alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

 

 

 

Patent Armory Inc.,

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Bose Corporation,

 Defendant. 

 

 Case No. 2:23-cv-335 

 Patent Case 

 Jury Trial Demanded 

 

 

PLAINTIFF'S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Plaintiff states that it does not have a parent corporation 

and that there is no publicly held corporation owning ten percent or more of its stock. 

Dated: July 18, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 /s/ Isaac Rabicoff 

 Isaac Rabicoff 

 Rabicoff Law LLC 

 600 Mamaroneck Ave STE 400 

 Harrison, NY 10528 

 7736694590 

 isaac@rabilaw.com 

 

 

 Counsel for Plaintiff

 Patent Armory Inc.

 

Case 2:23-cv-00335-JRG Document 3 Filed 07/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 56
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on all parties 

who have appeared in this case on July 18, 2023 via the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

 /s/ Isaac Rabicoff 

 Isaac Rabicoff 

Case 2:23-cv-00335-JRG Document 3 Filed 07/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 57
Kevin WATKINS, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 18-8895.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Michael PEREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6768.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Tracy Lebron VICK, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 18-6673.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division denied.
Troy VICTORINO, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
JOHN D. RUTLEDGE

, Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORT GAGE CORPORATION, LINDA M. ROARK , TENANT, ANNA A. ANDERSON A/K/A ANNA B. ANDERSON

, ET AL.

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4742

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 11, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. William A. Wilkes , Judge

. John D. Rutledge, pro se

, Appellant.

Kathleen E. Angione of SHD Legal Group, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

CLARK

, ROWE

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3543

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Alfredo Vladimir Andrad Medina, also known as Samuel Garcia Andrade, also

known as Vladimir Andrade, also known as Edgar Aldair Cobos Diaz, also known

as Jesus Lopez, also known as Alfredo Andrade Medina, also known as Moises

Cortez Lopez

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

 ____________

Submitted: February 15, 2024

Filed: February 21, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Alfredo Medina appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1

 after he

pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and

has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the

sentence was unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a

substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors

listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See

United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing

sentences for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse-of-discretion

standard; abuse of discretion occurs when the court fails to consider relevant factor,

gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error

of judgment in weighing the appropriate factors). Further, the court imposed a

sentence below the Guidelines range. See United States v. McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119,

1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that when the district court has varied below the

Guidelines range, it is “nearly inconceivable” that the court abused its discretion in

not varying further).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.

-2-
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,163
COMMITMENTS
   7,870      184      377   21,789   28,845   30,036   29,406   10,127   10,756

CHANGES FROM 07/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,078)
     395     -289     -557    1,956    2,393    1,793    1,547    1,285    1,531

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    19.6      0.5      0.9     54.3     71.8     74.8     73.2     25.2     26.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
      11        2        3       28       25       40       29
```

----

Updated July 27, 2012
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RICHARD LANG

§

§

§ CRIMINAL NO. 4:23-CR-119-SDJ-KPJ

§

§

§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 11, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered 

proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #22) that Defendant be 

committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 

eighteen (18) months, to run consecutively to any other term of imprisonment, with

no term of supervised release to follow. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge 

recommended Defendant be placed at FPC Yankton in Yankton, South Dakota, if 

appropriate.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #22)

and having received Defendant’s waiver of his right to object to the proposed findings 

and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #21), the Court is of the opinion 

that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the 

Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, 

Case 4:23-cr-00119-SDJ-KPJ Document 23 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 87
2

Defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a term of eighteen (18) months, to run consecutively to any other term 

of imprisonment, with no term of supervised release to follow. Additionally, the Court 

recommends Defendant be placed at FPC Yankton in Yankton, South Dakota, if 

appropriate.

Case 4:23-cr-00119-SDJ-KPJ Document 23 Filed 02/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 88
<PAGE>
                                  FORM 10-Q
                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
{X} QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 
                          EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1997
                               --------------

{   } TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE 
                   SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from ........ to .........

Commission file number: 0-222680

                         NATIONAL R.V. HOLDINGS, INC.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

              Delaware                     33-0371079
              --------                     ----------
   (State or other jurisdiction of      (I.R.S. Employer
   incorporation or organization)     Identification No.)

                             3411 N. Perris Blvd.
                           Perris, California 92571
                               (909) 943-6007
        (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including 
           area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to 
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X    NO__

      Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's 
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class                               Outstanding at May 9, 1997
-----                               --------------------------
Common stock, par value                   6,243,932
$.01 per share
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A is being filed solely to add the attached
Exhibit 27
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11732 ]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Park Dae Sung: Virtuous Ink, Contemporary Brush” at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-11005 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

d0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144743

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144743

COA: 302900

Saginaw CC: 06

- 028161

- FH

MICHAEL PAUL MORGAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JASON L. SMITH §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-198

 

WARDEN, USP BEAUMONT §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Jason L. Smith, a prisoner confined at the United States Penitentiary in Beaumont,

Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

On May 20, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended granting Respondent’s motion for summary

judgment and denying the petition. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report and

recommendation.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. Proper notice was given to Petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P.

5(b)(2)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 8] is ADOPTED. A

Case 1:23-cv-00198-MJT-ZJH Document 9 Filed 06/23/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 141
final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. 

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 23rd day of June, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00198-MJT-ZJH Document 9 Filed 06/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 142
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC

Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd., et al

2:23-cv-00285

Cobblestone Wireless, LLC

01/26/2024 /s/ Andrea L. Fair

Andrea L. Fair; Texas Bar No. 24078488

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, Texas 75604

andrea@wsfirm.com

(903) 757-6400

(903) 757-2323

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 40 Filed 01/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 419
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-19

'

IVAN OMAR DIAZ-VELAQUEZ '

A/K/A IVAN OMAR DIAZ-VELASQUEZ, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Ivan Omar Diaz-Velaquez, is 

Case 9:23-cr-00019-MAC-ZJH Document 25 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 69
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)

(Reentry of a Deported Alien).

Case 9:23-cr-00019-MAC-ZJH Document 25 Filed 10/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 70
Thomas Gilmore STEWART, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6280.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 211

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

courthouse as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.plaza at the south entrance of such building andS. Foley United States Courthouse’’, and theAvenue in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘ThomasStates courthouse located at 920 West Riverside
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 211

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 920 West Riverside Avenue in Spokane,

Washington, as the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley United States

Courthouse’’, and the plaza at the south entrance of

such building and courthouse as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan

Plaza’’.
2

•HR 211 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United

5 States courthouse located at 920 West Riverside Avenue

6 in Spokane, Washington, shall be known and designated

7 as the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley United States Courthouse’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

10 States to the Federal building and United States court11 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be

12 a reference to the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley United States Court13 house’’.

14 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF PLAZA.

15 (a) DESIGNATION.—The plaza located at the south

16 entrance of the Federal building and United States court17 house referred to in section 1(a) shall be known and des18 ignated as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

19 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg20 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
3

•HR 211 EH

1 States to the plaza referred to in subsection (a) shall be

2 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Marlon L. WATFORD, petitioner, v. Natasha DOE, et al.

No. 18-6195.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                            AGREE REALTY CORPORATION
             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003


Agree Realty Corporation; through its Operating Partnership, Agree Limited
Partnership, is the sole member of the following Limited Liability Companies:

SUBSIDIARY                                  JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION

Agree -- Columbia Crossing
  Project, L.L.C.                           Delaware

Agree -- Milestone Center
  Project, L.L.C.                           Delaware

Agree Facility No. 1, L.L.C.                Delaware

Tulsa Store No. 264, L.L.C.                 Delaware

Mt Pleasant Shopping Center L.L.C.          Michigan

ALPSC Associates, LLC                       South Carolina

Oklahoma City Store No. 151, L.L.C.         Delaware

Omaha Store No. 166, L.L.C.                 Delaware

Indianapolis Store No. 16, L.L.C.           Delaware

AMCP Germantown LLC                         Delaware

ACCP Maryland LLC                           Delaware

Agree Realty Corporation, through its Operating Partnership, Agree Limited
Partnership, owns a 99% interest in the following Limited Liability Company:


Lawrence Store No. 203, L.L.C.              Delaware
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident andChief Executive Officer


Date: May 14, 2010

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial
Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-3
Lena L. YOUNG, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur Green, Jr., Deceased, petitioner, v. CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA, et al.

No. 17-9134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.