alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 20, 2015

p0513

Order 

Clerk

May 20, 2015

149161

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149161

COA: 317720 

Oakland CC: 07-213611-FH

DAVID KATAJA, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2014 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Jonathan Khalid PETRAS, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings**



|                                                                                                                                                  | Year Ended June 30,   
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|                                                                                                                                                  | 2003                  
|                                                                                                                                                  | (Dollars in thousands)
|Basic

Average shares outstanding                                                                                                                 | 1,167,446             
|Net income                                                                                                                                        | $2,738,218            
|Basic earnings per share                                                                                                                          | $         2.35        
|                                                                                                                                                  |                       
|Diluted  Average shares outstanding                                                                                                               | 1,167,446             
|                                                                                                                                                  |                       
|Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
treasury stock method using the period end market
price, if greater than average market price | 31,734                
|                                                                                                                                                  |                       
|Total                                                                                                                                             | 1,199,180             
|Net income                                                                                                                                        | $2,738,218            
|Diluted earnings per share                                                                                                                        | $         2.28
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                    STATE OF ORGANIZATION     % OWNERSHIP
------------------                    ---------------------     -----------

<S>                                   <C>                       <C>
Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc.         Ohio                      100%

Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.       Minnesota                 100%

Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.       Delaware                  100%

Olympic Steel Receivables LLC         Delaware                  100%(a)

Olympic Steel Trading, Inc.           Ohio                      100%

Oly Steel Welding, Inc.               Michigan                  100%

Olympic Steel Iowa, Inc.              Iowa                      100%(b)

OLP LLC                               Michigan                  50%(c)

G.S.P., LLC                           Michigan                  49%(d)
</TABLE>




(a)  Owned 100% by Olympic Steel, Inc. and Olympic Steel Receivables, Inc.

(b)  Owned 100% by Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.

(c)  Owned 50% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.

(d)  Owned 49% by Oly Steel Welding, Inc.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael D. Siegal, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Olympic Steel,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of this annual report on Form 10-K:

         (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         By:  /s/ Michael D. Siegal
              ---------------------
         Michael D. Siegal
         Olympic Steel, Inc.
         Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

         March 26, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT CORP.,

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§

§

§

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-379-JRG-RSP

(LEAD CASE)

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions 

filed by Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint LLC. Dkt. No. 52. After consideration, and 

noting its unopposed nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that Defendants T-Mobile and Sprint have leave to serve the amended 

invalidity contentions described in the motion. Dkt. No. 52 at 2, 3. 

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 503
#### Foster, Appellant, *v.*Rubenstein.

Argued November 16, 1955.

Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Bell, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*237November 28, 1955:

*M. Wolf,*with him *Earl V. Compton, Franklin E. Spitzer, Jr., Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen*and *Compton, Sandier & Berman,*for appellants.

*William Fearen,*with him *Herbert 0. Schaeffer,*for appellee.

Opinion

Pm Curiam,

Plaintiffs instituted in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County in August, 1953, proceedings in equity to enjoin defendant from engaging in certain business activities; defendant requested an accounting and such proceedings are now pending. In October, 1954, plaintiffs entered judgment by confession on a bond accompanying a mortgage on defendant’s property in Perry County. Defendant obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and execution thereon stayed until the final .determination of the proceedings in Dauphin County. The Court of Common Pleas of Perry County continued the rule and stayed all proceedings pending final decision of the Dauphin County Court. Plaintiffs appeal from that order.

*238Defendant has moved to quash the appeal on the ground that it is interlocutory. The motion is overruled because an indefinite stay of execution is final and appealable: *Stofflett v. Kress,*342 Pa. 332, 334, 335, 21 A. 2d 31, 32; *Marko v. Mendelowski,*344 Pa. 665, 668, 25 A. 2d 692, 693, 694; *Lietka v. Hambersky,*167 Pa. Superior Ct. 304, 306, 307, 74 A. 2d 698, 699.

As to the merits of the appeal, the question is not whether the Court of Common Pleas of Perry County had *jurisdiction*to make the order now appealed from; it undoubtedly had such jurisdiction. The real .question is whether the order was proper under the circumstances. Whether realization on the lien on the property in Perry County should be stayed pending the conclusion of the equity proceedings in Dauphin County-— or until any particular stage thereof — can best be determined by the Dauphin County Court which has full control of the major controversy between the parties, the judgment being merely security for the payment of whatever may be owing by defendant to plaintiffs. Pending the proceedings before it, that Court has, of course, jurisdiction to enjoin plaintiffs from proceeding on the judgment in Perry County to whatever extent it may deem necessary or desirable.

We therefore make the following

ORDER

The order of the Court below is reversed, without prejudice to the right of defendant to petition the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County to enjoin plaintiffs from execution on the judgment entered in Perry County until such time as the said Court may direct.'
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/10/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      150,095
COMMITMENTS
  49,593   12,239   13,192   67,760  102,222  130,545  127,653   19,550   22,442

CHANGES FROM 07/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,221)
   1,091     -691     -373    1,014    5,022    1,732    3,958    2,489      263

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.0      8.2      8.8     45.1     68.1     87.0     85.0     13.0     15.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      52       20       26       51       76      112      116
```

----

Updated July 13, 2012
EXHIBIT E

Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 121
Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 122
Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 123
Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 124
Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 125
Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 126
Case 2:23-cv-00364-JRG Document 17-6 Filed 12/01/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 127
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       65,848
COMMITMENTS
   6,086    4,623        0   55,249   58,514   61,335   63,137    4,513    2,711

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,216)
    -136     -247        0   -1,016     -313   -1,152     -560      -64     -656

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2      7.0      0.0     83.9     88.9     93.1     95.9      6.9      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       72)
       8        7        0       35       34       43       41
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      122,470
COMMITMENTS
  21,240   17,780      567   86,266   99,065  108,073  117,412   14,397    5,058

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        622)
    -617    3,746      -82      722   -2,655       23    1,009      599     -387

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    17.3     14.5      0.5     70.4     80.9     88.2     95.9     11.8      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      101)
      27       15        2       41       35       69       51
```

----

Updated August 24, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,928                     164
<SECURITIES>                                    15,252                  18,292
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,897                   1,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                       117                      92
<INVENTORY>                                        252                     762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,924                  20,173
<PP&E>                                           1,553                   1,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                     822                     563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,069                  20,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,440                   1,607
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           151                     148
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,700                  19,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,069                  20,800
<SALES>                                              0                   3,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                   7,137
<CGS>                                                0                   2,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,068                  11,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   774                    (198)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 372                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,779)                 (3,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (8,779)                 (3,954)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,779)                 (3,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,779)                 (3,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.59)                  (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.59)                  (0.27)


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2131

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit the imposition

under that Act of any requirement to mitigate for the impacts of activities that occurred in the past.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to prohibit

the imposition under that Act of any requirement to

mitigate for the impacts of activities that occurred in

the past.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Taking Our Prop5 erty Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2131 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON IMPOSITION OF MITIGATION RE2 QUIREMENTS FOR IMPACTS OF ACTIVITIES

3 THAT OCCURRED IN THE PAST.

4 (a) MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR FEDERAL AGENCY

5 ACTIONS.—Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of

6 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following:

8 ‘‘(q) LIMITATION ON REQUIRED MITIGATION.—

9 ‘‘(1) MITIGATION PURSUANT TO OPINION OF

10 SECRETARY.—This section does not require mitiga11 tion for a covered agency action, and the Secretary

12 may not specify any measure under clause (ii) or

13 (iii) of subsection (b)(4)(C) and may not require

14 compliance with any term or condition under para15 graph subsection (b)(4)(C)(iv) for a covered agency

16 action, to mitigate impacts of any activity that oc17 curred before the date of the covered agency action.

18 ‘‘(2) MITIGATION PURSUANT TO COMMITTEE

19 EXEMPTION.—The Committee may not establish any

20 mitigation and enhancement measures under sub21 section (h)(1)(B) for any covered agency action to

22 mitigate impacts of any activity that occurred before

23 the date of the covered agency action.

24 ‘‘(3) COVERED AGENCY ACTION DEFINED.—In

25 this subsection the term ‘covered agency action’

26 means—
3

•HR 2131 IH

1 ‘‘(A) any construction activity funded (in

2 whole or in part) or carried out by a Federal

3 agency; and

4 ‘‘(B) the issuance by any Federal agency

5 of a license or permit that would authorize any

6 construction activity that is carried out or fund7 ed (in whole or in part) by a State or local gov8 ernment agency.’’.

9 (b) MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR INCIDENTAL TAKE

10 PERMITS.—Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act of

11 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539) is amended by adding at the end

12 the following:

13 ‘‘(k) LIMITATION ON REQUIRED MITIGATION.—

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(2) does not

15 require, and the Secretary may not require as a

16 term or condition of a permit under subsection

17 (a)(1)(B), that a permittee for a public project take

18 any measures to mitigate impacts of any taking or

19 other activity that occurred before the date of the

20 issuance of the permit.

21 ‘‘(2) PUBLIC PROJECT DEFINED.—In this sub22 section the term ‘public project’ means any construc23 tion activity funded (in whole or in part) or carried

24 out by a Federal, State, or local agency.’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 9 - 0289 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES MICHAEL WEBB, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until January 29 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 29 2020

12/29/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0289
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

PRO SE LITIGA T S CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC NOTICE

(For use by a non-prisoner pro se litigant only.)

This consent form provides the opportunity to consent to receive a Notice of Electronic Filing

(NEF) generated by the ECF system for each future document filed as a public entry in the case

identified below. The NEF contains a hyperlink to the document, which may be accessed one

time, within 15 days of the NEF s creation, without cost (the free look ). This form does not

serve to seek permission from the court to electronically file. Pursuant to Local Rule C -5(a)(2)(B),

you must have the Court's permission to electronically file documents in the ECF system.

Printed Name: K UZV <1 Case Number: 

Pro se Litigant s Acknowledgment of Electronic Notice Requirements

As evidenced by my signature below I declare that I acknowledge, consent, and agree to the

following:

1. To notify the Court and other case participants, via a filing made in my case, when my

contact information, including my email address, changes;

2. To receive through ECF notice of court orders and Judgments under Fed. R. Civ. P. 77(d)

and other filings entered therein and to waive service by other means under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 5(b)(2) of all documents for which I was sent a NEF, unless service by electronic means

is not allowed under the rules or due to the technical limitations of ECF. I further agree to

accept email notice of any sealed document;

3. To save each document I am served during the free look period or to be charged

PACER s per-page rate if I remotely access a document outside of those provisions, or to

view documents in person at the divisional Clerk's Offices in the Eastern District of Texas

at no charge on a public access terminal if my PACER account is disabled;

4. To advise the clerk if I am unable to access a document via a provision described above

so I may request a courtesy regeneration of the NEF;

5. That should I wish to withdraw my consent to receive electronic notice, I will make such

request via a filing in my case; and

6. That my ability to receive NEFs will be disabled should the Court decide that I am unable

to fulfill these requirements. I further acknowledge that if this determination is made, I

may receive notification of such from the clerk rather than a court order.

Signature: O > i - 

Printed Name: / t >i

E-mail: 

Date: 

Sign in ink and deliver or mail to the divisional office where your case is pending.

Case 4:23-cv-00389-ALM-AGD Document 3 Filed 05/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 9