Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2022-0509; Project Identifier AD-2022-00338-T; Amendment 39-22038; AD 2022-09-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
 AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
 ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
 SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 707, 717, and 727 airplanes; Model DC-8, DC-9, and DC-10 airplanes; Model MD-10 and MD-11 airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 (collectively described, in the preamble of this AD, as MD-80) airplanes; and Model MD-90-30 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that radio altimeters cannot be relied on to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G C-Band), and a recent determination that during approach, landings, and go-arounds, as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged. This AD requires revising the limitations and operating procedures sections of the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate specific operating procedures for, depending on the airplane model, instrument landing system (ILS) approaches, non-precision approaches, ground spoiler deployment, and go-around and missed approaches, when in the presence of 5G C-Band interference as identified by Notices to Air Missions (NOTAMs). The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
 DATES: This AD is effective May 23, 2022. The FAA must receive comments on this AD by July 7, 2022.
 ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: *Federal eRulemaking Portal:*
                         Go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov.*
                         Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
                    *Fax:*
                         202-493-2251.
                    *Mail:*
                         U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
                    *Hand Delivery:*
                         Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket at 
                    *https://www.regulations.gov*
                     by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0509; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations is listed above.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Igama, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5388; email: 
                        *Roderick.Igama@faa.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                    ( print page 31098) Background In March 2020, the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted final rules authorizing flexible use of the 3.7-3.98 GHz band for next generation services, including 5G and other advanced spectrum-based services.[1]
                    
                     Pursuant to these rules, C-Band wireless broadband deployment was permitted to occur in phases with the opportunity for operations in the lower 0.1 GHz of the band (3.7-3.8 GHz) in certain markets beginning on January 19, 2022. This AD refers to “5G C-Band” interference, but wireless broadband technologies, other than 5G, may use the same frequency band.[2]
                    
                     These other uses of the same frequency band are within the scope of this AD since they would introduce the same risk of radio altimeter interference as 5G C-Band. The radio altimeter is an important aircraft instrument, and its intended function is to provide direct height-above-terrain/water information to a variety of aircraft systems. Commercial aviation radio altimeters operate in the 4.2-4.4 GHz band, which is separated by 0.22 GHz from the C-Band telecommunication systems in the 3.7-3.98 GHz band. The radio altimeter is more precise than a barometric altimeter and for that reason is used where aircraft height over the ground needs to be precisely measured, such as autoland, manual landings, or other low altitude operations. The receiver on the radio altimeter is typically highly accurate, however it may deliver erroneous results in the presence of out-of-band radio frequency emissions from other frequency bands. The radio altimeter must detect faint signals reflected off the ground to measure altitude, in a manner similar to radar. Out-of-band signals could significantly degrade radio altimeter functions during critical phases of flight, if the altimeter is unable to sufficiently reject those signals. The FAA issued AD 2021-23-12, Amendment 39-21810 (86 FR 69984, December 9, 2021) (AD 2021-23-12) to address the effect of 5G C-Band interference on all transport and commuter category airplanes equipped with a radio (also known as radar) altimeter. AD 2021-23-12 requires revising the limitations section of the existing AFM to incorporate limitations prohibiting certain operations, which require radio altimeter data to land in low visibility conditions, when in the presence of 5G C-Band interference as identified by NOTAM. The FAA issued AD 2021-23-12 because radio altimeter anomalies that are undetected by the automation or pilot, particularly close to the ground (
                    *e.g.*, landing flare), could lead to loss of continued safe flight and landing. Since the FAA issued AD 2021-23-12, Boeing has continued to evaluate potential 5G C-Band interference on aircraft systems that rely on radio altimeter inputs. Boeing issued Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0038-01B(R1), dated February 2, 2022 (for Model 707 and 727 operators); Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0030-01B(R3), dated March 22, 2022 (for Model MD-10, MD-11, MD-80, and 717 operators); Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0040-01B, dated January 17, 2022 (for Model DC-8, DC-9, and DC-10 operators); Boeing MD-10 Flight Crew Operations Manual Bulletin 2-10C, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated March 18, 2022; Boeing MD-11 Flight Crew Operations Manual Bulletin 2-18C, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated March 18, 2022; and Boeing MD-80 Flight Crew Operations Manual Bulletin 80-2-019B, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated February 1, 2022; and Boeing 717 Flight Crew Operating Manual Bulletin FAB2 717-2-016C, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated March 18, 2022. Based on Boeing's data, the FAA identified an additional hazard presented by 5G C-Band interference on The Boeing Company Model 707 and 727 airplanes; Model 717-200 airplanes; Model DC-8-10, DC-8-20, DC-8-30, and DC-8-40 airplanes; DC-8-50, DC-8-60, DC-8-60F, DC-8-70, DC-8-70F series airplanes; Model DC-8F-54 and DC-8F-55 airplanes; Model DC-9-10, DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes; Model DC-10-10, DC-10-10F, DC-10-15, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), DC-10-40, and DC-10-40F airplanes; Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes; Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 (collectively described, in this preamble, as MD-80 [3]
                    
                    ) airplanes; and Model MD-90-30 airplanes. The FAA determined that anomalies due to 5G C-Band interference may affect multiple other airplane systems using radio altimeter data, regardless of the approach type or weather. These anomalies may not be evident until very low altitudes. Impacted systems depend on the airplane model and include, but are not limited to, flight guidance, autothrottle system, flight controls, traffic alert and collision avoidance system (TCAS), ground proximity warning system (GPWS), windshear advisory and guidance system (WAGS), and central aural warning system (CAWS). The effects on these impacted systems include: *Flight Guidance (for Model 717, MD-10, and MD-11 airplanes):*
                     Glideslope guidance sensitivity may be affected when conducting Category I ILS approaches to barometric altitude (BARO) minimums. During missed approach, pilot inputs into the flight control panel (FCP) may not result in commands to the flight director to provide speed or heading guidance, and may not provide altitude capture guidance. Simulator testing for Model MD-11 airplanes showed that in some cases the system will bias the flight director bars out of view when presented with the expected erroneous radio altimeter data, providing immediate and compelling information to the flightcrew to perform a go-around. If the flight director bars remain in view, appropriate guidance is still displayed, and other systems' effects are sufficient to elicit proper pilot response to land (if visual) or conduct a go-around. Similar effects are expected for Model 717 and MD-10 airplanes due to similar system architecture.
                *Flight Guidance (for Model 707, 727, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-80, and MD-90 airplanes):*
                     Glideslope guidance sensitivity may be affected when conducting Category I ILS approaches to BARO minimums.
                *Flight Guidance (for Model 717, MD-10, MD-11, MD-80, and MD-90 airplanes):*
                     As specified in the operating procedures in paragraph (h) of this AD, non-precision approaches can be flown using LNAV/VNAV with flight directors, autopilot, and autothrottle to published BARO minimums.
                *Autothrottle System (for Model 717, MD-10, and MD-11 airplanes):*
                     RETARD, FMA RETARD, ALIGN, and FLARE functions and indications may be unreliable and may occur early, late, or not at all. If the autothrottle system 
                    ( print page 31099)
                    is not in the FLARE mode, LO SPD protection can engage and advance with autothrottles ON or OFF.
                *Autothrottle System (for Model 707, 727, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-80, and MD-90 airplanes):*
                     Potentially erroneous autothrottle commands.
                *Flight Controls (for Model 717, MD-10, and MD-11 airplanes):*
                     Auto ground spoiler function may require manual extension. For Model MD-11 airplanes, longitudinal stability augmentation system (LSAS) and low altitude stability enhancement (LASE) may not function properly. The pitch attitude hold (PAH) may not wash out on schedule. Positive nose lowering (PNL) and pitch rate damping (PRD) may not be available during landing. Pitch attitude protection (PAP) may activate early, or not at all. If PAP is activated early, it may resist increasing pitch attitude, necessitating additional column pull force.
                *TCAS:*
                     May be unreliable and resolution advisories and voice warnings may not be inhibited below 1,000 feet above ground level (AGL).
                *Enhanced ground proximity warning system (E-GPWS) and WAGS:*
                     May be unreliable and activate early, late, or not at all.
                *CAWS:*
                     CAWS annunciations may not provide proper aural warnings or altitude callouts and/or radio altimeter displayed values during flare.
                Other simultaneous flight deck effects associated with the 5G C-Band interference could increase pilot workload. These erroneous indications and annunciations, as well as conflicting information, may be provided to the flightcrew during critical phases of flight. There may also be a lack of cues present to elicit prompt go-around or recovery initiation. These effects could lead to reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane and are an unsafe condition. To address this unsafe condition, this AD mandates procedures for operators to incorporate specific operating procedures for, depending on the airplane model, ILS approaches, non-precision approaches, ground spoiler deployment, and go-around and missed approaches, when in the presence of 5G C-Band interference as identified by NOTAMs. Finally, the FAA notes that AD 2021-23-12 remains in effect and prohibits certain ILS approaches. Thus, this AD addresses procedures applicable only to those ILS approaches not already prohibited by AD 2021-23-12. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. FAA's Determination The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency has determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type designs. AD Requirements This AD requires revising the limitations and operating procedures sections of the existing AFM to incorporate specific operating procedures for, depending on the airplane model, ILS approaches, non-precision approaches, ground spoiler deployment, and go-around and missed approaches, when in the presence of 5G C-Band interference as identified by NOTAMs. Compliance With AFM Revisions Section 91.9 prohibits any person from operating a civil aircraft without complying with the operating limitations specified in the AFM. FAA regulations also require operators to furnish pilots with any changes to the AFM (14 CFR 121.137) and pilots in command to be familiar with the AFM (14 CFR 91.505). Interim Action The FAA considers this AD to be an interim action. If final action is later identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking. Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective Date Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 
                    *et seq.*) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency, for “good cause,” finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under this section, an agency, upon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days, upon a finding of good cause. An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies forgoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because the FAA determined that radio altimeters cannot be relied on to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 5G C-Band. The FAA recently determined that as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function during approach, landings, and go-arounds, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged. This increased flightcrew workload could lead to reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. The urgency is based on the hazard presented by 5G C-Band interference and on the ongoing C-Band wireless broadband deployment. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and contrary to the public interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days, for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forgo notice and comment. Comments Invited The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under 
                    **ADDRESSES**
                    . Include Docket No. FAA-2022-0509 and Project Identifier AD-2022-00338-T at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this final rule because of those comments. Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to 
                    *https://www.regulations.gov,*
                     including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this final rule. Confidential Business Information CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as “PROPIN.” The FAA will treat such marked submissions as 
                    ( print page 31100)
                    confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Eric Igama, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5388; email: 
                    *Roderick.Igama@faa.gov.*
                     Any commentary that the FAA receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. Regulatory Flexibility Act The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this AD affects 476 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD: Estimated Costs
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
                             product
Cost on U.S.
                             operatorsAFM revision
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85
$0
$85
$40,460
 Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, and (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation
Aircraft
Aviation safety
Incorporation by reference
Safety
 Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
 1.The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13
 2.The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: **2022-09-18 The Boeing Company:**
                             Amendment 39-22038; Docket No. FAA-2022-0509; Project Identifier AD-2022-00338-T. (a) Effective Date This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 23, 2022. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to all The Boeing Company airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (9) of this AD, certificated in any category. (1) Model 707-100 Long Body, -200, -100B Long Body, and -100B Short Body series airplanes, and Model 707-300, -300B, -300C, and -400 series airplanes. (2) Model 717-200 airplanes. (3) Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes. (4) Model DC-8-11, DC-8-12, DC-8-21, DC-8-31, DC-8-32, DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, DC-8-43, DC-8-51, DC-8-52, DC-8-53, DC-8-55, DC-8F-54, DC-8F-55, DC-8-61, DC-8-62, DC-8-63, DC-8-61F, DC-8-62F, DC-8-63F, DC-8-71, DC-8-72, DC-8-73, DC-8-71F, DC-8-72F, and DC-8-73F airplanes. (5) Model DC-9-11, DC-9-12, DC-9-13, DC-9-14, DC-9-15, DC-9-15F, DC-9-21, DC-9-31, DC-9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B), DC-9-33F, DC-9-34, DC-9-34F, DC-9-41, and DC-9-51 airplanes. (6) Model DC-10-10, DC-10-10F, DC-10-15, DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10), DC-10-40, and DC-10-40F airplanes. (7) Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes. (8) Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. (9) Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), MD-88, and MD-90-30 airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a determination that radio altimeters cannot be relied on to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G C-Band), and a determination that during approach, landings, and go-arounds, as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged. The FAA is issuing this AD to address 5G C-Band interference that could result in increased flightcrew workload and could lead to reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Revision of Existing Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)—Limitations (1) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(3) through (6) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Limitations Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD into the Limitations Section of the existing AFM. 
 
  (2) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(2), (7), and (8) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Limitations Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 2 to paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 2 to paragraph (g)(2) of this AD into the Limitations Section of the existing AFM.  (3) For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(9) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Limitations Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 3 to paragraph (g)(3) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 3 to paragraph (g)(3) of this AD into the Limitations Section of the existing AFM. 
 
  (h) Revision of Existing AFM—Operating Procedures (1) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (3) through (6) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 4 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 4 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD into the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM. **Note 1 to paragraph (h)(1):**
                             Guidance for accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD can be found in Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0038-01B(R1), dated February 2, 2022; and Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0040-01B, dated January 17, 2022.  (2) For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(2) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 5 to paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 5 to paragraph (h)(2) of this AD into the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM. **Note 2 to paragraph (h)(2):**
                             Guidance for accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD can be found in Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0030-01B(R3), dated March 22, 2022; and Boeing 717 Flight Crew Operating Manual Bulletin FAB2 717-2-016C, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated March 18, 2022. 
 
  (3) For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(7) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 6 to paragraph (h)(3) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 6 to paragraph (h)(3) of this AD into the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM. **Note 3 to paragraph (h)(3):**
                             Guidance for accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD can be found in Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0030-01B(R3), dated March 22, 2022; and Boeing MD-10 Flight Crew Operations Manual Bulletin 2-10C, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated March 18, 2022. 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  (4) For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(8) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 7 to paragraph (h)(4) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 7 to paragraph (h)(4) of this AD into the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM. **Note 4 to paragraph (h)(4):**
                             Guidance for accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (h)(4) of this AD can be found in Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0030-01B(R3), dated March 22, 2022; and Boeing MD-11 Flight Crew Operations Manual Bulletin 2-18C, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated March 18, 2022. 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  (5) For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(9) of this AD: Within 2 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM to include the information specified in figure 8 to paragraph (h)(5) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of figure 8 to paragraph (h)(5) of this AD into the Operating Procedures Section of the existing AFM. **Note 5 to paragraph (h)(5):**
                             Guidance for accomplishing the actions required by paragraph (h)(5) of this AD can be found in Boeing Multi Operator Message MOM-MOM-22-0030-01B(R3), dated March 22, 2022; and Boeing MD-80 Flight Crew Operations Manual Bulletin 80-2-019B, “Operation in airspace affected by 5G signal interference,” dated February 1, 2022.  (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 
                            *9-ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.* (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (3) AMOCs approved for AD 2021-23-12, Amendment 39-21810 (86 FR 69984, December 9, 2021) providing relief for specific radio altimeter installations are approved as AMOCs for the provisions of this AD. (j) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Eric Igama, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5388; email: 
                            *Roderick.Igama@faa.gov.* (2) For service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110 SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet 
                            *https://www.myboeingfleet.com.* (k) Material Incorporated by Reference None. Issued on April 28, 2022. Gaetano A. Sciortino, Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         The FCC's rules did not make C-Band wireless broadband available in Alaska, Hawaii, and the U.S. Territories. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         The regulatory text of the AD uses the term “5G C-Band” which, for purposes of this AD, has the same meaning as “5G”, “C-Band” and “3.7-3.98 GHz.” Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         This preamble groups these models under the term “MD-80” in order to reflect the title and affected models of the “MD-80” bulletin described in the previous paragraph. The regulatory applicability of this AD, however, and required AFM changes, address the individual models of that “MD-80” group. Back to Citation


BILLING CODE 4910-13-P [FR Doc. 2022-11058 Filed 5-18-22; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 4910-13-C