alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/14/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,487
COMMITMENTS
   7,761    1,122    1,047   21,841   28,260   30,649   30,428   10,838   11,059

CHANGES FROM 08/07/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -644)
     224       86      379     -816     -183     -213      283     -431     -927

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    18.7      2.7      2.5     52.6     68.1     73.9     73.3     26.1     26.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      10        5        5       33       27       46       35
```

----

Updated August 17, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            6382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                            2000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   26582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         94150
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     26582
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 13418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   1000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12418)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order entered February 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01235-CV

EX PARTE NATHANIEL HUBERT

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. X-11-1261-H

ORDER

On October 18, 2012, this Court granted appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 

and we ordered court reporter Vicki Tuck to file the reporter’s record. To date, the reporter’s 

record has not been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Vicki Tuck to file, within THIRTY DAYS of 

the date of this order, the reporter’s record of the August 3, 2012 expunction hearing.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Vicki 

Tuck and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Nathaniel 

Hubert, TDCJ No. 00491576, Byrd Unit, 21 F.M. 247, Huntsville, TX 77320.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Randy JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1349.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Jerry Neil ALFRED, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8712.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 11-3520

___________________________ Lori Irish lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner - Appellant v. N. C. English, Warden lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________ Submitted: September 14, 2012 Filed: September 25, 2012 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Lori Irish appeals the district court’s 1 denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which she challenged the Bureau of Pris ons’ denial of her request for a 12-month placement in a Residential Reentry Center ( RRC). The appeal is moot, however, because Irish was transferred to an RRC dur ing the pendency of this appeal, and thus the court can no longer grant her the relief she requested. See Calderon v. Moore , 518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996) (per curiam) (when even t occurs during pendency of appeal that renders it impossible for court to grant eff ective relief, court should dismiss appeal as moot). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J. Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 7 Filed 08/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 35
Jacob Scott WATTERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6900.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2058 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2058

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
  estate tax purposes equal to the value of the decedent's individual 
 retirement plans, section 401(k) plans, and certain other retirement 
                                 plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

 Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
  estate tax purposes equal to the value of the decedent's individual 
 retirement plans, section 401(k) plans, and certain other retirement 
                                 plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FROM GROSS ESTATE FOR INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT PLANS, 
              SECTION 401(K) PLANS, AND CERTAIN OTHER PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter A of chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to estate tax) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section:

``SEC. 2058. CERTAIN RETIREMENT PLANS.

    ``For purposes of the tax imposed by section 2001, the value of the 
taxable estate shall be determined by deducting from the value of the 
gross estate the portion of the value of the gross estate which is 
attributable to--
            ``(1) any individual retirement plan, or
            ``(2) amounts attributable to employer contributions made 
        pursuant to elective deferrals described in subparagraph (A) or 
        (C) of section 402(g)(3) or section 501(c)(18)(D)(iii).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such subchapter 
A is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

                              ``Sec. 2058. Certain retirement plans.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to estates of decedents dying after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
             -------------------------------------------------------

Board of Directors and Stockholders
WVS Financial Corp.

We have reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of WVS Financial
Corp.  and  subsidiary  as of September 30, 2005,  and the related  statement of
income for the  three-month  periods  ended  September  30,  2005 and 2004,  the
consolidated  statement of changes in  stockholders'  equity for the three-month
period ended  September 30, 2005, and the  consolidated  statement of cash flows
for the three-month  periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.  These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted  our review in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversights  Board  (United  States).  A review of interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with  standards  of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversights  Board  (United
States),  the objective of which is the  expression of an opinion  regarding the
financial  statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly,  we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying  financial  statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously  audited,  in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting  Oversights Board (United States),  the consolidated balance sheet of
WVS Financial Corp. as of June 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements
of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then
ended  (not  presented  herein);  and in our  report  dated  July 28,  2005,  we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
November 1, 2005


                                      E-5
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ANTHONY JERHONE HEARN

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00078-SDJ

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE’S REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for 

administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The 

Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The 

Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea 

and adjudge Defendant guilty on Counts One and Two of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts 

Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review 

of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant 

Anthony Jerhone Hearn GUILTY of Counts One and Two of the Indictment, 

charging violations of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841, Possession with Intent to Distribute 

Cocaine, and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) - Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a 

Case 4:23-cr-00078-SDJ-AGD Document 45 Filed 11/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

118
2

Drug Trafficking Crime.

Case 4:23-cr-00078-SDJ-AGD Document 45 Filed 11/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

119
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- W.M. Jordan Company, Inc. Under Contract No. N40085-09-D-5034 APPEARANCE FORTHE 'APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60029

William E. Franczek, Esq.

Vandeventer Black LLP Norfolk, VA Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney David M. Marquez, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been withdrawn. Accordingly, it is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. Dated: 23 September 2015

# 4:~~---- Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60029, Appeal ofW.M. Jordan Company, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Bobby EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6934.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Ong VUE, petitioner, v. Frank X. HENKE, et al.

No. 18-6407.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/25/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      133,700
COMMITMENTS
  16,718   21,522   32,419   68,661   64,187  117,798  118,128   15,902   15,572

CHANGES FROM 10/18/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -14,883)
     390   -6,893   -2,932  -10,268   -1,687  -12,810  -11,512   -2,073   -3,371

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.5     16.1     24.2     51.4     48.0     88.1     88.4     11.9     11.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       83)
      26       21       33       22       24       68       68
```

----

Updated October 28, 2011
., . 

## 76

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

**4** with 8 eottlflrobak **Court** l

**drlrla&** 0r th0 WV~WJS 4r or tb aobok court **1943** to **January )lrt,**  **1943, ln**  c th0 E‘robate tclnutaa or udler

uoh **a8** Kr. 3ailey otate~ that he haa **0 pm8anted**  **hlo alaa**  **beaaum** 0r **JOur** prurlou~ ml&e that no prorlrlon **was** aadr ln **the 9tatuttia**  **ror** t!m payaent or **a ..peolal**  **i;ounty Judge**  l **loota4 by**  **t&a** 

### bar an4 **urra ~8**  **hr. Sallry**  **wrvO4,** ad in ~ mob l 0 thi0 0rrm bsa harotororr mlied upon 70~ o p ini o n m t d o h,

08 Er. s a ll r y

lt a aLs 8,**Bonomble** Cho‘, Aa



### ~‘0vorru04

___ **l8 the**  oeo. of **Xorkw.11 Toa**  **iJ8lTUtOn**

**m** 

### ub 3. t'. (2) 

### 273 (rr’lt 

### or **error** **d*nl~QJ,**

rp~nolob your Deprtwat ILOW 

### l d r i a ln c a .1

l 

### 1) Ua4or the o l r o uu t a a o u 

### ouslku4 in Air* b r uy

f 

### al o tt o r ,

d o c0 h i0 l && l

o n btlt u t o

l ky l olaL,agoa.artthr 

### oounty rhlah rmJA4 now ba pia? 

### e(2) IS pyrat ,lr 4~ lr me ball4 l

### a

## tltlo d tc l **mpoautloa for**  **tJL 4oyr**  **ho** 

## l ottmlly wrvod lathe Court,or 8hou.M hi0 ooaponwtion 0180 

### k fl&U@d rOr th0 

### &UIida7# 4&t&&i th0 

### p?iod or nPT~t* Prior te oh0 inotttuthn on4 

### 4otoralartlea or th0 

### out or -ll T* OalT~rtoD cooa 

### Doprrtmat rrndena V~idoaa 

### 808. the 

## l o a Q. a u tlm a

OS Qe. ir l

o o u ny j*o r .

T M80 o p la lo a8 l

### b **eanuarytoshe** 

## l girrlanottba l

ourl lat&XmhoU easu, th.nfO?a n Lwabr 

## l r~tr‘8&y oTor3(, 

### nld O)bAntPlr# DOa. 

### 04091whw9o.



### IimpQlag

tayour naona qurrtlm 1t1r be14 b 

## tbr Larkwall aare, eupra, timt 

### 3An4ayr l 

### 4 holfday‘ an laolu4a4 Ir: oomputhg the aoripo~oatlm 

### or a 

### 8go0181 oountf 

### judis. Your8 rory **trub-**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANTS

 

Please take notice that the undersigned hereby enters his appearance as counsel for 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Please direct 

and serve all notices, pleadings, papers and other material relevant to this action to Mr. Alex V.

Chachkes at the address listed below.

Dated: February 21, 2024 By: /s/ Alex V. Chachkes

Alex V. Chachkes

SETTY CHACHKES PLLC

113 Cherry Street, Suite 54517

Seattle, WA 98104

Tel: 917.428.1358

Email: alex@sechalaw.com 

Counsel for Defendants

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 02/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 420
-2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on February 21, 

2024. 

By: /s/ Alex V. Chachkes

Alex V. Chachkes

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 02/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 421
ACCEPTED04-16-00459-CVFOURTH COURT OF APPEALSSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS7/21/2016 3:07:55 PMKEITH HOTTLECLERK04-16-00459-CV
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                      5,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,150
<PP&E>                                          14,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,941
<SALES>                                         57,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,322
<CGS>                                           31,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,701
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,701
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.84


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2002 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2002

  To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a 
 study on mortality and adverse outcome rates of Medicare patients of 
       providers of anesthesia services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1999

Mr. Stark (for himself, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mrs. Thurman, 
 and Mr. Becerra) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a 
 study on mortality and adverse outcome rates of Medicare patients of 
       providers of anesthesia services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anesthesia Outcomes Study Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. ANESTHESIA OUTCOME STUDY.

    (a) Study.--(1) The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
conduct a study of mortality and adverse outcome rates of Medicare 
patients by providers of anesthesia services. In conducting the study, 
the Secretary shall analyze the impact of physician supervision of 
providers of anesthesia services, or lack thereof, on such mortality 
and adverse outcome rates.
    (2) In conducting the study, the Secretary shall consult with 
appropriate national professional organizations with respect to the 
methodology of the study, and shall use Medicare operating room 
anesthesia data, adjusted for patient acuity and other relevant 
scientific variables.
    (b) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2000, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study 
conducted under subsection (a).
    (c) Consideration of Report in Rulemaking.--The Secretary shall 
consider the results of such study when determining if any modification 
or change to the existing Medicare regulations in effect on January 1, 
1999, dealing with physician supervision of anesthesia services may be 
appropriate.
                                 <all>
```