32088 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

c. A Periodicals publication having 

original entry at an incorporated city 

situated entirely within a county or 

contiguous to one or more counties in 

the same state, but politically 

independent of such county or counties, 

is considered within a part of the county 

with which it is principally contiguous. 

Copies (except commingled 

nonsubscriber copies above 50% under 

7.9.3) mailed into that county are 

charged at In-County prices. Where 

more than one county is involved, the 

publisher selects the principal county 

and notifies the Postmaster. 

* * * * * 

11.3.3 Nonsubscriber or Nonrequester 

Copies 

[Revise the text of 11.3.3 to read as 

follows:] 

During a calendar year, the total 

number of nonsubscriber or 

nonrequester copies mailed at In-County 

prices may not exceed 50% of the 

number of subscriber or requester copies 

mailed at In-County prices, as under 

7.9.3. 

* * * * * 

Sarah E. Sullivan, 

Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11522 Filed 5–25–22; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2022–0236; FRL–9605–02– 

R7] 

Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of 

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

From Reactor Processes and 

Distillation Operations Processes in 

the Synthetic Organic Chemical 

Manufacturing Industry 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State 

of Missouri. This final action will 

amend a Missouri regulation that 

controls emissions from facilities in St. 

Louis City and Jefferson, St. Charles, 

Franklin, and St. Louis Counties. The 

revisions to this rule include amending 

the rule applicability section for sources 

subject to the rule, removing 

unnecessary words, updating 

incorporations by reference, amending 

definitions specific to the rule, updating 

test and reference methods and other 

minor edits. These revisions meet the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

and do not impact the stringency of the 

SIP or air quality. Approval of these 

revisions will ensure consistency 

between State and federally approved 

rules. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

June 27, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R07–OAR–2022–0236. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason Heitman, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air 

Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; 

telephone number: (913) 551–7664; 

email address: heitman.jason@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is the EPA taking? 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

The EPA is taking final action to 

approve revisions to 10 Code of State 

Regulations (CSR) 10–5.550, Control of 

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

From Reactor Processes and Distillation 

Operations Processes in the Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

Industry, in the Missouri SIP. On March 

25, 2022, the EPA published a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) which 

proposed to approve the SIP revision as 

submitted by Missouri on February 11, 

2020 (87 FR 17058). The revisions 

amend the rule applicability section for 

sources subject to this rule, remove 

unnecessary words, update 

incorporations by reference, amend 

definitions specific to the rule, update 

test and reference methods, and make 

other minor edits. More detail on the 

EPA’s analysis of the revisions can be 

found in the NPRM and technical 

support document (TSD) included in 

this docket. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The State’s submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. The State provided 

public notice on this SIP revision from 

May 1, 2019, to August 1, 2019, and 

received nine comments. The State 

revised the rule based on the comments 

submitted. In addition, as explained in 

more detail in the NPRM and technical 

support document (TSD) which is part 

of this document, the revision meets the 

substantive SIP requirements of the 

CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is the EPA taking? 

On March 25, 2022, the EPA 

published a NPRM proposing to 

approve Missouri’s February 11, 2020, 

SIP revision submittal (87 FR 17058). 

The EPA sought public comment on the 

NPRM and received no comments. 

Therefore, the EPA is taking final action 

to amend the Missouri SIP to include 

revisions to 10 CSR 10–5.550, Control of 

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

From Reactor Processes and Distillation 

Operations Processes in the Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

Industry. Approval of these revisions 

will ensure consistency between State 

and federally approved rules. As 

described in the NPRM and the TSD, the 

EPA has determined that these changes 

meet the requirements of the Clean Air 

Act and will not adversely impact air 

quality or the stringency of the SIP. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this document, the EPA is 

finalizing regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

Missouri Regulations described in 

Section I of this preamble and set forth 

below in the amendments to 40 CFR 

part 52. The EPA has made, and will 

continue to make, these materials 

generally available through 

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region 7 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

preamble for more information). 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 32089 

1 62 FR 27968, May 22, 1997. 

Therefore, these materials have been 

approved by the EPA for inclusion in 

the State Implementation Plan, have 

been incorporated by reference by EPA 

into that plan, are fully federally 

enforceable under sections 110 and 113 

of the CAA as of the effective date of the 

final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval, 

and will be incorporated by reference in 

the next update to the SIP compilation.1

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, 

this action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act (NTTA) because this 

rulemaking does not involve technical 

standards; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

• In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where the EPA or 

an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

• This action is subject to the 

Congressional Review Act, and the EPA 

will submit a rule report to each House 

of the Congress and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States. This action 

is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 

U.S.C. 804(2). 

• Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by July 26, 2022. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: May 20, 2022. 

Meghan A. McCollister, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 

52 as set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

■ 2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry 

‘‘10–5.550’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.1320 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS

Missouri 

citation Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

*******

Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control 

Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 

*******

10–5.550 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations Processes in the Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry.

1/30/2020 5/27/2022, [insert Federal 

Register citation].


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
32090 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS—Continued 

Missouri 

citation Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–11349 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0962; FRL–9400–03– 

R9] 

Delegation of New Source 

Performance Standards and National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for the States of Arizona 

and California 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: Because the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) received 

public comment, which we intend to 

address, we are withdrawing the direct 

final rule for Delegation of New Source 

Performance Standards and National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for the States of Arizona and 

California published on March 31, 2022. 

The EPA will take a final action on the 

proposed action in a separate 

subsequent final rulemaking. 

DATES: As of May 27, 2022, the EPA 

withdraws the direct final rule 

published at 87 FR 18705, on March 31, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 

94105. By phone: (415) 947–4152 or by 

email at buss.jeffrey@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Because the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) received a public 

comment that we intend to address, we 

are withdrawing the direct final rule for 

Delegation of New Source Performance 

Standards and National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for the States of Arizona and California 

published on March 31, 2022 (87 FR 

18705). We stated in that direct final 

rule that if we received adverse 

comment by May 2, 2022, the direct 

final rule would not take effect and we 

would publish a timely withdrawal in 

the Federal Register. We subsequently 

received one comment on that direct 

final rule that we intend to address. We 

will address this comment in a 

subsequent final action, which will be 

based on the parallel proposed rule also 

published on March 31, 2022 (87 FR 

18760). As stated in the direct final rule 

and the parallel proposed rule, we will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, 

and 63 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Hazardous 

substances, Intergovernmental relations, 

and Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Accordingly, the EPA withdraws the 

direct final rule published at 87 FR 

18705, on March 31, 2022. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 23, 2022. 

Elizabeth Adams, 

Director, Air and Radiation Division, Region 

IX. 

[FR Doc. 2022–11461 Filed 5–26–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Administration for Children and 

Families 

45 CFR Part 305 

RIN 0970–AC86 

Paternity Establishment Percentage 

Performance Relief 

AGENCY: Office of Child Support 

Enforcement (OCSE), Administration for 

Children and Families (ACF), 

Department of Health and Human 

Services (HHS). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: Due to the impact of the 

COVID–19 public health emergency 

(PHE) on State child support program 

operations, OCSE modifies the Paternity 

Establishment Percentage (PEP) from the 

90 percent performance threshold to 50 

percent for Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 

2020, 2021, and 2022 in order for a State 

to avoid a financial penalty. OCSE also 

provides that adverse findings of data 

reliability audits of a State’s paternity 

establishment data will not result in a 

financial penalty in FFYs 2020, 2021, 

and 2022. 

DATES: This rule is effective on May 27, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kimberly Smith, Senior Advisor, OCSE 

Division of Policy and Training, at 

ocse.dpt@acf.hhs.gov or (202) 401–5679. 

Deaf and hearing impaired individuals 

may call the Federal Dual Party Relay 

Service at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 

a.m. and 7 p.m. Eastern Time. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Statutory Authority 

This rule is published under the 

authority granted to the Secretary of 

Health and Human Services by section 

1102 of the Social Security Act (the Act) 

(42 U.S.C. 1302). Section 1102 of the 

Act authorizes the Secretary to publish 

regulations not inconsistent with the 

Act as may be necessary for the efficient 

administration of the functions with 

which the Secretary is responsible 

under the Act. The relief from the PEP 

performance penalty under this rule is 

based on statutory authority granted 

under section 452(g)(3)(A) of the Act (42 

U.S.C. 652(g)(3)(A)). 

II. Background 

This rule provides targeted and timelimited relief to States from penalties 

due to the impact of the national PHE 

caused by COVID–19 on State program 

performance. The pandemic has had an 

enormous adverse impact on child 

support services delivered by States 

under title IV–D of the Act, especially 

on paternity/parentage establishment, a 

core function of the child support 

program under section 452(a)(1) of the 

Act. 

A State’s paternity establishment 

performance, measured using the PEP, 

is a federally required performance 

measure under section 452(g) of the Act. 

Penalties related to the PEP performance 

measure are imposed as a reduction in 

the Temporary Assistance for Needy 

Families (TANF) program funding to 

States. 

Section 452(g)(3) of the Act authorizes 

the Secretary ‘‘to take into account such 

additional variables as the Secretary 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1