alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Collins O. NYABWA, petitioner, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA.

No. 17-8895.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT
31.3
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Larry
Hannappel, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Century Casinos,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date: May
10, 2005
 
 
 ________________________________
 Larry
Hannappel
 Senior
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
Simeon BOZIC, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8505.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1915 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1915

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 7), 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To provide grants to the States to improve the reporting of 
                   unidentified and missing persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Jennifer's Law''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

    The Attorney General is authorized to provide grant awards to 
States to enable States to improve the reporting of unidentified and 
missing persons.

SEC. 3. ELIGIBILITY.

    (a) Application.--To be eligible to receive a grant award under 
this Act, a State shall submit an application at such time and in such 
form as the Attorney General may reasonably require.
    (b) Contents.--Each such application shall include assurances that 
the State shall, to the greatest extent possible--
            (1) report to the National Crime Information Center and 
        when possible, to law enforcement authorities throughout the 
        State regarding every deceased unidentified person, regardless 
        of age, found in the State's jurisdiction;
            (2) enter a complete profile of such unidentified person in 
        compliance with the guidelines established by the Department of 
        Justice for the National Crime Information Center Missing and 
        Unidentified Persons File, including dental records, x-rays, 
        and fingerprints, if available;
            (3) enter the National Crime Information Center number or 
        other appropriate number assigned to the unidentified person on 
        the death certificate of each such unidentified person; and
            (4) retain all such records pertaining to unidentified 
        persons until a person is identified.

SEC. 4. USES OF FUNDS.

    A State that receives a grant award under this Act may use such 
funds received to establish or expand programs developed to improve the 
reporting of unidentified persons in accordance with the assurances 
provided in the application submitted pursuant to section 3(b).

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 Notice is hereby given that Robert Christopher Bunt of Parker Bunt & Ainsworth, PC 

enters his appearance in this matter as additional counsel for Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC. 

 Mr. Bunt may receive all communications from the Court and all parties at Parker Bunt & 

Ainsworth, PC, 100 East Ferguson, Suite 418, Tyler, Texas 75702; Telephone 903-531-3535; 

Email: rcbunt@pbatyler.com. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: October 17, 2023. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Texas State Bar No. 00787165 

PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 

100 E. Ferguson Suite 418 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Tel.: (903) 531-3535 

Marc Fenster 

CA State Bar No. 181067 

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com 

Reza Mirzaie 

CA State Bar No. 246953 

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 50 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1836
2 

Brian Ledahl 

CA State Bar No. 186579 

Email: bledahl@raklaw.com 

Ben Wang 

CA State Bar No. 228712 

Email: bwang@raklaw.com 

Paul Kroeger 

CA State Bar No. 229074 

Email: pkroeger@raklaw.com 

Neil A. Rubin 

CA State Bar No. 250761 

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com 

Kristopher Davis 

CA State Bar No. 329627 

Email: kdavis@raklaw.com 

James S. Tsuei 

CA State Bar No. 285530 

Email: jtsuei@raklaw.com 

Philip Wang 

CA State Bar No. 262239 

Email: pwang@raklaw.com 

Amy Hayden 

CA State Bar No. 287026 

Email: ahayden@raklaw.com 

James Milkey 

CA State Bar No. 281283 

Email: jmilkey@raklaw.com 

Jason M. Wietholter 

CA State Bar No. 337139 

Email: jwietholter@raklaw.com 

Qi Peter Tong 

TX State Bar No. 24119042 

Email: ptong@raklaw.com 

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor 

 Los Angeles, CA 90025 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

Headwater Research LLC 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 50 Filed 10/17/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1837
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on October 17, 2023 and 

has been served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. 

/s/ Robert Christopher Bunt 

Robert Christopher Bunt 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 50 Filed 10/17/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1838
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
   AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DISTRIBUTIONS

         The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the Company (including
subsidiaries and majority-owned partnerships) presents the relationship of the
Company's earnings to its fixed charges. "Earnings" as used in the computation,
is based on the Company's earnings attributable to OP Units from continuing
operations (which includes a charge to income for depreciation and amortization
expense) before income taxes, plus fixed charges. "Fixed charges" is comprised
of (i) interest charges, whether expensed or capitalized, and (ii) amortization
of loan costs and discounts or premiums relating to indebtedness of the Company
and its subsidiaries and majority-owned partnerships, excluding in all cases
items which would be or are eliminated in consolidation.

         The Company's ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges presents the
relationship of the Company's earnings (as defined above) to fixed charges (as
defined above).


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Year Ended December 31
                                              ----------------------
                                   2000       1999      1998     1997      1996
                                  ------     ------    ------   ------    ------
                                             (unaudited, in thousands)
<S>                               <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings:
 Income before distribution to
      Preferred OP Units:         $46,304   $37,435   $32,054   $27,927   $21,953 (1)
 Add fixed charges other than
 capitalized interest              29,651    27,289    23,987    14,423    11,277
                                  -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
                                  $75,955   $64,724   $56,041   $42,350   $33,230
                                  =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Fixed Charges:
 Interest expense                 $29,651   $27,289   $23,987   $14,423   $11,277
 Preferred OP Unit distribution     7,826     3,663     2,505     2,505     1,670
 Capitalized interest               3,148     2,230     1,045       756       380
                                  -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
 Total fixed charges              $40,625   $33,182   $27,537   $17,684   $13,327
                                  =======   =======   =======   =======   =======

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges                      1.87      1.95      2.03      2.39      2.49
                                  =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>


------------------------


(1)  Before Extraordinary Item in 1996
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/02/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      390,364
COMMITMENTS
  69,032  160,918   60,534  236,373  144,015  365,939  365,467   24,425   24,897

CHANGES FROM 09/25/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,238)
  -8,277  -11,587   -1,020    8,850    9,774     -447   -2,833   -2,791     -405

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    17.7     41.2     15.5     60.6     36.9     93.7     93.6      6.3      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      43       62       71       37       41      124      139
```

----

Updated October 5, 2012
No. 6:23-cv-00219

Jay Williams,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. Shine,

Defendant.

ORD ER

Plaintiff Jay Williams, an inmate at the Henderson County Jail

proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged violations of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was referred 

to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On May 12, 

2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this 

case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 3. The magistrate judge further recommended that dismissal of this case should count as a qualifying 

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 

F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff has not objected to the report 

and recommendation but has filed a handwritten coupon (Doc. 4), 

apparently in attempt to pay the filing fee.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation.

The court agrees that plaintiff’s duplicative, frivolous, and 

malicious filings are an abuse of the judicial process. Plaintiff has 

only continued his pattern of practice since the issuance of the 

report and recommendation, filing numerous additional cases 

with the same deficiencies. See Case Nos. 6:23-cv-256, 6:23-cv257, 6:23-cv-258, 6:23-cv-260, 6:23-cv-263, 6:23-cv-298, 6:23-cvCase 6:23-cv-00219-JCB-JDL Document 5 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
- 2 -

300, and 6:23-cv-301. Moreover, as plaintiff has been made aware, 

the filing of a handwritten “coupon” is not an acceptable form of 

payment and does not therefore affect the court’s screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See Case No. 6:23-cv-00258, Doc. 3.

Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The dismissal of this action under 

§ 1915A(b)(1) counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See 

Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 388. Plaintiff is warned that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in forma 

pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated 

or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of 

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). All motions pending in this 

civil action are denied.

So ordered by the court on June 30, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00219-JCB-JDL Document 5 Filed 06/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
Andrew John YELLOWBEAR, Jr., petitioner, v. Robert O. LAMPERT, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections.

No. 18-7044.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                           STATE OF ORGANIZATION                               % OWNERSHIP
------------------                           ---------------------                               -----------

<S>                                          <C>                                                 <C>
Olympia International, Inc.                  U.S. Virgin Islands                                 100%

Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc.                Ohio                                                100%

Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.              Minnesota                                           100%

Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.              Delaware                                            100%

Olympic Steel Receivables LLC                Delaware                                            100% *

Olympic Steel Trading, Inc.                  Ohio                                                100%

Oly Steel Welding, Inc.                      Michigan                                            100%

Olympic Continental Resources, LLC           Ohio                                                 45%**

OLP, LLC                                     Michigan                                             50%***

<FN>
  * Owned 100% by Olympic Steel, Inc. and Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.
 ** Owned 45% by Oylmpic Steel Trading, Inc.
*** Owned 50% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.
</TABLE>




                                 PAGE 84 of 88
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

JONATHAN LAMAR SIMPSON, #380719

VS.

SHERIFF SKINNER, ET AL.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23cv463 

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge (the “Report”) in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 13, 2024, the Report (Dkt. #27) was entered 

containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Sheriff Skinner, 

Officer Wolfe, Officer Scott, Officer Oscar, and Lt. Barnett’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #18) be 

granted and Plaintiff’s lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge also 

recommended that Plaintiff not be given leave to amend and that this dismissal count as a strike 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections

being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge

are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Sheriff Skinner, Officer Wolfe, Officer Scott,

Officer Oscar, and Lt. Barnett’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #18) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s lawsuit 

is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; this dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Case 4:23-cv-00463-ALM-KPJ Document 28 Filed 08/14/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 119
Case 4:23-cv-00463-ALM-KPJ Document 28 Filed 08/14/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 120
David IVY, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 18-6315.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § 

 § 

v. § No. 1:23-CR-39 

 § 

CEBE ISSAC GUILBEAUX § 

MOTION FOR DETENTION HEARING

 COMES NOW the United States and asks this Honorable Court to set the instant 

case for detention hearing under Title 18, United States Code, section 3141, et. seq., and 

would show the Court the following: 

 1. The pending case involves: 

 

 [ ] (A) A crime of violence. 

 

 [ ] (B) An offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or 

death. 

 [X] (C) An offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years 

or more is prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act, the 

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act or Title 21, United 

States Code, section 955(a). 

 [ ] (D) A felony committed after the Defendant had been convicted of two 

or more prior offenses described in Title 18, United States Code, 

section 3142(f)(1)(A)(C) or comparable state or local offenses. 

 [X] (E) A serious risk that the Defendant will flee. 

 [ ] (F) A serious risk that the person will obstruct or attempt to obstruct 

justice, or attempt to threaten, injure or intimidate a prospective 

witness or juror. 

Case 1:23-cr-00039-MJT Document 5 Filed 07/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 10
 [ ] (G) The person was on release pending trial for a felony under State, 

Federal or Local law; or was on probation or parole for an offense 

under State, Federal or Local law. 

 [ ] (H) A felony that involves a minor victim. 

 [X] (I) A felony that involves the possession or use of a firearm or 

 destructive device or any dangerous weapon. 

[ ] (J) A felony that involves the failure to register under Title United 

States Code, Section 2250. 

 2. No condition or combination of conditions will: 

 

 [X] (A) Reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required. 

 

 [X] (B) Reasonably assure the safety of the community or any other person. 

 

 The Government requests that the Defendant be held without bond. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 DAMIEN M. DIGGS 

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

 

 /s/ Jonathan Lee 

 Jonathan Lee 

Assistant U. S. Attorney 

 Eastern District of Texas 

 Kentucky Bar No. 93633 

 550 Fannin St., Suite 1250 

 Beaumont, Texas 77701 

 (409) 981-7950 

 Jonathan.Lee4@usdoj.gov

 

Case 1:23-cr-00039-MJT Document 5 Filed 07/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11
Ruben DELHORNO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1385.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Don KOZICH, petitioner, v. Ann DEIBERT, et al.

No. 18-6529.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      147,096
COMMITMENTS
  37,993   16,239   27,721   62,869   78,793  128,583  122,753   18,513   24,343

CHANGES FROM 01/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,177)
  -1,669     -705    1,346    3,328    2,649    3,006    3,290      171     -113

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.8     11.0     18.8     42.7     53.6     87.4     83.5     12.6     16.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      163)
      50       27       41       63       60      133      115
```

----

Updated January 13, 2012