29878 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2022 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes is 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s website. 

2The Commission has found the joint response to 

its notice of institution filed on behalf of ATI Flat 

Rolled Products Holdings, LLC, North American 

Stainless, and Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, 

domestic producers of stainless steel plate, to be 

individually adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–379 and 731– 

TA–788, 792–793 (Fourth Review)] 

Stainless Steel Plate From Belgium, 

South Africa, and Taiwan; Scheduling 

of Expedited Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of an expedited 

review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing and 

antidumping duty orders on stainless 

steel plate from Belgium, South Africa, 

and Taiwan would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

DATES: March 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andres Andrade (202–205–2078), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On March 7, 2022, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (86 

FR 68278, December 1, 2021) of the 

subject five-year reviews was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). 

For further information concerning 

the conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

Please note the Secretary’s Office will 

accept only electronic filings at this 

time. Filings must be made through the 

Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS, https://

edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any 

electronic filings will be accepted until 

further notice. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the reviews has been 

placed in the nonpublic record, and will 

be made available to persons on the 

Administrative Protective Order service 

list for these reviews on June 13, 2022. 

A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determinations 

the Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

June 21, 2022 and may not contain new 

factual information. Any person that is 

neither a party to the five-year reviews 

nor an interested party may submit a 

brief written statement (which shall not 

contain any new factual information) 

pertinent to the reviews by June 21, 

2022. However, should the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its reviews, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s Handbook on 

Filing Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 

published pursuant to section 207.62 of 

the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 12, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10547 Filed 5–16–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–562 and 731– 

TA–1329 (Review)] 

Ammonium Sulfate From China; Notice 

of Commission Determination To 

Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 to determine whether revocation of 

the countervailing and antidumping 

duty orders on ammonium sulfate from 

China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the reviews will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. 

DATES: May 9, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Stebbins (202–205–2039), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 17, 2022 / Notices 29879 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 9, 

2022, the Commission determined that 

it should proceed to full reviews in the 

subject five-year reviews pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission 

found that both the domestic and 

respondent interested party group 

responses to its notice of institution (87 

FR 5503, February 1, 2022) were 

adequate. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes will be available 

from the Office of the Secretary and at 

the Commission’s website. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 

published pursuant to § 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 11, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10516 Filed 5–16–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1244] 

Certain Batteries and Products 

Containing Same; Commission 

Decision To Review in Part an Initial 

Determination Granting in Part 

Complainants’ Motion for Summary 

Determination of a Violation of Section 

337; Request for Written Submissions 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 15) of the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting-in-part the complainants’ 

motion for summary determination of a 

violation of section 337. The 

Commission also requests written 

submissions from the parties on the 

issue under review and from the parties, 

interested government agencies, and 

interested persons on the issues of 

remedy, bonding, and the public 

interest, under the schedule set forth 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on February 5, 2021, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on 

a complaint filed by complainants One 

World Technologies, Inc. (‘‘One World’’) 

and Techtronic Power Tools Technology 

Ltd. (‘‘TTT’’) (collectively, 

‘‘Complainants’’). 86 FR 8379–80 (Feb. 

5, 2021). The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges a violation of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, or the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain batteries and products 

containing same by reason of 

infringement of the sole claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. D579,868 (‘‘the ’868 

patent’’); D580,353 (‘‘the ’353 patent’’); 

and D593,944 (‘‘the ’944 patent’’). Id. at 

8379. The complaint further alleges that 

a domestic industry exists. Id. The 

notice of investigation (‘‘NOI’’) names 

thirteen (13) respondents: Darui 

Development Limited (‘‘Darui 

Development’’); Dongguan Xinjitong 

Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Dongguan Electronic’’); Shenzhen 

Laipaili Electronics Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shenzhen Laipaili’’); Shenzhen 

MingYang Creation Electronic Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shenzhen MingYang’’); Shenzhen 

Rich Hao Yuan Energy Technology Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Rich Hao’’); Shenzhen 

Runsensheng Trading Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shenzhen Runsensheng’’); Shenzhen 

Saen Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen 

Saen’’); Shenzhen Shengruixiang ECommerce Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen ECommerce’’); Shenzhen Uni-Sun 

Electronics Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen UniSun’’); and Shenzhen Vmartego 

Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shenzhen Vmartego’’) (collectively, 

the ‘‘Defaulted Respondents’’); 

Shenzhen Liancheng Weiye Industrial 

Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Ollop Technology 

Co. Ltd.; and Shenzhen Tuo Yu 

Technology Co., Ltd. Id. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is 

participating in this investigation. Id. 

On May 17, 2021, Commission 

terminated the investigation based upon 

the withdrawal of the complaint with 

respect to respondents Shenzhen 

Liancheng Weiye Industrial Co., Ltd., 

Shenzhen Ollop Technology Co. Ltd., 

and Shenzhen Tuo Yu Technology Co., 

Ltd., after Complainants were unable to 

serve these respondents with copies of 

the Complaint and NOI. Order No. 7 

(Apr. 21, 2021), unreviewed by Notice 

(May 17, 2021). 

On April 20, 2021, Complainants filed 

a motion for an order to show cause 

why the remaining ten (10) named 

respondents (i.e., the Defaulted 

Respondents) should not be found in 

default after failing to respond to the 

Complaint and NOI, which had been 

duly served upon them. On May 4, 

2021, the motion was granted and an 

order to show cause was issued. Order 

No. 8 (May 4, 2021). On June 3, 2021, 

after they failed to respond to the order 

to show cause, ALJ issued an ID finding 

all ten Defaulted Respondents to be in 

default. Order No. 9 (June 3, 2021), 

unreviewed by Notice (June 23, 2021). 

On June 21, 2021, Complainants 

moved for a summary determination of 

violation of Section 337 by the 

Defaulted Respondents and for a 

recommended determination 

recommending entry of a general 

exclusion order and a bond at the rate 

of 100 percent during the Presidential 

review period. 

On July 16, 2021, OUII filed a 

response to Complainants’ motion 

supporting a finding of summary 

determination against only four (4) of 

the Defaulted Respondents: Darui 

Development, Dongguan Electronic, 

Shenzhen Rich Hao, and Shenzhen 

Saen. Specifically, OUII argued 

Complainants did not sufficiently 

connect the importation, sale, or sale 

after importation of certain of the 

Accused Products to the Defaulted 

Respondents. Otherwise, OUII stated it 

generally supports a finding that 

Complainants have satisfied the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement under section 

337(a)(3)(A) and (B) (19 U.S.C. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES