alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6886

RONALD A. PEGUESE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, District 

Judge. (2:07-cv-00285-WDK-JEB) 

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 27, 2008 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ronald A. Peguese, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant 

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ronald A. Peguese seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Peguese has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Peguese’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Sandra Sue GRAZZINI-RUCKI, petitioner, v. David Victor RUCKI.

No. 17-8865.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Exhibit








AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


This Amendment to Consulting Agreement (the "Amendment") is made as of December 31, 2018 between Selecta Biosciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Omid Farokhzad, M.D. (the "Consultant").


WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Consulting Agreement dated as of May 30, 2018 (the "Agreement") and wish to amend certain terms of the Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein and in the Agreement, the parties hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




		
	2.
	Term. The parties agree to delete Section 4 of the Agreement in its entirety and replace it with the following:




Term. The term of this Agreement will begin on April 1, 2018 and will end on December 31, 2019; provided, however, that the term may be extended by mutual agreement of the Company and the Consultant. The Company may terminate this Agreement at any time for any reason, without cause and without prior notice.


		
	3.
	Schedule A: The parties agree the following shall be added to "2. Compensation" set forth in Schedule A:




On December 2, 2018, the Company granted the Consultant an option to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company's common stock (the "Option"), subject to the terms and conditions of the Company's 2016 Incentive Award Plan (the "2016 Plan") and a stock option agreement between the Company and the Consultant. Subject to its terms, the Option shall continue to vest after termination of this Agreement, for as long as the Consultant serves the Company as a Service Provider (as defined in the 2016 Plan).


The Company shall compensate Consultant in consideration of Consultant's performance of the Services hereunder, for the period beginning January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2019, in the amount of $85,000, to be paid quarterly in arrears beginning on March 31, 2019 and prorated for any partial period of service.


		
	4.
	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement that are not amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. If there is conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of the Amendment will prevail.
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as an agreement under seal as of the date first written above.


	
					
	SELECTA BIOSCIENCES,INC
	 
	CONSULTANT

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/Carsten Brunn, Ph.D.
	 
	By:
	/s/Omid Farokhzad, M.D.

	Name:
	Carsten Brunn, Ph.D.
	 
	Name:
	Omid Farokhzad, M.D.

	Title:
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	Title:
	Chairman
Archie CABELLO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF OREGON.

No. 18-6871.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David V. PERRY, petitioner, v. Bruce KRIEGMAN.

No. 18-92.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 99.6



Report of Independent Auditors

The Board of Control of 
Scrubgrass Generating Company, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Scrubgrass Generating Company, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Scrubgrass Generating Company, L.P. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and whose report dated January 23, 2002, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. 
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the 2002 financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Scrubgrass Generating Company, L.P. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States./s/   Ernst & Young LLP
February 24, 2003
McLean, Virginia
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 5 Filed 08/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 33
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0740

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES MICHAEL COVEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie Pesanti 

DeLong is granted an extension of time to and including July 1, 2024, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0740
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,183
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,875
<INVENTORY>                                     64,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,205
<PP&E>                                         244,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,993
<BONDS>                                        153,004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,690
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,780
<SALES>                                        196,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,756
<CGS>                                          172,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,401
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,076
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,076
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
        

</TABLE>
8

se 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 37-4 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 301
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                          14,059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,139
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                      6,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,278
<PP&E>                                          18,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,166
<SALES>                                         54,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,263
<CGS>                                           34,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       958
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,547)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics, Inc. et al 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 12/20/2024 /s/ Ryan Lundquist Ryan Lundquist CO State Bar No. 56449

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

rlundquist@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 979-8268 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 304 Filed 12/20/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

21697
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

NELSON WILLIS

v. 

ADAM M. ARON 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23CV732 

ORDER 

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Notice (Dkt. #104) and 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of the District Judge’s Memorandum Adopting the 

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #105). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636, the Court 

hereby REFERS the above-referenced motions to United States Magistrate Judge Bill Davis for 

consideration and a determination or recommended disposition. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 4:23-cv-00732-ALM-BD Document 112 Filed 10/30/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2230
Edward LANG, petitioner, v. David BOBBY, Warden.

No. 18-6174.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Larry HAILEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6581.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      153,176
COMMITMENTS
  49,674   11,978   14,699   68,245  103,058  132,618  129,735   20,558   23,441

CHANGES FROM 07/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,504)
     981     -702     -169    1,024    5,049    1,836    4,178    2,667      326

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    32.4      7.8      9.6     44.6     67.3     86.6     84.7     13.4     15.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      52       20       28       55       78      117      119
```

----

Updated July 13, 2012
Kinzie Decarlos THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6430.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of the Principal Executive Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350****(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**I, Michael D. Siegal, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officerof Olympic Steel, Inc. (the “Company”), certify thatto the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of this annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2005 of the Company (the “Report”):     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. By:     /s/ Michael D. Siegal           Michael D. Siegal     Olympic Steel, Inc.     Chairman & Chief Executive OfficerMarch 14, 2006     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or asa separate disclosure document.     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Olympic Steel, Inc. andwill be retained by Olympic Steel, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of the Principal Executive Officer****Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350****(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**I, Michael D. Siegal, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officerof Olympic Steel, Inc. (the “Company”), certify thatto the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of this annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2004 of the Company (the “Report”):     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. By:     /s/ Michael D. Siegal           Michael D. Siegal     Olympic Steel, Inc.     Chairman & Chief Executive OfficerMarch 10, 2005
Jimmy D. WOODS, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 17-9423.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Enamelon, Inc. Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the Condensed Statement of
Operations for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       9,324,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    200,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,634,592
<PP&E>                                       1,043,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,951,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,602,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,342,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,951,107
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,080,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (130,956)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,949,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,949,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,949,370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 99.5

SOA Section 906 Certification

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such
officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year
ended April 25, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of §
13(a) or § 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

DATED the 13thday of July, 2010.

(s) Alain
Bouchard                 
Name:   Alain Bouchard Title:    
President and Chief Executive Officer

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

JAVIER PEDROZA, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-262

§

UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, §

§

Defendant. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Javier Pedroza, a prisoner confined at the United States Penitentiary in Beaumont,

Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#5) is

Case 1:23-cv-00262-MAC-ZJH Document 6 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 12
ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate

judge’s recommendation. 

2

Case 1:23-cv-00262-MAC-ZJH Document 6 Filed 09/18/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 13
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE § 1350

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended
September 30, 2003 of Lincoln Benefit Life Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Lincoln Benefit Life Company.

|Date:    November 14, 2003 | /s/CASEY J. SYLLACasey J. Sylla
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
|-------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           | /s/STEVEN E. SHEBIKSteven E. Shebik
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

E-4

---

QuickLinks