alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

PerDiemCo LLC,

2:23-cv-00411

Geoforce Inc.,

Geoforce, Inc.

By serving its Registered Agent at:

Capitol Corporate Services, Inc.

206 E. 9th St., Suite 1300

Austin, TX 78701

Chris P. Perque

FisherBroyles, LLP

2925 Richmond Ave., Suite 1200

Houston, TX 77098 9/14/23

Case 2:23-cv-00411-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 09/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 970
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00411 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00411-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 09/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 971
Sherard MARTIN, Petitioner, v. Davis MARINEZ, et al.

No. 19-768

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION, 

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-419-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VALVE CORPORATION’S RENEWED MOTION 

TO DISMISS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(3) FOR 

IMPROPER VENUE

Before the Court is Valve Corporation’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) for Improper Venue. After consideration of said motion, the Court 

finds that it is well-taken and should be GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above referenced litigation is hereby dismissed.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 39-11 Filed 02/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 504
Marvin LOPEZ-AGUILAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8865.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Antoine RICHMOND, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6343

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.23







MEMO FROM SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.







Date: November 18, 2011







From: Gerald Sullivan, Chairman







TO:  Michael Hanlon







RE: Conversion of Debt







As Chairman of Sibling Entertainment, I want to thank you for your willingness to help us by agreeing to accept shares of the common stock of SIBE in exchange for our obligations to you. Please accept this as support for the issuance as noted below:







On November 18, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Michael Hanlon, a director, pursuant to which the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock valued at


$130,000 as an incentive bonus. These were issued on November 18, 2011.







Please note that these shares are restricted under Rule 144 and cannot be traded for at least six (6) months. Also note that the stock trades infrequently, and there may be no trading market for the shares when you are ready to trade. Also note that the Series common stock, which you are an owner of, may convert into common stock and that event may cause dilution to the common stock, and reduce the share price, or market for the stock.












Thanks again, and I look forward to working with you going forward.







/s/ GERALD F. SULLIVAN


Gerald F. Sullivan


Chairman
Ronald D. VETETO, Petitioner, v. Gregory O. GRIFFIN, Judge, Circuit Court of Alabama, Montgomery County, et al.

No. 19-6516

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Marlon Jessie BLACHER, Petitioner, v. S. JOHNSON, Chief Deputy Warden.

No. 19-6988

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,163,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,588,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                   243,626
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,644,014
<PP&E>                                     140,169,540
<DEPRECIATION>                              54,739,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             227,193,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,157,693
<BONDS>                                    336,287,418
<COMMON>                                       169,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,772,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               227,193,588
<SALES>                                     38,737,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,737,367
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              117,542,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,354,401)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,576,216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          46,014,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (123,465,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,200,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (118,265,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (118,265,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.99)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STEVEN S. ABERG, SR.,

Respondent Below, 

Appellant,

v.

TINA JOHAL, 

Petitioner Below, 

Appellee.

§

 § 

§ 

 § 

§ 

 § 

§ 

 § 

§ 

 § 

§ 

 No. 561, 2019

 

 Court Below: Family Court 

 of the State of Delaware 

 File No. CK09-02326

 Petition No. 19-05835

Submitted: July 6, 2020

 Decided: July 9, 2020

ORDER

It appears to the Court that, on March 23, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued 

a notice, sent by certified mail, to the appellant, Steven S. Aberg, Sr., to show cause 

why his appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and 

appendix. Aberg received the notice to show cause on March 26, 2020. A timely 

response to the notice to show cause was due on or before April 6, 2020. Under the 

Court’s emergency orders that extended filing deadlines due to the COVID-19 

pandemic, the deadline for Aberg’s filing of his opening brief was extended through 

July 1, 2020. To date, Aberg has not responded to the notice to show cause nor has 

he filed an opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore deemed to be 

unopposed.
2 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves

Justice
```

```

----

Updated May 3, 2013
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      532,377
COMMITMENTS
 102,625   34,927  133,965  278,339  343,682  514,929  512,574   17,448   19,803

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,324)
  -2,931      -79   -7,526  -10,803  -14,701  -21,260  -22,306   -3,064   -2,018

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.3      6.6     25.2     52.3     64.6     96.7     96.3      3.3      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      44       40       57       59       62      130      135
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
Jose PANIAGUA-PANIAGUA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5191.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT32**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

Each of theundersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2006 of Lincoln Benefit Life Companyfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of LincolnBenefit Life Company.

August 8, 2006
|        | /s/ Casey J. Sylla                    |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Casey J. Sylla                        |
|   | Chairman of the Board  and  President |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi                  |   |   |
|   | John C. Pintozzi                      |
|   | Senior Vice President  and            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |
|        |                                       |        |        |  |  |

 

E-5

----
Michael SAMPLE, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 17-8567.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
```

```

----

Updated September 6, 2013
William D. THOMAS, Petitioner, v. Mark MCCULLICK, Warden.

No. 19-6924

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         508,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,589,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,098,247
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,710,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,615,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,710,304
<SALES>                                          3,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,144
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (41,384)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,384)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (41.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (41.38)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Environmental  Service
Professionals,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending
September 30, 2007 (the "Report") I, Edward L. Torres,  Chief Executive Officer,
and  President  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 19, 2007


\s\ Edward L. Torres
--------------------------------------------------------
Edward L. Torres, Chief Executive Officer, and President

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/08/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       59,577
COMMITMENTS
   9,455    3,142      180   44,800   53,377   54,435   56,699    5,142    2,878

CHANGES FROM 05/01/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,342)
     603      380       84      -98     -225      589      239      753    1,103

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    15.9      5.3      0.3     75.2     89.6     91.4     95.2      8.6      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
       8        4        1       28       31       37       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/08/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,365
COMMITMENTS
  16,384    3,776      331   57,895   77,008   74,610   81,115   10,755    4,250

CHANGES FROM 05/01/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        737)
      44      131       26       51      329      121      486      616      251

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.2      4.4      0.4     67.8     90.2     87.4     95.0     12.6      5.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      21        8        4       37       37       59       48
```

----

Updated May 11, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-92-MAC

'

DENNIS LEE KELLEY, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Dennis Lee Kelley, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00092-MAC-ZJH Document 26 Filed 05/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 91
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

Signed this date

May 21, 2024

Case 1:23-cr-00092-MAC-ZJH Document 26 Filed 05/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 92
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 456 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 

the Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers who have been 

killed or injured in the line of duty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2012 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. HATCH, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. 

KOHL, Mr. TESTER, Mr. KERRY, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. BAUCUS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. SESSIONS) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers who have been killed or injured in the 

line of duty. 

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is 

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance 

and dedication of law enforcement personnel; 

Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk 

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens as guardians of the peace; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 456 ATS 

Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in protecting the 

schools and schoolchildren of the United States; 

Whereas in 2011, 163 peace officers across the United States 

were killed in the line of duty; 

Whereas Congress should strongly support initiatives to reduce violent crime and to increase the factors that contribute to the safety of law enforcement officers; 

Whereas there are more than 19,000 Federal, State, and 

local law enforcement officers who lost their lives in the 

line of duty while protecting their fellow citizens, and 

whose names are engraved upon the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial in Washington, District of 

Columbia; 

Whereas in 1962, President John F. Kennedy designated 

May 15 as National Peace Officers Memorial Day; and 

Whereas on May 15, 2012, more than 20,000 peace officers 

are expected to gather in Washington, District of Columbia, to join with the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went 

before them: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates and acknowledges the dedi3 cation and sacrifices made by the Federal, State, 

4 and local law enforcement officers who have been 

5 killed or injured in the line of duty; 

6 (2) recognizes May 15, 2012, as ‘‘National 

7 Peace Officers Memorial Day’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 456 ATS 

1 (3) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe that day with appropriate ceremony, solem3 nity, appreciation, and respect. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

No. 6:23-cr-00105

United States of America

v.

Monty Ray Jordan

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). Judge Love

held a final revocation hearing on December 14, 2023, and issued a 

report and recommendation as to the disposition of this matter. Doc. 

13. Defendant waived his right to object to the report, agreed to the 

revocation of his supervised release, agreed to the sentence below, 

and waived his right to be present for sentencing. Doc. 12.

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. Defendant’s supervised release is revoked and the 

court orders that defendant Monty Ray Jordan be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 6 months with no further supervised release. The court recommends that the defendant serve his sentence 

at FMC Fort Worth, Texas, if available.

So ordered by the court on December 20, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00105-JCB-KNM Document 14 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 33