alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2059

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for 
higher education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, 
 and local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

 Mr. King (for himself and Mr. Stupak) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for 
higher education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, 
 and local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RETROACTIVE ELIGIBILITY DATES FOR FINANCIAL 
              ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION FOR SPOUSES AND CHILDREN 
              OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1216(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796d-5(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 1992,'' and inserting ``May 1, 
        1978,''; and
            (2) by striking ``October 1, 1997,'' and inserting 
        ``October 1, 1978,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect October 1, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA !, et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al.

No. 18-61.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FLEMING PROPERTIES, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company,

Appellant,

v.

ROBIN FLEMING,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1396

[January 20, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott R. Kerner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CA-003507-

XXXX-MB.

Daniel A. Bushell of Bushell Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Barry S. 

Balmuth of Barry S. Balmuth, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.

Dean A. Morande and Michael K. Winston of Carlton Fields, P.A., West 

Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CELESTINE PORTER,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2013-3013

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC0752120092-I-1.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MORRIS E. FISCHER, Law Office of Morris E. Fischer, 

of Silver Spring, Maryland, argued for petitioner. 

PHYLLIS JO BAUNACH, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department 

of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On 

the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, 

TODD M. HUGHES, Deputy Director, and JANE C. DEMPSEY, 

Trial Attorney. Of counsel was TRACEY ROCKENBACH, 
 

Naval Litigation Office, United States Department of 

Navy, of Washington, DC. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 18, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.26

Dominion Homes, Inc. 2006 Director Compensation Plan



|1. | $40,000 annual fee for each outside director ($10,000 per quarter)
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Additional $5,000 annual fee for each Audit Committee member (other than Audit Committee Chair) and each committee Chair (other than Audit Committee Chair) ($1,250 per quarter)
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Additional $10,000 annual fee for Audit Committee Chair ($2,500 per quarter)
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Additional $20,000 annual fee for the Lead Director ($5,000 per quarter)
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Director and Committee Fees shall be paid quarterly in advance.



|5. | Each outside director also receives, on the first day after the annual meeting, a grant of non-qualified stock options to purchase 2,500 common shares at an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-80-MAC

'

MICHAEL OCTAVIUS HAMPTON, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION 

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Indictment filed against the Defendant. 

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Michael Octavius Hampton, 

Case 1:23-cr-00080-MAC-CLS Document 25 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 70
2

is adjudged guilty as to Count Two of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm. 

Case 1:23-cr-00080-MAC-CLS Document 25 Filed 10/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 71
Marion Quinton BREWSTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-793.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00441

Lisa Michelle Ballenger,

Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner, Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Lisa Michelle Ballenger filed this action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the commissioner’s final decision denying her application for disability benefits. Doc. 1. The case 

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell 

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On February 22, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the Commissioner’s unopposed motion to remand 

to the Social Security Administration (Doc. 12) be granted. Doc. 13. 

The parties did not object to the report and recommendation. When 

no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report, the court reviews it

for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. Defendant’s unopposed motion to reverse with 

remand and enter judgment (Doc. 12) is granted. Defendant’s unfavorable final decision denying plaintiff’s claim for disability insurance benefits is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

So ordered by the court on April 1, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00441-JCB-KNM Document 14 Filed 04/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 670
David McGOWAN, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-5283.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.
Casey STOERMER, Petitioner v. OHIO.

No. 18-9565

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Clark County denied.
Gernard Denez CHESTNUT, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-6669.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

FREDERICK MCKNIGHT (22)

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:22-CR-00110 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the First Superseding 

Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Frederick 

McKnight GUILTY of Count One of the First Superseding Indictment, charging a violation 

of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1349 - Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27th November, 2024.

Case 4:22-cr-00110-JDK-AGD Document 741 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

2826
Nestor LEON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8008.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated February 8, 2013
WEST CONGRESS STREET PARTNERS, LLC, petitioner, v. RIVERTOWN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, et al.

No. 18-347.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
NovaCopper Inc.: Exhibit 4.5 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






NOVACOPPER INC.

NOVACOPPER ARRANGEMENT OPTIONS CERTIFICATE

NovaCopper Inc. (the “Company”) hereby grants to the
Participant named below, NovaCopper Arrangement Options to acquire common shares
in the capital of the Company (“Option Shares”), which grant is being
made pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement involving NovaGold Resources Inc., its
Securityholders and NovaCopper Inc. (the "Plan of Arrangement"). The
NovaCopper Arrangement Options will be governed by the terms of the 2004 Stock
Award Plan of NovaGold Resources Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto (the
“Plan”), and the terms outlined below.

	 
	Participant’s Name: 
	 
	Address: 
	 
	

    

	Total Option Shares (NovaCopper Arrangement
      Options x 0.1667): 
	 
	For U.S. Participants: of which
      ____________________ are Nonqualified Option Shares 
	 
	Exercise Price Per Share: 
	 
	Date of Grant: April 30, 2012 
	 
	Expiry Date: 
	 
	Terms of Vesting: 
	

    

    

	 
	
      For greater certainty, once the NovaCopper Arrangement
      Options have become vested, they continue to be exercisable until the
      termination or cancellation thereof as provided in this Certificate and
      the Plan. 

	 
	Other: 
	

    



Participant agrees that he/she may suffer tax consequences as a
result of the grant of these Options, the exercise of the Options and the
disposition of Shares. Participant acknowledges that he/she is not relying on
the Company for any tax advice. To the extent that the Option is potentially
subject to taxation under either Canada or the U.S. or both jurisdictions, the
Participant acknowledges that the Participant has had adequate opportunity to
obtain advice of independent tax counsel with respect to the tax treatment of
the Option (including federal, state and provincial, as applicable).
Furthermore, non-U.S. Participants who are granted Options that are not subject
to the restrictions applicable to U.S. Participants but who subsequently become
subject to U.S. federal income tax on compensatory income are encouraged to seek
advice of independent tax counsel to determine the applicability of U.S. tax law
to such Options.




This Stock Option Certificate is subject to the terms and
conditions of the Plan and, in the event of any inconsistency or contradiction
between the terms of the Stock Option Certificate and the Plan, the terms of the
Plan shall govern.

If you agree to accept the Options described above, subject to
all of the terms and conditions of the Plan of Arrangement and the Plan, please
sign one copy of this letter and return it to 
______________ by
______________ .

	 	NOVACOPPER INC.    
	 	 	  
	 	 	  
	 	By: 	
	 	 	Authorized Signatory 


I have received a copy of the Plan of Arrangement and the Plan
and agree to comply with, and agree that my participation is subject in all
respects to, its terms and conditions. Further, I consent to Solium Capital
maintaining and administering my NovaCopper Arrangement Options in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the Plan.

	 	 
	 	Name of Participant 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Signature of Participant 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Date
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2186

To suspend temporarily the duty on Rhinovirus drugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. BECERRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Rhinovirus drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•HR 2186 IH

‘‘ 9902.32.97 Trans-(2′R,

3′′′S,4S,5′S) -(4-

{2′-(4-

Fluorobenzyl)-6′-

methyl-5′-[(5′′-

methylisoxazole3′′-carbonyl)amino]-4-

oxoheptanoylamino}-5-(2′′′-

oxopyrrolidin-3′′′-

yl)pent-2-enoic

acid ethyl ester

(CAS No.

223537-30-2)

(provided for in

subheading

2931.00.60) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd., was in the process of
liquidation as of March 31, 2000 and as such is governed by liquidation basi
accounting.  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Swift Energy Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd's statement of net assets
in process of liquidation and statement of operations contained in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         83,279
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,414
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,693
<PP&E>                                         4,882,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,156,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,114
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        228,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,455
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,069<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,213,478
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,213,478
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,213,478
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00655-CR

Martin HERRERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8710A

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 24, 2018

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal in the underlying cause on September 4, 2018. A clerk’s 

record was filed on September 14, 2018, and the docket sheet reflects that appellant is still awaiting 

sentencing. Because the trial court has not imposed sentence in the underlying cause, we have no 

jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2 (providing appellate deadlines run 

from the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court). 

By order dated September 19, 2018, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by 

October 3, 2018, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did 
04-18-00655-CR

- 2 -

not respond to our order. Because the record reflects appellant is still awaiting sentencing, this 

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911115
<NAME> ATCHISON CASTING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                     66,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,046
<PP&E>                                         192,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,049
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,192
<SALES>                                        239,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,531
<CGS>                                          206,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>