alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/07/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      556,810
COMMITMENTS
 110,218   35,194  134,329  294,310  368,261  538,857  537,784   17,953   19,026

CHANGES FROM 04/30/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,123)
     438    1,153   -8,504      161     -184   -7,905   -7,535    1,782    1,412

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.8      6.3     24.1     52.9     66.1     96.8     96.6      3.2      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      45       40       66       57       61      134      140
```

----

Updated May 10, 2013
<PAGE>   1
                                                               Exhibit 23.1







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-4520, 33-4520-01) and Form S-8 (No. 33-34295) of
RACI Holdings, Inc., and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 5, 2001 relating
to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2000. We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in
such Registration Statement.




Greensboro, North Carolina
March 23, 2001
EXHIBIT 13

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 212
Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 2 

Source: https://www.att.com/features/wifi-calling/ 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 3 

Source: https://www.att.com/support/article/wireless/KM1114459?gsi

See also 16[a]-16[c] below. 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 4 

16[a] a shared component; The AT&T system includes a shared component, for example, at least 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description, Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GSOfficial Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description. 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 5 

Source: VoLTE Service Description and Implementation Guidelines VOctober 2014 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 6 

16[b] a first environment access module that communicates with the shared component to enable access to a first network using a first wireless access technology; and 

The AT&T system includes a first environment access module, for exaMME, that communicates with the shared component to enable access using a first wireless access technology (such as cellular access). 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description, Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GS

Official Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description. 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 7 

Source: VoLTE Service Description and Implementation Guidelines VOctober 2014 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 8 

16[c] a second environment access module that communicates with the shared component to enable access to a second network using a second wireless access technology that differs from the first wireless access technology. 

The AT&T system includes a second environment access module, for 3GPP AAA Server, that communicates with the shared component to 

second network using a second wireless access technology (such as Wthe first wireless access technology (such as cellular). 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description, Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - GS

Official Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description. 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 
Page 9 

Source: VoWiFi Service Description _Version 1.0, 03 March 2015 - G

Official Document V2020.02 - VoWiFi Service Description 

Case 2:23-cv-00443-JRG Document 1-14 Filed 09/27/23 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

CHRISTIAN BLANCHARD, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-375-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Christian Blanchard, proceeding pro se and seeking in forma pauperis

status, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love for findings of fact, 

conclusions of law, and recommendations for disposition. 

On October 3, 2023, Judge Love issued a Report recommending that the Court 

dismiss this case with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Docket No. 11. A 

copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff. However, no objections have been received. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

Case 6:23-cv-00375-JDK-JDL Document 12 Filed 11/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 32
2 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews the legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 11) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6th November, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00375-JDK-JDL Document 12 Filed 11/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 33
Robert Wayne ANNABEL, II, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 18-5695.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          38,786
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                       581
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,296,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,279,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,157,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    126,013
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     823,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,279,267
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,191
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,914
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,587
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC §

§

V. § 2 :23-CV-423-JRG-RSP

§ (Lead Case)

THE HOME DEPOT, INC. ET AL §

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC §

§

V. § 2:23-CV-418-JRG-RSP

§ (Member Case)

WALMART INC., ET AL §

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL 

OF DERON R. DACUS AS COUNSEL 

The Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel filed by 

Plaintiff Ravenwhite Licensing LLC hereby grants the motion.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Deron R. Dacus is WITHDRAWN as counsel for 

Plaintiff Ravenwhite Licensing LLC in the above-captioned civil action.

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 57-1 Filed 05/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 486
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

CHRISTIAN SALVADOR TURCIOS, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0142 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2012-101308-001

The Honorable Kerstin G. LeMaire, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Krista Wood

Counsel for Respondent

Christian Salvador Turcios, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 10-25-2022
STATE v. TURCIOS

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma, Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, and Vice 

Chief Judge David B. Gass delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Christian Salvador Turcios seeks review of the 

superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Turcios’

second petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or legal error, this court will not 

disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. See 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). Petitioner has the burden to 

show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for postconviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 This court has reviewed the record in this matter, the order 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief and the petition for review. 

This court finds the petitioner has not established error. 

¶4 This court grants review but denies relief.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-88518, No. 33-88520, No. 333-53741 and
No. 333-53743) of Rouge Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2000,
except as to the subsequent events described in Note 12 which is as of March 1,
2000, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 17, 2000
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-76

'

KENNETH WAYNE BIRDSONG, JR., '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Zack Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea. The court ORDERS the 

Defendant’s attorney to read and discuss the presentence report with the Defendant and file any 

objections to the report BEFORE the date of the sentencing hearing. 

Case 1:23-cr-00076-MAC-CLS Document 20 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 46
2

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Kenneth Wayne Birdsong, Jr., 

is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

Case 1:23-cr-00076-MAC-CLS Document 20 Filed 12/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 47
Faisal AMIN, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 18-5860.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Donald A. Kurz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMAK Worldwide,Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information related to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;
b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.              /s/ Donald A. Kurz   Donald A. Kurz   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)   
Dated: November 15, 2004
35
William J. O'BRIEN, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Nehemiah William FORD, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7320.

Supreme Court of the United States

July 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ROBERT D. HINSON §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-365

KIM KING, ET AL. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Robert D. Hinson, a prisoner confined at the Jefferson CountyCorrectional Facility,

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Kim King, Correctional Health, and the Jefferson County Correctional Facility.

The Court referred thismatterto theHonorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court.

On June 13, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without prejudice for

want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not

filed objections to the report and recommendation.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 1:23-cv-00365-MJT-CLS Document 25 Filed 07/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 60
ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the report of the magistrate judge [Dkt. 21] is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in

accordance with this memorandum order.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 30th day of July, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00365-MJT-CLS Document 25 Filed 07/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 61
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RAVENWHITE LICENSING LLC,

Plaintiff

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00423-JRG-RSP

v.

THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and HOME 

DEPOT USA, INC.,

Defendants.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), Plaintiff RavenWhite Licensing, 

LLC hereby files this notice of dismissal and dismisses without prejudice all claims against 

Defendants The Home Depot, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc. Dismissal is proper pursuant to 

Rule 41(a)(1)(A) because Defendants have not yet answered or filed a motion for summary 

judgment. This dismissal without prejudice is conditionless and each party shall bear its own 

costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses.

August 21, 2024 /s/ Andrea L. Fair

Robert F. Kramer

CA Bar No. 181706 (Admitted E.D. Texas)

rkramer@krameralberi.com

David Alberti (Admitted E.D. Texas)

CA Bar No. 220265

dalberti@krameralberti.com

Sal Lim (Admitted E.D. Texas)

CA Bar No. 211836

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 74 Filed 08/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

1269
-2-

slim@krameralberi.com

Russell S. Tonkovich

CA Bar No. 233280 (Admitted E.D. Texas)

rtonkovich@krameralberi.com

Robert C. Mattson (pro hac vice to be filed)

VA Bar No. 43586

rmattson@krameralberti.com

KRAMER ALBERTI LIM 

& TONKOVICH & LLP

577 Airport Blvd., Ste 250

Burlingame, CA 94010

Telephone: 650 825-4300

Facsimile: 650 460-8443

Of Counsel:

Andrea L. Fair

Texas Bar No. 24078488

andrea@wsfirm.com

WARD, SMITH & HILL PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Pkwy

Longview, Texas 75604

Telephone: (903) 757-6400

Facsimile: (903) 757-2323

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Ravenwhite Licensing, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). Therefore, this document was served on all counsel who 

are deemed to have consented to electronic service on this 21st day of August 2024.

/s/ Andrea L. Fair

Andrea L. Fair

Case 2:23-cv-00423-JRG-RSP Document 74 Filed 08/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

1270
Alberto Jorge SILVA-IBARRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6867.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Nagy Moustafa, Chief Executive Officer of Diversinet Corp., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diversinet Corp.





/s/ Nagy Moustafa

Name: Nagy Moustafa

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2005



This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Albert Wahbe, Chief Executive Officer of Diversinet Corp., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Diversinet Corp.





/s/ Albert Wahbe

Name: Albert Wahbe

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

March 2, 2009



This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Manuel LAMPON-PAZ, petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.

No. 18-6609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.