alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice of Appearance of Lead Counsel for General B. Chance Saltzman in his individual capacity

Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION 

JACE YARBROUGH, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 4:23-cv-00876

§

THE UNITED STATES SPACE FORCE; et al., §

§

Defendants. §

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF LEAD COUNSEL 

FOR DEFENDANT GENERAL B. CHANCE SALTZMAN

Defendant General B. Chance Saltzman, in his individual capacity, designates the 

following Trial Attorney as lead counsel in this case, and respectfully requests that the same be 

noted by the Clerk of the Court and that this attorney be added to the list of counsel to receive all 

future notices, orders, and filings through the Courts CM/ECF system:

SHMUEL BUSHWICK

Trial Attorney, Torts Branch

Lead Attorney

New Jersey Reg. No. 073632013

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Tel (202) 305-0401; Fax: (202) 616-4314

E-mail: Shmuel.bushwick@usdoj.gov

Case 4:23-cv-00876-ALM Document 20 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 115
Notice of Appearance of Lead Counsel for General B. Chance Saltzman in his individual capacity

Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

BRIAN M. BOYNTON

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Civil Division

C. SALVATREO D’ALESSIO, JR. 

Director, Torts Branch

ANDREA W. MCCARTHY

Deputy Director, Torts Branch

/s/ Shmuel Bushwick

SHMUEL BUSHWICK

Trial Attorney, Torts Branch

New Jersey Reg. No. 073632013

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Tel (202) 305-0401; Fax: (202) 616-4314

E-mail: Shmuel.bushwick@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR GENERAL B. CHANCE 

SALTZMAN IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on December 11, 2023, a true copy of this document was electronically 

served on all counsel of record through use of the Courts electronic- notification system.

/s/ Shmuel Bushwick

Shmuel Bushwick

Case 4:23-cv-00876-ALM Document 20 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 116
LETICA LAND COMPANY, LLC, Petitioner, v. ANACONDA-DEER LODGE COUNTY, MONTANA.

No. 18-1535.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NN, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March 15, 2011





/s/ James H. Dorton


James H. Dorton


Senior Vice President – Corporate Development and Chief Financial Officer








[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NN, Inc. and will be retained by NN, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

COLTON BIGHAM (1)

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:23-CR00222-SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court 

having heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant’s supervised 

release to the United States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court 

has received the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to its order. With Defendant having waived allocution before the Court as 

well as his right to object to the report of the Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the 

opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United 

States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s supervised release is hereby 

REVOKED. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the 

Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of ten (10) months, with a 3-year term 

of supervised release to follow. All prior conditions imposed in the original judgment 

are reimposed here.

Case 4:23-cr-00222-SDJ-AGD Document 23 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 67
2

The Court also recommends that Defendant be housed in a Bureau of Prisons

facility in the Dallas–Fort Worth, Texas area, if appropriate.

Case 4:23-cr-00222-SDJ-AGD Document 23 Filed 06/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 68
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**CIBER, Inc.**

**List of Subsidiaries**

**As of December 31, 2009**

 
| **Name**                         | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Organization** |
|----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|
|                             |       |                             |
| CIBER  Indiana LLC               |       | Indiana                          |
| CIBER  Associates LLC            |       | Delaware                         |
| CIBERsites  India Private Ltd.   |       | India                            |
| Iteamic  Pvt. Ltd.               |       | India                            |
| CIBER  Europe B.V.               |       | The  Netherlands                 |
| CIBER  Nederlands B.V.           |       | The  Netherlands                 |
| Top  Contracts BV                |       | The  Netherlands                 |
| CIBER  Europe Limited            |       | United  Kingdom                  |
| CIBER  (UK) Ltd.                 |       | United  Kingdom                  |
| CIBER  Novasoft Limited          |       | United  Kingdom                  |
| CIBER  Norge AS                  |       | Norway                           |
| CIBER  Logtec AS                 |       | Norway                           |
| InSync  AS *(1)*                 |       | Norway                           |
| CIBER  Danmark AS                |       | Denmark                          |
| C.I.B.E.R.  Sweden AB            |       | Sweden                           |
| CIBER  Holding GmbH              |       | Germany                          |
| CIBER  Novasoft AG               |       | Germany                          |
| Topcontracts  GmbH               |       | Germany                          |
| CIBER  Software GmbH             |       | Germany                          |
| CIBER  Novasoft IT-Services GmbH |       | Austria                          |
| CIBER  Oy                        |       | Finland                          |
| C.I.B.E.R.  S.L.                 |       | Spain                            |
| CIBER  Solutions S.L.            |       | Spain                            |
| CIBER  Novasoft s.r.o.           |       | Czech  Republic                  |
| OOO  CIBER Novasoft              |       | Russia                           |
| CIBER  Pty Ltd. *(2)*            |       | Australia                        |
| CIBER  Ltd. *(2)*                |       | New  Zealand                     |
| CIBER  Novasoft Co. Ltd.         |       | China                            |

 

----

All entities are 100% owned by CIBER or its subsidiaries, unlessotherwise noted.

Excludes non-operating and inactive subsidiaries.

 

*(1)**            **Owned80% by CIBER group*

*(2)**            **Owned70% by CIBER group*

 

----
**Exhibit 15**

May 10, 2010 

PartnerRe Ltd. 

Wellesley House 

90 Pitts Bay Road 

Pembroke HM 08 

Bermuda 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidatedinterim financial information of PartnerRe Ltd. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, as indicated in our report dated May 10, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2010, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-11998, 333-107242, 333-129762, 333-157585, 333-161207, 333-163445 and 333-163446 on Form S-8, and in Registration Statements Nos. 333-124713, 333-133573 and333-158531 on Form S-3. 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is notconsidered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche 

Deloitte & Touche 

Hamilton, Bermuda
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00532-CR

Thomas Jefferson Smallwood, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1343309R)

August 6, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(p)

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After considering the Appellant’s motion for rehearing, we deny the motion. 

We withdraw our April 30, 2015 opinion and judgment and substitute the 

following.

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § Case No. 2:23-CR-0003 JRG-RSP

§

JAMES ELLIS FIELDS §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S REPORT AND

FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

On this day, the Court considered the Findings of Fact and Recommendation of United 

States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne regarding defendant=s plea of guilty to Count 1 of the 

Indictment charging defendant with a violation of 21 U.S.C. ' 841(a)(1), Possession with Intent to 

Distribute Methamphetamine. Having conducted a proceeding in the form and manner prescribed 

by FED. R. CRIM P. 11, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court accept the defendant=s 

guilty plea. The parties waived their right to file objections to the Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation. The Court is of the opinion that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

should be accepted.

It is accordingly ORDERED that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge, filed September 6, 2023, are hereby ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that, pursuant to defendant=s plea agreement, the Court finds 

defendant GUILTY of Count 1 of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27th day of September, 2023.

Case 2:23-cr-00003-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 85
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2002 of Rouge Industries, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary P.
Latendresse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                                       /s/ Gary P. Latendresse
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Gary P. Latendresse
                                                       Vice Chairman and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       February 14, 2003
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00348

- CV

TRINITY HEALTHCARE, LLC

v. LILIAN PEACOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF GLADYS CECILIA KEELS

On Appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV52930

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged
against appe llant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
May 4, 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

VALVE CORPORATION, GEARBOX 

SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00419-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Gearbox Software, L.L.C. to Dismiss the 

Second Amended Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim (the “Motion to 

Dismiss”) filed by Defendant Gearbox Software, L.L.C. (“Gearbox”). (Dkt. No. 44). In the Motion

to Dismiss, Gearbox seeks the dismissal of Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) 

Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 40). (Dkt. No. 44 at 1). Since the filing of the Motion to 

Dismiss, Plaintiff has filed a Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 52). 

It is well established that a later-filed amended complaint moots a motion asking the Court 

to dismiss an earlier-filed complaint. See Griffin v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co., 697 F. App’x 793, 797 (5th 

Cir. 2017) (“Once filed, that amended complaint rendered all earlier motions ... moot.”); see also 

Bishop Display Tech LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00139-JRG, Dkt. No. 40 (E.D. 

Tex. Oct. 4, 2021) (“Once Plaintiff filed its amended complaint, the Motion became moot.”); 

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Eaton Corp. PLC, No. 2:19-CV-00290-JRG, 2019 WL 

11250161, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2019) (“Accordingly, the filing of an amended complaint moots 

a motion to dismiss the original complaint.”).

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 79 Filed 06/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1672
2

Accordingly, the Court finds that the Motion to Dismiss(Dkt. No. 44) should be and hereby 

is DENIED-AS-MOOT.

So Ordered this

Jun 5, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 79 Filed 06/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1673
Shane McMAHAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5393.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of XDOGS, Inc., ("the Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Kent A. Rodriguez, as
President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  July 6, 2005




/s/  Kent A. Rodriguez
----------------------------------
     Kent A. Rodriguez
     President and Principal Financial Officer
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

JERRAL W. JONES, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS and CYNTHIA 

DAVIS f/k/a CYNTHIA DAVIS-SPENCER, 

Defendants, 

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:23-cv-00032-RWS 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PLAINTIFF JERRAL W. JONES’S 

NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE (TRIAL WITNESS LIST AND EXHIBIT LIST) 

In accordance with the Court’s Discovery Order (Dkt. 39), Plaintiff Jerral W. Jones, by and 

through his undersigned attorneys, hereby notifies the Court that he has complied with the Court’s 

Docket Control Order (Dkt. 38) by serving his Trial Witness List and Trial Exhibit List on all 

counsel of record via electronic mail on May 21, 2024. 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 115 Filed 05/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2050
2 

Dated: May 21, 2024. 

FOLSOM ADR PLLC 

/s/ David Folsom 

David Folsom 

State Bar No. 07210800 

david@folsomadr.com 

6002-B Summerfield Dr. 

Texarkana, TX 75503 

(903) 277-7303 

JACKSON WALKER LLP 

/s/Charles L. Babcock 

Charles L. Babcock 

State Bar No. 01479500 

cbabcock@jw.com 

Nancy W. Hamilton 

State Bar No. 11587925 

nhamilton@jw.com 

1401 McKinney Street 

Suite 1900 

Houston, TX 77010 

(713) 752-4210 

(713) 752-4221 - Fax 

David T. Moran 

State Bar No. 14419400 

dmoran@jw.com 

Edwin Buffmire 

State Bar No. 24078283 

ebuffmire@jw.com 

Cody Martinez 

State Bar No. 24102146 

cmartinez@jw.com 

2323 Ross Avenue 

Suite 600 

Dallas, TX 75201 

(214) 953-6000 

(214) 953-5822 – Fax 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF JERRAL W. JONES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On May 21, 2024, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of the 

court of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing system 

of the court. I hereby certify that I will serve all counsel and/or pro se parties of record 

electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2). 

/s/ Edwin Buffmire 

Edwin Buffmire 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 115 Filed 05/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2051
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, H.K. Desai, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of QLogic
Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. By:
    /s/ H.K. DESAIH.K. DesaiChief Executive Officer Date: June 2, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2272 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2272

    To ensure the equitable treatment of graduates of the Uniformed 
    Services University of the Health Sciences of the Class of 1987.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

     Mr. Saxton (for himself, Mr. Scarborough, and Mr. Cunningham) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To ensure the equitable treatment of graduates of the Uniformed 
    Services University of the Health Sciences of the Class of 1987.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF CLASS OF 1987 OF THE UNIFORMED 
              SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES.

    An officer of the uniformed services who entered the Uniformed 
Services University of the Health Sciences as a student in 1983 and who 
successfully completed the course of instruction at the University in 
1987 shall be treated for purposes of determining pay and years of 
service in the same manner as a student at the University who graduated 
in 1986, notwithstanding the enactment of the Defense Officer Personnel 
Management Act (Public Law 96-513; 94 Stat. 2835).
                                 <all>
```