alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         158,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,807
<PP&E>                                         922,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                 687,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,797
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,548,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   559,949
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               499,140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (494,477)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 27 

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 193
	
 




 !"

 
# $

%&'()%(*+

*+&,%

-

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 194
	
 




 !"

 
# $

%

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 195
	
 




 !"

 
# $

%&'(

)

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 196
	
 




 !"

 
# $%

&'()*+,-')

.

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 197
	
 




 !"

 
# $

%

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 198
	
 




 !"

 
# 	$

%&'((')

*+,-.+,/-.012*21340-/2+5-6.708-01+5/81//908..,+.,28/058/2+587:+;0,525:<+=>?

@@@ 58/2+587:+;0,525:<+=20-A5:<-B

DEFFGH C

I

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 199
	
 




 !"

 
# $%

&

&

&

'()*+,

-.)/0+,(1.)

-.,.2304(1

56789

:;<=

59>?;9;=

59>?;9;=;@ABC;=

59>?;9;=5D;9E

59>?;9;7F68G=

F;:95?>;5?9>

G7:59;

=>7H

=H7:=7@=

C7:95C98=

C5@;;@=

D78:G59B7:

9@5B:B:IC;:9;@=

@;H7@95C7:C;@:

9;5F8=5H7@95??7IB:

D7@F;GB5

J

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 200
	
 




 !"

 
# $$

%

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 1-28 Filed 05/22/23 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 201
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE AARON’S COMPANY, INC. 

d/b/a BRANDSMART U.S.A., INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00268-JRG

PATENT CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Symbology 

Innovations, LLC respectfully submits this notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of 

Defendant The Aaron’s Company, Inc. d/b/a Brandsmart U.S.A., Inc.

Dated: August 25, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ René A. Vazquez 

René A. Vazquez

 Virginia Bar No. 41988

 rvazquez@ghiplaw.com

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

M. Scott Fuller

 Texas Bar No. 24036607

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

Facsimile: (903) 405-3999

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 2:23-cv-00268-JRG Document 14 Filed 08/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 148
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on August 25, 2023, I electronically transmitted the foregoing 

document using the CM/ECF system for filing, which will transmit the document electronically 

to all registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing, and paper copies 

have been served on those indicated as non-registered participants.

/s/ René A. Vazquez

René A. Vazquez

Case 2:23-cv-00268-JRG Document 14 Filed 08/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 149
Carl A. ROBERTSON, petitioner, v. INTERACTIVE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, et al.

No. 18-6501.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*820Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
                                                            330 E. Warm Springs
                                                            Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                                   702.257.1984
                                                             702.362.0540 (fax)





April 4, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm  of  G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report of
April 4, 2002,  on  the  Financial  Statements  of eCom Corp for the year ended
December 31, 2001, in its Form 10K-SB to be filed  with  the  US Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Signed,

G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA




<PAGE>
Eduardo BARINAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7873.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JONATHAN BRADLEY NYKAMP

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00047-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count One of the Information. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Jonathan Bradley 

Nykamp GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 371 

- Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1st May, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00047-JDK-KNM Document 18 Filed 05/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 53
DAVID BRIDGE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN, DIVISION 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-cv-547 

WOPAC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Defendant. 

DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF RULE 26 (a)(l) INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

Please take notice that Defendant, Wopac Construction, Inc., has served the Defendant's Rule 

26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures on Plaintiff, David Bridge. 

Service of Defendant's Rule 26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures on Plaintiff was made via email to 

Plaintiffs attorney ofrecord, on the 30th day of November, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Isl Michael C. Wynne 

MICHAEL C. WYNNE 

ATTORNEY IN CHARGE 

State Bar No. 22110800 

WYNNE, SMITH & YOUNG, PLLC 

707 W. Washington Street 

P.O. Box 2228 

Sherman, Texas75090 

903.893.8177 (T) 

903.892.0916 (F) 

mwynne@wynnesmithlaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

WOPAC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 

DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF RULE 26(a)(l) INITIAL DISCLOSURES ..... . . ....... ..... . . . ... Page 1 

Case 4:23-cv-00547-ALM-KPJ Document 7 Filed 11/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 29
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served upon all 

parties, by electronic filing, on this 30th day of November, 2023. 

Isl Michael C. Wynne 

DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF RULE 26(a)(l) INITIAL DISCLOSURES . .. .. .. . . . ... . ..... . ... . . Page 2 

Case 4:23-cv-00547-ALM-KPJ Document 7 Filed 11/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 30
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00643-CR

NO. 03-23-00644-CR

Abraham Kulor, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NOS. D-1-DC-23-300497 & D-1-DC-23-300495

THE HONORABLE KAREN SAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Abraham Kulor seeks to appeal from his judgments of conviction for 

murder. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02. The trial court has certified that these are plea-bargain 

cases and that Kulor has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 19, 2024

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          52,529
<SECURITIES>                                    28,849
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,673
<PP&E>                                          14,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,964
<SALES>                                         87,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,752
<CGS>                                           46,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,659)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          JAN-30-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               MAY-02-1998
[CASH]                                       1,228,000
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                5,668,000
[ALLOWANCES]                                   188,000
[INVENTORY]                                 11,159,000
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                            20,691,000
[PP&E]                                      18,256,000
[DEPRECIATION]                               7,804,000
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              39,723,000
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                       12,094,000
[BONDS]                                      6,259,000
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                        68,000
[OTHER-SE]                                  21,006,000
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                39,723,000
[SALES]                                     12,261,000
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            12,579,000
[CGS]                                        5,177,000
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                8,410,000
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                26,000
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             341,000
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (1,375,000)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                        (1,375,000)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (1,375,000)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.20)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.20)
</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2143

To suspend for 3 years the duty on 2,6-dichlorotoluene.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend for 3 years the duty on 2,6-dichlorotoluene.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,6-

4 DICHLOROTOLUENE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.82 2,6-dichlorotoluene (provided for in subheading

2903.69.70) ........................ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 this section shall apply with respect to goods entered, or
2

•HR 2143 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2074 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2074

  To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in water 
                  treatment and beauty care products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in water 
                  treatment and beauty care products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``     9902.61.03     Phosphonic acid,   Free        No change          No change          On or before 12/
                       (1-                                                                  31/2001           ''
                       hydroxyethyliden                                                                        .
                       e)bis- (CAS No.
                       2809-21-4)
                       (provided for in
                       subheading
                       2931.00.9030)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(110 So. 728)

No. 28143.

#### STATE of Louisiana v. L. C. HUDSON. In re L. C. HUDSON, Applying for Certiorari, Mandamus, and Prohibition.

(Nov. 2, 1926.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1926.)

George W. Smith, of Rayville, and Thomas O. Newton, of Monroe, for relator.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., and David I. Garrett, Dist. Atty., of Monroe, for the State.

BRUNOT, J.

All of the issues raised in this case are disposed of in the opinion and decree this day. handed down in No. 28142, State v. W. P. McCall, ante, p. 471, 110 So. 723.

It is therefore decreed-, that, the sentence herein be avoided, that the case be remanded to the lower court for sentence according to law, *487and that the writs of mandamus and prohibition applied for be denied.

O’NIELL, O. J., and ST. PAUL, J., concur in the decree.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 631

- CV

IN RE Mary DAHLMAN and Lantz HUBBERD

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 31, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court h as

considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the responses and reply of the parties and

is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ

of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1986

- PC

- 1440 , styled In re Willa Peters Hubberd Testamentary Trust

, pending in Probate Court No. 2

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tom Rickhoff presiding.
Virginia Denise WYCHE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


          To the Shareholders of Meridian Financial Corporation:

          We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Meridian
          Financial Corporation (an Indiana corporation) as of
          September 30, 1995, and the related statements of
          operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year
          then ended.  These financial statements are the
          responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
          responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
          statements based on our audit.

          We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
          auditing standards.  Those standards require that we plan
          and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
          whether the financial statements are free of material
          misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
          evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
          financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the
          accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
          management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
          statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides
          a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
          present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
          position of Meridian Financial Corporation as of September
          30, 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash
          flows  for  the year then ended in conformity with generally
          accepted accounting principles.




          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


          Indianapolis, Indiana,
          November 10, 1995
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1996
<CASH>                                         296,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,741,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,997,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,823,000
<PP&E>                                      15,431,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,663,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,975,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,397,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,060,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,668,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,975,000
<SALES>                                     11,828,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,133,000
<CGS>                                        5,001,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,885,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,122,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,122,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,122,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>