alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DONALD WARDRICK , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 1:95

- cr
- 00294

- PJM

- 1 )

Submitted : February 15, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Donald Wardrick , Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Donald War drick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Wardrick , No. 1:95

- cr
- 00294

- PJM

- 1 (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional proc ess.
AFFIRMED
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 361 

## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III No. CV

- 15

- 980

HEATHER CROW APPELLANT

V.

ADVANCED DENTAL IMPL ANTS AND DENTURE CENTER APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: August 31, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION [NO. G401349 ]

AFFIRMED
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge Heather Crow appeals the October 13, 2015 opinion of the Arkansas Workers ’ Compensation Commission (“the Commission”) that affirmed and adopted the April 29,
2015 opinion of the Administrative Law Judge, which denied Crow’s request for benefits pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 11 -9- 505 (a)(1). Crow argues that the decision of the Commission is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
We review a decision of the Commission to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support it. Queen v. Nortel Networks , 2013 Ark. App. 523. We review the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to
the Commission’s find ings. Id. It is the Commission’s province to weigh the evidence and
determine what is most credible. Id. The issue on appeal is not whether we would have reached a different result or whether the evidence would have supported a contraryCite as 2016 Ark. App. 361

2 conclusion; we will affirm if reasonable minds could reach the Commission’s conclusion.
Id. It is the Commission’s duty, not ours, to make credibility determinations, to weigh the evidence, and to resolve conflicts in the evidence and testimony. Adams v. Bemis Co.,
Inc. , 2010 Ark. App. 859, at 2. Where the Commission has denied a claim because of the claimant’s failure to meet her burden of proof, the substantial

- evidence standard of review requires that we affirm if the Commission’s opinion displays a substantial basis fo r the denial
of relief. Bolus v. Jack Cecil Hardware , 2013 Ark. App. 288. Because this is the sole issue now before us, and because the Commission’s opinion adequately explains the decision, we affirm by memorandum opinion. In re Memorandum Opinions , 16 Ar k. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985) (per curiam).
Affirmed

. V IRDEN and G RUBER , JJ ., agree. Martin Law Firm , by: Aaron L. Martin , for appellant. Smith, Williams & Meeks, L.L.P. , by: Ge ne Williams , for appellees.
ALLONGE 


TO


SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE 


ISSUED AUGUST 16, 2011


 


This Allonge to a Secured
Convertible Promissory Note (“Allonge”) is made as of this 20th day of April, 2012, by Ironwood
Gold, Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”) to Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Lender”). Reference is
hereby made to that certain Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued by Borrower to Lender dated August 16, 2011 (“Note”).
Except as amended hereby, the terms of the Note remain as originally stated.


 


The Principal Amount
as stated on the face of the Note shall be increased to $650,000 ($100,000 + $550,000). The amendment to the Principal Amount due
and owing on the Note described herein notwithstanding, Lender does not waive interest that may have accrued at a default rate
of interest and liquidated damages, if any, that may have accrued on the Note through the date of this Allonge, which default interest
and liquidated damages, if any, remain outstanding and payable.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Allonge is executed as of the date written above.


 


IRONWOOD GOLD, CORP.


 


	By: 	/s/	 
	 	Name: Behzad Shayanfar	 
	 	Title: CEO
Gerald HUMBERT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8911

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
Shane R. DODGE, et ux., Petitioners v. BONNERS FERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 19-7125

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Rogelio Sanchez MOLINAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8443.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ilich VARGAS, petitioner, v. John McMAHON, et al.

No. 18-6263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| **$475,000** |   | **August 12, 2004** |
|--------------|--------|---------------------|

----

----

|  | (a) |  | (a) waive demand, presentment, protest, notice      of protest, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection, notice of nonpayment      and all notices of a like nature; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|--|-----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|  | (b) |  | (b) to (i) the release, surrender, exchange      or substitution of all or any part of the security for the indebtedness      evidenced by this Note, or the taking of any additional security, (ii) the      release of any or all other persons from liability, whether primary or contingent,      for the indebtedness evidenced by this Note or for any related obligations,      and (iii) the granting of any other indulgences to any such person. |

----

----

----

----

|   | DIASYS CORPORATION                                                                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                      |
|   |                                                                                                      |
|   |                                                                                                      |
|   | By: S/ JEFFREY B. AARONSON              Jeffrey B. Aaronson, President |
|   |                                                                                                      |
|   |                                                                                                      |

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China World Trade Corporation,  a Nevada
company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  September 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, John H.W. Hui, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

___/s/_John H.W. Hui____________
John H.W. Hui
Chief Financial Officer

                                                           Date:  April 11, 2003
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

Autoscribe Corporation

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Repay Holdings Corporation, et al. 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00349-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED ESI ORDER

Plaintiff Autoscribe Corporation and Defendants Repay Holdings Corporation, et al., 

submit this Joint Motion to Enter the Parties’ Agreed ESI Order (the Proposed ESI Order is 

attached hereto).

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 79 Filed 05/30/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2437
2

Dated: May 30, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jason McManis 

Jason McManis

State Bar No.: 24088032 

Colin Phillips 

State Bar No.: 24105937 

Chun Deng 

State Bar No.: 24133178 

Angela Peterson

State Bar No.: 24137111 

Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing, PLLC 

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2500 

Houston, Texas 77010 

(713) 655-1101 

jmcmanis@azalaw.com

cphillips@azalaw.com

cdeng@azalaw.com

apeterson@azalaw.com 

Andrea L. Fair 

State Bar No.: 24078488 

Ward, Smith, & Hill, PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Parkway 

Longview, Texas 75604 

(903) 757-6400 

(903) 757-2323 (fax) 

andrea@wsfirm.com

Attorneys for Autoscribe Corporation

/s/ David H. Harper (with permission) 

David H. Harper (Lead Counsel) 

Texas Bar No. 09025540 

david.harper@haynesboone.com 

Stephanie N. Sivinski 

Texas Bar No. 24075080 

stephanie.sivinski@haynesboone.com 

Marron E. Frith 

TX Bar No. 24137884 

marron.frith@haynesboone.com 

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 

2801 N. Harwood Street 

Suite 2300 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

(214) 651-5000 (telephone) 

(214) 200-0615 (fax) 

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 79 Filed 05/30/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2438
3

Counsel for Repay Holdings

Corporation, et al. 

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 79 Filed 05/30/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2439
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on May 30, 2024, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF System. A true and correct 

of this document is also being served to all counsel of record via electronic mail. 

/s/ Jason McManis 

Jason McManis

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

On May 30, 2024, counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants met and conferred 

pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h). The parties are in agreement and are filing this motion jointly. 

/s/ Jason McManis 

Jason McManis

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 79 Filed 05/30/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2440
Exhibit 32.3


Certification of Chief Accounting Officer


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Century  Casinos,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.





     Date:  October 28, 2004

     /s/ Larry Hannappel
     -------------------
     Larry Hannappel
     Chief Accounting Officer
DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC, Petitioner, v. Guillermo ROBLES

No. 18-1539

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Stanley JABOIN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-7080

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
James Tyrell DRANE, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-6699.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Uromed Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivo Heiden, CEO, CFO andChairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ivo Heiden

Ivo Heiden CEO, CFO and ChairmanDated: March 28, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Uromed Corporation and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11.1

CAMERON ASHLEY BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    YEARS ENDED
                                     1998                              1997                                 1996
                     --------------------------------   -------------------------------    ----------------------------------
                      INCOME       SHARES     PER-SHARE   INCOME        SHARES     PER-SHARE    INCOME    SHARES       PER-SHARE
                    (NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR)  AMOUNT   (NUMERATOR)  (DENOMINATOR)  AMOUNT   (NUMERATOR) (DENOMINATOR) AMOUNT
                    ----------- ------------- --------- -----------  ------------- --------- ----------- ------------- ---------
<S>                 <C>            <C>        <C>        <C>             <C>       <C>        <C>          <C>         <C>
BASIC EPS
Income available
to common           $ 15,294       9,250      $ 1.65     $ 11,319        9,195     $ 1.23     $ 11,824     8,879       $ 1.33
                                              ======                               ======                              ======
stockholders

EFFECT OF DILUTIVE
SECURITIES                           251                                   252                               370
                                     ---                                   ---                               ---
DILUTED EPS 
Income available
to common
stockholders
assuming dilution     15,294       9,501        1.61       11,319        9,447     $ 1.20     $ 11,824     9,249         1.28
                    ========       =====      ======     ========        =====     ======     ========     =====       =======
</TABLE>
Roxanne ARI, Petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 19-7179.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Flordeliza A. HAWKINS, Petitioner, v. SUNTRUST BANK, et al.

No. 19-5147

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ANTHONY EVERS 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00101-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Anthony Evers 

GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) 

- Possession with the Intent to Distribute Cocaine.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 31st January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00101-JDK-JDL Document 28 Filed 01/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 82
Exhibit 10.2 Lease Agreement  Aquentium, Inc. agrees to rent eight thousand square feet (8,000) square feet of office and manufacturing space located at 5188 Western Way Perris, CA 92571 from Sani-Dri, Inc.  The building is a commercial office and warehouse consisting of one level. Office space includes: Reception area, two offices.   Term: October 1, 2009  September 20, 2010 Rate: .50 per square foot  Term: October 1, 2010  September 30, 2010 Rate: .60 per square foot  Term: October 1, 2010  May 2011 Rate: .75 per square foot   By: Aquentium, Inc.  /s/ Mark Taggatz Mark Taggatz, President   By: Sani-Dri, Inc.  /s/ Sherry Wilson Sherry Wilson, President
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


 


 


ASSIGNMENT


 


 In consideration for the issuance of 1,777,778
fully paid and assessable restricted shares of common stock of Bearing Mineral Exploration, Inc., a Nevada corporation and other
good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Art Agolli (the “Assignor”) hereby sell,
assign, transfer, and convey to Bearing Mineral Exploration, Inc, a Nevada corporation, (the “Assignee”) all of Assignor’s
right, title, and interest in and to that certain Letter Of Intent between Assignor and Sonoro Energy Ltd., dated April 12, 2012
which is attached hereto and marked "Exhibit A".


 


The Assignor warrants and represents
that said Letter of Intent is in full force and effect and is fully assignable.


 


The Assignee hereby assumes
and agrees to perform all obligation of the Assignor under the Letter of Intent and hereby holds Assignor safe and harmless from
any and all claims, suits or demands by any person relating to said Letter of Intent or this Assignment.


 


DATED:   April 17, 2012.


 


 





	 	 /s/ Art Agolli
	 	Art Agolli (Assignor)
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	BEARING MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.
	 	(Assignee)
	 	 
	 	BY: Art Agolli
	 	Art Agolli, President
Akash DIXIT, petitioner, v. Tanya Singh DIXIT.

No. 18-5197.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
David Lee SMITH, Petitioner v. Rick JACKSON

No. 19-7096

Supreme Court of the United States.

February 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** **

 

I, Roger E. Gower, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Micro Component Technology, Inc.:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation.

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated:  August 11, 2003 | By:                                                    | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                         | Roger E.  Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Dalton BETSINGER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6862.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 9, 2020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.