alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1



kpmg



KPMG LLP



Chartered Accountants

Telephone

(416) 228-7000

Yonge Corporate Centre

Telefax

(416) 228-7123

4100 Yonge Street Suite 200

www.kpmg.ca

North York ON M2P 2H3



Canada



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Diversinet Corp.

We consent to the use of our report dated February 14, 2005, except with respect to note 16 which is as of February 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Diversinet Corp.  as at December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and October 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and deficit and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003, October 31, 2002 and for the fourteen month period ended December 31, 2003,   incorporated herein by reference, and to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the prospectus.  Our report dated February 14, 2005, except with respect to note 16 which is as of February 28, 2005 included additional comments for U.S. readers that states that conditions and events exist that cast substantial doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

(signed) KPMG LLP



Toronto, Canada

March 16, 2005



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Diversinet Corp.

We consent to the use of our report dated September 9, 2003 with respect to the balance sheets of Caradas, Inc as at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of earnings, shareholders equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years then ended,  incorporated herein by reference, and to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the prospectus.  Our report dated September 9, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has incurred significant losses from operations which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

(signed) KPMG LLP





Toronto, Canada

March 16, 2005



#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         631,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                (68,712)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 595,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        254,744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   595,341
<SALES>                                         26,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,637
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

ROHN M. WEATHERLY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-cv-163

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VENUE

Petitioner Rohn M. Weatherly, an inmate confined within the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus.

Petitioner is challenging a conviction resulting from a plea of guilty in the 371st District

Court of Tarrant County, Texas. He states that as a result of the conviction he was sentenced to 15

years of imprisonment.1

Petitioner filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus in the federal judicial district where

he is confined. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), a petitioner may bring a habeas petition in the

federal judicial district in which he was convicted or in the district where he is incarcerated. Section

2241(d) further provides that a court may transfer the action to the other district in the furtherance

of justice.

Petitioner states he was convicted in Tarrant County, Texas. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124,

Tarrant County is in the Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Texas. As all records and witnesses involving petitioner’s criminal conviction may be

located in the Northern District, the transfer of this action to such district would further justice. It

is therefore

1

 Petitioner also challenged the failure of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to release him on special

parole and the failure to reduce his sentence based on the number of work credits he has earned. Those claims have

been severed into new petitions (doc. #2).

Case 9:23-cv-00163-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 01/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Fort Worth Division of the United

States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. 

2

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 29th day of January, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00163-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 01/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
Duane GREGLEY, Petitioner, v. Douglas FENDER, Warden.

No. 19-6810

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          52,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,733,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,818,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        724,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    126,013
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     810,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,818,649
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,417
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/02/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      419,124
COMMITMENTS
 126,718  194,991   68,342  197,668  125,226  392,728  388,559   26,396   30,565

CHANGES FROM 03/26/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,377)
   1,217    5,907    2,520    5,632      672    9,369    9,099        8      278

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.2     46.5     16.3     47.2     29.9     93.7     92.7      6.3      7.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      174)
      56       62       71       37       35      141      134
```

----

Updated April 5, 2013
Roger Dale EPPERSON, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY.

No. 18-6701.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2207

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain fluorinated compound.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 15, 1999

Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain fluorinated

compound.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.88 Methanone, (4-fluorophenyl) [3-[(4-

fluorophenyl) ethynyl]phenyl]- (provided for in subheading 2914.70.40) Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered,
2

HR 2207 IH

1 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment

3 of this Act.

Æ
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND

 * COURT OF APPEALS

 * OF MARYLAND

v. 

* Misc. Docket AG No. 48

 September Term, 2020

THOMAS BULLARD DABNEY, JR. *

(No. C-11-CV-20-000082,

* Circuit Court for Garrett

County)

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the 

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Thomas Bullard Dabney, 

Jr., it is this 26th day of March, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Thomas 

Bullard Dabney, Jr., be, and he hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 4.2 and 8.4(d)

of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.

 /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

 Chief Judge
EXHIBIT A 

Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 6
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 7
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 8
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 9
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 10
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 11
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 12
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 13
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 14
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 15
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 16
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 17
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 18
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 19
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 20
Case 4:23-cv-00085-SDJ Document 1-1 Filed 02/01/23 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 21
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-233-CR

EMILIO ROSAS, JR.	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS 	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Emilio Rosas, Jr. entered an open plea of guilty to possession of more than one but less than four grams of methamphetamine, enhanced to a second-degree felony by two prior felony convictions involving controlled substances.  See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(c) (Vernon Supp. 2009); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.42(a)(3) (Vernon Supp. 2009).  He appeals his conviction and sentence of twenty years’ confinement and a $10,000 fine. We affirm.

	Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.  386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).  Although we gave appellant the opportunity to file a pro se brief, he did not do so.  The State likewise did not file a brief.

	Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

	We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief.  We agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).  Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

							PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  April 8, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0740 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES MICHAEL COVEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie Pesanti DeLong is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0740
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

DAVID D. RICHARDSON, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, 

 Appellee 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 29 WAP 2014 

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court entered July 30, 

2014, at No. 114 CD 2014. 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2015, the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Vastar Resources, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-80844), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80846), Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80848), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-80850), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-87814), Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-87816), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-87818), and Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-86310) of our report
dated February 12, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of Vastar Resources, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Houston, Texas
March 6, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

SCOTT JAMES RICE 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00092-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count One of the Information. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Scott James 

Rice GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28th August, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00092-JDK-JDL Document 18 Filed 08/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 35
Jara Meotta Ishon FLOWERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ashley Kenneth HUNTER, petitioner, v. NORTH DAKOTA.

No. 18-6323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
ex10_2.htm








Exhibit 10.2


 


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program for 2012







Effective January 1, 2012, the following compensation program applies to non-employee directors of Compass Minerals International, Inc. (the “Company”):








	
  

	
1.

	
Annual Retainer -   Each non-employee director will receive from the Company an annual retainer of $145,000 per year:








	
  

	
a)

	
$60,000 of the annual retainer amount per year is the cash retainer and may be deferred into the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan at the election of the director; and








	
  

	
b)

	
$85,000 of the annual retainer amount per year must be deferred into the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan until ownership levels are met, and then may be deferred or taken in shares of stock of the Company.  Deferred amounts are converted into units equivalent to the value of the Company’s common stock and accumulated deferred fees are distributed in common stock.













	
  

	
2.

	
Ownership Levels -  Each non-employee member of the Board of Directors is required to obtain and to maintain ownership in Company stock (or its equivalent) equal to five times the annual cash retainer, which amount is to be achieved within five years of joining the Board.













	
  

	
3.

	
Committee Service Fee -   Each non-employee director will receive from the Company an annual fee for serving on each of the following committees, as follows:













	
Audit Committee

	 	$	7,500	 
	
Compensation Committee

	 	$	5,000	 
	
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

	 	$	5,000	 
	
Environmental, Health & Safety Committee

	 	$	5,000	 











	
  

	
4.

	
Committee Chair Fee.  Each non-employee director who serves as a committee chair for 2012 will receive from the Company the following annual fee, as follows:







 



	
Audit Committee

	 	$	15,000	 
	
Compensation Committee

	 	$	10,000	 
	
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

	 	$	7,500	 
	
Environmental, Health & Safety Committee

	 	$	7,500	 











	
  

	
5.

	
Lead Independent Director.  The Lead Independent Director will be paid an annual fee in the amount of $20,000 per year.













	
  

	
6.

	
Cash v. Deferral Election.  Non-employee directors may elect to receive fees paid for serving on a committee, as a committee chair, and as Lead Independent Director in cash or may elect to defer such into the Company’s Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.