alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Registrant's audited financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to those financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000917032
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
       <S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,414,916
<SECURITIES>                                21,714,050<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,543,346<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,257,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          474,362<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,783,034<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,257,396
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,076,897
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,875,312<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (798,415)<F5>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (798,415)<F5>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (798,415)<F5>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2,038)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2,038)
<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Includes $30,071 due from subsidiaries.
<F3>Includes $289,153 due to subsidiaries.
<F4>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest in Trust
with capital accounts of $23,876,239 less managing shareholder's
accumulated deficit of $93,205.
<F5>Includes writedowns of investments of $4,055,214.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
James Thomas HURST, II, petitioner, v. James CALDWELL, et al.

No. 18-67.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

OLGA BLACKLEDGE,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES BLACKLEDGE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 53 WM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of January , 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
James R. REECE, petitioner, v. L. Ray WHITLEY, et al.

No. 18-5697.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of American Recreational Enterprises,  Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-KSB (Report) for the year ended February 28, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof. I, Jorge Elias,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the best
of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jorge Elias
---------------------------
Jorge Elias
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 19, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARLOS BENITEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CR-02-10105; CA-05-112-7) Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlos Benitez, Appellant Pro Se. John Leslie Brownlee, United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Carlos Benitez seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his motion for reconsiderat ion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional c laims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Benitez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
co

o

to 8pm

a

53

5

t/2

K

s

s

6-7 pm

Aoorox 6:30pm an uber eats droooed off food at the subjects door. I. proceeded to the front door and waited I then noticed he had a ring

camera an a peep hole. I covered them up and waited by the steps.

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 37-2 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 299
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

 Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T INC. ET AL,

 Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00202-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Certain Deadlines. After 

due consideration, the motion is GRANTED. It is therefore

ORDERED that the deadlines are extended as shown in the table below. All other 

deadlines shall remain in place absent further leave of Court.

Event Previous Deadline New Deadline

File Proposed Docket Control 

Order and Proposed

Discovery Order

8/10/2023 8/24/2023

File Proposed Protective 

Order and Comply with 

Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the

Discovery Order

8/17/2023 8/31/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 33 Filed 08/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 928
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2054

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce for individuals

the maximum rate of tax on unrecaptured section 1250 gain from 25

percent to 20 percent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself, Mr. OSE, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr.

SHAYS, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. SHAW, Mr. GARY MILLER of

California, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. SANDLIN, and Mr. DAVIS of Florida)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce

for individuals the maximum rate of tax on unrecaptured

section 1250 gain from 25 percent to 20 percent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION FOR INDIVIDUALS IN MAXIMUM

4 CAPITAL GAINS RATES ON UNRECAPTURED

5 SECTION 1250 GAIN.

6 (a) REGULAR TAX.—

7 (1) Paragraph (1) of section 1(h) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to maximum
2

•HR 2054 IH

1 capital gains rate) is amended by adding ‘‘and’’ at

2 the end of subparagraph (C), by striking subpara3 graph (D), and by redesignating subparagraph (E)

4 as subparagraph (D).

5 (2) Paragraph (4) of section 1(h) of such Code

6 is amended by striking ‘‘the sum of—’’ and all that

7 follows and inserting ‘‘28-percent rate gain.’’

8 (3) Subsection (h) of section 1 of such Code is

9 amended by striking paragraph (7) and by redesig10 nating paragraphs (8) through (12) as paragraphs

11 (7) through (11), respectively.

12 (4) Paragraph (8) of section 1(h) of such Code

13 (as redesignated by paragraph (3)) is amended by

14 striking ‘‘, gain described in paragraph (7)(A)(i),

15 and’’.

16 (5) Paragraph (13) of section 1(h) of such

17 Code is hereby repealed.

18 (b) MINIMUM TAX.—

19 (1) Clause (ii) of section 55(b)(3)(A) of such

20 Code is amended to read as follows:

21 ‘‘(ii) the adjusted net capital gain,

22 plus’’.

23 (2) Paragraph (3) of section 55(b) of such Code

24 is amended by striking ‘‘plus’’ at the end of sub-
3

•HR 2054 IH

1 paragraph (C) and inserting a period and by strik2 ing subparagraph (D).

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

ELITE GAMING TECH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

WISTRON CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00191-JRG

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF LETTERS ROGATORY FOR

SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT WISTRON CORPORATION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(2) and 4(f)(2)(B), Plaintiff Elite Gaming 

Tech LLC (“EGT”) respectfully requests that this Court issue a Request for Judicial Assistance 

(“Letters Rogatory”) (attached as Exhibit A), addressed to the appropriate judicial authority in 

Taiwan, requesting that the Taiwanese authority assist in effectuating service of process upon 

Defendant Wistron Corporation (“Wistron”). 

EGT filed its Complaint against Wistron on April 24, 2023. Dkt. No. 1. This Court 

thereafter issued a Summons as to Wistron on April 25, 2023. Dkt. No. 7. Upon information and 

belief, Wistron is a publicly listed company with an address of No. 158 Singshan Rd. Neihu, 

Taipei, Taipei City, TW-11469, Taiwan. Accordingly, EGT respectfully requests that this Court 

issue Letters Rogatory seeking the assistance of the Taiwanese authority in effecting service of the 

Summons and Complaint upon Wistron. 

EGT respectfully requests that the Court return (a) the original copy of the signed and 

issued Letters Rogatory, and (b) two certified copies, to the undersigned counsel. The United 

States Department of State will oversee transmission of the Letters Rogatory to Taiwan through 

Case 2:23-cv-00191-JRG Document 8 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 22
diplomatic channels as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1781(a)(2). EGT will reimburse this Court for any 

expenses incurred in connection with the issuance and return of the Letters Rogatory. EGT has 

retained the services of Process Service Network, LLC, located at 24329 Main Street, Suite 220, 

Newhall, CA 91321, to ensure delivery of material and fees in accordance with United States and 

Taiwanese procedure. 

Dated: June 6, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III 

Alfred R. Fabricant

NY Bar No. 2219392

Email: ffabricant@fabricantllp.com

Peter Lambrianakos

NY Bar No. 2894392

Email: plambrianakos@fabricantllp.com

Vincent J. Rubino, III

NY Bar No. 4557435

Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com

FABRICANT LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South

Rye, New York 10580

Telephone: (212) 257-5797

Facsimile: (212) 257-5796

John Andrew Rubino

NY Bar No. 5020797

Email: jarubino@rubinoip.com

Michael Mondelli III

NY Bar No. 5805114

Email: mmondelli@rubinoip.com

RUBINO IP

51 J.F.K. Parkway

Short Hills, New Jersey 07078

Telephone: (201) 341-9445

Facsimile (973) 535-0921

Justin Kurt Truelove

Texas Bar No. 24013653

Email: kurt@truelovelawfirm.com

TRUELOVE LAW FIRM, PLLC

100 West Houston Street

Marshall, Texas 75670

Case 2:23-cv-00191-JRG Document 8 Filed 06/06/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 23
Telephone: (903) 938-8321

Facsimile: (903) 215-8510

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

ELITE GAMING TECH LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00191-JRG Document 8 Filed 06/06/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 24
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD21-15-000]

On May 6, 2022, the Joint Federal-State Task Force on Electric Transmission convened for a public meeting.

All interested persons are invited to file post-meeting comments to address issues raised during the meeting and identified in the Agenda issued April 22, 2022. For reference, questions asked by the meeting moderator are included below. Comments must be submitted on or before 21 days from the date of this Notice.

                    Comments may be filed electronically via the internet.[1]                                          Instructions are available on the Commission's website                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling.asp.*                     For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.                

                    For more information about this Notice, please contact: Gretchen Kershaw (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, (202) 502-8213,                     *Gretchen.Kershaw@ferc.gov*.                

Dated: May 11, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *See*18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) (2021).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-10549 Filed 5-16-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             724
<SECURITIES>                                     1,257
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                      1,818
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,973
<PP&E>                                           8,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,031
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,824
<SALES>                                          8,171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,571
<CGS>                                            6,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     33
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 33
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        33
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Gabino MEDINA OSORIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; Joel Valasquez-Rios, petitioner, v. United States; and Jose G. Vega-Zapata, petitioner, v. United States.

No. 18-6322.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Israel C. ISBELL, petitioner, v. Steven MERLAK, Warden.

No. 18-6638.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Eric A. KLEIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6949.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR and Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Philip A. MEARING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-288.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 21**

|Parent                               |                         |                                      
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                                     |                         |                                      
|Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.      |                         |                                      
|                                     |                         |                                      
|Subsidiaries (a)                     | Percentage of Ownership | Jurisdiction or State ofIncorporation
|                                     |                         |                                      
|Southern Missouri Bank and Trust Co. | 100%                    | Missouri                             
|SMS Financial Services, Inc.(b)      | 100%                    | Missouri                             

|(a) | The operation of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries are included in the Company's Financial
Statements contained in Item 7 hereof.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | Wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Missouri Bank and Trust Co.; subsidiary is inactive.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  November 9, 2010








/s/ Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin Haitzmann


Co Chief Executive Officer
Katrina WALKER, petitioner, v. Carl WEATHERSPOON, et al.

No. 18-623.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cr-00061-3

United States of America

v.

Abdil Kulseitov

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 174. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the magistrate judge. The court also accepts 

defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until 

after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Abdil Kulseitov (3) guilty of count one of the indictment, 

charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 – Conspiracy to Possess with 

Intent to Distribute Marijuana.

So ordered by the court on November 16, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00061-JCB-JDL Document 179 Filed 11/16/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 558
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Before the Court is Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics 

Company, Ltd.’s Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories and Requests for Admission. 

After considering the same, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 135-5 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 5617