alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       51,857
COMMITMENTS
   3,520   11,667    3,818   43,989   35,948   51,327   51,433      530      424

CHANGES FROM 12/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,372)
     245   -3,639      -25    1,354    5,124    1,574    1,460     -202      -88

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.8     22.5      7.4     84.8     69.3     99.0     99.2      1.0      0.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       8       10        7       21       22       34       35`

---

Updated December 28, 2012
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dani P. Bolognesi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ DANI P. BOLOGNESI
|---------------------
|Dani P. Bolognesi    



Chief
Executive Officer

November 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be retained
by Trimeris, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 * Revised: February 10, 2009 

2008-1370 

(Opposition No. 91/176,609) 

HOLT’S COMPANY, 

Appellant, 

v. 

VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED, 

Appellee. 

M. Kelly Tillery, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for 

appellant. 

*James W. Dabney, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, of New York, 

New York, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Victoria J.B. Doyle and 

Mitchell Epner, and John F. Duffy, of Washington, DC. 

Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office 

 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 

* Attorney’s name corrected. 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

 2008-1370 

(Opposition No. 91/176,609) 

HOLT’S COMPANY, 

 Appellant, 

v. 

VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED, 

 Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office 

in CASE NO(S). 91/176,609. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 

Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER Circuit Judges ) 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED February 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
EVP Global Sales Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 EVP Global Sales Compensation Plan 
  

			
	 Plan Elements
	  	 Recommendation

		
	Base Salary	  	$300,000
		
	Incentive Target $	  	$300,000
		
	Total Target Annual Comp	  	The EXECSIP is based on performance against two financial metrics in 2012. The metrics are annual Revenue and Global EBITDA (the EBITDA target is the same as is set for other
Executives in the SGA MIP)
		
	2012 Targets	  	 Revenue $[***] (80% weighting)

EBITDA $[***] (20% weighting)

		
	Incentive Payments	  	Incentive payments will be made on an annual basis; performance is tied to year end results

 2012 Potential Payment Outcomes – EVP Global Sales 

 

																																			
	 	 	 	  	Actual Revenue	 
	 	  	Target -
$94.9MM	 	  	Target -
$69.9MM	 	  	Target -
$44.9MM	 	  	Target -
$19.9MM	 	  	Target	 	  	Target +
$25MM	 	  	Target +
$50MM	 	  	Target +
$75MM	 
	 




	 	 Target - $19.9MM
	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  
	 	 Target - $12.9MM
	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  	  	$	0	  
	 	 Target - $11MM
	  	$	0	  	  	$	175,978	  	  	$	200,978	  	  	$	225,978	  	  	$	275,978	  	  	$	367,978	  	  	$	459,978	  	  	$	551,978	  
	 	 Target - $5.5MM
	  	$	0	  	  	$	187,989	  	  	$	212,989	  	  	$	237,989	  	  	$	287,989	  	  	$	379,989	  	  	$	471,989	  	  	$	563,989	  
	 	 Target
	  	$	0	  	  	$	200,000	  	  	$	225,000	  	  	$	250,000	  	  	$	300,000	  	  	$	392,000	  	  	$	484,000	  	  	$	576,000	  
	 	 Target + $5.1MM
	  	$	0	  	  	$	211,137	  	  	$	236,137	  	  	$	261,137	  	  	$	311,137	  	  	$	403,137	  	  	$	495,137	  	  	$	587,137	  
	 	 Target + $11MM
	  	$	0	  	  	$	224,022	  	  	$	249,022	  	  	$	274,022	  	  	$	324,022	  	  	$	416,022	  	  	$	508,022	  	  	$	600,000	  

 Over target revenue of $[***] each $1M of additional revenue, bonus will increase by [***]% of revenue
increase to a maximum of a $600,000 total bonus.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/13/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       50,830
COMMITMENTS
   3,762      979      416   41,110   46,259   45,288   47,654    5,542    3,176

CHANGES FROM 12/06/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,658)
   1,903   -1,138      416    2,685    6,482    5,004    5,760    1,654      898

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.4      1.9      0.8     80.9     91.0     89.1     93.8     10.9      6.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
       7        2        2       27       31       34       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/13/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,838
COMMITMENTS
   4,442   23,484      650   59,451   45,206   64,543   69,340   21,295   16,498

CHANGES FROM 12/06/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     19,065)
    -524      442      345    5,799    7,016    5,620    7,803   13,445   11,262

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     5.2     27.4      0.8     69.3     52.7     75.2     80.8     24.8     19.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       70)
      10        7        3       36       31       47       40
```

----

Updated December 16, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

NAOMI ANN PEREZ

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-45

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred a petition alleging violations of supervised release conditions to the 

Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for 

consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and

considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along 

with the record, pleadings and all available evidence.

At the close of the revocation hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn 

recommended:

1. finding the Defendant violated the first allegation in the petition that she failed to follow 

a standard condition of release; 

2. revoking the Defendant’s supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583; and

3. sentencing the defendant to a term of 6 months’ imprisonment to run concurrently with 

the revocation imprisonment sentence imposed in 1:23-CR-46, with two years of 

supervised release to follow. Perez requested to serve her term of imprisonment at the 

Federal Correctional Institute in Bryan, Texas, if the Bureau of Prisons can 

accommodate such request. The court adopts the magistrate judge’s findings for the 

imposition of the special conditions of supervised release.

Case 1:23-cr-00045-MJT Document 6 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 37
2

At the close of the revocation hearing, the Defendant, defense counsel and counsel for 

the Government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed 

findings and recommendations contained in the magistrate judge’s report, consenting to 

revocation of supervised release and imposition of the sentence recommended. The Defendant 

also waived his right to be present with counsel and to speak at sentencing before the court 

imposes the recommended sentence. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are 

correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition is GRANTED and Naomi Ann Perez’s 

supervised release is REVOKED. 

Judgment and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the magistrate 

judge’s recommendations.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 8th day of June, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00045-MJT Document 6 Filed 06/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 38
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QINGSHENG CHAI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72725

Agency No. A099-900-159

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District

Judge.

** 

Chai petitions for review of the determinations of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) that he failed to establish facts qualifying him for asylum and

withholding of removal. We review for substantial evidence and will reverse only

FILED

JUN 11 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
if the record compels a contrary conclusion. Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147,

1149-50 (9th Cir. 1999).

Assuming past persecution, the record does not compel the conclusion that

Chai established a nexus between the harm he suffered and one of the statutorily

protected grounds. See Molina-Morales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir.

2001). While Chai confronted Family Planning officials, he did so with the belief

and making the accusation that they had taken a bribe. The BIA thus concluded

that Chai was then detained and mistreated on account of this accusation, which

was the only central reason for the persecution. Chai’s own testimony supports

this conclusion, as he stated he was warned by the Family Planning officials not to

“expose the bribery of the director.” Therefore, absent evidence compelling the

conclusion that Chai was harmed based on his opposition to China’s coercive

population control policy, he has not established a nexus to a protected ground. 

Chai also did not establish a nexus to a protected ground by exposing

government corruption. Chai accused the Family Planning Director of taking a

bribe, but there is no evidence in the record that there was actual government

corruption and that the harm occurred in retaliation to that exposure. The BIA

concluded that the harm which occurred was the result of a purely personal dispute

2
based on the bribery accusations; the record does not compel a different

conclusion. See Perez-Ramirez v. Holder, 648 F.3d 953, 957 (9th Cir. 2011).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that Chai does not

have a well-founded fear of future persecution. Chai has not shown any “‘credible,

direct, and specific evidence’” in the record that would support “a reasonable fear

of persecution.” Acewicz v. INS, 984 F.2d 1056, 1061 (9th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, because Chai failed to demonstrate past persecution or a

well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground, we deny

the petition for review as to his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See

INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-83 (1992).

PETITION DENIED.

3
No. 6:23-cr-00039-1

United States of America

v.

Isaac Smith

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for administration of a guilty plea under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 29. 

The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the 

indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Isaac Smith guilty of count one of the indictment, charging 

a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a) - Escape.

So ordered by the court on May 19, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00039-JCB-KNM Document 30 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 66
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

OLGA BLACKLEDGE,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES BLACKLEDGE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 53 WM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

 Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00285-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Cobblestone 

Wireless, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, 

Inc. (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 70.) In the Motion, the parties represent that the above-captioned 

case has been resolved and request dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants in

the above-captioned action WITH prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses, or counterclaims 

for relief against Plaintiff WITHOUT prejudice. (Id. at 1.) 

Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.

Accordingly, all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in the 

above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All claims, defenses or 

counterclaims asserted by Defendants against Plaintiff are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. 

Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. All pending requests 

for relief in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case as no parties or 

claims remain. 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 71 Filed 10/10/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5214
____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 10th day of October, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 71 Filed 10/10/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5215
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      330,194
COMMITMENTS
  53,748  142,783   58,589  198,956  107,540  311,293  308,912   18,901   21,282

CHANGES FROM 12/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -68,049)
    -711   -6,714  -13,560  -46,396  -39,166  -60,667  -59,440   -7,382   -8,609

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.3     43.2     17.7     60.3     32.6     94.3     93.6      5.7      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      50       52       58       32       30      116      114
```

----

Updated December 28, 2012
AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION, petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-500.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the petition, vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and remand to that court with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot. See *United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 9, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41706

Summary Calendar

 

L.C. GARNER MATHIS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-02-CV-40

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

L. C. Garner Mathis, Jr. (Mathis), federal prisoner # 26925-

077, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Mathis

claims that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) erred in failing to award

him full credit towards his federal sentence for time served in

state prison after he was sentenced in federal court. Mathis

argues that his time in state prison should be credited to his
No. 02-41706

-2-

federal sentence because his state parole was revoked when he was

arrested for a federal charge. Mathis also argues that he is

entitled to credit on his federal sentence because a federal

detainer placed on him while he was in state prison prevented his

release from state custody.

The Attorney General, through the BOP, determines what

credit, if any, will be awarded to prisoners for time spent in

custody prior to the commencement of their sentences. See United

States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 337 (1992). Under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3585(b), the BOP may not award Mathis credit toward his term of

imprisonment for any time he spent in official detention prior to

the commencement of his federal sentence that was credited

against another sentence. See United States v. Dovalina, 711

F.2d 737, 740 (5th Cir. 1983); United States v. Chaplin, 451 F.2d

179, 181 (5th Cir. 1971). Mathis was awarded state credit

already for the time he spent in detention prior to the

commencement of his federal sentence.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

REYES REYES, JR., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-106

§

UVIEOGHENE UGHWANOGHO, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Reyes Reyes, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court previously

referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at

Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The

magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#4) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.

Signed this date

Sep 25, 2023

Case 1:23-cv-00106-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 18