[DO N OT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 11 01 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 8 :1 0- cr-0 00 41 -J DW -AEP-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us CEDRIC WILLIAMS, a.k .a. Pai n, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Sep te m be r 21 , 20 12 ) Befo re PRYOR, JORDAN an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:

Case: 11-11019 Date Filed: 09/21/2012 Page: 1 of 3Cedric W il li am s ap pe al s h is sen te nc e o f 60 m on th s o f im pr is on m en t im po se d fo ll owi ng hi s p le as of g ui lty fortwo co un ts of d is tri bu ti ng a qu an ti ty of a m ix tu re o r subs tanc e co nt ai ni ng a de te ct ab le am ou ntof c oc ai ne ba se withi n 1 ,00 0 feetof asch oo l, 2 1 U.S.C. § § 8 41 (a)( 1) , 86 0( a), an d fo ur co un ts of d is tri bu ti ng 5 gr am s o r m or e o f a m ix tu re o r subs tanc e co nt ai ni ng a de te ct ab le am ountof co cai ne ba se withi n 1 ,00 0 fe etof asch oo l, i d. Will iam s ch al le ng es th e ad di ti on of two po in ts to hi s cr im in al hi st ory cat eg ory forhi s co nv ic ti on s i n aFlo rid a co urt th atare u nd er ap pe al . W il li am s al so ch al le ng es th e d en ia l o f hi s re qu es t fo r se nt en ci ng un de r th e Fai r Sen te nc in g Actof 2 01 0, wh ic h i nc reas edfro m 5 t o 2 8 gr am s the m in im

um am ou ntof c oc ai ne ba se requi redto im po se a m an da to ry m in im um sen te nc e o f fi ve y ears of i m pr is on m en t. We affirm

th e cal cu la ti on of W il li am s’s h is to ry

cat eg ory , bu t the rece ntde ci si on of t he Supr em e Co urt i n Dor se y v. Un it edSta te s, 5 67 U.S. __

__ , 13 2 S . Ct. 2 32 1, 2 33 1 (2 01 2) , requi res th atwe va cat e Will iam s’s s en te nc e an d re m an d fo r res en te nc in g c on si st en t wi th th e Act . The di stric t co urt d idno t err in in crea si ng W il li am s’s cr im in al hi st ory cat eg ory forhi s p rio r se nt en ce o f 11 5 d ay s o f im pr is on m en t fo r po ss es si ng co cai ne an d p os se ss in g l es s tha n 2 0 g ram s o f can nabi s. Th e Sen te nc in g Gu id el in es pr ov id e th at“ [p ]riorsen te nc es un de r ap pe al are co un te d” inco m pu ti ng th e 2 Case: 11-11019 Date Filed: 09/21/2012 Page: 2 of 3cri m in al hi st ory cat eg ory . U.S.S.G. § 4A1 .2(l ). If W il li am s s uc ceed s i n h av in g hi s co nv ic ti on va cat ed , he m ay m ov e th e d is tri ctco urt t o s etasi de or c orrecthi s se nt en ce. See 28 U.S.C. § 2 25 5; Uni te d S tate s v . W al ke r, 19 8 F .3d81 1, 8 13 –1 4 (1 1t h C ir. 1 99 9) . As the go ve rn m en t co nc ed es , th e d is tri ctco urt erredby fail in g t o s en te nc e W il li am s u nd er the Fai r Sen te nc in g Act . After Wil li am s ap pe al ed , th e Supr em e Co urt h el d i n Do rs ey , 13 2 S . Ct. at23 31 , th at“ Co ng res s i nt en de d the . . . m or e le ni en t p en al ti es [un de r th e Act ] to ap pl y to th os e o ffen de rs who se cri m es pr eced edAug us t 3 , 20 10 , bu t wh o a re s en te nc edaft er tha t d at e.” Will iam s was se nt en cedon Feb ru ary 28 , 20 11 . W il li am s i s en ti tl edto th e m or e le ni en t p en al ti es pr ov id edinth e Act . W e AFFIRM inpa rt t he cal cu lati on of Wil li am s’s cr im in al hi st ory cat eg ory , bu t we VACATE W il li am s’s s en te nc e an d REMAND forres en te nc in g. AFFIRMED I N PART, VAC ATED, AND REMANDED.

3 Case: 11-11019 Date Filed: 09/21/2012 Page: 3 of 3