alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We haveissued our reports dated February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-163950, effectiveJanuary 10, 2010) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-160660, effective July, 17, 2009, File No. 333-125021, effective May, 18, 2005, File No. 333-41115, effective November 26, 1997, File No. 333-41125, effectiveNovember 26, 1997, File No. 333-41131, effective November 26, 1997, and File No. 333-41135, effective November 26, 1997). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Orlando, Florida 

February 26, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                     12,343        
<SECURITIES>                                    0 
<RECEIVABLES>                               4,781     
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                    783,924
<DEPRECIATION>                            (99,381)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            753,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                                   284,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                    10
<COMMON>                                      154
<OTHER-SE>                                285,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              753,334
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           34,921
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              23,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          5,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             9,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         9,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                9,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .52
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000917639
<NAME>                        CIDCO INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         12,349
<SECURITIES>                                   13,975
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,885
<INVENTORY>                                    22,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               97,503
<PP&E>                                         28,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                107,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,265
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          144
<OTHER-SE>                                     80,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  107,667
<SALES>                                       174,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              174,703
<CGS>                                         143,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  92,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (51,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.66)
        


</TABLE>
State of MISSOURI, et al., plaintiffs, v. State of CALIFORNIA.

No. 148, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint denied.

Justice THOMAS would grant the motion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement 

Contentions. (Dkt. No. 61.) The motion is GRANTED. 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 

ET AL.,

Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 62 Filed 03/21/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 980
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2049 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2049

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To rename Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts as ``Wolf Trap 
                National Park for the Performing Arts''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2049

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To rename Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts as ``Wolf Trap 
                National Park for the Performing Arts''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of the 
Wolf Trap Farm Park in Fairfax County, Virginia, and for other 
purposes'', Public Law 89-671 (16 U.S.C. 284) is amended in the first 
section and in section 11(2) by striking ``Wolf Trap Farm Park'' and 
inserting ``Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts''. Any 
reference to such park in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States shall be considered to be a reference 
to the ``Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts''.

SEC. 2. USE OF NAME.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of the 
Wolf Trap Farm Park in Fairfax County, Virginia, and for other 
purposes'', Public Law 89-671 (16 U.S.C. 284) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``Sec. 14. Any reference to the park other than by the name `Wolf 
Trap National Park for the Performing Arts' shall be prohibited.''.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER LAWS.

    Any laws, rules, or regulations that are applicable solely to units 
of the National Park System that are designated as a ``National Park'' 
shall not apply to ``Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts'' 
nor to any other units designated as a ``National Park for the 
Performing Arts''.

SEC. 4. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 4(c)(3) of ``An Act to provide for the establishment of the 
Wolf Trap Farm Park in Fairfax County, Virginia, and for other 
purposes'', Public Law 89-671 (16 U.S.C. 284) is amended by striking 
``Funds'' and inserting ``funds''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 15, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Skolsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ STEVEN D. SKOLSKY  
|Steven D. Skolsky      
|Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
3/31/23

Case 2:23-cv-00139-JRG Document 5 Filed 03/31/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 183
Case 2:23-cv-00139-JRG Document 5 Filed 03/31/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 184
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 15.2



Shareholders and Board of Directors
Detroit Diesel Corporation


We have made a review, in accordance with the standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of VM Motori S.p.A. and subsidiaries
(not presented separately herein) for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 as
indicated in our report dated October 18, 1996; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-84468, 33-84470 and
333-02024 on Form S-8. 

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered the Registration Statement
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Section 7 and 11
of that Act. 


/s/ Reconta Ernst & Young
Bologna, Italy
October 18, 1996




                                       18
Elzie BALL, et al. v. LeBLANC, Sec., Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, et al.

No. 18-162 (R46-03/OT 2018).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

CEBE ISSAC GUILBEAUX

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00039-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty 

Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommended that the 

court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Counts One, Three, and Four of the Superseding Indictment filed against the 

Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Cebe Issac Guilbeaux, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00039-MJT Document 52 Filed 02/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 205
adjudged guilty as to Counts One, Three, and Four of the Superseding Indictment charging a 

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (Possession with Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance 

(Methamphetamine “Actual”), 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Possession of a Firearm by a Prohibited 

Person), and 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (Possession of a Firearm (destructive device) by a Prohibited 

Person).

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 29th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00039-MJT Document 52 Filed 02/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 206
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/01/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      141,800
COMMITMENTS
  37,404   34,404   16,034   73,584   64,483  127,021  114,921   14,779   26,879

CHANGES FROM 04/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -7,247)
   2,868      123   -4,252   -3,664   -2,119   -5,048   -6,248   -2,198     -999

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    26.4     24.3     11.3     51.9     45.5     89.6     81.0     10.4     19.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      46       44       36       57       59      121      122
```

----

Updated May 4, 2012
Geary Mohammed MILLS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6856.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Artis Ryan MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5950.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

COREY EUGENE ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K, Reidinger, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00216-MR-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Eugene Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Corey Eugene Alexander appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Alexander , No. 3:01-cr00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,638,637
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,430,037
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 37,878,685
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    118,248,638
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,191,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             164,972,343
<DEPOSITS>                                 120,154,540
<SHORT-TERM>                                   750,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,638,341
<LONG-TERM>                                 19,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,563,596
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,065,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             164,972,343
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,285,759
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,939,912
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               188,834
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,414,502
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,263,225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,247,393
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,167,110
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  235,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (28,567)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,682,497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,504,764
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,504,764
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,644,764
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.24
<LOANS-NON>                                    181,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   311,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              5,089,965
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,295,222
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  429,998
<RECOVERIES>                                    90,923
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,191,147
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,071,147
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        120,000


</TABLE>
Frederick H. BANKS, petitioner, v. PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC, fka Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLC.

No. 18-8697.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          15,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,185
<PP&E>                                          70,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            60
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,953
<SALES>                                          1,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,108
<CGS>                                            1,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,249
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
ATTORNEY SIGN-IN SHEET

Judge Roy S. Payne

2:23-CV-0352-JRG-RSP

Headwater Research, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al.

2:23-CV-0379-JRG-RSP

Headwater Research, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.

2:23-CV-0397-JRG-RSP

Headwater Rese rch, LLC v. AT&T, Inc., et al.

November 19,2024 9:00 am

PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY

ATTORNEY NAME REPRESENTING

t/ ¦

A rt d Fz r

1x<\ c A ' O ) tk 2- \J (-Z. E -1

\) z\

/

\)1 ATT

1l-e j A 7

j (1 AT/

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 110-1 Filed 11/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID

#: 8314
ATTORNEY NAME REPRESENTING

v O

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 110-1 Filed 11/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID

#: 8315
Michael David SCOTT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8476.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.