alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                          


Prior years financial data schedules have not been restated  because there would
be no change in basic and diluted EPS.

</LEGEND> 
<CIK>                    0000917770
<NAME>                   FIBERCORE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (200)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,997
<PP&E>                                           7,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,373)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,660
<BONDS>                                         10,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,768
<SALES>                                          8,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,459
<CGS>                                            6,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,342)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,342)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,342)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2233

To provide relief from Federal tax liability arising from the settlement of

claims brought by African American farmers against the Department

of Agriculture for discrimination in farm credit and benefit programs

and to exclude amounts received under such settlement from meansbased determinations under programs funded in whole or in part with

Federal funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1999

Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide relief from Federal tax liability arising from the

settlement of claims brought by African American farmers against the Department of Agriculture for discrimination in farm credit and benefit programs and to exclude

amounts received under such settlement from meansbased determinations under programs funded in whole

or in part with Federal funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2233 IH

1 SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM FEDERAL TAX LIABILITY ARIS2 ING FROM THE SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS BY

3 AFRICAN AMERICAN FARMERS AGAINST THE

4 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOR DIS5 CRIMINATION IN FARM CREDIT AND BENEFIT

6 PROGRAMS.

7 Notwithstanding any provision of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986, in the case of a person who is certified

9 to be a member of the plaintiff class in the settlement of

10 the consolidated actions entitled ‘‘Pigford, et al. v. Glick11 man’’, No. 97–1978 (D.D.C.) (PLF), and ‘‘Brewington,

12 et al. v. Glickman’’ No. 98–1693 (D.D.C.) (PLF)—

13 (1) gross income for purposes of subtitle A of

14 such Code (relating to income taxes) shall not

15 include—

16 (A) any amount of a cash payment re17 ceived under such settlement, and

18 (B) any amount which (but for this sec19 tion) would be includible in gross income by

20 reason of the discharge of indebtedness pursu21 ant to such settlement, and

22 (2) no amount shall be includible in the gross

23 estate of any such person for purposes of chapter 11

24 of such Code (relating to estate taxes) by reason of

25 an interest in such settlement.
3

•HR 2233 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS UNDER PROGRAMS

2 FUNDED IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITH FED3 ERAL FUNDS.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with re5 spect to any calendar year in which a person receives an

6 amount under the settlement described in section 1, such

7 amount shall not—

8 (1) be considered income or resources in deter9 mining eligibility for,

10 (2) be used as a basis for denying or reducing

11 funds under, or

12 (3) be used as a basis for determining the

13 amount of assistance under,

14 any program funded in whole or in part with Federal

15 funds.

Æ
Exhibit 99



                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT




Board of Directors and Stockholders
WVS Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of WVS Financial
Corporation  and subsidiary as of March 31, 2002,  and the related  consolidated
statement of income for the three-month  and nine-month  periods ended March 31,
2002 and 2001, the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for
the nine-month  period ended March 31, 2002, and the  consolidated  statement of
cash flows for the  nine-month  periods  ended  March 31,  2002 and 2001.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America,  the
objective  of which is the  expression  of an opinion  regarding  the  financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance with auditing  standards  generally
accepted in the United States of America,  the consolidated  balance sheet as of
June 30, 2001,  and the related  consolidated  statements of income,  changes in
stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then  ended  (not  presented
herein);  and in our report  dated July 20, 2001,  we  expressed an  unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A. C.
--------------------------
S. R. Snodgrass, A. C.



Wexford, PA
May 8, 2002


                                      E-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (192)
<INVENTORY>                                     14,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,114
<PP&E>                                           5,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,971
<SALES>                                         43,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,584
<CGS>                                           23,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,777
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (292)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory commuter tax on

nonresidents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 1999

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN, and Mrs.

ROUKEMA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory

commuter tax on nonresidents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING DISCRIMINATORY

4 COMMUTER TAX ON NONRESIDENTS.

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—A State may not impose a tax on

6 the income earned in the State by nonresidents unless the

7 tax is of substantial equality of treatment for the citizens

8 of the State and the nonresidents so commuting.
2

•HR 2014 IH

1 (b) STATE.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term

2 ‘‘State’’ includes the District of Columbia and any political

3 subdivision of a State.

Æ
Kenneth J. TAGGART, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 18-660.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
John Randall QUINTERO, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 18-6019.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/17/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      161,121
COMMITMENTS
  54,339   11,863   15,138   71,579  110,306  141,056  137,307   20,066   23,815

CHANGES FROM 07/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,945)
   4,665     -116      439    3,334    7,249    8,438    7,572     -493      373

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.7      7.4      9.4     44.4     68.5     87.5     85.2     12.5     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      60       18       35       61       83      130      131
```

----

Updated July 20, 2012
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/20/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      137,676
COMMITMENTS
  35,635   22,112   19,168   60,181   68,178  114,984  109,458   22,692   28,218

CHANGES FROM 03/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,738)
     798   -1,206    1,410   -3,963      -87   -1,755      117    3,492    1,621

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.9     16.1     13.9     43.7     49.5     83.5     79.5     16.5     20.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      39       40       38       54       61      115      121
```

----

Updated March 23, 2012
Lemuel Clayton BRAY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9532

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Quordalis V. SANDERS, petitioner, v. Carlo ESQUEDA, Dane County Clerk of Court.

No. 18-6191.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District IV dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BRANDON D. WILLIAMS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-149

§

BALDEN POLK, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Brandon D. Williams, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice as repetitious. To date, the parties

have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#3) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

Case 9:23-cv-00149-MAC-CLS Document 5 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 22
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/04/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       39,408
COMMITMENTS
   1,039   11,399    1,292   36,247   25,898   38,578   38,589      830      819

CHANGES FROM 11/27/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,050)
     165     -388     -590   -3,205   -3,020   -3,630   -3,998     -420      -52

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.6     28.9      3.3     92.0     65.7     97.9     97.9      2.1      2.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       7        9        5       21       21       30       34`

---

Updated December 7, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    12,172
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                   813,046
<DEPRECIATION>                          (120,110)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           778,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                  224,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                   10
<COMMON>                                     158
<OTHER-SE>                               275,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             778,673
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          75,843
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             55,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           17,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       17,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              17,145
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.95


</TABLE>
```

```

----

Updated April 17, 2013
##### 



Exhibit 23.01

Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors of
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-17833, No. 333-72319, No. 333-30814, No. 333-56092, No. 333-71218)
and the registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-63576) of Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the
related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31,
2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. Our report
refers to a change in the Companys revenue recognition policy for
non-refundable upfront fees in 2000.

/s/ KPMG

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000911167
<NAME>                        Ariel Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         11,026,567
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,127,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,769,294
<INVENTORY>                                    2,096,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,048,100
<PP&E>                                         5,212,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,904,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,231,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,082,517
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,760,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,065,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,231,084
<SALES>                                        5,824,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,824,661
<CGS>                                          2,521,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,521,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,607,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             292,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,274,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.64)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0512

_________________

CHARLES J. HERINGER, III, as the Trustee of the

CHARLES J. HERINGER, III, Trust, dated May 20,

1999, as Amended and Restated; SHAWN A.

SCHAFFER and KRISTY M. SCHAFFER; MICHAEL 

A. DiFRONZO; TRACIE E. PABST; MOOSE 59, 

LLC; and MOOSE DROOL PROPERTIES, LLC,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v.

BARNEGAT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC; 

RZLDZL, LLC; and John and Jane Does 1-10;

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellants’ unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, and 

good cause shown, Appellant is hereby granted an extension of time until January 26, 2021, 

within which to file and serve their reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 30 2020

12/30/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0512
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Thursday, March 19, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00669

- CR

Leobardo ARAMBULA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From t he County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR

- 13

- 288

Honorable Romero Molina, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is

extended to April 13, 2015.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court