alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2273 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2273

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that certain 
  small businesses are permitted to use the cash method of accounting 
               even if they use merchandise or inventory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

Mr. Talent (for himself and Mr. English) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that certain 
  small businesses are permitted to use the cash method of accounting 
               even if they use merchandise or inventory.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF CASH ACCOUNTING RULES FOR SMALL BUSINESS.

    Section 446 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
general rule for methods of accounting) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Small Taxpayers Permitted To Use Cash Accounting Method 
Without Limitation.--A taxpayer shall not be required to use an accrual 
method of accounting for any taxable year by reason of using 
merchandise or inventory, if the average annual gross receipts of such 
taxpayer (or any predecessor) for the 3-year-period ending with such 
prior taxable year does not exceed $5,000,000. The rules of paragraphs 
(2) and (3) of section 448(c) shall apply for purposes of the preceding 
sentence. In the case of a C corporation or a partnership which has a C 
corporation as a partner, the first sentence of this subsection shall 
apply only if such C corporation or partnership meets the requirements 
of section 448(b)(3).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
In Re Pamela Denise IDLETT, petitioner.

No. 18-488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC and AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC. and 

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO U.S. PATENT 10,594,376

Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies (“Plaintiff”), Defendants 

AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp. (“AT&T”); and Intervenors Nokia of 

America Corporation and Ericsson Inc. ( “Intervenors”) (collectively, Plaintiffs, AT&T, and 

Intervenors are “Parties”) jointly request and stipulate to, pursuant to Red. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), 

dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s claim for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,594,376 (“the 

’376 Patent”) (i.e., Count III) and dismissal without prejudice of Intervenors’ counterclaims 

against Plaintiff for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’376 Patent, i.e., the Third 

Counterclaim at Dkt. Nos. 57 and 60. For the sake of clarity, this Stipulation of Dismissal is 

limited to the claims and counterclaims applicable to the ’376 Patent and does not apply to claims, 

or counterclaims applicable to the other asserted patents. The Parties further stipulate that Plaintiff 

(on the one hand) and Defendants and Intervenors (collectively on the other hand) shall bear their 

own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees with respect to the dismissed claims and counterclaims 

concerning the ’376 patent.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 71 Filed 02/23/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1523
2

Dated: February 23, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90025

Telephone: 310.826.7474

Facsimile: 310.826.6991

COUNSEL FOR AT&T DEFENDANTS 

AND INTERVENORS

/s/ Matthew Yungwirth

Matthew S. Yungwirth

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP

1075 Peachtree Street NE

Suite 1700

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Telephone: 404.253.6900

Facsimile: 404.253.6901

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 71 Filed 02/23/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1524
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that on February 23, 2024, a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing was filed with the Court’s CM/ECF service, which will provide an electronic 

notification of the service of such pleading to all counsel of record.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

 Reza Mirzaie 

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 71 Filed 02/23/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1525
Gregory AIME, et al., petitioners, v. JTH TAX, INC., dba Liberty Tax Service, et al.

No. 18-737.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, June 1, 2022, 10:00-11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held remotely.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matters To Be Considered: 

Decisional Matter: FY 2022 Midyear Review.

                        All attendees should pre-register for the Commission meeting using the following link:                         *https://cpsc.webex.com/​cpsc/​onstage/​g.php?​MTID=​e7f67727fc4fe1732edb1ec8436c5d9fe.*

After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: May 25, 2022.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11574 Filed 5-25-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,336
<SECURITIES>                                   130,382
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,453
<PP&E>                                          28,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,110
<BONDS>                                          7,152
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,242
<SALES>                                          4,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,561
<CGS>                                            2,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,868)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.31)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,563
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,971
<PP&E>                                         127,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,600
<BONDS>                                        127,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,800 <F1>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,511
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,599)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,733)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)


<FN>
<F1>Accumulated Deficit                        128,676
</FN>

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1784

To terminate certain sanctions with respect to India and Pakistan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1999

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on

Banking and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To terminate certain sanctions with respect to India and

Pakistan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN SANCTIONS WITH

4 RESPECT TO INDIA AND PAKISTAN.

5 (a) INDIA AND PAKISTAN.—Effective on the date of

6 the enactment of this Act, the sanctions contained in the

7 following provisions of law shall not apply to India and

8 Pakistan, with respect to any grounds for the imposition
2

•HR 1784 IH

1 of sanctions under those provisions arising before such

2 date of enactment:

3 (1) Section 101 of the Arms Export Control

4 Act (22 U.S.C. 2799aa).

5 (2) Section 102 of the Arms Export Control

6 Act (22 U.S.C. 2799aa–1).

7 (3) Section 2(b)(4) of the Export-Import Bank

8 Act of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635(b)(4)).

9 (b) CERTAIN PERSONS.—Effective on the date of the

10 enactment of this Act, the sanctions contained in sections

11 821 and 824 of the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Act

12 (22 U.S.C. 3201 note) shall not apply to any person, with

13 respect to any grounds for the imposition of sanctions

14 under those provisions arising before such date of enact15 ment, relating to the detonation by India or Pakistan of

16 nuclear explosive devices.

17 (c) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this

18 Act prohibits the imposition of sanctions by the President

19 under any provision of law specified in subsections (a) and

20 (b) by reason of any grounds for the imposition of sanc21 tions under that provision of law arising on or after the

22 date of the enactment of this Act.

23 SEC. 2. REPEALS.

24 The India-Pakistan Relief Act of 1988 (title IX of

25 the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Ad-
3

•HR 1784 IH

1 ministration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

2 1999, as contained in section 101(a) of Public Law 105–

3 277), is repealed.

Æ
Exhibit99.1

 

 

 

LODGENETENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (IS U.S.C. 1350)

 

 

                Eachof the undersigned, Scott C. Petersen and Gary H. Ritondaro, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of LodgeNetEntertainment Corporation (the “Company”), individually and not jointly hasexecuted this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the “Report”).

 

·              The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each ofthe undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 14th day of August,2002.

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/    Scott C. Petersen |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Scott C. Petersen                       |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |                                    |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/    Gary H. Ritondaro |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Gary H. Ritondaro                       |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |                                    |   |
J.A., petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 18-5927.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
- 1 - 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a § 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP 

 § (Lead Case) 

v. § 

 § 

AT&T INC., et al § 

 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a § 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP 

 § (Member Case) 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., § 

et al § 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, d/b/a § 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES § 

 § 

v. § CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP 

 § (Member Case) 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. § 

ORDER 

The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all 

pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00202. All parties are instructed to file 

any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 06/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 872
- 2 - 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case. 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 13th day of June, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 06/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 873
PURE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, et al., v. GRACE OF GOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH.

No. 18-636 (R46-08/OT 2018).

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------

FABRICANT LLP, PETER 

LAMBRIANAKOS, VINCENT J. RUBINO, 

III, ENRIQUE W. ITURRALDE, and ZHONG 

LAW FIRM,

 Plaintiffs,

-againstSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------

X

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

X

23-MC-272 (VSB)

ORDER 

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiffs initiated this action on August 14, 2023 by filing a motion to quash Defendants’ 

non-party subpoenas. (Docs. 1, 4 (“Motion to Quash”).) That same day, Plaintiffs filed a motion 

to transfer their motion to quash to the United States Eastern District of Texas, Marshall 

Division. (Doc. 3 (“Motion to Transfer”).) On August 21, 2023, Defendants filed an opposition 

to the Motion to Quash. (Doc. 13.) On August 23, 2023, Plaintiffs filed their reply in support of 

the Motion to Quash. (Doc. 17.) On August 28, 2023, Defendants filed a letter explaining that 

they do not oppose the Motion to Transfer. (Doc. 18.) 

The subpoenas that Plaintiff seeks to quash direct them “to comply at O’Melveny & 

Myers LLP’s New York, New York office, located at 7 Times Square Tower, New York, NY 

10036.” (Doc. 3 at 3.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f), “[w]hen the court where compliance is 

required did not issue the subpoena, it may transfer a motion under this rule to the issuing court 

if the person subject to the subpoena consents or if the court finds exceptional circumstances.” I 

Case 2:23-mc-00003-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 08/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 247
find that the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, having knowledge of the underlying 

matter, is best-positioned to resolve the Motion to Quash. Accordingly, the Motion to Transfer is 

GRANTED. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 30, 2023

New York, New York

______________________

Vernon S. Broderick 

United States District Judge

Case 2:23-mc-00003-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 08/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 248
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6133
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LACY DAVIS, III, a/k/a Lacey Davis, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-411-A) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lacy Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lacy Davis, III, appeals the district court’s denying his motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis , No. CR-94-411-A (Jan. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
In Re Alonzo Dean SHEPARD, petitioner.

No. 18-6825.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Bobby Jo GIPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES;

Keith Walker, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 17-8637.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

*374Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         17,432,848
<SECURITIES>                                   38,921,988
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,949,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,020,161
<PP&E>                                         3,346,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,906,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 79,784,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,510,167
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       46,985
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,753,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   79,784,928
<SALES>                                        61,654,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               61,654,625
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,687,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26,539,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,625,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,754,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,870,658
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (803,246)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,067,412
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .44



</TABLE>