alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

A PPOINTMENT S TO THE JUDICIAL

ETHICS ADVISORY BOARD :

:

:

:

: NO. 945

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

A ND NOW, this 3 1 st day of March

, 202 3

, pursuant to Rule 10 4 of the Pennsylvania

Rules of the Judicial Ethics Adv i sory Board, it is Ordered that the following individuals are appointed as members of the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board for the specified terms of

service

, commencing April 1, 2023 :

Two

- year term :

The Honorable Maureen E. Lally

- Green (Retired) , Allegheny County

Four

- year term :

The Honorable Stella M. Tsai, Philadelphia

The Honorable Mark D. Douple, Bucks County

Six

- year term :

The Honorable Katherine E. McGill, Montgomery County
Jermeal WHITE, petitioner, v. Charmaine BRACY, Warden, et al.

No. 18-6678.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

Redback Networks International, Inc. 

 

Redback Networks KK 

 

Redback Networks Korea, Inc. 

 

Redback Networks GmbH 

 

Redback Networks Brazil Ltda. 

 

Redback Networks de Mexico 

 

Redback Networks Canada Inc. 

 

Redback Networks SARL 

 

Redback Networks Spain, S.L. 

 

610380 B.C. Inc. 

 

610381 B.C. Inc. 

 

Redback Networks Systems Canada, Inc. 

 

Redback Networks Research 

 

Merlin Systems, Inc.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC moves for Robert Christopher Bunt, Charles Ainsworth, 

and Parker Bunt & Ainsworth, PC, to be permitted to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff in this case. 

Plaintiff will continue to be represented by the law firm of Russ August & Kabat. The withdrawal 

of Robert Christopher Bunt and Charles Ainsworth will not prejudice any party. Defendants do 

not oppose this Motion. 

Plaintiff further requests the Clerk terminate all CM/ECF notifications as to Robert 

Christopher Bunt and Charles Ainsworth for this action. 

Dated: July 15, 2024. Respectfully submitted, 

PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Texas State Bar No. 00787165 

Charles Ainsworth 

Texas State Bar No. 00783521 

100 E. Ferguson Suite 418 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Tel. (903) 531-3535 

rcbunt@pbatyler.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 109 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 4934
2 

charley@pbatyler.com 

Marc Fenster 

CA State Bar No. 181067 

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com 

Reza Mirzaie 

CA State Bar No. 246953 

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com 

Brian Ledahl 

CA State Bar No. 186579 

Email: bledahl@raklaw.com 

Ben Wang 

CA State Bar No. 228712 

Email: bwang@raklaw.com 

Dale Chang 

CA State Bar No. 248657 

Email: dchang@raklaw.com 

Paul Kroeger 

CA State Bar No. 229074 

Email: pkroeger@raklaw.com 

Neil A. Rubin 

CA State Bar No. 250761 

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com 

Kristopher Davis 

CA State Bar No. 329627 

James S. Tsuei 

CA State Bar No. 285530 

Email: jtsuei@raklaw.com 

Philip Wang 

CA State Bar No. 262239 

Email: pwang@raklaw.com 

Amy Hayden 

CA State Bar No. 287026 

Email: ahayden@raklaw.com 

Jason M. Wietholter 

CA State Bar No. 337139 

Email: jwietholter@raklaw.com

James N. Pickens 

CA State Bar No. 307474 

Email: jpickens@raklaw.com 

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Telephone: 310-826-7474 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 109 Filed 07/15/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4935
3 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on July 15, 2024 pursuant 

to Local Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel who have consented to electronic 

service. 

/s/ Robert C. Bunt 

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER BUNT 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

On July 15, 2024, counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants met and conferred 

pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h). Defendants do not oppose the relief sought herein. 

/s/ Robert C. Bunt 

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER BUNT 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 109 Filed 07/15/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4936
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

MARK PARSONS,

Plaintiff,

vs. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

No. 1:23-CV-324

JUDGE MICHAEL J. TRUNCALE

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND

GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to 

Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. [Dkt. 27.] The Commissioner’s response states that he is

unopposed to the requested fee. [Dkt. 28.] Judge Stetson recommended that the Court grant the 

Plaintiff’s application, and neither party filed objections to her Report and Recommendation. It is 

therefore

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation Regarding Attorney Fees is ADOPTED. 

It is further 

ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees [dkt. 27] is GRANTED and 

the Commissioner of Social Security shall pay Mark Parsons, in care of his attorney, George C. 

Piemonte, an attorney fee in the amount of $4,883.78. This amount includes fees and 

compensation for 19.56 hours of service at $125.00 per hour, plus an adjustment for increased 

costs of living consistent with the Consumer Price Index for the relevant time periods. The court 

directs that the award be mailed to Mark Parsons, in care of his attorney, George Piemonte, at his 

office address, Martin, Jones & Piemonte, P.O. Box 669468, Charlotte, NC 28266. It is further

Case 1:23-cv-00324-MJT-CLS Document 30 Filed 10/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2156
2

ORDERED that this award is subject to any beneficial, contractual and/or assignmentbased interests held by the Plaintiff’s attorney. If successful at the administrative level, the 

Plaintiff is granted an extension of sixty days from receipt of the Notice of Award from the Social 

Security Administration to file a motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 1st day of October, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00324-MJT-CLS Document 30 Filed 10/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2157
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/06/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       47,384
COMMITMENTS
   2,227    2,028        9   40,278   42,719   42,514   44,756    4,870    2,628

CHANGES FROM 02/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -623)
     686   -1,536      -57   -1,664      799   -1,035     -794      412      171

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     4.7      4.3      0.0     85.0     90.2     89.7     94.5     10.3      5.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
       4        4        1       28       30       33       34
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/06/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       82,327
COMMITMENTS
  16,789   17,113      839   53,998   61,254   71,626   79,206   10,701    3,121

CHANGES FROM 02/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,025)
   1,346   -1,596      616   -1,133    1,703      829      723      196      302

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.4     20.8      1.0     65.6     74.4     87.0     96.2     13.0      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       91)
      22        5        3       44       34       67       41
```

----

Updated March 9, 2012
EXHIBIT 10.1

First Amendment to
Employment Agreement

This
First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the First Amendment) amends the
Employment Agreement effective as of June 5, 2007 by and between Palatin Technologies,
Inc. and Carl Spana (the Employment Agreement), and is effective as of
December 7, 2007. The purpose of this First Amendment is to correct an error in the
Employment Agreement.

Section
6.5 (c) of the Employment Agreement is amended by striking the words 50% or
less and substituting in lieu thereof the words 50% or more.

This
First Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of New Jersey.

This
First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall
constitute an original, and all of which, taken together, shall be deemed to constitute
one and the same agreement.

As
amended hereby the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as an instrument under seal
effective as of the day and year set forth above.

|                                                                                                    |  |                        |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | 
|PALATIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                                                                          |  | EMPLOYEE              
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|By:                                                                                                 |  |                        |  | 
|Name: Stephen T. WillsTitle: Executive V.P. of Operations
         and      Chief Financial Officer |  | Carl Spana            
|                                                                                                   
|Date: December 7, 2007                                                                              |  | Date: December 7, 2007
Lindsey JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8632.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-41154, 333-41156, 333-43060, 333-59776 and 333-76578) on Form S-3 and (Nos.
333-96151, 333-31356, 333-39586, 333-97437 and 333-107737) on Form S-8 of
EasyLink Services Corporation of our report dated February 12, 2004, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of EasyLink Services Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of EasyLink Services Corporation filed on March 30, 2004.

Our report dated February 12, 2004, contains two explanatory paragraphs. The
first explanatory paragraph states that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations since inception and has a working capital deficiency that
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty. The second explanatory paragraph
states that the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" as of January 1, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2004
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Blitz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cadus Corporation and will be retained by Cadus Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ David BlitzDavid
      BlitzPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive
      Officer and Principal Financial Officer)





August
13, 2009





The
foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
EX-10.30.2





 Exhibit 10.30.2 

 
 



 
 June 6, 2018 

2018 Long Term Incentive Award Letter 

Dear First Name, 
 I am pleased to inform you that you have
received a Grant of Units under the Constellium 2018 Long Term Incentive Award Agreement in the amounts set forth below. These Units entitle you to receive Constellium Shares (or a cash equivalent, at Constellium’s discretion), subject to the
terms and conditions set forth in this Award Letter, in the Constellium 2018 Long Term Incentive Award Agreement (the “Award Agreement”) and the 2013 Constellium Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).
Capitalized Terms used in this Award Letter, unless so defined herein, shall have the meanings found in the Award Agreement or Plan. 
  

			
	Grant Date	  	May 25, 2018
		
	Award Value	  	$XX,XXX
		
	Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)	  	Y,YYY
		
	Vesting Date	  	May 25, 2021
		
	Vesting Period	  	From the Grant Date through the Vesting Date

 Please note that the vesting of the RSUs and the delivery of Shares (or a cash equivalent in respect of such RSUs) is subject
to the satisfaction of the Continued Service Condition. 
 You acknowledge that you have received a copy of, or have online access to, the Award Agreement
and the Plan, and hereby accept the Units granted, subject to all the terms and provisions of this Award Letter, the Award Agreement and the Plan. The Board or the Committee shall determine whether an event has occurred resulting in the forfeiture
of your Units and any Shares issuable thereunder and all such determinations shall be final and conclusive. You also acknowledge that this award and similar awards are made on a selective basis and are, therefore, to be kept confidential. 

 

					
	Very truly yours	 		 	Agreed and Accepted
			
	 /s/ Ryan Jurkovic
	 		 	  

	Ryan Jurkovic	 		 	First Name, Last Name
	Senior Vice President	 		 	
	Chief Human Resources Officer	 		 	Date (mm/dd/yyyy):                    


  

			
	 2018 LTIP Award Letter
	  	Last Name, First Name
Donald Keith RUNNELS, petitioner, v. Presley BORDELON, Warden.

No. 18-5139.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

GLENVERT GREEN, JR. §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv264

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ET AL. §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Glenvert Green, Jr., an inmate confined at the United States Penitentiary located in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff has filed a motion to “amend the entirety of his complaint” or for “withdrawal of

the entirety of the complaint” until his administrative remedy is fully exhausted (ECF No. 21). 

Allowing plaintiff to amend his complaint and bring unexhausted claims would require dismissal

of the complaint for failing to exhaust available remedies. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion is construed

as a motion for voluntary dismissal. 

Plaintiff is entitled to dismiss the case prior to the service of an answer or a motion for

summary judgment. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1). In this case, the opposing party has filed neither an

answer nor a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the action should be dismissed without

Case 1:23-cv-00264-MJT-ZJH Document 23 Filed 03/07/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

126
prejudice to plaintiff’s ability to file a new action after available administrative remedies are

exhausted. 

Recommendation

The above-styled action should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a).

Objections

Within fourteen days after being served with a copyof the magistrate judge's report, anyparty

may serve and file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. See Douglass v. United

Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 7th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00264-MJT-ZJH Document 23 Filed 03/07/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

127
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 07, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 07, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0192. JEFF RADER v. TIMOTHY BRANTLEY.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 14CV7342
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1 OF
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,085
<SECURITIES>                                    16,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                      190
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,983
<PP&E>                                          11,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,036
<BONDS>                                          7,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,601
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,937
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>