alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

LATTHEN CHANCE DOUGLAS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-274

PEDRO BOYKIN §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Latthen Chance Douglas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit against Pedro

Boykin. This matter was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 for conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction

(doc. #22). Plaintiff asks that the court order Defendant to provide Plaintiff with diabetic treatment,

as well provide him with nutritionally adequate snacks and meals after receiving treatment.

This lawsuit concerns events which occurred at the Stiles Unit, where Defendant was

employed. Plaintiff is now incarcerated at the Michael Unit. There is no indication Defendant is

employed at the Michael Unit. A plaintiff does not have standing to pursue injunctive relief when

the named defendant does not have the authority to provide the relief sought. McCreary v.

Richardson, 738 F.3d 651, 655 (5th Cir. 2013). As there is no indication Defendant has any

authority over officials at the Michael Unit, and is therefore unable to provide the relief Plaintiff

seeks, his motion for injunctive relief should be denied.

Recommendation

The Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction should be denied.

Case 1:23-cv-00274-MJT-CLS Document 28 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 263
Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained herein within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved party from

de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and

from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court except

on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1429 (5th Cir.

1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 26th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00274-MJT-CLS Document 28 Filed 02/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 264
Teresita A. CANUTO, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al.

No. 18-544.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CFO CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sec.1350, as adopted), Thomas Cawley, Chief Financial Officer of Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

1. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2(the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 30th day of March, 2007.
Boaz PLEASANT-BEY, Petitioner, v. SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al.

No. 19-6985

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Ruben Perez GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-9698

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 07, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/18/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       50,485
COMMITMENTS
   3,275   15,306    3,843   42,635   30,824   49,753   49,973      732      512

CHANGES FROM 12/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,526)
   2,200    2,945    2,487    2,849    2,290    7,536    7,722      -10     -196

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.5     30.3      7.6     84.5     61.1     98.6     99.0      1.4      1.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       8       11        6       22       21       34       35`

---

Updated December 21, 2012
Exhibit 99.1

# Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palatin Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Carl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2002

/s/  Carl Spana
Carl Spana, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 BEAUMONT DIVISION

DWAYNE MCDANIEL §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-265

UNKNOWN DEFENDANT §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Dwayne McDaniel, a prisoner confined atthe United States Penitentiary, proceeding

pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against an unknown Defendant. 

This action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

On August 21, 2023, a document mailed to Plaintiff at his last known address was returned

to the court as undeliverable because Plaintiff is no longer at that address. Eastern District of Texas

Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants to keep the clerk advised in writing of their current

address. As of this date, Plaintiff has not provided the court with his current address. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action sua

sponte for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. Griggs v. S.G.E. Mgmt., 905 F.3d

835, 844 (5th Cir. 2018); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “The power to

invoke this sanction is necessaryin order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases

Case 1:23-cv-00265-MAC-ZJH Document 7 Filed 08/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Courts.” Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626,

629-30 (1962); Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997).

Without a current mailing address, the court is unable to contact Plaintiff or proceed with this

action. Therefore, Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Local Rules warrants dismissal without

prejudice for want of prosecution.

Recommendation

This civil rights action should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court, except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 23rd day of August, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00265-MAC-ZJH Document 7 Filed 08/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/16/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       39,784
COMMITMENTS
   2,851      460        0   33,623   37,458   36,474   37,918    3,310    1,866

CHANGES FROM 08/09/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        470)
    -753      -30        0    1,357     -128      604     -158     -134      628

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.2      1.2      0.0     84.5     94.2     91.7     95.3      8.3      4.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       5        1        0       30       25       35       26
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/16/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       53,152
COMMITMENTS
   3,532    3,120        0   42,949   45,833   46,481   48,953    6,671    4,199

CHANGES FROM 08/09/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,460)
     331    1,921        0    5,892    3,926    6,223    5,847     -763     -387

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.6      5.9      0.0     80.8     86.2     87.4     92.1     12.6      7.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       65)
      10        5        0       33       27       43       32
```

----

Updated August 19, 2011
sutherland.htm


 


 



CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP












We consent to the reference to our firm in the Statement of Additional Information included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the Century II Affinity individual flexible premium deferred variable annuity contracts issued through the Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account (File No. 333-52290).  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

















SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

















By:           /s/ Stephen E/ Roth          


Stephen E. Roth


Washington, D.C.


April 27, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         June 15, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Margaret A. Morris Fears, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-5444,                         *maggie.morrisfears@nih.gov.*
      ( print page 30971)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 16, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10830 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                          0000911220
<NAME>     COUNTRY STAR RESTAURANTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                            USD
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                             17,430
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       130,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  289,968
<PP&E>                          5,636,773
<DEPRECIATION>                    993,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,023,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,971,289
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             114,243
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      1,938,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,023,814
<SALES>                         2,954,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,954,412
<CGS>                             976,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,839,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                488,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,373,401)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,373,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,527,858
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (845,543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.09)
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2206

To extend the period for beneficiaries of certain deceased members of the

uniformed services to apply for a death gratuity under the

Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance policy of such members.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1999

Mr. GORDON (for himself, Mr. BRYANT, and Mr. CLEMENT) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To extend the period for beneficiaries of certain deceased

members of the uniformed services to apply for a death

gratuity under the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance policy of such members.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Section 8134 of the Department of Defense Appro4 priations Act, 1994 (38 U.S.C. 1967 note) is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a)(2)(B), by striking out ‘‘in

6 the performance of duty’’ and inserting in lieu there7 of ‘‘in the line of duty’’; and
2

•HR 2206 IH

1 (2) in subsections (d) and (e), by striking out

2 ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

3 ‘‘September 30, 1996’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,375
<INVENTORY>                                      9,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,209
<PP&E>                                           9,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,070
<SALES>                                        136,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,802
<CGS>                                          102,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,581
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,371
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

THE AARON'S COMPANY, INC. DBA 

BRANDSMART U.S.A., INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00268-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice (the “Notice”) filed by Plaintiff 

Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Symbology”). (Dkt. No. 14). In the Notice, Symbology informs 

the Court that it is voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims in the above-captioned case 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Id. at 1).

Having considered the Notice, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all 

claims in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear 

its own costs and fees. All pending requests for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly 

granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the abovecaptioned case as no parties or claims remain.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of August, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00268-JRG Document 15 Filed 08/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 150
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                                        
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         STATE OF
                                       INCORPORATION
                                           OR
              SUBSIDIARY                ORGANIZATION                 DBA
              ----------                ------------                 ---
<S>                                      <C>                      <C>
BRAVOKILO, INC.                         Indiana            Burger King restaurant

FULL SERVICE DINING, INC.               Indiana            Spageddies restaurant

SOUTHWEST DINING, INC.                  Indiana            Chili's restaurant

GRAYLING CORPORATION                    Delaware           Chili's restaurant

CHILI'S OF MT. LAUREL, INC.             Delaware           Chili's restaurant

CHILI'S OF CHRISTIANA, INC.             Delaware           Chili's restaurant

GRADY'S AMERICAN GRILL RESTAURANT       Indiana            Grady's American Grill
CORPORATION                                                restaurant

GAGHC, INC.                             Delaware           Grady's American Grill
                                                           restaurant

GAGLC, INC.                             Texas              Grady's American Grill
                                                           restaurant

GRADY'S AMERICAN GRILL L.P.             Texas              Grady's American Grill
                                                           restaurant

GRADY'S, INC.                           Tennessee          Grady's American Grill
                                                           restaurant

TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.        Indiana            Tri-State Construction Co., Inc.
 
GRAYLING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION         Delaware           Chili's Restaurant
</TABLE>