alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1887

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the depiction of animal

cruelty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. GALLEGLY (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. BROWN of California, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the

depiction of animal cruelty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PUNISHMENT FOR DEPICTION OF ANIMAL CRU4 ELTY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘§ 48. Depiction of animal cruelty

9 ‘‘(a) CREATION, SALE, OR POSSESSION.—Whoever

10 knowingly creates, sells, or possesses a depiction of animal
2

•HR 1887 IH

1 cruelty with the intention of placing that depiction in

2 interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall

3 be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5

4 years, or both.

5 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section—

6 ‘‘(1) the term ‘depiction of animal cruelty’

7 means any visual or auditory depiction, including

8 any photograph, motion-picture film, video record9 ing, electronic image, or sound recording of conduct

10 in which a living animal is intentionally maimed,

11 mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, if such con12 duct is illegal under Federal law or the law of the

13 State in which the creation, sale, or possession takes

14 place, regardless of whether the maiming, mutila15 tion, torture, wounding, or killing took place in the

16 State; and

17 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ means each of the several

18 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth

19 of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American

20 Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana

21 Islands, and any other commonwealth, territory, or

22 possession of the United States.’’.
3

•HR 1887 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

2 for such chapter is amended by adding at the end the fol3 lowing:

‘‘48. Depiction of animal cruelty.’’.

Æ
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/28/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       37,896
COMMITMENTS
  11,877    1,741    2,640   16,283   25,571   30,800   29,952    7,096    7,944

CHANGES FROM 02/21/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,946)
    -465      212   -1,159      793   -1,147     -831   -2,094   -1,115      149

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.3      4.6      7.0     43.0     67.5     81.3     79.0     18.7     21.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      10        9       11       28       26       46       40
```

----

Updated March 2, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC’S 

MOTION TO TEMPORARILY SUBSTITUTE LEAD COUNSEL 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Temporarily Substitute Lead Counsel. The 

Court, having considered the same, is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Reza Mirzaie shall serve as Lead Counsel for Plaintiff during the 

September 16, 2024, motion hearing.

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 85-1 Filed 09/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6167
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 12

- 01029

- CV

Union Pacific Railroad Company

v

.

Estate of Geronimo Gutierrez, deceased, and Amelia Gutierrez and Adrian Gutierrez, Individually

in their Capacities as Dependents of Geronimo Gutierrez, deceased, and Amelia Gutierrez, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Geronimo Gutierrez

NO. 380337401 IN THE PROBATE COURT NO 4 OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

MT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE $10.00
$10.00 $10.00
$5.00 $10. 00 $5.00
$5.00 $5.00
$10.00 $5.00 $10.00
$5.00 $10.00
$5.00 $10.00 $5.00
$10.00 $5.00 05/05/2014

03/26/2014

01/28/2014

08/16/2013

07/12/2013

07/12/2013

06/26/2013

05/31/2013

05/31/2013

05/08/20 13

05/01/2013

04/05/2013

03/01/2013

03/01/2013

02/04/2013

02/04/2013

01/30/2013

01/30/2013 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- P AID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID APE

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

APE

APE

APE

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

APE

APEMT FEE

E

- TXGOV FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

E

- TXGOV FEE

CLK RECORD

E

- TXGOV FEE

FILING $10.00 $5.00 $8,598.00 $5.00
$686.00

$5.00 $175.00 01/30/2013

01/30/2013

01/04/2013

12/17/2012

12/04/2012

11/26/2012

11/26/2012 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID APE

APE

ANT

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $9,6 1 9 .00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine
, Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true stat ement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my
hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this October 30 , 2015

.
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-10679) of Olympic Steel, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2007, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Olympic Steel, Inc. which appears in Olympic Steel, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Cleveland, Ohio 

March 13, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS



I, Peter Hoetzinger , certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Century  Casinos,
Inc. (the "Company");

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are  responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its
     consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those
     entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  report is being
     prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and  procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c)  disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
     control  over  financial  reporting  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules
     13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's  most recent
     fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
     materially  affect,  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting.

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or  operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
     reasonably  likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  August 13, 2003

/s/ Peter Hoetzinger
--------------------
Peter Hoetzinger
Vice - Chairman and President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,655
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,639,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                 345,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,501,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,062,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    368,373
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,529,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,501,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               547,597
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                178,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            243,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,311
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.25


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17453 and #17454; Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00091]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky dated 05/16/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds, Tornadoes, Flooding, Landslides, Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         12/31/2021 through 01/01/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 05/18/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/18/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/21/2023.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Christian, Pike. *Contiguous Counties:* Kentucky: Caldwell, Floyd, Hopkins, Knott, Letcher, Martin, Muhlenberg, Todd, Trigg. Tennessee: Montgomery, Stewart. Virginia: Buchanan, Dickenson, Wise. West Virginia: Mingo. *The Interest Rates are:* Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.438Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.660Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.830Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.830Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17453 B and for economic injury is 17454 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-11275 Filed 5-24-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Kentucky 
Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial statements as of and 
for the three month period ended December 27, 1997 included in this Company's 
quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference 
to such condensed consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>			0000910394
<NAME>			KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000
<CURRENCY>	     	U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>				        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	        SEP-26-1998 
<PERIOD-START>	        SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>	        DEC-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>	                  1        
<CASH>		                  0
<SECURITIES>	                126        
<RECEIVABLES>	             13,613   
<ALLOWANCES>	                435    
<INVENTORY>		             19,486     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	             40,678
<PP&E>		             47,547
<DEPRECIATION>	             12,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	             84,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	             29,195
<BONDS>		             20,000
<COMMON>		                 50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	                  0
<PREFERRED>		                  0
<OTHER-SE>		             34,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         84,125
<SALES>		             26,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	             26,020
<CGS>		             23,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>	             23,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	                595 
<INCOME-PRETAX>	                 67 
<INCOME-TAX>	                 26 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	                 41 
<DISCONTINUED>	                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	                  0
<CHANGES>		                  0
<NET-INCOME>	                 41 
<EPS-PRIMARY>	                .01 
<EPS-DILUTED>	                .01 

</TABLE>
11056285 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Robert Christopher Bunt, 

Charles Ainsworth, and Parker Bunt & Ainsworth as counsel for Plaintiff. The Court, having 

considered same, is of the opinion the motion should be GRANTED. 

It is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate all CM/ECF notifications as to Robert 

Christopher Bunt and Charles Ainsworth for this action. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 109-1 Filed 07/15/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 4937
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-218

3D SMOKE SHOP INC d/b/a 3D SMOKE SHOP #3 

and IMAD HAMMAD,

3D SMOKE SHOP INC d/b/a 3D SMOKE SHOP #3 

REGISTERED AGENT: IMAD HAMMAD 

1301 JUSTIN RD #100 

LEWISVILLE, TX 75077

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire 

Minocha Law Firm 

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue 

Suite 700 

Dallas, Texas 75219

3/20/23

Case 4:23-cv-00218-ALM Document 2 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-218 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 4:23-cv-00218-ALM Document 2 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 16
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 11 - 00510 - CR

MICHAEL JEROME HAYES APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Michael Jerome Hayes was convicted by a jury of possession of one or more but less than four grams of cocaine and was sentenced to thirty

- two years’ confinement. This court affirmed Appellant’s conviction on October 19, 2006. See Hayes v. Stat e , No. 02

- 05

- 00431

- CR, 2006 WL 2986660 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Oct. 19, 2006, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) . On May 18, 2011, Appellant filed in the trial court a pro se ―Motion

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

F or Reconsideration For A New T rial .‖ The trial court denied the motion by written order the same day. In October 2011, Appellant filed a notice of appeal in this court in which he clearly attempts to appeal the order de nying his motion for new trial. No Texas statute authorizes a direct appeal from the den ial of a motion for new trial independently of the direct appeal from an underlying conviction. See
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02 (West 200 6 ) (―A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed

. . . .‖) (emphasis added); see also id. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011 )

. We generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only from a judgment of conviction. See McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet. ). Concerned that we may not have jurisdiction over his appeal of the denial of his motion for new trial, we sent Appellant a letter on November 15, 2011, notifying him that the appeal may be dismissed unless, on or before November
2 8, 2011, he or any part y filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Appellant requested and received an extension of time to respond and filed a response to our letter on December 7, 2011. The response does not, however, show grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.4(a); In re R.V., Jr. , 8 S.W.3d 692, 693

– 94 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied).3

We hold that we lack jurisdiction over Appellant’s appeal of the denial of his motion for new trial. Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: December 29, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Robert A. Bruggeworth, President and Chief Executive Officer of RF MicroDevices, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1)        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscalquarter ended             June 27, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a)             or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)        the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects,              thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Robert A. Bruggeworth                          Robert A. BruggeworthPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 6, 2009
Jose BENITEZ, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5464.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.