alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accountants and Consultants                               Tower Place, Suite 250
                                                       3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                                                     Atlanta, Georgia 30326-1026
                                              (404) 261-7200  FAX (404) 261-9481



October 29, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549


Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the response to Section 8 of Form 10-KSB
for the event that occurred on September 19, 2001, to be filed by our former
client, Rainwire Partners, Inc. We agree with the statements made in response
to that Item insofar as they relate to our Firm.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.

Tauber & Balser, P.C.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies T-MOBILE USA, INC. 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies 05/24/2023 /s/ Philip X. Wang Philip X. Wang (CA SBN 262239)

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 858
Larry E. WALDEN, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 18-6924.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7153
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TREVOR GRANT, a/k/a Roy Arrindell, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-159-N, CA-96-305) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Trevor Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his "Motion to Vacate Judgment" and his "Motion for Modification of Sentence." We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grant , Nos. CR-92-159-N; CA-96-305 (E.D. Va. July 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-419

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 

Defendant Valve Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss, 

GRANTS the Motion. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for the Plaintiff to submit its Response 

shall be extended up to and including December 8, 2023. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 19-1 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 176
Exhibit 21.1



SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP. 
Scheule of Subsidiaries

December 31, 2010

Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. [Colorado]

Subsidiaries-[jurisdiction] - percentage owned
- Altoro Gold Corp. [British Columbia, Canada] - 100%
      - Altoro Gold (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%
            - Minera Altoro (BVI) Ltd. [British Virgin Islands]- 100%
            - Minera Andes (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] -100%
                  - Compania Minera Andes del Sur S.A. [Bolivia] - 100%
            - Minera Altoro Brazil (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%
                  - Altoro Mineracao, Ltda. [Brazil] - 100%

- Minera Chambara, S.A [Peru] - 85% owned
- Minera Solitario Peru, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Minera Bongara, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Minera Soloco, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Mineracao Solitario Brazil, Ltd [Brazil]- 100%
- Minera Solitario Mexico, S.A. [Mexico] - 100%
- Mt. Hamilton, LLC [Colorado] - 10%
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P E ALS E LE V EN T HC IRC U IT April 9, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 11989

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 05 -016 58 -C V -G E T -1 M A H M O U D R A S H A D , P la in tif f

– A p p e lla n t, v ersu s F U L T O N C O U N T Y , G E O R G I A , D e f e n d a n t– A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o r th e rn D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( A p r i l9, 2008)Honora ble J ohn Antoon II , United States District Judg e for the Middle District of * Florida , sitti ngby

designation. 2 B ef ore B A R K E T T and F A Y , C i rc ui tJudg es , and A N T O O N , D i stri ctJudg e. * P E R C U R I A M: M a h m o u d R a s h a d ap p e a ls a n a d v e r s e s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t in f a v o ro f h is e m pl oy e r , F ul t on C ounty , on hi s c l a i m s of r e l i gi ous di s c r i m i na t i on a nd r e t a l i a t i on i n v i ol at i on of T i t l e V II of the C i vi l R i gh t s A ctof 19 64 , 42 U . S . C . §§ 20 00 e- 2(a) , 3(a) . U po n revi ew of the re cord, and u po n con si dera t i on of the bri ef s a nd oral a r gum e ntof

the pa r t i e s , w e c onc l ude tha tthe di s tr i c tc our tdi d note rri n gr a nt i ng s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t to F u lto n C o u n ty o n R a s h a d ’s r e lig io u s d is c r im in a tio n c la im . H ow ever , w e r ever se as t o h i s r et al i at i on cl ai m . T he di stri ctcourtfoun d that R a s ha d ha d e s t abl i s he d f a c t s s uf f i c i e ntt o s uppor thi s pr i m a f a c i e c a s e of r e t a l i a t i on; how e ve r , the c our tf ound tha tR a s ha d c oul d notpoi ntt o s uf f i c i e nt e vi de nc e r e butt i ng F ul t on C ounty ’ s pr of f e r e d r e a s on f

ort e r m i na t i ng hi m . W e f i nd evi dence i n the re cord fr om w hi ch a r ea sonabl e tri erof fa ctcoul d con cl ud e that F ul t on C ou nty’ s proff

er ed re as on for t erm i nat i ng R as had— i nsub ordi nat i on — w as m er el y pre t extual . T hu s, sum m ary j ud gm enton the re t al i at i on cl ai m w as e rr o n e o u s . A FFI R M ED I N PA R T, R EVER SED A N D R EM A N D ED I N PA R T.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAMS DANIELS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 23 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April

, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. Furthermore,

to the extent the “Petition to Amend Supplement for Habeas Corpus General” seeks leave

to amend, it is GRANTED. In all other resp ects, the “Petition to Amend Supplement for

Habeas Corpus General” is DENIED.
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Dominion Homes, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-26817 and
333-40051) of our report dated January 27, 1999, on our audits of the financial
statements of Dominion Homes, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and 1997 and for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

Columbus, Ohio
March 19, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of XDOGS, Inc., ("the Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Kent A. Rodriguez, as
President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  July 6, 2005




/s/  Kent A. Rodriguez
----------------------------------
     Kent A. Rodriguez
     President and Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                   11,318
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                                  827,202
<DEPRECIATION>                          129,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          787,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                 224,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                  10
<COMMON>                                    158
<OTHER-SE>                              274,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            787,483
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        116,227
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            83,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       18,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          26,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      26,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             26,732
<EPS-BASIC>                              1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                              1.48


</TABLE>
Sean Gregory MITCHELL, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-7123

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Juan ZAMUDIO, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-1230

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Edinson Herrera RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 19-6252

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG   Document 11-1   Filed 11/06/23   Page 1 of 3 PageID #:  154

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG   Document 11-1   Filed 11/06/23   Page 2 of 3 PageID #:  155

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG   Document 11-1   Filed 11/06/23   Page 3 of 3 PageID #:  156
EXHIBIT 32-B

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company), and the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the Company for the period covered
the Report, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    KEITH S. BAIR        
|Keith S. Bair March 15, 2007
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NN, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March 15, 2011











/s/ Roderick R. Baty


Roderick R. Baty


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer











[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NN, Inc. and will be retained by NN, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carl Spana, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: November 13, 2009

|                                                                                        | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Carl Spana                                                                          | 
|Carl Spana, President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) |
Kevin R. CARMODY, petitioner, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 18-6160.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00285-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Before the Court is Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics 

Company, Ltd.’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions. After 

considering same, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 59-15 Filed 07/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5170
Exhibit 32.2 

 

|   | **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO** |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   | **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO** |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Roy Dar, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company 

 

 

 

|   |   |   | /s/ Roy Dar                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Roy Dar

Senior Vice President, Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

 

 

Dated: August 14, 2008
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 215

To provide discretion to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons in the transfer

of District of Columbia inmates to private contract facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide discretion to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons in the transfer of District of Columbia inmates to

private contract facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 Prison Safety Act’’.
2

•HR 215 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING DISCRETION TO BUREAU OF PRISONS

2 IN TRANSFER OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN3 MATES TO PRIVATE CONTRACT FACILITIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11201(c)(1) of the Bal5 anced Budget Act of 1997 (DC Code, sec. 24–1201(c)(1))

6 is amended—

7 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),

8 by striking ‘‘shall house’’ and inserting ‘‘may

9 house’’;

10 (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘at least

11 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘up to 2000’’; and

12 (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘at least

13 50 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘up to 50 percent’’.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

15 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact16 ment of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

Æ
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1197

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska Onorio Noriega-Sanchez, also * known as Victor Noriega, also * [UNPUBLISHED] know as Martin Rocha, also known * as Jose Lamberto Noriega-Leon, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 6, 2002 Filed: December 23, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Onorio Noriega-Sanchez appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Nebraska after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing-2- methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. The district court sentenced Noriega-Sanchez to 120 months imprisonment, the statutory minimum, and 5 years supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising for reversal that NoriegaSanchez’s sentence is too severe. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. Initially, we note that Noriega-Sanchez stipulated to a drug quantity that triggered the imposition of the statutory minimum sentence. See United States v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal). In any event, Noriega-Sanchez’s severity argument fails, because mandatory minimum penalties for drug offenses do not violate the Eighth Amendment. See United States v. Johnson , 988 F.2d 859 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). Having found no nonfrivolous issues following our independent review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We further deny Noriega-Sanchez’s motion for appointment of new counsel. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sec. 1350, as adopted), Patrick J. ODea, the Chief Executive Officer of Peets Coffee & Tea, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 3, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Annual Report ) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 18th day of March, 2010.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    PATRICK J.
ODEA
|Patrick J. ODea       
|Chief Executive Officer

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Peets Coffee & Tea, Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.