alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-23689) pertaining to the Super Vision
International, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-32007) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
of our report dated March 6, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Super Vision International, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.





                                        Ernst & Young LLP





Orlando, Florida
March 27, 2000
EXHIBIT 23






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-174113), Form S-3 (File No. 333-156563), and the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-2320, File No. 333-127134 and File No. 333-17065) of the Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. 1994 and 2003 Stock Option Plans and the Southern Bank 401(k) Retirement Plan of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated September 21, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc., which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2011.




/s/BKD,LLP







Decatur, Illinois
September 21, 2011
Darrell J. HARPER, petitioner, v. Jim CROW.

No. 17-9538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
05-1457(GK)
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The J. Jill Group, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 24, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers certifies, to the best knowledge and belief ofthe signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ GORDON  R. COOKE                   |     |                              | /s/ OLGA L.  CONLEY |   |
|----------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Gordon R. Cooke                        |     | Olga L. Conley                    |                |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and | * * | Executive Vice President /        |                |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors     | * * | Chief Financial Officer and Chief |                |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*        |     | Administrative Officer            |                |
|                                   | * * | *(Principal Financial Officer)*   |                |
| Date: November 3,  2005           |     | Date: November 3,  2005      |                |

 

----
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 31, 2014

No. 04-14-00918-CR

Gary A. CAMPBELL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR3125

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has 

NO right of appeal.” We therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to file, within ten days of the 

date of this order, an electronic clerk’s record containing the following documents:

1. All pre-trial motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

2. All documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain, including the 

court’s admonishments, the defendant’s waiver and consent to stipulation 

of testimony, and any other stipulations;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

5. The notice(s) of appeal;

6. The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this 

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, 

and the court reporter or reporters responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/31/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      152,133
COMMITMENTS
  35,899   17,351   25,167   71,344   83,842  132,410  126,360   19,723   25,773

CHANGES FROM 01/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        840)
    -126   -5,421   -2,386    2,703    7,429      190     -379      649    1,219

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.6     11.4     16.5     46.9     55.1     87.0     83.1     13.0     16.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      44       32       40       63       61      123      121
```

----

Updated February 3, 2012
Darnell Bernard BLAGMON, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA

No. 18-6625.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          91,252
<SECURITIES>                                   442,014
<RECEIVABLES>                                      000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       000
<INVENTORY>                                        000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               533,266
<PP&E>                                             000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,228
<BONDS>                                            000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              000
<PREFERRED>                                        000
<COMMON>                                           000
<OTHER-SE>                                     524,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   533,266
<SALES>                                            000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,284
<CGS>                                              000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                       000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                000
<DISCONTINUED>                                     000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    000
<CHANGES>                                          000
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,358
<EPS-BASIC>                                      46.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    46.98


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY

                              OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that OLYMPIC STEEL, INC., an Ohio
corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby constitute and
appoint Michael D. Siegal, R. Louis Schneeberger and Richard T. Marabito their
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for and on behalf of Olympic Steel, Inc. and the undersigned
Directors and officers of Olympic Steel, Inc., and each of such Directors and
officers, to sign Olympic Steel, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999, any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitute or
substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney of Olympic Steel, Inc., and the Directors and
officers of Olympic Steel, Inc. may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Cleveland,
Ohio this 15th day of March, 2000.

                                            OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

                                            By: /s/ R. LOUIS SCHNEEBERGER
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              R. Louis Schneeberger,
                                              Chief Financial Officer

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:

/s/ MARTIN H. ELRAD
------------------------------------------------------
Martin H. Elrad, Director

/s/ THOMAS M. FORMAN
------------------------------------------------------
Thomas M. Forman, Director

/s/ SUREN A. HOVSEPIAN
------------------------------------------------------
Suren A. Hovsepian, Consultant and Director

/s/ BETSY S. ATKINS
------------------------------------------------------
Betsy S. Atkins, Director

/s/ R. LOUIS SCHNEEBERGER
------------------------------------------------------
R. Louis Schneeberger,
Chief Financial Officer and Director

/s/ MICHAEL D. SIEGAL
------------------------------------------------------
Michael D. Siegal, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

/s/ DAVID A. WOLFORT
------------------------------------------------------
David A. Wolfort,
Chief Operating Officer and Director

/s/ RICHARD T. MARABITO
------------------------------------------------------
Richard T. Marabito, Treasurer
and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

                                  Page 40 of 40
Harold Max POMPEE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
ewlu_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
  	 _________:
	 短期借款转长期借款借条
	 


  
 Loan agreement from short term to long term
  
 因 Merion Inc. 公司需要资金周转 ,曾于____年__月__日向___________先生/女士借款现金$____________美元整, 此借款年利率为__%。
  
 For the working capital turnover, Merion, Inc. had borrowed USD$_________ from _________ on ____________, and the annual interest rate was __%.
  
 现在本人__________同意将短期借款转为5年期的长期借款,5年期限从本次签字之日起计算。利息保持不变。
  
 Now I, __________ agree to change the short-term loan to 5 years long-term loan, which is effective upon the date this agreement is signed. Interest rate remains unchanged.
  
  
  
 出借方签字:_______________________
  
 出借方姓名:______________________
  
 Lender Signature: ____________________
  
 Lender Name: _______________________
  
  
  
  
  
 借款方(Borrower): Merion, Inc.
  
 Signature: __________________________
  
 Name: Dinghua Wang/ CEO
  
 March 21, 2019
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 5, 2017

s0329

Order 

Clerk

April 5, 2017

154209

BRANDI CRAMER f/k/a BRANDI

BITTERMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 154209

COA: 330736

Shiawassee CC: 15-007371-CZ

VILLAGE OF OAKLEY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE as moot Part III of the Court of Appeals 

opinion, see 316 Mich App ___ n 1, ___ n 7 (2016), and we REMAND this case to the 

Shiawassee Circuit Court for dismissal of the plaintiff’s Freedom of Information Act 

claims. See Federated Publications, Inc v Lansing, 467 Mich 98, 101 (2002). In all 

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. Thus, the award of 

attorney fees, costs, and disbursements remains vacated.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BILAL MUHAMMAD,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00125-CR

Appeal from the

168th District Court of 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20160D01015)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We 

further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2018.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 10, 2014

d1007 

# Order

Clerk October 10, 2014

149690(81)

SC: 149690

In re IAQUINTA, Minors

. COA: 315136

Wayne CC Family Division:

12

- 509215

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s August 22,

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1237

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Larry Duane Smith, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 15, 2005 

Filed: December 8, 2005

___________

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Larry Smith pleaded guilty to conspiring to manufacture 50 grams or more of

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Because prior drug convictions

subjected Smith to statutory minimum penalties, and the government so notified him,

see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(B), 851(a)(1), the district court1

 sentenced Smith to 10

years in prison and 8 years of supervised release. On appeal, Smith’s counsel has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
-2-

noting Smith’s belief that the government should have filed a downward-departure

motion for substantial assistance and he should have received a lesser sentence. 

We conclude that the district court did not err in imposing the statutory

mandatory minimum sentence, and that Smith has not shown the government

improperly refused to file a substantial-assistance motion. See Wade v. United States,

504 U.S. 181, 185-86 (1992) (defendant must show government’s refusal to move for

departure was not rationally related to any legitimate government purpose); United

States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (district court did not have

authority to depart below statutory minimum where government did not file

substantial-assistance motion and defendant did not qualify for safety-valve relief).

We also conclude that the sentence did not raise issues under United States v. Booker,

125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). See United States v. Thomas, 398 F.3d 1058, 1063-64 (8th Cir.

2005); United States v. Vieth, 397 F.3d 615, 620 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct.

2560 (2005). 

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Arthur Zafiropoulo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·                  the Quarterly Report ofUltratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  the information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.
| By:      | /s/ ARTHUR ZAFIROPOULO    |   | Date: November 2, 2006 |
|----------|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| Name:    | Arthur Zafiropoulo        |   |                        |
| *Title:* | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |                        |

 

I, Bruce Wright, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·                  the Quarterly Report ofUltratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  the information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.
| By:      | /s/ BRUCE WRIGHT          |   | Date: November 2, 2006 |
|----------|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| Name:    | Bruce Wright              |   |                        |
| *Title:* | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |                        |

 

----

*                    Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Ultratech, Inc. and will be retained by Ultratech, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,236
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         588,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        185,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     383,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,056
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,199
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,953
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,896)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<FN>
<F1>EPS excludes extraordinary loss of $.44 per share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Antrone Arness THOMAS, petitioner, v. David CHANDRAN.

No. 18-5235.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MIGUEL ANGEL COMPEAN-MEJIA

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00107

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Miguel Angel 

Compean-Mejia GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(a) and (b) - Reentry of a Deported Alien.

Case 4:23-cr-00107-ALM-AGD Document 31 Filed 07/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 62
Case 4:23-cr-00107-ALM-AGD Document 31 Filed 07/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 63
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-2320 and File No. 333-127134), of the Southern Missouri
Bancorp, Inc. 1994 and 2003 Stock Option Plans, of our report, dated August 15,
2008, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Southern
Missouri Bancorp, Inc. as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the three
years in the period ended June 30, 2008, which report is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  /s/BKD,LLP
    St.
Louis, Missouri
 September
29, 2008