alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911002
<NAME>NONE 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (705)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,012
<PP&E>                                         304,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                (96,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,321
<BONDS>                                        179,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,064
<SALES>                                         99,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,480
<CGS>                                           42,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,485)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: February 13, 2009

|                                                                                                    | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Stephen T. Wills                                                                                | 
|Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President andChief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         512,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,826,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,208,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,795,262
<PP&E>                                       1,962,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,643,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,460,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,376
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,619,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,645,479
<SALES>                                      3,513,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,513,329
<CGS>                                        2,436,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,436,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               697,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               118,396
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                497,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,978
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   357,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.149
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.149






</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.14(e)

                     AMENDMENT NO 8 TO CONTRACT CSXT-C-03951
               SUBJECT TO 49 USC ss.10709 AND 49 CFR ss.1313.3 (c)


         COGENTRIX OF ROCKY MOUNT, INC., (Industry); and CSX TRANSPORTATION,
INC., (CSXT); agree to amend the aforementioned Contract, which has been in
effect since October 27, 1989.


         1. This Amendment will be effective on January 1, 1999.


         2. The Contract is modified in the following manner:

         (A)      Effective on and after January 1, 1999, CSXT will permit
                  Industry to ship seventy-five (75) to eighty-three (83) car
                  unit trains at the ninety (90) car rate levels presently
                  applicable in the Contract.

         (B)      This Eighth Amendment will remain in effect through and
                  including December 31, 2000.


         3. All other provisions of the Contract are ratified and reaffirmed.



COGENTRIX OF ROCKY MOUNT, INC.                   CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

By: /s/ Elizabeth L. Rippetoe                    By: /s/ H. Wayne Foster, Jr.  
    ---------------------------------                ---------------------------
Title: Vice President and                        Title: Director - Utility Coal
         Assistant General Counsel                      -----------------------
       ------------------------------

BJK:JIB:12-14-98
COCR00843      (MEMO)
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 233

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 700

the ‘‘Richard C. White Federal Building’’.East San Antonio Street in El Paso, Texas, as
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 233

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 700 East San

Antonio Street in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Richard C.

White Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 233 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 700 East San Anto3 nio Street in El Paso, Texas, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Richard C. White Federal Building’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Richard C. White Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Gregory P. NESSELRODE, petitioner, v. Betsy DeVOS, Secretary of Education.

No. 18-6420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
George O. RILEY, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 18-5741.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Travis MILES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7387

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

DAVID VINSON §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv267

WARDEN BARTLETT, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff David Vinson, an inmate formerly confined at the Federal Correctional Complex in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit.

The Courtreferred this matter to the Honorable Christine Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge,

at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The

magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. A copy of the report and recommendation was mailed to plaintiff at the address provided to

the Court. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have

been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and

the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in

accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 26th day of November, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00267-MJT-CLS Document 19 Filed 11/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

55
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). R A / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AL I C I A H E RNA ND E Z L OZ AN O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73456 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 711- 362 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l i c i aH e rnande z L oz ano, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e ope n r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs ba s e d on i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l . W e ha ve 

# FI LED JAN 19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSR A/ Res ea r ch 07- 73456 2 j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the d en i al o f a m o t i o n t o reo p en , an drev i ew d e n o v o co n st i tu t i o n al q u est i o n s, in c lu d in g c la im s o f

in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. E ve n i f L oz ano c om pl i e d w i th the r e qui r e m e nt s s e tf orth i n M at te rof L oz ada , 19 I. & N . D ec . 63 7, 63 9 (B IA 19 88 ), L ozano fai l ed t o est abl i sh thather form eratt orney’ s a l l eged i neff ec t i ve as si st ance re sul t ed i n p re j ud i ce , and thu s her c la im o f in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l f

a ils . Se e id. at79 3-94 (t o p re vai l on an i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se l cl ai m a pet i t i on erm ustdem on strat e pre j ud i ce ). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
Patt MCGUIRE, Petitioner v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al.

No. 19-6536

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , Plaintiff-Appellee ,
v. R U F I N O P E R A L T A -S A

N C H E Z , Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 14-50393 14-50394 D .C. Nos. 3:12-cr-03370-L

A B -1 3:14-cr-01308-L

A B -1 ORDER

F iled Aug ust 22, 2017 B efore: Harry Preg erson, J a y S. B y b ee, and N. Randy

Smith, Circuit J udg es.

ORDER Appellant’s petition for panel rehearin g i s hereby G RANTED

. The opinion and dissent filed F ebruary 7, 2017, Nos. 14- 5 0 393 and 14-50394, and appearing at 847 F .3d 112 4 , a r e withdrawn. I t shall n o t b e c ited as precedent by o r to any court of the Ninth Circuit. A memorandum disposition is being simultaneously filed with this order. J udg e Preg erson concurs in the judg ment.U N I T E D S T A T E S V
. P E R A L T A -S A

N C H E Z 2 No further petitions for p anel rehearing o r r ehearing en banc will be entertained in this case.
## SCWC-30254
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
EDMUND M. ABORDO, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs. STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (S.P.P. NO. 09-1-0026; S.P. NO. 09-1-0426; CR. NO. 93-0737)

AMENDED ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI WITHOUT PREJUDICE (By: McKenna, J., for the court ) 1

## It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court of Appeals, see Hawai # i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2008); see also Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2008),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/PetitionerAppellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 5, 2011, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the

2

C o u r t : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , D u f f y , a n d M c K e n n a , J J . , a n d 1 C i r c u i t J u d g e A h n , i n p l a c e o f A c o b a , J . , r e c u s e d
.

I n t h e J u l y 7 , 2 0 1 1 O r d e r D i s m i s s i n g A p p l i c a t i o n f o r W r i t o f 2 C e r t i o r a r i W i t h o u t P r e j u d i c e t h e i n c o r r e c t d a t e o f J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 0 w a s l i s t e d
. 

## Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30254 08-JUL-2011 01:01 PM

## application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (“No later than 90 days

after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, any party may apply in writing to the supreme court for a writ of certiorari.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, July 8, 2011.
FOR THE COURT: /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Associate Justice

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SOCIAL POSITIONING INPUT SYSTEMS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendants

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-422-JRG-RSP

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(3) FOR IMPROPER VENUE

Before the Court is Valve Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(3) for Improper Venue. After consideration of said motion, the Court finds that 

it is well-taken and should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above referenced litigation is hereby dismissed 

in its entirety.

Case 2:23-cv-00422-JRG-RSP Document 11-3 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 124
Damon JONES, Petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-7100.

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Gerald SENSABAUGH, Petitioner, v. Kimberly HALLIBURTON, et al.

No. 19-771

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Christopher L. CROOM, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 19-7237

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES INC., 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC and AT&T CORP. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-040468 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC 

(“AT&T Mobility”) hereby states the following: 

1. AT&T Mobility is owned by the following companies: SBC Long Distance, LLC; 

AT&T Investment & Tower Holdings, LLC; BellSouth Mobile Data, Inc., and New Cingular 

Wireless Services, Inc. None of the companies listed above are publicly-traded companies and 

are subsidiaries of AT&T Inc. 

2. AT&T Inc. has no parent corporation and is itself a publicly held corporation. No 

one person or group owns 10% or more of the stock of AT&T Inc. 

Dated: December 11, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew Sean Yungwirth 

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1075 Peachtree Street, NE 

Suite 1700 

Atlanta, GA 30309-3929 

Telephone: 404.253.6935 

Facsimile: 404.253.6901 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 721
2 

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553) 

ddacus@dacusfirm.com 

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 

821 ESE Loop 323 

Suite 430 

Tyler, Texas 75701 

Telephone: 903.705.1117 

Facsimile: 903.581.2543 

William Andrew Liddell 

waliddell@duanemorris.com 

DUANE MORRIS LLP

900 S. Capital of Texas Hwy 

Suite 300 

Austin, TX 78746 

Telephone: 512.277.2272 

Facsimile: 512.227.2301 

Counsel for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on December 11, 2023. 

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Matthew S. Yungwirth 

Case 2:23-cv-00468-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 722
Jeffrey S. WINGATE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6896.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 472 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 472

 Designating October 7, 2012, as ``Operation Enduring Freedom Veterans 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2012

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Begich) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

           September 22 (legislative day, September 21), 2012

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to with an amended preamble

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating October 7, 2012, as ``Operation Enduring Freedom Veterans 
                                 Day''.

Whereas the initial volley of Operation Enduring Freedom took place in 
        Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, and October 7, 2012, marks the eleventh 
        anniversary of the war;
Whereas Operation Enduring Freedom, launched in response to the terrorist 
        attacks committed against the United States on September 11, 2001, 
        targeted al-Qaida and the Taliban protectors of al-Qaida in Afghanistan;
Whereas Operation Enduring Freedom is the longest ongoing war in which the 
        United States is involved;
Whereas the wounded warriors who have served in Operation Enduring Freedom carry 
        the scars of war, both seen and unseen;
Whereas some 2,000 patriots in the United States Armed Forces have made the 
        ultimate sacrifice while serving in Afghanistan;
Whereas the war in Afghanistan should not fade from the hearts and minds of the 
        people of the United States; and
Whereas the ongoing sacrifices made by the men and women of the Armed Forces 
        should be recognized and honored: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 7, 2012, as ``Operation Enduring 
        Freedom Veterans Day'';
            (2) honors the brave men and women who gave their lives 
        while serving the United States in Operation Enduring Freedom; 
        and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to salute 
        the more than half a million men and women who have served 
        bravely in Afghanistan to preserve our shared security and 
        freedom.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      669
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,338
<PP&E>                                          26,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,858
<BONDS>                                         23,331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,655
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,818
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,282)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>