alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      467
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,428
<PP&E>                                          62,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,875
<BONDS>                                         52,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,679
<SALES>                                          3,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,132
<CGS>                                            3,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    954
<INCOME-TAX>                                       742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
Christopher W. FILLMORE, petitioner, v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.

No. 18-6792.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 28, 2019, within which *862to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/24/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      592,840
COMMITMENTS
  90,280   28,460  173,337  310,275  371,143  573,892  572,940   18,948   19,900

CHANGES FROM 09/17/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -21,601)
  -3,246     -319  -11,730   -5,744   -5,234  -20,720  -17,283     -881   -4,318

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.2      4.8     29.2     52.3     62.6     96.8     96.6      3.2      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      34       35       55       62       63      125      125
```

----

Updated September 27, 2013
Chhay LIM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-714.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 197 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 197

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 27, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 410 
North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, as the ``Clifford R. Hope Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, is hereby designated as the 
``Clifford R. Hope Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Clifford R. Hope Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Jermaine MITCHELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7010.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
W.A. GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. HUMANA EMPLOYERS HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC.

No. 19-721

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50297 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1843-ALL-DB

-------------------- October 17, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court appointed counsel for Jose Dominguez (“Dominguez”), the Federal Public Defender, has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dominguez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave toNo. 02-50297 -2- withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Joseph J. Lodovic, IV, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MediaNewsGroup, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004
/S/Joseph J. Lodovic, IVJoseph J. Lodovic, IVPresident
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

** **

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

** **

** **

We consent to the reference to our firm underthe caption “Experts” in Registration Statement No. 333-172929 on Form S-3 and to the incorporation by reference thereinand in Registration Statement No. 333-146227 on Form S-8 of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. of our report dated March12, 2012, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. for the year ended December 31,2011.

 

 

/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

 

Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

March 12, 2012

Denver, Colorado
Charles Devan FULTON, Sr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6095

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated July 26, 2013
In Re Michael D. JOHNSON, petitioner.

No. 18-6961.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 10.1


 


[TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW]


 


STATE OF ISRAEL


 


 


MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND WATER RESOURCES


NATURAL RESOURCES AUTHORITY


 


Oil and Gas


22 April 2012–04–25


Oil ___363__2012


 





	Mr Richard Rinberg,CEO	Fax: 04/6231427
	Zion Oil & Gas,Inc	 
	22 Bareket Northern Industrial Zone	 
	Caesarea 38900	 







 


 


Hello


 


Re:Jordan Valley License/303- Work Program Update


Your letter dated 17 April


 


In response to your application and in view of the delay regarding
execution of the seismic survey I hereby update the license work program that was set for the license as follows:


 


		4.	Prepare a new 2D seismic survey and submit the data and summary report –by 12 May 2012.



		5.	Process the data of the new survey and submit the data and summary report- by 12 June 2012.



 


All other clauses in the program without change


 


In addition please submit an environmental document in accordance
with the instructions of the Ministry of Energy and Water Resources by 12 December 2012


 


 


Sincerely


 


Alexander Varshavsky


Commissioner of Petroleum Affairs
Elbert WALKER, petitioner, v. Antoine CALDWELL, Warden.

No. 18-8078.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Rafael Leonhard Wolfga BEIER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7180

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James P. TATTEN, petitioner, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, et al.

No. 18-595.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadus Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Blitz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Cadus Corporation and will be retained by Cadus Corporation and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ David
              BlitzDavid
              Blitz
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer (Chief
              Executive
                Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
              November
                12, 2007




The
      foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ James S. Tsuei James S. Tsuei CA Bar No. 285530

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 jtsuei@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 198
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

TAYLOR WALKINGSHIELD AND RICHARD MARLOWE

v. Record No. 1048-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM CULPEPER COUNTY DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 20, 1996 OF SOCIAL SERVICES

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CULPEPER COUNTY John R. Cullen, Judge (Monica J. Chernin, on brief), for appellants. No brief for appellee.

Taylor Walkingshield and Richard Marlowe appeal the decision of the circuit court denying their petition to vacate and hold void the October 19, 1994 consent order of the juvenile and domestic relations district court. The appellants challenged the district court order because no guardian ad litem had been appointed for their minor child at the time of the order. Upon reviewing the record and opening brief, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the

decision of the trial court. Rule 5A:27. "On appeal, the judgment of the trial court is presumed to be correct; its findings will not be overturned by this Court except in cases of manifest error. The burden is upon the party

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 alleging trial court error to show by the record that the judgment was erroneous." Steinberg v. Steinberg , 11 Va. App. 323, 326, 398 S.E.2d 507, 508 (1990). The circuit court found that the district court order from which the appeal was taken was "an interlocutory order which made no findings and was not dispositive," and was "a temporary order, did not adjudicate the issues or render a final disposition, and is not void for failure of the court to appoint a Guardian ad litem " prior to the entry

of the order. Under Code § 16.1-296, an appeal to the appropriate circuit court may be taken from "any final order or judgment of the juvenile court." The record supports the circuit court's findings, and demonstrates that the district court order was not a final order. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily affirmed.

Affirmed.
ex4-10.htm





Exhibit 4.10


 



Summary of Agreement between Jinpan Electric Group (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. and Shanghai Kai Tian Construction Group Co. Ltd. to construct factory building in the Shanghai facility







Jinpan Electric Group (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (“Shanghai Jinpan”) entered into an agreement (“Agreement”) with Shanghai Kai Tian Construction Group Co. Ltd. (“SKT”) on May 3, 2011 for the construction of a factory building (“Factory Building C”).  Pursuant to the Agreement, SKT shall supply materials and construct Factory Building C (excluding construction of the steel frame).    SKT shall coordinate the installation of the steel frame and shall be responsible for the overall quality and progress of the construction.  SKT shall commence construction on May 5, 2011 and complete construction on July 30, 2011.  The construction period is 85 days, during which the site must be ready for the construction of the steel frame by June 15, 2011.  The total contract price is RMB 4.402 million (including the price for the installation of the steel frame).
Guetatchew FIKROU, petitioner, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, et al.

No. 18-6489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-83438, 333-55723 and 333-54244) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. and (Form S-8 No. 333-69008) pertaining to the Stock Option and
Registration Rights Agreement dated January 26, 1994, of our report dated December 17, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Maxwell Shoe Company Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
October 31, 2002.





ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Boston, Massachusetts


January 22,
2003
Nestor LEON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8008.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-91438, No. 33-92548, No. 333-03450, No. 333-03452, No. 333-03454, No.
333-13521, No. 333-21905, No. 333-23005, No. 333-33893, No. 333-37273, No.
333-37553, No. 333-37565, No. 333-38071, No. 333-41049, No. 333-42417, No.
333-47563, No. 333-57863, No. 333-64377, No. 333-64379, No. 333-69728, No.
333-77941, No. 333-85684, and No. 333-102541 of Crescent Real Estate Equities
Company of our report dated February 13, 2004 (except for paragraph three of
Note 8, as to which the date is March 2, 2004, and Note 25, as to which the date
is March 9, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Crescent Real Estate Equities Company included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2004
EXHIBIT F

partments Welcome Home Letter ruck •

Hello Mike

You have been appr ved'! 

PI mc check your email for a link on bow to c-«ign ymi tease contract

-< 0 

Uk A-i;. i -£r i

. KAPWING

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 43-7 Filed 08/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 399
Ben ADAM, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, et al.

No. 19-805

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

ELDER SAUL RODRIGUEZQUINTANILLA 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00090-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that the 

Court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the Court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The Court orders that 

the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are adopted. The Court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ordered that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Elder Saul RodriguezCase 1:23-cr-00090-MJT Document 19 Filed 11/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 39
2

Quintanilla, is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 8 

U.S.C. § 1326(a) - Reentry of a Deported Alien.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 3rd day of November, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00090-MJT Document 19 Filed 11/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 40