alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dante OVERBY, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA; and Dante Overby, petitioner, v. Pennsylvania.

No. 18-8828.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/20/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      627,411
COMMITMENTS
  96,629   37,336  186,644  324,703  383,666  607,976  607,646   19,435   19,765

CHANGES FROM 08/13/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -23,172)
  -4,871   -9,140   -7,542  -11,431   -5,849  -23,844  -22,531      672     -641

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.4      6.0     29.7     51.8     61.2     96.9     96.8      3.1      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      150)
      39       39       57       64       67      131      136
```

----

Updated August 23, 2013
Paul E. RINEHART, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-6165.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ross County denied.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth R. Howe,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairy presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Kenneth R. Howe
---------------------------
Kenneth R. Howe
Chief Financial Officer

March 11, 2005
William CASTRO, Petitioner, v. R. Fred LEWIS, et al.

No. 19-862

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
GATEHOUSE MEDIA NEW YORK HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-1428

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Uriel GOMEZ-SAAVEDRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6359.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP

DECLARATION OF TIMOTHEE YERAMIAN IN SUPPORT

OF VALVE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER 

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(3) FOR IMPROPER VENUE

1. My name is Timothee Yeramian. I am over the age of twenty-one years, of sound 

mind, and competent in all respects to make this declaration. 

2. I make this declaration based on my own knowledge. I could and would 

competently testify to the accuracy of this declaration if called upon to testify regarding its 

contents.

3. I am an artist.

4. I am an employee at Valve Corporation (“Valve”).

5. I have been employed by Valve since October 31, 2022. 

6. I live in Bellevue, Washington.

7. I moved to Washington state in October 2022, shortly before I began working for 

Valve.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98451BF1-EDBE-4E44-9899-C6464DCA90D0 Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 11-2 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 157
2

8. Until October 19, 2023, I had not updated my location on my LinkedIn page. 

Before then, it therefore incorrectly reflected my previous Texas residence.

I affirm that the forgoing is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

Dated November 2, 2023

________

Timothee Yeramian 

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98451BF1-EDBE-4E44-9899-C6464DCA90D0 Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 11-2 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 158
MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, petitioner, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-18.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted. The joint motion of petitioners for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner in No. 18-18, 10 minutes for petitioners in No. 17-1717, 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General as *amicus curiae,* and 35 minutes for respondents.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-26-1-MAC

'

REDARYLL DAVIS, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Redaryll Davis, is adjudged 

Case 9:23-cr-00026-MAC-CLS Document 66 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 178
2

guilty as to Count Two of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon 

in Possession of a Firearm.

Case 9:23-cr-00026-MAC-CLS Document 66 Filed 03/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 179
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2312 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2312

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ion-exchange resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1999

  Mr. Sununu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain ion-exchange resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN ION-EXCHANGE RESIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new subheading:

      

``    9902.39.32    Ion-exchange      Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     resin,                                                                  31/2002          ''
                     comprising a                                                                              .
                     copolymer of 2-
                     propenenitrile
                     with
                     diethenylbenzen
                     e, hydrolyzed
                     (CAS No. 135832-
                     76-7) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     3914.00.60)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Edward G. McDONOUGH, petitioner, v. Youel SMITH, Individually and as Special District Attorney for the County of Rensselaer, New York, aka Trey Smith.

No. 18-485.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 11, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-2522;
File No. 333-14595) of our report dated February 11, 2000 on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Sun
Communities Operating Partnership as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for
the years ended December 1999, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7333

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SCOTT ANTHONY MARTIN, a/k/a Patsy Martin, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-00-82) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Anthony Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Scott Anthony Martin appeals from the district court’s order denying his request for preparation of transcripts at government expense in order to prepare a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin , No. CR00-82 (E.D. Va. filed July 13, 2001; entered July 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Finess Edward STOKES, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6575.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      354,273
COMMITMENTS
 111,642  149,767   83,704  139,756   98,454  335,102  331,925   19,171   22,348

CHANGES FROM 12/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,693)
  15,810   -8,702  -13,460  -24,081   -1,898  -21,731  -24,060   -2,962     -633

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.5     42.3     23.6     39.4     27.8     94.6     93.7      5.4      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      163)
      48       58       65       34       36      116      139
```

----

Updated December 30, 2013
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

East District of Texas

Case Number 4:23-CV{0871

Plaintiff:

Kathryn Sneed and Sneed Equestrian Estates, LLC

vs.

Defendant:

Jeffrey Gibbs, Calli Rouse, Gibbs Show Horses, Calli Rouse Show

Horres, Black Bird Ranch, The Bonaparte Family Living

Fon

Charles S. North

Keamey, McWilliams & Davis, pllc

1235 South Main, #280

Grapevine, TX 76051

lgceived by David Moore on the 9th day of October, 2023 at9:15 am to be served on Patricia Bonapade,

1623 Mockingbird Lane, Southlake, TX 76092.

I' David Moore, being duly swom, depose and say that on the 9th day of October, 2023 all0:50 am, l:

INDIVIDUALLYTPERSONALLY served by delivering a true copy of the Summons In A Clvll Action and Plaintiffs Original Complaint with the date of service endorsed thereon by me, to: patricia Bonaparte

at the address of: 1623 Mockingbird Lane, Southtake, TX 76092 and informed said person of ths

contents therein, in compliance with state statutes.

I certify that I am approved by the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) to deliver citations and

ce Courts in and for the State of Texas. I am competent to

ars of age, I am not a party to the above-referenced cause,

e involving moralturpitude, and I am not interested in the

Subscribed and Swom to before me on the 13th day

of October, 2023 by the affiant who is personally

PSC-I71 84 Exp-1 0/31/25

Interaction Civll Process Investigations

5773 Woodway Dr. #125

Houston, TX 77057

(832) 606€958

Our Job Serial Number: RJG-2023000711

known to me.

'ol o

CoPynghl e 1992-2023 DraamBurlt Soiwaro, Inc - Proc.s! Sorw|,s Totbor VE 2l

Case 4:23-cv-00871-ALM Document 16 Filed 10/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 42
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2110

To provide for the waiver of certain grounds of inadmissibility related to

political activity in Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland for

aliens married to United States citizens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. PAYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the waiver of certain grounds of inadmissibility related to political activity in Northern Ireland

or the Republic of Ireland for aliens married to United

States citizens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern Ireland

5 Peace and Reconciliation Act’’.
2

HR 2110 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF CERTAIN GROUNDS OF INADMIS2 SIBILITY.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the At4 torney General or the Secretary of State may not apply

5 paragraph (2)(A)(i)(I), (2)(B), or (3)(B) of section 212(a)

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act so as to render

7 inadmissible or deportable any alien who is the spouse of

8 a citizen of the United States, based upon the alien’s hav9 ing engaged, on or before the date of the enactment of

10 this Act, in criminal conduct in Northern Ireland or the

11 Republic of Ireland, if—

12 (1) on the date the conduct occurred, the alien

13 was a member of the Irish Republican Army, the Ul14 ster Volunteer Force, or the Ulster Freedom Fight15 ers; and

16 (2) the conduct was undertaken in the alien’s

17 capacity as a member of such group and for a polit18 ical purpose.

19 (b) EXCEPTION.—If the Attorney General or the Sec20 retary of State determines that the application of sub21 section (a) with respect to a particular alien would have

22 potentially serious adverse consequences for the national

23 security of the United States, the Attorney General or the

24 Secretary of State may decline to apply the subsection.

Æ
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 14

- 00478

- CV

Madhuri Bondyopadhyay and Probir K. Bondyopadhyay

v
.

Bank of New York Mellon fka Bank fo New York, as Trustee for the Certificationholders of the CWABS, Inc. Asset

- Backed Cert ificates, Series 2007

- SEA2

NO. 2013

- 17412 IN THE 157TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE
MT FEE
CLK RECORD
STATEWIDE EFILING
FILING $10.00 $10.00 $120.00 $20.00 $175.00 10/02/2014
07/28/2014
07/28/2014
07 /01/2014
07/01/2014 NOT PAID
PAID
PAID
PAID
PAID ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT 

### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $335.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this February 6 , 2015

.
James FORNEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7988.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *n forma pauperis* denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DOSHA SHAMAR GILDER,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CR-00094-MJT

JUDGE MICHAEL TRUNCALE

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Zack Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. The court ORDERS the 

Defendant’s attorney to read and discuss the presentence report with the Defendant and file any 

objections to the report BEFORE the date of the sentencing hearing. 

1

Case 1:23-cr-00094-MJT Document 20 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 55
It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and 

the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Dosha Shamar 

Gilder, is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 21st day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00094-MJT Document 20 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 56
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/16/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      623,053
COMMITMENTS
  94,202   31,442  192,712  321,537  377,601  608,451  601,755   14,602   21,298

CHANGES FROM 07/09/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     39,437)
  -2,259    2,717   26,633   17,256   11,638   41,630   40,988   -2,193   -1,551

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.1      5.0     30.9     51.6     60.6     97.7     96.6      2.3      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      156)
      38       40       62       65       70      139      140
```

----

Updated July 19, 2013
ONPOINT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY - Page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES and STATE OF TEXAS 

ex rel. DANIEL W. ELLIOTT, M.D. et al.,

v.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS MEDICAL 

ASSOCIATES, LLP; et al.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-00329

JUDGE MICHAEL J. TRUNCALE

DEFENDANT ONPOINT LAB, LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

UNDER NEW CAUSE NUMBER

Defendant OnPoint Lab, LLC (“OnPoint”) moves for leave to file its reply under the new 

cause number assigned to this matter following the transfer of the case from the Marshall Division, 

respectfully stating:

1. In response to the Complaint (Doc. 2), OnPoint moved to dismiss (Doc. 63), 

Relators responded (Doc. 89), and OnPoint replied (Doc. 95). All of this occurred under the cause 

number originally assigned to the case in the Marshall Division.

2. However, OnPoint’s reply was filed subsequent to the transfer order and the 

assignment of a new cause number to this case. As a result, OnPoint’s reply was not transferred 

along with all of the other pleadings in the case.

3. To correct this, OnPoint hereby moves for leave to file the reply under the new 

cause number, and tenders herewith a properly styled reply brief that should be linked to its motion 

to dismiss (Doc. 63).

4. This relief is not opposed by Relators.

5. Good cause exists for granting this relief because, in OnPoint’s view, the reply brief 

will aid the Court, the misfiling was inadvertent, and there is no prejudice to any party.

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 104 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1030
ONPOINT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY - Page 2

WHEREFORE, OnPoint prays that the Court direct the Clerk to either file the reply brief 

attached as Exhibit 1 hereto, or to permit OnPoint to do so.

Respectfully submitted, 

Dennis Roossien

Dennis L. Roossien, Jr.

Tex. Bar No. 00784873

Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.

500 N. Akard, Ste. 3800

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 855-7535

droossien@munsch.com

ATTORNEY FOR ONPOINT LAB, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that, prior to filing this motion, I consulted with counsel 

for Relators, who advised this motion is not opposed.

Dennis Roossien

Dennis L. Roossien, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all parties that have appeared through the Court’s electronic filing 

system.

Dennis Roossien

Dennis L. Roossien, Jr.

Case 1:23-cv-00329-MJT Document 104 Filed 10/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1031
John Denton ROUSE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5770.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.