alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6835

SHAIN CLAUDE COLLINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:13-cv-00474-GEC)

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shain Claude Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, 

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shain Claude Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); Reid v. 

Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district 

court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collins has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Raji RAB, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-382.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (546)
<INVENTORY>                                     50,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,478
<PP&E>                                          78,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                (29,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,059
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,034
<SALES>                                        286,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,024
<CGS>                                          262,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  262,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30761 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. L E S L I E K E I T H B L O X O M D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 5: 07- C R
- 50100- 1 B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L L Yan d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orneyapp oi n t ed to represent L esl ie K ei t h B l oxom ha s m oved f or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . B l oxom ha s not f i l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew o f th e re c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Dedrick MATTHEWS, Petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 19-7522

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 2, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
Timothy L. RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. Dewayne BURTON, Warden.

No. 18-6050.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Bruce C. ROSETTO, et al., petitioners, v. Charles MURPHY, et al.

No. 18-690.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

April 9, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-11989

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 05-01658-CV-GET-1

MAHMOUD RASHAD, 

Plaintiff–Appellant, 

versus 

FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, 

Defendant–Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 9, 2008)
 Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Florida, sitting by designation.

2

Before BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Mahmoud Rashad appeals an adverse summary judgment in favor of his

employer, Fulton County, on his claims of religious discrimination and retaliation

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a),

3(a).

Upon review of the record, and upon consideration of the briefs and oral

argument of the parties, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting

summary judgment to Fulton County on Rashad’s religious discrimination claim. 

However, we reverse as to his retaliation claim. The district court found that

Rashad had established facts sufficient to support his prima facie case of

retaliation; however, the court found that Rashad could not point to sufficient

evidence rebutting Fulton County’s proffered reason for terminating him. We find

evidence in the record from which a reasonable trier of fact could conclude that

Fulton County’s proffered reason for terminating Rashad—insubordination—was

merely pretextual. Thus, summary judgment on the retaliation claim was

erroneous. 

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC

Cisco Systems, Inc.

2:23-cv-00454

Cisco Systems, Inc.

07/02/2024 /s/ Randol Wayne Read

Randol Wayne Read; Texas Bar No. 00798457

24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1600

Houston, Texas 77046

rread@pattersonsheridan.com

(713) 577-4816

(713) 623-4846

Case 2:23-cv-00454-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 07/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 308
Exhibit 10.5

 

Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Six Flags Entertainment Corporation and Certain Executives—Walter S. Hawrylak and Brett Petit

 

This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) between                                           and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation amends that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of November 29, 2010 (the “Agreement”) between                                         and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement.

 

1.               Effective as of January 1, 2012, Section 3(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

“(b)         Annual Bonus.  During the Term, Executive shall have a target bonus opportunity (“Target Bonus”) of 62.5% of Base Salary.  Any annual bonus payable to Executive shall be paid during the calendar year following the calendar year performance year and no later than five days following the filing of the Company’s Form 10-K for the performance year (or, if the Company is not required to or does not file a Form 10-K, no later than five days following the completion of the audit of the applicable performance year).”

 

2.               Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned execute this Amendment as of the date set forth below.

 

SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

 

 

	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:  
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
[                                ]
    	
 
    	
Date:
Samuel POSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5871.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
**Exhibit 99.1(b)

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned chief financial officer of
Atchison Casting Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   November 14, 2002                   /s/ Kevin T. McDermed
                                            -----------------------------------
                                               Kevin T. McDermed
                                               Chief Financial Officer
```
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-380

AT&T Servs. Inc., AT&T Mob. LLC, AT&T Corp

✔

08/29/2023

✔ 45

11/3/2023

Adam Ahnhut

TX 24106983

Alston & Bird

2200 Ross Ave. #2300

Dallas, Texas 75201

214-922-3453

214-922-3899

adam.ahnhut@alston.com

Case 2:23-cv-00380-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 82
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 450 

Designating May 15, 2012, as ‘‘National MPS Awareness Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2012 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. KERRY, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. 

BURR, and Mr. INOUYE) submitted the following resolution; which was 

considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 15, 2012, as ‘‘National MPS Awareness 

Day’’. 

Whereas mucopolysaccharidosis (referred to in this resolution 

as ‘‘MPS’’) are a group of genetically determined 

lysosomal storage diseases that render the human body 

incapable of producing certain enzymes needed to break 

down complex carbohydrates; 

Whereas MPS diseases cause complex carbohydrates to be 

stored in almost every cell in the body and progressively 

cause cellular damage; 

Whereas the cellular damage caused by MPS— 

(1) adversely affects the human body by damaging 

the heart, respiratory system, bones, internal organs, and 

central nervous system; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 450 ATS 

(2) often results in intellectual disabilities, short 

stature, corneal damage, joint stiffness, loss of mobility, 

speech and hearing impairment, heart disease, hyperactivity, chronic respiratory problems, and, most importantly, a drastically shortened life span; 

Whereas symptoms of MPS are usually not apparent at birth; 

Whereas, without treatment, the life expectancy of an individual afflicted with MPS begins to decrease at a very 

early stage in the life of the individual; 

Whereas research has resulted in the development of limited 

treatments for some MPS diseases; 

Whereas promising advancements in the pursuit of treatments for additional MPS diseases are underway as of 

the date of agreement to this resolution; 

Whereas, despite the creation of new remedies, the bloodbrain barrier continues to be a significant impediment to 

effectively treating the brain, which prevents the treatment of many of the symptoms of MPS; 

Whereas the quality of life of the individuals afflicted with 

MPS, and the treatments available to those individuals, 

will be enhanced through the development of early detection techniques and early intervention; 

Whereas treatments and research advancements for MPS are 

limited by a lack of awareness about MPS diseases; 

Whereas the lack of awareness about MPS diseases extends 

to individuals within the medical community; 

Whereas the cellular damage that is caused by MPS makes 

MPS a model for the study of many other degenerative 

genetic diseases; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 450 ATS 

Whereas the development of effective therapies and a potential cure for MPS diseases can be accomplished by increased awareness, research, data collection, and information distribution: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 15, 2012, as ‘‘National 

3 MPS Awareness Day’’; and 

4 (2) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

5 MPS Awareness Day’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2012
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 15, 2013

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Chief Financial Officer
Richard Anthony WILFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6892.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/03/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      601,202
COMMITMENTS
  93,306   32,173  178,099  311,675  372,443  583,080  582,715   18,122   18,487

CHANGES FROM 08/27/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,410)
  -6,835      830   -2,603   -3,376   -9,062  -12,814  -10,835     -596   -2,575

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.5      5.4     29.6     51.8     61.9     97.0     96.9      3.0      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      143)
      36       34       56       65       65      130      128
```

----

Updated September 6, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S OPPOSED MOTION 

TO EXPEDITE BRIEFING ON MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S THIRD 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Before the Court is Defendant Valve Corporation’s Opposed Motion to Expedite Briefing 

on its Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint. After consideration of said motion, 

the finds that it should be GRANTED. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following schedule shall be followed by the 

parties with regard to the briefing on Valve Corporation’s Motion to Strike (Dkt. 57)

Event Date

Opening Brief April 8, 2024

Opposition Brief April 15, 2024 

Reply Brief April 19, 2024 

Sur-Reply Brief April 22, 2024 

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 59 Filed 04/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1459
##### Table of Contents



U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 10-Q/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For
the transition period from to
 Commission File Number 1-12804
 
 (MOBILE MINI, INC. LOGO)
  
 Delaware
    
    86-0748362(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 7420 S. Kyrene Road, Suite 101
Tempe, Arizona 85283
 (480) 894-6311
 
 þ o
  Large accelerated filer þ
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 o þ




---



##### Table of Contents








---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATION NOTESIGNATURESEX-31.1EX-31.2EX-32.1    Table of Contents  
 SIGNATURES
  MOBILE MINI, INC.Date:  November 10, 2008
    /s/ Lawrence TrachtenbergLawrence TrachtenbergChief Financial Officer &
Executive Vice President 48
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                    WILLIAM P. BRICK, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              OF PACKAGED ICE, INC.




This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the
year ended December 31, 2002 of Packaged Ice, Inc. (the "Issuer").

I, William P. Brick, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that, to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.



Dated:  March 19, 2003



                                     /s/ WILLIAM P. BRICK
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     William P. Brick


Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of March 2003.


/s/ DOUGLAS L. REEVES
------------------------------------------
Name:  Douglas L. Reeves
Title: Notary Public, State of Texas

My commission expires:  November 12, 2005