alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         30,145,855
<SECURITIES>                                   20,480,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,957,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,112,728
<PP&E>                                         3,150,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,371,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 68,661,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,474,627
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       46,713
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,877,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   68,661,087
<SALES>                                        56,151,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               56,151,613
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,129,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,302,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,574,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,759,591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,814,807
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,814,807
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .57



</TABLE>
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ Kristopher Davis Kristopher Davis CA Bar No. 329627

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 kdavis@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

Verizon Communications Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 461
Wesley Wayne SCHAEFER, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Criminal Institutions Division.

No. 18-6744.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4184

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. TYRON JEROME HUNTER, a/k/a Tyrone Jerome Hunter, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00251-LHT-1)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Ann L. Hester, Emily Marroquin, Charlotte, North Carolina, Fredilyn Sison, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Tyron Jerome Hunter pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2006), and was sentenced to 240 months in prison. Counsel for Hunter has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), alleging that she has found no meritorious issues for appeal but asserting that the district court may have improperly calculated Hunter’s Guidelines range. Hunter was notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. The Government has declined to file a responding brief. Finding no error, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for review. After a thorough Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing at which Hunter admitted his guilt, the district court sustained one of Hunter’s objections to his presentence investigation report and adopted the remaining findings contained therein, considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors, and sentenced Hunter to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence. See United States

v. Farrior , 535 F.3d 210, 224 (4th Cir. 2008) (“A statutorily required sentence . . . is per se reasonable.”). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. This court requires that counsel inform Hunter in

23 writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Hunter requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may motion this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Hunter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-419

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PLAINTIFF’S RULE 7.1(a) CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC, states that Patent Asset 

Management, LLC is the parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of 

its stock.

Dated: November 30, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 17 Filed 11/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 168
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document has been 

served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 17 Filed 11/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 169
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certifications**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Strategic Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, based on such officer’s knowledge, that: 

|   | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the ”Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

 

| Date: November 13, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Matthew H. Knight                                                                              |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   |  

 

 

Matthew H. Knight

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

  |
Tim SUNDAY, petitioner, v. FRIENDSHIP PAVILION ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC, et al.

No. 18-5506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals Georgia denied.
In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, applicant.

No. 18A669.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

The applications for leave to file the application for stay, the response, and the reply under seal presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court granted.
UNiTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the Eastem Dist「ict ofTexas

Sherman Division

NICOLE WEISZ, PIaintiff

CCT HOLDINGS, LLC, et al,  Defendants

Civil Action No. 4:23-CV-541

PROOF OF SERViCE AFFiDAVIT

Befo「e me, the undersigned authority, PerSOna=y appea「ed Tod E. Penderg「ass, tO me

WeI出nown, after being duIy sworn, did depose and say:

くくMy name is Tod E・ Penderg「ass. I am ove「 eighteen (18) yea「S Ofage and not a party to or

interested in the outcome of帥s case. I am autho「ized by RuIe lO3(2) & (3) ofthe Texas RuIes

Of CiviI P「ocedure to serve process issued by the Texas CiviI Courts and am certified by the

Judicial B「anch Certification Commission unde「 o「de「 of the Texas Supreme Cou巾

Ce輔cation No. PSC1660, Exp. 11/30/2023. 1 am pe「sona=y acquainted with the facts stated

he「ein and they are true and co「rect.

Came to hand on the 12th day of JuIy 2023, at 12:06 p.m. Summons in a CiviI Action with

Plaintiff’s O「iginal CompIaint fo「 service on Defendant CCT Holdinas.しLC.

NOT SERVED for the fo=owing 「easons:

On September 27, 2023, l attempted service via U.S.P.S. certified maii, retu... reCeipt

「equested, tO registe「ed agent, Michael S. Eymer at 250 W. Jewe=, Denver, CoIo「ado 80223.

On o「 about Novembe「 8, 2O23, the pa「cel was 「etu「ned to sende「, ma「ked no such address

and unabIe to fbn〃a「d.

1 decIare under penaIty of perju「y unde「 the iaws of the United States of Ame「ica that肌e

foregoing information contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is t「ue

and correct.”

P「inted Name: Tod E. Pende「q「ass

Service Fee $QJ2Q 516 W. Annie Street, Austin, Tx 78704

Re: Weimaker/3101

STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF TRAVIS

Before me, a nOtary PubIic, On this day personaIIy appea「ed the above-named person, known

to me to be the pe「son whose name is subsc「ibed to the fo「egoing document and, being by me

first duiy swo「n, deciared that the statementsIfacts therein contained are within his/her

PerSOnal knowiedge to be true and correct. Given under my hand and seai ofo楕ce on the 4th

day of Decembe「 2023.

[Fo「m PursuantTo FRCP 4(I)(1)]

§

§

§

Attachment 4 Case 4:23-cv-00541-ALM-AGD Document 5-5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 29
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KARIE PETIT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3634 ) JASON PETIT, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 15, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Mary Evans, Judge. James M. Oliver of Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A., Naples, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
```

```

----

Updated April 5, 2013
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251

For the relief of Renato Rosetti.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 16, 1999

Mr. ISTOOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Renato Rosetti.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Renato Rosetti shall be held and considered

7 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for

8 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of

9 this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Renato

12 Rosetti as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State
2

•HR 2251 IH

1 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number

2 during the current fiscal year the total number of immi3 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s

4 birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Æ
## **EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

## **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

##  

## I, Roger E. Gower, certify that:

##  

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro ComponentTechnology, Inc.:

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation.

 

c)disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:      May 10,  2006 | By:                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                                    | Roger E. Gower                        |
|                                                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 14
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 15
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 16
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 17
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 18
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 19
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 20
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 21
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 22
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 1-3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 23
Johnny Ray McCLOUD, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6860.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Joseph C. GARCIA, petitioner, v. Bryan COLLIER, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

No. 18-6892 (18A572).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IB

Union Calendar No. 16

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 221

[Report No. 106–31]

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to permit certain youth

to perform certain work with wood products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. KIND, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. KLINK, Mr.

FATTAH, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. REGULA, Mr. PICKERING, and

Mr. ADERHOLT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to permit

certain youth to perform certain work with wood products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 221 RH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION.

2 Section 13(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

3 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(c)) is amended by adding at the end

4 the following:

5 ‘‘(6)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), in the adminis6 tration and enforcement of the child labor provisions of

7 this Act, it shall not be considered oppressive child labor

8 for an individual who—

9 ‘‘(i) is at least 14 but under the age of 18, and

10 ‘‘(ii) is a member of a religious sect or division

11 thereof whose established teachings do not permit

12 formal education beyond the eighth grade,

13 to be employed inside or outside places of business where

14 machinery is used to process wood products.

15 ‘‘(B) The employment of an individual under sub16 paragraph (A) shall be permitted—

17 ‘‘(i) if the individual is supervised by an adult

18 relative of the individual or is supervised by an adult

19 member of the same religious sect or division as the

20 individual;

21 ‘‘(ii) if the individual does not operate or assist

22 in the operation of power-driven woodworking ma23 chines;

24 ‘‘(iii) if the individual is protected from wood

25 particles or other flying debris within the workplace

26 by a barrier appropriate to the potential hazard of
3

•HR 221 RH

1 such wood particles or flying debris or by maintain2 ing a sufficient distance from machinery in oper3 ation; and

4 ‘‘(iv) if the individual is required to use per5 sonal protective equipment to prevent exposure to

6 excessive levels of noise and saw dust.’’.
Union Calendar No. 16

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 221

[Report No. 106–31]

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

with wood products.to permit certain youth to perform certain work

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/07/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      152,800
COMMITMENTS
  37,094   14,269   26,044   71,185   87,288  134,324  127,601   18,477   25,199

CHANGES FROM 01/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        667)
   1,195   -3,082      877     -159    3,446    1,913    1,241   -1,246     -574

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.3      9.3     17.0     46.6     57.1     87.9     83.5     12.1     16.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      44       34       42       62       61      128      120
```

----

Updated February 10, 2012
Brian M. BURMASTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-635.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Kayla BUTTS, Individually and on Behalf of Her Daughter, A. F., a Minor, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-740

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., petitioners, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

No. 18-447.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

The Solicitor General is invited to file brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Samuel Raphael JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6087.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.