IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, 

LLC AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00397

LEAD CASE

JURY TRIAL

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00398

MEMBER CASE

JURY TRIAL

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, 

LLC AND AT&T CORP.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Partners II LLC and Defendants AT&T Services, 

Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Corp.’s Joint Proposed Order to Focus Asserted Patent 

Claims and Prior Art. Having considered the parties’ proposed terms for asserted claim and prior 

art reduction, it is so ORDERED:

1. This Order supplements all other discovery rules and orders. It streamlines the 

issues in this case to promote a “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination” of this action, as 

provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure0 F

1

.

 1 For purposes of this Order, a prior art instrumentality (such as a device or process) and associated references that 

describe that instrumentality shall count as one reference, as shall the closely related work of a single prior artist.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 60-1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1130
2. By the date set for the Plaintiff to serve its opening claim construction brief 

pursuant to P.R. 4-5(a), Plaintiff shall serve a Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, which shall 

assert no more than ten claims from each patent and not more than a total of 32 claims. Not later 

than 14 days after service of the Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, Defendant shall serve a 

Preliminary Election of Asserted Prior Art, which shall assert no more than twelve prior art 

references against each patent and not more than a total of 40 references.1 F

2

3. No later than 28 days before the service of expert reports by the party with the 

burden of proof on an issue, Plaintiff shall serve a Final Election of Asserted Claims, which shall 

identify no more than five asserted claims per patent from among the ten previously identified 

claims and no more than a total of 16 claims. By the date set for the service of expert reports by 

the party with the burden of proof on an issue, Defendant shall serve a Final Election of Asserted 

Prior Art, which shall identify no more than six asserted prior art references per patent from among 

the twelve prior art references previously identified for that particular patent and no more than a 

total of 20 references.2 F

3

 For purposes of this Final Election of Asserted Prior Art, each obviousness 

combination counts as a separate prior art reference. 

4. Subject to Court approval, the parties may modify this Order by agreement, but 

should endeavor to limit the asserted claims and prior art references to the greatest extent possible. 

Absent agreement, post-entry motions to modify this Order’s numerical limits on asserted claims 

 2 This final election of Asserted Claims is separate from and in addition to the patent claimant’s final pre-trial election 

of Asserted Claims as required by the Docket Control Order, which is set to occur 10 days before jury selection. (Dkt. 

No. 41 at 1.)

3 This final election of Asserted Prior Art is separate from and in addition to the patent claimant’s final pre-trial 

election of Asserted Prior Art as required by the Docket Control Order, which is set to occur 7 days before jury 

selection. (Dkt. No. 41 at 1.)

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 60-1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1131
and prior art references must demonstrate good cause warranting the modification. Motions to 

modify other portions of this Order are committed to the sound discretion of the Court.3F

4

Dated:__________________, 2024

_______________________________ 

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 4 This Order contemplates that the parties and the Court may further narrow the issues during pretrial proceedings in 

order to present a manageable case at trial.

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 60-1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1132