T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DING MA, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 75132 A ge nc yN o. A - 096- 070- 514 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D i ng M a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of Im m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g h is ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd re l i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 

# FI LED JU N 02 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 75132 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence, T ekle v . Mukasey , 533 F . 3d 1044, 1051 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , a nd w e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w a nd r e m and. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e d o e s n o t s up p o rt th e I J ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility d e te rm in a tio n . Se e Aki n m a de v . I NS , 1 9 6 F . 3 d9 5 1 , 9 5 6 ( 9 th C i r . 1 9 9 9 ) ( “ [ A] c onc e rn tha tthe a f

f i da vi ti s nota s c om pl e t e a s m i ghtbe de s i r e d c annot , w i thout m ore, prop er l y s erve as a bas i s f or a f i nd i ng of l ac k o f c re di bi l i ty. ”) (i nt ernal quot a t i ons a nd c i t a t i ons om i tt e d) . S pe c i f i c a l l y , M a ’ s om i s s i on f

r om hi s de c l ar a t i on o f b e in g k ic k e db yp o lic e m e n tw o o rth r e e tim e s o n h is r ig h t c a lf is m in o r , se e Ag u i le ra - Co ta v . I

NS , 914 F . 2d 1375, 1382 ( 9th C i r . 1990) ( m i norom i s s i ons c a n n o t s up p o rt an a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf in d in g ) , an dh is o m is s io n f r o m h is decl ar at i on of bei ng fi re d from hi s j ob i s m i no r i n l i gh tof hi s e xp l anat i on that v e rb a l te rm in a tio n is r o u tin e a n de x p e c te df o llo w in g a rr e s t, se e Sm olni akova v. G on zales , 4 2 2 F . 3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 4 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) . F i n a l l y , th e I J ’ s f i n d i n g th a tMa fa i l ed t o p rovi de w i tness corr ob orat i on of the l ett erconcerni ng hi s c hu rc h att endance does not s up po rtan advers e c re di bi l i ty det erm i nat i on because M a w as n o t r e q u ir e dto p r o v id e a d d itio n a l c o rr o b o r a tio n . Se e G u iv . I NS , 280 F . 3d 1217, 1227 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( “ W he r e , a s he r e , ape t i t i one rpr ovi de s s om e c orr obor a t i ve e vi de nc e t o s tr e ngthe n hi s c a s e , hi s f a i l ur e t o pr oduc e s t i l l m or e s upport i ng evi dence s ho ul d n otbe hel d agai nsthi m . ”) .07- 75132 3 A c c o r d in g ly , w e g r a n t th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w , an dr e m an df o rth e a g e n c yto c o n s id e rM a ’s a s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, an dC A T c la im s , ta k in g h is te s tim o n ya s tru e . See Soto-O larte v . H older , 55 5 F . 3d 10 89 , 10 93 -96 (9th C i r. 20 09 ); see a l

so IN S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.