34206 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

straw, group 16 at 0.01 ppm; herb group 

25 at 0.01 ppm; rapeseed subgroup 20A 

at 0.01 ppm; spice group 26 at 0.01 

ppm; vegetable, Brassica, head and 

stem, group 5–16 at 0.01 ppm; 

vegetable, bulb, group 3–07 at 0.01 ppm; 

vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 at 0.01 

ppm; vegetable, foliage of legume, group 

7 at 0.01 ppm; vegetable, fruiting, group 

8–10 at 0.01 ppm; vegetable, leafy, 

group 4–16 at 0.01 ppm; vegetable, 

leaves of root and tuber, group 2 at 0.01 

ppm; vegetable, legume, group 6 at 0.01 

ppm; vegetable, stalk, stem, and leaf 

petiole group 22 at 0.01 ppm; vegetable, 

root, subgroup 1A at 0.01 ppm; and 

vegetable, tuberous and corm, except 

potato, subgroup 1D at 0.01 ppm. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action establishes tolerances 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this action 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This action does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or Tribal Governments, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States or Tribal 

Governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 

determined that Executive Order 13132, 

entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 

13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 

9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In 

addition, this action does not impose 

any enforceable duty or contain any 

unfunded mandate as described under 

Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et 

seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: May 25, 2022. 

Marietta Echeverria, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR 

chapter I as follows: 

PART 180—TOLERANCES AND 

EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE 

CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.718, revise Table 1 to 

Paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

§ 180.718 Picarbutrazox; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) * * * 

TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a) 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

Cotton, gin byproducts ......... 0.01 

Cotton, undelinted seed ....... 0.01 

Grain, cereal, except rice, 

group 15 ............................ 0.01 

Grain, cereal, forage, fodder, 

and straw, group 16 .......... 0.01 

Herb group 25 ...................... 0.01 

Rapeseed subgroup 20A ...... 0.01 

Spice group 26 ..................... 0.01 

Vegetable, Brassica, head 

and stem, group 5–16 ....... 0.01 

Vegetable, bulb, group 3–07 0.01 

Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 0.01 

Vegetable, foliage of legume, 

group 7 .............................. 0.01 

Vegetable, fruiting, group 8– 

10 ...................................... 0.01 

Vegetable, leafy, group 4–16 0.01 

Vegetable, leaves of root 

and tuber, group 2 ............ 0.01 

Vegetable, legume, group 6 0.01 

Vegetable, stalk, stem, and 

leaf petiole group 22 ......... 0.01 

Vegetable, root, subgroup 1A 0.01 

Vegetable, tuberous and 

corm, except potato, subgroup 1D ........................... 0.01 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–11993 Filed 6–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0434; FRL–9636–01– 

OCSPP] 

Teflubenzuron; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of the insecticide 

teflubenzuron in or on grape and grape, 

raisin. There is no U.S. registration 

associated with these tolerances. BASF 

Corporation requested these tolerances 

under the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective June 

6, 2022. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

August 5, 2022 and must be filed in 

accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 34207 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0434, is 

available at https://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room and the OPP 

Docket is (202) 566–1744. 

Please review the visitor instructions 

and additional information about the 

docket available at https://www.epa.gov/ 

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director, 

Registration Division (7505T), Office of 

Pesticide Programs, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; 

main telephone number: (202) 566– 

1030; email address: RDFRNotices@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Office of the Federal Register’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/ 

current/title-40. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2021–0434 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing and must be received 

by the Hearing Clerk on or before 

August 5, 2022. Addresses for mail and 

hand delivery of objections and hearing 

requests are provided in 40 CFR 

178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2021–0434, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Do not submit electronically 

any information you consider to be CBI 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at https://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at https:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Tolerance 

In the Federal Register of August 24, 

2021 (86 FR 47275) (FRL–8792–02), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 

346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a 

pesticide petition (PP 0E8874) by BASF 

Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research 

Triangle Park, NC 27709. The petition 

requested that 40 CFR 180.687 be 

amended by establishing tolerances for 

residues of the insecticide 

teflubenzuron, (N-[[(3,5-dichloro-2,4- 

difluorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2,6- 

difluorobenzamide), in or on grape at 

0.7 parts per million (ppm) and grape, 

raisin at 0.9 ppm. That document 

referenced a summary of the petition 

prepared by BASF Corporation, which 

is available in docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2021–0434 in https://

www.regulations.gov. No substantive 

public comments were received in 

response to the notice of filing. 

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and 

Determination of Safety 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and in 

residential settings but does not include 

occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue. . . .’’ 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified 

therein, EPA has reviewed the available 

scientific data and other relevant 

information in support of this action. 

EPA has sufficient data to assess the 

hazards of and to make a determination 

on aggregate exposure for teflubenzuron 

including exposure resulting from the 

tolerances established by this action. 

EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks 

associated with teflubenzuron follows. 

In an effort to streamline its 

publications in the Federal Register, 

EPA is not reprinting sections that 

repeat what has been previously 

published for tolerance rulemakings of 

the same pesticide chemical. Where 

scientific information concerning a 

particular chemical remains unchanged, 

the content of those sections would not 

vary between tolerance rulemakings, 

and EPA considers referral back to those 

sections as sufficient to provide an 

explanation of the information EPA 

considered in making its safety 

determination for the new rulemaking. 

EPA has previously published 

tolerance rulemakings for teflubenzuron 

in which EPA concluded, based on the 

available information, that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm would 

result from aggregate exposure to 

teflubenzuron and established 

tolerances for residues of that chemical. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
34208 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA is incorporating previously 

published sections from those 

rulemakings as described further in this 

rulemaking, as they remain unchanged. 

Toxicological Profile. For a discussion 

of the Toxicological Profile of 

teflubenzuron, see Unit III.A of the 

teflubenzuron tolerance rulemaking 

published in the Federal Register of 

October 30, 2015 (80 FR 66805) (FRL– 

9933–25). 

Toxicological Points of Departure/ 

Levels of Concern. For a discussion of 

the Toxicological Points of Departure/ 

Levels of Concern used for the safety 

assessment of teflubenzuron, see Unit 

III.B of the October 30, 2015, 

rulemaking. 

Exposure Assessment. Much of the 

exposure assessment for teflubenzuron 

remains unchanged from the discussion 

in Unit III.C of the October 30, 2015, 

rulemaking, except as described below. 

The current exposure assessment 

incorporates the additional dietary 

exposure from this petitioned-for 

tolerances. Because this action 

establishes tolerances for residues of 

teflubenzuron in or on imported 

commodities for which there are no 

associated U.S. registrations, dietary 

exposure (food only) is the only 

anticipated exposure pathway. There 

are no domestic agricultural or 

residential uses registered or proposed 

for teflubenzuron that would result in 

drinking water or residential exposures. 

This tolerance petition does not warrant 

an occupational handler exposure 

assessment because the petition is for 

import tolerances without a U.S. 

registration. There are no short- or 

intermediate-term exposures from the 

use of teflubenzuron. An acute risk 

assessment was not performed because 

there were no toxicological effects 

attributable to a single dose identified. 

The unrefined chronic dietary (food 

only) exposure estimates represent the 

aggregate exposure assessment and 

assumed that teflubenzuron residues are 

present in all commodities at tolerance 

levels and that 100% of all crops are 

treated. Empirical processing factors of 

0.08 for apple juice and 0.04 for orange 

juice were incorporated into the dietary 

exposure model and the Agency’s 2018 

default processing factors were used to 

estimate residues in other processed 

commodities. The Agency’s approach 

for assessing these factors is discussed 

in detail in the document titled 

‘‘Chronic Dietary (Food Only) Exposure 

and Risk Assessment for the Proposed 

Tolerances Without a U.S. Registration 

for Residues in/on Grapes.’’ in docket ID 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0434. 

Safety Factor for Infants and 

Children. EPA continues to conclude 

that there is reliable data showing that 

the safety of infants and children would 

be adequately protected if the Food 

Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety 

factor were reduced from 10X to 1X. 

The reasons for that decision are 

articulated in Unit III.D of the October 

30, 2015, rulemaking. 

Aggregate Risks and Determination of 

Safety. EPA determines whether acute 

and chronic dietary pesticide exposures 

are safe by comparing aggregate 

exposure estimates to the acute 

population-adjusted dose (aPAD) and 

chronic population-adjusted dose PAD 

(cPAD). Short-, intermediate-, and 

chronic-term risks are evaluated by 

comparing the estimated aggregate food, 

water, and residential exposure to the 

appropriate points of departure (PODs) 

to ensure that an adequate margin of 

exposure (MOE) exists. 

An endpoint of concern attributable to 

a single dose was not identified; 

therefore, an acute dietary assessment 

was not performed. Chronic dietary 

risks are below the Agency’s level of 

concern of 100% of the cPAD for the 

U.S. general population and all 

population subgroups. The most highly 

exposed population subgroup is 

children 1–2 years old with an 

estimated risk of 48% of the cPAD. 

In accordance with the EPA’s ‘‘Final 

Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk 

Assessment’’ (March 2005), the Cancer 

Assessment Review Committee (CARC) 

classified teflubenzuron as ‘‘Suggestive 

Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential’’ 

based on the presence of rare liver 

tumors in male mice only. The Agency 

has determined that quantification of 

risk using a non-linear approach (i.e., 

reference dose [RfD]) will adequately 

account for all chronic toxicity, 

including carcinogenicity, that could 

result from exposure to teflubenzuron. 

Therefore, the chronic dietary risks, 

which are not of concern, are 

considered protective of both noncancer and cancer effects. 

Determination of Safety. Therefore, 

based on the risk assessments and 

information described above, EPA 

concludes there is a reasonable certainty 

that no harm will result to the general 

population, or to infants and children, 

from aggregate exposure to 

teflubenzuron residues. More detailed 

information about the Agency’s analysis 

can be found at https://

www.regulations.gov in the document 

titled ‘‘Chronic Dietary (Food Only) 

Exposure and Risk Assessment for the 

Proposed Tolerances Without a U.S. 

Registration for Residues in/on Grapes.’’ 

This document can be found in docket 

ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0434. 

IV. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

An adequate analytical method is 

available to enforce the petitioned-for 

tolerances for residues of teflubenzuron 

in/on crop commodities. Samples were 

analyzed for residues of teflubenzuron 

using a high-performance liquid 

chromatography method with tandem 

mass spectrometry detection (LC/MS/ 

MS), SOP–PA.0250. Acceptable 

concurrent recoveries were reported for 

samples of grape fortified with 

teflubenzuron at 0.01–1.0 ppm, thus 

validating the method. The limit of 

quantitation (LOQ; determined as the 

lowest level of method validation, 

LLMV) was 0.01 ppm. The estimated 

LOD (limit of detection) was 20% of the 

LOQ or 0.002 ppm. 

These methods may be requested 

from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry 

Branch, Environmental Science Center, 

701 Mapes Road, Fort Meade, MD 

20755–5350; telephone number: (410) 

305–2905. email address: 

residuemethods@epa.gov. 

B. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

Codex is a joint United Nations Food 

and Agriculture Organization/World 

Health Organization food standards 

program, and it is recognized as an 

international food safety standardssetting organization in trade agreements 

to which the United States is a party. 

EPA may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

The U.S. tolerance level for grape 

residues established in this action is 

harmonized with Codex. There are no 

established Canadian or Mexican MRLs 

for residues of teflubenzuron on grape. 

Additionally, there are no established 

Codex, Canadian, or Mexican MRLs for 

residues of teflubenzuron on grape, 

raisin. 

C. Revisions to Petitioned-For 

Tolerances 

Based upon the submitted data, no 

revisions to the petitioned-for tolerances 

proposed for residues in/on grape and 

grape, raisin are needed. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 34209 

V. Conclusion 

Therefore, tolerances are established 

for residues of the insecticide 

teflubenzuron, (N-[[(3,5-dichloro-2,4- 

difluorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2,6- 

difluorobenzamide), in or on grape at 

0.7 ppm; and grape, raisin, at 0.9 ppm. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action establishes tolerances 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this action 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This action does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerances in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or tribal governments, on the 

relationship between the National 

Government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999), and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply 

to this action. In addition, this action 

does not impose any enforceable duty or 

contain any unfunded mandate as 

described under Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: May 24, 2022. 

Marietta Echeverria, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the 

preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR 

chapter I as follows: 

PART 180—TOLERANCES AND 

EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE 

CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.687: 

■ a. Amend paragraph (a)(1) by: 

■ i. Adding a table heading; 

■ ii. Adding the commodities ‘‘Grape’’ 

and ‘‘Grape, raisin’’ to the table in 

alphabetical order; and 

■ iii. Revising footnote 1. 

■ b. Add a reserved paragraph (a)(2). 

■ c. Remove and reserve paragraphs (b), 

(c), and (d). 

The additions and revision read as 

follows: 

§ 180.687 Teflubenzuron; tolerances for 

residues. 

(a) * * * 

(1) * * * 

TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(1) 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

* * * * * 

Grape 1 .................................. 0.7 

Grape, raisin 1 ....................... 0.9 

* * * * * 

1Tolerance without U.S. registration. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–11558 Filed 6–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 1 

[MD Docket 20–270; FR ID 87861] 

Schedule of Application Fees of the 

Commission’s Rules; Amendment 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Correcting amendment. 

SUMMARY: With this amendment, the 

Federal Communications Commission 

(Commission) amends its rules to 

correct an inadvertent error in the 

Application Fee Report and Order, 

published in the Federal Register on 

March 19, 2021. 

DATES: Effective July 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Roland Helvajian, Office of the 

Managing Director at (202) 418–0444. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 29, 2020, the Commission 

released the Application Fee Report and 

Order, and published a final rule in the 

Federal Register on March 19, 2021, at 

86 FR 15026. The Application Fee 

Report and Order, among other things, 

erroneously omitted the fee for earth 

station applications for special 

temporary authority (STA). 

Subsequently, on October 25, 2021, the 

Commission released an Erratum, FCC– 

21–110, which among other things, 

corrected this omission by making 

changes to the Application Fee Report 

and Order, including revising the 

Commission’s rules, specifically 47 CFR 

1.1107, to revise the application fee 

schedule table to incorporate the fee for 

earth station applications for special 

temporary authority, and by revising the 

wording in specific instances from 

‘‘transaction’’ to ‘‘application.’’ In this 

document, the Commission amends the 

following: 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1