alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    133,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               272,709
<PP&E>                                          50,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          115,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           144
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,221
<SALES>                                        151,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           78,474
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,090
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,830
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

LIONRA TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

FORTINET, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00206-JRG

ORDER

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule CV-72, the Court sua sponte ORDERS that 

this case is hereby referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne for all pretrial 

purposes.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20th day of August, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00206-JRG-RSP Document 67 Filed 08/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1220
Daniel H. JONES, Petitioner, v. KENTUCKY, et al.

No. 18-9401

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Zachary N. TROST, et ux., petitioners, v. Sherry TROST.

No. 18-271.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
FG Filed by Filing Services Canada Inc. - (403) 717-3898


     

    
      
        	 KOKOMO ENTERPRISES
      INC.


      

       

    

    June 2,
2011

     

    CEIBA
NETWORK UG

    Am
Masling 54,

    58456
Witten,

    Germany

    


    Attention:  Mr. Lars
Schmidt

    


    Dear
Lars:

     

    
      	 Re: 	
               Incentive
      Share Purchase Option Agreement dated June 1, 2011 (the “Incentive Option
      Agreement”)
      between Kokomo Enterprises Inc. (“Kokomo”) and Ceiba Network UG
      (“Ceiba”).     

            


    

     

    The
object of this letter is to confirm our understanding that should Ceiba be
unable to exercise its incentive stock options by the expiry date of the
Incentive Option Agreement i.e., June 1, 2012 due to the trading price of
Kokomo’s common shares being $0.15 per common share or being less than $0.15 per
common share, then Kokomo shall be obligated to make a cash payment of US $3,250
to Ceiba as compensation for Ceiba’s services.  For greater certainty,
if during the twelve month period of the Incentive Option Agreement, Ceiba
exercises all or part of its incentive stock options, then Ceiba shall not be
entitled to receive any payment from Kokomo, and Kokomo shall not be obligated
to make any payment to Ceiba.

    


    Yours
sincerely,

     

    Kokomo
Enterprises Inc.

     

    Bedo H.
Kalpakian

    President
& CEO

    


    Side
Letter_Ceiba Network UG_June 2 2011.doc

     

    
      	
              
                KOKOMO
      ENTERPRISES INC.

              

              Suite
      1000, 1177 West Hastings St.

              Vancouver,
      BC   V6E 2K3

              Tel:
      604 681 1519   Fax: 604 681-9428

              www.kokomoenterprises.ca   email:
      info@kokomoenterprises.ca
**Exhibit 99.1(a)**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned chief executive officer ofAtchison Casting Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certify that, to myknowledge:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Dated: February 14, 2003 |   | /s/ Thomas K. Armstrong, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Thomas K. Armstrong, Jr.     |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer      |

 

----
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/27/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       39,840
COMMITMENTS
   2,770    5,175    2,606   34,385   31,902   39,761   39,683       79      157

CHANGES FROM 08/20/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        642)
     406     -247     -136      377      999      647      616       -5       26

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.0     13.0      6.5     86.3     80.1     99.8     99.6      0.2      0.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       38)
       9        6        7       16       18       27       29`

---

Updated August 30, 2013
Anthony Brian BEVAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7628.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT 

CORP.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-379-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Motion for Entry of an 

Order Focusing Asserted Patent Claim and Prior Art (Dkt. No. 58). Dkt. No. 88. After 

consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that Docket No. 58 is WITHDRAWN.

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 91 Filed 10/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5802
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000406

08-FEB-2018

08:02 AM
EXHIBIT 99.18




CONSENT OF EXPERT
  
   March 27, 2015
  Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Roberto Costa, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the description of mineral reserves of the Vila Nova Mine and of extracts from or a summary of other information pertaining to this project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
  By:
/s/ Roberto CostaRoberto Costa

Roberto Costa Engenharia Ltda.
Kenyatta Quinn MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

No. 19-7272

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31216-31217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XC049]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public joint meeting of its Habitat Committee via webinar 
to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive 
economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to 
the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Friday, June 10, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. 
Webinar registration URL information: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/965763058356419085.

ADDRESSES: Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 
Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    The Committee plans on selecting preferred alternatives for 
Southern New England Habitat Area of Particular Concern Framework. They 
also plan to discuss aquaculture updates and consider recommending that 
the Council initiate a framework related to authorization of Atlantic 
salmon aquaculture. The Committee will discuss offshore development 
(wind, cables) including upcoming comment opportunities. Also on the 
agenda is a brief review of Northeast Regional Habitat Assessment 
products and next steps. Other business may be discussed as necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been

[[Page 31217]]

notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address the 
emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the date. This meeting will be recorded. 
Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the recording is available 
upon request.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 18, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-11019 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/06/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      271,074
COMMITMENTS
  84,036   91,666   25,853  139,824  130,679  249,713  248,198   21,361   22,876

CHANGES FROM 02/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     34,546)
   9,801    7,948    4,639   19,996   20,776   34,436   33,363      110    1,183

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.0     33.8      9.5     51.6     48.2     92.1     91.6      7.9      8.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      122)
      30       42       41       33       37       91      100
```

----

Updated March 9, 2012
Elseddig Elmarioud MUSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6910.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                                   AMENDMENT

                                                      Dated as of March 28, 1997

         Reference is made to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as
of May 2, 1995 (as amended and supplemented, the "Purchase Agreement") among 
A I M Management Group Inc., Citibank, N.A. (the "Purchaser") and Citicorp 
North America, Inc., as agent for the Purchaser (the "Program Agent").

         Each of the undersigned agree that effective as of the date hereof,
the definition of "Purchaser Limit" set forth in Section 1.01 of the Purchase
Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the dates "March 31, 1997" and "April
1, 1997" set forth therein with the dates "May 31, 1997" and "June 1, 1997",
respectively.

         This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by
different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which counterparts,
when so executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, and all of
which counterparts, when taken together, shall constitute but one and the same
amendment.

         THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
be executed as of the date first above written.


                                           A I M MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.    
                                                                          
                                           By:  /s/ CAROL F. RELIHAN      
                                               -------------------------------- 
                                                   Authorized Signatory   
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                           CITIBANK, N.A.,                
                                            as Purchaser                  
                                                                          
                                           By:  ILLEGIBLE                 
                                               -------------------------------- 
                                                   Authorized Signatory   
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                           CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,  
                                            as Program Agent              
                                                                          
                                           By:  ILLEGIBLE                 
                                               -------------------------------- 
                                                   Authorized Signatory
Larry J. HUDACK, Petitioner, v. LA CRESTA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION.

No. 19-722

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
Fabio MOREL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7130

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
|   | KPMG LLPChartered AccountantsPO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir StreetVancouver BC V7Y 1K3Canada | TelephoneFaxInternet | (604) 691-3000(604) 691-3031www.kpmg.ca |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------------|

| ● | our Independent Auditors’ Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 23, 2012 on the consolidated financial statements of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, the consolidated income statements, statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information; and |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| ● | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 23, 2012 on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |

----
Exhibit 24.3

                           ACT TELECONFERENCING, INC.

                                Power of Attorney
                           of Director and/or Officer


              The undersigned director and/or officer of ACT Teleconferencing,
Inc., a Colorado corporation, does hereby make, constitute and appoint Gerald D.
Van Eeckhout and Gavin Thomson, and either of them, the undersigned's true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with power of substitution, for the undersigned and in
the undersigned's name, place and stead, to sign and affix the undersigned's
name as such director and/or officer of said Corporation to an Annual Report on
Form 10-K or other applicable form, and all amendments, thereto, to be filed by
said Corporation in April 1997 with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, with all
exhibits thereto and other supporting documents, with said Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and either of them, full power and authority to do
and perform any and all acts necessary or incidental to the performance and
execution of the powers herein expressly granted.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set the
undersigned's hand this 14th day of April, 1997.



                                          /s/ Donald Sturtevant
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Donald Sturtevant
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HUMBERTO CEBALLOS, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00059-CR

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D00479)

O R D E R

The clerk’s record has been filed. The trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of 

Appeal does not indicate whether or not the defendant has the right to appeal. Therefore, the Court 

ORDERS that the Honorable William E. Moody, Judge for the 34

th District Court of El Paso 

County, Texas, enter an amended Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal. The amended 

Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal shall be filed with the District Clerk of El Paso 

County, Texas, and the District Clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk’s record which will 

include the amended certification and file it with this Court on or before June 26, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11

th day of June, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6190** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JERMAINE CHAPMAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00022

- HCM

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : May 31 , 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jermaine Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jermaine Chapman appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Unit ed States v. Chapman , No. 4:07

- cr - 00022

- HCM

- JEB

- 1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 9, & entered Jan. 10, 2012) **.** We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.

AFFIRMED