alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
David L. DE CSEPEL, et al., petitioners, v. REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, et al.

No. 17-1165.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of Ambassador Stuart E. Eizenstat for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of AJC, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.
1The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of

Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2352

___________

Cornelius Moore, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Nebraska.

*

P.A. Bruce Wagner, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 28, 2000

 Filed: December 4, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Nebraska prisoner Cornelius Moore appeals from the district court’s1 denial of

his motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We

affirm.
2The Honorable Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, United States Magistrate Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

-2-

Moore filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various jail staff, prison staff,

and others, asserting violations of his constitutional rights. Prior to service, the

magistrate judge2 issued a report recommending dismissal of the complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915A. On June 4, 1999, the district court adopted the report and

dismissed Moore’s complaint without prejudice; the court’s order was entered on June

7, 1999. In February 2000, Moore moved for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b),

asserting that the magistrate judge abused her discretion, failed to construe liberally his

complaint, erred in concluding that he failed to state a claim under notice pleading, and

erred in requiring him to file an amended complaint. The district court denied Moore’s

motion, finding that the complaint was properly dismissed and that Moore had not

shown circumstances justifying relief from judgment under Rule 60(b).

We review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. See

Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988). Because Moore’s Rule

60(b) motion asserted only errors of law that could have been raised on appeal from the

underlying judgment, and because the motion was filed more than thirty days from the

date judgment was entered, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion

in denying Rule 60(b) relief. See id.; Fox v. Brewer, 620 F.2d 177, 180 (8th Cir. 1980)

(Rule 60(b) motion is not substitute for appeal).

Accordingly, we affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michael STOLLER, petitioner, v. WILMINGTON TRUST.

No. 18-6541.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
David Richard TRIMBLE, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-6703.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

COLTON BAILEY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv129

JOHN DOES 1-7 § 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Colton Bailey, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. This matter was

referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Amended Order

for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

 Procedural Background

On December 15, 2023, the court entered an order directing plaintiff to pay an initial partial

filing fee. Plaintiff was given 30 days to comply with the court’s order. The time for complying

with the order has expired. However, plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee or otherwise

contacted the court. 

Discussion

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for

failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030,

1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court's inherent power to

control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases.” Boudwin v.

Graystone Insurance Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash, R.R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962)).

By failing to comply with the order described above, plaintiff has failed to diligently

prosecute this lawsuit. As a result, this case should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Case 1:23-cv-00129-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 01/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 48
Recommendation

This lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Objections must be (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served and filed within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72(b).

A party’s failure to object bars that party from (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district

judge of proposed findings and recommendations, Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th

Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of unobjected-to factual

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n.,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 22nd day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00129-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 01/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 49
Travis W. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. MISSOURI.

No. 18-6337.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-3524

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Anthony Jackson, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

 ____________

 Submitted: March 10, 2023

Filed: March 15, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Anthony Jackson, Jr. appeals after the district court1

 revoked his supervised

release and sentenced him to 24 months in prison. His counsel has moved for leave

to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the sentence. 

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in sentencing Jackson, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910,

915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is

reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v.

Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court need not make specific

findings on § 3553(a) factors; all that is generally required to satisfy appellate court

is evidence that court was aware of relevant factors); and the sentence was within the

advisory Guidelines range, and below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3)

(maximum revocation prison term is 2 years if underlying offense is Class C felony);

Perkins, 526 F.3d at 1110 (revocation sentence within Guidelines range is accorded

presumption of reasonableness on appeal).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-
Linda THURMAN, et al., petitioners, v. JUDICIAL CORRECTION SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 18-1291.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Motion of Fane Lozman for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted.
DeAngelo HORN, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-6778.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





The Board of Directors and Shareholders
TALX Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
333-14619, No. 333-18389, No. 333-18393, No. 333-47569, No. 333-83369, No.
333-83367, No. 333-65370, and No. 333-65368 on Forms S-8 of TALX Corporation of
our report dated May 2, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
TALX Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and 2003 and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2003, which report appears in the March 31, 2003 annual report on Form
10-K of TALX Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of
accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective April 1, 2002 and
a change in accounting for revenue recognition effective April 1, 2000.




/s/ KPMG LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
May 22, 2003
Christopher JONES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-8572.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. Bonczek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ROBERT R. BONCZEK  
|Robert R. Bonczek      
|Chief Financial Officer



August 8, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be retained by Trimeris, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
. . 

. . 

Yebzusry 14, 1959 

Dr. cob. ‘n. car 

Stat0 Board or Eealth 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

. 

Chapter 41, Ln:rs .

Le~ialstuze,~rcgardbg foes t0 be CO~ectCd 

by th0 Stc?te~ Bs&3trzr for 

the isau~nce of ce~tifled 

copies 

Your request for m ~pirlon 02 the Sollo~iiq 

questlcns: 

*Are the rO5s'paid *y thz 3. 3. Eureru 

of the Census r0r these ~trmscripts, is338d 

undar thl? excegt@z to Seotion 21, S.zes OS 

Off.l03? 

Can the 5t3te ~e&G-mw, r,spointe~ 

under the euthorizstion of Sect& 4 of 

this Act, accept t&e opgointxnt as 

*Specicl *,eCt' oi t&c curem OS the CCR-. 

sus ard bat at disbursln,r ecant in hxdling tkese~ Sees?" 
ecr1g.s OS crrtdfied copies of births end-de&hs Yiithout 

payment of the fm herein grescribcd." 

Th9 33zkers of tho Lc~:slature izitezidea thst 

the G. S. Zsosus Zursuu &xuld h?ve eocees to the records of th8 Be&xtrer of Fital Stztiltks &hC obtsin, - 

v;ithout expemo to the State, tr~msori?ts of births end 

deaths if tpey so desired. i%s3v~r, if the -9qistrcr 

or ‘Jitm2 3xAehxl 0~3t~.~OtOa with the Euze2u of the 

Census to furnish the CrarsarLpts, it nppe?m to us that yS 

to Ntill the co3tzsct ::0tia re::uim et 1eost so28 

atfort end ~023 of ths ti.z.3 of tb3 %,-istmr. Ths 

ti=le'reqdreZ OS the -?a.@trer a& any eea:rJent be1011&g to the St&e cf Texzs, used in. tiie prep2rition 

of the trxziaripts, xuld constitute eq-ense to t&e 

Stat8 of Teus. . 

The canponsztion recefvc5 frc!a t3e ~Ruxxu 

of the Census forthc tronsar@tioz of births sna 

deaths, ia our o~fnioa, XOtid b3 fCSS Of Ofr'iC8. 

Your sowna quest ion arisa3 bocmsa of Lrticl.8 16, Section 33 of the Corxtitution of Texes, v:hich 

reads SS follolvs: . 

-The eccountin~ ofiiczrs of this 3tat.e 

shrill neither dzx3 nor zfy o mrrznt upon the 

trsazury 3.12 favor oi my person, for salary 

or coqensation es agent, officer or appointee, 

-..ho holds et the szlre tk2.e my other office or 

pooitior? of honor, trust or profit, under thfo 

stete or the Unite3 SC,z:tes, exce_ot es prescrii%ed in this Conetit%tioz. zrov7faea, that 

this restrictdo as to the OrY**iinC and pnyin3 

of rarxntn upon tke tremury shell not qply 

to officers of the Zktioml Cu=rd of Texze, 

the 'E!i~ticnul Cuzrd T%serve; tht! Qfi'ictrs Zesew6 Corps dr tiha Cr.ited States, nor to exlisted z~en of theXet:oml 023rd, the 22timal 

6uera ?ese:ve, ana the Cr~znized 3cser*res of 

the Unitzd Ljt.ateo. = 
-; 

: 

Dr. Ceo. 2. Co%, February 14, 1933, ??aEe 9 

It is the oplnicn of this Gtprt=ent that 

t'ce State Zegistrsr cannot accept the agFo13tzz-at of 

%pcaial Age&,* oP the Eu~zsu ol Ceuaua -.kile ho is 

actTnC 9s r?egistTar of the Eurezu ol Vital Statistics 

and is a ssloried State officer. 

Youl-s very truly 

. . 2Y 

. L!orris Zodzes 

z!?:o% AssiuLnt 

_- . 

“L==wiI3: -. 

. 

.:I 

_.‘.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/18/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       70,098
COMMITMENTS
   7,407    2,314      872   55,843   63,039   64,122   66,225    5,976    3,873

CHANGES FROM 09/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,734)
    -498      -12   -1,482    3,243    1,140    1,263     -354      471    2,088

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.6      3.3      1.2     79.7     89.9     91.5     94.5      8.5      5.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       70)
      10        4        2       37       32       48       37
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/18/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      141,381
COMMITMENTS
  23,237   17,443    1,347   94,135  108,248  118,719  127,038   22,662   14,343

CHANGES FROM 09/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,661)
   1,290    2,135   -3,339    6,180    5,719    4,131    4,515    3,530    3,146

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.4     12.3      1.0     66.6     76.6     84.0     89.9     16.0     10.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      109)
      32       10        5       50       39       84       52
```

----

Updated September 21, 2012
Mark A. DUBARRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Marcus LACEY, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-8827.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Luis Antonio BONILLA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6763.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,643
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,723
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,137
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          12,024
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,195
<LOANS>                                        324,188
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,429
<DEPOSITS>                                     315,998
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,393
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,399
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 372,429
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,342
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,637
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,979
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,131
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,223
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,756
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        2
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 108
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,098
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,906
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.47
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       292
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,390
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,390
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,390
        

</TABLE>
Ambrose KING, petitioner, v. Mary KING.

No. 18-5119.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1904

For the relief of Abimbola Oyebade-Balogun.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1999

Mrs. CLAYTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Abimbola Oyebade-Balogun.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSENT TO TRAVEL ABROAD FOR ABIMBOLA

4 OYEBADE-BALOGUN.

5 The Attorney General shall authorize Abimbola

6 Oyebade-Balogun temporarily to travel abroad to Lagos,

7 Nigeria, because of emergency and extenuating cir8 cumstances. If Abimbola Oyebade-Balogun returns to the

9 United States at the conclusion of this temporary trip

10 abroad, she shall be inspected and admitted in the same

11 immigration status she had at the time of departure.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

      ( print page 31517)    
In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Department of Agriculture (USDA) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a six-month emergency approval of the following information collection: ICR 0570-NEW, Meat and Poultry Intermediary Lending Program (MPILP). The requested approval would enable the implementation of this program to begin to increase the funds available to lenders to increase capacity for meat and poultry processing.

## Rural Business-Cooperative Service

*Title:*                     Meat and Poultry Intermediary Lending Program (MPILP).                

*OMB Control Number:*                     0570-NEW.                

*Summary of Collection:*                     The Rural Business-Cooperative Service is requesting emergency clearance approval for this information collection due to the need to effectively implement the program as quickly as possible to begin to increase the funds available to lenders to increase capacity for meat and poultry processing. Increasing capacity will help create a more diverse and secure U.S. food supply chain. Concentration within the meat and poultry sector had a disastrous effect on worker safety, producers' livelihood, and product availability at the height of the pandemic in 2020. This concentration must be addressed in order to avoid future disruptions and further price increases.                

Levi S. Harrell,

Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-11057 Filed 5-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P
W.P., petitioner, v. WEST VIRGINIA.

No. 17-8722.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of West Virginia, Kanawha County denied.