alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 20

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct and operate a visitor

center for the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational River on land

owned by the State of New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct and

operate a visitor center for the Upper Delaware Scenic

and Recreational River on land owned by the State of

New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Delaware Scenic

5 and Recreational River Mongaup Visitor Center Act of

6 1999’’.

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

8 The Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 20 IH

1 (1) The Secretary of the Interior approved a

2 management plan for the Upper Delaware Scenic

3 and Recreational River, as required by section 704

4 of Public Law 95–625 (16 U.S.C. 1274 note), on

5 September 29, 1987.

6 (2) The river management plan called for the

7 development of a primary visitor contact facility lo8 cated at the southern end of the river corridor.

9 (3) The river management plan determined that

10 the visitor center would be built and operated by the

11 National Park Service.

12 (4) The Act that designated the Upper Dela13 ware Scenic and Recreational River and the ap14 proved river management plan limits the Secretary

15 of the Interior’s authority to acquire land within the

16 boundary of the river corridor.

17 (5) The State of New York authorized on June

18 21, 1993, a 99-year lease between the New York

19 State Department of Environmental Conservation

20 and the National Park Service for the construction

21 and operation of a visitor center by the Federal Gov22 ernment on State-owned land in the Town of

23 Deerpark, Orange County, New York, in the vicinity

24 of Mongaup, which is the preferred site for the visi25 tor center.
3

•HR 20 IH

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF VISITOR CENTER FOR UPPER

2 DELAWARE SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL

3 RIVER.

4 For the purpose of constructing and operating a visi5 tor center for the Upper Delaware Scenic and Recreational

6 River and subject to the availability of appropriations, the

7 Secretary of the Interior may—

8 (1) enter into a lease with the State of New

9 York, for a term of 99 years, for State-owned land

10 within the boundaries of the Upper Delaware Scenic

11 and Recreational River located at an area known as

12 Mongaup near the confluence of the Mongaup and

13 Upper Delaware Rivers in the State of New York;

14 and

15 (2) construct and operate such a visitor center

16 on land leased under paragraph (2).

Æ
United States District Court 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

AMBER L. GREENE 

V. 

WHITE, JACOBS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23CV452 

JUDGE MAZZANT

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION 

The Court hereby ORDERS that this case be submitted to mediation in accordance with this 

court’s Mediation Plan. The mediator assigned is the Hon. Carol M. Siebman (Ret.), Siebman Law, 

Federal Courthouse Square, 300 N. Travis Street, Sherman, Texas 75090, (903) 870-0070, 

carol.siebman@siebman.com. 

The mediation conference shall be conducted by the following date: April 19, 2024. 

The mediator shall be responsible for communicating with counsel to coordinate a date for the 

mediation. 

The mediator shall submit a report within five days of the completion of the mediation 

conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER PAUL PARISIAN §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv181

WARDEN REED, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Christopher Paul Parisian, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit against Warden Reed,

Captain Troutman, and Counselor Hunter.

TheCourtreferred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The magistrate judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has

received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed

pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. 

A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address provided

to the Court. The copy of the Report mailed to Plaintiff was returned to the Court with as

undeliverable. Plaintiff, however, has failed to provide the Court with a new address at which he

may be contacted. As of this date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge have been filed.

Case 1:23-cv-00181-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 06/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct

and the Report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case

in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 25th day of June, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00181-MJT-CLS Document 7 Filed 06/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
Lee SIMMONS, petitioner, v. Paul Daniel SMITH, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service, et al.

No. 18-512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1152

COBURN T. NORFLEET,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (MISC-01-28-5)

Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Coburn T. Norfleet, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Phillip Cihlar, Carol

Ann Barthel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.;

Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his petition to quash administrative summonses issued to

third parties by the Internal Revenue Service. Our review of the

record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Norfleet v. United States, No. MISC-01-28-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec.

5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
E.K. WADE, petitioner, v. R. Alexander ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, et al.

No. 18-197.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  August 6, 2010








/s/ Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin Haitzmann


Co Chief Executive Officer
Salvador ORTIZ-URESTI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 3(i)(B)
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                       RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II


The undersigned certifies that:

1.      The name of the statutory trust is Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III
(the "Statutory Trust").

2.      The amendment to the Certificate of Trust of the Statutory Trust set
forth below (the "Amendment") has been duly authorized by the Managing
Shareholder of the Statutory Trust.

          The second paragraph of the Certificate of Trust is hereby amended to
read as follows:

          "2. The name and business address of the Corporate Trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware is Christiana Bank & Trust Company, 1314 King
Street, P.O. Box 957, Wilmington, DE 19899-0957, Attention: Corporate Trust
Administration."

3.      Pursuant to Title 12, 3801 et. at., the Delaware Statutory Trust Act,
(the "Act"), this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Trust of the
Statutory Trust shall become effective immediately upon fling with the Office of
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

4.      The Amendment is made pursuant to the authority granted by the Statutory
Trust under Section 3810(b) of the Act and pursuant to the authority set forth
in the governing instrument of the Statutory Trust.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Corporate Trustee of
the Statutory Trust, has duly executed this Certificate of Amendment this 18th
day of December, 2003.

                                              Christiana Bank & Trust Company,
                                              Corporate Trustee


                                              By: /s/ Toni L. Lindsay
                                              -------------------------
                                              Name:  Toni L. Lindsay
                                              Title: Vice President




       State of Delaware
      Secretary of State
   Division of Corporations
Delivered 02:18 PM 12/18/2003
  FILED 02:28 PM 12/18/2003
 SRV 030817295 - 2362359 FILE
Paminder S. PARMAR, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Surinder K. Parmar, et al., petitioners, v. Lisa MADIGAN, Attorney General of Illinois, et al.

No. 18-241.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
Rodney WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-6535.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
EXHIBIT 32-A

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President, and Chief Executive Officer and Director of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company) hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/    JAY W. FREELAND        
|Jay W. Freeland March 20, 2007
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136617 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136653 

Marilyn Kelly 136983 Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH, Justices 

a Protected Person,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136617 

 COA: 274709 
 Kent CC: 06-000982-NM 

BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D.,

GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF 

MANSOUR, M.D., VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, 

P.C., and SPECTRUM HEALTH

BUTTERWORTH CAMPUS,

Defendants, 

and 

JOHN CHARLES HEISER, M.D., and WEST 

MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH,

a Protected Person,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136653 

 COA: 274708 
 Kent CC: 06-000982-NM 

BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D.,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

JOHN CHARLES HEISER, M.D., WEST 

MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS,

GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF 

MANSOUR, M.D., VASCULAR ASSOCIATES, 

P.C., and SPECTRUM HEALTH

BUTTERWORTH CAMPUS,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/
 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

GARY L. BUSH, Guardian of GARY E. BUSH,

a Protected Person,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136983 

 COA: 274726 

Kent CC: 06-000982-NM 

BEHROOZ-BRUCE SHABAHANG, M.D.,

JOHN CHARLES HEISER, M.D., WEST 

MICHIGAN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEONS,

GEORGE T. SUGIYAMA, M.D., M. ASHRAF 

MANSOUR, M.D., and VASCULAR 

ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

Defendants, 

and 

SPECTRUM HEALTH BUTTERWORTH 

CAMPUS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On November 19, 2008, the Court heard oral argument on the applications for 

leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the 

Court, the applications are again considered, and they are GRANTED, limited to the 

issues: (1) whether the plaintiff’s defective notice of intent as to defendants West 

Michigan Cardiovascular Surgeons and Spectrum Health tolled the period of limitations 

pursuant to MCL 600.5856(c), as amended by 2004 PA 87, effective April 22, 2004; and 

(2) whether defendant Shabahang’s defective response to the plaintiff’s notice of intent, 

MCL 600.2912b(7), was presumed valid such that the plaintiff was required to wait the 

full 182-day period before filing his medical malpractice action. 

KELLY, J. (concurring). 

I concur in the order granting leave to appeal. However, I would welcome 

briefing and argument on all issues raised in the three cases in which leave to appeal has 

been granted. 

1215 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2008 

 Clerk
Seaun Llwellyn FARTHING, petitioner, v. Dara WATSON, Warden.

No. 18-7934.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
James E. JESSUP, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8883.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Russell BUCKLEW, petitioner, v. Anne L. PRECYTHE, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-8151.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted, and Cheryl A. Pilate, Esquire, of Kansas City, Missouri, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC. and SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., 

LTD., 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC’s Unopposed Motion to 

Amend Deadlines. Dkt. No. 46. After consideration, and in light of its unopposed nature, the 

Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s deadline to comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 is extended to 

September 28, 2023. 

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s deadline to comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 is extended to November 

23, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 09/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1827
#### STATE ex rel. BACKUS-BROOKS COMPANY v. DISTRICT COURT OF FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT.1

July 16, 1909.

No. 16,263.

Application to this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court for Hennepin county to cancel a judgment for personal property taxes entered May 14, 1909, against Backus-Brooks Company, where the judgment roll shows a citation issued to “Backus, Brooks & Co.” and a judgment against Backus-Brooks *Company.*

Writ denied.

*Harris Richardson*and *Harold O. Kerr,*for relator.

*Al. J. Smith,*County Attorney, and *H. W. Gray,*Assistant County Attorney, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 122 N. W. 314.

Bek Cubiam.

The relator, Backus-Brooks Company, petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus upon the following facts: A personal property tax judgment regular on its face was entered and docketed on the fourteenth day of May, 1909, in favor of the state of Minnesota and against the relator, for $1,785.79. No citation was ever issued to or served on relator on account of the personal property tax. The relator owned real property upon which the judgment was an apparent lien. The district court is threatening to, and is about to, and will, unless said judgment be canceled and set aside, issue an execution and sell said property. The relator had no adequate remedy, at law or otherwise. Upon this petition this court granted an order to show cause why the writ should not issue.

In this state personal property taxes are collected by proceedings which, so far as here involved, are strictly judicial in nature. Before judgment is entered, a prescribed citation must have been personally served on the owner of the property taxed. He is given an opportunity to appear and assert whatever defense he *536*may*have.. In consequence, where a personal tax judgment has been entered after failure to serve notice on the judgment debtor, the practice current in ordinary civil actions controls. Application for relief must be made in the district court, in which the judgment is docketed. This has been the invariable practice in this state, established for many years. It is adequate and sufficient. It is as “speedy” as is required of judicial proceedings by the constitution. It is true that it is not as “speedy” as mandamus. The present is one of the many constantly recurring instances in which it is improperly sought to use mandamus as a judicial short cut. Its application to cases of this kind would inundate this court with original hearings in default judgment cases, which in natural and orderly procedure should eo.me first’before the various district courts. We have examined the authorities to which relator refers us, and find nothing in them to change this conclusion.

The court declines, to issue the writ.
Robert WEISLER, III, petitioner, v. JEFFERSON PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al.

No. 18-348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 W.S.C. SECTION 1350 as adopted and PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons fulfilling similar functions, each certify:

(i)

That the financial information included in this Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and for the periods presented in the report; and

(ii)

That the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934



Date:

May 6, 2009                  By:    /s/Wilson Russell

Title: President and Principal Financial Officer
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/08/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       64,944
COMMITMENTS
  21,861    2,286    7,177   22,190   40,300   51,228   49,763   13,715   15,180

CHANGES FROM 03/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,587)
     306   -1,665   -1,007      389      488     -312   -2,184   -1,275      597

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.7      3.5     11.1     34.2     62.1     78.9     76.6     21.1     23.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      35        7       16       25       25       65       46
```

----

Updated March 11, 2011
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-2320 and File No. 333-127134), of the Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. 1994 and 2003 Stock Option Plans, of our report, dated August 22, 2007, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and for the three years ended June 30, 2007, which report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K

/s/ BKD, LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
September 28, 2007
Corey HOLDER, petitioner, v. Michael SEPANEK, Warden.

No. 18-6437.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

URGO HOTELS LP, a Maryland limited partnership, by and through its 

general partners, URGO LODGING MANAGEMENT, LLC, DONALD J. 

URGO, DONALD J. URGO, JR., KEVIN M. URGO, COLLIN D. URGO 

and UH-SI, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,

Appellants,

v.

THE RESORT AT SINGER ISLAND, HOTEL CONDOMINIUM 

ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1330

[April 3, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; David E. French, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CA014327-XXXX-MB.

Jack J. Aiello, Heather C. Costanzo, Devin S. Radkay, and Gregor J. 

Schwinghammer of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, 

for appellants.

Alan B. Rose and Daniel A. Thomas of Mrachek, Fitzgerald, Rose, 

Konopka, Thomas & Weiss, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Daniel S. 

Rosenbaum of Rosenbaum PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Garden Suburbs Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Pruitt, 24 So. 

2d 898 (Fla. 1946). 

WARNER, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Marek BISZCZANIK, petitioner, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al.

No. 18-639.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Michael QUATTROCCHI, petitioner.

No. 18-6448.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.