alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bradley Christopher STARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Beverly Allen BAKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5896.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

GALACTIC POWER, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

PICKENS RESOURCE CORP.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00405-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the 

United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore 

referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 2, 2024, the

Magistrate Judge entered a Report, (Dkt. #55), recommending Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment, (Dkt. #27), be denied and Defendant’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment, (Dkt. #35), be granted. On July 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed objections to the 

Report (Dkt. #59). On July 29, 2024, Defendant filed a Response (Dkt. #60).

Having received the Report of the Magistrate Judge, considered Plaintiff’s 

objections, (Dkt. #59), Defendant’s Response, (Dkt. #60), and having conducted a de 

novo review, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the 

Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the 

findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, 

(Dkt. #27), is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. #35), 

Case 4:23-cv-00405-SDJ-AGD Document 66 Filed 09/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 636
- 2 -

is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on 

the Pleadings, (Dkt. #23), is DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Modify the Scheduling 

Order (Dkt. #61) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s 

counterclaim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

Case 4:23-cv-00405-SDJ-AGD Document 66 Filed 09/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 637
EXHIBIT 6 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 72-6 Filed 08/07/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1941
From: Zhu, Michelle J.

To: rak_headwater@raklaw.com

Cc: *** GDCTMO-Headwater

Subject: RE: Headwater v. T-Mobile - Infringement Contentions

Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:44:00 AM

Counsel,

Headwater’s infringement contentions remain deficient, as per our prior correspondence from

February 1, 2024. See 2024-02-01 K. Dominguez Ltr. Having not received any amended contentions,

T-Mobile understands Headwater’s infringement allegations to be limited to the accused end-user

devices and functionality, i.e., the specifically identified “phones, tablets, wearables, [or] devices . . .

for use with T-Mobile’s wireless network services,” and will carry out its discovery obligations

consistent with that understanding.

Michelle J. Zhu

Associate Attorney 

T: 202.777.9413

MZhu@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON DUNN

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

1050 Connecticut Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-5306

From: Zhu, Michelle J. 

Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 5:21 PM

To: rak_headwater@raklaw.com

Cc: *** GDCTMO-Headwater <GDCTMO-Headwater@gibsondunn.com>

Subject: Headwater v. T-Mobile - Infringement Contentions

Counsel,

In light of the parties’ agreement to not oppose each other’s motions for leave to amend, please

provide your proposed amended infringement contentions for the T-Mobile case. Since you did not

indicate otherwise on our meet and confer, we assume the amendment for T-Mobile will mirror the

amendment served on Verizon.

Please direct all correspondence to our team email reflector going forward: GDCTMOHeadwater@gibsondunn.com. Thank you.

Michelle J. Zhu

Associate Attorney 

T: 202.777.9413

MZhu@gibsondunn.com

GIBSON DUNN

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 72-6 Filed 08/07/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1942
1050 Connecticut Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-5306

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 72-6 Filed 08/07/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1943
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/11/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       42,959
COMMITMENTS
   1,075   12,361    1,356   39,786   28,534   42,217   42,251      742      708

CHANGES FROM 12/04/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,551)
      36      962       64    3,539    2,636    3,639    3,662      -88     -111

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     2.5     28.8      3.2     92.6     66.4     98.3     98.4      1.7      1.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
       8       10        5       22       21       32       34`

---

Updated December 14, 2012
NOTICE OF TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PAGE 1 OF 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

LADARION HUGHES, ANGELA §

ALONZO, and DEMARCUS LIVELY, §

 §

Plaintiffs, §

 § Civil Action No. 6:23-cv-344

v. §

 §

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS, §

 §

Defendant. §

DEFENDANT SMITH COUNTY’S NOTICE

OF TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

COMES NOW Smith County, Texas, Defendant in the above-styled and -referenced cause, 

and files this its Notice of Twelfth Supplemental Disclosures, and would respectfully show unto 

the Court as follows:

On this date Defendant Smith County, Texas, provided all counsel of record with its 

Twelfth Supplemental Disclosures in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 

this Court’s Order.

Respectfully submitted,

David Iglesias 

Lead Counsel

State Bar No. 24051733

david@iglesiaslawfirm.com

IGLESIAS LAW FIRM, PLLC 

605 Chase Drive, Suite 8

Tyler, Texas 75701

Telephone: (903) 944-7185 

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 46 Filed 10/25/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 286
NOTICE OF TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PAGE 2 OF 2

Facsimile: (903) 630-5338

Dallas Office:

1412 Main Street, Suite 608

Dallas, Texas 75202

Telephone: (972) 863-9445

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 25, 2024, a copy of the foregoing was transmitted to all 

counsel of record in the above-referenced and -numbered action via the Court’s electronic filing 

system and electronic mail.

David Iglesias

Case 6:23-cv-00344-JDK Document 46 Filed 10/25/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 287
Leonard Nathaniel PERAGINE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6215.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Joan E. FARR, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-6781.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until January 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 23.1

                      Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 
10-K) of Northwest Airlines Corporation of our report dated January 21, 1997 
included in the Current Report (Form 8-K) dated March 6, 1997 of Northwest 
Airlines Corporation.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Northwest 
Airlines Corporation listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the 
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express 
an opinion based on our audit.  In our opinion, the financial statement 
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic 
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material 
respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-87252 and 333-13307) of Northwest Airlines 
Corporation and Northwest Airlines, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses and 
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-85220, 333-2652, 
333-14445 and 333-12571) of our report dated January 21, 1997, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, 
and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the 
financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of 
Northwest Airlines Corporation.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 1997
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/29/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,498
COMMITMENTS
   9,190    4,996    1,782   21,655   22,439   32,627   29,217    6,872   10,281

CHANGES FROM 05/22/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -225)
    -341      159        6     -305      215     -640      379      416     -604

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.3     12.6      4.5     54.8     56.8     82.6     74.0     17.4     26.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
       9       11        7       27       24       38       40
```

----

Updated June 5, 2012
Jose Joaquin RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. Joseph APONTE, et al.

No. 18-5425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
No. 6:23-cr-00064

United States of America

v.

Ruben Aguirre-Tolentino

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 23. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the magistrate judge. The court also accepts 

defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until 

after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Ruben Aguirre-Tolentino guilty of count one of the indictment, charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1) – Illegal 

Reentry Following Removal .

So ordered by the court on September 27, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00064-JCB-JDL Document 24 Filed 09/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 60
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DANA BOWMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

EMLI PECAN TC I, LP; EMLI PECAN 

GP, LLC; and LIBERTY 

MULTIFAMILY, LLC,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No.: 4:23-cv-00501-SDJ-AGD

JURY DEMANDED

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Dana Bowman, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby 

files this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and 

attorneys' fees.

Dated: July 12, 2024.

Respectfully Submitted,

CALHOUN &ASSOCIATES

/s/ Eric G. Calhoun

Eric G. Calhoun 

Texas Bar No. 03638800

1595 N. Central Expressway

Richardson, Texas 75080

(214) 766-8100

(214) 308-1947 Fax

eric@ecalhounlaw.com

egcla@ecalhounlaw.com (Assistant)

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 4:23-cv-00501-SDJ-AGD Document 25 Filed 07/16/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 400
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - page 2

LAW OFFICES OF R. DAVID FRITSCHE

/s/ R. David Fritsche

R. David Fritsche

921 Proton Road

San Antonio, Texas 78258-4203

Telephone: (210) 227-2726

Texas State Bar No. 07481200

E-Mail address: david@lawordf.com

E-Service address: service@lawordf.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS EMLI Pecan TC I, LP, 

EMLI Pecan GP, LLC, and Liberty Multifamily, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 12, 2024, the foregoing has been electronically filed with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 

following counsel of record:

R. David Fritsche

LAW OFFICES OF R. DAVID FRITSCHE

921 Proton Road

San Antonio, Texas 78258-4203

david@lawordf.com

service@lawordf.com

Counsel for Defendants EMLI Pecan TC I, 

LP, EMLI Pecan GP, LLC, and Liberty 

Multifamily, LLC

/s/ Eric G. Calhoun

Eric G. Calhoun

Case 4:23-cv-00501-SDJ-AGD Document 25 Filed 07/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 401
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew L. Graham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ANDREW L. GRAHAM                                                                 
|Andrew L. Graham Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Accounting Officer)

November 7, 2008

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



36
```
**Exhibit 99.1(a)

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned chief executive officer of
Atchison Casting Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   May 15, 2003                  /s/ Thomas K. Armstrong, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Thomas K. Armstrong, Jr.
                                           Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Atchison Casting Corporation and will be retained be Atchison
Casting Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

SUSAN ANN LOWDEN

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2747 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1-20-316

(Supreme Court of New Jersey, D-55 

September Term 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 60228

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2020, having failed to respond to a Notice 

and Order directing her to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline, 

Susan Ann Lowden is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months in 

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. She shall comply with all the provisions of 

Pa.R.D.E. 217.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41067 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTHONY WAYNE MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CR067

- - - - - - - - - - January 27, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Anthony Wayne Morris appeals his convictions of use of interstate facilities in the commission of a murder for hire and of solicitation to commit a crime of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 1958, 373. Morris contends that he has established the defense of entrapment as a matter of law and that, accordingly, the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Morris further asserts that the district court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of his rape and kidnapping of the intendedNo. 96-41067 -2- victim of the charged offenses because this evidence was not relevant and posed a substantial risk of unfair prejudice. Morris asserts that the district court abused its discretion in admitting evidence that he had raped and kidnapped his ex-wife Diana Lombardo, for essentially the same reasons. The evidence presented by the Government establishedMorris’s knowing and enthusiastic participation in the murderfor-hire scheme; it was thus sufficient to rebut Morris’s entrapment defense. United States v. Chavez , 119 F.3d 342, 346 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, his conviction of the charged crimes does not amount to a manifest miscarriage of justice. United States v. Thomas , 12 F.3d 1350, 1358 (5th Cir. 1994). Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence that Morris had kidnapped and raped the intended victim of his murder-for-hire scheme. This evidence was relevant to the issue of motive and aided in rebutting Morris’s entrapment defense. See United States v. Bentley-Smith , 2 F.3d 1368, 1377 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) & 403. Likewise, the admission of evidence that Morris had also raped his ex-wife, Diana Lombardo, did not constitute error as it too aided in rebutting Morris’s entrapment defense. And even if this evidence were found to be erroneously admitted, in light of the overwhelming evidence of Morris’s guilt and the government’s thorough rebuttal of his entrapment defense, it would constitute harmless error. See United States v. Gadison , 8 F.3d 186, 192 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ANDERSON LEE, JR. §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-150

ROCKELLA L. NEAL, et al., §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff, Anderson Lee, Jr., an inmate currently confined at the Leblanc Unit with the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Rockelaa L.

Neal, Sergeant, Jasmine L. Graham, Corrections Officer, and Deanda Y. Turk, Corrections Officer. 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The magistrate judge recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s claims for failure to state a claim and as

frivolous [Dkt. 7].

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections

to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.1

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance 

1

Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on May 9, 2023 [Dkt. 8].

Case 1:23-cv-00150-MJT-ZJH Document 9 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 24
with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 25th day of September, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00150-MJT-ZJH Document 9 Filed 09/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 25
Billy BRANTLEY, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 18-6726.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
Christine CORNELIUS, petitioner, v. TOWN OF ATKINSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

No. 18-6874.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
Alberic ISRAEL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al.

No. 17-8905.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

LATTHEN CHANCE DOUGLAS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv274

PEDRO BOYKIN §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Latthen Chance Douglas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The Court

referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge. The

Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending that a motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction be denied.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Proper notice was given to plaintiff at his

last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2). No objections were filed to the Report and

Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct

and the report of the Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 28] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. The

motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction [Dkt. 22) is DENIED.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 14th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00274-MJT-CLS Document 29 Filed 03/14/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 265