alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(110 So. 497)

No. 28031.

#### STATE v. OUZTS.

(Nov. 2, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial-Staff.)*

1. Rape <§=>44 — Witnesses <§=>337(4) — Evidence of intimacy, at time of alleged carnal knowledge of female under age of consent, and surrounding circumstances, held admissible to corroborate prosecutrix and Impeach defendant (Act No. 192 of 1912).

In prosecution for carnal knowledge with female between ages of 12 and 18 years under Act No. 192 of 1912, evidence as to number of times defendant had illicit relations with prosecutrix, engagement to be married, admissions, and length of relations, knowledge of pregnancy and birth of child, and letters during relation, was admissible to corroborate prosecuting witness and to impeach defendant.

2. Criminal law <§=>719(0.

Argument of district attorney, that if jury did not convict of statutory rape “on such testimony as was introduced” he pitied all women of parish, *held*permissible.

3. Criminal law <§=>1064(5).

Motion for new trial on ground that verdict is contrary to law and evidence presents nothing for consideration of Supreme Court.

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Bienville; John S. Richardson, Judge.

Lee Ouzts was convicted of carnal knowledge, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

J. Rush Wimberly, of Arcadia, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. D. Goff, Dist. Atty., of Arcadia (E. Rt Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

ST. PAUL, J.

The defendant was convicted of carnal knowledge of one L. S. Act No. 192 of 1912, p. 380. We find in the record 13 bills of exception.

*341I.

[1] Eleven of said bills relate to the admission of certain evidence. That evidence bore upon the number of times defendant had illicit relations with said L. S., whether they were then engaged to be married, whether the (approximate) date given in the indictment was the first time, how long the relations continued, if and when a child was born to said L. S., whether defendant had knowledge of her pregnancy, whether he had admitted his relations with her, and defendant’s letters to her during the continuance of those relations.

All of which clearly bore upon the intimacy existing between the parties at the time of the alleged offense and upon the surrounding circumstances thereof;. and hence was clearly admissible to corroborate the testimony of the prosecuting witness and to impeach the defendant’s denial thereof.

II.

[2] The defendant also complains that the .district attorney was allowed to argue that “if the jury did not convict the defendant, he pitied all the women of the parish.” The trial judge says the district attorney argued from the evidence only, to wit, if the jury did not convict the defendant “upon such testimony as was introduced.” This argument was clearly permissible.

III.

[3] The motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence presents nothing for the consideration of this court.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Rogerio S. TAVARES, petitioner, v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR-COMPANY OF RHODE ISLAND.

No. 17-1505.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALBERTO MONTELONGO

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 001

- CR

Appeal from the

243 rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20150D02224 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s fourth motion for extension of time to file the brief

until August 21

, 201 6

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

APPELLANT ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales , the Appel lant ’s Attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 21 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of Ju ly , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00266

- CV

In the ESTATE OF Louis GANTZ , Deceased

From the County Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- PC

- 0126

Honorable Linda Z. Jones , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 3, 2012

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellants filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellants. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d)(absent

agreement of parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CUR IAM
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2254 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2254

To amend the trade adjustment assistance provisions of the Trade Act of 
  1974 to allow the reimbursement of training costs incurred and for 
which payment became due within 30 days before the training is approved 
                       by the Secretary of Labor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the trade adjustment assistance provisions of the Trade Act of 
  1974 to allow the reimbursement of training costs incurred and for 
which payment became due within 30 days before the training is approved 
                       by the Secretary of Labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRAINING COSTS.

    Section 236(a)(6) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2296(a)(6)) 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking clause (ii) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(ii) from any source other than this section,
except that the Secretary shall reimburse an adversely affected worker 
for the costs of any training program approved under paragraph (1) for 
that worker to the extent that worker was enrolled in the training 
program during the 30-day period preceding the date on which the 
Secretary approved the program and such costs were incurred during that 
30-day period.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``will not be 
        required'' and inserting ``, subject to the exception in 
        subparagraph (A), will not be required''.
                                 <all>
```
**SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS**

**SET FOR SUBMISSION ON ORAL ARGUMENT TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2015**

**AT 1:30 P.M.**

(Before, Chief Justice Brian Quinn, Justice James T. Campbell, Justice Patrick A. Pirtle)

**07-15-00060-CV**	Jody James Farms, JV v. The Altman Group, 	Floyd County

Inc. and Laurie Diaz	

JENKINS, WAGNON & YOUNG, P.C. 		O/A Requested

  (Jody D. Jenkins) – Appellant							

			FIELD, MANNING, STONE, HAWTHORNE 	O/A Requested	

			  & AYCOCK, P.C.  (Anna McKim, J. Paul

  Manning) – Appellees		

**07-15-00102-CV**	Ronald Whittington and Mary Whittington	Potter County

v. Jay Green and Connie Green								

			SELL GRIFFIN MCLAIN P.C.			O/A Requested

 			  (Kerry McLain) – Appellants

			BURDETT MORGAN WILLIAMSON		O/A Requested

			  & BOYKIN, LLP		

  (Wyatt L. Brooks, Lewis Coppedge)

  – Appellees
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

DANNY JOHNSTON,

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant.

v.

PATRICIA ANN JOHNSTON,

Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff.

v.

EAST TEXAS OIL FIELD 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC,

Counter-Defendant.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CASE NO. 6:23-cv-413-JDK-KNM

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Counter-Plaintiff Patricia Johnston’s Motion for Contempt 

and Sanctions. Docket No. 14. This case was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations 

for disposition.

On July 8, 2024, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that the Court 

deny Patricia Johnston’s Motion for Contempt and Sanctions. Docket No. 63. No 

written objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court

1

Case 6:23-cv-00413-JDK-KNM Document 72 Filed 08/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 577
examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law.

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc),

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, no objections were filed. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate 

Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews her legal 

conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. 

Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding 

that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review 

is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations, the 

Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to law. 

Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 63) as the findings of this Court and 

DENIES Counter-Plaintiff Patricia Johnston’s Motion (Docket No. 14). 

2

So ordered and signed on this 

Aug 5, 2024

Case 6:23-cv-00413-JDK-KNM Document 72 Filed 08/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 578
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/25/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      293,710
COMMITMENTS
  66,260   90,554   81,779  111,829   93,146  259,868  265,479   33,842   28,231

CHANGES FROM 06/18/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -73,994)
 -14,838  -31,587  -12,840  -44,743  -25,275  -72,421  -69,702   -1,573   -4,292

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.6     30.8     27.8     38.1     31.7     88.5     90.4     11.5      9.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      156)
      48       62       70       31       30      122      127
```

----

Updated June 28, 2013
Exhibit 10.16


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 8% CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURE:


 


This First Amendment to the 8% Convertible
Debenture, dated September 27, 2017, made by Qrons Inc. for the benefit of CubeSquare LLC in the amount of $15,000 (the “Debenture”)
hereby amends the Debenture as follows:


 


The maturity date of the Debenture is hereby amended
to September 27, 2019.


 


Except as amended hereby all of the terms
and conditions of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


Dated this 9th
day of September 2018


 


Qrons Inc.





By: /s/Jonah Meer Chief Executive Officer


 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


 


CubeSquare LLC


 


By: /s/Jonah Meer Managing Member
Bryan George MILLS, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-8750.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ronald Ray NORMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6757.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                                                                 MARCH 31, 1997

             LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

   Statement Regarding Computation of Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock 
                                  (Unaudited)
           (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                            Three Months Ended
                                                 March 31,
                                         -----------------------
                                            1996          1997
                                         ---------   ----------
Net loss                                   $(2,873)     $(6,679)
                                         ---------   ----------
                                         ---------   ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding:
   Shares outstanding                    7,354,393   11,209,124


   Additional equivalent shares issuable
   from assumed exercise of common
   stock options (1)                        52,326       55,463
                                         ---------   ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding      7,406,719   11,264,587
                                         ---------   ----------
                                         ---------   ----------
Net loss attributable to common stock       ($0.39)      ($0.59)
                                         ---------   ----------
                                         ---------   ----------




---------
(1) Includes the effect of options issued during the twelve months preceding
    the Company's initial public offering.  Other options and warrants have not
    been included because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00352

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER 

FOCUSING ASSERTED PATENT CLAIM AND PRIOR ART

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Entry of an Order Focusing Asserted Patent 

Claims and Prior Art. The Court, having considered same, is of the opinion the motion should be

and is hereby GRANTED and orders as follows: 

• Within 7 days of the issuance of this Order, Headwater shall narrow to no more than 10 

claims from each patent and not more than a total of 32 claims. 

• 28 days afterwards, Verizon shall narrow to no more than twelve prior art references 

against each patent and not more than a total of 40 references. 

• By 28 days before the service of opening expert reports, Headwater shall narrow to no 

more than five asserted claims per patent and no more than a total of 16 claims. 

• By the date for opening expert reports, Verizon shall narrow to no more than six asserted 

prior art references per patent and no more than 20 total references. 

It is so ordered. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 63-10 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1297
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT  AND  SUBSIDIARIES  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 3, 1997 AND
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 3, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          23,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    204,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               500,518
<PP&E>                                         183,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           159
<OTHER-SE>                                     358,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   739,735
<SALES>                                        258,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,134
<CGS>                                          167,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00233

- CV

JLMH I NVESTMENTS
, LLC

, Appellant

V

.

F AMILY D OLLAR S TORES OF T EXAS
, LLC, ARCP FDCCC1403 LLC, 7B B UILDING & D EVELOPMENT
, LLC

, T RIPLE C D EVELOPMENT
, I NC ., B URKHARDT E NGINEERING C OMPANY
, AND M&S U TILITY C ONSTRUCTION
, LLC

, Appellees §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 342nd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 342

- 316818

- 20 )

June 13, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part

. We reverse that portion of the t rial

court’s judgment that dismissed JLMH ’ s request for inju nctive relief and remand this

case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion

. We affirm

the remainder of the trial court ’ s judgment.It is further ordered tha t al l parties shall bear the costs of th eir appeal, for

which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker Justice Brian Walker
<PAGE>   1

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.47(d)


                                
                                
                    AMENDMENT 7 TO CONTRACT CSXT-C-03951
        SUBJECT TO 49 USC Section 10709 AND 49 CFR Section 1313.3(c)


     COGENTRIX OF ROCKY MOUNT, INC. ("Industry") and CSX
TRANSPORTATION, INC. ("CSXT") agree to amend the aforementioned
Contract, which has been in effect since October 27, 1989.

     1.   This Amendment will be effective July 1, 1997.

     2.   The Contract is modified in the following manner:

          (A)  Industry and CSXT will use reasonable best efforts to
               implement a permanent solution to the grade crossing
               blockage concern at Industry's Rocky Mount Cogeneration
               Facility.

          (B)  As a temporary solution, effective on and after July 1,
               1997, CSXT will permit Industry to ship seventy-five
               (75) car unit trains at the ninety (90) car rate levels
               presently applicable in the Contract.

          (C)  This Seventh Amendment will remain in effect until a more
               permanent solution can be implemented, but will terminate
               no later than December 31, 1998.

      3.    All other provisions of the Contract are ratified and
            reaffirmed.


          COGENTRIX OF ROCKY MOUNT, INC.

          By:  /s/ Ronald A. Munse
          Title:   Vice President Fuels and Transportation


          CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

          By:  /s/ S. Walters
          Title:   Director, Non-Utility Generation
ANDREW GREE 

REG. NO. 27297-078

USP COLEMAN I

U.S. PENITENTIARY

P.O. BOX 1033

COLEMAN, FL 33521

RECEIVED

MAY 2 4 2023

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DIS RICT OF TEXAS

May ZZ, 2023

Mr. David O Toole

Clerk of Court

U. S. District Court

Eastern District of Texas

Sherman Division

101 East Pecan Street, Room 216

Sherman, Texas 75090

RE: Greer v. United States

Civil No. 4:23-cvCrim No. 4.T7-cr-00094-MAC-CAN-l

Dear Mr. O Toole:

Enclosed please find and accept for filing Movant’s Motion under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255(f)(3) to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal

Custody and Memorandum of Law in Support thereof. Please submit these

documents to the Court.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely,

ANDREW GRfeE

Appearing Pro Se

Encl, as noted

483

Case 4:23-cv-00483-MAC-AGD Document 1-2 Filed 05/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 38
EXHIBIT
23.01




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-84726, 33-84728, 333-25981, 333-114019, 333-152186, and 333-159217 of Gaming
Partners International Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8, of our
report dated March 30, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Gaming Partners International Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2009.




/s/ Moss
Adams LLP




San
Diego, CA


March 30,
2010
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,155
COMMITMENTS
   4,543    2,859    2,341   21,382   24,061   28,266   29,261    9,889    8,894

CHANGES FROM 02/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,579)
    -746      116      -11   -1,472   -1,541   -2,229   -1,436   -1,350   -2,143

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.9      7.5      6.1     56.0     63.1     74.1     76.7     25.9     23.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
       9        7        7       32       25       44       39
```

----

Updated March 8, 2013