alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                      RACI HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in Millions)



                                        Year Ended December 31,
                            ----------------------------------------------
                             1999      1998      1997      1996       1995
                            -----     -----     -----     ------     -----

Earnings:
  Net Income (Loss)         $23.0     $17.2     $ 5.5     $(13.8)    $11.5
  Add:
    Income Taxes             14.7      11.1       3.5       (7.0)      8.5
    Interest Expense(a)      14.1      19.2      23.6       25.1      21.5
    Portion of Rents
     Representative of
     Interest Factor          0.1       0.1       0.3        0.3       0.3
                            -----     -----     -----     ------     -----
                            $51.9     $47.6     $32.9     $  4.6     $41.8
                            =====     =====     =====     ======     =====

Fixed Charges:
    Interest Expense(a)     $14.1     $19.2     $23.6     $ 25.1     $21.5
    Capitalized Interest       --        --       0.2        0.2        --
    Portion of Rents
     Representative of
     Interest Factor          0.1       0.1       0.3        0.3       0.3
                            -----     -----     -----     ------     -----
                            $14.2     $19.3     $24.1     $ 25.6     $21.8
                            =====     =====     =====     ======     =====

     Ration of Earnings to
      Fixed Charges           3.7x      2.5x      1.4x       0.2x      1.9x


(a) Includes amortization of discount on indebtedness and excludes capitalized
    interest.
Micah G. PRITCHETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6858.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
F ILED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS EL EV EN TH C IRC UIT May 1 8, 2006 T HOMA S K. KA HN CLERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HEEL EV EN THCIRC UI T

_____________ N o. 05- 1680 1 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

_____________ D. C. Docket N o. 04-81184 -CV -W PD CHRIS TOPHER’ S CREATIVE DESIGN, INC., a. k. a Ch ri sto phe r’ s C hr ist m as P artyG if ts & A nti que s, CHR IST OP HE R JAME S,
Pl ai nti ff s- A ppe lla nts , ve rs us
VILLAGE O F NORTH PALM BEACH, De fendant-Appellee.

____________ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the S outhe rn D istri ct

of F lorida

____________ (M ay 1 8, 200 6) Be fo re T JO FL A T , D U BI N A a nd H IL L , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

This is an appeal fr om

a final j udgm ent and order granting summ ary j udgm ent in favor of the V illage of North P alm Beac h. T he district court held that pl ai nt iff fai le d t o s ho w th e es se nt ia l el em en t o f it s cl ai m un de r 42 U.S.C. § 2000 cc , the Re lig iou s L an d U se a nd I nst itu tio na liz edP er sons A ct , that the sig n
or din an ce of

the V ill ag e of

N orth P al m

Be ac h w as asub sta nti al bur de n on it s
ex er ci se of

r el igi ous ri ght s. F ind ing no r ev er sib le e rr or in thi s ho ldi ng, the j udgmen t i s du e to b e af

fi rmed
. AFFIR MED.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

v.

DOMINIC DAVID WILSON

,

Appellant

. No. 85230

- 2

- I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

P ER C URIAM

— Dominic Wilson appeals from the judgment and sentence entered

upon his plea of guilty to one count of murder in the second degree while armed with a

firearm

— an offense he committed at age 16 . He argues that the trial court , which

sentenced Wilson to an ad ult standard

- range sentence above what the parties jointly

recommended

, erred by not giving meaningful consideration to his youth at the time of

his offense . The State acknowledges that “there is no indication in the record how the

defendant’s youthfulnes s impacted the court’s [sentencing] decision.” It thus concedes

that the matter should be remanded for resentencing.

We accept the State’s concession. Cf. State v. Houston

- Sconiers , 188 Wn.2d 1,

21, 23, 391 P.3d 409 (2017) (court sentencing juvenile must c onsider mitigating

circumstances related to the defendant’s youth; it must also consider factors “like the

nature of the juvenile’s surrounding environment and family circumstances, the extent of

the ju venile’s participation in the crime,

. . . ‘the way familial and peer pressures may

have affected him [or her],’

. . . [and] how youth impacted any legal defense, along withNo. 852302

- I / 2

- 2

- any factors suggesting that the child might be successfully rehabilitated” (second

alteration in original) (quoting Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460, 477

- 78, 132 S. Ct. 2455,

183 L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012))). Accordingly , we reverse Wilson’s sentence and remand to

the trial court for resentencing

. Cf. In re Pers. Restraint of Carrasco , 1 Wn. 3d 224, 230,

525 P.3d 196 (2023) (“On direct appeal, the defendant needs only to establish the

existence of [a] Houston

- Sconiers error to be entitled to a new sentencing hearing.”).

Reversed and remanded.

FOR THE COURT:
Scott D. OLIVER, petitioner, v. Cynthia LINK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

No. 17-8752.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
David Elijah SMITH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6496

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ---- (2019).
Rolando CALDERIN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-6653.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |                                               
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Antares LDA                                |  | Antares, Portugal                             
|Cam2 SRL                                   |  | Rivoli, Italy                                 
|FARO Benelux BV                            |  | Eindhoven,Netherlands                         
|FARO Business Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. |  | New Delhi, India                              
|FARO Cayman LP                             |  | Georgetown, Cayman Islands                    
|FARO Cayman Ltd                            |  | Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands                  
|FARO Delaware Inc                          |  | Wilmington, Delaware, USA                     
|FARO Deutschland Holding GmbH              |  | Korntal-Münchingen, Germany                   
|FARO Europe KG                             |  | Korntal-Münchingen, Germany                   
|FARO FHN Netherlands BV                    |  | Amsterdam, Netherlands                        
|FARO Japan KK                              |  | Nagoya, Japan                                 
|FARO Scanning AG                           |  | Korntal-Münchingen, Germany                   
|FARO Scanner Production GmbH               |  | Korntal-Münchingen, Germany                   
|FARO Shanghai Co, Ltd                      |  | Shanghai, China                               
|FARO Singapore PTE Ltd                     |  | Singapore, Singapore                          
|FARO Spain SL                              |  | Barcelona, Spain                              
|FARO Swiss Holding GmbH                    |  | Beringen, Switzerland                         
|FARO Swiss Manufacturing GmbH              |  | Beringen, Switzerland                         
|FAO Tech Polska                            |  | Poznan, Poland                                
|FARO Verwaltungs GmbH                      |  | Korntal-Münchingen, Germany                   
|FARO Technologies (Thailand) Ltd.          |  | Bangkok,Thailand                              
|Faro Laser Trackers                        |  | Kennett Square, PA USA                        
|3D Measurement Technologies, S de RL de CV |  | Los Alpes Alvaro Obrégon Cd. De Mexico, Mexico
|FARO France                                |  | Röthenbach/Allgäu, France                     
|FARO UK                                    |  | Coventry, United Kingdom                      
|FARO Australia                             |  | Sydney, Australia
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the accompanying report of Nucentrix
Broadband Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The undersigned further certifies that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:        /s/ Carroll D. McHenry
     -------------------------------------------------------------
     Carroll D. McHenry
     Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer,
     Acting Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Stefone Dwayne PALOMO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6601.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP   Document 11-1   Filed 12/13/23   Page 1 of 3 PageID #:  118

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP   Document 11-1   Filed 12/13/23   Page 2 of 3 PageID #:  119

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP   Document 11-1   Filed 12/13/23   Page 3 of 3 PageID #:  120
Cory Devon WASHINGTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Lawrence Alfred LANDRUM, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-6709.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

*925Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ross County denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/25/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       60,134
COMMITMENTS
   6,928    2,497        0   48,706   55,343   55,634   57,840    4,500    2,294

CHANGES FROM 09/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -9,964)
    -479      183     -872   -7,137   -7,696   -8,488   -8,385   -1,476   -1,579

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.5      4.2      0.0     81.0     92.0     92.5     96.2      7.5      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       66)
       8        4        0       35       31       43       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/25/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      116,133
COMMITMENTS
  22,817   19,192      909   78,191   92,309  101,917  112,410   14,216    3,723

CHANGES FROM 09/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -25,248)
    -420    1,749     -438  -15,944  -15,939  -16,802  -14,628   -8,446  -10,620

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.6     16.5      0.8     67.3     79.5     87.8     96.8     12.2      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      114)
      35       11        4       48       35       84       49
```

----

Updated September 28, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON

WIRELESS

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP

LEAD CASE

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

PLAINTIFF,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC.; et al.

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP

MEMBER CASE

PLAINTIFF COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 245
Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC hereby notifies the Court that it has served 

Preliminary Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on all counsel for 

Defendants via electronic mail on December 11, 2023.

Dated: December 19, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Reza Mirzaie 

Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Marc A. Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Amy E. Hayden

CA State Bar No. 287026

Christian W. Conkle

CA State Bar No. 306374

Jonathan Ma

CA State Bar No. 312773

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com

Email: ahayden@raklaw.com

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com

Email: jma@raklaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 12/19/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 246
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 19th day of December, 2023, with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served 

by electronic mail on this same date.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 51 Filed 12/19/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 247
No. 6:23-cr-00087-2

United States of America

v.

Jacob Henderson Lacey

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for administration of a guilty plea under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 90. 

The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count five of the 

indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Jacob Henderson Lacey guilty of count five of the indictment, charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with 

Intent to Distribute and Distribution of Methamphetamine.

So ordered by the court on April 4, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00087-JCB-KNM Document 93 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 233
Case 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 04/02/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 653
Case 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 04/02/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 654
11314021.2 02 - 1 - 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been 

served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on April 2, 2024. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Case 2:23-cv-00409-JRG-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 04/02/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 655
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201800002

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JOSE J. AMARO

Electronics Technician (Non-Nuclear, Submarine Navigation) 

Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Northwest, 

Silverdale, WA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander Justin L. 

Hawks, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 15 February 2018

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, FULTON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 233 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.233

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio Street 
    in El Paso, Texas, as the ``Richard C. White Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 700 East San Antonio Street in El 
Paso, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Richard C. White 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard C. White 
Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 23.2



TO:    The Securities and Exchange Commission
        Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:    XDOGS, Inc.

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in Registration Statement Nos. 333-36560 and 333-53710 of
XDOGS, Inc., on Form S-8 of our report dated August 1, 2001 on the financial
statements of XDOGS, Inc., for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001, which is
part of this 10-KSB filing.


We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
filing.




/s/ Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.
------------------------------
Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
November 13, 2001
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/07/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,389
COMMITMENTS
  12,704    2,482    2,489   15,075   25,775   30,269   30,747    9,121    8,643

CHANGES FROM 01/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,652)
  -1,356     -122     -805      104     -181   -2,057   -1,108     -595   -1,544

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.3      6.3      6.3     38.3     65.4     76.8     78.1     23.2     21.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
      11       10       13       29       23       47       40
```

----

Updated February 10, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

ZACHARY WAYNE WHITE

Plaintiff,

v. 

FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, ET AL.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00847-ALMAGD

ORDER

Pending before the court is pro se Plaintiff Zachary Wayne White’s Motion requesting the 

court grant permission for electronic filing (Dkt. #8). Having reviewed the Motion, the court finds 

that it would serve the interests of efficiency for Plaintiff to receive electronic notice of filings 

and other postings in this matter and to file documents electronically as well. Therefore, the 

Clerk of Court shall add Plaintiff’s email address, zach@amec-llc.com (Dkt. #8 at 3), to the 

electronic service list. Once Plaintiff’s e-mail is on the service list, Plaintiff, as with all Parties 

on the electronic service list, will be deemed as having been given notice of all docket activity 

at the time of electronic posting. Accordingly, 

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion requesting the court grant permission 

for electronic filing (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED as set forth herein. The Clerk of Court shall 

add Plaintiff’s email address, zach@amec-llc.com, to the electronic service list. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00847-SDJ-KPJ Document 14 Filed 10/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 616