alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 333-10017 and 333-58403) pertaining to the ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc. Stock Option Plans of 1991 and 1996, of our report dated February 16, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Denver, Colorado
July 2, 1999
ex4-6 -- Converted by SECPublisher 2.1.1.8, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing



  


 


 






    	*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.



    	 



    
 


 


 






    	*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.



    	 



    
 


 


 






    	*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.



    	 



    
 


 


 






    	*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.



    	 



    
 


Table 1 To


Purchase Agreement No. PA-03600


Aircraft Delivery, Description, Price
and Advance Payments


 


	Airframe Model/MTOW:	777-Freighter	766800 Pounds	 	Detail Specification:	D019W007-D (2/19/2010)	***
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Engine Model/Thrust:	GE90-110BIL	110100 Pounds	 	Airframe Price Base Year/Escalation Formula:	***	***
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Airframe Price:	 	***	 	Engine Price Base Year/Escalation Formula:	N/A	N/A
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Optional Features:	 	***	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Sub-Total of Airframe and Features:	 	***	 	Airframe Escalation Date:	 	 
	 	 	 	 		 	 
	Engine Price (Per Aircraft):	 	***	 	Base Year Index(ECI):	***	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Aircraft Basic Price (Excluding BFE/SPE):	 	***	 	Base Year Index(ICI):	***	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Buyer Furnished Equipment (BFE) Estimate:	 	***	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Seller Purchased Equipment (SPE) Estimate:	 	***	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deposit per Aircraft:	 	***	 	 	 	 


 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	*** 
	Delivery
 Date	Number of
 Aircraft	Escalation
 Factor
 (Airframe)	 	 	***	***	***	***	***
	Jul-2013	1	***	 	 	***	***	***	***	***
	Aug-2013	1	***	 	 	***	***	***	***	***
	Jan-2015	1	***	 	 	***	***	***	***	***
	Jun-2015	2	***	 	 	***	***	***	***	***
	Jul-2015	1	***	 	 	***	***	***	***	***
	Total:	6	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 


 


	 	Boeing Proprietary	SA 1 Page 1


 



    	*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission.
In Re Richard DeCARO, petitioner.

No. 18-5812.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,411
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,991
<PP&E>                                         126,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,584
<BONDS>                                        216,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,918
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,458
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,258
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                       336
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Denver Ivan WILSON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6418.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2155 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2155

       To suspend temporarily the duty on THQ (Toluhydroquinone).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on THQ (Toluhydroquinone).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.29.05    THQ               Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     (Toluhydroquino                                                         31/2002          ''
                     ne), purchased                                                                            .
                     for resale (CAS
                     No. 000095-71-
                     6) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2907.29.90)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Joseph WITCHARD, petitioner, v. Bryan M. ANTONELLI, Warden.

No. 18-6720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Joseph VAN SACH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8740.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in light of *Stokeling v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 544, 202 L.E.2d 512 (2019).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

QUALITATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS, 

LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ADT, INC.

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00271-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (the “Notice”) 

filed by Plaintiff Qualitative Data Solutions, LLC (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 5.) In the Notice, Plaintiff 

dismisses the above-captioned action against Defendant ADT, Inc. (“Defendant”) without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 1).

Having considered the Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all 

claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in the above-captioned case are 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and 

attorneys’ fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no claims 

or parties remain.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of July, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00271-JRG-RSP Document 6 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 32
Exhibit 10.2

 

JOINDER AGREEMENT

 

This Joinder Agreement is executed by the undersigned pursuant to the Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Agreement”), by and among EQM Midstream Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), and the purchasers party thereto (the “Purchasers”), which is incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement.

 

By the execution of this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned agrees as follows:

 

1.              The undersigned acknowledges that the undersigned is acquiring an additional 205,044 Series A Preferred Units, subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (including the Schedules and Exhibits thereto).

 

2.              The undersigned hereby joins in, and agrees to be bound by and subject to, the Agreement, with the same force and effect as if the undersigned were originally a Purchaser party thereto.

 

3.              Any notice required or permitted by the Agreement shall be given to the undersigned at the address listed below.

 

4.              The Partnership hereby acknowledges and agrees that the undersigned shall be deemed a Purchaser under the Agreement with respect to the number of Series A Preferred Units set forth above and that such Purchaser shall be entitled to all of the rights and benefits, and subject to all of the obligations, of a Purchaser under the Agreement.

 

[Signature Pages Follow.]

 











 

EXECUTED AND DATED as of this 18th day of March, 2019.

 

	
 
    	
EQM MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   EQGP Services, LLC, its general partner
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Kirk R. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Kirk   R. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
				


 

Signature Page to Joinder Agreement to Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement

 











 

	
 
    	
Kayne Anderson Midstream/Energy Fund, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
KA   Fund Advisors, LLC
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   James C. Baker
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
James   C. Baker
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Managing   Director
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Notice   Address:
    	
KA   Fund Advisors, LLC
    
	
 
    	
Attention:   David Shladovsky
    
	
 
    	
1800   Avenue of the Stars, 3rd Floor
    
	
 
    	
Los   Angeles, CA 90067
    
				


 

Signature Page to Joinder Agreement to Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/31/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      538,158
COMMITMENTS
  34,263   28,286  157,731  328,386  338,835  520,380  524,852   17,778   13,306

CHANGES FROM 07/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,915)
  -1,103   -3,770    5,649    5,962   11,429   10,509   13,308      406   -2,393

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.4      5.3     29.3     61.0     63.0     96.7     97.5      3.3      2.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      37       22       55       68       68      130      127
```

----

Updated August 3, 2012
Translation of Equity Transfer Agreement



 Exhibit 4.87 
 Equity Transfer Agreement 
 No.: 2011 Zhongcheng Trust Huainan Ninetowns Investment Trust
Equity Transfer No.01 
 Party A (the “Transferor”): Zhongcheng Trust Co., Ltd. 

Party B (the “Transferee”): Beijing Ninetowns Port Software and Technology Co., Ltd. 

In accordance with the Company Law, the Contract Law as well as the resolutions adopted by the shareholders’ general meeting dated March 19,
2012, Party A and Party B, adhering to the principles of free will, fairness, honesty and credibility, hereby enter into this Agreement with respect to the equity transfer and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions herein. 

I. Standard and Price of Equity Transfer 
 1.
Party A will transfer all its equity interests in Beijing Ninetowns Suitable Estate Co., Ltd. (RMB90 million) to Party B on 1:1 basis. 
 2.
Party B shall pay up the full equity transfer price to Party A within 30 days following the execution of this Agreement. 
 3. Following the
effectiveness of this Agreement, the shareholder’s equity, claims and debts formerly enjoyed and assumed by Party A in connection with Beijing Ninetowns Suitable Estate Co., Ltd. shall be passed to Party B. 

II. Undertakings and Warranties 
 Party A
warrants that it has the full and effective right to dispose of its equity to be transferred to Party B and such equity is free of any pledge and third-party recourse. Otherwise, Party A shall bear any and all economic and legal responsibilities
arising as a result thereof. 
 III. Resolution of Disputes and Defaults 
 1. A default shall be constituted if either party fails to perform its obligations hereunder. The defaulting party shall bear the corresponding defaulting liability. 

2. Any dispute arising from the performance of this Agreement shall be resolved by both parties by friendly and amicable consultation. If no resolution
can be reached, either party may file a lawsuit before the people’s court in accordance with law. 
 IV. Effectiveness of Agreement

 1. This Agreement shall enter into force upon signing and stamping by both parties. As from the effective date hereof, the new shareholder
shall enjoy its rights and perform its obligations as a shareholder. 







 2. This Agreement is executed in five counterparts, two ones for Party A, one for Party B, one for the
company and one for the industrial and commercial administration. 
 Party A: Zhongcheng Trust Co., Ltd. (seal) 

(Company Seal)[seal: Zhongcheng Trust Co., Ltd. ] 
 /s/ Deng Hongguo 
 Party B: Beijing Ninetowns Port Software and Technology Co., Ltd.
(seal) 
 (Company Seal)[seal: Beijing Ninetowns Ports Software and Technology Co., Ltd.] 

/s/ Wang Shuang 

March 19, 2012
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 1, 2009 

s0901 

Order 

 

September 1, 2009 

138460 

SUSAN TKACHIK, Personal Representative of 

the Estate of JANET ELAINE MANDEVILLE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138460 

 COA: 280879 

Macomb Probate Court: 

03-178658-CZ 

FRANK MANDEVILLE, JR., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed whether, when a husband has abandoned his wife 

for the year and a half preceding her death, and the wife alone has made mortgage, tax, 

and insurance payments on property held as tenants by the entirety, the wife (or her 

estate) may receive contribution for the husband’s share of these payments.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T OCTOB ER 5, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 1 7 0 3 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 9 7

- 0 0 3 6 4

- C R

- 1

- M H S

- 1

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

P E T E R U N A K A L U , a

. k

. a

. E r o m s e l e H a k e e m , a

. k

. a

. O m o k e h i n d e L a w r e n c e , a

. k

. a

. P a t r i c k E r o m e s e l e , a

. k

. a

. G a b i r e l U

j o c h o k w E z e n i a ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f G e o r g i a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( O c t o b e r 5 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , M A R C U S a n d A N D E R S O N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.P E R C U R I A M :

P e t e r U n a k a l u a p p e a l s h i s s e n t e n c e o f 2 4 m o n t h s ’ i m p r i s o n m e n t i m p o s e d

f o l l o w i n g t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s r e v o c a t i o n o f h i s s u p e r v i s e d r e l e a s e , p u r s u a n t t o 1 8

U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 3 ( e )

. A f

t e r i m p o s i n g s e n t e n c e , t h e c o u r t f a i l e d t o e l i c i t t h e p a r t i e s ’

o b j e c t i o n s , i f a n y , a s r e q u i r e d b y U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. J o n e s , 8 9 9 F

. 2 d 1 0 9 7 , 1 1 0 2 ( 1 1 th

C i r

. 1 9 9 0 ) , o v e r r u l e d i n p a r t o n o t h e r g r o u n d s , U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. M o r r i l l , 9 8 4 F

. 2 d

1 1 3 6 ( 1 1 C i r

. 1 9 9 3 )

. W e t h e r e f o r e v a c a t e U n a k a l u ’ s s e n t e n c e a n d r e m a n d t h e th

c a s e w i t h t h e i n s t r u c t i o n t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , i n s e n t e n c i n g t h e d e f e n d a n t , e l i c i t

t h e p a r t i e s ’ o b

j e c t i o n s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h J o n e s

.
V A C A T E D a n d R E M A N D E D , w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n

.

2
NEW PRODUCTS CORPORATION, petitioner, v. Thomas R. TIBBLE, et al.

No. 18-135.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-90828 and No. 333-17833) on Form S-8 of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. of our
report dated February 28, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Baltimore, Maryland
March 7, 1997
 
                                      IV-5
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ENGINEERED CORROSION SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SOUTH-TEK SYSTEMS, LLC, POTTER ELECTRIC 

CO, LLC,

Appellees

______________________

2018-1685

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-

01351.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

BENJAMIN AARON SAIDMAN, Finnegan, Henderson, 

Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for 

appellant. Also represented by JASON E. STACH. 

 DAVID E. BENNETT, Coats & Bennett, PLLC, Cary, NC, 

argued for appellees. Also represented by EDWARD H.

GREEN, III, BRANDEE WOOLARD. 

 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 May 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2274

To provide for the transfer of 10 percent of a State’s apportionment of

certain highway funds to the State’s highway safety apportionment if

the State does not suspend the driver’s license of individuals under

the age of 21 convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To provide for the transfer of 10 percent of a State’s apportionment of certain highway funds to the State’s highway

safety apportionment if the State does not suspend the

driver’s license of individuals under the age of 21 convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF APPORTIONMENT.

4 On October 1, 2002, and each October 1 thereafter,

5 if a State has not enacted or is not enforcing a law that

6 requires in all circumstances the revocation or suspension

7 of the driver’s license of any individual who is less than
2

•HR 2274 IH

1 21 years of age and who is convicted, after the date of

2 enactment of this Act, of driving while under the influence

3 of alcohol, the Secretary shall transfer an amount equal

4 to 10 percent of the amount apportioned to any State on

5 that date under each of paragraphs (1), (3), and (4) of

6 section 104(b) of title 23, United States Code, to the ap7 portionment of the State under section 402 of such title

8 to be used for alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures,

9 especially for individuals who are less than 21 years of

10 age. Such suspension or revocation shall be until the indi11 vidual’s 21st birthday.

12 SEC. 2. DRIVING TO AND FROM WORK.

13 The apportionment of a State shall not be transferred

14 under section 1 if the State allows an individual convicted

15 while driving under the influence of alcohol to drive, dur16 ing the period of revocation or suspension of the individ17 ual’s driver’s license in accordance with section 1, only for

18 the purposes of going to and from such individual’s place

19 of employment or to and from a college or other institution

20 of higher education or a trade school.

Æ