alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32-B

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company), and the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the Company for the period covered
the Report, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/    KEITH S. BAIR
|Keith S. Bair       
|February 27, 2009
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Matthew H. Knight, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report as of and for the period ended June 30, 2007 on Form10-Q of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 13, 2007 /s/ Matthew H. Knight   Matthew H. Knight   Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 1 of 24 PageID #:  281

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 2 of 24 PageID #:  282

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 3 of 24 PageID #:  283

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 4 of 24 PageID #:  284

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 5 of 24 PageID #:  285

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 6 of 24 PageID #:  286

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 7 of 24 PageID #:  287

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 8 of 24 PageID #:  288

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 9 of 24 PageID #:  289

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 10 of 24 PageID #:  290

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 11 of 24 PageID #:  291

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 12 of 24 PageID #:  292

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 13 of 24 PageID #:  293

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 14 of 24 PageID #:  294

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 15 of 24 PageID #:  295

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 16 of 24 PageID #:  296

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 17 of 24 PageID #:  297

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 18 of 24 PageID #:  298

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 19 of 24 PageID #:  299

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 20 of 24 PageID #:  300

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 21 of 24 PageID #:  301

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 22 of 24 PageID #:  302

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 23 of 24 PageID #:  303

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP   Document 52-1   Filed 06/25/24   Page 24 of 24 PageID #:  304
Terry LaCarl JAMES, petitioner, v. ELDORADO CASINO SHREVEPORT JOINT VENTURE, et al.

No. 18M75.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 12.1




CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Shaike Orbach, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Silicom Ltd.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the Company and have:
  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  
  5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors:
  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: October 19, 2010
 /S/ Shaike Orbach

Shaike Orbach, Chief Executive Officer
sutherland.htm


 


 



CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP












We consent to the reference to our firm in the Statement of Additional Information included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the Century II individual flexible premium deferred variable annuity contracts issued through the Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account (File No. 33-89984).  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

















SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

















By:   /s/ Stephen E. Roth        


            Stephen E. Roth


Washington, D.C.


April 27, 2012
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

MARY LEE MOORE 

V. 

USAA/GARRISON AND CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23CV475 

JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On December 11, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #23) 

that Plaintiff Mary Lee Moore’s case be dismissed for want of subject matter jurisdiction under 

Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely 

objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the 

Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00475-ALM-KPJ Document 25 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 334
Santos REYES-VILLATORO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7227

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June
30, 2007 (the  "Report")  I, Edward L.  Torres,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and
President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:


         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 20, 2007


\s\ Edward L. Torres
--------------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Chief Executive Officer, and President

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.5

STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF QUEENS

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, David F. Bellet, a Director of JUST
FOR FEET, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do constitute and
appoint Harold Ruttenberg and Eric L. Tyra, and each of them, my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, on my behalf and in
my stead pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (i) a Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to register additional shares for issuance pursuant to the Just For
Feet, Inc. 1997 Employee Incentive Plan; (ii) post-effective amendments to the
following Registration Statements: 33-80578, 33-96588, 333-06531, 333-28041,
333-96584, 333-26345 and 333-28039; and (iii) the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1999, and to file the same with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto and
other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Registration Statements
or Reports, incorporating such changes as the said attorneys-in-fact deem
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or
their substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 4th day of
March, 1999.


                                     /s/ David F. Bellet
                                    -------------------------------
                                    David F. Bellet


                                ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
                                ---------------

     BEFORE me this 4th day of March, 1999, came David F. Bellet, personally
known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power
of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.


                                     /s/ Mavis Davidson
                                    -------------------------------
                                    NOTARY PUBLIC

                                    State of New York

                                    My Commission Expires:

                                             7/25/2000
                                    -------------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

(Note: Stockholders are requested to sign, date and return this Proxy promptly
in the enclosed stamped envelope, addressed to Secretary, Remington Arms
Company, Inc., 870 Remington Drive, Madison, North Carolina 27025.

                               RACI HOLDING, INC.
                                      PROXY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints Leon J. (Bill) Hendrix, Jr., Chairman and Thomas L. Millner, President
and CEO, or either of them, with power of substitution, attorneys and proxies to
appear and vote all of the shares of stock standing in the name of the
undersigned, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of RACI Holding, Inc., to be
held at the offices of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc., located at 375 Park
Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, New York 10152, on Tuesday, April 25, 2000
commencing at 9:00 a.m., and at any and all adjournments thereof; and the
undersigned hereby instructs said proxies to vote:

(1)     To elect the following twelve (12) Directors to serve until the next
        Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly
        elected and qualified:

        Leon J. (Bill) Hendrix, Thomas L. Millner, Joseph L. Rice, III, Stephen
        D. Bechtel, Jr., Richard A. Gilleland, Richard E. Heckert, Hubbard C.
        Howe, Bobby R. Brown, Michael G. Babiarz, H. Norman Schwarzkopf, B.
        Charles Ames and Dr. Ulrich Middelmann

        [ ]  FOR all nominees   [ ]  WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees

        [ ]  FOR all nominees except for the following: ________________________

(2)     To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. as the
        Company's independent auditors for the current fiscal year.

        [ ]  FOR          [ ]  AGAINST              [ ]  ABSTAIN

None of the above identified matters, which are proposed by RACI Holding, Inc.,
are conditioned on the approval of other matters.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION
IS GIVEN, "FOR" ITEMS 1 AND 2. IF ANY OTHER MATTERS ARE PRESENTED FOR ACTION,
THE PROXIES NAMED HEREIN WILL VOTE UPON SUCH MATTERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR
DISCRETION.

By executing this proxy, the undersigned represents that he or she is a
Stockholder of record and this proxy constitutes a valid and binding instrument
enforceable against the undersigned.

Dated this ____ day of ____________, 2000.


---------------------------------------------
 (Signature)

---------------------------------------------
Name of Stockholder (please print)

---------------------------------------------
Name and title of signatory (if Stockholder
is a corporation, partnership, trust or other
entity)


NO. OF SHARES:  _______

               THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE MANAGEMENT
                              OF RACI HOLDING, INC.
In Re Stephanie MICHAEL, petitioner.

No. 17-9323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 22, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit
32.1




Section
1350 Certifications




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that:




(i)
              the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended June 30, 2009 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Date:
      August 14,
      2009
                  
                  /s/
      Francis M. DiNuzzoFrancis
      M. DiNuzzo
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

ROBERT EARL RICHARDSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

GREGG COUNTY, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-415-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Robert Earl Richardson filed this pro se civil rights lawsuit pursuant 

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John 

D. Love for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On February 2, 2024, Judge Love issued a Report recommending that the 

Court dismiss this case without prejudice for want of prosecution and Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with a Court order. Docket No. 11. A copy of this Report was sent 

to Plaintiff. However, no objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:23-cv-00415-JDK-JDL Document 12 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 33
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 11) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of 

prosecution and Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the Court. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25th March, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00415-JDK-JDL Document 12 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 34