alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Bradley R. Meredith, certify, that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pointe Financial Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



(c)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 4, 2004

By: /s/ BRADLEYR. MEREDITH

Bradley R. Meredith, Chief Financial Officer

and Senior Vice President
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/21/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      434,988
COMMITMENTS
 111,468  165,081  102,887  190,465  131,767  404,820  399,735   30,168   35,253

CHANGES FROM 05/14/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     14,945)
    -525   -3,339    6,730    5,555    8,426   11,760   11,817    3,185    3,128

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.6     38.0     23.7     43.8     30.3     93.1     91.9      6.9      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      57       80       82       35       36      141      161
```

----

Updated May 24, 2013
Exhibit 21.1





SOLITARIO RESOURCES CORPORATION

Schedule of Subsidiaries

December 31, 2007

Solitario Resources Corporation [Colorado]
Subsidiaries-[jurisdiction] - percentage owned
- Altoro Gold Corp. [British Columbia, Canada] - 100%
      - Altoro Gold (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%
            - Minera Altoro (BVI) Ltd. [British Virgin Islands]- 100%
            - Minera Andes (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] -100%
                  - Compania Minera Andes del Sur S.A. [Bolivia] - 100%
            - Minera Altoro Brazil (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%
                  - Altoro Mineracao, Ltda. [Brazil] - 100%
- Pedra Branca do Mineracao, Ltda. [Brazil] -85% owned
- Minera Solitario Peru, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Minera Bongara, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Minera Soloco, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Mineracao Solitario Brazil, Ltd [Brazil]- 100%
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Under Section 319 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825q-1, the primary mission of the Commission's Office of Public Participation (“OPP”) is to coordinate assistance to the public with respect to authorities exercised by the Commission. The Director shall also coordinate assistance available to persons intervening or participating or proposing to intervene or participate in proceedings before the Commission.

                    In furtherance of this mission, each employee of the Office of Public Participation (OPP) is being designated as a non-decisional employee of the                           ( print page 32013)                        Commission effective on the day of this notice. As such, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2021), no OPP employee shall participate or advise as to the findings, conclusion or decision of the Commission in a proceeding covered by such rule. OPP staff will not be involved in such Commission decisional processes and will not advocate positions or conduct investigations for the Commission.                

                    Given the non-decisional status of each OPP employee as stated herein, communications between employees of OPP and parties or members of the public as to the merits of a contested on-the-record proceeding will not constitute                     *ex parte*                     communications, 18 CFR 385.2201 (2021). However, no OPP employee may share the contents of such communications with any decisional employee of the Commission, unless an established regulatory exception applies.                

This designation will remain in effect until withdrawn or modified by a subsequent notice.

Dated: May 20, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11331 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,200
<INVENTORY>                                     90,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,100
<PP&E>                                         132,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 380,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,900
<BONDS>                                        173,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   380,700
<SALES>                                        381,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               381,200
<CGS>                                          269,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  269,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.33


</TABLE>
Carlin ROBINSON, Individually, as Guardian and Next Friend of I. Y., M. Y., and A. Y., and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Veronica Williams, Deceased, et al., Petitioners, v. Daniel A. LIOI, et al.

No. 19-800

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                Exhibit 24.5


STATE OF    NEW YORK
          ----------------

COUNTY OF   QUEENS
          ----------------

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, David F. Bellet, a Director of JUST
FOR FEET, INC.,an Alabama corporation, do constitute and appoint Harold
Ruttenberg and Eric L. Tyra, jointly and severally, my true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
me in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for JUST
FOR FEET, INC. for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and to file such document
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, together with all exhibits thereto
and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my
stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report,
incorporating such changes as any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems
appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-
fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 22nd day of
April 1998.


                             /s/ David F. Bellet
                             --------------------
                             David F. Bellet



                                ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                --------------

    BEFORE me this 22nd day of April 1998, came David F. Bellet, personally
known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power
of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.

                                      Maria Donaldson
                             ---------------------------------
                             NOTARY PUBLIC


                             State of     New York
                                      ------------------------

                             My Commission Expires:
                                         7/25/98
                             ---------------------------------
Alan BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Susanna C. PINEDA, Judge, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 18-5720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA - 24 - 0108
PROTECT THE GALLATIN RIVER ,

Plaintiff/Appellant, v. GALLATIN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, GALLATIN COUNTY COMMISSION, AND JEFF AND JIRINA PFEIEL , Defendants/Appellees. **ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S**  **UNOPPOSED MOTION**  **FOR EXTENSION**  **OF TIME TO FILE**  **OPENING BRIEF**

Upon motion of P la intiff/Appellant, and good cause appearing, IT IS HERE BY ORDERED: The P la intiff/A ppellant will have up to and including May 8th, 2024 to file their opening brief in this matter. D AT ED THIS

____ DAY OF M ARCH , 202 4 .

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 21 2024

03/21/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0108
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2057

To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the chilling

effect on the constitutionally protected expression of religion by State

and local officials that results from the threat that potential litigants

may seek damages and attorney’s fees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. HOSTETTLER (for himself, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland,

Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. PICKERING, and Mr. TANCREDO) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to

eliminate the chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of religion by State and local officials

that results from the threat that potential litigants may

seek damages and attorney’s fees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Expression of

5 Religion Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2057 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN LAWSUITS AGAINST

2 STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS.

3 (a) CIVIL ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS.—

4 Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

5 (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence;

7 and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(b) The remedies with respect to a claim under this

10 section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a

11 prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment

12 of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.’’.

13 (b) ATTORNEYS FEES.—Section 722(b) of the Re14 vised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1988(b))

15 is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘However,

16 no fees shall be awarded under this subsection with re17 spect to a claim described in subsection (b) of section nine18 teen hundred and seventy nine.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
31.1
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Erwin
Haitzmann, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Century Casinos,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date: May
27, 2005
 
 
 /s/ Erwin
Haitzmann
 ________________________________
 Erwin
Haitzmann
 Chairman
and Co - Chief Executive Officer
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, petitioner, v. MEXICHEM FLUOR, INC., et al.

No. 18-2.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2007**

*Base Salaries*

The base salaries for 2007 for the executive officers (the "named executive officers") of Southern Missouri
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") also is a director of Southern Missouri Bank & Trust (the "Bank") who will be named
in the compensation table that will appear in the Company's upcoming 2007 annual meeting proxy statement are as
follows:

|Name and Title                                      | Base Salary
|--------------------------------------------------- | -----------
|Greg Steffens
President and Chief Financial Officer | $180,608   
|                                                   
|William Hribovsek
Chief Lending Officer             | $134,844   

*Description of 2007 Bonus Arrangement*

The Company has no formal written incentive bonus plan. The amount of bonus award is determined by the
Compensation Committee and can vary based on various factors, including Company performance.

Additional information about the 2007 bonus compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the
Company's definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in October 2007, except for
information contained under the headings "Compensation Committee Report," and "Report of the Audit Committee,"
a copy of which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ENSLEY LEON NEAL (20)

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00014

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Ensley Leon Neal

GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) -

Conspiracy to Engage in Monetary Transactions with Criminally Derived Property (Money 

Laundering).

Case 4:23-cr-00014-SDJ-AGD Document 536 Filed 03/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1772
In Re Samuel H. WILLIAMS, petitioner.

No. 18-5952.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Dominion Homes, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-26817 and 333-40051) of our
report dated February 2, 1998, on our audits of the financial statements of
Dominion Homes, Inc. as of December 31, 1997, and 1996 and for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K.


                                             Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Columbus, Ohio
March 30, 1998
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-84

'

LARRY DARNELL ROBERTS, JR., '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Larry Darnell Roberts, Jr., is 

Case 1:23-cr-00084-MAC-ZJH Document 37 Filed 04/17/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 99
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense Methamphetamine (Actual).

Signed this date

Apr 17, 2024

Case 1:23-cr-00084-MAC-ZJH Document 37 Filed 04/17/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 100