alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UsS- DISTRICT COURT EASTERN ISTRICT 0F TEX S

FEB 1 2023

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION b» ty 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § No. 1:23-CR- /D

§ Judge e, A.orh

AHMED ABDALLA ALLAM §

INDICTMENT

THE UNITED STATES GRAND JURY CHARGES:

Count One

Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)(2)(A)

(Possession of a Firearm in a School

Zone)

On or about the January 29, 2023, in the Eastern District of Texas, the defendant,

Ahmed Abdalla Allam, did knowingly possess a firearm, that is, one (1) Diamondback

Firearms, Model DB15, multi-caliber rifle bearing serial number DB2615207, that had

moved in interstate and foreign commerce, within a distance of 1,000 feet of the grounds

of St. Anthony Cathedral Basilica School, a place that the defendant knew and had

reasonable cause to believe was a school zone.

In violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)(2)(A).

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SEEK CRIMINAL FORFEITURE

Criminal Forfeiture Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

As the result of committing the felony offense in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d)

alleged in Count One of this indictment, defendant Ahmed Abdalla Allam shall forfeit

to the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), 26 U.S.C. §

Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 9 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 21
5872, and 49 U.S.C. § 80303, all firearms and ammunition involved in the offense,

including but not limited to the following:

one (1) Diamondback Firearms, Model DB15, multi-caliber rifle bearing

serial number DB2615207; one (1) thirty-round magazine; and one-hundred

and fif y (150) rounds of .556 caliber ammunition.

A TRUE BILL

BRIT FEATHERSTON

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

JOHN B. ROSS

Assistant United States Attorney

Date

Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 9 Filed 02/01/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 22
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § No. E23-C - If)

§ Judge Q e ~CAHMED ABDALLA ALLAM §

NOTICE OF PENALTY

Count One

Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)(2)(A) and 924(a)(4).

Penalty: Imprisonment of not more than five (5) years, a fine not to exceed

$250,000, or twice the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the

victim, whichever is greater, or both; a ter of supervised release of

not more than three (3) years.

Special Assessment: $ 100.00

Case 1:23-cr-00010-MAC-ZJH Document 9 Filed 02/01/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 23
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

STATE OF Alabama
         ________________

COUNTY OF Shelby 
         _______________


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Bart Starr, a Director of JUST FOR
FEET, INC.,an Alabama corporation, do constitute and appoint Harold Ruttenberg
and Eric L. Tyra, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for me in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for JUST FOR FEET, INC. for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998, pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto and other documents
in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and
all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes
as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or
substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 21st day of
April 1998.


                              /s/ Bart Starr
                              -------------------------------
                              Bart Starr



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

    BEFORE me this 21st day of April 1998, came Bart Starr, personally known to
me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of
Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.

                             Doris Lee Sewell
                             _________________________________
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of Alabama 
                                     ________________________

                             My Commission Expires:
                            
                             8/30/99
                             _________________________________
Alonzo D. MARSHALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5823.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1992 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1992

 To provide for a reduction in regulatory costs by maintaining Federal 
 average fuel economy standards applicable to automobiles in effect at 
                  current levels until changed by law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1999

 Mr. Klink (for himself, Mr. Upton, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Deal of Georgia, 
  Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Towns, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. 
 Sawyer, Mr. Regula, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
 McHugh, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Camp, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. 
  Brown of Ohio, Mr. Smith of Michigan, and Mr. Stump) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a reduction in regulatory costs by maintaining Federal 
 average fuel economy standards applicable to automobiles in effect at 
                  current levels until changed by law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS.

    The average fuel economy standards established, whether directly or 
indirectly, under regulations promulgated by the Secretary of 
Transportation under section 32901 et seq. of title 49, United States 
Code, prior to the date of the enactment of this Act for automobiles 
(as defined in section 32901 of such title) shall continue to apply 
without amendment, change, or other modification of any kind for the 
model years and the applicable automobiles specified in the regulation 
last promulgated for such automobiles and for each model year 
thereafter until such regulations are specifically amended or otherwise 
changed by law enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Javier PORTILLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7050.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      574,743
COMMITMENTS
  95,257   29,364  162,153  296,569  357,365  553,979  548,882   20,764   25,861

CHANGES FROM 11/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -12,012)
   2,267    1,288   -7,140   -8,587   -5,988  -13,460  -11,840    1,448     -172

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.6      5.1     28.2     51.6     62.2     96.4     95.5      3.6      4.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      147)
      39       30       61       71       61      140      127
```

----

Updated November 15, 2013
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10365

Summary Calendar

KEVIN REID ALTHOUSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DALLAS COUNTY D ISTRICT COURT, Clerk’s Office (Jim Hamlin); DAVID

DANIELS, Criminal Manager

- Dallas County District Clerk’s Office;

CARMEN VENUS, Deputy Clerk

- Dallas County District Clerk’s Office;

CLAIRE MOSES, Deputy Clerk

- Dallas County District Clerk’s Office;

VIRGIL MELTON, Court Coordinator 265th Judicial District Court,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CV-2225-M

August 5, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kevin Reid Althouse, Texas pri s oner #861608, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and

1915A(b)(1). Althouse contends that the district court erred in

dismissing his claims for denial of access to the courts.1 McDonald v. Steward , 132 F.3d 225, 230-31 (5th Cir. 1998)

(quoting Eason v. Thaler , 73 F.3d 1322, 1328 (5th Cir. 1996)).

2 See Taylor v. Johnson

, 257 F.3d 470, 472 (5th Cir. 2001)

(per curiam) (stating that a complaint is “frivolous” if it lacks

an arguable basis in law or fact).

3 See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

4 See Carson v. Johnson , 112 F.3d 818, 822-23 (5th Cir.

1997); Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996).

5 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

2 “[B]efore a pri soner may prevail on a claim that his

constitutional right of access to the courts was violated, he must

demonstrate ‘that his position as a litigant was prejudiced by his

denial of access to the cou rts.’” 1 Because Althouse failed to

assert that the defendants’ alleged actions prejudiced his position

as a litigant, the district court did not err in dismissing

Althouse’s complaint as frivolous. 2

Althouse’s appeal is likewise entirely without merit and must

be dismissed as frivolous. 3 T his dismissal of Althouse’s appeal as

frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit as

frivolous constitute two strikes against Althouse for purposes of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 4 I f one other action or appeal filed by

Althouse is dismissed on the g round that it is frivolous,

malicious, or fails to state a claim, he will be barred from

bringing a civil action or appeal as a prisoner proceeding in forma

pauperis unless he is un der imminent danger of serious physical

injury. 53

APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2284

To provide that certain costs of private foundations in removing hazardous

substances shall be treated as qualifying distributions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1999

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself and Mrs. NORTHUP) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide that certain costs of private foundations in removing hazardous substances shall be treated as qualifying

distributions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN COSTS OF PRIVATE FOUNDATION IN

4 REMOVING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES TREAT5 ED AS QUALIFYING DISTRIBUTION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable year

7 beginning after December 31, 1999, the distributable

8 amount of a private foundation for such taxable year for

9 purposes of section 4942 of the Internal Revenue Code

10 of 1986 shall be reduced (but not below zero) by any
2

•HR 2284 IH

1 amount paid or incurred (or set aside) by such private

2 foundation for the investigatory costs and direct costs of

3 removal or taking remedial action with respect to a haz4 ardous substance released at a facility which was owned

5 or operated by such private foundation.

6 (b) LIMITATIONS.—Subsection (a) shall only apply to

7 costs—

8 (1) incurred with respect to hazardous sub9 stances disposed of at a facility owned or operated

10 by the private foundation but only if—

11 (A) such facility was transferred to such

12 foundation by bequest before December 11,

13 1980, and

14 (B) the active operation of such facility by

15 such foundation was terminated before Decem16 ber 12, 1980, and

17 (2) which were not incurred pursuant to a

18 pending order issued to the private foundation uni19 laterally by the President or the President’s assignee

20 under section 106 of the Comprehensive Environ21 mental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

22 of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9606), or pursuant to a non23 consensual judgment against the private foundation

24 issued in a governmental cost recovery action under

25 section 107 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 9607).
3

•HR 2284 IH

1 (c) HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.—For purposes of this

2 section, the term ‘‘hazardous substance’’ has the meaning

3 given such term by section 101(14) of the Comprehensive

4 Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

5 of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601(14)).

Æ
Willie Kipyego BUTIA, Petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 19-786

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 32032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI RFA: Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Integrative 
Biology Initiative: Discovery of AMD Pathobiology using Patient-
Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Retinal Pigment 
Epithelium.
    Date: May 26, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jennifer C. Schiltz, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892, 240-276-5864, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f757a717176797a6d316c7c7776736b655f71767731787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec86898282858a899ec29f8f8485809896ac828584c28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 22, 2022.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11335 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Alfonso Ignacio VIGGERS, petitioner, v. Maria De La Merced VIGGERS.

No. 17-1560.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Paul Scott KLEIN, petitioner, v. Brian WILLIAMS, Sr., et al.

No. 17-8753.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

FRANCIS RAIA,

Appellant

(D.N.J. No. 2

- 18

- cr

- 00657

- 001)

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge

, AMBRO and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges

1. Unopposed Motion to Amend Opinion

ORDER

The foregoing Unopposed Motion to Amend Opinion is GRANTED as follows: The

April 2, 2020 precedential opinion in United States v. Raia , No. 20

- 1033, is VACATED

. An amended opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order.

By the Court:

s/ D. Broo ks Smith

Chief Circuit Judge

Dated: April 8, 2020

CJG/cc: Mark E. Coyne, Esq.

Steven G. Sanders, Esq.

Jenny Chung, Esq.

David M. Dugan, Esq.

Lee Vartan, Esq.

Alan L. Zegas, Esq.
**Exhibit 32.1****Section 1350 Certifications**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on suchofficer’s knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.        Date: November 14, 2007 /s/ Matthew H. Knight   Matthew H. Knight   Chief Executive Officer
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-419

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) respectfully submits this Motion for a 8-day 

Extension of Time to Respond to Valve Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss for Improper 

Venue, filed at Docket 45.

Plaintiff’s Response is currently due March 13, 2024.

Counsel for Plaintiff has conferred with counsel for Defendant, and have agreed to extend the 

deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to March 21, 2024. The present request is not offered for 

the purpose of delay or advantage.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 49 Filed 03/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 922
Dated: March 11, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with 

opposing counsel prior to filing this Motion, and counsel indicated its agreement with the relief 

requested herein.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document has been 

served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 49 Filed 03/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 923
EXHIBIT 15

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 237
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 2 

On information and belief, Lenovo Moto G Power mobile phones contain a Micron MT29046 multi-chip module with LPDDR4 SDRAM (Z11N die), 3D NAND Flash (B16A die)controller (PS8226 die). A 3D NAND flash array is a cubic memory array. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 3 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of horizontal select lines; 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of wordlines, which are horizonal select lines. 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 5 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of vertical select lines; 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of vertical select lines. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

a plurality of memory cells, each memory cell adjacent to a horizontal select line and adjacent to a vertical select line; and 

The 3D NAND Flash array has a plurality of floating gate memory cells, each memory cehorizontal select line and adjacent to a vertical select line. 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 6 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 2
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 2
Page 8 

orthogonal to each other. 

Techinsights, “Intel 29F01T2ANCTH2 64-Layer 256Gb 3D NAND Flash”, report AM

March 2018 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-16 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 2