alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         177,003
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               280,432
<PP&E>                                         6,049,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,218,738)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,110,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,717
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,103,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,110,928
<SALES>                                        32,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               34,328
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,048<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (225,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (225,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (225,079)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes gene al and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P., et al., petitioners, v. UPSTATE FOREVER, et al.

No. 18-268.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the *620Fourth Circuit. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States on or before 4 p.m., Friday, January 4, 2019.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

3D SCAN GUIDE LLC,

2:23-cv-194

CHROME FULL ARCH GUIDED SYSTEMS; and 

ROE DENTAL LABORATORY, INC.,

Chrome Full Arch Guided Systems 

c/o Dana A. Banks 

7165 East Pleasant Valley Road 

Independence, Ohio 44131

M. Scott Fuller 

Garteiser Honea - IP Trial Attorneys 

119 W Ferugson St. 

Tyler, TX 75702

04/27/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00194-JRG Document 3 Filed 04/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 33
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-194 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00194-JRG Document 3 Filed 04/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 34
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY
                               ------------------

                               OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
                               -------------------

         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that OLYMPIC STEEL, INC., an Ohio
corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby constitute and
appoint Michael D. Siegal and Richard T. Marabito their attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on behalf of
Olympic Steel, Inc. and the undersigned Directors and officers of Olympic Steel,
Inc., and each of such Directors and officers, to sign Olympic Steel, Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, any or all
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with
such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact
and agents or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

         This Power of Attorney of Olympic Steel, Inc., and the Directors and
officers of Olympic Steel, Inc. may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing it.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at
Cleveland, Ohio this 26th day of February, 2002.

                                     OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

                                     By: /s/ Richard T. Marabito
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                          Richard T. Marabito, Chief Financial
                                          Officer and Treasurer

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:

/s/ Martin H. Elrad                  /s/ Michael D. Siegal
-----------------------------        ------------------------------------------
Martin H. Elrad, Director            Michael D. Siegal, Chairman of the Board
                                     and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Thomas M. Forman                 /s/ David A. Wolfort
-----------------------------        ------------------------------------------
Thomas M. Forman, Director           David A. Wolfort, President, Chief
                                     Operating Officer and Director

/s/ Suren A. Hovsepian               /s/ Richard T. Marabito
-----------------------------        ------------------------------------------
Suren A. Hovsepian, Business         Richard T. Marabito, Chief Financial
Consultant and Director              Officer and Treasurer
                                     (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ James B. Meathe
-----------------------------
James B. Meathe, Director




                                       41
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/23/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      166,093
COMMITMENTS
  59,214   11,312   18,254   71,019  115,362  148,488  144,928   17,605   21,165

CHANGES FROM 10/16/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,578)
   3,734     -355      945     -466    2,865    4,213    3,455     -634      124

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    35.7      6.8     11.0     42.8     69.5     89.4     87.3     10.6     12.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      60       24       29       63       87      134      129
```

----

Updated October 26, 2012
DeWayne L. WESTER, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-6227.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
LaShunda BORDEN, petitioner, v. CHEAHA REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC.

No. 18-8859.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

*2721Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00188

Jay Williams,

Petitioner,

v.

Job Mongare,

Respondent.

ORDER

Petitioner Jay Williams, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus without paying the filing fee or moving to proceed in forma pauperis. The case was referred to United 

States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b).

On June 15, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the plaintiff be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and this case be dismissed without prejudice due to the petitioner’s

failure to prosecute and to comply with the court’s orders. Doc. 18. 

Specifically, the petitioner failed to either pay the fee or file a 

properly supported motion to proceed as a pauper or to amend his 

complaint as ordered. Docs 3, 18. A copy of the report was mailed to 

the petitioner, who did not file written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The petitioner is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 

and this case is dismissed without prejudice.

Case 6:23-cv-00188-JCB-KNM Document 22 Filed 08/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 76
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on August 10, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00188-JCB-KNM Document 22 Filed 08/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 77
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1879

For the relief of Edwardo Reyes and Dianelita Reyes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1999

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Edwardo Reyes and Dianelita Reyes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR EDWARDO

4 REYES AND DIANELITA REYES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Edwardo Reyes and Dianelita Reyes shall be eligible

8 for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im11 migrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjust12 ment of status to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 1879 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Edwardo Reyes or

2 Dianelita Reyes enters the United States before the filing

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be con4 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall,

5 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

7 as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Edwardo Reyes and Dianelita Reyes, the Sec16 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

17 by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the

18 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

19 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

22 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

23 under section 202(e) of such Act.

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
3

•HR 1879 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Edwardo Reyes and

2 Dianelita Reyes shall not, by virtue of such relationship,

3 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act.

Æ
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.23
Date:


__________________
Employee


RE: Retention Award 


Dear ______________, 


Intrepid recognizes all the hard work that you have demonstrated since joining Intrepid.  To show our appreciation for your contributions and your continued commitment to the company, Intrepid is rewarding you with a cash retention award totaling $_______.  Details of the award are described in this Letter Agreement.


Your award will vest and be paid to you in two installments: (1) on or around [date], in the amount of $_______, and (2) on or around _____________, in the amount of $_______, less all applicable withholdings and deductions authorized by you or required by law.


Payment is contingent on you satisfactorily performing your duties and remaining in continuous service with Intrepid or an affiliate from the date of this Letter Agreement through the applicable installment date (each, a “Vesting Date”). If your service with Intrepid ends for any reason before a Vesting Date, any unpaid portion of the award will be forfeited immediately.  


Neither the offering of the retention award nor this Letter Agreement gives you the right to continued service with Intrepid or its affiliates in any capacity. You remain an employee at will and Intrepid and its affiliates reserve the right to terminate your service at any time and for any reason not prohibited by law. This Letter Agreement may not be amended or modified except in writing and must be executed by both parties. 


To accept this Letter Agreement, please sign and date below and return this letter by ______________. 


Your continued service and commitment to Intrepid is greatly appreciated and we look forward to the future with you as a part of our organization.


Sincerely,        
        




         
______________________________    
Erica Wyatt         
Chief Human Resources Officer Officer        






______________________________
Agreed to and accepted
[Employee]
[Employee Job Title]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         106,504
<SECURITIES>                                    58,333
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,035
<PP&E>                                          29,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,922
<SALES>                                        207,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,815
<CGS>                                          105,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,156)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 BEAUMONT DIVISION

DARIUS JASON §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-208

FNU MOORE, ET AL. §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Darius Jason, a prisoner confined at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility,

proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

On June 1, 2023, Plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $20.00 within

thirty days of the date of the order. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the order on June 7, 2023. As

of this date, Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) authorizes the district court to dismiss an action sua

sponte for failure to prosecute or to comply with a court order. Griggs v. S.G.E. Mgmt., 905 F.3d

835, 844 (5th Cir. 2018); Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). “The power to

invoke this sanction is necessary in order to prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases

and to avoid congestion in the calendars of the District Courts.” Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626,

629-30 (1962); Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997).

Case 1:23-cv-00208-MJT-ZJH Document 6 Filed 07/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15
Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case diligently because he has not complied with the

court order to pay the initial partial filing fee. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed without

prejudice for want of prosecution.

Recommendation

This civil rights action should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court, except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 12th day of July, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00208-MJT-ZJH Document 6 Filed 07/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 16
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, petitioner, v. PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY, et al.

No. 18-267.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
|   | (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2009, as amended by Amendment No. 1, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hi-Shear Technology Corporation. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |              |                                                        |   |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | by:               | /s/ George W. Trahan                                        |   |
|   |              |   George W. Trahan                                |   |
|   |              |   President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |   |
|   | Date:   |   September 25, 2009                              |   |

----
In Re Taquan GULLETT, petitioner.

No. 18-6630.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  May 13, 2011








/s/ Erwin Haitzmann


— — — — — — — — — — —


Erwin Haitzmann


Co Chief Executive Officer