alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.(a).2.4







 


State of Israel


Ministry of Communications







General License


to Partner Communications Ltd.


for the Provision of Mobile Radio Telephone Services via the Cellular Method (MRT)


 


Amendment no. 92


 


By virtue of the authority of the Minister of Communications pursuant to section 4(e) of the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasting), 5742 – 1982 (hereinafter: “the Law”), which has been delegated to me, and by virtue of all of my other authorities pursuant to any law, and after I gave an opportunity to Partner Communications Ltd. (hereinafter: “Partner”) to present its arguments to me, I hereby amend the General License granted to Partner on April 7, 1998, as follows:


 


	
Amendment to Annex E.4

	
1.

	
In clause 1(c), the words “on Independence Day and on the parliamentary election day” shall be replaced with: “on Independence Day, on the parliamentary election day and on the general election day for the local authorities.”


	
Inception

	
2.

	
This license amendment shall come into effect on the signing date thereof.





 






	

9 Cheshvan 5779                    


(18 October 2018)



	

_____________________________________________________


Netanel (Nati) Cohen


Director-General
EXHIBIT 31.3
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Larry Hannappel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Century Casinos, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this  quarterly  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  disclosed  in this  quarterly  report  any  change in the  registrant's
internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to  materially  affect,   the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  May 13, 2004


________________________________
Larry Hannappel
Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>


                            EXHIBIT 23.1
          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 18, 1999, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements of Boss Holdings, Inc. (formerly Vista 
2000, Inc.) and Subsidiaries incorporated by reference in the Annual Report 
of Boss Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 26, 1998. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of 
said reports in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 26, 1998.


GRANT THORNTON LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
April 9, 1999
Christos KOUTENTIS, petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, LICENSING DIVISION.

No. 18-318.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department denied.
Exhibit 4.10

  

   

  

   

  

  
    THIS AMENDMENT is made this 23rd
      day of May 2018 BETWEEN:

    
      
        	(1)	
                PARTNER SHIPPING CO., having its registered office at
                    the Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, MH96960 Majuro, Marshall Islands (the “Owners”); and

              


      

    

    
      
        	(2)	
                V.SHIPS LIMITED, of Zina Kanther 16-18, Agia Triada,
                    3035 Limassol, Cyprus (the “Managers”).

              


      

    

    WHEREAS:

    
      
        	(A)	
                The Owners and the Managers have entered into a Ship Technical Management Agreement  with respect to the motor vessel PARTNERSHIP (IMO no. 9597848) dated May
                    15, 2017 (the “Management Agreement”);

              


      

    

    
      
        	(B)	
                The Owners have proceeded with the change of their country of incorporation from the Republic of The Marshall Islands to the Republic of Malta and are
                    provisionally registered under the name “PARTNER SHIPPING CO. LIMITED” as continuing in Malta as a limited liability company as from the 23rd day of May, 2018; and

              


      

    

    
      
        	(C)	
                The Owners will cease to be registered in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and be permanently registered as continuing in Malta as a limited liability
                    company (the “Re-domiciliation”).

              


      

    

    IT IS NOW THEREFORE MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HEREOF AS FOLLOWS:

    With effect from the date of the Re-domiciliation of the Owners, all references in the Management Agreement to “Partner
        Shipping Co.”, “Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands, MH 96960” and “Marshall Islands” shall mean “Partner Shipping Co. Limited”, “147/1, St. Lucia Street, Valletta, VLT 1185, Malta” and “Malta”
        respectively.

    Except as provided hereinabove, the terms and conditions of the Management Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
        force and effect.

    
      
        


    

    

    

    

    

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed by their duly authorised representatives on the date written above.

    	
            EXECUTED

          	
            )

          	 
	
            By Stamatios Tsantanis

          	
            )

          	
            /s/ Stamatios Tsantanis

          
	
            for and on behalf of

          	
            )

          	
            ......................

          
	
            PARTNER SHIPPING CO.

          	
            )

          	 
	 	 	 
	
            EXECUTED

          	
            )

          	 
	
            ByPhilippos Charalambides

          	
            )

          	
            /s/ Philippos Charalambides

          
	
            for and on behalf of

          	
            )

          	
            ......................

          
	
            V.SHIPS LIMITED

          	
            )
Steven DEDUAL, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9079.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         325,980
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  367,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               693,287
<PP&E>                                         9,404,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,794,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,329,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,824
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,197,402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,329,630
<SALES>                                        764,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               781,782
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  785,888<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (79,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (79,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (79,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
In Re John Peyton ALEXANDER, petitioner.

No. 18-7856.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Aaron GRAHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 16-6308.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gregory D. KILPATRICK, petitioner, v. Leslie M. ARP;

Gregory D. Kilpatrick, petitioner, v. Catherine Leahy Scott.

No. 18-6131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7073

JOHN JEFFRIES LISANICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director of VDOC,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-03-714-3)

Submitted: November 15, 2004 Decided: November 30, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Jeffries Lisanick, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John Jeffries Lisanick appeals from the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition by the district court. An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Lisanick

has not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of TALX Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
W. Canfield, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                 By: /s/ William W. Canfield
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                 William W. Canfield
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 TALX Corporation
                                 January 21, 2004
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/06/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      175,615
COMMITMENTS
  64,767   13,868   19,471   72,523  119,402  156,761  152,741   18,853   22,874

CHANGES FROM 10/30/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,530)
   2,230    2,403     -225    5,049    4,479    7,054    6,657      476      873

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    36.9      7.9     11.1     41.3     68.0     89.3     87.0     10.7     13.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      192)
      67       24       34       63       89      144      135
```

----

Updated November 9, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   9
       
<S>                         <C>                  
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      2,866        
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        605        
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0        
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0        
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                51,275        
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          0        
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            0        
<LOANS>                                   129,700        
<ALLOWANCE>                                 1,078        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            189,275        
<DEPOSITS>                                141,212        
<SHORT-TERM>                                3,446        
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         2,582        
<LONG-TERM>                                15,000        
<COMMON>                                       23        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0        
<PREFERRED>                                     0        
<OTHER-SE>                                 27,012        
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            189,275        
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            10,459        
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           2,581        
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               73        
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           13,113        
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          5,759        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          6,498        
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       6,615        
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 950        
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            298        
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             5,631        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,684        
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  1,053        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0        
<CHANGES>                                       0        
<NET-INCOME>                                1,053        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .56        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .55        
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               4.05        
<LOANS-NON>                                 2,682        
<LOANS-PAST>                                  436        
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0        
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             3,666        
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              848        
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 722        
<RECOVERIES>                                    2        
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           1,078        
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        1,078        
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0        
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         0       
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2356

ANTONIO JOSE ZAMBRANO REYES,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: September 3, 2019

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sam H. Hasan, HASAN LAW GROUP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph H. 

Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Leslie McKay, 

Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Jose Zambrano Reyes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen and 

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Zambrano Reyes’ claims and 

conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(a) (2019); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, 

we deny the petition for review substantially for the reasons stated by the Board.*

 

In re Zambrano Reyes (B.I.A. Oct. 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

 * Even if we assume that Zambrano Reyes’ motion was timely filed under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(iv) (2012), the Board provided substantive reasoning for denying the 

motion. Because this reasoning was not “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law” Mosere,

552 F.3d at 400 (internal quotation marks omitted), we find no abuse of discretion.
WASHINGTON STATES DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, petitioner, v. COUGAR DEN, INC.

No. 16-1498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31260-31261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee will 
meet on Friday, June 17, 2022. This meeting will be held virtually from 
10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST.
    The Committee presents advice and makes recommendations to the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on technical aspects of data 
collection and the formulation of economic measures and makes 
recommendations on areas of research. The BLS presents issues and then 
draws on the expertise of Committee members representing specialized 
fields within the academic disciplines of economics, statistics, data 
science, and survey design.
    The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

10:00 a.m. Commissioner's Welcome and Review of Agency Developments
10:30 a.m. Why are estimates of hours worked by the self-employed so 
volatile?
1:00 p.m. A Methodology to Incorporate Alternative Data in Import and 
Export Price Indexes
2:30 p.m. Chain-Link Employment Cost Index
4:00 p.m. Approximate Conclusion

    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting should be directed to Sarah Dale, Bureau of Labor Statistics 
Technical Advisory Committee, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d6d8c7c0d5d7d4f6f8e7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6949a8582979596b4baa5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals planning 
to attend the meeting should register at https://blstac.eventbrite.com. 
Individuals who require special accommodations should contact Ms. Dale 
at least two days prior to the meeting date.


[[Page 31261]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of May 2022.
Eric Molina,
Acting Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor 
Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2022-10984 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>