alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITY INTEREST AGREEMENT


         Between FiberCore Glasfaser Jena GmbH (hereinafter  "FiberCore")and AMP
Incorporated (hereinafter "AMP").

1.  FiberCore   transfers   title  to  current  and  future  assets  to  AMP  in
consideration of securing the loan for a capital  investment granted from AMP to
FiberCore, Inc. in the amount of US$3,000,000 up to 125% of said amount.


2. FiberCore guarantees that it is, without limitations,  entitled to dispose of
the assets and that no third party rights are in  existence  with regard to said
assets. The transfer of title will comprise with priority of the latest acquired
machinery and equipment.


3. If banks or other  creditors  shall  request a security  interest,  FiberCore
guarantees  that AMP's  security  interest will always have first ranking during
the term of this agreement.


4. AMP provides  FiberCore the free of charge use of the assets relating to this
agreement.  FiberCore  provides  insurance  coverage  for such assets on its own
expense against all risks.


5. This agreement  remains in force in the event of a change of the shareholders
of FiberCore or any other changes in the company's legal structure.


6. AMP and FiberCore shall terminate this agreement without limitations if:

         a)       both parties agree to a termination; or

         b)       the loan, including interest, is completely paid back
                  to AMP.



<PAGE>


AMP can terminate this agreement upon its own choice if AMP can sell  FiberCore,
Inc. stock in the  equivalent of  US$3,000,000  plus an annual  interest rate of
10%.


7. If any  provision  of this  agreement is  considered  to be invalid all other
provisions remain unaffected.


8. Venue is Wiesbaden.


FiberCore Glasfaser Jena GMBH


By:/s/ Michael J. Beecher
   ---------------------------
       Michael J. Beecher


FiberCore, Inc.


By:/s/ Michael J. Beecher
   ---------------------------
      Michael J. Beecher


AMP Incorporated


By:/s/ James E. Marley
   ---------------------------
       James E. Marley
       Chairman of the Board
Jael WATTS, petitioner, v. Michael K. ALLEN.

No. 18-490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CMI INDUSTRIES FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 1, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     39,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,442
<PP&E>                                         209,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                (152,850)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,407
<BONDS>                                        114,436
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           595
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,318
<SALES>                                        168,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,090
<CGS>                                          157,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (11,018)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18,012)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (7,790)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,222)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (10.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (10.29)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00352

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER REGARDING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE EDISCOVERY ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC (“Headwater”) and Defendants

Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc.’s

(collectively, “Verizon”) Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File E-Discovery Order. In the 

Agreed Motion, the Parties request an extension of time to file a Proposed E-Discovery Order from 

December 1, 2023 to on or before December 5, 2023. The Parties represent that they do not seek 

this extension for purposes of delay, but rather to allow the Parties adequate time to address their 

remaining disputes and the deadlines, obligations, and protections afforded by this proposed order. 

Having considered the Agreed Motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby 

GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to file a Proposed EDiscovery Order is extended up to and including December 5, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 49-1 Filed 12/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 677
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      606
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,796
<PP&E>                                          21,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,861
<BONDS>                                         10,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,081
<SALES>                                          7,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,828
<CGS>                                            2,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,437)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)
<FN>
<F1>EPS has been restated for the years ending December 31, 1995 and 1996 due to
the implementation of SAB 98 and SFAS 128.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2321

To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that coverage under the

health benefits program for Federal employees is provided for hearing

aids and examinations therefor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mrs. MORELLA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that coverage under the health benefits program for Federal

employees is provided for hearing aids and examinations

therefor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COVERAGE FOR HEARING AIDS.

4 Section 8902 of title 5, United States Code, is

5 amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(p)(1) A contract may not be made or a plan ap7 proved which does not include coverage for hearing aids

8 and examinations therefor.
2

•HR 2321 IH

1 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘hear2 ing aid’ means any wearable instrument or device designed

3 for, offered for the purpose of, or represented as aiding

4 persons with or compensating for, impaired hearing.’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 this section shall apply with respect to any contract en7 tered into or renewed, and any plan approved, on or after

8 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/17/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       55,798
COMMITMENTS
   6,842    2,773       55   42,718   50,027   49,615   52,855    6,183    2,943

CHANGES FROM 04/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,180)
   2,682     -806       18   -1,521    2,473    1,179    1,685    1,001      495

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.3      5.0      0.1     76.6     89.7     88.9     94.7     11.1      5.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       57)
       5        4        1       29       30       35       34
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/17/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       81,976
COMMITMENTS
  14,526    4,400      248   56,060   72,943   70,834   77,591   11,142    4,385

CHANGES FROM 04/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,752)
  -1,254   -1,173     -422     -267     -446   -1,943   -2,041      191      289

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    17.7      5.4      0.3     68.4     89.0     86.4     94.7     13.6      5.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       87)
      19        8        1       39       35       58       44
```

----

Updated April 20, 2012
Douglas Wayne THOMPSON, petitioner, v. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE.

No. 18-6572.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8, pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Plan (Nos. 33-75390, 33-87420,333-44097, 333-92425, 333-52370 and 333-75410) and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Nos. 33-75392 and 333-18519), Form SB-2 (No. 333-38668) and Form S-3 (No. 333-114035) of our report dated July 30, 2004, with respect to the financial statements ofNeurobiological Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

September 10, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

v. Civil No. ______________________

CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

On this ________ day of __________________, 20 _____, it appearing from the affidavit(s) 

in support of default of ____________________________, attorney for plaintiff, that each of the

defendants named below has failed to plead or otherwise defend herein as provided by the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure;

Now, therefore, the DEFAULT of each of the following named defendants is hereby entered:

DAVID	, CLERK

By: _________________________

 Deputy Clerk

p:\DFLT.ord

2:23-cv-00233-JRG

Randall Garteiser

CDNetworks Co., Ltd.

TOUCHPOINT PROJECTION

INNOVATIONS, LLC,

CDNETWORKS CO., LTD

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 7 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 80
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      496,713
COMMITMENTS
  38,408   41,211  115,944  314,873  317,771  469,226  474,926   27,487   21,787

CHANGES FROM 04/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,797)
   1,318    5,481    1,643    8,867    6,065   11,827   13,189    4,970    3,608

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.7      8.3     23.3     63.4     64.0     94.5     95.6      5.5      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      128)
      30       27       42       64       58      118      106
```

----

Updated April 13, 2012
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. Jennifer DAVIDSON.

No. 18-304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2545

___________

Albert L. Pierson, *

*

Petitioner - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern 

* District of Missouri.

Dave Dormire, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 8, 2007

Filed: May 6, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Below, the district court held Pierson’s petition for habeas corpus relief was

untimely. On appeal, we reversed. Pierson v. Dormire, 484 F.3d 486, 495 (8th Cir.

2007). We held Pierson’s petition was timely because our en banc decision in Nichols

v. Bowersox, 172 F.3d 1068, 1072 (8th Cir. 1999), required us to consider the state

court judgment against Pierson final ninety days after the Missouri Court of Appeals

entered its judgment. This ninety days represented the window of time within which

Pierson may have been entitled to file a writ of certiorari with United States Supreme

Court. The appellee petitioned our panel and our en banc court for rehearing. We
-2-

now grant in part the petition for panel rehearing, vacate in part our prior opinion, and

remand for further proceedings.

Subsequent to the issuance of our prior panel opinion in this case, our en banc

court in Riddle v. Kemna, No. 06-2542, --- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 927618 (8th Cir.

2008), abrogated the ninety-day rule of Nichols. The court in Riddle, however,

characterized this abrogation of Nichols as an “extraordinary circumstance, external

to Riddle and not attributable to him” that might justify application of the doctrine of

equitable tolling. Id. at *6. We ordered a remand in Riddle with instructions for the

district court to consider application of the doctrine of equitable tolling. We believe

the present case requires the same action on our part. Accordingly, we vacate that

portion of our prior opinion in this case which held Pierson’s habeas petition was

timely under the ninety-day rule of Nichols, and we remand for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion and Riddle.

______________________________
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

K.M.M., A CHILD,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-1047

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Leon 

G. Kazanzas, Assistant Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach, for Petitioner. 

No Appearance for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with 

the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the November 20, 2017 final 

orders of disposition rendered in Case Nos. 2016-31617-CJCI and 2017-31287-CJCI, in 

the Circuit Court in and for Volusia County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Gregory CRUM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6518.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

# **SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned herebycertify that this report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the informationcontained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:   August 10, 2006 | By:                                                   | /s/ Roger E. Gower |   |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                               | Roger E. Gower  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                                                  |
|                               |                                                  |
| Dated:   August 10, 2006 | By:                                                   | /s/ BachThuy T. Vo |   |
|                               | BachThuy T. Vo  Interim Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
Exhibit
32.3
 
 
 Certification
of Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company. 
 
 
 
 
 Date: May
10, 2005
 
 
 _________________
 Larry
Hannappel
 Senior
Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      458,807
COMMITMENTS
  70,819   59,356  117,985  246,811  264,245  435,615  441,586   23,192   17,221

CHANGES FROM 12/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,149)
  -3,650    3,487  -12,933  -11,520  -15,464  -28,103  -24,910    3,954      761

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.4     12.9     25.7     53.8     57.6     94.9     96.2      5.1      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      140)
      27       37       49       65       63      125      121
```

----

Updated December 28, 2012
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

 

SYMBOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

VALVE CORPORATION,

GEARBOX SOFTWARE, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-419

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

Plaintiff Symbology Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff”) respectfully submits this Motion for a 4-day 

Extension of Time to Respond to Valve Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss for Improper 

Venue, filed at Docket 11.

Plaintiff’s Response is currently due December 4, 2023.

Counsel for Plaintiff has conferred with counsel for Defendant, and have agreed to extend the 

deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion by 4 days. The proposed deadline would be December 8, 

2023. The present request is not offered for the purpose of delay or advantage.

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 19 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 174
Dated: December 4, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

 Texas Bar No. 24038912

 rgarteiser@ghiplaw.com

GARTEISER HONEA, PLLC

119 W. Ferguson Street

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 705-7420

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned attorney represents and confirms that a conference was conducted with 

opposing counsel prior to filing this Motion, and counsel indicated its agreement with the relief 

requested herein.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above document has been 

served to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system on.

/s/ Randall Garteiser

Randall Garteiser

Case 2:23-cv-00419-JRG Document 19 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 175
Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 10-1 Filed 06/28/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 95
Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 10-1 Filed 06/28/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 96
Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 10-1 Filed 06/28/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 97
Eddie Lee SHULAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6662.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.