alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

KEITH ALLEN FOWLER 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00012-MJT

AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 30.) Judge Stetson recommended 

that the Court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the Court 

adjudge the Defendant guilty on Counts One and Three of the Indictment filed against the 

Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The Court orders that 

the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are adopted. The Court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement 

until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ordered that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Keith Allen Fowler, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00012-MJT Document 35 Filed 07/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 102
2

adjudged guilty as to Counts One and Three of the Indictment charging violations of 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute Cocaine and 18 U.S.C. ' 922(g)(1) –

Possession of a Firearm by a Prohibited Person.

The Court’s prior Order Adopting entered on November 8, 2023 (Dkt, 31) contained a

typographical error as to the listed counts. The Court enters this Amended Order naming the 

correct counts to which the Defendant pled guilty—Counts One and Three. Therefore, it is 

ORDERED that the prior Order adopting (Dkt. 31) is VACATED.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 3rd day of July, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00012-MJT Document 35 Filed 07/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 103
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         8,751,258
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                3,138,358
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              12,888,599
<CASH>                                       2,487,022
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       3,195,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,488,945
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,977,873
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          478,485
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       554,151
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,606,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,488,945
<PREMIUMS>                                   2,537,130
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            529,788
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (128,784)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 487,012
<BENEFITS>                                     438,557
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    463,627
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                   170,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (128,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (128,701)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Levi ROCKEFELLER, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-6914

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment
(the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of November 12,
2008, by and between Interleukin Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”), and Kenneth S. Kornman,
an individual (“Employee”), is made effective as of March 31, 2012. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, Employer and
Employee desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Term through November 30, 2012.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained in this Amendment and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.Amendment
of Section 1 of the Agreement. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “for a period of three (3) years
thereafter” and inserting “through November 30, 2012.”


 


2.Miscellaneous.


 


(i)Except as contemplated by this
Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(ii)This Amendment
may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.


 


 


REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK


 


 



    	



    	 



    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized officers effective as of the date
first above written


 


 


 


	 	INTERLEUKIN GENETICS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Lewis H. Bender
	 	Name:	Lewis H. Bender
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	EMPLOYEE
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Kenneth S. Kornman
	 	Name:	Kenneth S. Kornman, D.D.S., Ph.D.


 






    	2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
KELLSTROM INDUSTRIES, INC. BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         272,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               69,250,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                 8,575,684
<INVENTORY>                                194,490,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           361,053,283
<PP&E>                                      29,741,905
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,401,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             541,445,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       38,192,858
<BONDS>                                    323,743,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,911
<OTHER-SE>                                 171,201,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               541,445,423
<SALES>                                    288,912,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           330,944,024
<CGS>                                      200,888,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              276,750,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,009,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             32,924,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,389,936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,534,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,534,904
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48


</TABLE>
Damon John White Bird SOLGADO, petitioner, v. Colby BRAUN, Warden.

No. 18-6290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

✔

2:23-cv-00419-JRG ✔

9/15/2023 11/6/2023 Potter Minton Tyler, TX 75702 102 N College Ave #900 903-597-8311 903-531-3939 Michael E. Jones mikejones@potterminton.com Valve Corporation

10929400

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 5 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 128
exhibit-10_33a.htm




SECOND EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE


TO


APRIL 21, 2008 GUARANTY AGREEMENT AND LINE OF CREDIT








	
  

	
April 10, 2012












American Wagering, Inc. and Subsidiaries


John Salerno


675 Grier Drive


Las Vegas, Nevada 89119







Re:  Second Extension the maturity date of the April 21, 2008 Guaranty Agreement and Line of Credit







Dear John:







Victor Salerno ("Salerno") approves a second extension of the maturity date for the line of credit (the "Line of Credit") he originally provided to American Wagering, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Borrower") through the April 21, 2008 Guaranty Agreement and Line of Credit Agreement, as it was amended by that certain Change Of Terms To Line Of Credit dated April 21, 2010 (“2010 First Extension”) on the terms and conditions set forth below.  All capitalized terms not defined have the definition prescribed to them in the 2010 First Extension.







Borrower: American Wagering, Inc. and subsidiaries







Amount: $1,000,000







Interest: At a rate per annum which at all times shall equal ten percent (10%) simple interest per annum.







Interest will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year for the actual number of days elapsed. Interest on Advances will be payable in arrears on the last day of each month.







Borrower acknowledges that Salerno has Advanced the full Line of Credit and is currently paying Salerno interest-only payments.







Maturity: The principal balance of Line of Credit will be due and payable, including any outstanding interest, on the earlier date of August 1, 2012 or the closing of the merger agreement and plan of merger between Borrower and William Hill Holding, Limited.







All other terms and conditions in that April 21, 2010 First Extension shall remain in full force and effect.











  





  











  








If the above terms and conditions are satisfactory, please so indicate on the enclosed copy hereof whereupon this letter will then constitute an Agreement between the Borrower and Salerno.







BORROWER








	
  

	
 By: /s/ John Salerno_______








	
  

	
        John Salerno








	
  

	
Title: Secretary








	
  

	
Agreed and Accepted on April 10, 2012

















SALERNO








	
  

	
By: /s/ Victor Salerno_______








	
  

	
Victor Salerno








	
  

	
Agreed and Accepted on April 10, 2012
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

##### **Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of CIBER, Inc.and related Prospectuses:

 
| (1) Form S-8  No. 33-81320   |   | (7) Form S-8  No. 33-88046    |   | (12)  Form S-8 No. 33-88048   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| (2) Form S-8  No. 33-88050   |   | (8) Form S-8  No. 333-15091   |   | (13)  Form S-8 No. 333-25545  |
| (3) Form S-8  No. 333-59015  |   | (9) Form S-8  No. 333-61287   |   | (14)  Form S-8 No. 333-91969  |
| (4) Form S-4  No. 333-102780 |   | (10) Form S-8  No. 333-113259 |   | (15)  Form S-8 No. 333-115951 |
| (5) Form S-8  No. 333-151923 |   | (11)  Form S-3 No. 333-155663      |   | (16)  Form S-4 No. 333-155906 |
| (6) Form S-8  No. 333-159635 |   |                                         |   |                                    |

 

of our reportsdated March 4, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsof CIBER, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of CIBER, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) of CIBER, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2009.

 
|               | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------------------|---------------------------------|
|               |                            |
| Denver,  Colorado  |                            |
| March 4, 2010 |                            |

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTRAEVIS PAKI SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1321

[December 22, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence Michael 

Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2008-CF-004836B.

Robert R. Berry of Law Office of Robert R. Berry, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/05/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      389,521
COMMITMENTS
 120,111  162,019   88,290  158,438  114,128  366,839  364,437   22,682   25,084

CHANGES FROM 10/29/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     27,031)
  14,894   17,129    6,956    3,944    4,406   25,794   28,491    1,237   -1,460

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.8     41.6     22.7     40.7     29.3     94.2     93.6      5.8      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      55       70       76       32       37      132      151
```

----

Updated November 8, 2013
Clemente Avelino PEREIDA, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 19-438

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. NO. 34,702 4 DARREN HENRY, 5 Defendant-Appellant, 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 7 Darren M. Kugler, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Almanza Abrams PA 12 Jared Abrams 13 Las Cruces, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 ZAMORA, Judge. 172 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No me morandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

5 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

8 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 9

10 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 11
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2254

To amend the trade adjustment assistance provisions of the Trade Act of

1974 to allow the reimbursement of training costs incurred and for

which payment became due within 30 days before the training is approved by the Secretary of Labor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1999

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the trade adjustment assistance provisions of the

Trade Act of 1974 to allow the reimbursement of training costs incurred and for which payment became due

within 30 days before the training is approved by the

Secretary of Labor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN TRAINING

4 COSTS.

5 Section 236(a)(6) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19

6 U.S.C. 2296(a)(6)) is amended—
2

•HR 2254 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking clause (ii)

2 and inserting the following:

3 ‘‘(ii) from any source other than this section,

4 except that the Secretary shall reimburse an adversely af5 fected worker for the costs of any training program ap6 proved under paragraph (1) for that worker to the extent

7 that worker was enrolled in the training program during

8 the 30-day period preceding the date on which the Sec9 retary approved the program and such costs were incurred

10 during that 30-day period.’’; and

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘will not

12 be required’’ and inserting ‘‘, subject to the excep13 tion in subparagraph (A), will not be required’’.

Æ
No. 6:23-cv-00258

Jay Williams,

Plaintiff,

v.

John Garrison,

Defendant.

ORDER 

Plaintiff Jay Williams, an inmate at the Henderson County 

Jail, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged 

violations of his rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On July 

17, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that 

this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 8. The magistrate judge further recommended that dismissal of this case should count as a qualifying 

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 

F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the 

report and recommendation but has filed a handwritten coupon as 

an attempt at payment in this matter. Doc. 9.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation. Moreover, as plaintiff 

has been made aware, the filing of a handwritten “coupon” is not 

an acceptable form of payment and does not therefore impact the 

court’s screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See Doc. 3.

Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The dismissal of this action under 

§ 1915A(b)(1) counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See 

Case 6:23-cv-00258-JCB-JDL Document 10 Filed 08/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 26
- 2 -

Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 388. Plaintiff is warned that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in forma 

pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated 

or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of 

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). All motions pending in this 

civil action are denied.

So ordered by the court on August 23, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00258-JCB-JDL Document 10 Filed 08/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 27
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  November 16, 2009

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Financial Officer and
                              Interim Chief Executive Officer
Ram MEHTA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-209.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.