alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Prospecta Energy Group, Inc.

, * From the 42nd District

Court of Coleman County,

Trial Court No. 5347

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00314

- CV * February 28, 2013

Ray Prichard d/b/a Rayder * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Oilfield Services, Inc. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has considered Prospecta Energy Group, Inc.’s motion to dismiss this appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted in part . Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against

P r ospecta Energy Group, Inc.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

. Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Blake J. Watterson 

BATFE et al. 

Blake J. Watterson 

05/17/2024 

G 

4:23-cv-00080 

/s/ Matthew Miller 

Matthew Miller. TX Bar No. 24046444 

Texas Public Policy Foundation 

901 Congress Ave. 

Austin. Texas 78701 

mmiller@texaspolicy.com 

(512) 472-2700 

(512) 472-2728 

Case 4:23-cv-00080-ALM Document 64 Filed 05/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1097
Grady PEDERSON, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA, et al.

No. 18-6686.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00266-CV

In the ESTATE OF Louis GANTZ, Deceased

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-PC-0126

Honorable Linda Z. Jones, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 3, 2012

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellants filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)(absent 

agreement of parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
Order entered November 8, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-16-01268-CV No. 05-16-01270-CV

IN RE CHARLIE PUENTES, Relator

Original Proceeding from th e County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 004-83427-2015 and 004-83429-2015



### ORDER Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart

In accordance with the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ

of mandamus and DENY AS MOOT relator’s motion for leave to file petition for writ of

mandamus.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1841

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to restore eligibility for

adjustment of status under section 245(i) of that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1999

Mr. GUTIERREZ (for himself and Mrs. MORELLA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to restore

eligibility for adjustment of status under section 245(i)

of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON ELIGI4 BILITY FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS UNDER

5 SECTION 245(I).

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 245(i)(1) of the Immigra7 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)) is amended

8 by striking ‘‘(i)(1)’’ through ‘‘The Attorney General’’ and

9 inserting the following:
2

•HR 1841 IH

1 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections

2 (a) and (c) of this section, an alien physically present in

3 the United States who—

4 ‘‘(A) entered the United States without inspec5 tion; or

6 ‘‘(B) is within one of the classes enumerated in

7 subsection (c) of this section;

8 may apply to the Attorney General for the adjustment of

9 his or her status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

10 permanent residence. The Attorney General’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall be effective as if included in the enact13 ment of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and

14 State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations

15 Act, 1998 (Public Law 105–119; 111 Stat. 2440).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,782
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,902
<PP&E>                                           7,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                        (339)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,372
<SALES>                                         40,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,525
<CGS>                                           37,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (962)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                          Northwest Airlines Corporation
             1996 Retention and Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan

                              First Amendment to the
                          Northwest Airlines Corporation
    1996 Retention and Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan ("First Amendment")

     1.   Reference is made to the Northwest Airlines Corporation 1996
Retention and Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan").

     2.   Section 1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows:

     "a.  "Administrator" means the Compensation Administration Subcommittee of
          the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board, or, if the
          Board elects to administer the Plan or there otherwise is no
          Administrator, the Board."

     3.   References to the "Plan" in the Plan document shall mean the Plan
as amended by this First Amendment.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/18/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      367,704
COMMITMENTS
  81,098  122,141   94,619  156,572  118,421  332,289  335,181   35,415   32,523

CHANGES FROM 06/11/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        -98)
  -1,679  -28,696    3,390     -488   25,220    1,223      -86   -1,321      -12

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.1     33.2     25.7     42.6     32.2     90.4     91.2      9.6      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      172)
      50       75       75       33       32      134      139
```

----

Updated June 21, 2013
Brandi K. STOKES, petitioner, v. Christopher Lance CORSBIE, et al.

No. 18-550.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*814Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.14





CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 28, 2013
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Paul Skayman, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical reports entitled (i) the “Technical Report for Kisladag Gold Mine, Turkey”, dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 2010, and (ii) the “Technical Report for Jinfeng Gold Mine, China” dated January 13, 2012 and effective March 15, 2011, and of extracts from or a summary of  the respective technical report and other information pertaining to these projects, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
  By:
/s/ Paul SkaymanPaul Skayman, MAusIMMEldorado Gold CorporationChief Operating Officer
Luis A. PENA, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-6846.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-08-28T10:53:51Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-08-28T10:54:00Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-08-28T10:54:00Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="91259">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-08-28T10:53:51Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
AUSTIN 
</p>
<p>250 </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<p>253. 
</p>
<p>COMMIITEL </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the "Registrant")
hereby  certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended  September 30, 2003 fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained  therein  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                   /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                                   ------------------------
                                                   Keith A. Simpson
                                                   Vice-President and
                                                   Chief Accounting Officer

Date: November 14, 2003

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-3
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2080

To amend title 18, United States Code, to transport maximum security

prisoners across State lines to prisons that are not classified to handle

maximum security prisoners.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to transport maximum security prisoners across State lines to prisons

that are not classified to handle maximum security prisoners.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prisoner Transfer Act

5 of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2080 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORT OF MAXIMUM SECURITY PRISONERS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 87 of title 18, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘§ 1794. Transport of maximum security prisoners

6 ‘‘Whoever, knowing or having reason to know that an

7 individual is a prisoner pursuant to conviction for crime

8 under State or Federal law, who is classified as a max9 imum security prisoner, knowingly transports that indi10 vidual across a State line, other than to a prison or other

11 facility classified as a maximum security prison or facility,

12 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than

13 2 years, or both.’’.

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

15 at the beginning of chapter 87 of title 18, United States

16 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘1794. Transport of maximum security prisoners.’’.

Æ
Samuel Lee AMBROSE, petitioner, v. Tony TRIERWEILER, Warden.

No. 17-8502.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/28/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-00254

PATTERSON TRADERS LLC d/b/a SMOKEZILLA

SMOKE SHOP and JESSICA C PATTERSON,

PATTERSON TRADERS LLC d/b/a SMOKEZILLA SMOKE SHOP

REGISTERED AGENT: JESSICA C PATTERSON

318 E OAK ST STE 160

DENTON, TX 76201

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00254-ALM Document 3 Filed 03/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 19
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00254

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00254-ALM Document 3 Filed 03/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 20
James Joseph KNOCHEL, Petitioner, v. Emily Noelle MIHAYLO.

No. 19M102

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal denied.
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2019
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 14, 2020

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-4520, 33-4520-01) and Form S-8 (No. 33-34295) of
RACI Holdings, Inc., and Subsidiaries of our reports dated March 2, 2000
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which
appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Selected Financial Data" in such Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 22, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10427 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. TELASA CLARK, III

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-177-5-A

-------------------- December 30, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Telasa Clark , III (“Clark”), appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of bank robbery and two counts of using and carrying a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. The district court departed upward from the sentencing range calculated under the United States Sentencing Guidelines to impose an aggregate 600-month sentence for the offenses of conviction.No. 02-10427 -2- Clark has failed to establish that the aggravated robbery for which he was convicted in state court and the offenses of conviction were part of a “common scheme or plan” within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(1); he therefore has shown no error in the use of the state conviction in his criminal history

score. See United States v. Garcia , 962 F.2d 479, 482 (5th Cir. 1992), abrogated in part, on different grounds, by Buford v. United States , 532 U.S. 59, 64-66 (2001) ; United States v. Ford , 996 F.2d 83, 86 (5th Cir. 1993)
. Clark has failed to show that the district court clearly erred in adding three levels to the offense level because the court determined that one of the robbery victims sustained more than bodily injury but less than severe bodily injury. See U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(3)(D); United States v. Moore , 997 F.2d 30, 37 (5th Cir. 1993). Finally, Clark has failed to show plain error in the district court’s decision to depart upward in light of Clark’s admitted extensive history of armed robbery; such a departure is authorized by U.S.C.G. § 4A1.3(e), the district court explained its reasons for departure, and Clark has not shown that the extent of the departure was unreasonable. See United States v. Ashburn , 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)( en banc ).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.14


CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 30, 2012
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
   I, Richard Miller, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical reports entitled (i) the “Technical Report for Kisladag Gold Mine, Turkey”, dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 2010, (ii) the “Technical Report for Jinfeng Gold Mine, China” dated January 13, 2012 and effective March 15, 2011, and (iii) the “Technical Report for the Perama Hill Project, Thrace, Greece,” dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 28, 2010, and the description of all mineral reserves of the Kisladag, Jinfeng (open pit), Tanjianshan and Perama Hill properties and of extracts from or a summary of  the respective technical report and and other information pertaining to these projects, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   By:
/s/ Richard MillerRichard Miller, P.Eng.Eldorado Gold CorporationManager, Mine Engineering
Demetrius Marcellus GREEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6687

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.