alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
NN, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.











Date:  April
      14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Roderick
      R. BatyRoderick
      R. BatyChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NN, Inc. and will be retained by NN, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/19/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       57,306
COMMITMENTS
   2,586    4,070    4,971   49,735   48,260   57,292   57,301       14        5

CHANGES FROM 11/12/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,339)
     468     -875    1,325    8,555    9,979   10,348   10,429       -9      -90

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     4.5      7.1      8.7     86.8     84.2    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       39)
       6        8       11       12       21       24       36`

---

Updated November 22, 2013
In Re Inzel GAITOR, petitioner.

No. 18-6478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

WINTERSPRING DIGITAL LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE 

TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00244-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff 

Winterspring Digital LLC (“Winterspring”) by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby 

dismisses this action as to Defendant Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (collectively, 

“Check Point”) voluntarily with prejudice by filing this Notice of Dismissal, with each party to 

bear its own costs and fees.

Dated: August 2, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III

Alfred R. Fabricant

NY Bar No. 2219392

Email: afabricant@fabricantllp.com

Peter Lambrianakos

NY Bar No. 2894392

Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com

Vincent J. Rubino, III

NY Bar No. 4557435

Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com

FABRICANT LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Road

Suite 206 South

Rye, New York 10580 

Telephone: (212) 257-5797

Facsimile: (212) 257-5796

Case 2:23-cv-00244-JRG-RSP Document 8 Filed 08/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26
Justin Kurt Truelove

Texas Bar No. 24013653

Email: kurt@truelovelawfirm.com

TRUELOVE LAW FIRM, PLLC

100 West Houston

Marshall, Texas 75670

Telephone: (903) 938-8321

Facsimile: (903) 215-8510

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

WINTERSPRING DIGITAL LLC 

Case 2:23-cv-00244-JRG-RSP Document 8 Filed 08/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DEREK CLINTON WARD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-167

§

SHERIFF JASON BRIDGES, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Derek Clinton Ward, an inmate confined at the Nacogdoches County Jail,

proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this

matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for

consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge

recommends dismissing the action without prejudice. To date, the parties have not filed objections

to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is

ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 13th day of November, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00167-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 14
Exhibit 4.27

 

SPOUSAL CONSENT

 

I, Liang Jun, am the lawful spouse of  Zhou Juan. I hereby consent unconditionally  that a certain percentage of the equity interest in Guangzhou Qianjun Technology Co., Ltd. that is held by and registered in the name of my spouse will be disposed of pursuant to the arrangements under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the Amended and Restated Equity Option Agreement and the Amended and Restated Equity Interest Pledge Agreement, which were executed by my spouse on October 26, 2011.

 

I further undertake not to take any action with the intent to interfere with the above arrangements, including making any claim that such equity interest constitutes property or community property between myself and my spouse. I hereby waive unconditionally and irrevocably any rights or entitlements whatsoever to such equity interest that may be granted to me according to any applicable laws.

 

 

	
 
    	
Liang Jun
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Liang Jun
    
	
 
    	
Date: October 26, 2011
    


 











 

SPOUSAL CONSENT

 

I, Chen Yusi, am the lawful spouse of  Liang Sheng. I hereby consent unconditionally  that a certain percentage of the equity interest in Guangzhou Qianjun Technology Co., Ltd. that is held by and registered in the name of my spouse will be disposed of pursuant to the arrangements under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the Amended and Restated Equity Option Agreement and the Amended and Restated Equity Interest Pledge Agreement, which were executed by my spouse on October 26, 2011.

 

I further undertake not to take any action with the intent to interfere with the above arrangements, including making any claim that such equity interest constitutes property or community property between myself and my spouse. I hereby waive unconditionally and irrevocably any rights or entitlements whatsoever to such equity interest that may be granted to me according to any applicable laws.

 

 

	
 
    	
Chen Yusi
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/ Chen Yusi
    
	
 
    	
Date: October 26, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc., that
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.



September 28, 2005



/S/    PAUL E.
FREIMANPaul E. Freiman President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request.
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Eastern District of Texas

✔

2:23-cv-436 9/21/2023 Eastern District of Texas

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, SMOOTHIE KING FRANCHISEES, INC.,

7,992,773 8/9/2011 SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC

8,424,752 4/23/2013 SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC

8,651,369 2/18/2014 SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC

8,936,190 1/20/2015 SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS LLC

nkl

Having considered the Stipulation, the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against 

Defendant in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

12/8/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00436-JRG Document 11 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 114
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 5, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60848

Summary Calendar

 

FRED HINES; GENEVA HINES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

STEVE PUCKETT, Commissioner of 

Mississippi Department of Corrections, 

Individually; JAMES ANDERSON, 

Superintendent of Parchman, Individually; 

JEFFERY THOMPSON, Individually; 

K. ROSS, Individually; R. RICE, 

Individually; STANLEY RUSSELL, 

Medical Director, Individually; 

JOHN DOES, 1-20 In Their Individual 

and Official Capacity; UNKNOWN HUNTER, 

Officer, Individually,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:99-CV-538-WS

 

Before GARWOOD, EMILIO M. GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs Fred Hines and Geneva Hines appeal from the
2

district court’s grant of summary judgment, on the basis of

qualified immunity, for James Anderson, Superintendent at Parchman,

Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). The plaintiffs’

civil rights suit stems from the suicide of their son, Clinton

Hines, a prisoner then housed at Parchman. After a de novo review

of the record, we affirm.

The plaintiffs argue that Anderson was deliberately

indifferent to a dangerous condition created by Parchman’s

“Pharmacy Distribution Program,” and thus violated Clinton Hines’s

Eight Amendment rights. The evidence does not reflect Anderson’s

personal involvement. See Thompson v. Steele, 709 F.2d 381, 382

(5th Cir. 1983). Nor does it reflect that Anderson was involved in

the implementation of the Pharmacy Distribution Program. See

Thompkins v. Belt, 828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir. 1987). Moreover,

the plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of

material fact that Anderson was subjectively aware either that

Clinton Hines posed a substantial suicide risk or that the prison’s

policies concerning prescription drugs posed a substantial risk of

increased inmate actual or attempted suicide. See Farmer v.

Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994). Accordingly, summary judgment

was proper even if we were to adopt the views expressed in Judge

Kravitch’s concurring opinion in Tittle v. Jefferson County

Commission, 10 F.3d 1535, 1541 (11th Cir. 1994). The alleged

“‘failure to alleviate a significant risk that [the official]
3

should have perceived, but did not’ is insufficient to show

deliberate indifference.” Domino v. Texas Dept of Criminal

Justice, 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir. 2001) (quoting Farmer, 511

U.S. at 838).

AFFIRMED.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2136

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the capital

gain treatment under section 631(b) of such Code shall apply to outright

sales of timber held for more than 1 year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. COLLINS (for himself and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the capital gain treatment under section 631(b)

of such Code shall apply to outright sales of timber

held for more than 1 year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timber Tax Simplifica5 tion Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2136 IH

1 SEC. 2. CAPITAL GAIN TREATMENT UNDER SECTION 631(b)

2 TO APPLY WHETHER OR NOT OWNER RE3 TAINS ECONOMIC INTEREST.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 631 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to disposal

6 of timber with a retained economic interest) is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘AND OUTRIGHT SALES OF

8 TIMBER’’ after ‘‘ECONOMIC INTEREST’’ in the sub9 section heading, and

10 (2) by striking ‘‘such owner retains an economic

11 interest in such timber’’ and inserting ‘‘such owner

12 either retains an economic interest in such timber or

13 makes an outright sale of such timber’’.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

15 this section shall apply to sales after the date of the enact16 ment of this Act.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 29, 2015

a0422 

# Order

Clerk April 29, 2015

148528

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148528

COA: 315209

Alger CC: 2012

- 001997

- FC

ISRAEL A. VELEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302( H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted. We note that the facts of this case are identical to

those in People v Cotto (Docket No. 148532), which we remanded to the Court of

Appeals for consideration as on leave grante d by order dated March 3, 2015.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Life
Insurance Company. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

      (1)   the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
            31, 2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.


Dated: March 31, 2005
                                          /s/  JAMES M. BENSON
                                          -------------------------
                                          Name:  James M. Benson
                                          Title: President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 BEAUMONT DIVISION

JEREMY LADON BUSBY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-325

BRYAN L. WILLIAMS, ET AL. §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Jeremy Ladon Busby, a prisoner previously confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

On October 30, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $21.83 within

thirty days of the date of the Order. (Doc. #10.) As of this date, Plaintiff has not paid the initial

partial filing fee. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action sua

sponte for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. Griggs v. S.G.E. Mgmt., 905 F.3d

835, 844 (5th Cir. 2018); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “The power to

invoke this sanction is necessary in order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases

and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Courts.” Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626,

629-30 (1962); Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997).

Case 1:23-cv-00325-MAC-CLS Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

13
Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case diligently because he has not paid the initial partial

filing fee. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.

Recommendation

This action should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and

recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by

the district court, except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d

1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72. 

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 11th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00325-MAC-CLS Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

14
## **EXHIBIT 31.1**

## **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

## I, Roger E. Gower, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for theregistrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

c) disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweakness in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
| Dated:   August 10, 2006 | By:                                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                               | Roger E. Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to October 9, 2018)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-18-101 State v. Policky

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Vamsidhar VURIMINDI, petitioner, v. The HOOPSKIRT LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-5881.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania dismissed. See Rule 39.8.