alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2296 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2296

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands to provide that 
 the number of members on the legislature of the Virgin Islands and the 
number of such members constituting a quorum shall be determined by the 
           laws of the Virgin Islands, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIZE OF LEGISLATURE.

    Section 5(b) of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands (48 
U.S.C. 1571(b)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``fifteen''; and
        (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following: ``The 
    number of such senators shall be determined by the laws of the 
    Virgin Islands.''.

SEC. 2. NUMBER CONSTITUTING QUORUM.

    The first sentence of section 9(a) of the Revised Organic Act of 
the Virgin Islands (48 U.S.C. 1575(a)) is amended to read as follows: 
``The number of members of the legislature needed to constitute a 
quorum shall be determined by the laws of the Virgin Islands.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with The Beard  Company's (the "Company")  Report on Form 10-Q for
the period  ended March 31,  2005,  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, William M. Beard,  Chairman of
the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  May 16, 2005                   By:           /s/ William M. Beard
                                                       William M. Beard
                                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
Denise ROBERTSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1 United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 93-2882.

NATEC, INC. and Natec Resources, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DETER COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

DETER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee,

v.

BENETECH, Defendant-Appellant.

Aug. 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the Southern

District of Texas.

Before KING, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

I.

Appellants, Natec, Inc., Natec Resources, Inc., and Benetech,

hold licenses to operate a patent owned by appellee, Deter Company.

The license agreements were entered into fo llowing settlement of

separate patent infringemen t lawsuits in courts other than the

Southern District of Texas, where this suit was filed. The instant

suit sought various types of relief, including a declaration that

the license agreements were unenforceable. This particular claim

for relief alleged that the patent, which is the subject of the

license agreements, expired bef ore the termination date of the

license agreement, and that Deter could not enforce the license

agreement after expiration of the patent. Deter filed motions for

summary judgment urging the distr ict court to give res judicata2

effect to the earlier c onsent judgments and settlements. The

district court essentially agreed with appellee's plea of res

judicata and dismissed plaintiffs' suit.

II.

We are persuaded that we lack jurisdiction to consider this

appeal. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a), the Federal Circuit has

exclusive jurisdiction of an appeal where the district court's

jurisdiction was based, in whole or in part, on 28 U.S.C. § 1338.

Section 1338(a) provides: "The district courts shall have original

jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress

relating to patents...."

The district court's j urisdiction in this case was based in

part on § 1338. The right of the patent holder, Deter, to enforce

the settlement agreements and obtain royal ties for use of the

patent after it expires is a substantial question of federal patent

law. S ee Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29, 85 S.Ct. 176, 13

L.Ed.2d 99 (1964); H emstreet v. Spiegel, Inc., 851 F.2d 348

(Fed.Cir.1988). Because the plaintiffs' right to relief depends

u pon resolution of a substantial question of federal patent law,

exclusive jurisdiction over this appe al is vested in the Federal

Circuit. S ee Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S.

800, 809, 108 S.Ct. 2166, 2174, 100 L.Ed.2d 811 ( 1988); Wang

Laboratories v. Applied Computer Sciences, 926 F.2d 92, 94 (1 s t

Cir.1991).

We therefore transfer this appeal to the Federal Circuit

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The clerk of this court is directed3

to transmit the record, briefs, and other documents relating to

this appeal to the clerk of the Federal Circuit.

APPEAL TRANSFERRED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

RANDALL TODD SMITH §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv19

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VENUE

Petitioner Randall Todd Smith, an inmate confined in the Federal Correctional Institute at

Fort Dix, New Jersey (“FCI-Fort Dix”), filed what has been construed as a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

A petition filed pursuant to Section 2241 must filed in the judicial district where the

petitioner is incarcerated. United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1990).1 FCI-Fort Dix

is located in Burlington County, New Jersey, which is in the District of New Jersey. As petitioner

is not confined within the Eastern District of Texas, this court lacks jurisdiction over his petition. 

Accordingly, this petition will be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of

New Jersey.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus

is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

1

 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a person

incarcerated pursuant to judgment of a state court may be filed in the federal judicial district where the petitioner is

incarcerated or the district in which he was convicted. However, petitioner is not incarcerated pursuant to a state

court judgment. 

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 25th day of January, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00019-MAC-ZJH Document 3 Filed 01/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5
**Exhibit 3.3**

**STATE OF DELAWARE**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

The corporationorganized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Laws of the State of Delaware does hereby certify: 

**FIRST:** That a meeting ofthe Board of Directors of Rubincon Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and callingfor a consent vote of the majority of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows: 

**RESOLVED,** that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing the Articles thereof numbered “4” so that, as amended, said Articles shall be read as follows: 

“Two hundred Million (200,000,000) shares with a par value of One Mil ($0.001) per share, amount to Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000).” 

**SECOND:** That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a consent resolution was obtained from the majority of the stockholders of theCompany where the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment. 

**THIRD:** That said amendment was dulyadopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

**FOURTH:** That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by reason of said amendment. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** said corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this nineteen day of September, 2005.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERISON

WIRELESS

Defendants, 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

Case No. 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

Defendant

Case No. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

------AND------

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERISON

WIRELESS

Defendants, 

Case No. 2:22-cv-00477-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 99-1 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 838
2

ERICSSON INC., and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORPORATION

Intervenors,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC., and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORPORATION

Intervenors,

Case No. 2:22-cv-00474-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

Defendant,

ERICSSON INC., and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORPORATION

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:22-cv-00478-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF REZA MIRZAIE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S SUR-REPLY IN 

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

I, Reza Mirzaie, declare and state as follows:

1. I am a member of the State Bar of California, an attorney at the firm of Russ August 

& Kabat, and counsel of record for Plaintiff AlmondNet, Inc. in the above-captioned action. I 

submit this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Consolidate. I have 

personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if called upon to testify, could and would 

testify competently thereto.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 99-1 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 839
3

2. Attached as Exhibit A is Docket Number 48 from Immersion Corp. v. Samsung 

Elecs. Am., Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00572-JRG (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2018)

3. Attached as Exhibit B is Docket Number 61 from Immersion Corp. v. Samsung 

Elecs. Am., Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00572-JRG (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2018)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on January 29, 2024, at Los Angeles, California.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 99-1 Filed 01/29/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 840
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA, 

INC., AND SPRINT CORP.,

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No: 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Corp. (“Defendants”),

and certifies that he is authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other 

papers in the above-captioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants.

Brian Rosenthal 

New York Bar No. 3961380 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2339 

Facsimile: (212) 817-9539 

BRosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 29 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 310
Dated: November 2, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian Rosenthal 

Brian Rosenthal 

New York Bar No. 3961380 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: (212) 351-2339 

Facsimile: (212) 817-9539 

Email: BRosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

 Counsel for Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 29 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 311
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on November 2, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Brian Rosenthal

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 29 Filed 11/02/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 312
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

Johnathan Testa

4:23-cv-00833

Battlestar, LLC a Texas Limited Liability Company doing 

business as “Battlestar Clothing and Gears Company” 

Battlestar, LLC d/b/a Battlestar Colthing and Gears Company

3613 Diamond Ridge

McKinney, Texas 75071

Robert Cherry, Esq.

DONIGER / BURROUGHS

2900 S. Congress Ave, #101

Austin, Texas 78704

(310) 590-1820

9/20/2023

Case 4:23-cv-00833-SDJ Document 3 Filed 09/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00833

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00833-SDJ Document 3 Filed 09/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 16
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michele
A. Paige, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation and will be retained by Cadus
Pharmaceutical Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

 /s/ Michele A. Paige
----------------------------------------------
Michele A. Paige
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
May 15, 2003

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.


                                       17
ex10_1-f8k04262012.htm


Exhibit 10.1







 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of this 30th day of April, 2012 (this “First Amendment”), by and between LIFETIME BRANDS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Employer"), and JEFFREY SIEGEL (the "Executive").


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of May 2, 2006, effective as of January 1, 2006, as amended by a first and second agreement (collectively, the “Predecessor Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Employer and Executive entered into a new Employment Agreement dated as of March 4, 2011, effective as of January 1, 2011 (the “New Agreement”), to replace the Predecessor Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Predecessor Agreement contained, in Section 3(a) thereof, and New Agreement contains, in Section 4(a) thereof, a provision limiting payments thereunder to the amount deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Cut-Back Provisions”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive desire to eliminate the Cut-Back Provisions.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


1.   Amendment.  The Cut-Back Provision in each of the Predecessor Agreement and the New Agreement are hereby deleted as if such provision was never contained therein.


 


2.   No Other Modification or Amendment.  Except as specifically provided herein, the Predecessor Agreement and New Agreement are not modified or amended in any other respect.


 


3.   Governing Law.  This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York (determined without regard to the choice of law provisions thereof), and the parties consent to jurisdiction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.


 


4.   Counterparts.  This First Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but both such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same document.


 






  





  











  













 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


 



 



	  	
LIFETIME BRANDS, INC.


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
By:

	

/s/ Ronald Shiftan



	
 


	  	  	
Ronald Shiftan


	  	  	
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, 

Chief Operating Officer and Director


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jeffrey Siegel	 
	 	 	Jeffrey Siegel
Exhibit 10(a)


 


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference
in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 215 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305 on Form N-1A of our report dated February 24,
2012, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Exchange Portfolio, a series of BlackRock FundsSM,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock FundsSM for the year ended December 31, 2011, and to the
references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” in the Prospectus and “Financial Statements”
in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement. 


	 
	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
	 
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 April 26, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A 

VERIZON WIRELESS, 

Defendant, 

ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORP., 

Intervenors. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

AT&T SERVICES INC., et al., 

Defendants, 

ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORP., 

Intervenors. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant, 

ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORP., 

Intervenors. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 107 Filed 10/18/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 889
2 

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, 

LLC and Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc., AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T 

Enterprises, LLC, and Cellco Partnership d/b/a, and Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation 

and Ericsson Inc. (Dkt. No. 105.) In the Motion, the parties represent that the above-captioned case 

has been resolved and request dismissal of all of the above-captioned actions WITH prejudice. (Id. 

at 2.) 

Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted between Plaintiff and Defendants and 

Intervenors in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to 

bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the abovecaptioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE all of the above-captioned cases as no parties or 

claims remain.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of October, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 107 Filed 10/18/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 890