alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that Jonathan B. Bright, of the law firm Fish & Richardson P.C.,

enters his appearance in this matter for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. and consents to electronic services of all papers in this action.

Dated: July 25, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

By: /s/ Jonathan B. Bright

Jonathan B. Bright 

GA Bar No. 256953

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

1180 Peachtree St NE, 21st Fl.

Atlanta, GA 30309

Phone: (404) 892-5005

Email: jbright@fr.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Samsung Electronics Co., LTD and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1746
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on July 25, 2023 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

/s/ Jonathan B. Bright

Jonathan B. Bright 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 35 Filed 07/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1747
EXHIBIT 32-B

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company), and the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the Company for the period covered
the Report, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    KEITH S. BAIR        
|Keith S. Bair March 20, 2007
Jerry DOCAJ, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 18-5700.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
(110 So. 768)

No. 28234.

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dallas MYERS.

(Nov. 29, 1926.)

Appeal from Twenty-Eirst Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa; Columbus Reid, Judge.

B. B. Purser, of Amite, for appellant.

■Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and A. L. Ponder, Jr., Dist. Atty., of Amite (E. R. Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

ST. PAUL, J.

The defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape.

The record contains neither bill of exceptions nor assignment of errors, and there is no error patent on the face of the record.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2106

To exempt certain small businesses from the increased tariffs and other

retaliatory measures imposed against products of the European Union

in response to the banana regime of the European Union and its treatment of imported bovine meat.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. ANDREWS, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. FROST, Mr. EVANS, and Mr. ALLEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To exempt certain small businesses from the increased tariffs

and other retaliatory measures imposed against products

of the European Union in response to the banana regime

of the European Union and its treatment of imported

bovine meat.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2106 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS

2 FROM INCREASED TARIFFS ON CERTAIN

3 PRODUCTS.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an im5 porter of goods of the European Union that are subject

6 to increased tariffs pursuant to the announcements of the

7 United States Trade Representative—

8 (1) on March 3, 1999, in response to the ba9 nana regime of the European Union, and

10 (2) on March 22, 1999, in response to the ban

11 by the European Union on imports of beef from the

12 United States that has been treated with scientif13 ically-proven safe hormones,

14 or any other such increased tariffs or retaliatory actions

15 imposed in response to the actions of the European Union

16 described in paragraphs (1) and (2), shall be exempt, to

17 the extent provided in section 2, from such increases or

18 retaliatory actions if the importer had fewer than 100 em19 ployees during the 2 preceding calendar quarters.

20 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXEMPTION.

21 The exemption under section 1 shall apply to an im22 porter in a calendar year for that quantity of an article

23 which does not exceed 125 percent of the quantity of the

24 same article that is a product of the European Union and
3

•HR 2106 IH

1 was imported by that importer during the preceding cal2 endar year.

Æ
Ronald GRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7769.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### cASE 

### NO. l2-14-00253-CV

JERITY 

### WEAKS and 

### JOYCE WE,AKS, APPF-,LLANT V. 

### IN 

### THE COURT OF 

### APPEALS I.'OIT 

### TWELFTH COTIRT OF APPE,ALS 

### DISTRICT OF

### TEXAS $ {i $ $ 

### KATHLEEN.IT'ANETl'Ii WHITE. 

### APPIiLI,I'E C]EITTI FI CATF], O F CON FEII IINC]E 

### TO 

### THE FIONOITAI}I,F] 

### ('OT]R'I: '['ltis 

## uill ccrtil'r anc] 

### conllrnr that 

### thc unclcrsignccl 

### attorncy 

### Ibr thc Appellants has 

### cortlcrlcd ri

## ith lVls. 

### .lunc l)arrcinrs-llorta. 

### thc attorncl 

## lirr the Appcllcc. 

## in rcgard 

## to the Appellants't.notiol-t to

### allou'filing ol'rcplv bricl'ancl 

### lirr cxtension o1'tinte

### to

### flle certiflcate asto word 

### cttutrt. lV1s. I)arrcil'as-llorta ltas aclviscd thc unclcrsigrrccl tltat shc o1-rpttscs thc ntotion. Respectlirl 

## lr subm ittccl.

Statc Bar 

### No. IOtt59100 

### P.O. Box 168 106W. 

### l-yler St. $ cxks \. \\ h rlc ( erlific^tc of ( iilfcfeilcr PA(;lt I ALrbrey l-. .lones. .lr Attorncy at Law ACCEPTED 12-14-00253-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/2/2015 3:50:53 PM CATHY LUSK CLERKAthens. 'fexas 75751 

### 'l'clcphone: 1903) 67-5-799t) Irax: (903) 670-3424 Ijmail:aubrqyjgrcslaw-(r.smb_argrnatLc_o_m 

### Al"l'ORNLY 

### FOI{ nPPlil,l.AN'fS CI.]RTI 

### FICATE OF' 

### SERVICE 'l'his r,vill 

### ccrlil'r that a tnrc ancl corrcct copy 

### of'thc abovc C'crtillcatc 

### of Confcrence has becn scn'ccl 

### olt Appcllcc's attorncv ol'rccurcl. Ms. .lanc 

### I)arrciras-llorta. iu accordance

### witli the J'exas Rulcs

### ol'Appcllatc l)roccdure

. N4 Sigrrcd 

### tl',i,

# 2-'2 clal

# ol' 4 ',

. 2015.

# at) /L



# ,Wi'-

\\caks r-\\ hilc ( erlificrte of ( oilfercDCc PA(;11 2 Aubrcy'
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE 

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK and 

UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT and 

WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; 

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and 

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. hereby notify the Court that they have served their Initial and 

Additional Disclosures on counsel for Plaintiff via electronic mail on December 14, 2023.

DATED: December 18, 2023 By: /s/ Melissa R. Smith

Melissa R. Smith 

Texas State Bar No. 24001351 

GILLAM & SMITH LLP 

303 South Washington Ave. 

Marshall, TX 75670 

903.934.8450 (Telephone) 

903.934.9257 (Facsimile) 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

Frank A. DeCosta 

Parmanand K. Sharma (pro hac vice) 

Christopher T. Blackford (pro hac vice)

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

901 New York Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20001-4413 

(202) 408-4000 

frank.decosta@finnegan.com 

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 49 Filed 12/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 844
2

parmanand.sharma@finnegan.com 

christopher.blackford@finnegan.com 

Charles H. Suh (pro hac vice) 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

1875 Explorer Street, 8th Floor 

Reston, VA 20190-6023 

(571) 203-2700 

charles.suh@finnegan.com 

Benjamin Schlesinger (pro hac vice) 

Shawn S. Chang (pro hac vice) 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

271 17th St. NW Suite 1400 

Atlanta, GA 30363-6209 

(404) 653-6400 

benjamin.schlesinger@finnegan.com 

shawn.chang@finnegan.com 

Counsel for Defendants 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung 

Semiconductor, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically in 

compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) and served via email on all counsel of record on this 18th day 

of December, 2023. 

/s/ Melissa R. Smith

Melissa R. Smith

Case 2:23-cv-00141-RWS-RSP Document 49 Filed 12/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 845
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 31247)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; RFA-R25.                    

*Date:*                         July 28, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Video Assisted Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zoe E. Huang, MD, Chief Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Office, Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-594-4937,                         *huangz@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 17, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10949 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Carl MOUTON, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 18-221.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
Exhibit 23.1 
 
Consent of Independent Auditors 
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Forms S-8 No. 33-77302, 33-83606, 33-77304, 33-93324, 333-06847 and 
333-06845) pertaining to the Inso Corporation, 1993 Stock Purchase Plan, 
1993 Stock Incentive Plan, 401(k) Plan, 1996 Non-employee Director Plan and 
1996 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated January 31, 1997, except for 
Note 11, as to which the date is February 6, 1997, with respect to the 
consolidated finacial statements and schedule of Inso Corporation included 
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                               -----------------------
                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 20, 1997
LEED HR, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. Jeff Ray MITCHELL.

No. 17-1533.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992

To provide for a reduction in regulatory costs by maintaining Federal average

fuel economy standards applicable to automobiles in effect at current

levels until changed by law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. KLINK (for himself, Mr. UPTON, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr.

HALL of Texas, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr.

SAWYER, Mr. REGULA, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr.

LEVIN, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. CAMP, Mr. TRAFICANT,

Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, and Mr.

STUMP) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To provide for a reduction in regulatory costs by maintaining

Federal average fuel economy standards applicable to

automobiles in effect at current levels until changed by

law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS.

4 The average fuel economy standards established,

5 whether directly or indirectly, under regulations promul6 gated by the Secretary of Transportation under section
2

•HR 1992 IH

1 32901 et seq. of title 49, United States Code, prior to

2 the date of the enactment of this Act for automobiles (as

3 defined in section 32901 of such title) shall continue to

4 apply without amendment, change, or other modification

5 of any kind for the model years and the applicable auto6 mobiles specified in the regulation last promulgated for

7 such automobiles and for each model year thereafter until

8 such regulations are specifically amended or otherwise

9 changed by law enacted after the date of the enactment

10 of this Act.

Æ
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       43,139
COMMITMENTS
   1,296    1,497        0   37,766   39,413   39,062   40,910    4,077    2,229

CHANGES FROM 01/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,278)
    -563      624        0    1,465      430      902    1,054      376      224

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.0      3.5      0.0     87.5     91.4     90.5     94.8      9.5      5.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       2        4        0       25       31       27       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       66,618
COMMITMENTS
   5,924   20,692      240   54,729   43,707   60,893   64,639    5,725    1,979

CHANGES FROM 01/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        181)
     571     -558        0     -569      717        2      159      179       22

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.9     31.1      0.4     82.2     65.6     91.4     97.0      8.6      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       71)
       9        6        1       36       28       45       35
```

----

Updated January 13, 2012
UNITED STATES ex rel. Joshua HARMAN, petitioner, v. TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.

No. 17-1149.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hi-Shear
Technology Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2005, I, Gregory J. Smith,
Vice President of Finance and Chief Executive Officer of Hi-Shear Technology
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2005,
         fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
         the year ended May 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects,
         the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear
         Technology Corporation.


                           /s/ Gregory J. Smith
                           ---------------------------------------
                           Gregory J. Smith
                           Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

September 13, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hi-Shear Technology Corporation
and will be retained by Hi-Shear Technology Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2149

To prohibit certain abortions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. BOUCHER,

Mr. KIND, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. VENTO, Mr. BALDACCI, Mrs. THURMAN,

Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. WYNN, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. LUTHER, Ms.

SANCHEZ, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut,

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. BENTSEN, and Mr.

MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit certain abortions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Late Term Abortion

5 Restriction Act’’.
2

HR 2149 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ABORTIONS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful, in or affect3 ing interstate or foreign commerce, knowingly to perform

4 an abortion after the fetus has become viable.

5 (b) EXCEPTION.—This section does not prohibit any

6 abortion if, in the medical judgment of the attending phy7 sician, the abortion is necessary to preserve the life of the

8 woman or to avert serious adverse health consequences to

9 the woman.

10 (c) CIVIL PENALTY.—A physician who violates this

11 section shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed

12 $10,000. The civil penalty provided by this subsection is

13 the exclusive remedy for a violation of this section.

Æ
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 10588
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus EDWIN JEROME OWENS, a.k.a. EJ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama USCA11 Case: 22-10588 Date Filed: 12/02/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 10588

D.C. Docket No. 1:20

- cr

- 00122

- TFM

- 30

____________________ Before R OSENBAUM , J ILL P RYOR , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd , 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th Cir. 2020) ( appeal waiver is enforceable when district court “clearly convey ed to the defendant that he was giving up his

r ight to appeal under most circumstances”); United States v. Bascomb , 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannotbe vitiated or altered by comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11 th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). USCA11 Case: 22-10588 Date Filed: 12/02/2022 Page: 2 of 2