Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 29177 

Management to the Office of the 

Secretary of the Department of the 

Interior. Applicable DOI regulations 

pertaining to the PILT program to be 

administered by the Office of the 

Secretary were published as a final rule 

in the Federal Register on December 7, 

2004 (69 FR 70557). The Office of the 

Secretary, Office of Budget, is now 

planning to extend the information 

collection approval authority in order to 

enable the Department of the Interior to 

continue to comply with the PILT Act. 

Title of Collection: Payments in Lieu 

of Taxes (PILT) Act, Statement of 

Federal Lands Payments. 

OMB Control Number: 1093–0005. 

Form Number: None. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: State 

governments. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 46. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 46. 

Estimated Completion Time per 

Response: 40 Hours. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 1,840 hours. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

Obtain or Retain a Benefit. 

Frequency of Collection: Annually. 

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour 

Burden Cost: None. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Jeffrey M. Parrillo, 

Departmental Information Collection 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10176 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4334–63–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1256] 

Notice of Request for Submissions on 

the Public Interest; Certain Portable 

Battery Jump Starters and 

Components Thereof 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on 

April 29, 2022, the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued 

an Initial Determination on Violation of 

Section 337. The ALJ also issued a 

Recommended Determination on 

remedy and bonding should a violation 

be found in the above-captioned 

investigation. The Commission is 

soliciting submissions on public interest 

issues raised by the recommended relief 

should the Commission find a violation. 

This notice is soliciting comments from 

the public only. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides 

that, if the Commission finds a 

violation, it shall exclude the articles 

concerned from the United States: 

unless, after considering the effect of such 

exclusion upon the public health and 

welfare, competitive conditions in the United 

States economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the United 

States, and United States consumers, it finds 

that such articles should not be excluded 

from entry. 

19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar 

provision applies to cease and desist 

orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1). 

The Commission is soliciting 

submissions on public interest issues 

raised by the recommended relief 

should the Commission find a violation, 

specifically: (1) A general exclusion 

order directed to certain portable battery 

jump starters and components thereof 

imported, sold for importation, and/or 

sold after importation that infringe one 

or more of asserted claims 1, 16, 24, 29, 

and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 10,604,024; (2) 

cease and desist orders directed to 

respondents Winplus North America, 

Inc., ADC Solutions Auto, LLC d/b/a 

Type-S, and Winplus NA, LLC, all of 

Costa Mesa, California; Shenzhen Carku 

Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

China; Antigravity Batteries LLC of 

Gardena, California; Gooloo 

Technologies LLC and Shenzhen Gooloo 

E-Commerce Co., Ltd., both of 

Shenzhen, China; Great Neck Saw 

Manufacturers, Inc. of Mineola, New 

York; Matco Tools Corporation of Stow, 

Ohio; Nekteck, Inc. of Anaheim, 

California; PowerMax Battery (U.S.A.), 

Inc. of Ontario, California; 70mai Co., 

Ltd. of Shanghai, China; Horizon Tool, 

Inc. of Greensboro, North Carolina; Paris 

Corporation of Westampton, New Jersey; 

Guangdong Boltpower Energy Co., Ltd. 

of Shenzhen, China; and Best Buy Co., 

Inc. of South Richfield, Minnesota with 

respect to these asserted claims; and (3) 

limited exclusion orders directed to 

certain portable battery jump starters 

and components thereof imported, sold 

for importation, and/or sold after 

importation by defaulting respondents 

Shenzhen Mediatek Tong Technology 

Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China and 

Zhejiang Quingyou Electronic 

Commerce Co., Ltd. of Zhejiang, China 

that infringe one or more of asserted 

U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 

4,811,656 and 4,811,749. Parties are to 

file public interest submissions 

pursuant to 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). 

The Commission is interested in 

further development of the record on 

the public interest in this investigation. 

Accordingly, members of the public are 

invited to file submissions of no more 

than five (5) pages, inclusive of 

attachments, concerning the public 

interest in light of the ALJ’s 

Recommended Determination on 

Remedy and Bonding issued in this 

investigation on April 29, 2022. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of the recommended remedial 

orders in this investigation, should the 

Commission find a violation, would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles potentially 

subject to the recommended remedial orders 

are used in the United States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, or 

welfare concerns in the United States relating 

to the recommended orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly competitive 

articles that complainant, its licensees, or 

third parties make in the United States which 

could replace the subject articles if they were 

to be excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third-party 

suppliers have the capacity to replace the 

volume of articles potentially subject to the 

recommended orders within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the recommended orders 

would impact consumers in the United 

States. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
29178 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by the close of business on 

June 7, 2022. Persons filing written 

submissions must file the original 

document electronically on or before the 

deadlines stated above. The 

Commission’s paper filing requirements 

in 19 CFR 210.4(f) are currently waived. 

85 FR 15798 (Mar. 19, 2020). 

Submissions should refer to the 

investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337– 

TA–1256’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ 

documents/handbook_on_filing_

procedures.pdf.). Persons with 

questions regarding filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment by marking each document 

with a header indicating that the 

document contains confidential 

information. This marking will be 

deemed to satisfy the request procedure 

set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 

210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) & 

210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which 

confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document 

must also be filed simultaneously with 

any confidential filing. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel, solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All contract personnel will 

sign appropriate nondisclosure 

agreements. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection on EDIS. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and in Part 210 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

part 210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 9, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10196 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1213 

(Rescission)] 

Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, 

Fixtures, and Components Thereof; 

Notice of a Commission Determination 

To Institute a Rescission Proceeding 

and Grant a Joint Petition To Rescind 

Remedial Orders; Termination of 

Rescission Proceeding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has 

determined to institute a rescission 

proceeding and grant a joint petition to 

rescind remedial orders issued in the 

underlying investigation. The rescission 

proceeding is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

(202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on August 17, 2020, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Ideal 

Industries Lighting LLC d/b/a Cree 

Lighting (‘‘Cree’’) of Durham, North 

Carolina. 85 FR 50047–48 (Aug. 17, 

2020). The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleged violations of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

(‘‘section 337’’), based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain light-emitting diode products, 

fixtures, and components thereof by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,403,531 (‘‘the ’531 

patent’’); 8,596,819 (‘‘the ’819 patent’’); 

8,777,449 (‘‘the ’449 patent’’); 9,261,270 

(‘‘the ’270 patent’’); and 9,476,570 (‘‘the 

’570 patent’’). The complaint further 

alleged the existence of a domestic 

industry. The Commission’s notice of 

investigation named RAB Lighting Inc. 

(‘‘RAB’’) of Northvale, New Jersey as the 

sole respondent. The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations did not participate 

in the investigation. 

On August 17, 2021, the presiding 

administrative law judge issued a final 

initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding a 

violation of section 337 based on 

infringement of the asserted claims of 

the ’270 and ’570 patents, and finding 

no violation with respect to the ’531, 

’819, and ’449 patents. 

On October 25, 2021, the Commission 

determined not to review the ID’s 

finding of a violation with respect to the 

’270 and ’570 patents and the ID’s 

finding of no violation with respect to 

the ’449 patent. 86 FR 60071–72 (Oct. 

29, 2021). 

On December 16, 2021, the 

Commission, on review, issued a final 

determination affirming the ID’s finding 

of no violation as to the ’531 and ’819 

patents. 86 FR 72623–24 (Dec. 22, 2021). 

As a remedy for the finding of a 

violation with respect to the ’270 and 

’570 patents, the Commission issued a 

limited exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’) 

directed against RAB’s infringing 

products and a cease and desist order 

(‘‘CDO’’) directed against RAB. Id. 

Cree and RAB each timely appealed 

the Commission’s final determination to 

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit. The separate appeals 

were subsequently consolidated. On 

March 28, 2022, the Cree and RAB 

jointly moved to voluntarily dismiss 

their appeal and cross-appeal. See Ideal 

Industries Lighting LLC v. ITC, Appeal 

Nos. 2022–1484, –1501, Joint 

Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal 

(Mar. 28, 2022). The Federal Circuit 

granted the motion and dismissed the 

appeals the following day. See Ideal 

Industries Lighting LLC v. ITC, Appeal 

Nos. 22–1484, –1501, Order (Fed. Cir. 

Mar. 29, 2022). 

On April 8, 2022, Cree and RAB 

jointly petitioned to rescind the 

previously-issued LEO and CDO based 

on settlement pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1337(k) and Commission Rule 210.76(a) 

(19 CFR 210.76(a)). The parties filed 

both confidential and public versions of 

the settlement agreements. 

Upon consideration of the parties’ 

joint petition, the Commission has 

determined to institute a recission 

proceeding, grant the parties’ joint 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES