alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2133

PEGGY I. JOHNSON, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00015-RJC-DCK) 

Submitted: March 20, 2009 Decided: April 8, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Peggy I. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Alan Michaels, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Peggy I. Johnson appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny her 

summary judgment motion and to grant the Commissioner’s summary 

judgment motion in her action seeking review of the 

Commissioner’s decision to deny her disability insurance 

benefits and Supplemental Security Income under the Social 

Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Johnson v. Astrue, No. 3:07-cv-00015-

RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32
 LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
 th
 /s/ Scott C. PetersenScott C. PetersenChief Executive Officer/s/ Gary H. RitondaroGary H. RitondaroChief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TASAI BETTS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 71 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2174

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the governing

boards and compensation committees of Medicare national accrediting

entities have public representation and the governing boards have public

meetings as a condition of recognizing their accreditation under the

Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

the governing boards and compensation committees of

Medicare national accrediting entities have public representation and the governing boards have public meetings as a condition of recognizing their accreditation

under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improvement of Medi5 care Accrediting Entity Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2174 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR GOVERNING BOARDS AND

2 COMPENSATION COMMITTEES OF MEDICARE

3 ACCREDITING ENTITIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1865 of the Social Secu5 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395bb) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, subsection

7 (f),’’ after ‘‘subsection (b)’’;

8 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘except as

9 provided in subsection (f),’’ after ‘‘In addition,’’; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section:

12 ‘‘(f) The previous provisions of this section shall not

13 apply to accreditation of a hospital or other provider entity

14 by any national accreditation body unless—

15 ‘‘(1) at least one-half of the membership of the

16 governing board of the body, and at least one-half

17 of the membership of the committee of the body that

18 governs compensation of its officers, is composed of

19 individuals who are members of the public approved

20 by the Secretary and who are not employed by (or

21 otherwise under contract with) the body (or any en22 tity accredited by the organization) or an immediate

23 family member of an individual who is so employed

24 or under contract with the body or such an entity;

25 and
3

•HR 2174 IH

1 ‘‘(2) meetings of the governing board of the

2 body are open to the public to the extent such meet3 ings would be required to be open to the public

4 under section 552b of title 5, United States Code,

5 if the body were an agency for purposes of such sec6 tion.’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 subsection (a) shall apply to the composition of the gov9 erning board and compensation committee and meetings

10 of such board as of January 1, 2000, with respect to ac11 creditations occurring on or after such date.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PetroCorp Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Gary R. Christopher and Steven R. Berlin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



November 14, 2003



|/s/ Gary R. Christopher
|-----------------------
|Gary R. Christopher    
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 14, 2003      
|                       
|s/ Steven R. Berlin    
|Steven R. Berlin       
|Chief Financial Officer
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

Case 2:23-cv-00227-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 06/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 379
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF THE MAXIM GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF
OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,978
<INVENTORY>                                    108,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,577
<PP&E>                                         247,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          242,351
<BONDS>                                        116,041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,695
<SALES>                                        441,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,785
<CGS>                                          305,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (904)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (23,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6,240)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    377
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.04)


</TABLE>
No. 6:23-cv-00214

Jay Williams,

Plaintiff,

v.

Nancy Perryman,

Defendant.

ORD ER

Plaintiff Jay Williams, an inmate at the Henderson County Jail

proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged violations of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was referred 

to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On May 12, 

2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this 

case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 3. The magistrate judge further recommended that dismissal of this case should count as a qualifying 

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 

F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff has not objected to the report 

and recommendation but has filed a handwritten coupon (Doc. 4), 

apparently in attempt to pay the filing fee.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation.

The court agrees that plaintiff’s duplicative, frivolous, and 

malicious filings are an abuse of the judicial process. Plaintiff has 

only continued his pattern of practice since the issuance of the 

report and recommendation, filing numerous additional cases 

with the same deficiencies. See Case Nos. 6:23-cv-256, 6:23-cv257, 6:23-cv-258, 6:23-cv-260, 6:23-cv-263, 6:23-cv-298, 6:23-cvCase 6:23-cv-00214-JCB-JDL Document 5 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
- 2 -

300, and 6:23-cv-301. Moreover, as plaintiff has been made aware, 

the filing of a handwritten “coupon” is not an acceptable form of 

payment and does not therefore affect the court’s screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See Case No. 6:23-cv-00258, Doc. 3.

Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The dismissal of this action under 

§ 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 388. Plaintiff is warned that if 

he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed 

in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent 

danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). All motions pending in this civil action are denied.

So ordered by the court on June 30, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00214-JCB-JDL Document 5 Filed 06/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
George EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
, 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 23-0232 

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM 

BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER 

Flt.Lt.) 

MAY 2 3 2023 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of ..inotana 

ORDER 

Jessie M. Big Knife has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montana 

pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, 

governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Big Knife has provided the necessary 

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV 

of the Rules for Admission to the State Bar of Montana. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Jessie M. Big Knife may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this e . S MP/ day of May, 2023. 

Chief 100 Ju *ce 

e ;.-e.----

05/23/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0232
2 

Justices
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY L. BILLINGER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 45 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.3


Certification of Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Century  Casinos,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"), the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material aspects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


     Date:  August 13, 2003


     /s/ Larry Hannappel
     --------------------
     Larry Hannappel
     Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary
Tyler T. HEAGY, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-5420.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

  THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
TAUBMAN REALTY GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (TRG) CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND TRG'S  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE YEAR
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000917473
<NAME>     THE TAUBMAN REALTY GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                            7,902
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    27,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                        393
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                        1,126,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                  234,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  969,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                       1,041,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (292,138)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    969,283
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                262,729
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   138,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               70,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  84,094
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              84,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (1,328)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     82,766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1,270<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1,270<F2>
<FN>
<F1>        TRG HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F2>        REPRESENTS EARNINGS DIVIDED BY WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF UNITS OF
            PARTNERSHIP INTEREST OUTSTANDING DURING THE PERIOD.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

UNPUBLISHED

January 4, 2024

v No. 338360

Wayne Circuit Court

TYLER MAURICE TATE, LC No. 16-010656-01-FJ

Defendant-Appellant.

ON REMAND

Before: M. J. KELLY, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ.

SHAPIRO, J. (concurring).

I concur with the majority as to the outcome and in most of its analysis. As I stated in 

dissent from our previous opinion, I do not agree that the trial court properly considered 

defendant’s youth when imposing sentence. However, that issue was resolved by the Supreme 

Court’s decision to remand solely on the issue of proportionality. 

Review for proportionality in this case is no easy task. Defendant was not the shooter, and, 

at age 16, was obviously influenced by the gang culture in which he had become involved. 

However, the evidence is clear that he knowingly and willingly participated in a murder 

characterized by lying in wait, which unequivocally demonstrates premeditation. 

Defendant refers us to other juvenile cases in which 40-year minimums were imposed, and 

points out that, in those cases, the defendant directly committed the murderous assaults. However, 

under the law that governs our review and the facts of the case, I cannot say that the trial court 

abused its discretion or imposed a disproportionate sentence. 

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/17/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      147,372
COMMITMENTS
  37,228   19,558   27,644   64,677   76,465  129,548  123,667   17,824   23,705

CHANGES FROM 01/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        276)
    -766    3,318      -77    1,808   -2,328      965      913     -690     -638

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.3     13.3     18.8     43.9     51.9     87.9     83.9     12.1     16.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      45       37       47       63       61      133      125
```

----

Updated January 20, 2012
NCTA-THE INTERNET AND TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-502.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Justice *475THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the petition, vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and remand to that court with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot. See *United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**Exhibit32.2**

**AFFINITYGROUP, INC.**

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Thomas F. Wolfe,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affinity Group, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

1.                                       Thisstatement is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March31, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”);

2.                                       ThePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

3.                                       Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof dates and for the periods indicated therein.
| Date: May 9, 2007 |
|-------------------|
|              | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe |   |
|              | Thomas F. Wolfe |
|              | Senior Vice President and |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or such other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of the written statement asrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Group, Inc. and will beretained by Affinity Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

1

----