alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11177]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m. on Thursday, May 26, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: May 19, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11177 Filed 5-19-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Jason A. LENZ, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6880.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/04/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      501,145
COMMITMENTS
  72,073   50,724  144,901  242,128  284,478  459,102  480,103   42,043   21,042

CHANGES FROM 11/27/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,220)
     951   -1,351   -1,971    8,573   12,075    7,553    8,753     -333   -1,533

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.4     10.1     28.9     48.3     56.8     91.6     95.8      8.4      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      148)
      34       35       52       67       66      133      128
```

----

Updated December 7, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-17-2-MAC

'

CHRISTOPHER HAYWOOD '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Information filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Christopher Haywood, is 

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Information charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 

Case 9:23-cr-00017-MAC-ZJH Document 100 Filed 07/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 544
2

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute Cocaine and 18 U.S.C. § 2 – Aiding and 

Abetting.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of July, 2024.

Case 9:23-cr-00017-MAC-ZJH Document 100 Filed 07/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 545
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,575                  19,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,512                   6,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,023                   1,220
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       4,488,373               4,223,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                 331,114                 262,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,323,832               4,119,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                      2,002,789               1,901,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    368,373                 368,373
<COMMON>                                             6                       6
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,444,108               1,355,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,323,832               4,119,224
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,512                 150,648
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,007                  43,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,985                  31,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,263                  28,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,257                  47,594
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,124                  45,043
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,807                  36,836
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.89                    0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87                    0.58


</TABLE>
I

★

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2125

To repeal the limitation on judicial jurisdiction imposed by section 377 of

the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas (for herself, Mr. BECERRA, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. LEE, Mr. FRANK of

Massachusetts, Ms. BERKLEY, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr.

REYES, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr.

ENGEL, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To repeal the limitation on judicial jurisdiction imposed by

section 377 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legal Amnesty Res5 toration Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2125 IH1S

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF LIMITATION ON LEGALIZATION

2 LITIGATION.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 245A(f)(4) of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255a(f)(4)) is

5 amended by striking subparagraph (C).

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 subsection (a) shall be effective as if included in the enact8 ment of section 201 of the Immigration Reform and Con9 trol Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–603; 100 Stat. 3394).

Æ
Brandi K. STOKES, petitioner, v. Christopher Lance CORSBIE, et al.

No. 18-470.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTitan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc Rubin, M.D.,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California,this 7th day of November, 2008. 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Farrell, J.D., Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for theperiod certified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State ofCalifornia, this 7th day of November, 2008.
and accompanying documentation, we have no way of properly evaluating

the petition."). For this reason, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

# ,eg-Ot ‘ Hardesty wasCilska r Parraguirre 

### nr-s Douglas J. J. , C.J.

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Emilio Eavalio Arenas Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2186 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2186

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Rhinovirus drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 1999

 Mr. Becerra introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Rhinovirus drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``    9902.32.97    Trans-(2R,        Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     3S,4S,5S) -(4-                                                          31/2002          ''
                     {2-(4-                                                                                    .
                     Fluorobenzyl)-6-
                     methyl-5-[(5-
                     methylisoxazole-
                     3-
                     carbonyl)amino]-
                     4-
                     oxoheptanoylami
                     no}-5-(2-
                     oxopyrrolidin-3-
                     yl)pent-2-enoic
                     acid ethyl
                     ester (CAS No.
                     223537-30-2)
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2931.00.60)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Robert W. DOUGHERTY, petitioner, v. Ivan T. GILMORE, Warden.

No. 18M81.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RESTORATION 1 CFL, LLC A/A/O 

ALEX TCHEKMEIAN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-755

ASI PREFERRED INSURANCE 

CORPORATION,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County,

Bob LeBlanc, Judge.

Jordan Mejeur, of Cohen Grossman, 

Maitland; and Gray R. Proctor, of Fox & 

Loquasto, P.A., Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellant.

Kenneth B. Bell, Lauren V. Purdy, of 

Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., 

Tallahassee; Anthony Russo and Thomas 

A. Keller, of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig, 

LLP, Tampa, Appellee.

WALLIS, J.

Restoration 1 CFL, LLC ("Appellant"), a/a/o Alex Tchekmeian ("the insured"),

appeals the trial court's dismissal of its breach of contract action against the insured's 
2

homeowner's insurance provider, ASI Preferred Insurance Corp. ("ASI"). After suffering 

a covered loss, the insured assigned his claim benefits to Appellant in exchange for its 

provision of emergency water cleanup services. Wells Fargo, the insured's mortgagee, 

did not consent to the assignment. Appellant then filed suit against ASI for unpaid or 

underpaid invoices, asserting standing pursuant to the assignment. ASI moved to 

dismiss, arguing the following provision in its insurance policy rendered the assignment 

invalid: "No assignment of claim benefits, regardless of whether made before loss or after 

loss, shall be valid without the written consent of all 'insureds', all additional insureds and 

all mortgagee(s) named in this policy." The trial court granted the motion to dismiss, 

stating, "[I]t is not unlawful to require the mortgagee's consent to an assignment of 

benefits."

We recently affirmed the Office of Insurance Regulation's disapproval of identical 

anti-assignment language in an insurance policy. Sec. First Ins. Co. v. Fla. Office of Ins. 

Regulation, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D2543, D2543 (Fla. 5th DCA Dec. 1, 2017). Because here, 

as in that case, the clause improperly restricts the assignment of post-loss claim benefits,

contrary to Florida law, we reverse the dismissal of Appellant's action and remand for 

further proceedings. See id.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Patricia MORRISON, petitioner, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC., et al.

No. 17-1537.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20044 Conference Calendar

THOMAS P. BUDNICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CV-3332

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Thomas P. Budnick appeals the district court’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his in forma pauperis (IFP) complaint against the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). We have reviewed the record and Budnick’s brief and find no reversible

error. See Budnick v. Nat’l Aeronautics and Space Admin. , No. H97-CV-3332 (S.D. Tex., Dec. 19, 1997). The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Budnick’s motion is DENIED.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/12/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      434,750
COMMITMENTS
 121,340  189,698   77,997  222,197  152,239  421,534  419,934   13,216   14,816

CHANGES FROM 03/05/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,873)
  18,808    7,023   10,515    4,741   16,854   34,064   34,392  -13,191  -13,519

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.9     43.6     17.9     51.1     35.0     97.0     96.6      3.0      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      62       68       74       40       38      143      146
```

----

Updated March 15, 2013
Patrick Emanuel SUTHERLAND, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-433

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:41 a.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2022.

# PLACE: 

The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), seconded by Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and concurred in by Acting Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

Dated this the 17th day of May, 2022.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-10910 Filed 5-17-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Gerald L. SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7037.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS, and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00352

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER REGARDING AGREED MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC (“Headwater”) and Defendants

Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc.’s

(collectively, “Verizon”) Agreed Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendant 

Verizon Communications Inc. In the Agreed Motion, the Parties agree to dismiss Defendant 

Verizon Communications Inc. without prejudice on the grounds that it is not a proper party to the 

action. 

Having considered the Agreed Motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby 

GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the caption is revised as follows:

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 38-1 Filed 10/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 576
2

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00352

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 38-1 Filed 10/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 577