alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PetroCorp Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”),we, Gary R. Christopher and Steven R. Berlin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto our knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 

August 8, 2003 

 

/s/ Gary R. Christopher 

 

Gary R. Christopher 

Chief Executive Officer 

August 8, 2003 

 

s/ Steven R. Berlin 

 

Steven R. Berlin 

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 11             Statement RE: Computation of Per Share Earnings




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three months ended                Nine months ended
                                                          June 30                            June 30
                                                  ------------------------         ------------------------
                                                    1997            1996              1997          1996
                                                  ---------       --------         ---------      ---------
                                                            (000's omitted, except per share data)

<S>                                               <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>   
Average shares outstanding                          14,440          12,705           14,344          12,273

Net effect of dilutive stock options                   187             322              133             251
                                                  --------        --------         --------        --------

Totals                                              14,627          13,027           14,477          12,524
                                                  ========        ========         ========        ========

Net income before extraordinary item                 1,887           1,676           17,420          13,419

Extraordinary item, net of taxes                        --           1,696               --           1,696
                                                  --------        --------         --------        --------

Net income (loss)                                 $  1,887        $    (20)        $ 17,420        $ 11,723
                                                  ========        ========         ========        ========

Per share amount before extraordinary item        $   0.13        $   0.13         $   1.20        $   1.07

Extraordinary item, net of taxes                        --        $  (0.13)              --        $  (0.13)
                                                  --------        --------         --------        --------

Per share amount                                  $   0.13        $   0.00         $   1.20        $   0.94
                                                  ========        ========         ========        ========
</TABLE>
Cristial SATTERWHITE, petitioner, v. FRISCH'S RESTAURANT, et al.

No. 17-8847.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Leon ESCOURSE-WESTBROOK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-9211

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *United States* v. *Davis* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2319, 204 L.Ed.2d 757 (2019).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2266 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2266

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase certain 
    payment amounts made to hospitals furnishing services under the 
                           Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1999

 Mrs. Lowey (for herself and Mr. Quinn) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase certain 
    payment amounts made to hospitals furnishing services under the 
                           Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare HEAL (Hospital Emergency 
Assistance Legislation) Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CERTAIN MEDICARE HOSPITAL PAYMENT AMOUNTS.

    (a) Payments for PPS Hospitals.--Section 1886(b)(3)(B)(i) of such 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(i)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subclauses (XV) and (XVI);
            (2) by redesignating subclause (XVII) as subclause (XVI);
            (3) by inserting after subclause (XIV) the following new 
        subclause:
            ``(XV) for each of fiscal years 2000 through 2002, the 
        market basket percentage increase minus 1.0 percentage point 
        for hospitals in all areas, and''.
    (b) Indirect Medical Education.--Section 188(d)(5)(B)(ii) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(ii)) is amended--
            by striking subclauses (III), (IV), and (V) and inserting 
        the following new subclasue:
                    ``(III) on or after October 1, 1998, `c' is equal 
                to 1.6.''.
    (c) Payments for Disproportionate Share Adjustments.--Section 
1886(d)(5)(F)(ix) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(ix)) is 
amended--
            (1) by adding ``and'' at the end of subclause (II); and
            (2) by striking subclauses (III), (IV), (V), and (VI) and 
        inserting the following new subclause:
            ``(III) during fiscal year 2000 and each subsequent fiscal 
        year, such additional payment amount shall be reduced by 0 
        percent.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          34,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,387
<PP&E>                                         280,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,710)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,128
<BONDS>                                        179,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,799
<SALES>                                         62,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,788
<CGS>                                           27,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,435)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM I OF
FORM 10Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,190
<SECURITIES>                                       496
<RECEIVABLES>                                      444
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,204
<PP&E>                                          15,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,459
<BONDS>                                          2,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,657
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,715
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor, 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor, 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOVANT-INTERVENOR ERICSSON INC.’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 58-1 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 436
Before the Court are Movant-Intervenor Ericsson Inc. (“Ericsson”)’s Unopposed Motions 

to Intervene. (Dkt. No. ); (Dkt. No. ); (Dkt. No. ). Ericsson moved to intervene 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b). Having 

considered the Motions, their unopposed nature, and the relevant authorities, the Court finds that 

the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED. Accordingly, Ericsson is permitted to intervene 

in theses actions and is GRANTED LEAVE to file a responsive pleading in intervention on or 

before . 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 58-1 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 437
In Re Joseph C. GARCIA, petitioner.

No. 18-6890 (18A570).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 99.2

                           CONTIMORTGAGE CORPORATION

                           UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM
                           FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS

                           FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
                           TOGETHER WITH AUDITORS' REPORT


                                      -10-
<PAGE>

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors of ContiMortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about ContiMortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers ("USAP") and that ContiMortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity
bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $14,000,000 and $6,000,000
as of December 31, 1998, included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
maintenance of a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about ContiMortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on ContiMortgage Corporation's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that ContiMortgage Corporation complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards and that ContiMortgage
Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $14,000,000 and $6,000,000 as of December 31, 1998, is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
New York, New York
March 12, 1999


                                      -11-
Bobby Kenneth WILLIAMSON, petitioner, v. Jamey LUTHER, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield, et al.

No. 18-6719.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

CARL GREIG §

v. § No. 5:23-CV-00030-JRG-JBB

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 

TEXARKANA

§

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States 

Magistrate Judge J. Boone Baxter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 26, 2024, the 

Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Original Complaint (Docket No. 17) be denied.

No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Thus, any aggrieved 

party is barred from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings and 

recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Court, having reviewed the Report and 

Recommendation, is of the opinion the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are 

correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as 

the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Original 

Complaint (Docket No. 17) is DENIED.

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of February, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00030-JRG-JBB Document 22 Filed 02/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 113
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 198 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 198

   To limit the types of commercial nonpostal services which may be 
              offered by the United States Postal Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Packard, Mr. Cox, Mrs. 
Bono, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Talent, Mr. Stump, 
 and Mr. Calvert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To limit the types of commercial nonpostal services which may be 
              offered by the United States Postal Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Service Core Business Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service is a quasi-government 
        corporation and receives certain benefits and privileges 
        pursuant to that status;
            (2) the United States Postal Service has a statutory 
        monopoly on the delivery of letters;
            (3) economic development should be promoted through small 
        business enhancement; and
            (4) the United States Postal Service has recently entered 
        into direct competition with private companies in the offering 
        of commercial nonpostal services.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ACTIVITIES ALLOWABLE.

    (a) Postal Policy.--Section 101 of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h)(1) The Postal Service may not make available to the public 
any commercial nonpostal service except if or to the extent that such 
service was made available nationwide by the Postal Service to the 
public (whether under the Domestic Mail Manual or otherwise) as of 
January 1, 1994.
    ``(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term `commercial 
nonpostal service' includes such services as volume retail 
photocopying, packaging services (including gift-wrapping services), 
notary public services, and the sale of office supplies.
    ``(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be considered--
            ``(A) to affect any governmental function or services in 
        support of any governmental function; or
            ``(B) to be applicable to the extent contrary to statute or 
        any treaty or international agreement.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect 4 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Victor MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. James ROBERTSON, Acting Warden.

No. 17-8908.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2010 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2010

To provide for the establishment of a National Firearm Injury Reporting 
 System, and for grants to States for the collection of information on 
                   fatal injuries caused by firearms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1999

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the establishment of a National Firearm Injury Reporting 
 System, and for grants to States for the collection of information on 
                   fatal injuries caused by firearms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL FIREARM INJURY REPORTING SYSTEM; 
              GRANTS TO STATES FOR THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION ON 
              FATAL FIREARMS INJURIES.

    (a) Establishment of National Firearm Injury Reporting System.--The 
Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as 
the ``Secretary'') shall establish a National Firearm Injury Reporting 
System, consisting of a central repository of information on all fatal 
injuries caused by firearms in the United States.
    (b) Grants to States.--The Secretary may make grants to States to 
enable each State to collect information on all fatal injuries caused 
by firearms in the State, including any such information collected by 
other sources of such information.
    (c) Regulations.--The Secretary, in consultation with State and 
local officials, shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary 
to carry out this section, including regulations specifying the 
specific kinds of information to be collected pursuant to this section, 
and the procedures to be followed in collecting such information and 
reporting such information to the National Firearm Injury Reporting 
System.
    (d) Advisory Committee.--The Secretary shall establish an advisory 
committee, composed of such members as the Secretary may select, for 
the purpose of providing the Secretary with advice on the appropriate 
standards to apply in the awarding of grants under this section.
    (e) Limitations on Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out 
this section, there are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney 
General not more than $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 through 
2004.
                                 <all>
```
OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE, et al., Petitioners, v. Lisa FLEMING, in Her Official Capacity, et al.

No. 18-1245

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-23689 and Form S-8 No.333-32007) pertaining to the Super Vision International, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of our report dated February 18, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Super Vision International, Inc. which appears in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Gallogly, Fernandez & Riley LLP 

 

Orlando, Florida 

March 28, 2005