<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-KSB

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      OF 1934

  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2008      COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-12810

                         HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

                     DELAWARE                                  22-2535743
         (State or other jurisdiction of                    (I.R.S. Employer
          incorporation or organization)                   Identification No.)

        24225 GARNIER STREET, TORRANCE, CA                     90505-5355
     (Address of principal executive offices)                  (Zip Code)

            Issuer's Telephone Number:                       (310) 784-2100

         Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
     (Title of each class)           (Name of each exchange on which registered)
          COMMON STOCK                         AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE

         Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
                              (Title of each class)
                                      NONE

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES (X) NO ( )

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. (X)

Indicate by check mark whether the registration is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ( ) NO (X)

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $27,628,000.

The aggregate value of the Registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant was approximately $16,828,825 as of July 3, 2008, based upon the
closing sale price on the American Stock Exchange on that date at which the
stock was last sold.

There were approximately 6,817,541 shares of the Registrants Common Stock issued
and outstanding as of July 3, 2008.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, pursuant to Rule 14a-6 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the Company's
2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III,
Items 9-14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format                YES ( )     NO (X)


<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                         HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
                                                   FORM 10-KSB

                                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                          PAGE
                                                                                                          ----
PART I.
         ITEM 1            BUSINESS..................................................................      1

         ITEM 2            PROPERTIES................................................................      4

         ITEM 3            LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.........................................................      4

         ITEM 4            SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.......................      7

PART II.
         ITEM 5            MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND.................      7
                           SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

         ITEM 6            MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
                           AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.................................................      8

         ITEM 7            FINANCIAL STATEMENTS......................................................     12

         ITEM 8            CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING...............     12
                           AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

         ITEM 8A           CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES...................................................     12

         ITEM 8B           OTHER INFORMATION.........................................................     14

PART III.
         ITEM 9            DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;.............     14
                           COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

         ITEM 10           EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION....................................................     14

         ITEM 11           SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
                           AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS............................     14

         ITEM 12           CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS............................     14

         ITEM 13           EXHIBITS .................................................................     14

         ITEM 14           PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES....................................     14

SIGNATURES                 ..........................................................................     15

EXHIBIT INDEX              ..........................................................................     16

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS........................................................................     17
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                                     PART I


ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

                                GENERAL OVERVIEW

         Hi-Shear Technology Corporation designs and manufactures high
reliability pyrotechnic, mechanical and electronic products for the aerospace
industry, national defense and other applications where pyrotechnic power is
desirable. Its products are primarily used in space satellites and satellite
launch vehicles, exploration missions, strategic missiles, tactical weapons,
advanced fighter aircraft and military systems. Customers such as the military,
satellite manufacturers, launch vehicle assemblers, U.S. Government departments
and agencies (including NASA), foreign space agencies, and others in the
aerospace and defense business widely use Hi-Shear's products.

         The Company's executive offices are located at 24225 Garnier Street,
Torrance, CA 90505-5355, Telephone (310) 784-2100 - Facsimile (310) 325-5354.

                                HI-SHEAR PRODUCTS

         Hi-Shear's products meet the specialized needs of both commercial and
military satellites, the United States space program and defense applications.
They consist primarily of pyrotechnic power cartridges and various types of
separation devices designed to meet the demand for reliable high performance,
with the strength to fasten two structures under rigorous conditions and then
provide quick release upon command. Hi-Shear cartridges, cutters, pin pullers,
separation nuts and separation bolts are used widely in the functioning of
satellites and the vehicles which launch them into space. In addition, we design
and manufacture electronic firing systems that control and sequentially fire the
pyrotechnic devices according to pre-programmed parameters. These electronic
devices and pyrotechnic products are used in missiles, launch vehicles, weapon
systems, fighter aircraft ejection seats and other applications. We continually
adapt our technology to produce products for other applications where
pyrotechnic power is desirable and our unique product designs are suitable.
Hi-Shear's products can be grouped into three product categories as follows:

         PYROTECHNIC CARTRIDGES/INITIATORS. Satellites, missiles, weapon systems
and other space vehicles require substantial stand-by power to perform certain
timing-dependent functions such as separation, cutting and deployment. Hi-Shear
designs, markets and manufactures pyrotechnic power cartridges/initiators and
explosive detonators that have a high-energy output. These power cartridges are
hermetically sealed electro-explosive devices that are compact, lightweight,
environment and corrosion resistant and operate with ultra high reliability. The
power cartridge provides the energy to operate the Company's separation devices,
pin pullers, thrusters, actuators and cutters. These devices are used to
separate rocket motors, nose cones, satellites, open satellite doors, payload
fairings, operate valves, deploy solar panels, booms, communications antennae,
missile fins, and stage separation on many of today's major launch vehicles.
Hi-Shear manufactures the highest reliability NASA standard initiator used
throughout its space exploration missions and the Space Shuttle.

         CARTRIDGE ACTUATED DEVICES. Hi-Shear's cartridge actuated devices are
mechanical gas-activated products for use on satellites, launch vehicles,
missiles and other space vehicles. These devices include separation nuts,
separation bolts, thrusters, wing/fin actuators, cutters, valves, pin pullers
and other devices. They are designed for use as standard high strength fastening
hardware with the ability to separate and/or release components or structures on
command. These devices provide the low shock mechanical action required for
rapid separation or deployment of structures or components in multistage launch
vehicles, such as satellites, payload fairings, nose cones, capsules, booster
rockets, tanks, solar arrays, antenna booms and other devices. We maintain an
active program for new designs, including pyrotechnic and electric low shock
deployment systems for the increasingly lighter satellites used in
communications and intelligence gathering.

                                       1
<PAGE>

         In addition to pyrotechnic cartridge activated devices, we manufacture
a line of electrically driven ultra low shock separation nuts for satellite
applications where an alternative to pyrotechnic activation is desirable. These
high performance electric separation devices provide the strength and flight
heritage identical to our cartridge activated separation nuts while providing
the advantage of reduced shock and resettable usage for appropriate
applications. Hi-Shear also manufactures sophisticated highly reliable
mechanical sub-components used on satellites to aim the satellites onboard
communications array and other components for space vehicles and weapons systems
according to customer supplied detailed designs and testing requirements.

         ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS. Hi-Shear is a key supplier of electronic products
that fire pyrotechnic and/or explosive charges while at the same time
maintaining the utmost in safety.

         Hi-Shear supplies electronic safe arm fuzes for various military
programs. The Company's Patriot (PAC-3) missile system safe arm fuze is used to
fire explosive elements contained in the PAC-3 missile. This dual function high
reliability safe arm fuze is a key operational component onboard each missile
launch. The PAC-3 high performance anti-missile batteries are deployed with the
U.S. Army and its allies throughout the world to protect against enemy missile
attack. We employ a proprietary initiator in the safe arm product that, when
removed, permits full testing of the electronics without risk to personnel or
damaging the integrity of the missile system. This allows for economical missile
system safety checks, and an extended shelf life estimated at 30 years, which is
among the longest in the industry.

         Hi-Shear manufactures both the electronic Mark 58 Acoustic Firing
Device and its master control unit, the Mark 92 Acoustic Firing Code
Transmitter, for use by the U.S. Navy. This unique ordnance firing system
utilizes acoustic signals for underwater demolition and is used by Navy divers
to dispose of sea mines, limpet mines, sonobuoys and torpedoes. The acoustic
firing device is specially constructed and tested to be non-magnetic equipment
so that it may be used safely in the proximity of magnetic influenced ordnance.
The acoustic firing device is consumed in each explosive disposal firing.

         The Firing Code Transmitter is the compact portable electronic console
that is operated on the oceans surface to remotely control the operation of the
firing device. The firing code transmitter is programmed by its operator to
effectively function the acoustic firing device, which is located underwater, at
a significant distance from the code transmitter console. The transmitter is
self contained in a briefcase sized weather proof case and has its own power
supply. The transmitter unit is completely reusable and may efficiently signal
the firing of many acoustic firing devices.

         The Company supplies to the U.S. military and its allies around the
world an ejection seat control unit and the ordnance devices that the control
unit signals to fire. These devices are sold for use on the U.S. Air Force ACES
II crew ejection seat installed in many fighter and bomber aircraft, including
the A-10, B-2, F-15 and F-16. The ejection seat utilizes multiple ordnance
devices that deploy parachutes, rockets and other events crucially necessary for
the pilot's ejection from the aircraft. Hi-Shear also manufactures various
ejection seat modification kits and other items used to enhance the performance
of the ejection system that are supplied to the military services according to
their detailed specifications and requirements.

                             CUSTOMERS AND CONTRACTS

         Most of the Company's customers are large aerospace prime or
subcontractors. In addition, Hi-Shear derives a significant amount of its
revenue from contracts that it has directly with Government customers, including
the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, U.S. Army and NASA. Sales to Lockheed Martin, the
United States Government and Boeing accounted for 39%, 19% and 13%,
respectively, of the Company's revenues in fiscal year 2008, compared to 37%,
16% and 8%, respectively, of the Company's revenues in fiscal year 2007.
Contract awards and contract competition phases vary from year to year, and
therefore sales distribution among customers during any one fiscal year should
not be considered indicative of future sales to those customers.

                                       2
<PAGE>

         In both fiscal years 2008 and 2007, all of the Company's contracts were
on a fixed price contract basis where we agree to perform certain work for a
fixed price. These fixed price contracts carry certain inherent risks, including
the underestimation of costs, problems with new technologies, costly changes
made by the customer for which it refuses to pay or the occurrence of adverse
changes over the contract period. Due to economies that can be encountered over
the period of the contract, these fixed price contracts can also offer
significant profit potential. The Company's contracts that evolve from the U.S.
Government or from its contractors are subject to termination for convenience by
the customer or the U.S. Government. However, if this termination for
convenience were exercised, the Company would be entitled to receive payment of
its costs incurred up to the date of termination and a reasonable termination
fee. U.S. Government contracts extending beyond one year are also conditioned
upon the continuing availability of Congressional appropriations because
Congress usually appropriates on a fiscal year basis even though contract
performance may take several years.

                                     BACKLOG

         The average time to design, manufacture and ship our products is
typical of the lead times required for highly engineered, custom manufactured
aerospace products. The final negotiation of the detailed contract requirements
together with the purchase of long lead time material, manufacturing processes
and testing take between 4 to 12 months or more to accomplish. During fiscal
year 2008, we continued programs to reduce many of our manufacturing lead-times
to help our customers reduce their product manufacturing time with more timely
delivery. This is part of an overall strategy by Hi-Shear's aerospace customers
to carry fewer components in inventory and to speed the construction of launch
vehicles, satellites and weapon systems.

         Total requirements included in contracts undertaken by us may contain
options that extend beyond one year, and accordingly, portions are carried
forward from one year to the next as part of the backlog. Some contracts with
the U.S. Government and its prime contractors are supply contracts and/or
multi-year options whose requirements are primarily based on the Government's
demand for products on a periodic basis. Because many factors affect the
scheduling of projects, no assurances can be given as to when revenue will be
realized on projects that are included in backlog. Although backlog represents
business that is considered to be firm, there can be no assurance that
cancellation, changes in quantities, funding changes, or scope adjustments will
not occur.

          As of May 31, 2008, the Company's backlog of unrecognized revenue and
unbilled amounts on open customers' orders was $21.3 million and $27.6 million,
respectively, compared to unrecognized revenue and unbilled backlog amounts as
of the end of the prior fiscal year of $18.6 million and $26.6 million,
respectively. The increase in unbilled backlog is the result of growth in
contract awards.

                                   COMPETITION

         Hi-Shear's aerospace and defense products are thoroughly tested
individually, as well as tested in conjunction with the end product into which
they are incorporated. After commencement of a given program, it is very costly
for competitors to design new competitive components or for customers to change
suppliers of the components since the customer would then be required to
re-qualify the products. Therefore, due to the Company's extensive financial
investment and years of involvement in the development of our products and the
practical barriers to entry into the market by competitors, competition is not a
critical factor for subsequent orders. In addition, local, state and federal
permits and licenses that are required to manufacture such pyrotechnic and
explosive devices as the Company produces are difficult to obtain and therefore
provide further barriers to entry into the market by competitors. Hi-Shear
currently qualifies as a small business entity for the purposes of obtaining
small business set aside contracts and dealing with U.S. Government contracts or
programs.

                                       3
<PAGE>

                          MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION

         Production consists of fabricating and assembling the mechanical and
electronic hardware components and separately preparing the pyrotechnic charge
used in the Company's cartridge devices. Production of the mechanical and
electronic devices involves machining components in the precision machining
center, the assembly of the components and the testing of the completed units.
Throughout the entire process, strict quality assurance controls are maintained
including customer and, where required, government inspection. After assembly,
the products are functionally tested on a sample basis. During fiscal year 2008,
Hi-Shear had approximately 117 full time employees (including employees hired
from temporary agencies), the majority of whom are engineers and technicians.
The handling and processing of pyrotechnic materials requires extensive
experience and expertise as well as the proper equipment, facilities and
permits. We have been safely handling and processing these fuels and oxidizers
for over forty years.

                             ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

         The Company files annual and quarterly reports and proxy statements
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to
federal securities laws. You may inspect such reports, including the exhibits
thereto, without charge, at the Public Reference Room of the Commission at 450
Fifth Street N.W., Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on the operation
of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. You
may also access such material electronically by means of the Commission's home
page on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.

         We intend to make available to our stockholders annual reports
containing financial statements audited by an independent certified public
accounting firm. We may also make available to our stockholders, from time to
time, other reports about material corporate developments.


ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

         Hi-Shear's manufacturing and executive offices are located in Torrance,
California, in a 76,000 square foot building organized for electronic,
mechanical, and pyrotechnic manufacturing, testing and assembly operations. The
Company leases these offices pursuant to a five (5) year lease through August
31, 2012. The Company also owns and operates a plant on twelve acres of land in
Santa Clarita, California that it utilizes as a storage and powder-blending
facility in addition to conducting manufacturing and testing. We believe that
our current leased facilities in Torrance and the property in Santa Clarita are
adequately covered by insurance and will adequately support the Company's
operations for the foreseeable future.


ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

         Hi-Shear filed suit against United Space Alliance, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company ("Alliance"), and USBI Co., a Delaware corporation
("USBI"), in November 2000 in the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial
Circuit, Brevard County, Florida. Hi-Shear sought to recover damages in excess
of $1,500,000, excluding interest, costs, and attorneys' fees, alleging Alliance
and USBI breached contracts for Hi-Shear to manufacture and deliver certain
hardware for use on the Space Shuttle. Hi-Shear also sought damages based on
claims alleging that Alliance and USBI fraudulently induced Hi-Shear to enter
into certain contracts to manufacture and deliver certain hardware for use on
the Space Shuttle. In addition, Hi-Shear sought damages for claims that
defendants misappropriated Hi-Shear's proprietary information and/or trade
secrets in certain technical data and information. Hi-Shear also alleged a claim
for a declaratory judgment.

                                       4
<PAGE>

         Alliance subsequently filed a counterclaim seeking damages of over
$450,000, excluding interest, costs, and attorneys' fees, alleging Hi-Shear
breached its contracts to manufacture and deliver certain hardware for use on
the Space Shuttle. Alliance also alleged a claim for conversion and an
accounting relating to certain items of alleged government furnished equipment,
and a claim for a declaratory judgment. As part of its defense in the
litigation, Alliance claimed that it was coerced through duress to enter into a
contract with Hi-Shear where Hi-Shear was the qualified successful lowest
bidder. In addition, Alliance demanded that Hi-Shear ship uncertified flight
hardware to it for use on the United States Space Shuttle, ahead of its normal
certification schedule. USBI did not file a counterclaim against the Company.

         In July 2004, Hi-Shear filed a separate but related suit against
Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company, a Delaware corporation, in the
Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Brevard County, Florida.
Hi-Shear sought to recover damages, alleging that defendant misappropriated
Hi-Shear's proprietary information and/or trade secrets in certain technical
data and information, conspired to misappropriate trade secrets, and interfered
with Hi-Shear's advantageous business relationships. After defendant filed, and
the court ruled on a motion to dismiss, and Hi-Shear filed an amended complaint
against Pacific Scientific, the court entered an order staying all further
proceedings in the case until the appeals from the suit between Hi-Shear and
Alliance and USBI are resolved, and the court enters a subsequent order lifting
the stay.

         Prior to the trial between Hi-Shear, Alliance, and USBI, the court made
legal rulings that the Company did not have trade secrets in certain technical
data and information, which the Company alleged had been misappropriated by
Alliance and USBI. As a result, the court granted in part Alliance's and USBI's
motions for summary judgment on that issue. Prior to trial, the court also made
legal rulings that USBI did not fraudulently induce Hi-Shear to enter into a
contract to manufacture and deliver certain flight hardware for use on the Space
Shuttle. As a result, the court granted Alliance's and USBI's motions for
summary judgment on that issue.

         Trial before a jury of Hi-Shear's remaining claims against Alliance and
USBI, and Alliance's counterclaim against Hi-Shear, commenced on July 5, 2005 in
Titusville, Florida. Shortly after the trial began, the court made additional
legal rulings, which resulted in its granting the remainder of Alliance's and
USBI's motions for summary judgment on the trade secrets issues. As a
consequence of those rulings and based on other circumstances, Hi-Shear
dismissed its remaining claims against USBI. As a result, USBI was no longer a
participant in the trial.

         The jury trial continued through September 2, 2005. Some of Hi-Shear's
claims were disposed of by the court based on legal rulings made during the
course of trial. Of the remaining claims that the jury was asked to decide, the
jury rendered a verdict in favor of Hi-Shear on one of its breach of contract
claims, and awarded the Company damages of $57,781, exclusive of interest,
costs, and attorneys' fees. The jury found in favor of Alliance on Hi-Shear's
remaining breach of contract claims and thus awarded Hi-Shear no damages on
those claims. The jury also found in favor of Alliance on its counterclaim for
breach of contracts but awarded it no damages. In addition, the jury determined
that Hi-Shear converted certain government furnished equipment pursuant to
Alliance's conversion counterclaim.

         In August 2005, the court entered final judgment on Hi-Shear's claims
against USBI. After hearing and denying post-trial motions by both Hi-Shear and
Alliance, in May 2006 the court entered final judgment on Hi-Shear's and
Alliance's respective claims against each other.

         In September 2005, Hi-Shear appealed the final judgment entered on its
claims against USBI to Florida's Fifth District Court of Appeal. Alliance
participated in that appeal as an appellee based on its having joined in the
trade secrets and fraudulent inducement summary judgment motions at the trial
level. In February 2007, after hearing oral argument, the court of appeal
affirmed the trial court's rulings and final judgment in favor of USBI. The
appellate court denied motions by Hi-Shear and Alliance to recover attorneys'
fees incurred on appeal.

                                       5
<PAGE>

         In June 2006, Hi-Shear appealed the final judgment entered on its
claims against Alliance, and Alliance's counterclaims against Hi-Shear, to
Florida's Fifth District Court of Appeal challenging the legal basis of the
lower court's final judgment including the amounts of the recovery of Hi-Shear's
damages on contracts for manufactured components and other claims at trial. The
appeal encompasses issues evident throughout the court proceedings, including
the legal basis of the trial court's judgments and questionable adverse rulings
by the court during the entire course of the trial. Alliance has filed its
cross-appeal, parties' briefs on appeal have been filed, and the oral arguments
to the appellate court were completed on June 25, 2008. The Florida Fifth
District Court of Appeal will issue its decision regarding this appeal in due
course. The Company is not able to estimate when the decision will be issued or
the ultimate outcome of such decision.

         In the final judgments, the trial court retained jurisdiction to
consider motions by the parties to recover attorneys' fees and litigation costs.
In December 2006, the trial court entered an order denying Hi-Shear's motion for
entitlement to recover its attorneys' fees and costs from Alliance, even though
Hi-Shear was the only party to have been awarded damages by the jury. In that
same order, the court determined that instead, Alliance had prevailed on its
claims for breach on three of four contracts and thus was entitled to recover
from Hi-Shear its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred relating to count I of its
counterclaim against Hi-Shear for breach of contracts. The court also ordered
that both Alliance and USBI were entitled to recover their respective litigation
costs from Hi-Shear. Alliance has claimed the amount of reasonable attorneys'
fees it should recover from Hi-Shear is approximately $2,900,000, and the amount
of litigation costs it should recover from Hi-Shear is approximately $453,000.
USBI has claimed the amount of litigation costs it should recover from Hi-Shear
is approximately $48,000. Hi-Shear has opposed these claims, believing that the
amounts sought by Alliance and USBI are excessive.

         On March 13-14, 2008, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on
the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees to be awarded to Alliance. At the
hearing, Hi-Shear offered evidence and expert testimony to establish that
Alliance's request for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs are excessive and
that they should not have exceeded approximately $400,000. The trial court also
issued an order requiring memoranda of law by the parties on the amount of costs
to be awarded to Alliance and USBI.

         On July 28, 2008, the trial court sent a letter to Alliance's attorneys
asking them to prepare a form of order regarding attorneys' fees. Hi-Shear
received a copy of the letter on July 31, 2008. The letter does not specify the
final amount of attorneys' fees to be awarded, and it indicates than an
additional hearing will be required on specific issues. However, the letter also
indicates that the trial court will make favorable rulings for Alliance on
several issues, and it appears that the trial court may award to Alliance the
preponderance of the attorneys' fees it seeks. On August 7, 2008, the trial
court sent an additional letter to Alliance's attorneys addressing taxable costs
that Alliance and USBI are entitled to recover.

         The final outcome of Hi-Shear's pending appeal and Alliance's pending
cross-appeal may have an effect on an award of attorneys' fees and costs to
Alliance. Although Hi-Shear believes that it will prevail on its appeal and that
the trial court's order that it pay Alliance's and USBI's attorneys' fees and
costs will be reversed, Hi-Shear believes that it is appropriate under generally
accepted accounting principles to accrue an estimate of the fees and costs
described in the court's letters. Although Hi-Shear is unable to determine the
precise amount of attorney fees that will be awarded at this time, it believes
that it is appropriate under generally accepted accounting principles to accrue
approximately $3,275,000 associated with the litigation for its year ended May
31, 2008. This accrual does not include possible costs for prejudgment interest
which may be assessed at the statutory rate dating from December, 2006. The
ultimate award of an amount of attorneys' fees and costs against Hi-Shear, if
any, will not have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position
and results of operations in the period a final fee and cost decision is made
because an accrual of the estimated cost has been reflected in the current
year's financial results. A reversal of this accrual amount in whole or in part
in a subsequent period would have a positive impact on that period's financial
results.

                                       6
<PAGE>

         In addition, the Company is subject to other claims and legal actions
that may arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the
Company, after consultation with counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with
respect to these other claims and legal actions, will not have a material effect
on the financial position or on the results of operations.


ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

         None.


                                     PART II


ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL
         BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

         Hi-Shear's Common Stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under
the symbol "HSR". The following table reflects the high and low sales prices of
the Company's Common Stock, as reported by the American Stock Exchange composite
tape, for the periods set forth below:

                                                           High           Low
                                                           ----           ---
         Fiscal Year 2008 ending May 31, 2008

                           4th Quarter                   $  11.94      $  10.50
                           3rd Quarter                      13.64         11.11
                           2nd Quarter                      13.34          9.07
                           1st Quarter                      10.59          7.00

         Fiscal Year 2007 ending May 31, 2007

                           4th Quarter                   $  12.11      $  10.15
                           3rd Quarter                      13.12          8.17
                           2nd Quarter                      11.70          6.16
                           1st Quarter                      18.90          8.68


         The Board of Directors approved and the Company paid two cash dividends
during the fiscal year. The first cash dividend of $2,383,000, or $0.35 per
share was paid October 8, 2007 to shareholders of record as of close of business
October 5, 2007. The second cash dividend of $2,726,000, or $0.40 per share was
paid April 11, 2008 to shareholders of record as of close of business April 1,
2008. The dividends were not special, and did not represent that the Company
will pay dividends on a scheduled basis. Dividends will be determined by the
Board of Directors in light of the conditions then existing, including earnings,
financial requirements and conditions, opportunities for reinvesting earnings,
business conditions and other factors.

         The number of holders of record of Hi-Shear's Common Stock was 54 and
the number of beneficial shareholders was approximately 1,136 as of July 3,
2008.


                                       7
<PAGE>

ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

                                GENERAL OVERVIEW

         The following discussion of Hi-Shear's financial condition and results
of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. This report, including this
discussion, contains forward-looking statements about business strategies,
market potential, and product launches and future financial performance that
involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of certain factors. These factors include the acceptance and pricing of
its new products, the development and nature of its relationship with key
strategic partners, the allocation of the federal budget for government
sponsored military and aerospace programs and the economy in general.

                          CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         Hi-Shear's revenues are derived principally from fixed-price contracts
that are accounted for on the percentage-of-completion method. Revenues for
those contracts are calculated on the basis of the relationship between costs
incurred and total estimated costs at completion of the contracts
("cost-to-cost" type of percentage-of-completion method of accounting). Revenue
recognition for contracts that require relatively less time to complete than
those contracts accounted for on a percentage-of-completion basis are recognized
as deliveries are made and invoices are submitted.

         Because of the large amount of contracts in process at any point in
time, changes in estimated costs to complete can have a significant impact on
profitability of the Company. We estimate that each 1% change in the total
estimated costs to complete the contracts in process at May 31, 2008 would
change both the amount of revenue and earnings recognized by approximately
$113,000. We evaluate and update estimated costs to complete for open contracts
on a regular basis. Those evaluations and updates include the participation of
management and other key employees from all operational areas. Changed estimates
to complete the contracts are then incorporated in the calculations of revenues
and profits.

         Included in the inventories recorded and maintained by the Company are
purchased and manufactured component parts and finished goods that relate to
previously completed contracts. The Company's management periodically assesses
the likelihood that those inventory items will be used in future contracts,
since many of the Company's past contracts relate to on-going programs, for
which it will be awarded similar contracts. The current method utilized in
management's assessment is to evaluate individual items in the inventories and
assess current or future contract requirements which may use inventory parts. A
reserve is established for individual inventory parts based on said analysis.
Since the inventory reserve methodology is subjective, and subject to changes in
estimates based upon updated information, changes in those estimates can be
substantial.

                              RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2008 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2007

         Strong customer demand for product resulted in $30,087,000 of orders
received during the year in comparison to $25,969,000 for the previous year.
Revenues recognized during fiscal year 2008 were $27,628,000, compared to the
$20,550,000 of revenues recognized during fiscal year 2007. The increased
revenues this year consisted of a higher concentration of satellite and launch
vehicle products and resulted in increased profitability during the year.
Utilizing an expanded workforce, production activities grew to meet the demand
in both the electronic and pyrotechnic-based device product areas. The Company
serviced over 200 separate space and defense projects during the year. Products
used in space applications totaled 46% of total revenues while products
manufactured for use in national missile defense accounted for 27% of total
revenues.

                                       8
<PAGE>

         Cost of revenues for the fiscal year 2008 was $14,827,000, or 54% of
revenues, compared to $11,652,000, or 57% of revenues, for the prior fiscal
year. Cost containment programs, including utilization of new equipment,
absorption of fixed overhead expenses by a larger labor base and continuing
improvements in manufacturing procedures also contributed to the reduction in
cost of revenues. There was a $42,000 increase to inventory reserves for fiscal
year 2008.

         Gross margin continued to improve in both total amount and as a
percentage of revenues. A higher concentration of satellite and launch vehicle
products drove increased profitability and contributed to increasing gross
margin percentages year over year. Gross margin for fiscal year 2008 increased
$3,903,000 to $12,801,000, or 46% of revenues, from $8,898,000, or 43% of
revenues, which was reported for fiscal year 2007. Consistent with year over
year reductions to cost of revenues, the Company continues to realize gross
margin improvement.

         Selling, general and administrative expenses were $3,413,000 for fiscal
year 2008, compared to $2,974,000 in fiscal year 2007. The 15% increase or
$439,000 is predominately an increase in consulting and accounting expenses.

Litigation Expenses
-------------------

         A total of $3,846,000 was charged to general and administrative expense
during the year to reflect the costs related solely to the prosecution of the
Alliance lawsuit and an estimate of possible fee and court cost awards adverse
to the Company made related to the case. Legal expenses of $619,000 were
disbursed to Hi-Shear legal representatives in addition to a $3,275,000 accrual
made based on estimates of court letters related to possible amounts of legal
fees to be awarded in the case adverse to Hi-Shear. This accrual does not
include possible costs for prejudgment interest which may be assessed at the
statutory rate dating from December, 2006. These expenses are exclusively
related to this single lawsuit and have no effect on the direct operations of
the Company. Hi-Shear has appealed the final judgment entered on its claims
against Alliance to the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals. See Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.

         Operating Income of $5,542,000 was lower than the $5,673,000 for the
prior year. The reduction of operating income was caused by the $3,846,000
litigation expenses related to the Alliance lawsuit as referred to above.
Excluding this singular litigation expense, the operating income would have been
$3,447,000 higher. This operating income (excluding litigation expense) of
$8,989,000 yields a 52% increase over last year's operating income (excluding
litigation expense) of $5,924,000. This increase is driven by the greater
revenue produced in the year and favorable gross product margins.

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                        FISCAL YEAR 2008

                       Statement of Operations      Impact of    Statement of Operations
                              including            Litigation            without
                          Litigation Expense        Expenses        Litigation Expense
                       -----------------------    ------------   -----------------------
Revenues                    $ 27,628,000                              $ 27,628,000
Pre-tax Income               $ 5,586,000          $ 3,447,000          $ 9,033,000
Taxes                        $ 2,046,000          $ 1,263,000          $ 3,309,000
Net Income                   $ 3,540,000          $ 2,184,000          $ 5,724,000
Earnings per Share                $ 0.52               $ 0.32               $ 0.84

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                       9
<PAGE>

         The Company realized pre-tax income of $5,586,000, or 20% of revenues,
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008, compared to pre-tax income of
$5,673,000, or 28% of revenues, for the previous fiscal year. The reduction of
8% was driven by the litigation expenses described above; excluding litigation
expenses, pre-tax income would have increased more than $3,400,000 resulting
from process improvements and increased absorption of fixed overhead expenses by
a larger labor base.

         Income tax expense for fiscal year 2008 was $2,046,000 and 37% of
pre-tax income, compared to $2,255,000 and 40% of pre-tax income for fiscal year
2007. The decrease in income tax expense occurred primarily as a consequence of
the corresponding decrease in pre-tax income, upon which reported income tax
expense is principally based. The decrease in the percentage of pre-tax income
from 40% to 37% is the result of the increase in the domestic production
activity deduction (from 3% to 6%).

         In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes" ("FIN 48"), to create a single model to address accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes
by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to
meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on deregulation, measurement, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted the
provisions of FIN 48 on June 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a
significant effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations
for the year ended May 31, 2008. Further, the Company is currently under audit
by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's management has considered the
various tax positions subject to examination in accordance with FIN 48, and as a
result, the Company's management does not anticipate any material adjustments
that may arise as the result of the examination. Accordingly, no adjustments
have been made to the accompanying financial statements.

         Net income for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008 was $3,540,000, or
$0.52 per share and 13% of revenues, compared to $3,418,000, or $0.50 per share
and 17% of revenues, for the previous fiscal year. The net income increased 4%
over last year including the litigation expenses and is driven by increased
revenue and favorable product gross margins. The decline in net income as a
percentage of total revenue is the result of the litigation expenses described
above. Net income excluding this singular litigation expense was $5,724,000 or
$0.84 per share, an increase of approximately $2,300,000 compared to last year.
The Company's positive earnings and new orders during the year supported the
distribution of two dividends to shareholders, a $0.35 per share dividend to
shareholders in October, 2007 and a $0.40 per share dividend to shareholders in
April, 2008. A total of $0.75 per share was paid to the shareholders of record
during fiscal 2008.

         Fourth Quarter revenues were strong as improvements to manufacturing
processes were enhanced and new orders were received. Revenues in the 4th
quarter were $9,102,000 compared to $5,975,000 for the same quarter in fiscal
year 2007. A strong customer demand for satellite and launch products
contributed to higher gross margins and higher operating margins. Gross margin
in the 4th quarter of fiscal year 2008 was 47% compared to 43% for the same
period last year. The implementation of new automated equipment, operating
efficiencies and lower overhead costs contributed to a strong gross margin.
Operating margin in the 4th quarter of fiscal year 2008 was 5% compared to 30%
for the same period last year due to litigation expenses described above. Cash
balances continue to remain strong. All operating expenses are and have been
covered by current cash balances and thus, there is no balance on the revolving
line of credit the Company maintains with its Bank.

                               FINANCIAL CONDITION

         Accounts receivable balances, which consist of billed and unbilled
amounts were $8,111,000 and $6,363,000 respectively at the end of fiscal year
2008. The billed and unbilled amounts at the completion of fiscal year 2007 were
$4,936,000 and $8,071,000 respectively. The accounts receivable balances at both
May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007 were not reduced for reserves on doubtful
accounts. The increase in billed receivables of $3,175,000 can be attributed to
the increase in contract performance resulting in billing opportunities, as well
as the negotiation of interim billing events on long term contracts contributed
to the higher billed balance.

                                       10
<PAGE>

         Unbilled receivables represent revenues recognized from fixed priced
contracts based upon percentage-of-completion, but in advance of completing
billable events for which invoices are submitted to customers. As billing events
occur for such contracts (generally tied to delivery of hardware), previously
unbilled receivables are converted to billed accounts receivable with the
preparation and submission of invoices to customers. Unbilled receivables at May
31, 2008 were $6,363,000, compared to $8,071,000 at the end of fiscal year 2007.
The decrease in unbilled receivables at May 31, 2008 can be attributed to the
billing events described above.

         Inventories, net of reserves, decreased to $1,345,000 at May 31, 2008
from $1,569,000 at May 31, 2007. Inventory reserves, which are established in
accordance with management's estimates regarding the extent to which inventory
items will ultimately be used to generate future revenues, were $526,000 at May
31, 2008, compared to $484,000 at May 31, 2007.

         Trade accounts payable decreased to $740,000 at the end of fiscal year
2008 compared to $793,000 at the end of fiscal year 2007. Timing of receipts
submitted to Hi-Shear for payment at the end of any fiscal month/year will
directly impact the outstanding balance for invoices due. There are no disputed
amounts included in accounts payable at May 31, 2008.

         At both May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007, the Company did not have any
bank debt and has available borrowing of up to $5,000,000 available from its
commercial bank under a revolving line of credit maturing December 15, 2009 (See
Note 8). The Company also has available a $1,000,000 equipment letter of credit
maturing January 31, 2009, and bearing interest under the same terms as the
revolving line of credit. As of May 31, 2008, there was no existing balance on
this instrument.

                         LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

         Net cash of $5,994,000 was provided by operating activities during
fiscal year 2008, compared to net cash of $1,910,000 that was provided by
operating activities during fiscal year 2007. The increase in net operating cash
flows between the two fiscal years was primarily the result of increases in
accounts receivable and collections of accounts receivables as described above.

         To supplement cash provided by operating activities, the Company
maintains a business loan agreement including a revolving line of credit with a
commercial bank, for the purpose of having sufficient cash to meet its cash
obligations. There was no outstanding balance under this line of credit at May
31, 2008. Since the maximum borrowing limit under the line of credit is
$5,000,000, the amount available for borrowing at May 31, 2008 was $5,000,000.
The line of credit is available to the Company through December 15, 2009, which
is the maturity date of the business loan agreement covering the line of credit.
Outstanding amounts under the line of credit bear interest at prime less .25%
(4.75% at May 31, 2008) or at the Company's option LIBOR plus 2% (4.9% at May
31, 2008).

         The Company also has available a $1,000,000 equipment letter of credit
maturing January 31, 2009, and bearing interest under the same terms as the
revolving line of credit. As of May 31, 2008, there was no existing balance on
this instrument.

                                       11
<PAGE>

         The business loan agreement contains various financial covenants that
have been modified during the fiscal year. On June 4th, 2007, the covenant
requiring a quarterly certificate of compliance was removed; in addition, the
requirement for the bank to pre-approve a dividend prior to payment was removed.
Revised language specifies the Company may make periodic distribution of excess
capital in the form of dividend to its shareholders if and only if at the time
of such payment, the Company is in compliance with all provisions of the loan
document, including (without limitation) all financial covenants, and no default
under the agreement has occurred, is continuing or would result from the making
of such payment. In June, 2008 the fixed charge coverage ratio was modified
effective February 29, 2008. The modification allows cash dividends to be
excluded from the calculation if liquid assets on the day of distribution are at
least $750,000. The covenants including current ratio (at least 2 to 1) and the
fixed charge coverage ratio (1.25 to 1) shall exist as covenants under the loan
agreement (although quarterly reporting is no longer required). At May 31, 2008,
the Company was compliant with all of the financial covenants.

         The Company's management believes that the current line of credit is
sufficient to enable the Company to meet its projected needs for cash throughout
the period of time during which the revolving line of credit is available for
its use.

         In its attempt to minimize interest expense associated with any
outstanding balance that may exist under the revolving line of credit, the
Company has arranged with its bank to maintain "zero balances" in its
disbursement and depository accounts for the purpose of "sweeping" excess
deposited cash to pay down any revolving line of credit balance. As a result of
this arrangement, the reported "cash and cash equivalents" amounts reflected on
the Company's balance sheet may be minimal if the need to sweep to cover line of
credit balances exist. Because no balance existed on the line of credit at May
31, 2008, the need to "sweep" excess cash was not necessary and therefore
reported "cash and cash equivalents" at that date was $1,655,000.

         With the approval of its Board of Directors, the Company paid two cash
dividends of $2,383,000, or $0.35 per share and $2,726,000 and $0.40 per share,
to shareholders of record as of the close of business October 5, 2007 and April
1, 2008 respectively. The dividends were not special, and did not represent that
the Company will pay dividends on a scheduled basis.


ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         The reports of the independent certified public accountants and
financial statements and notes listed in the accompanying index are part of this
report. See "Index to Financial Statements" on page 17.


ITEM 8.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

         None.


ITEM 8A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

         As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"), the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures as of May 31,
2008, being the date of the most recently completed fiscal year. This evaluation
was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of George W.
Trahan, Chief Executive Officer and Jan L. Hauhe, Chief Financial Officer. Based
upon that evaluation, both the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that current disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports
that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

         Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

                                       12
<PAGE>

         During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008, there were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting
during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008. Improvements to strengthen internal
controls have been made during the current fiscal year and will continue to be
made to address identified weaknesses.

         The term "internal control over financial reporting" is defined as a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the registrant's principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by the registrant's board of directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
includes those policies and procedures that:

(a)    Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
       accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
       assets of the registrant;
(b)    Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
       to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
       generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
       expenditures of the registrant are being made only in accordance with
       authorizations of management and directors of the registrant; and
(c)    Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
       unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the registrant's assets
       that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

         In connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the
year ended May 31, 2008, certain internal control weaknesses became evident that
require the following remedial actions to remove them from the material weakness
category:

1.     Documentation and surveillance of internal controls needs to be improved
       to fully support management's assessment of controls.
2.     Design of financial closing procedures and controls needs to be improved
       to ensure compliance with new accounting pronouncements, regulations, and
       to prevent material misstatements.
3.     Internal technical resources, regarding complex accounting and reporting
       issues, should be strengthened in the financial area.

         As part of the communications by Raimondo Pettit Group, with respect to
their audit procedures for fiscal year 2008, Raimondo Pettit Group informed the
CFO and CEO that these areas constituted material weaknesses as defined by
Auditing Standard No. 5, "An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements," established by
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

         In accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
Company intends to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make the necessary
improvements to remediate these deficiencies. We intend to consider the results
of our remediation efforts and related testing as part of our fiscal year-end
2009 assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting.

         This 10-KSB does not include an attestation report of our registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management's report was not subject to attestation by Raimondo Pettit Group
pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only
Management's report in this 10-KSB.

                                       13
<PAGE>

ITEM 8B.  OTHER INFORMATION

         None.


                                    PART III

ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
         COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

         Information required by this item will be contained in the Company's
Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after May 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

         The information required by this item will be contained in the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after May 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by
reference.


ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

         The information required by this item will be contained in the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after May 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by
reference.


ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

         The information required by this item will be contained in the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after May 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by
reference.


ITEM 13. EXHIBITS

         Exhibits: See "Exhibit Index", page 16.


ITEM 14. zPRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

         The information required by this item will be contained in the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after May 31, 2008 and is incorporated herein by
reference.


                                       14
<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"), the registrant caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                         HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


Date: August 29, 2008                    By:  /s/ George W. Trahan
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              George W. Trahan
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chairman

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

Date: August 29, 2008                    By:  /s/ George W. Trahan
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              George W. Trahan
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chairman


                                         By:  /s/ Thomas R. Mooney
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Thomas R. Mooney
                                              Director, Co-chairman of the Board


                                         By:  /s/ Jan L. Hauhe
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jan L. Hauhe
                                              Chief Financial Officer


                                         By:  /s/ Jack Bunis
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jack Bunis
                                              Director


                                         By:  /s/ Lawrence Moreau
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Lawrence Moreau
                                              Director


                                         By:  /s/ John Zaepfel
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              John Zaepfel
                                              Director


                                       15
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                          EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NUMBER                             DESCRIPTIONS                                SEQUENTIALLY NUMBERED
--------------                             ------------                                ---------------------
3.1                Certificate of Incorporation, as amended(1)
3.2                Bylaws, as amended(2)
4.1                Form of Common Stock(3)
10.1               1993 Stock Option Plan(2)
10.2.3             Consulting Agreement with Thomas R. Mooney(17)
10.3.3             Employment Agreement with George W. Trahan(17)
10.4.1             Torrance Property Lease(6)
10.4.1.1           Torrance Property Lease Amendment #1(12)
10.4.1.2           Torrance Property Lease Amendment #2(15)
10.5.1             Form of Buy/Sell Agreement(6)
10.6               Southern California Bank Credit Facility (now U.S. Bank)(4)
10.6.1             Promissory Note Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(5)
10.6.2             Promissory Note Related to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(7)
10.6.3             Promissory Note and Amendment Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(7)
10.6.3.1           Amendments to Promissory Notes Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(8)
10.6.3.2           Amendments to Promissory Notes Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(11)
10.6.3.3           Amendment to Promissory Note Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(12)
10.6.3.4           Amendment to Promissory Note Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(13)
10.6.3.5           Amendment to Promissory Note Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(16)
10.6.3.6           Amendment to Promissory Note Relating to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(17)
10.6.4             Term Note Related to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(11)
10.6.4.1           Term Note Related to U.S. Bank Credit Facility(16)
10.7               Revolving Credit Note
10.7.1             Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Loan Documents
16.2               Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant(9)
16.3               Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant (10)
20                 Form 8-K/A filed August 8, 2003(12)
23.1               Consent of Raimondo Pettit Group
31                 Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
32                 Section 1350 Certifications
</TABLE>

(1)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM SB-2
     REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 33-73972 FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
     COMMISSION ON JANUARY 10, 1994.
(2)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM SB-2
     REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 33-73972 FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
     COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 1, 1994.
(3)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM SB-2
     REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO. 33-73972 FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
     COMMISSION ON MARCH 23, 1994.
(4)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 12, 1998.
(5)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 17, 1999.
(6)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 24, 2000.
(7)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 10, 2002.
(8)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 29, 2002.
(9)  PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO EXHIBIT 16.2 TO FORM
     8-K/A FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JANUARY 24,
     2003.
(10) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO EXHIBIT 16.3 TO FORM
     8-K/A FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 8, 2003.
(11) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2003.
(12) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 30, 2004.
(13) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2005.
(14) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JULY 28, 2006.
(15) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JANUARY 16, 2007.
(16) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON APRIL 13, 2007.
(17) PREVIOUSLY FILED AND INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB
     FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON AUGUST 10, 2007.


                                       16
<PAGE>

                          INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                                                         PAGE
                                                                         ----

Independent Auditors' Report.......................................          F-1

Balance Sheet......................................................          F-2

Statements of Operations...........................................          F-3

Statements of Stockholders' Equity  ...............................          F-4

Statements of Cash Flows   ........................................          F-5

Notes to Financial Statements......................................   F-6 - F-23



                                       17
<PAGE>

                              RAIMONDO PETTIT GROUP
                A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Hi-Shear Technology
Corporation as of May 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Hi-Shear Technology Corporation
as of May 31, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
two year period then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America


/s/ Raimondo Pettit Group


Torrance, California
August 27, 2008


                                      F-1
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


BALANCE SHEET
MAY 31, 2008

ASSETS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Assets:
  Cash and cash equivalents                                          $ 1,655,000
  Accounts receivable, net (Note 4)                                   14,474,000
  Inventories, net (Note 5)                                            1,345,000
  Deferred income taxes (Note 12)                                      2,430,000
  Prepaid expenses and other current assets                              182,000
                                                                     -----------
                        TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                         $20,086,000

Land  (Note 7)                                                           846,000
Equipment, net (Note 6)                                                2,003,000
                                                                     -----------
                            TOTAL ASSETS                             $22,935,000
                                                                     ===========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Liabilities:
  Trade accounts payable                                                 740,000
  Accrued liabilities (Note 9)                                         5,872,000
  Deferred revenue (Note 10)                                           1,204,000
  Current portion of obligations under capital leases (Note 11)           40,000
                                                                     -----------
                     TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                       $ 7,856,000

Deferred income taxes (Note 12)                                          315,000
Obligation under capital leases (less current portion) (Note 11)          34,000
                                                                     -----------
                         TOTAL LIABILITIES                           $ 8,205,000

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 8, 13 and 16)
Stockholders' Equity
  Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 500,000 shares
    authorized;  no shares issued                                              0
  Common stock, $.001 par value - 25,000,000 shares
    authorized; 6,817,541 shares issued
    and outstanding at May 31, 2008                                        7,000
  Additional paid-in capital                                           7,823,000
  Retained earnings                                                    6,900,000
                                                                     -----------
                     TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                      $14,730,000

             TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY              $22,935,000
                                                                     ===========

See Notes to Financial Statements.


                                      F-2
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED MAY 31,

                                                         2008           2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REVENUES                                              $27,628,000    $20,550,000

Cost of Revenues                                       14,827,000     11,652,000
                                                      -----------    -----------

GROSS MARGIN                                           12,801,000      8,898,000

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses            3,413,000      2,974,000
Litigation Expense                                      3,846,000        251,000
                                                      -----------    -----------

OPERATING INCOME                                        5,542,000      5,673,000

Interest Income, Net                                       44,000              0
                                                      -----------    -----------

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE                        5,586,000      5,673,000

Income Tax Expense                                      2,046,000      2,255,000
                                                      -----------    -----------

NET INCOME                                            $ 3,540,000    $ 3,418,000
                                                      ===========    ===========


Earnings per Common Share - Basic                     $      0.52    $      0.50
                                                      -----------    -----------
Earnings per Common Share - Diluted                   $      0.52    $      0.50
                                                      -----------    -----------

Weighted # Common Shares Outstanding:
   Basic                                                6,808,000      6,778,000
                                                      -----------    -----------
   Diluted                                              6,825,000      6,812,000
                                                      -----------    -----------

See Notes to Financial Statements.


                                      F-3
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
YEARS ENDED MAY 31, 2008 AND 2007


                                     Common Stock            Additional                        Total
                              ---------------------------     Paid-In        Retained      Stockholders'
                                 Shares         Amount        Capital        Earnings         Equity
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balance, May 31, 2006            6,774,000   $      7,000   $  7,503,000   $  6,746,000    $ 14,256,000

   Stock based compensation             --             --         16,000             --          16,000
   Stock options exercised          11,000             --         48,000             --          48,000
   Dividend                             --             --             --     (1,695,000)     (1,695,000)
   Net Income                           --             --             --      3,418,000       3,418,000
                              ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------

Balance, May 31, 2007            6,785,000          7,000      7,567,000      8,469,000      16,043,000

   Stock based compensation             --             --        110,000             --         110,000
   Stock options exercised          33,000             --        146,000             --         146,000
   Dividend                             --             --             --     (5,109,000)     (5,109,000)
   Net Income                           --             --             --      3,540,000       3,540,000
                              ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------

Balance May 31, 2008             6,818,000   $      7,000   $  7,823,000   $  6,900,000    $ 14,730,000


See Notes to Financial Statements.


                                              F-4
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED MAY 31,
                                                             2008           2007
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
  Net  income                                             $ 3,540,000    $ 3,418,000
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
     provided by operating activities:
       Depreciation and amortization                          472,000        465,000
       Loss on disposition of inventory                       380,000              0
       Accrued losses on uncompleted contracts               (180,000)             0
       Provision for inventory reserves                        42,000         59,000
       Deferred income taxes, net                          (1,427,000)      (216,000)
       Stock based compensation                               110,000         16,000
  Changes in assets and liabilities:
       Accounts receivable                                 (1,449,000)    (2,087,000)
       Inventories                                            (18,000)       (18,000)
       Prepaid expenses and other assets                      (40,000)        28,000
       Trade accounts payable                                 (53,000)       (67,000)
       Accrued liabilities                                  3,619,000        348,000
       Deferred revenue                                       998,000        (36,000)
                                                          -----------    -----------
              NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES     5,994,000      1,910,000

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
  Purchase of equipment                                      (334,000)      (734,000)
                                                          -----------    -----------
              NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES          (334,000)      (734,000)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
  Proceeds from stock options exercised                       146,000         48,000
  Payment of stock dividends                               (5,109,000)    (1,695,000)
  Payment on capital lease obligations                        (39,000)       (40,000)
                                                          -----------    -----------
              NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES        (5,002,000)    (1,687,000)

                   NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH            658,000       (511,000)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD                997,000      1,508,000
                                                          -----------    -----------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD                  $ 1,655,000    $   997,000
                                                          ===========    ===========

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
  Cash paid for interest                                       16,000         10,000
  Cash paid for taxes                                       3,529,000      2,337,000

  Non-cash investing and financing activities
    Stock based compensation                                  110,000         16,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.


                                      F-5
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NOTE 1.  NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NATURE OF BUSINESS:

Hi-Shear Technology Corporation designs and manufactures power cartridges,
separation devices, electronic firing units and other special components used by
the worldwide aerospace industry, the military and the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA). The Company's aerospace products are procured under
both long and short-term contracts with numerous aerospace contractors,
subcontractors and agencies of the United States Government. The Company is
dependent on the continuation of the satellite industry and government sponsored
military and aerospace programs in order to maintain its revenues.

A SUMMARY OF THE COMPANY'S SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES IS AS FOLLOWS:

USE OF ESTIMATES:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of both assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates and assumptions made by management are used for, but not
limited to, the realization of claims receivable and certain inventories, costs
to complete contracts, and the carrying value of long-lived assets. Actual
results could differ from those estimates, and such changes could be material.

REVENUE RECOGNITION:

The Company's revenues are derived principally from fixed-price contracts that
are accounted for on the percentage-of-completion method. Revenues for those
contracts are calculated on the basis of the relationship between costs incurred
and total estimated costs to complete the contracts (cost-to-cost type of
percentage-of-completion method of accounting). Revenue recognition for
contracts that require relatively less time to complete than those contracts
accounted for on a percentage-of-completion basis are recognized as deliveries
are made.

Provisions for estimated total contract losses on uncompleted contracts are made
in the period in which such losses are determined. Amounts representing contract
change orders are included in revenues only when the amounts can reliably be
estimated and realization is probable. Changes in estimates of revenues, costs
and profits are recognized in the period such changes are made.

The Company submits claims for cost reimbursement related to contract
requirement changes not yet incorporated into its contract or other contract
costs in negotiation. These claims for reimbursement result from changes to
specifications, additional work required to be performed by the Company to
satisfy customer requests beyond contract scope, failure of customer designed
components, and adjustments to contract pricing due to the customer reducing
unit quantities. Claims receivable are recorded to the extent of costs incurred,
and when, in management's opinion, it is probable that the claim will be
collected in full and the amount of the claim can be reasonably estimated.

                                      F-6
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 1.  NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:

Included are amounts billed and currently due from customers under all types of
contracts, plus amounts earned but unbilled on long-term contracts accounted for
under the cost-to-cost type of percentage-of-completion method of accounting.

The Company evaluates all outstanding billed accounts receivable to assess the
potential need for an allowance for doubtful accounts. In that assessment, the
Company considers the financial condition of its customers and the legal and
contractual bases underlying the accounts receivable.

INVENTORIES:

Inventories are composed of raw materials and component parts, work-in-process,
and finished goods available for sale. Raw materials and component parts
consists of purchased and manufactured parts that are not allocated to an
existing production job and are expected to be utilized in anticipated future
customer contracts. Work-in-process consists of costs incurred for non-contract
jobs in process for manufacturing components and sub-assemblies that do not
relate to existing production contracts, but are built in anticipation of future
customer contracts. Finished goods consist of completed manufactured products to
fulfill future anticipated customer contracts.

Inventory costs for component parts, work-in-process and finished goods include
costs for material, direct labor, sub-contracting for manufacturing processes
and testing, and manufacturing and engineering overhead. Selling, general and
administrative costs are not included in inventory, and are charged to expense
as incurred. In accordance with industry practice, inventories are classified as
a current asset, and include items that may be allocated to contracts that will
not be completed within twelve months. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost
or estimated market value, and is determined on a "first-in, first-out" basis.

EQUIPMENT:

Equipment is recorded at cost. The Company also capitalizes certain material and
labor incurred in connection with the construction of assets. Depreciation and
amortization are charged against income using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful service lives of the related assets. The principal lives used
in determining depreciation and amortization rates are as follows: machinery and
equipment, 3 to 10 years; autos, 5 years; tooling, 3 years; furniture and
fixtures, 5 to 10 years.

LAND:

Investment in land is recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value.

IMPAIRMENT ON LONG-LIVED ASSETS:

The Company records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations
when events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the carrying amounts of those assets. Assets deemed impaired are recorded to the
lower of carrying value or fair value.

                                      F-7
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

INCOME TAXES:

Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred
income tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and
operating loss carryforwards and deferred income tax liabilities are recognized
for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences
between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.
Deferred income tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the
opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Deferred income tax assets
and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on
the date of enactment.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes"
("FIN 48"), to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in
tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
deregulation, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in
interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48
on June 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a significant effect on the
Company's financial position and results of operations for the year ended May
31, 2008. Further, the Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue
Service. The Company's management has considered the various tax positions
subject to examination in accordance with FIN 48, and as a result, the Company's
management does not anticipate any material adjustments that may arise as the
result of the examination. Accordingly, no adjustments have been made to the
accompanying financial statements.

EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings per share (EPS) are computed as net income divided by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. EPS
assuming dilution reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common
shares issuable through stock options. The dilutive effect from outstanding
options for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 did not change earnings per share.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used to
calculate earnings per common share, as presented in the statements of
operations:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
                                                                            YEAR ENDED MAY 31,
                                                                         -----------------------
                                                                            2008         2007
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC:
     Numerator:  earnings available for common Stockholder               $3,540,000   $3,418,000
     Denominator:  weighted average shares - basic                        6,808,000    6,778,000
     EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC                                   $     0.52   $     0.50
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED:
     Numerator:  earnings available for common Stockholder               $3,540,000   $3,418,000
     Denominator:  weighted average shares - diluted                      6,825,000    6,812,000
     EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED                                 $     0.52   $     0.50
CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARE - DILUTED:
     Weighted Average # Common Shares Outstanding During the Period       6,808,000    6,778,000
     Effect of Dilutive Securities Options                                   17,000       34,000
                                                                         ----------   ----------
     Weighted # Common Shares and Dilutive Potential Common Stock
        used in Diluted EPS                                               6,825,000    6,812,000
                                                                         ==========   ==========

     Antidilutive shares not included in above calculation because the
        option price is less than the weighted average 12-month price
     Stock options outstanding                                                    0            0
                                                                         ==========   ==========
</TABLE>


                                      F-8
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with a maturity date of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.

The Company periodically has cash on deposit with its bank that exceeds the
insurance limits of the FDIC. The Company has not experienced any losses on such
deposits.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:

The Company accounts for stock-based employee and non employee transactions
under the requirements of SFAS No. 123R "Share Based Payment" which requires
compensation to be recorded based on the fair value of the securities issued or
the services received, whichever is more reliably measurable.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the fair
value of the stock options. The fair value of grants is determined by published
market values at the date of grant. The adoption of SFAS 123R resulted in
additional stock-based compensation of $110,000 for the year ended May 31, 2008
and $16,000 for the year ended May 31, 2007.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In July, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. Interpretation 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial
statements in accordance with Statement 109 and prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Additionally,
Interpretation 48 provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
Interpretation 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, with early adoption permitted. The Company implemented FIN 48 during
fiscal year 2008 with no material effect on the Company's financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.

In September, 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 addresses how companies should
measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for
recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). As a result of SFAS 157, there is now a common definition of
fair value to be used throughout GAAP. The FASB believes that the new standard
will make the measurement of fair value more consistent and comparable and
improve disclosures about those measures. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November, 15, 2007. The Company's management does not expect a
material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
cash flows as a result of the adoption of SFAS 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,
including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities
to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value
(the "fair value option"). A business entity shall report unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at
each subsequent reporting period. This accounting standard is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of SFAS No. 159 is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

                                      F-9
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

In December 2007, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulleting (SAB) 110. SAB 110
specifies the use of a `simplified' method as described in SAB 107 in developing
an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R). As of June, 2006 the
Company accounts for stock-based employee and non-employee transactions under
SFAS 123 (R) and does not expect the implementation of SAB 110 to have a
material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
cash flow.

In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position EITF 03-6-1. This FASB Staff
Position (FSP) addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need
to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS)
under the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement
No. 128, Earnings Per Share. This FSP shall be effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim
periods within those years; early application is not permitted. The Company
intends to implement EITF 03-6-1 during the quarter ended August 31, 2009.
Management does not expect the adoption of this Staff Position to have a
material effect on the Company's future financial position, results of
operations or cash flow.

NOTE 2.  FOURTH QUARTER ADJUSTMENTS

There were no material fourth quarter adjustments.

NOTE 3.  MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIER CONCENTRATION

The Company derives a major portion of its revenues directly from sales to
certain large companies that have operations associated with satellite, launch
vehicle and/or government defense contracts, as well as directly from
departments and agencies of the United States Government. Sales to these major
customers, which provided revenues during fiscal year 2008 in excess of 10% of
total revenues, consist of the following:

                                                         2008           2007
                                                       --------       --------

Lockheed Martin                                           39%            37%
United States Government (Including NASA)                 19%            16%
Boeing                                                    13%            8%

At May 31, 2008, billed and unpaid accounts receivable included totals of
$3,237,000, or 40% of total billed and unpaid accounts receivable, due from
Lockheed Martin companies, $1,648,000, or 20% of total billed and unpaid
accounts receivable, due from the U.S. Government entities, and $588,000 or 7%
of total billed and unpaid accounts receivable, due from Boeing, respectively.


                                      F-10
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 4.  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

   Billed and unpaid receivables at May 31, 2007                   $  4,936,000
   Billed receivables for fiscal year 2008                           29,986,000
                                                                   ------------
                                                                     34,922,000
   Collected receivables for fiscal year 2008                        26,811,000
                                                                   ------------
   Billed and unpaid receivables at May 31, 2008                      8,111,000
                                                                   ------------

   Unbilled receivables at May 31, 2008:
      Unbilled receivables on contracts in process                    6,506,000
      Accrued losses on uncompleted contracts                          (180,000)
                                                                   ------------
      Unbilled receivables on completed contracts                        37,000
                                                                   ------------
                                                                      6,363,000
                                                                   ------------

   Total gross accounts receivable at May 31, 2008                   14,474,000
   Allowance for doubtful accounts                                            0
                                                                   ------------
   Total net accounts receivable at May 31, 2008                   $ 14,474,000
                                                                   ============

Accounts receivable consists of billed and unbilled amounts due from the United
States Government, prime and subcontractors under long-term contracts. Billed
and unbilled accounts receivables at May 31, 2008 were $8,111,000 and
$6,363,000, respectively.

The billed accounts receivable balance includes $58,000 for damages awarded to
the Company by the jury of a concluded trial of the Company's lawsuit against
the United Space Alliance, LLP for alleged breaches of contracts. The Company
has filed a Notice of Appeal of that jury verdict (See Note 13).

The Company submits claims for cost reimbursement related to contract
requirement changes not yet incorporated into its contract or other contract
costs in negotiation. The Company is currently providing effort on one
build-to-print contract for which it has a claim. The claim results from flaws
on a customer provided build-to-print design. The Company is also providing
effort on an aircraft project for which it has a claim. The claim results from a
contract received with an additional option quantity priced; this device is
procured on an annual basis from the customer. As of May 31, 2008 the Company
had incurred additional costs outside the scope of the original contracts
totaling $130,000. Included in revenue for the year ended May 31, 2008 was
$469,000 and is classified as a current unbilled receivable on the balance
sheet. Total customer price modifications are expected to be $648,000 for these
contracts; there is currently no progress billings associated with these claims.


                                      F-11
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 4.  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (CONTINUED)

Unbilled receivables include revenues recognized from fixed priced contracts
under the percentage-of-completion method, but in advance of completing billable
events for which invoices are submitted to customers. The total costs and
earnings recognized from inception-to-date on contracts in process at May 31,
2008 are as follows:

   Total contracts in process                                      $ 54,990,000
                                                                   ============

   Total estimated costs                                           $ 22,807,000
   Add estimated earnings                                            12,201,000
                                                                   ------------

   Total revenue recognized                                          35,008,000
   Less amounts billed                                               29,669,000
                                                                   ------------
                                                                   $  5,339,000
                                                                   ============
   Unbilled receivables on contracts in process                    $  6,543,000
   Deferred revenue on contracts in process                          (1,204,000)
                                                                   ------------
                                                                   $  5,339,000
                                                                   ============

Because of the large amount of contracts in process at any point in time,
changes in estimates to complete can have a significant impact on the
profitability of the Company. Management estimates that each 1% change in the
total estimated costs to complete the contracts in process at May 31, 2008 would
change both the recognized revenue and earnings by approximately $113,000.

During the fiscal years 2008 and 2007, the Company generated revenues of
approximately $2,785,000 and $2,073,000, respectively, from sources outside of
the United States.

NOTE 5.  INVENTORIES

   Raw materials and component parts                                $   380,000
   Work-in-process                                                      918,000
   Finished goods                                                       573,000
                                                                    -----------
                                                                      1,871,000
   Less inventory reserves                                             (526,000)
                                                                    -----------

                           Total net inventory                      $ 1,345,000
                                                                    ===========

Included in inventories recorded and maintained by the Company are purchased and
manufactured component parts and finished goods that relate to previously
completed contracts. The Company's management periodically assesses the
likelihood that those inventory items will be used in future contracts, since
many of the Company's past contracts relate to on-going programs, for which it
will be awarded similar contracts. The current method utilized in management's
assessment is to evaluate items in the inventories and assess current or future
contract requirements which may use inventory parts. A reserve is established
based on said analysis. Since the inventory reserve methodology is subjective,
and subject to changes in estimates based upon updated information, changes in
those estimates can be substantial.

                                      F-12
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 6.  EQUIPMENT

   Machinery and equipment                                          $ 5,433,000
   Office equipment and furniture                                       562,000
   Leasehold improvements                                               369,000
   Production and test tooling                                          225,000
   Automobiles/delivery vehicle                                         187,000
   Projects in process                                                   13,000
                                                                    -----------
                                                                      6,789,000
   Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                    (4,786,000)
                                                                    -----------

                           Total net equipment                      $ 2,003,000
                                                                    ===========

For fiscal year 2008, the Company capitalized costs amounting to $21,000 that
were incurred in the purchase or manufacture of production and test tooling
related primarily to new products designed and qualified for production by the
Company during fiscal year 2008. Each tool, for which costs are capitalized, is
expected to be used repeatedly in the production or test of similar parts for
multiple orders over an extended period of time of at least three years.
Accordingly, capitalized tooling costs are depreciated on a straight-line basis
over three years.

Included in automobiles is $164,000 in capital leases, which is reduced by
accumulated depreciation of $89,000 at May 31, 2008.

NOTE 7.  LAND

The Company owns twelve acres of land located in the Santa Clarita Business Park
in Santa Clarita, California, on which it has several buildings that it uses for
storage and blending of pyrotechnic powders utilized in many of its manufactured
products.

NOTE 8.  BANK LINE OF CREDIT AND NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has a business loan agreement with a bank for the purpose of
obtaining a revolving line of credit and term loans. Borrowings under this
business loan agreement are collateralized by the Company's assets.

At May 31, 2008 and throughout fiscal year 2008, the Company did not have
outstanding balances on the revolving line of credit.

The revolving line of credit, under which the Company can borrow up to a maximum
limit of $5,000,000, is set to mature on December 15, 2009. Outstanding balances
under the line of credit bear interest based on prime less .25% (4.75% at May
31, 2008) or at the Company's option LIBOR plus 2% (4.9% at May 31, 2008).

The Company also has available a $1,000,000 equipment letter of credit maturing
January 31, 2009, and bearing interest under the same terms as the revolving
line of credit. As of May 31, 2008, there was no existing balance on this
instrument.

                                      F-13
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 8.  BANK LINE OF CREDIT AND NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

The business loan agreement contains various financial covenants that have been
modified during the fiscal year. On June 4th, 2007, the covenant requiring a
quarterly certificate of compliance was removed; in addition, the requirement
for the bank to pre-approve a dividend prior to payment was removed. Revised
language specifies the Company may make periodic distribution of excess capital
in the form of dividend to its shareholders if and only if at the time of such
payment, the Company is in compliance with all provisions of the loan document,
including (without limitation) all financial covenants, and no default under the
agreement has occurred, is continuing or would result from the making of such
payment. In June, 2008 the fixed charge coverage ratio was modified effective
February 29, 2008. The modification allows cash dividends to be excluded from
the calculation if liquid assets on the day of distribution are at least
$750,000. The covenants including current ratio (at least 2 to 1) and the fixed
charge coverage ratio (1.25 to 1) shall exist as covenants under the loan
agreement (although quarterly reporting is no longer required). At May 31, 2008,
the Company was compliant with all of the financial covenants.

NOTE 9.  ACCRUED CURRENT LIABILITIES

As of May 31, 2008, accrued current liabilities consist of the following:

   Accrued vacation                                                   $1,238,000
   Accrued salaries, wages and bonus                                     653,000
   Deferred compensation                                                 112,000
   Accrued commissions                                                   239,000
   Accrued facilities rent                                                61,000
   Accrued professional fees                                              54,000
   Accrued Alliance litigation costs                                   3,275,000
   Accrued income taxes                                                  218,000
   Miscellaneous                                                          22,000
                                                                      ----------

            Total accrued current liabilities                         $5,872,000
                                                                      ==========

NOTE 10.  DEFERRED REVENUE

Deferred revenue is composed of amounts billed to customers in excess of
revenues earned and recognized on the related contracts at the end of a
financial period. As the Company continues to perform work on those contracts in
process, revenue is earned and "deferred revenue" on the balance sheet is
reclassified to earned "revenue" on the statements of operations. Deferred
revenue was $1,204,000 at May 31, 2008.


                                      F-14
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 11.  CAPITAL LEASES

The Company leases vehicles under capital leasing agreements which expire at
various dates through July 2011. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Year ending May 31,

          2009                                                         $ 43,000
          2010                                                           36,000
          2011                                                            1,000
                                                                       --------
          Total minimum lease payments                                   80,000

          Amounts representing interest                                   6,000
                                                                       --------

          Present value of net minimum lease payments                    74,000

          Current maturities                                            (40,000)
                                                                       --------
                                                                       $ 34,000
                                                                       ========

NOTE 12.  INCOME TAXES

     Deferred income taxes at May 31, 2008 consist of the following:
     Current
       Deferred income tax asset:
          Accrued vacation                                          $   536,000
          Supplemental employee retirement plan                          48,000
          Inventory reserves                                            225,000
          Current year state tax expense                                272,000
          Accrued bonus                                                 161,000
          Accrued legal fees and litigation costs                     1,403,000
                                                                    -----------
       Total current deferred income tax asset                        2,645,000

       Deferred income tax liability:
          Prepaid expenses                                              (68,000)
          Deferred state taxes                                         (147,000)
                                                                    -----------
       Total current deferred income tax liability                     (215,000)
                                                                    -----------

     Net current deferred income tax asset                            2,430,000

     Non-current
       Deferred income tax liability:
          Fixed assets                                                 (315,000)
                                                                    -----------
       Total net non-current deferred tax liability                    (315,000)

     Total net deferred income taxes                                $ 2,115,000
                                                                    ===========

                                      F-15
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 12.  INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)

Realization of deferred income tax assets is primarily dependent upon generating
sufficient taxable income to absorb the tax benefit of the deferred income tax
assets. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more
likely than not that the net deferred income tax assets will be realized prior
to expiration. That assessment is based upon the Company's expectations for a
continuation of profitable operations. The amount of the deferred income tax
assets considered realizable, however, could be increased or reduced in the near
term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryover periods are
increased or reduced, or if certain changes in the ownership structure of the
Company occur.

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

                                                    2008                2007
                                                 -----------        -----------
   Current tax expense:
               Federal                           $ 2,681,000        $ 1,905,000
               State                                 799,000            565,000
                                                 -----------        -----------
                                                 $ 3,480,000        $ 2,470,000
                                                 ===========        ===========

   Deferred tax expense (benefit)
               Federal                           $(1,134,000)       $  (166,000)
               State                                (300,000)           (49,000)
                                                 -----------        -----------
                                                 $(1,434,000)       $  (215,000)
                                                 ===========        ===========
   Total tax provision                           $ 2,046,000        $ 2,255,000
                                                 ===========        ===========

A reconciliation of actual tax (credit) to the amount computed by applying the
federal statutory income tax rates to income before income taxes is as follows:

                                                        2008            2007
                                                     -----------    -----------
   Federal income tax computed at statutory rate     $ 1,899,000    $ 1,929,000
   Permanent differences                                (175,000)         8,000
   State taxes, net of federal benefit                   322,000        336,000
   Other state tax and minimum taxes                           0          7,000
   Tax Credits                                                 0        (25,000)
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                     $ 2,046,000    $ 2,255,000
                                                     ===========    ===========

NOTE 13.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases its facilities, automobiles and certain equipment under
operating lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2013. Rental
expense under operating leases for the years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 was
approximately $656,000 and $660,000 respectively.

                                      F-16
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 13.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Maximum annual rentals under all non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

                                          2009                        $  629,000
                                          2010                           646,000
                                          2011                           663,000
                                          2012                           681,000
                                    Thereafter                           181,000
                                                                      ----------
                                                                      $2,800,000
                                                                      ==========

$2,500,000 of the above lease commitment is for rent of the Company's offices
and production facility in Torrance. The lease agreement for the facility
extends through August 31, 2012.

Hi-Shear filed suit against United Space Alliance, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company ("Alliance"), and USBI Co., a Delaware corporation ("USBI"),
in November 2000 in the Circuit Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit,
Brevard County, Florida. Hi-Shear sought to recover damages in excess of
$1,500,000, excluding interest, costs, and attorneys' fees, alleging Alliance
and USBI breached contracts for Hi-Shear to manufacture and deliver certain
hardware for use on the Space Shuttle. Hi-Shear also sought damages based on
claims alleging that Alliance and USBI fraudulently induced Hi-Shear to enter
into certain contracts to manufacture and deliver certain hardware for use on
the Space Shuttle. In addition, Hi-Shear sought damages for claims that
defendants misappropriated Hi-Shear's proprietary information and/or trade
secrets in certain technical data and information. Hi-Shear also alleged a claim
for a declaratory judgment.

Alliance subsequently filed a counterclaim seeking damages of over $450,000,
excluding interest, costs, and attorneys' fees, alleging Hi-Shear breached its
contracts to manufacture and deliver certain hardware for use on the Space
Shuttle. Alliance also alleged a claim for conversion and an accounting relating
to certain items of alleged government furnished equipment, and a claim for a
declaratory judgment. As part of its defense in the litigation, Alliance claimed
that it was coerced through duress to enter into a contract with Hi-Shear where
Hi-Shear was the qualified successful lowest bidder. In addition, Alliance
demanded that Hi-Shear ship uncertified flight hardware to it for use on the
United States Space Shuttle, ahead of its normal certification schedule. USBI
did not file a counterclaim against the Company.

In July 2004, Hi-Shear filed a separate but related suit against Pacific
Scientific Energetic Materials Company, a Delaware corporation, in the Circuit
Court of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, Brevard County, Florida. Hi-Shear
sought to recover damages, alleging that defendant misappropriated Hi-Shear's
proprietary information and/or trade secrets in certain technical data and
information, conspired to misappropriate trade secrets, and interfered with
Hi-Shear's advantageous business relationships. After defendant filed, and the
court ruled on a motion to dismiss, and Hi-Shear filed an amended complaint
against Pacific Scientific, the court entered an order staying all further
proceedings in the case until the appeals from the suit between Hi-Shear and
Alliance and USBI are resolved, and the court enters a subsequent order lifting
the stay.

                                      F-17
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 13.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Prior to the trial between Hi-Shear, Alliance, and USBI, the court made legal
rulings that the Company did not have trade secrets in certain technical data
and information, which the Company alleged had been misappropriated by Alliance
and USBI. As a result, the court granted in part Alliance's and USBI's motions
for summary judgment on that issue. Prior to trial, the court also made legal
rulings that USBI did not fraudulently induce Hi-Shear to enter into a contract
to manufacture and deliver certain flight hardware for use on the Space Shuttle.
As a result, the court granted Alliance's and USBI's motions for summary
judgment on that issue.

Trial before a jury of Hi-Shear's remaining claims against Alliance and USBI,
and Alliance's counterclaim against Hi-Shear, commenced on July 5, 2005 in
Titusville, Florida. Shortly after the trial began, the court made additional
legal rulings, which resulted in its granting the remainder of Alliance's and
USBI's motions for summary judgment on the trade secrets issues. As a
consequence of those rulings and based on other circumstances, Hi-Shear
dismissed its remaining claims against USBI. As a result, USBI was no longer a
participant in the trial.

The jury trial continued through September 2, 2005. Some of Hi-Shear's claims
were disposed of by the court based on legal rulings made during the course of
trial. Of the remaining claims that the jury was asked to decide, the jury
rendered a verdict in favor of Hi-Shear on one of its breach of contract claims,
and awarded the Company damages of $57,781, exclusive of interest, costs, and
attorneys' fees. The jury found in favor of Alliance on Hi-Shear's remaining
breach of contract claims and thus awarded Hi-Shear no damages on those claims.
The jury also found in favor of Alliance on its counterclaim for breach of
contracts but awarded it no damages. In addition, the jury determined that
Hi-Shear converted certain government furnished equipment pursuant to Alliance's
conversion counterclaim.

In August 2005, the court entered final judgment on Hi-Shear's claims against
USBI. After hearing and denying post-trial motions by both Hi-Shear and
Alliance, in May 2006 the court entered final judgment on Hi-Shear's and
Alliance's respective claims against each other.

In September 2005, Hi-Shear appealed the final judgment entered on its claims
against USBI to Florida's Fifth District Court of Appeal. Alliance participated
in that appeal as an appellee based on its having joined in the trade secrets
and fraudulent inducement summary judgment motions at the trial level. In
February 2007, after hearing oral argument, the court of appeal affirmed the
trial court's rulings and final judgment in favor of USBI. The appellate court
denied motions by Hi-Shear and Alliance to recover attorneys' fees incurred on
appeal.

In June 2006, Hi-Shear appealed the final judgment entered on its claims against
Alliance, and Alliance's counterclaims against Hi-Shear, to Florida's Fifth
District Court of Appeal challenging the legal basis of the lower court's final
judgment including the amounts of the recovery of Hi-Shear's damages on
contracts for manufactured components and other claims at trial. The appeal
encompasses issues evident throughout the court proceedings, including the legal
basis of the trial court's judgments and questionable adverse rulings by the
court during the entire course of the trial. Alliance has filed its
cross-appeal, parties' briefs on appeal have been filed, and the oral arguments
to the appellate court were completed on June 25, 2008. The Florida Fifth
District Court of Appeal will issue its decision regarding this appeal in due
course. The Company is not able to estimate when the decision will be issued or
the ultimate outcome of such decision.

In the final judgments, the trial court retained jurisdiction to consider
motions by the parties to recover attorneys' fees and litigation costs. In
December 2006, the trial court entered an order denying Hi-Shear's motion for
entitlement to recover its attorneys' fees and costs from Alliance, even though
Hi-Shear was the only party to have been awarded damages by the jury. In that
same order, the court determined that instead,

                                      F-18
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 13.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)

Alliance had prevailed on its claims for breach on three of four contracts and
thus was entitled to recover from Hi-Shear its reasonable attorneys' fees
incurred relating to count I of its counterclaim against Hi-Shear for breach of
contracts. The court also ordered that both Alliance and USBI were entitled to
recover their respective litigation costs from Hi-Shear. Alliance has claimed
the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees it should recover from Hi-Shear is
approximately $2,900,000, and the amount of litigation costs it should recover
from Hi-Shear is approximately $453,000. USBI has claimed the amount of
litigation costs it should recover from Hi-Shear is approximately $48,000.
Hi-Shear has opposed these claims, believing that the amounts sought by Alliance
and USBI are excessive.

On March 13-14, 2008, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on the amount
of reasonable attorneys' fees to be awarded to Alliance. At the hearing,
Hi-Shear offered evidence and expert testimony to establish that Alliance's
request for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs are excessive and that they
should not have exceeded approximately $400,000. The trial court also issued an
order requiring memoranda of law by the parties on the amount of costs to be
awarded to Alliance and USBI.

On July 28, 2008, the trial court sent a letter to Alliance's attorneys asking
them to prepare a form of order regarding attorneys' fees. Hi-Shear received a
copy of the letter on July 31, 2008. The letter does not specify the final
amount of attorneys' fees to be awarded, and it indicates than an additional
hearing will be required on specific issues. However, the letter also indicates
that the trial court will make favorable rulings for Alliance on several issues,
and it appears that the trial court may award to Alliance the preponderance of
the attorneys' fees it seeks. On August 7, 2008, the trial court sent an
additional letter to Alliance's attorneys addressing taxable costs that Alliance
and USBI are entitled to recover.

The final outcome of Hi-Shear's pending appeal and Alliance's pending
cross-appeal may have an effect on an award of attorneys' fees and costs to
Alliance. Although Hi-Shear believes that it will prevail on its appeal and that
the trial court's order that it pay Alliance's and USBI's attorneys' fees and
costs will be reversed, Hi-Shear believes that it is appropriate under generally
accepted accounting principles to accrue an estimate of the fees and costs
described in the court's letters. Although Hi-Shear is unable to determine the
precise amount of attorney fees that will be awarded at this time, it believes
that it is appropriate under generally accepted accounting principles to accrue
approximately $3,275,000 associated with the litigation for its year ended May
31, 2008. This accrual does not include possible costs for prejudgment interest
which may be assessed at the statutory rate dating from December, 2006.

In addition, the Company is subject to other claims and legal actions that may
arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the Company, after
consultation with counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these
other claims and legal actions, will not have a material effect on the financial
position or on the results of operations.

NOTE 14.  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

The Company had a non-statutory stock option plan, which was in effect from
December 23, 1993 through its termination date of December 23, 2003. Under the
plan, options to purchase common stock, with a maximum term of 10 years, were
granted and vested as determined by the Company's Stock Option Committee.
Options for up to 500,000 shares could be granted to employees or directors.
Termination of the stock option plan did not nullify stock options previously
granted, but not exercised. Those options continue to be exercisable through
their expiration dates, which occur ten years after their grant dates.

                                      F-19
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 14.  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)

On July 31, 2006 the Company's Board of Directors approved the 2006 Stock Award
Plan, which was subsequently accepted by Company's shareholders for adoption at
the October 16, 2006 annual shareholders' meeting. Under the plan, options to
purchase common stock, with a maximum term of 10 years, are granted and vested
as determined by the Company's Stock Option Committee. Grants and/or options for
up to 500,000 shares could be issued to employees or directors.

Stock options are valid for ten years and have various vesting schedules.
Current options have 2 year, 3 year and 4 year vesting schedules. There were
35,500 options granted during fiscal year 2008.

Stock grants have various vesting schedules. Current grants vest 50% each six
months following the date of grant. There were 9,750 grants issued during fiscal
year 2008. The fair value of grants is determined by published market values at
the date of grant.

The fair value of each option is estimated at the issue date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model
requires the use of certain assumptions, including fair value, expected terms,
expected volatility, expected dividends, risk-free interest rate and expected
forfeiture rate to calculate the fair value of stock-based payment awards. The
assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock option awards involve
inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result,
if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the computed fair
value and resulting stock-based compensation expense could be different in the
future. Furthermore, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture
rate and recognize expense only for those shares expected to vest. If the actual
forfeiture rate is materially different from the estimate, the stock based
compensation expense could be different from what is recorded in the current
period. The fair value of the options granted in 2008 was calculated by using
the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend rates of 2.47% and 3.1%;
price volatility of 68.93% and 86.5%; risk-free interest rates of 4.21% and
3.28%; and expected life of five years. The fair value of options granted in
2007 was calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend
rate of 4.7%; price volatility of 81.55%; risk-free interest rate of 4.96%; and
expected life of six years.

The Company does not have information available which is indicative of future
exercise and post-vesting behavior to estimate the expected term. The Company
adopted the simplified method of estimating the expected term of a stock option,
as permitted by SAB 107. Under this method, the expected term is presumed to be
the mid-point between the vesting date and the contractual end of the term.

The expected volatility is derived from historical volatility of the Company's
common stock.

The dividend rate is based on the Company's historic dividend rate.

The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S.
Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximately equal to the
expected life of the Company's stock options.

As the Company has little to no history of actual forfeitures, nor any
indication of pending forfeitures, the pre-vesting forfeiture rate is estimated
to be zero.


                                      F-20
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 14.  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)

A summary of the status of the option plan and changes during fiscal years 2008
and 2007 is as follows:

                                              2008                   2007
                                      -------------------    -------------------
                                                 Weighted-             Weighted-
                                                  Average               Average
                                                 Exercise              Exercise
             Fixed Options             Shares      Price      Shares     Price
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at beginning of year       52,834    $   4.20     71,500   $    4.32
     Granted                           35,500        9.75      2,000       10.94
     Exercised                        (32,584)       4.48    (10,500)       5.67
     Forfeited                         (5,281)       6.75    (10,166)       5.95
                                      -------                -------

Outstanding at end of year             50,469        7.66     52,834        4.20
                                      =======                =======

Exercisable at end of year             14,969        2.69     43,584        4.14


A summary of the status of the grant plan and changes during fiscal year 2008 is
as follows:

                                                        2008
                                                     ----------
                              Fixed Grants             Shares
                    -------------------------------------------
                    Outstanding at beginning of year         0
                         Granted                         9,750
                         Exercised                           0
                         Forfeited                           0
                                                     ----------

                    Outstanding at end of year           9,750
                                                     ==========

At the end of fiscal year 2007, there were 498,000 shares available for issue.
Including stock option and stock grant activity for the current year, there were
447,719 shares available for issue at the end of fiscal year 2008.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company recorded stock-based
compensation of $110,000 during the year ended May 31, 2008. Stock based
compensation of $56,000 was recorded for the 35,500 options issued during fiscal
year 2008; stock based compensation of $54,000 was recorded for the 9,750 grants
issued during fiscal year 2008. The Company elected to recognize stock-based
compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period
for the entire award.

As of May 31, 2008, total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock
options of $157,000 is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 3 years. As of May 31, 2008, total unrecognized compensation costs related to
stock grants of $54,000 is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 6 months.


                                      F-21
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 14.  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)

Information relating to stock options at May 31, 2008 summarized by exercised
price is as follows:

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                         Options Outstanding                                   Options Exercisable
----------------------------------------------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                                   Weighted-
                                    Average     Weighted-                            Weighted-
                                   Remaining     Average    Aggregate                 Average   Aggregate
      Range of         Number     Contractual   Exercise    Intrinsic     Number     Exercise   Intrinsic
   Exercise Price    Outstanding      Life        Price       Value     Exercisable    Price      Value
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2.64 - $6.99            14,969    5.6 years   $    2.69   $   17,168       14,969   $   2.69   $ 17,168
$7.00 - $9.99            33,500    9.5 years        9.71      186,092            0          0          0
$10.00 - $12.00           2,000    9.0 years       10.49       12,253            0          0          0
                    ------------                           -----------  -----------             ---------

                         50,469                $    7.66   $  215,513       14,969   $   2.69   $ 17,168
                    ============                           ===========  ===========             =========
</TABLE>

Information relating to stock grants at May 31, 2008 summarized by exercised
price is as follows:

                               Grants Outstanding
                     --------------------------------------
                                     Weighted-
                                      Average
                                     Remaining   Aggregate
                         Number     Contractual  Intrinsic
                       Outstanding      Life       Value
                     --------------------------------------
                            9,750    0.5 years   $ 107,506

                            9,750                $ 107,506
                     =============               ==========


Information related to non-vested stock options at May 31, 2008 is as follows:

                                                              Weighted Average
                                              Number of          Issue Date
                                                Shares      Fair Value Per Share
                                              ---------     --------------------

   Non-Vested Options at May 31, 2007             5,625     $               2.69
   Issued                                        35,500                     9.75
   Vested                                         4,750                     2.68
   Forfeited                                        875                    10.94
                                              ---------     --------------------
   Non-Vested Options at May 31, 2008            35,500     $               9.75
                                              =========     ====================

                                      F-22
<PAGE>

HI-SHEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE 14.  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)

Information relating to non-vested stock grants at May 31, 2008 is as follows:

                                                              Weighted Average
                                              Number of          Issue Date
                                                Shares      Fair Value Per Share
                                              ---------     --------------------

Non-Vested Grants at May 31, 2007                     0     $               0.00
Issued                                            9,750                    11.76
Vested                                            4,875                    11.76
Forfeited                                             0                     0.00
                                              ---------     --------------------
Non-Vested Grants at May 31, 2008                 4,875     $              11.76
                                              =========     ====================

NOTE 15.  RELATED PARTIES

A director of the Company performs consulting services for the Company under a
two-year contract that expires February 28, 2009. The Company incurred $254,000
and $229,000 of consulting fees for the years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.

NOTE 16. 401(k) RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company has a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the "401(k) Plan") that covers
substantially all employees. Employees may elect to contribute a percentage of
compensation to the maximum deferred amount allowed by tax laws. The Company may
make a matching contribution to the 401(k) Plan and/or a profit sharing
contribution which is allocated to all eligible participants, whether they made
deferral contributions or not. Contributions are made solely at the discretion
of the Company's Board of Directors. The Company did not make a matching
contribution or a profit sharing contribution to the 401(k) Plan for the fiscal
years ended May 31, 2008 and 2007.


                                      F-23