alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CMI INDUSTRIES INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-2-1999
<CASH>                                           1,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,225
<INVENTORY>                                     55,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,309
<PP&E>                                         263,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,080
<BONDS>                                        133,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,589
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,162
<SALES>                                        280,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               281,310
<CGS>                                          257,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6,495)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (6.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.18)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000917823
<NAME>                        PROPHET 21, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,219
<SECURITIES>                                   2,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (398)
<INVENTORY>                                    698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,974
<PP&E>                                         6,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,105)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 37,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,322
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       43
<OTHER-SE>                                     27,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   37,173
<SALES>                                        46,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,115
<CGS>                                          23,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  23,763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (292)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (397)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (491)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   596
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.15


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0494

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DAVID ALAN SPAGNOLO, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 1, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2021

09/20/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0494
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

ET AL., 

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

The Court issues this Order sua sponte. The Court is of the opinion that the parties might 

benefit from mediation. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to mediate in this case as 

soon as practicable, but no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. The mediation shall 

be conducted by the Hon. David Folsom, 6002 Summerfield Drive, Texarkana, Texas 75503, 

david@folsomadr.com. To ensure that mediation is as productive as possible, the Court hereby 

ORDERS that each party shall personally attend such mediation with lead counsel, local counsel, 

and a representative who has full and unilateral authority to act on and compromise on all pending 

disputes. No party or representative shall leave the mediation session, once it begins, without the 

approval of the mediator. The district’s applicable local rules shall otherwise govern and apply in 

all respects. The mediator may, within his discretion, afford any participant permission to attend 

virtually. However, the mediator may, by the same token, require in person participation, from 

any or all participants. Such matters are left to the mediator’s sound discretion. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 274 Filed 11/27/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

21070
2 

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of November, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 274 Filed 11/27/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

21071
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10.4.1.1

                               LEASE AMENDMENT #1
                               ------------------


EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 23, 2004, the Lease dated August 29, 1999, between Lomita
Enterprise #4, LLC (Lessor) and Hi-Shear Technology Corp., a Delaware Corp.
(Lessee), for the premises located at 24225 Garnier Street, Torrance,
California, is hereby amended as follows:

1)       PARAGRAPH 3.1 TERM: The term of this Lease shall be extended for five
         (5) additional years. The Lease shall now expire on August 31, 2009.

2)       PARAGRAPH 4, RENT; AND PARAGRAPH 70, RENT ESCALATIONS: The rent during
         the extended term shall be increased annually and paid in accordance
         with the following rent schedule:

         September 1, 2004 through August 31, 2005   $41,715.00 per month
         September 1, 2005 through August 31, 2006   $42,966.45 per month
         September 1, 2006 through August 31, 2007   $44,255.44 per month
         September 1, 2007 through August 31, 2008   $45,583.11 per month
         September 1, 2008 through August 31, 2009   $46,950.60 per month

3)       ADDENDUM, PARAGRAPH 60 LESSOR'S TENANT IMPROVEMENTS: Lessor, at
         Lessor's sole cost and expense agrees to make all of the minor repairs
         to the parking lot per the attached proposal from PAC VIII, INC. This
         includes slurry coating, sealing, re-striping and stenciling the
         parking lot and re-surfacing the low area in the front drive lane of
         the lot.

4)       ADDENDUM, PARAGRAPH 61 LESSEE'S TENANT IMPROVEMENTS: Lessee has
         Lessor's permission to remove, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, four
         (4) olive trees located in front of the Premises. Lessee agrees to
         verify with Lessor, the exact trees to be removed, prior to their
         removal.

EXCEPT FOR THE CHANGES DESCRIBED ABOVE, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
LEASE SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


LESSOR:                                      LESSEE:

LOMITA ENTERPRISES #4 LLC                    HIGH-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORP.
a limited liability company                  a Delaware corp.


By:  West America Construction Corp.,        By:  /s/ George W. Trahan
      Manager                                     George W. Trahan, President


By:  /s/ Nicholas M. Brown                   By:  /s/ Gregory J. Smith
     Nicholas M. Brown, President                 Gregory J. Smith, CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                             955
<SECURITIES>                                28,285,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                  287,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                   279,954
<INVENTORY>                                     30,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,833
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          986,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,190,265
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,049,684)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,933
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,859
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (97,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (97,654)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
DANIELLE BERGER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5271

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant; Danielle Berger, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (722)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,108
<PP&E>                                         343,226
<DEPRECIATION>                               (117,475)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,976
<BONDS>                                        205,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,012
<SALES>                                         36,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,347
<CGS>                                           16,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,484)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-76288, 333-26817, 333-40051 and
333-105028) of Dominion Homes, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2005 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|Columbus, Ohio                
|March 16, 2005
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2194

To suspend temporarily the duty on Butralin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Butralin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.38.00 [N-sec-butyl-4-

tert-butyl-2,6-

dinitroaniline]

(CAS No.

33629–47–9)

(provided for in

subheading

3808.30.15) and

any mixtures

containing same Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•HR 2194 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 27, 1997 (Unaudited) and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Twenty-six Weeks Ended September
27, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           2,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,336
<INVENTORY>                                    120,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               222,608
<PP&E>                                         716,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                 341,890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,361
<BONDS>                                        685,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (433,180)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,924
<SALES>                                        188,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,106
<CGS>                                          147,991
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,388
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case narne: J Frederick Welling & 57 Memorial Apartments LP v. Harris County

Appraisal District 8,: Appraisal Review Board of Harris County

Appraisal District

Appellate case number: 01-11-00874-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-68613

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas

On November 20, 2012, this Court abated this appeal, remanded the case to the trial court

for entry of additional findings of fact and conclusions of law, and requested the written findings

and conclusions of the trial court be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. A supplemental

clerk’s record was filed with this Court; however, it does not contain the signed order with the

additional findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court.

The District Court Clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record \vith the

Clerk of this Court that contains the following document: a signed order with the additional

findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court.

The supplemental clerk’s record is to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within fifteen

days from the entry of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/Rebeca Huddle

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: December 20, 2012
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20360 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALMA ROSA CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-314-13

- - - - - - - - - - December 17, 1998 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Alma Rosa Carrillo moves to withdraw as appellate counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We have independently reviewed counsel’s brief and the record and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:23-cv-00231-JRG Document 116-1 Filed 08/20/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 4073
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

v. Civ. No. ________________________

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

I hereby certify that I am the plaintiff or the attorney of record for the plaintiff in the above

cause, and that defendant ________________________________ was served by the following

method:

I further certify that the defendant has failed to serve an answer or other responsive pleading;

no extension has been granted or any extension has expired; the defendant is neither an infant (under

age 21) nor an incompetent person; the defendant is not in the active military service of the 

United States of America or its officers or agents or was not six months prior to the filing of the 

case.7KHUHIRUHWKH&OHUNLVUHTXHVWHGWRHQWHUDGHIDXOWDJDLQVWVDLGGHIHQGDQW

,GHFODUHRUFHUWLI\YHULI\RUVWDWHXQGHUSHQDOW\RISHUMXU\XQGHUWKHODZVRIWKH

8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFDWKDWWKHIRUHJRLQJLVWUXHDQGFRUUHFW

Date:

___________________

__________________________________________

Plaintiff or Attorney for Plaintiff

__________________________________________

Bar No.

__________________________________________

Address

__________________________________________

AT&T Corp., AT&T Communications LLC,

AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility II LLC,

AT&T Services Inc., Nokia of America

Corporation (Counterclaim Plaintiffs)

Atlantic IP Services Limited (Counterclaim

Defendant)

2:23-cv-00231

Atlantic IP Services Limited

via a process server on an officer of the company in the United States as set forth in the

Return and Proof of Service. See Dkt. 101. Atlantic IP Services Limited was also

served at its corporate headquarters in Dublin, Ireland via overnight, first-class mail,

signature required. See Exhibit 2 (attached hereto).

08/20/2024

/s/ M. Scott Stevens

N.C. Bar No. 37828

1120 South Tryon Street, Suite 300

Charlotte, NC 28203-6818

Case 2:23-cv-00231-JRG Document 116-1 Filed 08/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 4074
No. 6:23-cv-00367

Christian Blanchard,

Plaintiff,

v.

UT Health East Texas EMS et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Christian Blanchard, proceeding pro se and in forma 

pauperis, filed this action asserting negligence claims. Doc. 1. The 

case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole 

Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 2. 

On October 3, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Doc. 18. Plaintiff did not file written objections. When a 

party fails to object to a magistrate judge’s report, the court reviews 

the record only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. 

Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996).

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. The court dismissesthis action without prejudice. 

Any motion not ruled on is denied as moot.

So ordered by the court on November 17, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00367-JCB-KNM Document 19 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 62
Emeterio Espino RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6199

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.