alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11132]



[[Page 31095]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a

[CIS No. 2719-22]
RIN 1615-AC79

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

20 CFR Part 655

[DOL Docket No. ETA-2022-0004]
RIN 1205-AC10


Exercise of Time-Limited Authority To Increase the Numerical 
Limitation for Second Half of FY 2022 for the H-2B Temporary 
Nonagricultural Worker Program and Portability Flexibility for H-2B 
Workers Seeking To Change Employers; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Department 
of Homeland Security (DHS), and Employment and Training Administration 
and Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).

ACTION: Temporary final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 18, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security and 
Department of Labor jointly published a temporary final rule titled 
``Exercise of Time-Limited Authority to Increase the Numerical 
Limitation for Second Half of FY 2022 for the H-2B Temporary 
Nonagricultural Worker Program and Portability Flexibility for H-2B 
Workers Seeking To Change Employers.'' The fourth amendatory 
instruction to the DHS regulatory text contained a typo. This document 
corrects that typo.

DATES: Effective on May 18, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samantha Deshommes, Chief, Regulatory 
Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 5900 Capital 
Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 20746; telephone 240-721-3000 (this is 
not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2022-10631, appearing in the 
first column on page 30377 in the Federal Register of Wednesday, May 
18, 2022, the following correction is made:


Sec.  274a.12   [Corrected]

0
1. On page 30377, in the first column, in part 274a, in amendment 4, 
the instruction ``Effective May 18, 2022 through May 18, 2025, amend 
Sec.  274a.12 by adding paragraph (b)(31) to read as follows'' is 
corrected to read ``Effective May 18, 2022 through May 18, 2025, amend 
Sec.  274a.12 by adding paragraph (b)(32) to read as follows:''.

Christina E. McDonald,
Federal Register Liaison, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Laura Dawkins,
Federal Register Liaison, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2022-11132 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                              [MetaSolv Letterhead]

                                CEO Certification

         I, James P. Janicki, Chief Executive Officer of MetaSolv, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002 dated as of March 27, 2003 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully
complies with the requirements of that section.

         I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material aspects, the financial operations and results of
operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ James P. Janicki
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        James P. Janicki,
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 27, 2003

<PAGE>

                              [MetaSolv Letterhead]

                                CFO Certification

         I, Glenn A. Etherington, Chief Financial Officer of MetaSolv, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002 dated as of March 27, 2003 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully
complies with the requirements of that section.

         I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material aspects, the financial operations and results of
operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Glenn A. Etherington
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Glenn A. Etherington
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 27, 2003
Rudy MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9234

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of *United States* v. *Davis* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2319, 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (2019).
ALPINE PCS, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1507.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 6835

SHAIN CLAUDE COLLINS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv - 00474

- GEC )

Submitted : May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before MOTZ , THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Shain Claude Collins , Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shain Claude Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unl ess a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a co nstitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional cla ims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedura l ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingl y, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument wou ld not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  AUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE  YEAR  ENDED
DECEMBER  31,  1998  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000917321
<NAME>                        FinishMaster, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,009
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,680
<INVENTORY>                                    57,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               97,887
<PP&E>                                         19,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          55,591
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       7,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   226,947
<SALES>                                        309,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               309,946
<CGS>                                          200,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,988
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,988
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.29
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6188

In Re: PETE SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad,

a/k/a Jose,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-117)

Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 19, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Pete Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the

district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b). He seeks an order from this Court directing the

district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is

not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the

mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another

mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously.

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 4.42


 


English Translation for Reference Only


 


Agreement


 


Party A: CEEG (Nanjing) Renewable Energy Co.,
Ltd.


 


Party B: CEEG (Nanjing) Solar Research
Institute Co., Ltd.


 


Party C: China Electric Equipment Group
Co., Ltd.


 


Party D: CEEG (Nanjing) Semiconductor Co.,
Ltd.


 


Party E: CEEG Nanjing International Trade
Co. Ltd.


 


Party F: CEEG (Nanjing) Special Transformer
Co., Ltd.


 


Party G: CEEG (Jiangsu) Insulative New
Material Co., Ltd.


 


Thereinafter referred
to as: Party A, Party B, Party C, Party D, Party E, Party F, Party G


 


Due to expiration of
creditor's rights and liabilities of above-mentioned seven parties, through friendly negotiation all parties agree to transfer
creditor's rights and liabilities in one of following modes.


 


1.
 Party A will transfer its creditor’s right to Party B totaling at RMB Fifty one million and ninety five thousand
and four hundred and six yuan and two chiao and three cents (RMB51,095,406.23 )to Party C, Party D, Party E, Party F and
Party G, including five million and four hundred and ninety four thousand and three hundred and twenty six yuan and one chiao
and six cents (RMB5,494, 326.16) accepted by Party C, two million and five hundred and twenty one thousand and five hundred
and twenty two yuan and two chaio (RMB2,521,522.20) accepted by Party D, eight million and nine hundred and seventy nine
thousand and five hundred and eighty nine yuan and nine chiao and two cents (RMB8, 979, 589.92) accepted by Party E, thirty
four million and seventy three thousand and five hundred and sixty seven yuan and nine chiao and five cents (RMB34, 073,
567.95) accepted by Party F, and twenty six thousand and four hundred yuan (RMB26,400) accepted by Party G.


 


2. The remaining creditor's rights and
liabilities unsettled by all parties after it is offset shall be solved by all parties through negotiation.


 


The agreement shall
be in 7 original copies which are taken as proof for entry into the account book.


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


	 	
        Party A: CEEG (Nanjing) Renewable Energy Co.,
        Ltd.

        /seal/ CEEG (Nanjing) Renewable Energy Co., Ltd.

         

	 	
        Party B: CEEG (Nanjing) Solar Research
        Institute Co., Ltd.

        /seal/ CEEG (Nanjing) Solar Research
        Institute Co., Ltd.

         

	 	
        Party C: China Electric Equipment Group
        Co., Ltd.

        /seal/ China Electric Equipment Group Co.,
        Ltd.

         

	 	
        Party D: CEEG (Nanjing) Semiconductor Co.,
        Ltd.

        /seal/ CEEG (Nanjing) Semiconductor Co.,
        Ltd.

         

	 	
        Party E: CEEG Nanjing International Trade
        Co. Ltd.

        /seal/ CEEG Nanjing International Trade
        Co. Ltd.

         

	 	
        Party F: CEEG (Nanjing) Special Transformer
        Co., Ltd.

        /seal/ CEEG (Nanjing) Special Transformer
        Co., Ltd.

         

	 	
        Party G: CEEG (Jiangsu) Insulative New
        Material Co., Ltd.

        /seal/ CEEG (Jiangsu) Insulative
New Material Co., Ltd. 

	 	 


Date: December 31, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


















<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,576
<SECURITIES>                                    14,704
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,566
<PP&E>                                           6,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,276
<BONDS>                                         24,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,932
<OTHER-SE>                                    (102,358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,574
<SALES>                                            837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   837
<CGS>                                            3,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,911)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                23,273
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.81

        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00024-CR

Hai Ho, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3011256, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellan t Hai Ho appeals from orders revoking community supervision and imposing

concurrent ten-year prison sentences for two counts of aggravated assault. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West 2003. Ho was originally convicted on his pleas of guilty to the offenses.

Ho’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The brief meets the requirements of A nders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds

to be advanced. S ee also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ackson v. State , 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); G ainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)

. A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to Ho, was advised of his right to examine the appellate2

record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed, but a letter from Ho explaining why he believes the punishment is too harsh has been read and considered by the Court.

We have reviewed the r ecord and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous
and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The orders revoking community supervision are affirmed.

__________________________________________ Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Affirmed Filed: August 14, 2003
Do Not Publish
Carlton Roland HUNTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6328.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 21**
**List of Subsidiaries of Olympic Steel, Inc.**         **Name of Subsidiary****State of Organization****% Ownership**         Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc. Ohio  100%  Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc. Minnesota  100%  Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc. Delaware  100%  Olympic Steel Receivables LLC Delaware  100% (a)Olympic Steel Trading, Inc. Ohio  100%  Oly Steel Welding, Inc. Michigan  100%  Olympic Steel Iowa, Inc. Iowa  100% (b)OLP LLC Michigan  50% (c)G.S.P., LLC Michigan  49% (d)
(a)  Owned 100% by Olympic Steel, Inc. and Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc. (b)  Owned 100% by Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc. (c)  Owned 50% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc. (d)  Owned 49% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.
Andrew Guy MORET, petitioner, v. Pat GARRETT.

No. 18-8241.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
32.4
 
 
 Certification
of Chief Accounting Officer
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company. 
 
 
 
 
 Date: May
10, 2005
 
 
 _________________
 Ray
Sienko
 Chief
Accounting Officer
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

Case No. 2:23-CV-00352-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend its Invalidity 

Contentions. (Dkt. No. 59.) The motion is GRANTED. 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 60 Filed 03/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 972
Kenneth Edward WERBACH, petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, et al.

No. 18-6209.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          733423
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (86584)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  695537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         284452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      292435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    695537
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 28506
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 20507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6729
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>