alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: November 5 , 2020

CASE OF: DUANE EUGENE OWEN V

. STATE OF FLORIDA

DOCKET NO.: SC 18

- 810 OPINION FILED: June 2 5 , 2020

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION S HA VE BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE

OPINION:

On p age 2, second paragraph

, “ Owen has also been convicted of the first

- degree murder of another victim, Georgianna Worden, who was murdered five days after Slattery in a scenario “substantially similar to [that] of the Slattery murder.” Id . at
691.” has been changed to “ Owen has also been convicted of the first

- degree murder of another victim, Georgianna Worden, who was murdered approximately two months after Slattery in a scenario “substantially similar to [that] of the Slattery murder.” Id. at 691

- 92; Owen v. State ( Owen I ), 560 So . 2d 207, 209 (Fla. 1990). ”

On p.3, first full paragraph

, “Even though Owen murdered Slattery five days before he murdered Worden, his death sentence for the murder of Slattery is in a different posture with respect to our Hurst

- related precedent. The re ason for this difference is that Owen’s original conviction and sentence of death for Slattery’s murder was reversed and remanded for a new trial, see Owen v. State ( Owen I ), 560 So. 2d. 207, 212 (Fla. 1990), which delayed the finality date of his convicti on and sentence for that murder. ” has been changed to “Even though Owen murdered Slattery before he murdered Worden, his death sentence for the murder of Slattery is in a different posture with respect to our Hurst

- related precedent. The reason for

this d ifference is that Owen’s original conviction and sentence of death for Slattery’s murder were reversed and remanded for a new trial, see Owen I , 560 So. 2d at 212, which delayed the finality date of his conviction and sentence for that

murder.”

SIGNED: O PINION CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          12,487
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,093
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,726
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,626
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,634
<LOANS>                                        690,420
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 781,358
<DEPOSITS>                                     572,391
<SHORT-TERM>                                    94,641
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,161
<LONG-TERM>                                     42,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,113
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 781,358
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,757
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  927
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,684
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,797
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,508
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,176
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      562
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         196
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.89
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,226
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,217
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,527
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       15
<RECOVERIES>                                        13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,087
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,087
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,370
        


</TABLE>
Michael BARRETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5209.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*787Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00285-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Cobblestone Wireless, LLC’s Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. Dkt. No. 16. After 

consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s deadline to serve contentions pursuant to P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 is 

extended to September 28, 2023. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ deadline to serve contentions pursuant to P.R. 

3-3 & 3-4 is extended to November 23, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 258
Kareem GLASS, petitioner, v. Melissa HAINSWORTH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset.

No. 18-6582.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

KANTON DAMONT THOMAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00129

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, the Court hereby 

ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States 

Magistrate Judge and accepts Defendant’s guilty plea. It is further ORDERED that, in accordance 

with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the Magistrate Judge’s findings, Defendant is adjudged guilty 

as to Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon in 

Possession of a Firearm.

Case 4:23-cr-00129-ALM-AGD Document 18 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 31
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND 

AKOUSTIS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

QORVO, INC.,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-180

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANT QORVO, INC.’S NOTICE OF SERVICE AND

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH P.R. 4-1

Pursuant to the Court’s Docket Control Order (Dkt. 46) and P.R. 4-1, Defendant Qorvo, 

Inc. (“Qorvo”) hereby provides notice that Qorvo served its Proposed Claim Terms for 

Construction upon Plaintiffs’ counsel of record via electronic mail on March 19, 2024. 
-2-

Dated: March 19, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

By: /s/ Robert M. Masters

JENNIFER KLEIN AYERS (Texas Bar No. 24069322)

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

2200 Ross Ave, 20th Floor

Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: 469.391.7400

Facsimile: 469.391.7401

jayers@sheppardmullin.com

ROBERT M. MASTERS (MD State Bar No. 14770)

JONATHAN DEFOSSE (VA State Bar No. 48220)

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

2099 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 100

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: 202.747.1900

Facsimile: 202.747.3369

rmasters@sheppardmullin.com

jdefosse@sheppardmullin.com

Attorneys for Defendant Qorvo, Inc.
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has 

been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on March 19, 2024.

/s/ Robert M. Masters

Robert M. Masters
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,349
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,479
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,939
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          33,889
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,085
<LOANS>                                        260,774
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,789
<DEPOSITS>                                     278,751
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,325
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,856
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 327,789
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,986
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,952
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,938
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,228
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,228
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,710
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        1
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,450
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.42
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       296
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,386
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,387
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,387
        

</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 171 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  Union Calendar No. 11
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 171

                          [Report No. 106-16]

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                    Jersey, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

     Mr. LoBiondo (for himself, Mr. Frelinghuysen, and Mr. Saxton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

                           February 11, 1999

Additional sponsors: Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Franks of New Jersey, 
                     Mrs. Roukema, and Mr. Pallone

                           February 11, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                    Jersey, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 6 of Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$4,000,000''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``five'' and inserting 
        ``10''.
                                     





                                                  Union Calendar No. 11

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 171

                          [Report No. 106-16]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                    Jersey, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 11, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
Dannye T. McINTOSH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6974.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
John E. HAMILTON, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 18-542.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
KE KAILANI DEVELOPMENT LLC, et al., petitioners, v. KE KAILANI PARTNERS, LLC, et al.

No. 16-763.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/18/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,941
COMMITMENTS
   8,744      813    1,098   21,411   29,602   31,253   31,513   10,688   10,428

CHANGES FROM 09/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,795)
     256     -197      116   -1,024      651     -652      570    2,448    1,226

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.8      1.9      2.6     51.1     70.6     74.5     75.1     25.5     24.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       48)
      14        3        7       25       18       42       26
```

----

Updated September 21, 2012
BLAKE J. WATTERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, 

FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES; 

STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his 

official capacity as Director of the 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives; 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE; 

MERRICK GARLAND, in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the 

United States;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00080

Judge Mazzant

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR A SCHEDULING ORDER 

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court, having considered the Joint Motion for a Scheduling 

Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt #17), concludes 

that the motion has merit and should be, and hereby is, GRANTED. Accordingly, 

it is ORDERED that: 

1. The Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

is due on Friday, March 31, 2023;

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 4:23-cv-00080-ALM Document 28 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 488
2. The Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment is due on Friday, April 7, 2023; and

3. The parties are excused from any applicable initial disclosure

obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Case 4:23-cv-00080-ALM Document 28 Filed 03/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 489
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
of President and Co Chief Executive Officer








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:  May
9, 2008





/s/ Peter Hoetzinger


Peter
Hoetzinger


President
and Co Chief Executive Officer
# FILED

February 27, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

WILMA JEAN LAMPLEY, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) ) Williamson Chancery VS. ) No. 23651 ) GORDON RAY LAMPLEY, ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9708-CH-00423 Defendant/Appel

lant. )


## CONCURRING OPIN

ION

I have take n the unusual step of pr eparing this separa

te opinion because the assertions in M r. Lampley’s petition for r ehearing require s ome response. The petition states that this court’s February 6, 1 998 opinion “totally over looked or refused to acknowledge” Ms. Lampley’s August 1996 mortgage application in which Ms. Lampley states that her gros s monthly income was $6,652. The petiti on also asserts that we must treat this statement as a b

in din g admission by Ms. Lampley because of our decision in Patterson v. Patterson , App. No. 88-26 8-II, 1989 WL 5451 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 1989), perm. app. denied (Tenn. May 1, 1989). Neither assertion is corre

ct.

Our original opinio n recounts Mr. Lampley’s assertion that Ms. Lampley’s g ross monthly income had increased dramatically after 1994 from $833 per mo nt h to $6,652 per month. We also pointed out tha t her net monthly incom

e was $1,828 after deducting the expenses of her house cleaning business. Because Ms. Lampley’s testimonyabout he r net monthly in come was essentially unchallenged, we considered her net monthly incom e when we determined whether Mr. Lampley had made o ut a case for reducing or eliminating his spousal support obligation. W hile the increase in Ms. Lample

y’s i ncome may very we ll be a material c

hange in circumstanc

es, it does not necessarily foll ow that decreasing

or eliminating her s

pousal support is warranted.

The circumstances of thi s case differ mar kedly from those in Patterson v. Patterson

. Mr. Patterson testifie d at trial that his int

erest in his law partnership did-2-

not have “any tangible va

lue , ” even though he had earlier submitted a financial statement to a bank stating that the value of this interest was $100,000. This court determined that Mr. Patterson’s financial statement was an admission against i nterest th attended to establish tha t the value of his inte

rest in his law part

nership wa s $100,000. See Patterson v. Patterson , 1989 WL 5451, at * 2. Ms. Lampley did not provide similar inconsistent testimony in this case. She never attempted to repudia

te the statement on her mortgage loan that her gross monthly incom e was $6,652, but rather she simply testified about her net monthly income after the expenses of her business were deducted fr om her gross income.

The plain differ

ence between gros s and net income is sufficient to render Patterson v. Patt erson inapposite.

_______________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
**EXHIBIT 21**

|Parent                               |                         |                                      
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                                     |                         |                                      
|Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.      |                         |                                      
|                                     |                         |                                      
|Subsidiaries(a)                      | Percentage of Ownership | Jurisdiction or State ofIncorporation
|                                     |                         |                                      
|Southern Missouri Bank and Trust Co. | 100%                    | Missouri                             
|SMS Financial Services, Inc.(b)      | 100%                    | Missouri                             

___________________________(a)
The operation of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries are included in the Company's Financial Statements
contained in Item 7 hereof.(b)
Wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Missouri Bank and Trust Co.; subsidiary is inactive.
Gerald DANIELS, petitioner, v. Janet DOWLING, Warden.

No. 18-6085.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.