alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                 
  Each person whose signature appears below appoints Stuart W. Fuhlendorf,
  his or her attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him or 
  her in any and all capacities, to sign an annual report to be filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on Form
  10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, by Electronic Fab Technology,
  Corp., a Colorado corporation , and all amendments thereto, and to file the 
  same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Commission; granting unto said
  attorney-in-fact full power and authority to perform any other act on
  behalf of the undersigned required to be done in the premises, hereby 
  ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact may lawfully do 
  or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
    
    
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Gerald J. Reid                                 
                                Gerald J. Reid
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Jack Calderon                                 
                                Jack Calderon
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Lloyd A. McConnell                             
                                Lloyd A. McConnell
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Stuart W. Fuhlendorf                          
                                Stuart W. Fuhlendorf
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Brent L. Hofmeister                             
                                Brent L. Hofmeister
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Lucille A. Reid                                 
                                Lucille A. Reid
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       David W. Van Wert                             
                                David W. Van Wert
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Darrayl Cannon                               
                                Darrayl Cannon
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Masoud S. Shirazi                             
                                Masoud S. Shirazi
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Robert McNamara                               
                                Robert McNamara
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       James A. Doran                                
                                James A. Doran
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Richard L. Monfort                             
                                Richard L. Monfort
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Charles Hewitson                              
                                Charles Hewitson
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Gregory Hewitson                             
                                Gregory Hewitson
    
    Date:  March 27, 1997       Matthew Hewitson                               
                                Matthew Hewitson
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ANTHONY GLYN WAGNER (1)

§

§

§ CRIMINAL NO. 4:23-CR-62-SDJ-KPJ-1

§

§

§ 

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 16, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered 

proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #16) that Defendant be 

committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 

twenty-four (24) months, to run consecutively to any other term of imprisonment,

with no term of supervised release to follow. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge 

recommended Defendant be placed at FCI Oakdale, in Oakdale, Louisiana, if 

appropriate.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #16)

and having received Defendant’s waiver of his right to object to the proposed findings 

and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #15), the Court is of the opinion 

that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the 

Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, 

Case 4:23-cr-00062-SDJ-KPJ Document 17 Filed 02/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 48
2

Defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be 

imprisoned for a term of twenty-four (24) months, to run consecutively to any other 

term of imprisonment, with no term of supervised release to follow. Additionally, the 

Court recommends Defendant be placed at FCI Oakdale, in Oakdale, Louisiana, if 

appropriate.

Case 4:23-cr-00062-SDJ-KPJ Document 17 Filed 02/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 49
Dieter Charles VOGT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1325.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/31/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       90,412
COMMITMENTS
   9,966      283    3,688   76,758   86,441   90,412   90,412        0        0

CHANGES FROM 07/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        729)
  -1,375        0      773    1,331      -44      729      729        0        0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.0      0.3      4.1     84.9     95.6    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       3        3        4        9       13       14       18
```

----

Updated August 3, 2012
Hugo ISLAS-HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5706.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,013
<SECURITIES>                                    50,646
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,055
<PP&E>                                           5,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,478
<SALES>                                         19,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,062
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

NICKOLAS WOLFFORD, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-95

§

NELANJ YLLI, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Nickolas Wolfford, a prisoner confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. On July 10, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended granting Plaintiff’s Motion

to Dismiss and dismissing the action without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#7) is

Case 9:23-cv-00095-MAC-CLS Document 9 Filed 08/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (#6) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered

in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. 

2

Signed this date

Aug 25, 2023

Case 9:23-cv-00095-MAC-CLS Document 9 Filed 08/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 197 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 197

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 410 
North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, as the ``Clifford R. Hope Post 
                               Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 197

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 410 
North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, as the ``Clifford R. Hope Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, is hereby designated as the 
``Clifford R. Hope Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``Clifford R. Hope Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/07/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      439,806
COMMITMENTS
  57,672   14,269  106,311  254,106  301,111  418,089  421,691   21,717   18,114

CHANGES FROM 01/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     24,783)
   2,394   -9,710   12,227    9,233   21,680   23,855   24,198      929      585

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.1      3.2     24.2     57.8     68.5     95.1     95.9      4.9      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      124)
      37       12       46       65       64      121      110
```

----

Updated February 10, 2012
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 4, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00479

- CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF J.B., a

Mentally Ill Person,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- MH

- 2027

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file respon se is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JULIUS TIMOTHY DAWSON §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv156

BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL. §

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Julius Timothy Dawson, an inmate confined within the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed the above styled civil

rights lawsuit. This matter was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636 for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order

(doc. no. 2). At the time he filed his complaint and motion, plaintiff was incarcerated at the LeBlanc

Unit. He subsequently notified the court of his transfer to the Terrell Unit. A transfer to another

correctional facility renders a claim for injunctive relief based on conditions at a litigant’s former

correctional facility moot. Cooper v. Sheriff, Lubbock County, 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1991);

Beck v. Lynaugh, 842 F.2d 759, 762 (5th Cir. 1988). As a result, plaintiff’s motion seeking a

preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order should be denied as moot.

Recommendation

Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order should be

denied as moot.

Objections

Objections must be (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served and filed within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV. P. 6(a), 6(b) and 72(b).

A party’s failure to object bars that party from (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district

judge of proposed findings and recommendations, Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th

Case 1:23-cv-00156-MJT-ZJH Document 6 Filed 09/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 45
Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of unobjected-to factual

findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n.,

79 F.3d 1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 19th day of September, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00156-MJT-ZJH Document 6 Filed 09/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 46
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         May 18, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on May 11, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 741 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-58, CP2022-63.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-10659 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Bryan Marque GILSTRAP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6712.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

V.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.; 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SOTERA STIPULATION

Plaintiff Cobblestone hereby notifies the Court that the Samsung Defendants filed a Sotera

stipulation in IPR2024-00315, Paper 8, which makes the following stipulation regarding the 

Samsung Defendants’ invalidity arguments for Patent 9,094,888: 

Samsung Electronics Am., Inc. v. Cobblestone Wireless, LLC, IPR2024-00315, Paper 8 at 2 (May 

7, 2024). In Sotera Wireless, Inc. v. Masimo Corp., “Petitioner filed a stipulation in the District 

Court.” IPR2020-01019, Paper 12 at 13 (Dec. 1, 2020) (filing stipulation in Masimo Corporation 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 06/07/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 883
2

v. Sotera Wireless, Inc., No. 3:19-cv-01100-BAS-MSB, Dkt. 86 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2020)). 

Accordingly, Plaintiff hereby files a true and correct copy of the Samsung Defendants’ stipulation 

as Exhibit A. 

Other than filing a copy of the stipulation in the record, no other relief is sought by Plaintiff 

at this time. Samsung has indicated it may seek to withdraw this stipulation. 

Dated: June 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

CA State Bar No. 246953

Marc A. Fenster

CA State Bar No. 181067

Neil A. Rubin

CA State Bar No. 250761

Christian W. Conkle

CA State Bar No. 306374

Jonathan Ma

CA State Bar No. 312773

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Telephone: 310-826-7474

Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com

Email: mfenster@raklaw.com

Email: nrubin@raklaw.com

Email: cconkle@raklaw.com

Email: jma@raklaw.com

Qi (Peter) Tong

TX State Bar No. 24119042

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

4925 Greenville Ave., Suite 200

Dallas, TX 75206

Email: ptong@raklaw.com

Andrea Fair 

Ward Smith & Hill, PLLC

1507 Bill Owens Parkway

Longview, Texas 75604

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 06/07/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 884
3

(903) 757-6400

andrea@wsfirm.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 06/07/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 885
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 7, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 

Clerk of the Court for the Eastern District of Texas using the ECF System, and served defendants 

with a copy via electronic mail.

Additionally, copies are being served on Samsung’s IPR counsel by email: 

jimglass@quinnemanuel.com, quincylu@quinnemanuel.com, and 

jasonwiliams@quinnemanuel.com.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 55 Filed 06/07/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 886
## 2002 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

3-6-2002 

# P A P sy chi a tr ic v

. Gr ee n S pr in g H e alth

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 0-3403

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2002 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" P A P s y chi a tr ic v

. Gr e e n S pr in g H e alth " (2002). 2002 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 154. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002/154

### <!TOF>

### PRECEDENTIAL

Filed March 6, 2002

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 00-3403

PENNSYLVANIA PSYCHIATRIC SOCIETY, Appellant

v.

GREEN SPRING HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; MAGELLAN HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; HIGHMARK, INC.; KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN WEST, INC.; KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN CENTRAL, INC.; KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN EAST, INC.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania D.C. Civil Action No. 99-cv-00937 (Honorable Gary L. Lancaster)

Argued October 31, 2000

Before: SCIRICA, NYGAARD and BARRY, Circuit Ju dges

### ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the caption of the slip opinion in the above case, filed February 6, 2002, be amended at page 3 as follows:

Delete: RICHARD D. RASKIN, ESQUIRE Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 10 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603

Attorney for Amici Curiae-Appellant, The American Medical Association and Pennsylvania Medical Society

Insert: JACK R. BIERIG, ESQUIRE Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 10 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603

Attorney for Amici Curiae-Appellant, The American Medical Association and Pennsylvania Medical Society

By the Court,
/s/Anthony J. SiricaCircuit Judge

Dated: March 6, 2002

A True Copy: Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2