alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations from the Company's report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,100,422
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  478,774
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,061,099
<CASH>                                         804,812
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              53,847
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,282,389
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                926,778
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             63,962
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,535,639
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       805,996
<OTHER-SE>                                     475,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,282,389
<PREMIUMS>                                   6,152,634
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             85,449
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   9,398
<BENEFITS>                                   5,361,545
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,168,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (600,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (309,013)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (600,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (600,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.87)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               3,208,334
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             786,351
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             4,207,412
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              3,462,417
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Frank STRAUB, petitioner, v. CITY OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, et al.

No. 18-527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0000911220
<NAME>                       COUNTRY STAR RESTAURANTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                              USD
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                                8,810
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         167,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    394,907
<PP&E>                                            5,903,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,004,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,553,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,369,607
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             90,043
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,094,004 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,553,654
<SALES>                                           1,144,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,144,916
<CGS>                                               351,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,804,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  164,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (824,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (824,136)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (824,136)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Gary THOMAS and Felix Parrilla, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                       1,228,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,668,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   188,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,159,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,691,000
<PP&E>                                      18,256,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,804,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,723,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,094,000
<BONDS>                                      6,259,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,006,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,723,000
<SALES>                                     12,261,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,579,000
<CGS>                                        5,177,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,410,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             341,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,375,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,375,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,375,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
WESTERNGECO LLC, petitioner, v. ION GEOPHYSICAL CORPORATION.

No. 18M86.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137051 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

JODI P. HEERINGA, Trustee of the 

Jodi P. Heeringa Trust, dated May 7, 1985,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137051 

 COA: 274852 

Ottawa CC: 04-050689-CH 

GLEN E. PETROELJE and MARILYN C. 

PETROELJE, as Trustee of the

Marilyn C. Petroelje Living Trust, dated 

November 2, 1999,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

1215 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 30, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.22

DOMINION HOMES, INC.

2007 Director Compensation Plan



|1. | Director Fees (paid quarterly in advance)*
|-- | ------------------------------------------



| | (a) | $40,000 annual fee for each outside director ($10,000 per quarter)
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | Additional $5,000 annual fee ($1,250 per quarter) for:
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | each Audit Committee member (other than Audit Committee Chair)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Compensation Committee Chair, and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Governance Committee Chair
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| | (c) | Additional $10,000 annual fee for the Audit Committee Chair ($2,500 per quarter)
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Annual award of options to purchase 2,500 common shares of the Company (non-qualified).
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Reimbursement of expenses incurred in personal financial planning of up to $7,500 in any calendar year.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Participation in Executive Deferred Compensation Plan  allows directors to defer receipt of their director fees and receive a matching contribution of 25% with respect to
those fees, not to exceed $2,500 in any year.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

|* | Directors receive 50% of their director and committee fees otherwise payable to them in common shares of the Company under the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Equity Plan, and may
elect to receive up to 100% of their director and committee fees in common shares.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

YUM! BRANDS, INC. 

Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP 

(Lead Case) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

INSPIRE BRANDS, INC. 

Defendant 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00402-JRG-RSP 

(Member Case) 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

STIPULATED DISMISSAL BETWEEN 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC AND YUM! BRANDS, INC. 

Plaintiff Analytical Technologies, LLC (hereinafter “AT”) and Defendant YUM! Brands, 

Inc. (hereinafter “YUM”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, hereby stipulate to an order dismissing 

WITH PREJUDICE all claims for relief against YUM in lead case 2:23-cv-00401-JRG, with each 

party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses. 

A proposed ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL BETWEEN 

ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC AND YUM! BRANDS, INC. is attached hereto. 

Case 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 131
2 

Dated: January 25, 2024 

By: /s/ Donald R. McPhail 

Donald R. McPhail (admitted) 

OBLON, MCLELLAND, MAIER 

 & NEUSTADT LLP 

1940 Duke Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

dmcphail@oblon.com 

Telephone: 703-413-3000 

Facsimile: 703-413-2220 

Counsel for Analytical Technologies, LLC 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Robert L. Lee 

Robert L. Lee (GA Bar No. 443978) 

Shaleen J. Patel (GA Bar No. 295554) 

 ALSTON & BIRD LLP 

1201 West Peachtree Street, Suite 4900 

 Atlanta, GA 30309 

 Telephone: 404-881-7635 

 Facsimile: 404-881-7777 

 bob.lee@alston.com 

 shaleen.patel@alston.com 

 Counsel for Defendant Yum! Brands, Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 132
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on January 25, 2024 I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

via electronic mail to all counsel of record. 

 

 /s/ Diana Bowen 

Case 2:23-cv-00401-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 01/25/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 133
PDR NETWORK, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC, INC.

No. 17-1705.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2314

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude beverage alcohol compounds emitted

from aging warehouses from the definition of volatile organic compounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. WHITFIELD (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr.

LUCAS of Kentucky, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. FLETCHER, Mr. NEY, Mr.

MCINTOSH, Mr. HILLEARY, and Mr. BRYANT) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude beverage alcohol

compounds emitted from aging warehouses from the definition of volatile organic compounds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COM4 POUNDS.

5 Section 302(s) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

6 7602(s)) is amended by adding the following at the end

7 thereof: ‘‘Such term shall not include beverage alcohol

8 compounds (ethanol) emitted from aging warehouses.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2306 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2306

  To amend the qualification requirements for serving with the Census 
                           Monitoring Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 1999

  Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mrs. 
 Jones of Ohio, and Mrs. Clayton) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the qualification requirements for serving with the Census 
                           Monitoring Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the Census Monitoring Board was created to provide 
        bipartisan oversight of the decennial census to be conducted in 
        2000, one of the most critical constitutional functions the 
        Federal Government will perform;
            (2) members of the Board are expected to provide objective, 
        unbiased oversight and to contribute a substantial amount of 
        time toward their duties;
            (3) members of the Board should make every effort to avoid 
        conflicts of interest or even the appearance of a potential 
        conflict of interest; and
            (4) acceptance of a senior-level position in a Presidential 
        or a Vice Presidential campaign creates a significant 
        possibility of a conflict of interest and is incompatible with 
        the objective, unbiased oversight required of members of the 
        Board.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DISQUALIFIED FROM SERVING.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 210(i) of Public Law 105-
119 (13 U.S.C. 141 note; 111 Stat. 2486) is amended by striking ``or'' 
at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end of 
subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; or'', and by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(C) as the chairman or co-chairman of, or in any other 
        senior-level management position with--
                    ``(i) a political committee for an individual who 
                seeks nomination for election, or election, to the 
                office of President or Vice President, or
                    ``(ii) a national committee of a political party,
        whether on a paid basis or otherwise.''.
    (b) Applicability.--Paragraph (2) of such section 210(i) is further 
amended, in the matter before subparagraph (A), by striking ``or who 
has ever served''.
                                 <all>
```
Scherrieto LITTLE, Petitioner, v. Janis NAU, as Administrator.

No. 19-6937

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2151

To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on thionyl chloride.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.28.01 Thionyl chloride,

used as imaging

chemical for photographic applications (CAS No.

007719–09–7)

(provided for in

subheading

2812.10.50) ....... Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•HR 2151 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Lee Alvin VINCENT, Petitioner, v. Brian E. WILLIAMS, Warden.

No. 19-7069

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Steven Doyle BURTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6137.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2321 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2321

To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that coverage under the 
 health benefits program for Federal employees is provided for hearing 
                    aids and examinations therefor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1999

 Mrs. Morella introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that coverage under the 
 health benefits program for Federal employees is provided for hearing 
                    aids and examinations therefor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COVERAGE FOR HEARING AIDS.

    Section 8902 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(p)(1) A contract may not be made or a plan approved which does 
not include coverage for hearing aids and examinations therefor.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `hearing aid' means 
any wearable instrument or device designed for, offered for the purpose 
of, or represented as aiding persons with or compensating for, impaired 
hearing.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to any contract entered into or renewed, and any plan 
approved, on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Ornette M. TERRY, aka Keith Terry, aka Keith M. Terry, aka Orhette Terry, aka Rasheia Terry, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 17-8939.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Jersey denied.
Larry David DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Brian DANIEL, et al.

No. 19-5244

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cr-00061-2

United States of America

v.

Natalia Semenova

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

On September 21, 2023, the court entered a preliminary order of 

forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a). Doc. 118. Because the forfeiture order consists only of cash proceeds obtained by the defendant, no ancillary proceeding is required to adjudicate the interests of 

third parties in the forfeited property. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(c)(1). Accordingly, the government’s motion for final 

order of forfeiture (Doc. 167) is granted.

It is further ordered that the defendant, Natalia Semenova, shall 

forfeit to the United States the sum of $20,000.00 and all interest 

and proceeds thereto, representing the amount of proceeds obtained 

by defendant as a result of the offense alleged in count one of the 

information and for which defendant is personally liable, pursuant to 

21 U.S.C. § 853(a).

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(4), this 

order of forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at the time 

of sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in 

the judgment.

Pursuant to Rule 32.2(e), the government may, at any time, move 

to amend this order of forfeiture to include substitute property having a value not to exceed $20,000.00 to satisfy the cash proceeds 

sought for forfeiture in whole or in part.

The United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the 

case for the purpose of enforcing this order.

Case 6:23-cr-00061-JCB-JDL Document 183 Filed 11/16/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 570
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on November 16, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00061-JCB-JDL Document 183 Filed 11/16/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 571