alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

2:23-CV-415-JRG-RSP

JO-ANN STORES, LLC.

Jo-Ann Stores, LLC by serving its registered agent, CT Corporation System, 1999 

Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201. William E. Davis, III 

Davis Firm, PC 

213 N. Fredonia Street, Ste 230 

Longview, Texas 75601

9/18/23

Case 2:23-cv-00415-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 126
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-CV-415-JRG-RSP JO-ANN STORES, LLC 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00415-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 09/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 127
Exhibit 4.26

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

I, Zhou Juan, citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), PRC ID card number362502197610284422, hereby irrevocably authorize Zhou Juan (“Ms. Zhou”) to exercise the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney pursuant to Section 2.5 of the Business Operations Agreement entered into among Beijing Wole Technology Co., Ltd.  (“Wole”), Guangzhou Qianjun Technology Co., Ltd. (“Qianjun”), Ms. Zhou and me on October 26, 2011 (the “Operations Agreement”) :

 

I hereby authorize and designate Ms. Zhou to vote on my behalf at the shareholders’ meetings of Qianjun and exercise the full voting rights as its shareholder as granted to me by law and under the Articles of Association of Qianjun, including but not limited to, the right to propose the holding of shareholders’ meeting, to accept any notification about the holding and discussion procedure of the meeting, to attend the shareholders’ meeting of Qianjun and exercise the full voting rights (such as, to serve as my authorized representative on the shareholders’ meeting of Qianjun, to designate and appoint the executive director or directors of the Board and the general manager and to decide the allotment of the profits, etc.), to sell or transfer any or all of my equity interest in Qianjun, etc.

 

The above authorization and designation are based upon the fact that Ms. Zhou is acting as an employee of Wole and Wole has appointed and authorized Ms. Zhou as its authorized representative in accordance with the Operations Agreement. Once Ms. Zhou loses her title or position in Wole or Wole issues a written notice to dismiss or replace Ms. Zhou with another person as its authorized representative, this Power of Attorney shall become invalid immediately and I will withdraw such authorization to her immediately and designate/authorize another individual(s) designated by Wole to exercise all the rights mentioned above. I will sign another Power of Attorney in form and substance satisfactory to Wole.

 

The term of this Power of Attorney is ten (10) years from its date of execution, unless the Operations Agreement is terminated early for any reason or the relevant events as outlined above occur.

 

This Power of Attorney shall, upon becoming effective, replace all the previous POAs I had signed previously.

 

 

	
 
    	
Zhou   Juan
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Zhou Juan
    
	
 
    	
Date:   October 26, 2011
Marco M. TORRES, petitioner, v. Frances M. PERRONE, Judge, Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Hillsborough County.

No. 18-6199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Issac Efren JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-6814

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,289
<PP&E>                                          26,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,744
<SALES>                                         36,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,231
<CGS>                                           19,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,951
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (180)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
VASTAR RESOURCES, INC.: FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
1999. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
RULE 5-03-04 SPECIFICALLY DOES NOT ADDRESS SG&A COSTS AS A REQUIREMENT
IN THE FDS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          40,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  217,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               307,100
<PP&E>                                       6,287,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,967,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,710,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,900
<BONDS>                                        975,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     805,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,710,000
<SALES>                                      1,107,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,175,500
<CGS>                                          673,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  858,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                185,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (28,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            213,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   213,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.16


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB of Stanford
      Management Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Vera
      McCullough, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary-Treasurer and Director, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

















Date:
      November 13, 2007    VERA
      MCCULLOUGH


Vera
      McCullough


Secretary-Treasurer,
      Chief


Financial
      Officer and Director








-1-


-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

BOBBY LORIS JONES 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00083-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS 

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The 

Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that 

the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the 

Indictment 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant BOBBY LORIS 

JONES GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4th April, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00083-JDK-JDL Document 29 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 82
Charles Alan DYER, Petitioner, v. Jim FARRIS, Warden.

No. 19-6999

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### AUG 26 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-2045 JEANETTE M. TRUJILLO, Defendant-Appellant. (D.C. No. CIV-98-1051-JC) (D. N.M.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BALDOCK , and HENRY , Circuit Judges. **

Defendant Jeanette M. Trujillo pled guilty in federal district court to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Plaintiff did not move to withdraw her guilty plea and did not perfect a direct criminal appeal. Instead, Plaintiff filed a petition to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the district court claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. According to Plaintiff, defense2

counsel failed to properly advise her as to the consequences of her guilty plea. In a thorough Memorandum Opinion and Order, the district court summarily dismissed the petition. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Petitions. Now before us is Plaintiff’s application for a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). A defendant may appeal the denial of a § 2255 petition only if “a circuit justice or judge” issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability “may issue . . . only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Id. § 2253(c)(2). We conclude that Petitioner has failed to make the required showing. We have thoroughly reviewed Defendant’s application for a certificate of appealability, her brief, the district court’s order, and the entire record before us. We conclude the Plaintiff’s claims are meritless substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the petition. Because Plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we deny her request for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
**Exhibit 6**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul N. Wright, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley        Act of 2002, that:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| April 3, 2009 | /s/ Paul N. Wright |
|---------------|--------------------|
|          | Paul N. Wright     |

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|--------|-------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eldorado Gold Corporation and will be retained by Eldorado Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 223 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 223

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the 
   disclosure of certain information by persons conducting polls by 
      telephone during campaigns for election for Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Gibbons, and Mr. 
  Pickering) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the 
   disclosure of certain information by persons conducting polls by 
      telephone during campaigns for election for Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Push Poll Disclaimer Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION BY PERSONS CONDUCTING POLLS DURING 
              FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS.

    (a) In General.--Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

  ``disclosure of information by persons conducting polls by telephone

    ``Sec. 323. Any person who conducts a poll by telephone or 
electronic means to interview individuals on opinions relating to any 
election for Federal office shall disclose to each respondent to the 
poll the following information:
            ``(1) The person's identity.
            ``(2) The identity of the person sponsoring the poll or 
        paying the expenses associated with the poll.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections occurring after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 452 

Designating July 13, 2012, as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars 

is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and 

cultural heritage of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. BURR) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 13, 2012, as ‘‘Collector Car Appreciation 

Day’’ and recognizing that the collection and restoration 

of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 

100-year history of the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 452 ATS 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 13, 2012, as ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to engage in events and commemorations of Col10 lector Car Appreciation Day that create opportuni11 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

12 about the importance of preserving the cultural her13 itage of the United States, including through the 

14 collection and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Vernon Montrell WEBSTER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-7572

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in *United States* v. *Franklin* , 2019 WI 64, 387 Wis. 2d 259, 928 N.W. 2d 545 (2019).
Victor Solorzano TAVIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6897.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Manfredo M. SALINAS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD.

No. 19-199

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.