alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

TYRON JEROME HUNTER, a/k/a Tyrone Jerome Hunter, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00251-LHT-1) 

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008 

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF 

WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Ann L. Hester, Emily Marroquin, 

Charlotte, North Carolina, Fredilyn Sison, Asheville, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Tyron Jerome Hunter pled guilty pursuant to a plea 

agreement to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 

cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2006), and 

was sentenced to 240 months in prison. Counsel for Hunter has 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), alleging that she has found no meritorious issues for 

appeal but asserting that the district court may have improperly 

calculated Hunter’s Guidelines range. Hunter was notified of 

his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done 

so. The Government has declined to file a responding brief. 

Finding no error, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

 In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire 

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for 

review. After a thorough Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing at which 

Hunter admitted his guilt, the district court sustained one of 

Hunter’s objections to his presentence investigation report and 

adopted the remaining findings contained therein, considered the 

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors, and sentenced Hunter to the 

statutory mandatory minimum sentence. See United States 

v. Farrior, 535 F.3d 210, 224 (4th Cir. 2008) (“A statutorily 

required sentence . . . is per se reasonable.”). 

 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district 

court. This court requires that counsel inform Hunter in 

2 
3 

writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United 

States for further review. If Hunter requests that a petition 

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be 

frivolous, then counsel may motion this court for leave to 

withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that 

a copy thereof was served on Hunter. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1013

___________ Nora Grajeda Estrada, * * Petitioner, * * v. * Petition for Review of an * Order of the Immigration District Director, U.S. Department of * and Naturalization Service. Justice Immigration & Naturalization * Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: May 21, 1998 Filed: May 29, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nora Estrada, a native of Guatemala, petitions for review of a final decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service after the Board of Immigration Appeal s (BIA) dismissed as untimely her appeal from a decision of the Immigration Judge
. Estrada does not argue that her appeal to the BIA was timely, and the BIA c annot waive the appeal deadline as Estrada suggests. See Atiqullah v. Imm igration & Naturalization Serv. , 39 F.3d 896, 898 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (time limit for filing-2-

notice of appeal to BIA is mandatory and jurisdictional). Accordingly, we den y Estrada & s petition. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Wesley DORCELUS, Petitioner, v. Chris BRANNON, Warden.

No. 19-6827

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2256 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2256

  To designate the San Antonio International Airport in San Antonio, 
Texas, as an airport at which certain private aircraft arriving in the 
   United States from a foreign area may land for processing by the 
                            Customs Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

 Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the San Antonio International Airport in San Antonio, 
Texas, as an airport at which certain private aircraft arriving in the 
   United States from a foreign area may land for processing by the 
                            Customs Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SAN ANTONIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FOR CUSTOMS 
              PROCESSING OF CERTAIN PRIVATE AIRCRAFT ARRIVING IN THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    (a) Designation.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of the Customs Service shall 
designate the San Antonio International Airport in San Antonio, Texas, 
as an airport at which private aircraft described in subsection (b) may 
land for processing by the Customs Service in accordance with section 
122.24(b) of title 19, Code of Federal Regulations.
    (b) Private Aircraft.--Private aircraft described in this 
subsection are private aircraft that--
            (1) arrive in the United States from a foreign area and 
        have a final destination in the United States of San Antonio 
        International Airport in San Antonio, Texas; and
            (2) would otherwise be required to land for processing by 
        the Customs Service at an airport listed in section 122.24(b) 
        of title 19, Code of Federal Regulations, in accordance with 
        such section.
    (c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``private aircraft'' has 
the meaning given such term in section 122.23(a)(1) of title 19, Code 
of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
George EASTERLY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5705.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

*421Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Venise METAYER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-6957

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
Exhibit 4.47


 


English Translation for Reference Only


 


Security
Agreement on Maximum Amount Guarantee


 


	 	No:


 


Guarantor: China Electric Equipment Group
Co., Ltd. (hereafter refers to as “Party A”)


 


Guarantee: China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co.,
Ltd. and its subsidiary (hereafter refers to as “Party B”)


 


Party B needs the foreign financing loan
in order to expand the production and management. Party A shall voluntarily provide the guarantee for the relevant creditor’s
right that is formed between and by the Party B and lender. Therefore, in accordance with Contract Law, Security Law and the pertinent
provisions of relevant laws and regulations, Party A and B conclude and enter into this agreement and jointly abide by such agreement
through the full consultation.


 


1. The maximum limit of the guarantee under
this agreement is: RMB 2.5 billion (refers to the loan actually formed in any time within the term hereof, total amount guaranteed
is less than 2.5 billion yuan).


 


2. The term of this agreement shall expire
on December 31, 2015; with the official confirmation of both parties, from January 1, 2011 to the date of this agreement, all loan
amounts that Party B has generated in actual term shall be covered under this agreement. Party A agrees to provide the guarantee
required by Party B.


 


3. The cost of guarantee: None.


 


4. Governing law: this agreement shall
apply for Law of the People's Republic of China.


 


5. Important events: where the ownership
structure or control power of Party B has the major changes, Party A shall be entitled to unilaterally notify to terminate this
agreement; with respect to the existing guarantee under this agreement, Party B shall be obligated to repay the loan Party A guarantees
in advance or provide Party A with the counter guarantee within 30 days upon the date of termination of this agreement.


 


6. Settlement of disputes: all disputes
arising from the effectiveness, performance and interpretation of this agreement shall be settled friendly by both parties. In
case that no consultation reaches, it shall be governed by the People’s Court of First Instance within the jurisdiction where
Party A is located. The relevant expenses occurred from the litigation (including counsel fee, travel expense, forensics charge,
notarial fees, litigation costs, etc.) shall be borne by the failing party.


 


7. This agreement shall go into effect
from the date of execution and sealing by both parties. Any matters not covered hereby shall be consulted by both parties. The
supplementary agreement shall be signed and have the same effect with this agreement.


 


8. This agreement shall be in duplicate,
with each party holding one with the same effect.


 


	Party A: China Electric Equipment Group Co., Ltd.	Party B: China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.
	Authorized representative	Authorized representative
	Date: April 12, 2012	Date:
	 	 
	/seal/ China Electric Equipment Group Co., Ltd.	/seal/ China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.
Michael Eugene BANKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9038.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Dante TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK.

No. 19-7170

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                                                            SEPTEMBER 30, 1997

                                           
                 LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                           
        Statement Regarding Computation of Net Loss Per Share of Common Stock
                                     (Unaudited)
                                           

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED            NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                             SEPTEMBER 30,                 SEPTEMBER 30,
                                       -------------------------     -------------------------
                                          1996           1997           1996           1997
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>             <C>           <C> 
Net loss (in thousands)                   $(1,857)       $(5,050)       $(8,125)      $(17,485)
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------
Weighted average shares:
   Average shares outstanding          11,042,406     11,266,160      9,073,326    11,229,782 
   Assumed additional shares (1)           51,249         48,659         52,644        50,928 
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------

   Weighted average common shares      11,093,655     11,314,819      9,125,970    11,280,710
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------

Net loss per common share                $  (0.17)      $  (0.45)      $  (0.89)      $  (1.55)
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------
                                       ----------    -----------     ----------    -----------
</TABLE>
------------------
(1) Represents the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options issued
    during the twelve months preceding the Company's initial public offering. 
    The exercise of other options and warrants has not been assumed because
    their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of GlobespanVirata, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armando
Geday, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Armando Geday
--------------------------------------
Armando Geday
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 10, 2003
Wendell WEAVER, petitioner, v. Walter NICHOLSON, Warden.

No. 18-6560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

*650Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION

v.

GOPALA KRISHNAN, ET AL.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL NO. 4:23-CV-885-SDJ 

COURT’S ADVISORY CONCERNING PENDING APPEAL

On April 24, 2024, Defendants filed a Notice of Appeal. (Dkt. #117). 

Therein, Defendants appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Fifth Circuit the “Court’s Temporary Restraining Order and Asset Freeze 

Order [ECF No. 16], [Agreed] Preliminary Injunction and Order Extending Asset 

Freeze and Other Ancillary Relief [ECF No. 49], and Omnibus Order dated March 7, 

2024 [ECF No. 91] as amended by the Order on Receivership Defendants’ Motion for 

Relief from Paragraphs 9, 10, and 11 of the Omnibus Order [ECF 

No. 112].” (Dkt. #117). The Court advises the parties that under controlling Fifth 

Circuit precedent, “[a] notice of appeal from an appealable order divests the district 

court of jurisdiction over aspects of the case on appeal.” In re Fort Worth 

Chamber of Commerce, 98 F.4th 265, 272 (5th Cir. 2024). Accordingly, the 

Court is “divested of jurisdiction to take any action with regard to the matter except 

in aid of the appeal.” Id. at 273. 

Case 4:23-cv-00885-SDJ Document 121 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3845
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      167,590
COMMITMENTS
  41,506   40,239   21,599   86,471   80,586  149,576  142,424   18,014   25,166

CHANGES FROM 03/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,198)
   1,633   -1,239      171      101    2,687    1,905    1,619    1,293    1,579

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.8     24.0     12.9     51.6     48.1     89.3     85.0     10.7     15.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      198)
      49       49       42       57       72      132      147
```

----

Updated March 22, 2013
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/08/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       82,568
COMMITMENTS
   5,914    6,161       90   70,608   73,170   76,612   79,421    5,956    3,147

CHANGES FROM 12/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,268)
     247      425       90      580    1,108      917    1,623    1,351      645

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.2      7.5      0.1     85.5     88.6     92.8     96.2      7.2      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       71)
       8        7        1       37       33       46       40
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/08/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      155,860
COMMITMENTS
  30,439   19,569    1,491  107,190  129,599  139,120  150,659   16,740    5,201

CHANGES FROM 12/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,939)
    -238    1,398     -590    4,745    3,763    3,917    4,571    2,022    1,368

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.5     12.6      1.0     68.8     83.2     89.3     96.7     10.7      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      37       13        5       63       35      103       50
```

----

Updated January 15, 2013
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Skolsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ STEVEN D. SKOLSKY  
|Steven D. Skolsky      
|Chief Executive Officer



August 8, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be retained by Trimeris, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Company's
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements
together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            3558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      814
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8601
<PP&E>                                           28056
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7117
<BONDS>                                          38952
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14729)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6195
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Charles T. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

No. 19-812

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
QLogic Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-75814, 333-13137, 333-66407 and 333-70112) and
on Form S-3 (No. 333-25881) of QLogic Corporation of our report dated May 7,
2002, related to the consolidated balance sheets of QLogic Corporation and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and April 1, 2001 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2002, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2002,
annual report on Form 10-K of QLogic Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
June 14, 2002