alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
DAVID IGNACIO LOPEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 10193

D.C. No. 4:14

- cr

- 00220

- JGZ

- JR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 8, 2020 * * San Francisco, California
Before: MILLER and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges, and SCHILTZ, ** * District Judge.

Defendant

- Appellant David Ignacio Lopez appeals from the district court’s
revocation of his supervised release and the imposition of an additional 60 months

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District o f Minnesota, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUN 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
Lopez argues for the first time on appeal that the supervised release

condition s imposed in his original sentence and in his revocation sentence
prohibiting him from having contact with minors are unconstitutionally vague. We
disagree , concluding that there was no error, let alone plain error

. United States v.

Johnson , 626 F.3d 1085, 1088

– 89 (9 th Cir. 2010)

. We construe release conditions
as not prohibiting unintentional conduct o r incidental contacts. See, e.g. , United

States v. Vega , 545 F.3d 743, 750 (9th Cir. 2008) ; United States v. Napulou , 593
F.3d 1041, 1045 (9th Cir. 2010). Thus, there was no error in imp osing the no

contact condit ions because a person of “common intelligence” would understand
what they prohibit : knowing ly being around or having contact with a minor that is

more than incidental

. United States v. King , 608 F.3d 1122, 1128 (9th Cir. 2010)

.
Nor did the district court plainly err in failing to consider the effect of the no

contact condition s on Lopez’s relationsh ip with his brother because the condition s

did not “ tar get [] ” Lopez ’s sibling relationship , United States v. Wolf Child , 699

F.3d 108 2, 1090 (9th Cir. 2012) , and Lopez failed to show that the y infringe his
right to familial association.
Finally, Lopez contends that his sentence is procedurally unsound and
substantively unreasonable. We conclude there was no procedur al plain error, as

described above. W e also conclude the district court did n ot abuse its discretion3

and impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. Un ited States v. Blinkinsop , 606
F.3d 1110, 1114 (9th Cir. 2010)

. T he record reveals that Lopez’s sentence
reasonably relat es to the statutory goal the district court identified

— protecting the
public

— given the underlying c onviction and the nature of the supe rvised release

violation

. See United States v. Rudd , 662 F.3d 1257, 1261 (9th Cir. 2011) ; 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a)

.
AFFIRMED.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/04/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,510
COMMITMENTS
   8,339    3,882    1,383   18,250   23,682   27,972   28,947   10,538    9,563

CHANGES FROM 05/28/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        -98)
     622     -587      -96     -248    1,070      278      387     -376     -485

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.7     10.1      3.6     47.4     61.5     72.6     75.2     27.4     24.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
      12        8        6       35       27       49       39
```

----

Updated June 7, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Reptron Electronics, Inc., Inc., a Florida corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:



To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 30, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    PAUL J. PLANTE                               
|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Paul J. Plante President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Allan M. LEAVITT, Petitioner, v. Cynthia A. PHILLIPS, et al.

No. 19-7152

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Roy Dar, certify that:1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of EMAK Worldwide, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatedto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ Roy Dar     Roy Dar  Vice President, Controller  (Principal Accounting Officer)Dated: August 22, 2006
Lorina G. DELFIERRO, petitioner, v. PENSCO TRUST COMPANY, fbo Jeffrey D. HERMANN.

No. 18-604.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

JAMES RUSSELL ODEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MIKE LEWIS, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-442-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff James Russell Oden, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for 

disposition. 

On April 8, 2024, Judge Love issued a Report recommending that the Court 

dismiss this case without prejudice for want of prosecution. Docket No. 13. A copy 

of this Report was sent to Plaintiff. However, no objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:23-cv-00442-JDK-JDL Document 14 Filed 07/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 37
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 13) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of 

prosecution. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 30th July, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00442-JDK-JDL Document 14 Filed 07/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 38
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2278

To require the National Park Service to conduct a feasibility study regarding

options for the protection and expanded visitor enjoyment of nationally

significant natural and cultural resources at Fort Hunter Liggett, California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1999

Mr. FARR of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To require the National Park Service to conduct a feasibility

study regarding options for the protection and expanded

visitor enjoyment of nationally significant natural and

cultural resources at Fort Hunter Liggett, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEASIBILITY STUDY REGARDING PROTECTION

4 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES AT

5 FORT HUNTER LIGGETT, CALIFORNIA.

6 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Inte7 rior, acting through the Director of the National Park

8 Service, shall undertake a feasibility study regarding op-
2

•HR 2278 IH

1 tions for the near- and long-term protection and expanded

2 visitor enjoyment of nationally significant natural and cul3 tural resources by the National Park Service or other

4 agencies as appropriate at Fort Hunter Liggett, Cali5 fornia.

6 (b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Interior

7 shall consult with all other affected or interested agencies,

8 including the Department of the Army, in the preparation

9 of the study.

10 (c) COMPLETION AND SUBMISSION.—Not later than

11 August 30, 2000, the Secretary of the Interior shall sub12 mit to Congress a report containing the results of the

13 study, along with such protection and visitor access rec14 ommendations as the Secretary of the Interior considers

15 appropriate.

Æ
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC T-MOBILE USA, INC. 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 09/06/2023 /s/ Qi Tong Qi Tong CA SBN 330347

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP Document 13 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 72
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,483
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,552
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     89,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,450
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,180
<LOANS>                                        219,659
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 377,791
<DEPOSITS>                                     290,674
<SHORT-TERM>                                    27,334
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,875
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,508
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 377,791
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,773
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,111
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    90
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,974
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,071
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,763
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,211
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 310
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,705
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,705
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.65
<LOANS-NON>                                        424
<LOANS-PAST>                                       365
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   305
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,281
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       30
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,406
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,406
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### **Exhibit 31.1**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Casey J. Sylla, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln Benefit LifeCompany;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)                         Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)                          Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

May8, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ Casey J. Sylla        |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |                      |
|   | Casey J. Sylla            |
|   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   | President                 |

 

E-2

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group Reproduction, Andrology, and Gynecology Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         June 28, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2125D, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jagpreet Singh Nanda, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2125D, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 451-4454,                         *jagpreet.nanda@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: May 23, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-11334 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P