alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2327 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2327

To provide that pay for Members of Congress may not be increased by any 
 adjustment scheduled to take effect in a year immediately following a 
   fiscal year in which a deficit in the budget of the United States 
                           Government exists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1999

 Mr. Stearns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on 
House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that pay for Members of Congress may not be increased by any 
 adjustment scheduled to take effect in a year immediately following a 
   fiscal year in which a deficit in the budget of the United States 
                           Government exists.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deficit Accountability Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. EFFECT OF A BUDGET DEFICIT.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``Subject to 
        subparagraph (B),'' and inserting ``Subject to subparagraph (B) 
        and paragraph (3),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3)(A) An adjustment under paragraph (2) which is scheduled to 
take effect in a calendar year shall not be made if the budget of the 
United States Government was in deficit for the last fiscal year ending 
before the start of such calendar year, as determined under 
subparagraph (B).
    ``(B) Not later than 2 months after the end of each fiscal year, 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall--
            ``(i) determine whether the budget of the United States 
        Government was in deficit for such fiscal year; and
            ``(ii) submit a written report to the Congress as to its 
        findings under this subparagraph.
A failure to make a timely determination under the preceding sentence 
shall be treated as a determination under this subparagraph that the 
budget of the United States Government was in deficit for the fiscal 
year involved.''.
                                 <all>
```
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-00419-JRG

Gearbox Software, L.L.C.

✔

9/27/2023

✔

11/17/2023

Michael J. Sacksteder

CSB No. 191605

Fenwick & West LLP

555 California Street, 12th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

415-875-2300

415-281-1350

msacksteder@fenwick.com

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 6 Filed 10/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 129
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-91-MAC

'

LAMAR FITTON, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Lamar Fitton, is adjudged 

Case 1:23-cr-00091-MAC-CLS Document 22 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
2

guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon 

in Possession of a Firearm.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00091-MAC-CLS Document 22 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
Frederick Lee ROBINSON, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9169.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc., that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.





September 27, 2002



/s/    PAUL E.
FREIMANPaul E. Freiman Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
Danica BULOVIC, petitioner, v. THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMAKET COMPANY, LLC, et al.

No. 17-9461.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      160,314
COMMITMENTS
  53,949    9,892   15,755   66,739  108,594  136,443  134,240   23,871   26,074

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,527)
     848      311   -1,329      224    2,749     -257    1,730   -1,270   -3,257

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.7      6.2      9.8     41.6     67.7     85.1     83.7     14.9     16.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      67       18       35       63       81      141      127
```

----

Updated August 24, 2012
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6601

FERNANDO M. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Director; HARLEY LAPPIN, Regional Director; R. D. GLANCY, Regional Office; HARRELL WATTS, National Appeals; GENERAL COUNSEL FOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; B. G. COMPTON, Warden; MR. BOGDAN, Associate Warden; MRS. BRIGHT, Systems Manager; MR. MCGORTY, Food Service Administrator; MR. SERVOSS, Assistant Food Service Administrator; MR. MOST, Assistant Food Service Administrator; MR. GOLUB, Case Manager; MS. GEYER, Case Manager; OFFICER GAMBREL, Mailroom; OFFICER LIVENGOOD, Food Service; OFFICER SHIFFER, Food Service; OFFICER BITTINGER, Food Service, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-2021-8-AW) Submitted: October 3, 2005 Decided: November 17, 2005 Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.- 2 - Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fernando M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). - 3 - PER CURIAM: Fernando M. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeSmith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons , No. CA-04-2021-8-AW (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.35




 





Schedule of Certain Parties to 2018
Securities Purchase Agreement

and Registration Rights Agreements


 


The following directors,
executive officers and principal stockholders of AudioEye, Inc. (the “Company”), in addition to certain other investors,
each entered into (i) a Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 6, 2018 with the Company in the form attached as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7,
2018, and (ii) a Registration Rights Agreement with the Company dated August 6, 2018 in the form attached as Exhibit 4.1 to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2018:


 


	Purchaser	No. of Shares

of Common Stock

Acquired Pursuant to

Securities Purchase

Agreement and

Subject to Registration

Rights Agreement	Total Purchase

Price for Securities
	CSB IV US Holdings, LLC (1)	16,000	$100,000
	HZ Investments Family LP (2)	10,400	65,000
	Todd Bankofier	1,600	10,000
	Anthony Coelho	4,000	25,000
	Sero Capital LLC (3)	1,031,132	250,000
	Ernest W. Purcell	32,000	200,000


 





 






 


		(1)	Dr. Carr Bettis, our Executive Chairman/Chairman of the Board and a director, has reported that
he has sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of CSB IV Holdings LLC.



 


		(2)	Alexandre Zyngier, one of our directors, has reported that he has sole voting and dispositive power
over the securities held for the account of HZ Investments Family LP.



 


		(3)	Sero Capital LLC is a successor to Anthion Partners II LLC, which originally acquired the shares
and entered into the Securities Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Keith A. SimpsonKeith A. SimpsonVice-President andChief Accounting Officer


Date: February 9, 2011

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial
Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-4
Refinishers Warehouse, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Thompson PBE, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Grand Distributing Corp., a California  corporation and a subsidiary of Thompson
PBE, Inc.  Thompson  Lacquer Co., a California  corporation  and a subsidiary of
Thompson PBE, Inc. Arnold Paint Company, a Florida  corporation and a subsidiary
of Thompson PBE, Inc. Santa Clara Color,  Inc., a California  corporation  and a
subsidiary of Thompson PBE, Inc. McNeil & Sons Auto Paint, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation  and a subsidiary of Thompson PBE, Inc.  Automotive  Paint & Supply,
Inc., a Virginia  corporation  and a subsidiary  of Thompson PBE, Inc. Auto Body
Supply  Corporation,  a  Massachusetts  corporation and a subsidiary of Thompson
PBE, Inc.
```

```

----

Updated August 9, 2013
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Castle Group, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Rick Wall, CEO and Michael S. Nitta, Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  Date:November 7, 2007By:/s/Rick WallRick Wall, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorDate:November 7, 2007By:/s/Michael S. NittaMichael S. Nitta, Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEET
                              AND INCOME STATEMENTS DATED 6/30/96
                              AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                              TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>                              
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         4,602,815
<SECURITIES>                                   6,157,643
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,582,390
<PP&E>                                           356,660
<DEPRECIATION>                                   127,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,392,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            893,152
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                      29,302,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (18,803,335)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,392,363
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 506,242
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,717,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,211,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,211,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,211,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (1.05)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.50
                                AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                      TO
                      VASTAR RESOURCES, INC. SAVINGS PLAN
                          __________________________



Pursuant to the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors on October 15,
1997, the Vastar Resources, Inc. Savings Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended
effective as of November 1, 1997:


Paragraph 10.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:



   "10.1  Amendment of Plan
          (a)  Except as provided in Subparagraph 10.1(b), the Plan may be
               amended by the Board of Directors of Vastar Resources, Inc.

          (b)  A committee consisting of the Vice President, Human Resources,
               the Vice President and Controller, the Vice President and General
               Counsel, and the General Tax Officer of Vastar Resources, Inc.
               may amend the Plan under the following circumstances:

               (i)   Legally required changes;

               (ii)  Improvement of administrative efficiency;

               (iii) Implementation of contractual commitments made by the
                     Company regarding matters relating to acquisitions,
                     divestitures, joint ventures or mergers and any matter
                     negotiated pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement;

               (iv)  Implementation of any transfer of assets, merger or spin-
                     off of plan assets among plans within the Company; or

               (v)   Implementation of participation in the Plan by Subsidiaries
                     or Affiliates of the Company.

                                       1
<PAGE>
 
          (c)  No amendment shall reduce the account of any Member as of the
               date of such amendment."


Executed this 30th day of December, 1997.


ATTEST                                    VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.



By: /s/ JONATHAN D. EDELFELT              By: /s/ JEFFREY M. BENDER
    -------------------------                 ---------------------
    JONATHAN D. EDELFELT                      JEFFREY M. BENDER
    Associate Secretary                       Vice President
                                              Human Resources

                                       2
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 40279/40280

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

SUNNY ANGEL ROBISON ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 571

Filed: July 9, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN U NPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. David C. Nye , District Judge.

Order s denying I.C.R. 35 motion s for reduction of sentence s , affirmed

. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respon dent.

________________________________________________ GUITIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
This is a consolidated appeal. In Docket No. 40279, Sunny Angel Robison was
convicted of accessory to grand theft by possession of stolen property , Idaho Code § § 18

- 2403(4), 18

- 2407(1), and 18

- 205 . The district court imposed a unified sentence of four years with two years determinate

. In Docket No. 40280, Robison was convicted of sexual abuse of a
minor, I.C. § 18

- 1506(1)(B). The district court i mposed a unified sentence of six years with three years determinate, to run concurrently with her sentence for accessory to grand theft. The
sentences were suspended in both cases and the district court retained jurisdiction. Prior to the

end of the reta ined jurisdiction period, the district court relinquished jurisdiction in both cases.2 Robison filed Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion s , which the district court denied. Robison appeals

from the denial of her Rule 35 motion s

. A Rule 35 motion is a request for leniency which is addressed to the sound discretion of the sentencing court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v.

Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of new or additional information

su bsequently provided to the district court in support of the motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho
201, 159 P.3d 838 (2007). Our focus on review is upon the nature of the offense and the

character of the offender. State v. Reinke , 103 Idaho 771, 772, 653 P .2d 1183, 1184 (Ct. App. 1982). Where a sentence is not illegal, the appellant must show that it is unreasonably harsh in
light of the primary objective of protecting society and the related goals of deterrence,

rehabilitation and retribution. State v. B roadhead , 120 Idaho 141, 145, 814 P.2d 401, 405
(1991), overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown , 121 Idaho 385, 825 P.2d 482 (1992);

State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982).
Having reviewed the record, including any new information submitted with Robison ’s

Rule 35 motion s , we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the motion s

. Accordingly, the district court’s order s denying Robison ’s I.C.R. 35 motion s are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. Bursic President and
Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 2, 2011

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-3
```

```

----

Updated January 18, 2013