alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Plaintiff / Petitioner:

BEHAVIOR ANALYST CERTIFICATION BOARD, I C.,

Defen ant / Respondent:

MICHAEL MOATES, an Individual; MISTY K1ESCHNICK, an Individual;

and THE GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL PRACTITIONERS AND

EXAMI ERS.

Received by: For:

Stealth Process Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, P.C.

To be serve upon:

MICHAEL MOATES,

I, JAMES HATCHER, being duly sworn, depose and say: I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to th s action, and that within the

boundaries of the state where service was effected, I was authorized by law to make service of the ocuments and informed said person of

the contents herein

Recipient Name / A ress: MICHAEL MOATES,, 4501 NAUTILUS CIR Apt. 710, FORT WORTH, TX 76106

anner of Service: Personal/lndivi ual, May 22, 2023,11:05 am CDT

Documents: Summons and Complaint (Received Apr 26, 2023 at 9:48am CDT)

Additional Comments:

1) Unsuccessful Attempt: May 5, 2023, 5:14 pm CDT at 4501 AUTILUS CI Apt. 710, FORT WORTH, TX 76106

4-5 pm ,, „ ,. . .

I arrived at 3:55 I saw a package at the door and took a peak and It s from Chewys listed for the subJect.; Also a vehicle matchin the

description of subject vehicle was present but this vehicle has dealer tags. See pic.

CD

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 37-1 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 298
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 207 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 207

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that physicians 
comparability allowances be treated as part of basic pay for retirement 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mrs. Morella (for herself and Mr. Moran of Virginia) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that physicians 
comparability allowances be treated as part of basic pay for retirement 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHYSICIANS COMPARABILITY ALLOWANCE TO BE TREATED AS PART OF 
              BASIC PAY FOR RETIREMENT PURPOSES.

    (a) Definition of Basic Pay.--Paragraph (3) of section 8331 of 
title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (F) by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (G) by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
                    ``(H) with respect to a Government physician 
                (within the meaning of section 5948), an allowance paid 
                under such section;''; and
            (4) in the matter following subparagraph (H) (as added by 
        paragraph (3)) by striking ``through (G)'' and inserting 
        ``through (H)''.
    (b) Repeal.--Paragraph (1) of section 5948(h) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``chapter 81, 83, or 87'' and 
inserting ``chapter 81 or 87''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to pay for service performed in pay periods beginning on 
or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1963

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on triacetonamine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1999

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend until December 31, 2002, the duty on

triacetonamine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON TRIACETONAMINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.80 4-piperdone 2,2,6,6

tetramethyl (Cas No. 826–

36–8) (provided for in subheading 2933.39.61) and

any mixtures containing the

foregoing .............................. Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•HR 1963 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1 The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1392

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Raymond J. Ramirez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 19, 2003 Filed: September 29, 2003

___________ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Raymond Ramirez (Ramirez) pled guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(B). The district court 1 sentenced Ramirez to 120 months imprisonment and 8 years supervised release. On appeal, Ramirez’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the government unreasonably refused to file a motion for a downward departure based upon Ramirez’s substantial assistance.-2- In the plea agreement, however, Ramirez waived his right to appeal, with limited exceptions not applicable here. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude Ramirez’s challenge to his sentence is within the scope of the waiver, he entered into the plea agreement knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-91 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/17/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      350,768
COMMITMENTS
  72,230  133,282   51,910  201,251  140,594  325,391  325,786   25,377   24,982

CHANGES FROM 07/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,425)
  -8,933    7,638    6,174   15,433      679   12,674   14,491    3,751    1,934

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.6     38.0     14.8     57.4     40.1     92.8     92.9      7.2      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      147)
      43       61       67       30       34      115      127
```

----

Updated July 20, 2012
Leonicio Arias COREAS, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8022.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/04/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      150,736
COMMITMENTS
  57,040   11,609   13,192   62,822  104,170  133,053  128,970   17,683   21,765

CHANGES FROM 08/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,380)
   3,135    2,734   -1,526   -1,543   -1,353       66     -145   -2,446   -2,235

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    37.8      7.7      8.8     41.7     69.1     88.3     85.6     11.7     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      66       21       27       55       78      131      117
```

----

Updated September 4, 2012
#### **Exhibit 31.2**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John C. Pintozzi, certifythat:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln Benefit LifeCompany;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)                         Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)                          Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                          All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                         Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

May8, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi      |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |                      |
|   | John C. Pintozzi          |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

E-3

----
Jodi A. SMITH, petitioner, v. LAKEWOOD RANCH GYMNASTICS LLC, et al.

No. 18-602.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Roberto PABON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8331.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Richard D. WATERSON, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6692.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

4/25/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-00365

ABN BUSINESS GROUP LLC d/b/a CLOUD VILLE

VAPOR AND SMOKE SHOP and BONAS KHANAL,

BONAS KHANAL

1803 SABLE BAY LANE

ARLINGTON, TX 76005

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00365-SDJ Document 4 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00365

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00365-SDJ Document 4 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
Tessa CHILDRESS aka Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson Carlisle Childress, petitioner, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 17-8548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Michael BENANTI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8665.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-N-0619]


Advisory Committee; Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee; 
Renewal; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
entitled ``Advisory Committee; Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory 
Committee; Renewal'' that appeared in the Federal Register of May 11, 
2022. The document announced the renewal of the Gastrointestinal Drugs 
Advisory Committee. The document was published with the incorrect 
docket number. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rhea Bhatt, Division of Advisory 
Committee and Consultant Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and 
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 
31, Rm. 2434, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-9001, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efa8a6abaeacaf898b8ec187879cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f08060b0e0c0f292b2e6127273c61282039">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Wednesday, May 
11, 2022 (87 FR 28834), in FR Doc. 2022-10040, on page 28834, the 
following correction is made:
    1. On page 28834, in the first column of the header of the 
document, ``Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0619'' is corrected to read ``Docket 
No. FDA-2022-N-0619''.

    Dated: May 13, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10941 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Robert J. KULICK, petitioner, v. LEISURE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC.

No. 18-6907.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Antonio SIERRA, petitioner, v. Josh SHAPIRO, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, et al.

No. 18-8610.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-23689) pertaining to the Super Vision
International, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-32007) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
of our report dated February 19, 1999, with respect to the financial statements
of Super Vision International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1998.





Ernst & Young LLP



Orlando, Florida
March 29, 1999
Stephen Dale BARBEE, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5289.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Fredrick A. LAUX, petitioner, v. Dushan ZATECKY, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

No. 18-5640.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Michael J. ROTONDO, petitioner, v. Angela C. GASPARINI.

No. 17-8668.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/11/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       45,071
COMMITMENTS
  10,082    1,537      981   23,673   32,654   34,736   35,173   10,335    9,898

CHANGES FROM 12/04/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,159)
     135      251     -144    1,781    1,197    1,772    1,304      386      855

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.4      3.4      2.2     52.5     72.5     77.1     78.0     22.9     22.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       51)
      14        2        7       28       24       45       31
```

----

Updated December 14, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-11041

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAMUEL CASTILLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-74-1

Before JONES, DENNIS and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Samuel Castillo appeals the 151-month sentence he received following his

guilty plea conviction for conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Specifically, he challenges

the district court’s refusal to award him a three-level sentencing reduction for

acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Castillo asserts that

he timely pleaded guilty and that, although he moved to withdraw the plea, the

motion was based on bad advice from fellow inmates. He states that he

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 29, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 11-11041 Document: 00512067836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2012
No. 11-11041

subsequently apologized and sought to rectify the error during debriefing and

that he was therefore entitled to the reduction.

The district court’s denial of a sentencing reduction for acceptance of

responsibility was not “without foundation.” United States v. Juarez-Duarte,

513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008). Castillo moved to withdraw his plea based on

his alleged confusion over the type of drug involved in his offense, which

confusion the district court found to be incredible, and which credibility finding

Castillo has never contested. Because Castillo falsely denied knowing that his

offense involved methamphetamine in an attempt to reduce his culpability, he

acted in a manner inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. See § 3E1.1,

comment. (n.3); United States v. Medina-Anicacio, 325 F.3d 638, 648 (5th Cir.

2003); see also United States v. Angeles-Mendoza, 407 F.3d 742, 753 (5th Cir.

2005). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 11-11041 Document: 00512067836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2012
Frank COSTELON, petitioner, v. NEW MEXICO.

No. 18-5224.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William Wise MOCK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6256.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.