alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,040
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,503
<PP&E>                                         9,420,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,464,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,148,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          96,614
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,031,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,148,154
<SALES>                                        124,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               124,916
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,027<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27,697)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,697)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
In Re Peter T. ROUKIS, petitioner.

No. 18-6868.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-1999
<CASH>                                          27,590
<SECURITIES>                                     1,011
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                       348
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,931
<PP&E>                                          61,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,818
<BONDS>                                        310,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                   (172,710)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,913
<SALES>                                         18,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,466
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (425)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                173,783
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   166,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE INCLUDES INFORMATION FOR THE PREDECESSOR ENTITY
FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE (APRIL 1, 1999).
</FN>


</TABLE>
Order filed, June 22, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00419-CV

____________

GEORGA A. MORAN, JR AND SUSAN K., MORAN, Appellant

V.

MEMORIAL POINT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 411th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CIV 24596

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 10, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Laura Wells, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CFO CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sec. 1350, as adopted), Thomas Cawley, Chief Financial Officer of Peet’s Coffee& Tea, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

 

1. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 2, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the16th day of March, 2005.
Capital Contribution Agreement



 Exhibit 10.15 
 CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 
 THIS CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
is made and entered into as of this 20th day of April, 2012, by and between (i) Perfect Sting Racing Corporation (“Raceco”) and (ii) Golden Pegasus Racing Incorporated (“Golden Pegasus”). 

W I T N E S S E T H: 
 1. Capital Contribution. Golden Pegasus is currently the sole shareholder of Raceco and in connection with the anticipated initial public offering (the “IPO”) of common shares of Raceco,
Golden Pegasus hereby agrees to pay any and all commissions and expense reimbursements paid to selling agents in connection with the IPO through an additional capital contribution to Raceco. No additional shares are to be issued in consideration for
any such additional capital contribution. Any such additional capital contribution will be paid no later than the closing date of the IPO. 
 2. Representations and Warranties of Golden Pegasus. Golden Pegasus represents and warrants to Raceco: 
 (a) Binding Obligation. This Capital Contribution Agreement is a valid, binding obligation of Golden Pegasus, enforceable in accordance with its terms; and 

(b) No Violation. The execution, delivery and performance of the Capital Contribution Agreement by Golden Pegasus do not violate
any laws, regulations, orders, decrees or agreements binding upon or affecting Golden Pegasus or this transaction; 
 3.
Representations and Warranties of Raceco. Raceco represents and warrants to Golden Pegasus that the execution, delivery and performance of this Capital Contribution Agreement by Raceco do not violate any laws, regulations, orders, decrees or
agreements binding upon or affecting Raceco or this transaction. 
 4. Governing Law. The Capital Contribution Agreement
was entered into and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been signed by Golden Pegasus and Raceco as of the
date first above written. 
  

			
	PERFECT STING RACING CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	     /s/ Lyle Strachan

	Name: Lyle Strachan
	Title:   Chief Financial Officer
	
	GOLDEN PEGASUS RACING INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	     /s/ Michael Rogers

	Name: Michael Rogers
	Title:   Chief Executive Officer



  
 2
Lamond LATNEY, petitioner, v. Anthony PARKER.

No. 18-6224.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 1

                 To provide for Social Security reform.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 1999

 Mr. Hastert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To provide for Social Security reform.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the President, in his 1998 State of the Union address, 
        committed the Nation to saving Social Security, a call which he 
        repeated in his 1999 State of the Union address;
            (2) recognizing the importance of Social Security to 
        millions of American families, Speaker Hastert at the opening 
        of the 106th Congress reserved the House bill designation H.R. 
        1 for the President's detailed legislative proposal to save 
        Social Security;
            (3) every major reform of Social Security in our Nation's 
        history has been initiated by the President, either through his 
        submission of his own detailed legislative proposal to the 
        Congress or through his support for a bipartisan commission to 
        draft and submit to the Congress such a proposal on his behalf; 
        and
            (4) the President's ``framework'' for reform issued as part 
        of his Fiscal Year 2000 Budget proposal, while offering several 
        constructive suggestions for reform, has not been submitted to 
        the Congress to date in the form of detailed legislative 
        language.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    The President should submit to each House of the Congress as soon 
as possible a detailed legislative proposal that would truly save 
Social Security for the coming generations of Americans.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6703

BRYANT PHIPPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RON ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections; SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden; ROSE M.

LEABOUGH, Adjustment Hearings Chairperson;

SERGEANT GREYER, Investigation Officer;

WILLIAM P. RODGERS, Regional Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-95-1173-AM)

Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Phipps, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bryant Phipps appeals the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action for failing to state a claim

upon which relief could be granted. We modify the dismissal to

reflect that the action is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(d) (1988), and we affirm the dismissal as modified.

Phipps alleged that his due process rights were violated when,

pursuant to a prison disciplinary proceeding, he was found guilty

of being under the influence of heroin. Phipps claimed the right

to a urine screen at his own expense to confirm the results of the

test upon which he was convicted.

After considering an amended complaint submitted by Phipps,

and before process was served on the defendants, the district court

dismissed the action for failing to state a claim upon which relief

could be granted. While we find the dismissal proper, the district

court did not specify the rule or statute under which it proceeded

in dismissing the claim.

The district court should have dismissed the action pursuant

to § 1915(d), because Phipps proceeds in forma pauperis and none of

the defendants have been served with process. Accordingly, though

we affirm the district court's order, we modify the order to reflect that the dismissal is pursuant to § 1915(d). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,340,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  228,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                    692,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,504,479
<PP&E>                                      15,901,686
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,110,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,885,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,212,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              600
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,687
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,135,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,885,000
<SALES>                                      2,841,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,901,366
<CGS>                                        1,100,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,775,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,006,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,006,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,006,334)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99





              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350 as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinnacle Financial
                  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
                  June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: AUGUST 9, 2002                By: /S/ L. JACKSON MCCONNELL
      --------------                    ------------------------
                                            L. Jackson McConnell
                                            Chairman and Chief
                                            Executive Officer


Date: AUGUST 9, 2002                By: /S/ H. THOMAS WARREN III.
      --------------                    -------------------------
                                        H. Thomas Warren III
                                        Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2198 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2198

      To suspend temporarily the duty on branched dodecylbenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 1999

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on branched dodecylbenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.29.01    Branched          Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     dodecylbenzene                                                          31/2002          ''
                     (CAS No. 123-01-                                                                          .
                     3) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2902.90.30)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

```

----

Updated February 1, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                           81,863,494
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    52,277,307
<ALLOWANCES>                    (24,269,460)
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                117,140,247
<PP&E>                           60,057,107
<DEPRECIATION>                   (8,575,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  271,915,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            24,541,696
<BONDS>                         102,856,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            231,283
<OTHER-SE>                      141,712,756 <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    271,915,622
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 66,269,015
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    49,798,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                5,241,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  11,228,923
<INCOME-TAX>                      4,108,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               7,120,768
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      7,120,768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .47
<FN> 
<F1> Retained earnings - $9,856,011
        


</TABLE>
Ramona I. MORGAN, petitioner, v. KANSAS, et al.

No. 17-8043.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Order entered October , 2012 

In The 

Court of Sppeato 

jfiftb 7113tEitrict of Mexati at 3Batlati 

No. 05-12-00082-CV 

YVONNE BROWN, Appellant 

V. 

BUCKINGHAM, CAMDEN, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-07753-B 

ORDER 

The Court DENIES appellant's October 1, 2012 motion to extend time to file a motion 

for rehearing. On August 29, 2012, the Court denied appellant's July 25, 2012 motion for 

rehearing without changing either the opinion or judgment. Under these circumstances, 

appellant is not entitled to file a second motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.5.
Dean Edward CALHOUN, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-6368.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Waling CHOIZILME, petitioner, v. Matthew G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General.

No. 18-526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7811

JERRY HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Commonwealth of Virginia; RON ANGELONE, Director; C.D. LARSEN, Warden; CAROL WALLACE, Associate Warden of Operations; DR. OFOGH, Chief Physician; DR. JACOBS, Chief Psychiatrist, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-00-243-2) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2000). Because Appellant did notdemonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED