IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A 

VERIZON WIRELESS, 

Defendant, 

ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORP., 

Intervenors. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

AT&T SERVICES INC., et al., 

Defendants, 

ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORP., 

Intervenors. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant, 

ERICSSON INC. and NOKIA OF 

AMERICA CORP., 

Intervenors. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC’s Unopposed 

Motion to Correct, or in the Alternative, Alter/Amend Order (the “Motion”) requesting the Court 

correct or, alternatively, amend its October 18, 2024 Order of dismissal. (Dkt. No. 109).

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 11/21/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:

900
2 

Having considered the Motion, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 60(a) and 59(e), the Court finds that it should be and hereby is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the October 18, 2024 Order 

of dismissal (Dkt. No. 107) is hereby corrected to read as follows:

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff 

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC and Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc., AT&T Services Inc., 

AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Enterprises, LLC, and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless, and Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation and Ericsson Inc. (Dkt. No. 105.) 

In the Motion, the parties represent that the above-captioned cases have all been resolved 

and request dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants in the 

above-captioned cases with prejudice.1(Id. at 2.) The parties also request dismissal of 

Defendants’ and Intervenors’ claims, defenses, or counterclaims for relief against 

Plaintiff without prejudice. (Id.) 

Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against 

Defendants in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE,

2 and 

all claims, defenses, or counterclaims asserted by Defendants and Intervenors against 

Plaintiff are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear its own 

costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests for relief in the abovecaptioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE all of the above-captioned cases as 

no parties or claims remain.

2

 Subject to the conditions and exceptions in the above footnote.

1

 “Solely with respect to Claims in any Licensor Litigation against Designated Licensees that are based upon Third 

Party Branded Handsets, such Claims will be dismissed without prejudice. All capitalized terms in the foregoing 

sentence are understood to have the meaning ascribed to them in the respective agreements of the Parties resolving 

the instant litigations.” (Dkt. No. 105 at 2 n.1.)

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 11/21/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:

901
So Ordered this

Nov 21, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 11/21/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:

902