alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Carlton ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6915.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *854*Brown v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 624, 202 L.Ed.2d 450 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Gerald JONES, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-8911.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Oscar SOSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6666.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
George JENKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00419-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint (Agreed) Motion Regarding Plaintiffs’ Sur-Reply in 

Opposition to Valve’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (the “Joint Motion”) filed by 

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Valve Corporation (“Valve”). 

(Dkt. No. 73). In the Joint Motion, Plaintiff and Valve request that the Court: (1) “allow Plaintiff[]

to file a ‘corrected sur-reply’ to clarify a citation error on pg. 2 n.2” by May 15, 2024, and (2) 

“allow Valve leave to file a sur-sur-reply in support of Valve’s motion to dismiss [(Dkt. No. 55)] 

that is limited to no more than five pages” to respond to arguments made for the first time in 

Plaintiff’s sur-reply. (Dkt. No. 73 at 1-2).

Having considered the Joint Motion, and noting its joint nature, the Court finds that it 

should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff has leave to 

file its corrected sur-reply as described herein. It is further ORDERED that Valve has leave to file 

a sur-sur-reply in support of Valve’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 55) that is limited to no more 

than five pages and that responds only to arguments made for the first time in Plaintiff’s sur-reply. 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 74 Filed 05/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1619
2

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of May, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 74 Filed 05/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1620
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION 

JANE DOE (D.D.J.), 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

G6 HOSPITALITY LLC, 

G6 HOSPITALITY IP, LLC, 

G6 HOSPITALITY PROPERTY, LLC, 

G6 HOSPITALITY PURCHASING, LLC, 

and AESHA, LLC, 

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-00269 

G6 DEFENDANTS’ CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Defendants G6 Hospitality LLC, G6 Hospitality IP, 

LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, LLC, and G6 Hospitality Purchasing, LLC (collectively, “G6 

Defendants”) make the following disclosures: 

1. The undersigned counsel of record for the G6 Defendants certifies that the G6 

Defendants have no parent corporation and no publicly held corporation directly owns 10% or 

more of their stock. 

2. Federal jurisdiction in this case is not based on diversity of citizenship. 

Case 1:23-cv-00269-MJT Document 17 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 76
- 2 - 

Dated: September 25, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

By: /s/ Kim J. Askew 

Kim J. Askew 

Texas Bar No. 01391550 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

1900 N. Pearl Street, Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75201-2482 

Phone: (214) 743-4500 

Fax: (214) 743-4545 

kim.askew@us.dlapiper.com 

Ellen E. Dew 

Maryland State Bar No. 0812180158 

(to be admitted pro hac vice) 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

6225 Smith Avenue 

Baltimore, MD 21209 

Phone: (410) 580-4127 

Fax: (410) 580-4127 

ellen.dew@us.dlapiper.com 

Angela C. Agrusa 

California State Bar No. 131337 

(to be admitted pro hac vice) 

DLA PIPER LLP (US) 

2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 400 

Los Angeles, California 90067-4704 

Phone: (310) 595-3000 

Fax: (310) 595-3300 

angela.agrusa@us.dlapiper.com 

Counsel for G6 Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality IP, 

LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, LLC, and G6 

Hospitality Purchasing, LLC

Case 1:23-cv-00269-MJT Document 17 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 77
- 3 - 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 25th day of September 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was served via the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing to all 

counsel of record. 

/s/ Kim J. Askew 

Kim J. Askew 

Case 1:23-cv-00269-MJT Document 17 Filed 09/25/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 78
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/30/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       35,222
COMMITMENTS
   3,180    8,041      727   20,551   15,909   24,458   24,677   10,764   10,545

CHANGES FROM 07/23/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,953)
    -804      800      157   -1,097   -2,165   -1,744   -1,208     -209     -745

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.0     22.8      2.1     58.3     45.2     69.4     70.1     30.6     29.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
       6       15        7       34       24       45       42
```

----

Updated August 2, 2013
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2022

No. 04-22-00371-CV

Jeanine BELL and Sheila Petsch,

Appellants

v.

Darrell PETSCH,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16468

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 22, 2022, appellant filed a motion to abate this appeal “to allow the parties to 

sever a counterclaim and obtain a final judgment from the trial court.” We ORDER appellee to 

file a response to the motion within ten days from the date of this order.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Jimmy Walter FUENTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6829.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7974

DAVID WAYNE PRUITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STERLING PROFFITT; JAMES W. FEELEY, M.D.; JOHN DOES; VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor; RON ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-34-R) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Wayne Pruitt, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Eckert Phillips, PAYNE, DART, GALLO & PHILLIPS, Charlottesville, Virginia; Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on March 29, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on December 4, 1995. Appellant's failure to notea timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL PAGE 1 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVSION 

JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

 Plaintiff 

 vs. 

GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., LTD., 

D/B/A OPPO 

 Defendant, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23 CV 79 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

 Please take notice that Jennifer L. Truelove, Texas State Bar 24012906, of McKool 

Smith, P.C., 104 East Houston Street, Suite 300, Marshall, Texas, 75670, (903) 923-9000 [Tel], 

(903) 923-9099 [Fax] hereby enters an appearance as one of the attorneys for the Plaintiff, 

Jawbone Innovations, LLC. 

DATED: March 1, 2023 

 Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Jennifer Truelove 

Samuel F. Baxter 

Texas State Bar No. 01938000 

Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com 

Jennifer L. Truelove 

Texas State Bar No. 24012906 

Email:jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 

104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Telephone: (903) 923-9000 

Facsimile: (903) 923-9099 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, 

JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC. 

Case 2:23-cv-00079-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 03/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 75
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL PAGE 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service 

are being served on March 1, 2023, with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

systems per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel with be served by electronic mail, 

facsimile, overnight delivery and/or First Class Mail on this date. 

/s/ Jennifer L. Truelove 

Jennifer L. Truelove 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00079-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 03/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 76
ex_10-2.htm















10172 Linn Station Road


Louisville, KY 40223












April 25, 2012












To the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of NTS Mortgage Income Fund (the “Audit Committee”):


 


NTS Development Company and Residential Management Company (collectively referred to herein as “NTS”) agree to defer amounts owed to them by the NTS Mortgage Income Fund or its subsidiaries (the “Fund”) as of April 10, 2012, and to permit any such amounts to accrue through June 30, 2012, other than as permitted by cash flows of the Fund.  As of April 10, 2012, the Fund owed $8,575,150.76 to NTS and their affiliates.


 


NTS further agrees to advance to the Fund such monies as are reasonably necessary to cover any shortfalls for expenses incurred between April 10, 2012 and June 30, 2012, and for those expenses provided for in the Fund’s 2011-2012 Budget as approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors through June 30, 2012.  Unless NTS otherwise agrees, any such advances shall exclude any principal repayments on the mortgage note owed by the Fund to PNC Bank, National Association.


 


The terms of any deferrals or advances from NTS will be presented to the Audit Committee for prior approval and may be documented through a promissory note or notes from the Fund to NTS or their affiliates which shall mature on June 30, 2012.  Any amounts so deferred or advanced by NTS shall accrue interest at the same rate as the NTS cost of funds rate which is currently 5.34%.


 


NTS has the financial ability to allow such deferrals and advances and will provide evidence of such upon reasonable request of the Audit Committee.


 


 



	 	
/s/ J. D. Nichols             


J.D. Nichols


Chairman of NTS Development Company


and Residential Management Company


	
 


 

	 
	 	
/s/ Brian F. Lavin            


Brian F. Lavin


President of NTS Development Company


and Residential Management Company
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gaming Partners InternationalCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gerard P.Charlier, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and David W. Grimes, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
|                         | GAMING PARTNERS  INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 15, 2007 | By:                                        | /s/ GERARD P. CHARLIER |
|                    | * *                                   | Gerard P. Charlier, |
|                    | * *                                   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| Date: May 15, 2007 | By:                                        | /s/ DAVID W. GRIMES |
|                    | * *                                   | David W. Grimes |
|                    |                                       | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

This certification is being furnished to the SEC as anexhibit to the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by referencein any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Rhett BEAN, petitioner, v. Israel HAMILTON, Warden.

No. 18-6788.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

' NO. 9:23-CR-10-2-MAC

'

versus

CHRISTOPHER SHANE OSBORN, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Christopher Shane Osborn, is 

Case 9:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 53 Filed 01/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 164
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 -

Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 12th day of January, 2024.

Case 9:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 53 Filed 01/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 165
Alan M. BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Susanna C. PINEDA, Judge, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 18-6380.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
- 1 -

No. 6:23-cv-00443

MidFirst Bank,

Plaintiff,

v.

Jerry Olin Huff,

Defendant.

ORDER

On July 5, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion for attorneys’fees and 

costs. Doc. 11. The motion was referred to Magistrate Judge John 

D. Love for findings of fact and recommendation for disposition. 

Doc. 12. The magistrate judge issued an initial report recommending that the motion be denied without prejudice to refiling. 

Doc. 13. Thereafter, on July 31, 2024, plaintiff filed an amended 

motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Doc. 14. The magistrate 

judge then issued a supplemental report recommending that 

plaintiff’s motion be granted in part and denied in part and that 

plaintiff receive the sum of $2,310.00 in attorneys’ fees and 

$402.00 in costs. Doc. 15.

Neither party has filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and the timeframe for doing so has 

passed. The court therefore reviews the report only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 

(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s supplemental report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, 

the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s

motion (Doc. 14) is granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiff is awarded the sum of $2,310.00 in attorneys’ fees and 

$402.00 in costs. Plaintiff’s original motion for attorneys’ fees 

(Doc. 11) is denied as moot.

Case 6:23-cv-00443-JCB-JDL Document 16 Filed 10/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 161
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on October 3, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00443-JCB-JDL Document 16 Filed 10/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 162
James P. CORNELIO, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT, et al.

No. 17-1564.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2017

a0117 

# Order

Clerk January 24, 2017

152448 & (133)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 152448

COA: 317892

St. Clair CC: 10

- 002936

- FC

TIA MARIE

- MITCHELL SKINNER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the joint motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED

in part. The application for leave to appeal the Au gust 20, 2015 judgment of the Court of

Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address whether the

decision to sentence a person under the age of 18 to a prison term of life without parole

under MCL 769.25 must be made by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, see Apprendi v

New Jersey , 530 US 466, 476; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), in light of

Montgomery v Louisiana , 577 US ___; 136 S Ct 718; 193 L Ed 2d 599 (2016), and Miller

v Alabama , 567 US ___; 132 S Ct 2455; 183 L Ed 2d 407 ( 2012).

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future

session of the Court when it will hear oral argument in People v Hyatt (Docket No.

153081).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorne ys

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups

interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for

permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,828
COMMITMENTS
  27,173    2,119    3,551   46,451   75,904   77,175   81,574    6,653    2,254

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        421)
     -86     -267     -254      364      799       24      278      397      143

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.4      2.5      4.2     55.4     90.5     92.1     97.3      7.9      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       85)
      16        4        1       42       42       58       47
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      270,205
COMMITMENTS
  87,014   31,498    1,238  166,860  232,714  255,112  265,450   15,093    4,755

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,793)
  -1,829   -2,815       98   -2,243      135   -3,974   -2,582    2,181      789

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.2     11.7      0.5     61.8     86.1     94.4     98.2      5.6      1.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      59       21       12       77       53      142       80
```

----

Updated November 8, 2013