alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2117

To require any amounts appropriated for Members’ Representational Allowances for the House of Representatives for a session of Congress that

remain after all payments are made from such Allowances for the session

to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit reduction or to

reduce the Federal debt.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on

Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of

the committee concerned

A BILL

To require any amounts appropriated for Members’ Representational Allowances for the House of Representatives for a session of Congress that remain after all

payments are made from such Allowances for the session

to be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit

reduction or to reduce the Federal debt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2117 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEM2 BERS’ REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCES TO

3 BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO RE4 DUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any

6 rule or other authority, any amounts appropriated for

7 Members’ Representational Allowances for the House of

8 Representatives for a session of Congress or other period

9 which remain after all payments are made under such Al10 lowances for the session or period shall be deposited in

11 the Treasury and used for deficit reduction, (or, if there

12 is no Federal budget deficit after all such payments have

13 been made, for reducing the Federal debt, in such manner

14 as the Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate).

15 SEC. 2. REPORT ON AMOUNT DEPOSITED.

16 The Committee on Appropriations of the House of

17 Representatives shall include in its report accompanying

18 the annual appropriations bill for the legislative branch

19 for a fiscal year a statement of the amount deposited

20 under section 1 for the preceding calendar year with re21 spect to each Member of the House of Representatives and

22 the total deposited with respect to all Members.
3

•HR 2117 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

2 In this Act, the term ‘‘Member of the House of Rep3 resentatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Delegate or

4 Resident Commissioner to, the Congress.

Æ
## **EXHIBIT 31.1**

## **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

## I, Roger E.Gower, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.
| Dated: November 6, 2006 |   | By:                                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                    |   | Roger E. Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Ann MERLINO, et al., Petitioners, v. Cara BUONINCONTRI.

No. 19-773

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NATILIYA SONIS, a/k/a NATALIYA SONIS,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as 

successor in interest to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as trustee for 

Novastar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2005-2, Novastar Home Equity 

Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2487

[June 9, 2022]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE17-016521.

Brian S. Behar of Behar, Gutt & Glazer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Kimberly S. Mello and Arda Goker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Charles C. GORE, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-6565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                         724,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,322,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,728,000
<PP&E>                                      17,857,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,379,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,514,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,286,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,534,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,514,000
<SALES>                                     38,595,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,599,000
<CGS>                                       17,384,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,476,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               162,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,331,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,754,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,754,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,754,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Andre Ralph HAYMOND.

No. 17-1672.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JOSE DE JESUS SANDOVAL (1) 

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:23-CR-00200-

ALM-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court having 

heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant’s supervised release to the United 

States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court has received the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. With Defendant 

having waived allocution before the Court as well as his right to object to the report of the 

Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s supervised release is hereby REVOKED. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of 

Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of twenty-four (24) months, to run consecutively to the 

sentence imposed in 4:20-CR-00159-003, with no term of supervised release to follow. 

Case 4:23-cr-00200-ALM-AGD Document 18 Filed 10/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 40
2 

The Court also recommends that Defendant be housed in a Bureau of Prisons facility in the 

Seagoville, Texas area, if appropriate. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 4:23-cr-00200-ALM-AGD Document 18 Filed 10/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 41
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 211

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at West 920 Riverside Avenue in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘Thomas

S. Foley Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’, and the

plaza at the south entrance of such building and courthouse as the

‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. NETHERCUTT (for himself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. DUNN of Washington,

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. METCALF, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. DICKS,

Mr. INSLEE, and Mr. SMITH of Washington) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at West 920 Riverside Avenue in Spokane,

Washington, as the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley Federal Building

and United States Courthouse’’, and the plaza at the

south entrance of such building and courthouse as the

‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 211 IH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF BUILDING AND COURT2 HOUSE.

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United

4 States courthouse located at West 920 Riverside Avenue

5 in Spokane, Washington, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley Federal Building and United

7 States Courthouse’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

10 States to the Federal building and United States court11 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be

12 a reference to the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley Federal Building and

13 United States Courthouse’’.

14 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF PLAZA.

15 (a) DESIGNATION.—The plaza located at the south

16 entrance of the Federal building and United States court17 house referred to in section 1(a) shall be known and des18 ignated as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

19 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg20 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

21 States to the plaza referred to in subsection (a) shall be

22 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

23 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

24 This Act shall take effect on March 6, 1999.

Æ
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/30/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      168,084
COMMITMENTS
  62,537   11,465   19,696   67,474  114,923  149,707  146,084   18,378   22,001

CHANGES FROM 10/23/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,991)
   3,322      153    1,442   -3,545     -439    1,219    1,155      772      836

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    37.2      6.8     11.7     40.1     68.4     89.1     86.9     10.9     13.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      59       25       35       61       87      136      133
```

----

Updated November 2, 2012
* Pursuant to5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________
No. 97-31203

______________________

DONALD WOLFE

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana

Respondents-Appellees.

____________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

(97-CV-1161-G)

____________________________________________

April 20, 1999

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having reviewed the briefs and the record, and concluding, inter alia
, that the claim at

issue is pr ocedurally barred, s ee Muhleisen v. Ieyoub
, 168 F.3d 840, 843 (5th Cir. 1999), the

denial of habeas relief is

AFFIRMED.

All pending motions are moot in light of the opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11748]

I hereby revoke the designations of the following persons as Specially Designated Global Terrorists, under E.O. 13224: Mohad Moalim, Farah Mohamed Shirdon, Musa Abu Dawud, Aliaskhab Kebekov, Ibrahim al-Rubaysh, and Abu al-Wardah as-Syarqi (and their respective aliases).

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: April 1, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-10825 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
Eugene RILEY, III, petitioner, v. Stephanie DORETHY, Warden.

No. 18-6615.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Arthur Lawton CLARK, Petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 19-691

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00149
- CR

Jose Salvador Aguilar, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNT Y NO. 2016CR1020, THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. STEPHENS II, JUDGE PR ESID ING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Jose Salvador Aguilar was co n vict ed of driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code § 49.04. Prior to trial , Aguilar filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained d uring a tra ffic stop . The district court denied the motion after hearing argument from the parti es. Following his conviction, Aguilar filed a motion requesting the district court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law related to its ruling on his mot ion t o suppres s . The record bef or e us does not contain any findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the motion to suppress, and Aguilar has filed a motion asking this Court to abate the appeal and remand the c ase in order to allow the district court t o prepare findings of fact and concl usions of law supporting its ruling.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that “upon the request of the losing
p arty on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court shall state its essential findings,” which th e
court defined as “findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate court2

with a basis upon which to review the trial court ’ s appli cation of the law to the facts.” State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The finding s must be “adequate and complete, covering every potentially dispositive issue that might reasonably be said to have arisen in the course of the suppre ssion proceedings

. ” State v. Elias , 339 S.W.3d 667, 676 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011)

. Findings of fact and co nclusions of law “ensure that reviewing courts need not
presume, assume, or guess at what historical facts a trial judge actually found when making a ruling in a motion to suppress hearing.” State v. Mendoza , 365 S.W.3d 666, 67 1 (Tex. Crim. App.
20 12)

. M oreover, “Rule 44.4 authori zes the court of appeals to remand the case to the trial

court so that the court of appeals is not forced to infer facts from an unexplained ruling.” Cullen , 195 S.W.3d at 698 (citing Tex. R. App. P. 44.4).

Accordingly, w e abate the appeal and remand the cause to the district court so that it may make findings of fact and conclusions of law pertaining to its deni al of Aguilar ’ s motion to
suppress. The district court is instructed to file with this Court a supp lemental cle rk ’ s re cord containing those findings of fact and conclusions of law no later than January 6 , 20 20

. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). This appeal will be reinstated once the supplemental clerk ’ s record is filed.

It is so ordered December 6 , 2019.

Before Just ices Go odwin, Baker, and Kelly Ab ated and Rem anded Filed: December 6, 2019 Do Not Publish
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY,

LLC AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP 

(LEAD CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY,

LLC AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00398-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF JASON WIETHOLTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF 

HEADWATER’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING 

INTER PARTES REVIEW AND RELATED MANUFACTURER CASES

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 73-1 Filed 10/30/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 2329
1

1. I, Jason Wietholter, declare as follows:

2. I am counsel for Headwater Research LLC (“Headwater”) in the above-captioned 

action. I provide this declaration in support of Headwater’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion To 

Stay Pending Inter Partes Review and Related Manufacturer Cases. I have personal knowledge of 

the facts set forth herein, and if called upon to testify, could and would testify competently thereto.

3. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Decision Granting Institution of 

Inter Partes Review in IPR2024-00809, Paper 11, dated October 23, 2024.

4. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review 

of U.S. Patent No. 9,198,042 in IPR2024-00809, Paper 4, dated April 19, 2024.

5. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review

in IPR2024-00945, Paper 1, dated June 7, 2024.

6. Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review

in IPR2024-00944, Paper 1, dated June 7, 2024.

7. Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review

in IPR2024-00943, Paper 1, dated June 7, 2024.

8. Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review

in IPR2024-00942, Paper 1, dated June 7, 2024.

9. Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review

of U.S. Patent No. 8,924,543 in IPR2024-01042, Paper 5, dated June 20, 2024.

10. Attached as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Petition for Inter Partes Review

of U.S. Patent No. 8,924,543 in IPR2024-01041, Paper 5, dated June 20, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 73-1 Filed 10/30/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2330
2

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on October 30, 2024 at Los Angeles, California.

By: /s/ Jason Wietholter

Jason Wietholter

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 73-1 Filed 10/30/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2331
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Solitario Resources Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher E. Herald, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 10, 2008
By: /s/ Christopher E. HeraldChristopher E. Herald
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------