alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA CAUSE NO. DA 21**  **- 0552**  STEPHANIE KIPFINGER, BEN CUNNINGHAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND OF EVERETT CUNNINGHAM, A MINOR, Plaintiffs and Appellants , vs. GREAT FALLS OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, AND JULIE KUYKENDALL.

Defendants and Appellees . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPREME COURT CAUSE No. DA 21
- 0552

**ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME**  **FOR APPELLANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEF** 

UPON REVIEW of the Appellants’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief (Unopposed) and with good cause being shown first; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant’s Deadline to File their Reply Brief presently set for the 12 th day of July, 2022 is hereby VACATED and RESET for the 24 th day of August, 2022. No further extensions will be granted. **ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.** CC:

- Appellants:

o Daniel J. Flaherty o Will Ballew o Ben Novotny o Michael Brooks

- Appellee, c/o Gary Kalkstein

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 11 2022

07/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0552
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       46,314
COMMITMENTS
   1,457    2,391        0   40,280   41,922   41,737   44,313    4,577    2,001

CHANGES FROM 01/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        722)
     374      450        0      145      599      519    1,049      203     -327

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.1      5.2      0.0     87.0     90.5     90.1     95.7      9.9      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       51)
       2        4        0       25       32       27       36
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       68,109
COMMITMENTS
   7,446   20,970      223   54,019   45,367   61,688   66,560    6,421    1,549

CHANGES FROM 01/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,655)
   1,303     -514      -45   -2,018      264     -760     -295     -895   -1,360

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.9     30.8      0.3     79.3     66.6     90.6     97.7      9.4      2.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      14        8        1       39       32       53       41
```

----

Updated January 27, 2012
Delmart E.J.M. VREELAND, II, petitioner, v. David ZUPAN, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8387.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
JC Christopher PULHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7077.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 221

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to permit certain youth

to perform certain work with wood products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. PITTS (for himself, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. KIND, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. KLINK, Mr.

FATTAH, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. REGULA, Mr. PICKERING, and

Mr. ADERHOLT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to permit

certain youth to perform certain work with wood products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION.

4 Section 13(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

5 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(c)) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:

7 ‘‘(6)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), in the adminis8 tration and enforcement of the child labor provisions of
2

•HR 221 IH

1 this Act, it shall not be considered oppressive child labor

2 for an individual who—

3 ‘‘(i) is at least 14 but under the age of 18, and

4 ‘‘(ii) is a member of a religious sect or division

5 thereof whose established teachings do not permit

6 formal education beyond the eighth grade,

7 to be employed inside or outside places of business where

8 machinery is used to process wood products.

9 ‘‘(B) The employment of an individual under sub10 paragraph (A) shall be permitted—

11 ‘‘(i) if the individual is supervised by an adult

12 relative of the individual or is supervised by an adult

13 member of the same religious sect or division as the

14 individual;

15 ‘‘(ii) if the individual does not operate or assist

16 in the operation of power-driven woodworking ma17 chines;

18 ‘‘(iii) if the individual is protected from wood

19 particles or other flying debris within the workplace

20 by a barrier appropriate to the potential hazard of

21 such wood particles or flying debris or by maintain22 ing a sufficient distance from machinery in oper23 ation; and
3

•HR 221 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) if the individual is required to use per2 sonal protective equipment to prevent exposure to

3 excessive levels of noise and saw dust.’’.

Æ
Darrell Wayne BROWN, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-362.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COGENTRIX
ENERGY INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          88,811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,155
<PP&E>                                         477,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,499,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,481
<BONDS>                                      1,127,184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,499,851
<SALES>                                        318,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               417,409
<CGS>                                          267,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,914
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (743)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,989
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   131.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   131.17
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certificate is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification is included solely for the purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose. In connection with the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2007, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. that to such officers knowledge:

1. such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Nexxus Lighting, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nexxus Lighting, Inc.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | NEXXUS LIGHTING, INC.                
|                      | 
|Dated: March 28, 2008 |  | /s/ Michael A. Bauer                 
|                      |  | Michael A. Bauer,                    
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ John C. Oakley                   
|                      |  | John C. Oakley,                      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION 

RETA RANDLE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-191-MJT 

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DKT. 40] 

Plaintiff Reta Randle brought several contractual and extra-contractual claims against 

Defendant Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company for property damages arising from a 

home fire. [Dkt. 1]. The District Court referred Plaintiff’s Motion for Civil Contempt and 

Sanctions [Dkts. 35, 36] to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, 

for consideration and disposition. On August 21, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and 

Recommendation [Dkt. 40] in which she recommended that Plaintiff’s motion [Dkt. 35] be 

dismissed as moot, subject to refiling following Defendant’s compliance with the Court’s order of 

August 19, 2024. [Dkt. 39]. That order overruled Defendant’s objections [Dkt. 26] to the 

Magistrate Judge’s prior discovery order [Dkts. 10, 22] and ordered compliance with said order by 

August 26, 2024. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the current report. 

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available 

evidence. After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of 

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 1:23-cv-00191-MJT Document 46 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 337
2 

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 

40] is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Civil Contempt and Sanctions [Dkt. 35] is DISMISSED 

as moot, subject to refiling after Defendant’s compliance with the Court’s order of August 19, 

2024. [Dkt. 39]. 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 6th day of September, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00191-MJT Document 46 Filed 09/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 338
APPLE INC., Petitioner, v. VIRNETX INC., et al.

No. 19-832

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb. 24, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Alexander NDAULA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7039.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Kenneth Richard BARBER, petitioner v. Stuart SHERMAN, Warden.

No. 18M78.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Waddell BYNUM, petitioner, v. DEKALB COUNTY SANITATION.

No. 18-6460.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on May 26, 2022.

# PLACE: 

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting will be a hybrid meeting).

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

* * * * *

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-10943 Filed 5-17-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Cleveland McDowell MEADOR, IV, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6994.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-75390, 33-87420, 333-44097, 333-92425, 333-52730 and 333-75410) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Plan
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-75392 and 333-18519) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Form S-8 (No. 333-119486) pertaining to the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Form S-8 (No. 333-132022) pertaining to the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Form SB-2 (No. 333-38668) pertaining to the registration of 1,200,000 shares of common stock
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Form S-3 (No. 333-114035) pertaining to the registration of 4,640,480 shares of common stock
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (7) | Form S-3 (No. 333-119492) pertaining to the registration of 4,774,334 shares of common stock
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (8) | Form S-3 (No. 333-123017) pertaining to the registration of $25,000,000 of common stock
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated September 27, 2005 (except for the Restatement section of Note 1, Note 2 and Note 10, as to which the date is November 2, 2006), with respect to the 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial
statements of Neurobiological Technologies, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2006.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California

November 2, 2006
Theadene MATTIS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5962.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
John LASCHKEWITSCH, petitioner, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 18-6228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2154

 To suspend temporarily the duty on myristic acid (tetrabecanoic acid).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

 Mr. Jenkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on myristic acid (tetrabecanoic acid).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.29.02    Myristic acid     Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     (tetrabecanoic                                                          31/2002          ''
                     acid), used as                                                                            .
                     imaging custom
                     chemical (CAS
                     No. 000544-63-
                     8) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2915.90.50)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,262

EX PARTE MARK RUSSELL MCKEE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-34,147 IN THE 244 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea

bargain, was convicted of burglary of a habitation, and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He did

not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because the plea agreement cannot be

followed. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The plea papers, admonishments, judgment and trial transcripts all reflect that the plea
2

agreement specifically included the provision that this sentence would run concurrently with

Applicant’s ten year federal sentence imposed in December 2006. The federal judgment requires

and specifically states that the federal sentence is to begin when the state sentence expires. The

terms of Applicant’s plea bargain were not met, therefore Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte

Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. C-34,147 in the 244 Judicial District Court th

of Ector County is set aside, and applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Ector County

to answer the charge against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 18, 2009

Do Not Publish
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

KAREN KAY PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COUNTY OF SMITH, PHILIP 

GREANEAD, SMITH COUN1Y 

DETECTIVE; JOHNATHAN PETERS, 

SMITH COUNTY DEPUTY; RILEY 

RUGG, SMITH COUNTY DEPUTY; AND 

LARRY SMITH., SMITH COUNTY 

SHERIFF;

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:23-CV-00293-JDK

ORDER

On August 29, 2023, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Doc. No. 13) in this matter. 

Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now the live complaint in this action (Doc. No. 13). Accordingly, 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the original complaint (Doc. No. 4) is DENIED as moot. 

Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the amended complaint in accordance with the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00293-JDK-JDL Document 14 Filed 08/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 57
Rayburn Scott HARMON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5965.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.