alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton 

TAYLOR WALKINGSHIELD 

AND 

RICHARD MARLOWE 

v. Record No. 1048-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

CULPEPER COUNTY DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 20, 1996 

 OF SOCIAL SERVICES 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CULPEPER COUNTY 

John R. Cullen, Judge 

 (Monica J. Chernin, on brief), for appellants. 

 No brief for appellee. 

 Taylor Walkingshield and Richard Marlowe appeal the decision 

of the circuit court denying their petition to vacate and hold 

void the October 19, 1994 consent order of the juvenile and 

domestic relations district court. The appellants challenged the 

district court order because no guardian ad litem had been 

appointed for their minor child at the time of the order. Upon 

reviewing the record and opening brief, we conclude that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the 

decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. 

 "On appeal, the judgment of the trial court is presumed to 

be correct; its findings will not be overturned by this Court 

except in cases of manifest error. The burden is upon the party 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

alleging trial court error to show by the record that the 

judgment was erroneous." Steinberg v. Steinberg, 11 Va. App. 

323, 326, 398 S.E.2d 507, 508 (1990). The circuit court found 

that the district court order from which the appeal was taken was 

"an interlocutory order which made no findings and was not 

dispositive," and was "a temporary order, did not adjudicate the 

issues or render a final disposition, and is not void for failure 

of the court to appoint a Guardian ad litem" prior to the entry 

of the order. 

 Under Code § 16.1-296, an appeal to the appropriate circuit 

court may be taken from "any final order or judgment of the 

juvenile court." The record supports the circuit court's 

findings, and demonstrates that the district court order was not 

a final order. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is 

summarily affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-152186, 33-84726,
33-84728, 333-25981, and 333-114019 of Gaming Partners International Corporation (formerly known as Paul-Son Gaming Corporation) and Subsidiaries on
Form S-8, of our report dated March 30, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gaming Partners International Corporation and Subsidiaries
for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ MOSS
ADAMS LLP

San
Diego, CA
March 30, 2009

---



QuickLinks
Khalil WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH EXCEPTIONALITIES.

No. 19-745

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jose MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5346

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 24

POWERS OF ATTORNEY

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that OLYMPIC STEEL, INC., an Ohio corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby
constitute and appoint Michael D. Siegal and Richard T. Marabito their attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on behalf of Olympic Steel, Inc. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Olympic
Steel, Inc., and each of such Directors and officers, to sign Olympic Steel, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such
matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorney of Olympic Steel, Inc., and the Directors and officers of Olympic Steel, Inc. may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original with
respect to the person executing it.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland, Ohio this
13th day of March, 2007.



OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.By:

/s/ Richard T. MarabitoRichard T. Marabito, Chief FinancialOfficer




|                                    |  |  |  |                                                                           
|----------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Directors and Officers:             |  |  |  |                                                                           
|                                    |  | 
|/s/ Martin H. Elrad                 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Siegal                                                     
|Martin H. Elrad, Director           |  |  |  | Michael D. Siegal, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer       
|                                    |  | 
|/s/ Thomas M. Forman                |  |  |  | /s/ David A. Wolfort                                                      
|Thomas M. Forman, Director          |  |  |  | David A. Wolfort, President, ChiefOperating Officer and Director          
|                                    |  | 
|/s/ Ralph M. Della Ratta, Jr.       |  |  |  | /s/ Richard T. Marabito                                                   
|Ralph M. Della Ratta, Jr., Director |  |  |  | Richard T. Marabito, Chief FinancialOfficer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|                                    |  | 
|/s/ James B. Meathe                 |  |  |  | /s/ Howard L. Goldstein                                                   
|James B. Meathe, Director           |  |  |  | Howard L. Goldstein, Director
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2206 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2206

 To extend the period for beneficiaries of certain deceased members of 
    the uniformed services to apply for a death gratuity under the 
      Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance policy of such members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

 Mr. Gordon (for himself, Mr. Bryant, and Mr. Clement) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the period for beneficiaries of certain deceased members of 
    the uniformed services to apply for a death gratuity under the 
      Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance policy of such members.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 8134 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1994 
(38 U.S.C. 1967 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(B), by striking out ``in the 
        performance of duty'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``in the 
        line of duty''; and
            (2) in subsections (d) and (e), by striking out ``September 
        30, 1994'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``September 30, 
        1996''.
                                 <all>
```
Tiberiu KLEIN, et al., petitioners, v. Daniel O'BRIEN, et al.

No. 18-79.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11278]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Docket No. DHS--2022-0033]


Homeland Security Advisory Council

AGENCY: The Office of Partnership and Engagement (OPE), The Department 
of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice of a closed Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC) will meet 
virtually on Monday, May 23, 2022. The meeting will be closed to the 
public.

DATES: The meeting will take place from 10:30 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. ET on 
Monday, May 23, 2022.
    Public participation: The meeting will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miron at 202-282-8000 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#470f140604072f3669232f3469202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6eef5e7e5e6ced788c2ced588c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under 
Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public Law 
92-463 (5 U.S.C. Appendix), which requires a portion of each FACA 
committee meeting to be open to the public unless the President, or the 
head of the agency to which the advisory committee reports, determines 
that a portion of the meeting may be closed to the public in accordance 
with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c).
    The HSAC provides organizationally independent, strategic, timely, 
specific, actionable advice, and recommendations to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security on matters related to homeland security. The Council 
consists of senior executives from government, the private sector, 
academia, law enforcement, and non-governmental organizations.
    The HSAC will meet in a closed session from 10:30 a.m. to 11:15 
a.m. ET to participate in a sensitive discussion with DHS Secretary 
Alejandro N. Mayorkas regarding DHS operations.
    Basis for Closure: In accordance with Section 10(d) of FACA, the 
Secretary of Homeland Security has determined this meeting must be 
closed during this session as the disclosure of the information relayed 
would be detrimental to the public interest for the following reasons:
    The HSAC will participate in a sensitive operational discussion 
containing For Official Use Only and Law Enforcement Sensitive 
information. This discussion will include information regarding threats 
facing the United States and how DHS plans to address those threats. 
The session is closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7) and(9)(B).

    Dated: May 20, 2022.
Michael J. Miron,
Deputy Executive Director, Homeland Security Advisory Council, 
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2022-11278 Filed 5-20-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4412-FN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that: 

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

 

|                  |   |   |                                                                 |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 15, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Anthony J. Simonetta                                             |
|                  |   |   |  

 

 

Anthony J. Simonetta Chief Financial Officer |
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00140-CV

RICARDO MALDONADO DAVILA

v.

M & M TOWING AND RECOVERY, INC.

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CL-19-5371-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Each party shall bear their own costs 

relating to this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 26, 2021
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, David  Blitz,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cadus  Corporation  and will be retained  by Cadus  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 /s/ David Blitz
----------------------------------------------
David Blitz
President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
August 11, 2005

The foregoing  certification is furnished  solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.
Exhibit 4(d)


Amendment No. 1 to the Investment Management
Agreement


This Amendment No.
1 to the Investment Management Agreement dated as of June 1, 2011 (the “Amendment”) is entered into by and between
BlackRock World Income Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Fund”), and BlackRock Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (the “Advisor”).


WHEREAS, the Fund
and the Advisor have entered into an Investment Management Agreement dated September 29, 2006 (the “Management Agreement”)
pursuant to which the Advisor agreed to act as investment advisor to the Fund; and


WHEREAS, the Management Agreement provides
that the Fund will pay to the Advisor a monthly fee in arrears at an annual rate equal to the amount set forth in Schedule A thereto;
and


WHEREAS, the Management
Agreement provides that the Management Agreement may be amended by the parties to the Management Agreement only if the amendment
is specifically approved by a vote of the Board of Directors of the Fund, including a majority of those Directors who are not parties
to the Management Agreement or interested persons of any such party cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting
on such approval, and, where required by the Investment Company Act of 1940, by a vote of the majority of the outstanding voting
securities of the Fund; and


WHEREAS, the Board
of Directors, including a majority of those Directors who are not interested persons of the Fund, specifically approved this Amendment
at an in-person meeting held on May 11, 2011;


NOW, THEREFORE, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


		1.	Schedule A of the Management Agreement is hereby amended as set forth on the Schedule A attached
hereto with respect to the Fund.



		2.	Except as otherwise set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Management Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.



 



     

     

    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Investment Management Agreement to be executed by their officers designated
below as of the day and year first above written.


BLACKROCK WORLD INCOME FUND, INC.


 


 


 


By: /s/ John M. Perlowski_______________


Name: John M. Perlowski


Title: President and CEO


 


 


 


BLACKROCK ADVISORS, LLC


 


 


 


By: /s/ Neal J. Andrews________________


Name: Neal J. Andrews


Title: Managing Director


 


 



     

     

    

 


Schedule A


Investment Advisory Fee


0.60%
of the average daily Net Assets of the Fund not exceeding $1 billion; 0.56% of the average daily Net Assets of the Fund exceeding
$1 billion but not exceeding $3 billion; 0.54% of the average daily Net Assets of the Fund exceeding $3 billion but not exceeding
$5 billion; 0.52% of the average daily Net Assets of the Fund exceeding $5 billion but not exceeding $10 billion; and 0.51% of
the average daily Net Assets of the Fund exceeding $10 billion.
In Re Angel RUIZ-RIVERA, petitioner.

No. 17-8981.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

Autoscribe Corporation

Plaintiff,

v.

Payment Savvy, LLC

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00390-JRG 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Autoscribe 

Corporation, by and through its undersigned counsel, certifies that as of this date, Autoscribe 

Corporation has no parent corporation, and that no publicly-held corporation owns 10% or more 

of its stock.

Dated: October 17, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jason McManis

Jason McManis

State Bar No.: 24088032 

Colin Phillips

State Bar No.: 24105937 

Chun Deng

State Bar No.: 24133178

AHMAD,ZAVITSANOS &MENSING,PLLC

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2500

Houston, Texas 77010

(713) 655-1101

jmcmanis@azalaw.com

cphillips@azalaw.com

cdeng@azalaw.com

Case 2:23-cv-00390-JRG Document 9 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 30
Andrea L. Fair

State Bar No.: 24078488 

WARD, SMITH, & HILL, PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Parkway 

Longview, Texas 75604

(903) 757-6400

(903) 757-2323 (fax)

andrea@wsfirm.com

Attorneys for Autoscribe Corporation

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that that on October 17, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF System.

/s/ Jason McManis

Jason McManis

2

Case 2:23-cv-00390-JRG Document 9 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 31
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LS EVENTS LLC d/b/a VIA AMERICAS LLC, and

THE HEARTBEAT FOUNDATION

, Appellant s ,

v.

MINORITY HELP, INC. and ALVANIA VIVIANE SAIDE

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D2023

- 0959

[ February 1, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18

- 006788.

Lane Weinbaum of Weinbaum P.A., Coconut Creek, for appellant s

.

Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper of Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, and Gordon Koegler of Law Offices of Gordon Koegler, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ARTHUR WILSON MCDANIELS § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-298

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Movant Arthur Wilson McDaniels, a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se, brings this Motion

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

The Motion was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Movant is in custody pursuant to a judgment entered in the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Texas. Movant was convicted in cause number 1:22-CR-34 of conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. Movant was sentenced to 136 months of

imprisonment. On July 17, 2023, Movant filed a notice of appeal. The appeal is currently pending

before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 

A District Court may not adjudicate the merits of an application for post-conviction relief if

a direct appeal is pending. Fassler v. United States, 858 F.2d 1016, 1019 (5th Cir. 1988). 

Because Movant’s direct appeal is pending before the Fifth Circuit, this court may not entertain 

the motion to vacate sentence at this time. The Motion should be dismissed, and Movant may 

refile his Motion to Vacate Sentence after his direct appeal is concluded. 

Case 1:23-cv-00298-MAC-CLS Document 9 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 36
Recommendation

This Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence should be dismissed without

prejudice. 

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 11th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00298-MAC-CLS Document 9 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 37