alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANTS

 

Please take notice that the undersigned hereby enters his appearance as counsel for 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Please direct 

and serve all notices, pleadings, papers and other material relevant to this action to Mr. Nagendra 

Setty at the address listed below.

Dated: February 21, 2024 By: /s/ Nagendra Setty

Nagendra Setty

SETTY CHACHKES PLLC

113 Cherry Street, Suite 54517

Seattle, WA 98104

Tel: 415.766.1149

Email: nick@sechalaw.com 

Counsel for Defendants

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 42 Filed 02/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 422
-2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF system on February 21, 

2024. 

By: /s/ Nagendra Setty

Nagendra Setty

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 42 Filed 02/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 423
Order entered April 5, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00048-CV

ERNESTINA GARCIA, Appellant

V.

RACHEL RUCKER, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-11929-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 2, 2021 motion for an extension of time 

to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to May 

3, 2021.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF SLOANE KYRAZIS

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Sloane Kyrazis, enters her 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 43 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 189
-2-

Wireless (“Verizon” or “Defendant”). Defendant respectfully requests that the court take note of 

this Notice of Appearance and makes Sloane Kyrazis its counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies 

of all communications and other documents filed in the above-referenced proceedings that are 

not filed via ECF should be emailed or faxed to Sloane Kyrazis at the address set forth below.

Dated: December 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Sloane Kyrazis

Sloane Kyrazis (GA Bar No. 878240) 

 Sloane.kyrazis@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a 

Verizon Wireless 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 43 Filed 12/01/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 190
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of December, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such 

filing upon Counsel of Record. 

/s/ Sloane Kyrazis

Sloane Kyrazis (GA Bar No. 878240) 

 Sloane.kyrazis@alston.com 

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900 

Atlanta, GA 30309 

Telephone: (404)881-7000 

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a 

Verizon Wireless

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 43 Filed 12/01/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 191
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                 DAVID McINTOSH
                            7932 FLAGER COURT SOUTH
                           WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33405
                       (561) 650-0659; FAX (561) 655-5677



                                                                  April 27, 2000


Mr. Joseph A. Paul, CEO
US Diagnostic, Inc.
777 South Flagler Drive
Suite 1200
West Palm Beach, FL 33401


Dear Joe:

In order to confirm the understanding we've reached orally, I restate below the
agreement under which I'll render consulting services to USD.

I've agreed to commit a minimum of 300 hours over the next 4 months or so, in
order to examine the feasibility of USD complementing its current endeavors
through an internet-based Application Service Provider (ASP) enterprise.

My time investment began Monday, April 24, in preparation for Tuesday's
meeting in your offices. I would hope to complete the task before the end of
August and will target completion by mid-August. I've committed to be
out-of-state for the last two weeks of July and the first week of August. While
I approach this engagement with a true sense of urgency (for all the reasons we
both understand about the need to launch such strategies as quickly as
possible), there can be no assurance that events beyond my control might not
delay the final written product.

My ability to complete the project in a timely manner is also dependent on the
availability of Stan Repetta to work with me. Stan has indicated that he
believes a substantial part of his time can be, and should be, devoted to this
effort. I'm pleased with his level of excitement about the project.

My work product will constitute a comprehensive report to the Board of
Directors, along with a suggested plan of action for the Company.

The Company has agreed to compensate me, as an independent contractor, at the
fixed rate of $15,000 per month for 4 months. The payments will be due on the
5th day of May, June, July and August of this year. In addition, the Company
will bear the cost of reasonable expenses incurred by me which have a direct
relationship to the engagement. If I advance money for such expenses, the
Company will reimburse me for directly-related expenses when I submit full
documentation of them.

Please signify your concurrence with this agreement at the bottom of this
letter.


My best to you,

/s/ DAVID McINTOSH
-------------------
David McIntosh                             ACCEPTED:

                                           /s/ JOSEPH A. PAUL, CEO  4/22/00
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Joseph A. Paul, CEO       Date
II

Calendar No. 864

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2302

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of September 28

(legislative day, September 22), 2000, by Mr. THOMPSON, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the building of the United States Postal Service

located at 307 Main Street in Johnson City, New York,

as the ‘‘James W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The building of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 307 Main Street in Johnson City, New York,

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James W. McCabe,

7 Sr. Post Office Building’’.
2

•HR 2302 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘James W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

Calendar No. 864

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 2302

AN ACT

To designate the building of the United States

Postal Service located at 307 Main Street inJohnson City, New York, as the ‘‘James W.McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building’’.

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of

September 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2000without amendment
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ETHAN THOMAS BROWN §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv169

ROBERT J. RADER, ET AL. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Ethan Thomas Brown, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The Court referred

this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate

Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending that a motion to dismiss filed by defendants DuBose, Coleman, Martin, Rader and

Warner be granted.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Proper notice was given to plaintiff at his

last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2). No objections were filed to the Report and

Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct

and the report of the Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 13] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. The

motion to dismiss [Dkt. 6] is GRANTED. Defendants DuBose, Coleman, Martin, Rader and Warner

are DISMISSED from this lawsuit.

 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 18th day of March, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00169-MJT-CLS Document 16 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 147
Shane ROACH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6804.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
* Pursuan t to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31281

RICKY L. HETCHLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, LTD.;

GRASSO PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CONOCO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2208)

January 8, 1999

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ricky L. Hetchler appeals an adverse jury verdict and certain rul ings and

decisions by the trial judge in his action against Conoco, Inc., arising out of the

claimed rape and subsequent death of her daughter, Lonna Herronen. Our review2

of the record in this case, aided by the briefs and oral arguments of counsel,

persuades that the jury finding of no liability herein on the part of Conoco is

adequately supported by the record, obviating the necessity for consideration of

other issues advanced herein. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      521,510
COMMITMENTS
  50,041   23,422   97,748  348,238  378,894  496,027  500,064   25,483   21,446

CHANGES FROM 03/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -32,516)
  -6,423   -1,577  -10,282  -17,500  -18,114  -34,205  -29,973    1,689   -2,543

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.6      4.5     18.7     66.8     72.7     95.1     95.9      4.9      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      129)
      33       23       46       61       61      119      109
```

----

Updated March 25, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the

Human Rights Defense Center,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

PAUL R. BABEU, individually and in his

official capacity as Sheriff of Pinal

County, Arizona; PINAL COUNTY,

ARIZONA; TONYA DELGADO, Sgt., in

her individual and official capacities;

ALYSSA ROMERO; LAURENDA

HENSLEY-SALISBERRY; CHERYL

MCBIRNIE; JOHN JOHNSTON;

LAUREN MCVICKER, Detention Aides,

in their individual capacities; LORETTA

VALDEZ; DALTON GAY; ERICA

CHAVEZ; DENA KELLY, in their

individual capacities; AMADO

MARTINEZ, Sgt., in his individual and

official capacities; LEONARD ARNOLD,

Sgt., in his individual and official

capacities; DAVID LINDERHOLM,

Training Specialist, in his individual and

official capacities; FRANCES HAWKINS,

Lt., in her individual and official

capacities; DENNIS RUSHING;

No. 13-15965

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01761-GMS

MEMORANDUM*

FILED

JAN 22 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
MATTHEW HULL, Lt., in his individual

and official capacities; DARREN

RUSHING, Lt., in his individual and

official capacities; VERNITA GANT, Lt.,

in her individual and official capacities;

MICHELE MCNEELY, Lt., in her

individual and official capacities;

GILBERT HOYOS, Lt., in his individual

and official capacities; TERRY

JOHNSON, Captain, in his individual and

official capacities; JAYME

VALENZUELA, Captain, in his individual

and official capacities; RUBEN

MONTANO, Captain, in his individual

and official capacities; JAMES KIMBLE,

Deputy Chief, in his individual and official

capacities,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2014

San Francisco, California

Before: ALARCÓN, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Prison Legal News appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for a

permanent injunction against the defendants, who operate the Pinal County Jail. 

Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) and we review for abuse of

discretion. Cummings v. Connell, 316 F.3d 886, 897 (9th Cir. 2003). Finding

none, we affirm. 
“Perhaps the most significant single component in the judicial decision

whether to exercise equity jurisdiction and grant permanent injunctive relief is the

court's discretion.” Charles Alan Wright et al., 11A Fed. Pract. & Proc. § 2942 &

n.3 (2d ed. 2013) (collecting cases). Here, the district court took the

extraordinarily cautious step of seeking additional briefing and evidence on the

motion before concluding that a permanent injunction was unnecessary. In light

this attention and the extraordinary deference we must show, we cannot find an

abuse of discretion here. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA,

INC., AND SPRINT CORP.,

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No: 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Corp. (“Defendants”),

and certifies that he is authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other 

papers in the above-captioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants.

Brian Rosenthal 

New York Bar No. 3961380 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2339 

Facsimile: (212) 817-9539 

BRosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 220
Dated: November 2, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Brian Rosenthal 

Brian Rosenthal 

New York Bar No. 3961380 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166-0193 

Telephone: (212) 351-2339 

Facsimile: (212) 817-9539 

Email: BRosenthal@gibsondunn.com 

 Counsel for Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 221
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on November 2, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Brian Rosenthal

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 11/02/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 222
Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 11/02/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 223
Corvain T. COOPER, aka CV, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5222.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cr-00042

United States of America

v.

Douglas Ryan Dahl

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). Judge Love

held a final revocation hearing on June 20, 2024, and issued a report 

and recommendation recommending that defendant’s term of supervised release should be revoked. Doc. 15. Defendant waived his

right to object to the report, agreed to the revocation of his supervised release, agreed to the sentence below, and waived his right to 

be present for sentencing. Doc. 14.

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. The court orders that the defendant be sentenced 

to a period of 24 months’ imprisonment with no supervised release 

to follow. The court recommends that the defendant serve his sentence at USP Hazelton, WV, if available.

So ordered by the court on June 28, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00042-JCB-JDL Document 16 Filed 06/28/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 69
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics 

America, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Excuse Attendance of Lead Counsel at the October 2, 2024, 

Motion Hearing. (Dkt. No. 155). After consideration, and noting its unopposed nature, the Motion 

is GRANTED. It is

ORDERED that Ruffin B. Cordell is excused from attending the Motion Hearing on 

October 2, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 156 Filed 10/01/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6045
VOTER VERIFIED, INC., petitioner, v. ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE LLC.

No. 18-549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133142 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 133142 COA: 271579 Macomb CC: 05-004049-FC MARY ANN MCBRIDE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On November 8, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is ag ain considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE IN PA RT the judgment of the Co urt of Appeals and REMAND this case to the trial court for further proceedings no t inconsistent with this order. The trial court erred in determini ng that the prosecutor failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant made a knowing and intellig ent waiver of her Miranda 1 rights. The totality of the circumstances surrounding the int errogation reflects that defendant knowingly, intelligently , and voluntarily waived her Miranda rights. Moran v Burbine , 475 US 412 (1986).

W EAVER , J., concurs and states as follows:

I concur with the majority ’s partial reversal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals and with the majority ’s order remanding this case to the trial court for further proceedings because the totality of the circumstan ces surrounding the interrogation reflects that the defendant knowingly, in telligently, and volunt arily waived her Miranda rights. See Miranda v Arizona , 384 US 436 (1966).

I write separately because viewing the defendant’s videotaped confession is integral to evaluating wheth er the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily

1 Miranda v Arizona , 384 U S 436 (1966)._______________________________________ __ 2

waived her Miranda rights. Although the defendant’s confession tape should not be posted on the Court’s website before the trial in this matter, the Court should post the tape after the conclusion of the trial and all possible appeals.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

d0129 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2008

Clerk
LIMITED WAIVER AGREEMENT

THIS LIMITED WAIVER AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this 23rd day of January, 2002, by and between COGENTRIX ENERGY, INC., a North Carolina corporation (the "Corporation"), and THOMAS F. SCHWARTZ (the "Executive").

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE



Amount A is the actual amount of the 2001 Performance Bonus; andAmount B is the excess (if any) of (i) one million dollars ($1,000,000) over (ii) the bonus paid to the Executive based on calendar year 2001 results under the Cogentrix Energy, Inc. Incentive Bonus Plan.



Amount A is the actual amount of the 2001 Performance Bonus; and

Amount B is the excess (if any) of (i) one million dollars ($1,000,000) over (ii) the bonus paid to the Executive based on calendar year 2001 results under the Cogentrix Energy, Inc. Incentive Bonus Plan.

As used in this paragraph, the terms "Transaction," "Transaction Bonus" and "Total Compensation" shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Program.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Limited Waiver Agreement as of the day and year first above written.



COGENTRIX ENERGY, INC.



By:  /s/ DAVID J. LEWISDavid J. Lewis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ THOMAS F. SCHWARTZ          Thomas F. Schwartz