alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/19/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      214,920
COMMITMENTS
  30,257   33,691   38,958  123,227  126,367  192,442  199,016   22,478   15,904

CHANGES FROM 04/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     25,935)
     610    6,600    1,868   24,392   18,926   26,870   27,394     -935   -1,459

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.1     15.7     18.1     57.3     58.8     89.5     92.6     10.5      7.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      121)
      46       30       48       26       30      100       93
```

----

Updated April 22, 2011
EXHIBIT 99.18




CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 28, 2013
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Antony Francis, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical reports entitled (i) the “Technical Report on the Stratoni project – Pb Zn Ag Deposit, Northern Greece” dated September 21, 2010,  (ii) the “Skouries Cu/Au Project, Greece – NI43-101 Technical Report” dated July 14, 2011, and (iii) the “Technical Report on the Olympias Project, Au Pb Zn Ag Deposit, Northern Greece” dated July 14, 2011 and of extracts from or a summary of  the technical reports and other information pertaining to these projects, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
  By:
/s/ Antony FrancisAntony Francis, FIMMM
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNIVERSAL CONNECTIVITY 

TECHNOLOGIES INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LENOVO GROUP LIMITED.

Defendant.

 Civil Action No.: 2:23-CV-00449

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Defendant Lenovo Group Limited hereby notifies the Court that it has served Document 

Productions and Supplemental Responses on counsel for Plaintiff via electronic mail on October

11, 2024 in compliance with the Court’s October 2, 2024, Order [Dkt. No.44]. LGL has also 

notified counsel for Plaintiff that it will work cooperatively to address any questions or concerns 

regarding the same.

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 46 Filed 10/11/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1045
2

Dated: October 11, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Stephen Marshall

Melissa R. Smith

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com

GILLAM & SMITH LLP

303 South Washington Avenue

Marshall, TX 75670

(903) 934-8450

Indranil Mukerji

MA Bar No. 644059

imukerji@cov.com

Stephen Marshall

DC Bar No. 1012870

smarshall@cov.com

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001-4956

Telephone: (202) 626-6000

Sudip Kundu

skundu@dtolaw.com

DTO LAW

307 5th Avenue, 12th Floor

New York, NY 10016

Telephone: (646) 403-9901

Aliza George Carrano

DC Bar No. 995661

acarrano@willkie.com

Dane Sowers

TX Bar No. 24126820

dsowers@willkie.com

WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP

1875 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-1238

Telephone: (202) 303-1000

Facsimile: (202) 303-2000

Attorneys for Defendant Lenovo Group 

Limited

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 46 Filed 10/11/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1046
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing document has been served via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) 

upon all counsel of record on October 11, 2024. 

________________________

Melissa R. Smith

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00449-JRG Document 46 Filed 10/11/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1047
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         77,568
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,465
<PP&E>                                         9,355,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,504,805)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,115,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          87,965
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,007,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,115,478
<SALES>                                        265,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265,320
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  221,593<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,613)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,613)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,613)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration  Statement
pertaining to the FinishMaster,  Inc. Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 filed with the
SEC on January 23,  1996) of  FinishMaster,  Inc. of our report  dated April 18,
1996,  with  respect  to  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of
FinishMaster,  Inc. included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
March 31, 1996.



                                                     ERNST & YOUNG L.L.P.


Detroit, Michigan
May 13, 1996
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

WOODARD, HITESMAN, and KOVAC, 

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Jose A. GALLARDO-RAMIREZ

Airman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 201900064

Decided: 20 June 2019.

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

Military Judge: Jonathan T. Stephens, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 5 November 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval 

Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting 

alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: confinement for 10 

months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: Captain Scott F. Hallauer, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________
United States v. Gallardo-Ramirez, No. 201900064

2

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s 

substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are 

AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Excluded from the below cost/expense information are nonrecurring and
restructuring charges of $110 and $17, respectively.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       77
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                        103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   193
<PP&E>                                             537
<DEPRECIATION>                                     214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              102
<BONDS>                                            377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       627
<SALES>                                          1,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,027
<CGS>                                              537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (73)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (26)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (47)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (47)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.42)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statements for American Tax-Exempt Bond Trust and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>    0000916824
<NAME> American Tax-Exempt Bond Trust
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>    JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>    889,126
<SECURITIES>    26,607,953
<RECEIVABLES>    182,058
<ALLOWANCES>    0
<INVENTORY>    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>    0
<PP&E>    0
<DEPRECIATION>    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>    27,691,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    661,178
<BONDS>    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>    0
<PREFERRED>    0
<COMMON>    0
<OTHER-SE>    27,030,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,691,637
<SALES>    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>    2,112,890
<CGS>    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>    213,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>    1,899,873
<INCOME-TAX>    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>    0
<DISCONTINUED>    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>    0
<CHANGES>    0
<NET-INCOME>    1,899,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>    1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>    0
        

</TABLE>
Gary Dan BILBO, Sr., petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5989.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mario TORRES, Petitioner, v. Shawn HATTON, Warden.

No. 19-7004

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2282

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow penalty-free withdrawals from individual retirement plans for adoption expenses and to

expand and extend permanently the exclusion allowed for employer adoption assistance programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1999

Mr. BLILEY (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. CAMP, Mr. SCOTT, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. POMEROY, and Mr. DEMINT) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow penalty-free withdrawals from individual retirement plans

for adoption expenses and to expand and extend permanently the exclusion allowed for employer adoption assistance programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Families First Act’’.
2

•HR 2282 IH

1 SEC. 2. PENALTY-FREE WITHDRAWALS FROM INDIVIDUAL

2 RETIREMENT PLANS FOR ADOPTION EX3 PENSES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding

6 at the end the following new subparagraph:

7 ‘‘(G) QUALIFIED ADOPTION EXPENSES.—

8 Distributions from an individual retirement

9 plan (other than distributions described in the

10 preceding subparagraphs of this paragraph) to

11 the extent that the amount of such distributions

12 does not exceed the lesser of—

13 ‘‘(i) $5,000, or

14 ‘‘(ii) the excess (if any) of—

15 ‘‘(I) the qualified adoption ex16 penses (as defined in section 23(d))

17 paid by the taxpayer during the tax18 able year, over

19 ‘‘(II) the amount of the credit al20 lowable under section 23 for such ex21 penses (determined as if such credit

22 were allowed for such year without re23 gard to any limitation based on liabil24 ity for tax).’’
3

•HR 2282 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of

3 the enactment of this Act.

4 SEC. 3. EMPLOYER ADOPTION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

5 (a) PERMANENT EXTENSION.—Section 137 of the

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to adoption as7 sistance programs) is amended by striking subsection (f).

8 (b) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION AMOUNT.—

9 Paragraph (1) of section 137(b) of such Code (relating

10 to dollar limitation) is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and

11 all that follows and inserting ‘‘$10,000’’.

12 (c) INCREASE IN INCOME LIMITATION.—Subpara13 graph (A) of section 137(b)(2) of such Code (relating to

14 income limitation) is amended by striking ‘‘$75,000’’ and

15 inserting ‘‘$150,000’’.

16 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

18 December 31, 1999.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

129958 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly LOUIS GHAFFARI, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellant, Stephen J. Markman, v SC: 129958 Justices COA: 240025 Wayne CC: 00-007319-NO TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-Plaintiff, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

HOYT, BRUM & LINK, and GUIDELINE MECHANICAL, INC.,Defendants, Cross-DefendantsAppellees, and

R.W. MEAD & SONS, INC., and CONTI ELECTRIC, INC., Third-Party Defendants, and

ACOUSTICAL CEILING & PARTITION COMPANY, Defendant, and

THE EDISON INSTITUTE, a/k/a HENRY FORD MUSEUM & GREENFIELD VILLAGE, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to a ppeal the October 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2006

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

EVEN THOMAS, III,

 Plaintiff, 

versus

WINDHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT,

 Defendant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 NO. 1:23-cv-00228-MAC-ZJH

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On June 12, 2023, the court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United 

States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial management pursuant to a standing order. The case was 

originally filed in County Court at Law 1, Jefferson County, Texas. See Doc. No. 1 at 1. 

Defendant Windham School District removed the case to this court. Id. Pending before the 

court are Plaintiff Even Thomas’s Motion to Remand to State Court (Doc. No. 8), Amended 

Motion to Remand to State Court (Doc. No. 16), and Second Amended Motion to Remand to State 

Court (Doc. No. 17). On October 10, 2023, Judge Hawthorn issued his Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. No. 26), which recommended granting Plaintiff’s motions to remand 

because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Doc. No. 26 at 4.

The court has received and considered the report of the magistrate judge. No objections 

to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.

Case 1:23-cv-00228-MAC-ZJH Document 28 Filed 11/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 419
2

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 

(Doc. No. 26) is ADOPTED and the Plaintiffs’ Motions to Remand (Doc. Nos. 8. 16-17) are 

GRANTED. This action is REMANDED to County Court at Law 1, Jefferson County, Texas.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 14th day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00228-MAC-ZJH Document 28 Filed 11/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 420
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

INTERNATIONAL 

INSTITUTE OF AESTHETIC 

ARTS & BEAUTY, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

MIDVALE INDEMNITY 

COMPANY AND GALLAGER 

BASSET SERVICE, INC.

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO._____

On removal from the County 

Civil Court at Law No. 6 of 

Collin County, Texas

Cause No. 006-00090-2023

INDEX OF MATTERS BEING FILED

1. Civil Cover Sheet;

2. Index of Matters Being Filed (Exhibit A);

3. Citation of Service on Defendant Midvale Insurance Company and Plaintiff’s Original 

Petition (Exhibit B);

4. Defendant’s Original Answer and Notice of Application for Jury Trial (Exhibit C);

5. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Disclosures (Exhibit D);

6. Company Summary from the Texas Department of Insurance; (Exhibit E);

7. Docket Sheet (Exhibit F); 

8. Plaintiff’s Notice of Non-Suit with Prejudice (Exhibit G); and

9. List of counsel of record and certificate of interested parties (Exhibit H) (The only orders 

signed by the state court judge were a Motion for Continuance the Plaintiff’s Notice of 

Non-Suit with Prejudice of Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.). 

Exhibit A

Case 4:23-cv-00841-ALM Document 1-1 Filed 09/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 8
Respectfully submitted, 

THE HUDGINS LAW FIRM, P.C.

By: /s/ Steven F. Hudgins 

Steven F. Hudgins

Attorney in Charge

State Bar Number 00793993

Southern District Bar No. 19623

24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2000

Houston, Texas 77046

Telephone (713) 623-2550

Facsimile (713) 623-2793

shudgins@hudgins-law.com 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT,

MIDVALE INDEMNITY COMPANY 

Exhibit A

Case 4:23-cv-00841-ALM Document 1-1 Filed 09/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FILED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT IN
FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000917821
<NAME>                        UROMED CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                               3,485
<SECURITIES>                                        14,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                          615
<ALLOWANCES>                                            30
<INVENTORY>                                            841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19,763
<PP&E>                                               1,511
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      21,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,492
<BONDS>                                             17,393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           107,164
<OTHER-SE>                                        (104,173)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,991
<SALES>                                              2,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,645
<CGS>                                                2,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (1,527)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (5,501)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (5,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      3,021
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,525)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.48)



</TABLE>
FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS, petitioner, v. Lois M. DAVIS.

No. 18-525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 11, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.