alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 6:23-cv-00360

Donnel J. Shelton,

Plaintiff,

v.

Craig Shelton, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER 

Plaintiff Donnel Shelton, a pretrial detainee confined at the 

Van Zandt County Jail, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit 

complaining of alleged violations of his rights pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love. On August 18, 2023, the magistrate judge 

issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s claims against 

defendant Tonda Curry be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 8. Plaintiff filed objections to the 

report and recommendation and an amended complaint. Docs. 15, 

16. 

The court reviews the objected-to portions of a report and 

recommendation de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de 

novo review, the court examines the entire record and makes an 

independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. 

Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). 

Plaintiff’s objections do not allege any specific facts to show that 

Van Zandt County prosecutor Tonda Curry acted outside of the 

scope of her prosecutorial duties. Having reviewed the record, the 

court agrees that plaintiff has not overcome the absolute immunity 

that attaches to prosecutors acting within the scope of their duties. 

Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 420–24 (1976). 

Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are without merit. The 

report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 8) is

Case 6:23-cv-00360-JCB-JDL Document 18 Filed 09/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 103
- 2 -

accepted. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Tonda Curry are

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). 

So ordered by the court on September 29, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00360-JCB-JDL Document 18 Filed 09/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 104
Robert J. KULICK, petitioner, v. LEISURE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC.

No. 18-6743.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
TERMINATION  AGREEMENT,   dated  as  of  September  30,  1999,  between
         Hospitality  Worldwide  Services,  Inc.,  a New York  corporation  (the
         "Company"), and Robert Berman (the "Executive")

         The  company  and the  Executive  are  parties  to  certain  Employment
Agreement,  dated January 1, 1998,  between the Company and the  Executive  (the
"Employment Agreement").

         The parties hereby agree as follows:

         1. Effective immediately,  the Employment Agreement shall terminate and
shall be of no  further  force or  effect  for  Section  9, 10, 11 and 12 of the
Employment  Agreement that shall survive its  termination,  and the Executive is
hereby  released  from any future  obligations  under the  Employment  Agreement
except for Section 9, 10, 11 and 12.

         2. The Executive shall, without compensation, remain in his capacity as
Chairman, with such powers and authority as determined by the Company's Board of
Directors, until his successor is identified.

         3. The Executive hereby acknowledges that the Company has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the Employment Agreement and hereby released and waives
all claims against the Company, its officers, directors and affiliates under the
Employment Agreement.

         4. This  Agreement  shall be governed and construed in accordance  with
the laws of the State of New York without  regard to  principles of conflicts of
laws.

         5. This Agreement  constitutes the entire understandings of the parties
hereto and supersedes all prior agreements or understandings with respect to the
subject matter contained herein.

         6. This  Agreement may be executed in any number of  counterparts,  and
each such counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original  instrument,  but
all such counterparts together shall constitute but one agreement.


<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as
of the date first above.

                                            HOSPITALITY WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.


                                            By /s/ Douglas Parker
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Douglas Parker
                                                 Title:  President



                                            /s/ Robert Berman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert Berman




                                       -2-
Exhibit 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of Baltic
International USA, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2017
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David A. Grossman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

Date:  April 17, 2018

                              /s/ David A. Grossman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              David A. Grossman
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                Chief Financial Officer
Larry HOUSEHOLDER, et al., appellants, v. OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.

No. 19-70

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019

Motion of Stephen M. Shapiro for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Judgment vacated, and cases remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for further consideration in light of *Rucho* v. *Common Cause* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2484, 204 L.Ed.2d 931 (2019).
Jenn-Ching LUO, petitioner, v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 18-529.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

Dated: February 8, 2008

/s/ Stephen T. Wills
  Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

Headwater Research LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco 

Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and 

Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc.,

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00352 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as lead counsel of record for 

Defendants Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and 

Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. (“Defendants” or “Verizon”), and certifies that she is 

authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the abovecaptioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants. 

Katherine Q. Dominguez 

New York Bar No. 4741237 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2490 

Facsimile: (212) 351-6390 

KDominguez@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 09/29/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 467
Dated: September 29, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Katherine Q. Dominguez 

Katherine Q. Dominguez 

New York Bar No. 4741237 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: (212) 351-4000 

Facsimile: (212) 351-4025 

Email: KDominguez@gibsondunn.com 

Counsel Defendants Verizon Communications, 

Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services 

Group Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 09/29/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 468
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on September 29, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Katherine Q. Dominguez 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 23 Filed 09/29/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 469
Cite as 2013 Ark. 442



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No.
IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Opinion Delivered October 31, 2013

PER CURIAM We appoint Judge David Hudson, Sebastian County Judge; Tina Owens, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Emergency Management; Honorable Stephanie Casady, Saline County District Court–Bryant; and Mikki Hastings, Clark County Office of Emergency Management, to the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Security and Emergency Preparedness for three-year terms to expire on September 30, 2016. We thank them for their willingness to serve on this important committee.
CONSENT OF EXPERT



March 30, 2017



Eldorado Gold Corporation



United States Securities and Exchange Commission



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Re: Eldorado Gold Corporation



I, Paul Skayman, do hereby consent to the filing
of:

1. the written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled the “Technical
Report for Kisladag Gold Mine, Turkey”, dated March 15, 2010 and effective January 2010 in the Annual Information Form (the
“AIF”) of Eldorado Gold Corporation (the “Company”) being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 40-F”);
2. the scientific or technical information contained in the AIF for all the properties
described in the AIF and the technical data disclosed in the AIF relating to Kisladag, Efemcukuru, Olympias and Skouries; and
3. except as otherwise noted, all scientific and technical information contained in the
Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December
31, 2016 (the “MD&A”),

and the use of my name in the AIF and in the Form 40-F and any amendments
thereto, and the Company’s MD&A, and any amendments thereto, and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 incorporating
by reference the Company’s AIF, MD&A and Form 40-F.



| | By: | /s/ Paul Skayman         
| | --- | -------------------------
| |     | Paul Skayman, FAusIMM    
| |     | Eldorado Gold Corporation
| |     | Chief Operating Officer  
| |     |
Douglas Walter GREENE, Petitioner, v. INDEPENDENT PILOTS ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-1375.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of QLogic Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
March 28, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ H.K. DESAIH.K. DesaiChief Executive Officer /s/ ANTHONY J. MASSETTIAnthony J. MassettiChief Financial Officer  Dated: June 2, 2004 The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350. It is not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference and regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2189 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2189

  To compensate certain former American hostages held in Lebanon and 
                   certain members of their families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 1999

  Mr. Hunter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To compensate certain former American hostages held in Lebanon and 
                   certain members of their families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Former Hostage Compensation Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of the Congress that the Department of State 
should make a full effort to assist former American hostages, taken as 
victims of international terrorism, in matters of compensation for 
injuries related to their imprisonment.

SEC. 3. COMPENSATION OF VICTIMS OF CERTAIN TERRORIST ACTS.

    Subject to the availability appropriated funds, and subject to such 
conditions as the Secretary of State may prescribe to prevent unjust 
enrichment, the Secretary shall pay, to each plaintiff in the case of 
Cicippio v. Islamic Republic of Iran (Civil Action No. 96-1805(TPJ), 
brought in the United States District Court for the District of 
Columbia) who requests such payment, the following amounts:
            (1) To a former hostage, a sum not to exceed $10,000,000.
            (2) To the spouse of a former hostage, a sum not to exceed 
        $4,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
Ric THOMASON, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-7132

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.03

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-84726, 33-84728, and
333-25981) and Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-86010 on Form S-3 of Paul-Son Gaming Corporation of our report
dated February 15, 2002, except for Note 10 as to which the date is April 23, 2002, which appears in this Form 10-K insofar as such report relates to the
financial statements of The Bud Jones Company, Inc. for the periods ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.

/s/
Bradshaw, Smith & Co., LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 29, 2003

---

QuickLinks
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/15/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      362,200
COMMITMENTS
  70,022  133,636   82,003  188,324  121,934  340,349  337,573   21,851   24,627

CHANGES FROM 10/08/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -14,288)
 -15,247  -23,883   -4,098    8,242   17,419  -11,103  -10,562   -3,185   -3,726

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.3     36.9     22.6     52.0     33.7     94.0     93.2      6.0      6.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      46       63       73       34       38      127      135
```

----

Updated October 30, 2013
From: Randall Garteiser rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

Subject: Re: Today's deadlines in Valve cases

Date: April 19, 2024 at 12:38 PM

To: Machleidt, Dario dmachleidt@ktslaw.com

Cc: Geyer, Kate KGeyer@ktslaw.com, Shaun Hassett shaunhassett@potterminton.com,

Jessica.kaempf.opposing.counsel.gearbox Kaempf jkaempf@fenwick.com, Michael Sacksteder msacksteder@fenwick.com,

Hannah Reid HReid@fenwick.com, Mike Jones mikejones@potterminton.com, Damitio, Chris CDamitio@ktslaw.com

Okay, thanks for following up. Yes, let’s talk at 3 pm Central, 1 pm Pacific. We can use this call-in number.

(903)284-5200,103#,5667#

3 pm Central, 1 pm Pacific

Below was the proposed stipulation I was referring too. I sent it to everyone after our last meet and confer on April 8, 2024.

Revised Draft Joint Stipulation Text for Valve’s Consideration

Whereas, the parties have entered into an Order controlling venue discovery in defendant Valve Corporation cases pending in this

district involving three patent asset management subsidiaries, Symbology, QTI and SPIS;

Whereas, judicial economy is served by the Court ruling on Valve’s Rule 12(b)(3) motion in the first filed case, Symbology v. Valve, as

opposed to all three cases;

Whereas, the parties agree the decision in the Symbology v Valve case on the issued of venue being proper under Rule 12(b)(3) will

be dispositive in all three cases;

Whereas, plaintiff agrees it will not challenge on appeal a decision on the Court’s ruling on Valve’s Rule 12(b)(3) motion;

Whereas, the parties agree to suspend briefing on the motions in QTI and SPIS to avoid escalation of amending complaints under the

general rule in this district that amendments to pleadings should be readily granted to promote resolution on the merits;

Whereas, the parties have agreed to delay setting deposition dates and source code review in the Symbology case until August 1,

2024;

Whereas, the parties have agreed to delay setting depositions dates and source code review in the QTI and SPIS case until October

1, 2024;

Whereas, the parties agree to re-visit this stipulation and proposed order on or about August 1, 2024, if the Court has not ruled on the

Rule 12(b)(3) motion by August 1, 2024;

Whereas, Plaintiff agrees that it will file a response to Valve Corporation’s pending motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) no later

than April 22, 2024, in the leading Symbology Innovations v. Valve Corp. litigation.

Re/ SPIS v. 

Valve -...il 8.eml

On Apr 18, 2024, at 7:58 PM, Machleidt, Dario <dmachleidt@ktslaw.com> wrote:

Randy,

You never responded to Kate’s email. We’re available to meet and confer tomorrow

morning. As we’ve repeatedly said, it’s unclear what you’re proposing.

We do not consider the parties to have met and conferred until we talk.

Sincerely,

Case 2:23-cv-00425-JRG-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 04/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 682
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

RICH MEDIA CLUB LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

DMG MEDIA LIMITED,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00388-JRG

ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant DMG Media 

Limited (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 14). In the Motion, Defendant seeks the dismissal of Plaintiff 

Rich Media Club LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(6). (Id. at 1). Since the filing of the Motion, Plaintiff has filed an Amended 

Complaint. (Dkt. No. 17). 

It is well established that a later-filed amended complaint moots a motion asking the Court 

to dismiss an earlier-filed complaint. See Griffin v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co., 697 F. App’x 793, 797 (5th 

Cir. 2017) (“Once filed, that amended complaint rendered all earlier motions ... moot.”); see also 

Bishop Display Tech LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00139-JRG, Dkt. No. 40 (E.D. 

Tex. Oct. 4, 2021) (“Once Plaintiff filed its amended complaint, the Motion became moot.”); 

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Eaton Corp. PLC, No. 2:19-CV-00290-JRG, 2019 WL 

11250161, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2019) (“Accordingly, the filing of an amended complaint moots 

a motion to dismiss the original complaint.”).

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 20 Filed 03/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 382
2

Accordingly, the Court finds that the Motion (Dkt. No. 14) should be and hereby is

DENIED-AS-MOOT.

So Ordered this

Mar 2, 2024

Case 2:23-cv-00388-JRG Document 20 Filed 03/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 383
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-16183)
amended as of February 11, 1997 and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 33-88518, No. 33-88520, No. 333-53741 and No. 333-53743) of Rouge
Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 1999, except as to the
subsequent event described in Note 11 which is as of March 2, 1999, and the
second paragraph of Note 10 which is as of March 25, 1999, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 1998. We also
consent to the application of such report to the Financial Statement Schedules
for the three years ended December 31, 1998 listed under Item 14(a) of the Rouge
Industries, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended December 31,
1998 when such schedules are read in conjunction with he financial statements
referred to in our report. The audits referred to in such report also included
these schedules.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan
March 31, 1999