alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE>                          5
 <LEGEND>
                                    THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                                    INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
                                    SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENTS DATED
                                    6/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                                    REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 </LEGEND>
 <MULTIPLIER>                       1

 <S>                                <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1999
 <PERIOD-START>                     JUL-01-1998
 <PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1999
 <CASH>                             201,202
 <SECURITIES>                       0
 <RECEIVABLES>                      0
 <ALLOWANCES>                       0
 <INVENTORY>                        0
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                   245,035
 <PP&E>                             292,182
 <DEPRECIATION>                     288,386
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     248,831
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,134,839
 <BONDS>                            0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
 <PREFERRED>                        1,166,000
 <COMMON>                           29,985,352
 <OTHER-SE>                         (32,037,360)
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       248,831
 <SALES>                            0
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                   99,544
 <CGS>                              0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                      0
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                   3,838,726
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 (46,949)
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                    (3,692,233)
 <INCOME-TAX>                       0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                (3,692,233)
 <DISCONTINUED>                     0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
 <CHANGES>                          0
 <NET-INCOME>                       (3,692,233)
 <EPS-BASIC>                      (0.49)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.49)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 24(b)


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                       FOR
                           ANNUAL REPORTS ON FORM 10-K


         The undersigned, a director of Health Power, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints Dr. Bernard F.
Master and Alec Wightman, and each of them, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact
and agents, with full power to act without the other, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for me and in my name, place, and stead, in my
capacity as director of the Company, to execute the Company's Form 10-K Annual
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and for each fiscal year
thereafter, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as I
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





/s/ Jonathan R. Wagner                                  March 22, 2000
---------------------------------------                 --------------
Jonathan R. Wagner                                      Date
Bernard MORELLO, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-463.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JURY DEMAND

In accordance with Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. hereby respectfully demand 

a jury trial on all issues so triable.

Dated: October 10, 2023

By /s/ Melissa R. Smith

Victoria F. Maroulis

California Bar No. 202603 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)

victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

Tel : 650-801-5000

Fax: 650-801-5100

Sean Pak

California Bar No. 219032 (pro hac vice forthcoming)

seanpak@quinnemanuel.com 

Iman Lordgooei 

California Bar No. 251320 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)

imanlordgooei@quinnemanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Tel: 415-875-6600

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 291
2

Fax: 415-875-6700

Kevin Hardy

D.C. Bar No. 473941 (admitted in E.D. Tex.)

kevinhardy@quinnemanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

1300 I Street, N.W., Suite 900

Washington, DC 20005

Tel: 202.538.8000

Fax: 202.538.8100

Melissa R. Smith

Texas State Bar No. 24001351 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

303 South Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670

Phone: (903) 934-8450

Fax: (903) 934-9257

Counsel for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented 

to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF 

system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on October 10, 2023.

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

 Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 10/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 292
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                   333,914
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,362
<PP&E>                                         191,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 667,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,261,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,714,319
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,953,701)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   667,273
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,744
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,638
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (93,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DEREK LAMONT WILSON, JR., #72927

VS. 

GRAYSON COUNTY JAIL

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23cv706

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who 

issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiff’s lawsuit should be dismissed 

without prejudice for want of prosecution. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate 

Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such 

action, has been presented for consideration. No objections having been timely filed,1 the Court 

concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the 

same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s amended complaint is DISMISSED without 

prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED.

1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #11) was returned as undeliverable on November 20, 2023, and 

marked, Return to Sender-Not Deliverable as Addressed-Unable to Forward” and “Not Here.” (Dkt. #12). Plaintiff 

has not updated his address with the Court.

Case 4:23-cv-00706-ALM-KPJ Document 13 Filed 12/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 32
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00254-CR

JASON ALAN MCCONNELL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-03699-CRM-CCL1

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due February 26, 2018. After two extensions of 

time were granted, Appellant’s brief was due June 1, 2018. Appellant has now requested 

a 15 day extension because counsel recently discovered that he only had a limited time to 

access the reporter’s record through a link provided by the reporter and has not had 

access to the record. 

The Court questions why counsel had not discovered this potential problem in the 

five months since the record has been filed. The Court also questions whether counsel 
McConnell v. State Page 2

can read the record, given that counsel may not have had access to it until the afternoon 

of May 28, 2018, and prepare and file an adequate brief within, at most, 17 days. 

Nevertheless, the Court grants appellant’s motion, and appellant’s brief is due 

June 15, 2018. The failure to timely file appellant’s brief will result in the Court abating 

this appeal to determine if appellant is receiving effective assistance of counsel.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed June 13, 2018
Akheem WIGGINS, petitioner, v. Robert C. TANNER, Warden.

No. 18-6334.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
sutherland.htm


 


 



CONSENT OF SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP












We consent to the reference to our firm in the Statement of Additional Information included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the Century II individual flexible premium deferred variable annuity contracts issued through the Kansas City Life Variable Annuity Separate Account (File No. 333-165116).  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

















SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP

















By:           /s/ Stephen E. Roth          


Stephen E. Roth


Washington, D.C.


April 27, 2012
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00589-CR

Letitia Dobbins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-10-201986, HONORABLE JIM CORONADO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Letitia Dobbins has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the district court’s

judgment placing her on community supervision following her plea of guilty to the offense of

possession of a controlled substance, cocaine. SeeTex. Health & SafetyCode Ann. § 481.115(a)-(b)

(West 2010). The district court has certified that this is a plea-bargain case, the defendant has no

right of appeal, and the defendant has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson

Dismissed

Filed: November 4, 2011

Do Not Publish
Exhibit
      32.1


Certification
      of Co Chief Executive Officer





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.










Date:
      May
      9, 2007





/s/
      Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin
      Haitzmann


Co
      Chief
      Executive Officer
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

Case 2:23-cv-00390-JRG Document 8 Filed 10/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 29
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/13/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      441,586
COMMITMENTS
 106,359  219,503   78,039  229,700  116,316  414,098  413,858   27,488   27,728

CHANGES FROM 08/06/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     39,041)
   7,182   15,929    4,279   24,124   16,035   35,585   36,243    3,456    2,798

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.1     49.7     17.7     52.0     26.3     93.8     93.7      6.2      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      54       78       71       38       35      137      147
```

----

Updated August 16, 2013
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

June 30, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00398

- CR

Susan I. ANDERSON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial Distri ct Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0841 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Susan I. Anderson pled no contest to tampering with a government al record

with intent to defraud or harm . On January 16, 2015 , Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was

deferred and s he was placed on community supervision. On June 1, 2016, the trial court amended Appellant’s community supervision conditions. Appellant now seeks to appeal from
the trial court’s June 1 , 2016 order modifying the conditions of her deferred adjudication

. “[A] n order modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication is not in itself appealable .” Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ; see Basaldua v.

State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977).

W e ORDER Appellant to show ca use i n writing within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Davis , 195

S.W.3d at 711.

_________________________________ Patr icia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
Raul PADILLA-RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Robert M. CULLEY, et al.

No. 17-1568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          53,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       785
<INVENTORY>                                     11,327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,455
<PP&E>                                          12,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,764
<SALES>                                        150,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,320
<CGS>                                          113,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   204
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.99


</TABLE>
Kevin Dion GADDIS, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 19-7032

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
Willie Seth CRAIN, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6882.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Reynolds v. Florida,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, 202 L.Ed.2d 389 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
DTE-3.31.2012-Ex_10-80






Exhibit 10-80
Second Amendment
to the
DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan
(Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005)


Recitals


		
	A.
	DTE Energy Company (the “Company”) adopted the DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental   Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005) (the “Plan”) to enable the Company to attract and retain executives.




		
	B.
	The Organization and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company's Board of Directors is authorized to amend the Plan.




		
	C.
	By a resolution properly adopted on May 5, 2011, the Committee amends the Plan to grant the Committee the discretion to extend participation in the Management Supplemental Benefit Plan portion of the Plan to executives otherwise eligible to participate in the Plan.




Plan Amendment


Effective as of the date this amendment is adopted, the DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005) is amended by replacing Section 2.21 in its entirety with the following:


2.21    “Grandfathered MSBP Participant” means:


(a)    an active employee of DTE on December 31, 2000 who was participating in the MSBP on December 31, 2000 and is included in Appendix C; or


(b)    an individual who has been designated by the Committee, in its complete discretion, as a Grandfathered MSBP Participant to be added to Appendix C with a Group I or Group II designation (determined in the Committee's discretion), any Awarded Service (determined in the Committee's discretion), and the effective date of the individual's designation as a participant in the MSBP (determined in the Committee's discretion). 


DTE Energy Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed on the 5th day of May, 2011.


DTE ENERGY COMPANY






By  /s/ LARRY E. STEWARD        
Larry E. Steward
Vice President, Human Resources






























Second Amendment to January 1, 2005 Amended and Restated ESRP - Page 1 of 1