alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TIMOTHY DONALD HURICKS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-64

§

MISTY SUMNER, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Timothy Donald Huricks, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, CorrectionalInstitutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this

lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack

Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to

applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action

as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. To date, the parties

have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of November, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00064-MAC-ZJH Document 35 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 100
Shirley A. STEWART, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., et al.

No. 18-5106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

```

----

Updated May 31, 2013
LAN TU TRINH, petitioner, v. Kathleen Lien TRINH.

No. 17-9306.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jesus RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8881.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Maha Z. RAYAN, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 18-6540.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Order filed February 12, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00016-CR

____________

WARREN L. HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1386667

ABATEMENT ORDER

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed February 10, 2015. According to the 

record, appellant entered a plea of guilty, without an agreed recommendation on 

punishment, to aggravated robbery. On September 22, 2014, the trial court sentenced 

appellant to confinement for eighteen years in prison. Appellant filed a pro se motion for 

new trial and notice of appeal. No attorney has made an appearance on appeal on behalf 

of appellant. This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to appointment of 

counsel. Accordingly, we enter the following order: 
We ORDER the judge of the 208th District Court to immediately conduct a 

hearing at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, if any, and counsel for the State 

shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether 

appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent 

and, thus entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. The judge shall appoint appellate 

counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing 

is made, shall make any necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law and 

orders, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s order and any findings and 

conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the supplemental clerk’s record, 

and a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of any video 

teleconference shall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the 

date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

supplemental records are filed in this court. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may 

reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of President and Co Chief Executive Officer








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














Date:  August
8, 2008







/s/
Peter Hoetzinger


Peter
Hoetzinger


President
and Co Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Docket Control 

Order and Discovery Order filed by Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC and Defendants Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 48. After consideration,

and noting its joint nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that Headwater Research and Samsung’s deadline to file their proposed 

docket control order and discovery order is extended to October 19, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 49 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1835
Eminiano A. REODICA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7035.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2002 of Prophet 21, Inc. (the "Registrant") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
M. Giuliani, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss. 78m(a)
     or ss. 78o(d)); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


/s/  THOMAS M. GIULIANI
-------------------------------
Thomas M. Giuliani
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
September 30, 2002
Exhibit 32.3








Certification of Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date:  August 10, 2009








/s/ Larry Hannappel


Larry Hannappel


Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

LESFORD MARK REID §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv13

BRYAN K. DOBBS, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Lesford Mark Reid, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary at Beaumont, Texas,

filed this lawsuit pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971), against numerous defendants.

Venue in a lawsuit filed pursuant to Bivens is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Stafford v.

Briggs, 444 U.S. 527, 542 (1980). Section 1391(b) states venue is proper in any judicial district

where a defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the state in which the district is located,

or in a district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims being asserted

occurred. 

Plaintiff’s claims involve events which occurred in Jefferson County, Texas. In addition,

all of the defendants appear to reside in Jefferson County. Jefferson County is located in the Eastern

County of Texas. However, it is in the Beaumont Division rather than the Lufkin Division. As a

result, while venue with respect to this case is proper in the Eastern District, it is not proper in the

Lufkin Division.

When a case or claim is filed in the wrong district or division, the court “shall dismiss, or if

it be in the interests of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have

been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The court is of the opinion it would be the interests of justice

to transfer this case to the Lufkin Division.

Case 1:23-cv-00032-MJT-ZJH Document 4 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26
ORDER

It is accordingly ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Beaumont Division

of this court.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 24th day of January, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00032-MJT-ZJH Document 4 Filed 01/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27
Yoni CASTRO-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5829

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6264
ISMAIL ABDUR RASHID, a/k/a Ismail AbdurRashid, a/k/a Ezekiel Thomas, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. RAIBEL, Ms., Nurse; MS. GREENE, Nurse; MS. GANDY, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-726-4-OBE) Submitted: June 3, 1997 Decided: June 16, 1997 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ismail Abdur Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. James Miller Davis, Jr., Alfred Johnston Cox, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rashid v. Raibel , No. CA-96-726-4-OBE (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Frederick National 
Laboratory Advisory Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be held virtually and is open to the public. 
Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need special 
assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the meeting, 
should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be accessed from the NIH 
Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov).

    Name of Committee: Frederick National Laboratory Advisory 
Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    Date: June 27, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Ongoing and new activities at the Frederick National 
Laboratory for Cancer Research.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Wlodek Lopaczynski, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant 
Director, Office of the Director, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 
Medical Center Drive, Seventh Floor, West Tower, Room 7W514, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (240) 276-6458, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#375b5847565440775a565e5b19595e5f19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e78b8897868490a78a868e8bc9898e8fc9808891">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: FNLAC: https://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/fac/fac.htm, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 24, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11458 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

____________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

Patent Armory Inc.

2:23-cv-393

BLH Acquisition Co., LLC

BLH Acquisition Co., LLC

c/o The Corporation Trust Company

Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange St, Wilmington DE 19801

Rabicoff Law LLC

600 Mamaroneck Ave STE 400, Harrison, NY 10528

7736694590

8/31/23

Case 2:23-cv-00393-JRG Document 5 Filed 08/31/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 334
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00393-JRG Document 5 Filed 08/31/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 335
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           8,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (587)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,848
<PP&E>                                           4,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,500
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,051
<SALES>                                          2,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,631
<CGS>                                            1,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (79)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,128)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       52
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,050<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,745
<BONDS>                                            660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           227
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,894<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   2,576
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,471)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
<FN>
<F1>Includes net assets of discontinued operations of $13,147.
<F2>Accumulated Deficit - $128,414
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY               STATE OF ORGANIZATION  % OWNERSHIP
------------------               ---------------------  -----------
<S>                              <C>                    <C>
Olympia International, Inc.      U.S. Virgin Islands        100%
Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc.    Ohio                       100%
Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.  Minnesota                  100%
Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.  Delaware                   100%
Olympic Steel Receivables LLC    Delaware                   100%(a)
Olympic Steel Trading, Inc.      Ohio                       100%
Oly Steel Welding, Inc.          Michigan                   100%
Olympic Steel Iowa, Inc.         Iowa                       100%(b)
OLP LLC                          Michigan                    50%(c)
Trumark Steel & Processing LLC   Michigan                    49%(d)
</TABLE>

---------------
(a) Owned 100% by Olympic Steel, Inc. and Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.

(b) Owned 100% by Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.

(c) Owned 50% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.

(d) Owned 49% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.

                                  Page 38 of 40