alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 19, 2006

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

 Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

 Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 03-2817

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ALBERTO RAMON DIAZ-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division

No. 01 CR 883

Robert W. Gettleman, 

Judge.

O R D E R

Alberto Ramon Diaz-Gutierrez pleaded guilty to reentering the United States

without permission after he was deported following conviction for an aggravated

felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). In sentencing him, Judge Robert W. Gettleman

treated the guidelines as mandatory in accordance with the law as it existed before

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Following Booker, we ordered a

limited remand, pursuant to United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.

2005), so the judge could inform us whether he would have sentenced DiazGutierrez differently had he known the sentencing guidelines were merely advisory. 

In response to our order, Judge Gettleman stated in part:

The Court is unable at this time to say that it would have

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
No. 03-2817 Page 2

imposed the same sentence if it had known the

Sentencing Guidelines were merely advisory. The Court

therefore desires to re-sentence the defendant.

We invited the parties to file position statements concerning the appropriate

disposition of the case. Only Diaz-Gutierrez has responded, and he concurs with

the district court that resentencing is appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED

that Diaz-Gutierrez’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the

district court for resentencing.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       40,392
COMMITMENTS
   1,163    9,848    2,239   36,289   27,625   39,691   39,712      701      680

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        313)
    -428  -13,085      -26      446   13,109       -8       -2      321      315

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.9     24.4      5.5     89.8     68.4     98.3     98.3      1.7      1.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       6        9        7       21       23       30       37`

---

Updated November 26, 2012
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2153

To suspend temporarily the duty on PHBA (p-hydroxybenzoic acid).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. JENKINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on PHBA (phydroxybenzoic acid).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:
2

•HR 2153 IH

‘‘ 9902.29.03 PHBA (pHydroxybenzoic

acid), used to

produce liquefied

crystal polymer

(LCP) (CAS No.

000099–96–7)

(provided for in

subheading

2918.29.22) ....... Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

```

----

Updated May 10, 2013
Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 9 Filed 08/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 38
Attachment

Behalf of Defendants: 

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION and REPAY HOLDINGS, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 9 Filed 08/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 39
# **EXHIBIT10.1**

## **OFFER LETTER TO BRUCE FICKS, CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER OF THE COMPANY**

June29, 2007

Mr. Bruce R. Ficks4200 West 100th StreetBloomington, MN  55437

DearBruce,

We are very pleased to offer you the position of ChiefFinancial Officer for MCT.  In this roleyou will be reporting to Roger Gower, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman ofthe Board.

Your starting salary will be $145,000 per year,payable at a bi-weekly rate of $5,576.92. You will accrue vacation at a rate of4 weeks per year.  You will also be eligible for 3 months of basepay following a “Change in Control” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, ifyour position is eliminated or significantly reduced in scope, responsibilityor compensation. You will be eligible for annual bonuses if approved by theCompensation Committee.  For 2007, youwill be eligible for a bonus of up to $ 30,000 if you satisfy goals mutuallyset by you and the CEO relating to identifying and meeting Sarbanes-Oxleyrequirements.

You will be grantedoptions to purchase 200,000 shares of MCT stock, subject to approval by theCompensation Committee. Option price is the closing market price of MCT stockon the option approval date. Options vest at a rate of 25% per year, beginningon the first anniversary date from the date of grant, as will be noted in theoption agreement.

You will alsoreceive the same benefits available to all MCT employees, including the optionto participate in medical, dental, life and disability insurance plans, and inour 401(K) plan.  You will be given anannual performance and salary review commencing July 1, 2008.

Youremployment with MCT will begin on July 23, 2007.  To show acceptance of this offer, we requestyou sign this offer letter, and the attached MCT Employee Agreement and returnthem to us.

Youremployment with MCT will be at-will, which means that it can be terminated byeither you or MCT at any time for any reason. Nothing contained in this letter or the MCT Employee Agreement altersyour status as an at-will employee.

Weare confident that your association with MCT will prove to be challenging andrewarding, and we look forward to having you join our team.

Ifyou have any questions, please contact us.

Sincerely,
| By:                         | /s/ Roger Gower         |   | By:                           | /s/ Kathy Dimmick |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| Roger Gower                 | Kathy Dimmick           |
| Chief Executive Officer and | Human Resources Manager |
| Chairman of the Board       |                    |
|                        |                    |
| :encl                       |                    |
|                        |                    |
| Accepted:                   |                    |
|                        |                    |
| By:                         | /s/ Bruce R. Ficks      |   | Date:  July 3, 2007 |              |
| Bruce R. Ficks              |                    |
|                             |                         |        |                               |                   |        |  |

 

1

----
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/01/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       36,800
COMMITMENTS
  10,487    2,094    1,578   18,947   24,125   31,012   27,797    5,788    9,003

CHANGES FROM 04/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,895)
    -993     -126      -21     -665   -2,615   -1,679   -2,762   -1,216     -133

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.5      5.7      4.3     51.5     65.6     84.3     75.5     15.7     24.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       57)
      11        8        6       30       24       44       37
```

----

Updated May 4, 2012
Jon KRAKAUER, Petitioner, v. Clayton T. CHRISTIAN, Montana Commissioner of Higher Education.

No. 19-600

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2099

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of sennosides.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of sennosides.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF SENNOSIDES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.44 Mixtures of

sennosides (provided for in subheading

2938.90.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to articles entered,
2

•HR 2099 IH

1 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Kevin SINGSON, petitioner, v. Sean REYES, Attorney General of Utah.

No. 18-332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.
Jason Eugene BUSH, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18M82.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Clement REYNOLDS, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-698.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2083

To provide for the appointment by the Attorney General of a special counsel

when investigation or prosecution of a person by an office or official

of the Department of Justice may result in a personal, financial, or

political conflict of interest.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. GEKAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the appointment by the Attorney General

of a special counsel when investigation or prosecution

of a person by an office or official of the Department

of Justice may result in a personal, financial, or political

conflict of interest.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Counsel Act

5 of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2083 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL.

2 (a) APPOINTMENT.—Upon a determination of the At3 torney General that—

4 (1) the investigation or prosecution of any per5 son for an alleged violation of Federal criminal law

6 by any office or official of the Department of Justice

7 may result in a personal, financial, or political con8 flict of interest, and

9 (2) it is in the public interest for the Attorney

10 General to resolve any such conflict of interest by

11 appointing a special counsel to head a temporary Of12 fice of Special Counsel within the Department of

13 Justice,

14 the Attorney General may appoint a counsel to head such

15 Office.

16 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Attorney General shall

17 issue (and may amend from time to time thereafter) regu18 lations to—

19 (1) govern the conduct of any investigation or

20 prosecution by a special counsel appointed by the

21 Attorney General under subsection (a); and

22 (2) to provide that the special counsel may be

23 removed from office only by the personal action of

24 the Attorney General and only for good cause.
3

•HR 2083 IH

1 The first regulations under this subsection shall be issued

2 and made effective no later than 90 days from the date

3 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSEPH NIZAR AL

- HANNA,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00037

- CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20150C05817)

O R D E R

Appellant is represented on appeal by the Honorable Ruben Morales who was elected to

serve as the Judge of the County Court at Law No. 7 of El Paso County, Texas. Judg e Morales’

term began on January 1, 2019. Judge Morales can no longer serve as counsel for Appellant, but

the Appellant’s brief was also signed by the Honorable Matthew DeKoatz. On our own motion,

we have removed Judge Morales as lead appellate counsel. Mr. DeKoatz is now designated as

lead counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-225-CR

CHRISTOFER CLAYTON MILTON

A/K/A CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON MILTON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received

this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 10, 2009
, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 23-0232

IN RE MOTION FORADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER 

# Flt.Lt.) MAY 2 3 2023 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of ..inotana ORDER

Jessie M. Big Knife has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar ofMontana pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informedthe Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Big Knife has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Jessie M. Big Knife may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearingin may bemade by contactingthe office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED thise . S day

MP/ ofMay, 2023.
ChiefJu *ce 10 0
e ;.-e.---- 05/23/2023

Case Number: PR 23-02322 Justices
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 224 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 224

              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Knollenberg, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Pickering, 
 and Mr. DeMint) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes) is hereby 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to estates of decedents dying, and transfers made, after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 09/05/2023 /s/ Philip Wang Philip Wang CA Bar No. 262239

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 pwang@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Plaintiff

v.

T-Mobile US, Inc. et al

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 15 Filed 09/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 199
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

IN THE INTEREST OF: T. J. ET AL., CHILDREN (MOTHER)

The juvenile court terminated the mother’s parental rights on December 22,

2015. The mother thereafter filed a motion for new trial, which the juvenile court

denied on November 29, 2016. The mother filed this application for discretionary

review on December 30, 2016. Because the application was not timely filed, we lack

jurisdiction. 

An application istimely if it is filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought

to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). For this Court to have jurisdiction, an application

for discretionary appeal must be timely filed. See In Interest of B. R. F., 299 Ga. 294,

296-298 (788 SE2d 416) (2016); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d

57) (1989). Because the mother’s application was filed 31 days after the juvenile

court denied her motion for new trial, we lack jurisdiction.

1

 

1 As an exhibit to her application filed on December 30, the mother has filed

a “Request to Accept Late Filing,” asserting that her counsel encountered technical

difficulties when attempting to file her application shortly before midnight on

December 29. Even if we were to construe the mother’s “Request to Accept Late

Filing,” as a motion for extension of time to file her application, “[n]o extensions of

time shall be granted in filing a discretionary application unless the motion for

extension is filed on or before the due date of the discretionary application.” Court

of Appeals Rule 31 (g).

January 27, 2017
Thus, this application for discretionary appeal is hereby DISMISSED.2

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2 Even if the mother had filed her application within 30 days of the denial of

her motion for a new trial, she has failed to submit a copy of that motion, in violation

of OCGA § 5-6-35 (c) and Court of Appeals Rule 31 (b), which precludes us from

ascertaining whether it was timely filed so as to have tolled the deadline for filing a

discretionary application until December 29. See OCGA §§ 5-5-40 (a); 5-6-35 (d);

Wright v. Rhodes, 198 Ga. App. 269, 269 (401 SE2d 35) (1990). However, we direct

the mother to take note of our instruction in In re B. R. F., 338 Ga. App. 762, 762-63

(791 SE2d 859) (2016) regarding the possibility of requesting to file an out-of-time

application in juvenile court, to the extent such relief may be warranted under the

particular circumstances of her case.

01/27/2017
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-88-MAC

'

TANEE LATRICE COLEMAN, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that the 

court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count One of the Information filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement 

until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Tanee Latrice Coleman, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00088-MAC-CLS Document 17 Filed 09/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 39
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Information charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

1001(a)(2)—False Statement Made to an Agency or Department of the United States.

Case 1:23-cr-00088-MAC-CLS Document 17 Filed 09/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 40
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE § 1350

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30,
2004 of Lincoln Benefit Life Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Lincoln Benefit Life Company.

|Date: August 10, 2004 | /s/CASEY J. SYLLACasey J. Sylla
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | /s/STEVEN E. SHEBIKSteven E. Shebik
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

E-4

---