alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      1,041,492 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                               8,041,481 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  178,159 
<INVENTORY>                                    95,468 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           12,526,168       
<PP&E>                                     39,433,864      
<DEPRECIATION>                             10,422,169    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             42,197,831      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,725,597    
<BONDS>                                             0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                       45,813 
<OTHER-SE>                                 34,011,972       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               42,197,831         
<SALES>                                    10,679,548          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           10,679,548          
<CGS>                                       5,859,223          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               5,859,223          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,007,755       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,999       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,807,571       
<INCOME-TAX>                                  685,079      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,122,492      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                1,122,492 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .25 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .25 
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

IMPLICIT, LLC

v.

CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:23-CV-770-SDJ

ORDER

The Court has received the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Stay all Deadlines, 

(Dkt. #30), advising that all claims in this case have been settled.

It is therefore ORDERED that, on or before July 22, 2024, all parties shall 

file with the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal 

from the Court’s active docket. If such papers are not received by the Court by the 

scheduled deadline, the Court may order counsel to appear at a hearing for the 

purpose of determining which party is responsible for the delay. Thereafter, the Court 

may enter such orders as are just and necessary to ensure prompt resolution of this 

case. 

It is further ORDERED that any deadlines and hearings scheduled in this 

matter are STAYED until July 22, 2024. If dismissal documents have not been filed 

with the Court by that date, the parties must file a report with the Court, by no later 

than July 24, 2024, on the status of settlement.

Case 4:23-cv-00770-SDJ Document 31 Filed 07/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 250
EXHIBIT 99.21




CONSENT OF EXPERT
   March 28, 2013
   Eldorado Gold Corporation
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation
  I, Rick Alexander, do hereby consent to the filing of the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “Technical Report for the Tocantinzinho Gold Mine Project, Brazil” dated May 3, 2011 and other information pertaining to the Tocantinzho Project, and the use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating by reference the Company’s Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F.
   
  By:
/s/ Rick AlexanderRick Alexander P. Eng.Eldorado Gold CorporationProject Director
Exhibit 8



SUBSIDIARIES



Our wholly-owned subsidiaries are:

•

Caradas, Inc., a Delaware corporation

•

Diversinet Corp., a Delaware corporation

•

DSS Software Technologies, a California corporation, (inactive)

•

Diversinet Corporation of America, a Delaware corporation, (inactive)

•

Diversinet Inc., an Ontario corporation, (inactive)

•

Diversinet (Israel) Ltd., an Israeli corporation (inactive)

•

The Instant Publisher Ltd., a Barbados corporation, (inactive)



Our joint venture is:

Atria Limited, a 50% owned joint venture that operated in Hong Kong, (inactive)
Joshua Andrew MONROE, Petitioner, v. Scott LEWIS, Warden.

No. 19-7231

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

KEITHUS JONES §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv336

JOHN B. STEVENS, JR., ET AL. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Keithus Jones, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The Court referred

this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate

Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending the case be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted

and for seeking monetary relief from defendants immune from such relief.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Proper notice was given to plaintiff at his

last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2). No objections were filed to the Report and

Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct

and the report of the Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 6] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. A final

judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 18th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00336-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 29
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/07/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       45,961
COMMITMENTS
   1,820    1,919        0   39,740   42,183   41,560   44,102    4,401    1,859

CHANGES FROM 01/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -676)
     363      108        0     -698     -578     -335     -470     -341     -206

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     4.0      4.2      0.0     86.5     91.8     90.4     96.0      9.6      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
       3        4        0       26       32       29       36
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/07/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       76,474
COMMITMENTS
  12,620   19,297      223   54,038   53,860   66,881   73,380    9,593    3,094

CHANGES FROM 01/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,146)
   2,211    1,999        0    2,092    3,480    4,303    5,479     -157   -1,333

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.5     25.2      0.3     70.7     70.4     87.5     96.0     12.5      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       85)
      18        7        1       40       34       58       42
```

----

Updated February 10, 2012
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

Case 4:23-cv-00871-ALM Document 13 Filed 10/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 39
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Prophet 21, Inc.:


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-38035) of Prophet 21, Inc. of our reports dated August 9,
2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Prophet 21, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the June 30, 2002 annual
report on Form 10-K of Prophet 21, Inc.



KPMG LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 27, 2002
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

V. § CASE NO. 1:01-CR-171

§

CRAIG EDWARD NOACK §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA OF TRUE

The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin, at

Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the Local Rules for the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §

3401(I) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), Judge Giblin held a hearing and submitted findings of fact and a

recommendation on the revocation of Defendant’s supervised release.

Having conducted the proceedings in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 11 and 18 U.S.C. § 3583, the magistrate judge issued his Findings of Fact and

Recommendation on Plea of True [Clerk’s doc. #47]. The magistrate judge recommended that the

Court revoke Defendant’s supervised release and impose a term of imprisonment for the revocation,

with no additional supervision to follow.
-2-

The parties have not objected to Judge Giblin’s report, and the Defendant waived his right

to be present and allocute at sentencing. Accordingly, after review, the Court concludes that the

Findings of Fact and Recommendation should be accepted.

It is ORDERED that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Plea of True [Clerk’s

doc. #47] are ADOPTED. The Court finds that Defendant, Craig Edward Noack, violated

conditions of his supervised release. The Court accordingly ORDERS that the Defendant’s term

of supervision is REVOKED. Pursuant to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court

ORDERS Defendant to serve a term of twelve (12) months and one (1) day imprisonment for the

revocation. The Court recommends that Defendant be placed in the Federal Correctional Institute

located in Texarkana, Texas, if possible. No further term of supervised release is ordered.
No. 6:23-cr-00090

United States of America

v.

Robert Jessie Martin

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 43. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id. at 2.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Robert Jessie Martin guilty of count one of the indictment, 

charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 – Conspiracy to Distribute 

and Possess with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine.

So ordered by the court on April 15, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00090-JCB-JDL Document 44 Filed 04/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 138
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10365

Summary Calendar

 

KEVIN REID ALTHOUSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, Clerk’s Office (Jim Hamlin); DAVID

DANIELS, Criminal Manager - Dallas County District Clerk’s Office;

CARMEN VENUS, Deputy Clerk - Dallas County District Clerk’s Office;

CLAIRE MOSES, Deputy Clerk - Dallas County District Clerk’s Office;

VIRGIL MELTON, Court Coordinator 265th Judicial District Court,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:01-CV-2225-M

 

August 5, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kevin Reid Althouse, Texas prisoner #861608, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and

1915A(b)(1). Althouse contends that the district court erred in

dismissing his claims for denial of access to the courts.
1 McDonald v. Steward, 132 F.3d 225, 230-31 (5th Cir. 1998)

(quoting Eason v. Thaler, 73 F.3d 1322, 1328 (5th Cir. 1996)).

2 See Taylor v. Johnson, 257 F.3d 470, 472 (5th Cir. 2001)

(per curiam) (stating that a complaint is “frivolous” if it lacks

an arguable basis in law or fact).

3 See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

4 See Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 822-23 (5th Cir.

1997); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996).

5 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

2

“[B]efore a prisoner may prevail on a claim that his

constitutional right of access to the courts was violated, he must

demonstrate ‘that his position as a litigant was prejudiced by his

denial of access to the courts.’”1 Because Althouse failed to

assert that the defendants’ alleged actions prejudiced his position

as a litigant, the district court did not err in dismissing

Althouse’s complaint as frivolous.2

Althouse’s appeal is likewise entirely without merit and must

be dismissed as frivolous.3 This dismissal of Althouse’s appeal as

frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit as

frivolous constitute two strikes against Althouse for purposes of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).4 If one other action or appeal filed by

Althouse is dismissed on the ground that it is frivolous,

malicious, or fails to state a claim, he will be barred from

bringing a civil action or appeal as a prisoner proceeding in forma

pauperis unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury.5
3

APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      DM MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

                          QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q



<TABLE>
                                     COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                        ----------------------    ----------------------
                                                         JUNE 28,     JUNE 29,     JUNE 28,     JUNE 29,
                                                           1997         1996        1997          1996
                                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
PRIMARY:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
  during the period .................................   4,548,453    4,296,652    4,529,189    4,291,962

Assumed exercise of options .........................     602,559      439,902      527,347      327,850
                                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares    
  outstanding .......................................   5,151,012    4,736,554    5,056,536    4,619,812 
                                                        =========    =========    =========    ========= 



<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                        ----------------------    ----------------------
                                                         JUNE 28,     JUNE 29,     JUNE 28,     JUNE 29,
                                                           1997         1996        1997          1996
                                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
FULLY DILUTED:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
  during the period .................................   4,548,453    4,296,652    4,529,189    4,291,962

Assumed exercise of options .........................     689,528      498,607      680,337      382,080
                                                        ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------

Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares    
  outstanding .......................................   5,237,981    4,795,259    5,209,526    4,674,042 
                                                        =========    =========    =========    ========= 
</TABLE>


                                       17
REGINOL COBB A/K/A 

REGINALD COBB,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2486

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 10, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Calhoun County.

Allen L. Register, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant; Reginol Cobb a/k/a Reginald Cobb, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY, LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00397 

LEAD CASE

JURY TRIAL

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00398 

JURY TRIAL

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T 

MOBILITY, LLC AND AT&T CORP., 

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that Erik B. Fountain is entering an appearance for AT&T Services Inc., 

AT&T Mobility, LLC, and AT&T Corp., (collectively “AT&T” or “Defendants”) in the above 

numbered and entitled causes: 

Erik B. Fountain 

Texas State Bar No. 24097701 

efountain@mckoolsmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

300 Crescent Court Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 978-4000 

Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 

Mr. Fountain is currently admitted to practice in the Eastern District of Texas. 

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 02/01/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 585
2 

Dated: February 1, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Erik B. Fountain

Erik B. Fountain 

Texas State Bar No. 24097701 

efountain@mckoolsmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

300 Crescent Court Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: (214) 978-4000 

Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 

ATTORNEY FOR AT&T SERVICES

INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AND 

AT&T CORP. 

 

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 02/01/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 586
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been 

served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on February 1, 2024. 

/s/ Erik B. Fountain

Erik B. Fountain 

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 46 Filed 02/01/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 587
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, David Hackett, Chief Financial Officer of Diversinet Corp., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diversinet Corp.





/s/ David Hackett

Name: David Hackett

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2005



This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Joseph WHITE, petitioner, v. DETROIT EAST COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH, et al.

No. 18-6476.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

V.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.; 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP 

[PROPOSED]ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY 

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify Protective Order (Dkt. No. __) (the 

“Motion”). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be 

and hereby is GRANTED.

It is therefore ORDERED that that the Protective Order set forth in Dkt. No. 36 be 

modified to include the following provision:

37. Documentary discovery and source code discovery produced or made available 

by Samsung in this case may be produced by Cobblestone in Cobblestone Wireless, 

LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00477-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.) (Lead 

Case) and Cobblestone Wireless, LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless, Case No. 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.) (Lead Case) with the 

same Bates number and confidentiality designations. 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 43-1 Filed 02/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 439