alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 194

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to allow duty drawback

for grape juice concentrates, regardless of color or variety.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, and Mr. HASTINGS

of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to allow

duty drawback for grape juice concentrates, regardless

of color or variety.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUBSTITUTION OF GRAPE JUICE CON4 CENTRATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 313 of the Tariff Act of

6 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following:

8 ‘‘(x) GRAPE JUICE CONCENTRATES.—Any grape

9 juice concentrate of degrees brix 68–70 shall be considered
2

•HR 194 IH

1 as ‘of the same kind and quality’ for purposes of sub2 section (b) of this section, regardless of color, variety, or

3 any other characteristic.’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

6 of this Act, and shall apply to any drawback claim filed

7 on or after such date.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 13a-14(a)/15D-14(a) 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher E. Herald certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Solitario Resources Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

               a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

               b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

               c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DANIEL DAVID VERMETTE ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 215 LT Case No. 2014

- CF

- 3669 STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed May 10, 2022 3.800 Appeal from t he Circuit Court f or Mar ion County, Peter M. Brigham, Judge. Daniel David Vermette, Crestview, pro se.
N o Appearance fo r Appellee. PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Simmons v. State , 33 2 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022).

COHEN , EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/29/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      144,292
COMMITMENTS
  36,002   20,214   18,659   72,128   76,899  126,789  115,772   17,503   28,520

CHANGES FROM 05/22/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,066)
      51   -3,938      531   -1,381    2,424     -799     -983    1,865    2,048

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.0     14.0     12.9     50.0     53.3     87.9     80.2     12.1     19.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      155)
      38       40       42       58       61      121      121
```

----

Updated June 5, 2012
DEMETRIC JOHNSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3636

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 11, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Frank E. Sheffield, Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR

, OSTERHAUS

, and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Andre HOSKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-1591.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Medifast, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Michael S. McDevitt,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
                the
                Company.








By: /s/
      Michael S. McDevitt


Michael
      S. McDevitt


Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer


November
      8, 2007
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21  List of Subsidiaries


Subsidiary                           Incorporation
Inso Chicago Corporation             Illinois
Inso Kansas City Corporation         Missouri
Inso Corporation Ltd.                United Kingdom
Henderson Software, Inc.             Colorado
Electronic Book                      Massachusetts
Technologies Mass, Inc.
Electronic Book                      Canada
Technologies Canada, Ltd.
Inso Florida Corporation             New York
Inso (Overseas) Corporation          Delaware
eBusiness Technologies-              Delaware
USA, Inc.
Inso France SARL                     France
Inso Foreign Sales Corporation       Barbados
ViewCo ULC, and its 100%             Canada
owned subsidiaries:
Venture Lab, Inc.; Ncode
Research Inc.; and
Paradigm Development
Corporation

Inso Australia Pty Ltd.              Australia
Electronic Book
Technologies SA                      Switzerland
Inso Securities Corporation          Massachusetts
Inso Dallas Corporation              Delaware
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 19, 2020

N o. 04

- 19

- 00879

- CV

CITY OF LEON VALLEY

, Appellant

v.

Benny MARTINEZ

, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 08343

Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding 1

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we REVERSE the trial court’s order and dismiss Appellee’s suit for want of jurisdiction. Appellee’s motion for expedited consideration of this appeal is MOOT. We tax costs of court for this appeal against Benny

Martinez.

It is so ORDERED on August 19, 2020

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Just ice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of August, 2020

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 The Honorable Peter Sakai, presiding judge of the 225th Judicial District Court, signed the order being appealed. The Honorable Rosie Alvarado is the presiding judge of the 438th Judicial District Court.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-1-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38--Spartanburg County, South Carolina 
Authorization of Production Activity, BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC 
(Passenger Motor Vehicles), Spartanburg, South Carolina

    On January 13, 2022, BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within Subzone 38A, in Spartanburg, South Carolina.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (87 FR 3761, January 25, 2022). On May 
13, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: May 13, 2022.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10683 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Michael SINEGAL, petitioner, v. Dawn POLK.

No. 18-122.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Austin MYERS, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-6532.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
Exhibit
10.1


 


	Mr.
    Anshu Bhatnagar	March
    20, 2019


Chief
Executive Officer


mPhase
Technologies, Inc.


 


Dear
Anshu,


 


Please
accept my resignation as a Director of mPhase Technologies Inc. effective midnight March 20, 2019


 


I
have enjoyed being a Director of the Company. I wish you the best of luck in taking mPhase forward to greater heights.


 


Regards,


 


/s/
Ronald Durando





 



Ronald
A. Durando
Exhibit 5

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 59-7 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1038
App. 046
App. 047
Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 59-7 Filed 12/08/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 1041
App. 049
App. 050
Michael PATINO, petitioner, v. RHODE ISLAND.

No. 18-6181.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/31/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      326,066
COMMITMENTS
  52,014  130,293   61,143  192,398  114,228  305,555  305,664   20,511   20,402

CHANGES FROM 12/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,128)
  -1,734  -12,490    2,554   -6,558    6,688   -5,738   -3,248    1,610     -880

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.0     40.0     18.8     59.0     35.0     93.7     93.7      6.3      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      141)
      52       47       60       30       31      114      113
```

----

Updated January 4, 2013
Johanna ONG, et al., petitioners, v. HUDSON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al.

No. 18-1146.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mario VILLENA, et al., petitioners, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 18-1223.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Rodney L. JONES, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

No. 18-6068.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report of Extensions, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10K,  for  the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Crawford Shaw, the
chief  executive  officer  of  the company hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K, of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  May 21,  2009

/s/  Crawford  Shaw
-------------------
Crawford  Shaw
Principal  Executive  Officer  and  Director
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

# Certification Pursuant
to 18.U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Silicom Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
               the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Signature: /S/ Eran Gilad
Eran Gilad,Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 22, 2009 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


GENERAL TERMS AGREEMENT BETWEEN MJET AND AIRCOM PACIFIC INC FOR
THE IN-FLIGHT CONNECTIVITY PROVISION, INSTALLATION, TESTING AND CERTIFICATION OF THE AERKOMM K++ SYSTEM ON AIRCRAFT ACJ A319 MSN
4353


 


This General Terms Agreement is made
between MJet GmbH, an Austrian private limited company with its principal place of business at Concorde Business Park 1/C3/12,
2320 Schwechat, Austria (“MJet”), and Aircom Pacific, Inc., a California corporation with its principal place
of business at 44043 Fremont Blvd, Fremont, CA 94538 USA(“Aircom”).


		1.	MJet accepts to make aircraft ACJ A319 MSN 4353 Registration OE-LJG available to Aircom as a prototype
aircraft for the installation, testing, certification and connectivity services of Aircom’s Aerkomm K++ system at an approved
Airbus maintenance repair organization under EASA 145 requirements, at a time as mutually agreed between both parties.






		2.	Aircom will provide to MJet the Aerkomm K++ equipment free of charge.



 


		3.	The installation of the whole Aerkomm K++ system, including the Airbus Service Bulletin and associated
material kit, will be free of charge for MJet.



 


		4.	The installation and testing of the Aircom’s Aerkomm K++ system on aircraft MSN 4353 will
be under the supervision of Airbus at no cost to MJet.



 


		5.	The approval of the retrofit solution by the EASA and by the FAA will be under the responsibility
of Airbus and at no cost to MJet.



 


		6.	MJet will pay Aircom a one-time cost of [*] upon the successful completion of the installation,
testing and certification of the Aerkomm K++ equipment.



 


		7.	MJet will pay Aircom [*] per month for Connectivity Services with unlimited data provided by Aircom.



 


		8.	This agreement set forth the general terms agreed between the parties which will then be used as
the basis for developing full detail business agreement.



 


	 	 	 
	Louis Giordimaina	 	Konstantin Essler
	COO	 	COO & Accountable Manager
	Aircom Pacific, Inc.	 	MJet
	Date: ________________	 	Date: ___________________
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

#### **CERTIFICATIONS**

I, JamesE. Hohmann, certify that:

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln Benefit Life Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)                        Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)                       Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)                        Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)                        All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                       Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November5, 2007
| /s/ James E. Hohmann    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| James E. Hohmann        |   |
| Chairman and            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

E-2

----