alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             740
<SECURITIES>                                       438
<RECEIVABLES>                                      665
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,598
<PP&E>                                           6,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              306
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           850
<OTHER-SE>                                       (312)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,336
<SALES>                                         10,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    985
<INCOME-TAX>                                       379
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      9
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.21


</TABLE>
UAET (02-2008)

Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

Attach this form to the Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint event.

CASE AND DEADLINE INFORMATION

Civil Action No.:

Name of party requesting extension:

Is this the first application for extension of time in this case? Yes

No

If no, please indicate which application this represents: Second

Third

Other ___________

Date of Service of Summons:

Number of days requested: 30 days

15 days

Other _____ days

New Deadline Date: (Required)

ATTORNEY FILING APPLICATION INFORMATION

Full Name:

State Bar No.:

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

A certificate of conference does not need to be filed with this unopposed application.

2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP

Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless

✔

08/29/2023

✔ 45

11/03/2023

Adam Ahnhut

TX 24106983

Alston & Bird LLP

2200 Ross Ave. #2300

Dallas, Texas 75201

214-922-3453

214-922-3899

adam.ahnhut@alston.com

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 18 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 77
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

JUAN RAFAEL ROSARIO,

#02160948

Petitioner, 

v.

DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, 

Respondent. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23-CV-033-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On April 13, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a 

Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 14) recommending that Petitioner’s Motion 

for Default Judgment (Docket No. 11), construed as a motion for entry of default, be 

denied.

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and 

Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court 

examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law.

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), 

superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to 

file objections from ten to fourteen days). 

1

Case 6:23-cv-00033-JDK-KNM Document 23 Filed 06/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 539
Here, Petitioner did not file objections in the prescribed period. The Court, 

therefore, reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of 

discretion and reviews her legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary 

to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 

492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are 

filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to 

law”).

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the 

Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to law.

The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 14) as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report

(Docket No. 14) is ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 11) is 

DENIED. 

2

Signed this

Jun 12, 2023

Case 6:23-cv-00033-JDK-KNM Document 23 Filed 06/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 540
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

I, JeffreyAaronson, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of DiaSys Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report.

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report.

 

4. TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

 

a)                   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)                  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                   disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.  TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial report.

 
| Dated:  October 8, 2003 | /s/  Jeffrey Aaronson                      |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Jeffrey  Aaronson, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/29/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      574,623
COMMITMENTS
  50,526   21,746  125,664  371,079  406,601  547,269  554,012   27,353   20,611

CHANGES FROM 03/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,619)
     904   -2,070    5,614    3,951    9,067   10,469   12,611      150   -1,992

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.8      3.8     21.9     64.6     70.8     95.2     96.4      4.8      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      34       24       49       62       63      122      114
```

----

Updated April 1, 2011
Ali ELGHANNAM, petitioner, v. EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE.

No. 17-9476.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jonathan S. NELSON, petitioner, v. Joe NORWOOD, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6939.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Olivia DE HAVILLAND, petitioner, v. FX NETWORKS, LLC, et al.

No. 18-453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
IB

Union Calendar No. 145

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2181

[Report No. 106–251]

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire and equip fishery survey

vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself and Mr. SAXTON) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

JULY 22, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire and

equip fishery survey vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fisheries Survey Ves5 sel Authorization Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2181 RH

1 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF FISHERY SURVEY VESSELS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, subject to the

3 availability of appropriations, may in accordance with this

4 section acquire, by purchase, lease, lease-purchase, or

5 charter, and equip up to 6 fishery survey vessels in accord6 ance with this section.

7 (b) VESSEL REQUIREMENTS.—Any vessel acquired

8 and equipped under this section must—

9 (1) be capable of—

10 (A) staying at sea continuously for at least

11 30 days;

12 (B) conducting fishery population surveys

13 using hydroacoustic, longlining, deep water, and

14 pelagic trawls, and other necessary survey tech15 niques; and

16 (C) conducting other work necessary to

17 provide fishery managers with the accurate and

18 timely data needed to prepare and implement

19 fishery management plans; and

20 (2) have a hull that meets the International

21 Council for Exploration of the Sea standard regard22 ing acoustic quietness.

23 (c) AUTHORIZATION.—To carry out this section there

24 are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary

25 $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002,

26 2003, 2004, and 2005.

Union Calendar No. 145

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2181

[Report No. 106–251]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire

and equip fishery survey vessels.

JULY 22, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date:  August 10, 2009








/s/ Erwin Haitzmann  Erwin Haitzmann


Co Chief Executive Officer
Vicente QUIROZ, petitioner, v. John Thomas MORAN, et al.

No. 17-8795.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to
     U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carl Spana, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my knowledge, that the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 of Palatin
Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  May 13, 2004 | /s/ Carl SpanaCarl SpanaPresident and Chief
     Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2213 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2213

To allow an exception from making formal entry for a vessel required to 
   anchor at Belle Isle Anchorage, Port of Detroit, Michigan, while 
 awaiting the availability of cargo or for the purpose of taking on a 
 pilot or awaiting pilot services, prior to proceeding to the Port of 
                             Toledo, Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

  Ms. Kaptur introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow an exception from making formal entry for a vessel required to 
   anchor at Belle Isle Anchorage, Port of Detroit, Michigan, while 
 awaiting the availability of cargo or for the purpose of taking on a 
 pilot or awaiting pilot services, prior to proceeding to the Port of 
                             Toledo, Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM MAKING FORMAL ENTRY FOR CERTAIN VESSELS.

    Section 441 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1441) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Any vessel required to anchor at the Belle Isle 
        Anchorage in the waters of the Detroit River in the State of 
        Michigan, for the purposes of awaiting the availability of 
        cargo or berthing space or for the purpose of taking on a pilot 
        or awaiting pilot services, or at the direction of the Coast 
        Guard, prior to proceeding to the Port of Toledo, Ohio, where 
        the vessel makes entry under section 434 or obtains clearance 
        under section 4197 of the Revised Statutes of the United 
        States.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of National RV Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Bradley C. Albrechtsen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,and Thomas J. Martini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |  /s/ Bradley C. Albrechtsen |                       |  /s/ Thomas J. Martini |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Bradley C.  Albrechtsen          | Thomas J.  Martini         |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer         | Chief Financial  Officer   |
|   | and President                    | (Principal  Accounting and |
|   | Date: May 4,  2006               |  Financial Officer)   |
|   |                             | Date: May 4,  2006         |

 

1

----
```

```

----

Updated March 22, 2013
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-1383

L.T. Case No. 2024-11130-CIDL

_____________________________

ROBERTO MUNOZ-RIVERA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA AND 

SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.

Kathleen McNeilly, Judge.

Roberto Munoz-Rivera, Mayo, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney 

Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee, State of Florida.

No Appearance for Appellee, Secretary of Department of 

Corrections.

July 23, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

MAKAR, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31043-31044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 1:00 p.m.

PLACE:  The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS:  The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to 
the rule under the Investment Company Act that addresses investment 
company names that are likely to mislead investors about an investment 
company's investments and risks. The amendments the Commission will 
consider also include enhanced prospectus disclosure requirements for 
terminology used in investment company names, as well as public 
reporting regarding compliance with the new names-related requirements.
    2. The Commission also will consider whether to propose amendments 
to rules and reporting forms for registered investment advisers, 
certain advisers exempt from registration, registered investment 
companies, and business development companies to provide standardized 
environmental, social, and governance (``ESG'') disclosure to investors 
and the Commission.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.


[[Page 31044]]


(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: May 18, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10996 Filed 5-18-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Jesus VALLE, petitioner, v. Rusty ROGERS, et al.

No. 18-6427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Robert KLEIN, petitioner, v. CENTENNIAL RANCH AND ASPEN MOUNTAIN RANCH ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-6274.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
```

```

----

Updated June 21, 2013
Samantha Christine VELAZQUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6918.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
XIU JIAN SUN, petitioner, v. Stephen MULLKOFF.

No. 18-262.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, and Statement of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                        36,877,143
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 65,566
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              37,221,157
<PP&E>                        5,446,404
<DEPRECIATION>                2,346,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                42,771,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         516,043
<BONDS>                       150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      124,576
<OTHER-SE>                    41,980,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  42,771,483
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              6,564,150
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 11,140,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            7,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (3,675,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                  (40,048)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (3,635,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (3,635,033)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        


</TABLE>