alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

RICH MEDIA CLUB LLC, 

2:23-cv-00388-JRG

DMG MEDIA LIMITED

DMG Media Limited 

Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London, W8 5TT, England Alison A. Richards 

Global IP Law Group, LLC 

55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 3400 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Phone: 312-241-1500 8/29/23

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 6 Filed 08/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 19
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00388-JRG 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 6 Filed 08/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ Jason M. Wietholter Jason M. Wietholter CA Bar No. 337139

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 jwietholter@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 201
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

JOHN A. ABBOTT, §

§

Petitioner, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-39

§

WARDEN THOMAS, §

§

Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

John A. Abbott, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United

States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the respondent’s motion for summary judgment be granted and the petition

dismissed as moot. To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds

that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#10) is ADOPTED. The motion for summary

judgment (#9) is GRANTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 9th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00039-MJT-ZJH Document 11 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 123
Alan BARTLETT, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-6452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
NOTICE OF SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PAGE 1 OF 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

LADARION HUGHES, ANGELA §

ALONZO, and DEMARCUS LIVELY, §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 § Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-344

v. §

 §

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS, §

 §

Defendant. §

DEFENDANT SMITH COUNTY’S NOTICE

OF SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

COMES NOW Smith County, Texas, Defendant in the above-styled and -referenced cause, 

and files this its Notice of Seventh Supplemental Disclosures, and would respectfully show unto 

the Court as follows:

On this date Defendant Smith County, Texas, provided all counsel of record with its 

Seventh Supplemental Disclosures in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 

this Court’s Order.

Respectfully submitted,

David Iglesias 

Lead Counsel

State Bar No. 24051733

david@iglesiaslawfirm.com

IGLESIAS LAW FIRM, PLLC 

605 Chase Drive, Suite 8

Tyler, Texas 75701

Telephone: (903) 944-7185 

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 32 Filed 09/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 248
NOTICE OF SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PAGE 2 OF 2

Facsimile: (903) 630-5338

Dallas Office:

1412 Main Street, Suite 608

Dallas, Texas 75202

Telephone: (972) 863-9445

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 9, 2024, a copy of the foregoing was transmitted to all 

counsel of record in the above-referenced and -numbered action via the Court’s electronic filing 

system and electronic mail.

David Iglesias

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 32 Filed 09/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 249
In Re Urvashi BHAGAT, petitioner.

No. 18-1274.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William Randolph HARLOFF, petitioner, v. Craig KOENIG, Warden.

No. 18-6629.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
ez ;fe/ J4;cJ5S 7/ ?7 6/ _ _

E .C Co i A B«xomAA 7 U.S? 

?D .fec>x. afc_O3C_ . 

'&e_< ury G> ; 7~x , 777 90 _ _ ._ 

/ 

ffrr_I„L 0_A „0z 7 rK 

Ua/i1 ieD D ct 

l 5+ ec- D » 6 €j_C± (>j - I A 

|C )of - ih rO ir&ed 

)? r y Tf j ie /±b Cc r 

y. A/y -t I S A / Zctf . J /M Cvrre /Z A _ 

Be v /ncAj (Jfj'4 D AnD -k ;$ /ny ?k . A>h A O '. M r Jh i 

c?/7Jx AnilA Af-,/ Cc Aal

,tbl 4 m kfeu *. t?tJife££t £_ k A Vz VLA \ LLt 

.. /?X CA i /t o/</ tWo D oz/e. hour t> A J/ fa 

i h r \Aid :Ai .4 t ;r T /M y.. Thi J C_L 2 A

-bre>le .t4io 'A c .mej l of Q) LD i/Lids peri c j5 /> /A o>/e

de J A lA A she.«; c f SdNj ±hd PkcAL _ d A<s

2e> / AcS, JL A A o A 

I rV A) - 4 c- r/ A g './ ro>G > e JL

_M/a € A oo+ ie_ b T

J S here £) 4Kc LA St fi led T 5 /44.(C« / // yp j74

uw -to be. Bother«J va K o joj 4* pA/kA fe> St 

A P ce /4A// p cp/c 4AAf rrc

i-O K. I i C v$ WA f f a e ;A G j

hke. j c P A pbe/rii..,X An zf-f' e-fe IS e S +ht 

< /' Z/o .A i u y /lAyii of Ike, S. jB i z r 

AmB T FS oF HF rtfouOrf ZIl l fc

£C>lt&kMC£. / ft sreFF/x /E vrc i&vc£. Ma. Wr/V / rd -

PLEftSt H&L£ US S7bf S JC- HUI ;
1 •
f-o. y 030

BfcrtoMtjjr; T/. T i o

CLERK, U.S. DIST ICT COURT

RECEIVED

MAR 2 3 2023

EASTE N DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMO T, TEXAS

. .NO TH ¦HOLJST H TX 773..

2'1 2S 3'.3v I f S '1-

00

nm c> [
Scott PETERS, petitioner, v. John BALDWIN.

No. 18-6607.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      300,629
COMMITMENTS
  81,862  102,100   33,963  164,584  142,597  280,409  278,660   20,220   21,969

CHANGES FROM 04/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -39,808)
     371    3,661  -10,481  -24,062  -25,188  -34,172  -32,008   -5,636   -7,800

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.2     34.0     11.3     54.7     47.4     93.3     92.7      6.7      7.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      126)
      30       51       51       31       37       94      113
```

----

Updated April 27, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

NICKOLAS P. HOLTZ § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-259

UNKNOWN DEFENDANT §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Nickolas P. Holtz, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. This matter

was referred to the undersigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the

Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States

Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition

of the case.

Discussion

A Notice of Case Assignment Form was mailed to Plaintiff at the United States Penitentiary

in Beaumont, Texas, the address Plaintiff provided to the court. The copy of the form sent to

Plaintiff was returned to the court with a notation stating Plaintiff was no longer at that address

(Doc. #4.). Plaintiff has not supplied the court with a new address or otherwise contacted the court.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action for

want of prosecution sua sponte whenever necessary to achieve the orderly and expeditious

disposition of cases. Anthony v. Marion Cnty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1167 (5th Cir. 1980). 

See also McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988). Eastern District of Texas

Local Rule CV-11(d) requires pro se litigants such as Plaintiff to provide the court with a physical

address and keep the clerk advised in writing of a current address.

By not providing the court with his current address, Plaintiff has prevented the court from

communicating with him and moving this case towards resolution. He has therefore failed to

diligently prosecute this case. As a result, this case should be dismissed without prejudice for want

of prosecution.

Case 1:23-cv-00259-MJT-CLS Document 5 Filed 08/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 10
Recommendation

This civil rights lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and file

written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved

party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and

recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by

the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d

1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 2nd day of August, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00259-MJT-CLS Document 5 Filed 08/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF ARM FINANCIAL GROUP INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED AND THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         3,899,938
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      40,478
<MORTGAGE>                                      16,666
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               4,081,024
<CASH>                                         186,898
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          81,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,231,042
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              4,024,820
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 38,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                           232
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,231,042
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            235,270
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3,027
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  17,528
<BENEFITS>                                     175,331
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      7,680
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            26,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,580
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,734
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      566,793
COMMITMENTS
  36,153   42,512  170,376  338,561  336,947  545,090  549,835   21,703   16,958

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,530)
     756    5,397   -2,330   -3,392   -5,591   -4,966   -2,524    2,437       -6

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.4      7.5     30.1     59.7     59.4     96.2     97.0      3.8      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      136)
      31       29       49       64       65      123      121
```

----

Updated August 24, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

HUMBERTO LANDIN (1)

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00139 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Humberto Landin

GUILTY of Count Two of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - 

Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine. 

Case 4:23-cr-00139-SDJ-AGD Document 49 Filed 04/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 113
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

TIMOTHY WAYNE YOW (1) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00096-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count Six of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Timothy 

Wayne Yow (1) GUILTY of Count Six of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4th March, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00096-JDK-JDL Document 218 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 550
No. 6:23-cr-00050

United States of America

v.

Aaron Levi Flores

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 37. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Ernest Nathaniel Place, Jr. guilty of count one of the indictment, charging a violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) - Possession of an 

Unregistered Firearm.

So ordered by the court on April 16, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00050-JCB-JDL Document 39 Filed 04/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 111
Exhibit 13.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18.U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with Amendment No.2 on Form 20-F/A to the annual report of Silicom Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Signature: /S/ Shaike Orbach
 Shaike Orbach, Chief Executive Officer
 
 Date: November 23, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


           CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF FRIEDMAN'S INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friedman's Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley J. Stinn,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Bradley J. Stinn
----------------------------
Bradley J. Stinn
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Friedman's Inc. and will be
retained by Friedman's Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.