alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/03/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      530,637
COMMITMENTS
  56,681   20,577  136,683  315,592  356,258  508,956  513,518   21,681   17,119

CHANGES FROM 06/26/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,676)
   6,456   -2,654   -3,175    1,764   10,189    5,044    4,361      632    1,315

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.7      3.9     25.8     59.5     67.1     95.9     96.8      4.1      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      127)
      29       27       51       64       64      122      116
```

----

Updated July 3, 2012
98669227v.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION 

LINDA BRADSHAW, 

Plaintiff 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

v. 

THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:23-cv-00295 

DEFENDANT PRUDENTIAL’S RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant The Prudential 

Insurance Company of America states that it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential 

Financial, Inc. Prudential Financial, Inc. is a publicly traded company, and no parent corporation 

or any publicly-held corporation owns 10 percent or more of its stock. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Esteban Shardonofsky

Esteban Shardonofsky 

sshardonofsky@seyfarth.com 

Texas State Bar. No. 24051323 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

700 Milam Street, Suite 1400 

Houston, TX 77002 

Telephone: (713) 225-2300 

Facsimile: (713) 225-2340 

 Attorney for Defendant 

 The Prudential Insurance Company of 

 America 

Case 1:23-cv-00295-MJT Document 4 Filed 10/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
98669227v.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I caused a copy of the a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

instrument to be served upon the following counsel of record by the Court’s ECF system on this 

the 3rd day of October, 2023 

J. Price McNamara 

McNamara Law Offices 

10455 Jefferson Highway, Ste. 2B 

Baton Rouge, LA 70809 

price@jpricemcnamara.com 

/s/ Esteban Shardonofsky

Esteban Shardonofsky 

One of the Attorneys for Defendant 

The Prudential Insurance Company of 

America

Case 1:23-cv-00295-MJT Document 4 Filed 10/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         666,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (74,166)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        199,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                     247,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   634,702
<SALES>                                         28,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,822
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,658
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/27/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-243

HAPPY SMOKE LLC d/b/a HAPPY SMOKE, AHMED

ALDHAMARI, ALEXANDER ALHADDAD, and SAM

MOHAMED ALDHAMARI,

HAPPY SMOKE LLC d/b/a HAPPY SMOKE

REGISTERED AGENT: AHMED ALDHAMARI

3611 14TH ST #160

PLANO, TX 75074

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00243-ALM Document 4 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-243

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00243-ALM Document 4 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
Jim Walter QUALLS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5771.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      have
      issued our reports dated June 21, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements and schedule and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of
      FARO
      Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration
      Statements of FARO Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-124021,
      effective April 21, 2005 and File No. 333-121919, effective January 14,2005)
      and
      Forms S-8 (File No. 333-125021, effective May, 18, 2005, File No. 333-41115,
      effective November 26, 1997, File No. 333-41125, effective November 26, 1997,
      File No. 333-41131, effective November 26, 1997 and File No. 333-41135,
      effective, November 26, 1997).


/s/
                GRANT THORNTON LLPOrlando,
                Florida
              June
                29, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to
     U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  November 14, 2003 | /s/ Stephen T. WillsStephen T. WillsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
     Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 12.2




CERTIFICATION





I, Eran Gilad, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Silicom Ltd.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the Company and have:





(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and;





5.  The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors:





(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: March 16, 2011




/S/ Eran Gilad

Eran Gilad, Chief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

128558 & (45) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, HELEN KENNEDY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128558 

 COA: 251565 
 Wayne CC: 02-222435-NO

FRANKWOOD MANAGEMENT CO., INC., 

WARRENWOODS APARTMENTS, INC.,

SATOVSKY FAMILY L.L.C., SATOVSKY

INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., SATOVSKY 

MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LESTER

SATOVSKY, ABRAHAN SATOVSKY, 

and NEIL SATOVSKY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

enlarge record on appeal is DENIED. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

NELSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff, FILED

V.

ADAM M. ARON,

Defendant. CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTE N DISTRICT OF TEXAS

§

§

§ Civil Action o. 4:23-cv-732-ALM

§

§

§

NOTICE OF ERRATA

Plaintiff, Nelson Willis, proceeding pro se, respectfully submits this Notice of Errata to correct certain

errors in the dates referenced in the Supplemental to Plaintiff s Objection (94) to Magistrate Judge s

Report and Recommendation (88) filed on August 12, 2024. The corrections are as follows:

1. Page X, Line Y:

• Incorrect Date: June 27, 2023

• Corrected Date: July 27, 2023

2. Page X, Line Y:

• Incorrect Date: June 21, 2023

• Corrected Date: July 21, 2023

3. Page X, Line Y:

• Incorrect Date: June 21, 2023 at 3:08 PM CST

• Corrected Date: July 21, 2023 at 3:08 PM CST

These corrections do not affect the substance of the arguments presented in the Supplemental to

Plaintiff's Objection (94). The Plaintiff requests that the Court take notice of these corrected dates for

the accurate and fair adjudication of this case.

DATED: August 13, 2024

Respectfully submitted,

Case 4:23-cv-00732-ALM-KPJ Document 96 Filed 08/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1469
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Errata has been served on all

counsel of record via the court s electronic notification system on this 12th day of August, 2024.

el on Willis

Pldintiff Pro Se

1 05 County Road 208

Gainesville, TX 76240

Phone: 972-533-4126

Email: nelsonwillis3@ mail.com

Case 4:23-cv-00732-ALM-KPJ Document 96 Filed 08/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1470
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SAMMY MOSLEY

§

§

§

§

§

 Case No. 2:23-CR-0009-JRG-RSP

MEMORANDUM ORDER

The Court referred a petition, alleging violation of supervised release conditions, to 

United States Magistrate Judge Roy Payne at Marshall, Texas for consideration pursuant to 

applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Court has received and considered the Report of 

the United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings, 

and all available evidence. 

At the close of the June 5, 2024, revocation hearing, Defendant, defense counsel and 

counsel for the government signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed 

findings and recommendations contained in the United States Magistrate Judge’s 

report, consenting to revocation of supervised release and consenting to the imposition of the 

sentence recommended in the report. Defendant also waived his right to be present and speak 

before the District Judge imposes the recommended sentence. Therefore, the Court may act 

on the report and recommendation immediately. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are 

correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore 

ORDERED that the Defendant’s plea of true to the allegations set forth in the 

government’s petition be ACCEPTED. Based upon the Defendant’s plea of true to 

the allegations, the Court finds that the Defendant violated the conditions of his supervised 

release. 

Case 2:23-cr-00009-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 06/11/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 67
2

It is further 

ORDERED that the Defendant’s supervised release be REVOKED. Judgment 

and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the Magistrate 

Judge’s recommendations. It is further 

ORDERED that the Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to 

be imprisoned for a term of eight months, followed by three years supervised release under the 

same conditions with the first six months spent in a half-way house. The Court recommended 

service of sentence at FCI Seagoville, Texas. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of June, 2024.

Case 2:23-cr-00009-JRG-RSP Document 20 Filed 06/11/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 68
##### 



Exhibit 32.01 Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Guilford Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date
hereof:  a)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: March 15, 2004 /s/ Craig R. Smith, M.D.
Nicholas Ryan HEMSHER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/31/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      467,877
COMMITMENTS
  73,459   47,063  128,699  249,766  278,408  451,924  454,170   15,953   13,707

CHANGES FROM 12/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,070)
   2,640  -12,293   10,714    2,955   14,163   16,309   12,584   -7,239   -3,514

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.7     10.1     27.5     53.4     59.5     96.6     97.1      3.4      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      146)
      31       34       55       67       64      134      126
```

----

Updated January 4, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings in Existing Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-696-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.                

*Description:*                    Refund Report: TPC 2022 Annual L&U Cash-Out Refund Report to be effective N/A.                

*Filed Date:*                    5/19/22.                

*Accession Number:*                    20220519-5141.                

*Comment Date:*                    5 pm ET 5/31/22.                

Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: May 20, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-11332 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Jacob W. DENG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M67.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

TOUCHPOINT PROJECTION 

INNOVATIONS, LLC

v.

CNETWORKS CO., LTD,

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-0233-JRG

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR TIME TO RESPOND TO 

CDNETWORKS’ OPPOSED MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT (DKT. 10)

Before the Court is Plaintiff Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC’s Unopposed Motion for 

an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant CDNetworks Co., Ltd.’s Opposed Motion to Set Aside 

Default (Dkt. 10). 

Having considered the Motion, the Court determines that it should be, and is hereby, 

GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion is hereby set to July 26, 

2024. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 11-1 Filed 07/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 107