alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

AKOUSTIS, INC.

Plaintiff,

vs.

QORVO, INC.

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00180-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL

PLAINTIFFS AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND AKOUSTIS, INC’S

P.R. 4-1 DISCLOSURES

Pursuant to Patent Rule 4-1, Plaintiffs Akoustis Technologies, Inc. and Akoustis, Inc. 

(collectively, “Akoustis”) identifies the following “list of claim terms, phrases, or clauses which 

that party contends should be construed or found indefinite by the Court, and identify any claim 

element which that party contends should be governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(f):” None. 

All terms not identified should be given their plain and ordinary meaning. 

Akoustis reserves the right to address any claim terms that Qorvo believes require 

construction or to amend/supplement its position based on Qorvo’s Patent Rule 4-1 disclosure.

Case 2:23-cv-00180-JRG-RSP Document 78 Filed 03/20/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1672
2 

Dated: March 19, 2024. MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

/s/ John B. Campbell

John B. Campbell 

Texas State Bar No. 24036314 

jcampbell@McKoolSmith.com 

James E. Quigley

Texas State Bar No. 24075810 

jquigley@McKoolSmith.com 

George T. Fishback, Jr. 

Texas State Bar No. 24120823 

gfishback@McKoolSmith.com 

Caroline Burks

Texas State Bar No. 24126000 

cburks@McKoolSmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

303 Colorado Street Suite 2100 

Austin, TX 78701 

Telephone: (512) 692-8700 

Facsimile: (512) 692-8744 

Samuel F. Baxter 

Texas State Bar No. 01938000 

sbaxter@McKoolSmith.com 

Jennifer L. Truelove

Texas State Bar No. 24012906 

jtruelove@McKoolSmith.com 

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

104 East Houston Street, Suite 300 

Marshall, TX 75670 

Telephone: (903) 923-9002 

Facsimile: (903) 923-9099 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

AND AKOUSTIS, INC.

 

Case 2:23-cv-00180-JRG-RSP Document 78 Filed 03/20/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1673
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has 

been served on all counsel of record via email on March 19, 2024. 

/s/ John B. Campbell 

John B. Campbell 

Case 2:23-cv-00180-JRG-RSP Document 78 Filed 03/20/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1674
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC

2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 11/29/2023 /s/ Adam S. Hoffman Adam S. Hoffman CA Bar No. 218740

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

(310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Address

 ahoffman@raklaw.com

T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

 Plaintiff

 v.

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 38 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 299
In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

____________________

No. 16-2475

TERENCE S. CHANCELLOR,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING and JPMORGAN CHASE

BANK, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 14 C 7712 — Sharon Johnson Coleman, Judge.

____________________

SUBMITTED JULY 5, 2017 — DECIDED JULY 19, 2017

____________________

Before POSNER, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff reached an oral agreement to settle a litigation arising out of a home mortgage

loan to him, but the defendants insisted that as part of the

settlement he would have to release any claims he had

against another bank, and also a trust company, neither of

which had been a party to the litigation. Although the district judge agreed with the defendants’ position, it hasn’t

been proved that anyone had told the plaintiff during the
2 No. 16-2475

settlement conference that by agreeing to the settlement he

would also be releasing any claim he might have against the

two nonparties to the litigation. Because there was no evidentiary proceeding, there was no basis for the judge’s deciding that the plaintiff had agreed to release the claims

against the nonparties. The judgment must therefore be vacated and the case remanded for a factual inquiry into the

parties’ disagreement.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA,

INC., AND SPRINT CORP.,

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No: 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Corp. (“Defendants”), and certifies 

that he is authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the 

above-captioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants. 

Josh A. Krevitt 

New York Bar No. 2568228 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2490, Facsimile: (212) 351-6390 

JKrevitt@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 217
Dated: November 2, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Josh A. Krevitt

Josh A. Krevitt 

New York Bar No. 2568228 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2490 

Facsimile: (212) 351-6390 

JKrevitt@gibsondunn.com 

 Counsel for Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 218
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on November 2, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Josh A. Krevitt

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 11/02/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 219
Exhibit 32
 LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
 th
 /s/ Scott C. Petersen

Scott C. PetersenChief Executive Officer/s/ Gary H. Ritondaro

Gary H. RitondaroPrincipal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-04263 and No. 333-05943 on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement No.
333-14149 and No. 333-12577 on Form S-4 of Heartland Wireless Communications,
Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 24, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996, which reports appear in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K
of Heartland Wireless Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries.

As discussed in note 1(d) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for the direct costs and installation fees
related to subscriber installations in 1995.


                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 27, 1997
Order entered November ,2012

In The 

## ifalj iatritt ot txaa at aIlaa

No. 05-12-00196-CR ERIC KEITH SCOTT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No.

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006-85362-2011



### ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On October 11, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the clerk’s and reporter’s records have not been filed. We ADOPT the trial court’s findings that based on counsel’s representations that appellant has not contacted him and has not made arrangements to pay for the record, appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal. We will dispose of the appeal in due course. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT (10)(a) 

Consent of Counsel 







 [Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP] 

April 16, 2012 
 Board of Directors

 Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company 
 Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate Account A 
 4333 Edgewood Road, NE 

Cedar Rapids, IA. 52499-0001 
  

	 	RE:	Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate Account A 

 Merrill Lynch Investor Choice AnnuitySM (Investor Series) 
 File No. 333-118362/811-06459 

Gentlemen: 
 We hereby consent
to the use of our name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the Prospectus contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 16 to the Registration Statement to Form N-4 (File No. 333-118362) of the Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity
Separate Account A filed by Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of
the Securities Act of 1933. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frederick R. Bellamy

		 	Frederick R. Bellamy
Anthony Rayshon BETHEA, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

WILLIAM LOGAN JAMES, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-126

§

POLK COUNTY JAIL, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff William Logan James, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#8) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of December, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00126-MAC-CLS Document 10 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 14
In Re Leigh Jesse QUINTO, petitioner.

No. 18-7097.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```

```

----

Updated October 5, 2012
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. S HA NE J ON B R AA T E N, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 30320 D. C . No . 1 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 0 0 2 - J DS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont ana J a c k D . S ha ns tr om , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B e f o r e : W A R D L A W , C L I F T O N , an dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S ha ne J on B r a a t e n appe a l s f r om the 110- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f orr e c e i ptof

c hi l d pornogr aphy , i n vi ol a t i on of 18 U. S . C . § 2 2 5 2 A( a ) ( 2 ) . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U. S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dwe 

# FI LED SEP 20 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 30320 2 a f f irm . B r a a te n c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f a ile dto e x p la in a d e q u a te lyth e b a s is f o rits s e n te n c e a n dig n o r e dh is p o lic ya r g u m e n ts c h a lle n g in g th e c h ild po rnog raph y G ui del i ne. T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe courtsuff

i ci ent l y e xp l ai ned the re as on s f

or i m po si ng the bel ow -G ui del i nes s ent ence , and thati tconsi dere d B r a a te n ’s a r g u m e n ts . See U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 2-93 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) ; U

ni ted States v. P er ez -P er ez , 51 2 F . 3d 51 4, 51 6 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). B ra at en al so cont ends thathi s s ent ence i s s ub st ant i vel y unrea sonabl e. In l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t anc e s a nd the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f a c to r s , B r a a te n ’s b e lo w - G u id e lin e s s e n te n c e is s ub s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e G a ll v. U ni ted States , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) . A FFI R M ED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          52,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,733,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,818,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        724,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    126,013
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     810,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,818,649
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,417
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

ROBIN LEE DETWILER 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00078-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that the 

Court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the Court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The Court orders that 

the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge 

are adopted. The Court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement 

until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ordered that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Robin Lee Detwiler, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00078-MJT Document 40 Filed 05/20/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 111
2

adjudged guilty as to Count Two of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. '

922(a)(1)(A)—Engaging in the Business of Selling Firearms without a License.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 20th day of May, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00078-MJT Document 40 Filed 05/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 112
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA 

VERIZON WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T 

SERVICES, INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF JOHN D. HAYNES

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, John D. Haynes, enters his 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp. (collectively, “AT&T” or “Defendants”). Defendants respectfully 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 180
2 

request that the court take note of this Notice of Appearance and makes John D. Haynes their

counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies of all communications and other documents filed in the 

above-referenced proceedings that are not filed via ECF should be emailed or faxed to John D. 

Haynes at the address set forth below.

Dated: December 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John D. Haynes

John D. Haynes (GA Bar No. 340599) 

 john.haynes@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777 

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 181
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of December, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification 

of such filing upon Counsel of Record. 

//s/ John D. Haynes

John D. Haynes (GA Bar No. 340599) 

 John.haynes@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., 

AT&T Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 12/01/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 182
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

____________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

InnoMemory, LLC

2:23-cv-337

Micro-Star International Co. Ltd.

Micro-Star International Co. Ltd.

c/o Micro-Star International Co. Ltd.

235 No. 69, LiDe St., Chung-Ho City, Taipei Hsien 235, Taiwan

Rabicoff Law LLC

600 Mamaroneck Ave STE 400, Harrison, NY 10528

7736694590

7/20/23

Case 2:23-cv-00337-RWS-RSP Document 5 Filed 07/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 45
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00337-RWS-RSP Document 5 Filed 07/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 46