alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/19/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      420,548
COMMITMENTS
  57,347   24,118  101,405  244,605  278,908  403,357  404,431   17,191   16,117

CHANGES FROM 06/12/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -25,074)
   6,228   -3,181   -9,705  -17,424  -12,744  -20,901  -25,630   -4,173      556

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.6      5.7     24.1     58.2     66.3     95.9     96.2      4.1      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      38       21       42       67       65      124      110
```

----

Updated June 22, 2012
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin A. Mattingly, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MARTIN A. MATTINGLY
|Martin A. Mattingly    
|Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2010

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



30
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 5, 2010 

jm 

Order 

 

January 5, 2010 

140298 (14) 

RAYMOND BETTISON, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140298 

 COA: 293823 

PAROLE BOARD, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Jose Luis PINEDA, petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 17-8655.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in *71light of *Sessions v. Dimaya,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).
Eric WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-6090.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
Order entered November 8, 2016 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01268-CV 

No. 05-16-01270-CV 

IN RE CHARLIE PUENTES, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 004-83427-2015 and 004-83429-2015 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart 

In accordance with the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ 

of mandamus and DENY AS MOOT relator’s motion for leave to file petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

 JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

 

 

 

Patent Armory Inc.,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Bose Corporation,

 Defendant. 

 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-00335-JRG 

 Patent Case 

 Jury Trial Demanded 

 

 

 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

The request to dismiss this matter without prejudice is hereby GRANTED. 

Case 2:23-cv-00335-JRG Document 7-1 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 64
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31236-31237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 22, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE,

[[Page 31237]]

Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0e1d0d0ccc9c3c1d4c9cfced38ee3cfcdcdc5ced4d3e0c1d4cc8ec6d2c28ecfd2c7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2f3c2c2dedbd1d3c6dbdddcc19cf1dddfdfd7dcc6c1f2d3c6de9cd4c0d09cddc0d5">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Heart of Georgia Bancshares, Inc., Vidalia, Georgia; to acquire 
Bank of Lumber, Lumber City, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-11008 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      431,418
COMMITMENTS
  49,293   23,198  105,946  256,305  282,235  411,544  411,379   19,873   20,039

CHANGES FROM 02/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -16,319)
  -4,134     -280   -1,234   -9,352  -14,169  -14,720  -15,683   -1,599     -636

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.4      5.4     24.6     59.4     65.4     95.4     95.4      4.6      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      120)
      33       16       43       59       61      112      105
```

----

Updated February 24, 2012
Alice BROWN, petitioner, v. DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-9567.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30704

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSIE E. SINEGAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:00-CR-60006

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court revoked Josie E. Sinegal’s probation and

sentenced her to serve four years in prison. Sinegal appeals her

sentence. She argues that her sentence is unreasonable because it

exceeded the advisory guideline range, because her violations did

not warrant such a harsh sentence, and because the district court

failed to provide sufficient reasons for the sentence. She

requests that this court vacate her sentence and remand the case

for resentencing.
2

We have yet to decide whether revocation sentences imposed

following the release of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

(2005), should be reviewed under the reasonableness standard or the

plainly unreasonable standard. See United States v. Hinson,

429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1804

(2006). Nevertheless, resolution of this issue is not needed to

dispose of this appeal because Sinegal has not shown that she

should prevail under either standard. See id. Sinegal’s sentence

exceeded the recommended guidelines sentence but not the pertinent

statutory maximum sentence. Further, a review of the record

demonstrates that the district court considered the relevant

sentencing factors. See United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707

(5th Cir. 2006). Consequently, the sentence was neither

unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/04/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,912
COMMITMENTS
   9,947    1,287    1,125   21,892   31,457   32,963   33,869    9,948    9,043

CHANGES FROM 11/27/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,374)
    -116     -342     -168    1,740    1,280    1,456      770      -83      604

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.2      3.0      2.6     51.0     73.3     76.8     78.9     23.2     21.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       49)
      14        2        8       25       23       43       31
```

----

Updated December 7, 2012
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.,
that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc.



November 6, 2006



/s/    CRAIG W.CARLSONCraig W. Carlson Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 By:  /s/ Gregory T. DonovanGregory T. DonovanChief Financial Officer
Campbell & Company, Inc.
General Partner
Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.November 14, 2008 -E 3-
Luke Waine CAINES, Jr., petitioner, v. Josie GASTELO, Warden.

No. 17-8780.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-23689) pertaining to the Super Vision International, Inc. 1994
Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32007)
pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of our report dated March
7, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Super Vision
International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year
ended December 31, 2000.


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Orlando, Florida
March 22, 2002
<PAGE>




                                                            Exhibit 23.1



                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Forms S-8 No. 33-77302, 33-83606, 33-77304, 33-93324, 333-06847, 333-06845, 
333-67771, 333-67773, and 333-67777) pertaining to the Inso Corporation 1993 
Stock Purchase Plan, 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, 401(k) Plan, 1996 
Non-employee Director Plan and 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and in the 
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-69259) of Inso Corporation and in 
the related Prospectus of our report dated March 29, 1999, with respect to 
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Inso Corporation 
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 
1998.

                                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

TERRANCE FLETCHER §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv37

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID §

MEMORANDUM ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER

Petitioner Terrance Fletcher, an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Discussion

On May 20, 2011, in the 277th District Court for Bexar County, Texas, petitioner was

convicted of Murder-Habitual Offender. Petitioner was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for life

in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. Petitioner brings

this petition contesting his conviction and sentence.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), a petitioner may bring his petition for writ of habeas corpus

in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the

district within which he was convicted. Section 2241(d) further provides that the district court in

the exercise of its discretion may transfer the action to the other district in the furtherance of justice.

Petitioner is currently confined at the Stiles Unit located in Beaumont, Texas. However,

petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Bexar County, Texas. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 124, Bexar

County is in the San Antonio Division of the Western District of Texas.

Case 1:23-cv-00037-MJT-ZJH Document 2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18
While jurisdiction is proper in the Eastern District of Texas because the prisoner is confined

within the district court’s territorial boundaries, the court has considered the circumstances and has

determined that the interest of justice would best be served if this petition were transferred to the

division in which the petitioner was convicted. 

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest

of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it could

have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only for an abuse of

discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989). 

Since petitioner complains of a conviction which occurred in the San Antonio Division of

the Western District of Texas and all records and witnesses involving this action may be located in

the Western District, the transfer of this action to such division would further justice. Therefore, it

is the opinion of the undersigned that this petition should be transferred to the United States District

Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. An Order of Transfer so providing

shall be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Order.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 1st day of February, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00037-MJT-ZJH Document 2 Filed 02/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 19
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ Philip Wang Philip Wang CA Bar No. 262239

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

Verizon Communications Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 19 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 463
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Quality Dining, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-84698) of our report dated January
10, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Quality
Dining, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 27, 1996 and October 29, 1995, and
for the fifty-two week periods ended October 27, 1996, October 29, 1995 and
October 30, 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                    COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


South Bend, Indiana
January 22, 1997