Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Notices 32185 

MOKA International Ltd. of Sha Tin, 

New Territories, Hong Kong; and TCL 

Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. of Bac 

Tan Uyen District, Binh Duong 

Province, Vietnam (collectively, ‘‘TCL’’). 

Id. at 66356. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations was not named as a party 

to this investigation. Id. 

The Commission has partially 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to certain patents and patent 

claims. Order No. 25 (Jan. 15, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 1, 

2021); Order No. 34 (Feb. 19, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (March 

15, 2021); Order No. 49 (April 21, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 10, 

2021); Order No. 65 (June 28, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (July 28, 

2021). 

The Commission has also partially 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to certain respondents due to 

settlement agreements. See Order No. 37 

(terminating MediaTek), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (March 12, 2021); Order 

No. 67 (July 16, 2021) (terminating 

RealTek), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Aug. 4, 2021); Order No. 69 

(Aug. 12, 2021) (terminating LG, 

Samsung), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Sept. 15, 2021). 

On April 19, 2022, DivX and TCL 

jointly moved to terminate the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement that resolves the dispute 

between the parties. 

On April 22, 2022, the presiding ALJ 

issued the subject ID (Order No. 76) 

granting the joint motion to terminate 

the investigation based on the 

settlement agreement. The ID finds that, 

pursuant to Commission Rules 

210.21(a)(1), (b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1), 

(b)(1)), DivX and TCL have represented 

that there are no other agreements, 

express or implied, oral or written, 

between them regarding the subject 

matter of this investigation. The ID 

further finds that termination is proper 

because it would not be contrary to the 

public health and welfare, competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, the 

production of like or directly 

competitive conditions in the United 

States, or U.S. consumers. The ID 

further finds that termination is in the 

public interest, and it will conserve 

public and private resources. 

No party filed a petition for review of 

the subject ID. 

On October 4, 2021, former 

respondent RealTek filed a motion for 

sanctions against DivX, pursuant to 

Commission Rules 210.4 and 210.25 (19 

CFR 210.4, 210.25), for alleged 

misrepresentations and misconduct 

during the investigation. DivX filed its 

opposition to RealTek’s motion on 

October 14, 2021. 

On April 22, 2022, the presiding ALJ 

issued Order No. 75, denying RealTek’s 

motion for sanctions. Order No. 75 

(April 22, 2022). 

The Commission has determined not 

to review Order No. 76. This 

investigation is hereby terminated. 

The Commission has set the following 

schedule in connection with Order No. 

75. Any petition for review of Order No. 

75 must be filed by June 1, 2022. 

Responses to a petition for review, if 

any, must be filed by June 8, 2022. 

The Commission voted to approve 

this determination on May 24, 2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determinations is contained in Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 24, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11460 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Barcode Scanners, Scan 

Engines, Mobile Computers with 

Barcode Scanning Functionalities, 

Products Containing the Same, and 

Components Thereof II, DN 3623; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint or complainant’s filing 

pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

For help accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure filed on behalf of 

Honeywell International Inc. and Hand 

Held Products, Inc. on May 23, 2022. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain barcode 

scanners, scan engines, mobile 

computers with barcode scanning 

functionalities, products containing the 

same, and components thereof II. The 

complainant names as respondents: 

Zebra Technologies Corporation of 

Lincolnshire, IL; and Symbol 

Technologies, Inc. of Holtsville. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission issue a limited exclusion 

order, cease and desist orders, and 

impose a bond upon respondents 

alleged infringing articles during the 60- 

day Presidential review period pursuant 

to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondent, other interested 

parties, and members of the public are 

invited to file comments on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should 

address whether issuance of the relief 

specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
32186 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Notices 

1Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: 

https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_

filing_procedures.pdf. 

2All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. 

1Because the Request for Hearing was emailed 

after 5:00 p.m. on January 25, 2022, it was deemed 

filed on January 26, 2022. Order Regarding Request 

for Hearing Attachments and Filing Procedures, at 

1. 

2 In the Request for Hearing email, Respondent’s 

wife represented that she had included her Power 

of Attorney in the form of fourteen file attachments, 

but the ALJ was unable to access the attachments. 

Order Regarding Request for Hearing Attachments 

and Filing Procedures, at 1; see also Request for 

Hearing. 

3The Government’s Notice of Filing of Evidence 

Regarding Proof of Service showed that Respondent 

was not served with the OSC until January 4, 2022, 

thus, Respondent’s Request for Hearing was timely 

filed. Order Granting the Government’s Motion for 

Summary Disposition, and Recommended Rulings, 

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision 

of the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter, 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions on the public 

interest must be filed no later than by 

close of business, eight calendar days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. There 

will be further opportunities for 

comment on the public interest after the 

issuance of any final initial 

determination in this investigation. Any 

written submissions on other issues 

must also be filed by no later than the 

close of business, eight calendar days 

after publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. Complainant may file 

replies to any written submissions no 

later than three calendar days after the 

date on which any initial submissions 

were due. No other submissions will be 

accepted, unless requested by the 

Commission. Any submissions and 

replies filed in response to this Notice 

are limited to five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments. Persons filing 

written submissions must file the 

original document electronically on or 

before the deadlines stated above. 

Submissions should refer to the docket 

number (‘‘Docket No. 3623’’) in a 

prominent place on the cover page and/ 

or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic 

Filing Procedures 1). Please note the 

Secretary’s Office will accept only 

electronic filings during this time. 

Filings must be made through the 

Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS, https://

edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any 

electronic filings will be accepted until 

further notice. Persons with questions 

regarding filing should contact the 

Secretary at EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Any 

person desiring to submit a document to 

the Commission in confidence must 

request confidential treatment. All such 

requests should be directed to the 

Secretary to the Commission and must 

include a full statement of the reasons 

why the Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS.3 This action is taken under 

the authority of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1337), and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 23, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11379 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[Docket No. 22–14] 

Omar Garcia, M.D.; Decision and Order 

On November 4, 2021, the former 

Acting Assistant Administrator, 

Diversion Control Division, Drug 

Enforcement Administration 

(hereinafter, DEA or Government), 

issued an Order to Show Cause 

(hereinafter, OSC) to Omar Garcia, M.D. 

(hereinafter, Respondent) of Ocala, 

Florida. OSC, at 1 and 3. The OSC 

proposed the revocation of 

Respondent’s Certificate of Registration 

No. FG2055158. Id. at 1. It alleged that 

Respondent is ‘‘without authority to 

handle controlled substances in Florida, 

the state in which [he is] registered with 

DEA.’’ Id. at 2 (citing 21 U.S.C. 

824(a)(3)). 

Specifically, the OSC alleged that on 

September 3, 2021, the Florida Board of 

Medicine entered an Order that, 

effective immediately, revoked 

Respondent’s state medical license after 

a finding that he had been convicted of 

six counts of Health Care Fraud and 

excluded for cause from participating in 

the Florida Medicaid program. Id. 

The OSC notified Respondent of the 

right to request a hearing on the 

allegations or to submit a written 

statement, while waiving the right to a 

hearing, the procedures for electing each 

option, and the consequences for failing 

to elect either option. Id. (citing 21 CFR 

1301.43). The OSC also notified 

Respondent of the opportunity to 

submit a corrective action plan. Id. at 3 

(citing 21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)). 

By email dated January 25, 2022,1

Respondent’s wife submitted a Request 

for Hearing on Respondent’s behalf, 

stating that Respondent was in federal 

prison. Request for Hearing dated 

January 25, 2022. The Office of 

Administrative Law Judges put the 

matter on the docket and assigned it to 

Administrative Law Judge Teresa A. 

Wallbaum (hereinafter, the ALJ). On 

January 26, 2022, the ALJ issued an 

Order Regarding Request for Hearing 

Attachments and Filing Procedures 2 as 

well as an Order Directing the 

Government to File Evidence Regarding 

Service of the Order to Show Cause. On 

January 28, 2022, the Respondent’s wife 

filed a copy of her Power of Attorney as 

well as an updated Request for Hearing 

dated January 26, 2022. In the updated 

Request for Hearing, Respondent’s wife 

represented that although Respondent’s 

Florida medical license was revoked, 

his DEA registration had been issued in 

Illinois, not Florida. Request for Hearing 

dated January 26, 2022, at 1. 

Respondent’s wife also noted that 

Respondent holds three other state 

licenses and that his DEA registration 

record was ‘‘impeccable.’’ Id. On 

February 9, 2022, the Government filed 

its Notice of Filing of Evidence 

Regarding Proof of Service.3


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1