alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2052

To provide the State of Oregon with a role in decisions made on environmental

restoration and waste management at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Reservation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself and Mr. WALDEN of Oregon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in

addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide the State of Oregon with a role in decisions

made on environmental restoration and waste management at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Reservation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hanford Environ5 mental Cleanup Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 2052 IH

1 (1) The hazardous and radioactive wastes at

2 the Department of Energy’s Hanford Reservation

3 threaten the health and well-being of the citizens of

4 the States of Oregon and Washington.

5 (2) Thousands of citizens of the State of Or6 egon live within the emergency planning radius of

7 the Hanford Reservation.

8 (3) The Columbia River is vital to commerce,

9 irrigation, recreation, and fisheries in the States of

10 Oregon and Washington.

11 (4) Virtually every shipment of radioactive ma12 terial to and from the Hanford Reservation travels

13 through the State of Oregon for more than 200

14 miles.

15 (5) The State of Oregon has no right under

16 current law to participate in decisions on manage17 ment or cleanup of the hazardous and radioactive

18 wastes at the Hanford Reservation except in an ad19 visory way.

20 SEC. 3. STATE OF OREGON PARTICIPATION AT HANFORD.

21 The State of Oregon shall have the same rights as

22 the State of Washington under Federal law to participate

23 in decisions regarding the management, cleanup, and dis24 posal of hazardous and radioactive wastes at the Hanford

25 Reservation, including the right to participate as a party
3

•HR 2052 IH

1 in negotiations, dispute resolution, and enforcement ac2 tions of the existing Hanford Federal Facility Agreement

3 and Consent Order (also known as the Hanford Tri-Party

4 Agreement). The existing parties to the Hanford Facility

5 Agreement and Consent Order shall, at the first reason6 able opportunity, provide to the State of Oregon the right

7 to fully participate in negotiations, dispute resolution, and

8 enforcement of that Agreement and Consent Order.

Æ
Dean Browning WEBB, et al., Petitioners, v. DEERE CREDIT, INC., et al.

No. 19-695

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T INC. et al,

 Defendants.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP

Lead Case

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00398-JRG-RSP

Member Case

ORDER

Before the Court is the Notice of Dismissal (“Notice”) filed by Headwater Research LLC 

(“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 27.) In the Notice, Plaintiff represents that all claims asserted against 

Defendant AT&T, Inc. in lead case 2:23-cv-00397 and member case 2:23-cv-00398 are voluntarily 

dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Id. at 1.) 

In light of the Notice, which the Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES, and 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all pending claims and causes of action in lead case 2:23-cv-00397 

and member case 2:23-cv-00398 asserted against AT&T, Inc., only, are DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All pending requests for relief asserted between Plaintiff and 

AT&T, Inc. in the above-captioned case not explicitly granted herein are DENIED AS MOOT. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to MAINTAIN AS OPEN the above-captioned cases as 

other defendants remain.

So Ordered this

Dec 8, 2023

Case 2:23-cv-00397-JRG-RSP Document 37 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 367
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8542

DAVID CRUMP, a/k/a David Lee Crump, Sr., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

DOCTOR ARGARWAL, Deputy Director of N.C. Department of 

Corrections Healthcare; BOYD BENNETT, Director for N.C. 

Department of Corrections; CARLTON B. JOYNER, Director of 

Case Management; STEVE BAILEY, Western Regional Area 

Director for N.C. Department of Corrections; SID HARKELROAD, 

a/k/a Sidney Harkelroad, Superintendent at Marion 

Correctional Institution, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00495-GCM) 

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David Crump, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

David Crump appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crump 

v. Argarwal, No. 1:08-cv-00495-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2008). We 

deny Crump’s pending motion to compel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50744 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOE MARTINEZ BUSTAMANTE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CA-520

- - - - - - - - - - June 30, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Federal prisoner Joe Martinez Bustamante, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. COA wasgranted on the issue whether Bustamante should be granted an outof-time appeal on the grounds that counsel was ineffective in failing to prosecute his direct criminal appeal, as was recommended by the magistrate judge.No. 98-50744 -2- The record demonstrates that counsel’s inaction denied Bustamante his right to a direct appeal. See U.S. v. Riascos , 76

F.3d 93, 94 (5th Cir. 1996)(record supported denial-of-appellate counsel claim when counsel filed notice of appeal but the appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution). The Government’s contention that counsel was not ineffective because Bustamante ultimately decided to pursue a collateral challenge instead of a direct appeal is without merit. Counsel’s affidavit acknowledges that he did not perfect the appeal; it further explains that Bustamante’s decision to pursue a collateral challenge was made only after the appeal had been dismissed and was the result of counsel’s advice to pursue a collateral attack because of the difficulties involved in reinstating the appeal. As Bustamante points out, his decision to pursue a collateral challenge on counsel’s advice after his appeal was dismissed is not evidence that he had not desired to pursue a direct appeal. The Government’s argument that Bustamante has not demonstrated any prejudice is not well-taken. Because Bustamante has demonstrated a constructive absolute denial of counsel, prejudice is presumed. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 88 (1988); Sharp v. Puckett , 930 F.2d 450, 451-52 (5th Cir. 1991).The district court erred in determining that Bustamante’s denialof-appellate-counsel claim is without merit. Its judgment is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. We do not reach the other issues raised in Bustamante’s brief because the appeal is limited to the issue stated in theNo. 98-50744 -3- certificate of appealability. See Lackey v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1997).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

PRISCILLA L. MILAM,

Plaintiff,

v. 

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23-CV-00040-JDK

AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 3, 2024, this court issued a report and recommendation recommending that 

Plaintiff’s application for application for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act 

(“EAJA”) (Doc. No. 20) be granted. (Doc. No. 21). This amended report and recommendation 

takes the place of the original solely for the purpose of correcting the calculation therein. Since the 

issuance of the report and recommendation, the annual CPI for the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 

area has been released. The series now reports an annual CPI of 287.974. (See U.S. Bureau of 

Labor and Statistics CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), Series ID: CUURS37ASA0, available 

at https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet). Taking the annual CPI for 2023 of 287.974 and 

subtracting the annual 1996 cost of living factor, 148.8, results in a difference of 139.174. Diving 

this difference by the 1996 annual factor, 148.8, results in a quotient of .935 or a 93.5% increase 

in the cost of living since 1996. Multiplying an increase of 1.935 times the hourly rate established 

in 1996, $125.00, results in an adjusted amount of attorney’s fees of $241.88. 

Case 6:23-cv-00040-JDK-JDL Document 22 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

2461
2

The work conducted by Plaintiff’s counsel in this case all occurred in 2023 (Doc. No. 20-

7), yet, likely given the not-yet-reported data, Plaintiff’s counsel used the annual CPI from 2022, 

273.855, to calculate the proposed hourly rate (Doc. No. 21, n. 21). Because the annual CPI for 

2023 has now been released, the matter of fees is more accurately calculated using that rate—the 

rate for the year in which the legal work was conducted in this case. Accordingly, the court finds 

that an adjusted rate of $241.88 is more reasonable. Considering the 31.8 hours worked in this 

case, this yields an EAJA fee award in the amount of $7,691.63. 

Therefore, the court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s application (Doc. No. 20) be 

GRANTED as amended herein and that the Commissioner pay to Plaintiff the sum of $7,691.63 

in fees pursuant to EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and $402.00 in costs, by making the payment 

payable to Plaintiff and sending the payment to Plaintiff’s counsel.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cv-00040-JDK-JDL Document 22 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

2462
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WHITBURN, LLC, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1056 ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; BASHEER ) ALLY; ROOSHNEE ALLY; and ) RIVERCREST COMMUNITY ) ASSOCIATION, INC., ) ) Appellees. ) )

Opinion filed January 15, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Raul C. Palomino, Jr., Senior Judge.

Stuart Jay Levine and Heather A. DeGrave of Walters, Levine, Klingensmith & Thomison, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Rottmann, and Taylor L. Broadhead of McGuire

Woods LLP, Jacksonvi lle, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

MORRIS, Judge.- 2 - We convert this proceeding to an appeal of a final order and a ffirm for the

reasons explained in Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., N o. 2D14-5563 (Fla. 2d

DCA Dec. 18, 2015).

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHANE YEAGIN, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-96

§

BRYON LYONS, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Shane Yeagin, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#12) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 31st day of October, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00096-MAC-CLS Document 14 Filed 10/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 20
Valentino JACKSON, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-8842.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,193
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,689
<PP&E>                                         129,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,565
<BONDS>                                        133,717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           227
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,210
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,857
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                71,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,701
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (842)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,598
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,041)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)


</TABLE>
Valerie Louise WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6007.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
HAWAII MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. Randy RUDEL.

No. 19-752

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-64 (1)

'

ELVE TROY BENJAMIN, JR., '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Elve Troy Benjamin, Jr. (1), 

Case 1:23-cr-00064-MAC-ZJH Document 52 Filed 11/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 133
2

is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 -

Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Phencyclidine (PCP).

Case 1:23-cr-00064-MAC-ZJH Document 52 Filed 11/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 134
##### 



LodgeNet Entertainment Corporation
    
    Form 10-Q
 Exhibit 32
 LODGENET ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
 th
 /s/ Scott C. PetersenScott C. PetersenChief Executive Officer/s/ Gary H. RitondaroGary H. RitondaroChief Financial Officer
  September 30, 2005
 Page 37
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ALAN C. KAUFFMAN

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 97 DB 2014 (No. 63 RST 2014) 

Attorney Registration No. 2946 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2014, the Report and Recommendation 

of Disciplinary Board Member dated September 3, 2014, is approved and it is 

ORDERED that Alan C. Kauffman, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         325,980
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  367,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               693,287
<PP&E>                                         9,404,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,794,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,329,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,824
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,197,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,329,630
<SALES>                                        277,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               285,934
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  389,974<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (137,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (137,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (137,663)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/14/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,106
COMMITMENTS
  12,413    2,135    3,758   14,562   25,517   30,733   31,410    8,373    7,696

CHANGES FROM 02/07/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -283)
    -291     -347    1,269     -513     -258      464      663     -747     -946

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.7      5.5      9.6     37.2     65.3     78.6     80.3     21.4     19.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      13       10       15       29       26       51       44
```

----

Updated February 17, 2012
```

```

----

Updated July 8, 2013