alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

of Eastern District of Texas

✔

2:23-cv-362 8/8/2023 of Eastern District of Texas

RICH MEDIA CLUB LLC, RESEARCHGATE GMBH,

11,443,329 Rich Media Club LLC

11,468,453 Rich Media Club LLC

11,631,115 Rich Media Club LLC

nkl

Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACKNOWLEDGES and ACCEPTS that

all claims by and between the Parties in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

10/10/2024

Case 2:23-cv-00362-JRG Document 26 Filed 10/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 79
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 15, 2013

NO. 03-13-00140-CR

Benjamin Louis Labahn, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s judgment 

revoking community supervision, but that such error does not require the judgment be reversed: 

IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the trial court is 

modified to delete “8 years TDCJ” as the “Terms of Plea Agreement” and to instead reflect that 

the “Terms of Plea Agreement” are “Not Applicable.” As so modified, the trial court’s judgment 

revoking community supervision is affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that the 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that 

this decision be certified below for observance.
Andrew John MILLER, petitioner, v. Duncan MacLAREN, Warden.

No. 18-6655.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996             APR-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996             APR-30-1995
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,888                  18,521
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,500                   1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,388)                (20,021)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 150                     134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (367)                 (3,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (367)                 (3,761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (367)                 (3,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEURIG DR. PEPPER INC., 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00249-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff 

Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Symbology”) and Defendant Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. (“Keurig”)

(collectively, the “Parties”) respectfully submit this stipulation of dismissal of Symbology’s 

claims against Keurig with prejudice and Keurig’s counterclaims against Symbology without 

prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.

Case 2:23-cv-00249-JRG Document 30 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 896
-2-

Dated: November 17, 2023 Respectfully Submitted

/s/ Randall Garteiser

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 sfuller@ghiplaw.com

Randall Garteiser 

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Christopher A. Honea

 Texas Bar No. 24059967

 chonea@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Alexander Hale Martin

Alexander Hale Martin

Texas Bar No. 24091828

Neil J. McNabnay

Texas Bar No. 24002583

Ricardo J. Bonilla

Texas Bar No. 24082704

Rodeen Talebi

Texas Bar No. 24103958

Sarika Patel

Texas Bar No. 24073520

martin@fr.com

mcnabnay@fr.com

rbonilla@fr.com

talebi@fr.com

patel@fr.com

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1717 Main Street, Suite 5000

Dallas, Texas 75201

(214) 747-5070 (Telephone)

(214) 747-2091 (Facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:23-cv-00249-JRG Document 30 Filed 11/17/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 897
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ Randall T. Garteiser

Randall T. Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00249-JRG Document 30 Filed 11/17/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 898
Carlos Antonio RAYMOND, Petitioner v. Martin Joseph ROY, et al.

No. 18-8804

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Zachariah J. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. INDIANA

No. 18-1486

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
11056285 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA, 

INC., and SPRINT CORP., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP 

JURY DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Robert Christopher Bunt 

and Parker Bunt & Ainsworth as counsel for Plaintiff. The Court, having considered same, is of 

the opinion the motion should be GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate all CM/ECF notifications as to Robert 

Christopher Bunt for this action. 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 35-1 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 350
Antonio MERCEDES-RIJO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                
                                                                Exhibit 10.6.2


                               AMENDMENT NO. 3
                     EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

                             JUST FOR FEET, INC.

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Just For Feet, Inc. (the "Corporation")
has previously adopted, and the shareholders of the Corporation have approved,
the Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan") pursuant
to which options to purchase stock of the Corporation may be issued to eligible
directors, officers and key employees of the Corporation; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems it desirable
to amend the Plan so as to increase the number of shares available for issuance
pursuant to the exercise of options granted under the Plan and to provide
for the exercise of options under the Plan upon the termination of employment,
death or disability of a Plan participant;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended upon the terms, and subject to
the conditions, set forth herein;

                                  ARTICLE I

                              AMENDMENTS TO PLAN

     1.1 Section 4 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting such section
in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:

         "4. SHARES RESERVED FOR PLAN. The shares of the
             ------------------------
             Corporation's $.0001 par value common stock
             (the "Common Stock") to be sold to eligible
             employees under the Plan may at the election
             of the Board of Directors be either treasury
             shares or shares originally issued for such
             purpose. The maximum number of shares which
             shall be reserved and made available for sale
             under the Plan shall be Three Million (3,000,000).
             Any shares subject to an option granted hereunder
             which for any reason expires or is terminated
             unexercised may again be subject to an option
             under the Plan."


                                  ARTICLE II

                         EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT

     2.1 The amendment effected hereby shall be effective for options granted
under the Plan to eligible employees on or after the date this amendment
is approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, but subject to
approval of a majority of the shares of Common Stock of the Corporation entitled
to vote thereon represented in person and by proxy at a meeting of
shareholders.


<PAGE>
 
In the event shareholder approval of adoption of this amendment is not obtained 
within twelve months of the date this amendment is approved by the Board of 
Directors of the Corporation, then any option in the intervening period to 
eligible employees shall be void.
 
 
                                      2
<PAGE>


                        OVERSEAS FILMGROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES


Alien Towers, Inc., a California corporation
Code 99 Productions, Inc., a California corporation
Enough Rope, Inc., a California corporation
Intrastate Film Distributors, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Jacaranda Music, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Overseas Filmgroup (UK) Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the
  United Kingdom
Positive, Inc., a California corporation
Road to Ruin, Inc., a California corporation
Walrus Pictures, Inc., a California corporation


                     OVERSEAS FILMGROUP (UK) LIMITED SUBSIDIARIES


Elphich Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.,
that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.



November 6, 2006



/s/    PAUL E. FREIMANPaul E. Freiman President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
Steven D. LISLE, Jr., Petitioner, v. James DIERCKS, et al.

No. 19-6929

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00616- CR NO. 03-15-00620- CR
The State of Texas, App ellant

v. Dennis Davis, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 167 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 09- 9001 85, H ONO RAB LE P . DAVID W AHLB ERG, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

The State of Texas filed a motion to con s o lidate its two appea ls in the aboveref ere nce d ca u s es . I n cause number 03-15-00616- CR, the State ref ere nced its intent to appea l the district court’s September 10, 2015 finding s o f fact and conclusions of law reg arding Davis’s motion to s et aside the indictment, which were attache d to the notice of a ppeal. In cause number

1 03-15-00620- CR, the State appea led the district court’s September 9, 2015 order setting aside Davis’s indictment for

violation of his constitut ional rig ht to a speedy trial. Davis filed a motion to dismiss in both causes, c ontending that the court’s finding s and conclusions aft er s et t i ng aside the indictment did not constitute an appea lable order
an d t h at dismiss al of the first appea l, not consolidation with the later- filed appea l, is appropri at e.
That notice also made conflicting ref ere nce to the court’s order dismiss ing the indictment. 1See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01 (listing order s from which State may appea l in criminal case ).

We ag ree . Acc ording ly , the Court denies the State’s motion to con s o l i d ate these appea ls and g rants in part Davis’s motions to dismiss these appea ls. The State’s appea l in cause number 03-15- 00616-CR is dis missed, and its appea l in cause numbe r 03-15- 00620-CR remains pending
. 2

Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field 03-15-00616- CR Dismissed on Appellee’ s Motion 03-15-00620- CR Remains pending Filed: Nove mber 19, 2015 Do Not Publish

Davis’s re q u es t t o strike the second notice of appea l beca use it was not filed as an 2 “ame nded” notice of appe al is denied. 2
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries



|                                                          |  |             
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                                                      |  | Jurisdiction
|Dominion Homes Financial Services, Ltd.                   |  | Ohio        
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Structural Warranty Company, LLC                 |  | Ohio        
|                                                          | 
|Resolution Property Company, LLC                          |  | Ohio        
|                                                          | 
|Alliance Title Agency of Kentucky, LLC                    |  | Kentucky    
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes of Kentucky, Ltd. (d/b/a Dominion Homes) |  | Kentucky    
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC                        |  | Kentucky    
|                                                          | 
|Dominion Homes Realty, LLC                                |  | Kentucky    



All listed
subsidiaries are wholly-owned, except for Dominion Homes of Kentucky, Ltd. (DHK). DHK is a Kentucky limited liability partnership whose general partner is Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC and whose limited partner is Dominion Homes,
Inc. DHK is 99% owned by Dominion Homes, Inc. and 1% owned by Dominion Homes of Kentucky GP, LLC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                       533
<INVENTORY>                                     38,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,488
<PP&E>                                         148,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,651
<SALES>                                        244,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,854
<CGS>                                          208,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,128
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors of
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-90828, No. 333-17833, No. 333-72319 and No. 333-30814) on Form S-8 and
registration statements (No. 333-35415, No. 333-23001, No. 333-82397 and No.
333-87091) on Form S-3 of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. of our reports dated
February 11, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1999, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, which
reports appear in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc.


/s/KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 2000
Exhibit 21

FinishMaster, Inc. Subsidiaries

1.       Refinishers Warehouse,  Inc., a Michigan corporation and a wholly-owned
         subsidiary of the registrant.

2.       Thompson  PBE,  Inc.   ("Thompson"),   a  Delaware  corporation  and  a
         wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.

3.       Except as otherwise indicated,  each of the following subsidiaries is a
         wholly-owned subsidiary of Thompson:

                  Grand Distributing Corp., a California corporation
                  Thompson Lacquer Co., a California corporation
                  Arnold Paint Company , a Florida corporation
                  Santa Clara Color, Inc., a California corporation
                  McNeil & Sons Auto Paint, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
                  Auto Body Supply Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation
                  Automotive Paint & Supply, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Carlos Manuel AYESTAS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 19-569

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc.:
(formerly Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc.)

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-79913) on Form S-8 of Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. of our report dated
February 18, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Nucentrix
Broadband Networks, Inc. (formerly Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc.) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the periods
from January 1, 1999 to April 1, 1999, the effective date of the reorganization
discussed in the paragraph below (the "Effective Date"), and from the Effective
Date to December 31, 1999, and for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 1998, and the related financial statement schedule, which
report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Nucentrix
Broadband Networks, Inc.

Our report states that upon consummation of a prenegotiated Plan of
Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on the
Effective Date, the Company adopted fresh start reporting in accordance with
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code. As
a result of the application of fresh start reporting, the consolidated financial
statements of Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. (formerly Heartland Wireless
Communications, Inc.) and subsidiaries for the period from the Effective Date to
December 31, 1999 are presented on a different cost basis than those for periods
prior to the Effective Date, and accordingly, are not directly comparable.


                                    KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2000