alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.2


 


Addendum
to


Promissory
Note for Callable and Convertible Preferred Shares


Secured
by Ownership Rights in Tooling Mold


 


 


On May 23, 2011, ATVRockN,
a Nevada corporation (the “Payor”) and Dan Berger, an individual and resident of Tennessee (the “Payee”)
entered into a $25,000 “Promissory Note for Callable and Convertible Preferred Shares Secured by Ownership Rights in Tooling
Mold,” herein referred to as the “Parties.”


 


Both Parties have agreed that it is in their
best interests to clarify the original Agreement by removing and replacing the following items in the Agreement:


 


1 The prepayment penalty of $5,000 at the maturity
date of May 23, 2012 and May 23, 2012 has been removed in its entirety.


 


2. ATVRockN can
buyback the 25,000 Series B preferred shares and security interest in the tooling mold at any time for $25,000, plus any unpaid
interest at the time the buyback takes place.


 


3. May 23, 2013, not May 23, 2012 is the “Maturity
Date” of this Note.


 


4. Failure to pay the Note in full by May 23,
2013, along with quarterly interest payments of $1,250 per quarter, will result in a one-time penalty of $5,000 and the transfer
of ownership of the tooling mold owned by ATVRockN to Dan Berger.


 


This addendum, executed on April 13, 2012,
only modifies the terms listed above, it does not modify any of the other terms.


 


ATVRockN


Payor


 


/s/ J. Chad Guidry


J. Chad Guidry


President


 


 


Dan Berger


Payee


 


/s/ Dan Berger


Dan Berger
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I,  James L. Holbrook, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information related to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

 

|   |   |   | /s/ James L. Holbrook, Jr.                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | James L. Holbrook, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

Dated: November 14, 2006
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY 

INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-425-JRG

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Plaintiff Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) respectfully files this statement in 

opposition to Valve Corporation’s motion to dismiss. Valve Corporation has moved to dismiss in three 

cases as explained in the order allowing for consolidated venue discovery across these three cases. Valve

insists on having the court rule on three separate motions to dismiss based all on venue being improper 

under Rule 12(b)(3). There is no motion to transfer under Section 1404 filed by Valve Corporation in 

any of the three cases, just under Rule 12(b)(3). 

As Plaintiff will explain in more detail in its motion to consolidate the briefing on these three 

motions to dismiss, Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference the arguments it makes in the lead case in 

opposition to Valve’s Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(3), which is titled Symbology Innovations, 

LLC v. Steam Corporation, Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG, Dkt. No. 55 (E.D. Tex. 2023). For the reasons 

stated therein, the Court should deny Plaintiff Valve’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3).

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 04/20/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 670
Dated: April 19, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with opposing 

counsel prior to filing this Motion, and counsel indicated that it opposes this motion and beliefs that 

Plaintiff has improperly broken its agreement to file an opposition in lieu of an amended complaint.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document has been 

served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 04/20/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 671
Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 04/20/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 672
Order entered October 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00699-CV

KIRK WEST, Appellant

V.

MIKE COLLINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002-00091-2014

ORDER

By order dated August 25, 2014, appellant, who is pro se, was granted an extension of 

time to file his brief. The brief was to be filed no later than September 30, 2014. To date, 

however, the brief has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief, along 

with an extension motion that complies with rule of appellate procedure 10.5(b), no later than 

October 27, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b). Appellant is cautioned that failure to comply 

may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 24 POWERS OF ATTORNEY OLYMPIC STEEL, INC. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that OLYMPIC STEEL, INC., an Ohio corporation, and each person
whose name is signed below hereby constitute and appoint Michael D. Siegal and Richard T. Marabito
their attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on
behalf of Olympic Steel, Inc. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Olympic Steel, Inc.,
and each of such Directors and officers, to sign Olympic Steel, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby
ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitute or
substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney of Olympic Steel, Inc., and the Directors and officers of Olympic
Steel, Inc. may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original
with respect to the person executing it. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland, Ohio this 10th
day of March, 2005. OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.By:/s/ Richard T. MarabitoRichard T. Marabito, Chief FinancialOfficerDirectors and Officers:/s/ Martin H. Elrad
    
    /s/ Michael D. SiegalMartin H. Elrad, Director
    
    Michael D. Siegal, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer/s/ Thomas M. Forman
    
    /s/ David A. WolfortThomas M. Forman, Director
    
    David A. Wolfort, President, ChiefOperating Officer and Director/s/ Ralph M. Della Ratta, Jr.
    
    /s/ Richard T. MarabitoRalph M. Della Ratta, Jr., Director
    
    Richard T. Marabito, Chief FinancialOfficer (Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ James B. Meathe
    
    /s/ Howard L. GoldsteinJames B. Meathe, Director
    
    Howard L. Goldstein, Director
----

|   | /s/ Selwyn Joffe        |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Selwyn Joffe            |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | July 29, 2016           |   |

|   | /s/ David Lee           |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David Lee               |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | July 29, 2016           |   |

|   | /s/ Kevin Daly           |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Kevin Daly               |   |
|   | Chief Accounting Officer |   |
|   | July 29, 2016            |   |

----
Sergio Antonio HARO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6847.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/29/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      272,588
COMMITMENTS
  62,303   85,934   36,635  152,502  129,581  251,440  252,150   21,148   20,438

CHANGES FROM 05/22/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,047)
  -8,584   -9,415     -510   -7,483   -7,962  -16,577  -17,887    1,530    2,840

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.9     31.5     13.4     55.9     47.5     92.2     92.5      7.8      7.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      128)
      33       49       51       32       37       97      113
```

----

Updated June 5, 2012
Glen Ray MAXWELL, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-9309.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*149Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF  THE CASTLE GROUP, INC.   The following amendments to the Bylaws of the Company were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on March 12, 1998, to-wit:   1. Subject to compliance with the applicable proxy or information statement, rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any similar state regulatory agency, stockholders owning at least 50% of the Company=s outstanding voting securities may call a special meeting of the stockholders of the Company at which the affirmative vote of such persons may remove any director, without cause;  2. The Bylaws of the Company may be amended by the affirmative vote of persons owning not less than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company.    Date: March 12, 1998                               /s/Motoko Takahashi _____________________________________ Motoko Takahashi, Corporate Secretary
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

BENEFICIENT and BRAD 

HEPPNER, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ALEXANDER GLADSTONE, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-376-JDK 

ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY 

AND ADJOURN TRIAL DATE 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to stay discovery pending 

resolution of any motion that Defendant Dow Jones & Company may file in response 

to Plaintiffs Beneficient and Brad Heppner’s amended complaint. Docket No. 59. The 

parties note that Dow Jones’s deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is 

November 8, 2024, and seek to conserve resources by focusing on any potentially 

dispositive motion before proceeding with discovery. 

But this case has been pending for more than thirteen months. And the 

current schedule provides almost a year before discovery closes and more than 

eighteen months before trial. Docket No. 35. Given the timeline and the stage of the 

proceedings, the Court finds that the parties have not shown good cause for an 

indefinite stay. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9th September, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00376-JDK Document 60 Filed 09/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1663
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/02/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      616,975
COMMITMENTS
  58,663   57,790  176,128  361,172  366,350  595,963  600,268   21,011   16,706

CHANGES FROM 09/25/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,644)
  -2,618   -5,770    8,595      567    2,192    6,543    5,016      101    1,628

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.5      9.4     28.5     58.5     59.4     96.6     97.3      3.4      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      144)
      33       31       56       70       67      135      128
```

----

Updated October 5, 2012
Elvin HILL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6798.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 21.01**
**SUBSIDIARIES OF GUILFORD PHARMACEUTICALS INC.**
Below is a list of direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company. All subsidiaries arewholly-owned.
 1.  GPI Investments, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company  2.  Guilford Pharmaceutical Products Inc., a Maryland corporation  3.  GPI (Canada) Inc., a Delaware corporation  4.  Guilford Pharmaceuticals Limited, an English corporation  5.  ProQuest Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware corporation  6.  GPI IP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company  7.  Artery, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company  8.  Guilford Pharmaceuticals Canada Co., a Nova Scotian unlimited liability company
- 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AUTOSCRIBE CORPORATION §

§

§ CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00349-JRG

v. § (Lead Case)

§ 

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION, §

et al. §

AUTOSCRIBE CORPORATION §

§

§ CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00364-JRG

v. § (Member Case)

§ 

FORTIS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, LLC §

§

ORDER

Before the Court are two motions. The first is the Joint (Agreed) Motion for Entry of 

Docket Control Order and Motion to Consolidate for Pretrial Purposes (the “First Motion to 

Consolidate”) filed jointly in Case No. 2:23-cv-0349 by Plaintiff Autoscribe Corporation 

(“Autoscribe”) and Defendants Repay Holdings Corporation and Repay Holdings, LLC 

(collectively, “Repay Holdings”). (2:23-cv-0349, Dkt. No. 28.) The second is the Joint (Agreed) 

Motion for Entry of Docket Control Order and Motion to Consolidate for Pretrial Purposes (the 

“Second Motion to Consolidate”) filed jointly in Case No. 2:23-cv-0364 by Plaintiff Autoscribe 

and Fortis Payment Systems, LLC (“Fortis”). (2:23-cv-0364, Dkt. No. 19.)

The First Motion to Consolidate and the Second Motion to Consolidate (collectively, the 

“Motions”) both request that the Court consolidate the above-captioned cases and set the -0349 

case as the lead case. (2:23-cv-0349, Dkt. No. 28 at 1–2, Dkt. No. 28-2 at 1; 2:23-cv-0364, Dkt. 

No. 19 at 1; Dkt. No. 19-2 at 1.) The Motions also request entry of a Docket Control Order. (2:23-

Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 21 Filed 12/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 154
- 2 -

cv-0349, Dkt. No. 28 at 1–2; 2:23-cv-0364, Dkt. No. 19 at 1–2.) As noted before, the Motions are 

jointly filed. (2:23-cv-0349, Dkt. No. 28 at 1, 4; 2:23-cv-0364, Dkt. No. 19 at 1, 4.)

Having considered the Motions and noting their joint natures, the Court finds that they

should be and hereby are GRANTED-IN-PART. Accordingly, the above-captioned cases are

hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case 

No. 2:23-cv-00349. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. 

Individual cases remain active for trial. 

The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated Defendants into the Lead Case and their 

corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance 

in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. 

Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in 

the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case. 

Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead 

Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the 

relevant member case.

The balance of the Motion, which concerns entry of a docket control order, is CARRIED.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 21 Filed 12/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 155
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Zohar Ziv, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatedto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.              /s/ Zohar Ziv   Zohar Ziv   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer