Law 98-178; 97 Stat. 1126), which recognized 
        the value of travel and tourism;
Whereas National Travel and Tourism Week is celebrated across the United States 
        from May 5 through 13, 2012;
Whereas more than 120 travel destinations throughout the United States are 
        holding events in honor of National Travel and Tourism Week;
Whereas the travel and tourism industry supports more than 14,000,000 jobs in 
        the United States;
Whereas the travel and tourism industry employs individuals in all 50 States and 
        all the territories of the United States;
Whereas international travel to the United States is the single largest export 
        industry in the country;
Whereas the travel and tourism industry, Congress, and the executive branch have 
        worked to streamline the visa process and make the United States 
        welcoming to visitors from other countries;
Whereas travel and tourism provide significant economic benefits to the United 
        States by generating nearly $2,000,000,000,000 in annual economic 
        output;
Whereas leisure travel allows individuals to experience the rich cultural 
        heritage and educational opportunities of the United States and its 
        communities; and
Whereas, the immense value of travel and tourism cannot be overstated: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes May 5 through 13, 2012, as National Travel 
        and Tourism Week;
            (2) commends the travel and tourism industry for its 
        important contributions to the United States of America; and
            (3) commends the employees of the travel and tourism 
        industry for their important contributions to the United States 
        of America.
                                 <all>
```
Atif Babar MALIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6087

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.15




CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 28, 2013
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Stephen Juras, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical reports entitled (i) the “Technical Report for Kisladag Gold Mine, Turkey”, dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 2010, (ii) the “Technical Report on the Efemcukuru Project” dated September 17, 2007, and effective August 1, 2007, (iii) the “Technical Report for Jinfeng Gold Mine, China” dated January 13, 2012 and effective March 15, 2011, (iv) the “Technical Report on Vila Nova Iron Ore Project” dated July 31, 2007, (v) the “Technical Report for the Tocantinzinho Gold Project, Brazil” dated May 3, 2011, and (vi) the “Technical Report for the Perama Hill Project, Thrace, Greece,” dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 28, 2010, and of extracts from or a summary of  the respective technical reports and of certain mineral resource estimates and other information pertaining to these projects, and the description of all mineral resources of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) in the Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “AIF”),  and the use of my name in the AIF and Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s AIF and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
  By:
/s/ Stephen JurasStephen Juras, P.GeoEldorado Gold CorporationDirector of Technical Services
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BARCO, INC. et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

YEALINK (USA) NETWORK 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP

ORDER

The Court issues this order sua sponte. On November 1, 2024, the Court scheduled a 

hearing for November 15, 2024, on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 45). The Parties have 

not complied with the Standing Order Regarding “Meet and Confer” Obligations Relating to 

Discovery Disputes.1 Paragraph 2 of that Order requires that “[w]ithin 72 hours of the Court setting 

any discovery motion for a hearing, each party's lead attorney . . . and local counsel shall meet and 

confer in person or by telephone, without the involvement or participation of other attorneys, in an 

effort to resolve the dispute without Court intervention.” And Paragraph 3 requires that “counsel 

shall promptly notify the Court of the results of that meeting by filing a joint report of no more 

than 2 pages. Such joint report shall be filed by the earlier of 48 hours following that meeting or 

24 hours before said hearing.” The parties have not notified the Court of the results of that meeting.

This Order is not optional.

1

https://txed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judgeFiles/Standing%20Order%20Regarding%20Meet%20and%20Conf

er%20Obligations%20for%20Discovery%20Dispute.pdf

Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 56 Filed 11/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

484
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties file a joint report regarding the results of 

their compliant meet and confer by November 14, 2024 at Noon. 

Case 2:23-cv-00521-JRG-RSP Document 56 Filed 11/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

485
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0007. ANGELA J. THIGPEN v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE.

Angela J. Thigpen, defendant in the underlying state court dispossessory

action, has filed an application for discretionary appeal from the trial court’s order

dismissing her counterclaims. From the materials submitted with the application, it

appears that the challenged order resolved all pending issues. Further, no provision

of OCGA § 5-6-35 appears to apply to this case. The order, therefore, appears to be

subject to direct appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1).

We will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the

lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly,

this application is hereby GRANTED, and Thigpen shall have ten days from the date

of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. If she has already filed a

notice of appeal in the trial court, she need not file a second notice. The clerk of the

trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to

the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/09/2014

September 09, 2014
Charlie CAMPBELL, petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ADJUDICATION BUREAU.

No. 17-8935.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.