alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR 

THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW 

YORK and UNIVERSITY OF 

CONNECTICUT and WORCESTER 

POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE, 

Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

XIAOMI CORPORATION, XIAOMI 

H.K. LTD., XIAOMI 

COMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD., 

XIAOMI INC., AND ZEPP HEALTH 

CORPORATION 

 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00353-JRG 

 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES 

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. Having considered the 

motion, the Court GRANTS the motion. It is THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline 

for Plaintiffs to respond to the Zepp Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. 22, 23, and 24) 

shall be July 1, 2024. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for all Defendants to serve 

invalidity contentions and subject-matter eligibility contentions is extended until 10 weeks 

after the case management conference. 

Case 2:23-cv-00353-RWS-RSP Document 28-1 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 996
SANDEE BRYAN MARION CHIEF JUSTICE KAREN ANGELINI MARIALYN BARNARD REBECA C. MARTINEZ PATRICIA 0. ALVAREZ LUZ ELENA D, CHAPA JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES 

### COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER 300 DOLOROSA. SUITE 3200 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE (210)335-2635 FACSIMILE NO.

(210)335-2762 July 12,2016 Shannon K. Dunn Law Office ofBeth Watkins 926 Chulie Drive SanAntonio, TX 78216 Lowell Frank Denton 

### Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal Hyde & Zech PC 2517 N. Main Ave. San Antonio, TX 78212-4685 Clarissa Rodriguez 2517 N. Main Ave. San Antonio, TX 78212-4685 Elizabeth Guerrero-Southard Denton, Navarro, Rocha & Bernal 2517 N. Main Ave. San Antonio, TX 78212-4685

RE: CourtofAppeals Number: 04-16-00278-CV Trial Court Case Number: 15-02-30780-MCV 

### Style: City ofEagle Pass V. 

### Dulce Milagro Hernandez, Individually and as Next Friend of Adalberto Hernandez Enclosed please find tlie order which the Honorable Court ofAppeals has 

### issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause. Ifyou should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

cc: Beth Watkins Rey Perez 

### Joseph Casseb Very truly yours, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK Jacqueline S. Fennell Legal Assistant, Fourth Court ofAppeals 210-335-3854

# Jfaurtlj Court ofSppealsi ^an Antonio, tlDexas July 12, 2016 No. 04-16-00278-CV CITY OF EAGLE PASS, 

### Appellant-s

V. Dulce Milagro HERNANDEZ, Individually and as Next Friend ofAdalberto Hernandez, Appellee-s From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas Trial CourtNo. I5-02-30780-MCV 

### Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding
ORDER 

### In this court's orderofJune 1, 2016, appellate deadlines in this case were suspended until July 18,2016 and the parlies were orderedto mediation with Joseph Casseb. On July 11,2016, the parties filed aJoint Motionrequestingto Extend the Time for Court ordered Mediation and to file Appellant's brief. The parties' motion is GRANTED. 

### Appellate deadlines in this case are hereby suspended untilAugust 22,2016. It is so ORDERED on July 12, 2016.

rd, Justice

### IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal ofthe said court on this 12th day ofJuly, 2016.

22 f ^

" i •0« 1


### '^umwww^ Keim E. Hottle Clerk ofCourt
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 20, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00216

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.F., J.J.L., AND J.A.R., CHILDREN,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- PA

- 02310

Honorable Charles E. Mon temayor , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on October 20, 2020

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
Christine Almas ROSE, Individually and as Mother of Jessie Lee Rose, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF UTICA, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 19-811

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba, 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00204-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to Serve Initial and Additional Disclosures. After consideration of the same, the Court is of 

the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 

serve its Initial and Additional Disclosures is extended up to and including September 14, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 43-1 Filed 08/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1019
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4292

___________

Jack R. Hammack; Shirley O. *

Hammack, *

*

Plaintiffs - Appellees, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Missouri.

*

Cadiz Land Company, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 18, 1998

 Filed: June 26, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jack R. and Shirley O. Hammack filed the instant diversity action against Cadiz

Land Company, Inc. (Cadiz), and numerous others, asserting state law claims for

common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with the sale and

management of certain property the Hammacks purchased from Cadiz&s corporate

predecessor. Cadiz moved for summary judgment, asserting, among other things, that

the action was barred by two settlement agreements the Hammacks had executed with
-2-

Cadiz&s predecessor. The Hammacks later moved under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(2) to voluntarily dismiss Cadiz with prejudice; Cadiz, in turn, moved
The HONORABLE ORTRIE D. SMITH, United States District Judge for the 1

Western District of Missouri.

-3-

for an award of attorney&s fees and non-taxable costs, asserting that it was entitled to

a fee award under the prior settlement agreements. The district court granted the

1

Hammacks& motion to dismiss Cadiz with prejudice; denied Cadiz&s motions for

attorney&s fees, non-taxable costs, and sanctions; and denied Cadiz’s summary

judgment motion as moot. Cadiz appeals that portion of the court&s order denying its

request for fees and costs.

In a diversity case, we follow state law regarding the award of attorney&s fees,

absent conflict with a federal statute or court rule. See Lamb Eng&g & Constr. Co. v.

Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 103 F.3d 1422, 1434 (8th Cir. 1997). Missouri law

permits an award of attorney&s fees that is authorized by contract. See Skyles v. Burge,

830 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Mo. App. 1992) (describing bases under Missouri law for

recovery of attorney&s fees). However, we have carefully examined the relevant

provisions of the settlement agreements and agree with the district court that they do

not authorize an award of attorney&s fees to Cadiz as a result of the voluntary dismissal

of the Hammacks’ claims with prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       36,240
COMMITMENTS
   3,609    8,532    1,072   20,645   15,321   25,326   24,925   10,914   11,315

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        522)
     109     -230      436     -347     -292      198      -86      324      608

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.0     23.5      3.0     57.0     42.3     69.9     68.8     30.1     31.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
       8       14        9       30       22       41       43
```

----

Updated August 16, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000911167
<NAME>                        Ariel Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,915,528
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,798,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                   332,867
<INVENTORY>                                    2,890,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,239,889
<PP&E>                                         5,993,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,724,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,975,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,835,400
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,073,920
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,592,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,975,081
<SALES>                                        5,350,029
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,350,029
<CGS>                                          3,143,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,143,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,997,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             313,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,743,028)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,743,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,743,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.01)



</TABLE>
Matthew T. WATKINS, Petitioner, v. Andrew M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 19-669

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

DAVID CAYETANO-VAZQUEZ,

Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00196-CR

Appeal from

the County Court

of Kinney County, Texas

(TC# 11472CR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court, treating this cause as a petition for a writ of mandamus, remands to the trial 

court for it to consider David Cayetano-Vazquez’s application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus 

on the merits in light of the Fourth Court of Appeals’ holding in Aparicio and its progeny, and 

determine whether—at the time Cayetano-Vazquez was arrested and charged with criminal 

trespass—the State was applying the criminal trespass statute under Operation Lone Star in an 

unconstitutional manner by selectively prosecuting males only, without justification.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to Cayetano-Vazquez’s 

ability to seek relief, if necessary, after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its 

ruling.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Palafox, and Soto, JJ., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J., (Ret.) sitting by assignment
annualreport2018form1606






                                                                            Exhibit  10.12                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Orion Group Holdings, Inc.                  Summary of Non-Employee  Director Compensation Arrangements                                   as of December 31, 2018     For service as a non-employee director, compensation consists of cash and equity compensation as follows:   Board of Directors   Cash Compensation:        •   Annual cash retainer of $50,000 to each member      •   Additional cash retainer of $70,000 for Board Chair   Equity Compensation:      •   Annual equity grant with a grant date value of $90,000   Audit Committee      •   Annual cash committee retainers – $20,000 for chair, $14,000  for each other member   Compensation Committee      •   Annual cash committee retainers – $20,000 for chair, $14,000  for each other member   Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee      •   Annual cash committee retainers – $16,000 for chair, $14,000  for each other member       {N3791783.2}
John Joseph DOUGLAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6229

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated:  November 9, 2006

/s/ Stephen T. Wills
Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          (Adopted Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned officers, Gary A. Shiffman and Jeffrey P. Jorissen, hereby
certify that, to their knowledge: (a) this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sun
Communities Operating Limited Partnership, for the year ended December 31, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (b) the information contained in this Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the issuer.



         /s/ Gary A. Shiffman                             Dated: March 31, 2003
-----------------------------------------------
Gary A. Shiffman, Chief Executive Officer
of Sun Communities, Inc., its General Partner

         /s/ Jeffrey P. Jorissen                          Dated: March 31, 2003
-----------------------------------------------
Jeffrey P. Jorissen, Chief Financial Officer
of Sun Communities, Inc., its General Partner


  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership and will be retained
by Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Blitz, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cadus  Corporation  and will be retained  by Cadus  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 /s/ David Blitz
----------------------------------------------
David Blitz
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
August 16, 2004

The foregoing  certification is furnished  solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.
EXHIBIT 11

         Net loss per common and common equivalent share for the period January
1, 1996 to September 30, 1996 is determined on a basis consistent with APB 15.
During this period a treasury stock approach was used in determining the
incremental shares outstanding.  Because the Company has reported losses in each
period, the impact of the incremental shares was anti-dilutive.

         The calculation follows:

                 Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                     Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

                                                     Three Months Ended                   Nine Months Ended
                                                        September 30,                        September 30,
                                                     --------------------                -------------------
                                                     1995            1996                1995           1996
                                                     ----            ----                ----           ----
                                                         (Unaudited)                         (Unaudited)
<S> <C>
Common stock issued through
December 31, 1994 and 1995,
respectively...........................                    -              -           5,861,332       5,994,790

Common stock issued through
June 30, 1995 and 1996,
respectively...........................            5,986,245      7,153,796                   -               -

Weighted average common
stock issued / (repurchased)
in the three months ended
September 30, 1995
and 1996, respectively.................               (3,920)        10,935                   -               -

Weighted average common
stock issued in the nine
months ended September 30, 1995
and 1996, respectively.................                    -              -              87,907         780,715
                                                  ----------      ---------           ---------       ---------
Total stock.............................           5,982,325      7,164,731           5,949,239       6,775,505
                                                  ==========     ==========           =========       =========

Net loss   .............................         $(1,014,286)    $ (130,463)        $(2,421,497)    $(2,612,158)
                                                 ===========     ==========          ==========      ==========

Net loss per common and common
     equivalent share                            $     (0.17)    $    (0.02)        $     (0.41)    $     (0.39)
                                                 ===========     ==========         ===========      ==========

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 33-84726, 333-114019, 333-152186, and 333-159217 of Gaming Partners International Corporation andSubsidiaries on Form S-8, of our report dated March 20, 2015, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) of Gaming Partners International Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

 

San Diego, CA

March 20, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000917734
<NAME> RIDE INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                       925
<INVENTORY>                                      6,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,166
<PP&E>                                           7,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,341
<COMMON>                                        42,393
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,664)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,995
<SALES>                                         36,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,475
<CGS>                                           26,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   361
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,290)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (595)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,695)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)
        

</TABLE>
NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-280

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

The Respondent' Suggestion of Mootness denied. The question of mootness will be subject to further consideration at oral argument, and the parties should be prepared to discuss it.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 Date: November 10, 2008
    /s/ Steven G. BungerSteven G. BungerChief Executive Officer Mobile Mini, Inc.Date: November 10, 2008
    /s/ Lawrence TrachtenbergLawrence TrachtenbergExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer Mobile Mini, Inc.