alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avalon
Oil & Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: October 15, 2014 | By: | /s/ Kent Rodriguez                                                                    | 
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Kent Rodriguez                                                                        | 
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer, President,
        Secretary and Principal Financial Officer |
Form of Amendment to Executive Officer and Non-Employee Stock Options



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

					
		 		 	
	



	 		 	





 [FORM OF AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND NON-EMPLOYEE 

DIRECTOR STOCK OPTIONS TO PERMIT NET EXERCISES] 
  

			
	To:	 	[Section 16 Executive Officers / Non-Employee Directors]
		
	From:	 	
		
	Date:	 	
		
	Subject:	 	Notice of Amendment to Stock Option Agreements – Net Exercise

 On February 17, 2012, the Management Organization and Compensation Committee approved, effective immediately, an amendment to
all of your outstanding option awards to permit so-called net exercises. 
 A net exercise is one whereby you “pay” the exercise cost of the
options you are exercising by directing Graco to withhold a number of shares, having an aggregate fair market value equal to the aggregate exercise price of the options being exercised [and the resulting taxes], from the shares that would otherwise
be deliverable upon exercise of the option. This method results in your ownership of the remaining shares. This is an additional method of exercising options, and you may still use the other exercise methods described in your option award agreements
at any time. 
 The net exercise method is only available to you so long as you are a [Section 16 officer / director]. If you cease to be a [Section 16
officer / director] for any reason, you will be limited to the methods of exercise originally provided for in your option agreement. Accordingly, the section of your outstanding stock option agreements describing methods for exercising your options
is amended to permit you to exercise the option as follows: 
 “If you are serving as an executive officer or director of the Company, as applicable,
on the date of exercise, by a reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock to be delivered upon exercise, which number of shares to be withheld shall have an aggregate fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the exercise price.”

 I recommend that you file this notice of amendment with your outstanding award documents as a reminder of this amendment; your award documents will not
be reissued.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-83438) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan of
Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. of our report dated December 17, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. included in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1996.

        Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule 
of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2). This schedule is the 
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an 
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the consolidated financial 
statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic 
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects 
the information set forth therein.


                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
January 22, 1997
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

2:23cv443

AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, 

and AT&T Corp.

AT&T Inc. Matthew G. Berkowitz 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

mberkowitz@reichmanjorgensen.com

9/27/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 305
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23cv443 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 306
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

Iionorable

**Frank Ff** 

**. k&-ray**  County **AttorneJ CarBoll**  **Qount~ Panhsndle,**  **Toxar**

**Dear sir:**  OpinionNo. O-8806 ROI The mathorltyof the County Commlr8loIl6rn' **court** to moQUire hIId **ior** the dl'lkinIL6~ oi Nate hl~hwa~r. ,(

that the 8tato Iilghway Dsparttaent a drainagOdltrhwhlob and the property

### owner the rlghtr-of-way,

oonvenlent to any **road to**  be

. . **m&Ataln*&**

. . .) the same my bo’aopulrod by pureham or oondemnation

by the **OOUntJ 0011&8~iO?X6~** **’ QOUXt.**  **”** (Undersoorlng **OW6)**Hon. Irnnk B. U.cmy, page 8

It is, therefore,

apparmt from the Artlole **just** qtiotad that the nroessltyof auoh land or right-of-way must first be datermIne& by tha Etete Elghwag Commi~aion. In otherworbr, tha authorityto detarmlna whether or not the land la naoesaary for tha propar maintenanoeoi a State highway is in the State iiidhwey

Cozraaisaion

ad not In the oomlaaloners* oourt. Artiole 6074n,Vernon~a Annotated Civil Statutes,also provldao that boforo a oounty oan aoquira land Sor euoh purF0868) a request must ba mada by tha State highway Comlaalon. he oounty &oar not have authorityto purchase or condoms if&n& for State hi&way purpow% on its own bahalf. O*KooCa VS. &ldSpeth County, 28 g. ‘h;. (ed) 626.

You are, theroiore, advlsad that the oounty oommlsalonsrs~ oourt aannot eoqutra land for dralmga purposesuntil it is 6*- termlnedby the State tighuay Comu~larlon thatsuch land ia nsoeaaary for the propar 8aintenanoa of aald highway. You am furtheradvlard t&t tho oouutymust also bo requaisoted by the State Hl&hway Commissionto ooqulro aaid traot of land before it ha8 authorityto 60 80. I? it does not have auoh a roquaat, it is not authorlashto prooure land ror Mid pUTpOa6. Ho sincerelytrust that the above fully snawera your lnqulry, wo are

RHC tN Y0urs very truly ATT@BWKGEXSfW,OFT~S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          2,081
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>          18,232
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                16,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     23,159
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            0
<LOANS>                         347,341
<ALLOWANCE>                     1,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  413,957
<DEPOSITS>                      363,354
<SHORT-TERM>                    5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>             5,680
<LONG-TERM>                     2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        34,874
<OTHER-SE>                      3,049
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  413,957
<INTEREST-LOAN>                 24,771
<INTEREST-INVEST>               1,135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                1,347
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                27,253
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>              16,821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              17,204
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>           10,049
<LOAN-LOSSES>                   2
<SECURITIES-GAINS>              14
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                 5,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 5,269
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>      3,055
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       55
<NET-INCOME>                    3,110
<EPS-BASIC>                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                  2.60
<LOANS-NON>                     0
<LOANS-PAST>                    88
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                1,390
<CHARGE-OFFS>                   50
<RECOVERIES>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>               1,342
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>            1,222
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>         120


</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors


Silicom Ltd.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement no. 333-149144 on Form S-8 of Silicom Ltd. of our report dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Silicom Ltd. and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 20-F of Silicom Ltd.




Somekh Chaikin


Certified Public Accountants (Israel)


Member Firm of KPMG International




Tel Aviv, Israel


March 16, 2011
Jesus Antonio ALDANA, petitioner, v. Kelly SANTORO, Warden.

No. 17-8983.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Salim ABDUL-MALIK, Petitioner, v. CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, et al.

No. 19-6879

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Kenneth Floyd PRUTTING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5398.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Lee CRAFT, petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 18M58.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Registrant's audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000917032
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,959,240
<SECURITIES>                                28,050,750<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,068,325
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,430,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,388,939<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,430,075
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,773,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,231,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,541,686
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,541,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,541,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    6,486
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    6,486
<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest
in Trust with capital accounts of $31,406,084 less
managing shareholder's accumulated deficit of $17,145.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

2:23cv445

Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco Partnership, 

d/b/a Verizon Wireless.

Verizon Communications Inc. Matthew G. Berkowitz 

Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP 

100 Marine Parkway, Suite 300 

Redwood Shores, CA 94065 

mberkowitz@reichmanjorgensen.com

9/27/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 301
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23cv445 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00445-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 302
Joseph DINGLER, petitioner, v. MILESTONE MANAGEMENT, et al.

No. 17-8670.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128558 & (45) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, HELEN KENNEDY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128558 COA: 251565 Wayne CC: 02-222435-NO FRANKWOOD MANAGE MENT CO., INC., WARRENWOODS APARTMENTS, INC., SATOVSKY FAMILY L.L.C., SATOVSKY INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., SATOVSKY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LESTER SATOVSKY, ABR AHAN SATOVSKY, and NEIL SATOVSKY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to enlarge record on a ppeal is DENIED.

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Glas-Aire Industries Group Ltd. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 19, 2002

/s/ Craig GrossmanCraig Grossman Chief Executive Officer





Dated: November 19, 2002

/s/ Linda KwanLinda Kwan Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00352 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc. 

(“Defendants” or “Verizon”), and certifies that she is authorized to receive service of all pleadings, 

notices, orders and other papers in the above-captioned matter on behalf of the above-named 

Defendants.

Michelle Zhu

District of Columbia Bar No. 90018810 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 777-9413 

Facsimile: (202)831-6063 

MZhu@gibsondunn.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 65 Filed 05/10/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1315
Dated: May 10, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michelle Zhu 

Michelle Zhu 

District of Columbia Bar No. 90018810 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

1050 Connecticut Ave NW 

Washington, DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 777-9413 

Facsimile: (202)831-6063 

Email: MZhu@gibsondunn.com 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 65 Filed 05/10/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1316
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on May 10, 2024, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Michelle Zhu

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 65 Filed 05/10/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1317
Umesh KAUSHAL, Petitioner v. INDIANA

No. 18-1499

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District denied.
Daniel PYE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7478

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of 
Just For Feet, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 regarding the Just For Feet, 
Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and the Just For Feet, Inc.
Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 17, 1997
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Just For Feet, Inc. for the year
ended January 31, 1997.

                                           Deloitte & Touche LLP


Birmingham, Alabama
April 24, 1997