alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES

v. 

CHRISTOPHER DAVID YOES

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:23-CR-103

(Judge Mazzant/Judge Durrett)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United 

States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate 

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 25, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report 

(Dkt. #21) recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Dkt. #10) and Supplemental 

Motion to Suppress (Dkt. #15) be denied. No party filed objections to the Report. 

Having received the Report of the Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the 

findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s 

report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Dkt. #10) and 

Supplemental Motion to Suppress (Dkt. #15) are DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cr-00103-ALM-AGD Document 26 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 112
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Income and the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  244,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               288,900
<PP&E>                                       5,189,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,598,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,924,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,500
<BONDS>                                        672,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     504,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,924,800
<SALES>                                        986,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,013,700
<CGS>                                          492,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  668,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            240,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   240,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46
        

</TABLE>
Jamahl Harim SIMMONS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-620.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1919

To require the Commissioner of Social Security to provide prisoner information obtained from the States to Federal and federally assisted benefit

programs as a means of preventing the erroneous provision of benefits

to prisoners.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. HERGER (for himself, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. CRANE, Mr. RAMSTAD, Ms.

DUNN, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. WELLER, and Mr. FOLEY)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To require the Commissioner of Social Security to provide

prisoner information obtained from the States to Federal

and federally assisted benefit programs as a means of

preventing the erroneous provision of benefits to prisoners.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal Welfare Pre5 vention Act, Part III’’.
2

•HR 1919 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE STATE PRISONER IN2 FORMATION TO FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY

3 ASSISTED BENEFIT PROGRAMS.

4 Section 1611(e)(1)(I)(ii)(II) of the Social Security

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(e)(1)(I)(ii)(II)) is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘is authorized to’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32165-32166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at

[[Page 32166]]

the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 27, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. S.B.C.P. Bancorp, Inc., Cross Plains, Wisconsin; to merge with 
Monona Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Monona Bank, 
both of Monona, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-11474 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30476

GRIMALDI CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

ET AL.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

H. TOM ROBINSON, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-484-A)

January 8, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Grimaldi Construction, Inc., et al., appeal an adverse summary judgment in

their action against H. Tom Robinson and American International Specialty Lines

Insurance Company. Having considered the summary judgment record, briefs and

oral arguments of counsel, and substantially forthe reasons assigned and authorities

cited by the district court in its Order and Reasons signed and filed April 18, 1997,
2

we AFFIRM.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41484 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ALEXIS ALAN AZUARA

- PAZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1

- 15

- CR

- 433

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alexis Alan Azuara

Paz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Azuara

- Paz h a s not filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41484 Document: 00513557024 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 41484

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withd raw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41484 Document: 00513557024 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.26







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: January 31, 2012







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO:  Steve Carlson







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







In January, 2012, the Company issued 557,600 shares of common stock to Steve Carlson, the former CEO, in full satisfaction of all amounts owed to him for his services.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
Gino Velez SCOTT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6783.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1996, OF BORROR CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                     95,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           8,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,526
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,826
<SALES>                                        175,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,579
<CGS>                                          136,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,037
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64


</TABLE>
Bruce MERRYMAN, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6685.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.5

Report of Independent Auditors

The Board of Control of 
Northampton Generating Company, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Northampton Generating Company, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Northampton Generating Company, L.P. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and whose report dated January 23, 2002, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. 
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the 2002 financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Northampton Generating Company, L.P. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Partnership changed its method of accounting for certain derivative contracts./s/   Ernst & Young LLP
February 24, 2003
McLean, Virginia
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2220 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2220

       To suspend temporarily the duty on tungsten concentrates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

   Mr. Lewis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on tungsten concentrates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.26.11    Tungsten          Free              No Change         No change         On or before 12/
                     concentrates                                                            31/2002          ''
                     (provided for                                                                             .
                     in subheading
                     2611.00.60)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
ASARCO LLC, Petitioner v. UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC

No. 18-1415

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stuart DIZAK, petitioner, v. Brandon SMITH, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility.

No. 18-6639.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
ortx-ex413_691.htm



 

Exhibit 4.13

 



 

 

 

 


	
Securities and Exchange Commission
	
Our ref:
	
SJM/63043/SMM

	
100 F Street, NE 
	
 
	
 

	
Washington DC 20549
	
 
	
 

	
USA
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
19 March 2019




Ladies & Gentlemen

We have read the statements made by Orchard Therapeutics PLC (copy attached), which we understand will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Item 16 of Form 20-F of Orchard Therapeutics PLC on 22 March 2019.  We agree with the statements concerning our firm contained therein.

Yours faithfully



Blick Rothenberg Audit LLP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


	
Blick Rothenberg Audit LLP
	
Tel:
	
+44 (0)20 7486 0111
	
 

	
16 Great Queen Street
	
Fax:
	
+44 (0)20 7935 6852
	
 

	
Covent Garden
	
Email:
	
email@blickrothenberg.com
	
 

	
London WC2B 5AH
	
Web:
	
www.blickrothenberg.com
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Blick Rothenberg Audit LLP is a UK limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales No. OC377158. A list of members (who we refer to as partners) is available at the registered office address above. Blick Rothenberg Audit LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority to carry on investment business. Blick Rothenberg is an independent member of BKR International.
1

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DARLENE BALISTRERI-AMRHEIN

V.

ATTORNEY LARRY HERCULES & 

LAW FIRM, et al.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23CV862

JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On May 30, 2024, the report of the Magistrate Judge (the “Report”) (Dkt. #6) was entered 

containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Darlene BalistreriAmrhein’s (“Plaintiff”) claims be dismissed without prejudice and any pending motions be denied 

as moot pursuant to Rule 41(b) because Plaintiff did not comply with the terms of a pre-filing 

injunction issued against her. On June 10, 2024, Plaintiff filed Objections (Dkt. #7) to the Report.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Objections (Dkt. #7) and is of the opinion 

that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the Objections (Dkt. #7)

are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s 

Objections (Dkt. #7) are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Dkt. #6) is 

ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and 

any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

Case 4:23-cv-00862-ALM-KPJ Document 8 Filed 06/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1136
2

Case 4:23-cv-00862-ALM-KPJ Document 8 Filed 06/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1137
EXHIBIT 31.1 

Certifications of ChiefExecutive Officer 

I, Carl Spana, certifythat: 

I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of Palatin Technologies, Inc.; 

Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated          subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly          during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

(b)              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting. 

Date: February 9, 2005 

/s/ Carl Spana            

Carl Spana, ChiefExecutive Officer