alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 23, 2008

Mr. C. Alfred Mackenzie

Haley & Olson, P.C.

510 N. Valley Mills Dr., Suite 600

Waco, TX 76710

Mr. Vincent L. Marable III

221 N. Houston Street

Wharton, TX 77488

Mr. Greg White

Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee LLP

P.O. Box 1470

Waco, TX 76703

RE:Case Numbers:  05-0386 & 05-0788 

Court of Appeals Number:  10-02-00026-CV & 10-02-000420-CV

Trial Court Number:  99-2717-4

Style:PROVIDENCE HEALTH CENTER A/K/A DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY HEALTH SERVICES OF WACO AND DEPAUL CENTER A/K/A DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY HEALTH SERVICES OF WACO

v.

JIMMY AND CAROLYN DOWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN LANCE DOWELL, DECEASED

*- Consolidated with –*

JAMES C. PETTIT, D.O. 

v.

JIMMY AND CAROLYN DOWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN LANCE DOWELL, DECEASED

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 05-0386Page 2**
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10878

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUNA-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:17-CR-10-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luna-Martinez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luna-Martinez has not filed a response. Although LunaMartinez remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the 

term of imprisonment. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10878 Document: 00514396255 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
No. 17-10878

2

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment 

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-10878 Document: 00514396255 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
Jose G. PADILLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8664.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
      32.3








Certification
      of Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.










Date:  August
      8, 2007







/s/ Larry Hannappel


Larry
      Hannappel


Senior
      Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
Dear Clerk of Court,

I hope this email finds you well. My name is Betty Zhou, and I am the in-house legal counsel of CDNetworks Co.,

Ltd. ("CDNetworks"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea. I am writing

to you today to respectfully request the court to grant CDNetworks permission to the court's e-filing system

(https://www.txed.uscourts.qov/?q=cmecf-reQistration) allowing CDNetworks to participate as non-prisoner

pro se litigant in the liti ation and file electronically.

CDNetworks understood from a source that our name was appeared on your court s e-filing system (Case

Number: 2:23cv233), which, CDNetworks has never been served and is surprising to find out that all the

allegations and facts in the Compliant are inaccurate. Our attempts to engage an attorney didn't go well, hence

to safeguard our interest and clarify the facts, CDNetowrks respectfully request your permission to the

registration and allow CD etworks to file electronically.

We kindly ask for your consideration of our request. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Betty Zhou | Legal Team

CDNetworks Co., Ltd.

CDNetworks

CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside the Judiciary. Exercise caution when opening

attachments or clicking on links.

3

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 8 Filed 04/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 81
PIONEER CENTRES HOLDING, et al. v. ALERUS FINANCIAL.

No. 17-667 (R46-036 / OT 2017).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 20, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Lawrence Dusean ADKINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9371.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# iHw-m ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 04-13-00637-CR Intoxication 

## OFFENSE: Manslaughter JeffreyTheisen v. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Bexar COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 399th District Court DATE: 10/08-2014 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 2012CR2446



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD STYLE: «Style1» v. «Style2» CCA#: 

# l«Hft-H
Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWIN CCA IS: 

# DATE: O^lltJZPlT JUDGE: fijbs./^u^l. CCA Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10(q)

                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This amendment is made effective May 1, 1996, to the Employment
Agreement dated May 1, 1994, as amended as of March 27, 1995 (collectively, the
"Employment Agreement"), between Health Power Management Corporation, an Ohio
corporation (the "Company"), and Thomas E. Beaty, Jr. (the "Employee"), who
hereby agree as follows:

         ss.1. The base salary set forth in ss.6(a) of the Employment Agreement
hereby is increased from $132,000 to $160,000 per annum.

         ss.2. The automobile allowance set forth in ss.8(b) of the Employment
Agreement hereby is increased from $500 to $700 per month.

         ss.3. For purposes of determining (a) the Employee's incentive cash
bonus for the 1996 Performance Year and (b) the number of Shares subject to the
Employee's Formula Vesting Options to receive accelerated treatment for the 1996
Performance Year, the Employee and the Company agree that for the 1996
Performance Year the Maximum Cash Bonus shall be $250,000 and the Ceiling Amount
shall be $1,000,000.

         ss.4. The Employee and the Company agree that the performance goals to
be accomplished by the Employee or under his direction and management on behalf
of Health Power, Inc. and its subsidiaries for 1996 are attached hereto as
Exhibit A, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. It is understood
that the Company's Compensation Committee will assess the extent to which such
goals were achieved in connection with its determination of the number of Shares
subject to the Employee's Discretionary Vesting Options to receive accelerated
vesting treatment for the 1996 Performance Year.

         ss.5. The Company shall not geographically relocate the Employee from
the Columbus, Ohio area without the prior consent of the Employee.

         ss.6. All capitalized terms used in this amendment but not otherwise
defined herein shall have the respective meanings given those terms in the
Employment Agreement.

         ss.7. This document is an amendment to the Employment Agreement. In the
event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Employment Agreement
and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall control. Except as
notified by this amendment, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect without change.

HEALTH POWER MANAGEMENT
  CORPORATION


By /s/ Bernard F. Master, D.O.                  /s/ Thomas E. Beaty, Jr.
   ---------------------------                  ------------------------
   Bernard F. Master, D.O.,                     THOMAS E. BEATY, JR.
         Chairman


                                     - 66 -
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Based on a review of the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth R. Howe, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairy presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations
Timothy HICKMAN-SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6810.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.2

[TRIMERIS LETTERHEAD]

Re: Extension of Executive Employment Agreement

Trimeris (Company) would like to extend the term of your Executive Employment Agreement with the Company such that the Agreement would now expire at
December 31, 2008. If you are amenable to such an extension, please sign below (sign each of the two originals). The Company will execute this Extension Agreement and return one executed original to you for your records.

Thank you for your attention:

Accepted



|     |  |                    |  |  |  |      |  |                          
|---- |  | ------------------ |  |  |  | ---- |  | -------------------------
|By   |  | /s/ Carol Ohmstede |  |  |  | By   |  | /s/ E. Lawrence Hill, Jr.
|     |  | Carol Ohmstede     |  |  |  |      |  | E. Lawrence Hill, Jr.    
|     |  |                    |  | 
|Date |  | August 1, 2007     |  |  |  | Date |  | August 1, 2007
Exhibit 14.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING
FIRM

To the Board of Directors
Silicom Connectivity Solutions, Inc.
(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Silicom, Ltd.)
Mahwah, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Silicom Connectivity
Solutions, Inc. (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Silicom, Ltd.) as of December 31,
2002, and the related statements of operations, accumulated deficit and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Silicom
Connectivity Solutions, Inc. (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Silicom, Ltd.) as of
December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The Companys parent company has expressed both its ability and its
intent to continue providing financial support to assure that Silicom
Connectivity Solutions, Inc. will continue in operation.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
January 6, 2003

---

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

ALEXANDRA DAVIS,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v. 

JERRAL W. JONES, DALLAS COWBOYS 

FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD., JAMES 

WILKINSON, TRAILRUNNER 

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, DONALD JACK, 

JR.,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs,

&

CYNTHIA DAVIS,

 Third-Party Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-00032-RWS

ORDER

Before the Court is Counter-Plaintiff Jerral W. Jones’s Unopposed Motion to Realign 

Parties (Docket No. 88) and Third-Party Defendant1 Cynthia Davis f/k/a Cynthia Davis-Spencer’s 

Partially Opposed Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 91). As indicated by Cynthia Davis, 

Jones opposes the motion to transfer while Counter-Defendant Alexandra Davis is unopposed. Id. 

Having reviewed the pending motions, it is 

ORDERED that Jones SHALL file a response to Cynthia Davis’s motion (Docket No. 91) 

no later than Friday, May 10, 2024. Cynthia Davis SHALL file her reply no later than Tuesday, 

May 14, 2024. It is further

1 Although Cynthia Davis’s motion is written as though the parties are already realigned, the Court 

has not yet granted Jones’s motion. 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 93 Filed 05/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1556
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED that the parties’ briefing SHALL address all issues raised in Cynthia Davis’s 

motion, including the issue of jurisdiction. It is further 

ORDERED that Jones’s Unopposed Motion to Realign Parties (Docket No. 88) and 

Cynthia Davis’s Partially Opposed Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket No. 91) is SET for a hearing 

on Thursday, May 16, at 2 p.m. in Texarkana, Texas.2

2

Jones’s Motion to Show Cause (Docket No. 83) is also set for a hearing on May 16, 2024. See 

Docket No. 84. The parties shall be prepared to address all three motions at the hearing. 

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of May, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 93 Filed 05/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1557
The DUTRA GROUP, petitioner, v. Christopher BATTERTON.

No. 18-266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 7, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

STEPHEN CORTEZ, JR., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-66

§

SKYVIEW UNIT, §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Stephen Cortez, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court previously

referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at

Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The

magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending that the case dismissed without prejudice as moot. To date, the parties have not

filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#22) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 13th day of June, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00066-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 06/13/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 62
No. 6:23-cr-00061-2

United States of America

v.

Natalia Semenova

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 119. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived her right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the magistrate judge. The court also accepts 

defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until 

after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Natalia Semenova (2) guilty of count one of the indictment, 

charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 – Conspiracy to Possess with 

Intent to Distribute Marijuana.

So ordered by the court on September 25, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00061-JCB-JDL Document 120 Filed 09/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 258
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

Headwater Research LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco 

Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and 

Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc.,

Defendants. 

CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00352 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants Verizon Communications, Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and 

Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. (“Defendants” or “Verizon”), and certifies that he is 

authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the abovecaptioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants. 

Josh A. Krevitt 

New York Bar No. 2568228 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2490, Facsimile: (212) 716-6390 

JKrevitt@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 10/09/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 476
Dated: October 9, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Josh A. Krevitt

Josh A. Krevitt 

New York Bar No. 2568228 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

200 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10166 

Telephone: (212) 351-2490 

Facsimile: (212) 716-6390 

JKrevitt@gibsondunn.com 

Counsel Defendants Verizon Communications, 

Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon 

Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services 

Group Inc. 

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 10/09/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 477
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on October 9, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Josh A. Krevitt

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 26 Filed 10/09/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 478
JOSEPH CAIN JOHNSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 560

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 22, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael Flowers

, Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS

, C.J., and RAY and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.




Date:
September 17, 2010

By:
/s/ Greg A. Steffens

Greg A. Steffens

President

(Principal Executive and Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)
Filed 3/1/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 41

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Brian Keith Mindt, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160288

Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Lilie A. Schoenack, Assistant State’s Attorney, 230 Fourth St. N.W., Rm. 301, Valley City, ND 58072, for plaintiff and appellee.

Brian Keith Mindt, self-represented, 749 12th St. NW, Valley City, ND 58072, defendant and appellant.

State v. Mindt

No. 20160288

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Brian Mindt appealed from an order deferring imposition of his sentence for a disorderly conduct charge under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31-01 after a bench trial, and an order denying his motion for a new trial.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

William a. Neumann, S.J.

[¶3]The Honorable William A. Neumann, S.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.
Sade GARNETT, petitioner, v. REMEDI SENIORCARE OF VIRGINIA, LLC.

No. 18-465.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.