alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-15-00169- CV In re Nationwid e Insurance Com pany of Am eric a, Nationw ide Mutual In surance Com pany, Nation wi de Mutual Fir e Insurance Com pany, Nationw ide Lif

e Insurance Com pany, Nation wi de Ge neral Insurance Com pany, Nationw ide P roperty and Casu alty Insu rance C om pany, an d Ronn i B. Poe

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus complain ing of the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss pursuant to a forum-se lection clause . On this rec ord, the Court denies the pe tition for writ of mandamus. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland Filed: Apr il 3, 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff, 

v.

AT&T INC., AT&T SERVICES INC., 

AT&T MOBILITY LLC and AT&T CORP.

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

(Lead)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT AT&T SERVICES, INC.’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. 

(“AT&T Services”) hereby states the following:

1. The following is the owner of AT&T Services: AT&T Inc.

2. AT&T Services is not a publicly traded company.

3. AT&T Inc. has no parent corporation and is itself a publicly held corporation. No 

one person or group owns 10% or more of the stock of AT&T Inc. 

Dated: July 17, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Deron R. Dacus

Deron R. Dacus (TBN 00790553)

ddacus@dacusfirm.com

THE DACUS FIRM, P.C.

821 ESE Loop 323

Suite 430

Tyler, Texas 75701

Telephone: 903.705.1117

Facsimile: 903.581.2543

Counsel for Defendant AT&T Services, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 25 Filed 07/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 886
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on July 17, 2023

pursuant to Local Civil Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service.

/s/ Deron R. Dacus

 Deron R. Dacus

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 25 Filed 07/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 887
Bernard J. BAGDIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6765.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '

'

'

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-8

'

'

'

BEVERLY HURST (3) '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He 

further recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the 

Indictment filed against the Defendant. 

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Beverly Hurst, is 

Case 9:23-cr-00008-MAC-ZJH Document 157 Filed 01/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 562
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 

846 - Conspiracy to Possess with the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine Actual. 

Case 9:23-cr-00008-MAC-ZJH Document 157 Filed 01/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 563
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1952

To suspend temporarily the duty on HIV/AIDS drugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1999

Mr. BECERRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on HIV/AIDS drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new subheading:
2

•HR 1952 IH

‘‘ 9902.32.99 5-[(3,5-

Dichlorophenyl)thio]-4-(1-

methylethyl)-1-

(4-

pyridinylmethyl)-

1H-imidazole-2-

methanol carbamate (CAS No.

178979-85-6)

(provided for in

subheading

2933.39.91) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Agree, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairy presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/S/ RICHARD AGREE
-------------------------------------
Richard Agree
Chief Executive Officer

December 7, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

MARTIN F. VALLE §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv89

MEDICAL DOCTOR, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Martin F. Valle, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 against an unidentified medical doctor and the Lychner State Jail. 

Analysis

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, et. seq., under which this case is brought, does not

contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28

U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curiam, 480 F.2d 805 (5th

Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28

U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside

or in which the claim arose. 

Plaintiff complains of events which occurred at the Lychner State Jail, which is located in

Harris County, Texas. As a result, plaintiff's claims arose in Harris County. In addition, the

individual defendant appears to reside in Harris County. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Harris County

is located in the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Texas. As a result, venue is not proper in this court.

When a case is filed in the wrong district or division, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in

the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been

Case 9:23-cv-00089-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 05/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 13
brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). As the proper venue for this action is the Southern District of Texas,

this matter should be transferred to the Southern District.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the

Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 15th day of May, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00089-MAC-ZJH Document 2 Filed 05/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 14
EXHIBIT 32-A

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company) hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/     Jay W. Freeland
|Jay W. Freeland        
|February 28, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,731
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,755
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     78,080
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          78,080
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            78,080
<LOANS>                                        374,735
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 514,125
<DEPOSITS>                                     331,796
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,002
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,780
<LONG-TERM>                                    131,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,765
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 514,125
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,707
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,753
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,460
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,068
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,392
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      627
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  48
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,280
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,280
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,269
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.14
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,038
<LOANS-PAST>                                       118
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,648
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       84
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,209
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,209


</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/06/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      522,779
COMMITMENTS
  39,253   25,325  110,820  354,464  366,829  504,537  502,974   18,242   19,805

CHANGES FROM 03/30/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,602)
   6,773    1,339    6,112   -4,085       58    8,799    7,508   -2,198     -907

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.5      4.8     21.2     67.8     70.2     96.5     96.2      3.5      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      108)
      27       13       35       58       63      100      100
```

----

Updated April 9, 2010
Exhibit 12.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Cristalerias de Chile S.A. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Cirilo Elton Gonzalez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Cirilo Elton Gonzalez

Cirilo Elton Gonzalez
Chief Executive Officer
Cristalerias de Chile S.A.
Dated: June 26, 2003
Douglas Roy BURNS, petitioner, v. Connie HORTON, Warden.

No. 18-5993.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

d0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

138195

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138195 COA: 276595 Wayne CC: 06-011003-01 DAVID WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Joseph PERRONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
ARIZONA, petitioner, v. Guy James GOODMAN.

No. 18-391.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Motion of Arizona Voice for Crime Victims, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of Michael C. Dorf, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
John WILBORN, petitioner, v. Kelly RYAN, Warden.

No. 18-6861.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT      99.1**

**FARO      TECHNOLOGIES INC. PROPERTIES**

| **No.** |   | **Location**                                                                                         |   | **Sq.                Ft.** |   | **Owned/Leased** |   | **Purposes**                                                                                                 |
|---------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1       |   | 125                Technology Park, Lake Mary, Florida                                               |   | 35,000                     |   | Leased           |   | Headquarters,                manufacturing, research and development, service                                |
| 2       |   | 525                Technology Park, Lake Mary, Florida                                               |   | 8,200                      |   | Leased           |   | Sales                and marketing                                                                           |
| 3       |   | 222                Gale Lane, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania                                           |   | 36,800                     |   | Leased           |   | Manufacturing,                research and development, service                                              |
| 4       |   | Ingersheimer                Str.12, D-70499 Stuttgart-Weilmdorf, Germany                             |   | 19,500                     |   | Leased           |   | European                headquarters, manufacturing, sales, research and development,                service |
| 5       |   | Wiesengasse                20CH-8222                BeringenSwitzerland                              |   | 15,930                     |   | Leased           |   | Manufacturing                                                                                                |
| 6       |   | 1401                Wakabadai Meito-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 465-0015, Japan                                |   | 5,200                      |   | Leased           |   | Sales,                service                                                                                |
| 7       |   | 798                Zhaojiabang Road, Shanghai, China                                                 |   | 11,500                     |   | Leased           |   | Sales,                service                                                                                |
| 8       |   | No.                3 Changi South St 2#01-01                Xilin Districentre Building B, Singapore |   | 22,000                     |   | Leased           |   | Asia                headquarters, manufacturing, sales,                service                               |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 

JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ-VARGAS,

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00115-SDJ

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance 

with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant Juan Carlos 

Lopez-Vargas is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of 

Title 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) - Reentry of a Deported Alien. 

Case 4:23-cr-00115-SDJ-KPJ Document 19 Filed 12/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 34
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/28/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      149,480
COMMITMENTS
  53,936    9,117   12,496   63,206  104,431  129,638  126,044   19,842   23,436

CHANGES FROM 08/21/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,501)
    -469     -869     -263   -1,752   -3,005   -2,484   -4,137   -3,017   -1,364

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    36.1      6.1      8.4     42.3     69.9     86.7     84.3     13.3     15.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      183)
      61       25       34       63       77      144      122
```

----

Updated August 31, 2012
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Arthur W. Zafiropoulo,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  the QuarterlyReport of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 3,2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Arthur  W. Zafiropoulo* |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Arthur  Zafiropoulo         |
|   | Title: | Chief  Executive Officer    |

 

----

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ultratech, Inc.and will be retained by Ultratech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----