alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LUMMI TRIBE OF THE LUMMI RESERVATION, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JERRAL W. JONES, DALLAS COWBOYS 

FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD., JAMES 

WILKINSON, TRAILRUNNER 

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and DONALD 

JACK, JR. 

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:23-cv-00032-RWS 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIALLY AGREED MOTION FOR 

CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT JACK’S DEPOSITION 

Before the Court is Defendants’ Partially Agreed Motion for Continuance of Defendant 

Jack’s Deposition (the “Motion”). Having considered the Motion, response and reply thereto (if 

any), the Court concludes that the Motion is well taken and should be GRANTED. 

It is therefore, ORDERED that Jack’s deposition be continued temporarily without 

conditions to an agreed date. 

It is further ORDERED that all depositions in this matter are continued until after the 

motion to dismiss is argued. 

It is further ORDERED that when depositions commence they follow the order as 

previously agreed by the Parties, specifically: Plaintiff, Wilkinson, TrailRunner, Jack and Jones. 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 57-1 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 954
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/06/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       37,550
COMMITMENTS
   1,124   20,661    1,937   33,355   13,503   36,416   36,101    1,134    1,449

CHANGES FROM 10/30/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,360)
    -652    1,508     -282   -3,912   -6,143   -4,846   -4,917      486      557

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.0     55.0      5.2     88.8     36.0     97.0     96.1      3.0      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       43)
       4       13        6       20       21       28       36`

---

Updated November 9, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11211]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m. EDT, Thursday, May 26, 2022.

PLACE: CFTC headquarters office, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement matters. In the event that the 
time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will 
be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: May 19, 2022.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-11211 Filed 5-20-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Manuel de Jesus GORDILLO-ESCANDON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7177.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
TALX Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
333-14619, No. 333-18389, No. 333-18393, No. 333-47569, No. 333-83369, and No.
333-83367 on Forms S-8 of TALX Corporation of our report dated May 5, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of TALX Corporation and subsidiaries
as of March 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2000, which report appears in the March 31,
2000 annual report on Form 10-K of TALX Corporation.



                                                      KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
June 28, 2000
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Paul E. Freiman, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2002;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; and





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report.








September 27, 2002





/s/    PAUL E.
FREIMANPaul E. Freiman Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
EXHIBIT 3.1b

                            ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                   TO THE
                        ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                            VARI-L COMPANY, INC.


          Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado Business Corporation
Act, the undersigned Corporation adopts the following Articles of
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

          FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is Vari-L Company, Inc.

          SECOND:  The following amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation was adopted on June 26, 1996 by a vote of the shareholders
sufficient for approval as prescribed by the Colorado Business Corporation
Act:

          Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:

                                 ARTICLE IV

          The total authorized capital of the Corporation shall consist of
50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, which shares shall have a par value of
$.01.  Any and all of such shares may be issued for such consideration
expressed in dollars, not less than the par value thereof, as shall be
fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors.  The consideration
shall be paid, in whole or in part, in money, in other property, tangible
or intangible, or in labor or services actually performed for the
Corporation.  The promise of future services shall not constitute payment
or part payment for such shares.  Neither the promissory note of a
subscriber or direct purchaser of shares from the Corporation nor the
unsecured or nonnegotiable promissory note of any other person shall
constitute payment or part payment for such shares.

          Upon receipt of the consideration in an amount not less than par
value, such shares shall be issued and deemed fully paid and
nonassessable.

          THIRD:  This Amendment does not effect any exchange,
reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares.

                                   VARI-L COMPANY, INC.


                                   By: /s/David G. Sherman
                                       David G. Sherman, President
Aaron GRANT-FARLEY, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-8708.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints James R. Maronick, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, of Solitario Resources Corporation and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|NAME/s/ Steven A. Webster                 Steven A. Webster | DATEMarch 7, 2008
|----------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------
|/s/ Mark E. Jones, III                                      | March 7, 2008    
|Mark E. Jones, III                                          |                  
|/s/ Christopher E. Herald                                   | March 7, 2008    
|Christopher E. Herald                                       |                  
|/s/ Leonard Harris                                          | March 7, 2008    
|Leonard Harris                                              |                  
|/s/ John Hainey                                             | March 7, 2008    
|John Hainey                                                 |                  
|/s/ Brian Labadie                                           | March 7, 2008    
|Brian Labadie                                               |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7


JOSEPH A. PAUL Letterhead



October 27, 2000


US Diagnostic Inc.
250 S. Australian Avenue
9th Floor
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Attn:    Board of Directors

Gentlemen:

I hereby resign as a Director, President & Chief Executive Officer of US
Diagnostic Inc. effective as of January 5, 2001. The resignation shall not be
construed to amend or cancel the current agreement between US Diagnostic Inc.
and Joseph A. Paul regarding Joseph A. Paul's current employment agreement,
including but not limited to the retention bonus payments as outlined and
approved by the Board of Directors on April 19, 2000.

Sincerely,


/s/ Joseph A. Paul
----------------------
    Joseph A. Paul
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 

| Date: June 5, 2009 |                                               |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                               |
|                    |                                               |
|                    | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe                                |
|                    | Thomas F. Wolfe                                    |
|                    | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
In Re Lewis BROWN, petitioner.

No. 18-5020.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            OCT-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,019
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                9,258
<PP&E>                                        182,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 54,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                189,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,220
<BONDS>                                       108,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           28
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  189,037
<SALES>                                       230,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              230,751
<CGS>                                          67,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 221,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   43
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,957)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.15)



</TABLE>
. (I

- .



### THEA~ORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS

WILL WILSON AITORNICY G*:NERAL 

### June4,1957
Honorable E. W.Patteson Opinion No. WW-145 County Attorney Gonzales County Re: Whether or not awife must Gonzales , Texas file adivorce suit before she ma cle 60t proceed under Brti-

, Penal Code of Dear Sir: Texas

You recently requested an opinion from this office on the following question:

“Is it necessary for awife to file adivorce proceeding before she maytake advantage of the provisions contained in Article 604, Penal Code of Texas?” It is our opinion that it is unnecessary for adivorce proceeding to precede the action contemplated by Uticle 604, Penal Code.

Article 604, Penal Code of Texas, is as follows:

“The Court during its term, or Judge thereof in vacation after the filing of complaint against or after the return of indictment of any person for the crime of wife, or of child, or of wife and child desertion shall upon application of the complainant give notice to the defendant of such application andmayupon hearing thereof enter such temporary orders as mayseemjust, providing for the support of deserted wives and children or both, pendente lite, andmaypunish for the violation or refusal to obey such order as for contempt*I’ Wefind the following statement in ExParte Tavlor 

### 137Tex. 505, 155 S.W.2d 

### 358(1941): ,

“It was well settled by the decisions of this State, prior to the enactment of Article 4639a, Acts 1935, 44th Leg., p. 111, ch. 39, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Statutes, that the courts of this State, in an independent suit not involving adivorce ora
.

Honorable E. W.Patteson, page 2 (WW-145)

the custody of aminor child were without authority to compel the payment of allowances by aparent for the support of his minor child.

, 120 Tex. 491, 40 S.W. er v. BOWY~ 130 Tex. e above statiment we inal action such as is provided for in the Penal Code, Article 604, which is not here involved.”

“It is very clear from areading of the above Act that it does not attempt to enlarge the power of the court so as to authorize the compelling of such payments in suits not involving a suit ;for divorce or the custody of aminor child. 9e 0 It will be noticed that ExParte Tavlpr and the cases cited therein as authorities for the holding have reference to child support actions.

These decisions were written prior to the enactment of Article 4639b, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, Acts 1955, 54th Legislature. This newlegislative enactment permits a suit independent of adivorce proceeding to compel child support payments. Certainly Article 604, Penal Code of Texas is an ancillary proceeding to a criminal action and is not conditional upon a divorce proceeding first being instituted.

Article 604, Penal Code of Texas, provides ancillary relief to a criminal action, and it is not necessary for awife to file adivorce proceeding in order to take advantage of the provision of said statute. Very truly yours, WILLWILSON

JLS:jl:rh:wb AssistantHonorable E. U. Patteson, page 3 

### cm!-1451

APPROVED: OPINIONCOMPfITTL&:: H. Grady Chandler, Chairman Robert 0. Smith EdCazares Will Davis REVIEWED

FORTHEATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Geo. P. Blackburn
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

RICHARD BLANE SIMS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § Case No. 6:23-cv-299-JDK-KNM

§

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS §

IN MABANK, TEXAS §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Richard Blane Sims, an inmate of the Henderson County Jail 

proceding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

without paying the filing fee. The case was referred to United States Magistrate 

K. Nicole Mitchell for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and 

recommendations for the disposition of the case. 

On August 17, 2023, Judge Mitchell issued a Report recommending that 

Plaintiff’s lawsuit be dismissed for failure to prosecute because Plaintiff had failed to 

comply with the Court’s order to satisfy the filing fee requirement and amend his 

complaint. Docket No. 3. A copy of this Report was mailed to Plaintiff, but he did not 

file written objections and has taken no steps to prosecute this case since he filed his 

complaint. 

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de 

novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of the Report and Recommendation. 

1

Case 6:23-cv-00299-JDK-KNM Document 4 Filed 10/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 9
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire 

record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United 

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other 

grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from 

ten to fourteen days). 

Here, Plaintiff did not object in the prescribed period. The Court therefore 

reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and 

reviews his legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 

918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the 

standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the record in this case, 

the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to 

law. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the 

United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 3) as the findings of this Court. It is 

therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to 

prosecute. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. 

2

Signed this

Oct 4, 2023

Case 6:23-cv-00299-JDK-KNM Document 4 Filed 10/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 10
Gerren K. LOVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6461.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRUNO DIPASQUALE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-5145

)

LISETTE DIPASQUALE, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 30, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge.

David R. Hazouri and Raymond J. Rafool of 

Rafool, LLC, Miami, for Appellant.

Cynthia B. Hall and Brian M. Silverio of 

Silverio & Hall, Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Joe Litton BAILEY, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-5999.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/15/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,875
COMMITMENTS
   9,906    4,445    1,522   22,181   22,610   33,609   28,577    6,265   11,298

CHANGES FROM 05/08/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        742)
     264    1,314     -434      699     -954      528      -75      214      817

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    24.8     11.1      3.8     55.6     56.7     84.3     71.7     15.7     28.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
       8       12        6       29       23       40       38
```

----

Updated May 21, 2012