alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2057 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2057

  To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the 
    chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of 
religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that 
       potential litigants may seek damages and attorney's fees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

 Mr. Hostettler (for himself, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, 
Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. 
  McIntosh, Mr. Pickering, and Mr. Tancredo) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the 
    chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of 
religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that 
       potential litigants may seek damages and attorney's fees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Expression of Religion Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN LAWSUITS AGAINST STATE AND LOCAL 
              OFFICIALS.

    (a) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.--Section 1979 of the 
Revised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before the first sentence; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where 
the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the 
Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to 
injunctive relief.''.
    (b) Attorneys Fees.--Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes of the 
United States (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``However, no fees shall be awarded under this subsection 
with respect to a claim described in subsection (b) of section nineteen 
hundred and seventy nine.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>     0000911147
<NAME>    Century Casinos, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         2,740,183
<SECURITIES>                                   1,572,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    69,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,111,868
<PP&E>                                         17,167,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,541,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,286,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,625,444
<BONDS>                                        10,123,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       158,619
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,379,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,286,893
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,193,369
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,384,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,081,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             784,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                49,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (98,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            147,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (171,860)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.2**

 

I, John C. Pintozzi, certifythat:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln BenefitLife Company;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)                          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)                         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                          Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| August  6, 2007 |                    |
|-----------------|-------------------------|
|            |                    |
|            | /s/ John C. Pintozzi    |   |
|            |                    |
|            | John C. Pintozzi        |
|            | Vice President and      |
|            | Chief Financial Officer |

 

E-3

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31570-31571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and

[[Page 31571]]

the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Program Project.
    Date: July 8, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National 
Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 827-3101, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741015061d1b5a101d111301110e341a1d1c5a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690d081b0006470d000c0e1c0c1329070001470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 19, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11161 Filed 5-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATION, LLC dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY LLC, AND AT&T CORP.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00202-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

It is ORDERED that Michael Paul is hereby appointed as the Court’s technical advisor in 

the above-captioned case, with his fees and expenses to be assessed equally between Plaintiff and 

Defendants and timely paid as billed. Mr. Paul’s contact information is as follows:

Michael D. Paul 

Michael D. Paul, PLLC

26110 High Timber Pass St.

San Antonio, TX 78260-8041

Phone: (210) 473-8696

Email: mdeanpaul@gmail.com

The parties are ORDERED to send courtesy copies of claim construction briefs, exhibits, 

and technology tutorials in PDF form to mdeanpaul@gmail.com. If the document was filed with 

the Court, the copy must include the CM/ECF header. For claim construction materials that have 

already been filed, the filing party is ORDERED to provide copies to Mr. Paul within two business 

days. Otherwise, the filing party is ORDERED to provide copies to Mr. Paul no later than one 

business day after filing future claim construction material.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 87 Filed 08/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2689
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       52
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,979<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,676
<BONDS>                                            599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (2,389)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,053)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.62)
<FN>
<F1>Includes net assets of discontinued operations of $910.
Accumulated deficit - $137,996.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

SHEMAR DIJOHN BRADSHAW

v.

ALLEN POLICE DEPARTMENT

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:23-CV-87-SDJ

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART

THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Magistrate Judge has entered proposed findings 

of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #27), that Defendant Allen 

Police Department’s Second Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon 

Which Relief Can Be Granted and Brief in Support, (Dkt. #22), be granted. 

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no 

timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and 

conclusions contained in the Report should be ADOPTED in part and MODIFIED 

in part. The Court adopts the Report entirely with a slight modification to 

the Report’s discussion implicating the single-incident exception to the 

deliberate-indifference standard. 

The Fifth Circuit has said that a plaintiff may establish deliberate indifference 

through the “extremely narrow” single-incident exception. Hutcheson v. Dallas Cnty., 

Case 4:23-cv-00087-SDJ-KPJ Document 28 Filed 03/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 104
2

994 F.3d 477, 482 (5th Cir. 2021). This exception requires the plaintiff to “prove that 

the highly predictable consequence of a failure to train would result in the specific 

injury suffered.” Id. And it “is generally reserved for those cases in which the 

government actor was provided no training whatsoever.” Id. at 483. This clarification

does not affect the outcome of this case.

The Court also dismisses this case without prejudice, rather than with

prejudice.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #22), is 

GRANTED, and Plaintiff Shemar Dijohn Bradshaw’s claim against Defendant is 

DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to file an amended

complaint no later than fourteen days after the entry of this Memorandum Adopting 

in Part and Modifying in Part the Report and Recommendation.

Case 4:23-cv-00087-SDJ-KPJ Document 28 Filed 03/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 105
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/04/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,310
COMMITMENTS
  10,206    1,280      748   21,508   31,357   32,462   33,385    9,848    8,925

CHANGES FROM 11/27/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,349)
     -92     -349     -190    1,709    1,277    1,427      738      -78      611

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.1      3.0      1.8     50.8     74.1     76.7     78.9     23.3     21.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       49)
      15        1        6       25       23       43       29
```

----

Updated December 7, 2012
MORSY E., petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

No. 17-1549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

KEITH ALLEN FOWLER 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00012-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that the 

Court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the Court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Counts One and Two of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The Court orders that 

the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are adopted. The Court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement 

until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ordered that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Keith Allen Fowler, is 

adjudged guilty as to Counts One and Two of the Indictment charging violations of 21 U.S.C. § 

Case 1:23-cr-00012-MJT Document 31 Filed 11/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 85
2

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute Cocaine and 18 U.S.C. ' 922(g)(1) –

Possession of a Firearm by a Prohibited Person.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 8th day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00012-MJT Document 31 Filed 11/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 86
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(b) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE

UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dominion
Homes, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Douglas G. BorrorPrint Name: Douglas G. BorrorTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 7, 2008


In connection with the Annual Report of Dominion Homes, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William G. CornelyPrint Name: William G. CornelyTitle: Executive Vice PresidentFinance, Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 7, 2008


This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the
liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
Anson CHI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5599.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Petitioner v. Constance RAMOS, et al.

No. 18-1437

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














Date:  August
8, 2008







/s/
Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin
Haitzmann


Co Chief
Executive Officer