alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIFTH DIVISION

DILLARD, C. J.,

REESE and BETHEL, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules

March 20, 2018

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A16A0201. HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. S. G.

BETHEL, Judge.

Our earlier decision in this case, Henry County Board of Education v. S. G.,

337 Ga. App. 260 (786 SE2d 907) (2016), was reversed by the Supreme Court of

Georgia, Henry County Board of Education v. S. G., 301 Ga. 794 (804 SE2d 427)

(2017). We now vacate our earlier decision, and we adopt the opinion and decision

of the Supreme Court as our own. We reverse the judgment of the Superior Court and

remand the case with direction that it, in turn, remand to the Board of Education for

further findings and conclusions after applying the appropriate law to the evidence

in accordance with this opinion. 

Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction. Dillard, C. J., and

Reese, J., concur.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1





March 18, 2019


Mr. Scott D. Peters
c/o Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
16435 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 320
Scottsdale, AZ  85254


		
	Re:
	Extension of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement




Dear Scott:


Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between you and Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. (the “Company”), dated as of July 8, 2016 and subsequently amended on July 14, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”).  This letter is to confirm our agreement that the term of the Employment Agreement (as provided in Section 2 of the Employment Agreement) will be extended so that the Expiration Date (as defined in the Employment Agreement) will be March 13, 2023 (such term being subject to earlier termination as provided in Section 7 of the Employment Agreement). 
Except as expressly set forth herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its current terms.  This letter may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
If this letter accurately sets forth our mutual understanding with respect to the foregoing matters, please indicate your acceptance by signing this letter and returning it to the undersigned.  This letter shall be a binding agreement between the Company and you.  A duplicate copy of this letter is included for your records.
                      Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. 

By:  /s/ Robert A. Milligan
Its:  Chief Financial Officer


Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ Scott D. Peters
Scott D. Peters


Date: March 18, 2019
Denis Aviles SALGUERO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00285-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Amend Docket Control Order filed by 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 62. 

After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that the Parties’ deadline to comply with P.R. 4-2 and exchange preliminary 

claim constructions is August 7, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 63 Filed 08/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5183
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JENNIFER RENEE CLARK (1)

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00088-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count Eleven of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Jennifer Renee 

Clark GUILTY of Count Eleven of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with Intent to Distribute and Distribution of Methamphetamine.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4th January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00088-JDK-KNM Document 47 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 118
Esau ESCOBAR, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-6663.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP INC., 

Defendants,

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00352

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION 

OF INTER PARTES REVIEW AND THE RELATED MANUFACTURER CASES

Before the Court is Defendants Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon 

Corporate Services Group, Inc.’s (collectively, “Verizon”) Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of 

Inter Partes Review and the Related Manufacturer Cases. Having considered the Motion, the 

Court finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 93-4 Filed 10/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6354
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/30/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-00263

AYA MURPHY LLC d/b/a SMOKY PUFFS SMOKE

AND VAPE SHOP, ASSAD ALSHAMI, AYMAN

ALSHAMI, and YASER ALJAZAERLI,

YASER ALJAZAERLI

804 BAYOU CT

WYLIE, TX 75098

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00263-SDJ Document 5 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00263

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00263-SDJ Document 5 Filed 03/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 24
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                    14,722
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               14,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          65,669
<PP&E>                                   946,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,280,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,742,377
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                               1,917,108
<OTHER-SE>                            (2,758,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,280,968
<SALES>                                2,147,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       2,147,022
<CGS>                                    693,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            693,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       2,334,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        76,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (957,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (957,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (957,029)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.36)
       


</TABLE>
LEI YIN, petitioner, v. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC.

No. 18-6717.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

*838THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Abel PUENTE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6457.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998           DEC-31-1998      
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998           JAN-01-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998           SEP-30-1998      
<CASH>                                              4,247                 4,247
<SECURITIES>                                            0                     0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      28,073                28,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                        5,366                 5,366
<INVENTORY>                                             0                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   33,248                33,248
<PP&E>                                            110,050               110,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                     22,616                22,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    183,238               183,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              34,167                34,167
<BONDS>                                                 0                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             0                     0
<COMMON>                                               58                    58
<OTHER-SE>                                         63,897                63,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      183,238               183,238
<SALES>                                            25,173                69,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   25,173                69,183
<CGS>                                              14,459                40,306 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      14,459                40,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    9,190                26,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,086                 6,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (754)               (4,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0               (1,455)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (754)               (2,724)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0                     0
<CHANGES>                                               0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (754)               (2,724)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.13)                 (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.13)                 (.54) 
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Blitz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cadus Corporation and will be retained by Cadus Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ David BlitzDavid
      BlitzPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive
      Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)





November
16, 2009





The
foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street,                           ( print page 31887)                        Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201387.                

*Agreement Name:*                     HLAG/ONE/Sealand USWC-Mexico and Central America Cooperative Working Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hapag-Lloyd AG; Maersk Line A/S d/b/a Sealand; and Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Joshua Stein, Cozen O'Connor.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Agreement authorizes the parties to share vessels and vessel space and to exchange slots on their respective vessels in the trades between ports on the West Coast of the United States, including California on the one hand, and ports on the West Coast of Mexico and Central America, including Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, on the other hand.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     6/23/2022.                

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​63507.*

Dated: May 20, 2022.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11248 Filed 5-24-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1993-B  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         47,732
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,279
<PP&E>                                         9,418,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,360,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,368,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,603
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,203,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,368,399
<SALES>                                        457,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               473,933
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,490,962<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,122,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,122,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,122,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KYUNG ROK MIN,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 70114

Agency No. A089

- 168

- 889

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2014 **

Before: LEAVY , FISHER, and N

. R

. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Kyung Rok Min, a native and citizen of South Korea , petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal

, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 28 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 70114

findings, Ayala v. Holder , 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9 th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) , and we

deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Min established extraordinary

circumstances to excuse his untimely asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. §

1208.4(a)(5) ; see also Dhital v. Mukasey , 532 F.3d 1044, 1049 (9 th Cir. 2008).

Thus, Min’s asylum claim fails.

S ubstantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Min did not establish

that his membership in a particular social group of former police officers was one

central reason for why he was threatened and fears future harm. See A yala

, 640

F.3d at 1098 (evidence demonstrated former officer was shot at and threatened

because he had arrested particular cr iminal, not on account of his status as a former

police officer)

. Thus, Min ’ s withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, s ubstantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of Min’s CAT claim

because he failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured with the

consent or acquiescence of the South Korean government

. See Wakkary v. Holder

,

558 F.3d 1049, 1097

- 98 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Milton Nelson WARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of *Class v. United States,* 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 798, 200 L.Ed.2d 37 (2018).