alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         282,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,332
<PP&E>                                          98,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 607,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          822,375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   (214,675)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   607,700
<SALES>                                          2,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,342
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,469,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,738,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,738,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,738,817)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)


</TABLE>
The AMERICAN LEGION, et al., petitioners, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 17-1717.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted. The joint motion of petitioners for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner in No. 18-18, 10 minutes for petitioners in No. 17-1717, 10 minutes for the Acting Solicitor General as *amicus curiae,* and 35 minutes for respondents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et 

al,

T-MOBILE US, INC., ET AL.

AT&T, INC., ET AL.

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00352-JRG-RSP

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00379-JRG-RSP

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00397-JRG-RSP

Markman Hearing

MAG. JUDGE ROY PAYNE PRESIDING

November 19, 2024

OPEN: 9:04 am ADJOURN: 10:38 am

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF: See attached

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS: See attached

TECHNICAL ADVISOR: Mike Paul

LAW CLERK: Greg Saltz

COURT REPORTER: Shelly Holmes

COURTROOM DEPUTY: Becky Andrews

Court opened. Case called. Andrea Fair introduced co-counsel and announced ready. Deron 

Dacus introduced co-counsel and announced ready.

The Court heard argument on a term by term basis. Philip Wang and Kris Davis presented 

argument on behalf of Plaintiff. Celine Crowson, Kate Dominguez, Rob Vincent and Kevin 

Hess presented argument on behalf of Defendants.

The Court took the claim construction matters under submission.

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 11/19/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

7752
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TREVOR GRANT, a/k/a Roy Arrindell,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-159-N, CA-96-305)

Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trevor Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

"Motion to Vacate Judgment" and his "Motion for Modification of

Sentence." We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Grant, Nos. CR-92-159-N;

CA-96-305 (E.D. Va. July 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

DEMETRICE BAIN §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-30

WARDEN, USP BEAUMONT §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS 

AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, Demetrice Bain, an inmate currently confined at USP Beaumont, proceeding pro

se, filed what appears to be a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The Magistrate Judge recommends denying this § 2241 petition. 

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the records, and pleadings [Dkt. 3]. 

Petitioner filed objections on February 21, 2023 [Dkt. 4]. This requires a de novo review of the

objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). 

In the present petition, Petitioner argues that pursuant to United States v. Taylor, 142 S.Ct.

2015 (2022) (“Taylor”), his conviction for attempted Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

should be vacated. Petitioner contends that § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to challenge his

conviction. In denying this claim, the magistrate judge noted that Petitioner had already received

permission from the Eleventh Circuit to file a successive § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or

correct sentence, and considered and denied his claims under Taylor. United States v. Bain, Case

No. 8:06-CR-475-T-26EAJ. The Eleventh Circuit specifically found that, “[t]he Court’s

interpretation of a substantive criminal statute, using established rules of statutory construction,

cannot announce a new rule of constitutional law under § 2255(h).” Id. This Court can find no error

in the magistrate judge’s determination. As stated by the magistrate judge, Petitioner is attempting

Case 1:23-cv-00030-MJT-ZJH Document 7 Filed 04/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
to attack the legality of his conviction in a § 2241 under the Reyes’-Requena exception. 243 F.3d

893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). As Petitioner’s present claims have already been considered in a

successive § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, Petitioner cannot show the

inadequacy or ineffectiveness of § 2255. By filing this § 2241, Petitioner is trying to circumvent the

restrictions of § 2255 and seek reconsideration of his arguments by a different court. This Court

declines to accept that invitation. 

ORDER

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions

of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A

Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 12th day of April, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00030-MJT-ZJH Document 7 Filed 04/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff, Hillsborough County, Florida, Petitioner, v. Doris FREYRE, et al.

No. 18-1210

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-40698 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ERIC SALOMON JORGE-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-1696-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal c a se, Eric Salomon Jorge-Mendoza raises an argument that h e c oncedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 3 08-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of an offense under 21 U.S. C

. § 8 4 1

. Knowledge of drug type and q uantit y a lso i s not an element of the offense under the related statutes of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and § 960(a). United S tates v . Restrepo-Granda , 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5t h C ir. 1 978); see United States v. V alencia-Gonzales , 172 U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-40698 Document: 00512277178 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013No. 12-40698

F.3d 344, 345-46 (5th Cir. 1999). The appellant’s motion f o r s u mmary disposition is GRANTED, a nd the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-40698 Document: 00512277178 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, and Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            5,268,807
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,340,765
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   26,320,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               109,193
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               132,857
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                        6,517,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     26,320,667
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    700,000
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,200,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (970,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (970,989)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (970,989)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.07)


</TABLE>
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 08/23/2023 /s/ Neil A. Rubin Neil A. Rubin CA Bar No. 250761

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 10 Filed 08/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 278
Cecil L. MORTON, petitioner, v. Ron HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center.

No. 18-5887.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA, 

INC., AND SPRINT CORP.,

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No: 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Corp. (“Defendants”), and certifies 

that he is authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the 

above-captioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants.

Andrew Robb 

California Bar No. 291438 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

310 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 

Telephone: (650) 849-5334 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5034 

ARobb@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 224
Dated: November 2, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew Robb 

Andrew Robb 

California Bar No. 291438 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

310 University Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94301 

Telephone: (650) 849-5334 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5034 

Email: ARobb@gibsondunn.com 

 Counsel for Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 225
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on November 2, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Andrew Robb 

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 28 Filed 11/02/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 226
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Hi-Shear Technology Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2006, I, George W.
Trahan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Co-chairman of Hi-Shear
Technology Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2006,
         fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
         the year ended May 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear
         Technology Corporation.


                           /s/ George W. Trahan
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           George W. Trahan
                           President, Chief Executive Officer and Co-chairman

July 28, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hi-Shear Technology Corporation
and will be retained by Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

T-Mobile USA, Inc, et al

2:23cv444

Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

09/26/2023 /s/ Andrea L. Fair

Andrea L. Fair; Texas Bar No. 24078488

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, Texas 75604

andrea@wsfirm.com

(903) 757-6400

(903) 757-2323

Case 2:23-cv-00444-JRG Document 5 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 323
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (800)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,904
<PP&E>                                         390,772
<DEPRECIATION>                               (184,844)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,730
<BONDS>                                        268,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,255
<SALES>                                         49,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,640
<CGS>                                           21,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,309
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: November 14, 2008

|                                                                                                    | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Stephen T. Wills                                                                                | 
|Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President andChief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000917823
<NAME>                        PROPHET 21, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        46,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,614
<CGS>                                          24,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (304)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,539
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .90


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gaming Partners International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Gerard P. Charlier, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and David W. Grimes, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



|                     |  | GAMING PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | By:                                      
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | By:                                      

This
certification is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A
signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks