IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

NICOLE WEISZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CCT HOLDINGS, LLC

AND MICHAEL EYMER, 

INDIVIDUALLY,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

 Case No. 4:23-cv-541-ALM-AGD

 

REQUEST FOR CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

1. Defendant CCT Holdings, LLC is a Colorado entity that employed Plaintiff while 

she worked in Texas, but does not have a registered agent in Texas. Exhibit A, Declaration of 

Douglas B. Welmaker. 

2. As per the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office, CCT’s registered agent is Michael 

Eymer. See Attachment 1 to Exhibit A, which is a true and correct copy of Defendant CCT’s 

Colorado Secretary of State information, and is current as of today, December 22, 2023. The 

physical address for Mr. Eymer is listed at 3454 Alma Lane, Kittredge, Co., 80457. Id. 

3. On July 13, 2023, Plaintiff attempted service on CCT through its registered agent,

Mr. Eymer, using a process server out of Austin, Texas, Direct Results Legal Services. Service

was attempted via certified mail at the address listed for Mr. Eymer with the Colorado Secretary

of State’s Office, but the certified mail was returned on August 12, 2023 with the notation “return

to sender, refused, unable to forward.” See Attachment 2 to Exhibit A, a true and correct copy of

the Proof of Service Affidavit, by Tod Pendergrass. 

Case 4:23-cv-00541-ALM-AGD Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 14
2

4. In September 2023, Plaintiff then then hired a Colorado process server, Quality

Process Servers out of Longmont Colorado to serve CCT and Registered Agent Eymer in person

at 3454 Alma Lane, Kittredge, Co., 80457, but the process server was unable to effectuate service,

reporting that she spoke to an individual at this address who claimed they did not know who

Michael Eymer or CCT was. See Attachment 3 to Exhibit A, a true and correct copy of Quality

Process Server’s return.

5. On September 27, 2023, Plaintiff then attempted to have Direct Results serve CCT

via certified mail at CCT’s principal office mailing address, which is listed with the Colorado

Secretary of State at 250 W. Jewell, Denver Colorado, 80223. That certified mail came back with

the notation “No such address” on November 8, 2023. See Attachment 4 to Exhibit A, a true and

correct copy of Mr. Pendergrass’s affidavit.

6. On November 16, 2023, Plaintiff then attempted to have CCT served by certified

mail on Eymer at the Registered Agent’s mailing address, which is PO Box 998, Kittridge

Colorado 80457, but the certified mail came back with the notation “refused” on November 30,

2023. See Attachment 5 to Exhibit A, and true and correct copy of Mr. Pendergrass’s affidavit.

7. Under Colorado Rev. Civ. Stat. § 7-90-704 (2)(c)1, if a registered agent is not

present where they have listed their address, then service is effectuated five days after mailing to

the registered agent’s listed address. 

1 7-90-704. Service on entities:

(1) The registered agent of an entity is an agent of the entity authorized to receive service of any process, notice, or

demand required or permitted by law to be served on the entity. The registered agent of an entity is an agent of the

entity to whom the secretary of state may deliver any form, notice, or other document with respect to the entity under

this title, unless otherwise specified by an organic statute.

(2) If an entity that is required to maintain a registered agent pursuant to this part 7 has no registered agent, or if the

registered agent is not located under its registered agent name at its registered agent address, or if the registered agent

cannot with reasonable diligence be served, the entity may be served by registered mail or by certified mail, return

receipt requested, addressed to the entity at its principal address. Service is perfected under this subsection (2) at the

earliest of:(a) The date the entity receives the process, notice, or demand; (b) The date shown on the return receipt, if

signed on behalf of the entity; or (c) Five days after mailing. (Emphasis added)

Case 4:23-cv-00541-ALM-AGD Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 15
3

8. In this case, at the earliest, Defendant CCT was served five days after July 13, 2023,

which would have been July 18, 2023. At the latest, Defendant CCT was served five days after

November 16, 2023, which would have been November 21, 2023. Assuming the later date for

service of process, then Defendant CCT’s answer would have been due December 12, 2023. As

it is now December 22, 2023, and Defendant CCT has not answered, Defendant CCT is in default,

and Plaintiff seeks to have the clerk issue a default against Defendant CCT.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff asks the Clerk to enter the Clerk’s

Entry of Default, and seeks all other relief to which she may show herself justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

WELMAKER LAW, PLLC

/s/ Douglas B. Welmaker

Douglas B. Welmaker

Attorney-in-Charge

State Bar No. 00788641

Welmaker Law, PLLC

409 N. Fredonia, Suite 118

Longview, Texas 75601

Phone: (512) 799-2048

Email: doug@welmakerlaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 4:23-cv-00541-ALM-AGD Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 16
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing Request for Clerk’s Entry of Default has been 

electronically served through the Court’s CM/ECF system on December 22, 2023.

/s/ Douglas B. Welmaker 

Douglas B. Welmaker

Case 4:23-cv-00541-ALM-AGD Document 5 Filed 12/22/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 17