alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
24.1**
 
 
 
 
 **POWER
OF ATTORNEY**
 
 
 The
undersigned, a member of the Board of Directors or an officer of MIDAMERICAN
ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY, an Iowa corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes
and appoints Douglas L. Anderson and James D. Stallmeyer and each of them, as
his/her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for and in his/her stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 and to execute any amendments thereto
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and applicable
stock exchanges, with the full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes as he/she
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agent, or his/her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 Executed
as of February 28, 2005
 
 /s/
      David L. Sokol
    
    /s/
      Gregory E. AbelDAVID
      L. SOKOL
    
    GREGORY
      E. ABEL/s/
      Patrick J. Goodman
    
    /s/
      Stanley J. BrightPATRICK
      J. GOODMAN
    
    STANLEY
      J. BRIGHT/s/
      Edgar D. Aronson
    
    /s/
      Walter Scott, Jr.EDGAR
      D. ARONSON
    
    WALTER
      SCOTT, JR./s/
      Richard R. Jaros
    
    /s/
      Warren E. BuffettRICHARD
      R. JAROS
    
    WARREN
      E. BUFFETT/s/
      Marc D. Hamburg
    
    /s/
      W. David ScottMARC
      D. HAMBURG
    
    W.
      DAVID SCOTT/s/
      John K. BowerJOHN
      K. BOYER
Eric C. BEAUCHAMP, petitioner, v. D.J. DOGLIETTO, et al.

No. 18-5560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      13,329,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,137,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   135,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,596,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,669,000
<PP&E>                                      10,607,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,721,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,292,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,633,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,606,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,292,000
<SALES>                                     54,455,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,455,000
<CGS>                                       24,381,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,072,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               217,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                424,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            424,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   424,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        



</TABLE>
Rachel MOORE, petitioner, v. Shawn BREWER, Warden.

No. 17-8968.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
John Phillip BENDER, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6051.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                       793
<INVENTORY>                                     64,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,287
<PP&E>                                         206,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 380,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   380,784
<SALES>                                        225,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,404
<CGS>                                          197,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,756
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,844)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ONHEALTH
NETWORK  COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          4,973
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                      311
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,762
<PP&E>                                          2,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,128
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          203
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,471
<SALES>                                         1,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,787
<CGS>                                             187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               30,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   54
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (28,607)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.77)



</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SOCIAL POSITIONING INPUT SYSTEMS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendants 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-422-JRG-RSP

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENTER AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendant VALVE CORPORATION respectfully submits this unopposed motion to enter 

the attached Agreed Protective Order. 

Dated: April 15, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Shaun W. Hassett, with permission 

by Dario A. Machleidt

Michael E. Jones (SBN: 10929400) 

Shaun W. Hassett (SBN: 24074372) 

Potter Minton, PC 

102 North College, Ste. 900 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

903-597-8311 (telephone)

mikejones@potterminton.com

shaunhassett@potterminton.com

Dario A. Machleidt

Kathleen R. Geyer

Christopher P. Damitio 

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton

1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3700 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 467-9600 

Facsimile: (206) 623-6793 

DMachleidt@ktslaw.com

KGeyer@ktslaw.com 

CDamitio@ktslaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Valve Corp. 

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 169
2 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on April 15, 2024 counsel for Plaintiff and 

Defendants complied with the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(i). This motion 

is unopposed by the parties. 

/s/ Shaun W. Hassett 

Shaun W. Hassett

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 04/15/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 170
Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract



 Exhibit 10.2 
 TERMINATION OF AMENDMENT TO LEASE CONTRACT 
 This
Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract (“Termination Contract”) is made as of February 28, 2012, between The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, a public corporation organized and existing by virtue of Act No. 188 of
May 11, 1942, as amended, (the “Landlord”), and Integra CI, Inc., formerly known as Integra Neurosciences P.R., Inc., a Cayman Islands company (the “Tenant”). 

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant are parties to a certain Lease Agreement dated April 11, 2003 which was amended
on October 24, 2005, amended and restated by a Lease Contract dated April 1, 2005 (registered by the Landlord on September 15, 2006), and amended by an Amendment to Lease Contract dated as of November 2, 2011 (the
“Amendment.”) Pursuant to the provisions of the Amendment, the Landlord leased to the Tenant, and the Tenant rented from the Landlord, the Additional Premises, identified as Project No. S-1212-0-77-00. 

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to terminate the Amendment executed for the Additional Premises. 

 

	 	1.	The Amendment is hereby terminated effective as of the date of this Termination Contract. 


 

	 	2.	Landlord and Tenant agree that any notice requirements and any fees or penalties for termination of the Lease are hereby waived. 


 

	 	3.	Landlord acknowledges that Tenant requested the Amendment Termination; nevertheless, Landlord hereby releases Tenant from any further responsibility, obligation or
liability under the Amendment, considering that Tenant did not receive the leased premises. 

  

	 	4.	Landlord has not inspected the premises. 









	 	5.	Landlord agrees to return the $46,109.92 ($15.235.45 Cash Receipt No. 170974- January 28, 2010 and $30,874.47 Cash Receipt No. 174805- November 16,
2011) representing the security deposit balance of this Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract. 

  

	 	6.	Except as otherwise provided in this Termination of Amendment to Lease Contract, terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed, or caused to be executed, this
Termination of Lease Agreement as of the day and year first above written. 
  

									
	LANDLORD:	 		 	TENANT:
			
	PUERTO RICO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,	 		 	INTEGRA CI, INC.,
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Armando Bustillo
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Peter J. Arduini

					
	Name: 	 	 Armando Bustillo
	 		 	Name:	 	 Peter J. Arduini

					
	Title: 	 	 Director
	 		 	Title: 	 	 President and Chief Executive Officer

					
	Date: 	 	 3/26/12
	 		 	Date: 	 	 4/2/12
Felisa TUNAC, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Randy Tunac, Deceased, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-570.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Luis Alberto TORRES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6086

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2110 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2110

To provide for the waiver of certain grounds of inadmissibility related 
 to political activity in Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland 
             for aliens married to United States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 1999

  Mr. Payne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the waiver of certain grounds of inadmissibility related 
 to political activity in Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland 
             for aliens married to United States citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Ireland Peace and 
Reconciliation Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF CERTAIN GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Attorney General or 
the Secretary of State may not apply paragraph (2)(A)(i)(I), (2)(B), or 
(3)(B) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act so as 
to render inadmissible or deportable any alien who is the spouse of a 
citizen of the United States, based upon the alien's having engaged, on 
or before the date of the enactment of this Act, in criminal conduct in 
Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland, if--
            (1) on the date the conduct occurred, the alien was a 
        member of the Irish Republican Army, the Ulster Volunteer 
        Force, or the Ulster Freedom Fighters; and
            (2) the conduct was undertaken in the alien's capacity as a 
        member of such group and for a political purpose.
    (b) Exception.--If the Attorney General or the Secretary of State 
determines that the application of subsection (a) with respect to a 
particular alien would have potentially serious adverse consequences 
for the national security of the United States, the Attorney General or 
the Secretary of State may decline to apply the subsection.
                                 <all>
```
Sydney L. THIESZEN, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 18-6405.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6836
AUTMUS PEEKS, Petitioner - Appellant, versusS. R. WITKOWSKI, Warden; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-3557-2-11) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Autmus Peeks, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Peeks v. Witkowski , No. CA-95-3557-2-11 (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GLUE WILKINS,

Petitioner

v.

HON. RICHARD A. LEWIS, PRESIDENT

JUDGE, 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 155 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 3rd day of December , 2020, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “King’s Bench Matters” is DENIED. The

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 10.01(f)


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                          GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
        1993 EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION AND RESTRICTED SHARE PLAN, AS AMENDED

     Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. hereby amends the terms of the Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc. 1993 Employee Share Option and Restricted Share Plan, as
amended (the "1993 Plan") as follows:

     Section 3.2 of the 1993 Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the
following sentence at the end of the Section:

          The Committee may delegate its authority under the Plan to grant
     Options and Restricted Shares to a one-member committee of the Board of
     Directors.

     Section 4 of the 1993 Plan is hereby amended by deleting the second
sentence of Section 4 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

          The number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Incentive Awards
     under the Plan shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 3,835,000 Shares.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00419-JRG 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF 

DEFENDANT GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Gearbox Software, L.L.C. 

(“Gearbox”), through its undersigned counsel, states the following: The parent company of 

Gearbox is The Gearbox Entertainment Company, Inc., and to Gearbox’s knowledge, no publicly 

held corporation owns 10% or more of Gearbox’s stock. 

Dated: January 9, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Michael J. Sacksteder 

Michael J. Sacksteder 

CA Bar No. 191605 (Admitted to E.D. Texas) 

Email: msacksteder@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

555 California Street, 12th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 875-2300 

Jessica M. Kaempf 

WA Bar No. 51666 (Admitted to E.D. Texas) 

Email: jkaempf@fenwick.com 

FENWICK & WEST LLP 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 34 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 303
2 

401 Union Street, 5th Floor 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Telephone: (206) 389-4510 

Attorneys for Gearbox Software, L.L.C. 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 34 Filed 01/09/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 304
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

Dated: January 9, 2024 /s/ Michael J. Sacksteder 

Michael J. Sacksteder 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 34 Filed 01/09/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 305