CAUSE NO.------

PRUVIT VENTURES, INC., § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

Plaintiff, 

v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

ALEXIS BRADY, 

Defendant. COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Pruvit Ventures, Inc. ("Pruvit"), and files this its Verified Original 

Petition and Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction, and Permanent 

Injunction against Defendant Alexis Brady. In support thereof, Pruvit respectfully shows the Court 

the following: 

I. 

DISCOVERY LEVEL AND RULE 47 STATEMENT 

1. Pruvit intends to conduct discovery under Level 3, pursuant to Rule 190.3 of the 

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Pruvit affirmatively pleads that this lawsuit is not governed 

by the expedited action process under Rule 169 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, as 

Pruvit states it seeks monetary relief over $1,000,000.00, including damages of any kind, penalties, 

costs, expenses, pre-judgment interest and attorney fees, and for all other relief to which Pruvit 

may be entitled. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 47(c)(4), (d). As this lawsuit is at its inception and discovery 

has not yet been conducted, Pruvit reserves the right to modify and/or amend the foregoing 

statement of relief. 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 1 

Filed: 8/21/2023 1:02 PM

Michael Gould

District Clerk

Collin County, Texas

By Amy Mathis Deputy

471-04845-2023 Envelope ID: 78735785

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 33
II. 

PARTIES 

2. Pruvit Ventures, Inc. is a domestic corporation authorized to conduct business in 

the state of Texas with a principal place of business located in Collin County, Texas at 901 Sam 

Rayburn Hwy, Melissa, Texas 75454. 

3. Defendant Alexis Brady ("Brady") is an individual and a resident of Sununit 

County, Colorado. Brady resides at her home address of 112 Illinois Gultch Road, Unit 8-5, 

Breckemidge, CO 80424, and may be served with process by serving the Texas Secretary of State, 

1019 Brazos Street, Austin, Texas 78701 as her agent for service, because Defendant Alexis Brady 

has engaged in business in Texas but has not designated or maintained a registered agent for service 

of process in Texas. TEX. C1v. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ 17.044(b). Alternatively, Alexis Brady may 

be served at her residence located at 112 Illinois Gultch Road, Unit 8-5, Breckemidge, CO 80424. 

III. 

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 

4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter herein as the amount m 

controversy is within the jurisdictional limits of the Court. See TEX. R. C1v. P. 47(b). 

5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Brady under the Texas Long-Arm Statute 

(Tux. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 17.042, et. seq.) because Defendant contracted with a Texas 

resident, has committed a tort, in whole or in part, against Pruvit in Texas, as described in greater 

detail herein. Pruvit's claims and causes of action arise out of Brady's purposeful actions directed 

towards Pruvit in the state of Texas. Further Brady and Pruvit contractually agreed that all disputes 

between the Parties are subject to Texas law and shall be resolved in Courts located in Collin 

County, Texas. 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page2 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 34
6. Venue is proper in Collin County, Texas pursuant to §15.002(a)(l) of the TEXAS 

CIVIL PRACTICES & REMEDIES CODE as all or substantially all of the events giving rise to Pruvit' s 

causes of action arose in Collin County and Defendant agreed to courts in Collin County, Texas. 

as the exclusive forum for resolution of disputes. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ 15.002(a)(l ). 

IV. 

STATEMENT OF FACTS 

7. Pruvit is a worldwide leader in ketone technology and a pioneer in selling ketone 

products. Pruvit is a community-based marketing company that has independent promoters, called 

Pruvers, that market and sell its unique products throughout the country. 

8. Over time, as senior Pruvit promoters bring in new promoters, an up-line and downline structure is created. In many cases, Pruvit' s successful Pruvers have created extensive 

downlines of fellow Pruvers totaling in the hundreds. 

9. Pruvit invests significant amounts of time, money, and resources into protecting its 

technology and the integrity of its community of representatives. When a Pruver leaves Pruvit, it 

can adversely affect both the compensation of other Pruvers as well as the profits of Pruvit. 

10. As part of Pruvit's business, it holds an exclusive sub-license to market ketone 

products that utilize BHB salts. For years, Pruvit has actively marketed and sold a product line that 

utilizes this ketone technology. In order to protect this license, the technology, Pruvit's customers, 

and its Pruvers, Pruvit requires each Pruver to agree to its Statement of Policies and Procedures 

(the "Pruver Agreement"). To maintain active Pruver status and to be eligible for any commissions 

and/or bonuses, Pruvers must agree to the terms of the current Pruver Agreement, which Brady 

did. 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page3 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 35
11. The Pruver Agreement, in pertinent part, prohibits a Pruver (such as Brady), during 

the term of the agreement and for a period of time following separation from Pruvit, from the 

following: 

• Promoting products for other companies that compete with products 

offered by Pruvit; 

• Recruiting Pruvit promoters and customers for any other direct sales or 

network marketing business; 

• Engaging in discourteous, deceptive, misleading, unethical or immoral 

conduct and practices in connection with Pruvit and its products and 

services; and 

• Promoting non-Pruvit products or services on the same social media site 

as Pruvit's products. 

12. As Pruvers continue to rise within the ranks of Pruvit, they are eligible to be 

elevated to the Ownership Pool. With that elevation, the Pruver, such as Brady, agrees to the terms 

and conditions of the Promoter Ownership Pool Agreement in exchange for additional 

compensation ("Pool Agreement"). Under Pool Agreement, the Pruver agrees to the following: 

• Promoter shall not directly or indirectly, or through an affiliate of under a 

contract with another entity, advertise, market, promote, accept orders for, sell, 

ship or distribute any products or services of any umelated entity in the "Direct 

Sales/Network Marketing" space. 

• Promoter further agrees that for a one (1) year period, immediately following 

termination of this Agreement, Promoter shall not initiate contact with, recruit, 

solicit, sponsor, or induce or attempt to initiate contact with, recruit, solicit, 

sponsor, or induce, any Company customer or Promoter to leave the Company, 

cease being a customer or Promoter of Company, or participate in or become 

a Promoter or distributor of any other company, including without limitation 

Promotor' s business ventures. 

• Promoter further agrees not to disparage Pruvit. 

• Promoter further agrees that during the term of the Agreement and one ( 1) year 

period, immediately following termination of this Agreement, Promoter shall 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC. 'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page4 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 36
breached section 12 of the Pool Agreement where Brady agreed that she would not initiate contact 

with, recruit, solicit, sponsor, or attempt to initiate contact with any customer or promoter of Pruvit 

for a year after her termination. Defendant is aggressively recruiting Pruvit's customers and 

promoters in further violation of her contractual obligations to Pruvit. Defendant Brady engaged 

in this conduct prior to and after the tennination of her promoter relationships with Pruvit. 

17. Defendant has recruited current Pruvers to join Competitors via Facebook posts, 

Milkshake, Instagrarn, text messages, and personal interactions. Defendant's various online and 

social media accounts are replete with examples of such breaches. Defendant has posted videos 

promoting Competitors over Pruvit and invited cunent Pruvers to participate and comment. For 

example: 

~ Alexis Brady 

~ May1 1 ·~ 

Who wants to check out my FREE ebook to 

learn how to get started in Affiliate 

Marketing & generate true passive income 

in 1-2 hours a day?! ~ 

0 0 64 141 comments 

19. Defendant is aware that the individuals she is recruiting away from Pruvit are 

PLAINTI FF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page6 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 37
subject to and bound by non-competition and confidentiality clauses in the Pruver Agreement and 

the Pool Agreement - the same contractual obligations that Defendant is bound to follow. 

Defendant is also bound by her Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement. Despite such 

knowledge and awareness, Defendant has proceeded to actively solicit other Provers and 

encourage them to leave Pruvit and purchase and sell competing products. 

20. Pruvit recently became aware of Defendant's improper and malicious efforts 

because some Provers have rebuffed Defendant. The full breadth of Defendant's misconduct is 

unknown. 

21. Defendant's conduct constitutes a breach of the Pruver Agreement, the Pool 

Agreement and the Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement. Defendant's conduct also 

constitutes tortious interference with Plaintiff's contracts, specifically the agreements with 

Plaintiffs Provers and its current and future customers. There is also a reasonable probability 

Pruvit would have recruited and contracted with more Provers and customers had Defendant not 

breached her contractual obligations. 

22. Discovery of Competitors' distributor and customer lists is expected to reveal 

Provers and Pruvit customers who were not only recruited, but left Pruvit, and joined Competitors 

due to Defendant's improper conduct. Pruvit also anticipates that upon the completion of its 

investigation, additional entities and/or individuals will be identified to have participated or 

conspired with Defendant in the misconduct made a subject of this suit. 

v. 

CAUSES OF ACTION 

23. The factual allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs are incorporated herein 

by reference for all purposes as if set forth in full: 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, JNC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Pagc7 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 38
COUNT 1--BREACH OF CONTRACT 

24. Pruvit and Defendant entered into the above-referenced Pruver Agreement, Pool 

Agreement and the Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement. The Pruver Agreement and 

Pool Agreement specifically provide, in pertinent part, that Defendant is not to: (1) promote 

products for other companies that compete with products offered by Pruvit; (2) solicit Pruvit 

promoters and customers for any other direct sales or network marketing business; (3) engage in 

discourteous, deceptive, misleading, unethical or immoral conduct and practices in connection 

with Pruvit and its products and services; and (4) promote non-Pruvit products or services on the 

same social media site as Pruvit' s products and services. Pruvit performed under its agreements 

with Defendant by supplying her with services and products to sell and by giving her a platform 

to generate income. In the Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, Defendant also agreed 

to not participate or engage with any multi-level marketing or direct selling company for one year 

. after termination. 

25. Defendant Brady has breached the Pruver Agreement, Pool Agreement and 

Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, by promoting and selling competitive products, 

including on the same social media site as those products and services of Pruvit, and recruiting 

other Pruvers for her own benefit and/or that of a competitor. Defendant further breached the 

Agreements by promoting and selling Competitors' products to current and former Pruvers and 

customers of Pruvit. Pruvit expects that more breaches will be revealed through discovery in this 

case. 

26. As a result of these breaches, Pruvit has suffered harm, and will continue to suffer 

actual damage or loss, including lost profits, loss of good will and harm to customer relationships, 

and loss of future contracts and business prospects, all for which Defendant Brady is liable. 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC. 'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page8 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 39
COUNT 2-TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH EXISTING CONTRACTS 

27. Pruvit was a party to valid contracts with third parties, including its Pruvers and 

customers. 

28. Defendant Brady has willfully and intentionally interfered with those contracts by 

encouraging current Pruvers and customers of Pruvit to cease doing business with Pruvit. Pruvit 

fully expects that additional specific Pruvers and contracts will be revealed through discovery in 

this case. Defendant knew these third parties had contracts with Pruvit when she contacted them. 

Defendant's interference with Pruvit' s contracts proximately caused Pruvit actual damages and 

losses. Moreover, Defendant's interference has caused, and continued to cause, disruption to 

Pruvit' s business. 

COUNT 3-TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE RELATIONS 

29. Additionally, there was a reasonable probability that Pruvit would have entered into 

contracts with Pruvers and customers, had Defendant Brady not intentionally interfered with the 

formation of those relationships. Defendant Brady intentionally interfered with those relationships. 

Defendant's interference with Pruvit' s prospective contracts proximately caused Pruvit actual 

damages and losses, including loss of those contracts and sales generated therefrom. Moreover, 

Defendant Brady's interference has caused, and continues to cause, disruption to Pruvit' s business. 

VI. 

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 

30. The factual allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs are incorporated herein 

by reference for all purposes as if set forth in full: 

31. Pruvit's Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction 

is authorized by Sections 65.011(2) and (3) of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE. 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page9 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 40
32. Pruvit is likely to suffer permanent and irreparable harm if an injunction is not 

entered. There is no other adequate remedy at law and Pruvit seeks the equitable intervention of 

this Court. Therefore, for the foregoing reasons as stated above in this Petition, Pruvit requests the 

Court issue a Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary Injunction immediately restraining and 

enjoining the conduct outlined in the preceding paragraphs. 

33. Conduct to be Restrained. In order to preserve the status quo pending the final 

trial on the merits of this case, Pruvit asks this Court to issue a Temporary Restraining Order and 

Temporary Injunction to restrain and enjoin Defendant Brady, both directly and indirectly, as well 

as her respective agents, employees, servants, attorneys, representatives, affiliates, entities, 

successors, and assigns, and any and all other persons and entities under their control and/or 

direction, or acting in active concert and participation with them, from engaging in any of the 

following: 

a. Inducing, in any mam1er, any existing customer of Pruvit to terminate 

his/her/its business relationship with Pruvit; 

b. Inducing, in any marmer, any existing promoter of Pruvit to terminate 

his/her/its business relationship with Pruvit; 

c. Inducing, in any manner, any existing promoter of Pruvit to violate or 

breach the terms of his/her/its Pruver Agreement; 

d. Directly or indirectly recruiting, in any manner, any other Pruvit 

promoters and customers for any other direct sales or network marketing 

business; 

e. Promoting, in any manner, non-Pruvit products or services on any social 

media sites or platforms used to promote Pruvit' s products previously; 

f. Directly or indirectly disclosing or otherwise using, in any marmer, any 

confidential and/or proprietary information relating to Pruvit or any of 

its products and services; 

g. Promoting or marketing Competitors' products, to existing customers 

and promoters of Pruvit; and 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 10 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 41
h. Making and/or publishing false or misleading claims about Pruvit's 

products. 

34. Plaintiff is Likely to Succeed on the Merits. Pruvit has a probable right to relief 

upon final hearing. In particular, Pruvit will present evidence of Defendant Brady's breach of and 

interference with contracts and evidence of causation and the extent of Pruvit's damages. 

35. Harm to Plaintiff is Imminent and Irreparable. Harm to Pruvit is imminent and 

irreparable. Defendant Brady's conduct is ongoing and has caused and will continue to cause 

irreparable harm to Pruvit. The damage to Pruvit' s reputation and that of its products, as well as 

the continuing disruption caused by Defendant Brady to Pruvit's business is immeasurable. 

Moreover, so long as Defendant Brady's conduct continues, it will be impossible to identify and 

calculate the extent of the harm to Pruvit and quantify Pruvit' s damages. 

36. No Adequate Remedy at Law. In the absence of injunctive relief, Pruvit has no 

adequate remedy at law. Breach of non-compete, non-disclosure, and non-solicitation agreements 

is the epitome of irreparable harm justifying injunctive relief. Further, Defendant is not a Texas 

resident and upon information and belief lacks property or assets in Texas sufficient to satisfy a 

judgment for damages. It is essential that the Court immediately restrain Defendant Brady from 

continuing the conduct described herein. Pruvit is willing to post a bond in accordance with TEX. 

R. CIV. P. 684. 

37. Hearing. In compliance with the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, Pruvit is 

entitled to a hearing providing the relief requested above to give it an opportunity to be heard by 

the Court. Pruvit requests that the Court set a hearing to consider whether temporary injunctive 

relief should be granted pending a trial on the merits. 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 11 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 42
38. Permanent Injunctive Relief. Pruvit further pleads for a permanent injunction, 

enjoining Defendant Brady from engaging in the above acts for the appropriate time period as 

agreed by the parties, following a trial of this cause. 

VII. 

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT 

3 9. All conditions precedent to Pruvit' s right to bring the above causes of action, and 

for recovery requested herein, have been performed, excused, or otherwise already occurred. 

VIII. 

EXEMPLARY DAMAGES 

40. Pruvit is entitled to exemplary damages for Defendant Brady's intentional conduct, 

because such acts were committed with that level of mental culpability for which Texas law allows 

a jury to impose punitive damages. Pruvit seeks an award of such damages. 

IX. 

ATTORNEY FEES 

41. Pruvit seeks the recovery of attorney's fees pursuant to TEX C1v. PRAC. & REM. 

CODE§ 38.001. 

x. 

PRAYER 

40. Pruvit therefore requests that Defendant Alexis Brady be cited to appear and 

answer, and that upon final hearing, Pruvit be awarded the following: 

(1) A Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction 

be issued restraining and enjoining Defendant Brady, both directly and indirectly, 

as well as her respective agents, employees, servants, attorneys, representatives, 

affiliates, entities, successors, and assigns, and any and all other persons and entities 

under their control and/or direction, or acting in active concert and participation 

with them, from the conduct described herein; 

(2) Pruvit be granted judgment against Defendant Alexis Brady for damages within the 

jurisdictional limits of this Court; 

PLAINTIFFPRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 12 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 43
(3) Defendant Alexis Brady be disgorged of any profits obtained because of the subject 

breaches and improper conduct referenced herein; 

( 4) Pruvit be granted judgment against Defendant Alexis Brady for exemplary damages 

within the jurisdictional limits of this Comi; 

(5) Pruvit be granted judgment against Defendant Alexis Brady for reasonable and 

necessary attorney's fees, costs of suit, and pre- and post-judgment interest; and 

(6) Pruvit be granted such other relief, at law or in equity, as is just and proper. 

Respectfully submitted, 

SCHEEF & STONE, LLP 

byron.hemy@solidcounsel.com 

KELLYE. KLEIST 

State Bar No. 24046229 

kelly.kleist@solidcounsel.com 

2600 Network Blvd., Suite 400 

Frisco, Texas 75034 

Tel.: (214) 472-2100 

Fax: (214) 472-2150 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

PRUVIT VENTURES, INC. 

PLAINTIFF' PRUVIT VENTURES, INC.'S VERIFIED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJlJNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 13 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 44
ST ATE OF TEXAS 

COUNTY OF COLLIN 

VERIFICATION 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Before me, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared Jenifer Grace, 

who, after being duly sworn, stated under oath that she is the Chief Legal Officer for Pruvit 

Ventures, Inc., that she has read Plaintiff Pruvit Ventures, Inc. 's Verified Original Petition and 

Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction 

(the "Application"), and that she is authorized to make this verification and apply for injunctive 

relief. Jenifer Grace fmiher stated that every statement of fact contained in the Statement of Facts 

(Paragraphs 7-22), along with the excerpted post in paragraphs 13 and 18, are, upon information 

and belief, true and correct. 

e, Chief Legal Officer 

es, Inc. 

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on the ~ day of August, 2023, to 

certify which witness my hand and official seal. 

,,,':.'iV~~1,,_ KARI STANISH .:o ~····C9:4;.. 

:~/..A:,·-~; Notary Public, State of Texas 

~~:. .. "11'\.lj§ Comm. Expires 03·30·2024 

.-,,,:r,m;~ .$' Notary 10 128939336 

Notary Public for the State of Texas 

PLAINTIFF PRUVIT VENTURES, I NC. 'S VERJFI ED ORIGINAL PETITION 

AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, 

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Page 14 

Case 4:23-cv-00787-SDJ Document 2 Filed 09/01/23 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 45