alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00768

- CV

In the Interest of O.Z.O. Appealed from the 257th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2010

- 67564). Memorandum o pinion delivered by Justice Brown. Justices Christopher and Wise also participating.

TO THE 257TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on August 27, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its
order in these words:

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee Olakunle
Oladunni , signed May 23, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of
the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant Denetra McClairne to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost , Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, November 06, 2015.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

 Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON 

WIRELESS, and VERIZON CORPORATE 

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00352-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC and Defendants Cellco 

Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc.’s Agreed 

Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with Patent Rules 3-3 and 3-4 and the Standing Order 

Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility Contentions. (Dkt. No. 53.) Having considered the Agreed 

Motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the deadline for Verizon to comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 and the Standing Order 

Regarding Subject-Matter Eligibility Contentions is extended to December 21, 2023.

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 54 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 892
Terrence DENMARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5730.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
John DOE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M83.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00693-CR

IN RE John Michael POPE, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 16, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asks this court to compel the trial 

court to dismiss his underlying case on the grounds that his right to a speedy trial has been violated.

Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. 

Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid 

representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for 

this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CR-12867, styled The State of Texas v. John Michael Pope, Jr., 

pending in the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/11/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       29,719
COMMITMENTS
   3,504   19,271    1,277   24,766    9,018   29,547   29,566      172      153

CHANGES FROM 09/04/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,957)
     680    3,260     -130    3,564      908    4,114    4,038     -157      -81

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.8     64.8      4.3     83.3     30.3     99.4     99.5      0.6      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       33)
      10        6        4       14       13       24       23`

---

Updated September 14, 2012
Charles PODARAS, petitioner, v. CITY OF MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-5410.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

*327Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2092

To require that the membership of advisory bodies serving the National

Cancer Institute include individuals who are knowledgeable in complementary and alternative medicine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To require that the membership of advisory bodies serving

the National Cancer Institute include individuals who

are knowledgeable in complementary and alternative

medicine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inclusion of Alternative

5 Approaches in Cancer Research Act’’.
2

•HR 2092 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEMBERSHIP OF ADVISORY BODIES OF NATIONAL

2 CANCER INSTITUTE; INCLUSION OF INDIVID3 UALS KNOWLEDGEABLE IN COMPLEMEN4 TARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The membership of each advisory

6 body established by the President, the Secretary of Health

7 and Human Services, the Director of the National Insti8 tutes of Health, or the Director of the National Cancer

9 Institute for the purpose of providing advice regarding the

10 programs of the National Cancer Institute, including peer

11 review groups that make recommendations regarding ap12 plications for financial support, shall include one or more

13 individuals who are knowledgeable in complementary and

14 alternative medicine.

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

16 (1) NATIONAL CANCER ADVISORY BOARD.—Sec17 tion 406(h)(2)(A)(iii) of the Public Health Service

18 Act (42 U.S.C. 284a(h)(2)(A)(iii)) is amended by in19 serting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, and

20 one or more shall be individuals who are knowledge21 able in complementary and alternative medicine’’.

22 (2) PRESIDENT’S CANCER PANEL.—Section

23 415(a)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42

24 U.S.C. 285a–4(a)(1)) is amended—
3

•HR 2092 IH

1 (A) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘com2 posed of three persons’’ and inserting ‘‘com3 posed of four persons’’; and

4 (B) in the last sentence, by inserting be5 fore the period the following: ‘‘, and at least one

6 member shall be knowledgeable in complemen7 tary and alternative medicine’’.

8 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The appointment of

9 an individual to an advisory body under subsection (a) or

10 (b) is in addition to the individuals who otherwise serve

11 as members of the advisory body. Subsections (a) and (b)

12 may not be construed as requiring that the membership

13 of any individual serving on such a body be terminated.

Æ
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/26/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       67,537
COMMITMENTS
   7,202    2,887        0   55,689   62,181   62,891   65,068    4,646    2,469

CHANGES FROM 06/19/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        865)
     602     -176        0      343    1,246      945    1,070      -80     -205

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.7      4.3      0.0     82.5     92.1     93.1     96.3      6.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       59)
       9        4        0       30       27       39       31
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/26/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      109,386
COMMITMENTS
  19,697    6,671      325   78,878   94,461   98,900  101,457   10,486    7,929

CHANGES FROM 06/19/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,101)
     765     -252      102   -1,352     -473     -485     -623     -616     -478

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    18.0      6.1      0.3     72.1     86.4     90.4     92.8      9.6      7.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      29       11        3       35       35       64       49
```

----

Updated June 29, 2012
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00411 -CR Jus ti n Ry an Le Bla nc , A ppe lla nt

v . State of Texas , Appellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAV IS COUNTY NO. C-1-C R-05-691860 , HONORABLE JAN BRELAND , JUDG E PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant Just in Ry an L eB lanc no longe r wishes to pur sue his appea l and has filed a motion to dism iss. W e grant the motion and dismiss the appea l. Tex. R . App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Nove mber 15, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Chester Larvell STARNES, Jr., petitioner, v. Shane JACKSON, Warden.

No. 18-6403.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

SPS OWNER, LLC

v. 

RAHEEM WARD

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL CASE NO. 4:23-CV-67-SDJ

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 10, 2023, the Report of the 

Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #5), was entered containing proposed findings of fact and 

recommendations that this cause be sua sponte remanded to state court. Having 

assessed the Report and the record in this case, and no objections to the Report having 

been timely filed, the Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report should be 

adopted.

It is therefore ORDERED that the above captioned case is hereby 

REMANDED to the Justice Court, Precinct No. 4, of Collin County, Texas.

The Clerk is instructed to close this civil action.

Case 4:23-cv-00067-SDJ-CAN Document 7 Filed 06/15/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 29
Mostafa MASOMI, petitioner, v. Mehrandokht MADADI.

No. 18-659.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.5

 

Joinder Agreement

 

This Joinder Agreement is executed by the undersigned pursuant to the Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Agreement”), by and among EQM Midstream Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), and the purchasers party thereto, which is incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement.

 

By the execution of this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned agrees as follows:

 

1.              On March 13, 2019, the undersigned agreed to purchase 1,435,309 Series A Preferred Units (the “Initial Units”), subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (including the Schedules and Exhibits thereto).

 

2.              The undersigned hereby agrees to acquire an additional 100,028 Series A Preferred Units at the Closing (the “Incremental Units”), on the same terms and conditions as the Initial Units; provided, however, that the undersigned will not be entitled to receive the Structuring Fee with respect to the incremental Funding Obligation attributable to the Incremental Units (but, for the avoidance of doubt, will be entitled to receive the Transaction Fee with respect to such incremental Funding Obligation).

 

3.              The Partnership hereby acknowledges and agrees that the undersigned shall be deemed a Lead Purchaser under the Agreement with respect to the Incremental Units.

 











 

EXECUTED AND DATED as of this 18th day of March, 2019.

 

	
 
    	
EQM MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   EQGP Services, LLC, its general partner
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Kirk R. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Kirk   R. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    


 

Signature Page to Joinder Agreement to Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement

 











 

	
 
    	
MTP   ENERGY MASTER FUND LLC
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
MTP   Energy Management LLC,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
its   managing member
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
Magnetar   Financial LLC,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
its   sole member
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Karl Wachter
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name: Karl Wachter
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   General Counsel
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Notice Address:
    
	
 
    	
c/o Magnetar Financial LLC
    
	
 
    	
1603 Orrington Ave., 13th Floor
    
	
 
    	
Evanston, IL 60201
    


 

Signature Page to Joinder Agreement to Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement
Raymond MORRISON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8892.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
II

Calendar No. 614

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1666

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 22, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JUNE 21, 2000

Reported by Mr. THOMPSON, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

at 200 East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as

the ‘‘Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 200 East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida,

6 is hereby designated as the ‘‘Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr.

7 Post Office’’.
2

•HR 1666 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference to such facility in any law, regulation,

3 map, document, paper, or other record of the United

4 States shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Cap5 tain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 21,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 614

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 1666

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as the ‘‘Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr.

Post Office’’.

JUNE 21, 2000

Reported without amendment
Kenneth MAYLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-583.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,012
<SECURITIES>                                   254,293
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               272,305
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,329
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     267,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,305
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,862
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    46.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    46.99
        

</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MESA RITH, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. HECTOR A. RIOS, Jr., Warden, Respondent - Appellee. No. 10-16940 D.C. No. 1:10-cv-01035-LJO-GSA
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 12, 2013 ** San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE, McKEOWN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Rith appeals from the district court’s judgment of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 

# FILED
APR 01 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Although Rith’s argument that he was entitled to bring a section 2241 petition was based on his contention that he was “actually innocent,” he did not argue that he was actually innocent of th e crime of conviction. His argument that he was innocent of his career offender status for sentencing purposes is “not cognizable as a claim of actual innocence.” Marrero v. Ives , 682 F.3d 1190, 1195 (9th Cir. 2012) cert. denied , 2013 WL 598706 (Feb. 19, 2013). He has not argued that any of the exceptions to this rule r ecognized by our sister circuits apply here. See Id. at 1194-95. Accordingly, the district court did not err in holding it had no jurisdiction to hear the petition. Id. at 1195. AFFIRMED
.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE § 1350

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31,
2003 of Lincoln Benefit Life Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lincoln Benefit Life Company. This certification
accompanies this quarterly report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by Lincoln Benefit Life Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

|Date:    May 13, 2003 |  | /s/CASEY J. SYLLACasey J. Sylla
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/STEVEN E. SHEBIKSteven E. Shebik
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
Dion Dakota JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M44.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 2, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00385

- CR

Chico Warn

- Her DYKE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Co urt, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR1065

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea

- bargain case,

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” We, therefore, ORDER the trial court clerk to file the

clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the following documents:

1. All pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiv er, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant  s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post

- judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defenda nt’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.

All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The

clerk of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trialcourt clerk, a nd the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this

appeal.

_________________________________ Karen Ang elini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hott le

Clerk of Court
William Henry STARRETT, Jr., petitioner, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-627.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.