alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

' NO. 1:23-CR-71

'

versus

DAVID RUSCHE MOEHLE (2), '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant. 

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, David Rusche Moehle (2), is 

Case 1:23-cr-00071-MAC-ZJH Document 69 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 170
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C § 2119 

(Carjacking).

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cr-00071-MAC-ZJH Document 69 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 171
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
previously filed on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-79913 and 333-47550) of Nucentrix
Broadband Networks, Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the
annual report on Form 10-K of Nucentrix Broadband Networks, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that the Company's recurring losses
from operations and the resulting dependence upon access to additional financing
and the Company's current negative capital working position raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements and the financial statement schedule do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


/S/ KBA Group LLP

KBA GROUP LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 25, 2003
Donell A. THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5786.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/25/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       40,631
COMMITMENTS
   3,387   18,833    2,546   34,483   19,066   40,416   40,445      215      186

CHANGES FROM 09/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,611)
     119      172      661    3,632    3,565    4,412    4,398     -801     -787

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.3     46.4      6.3     84.9     46.9     99.5     99.5      0.5      0.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       36)
       7        7        6       19       18       29       29`

---

Updated September 28, 2012
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6821
SHERMAN L. ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-205) Submitted: October 27, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherman L. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Sherman L. Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039-40 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Roberto Moreno RAMOS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-6682 (18A512).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Adony NINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6865.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Victor M. MANGUAL-ROSADO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

OWEN D. DENSON, JR., a/k/a HIKIM )

SHABAZZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4262

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, 

Judge.

Owen D. Denson, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Donnie George MORTON, petitioner, v. Frank L. PERRY, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

No. 16-6777.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-19-2022]

AbbVie Ltd., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico within Subzone 7I. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on May 13, 2022.

                    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material and specific finished product described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's website—accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*                     The proposed finished product and material would be added to the production authority that the Board previously approved for the operation, as reflected on the Board's website.                

The proposed finished product is venetoclax film coated tablets (duty-free).

The proposed foreign-status material is venetoclax active pharmaceutical ingredient (duty rate 6.5%).

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is June 28, 2022.                

A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information System” section of the Board's website.

                    For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at                     *Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov.*

Dated: May 13, 2022.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-10746 Filed 5-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/06/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       37,245
COMMITMENTS
  12,530    1,255    1,862   15,818   26,048   30,210   29,165    7,035    8,081

CHANGES FROM 02/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -651)
     653     -486     -778     -465      477     -590     -787      -61      136

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.6      3.4      5.0     42.5     69.9     81.1     78.3     18.9     21.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      12        8       11       26       26       46       38
```

----

Updated March 9, 2012
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

TEXT OF OPTION AMENDMENTS 
 RESOLVED, that Section 3.1(b) of each of (i) the option agreement for 24,000 options dated January 19, 2012 for Mr. James Skulina and (ii) the option agreement for 24,000 options
dated March 19, 2012 for Mr. Peter Palmer is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety as follows: 

“(b) No portion of the Option which has not become vested and exercisable at the date of the Participant’s
Termination of Services shall thereafter become vested and exercisable, except as follows or as may be otherwise provided by the Administrator: 
 If Participant incurs a termination of employment under any of the circumstances described in Section 5(a)(i) (death) of that certain [reference individual’s Employment Agreement] (the
“Employment Agreement”), Section 5(a)(ii) (Disability) of the Employment Agreement, Section 5(a)(iv) (Resignation for Good Reason) of the Employment Agreement or Section 5(a)(v) (Termination without Cause) of
the Employment Agreement, in each such case vesting will continue after termination of employment as provided below: 
  

					
	 Termination Date
	  	Percent of
Remaining
Options
That
May
Continue
to
Vest	 
	 Prior to October 1, 2012
	  	 	0	% 
	 On or after October 1, 2012 but prior to October 1, 2013
	  	 	20	% 
	 On or after October 1, 2013 but prior to October 1, 2014
	  	 	40	% 
	 On or after October 1, 2014 but prior to October 1, 2015
	  	 	60	% 
	 On or after October 1, 2015 but prior to October 1, 2016
	  	 	80	% 
	 On or after October 1, 2016
	  	 	100	% 

 The percentage of remaining Options permitted to vest will be spread ratably over the performance vesting
schedule and time vesting schedule.” 
 RESOLVED, that the following be added to Section 3.3 of each of the option
agreements described in the foregoing two resolutions: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any Option vests after the
Participant’s Termination of Services for reasons set forth herein pursuant to Section 3.1 and the Participant has a limit of six months or one year following such Termination of Services to exercise the Option pursuant to paragraph
(d) or (e), the Participant shall have six months after the Option vests to exercise such Option.”
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 3 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk October 3 , 2019

15 9 443 ( 17 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 9 443

v COA: 347375

Wayne CC: 18

- 006163

- FC

MARCUS WAYNE MARTIN

, JR

. ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before November 20, 2019.
Angel BARREIRO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-6000.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2212 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2212

   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain fluorinated compound.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 1999

 Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain fluorinated compound.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.98      Methanone, (4-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         fluorophenyl)phen                                                  31/2003          ''.
                         yl-(CAS No. 345-
                         83-5) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2914.70.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC,

2:23-cv-233

CDNetworks Co. Ltd.,

CDNetworks Co. Ltd., 

c/o Texas Secretary of State 

James E. Rudder Building 

1019 Brazos, Room 105 

Austin, Texas 78701

Randall Garteiser 

Garteiser Honea - IP Trial Attorneys 

119 W Ferugson St. 

Tyler, TX 75702

7/11/23

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 3 Filed 07/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 74
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-233 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 3 Filed 07/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 75
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
       (Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Annual Report of Sun Communities Operating Limited
Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officers of its general partner, Sun Communities,
Inc., Gary A. Shiffman and Jeffrey P. Jorissen, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Gary A. Shiffman                                       Dated: March 15, 2004
-----------------------------------------------------
Gary A. Shiffman, Chief Executive Officer
of Sun Communities, Inc., the General Partner

/s/ Jeffrey P. Jorissen                                   Dated: March 15, 2004
-----------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey P. Jorissen, Chief Financial Officer
of Sun Communities, Inc., the General Partner

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership and will be retained
by Sun Communities Operating Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2181 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2181

  To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire and equip fishery 
                            survey vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

    Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself and Mr. Saxton) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to acquire and equip fishery 
                            survey vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fisheries Survey Vessel 
Authorization Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF FISHERY SURVEY VESSELS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, subject to the availability of 
appropriations, may in accordance with this section acquire, by 
purchase, lease, lease-purchase, or charter, and equip up to 6 fishery 
survey vessels in accordance with this section.
    (b) Vessel Requirements.--Any vessel acquired and equipped under 
this section must--
            (1) be capable of--
                    (A) staying at sea continuously for at least 30 
                days;
                    (B) conducting fishery population surveys using 
                hydroacoustic, longlining, deep water, and pelagic 
                trawls, and other necessary survey techniques; and
                    (C) conducting other work necessary to provide 
                fishery managers with the accurate and timely data 
                needed to prepare and implement fishery management 
                plans; and
            (2) have a hull that meets the International Council for 
        Exploration of the Sea standard regarding acoustic quietness.
    (c) Authorization.--To carry out this section there are authorized 
to be appropriated to the Secretary $60,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005.
                                 <all>
```