alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            2156
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2007
<ALLOWANCES>                                       279
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7516
<PP&E>                                           25958
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5636
<BONDS>                                          28557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1910)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33474
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5985
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1251)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 20

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct and operate a visitor center

for the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River on land owned by the

State of New York.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Delaware Scenic and

Recreational River Mongaup Visitor Center Act of 1999’’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) The Secretary of the Interior approved a management

plan for the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River,

as required by section 704 of Public Law 95–625 (16 U.S.C.

1274 note), on September 29, 1987.

(2) The river management plan called for the development

of a primary visitor contact facility located at the southern

end of the river corridor.

(3) The river management plan determined that the visitor

center would be built and operated by the National Park

Service.

(4) The Act that designated the Upper Delaware Scenic

and Recreational River and the approved river management

plan limits the Secretary of the Interior’s authority to acquire

land within the boundary of the river corridor.

(5) The State of New York authorized on June 21, 1993,

a 99-year lease between the New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation and the National Park Service

for the construction and operation of a visitor center by the

Federal Government on State-owned land in the Town of

Deerpark, Orange County, New York, in the vicinity of

Mongaup, which is the preferred site for the visitor center.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF VISITOR CENTER FOR UPPER DELAWARE

SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVER.

For the purpose of constructing and operating a visitor center

for the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River and subject

to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of the Interior

may—

(1) enter into a lease with the State of New York, for

a term of 99 years, for State-owned land within the boundaries

of the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River located

at an area known as Mongaup near the confluence of the
H. R. 20—2

Mongaup and Upper Delaware Rivers in the State of New

York; and

(2) construct and operate such a visitor center on land

leased under paragraph (2).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7531

STEVEN M. JOHNSON, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

SECRETARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-02153-JFM) 

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Steven M. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Patrick McINTOSH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6751.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2144 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2144

     To suspend for 3 years the duty on 3-Amino-3-methyl-1-pentyne.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend for 3 years the duty on 3-Amino-3-methyl-1-pentyne.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 3-AMINO-3-METHYL-1-PENTYNE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.32.84       3-Amino-3-methyl-1- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         pentyne (provided                                                  31/2002          ''.
                         for in subheading
                         2921.19.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Ada Albors GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. William M. STERN, et al.

No. 18-8193.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 46



		

			Exhibit 4.6

		




		
			
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			March 15, 2019
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Securities and Exchange Commission 
		

		
			100 F Street, NE
		

		
			Washington, D.C. 20549
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Re: Central Federal Corporation —Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Ladies and Gentlemen:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Central Federal Corporation, a Delaware  corporation, is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") its Annual Report on Form 10-K of Central Federal Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
		

		
			Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Central Federal Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to Central Federal Corporation’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of Central Federal Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
		

		
			Very truly yours,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/Timothy T. O’Dell
		

		
			Timothy T. O’Dell
		

		
			President and Chief Executive Officer
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
----

|   | /s/ Selwyn Joffe        |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Selwyn Joffe            |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | July 29, 2013           |   |
|   | /s/ David Lee           |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David Lee               |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | July 29, 2013           |   |
|   | /s/ Kevin Daly           |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Kevin Daly               |   |
|   | Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|   | July 29, 2013            |   |

----
Form of Non-LTIP Stock Unit Certificate



 EXHIBIT 10(p)(p) 

NON-LTIP 

STOCK UNIT CERTIFICATE 
 This Stock Unit Certificate represents the grant to             of             stock
units (the “Stock Units”) pursuant to the terms of the EMCOR Group, Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan. 
 The
Stock Units shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as if they were granted as stock units under the EMCOR Group Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) and the rights and obligations of
            and EMCOR Group, Inc. as to the Stock Units shall be the same as if they were stock units issued             under
the LTIP. 
  

					
	 (Seal)
	 		 	 EMCOR Group, Inc.

			
	 	 		 	 EMCOR Group, Inc.

			
	 	 		 	 By: _____________________


 ATTEST: 
  

 

                Secretary 

Dated:
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF EMILY WELCH

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Emily Welch, enters her appearance 

in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile” or 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 45 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 195
-2-

“Defendant”). Defendant respectfully requests that the court take note of this Notice of 

Appearance and makes Emily Welch its counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies of all 

communications and other documents filed in the above-referenced proceedings that are not filed 

via ECF should be emailed or faxed to Emily Welch at the address set forth below.

Dated: December 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Emily Welch

Emily Welch (GA Bar No. 606071) 

 Emily.welch@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 45 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 196
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of December, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such 

filing upon Counsel of Record. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Emily Welch

Emily Welch (GA Bar No. 606071) 

 Emily.welch@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 45 Filed 12/01/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 197
Richard A. JILES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6705.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Ronald T. SPOOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7007.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Tommy ALEXANDER, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6559.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 11742]

                    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the Aum Shinrikyo (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation.                          ( print page 31051)    

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of Aum Shinrikyo (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be revoked.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*Authority:*8 U.S.C. 1189.                

Dated: May 11, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-10866 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
Edgar Baltazar GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M89.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000406 08-FEB-2018 08:02 AM
Myra TYLER, petitioner, v. MAIN INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.

No. 18-6710.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
## **EXHIBIT31.1**

##  

## **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

##  

## I, Roger E. Gower, certify that:

##  

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

 

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 
| Dated:  November 3, 2003 | By:                                   |  /s/ Roger E.  Gower |   |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                               | Roger E. Gower                        |
|                               | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

LOUIS JAMES BROWN III, #02352001

VS.

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23cv773 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett, who issued a Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) 

(Dkt. #26) concluding that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #18) should be 

denied. Petitioner filed a Notice (Dkt. #27),1acknowledging that summary judgment is not a 

proper method of adjudicating a § 2254 petition. See Browder v. Dir., Ill. Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 

257, 269 n.14 (1978). Thus, Petitioner has not objected to the findings and conclusions of the 

Report. 

The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and 

recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. The 

Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, 

the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court. 

It is accordingly ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #18) is 

DENIED. 

1 In the Notice, Petitioner seeks an expedited ruling in his case. (Dkt. #27). The Court will consider

Petitioner’s case as soon as possible given its substantial docket and limited resources.

Case 4:23-cv-00773-ALM-AGD Document 30 Filed 12/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

4499
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00773-ALM-AGD Document 30 Filed 12/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

4500
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorportation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8)  pertaining  to the 1993 Stock Plan (Nos.  33-75390 and 33-87420) and
the Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan (Nos.  33-75392 and  333-18519),  and in the
related Prospectuses, of Neurobiological Technologies,  Inc. of our report dated
July 25,  1997,  with respect to the  financial  statements  of  Neurobiological
Technologies,  Inc.  included in this annual  report (Form  10-KSB) for the year
ended June 30, 1997.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Francisco, California  
October 2, 1997

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated:  October 2, 1997                 /s/ Paul E. Freiman

Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.      President, Chief Executive Officer