alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/14/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       92,268
COMMITMENTS
   8,696      283    3,938   79,634   88,047   92,268   92,268        0        0

CHANGES FROM 08/07/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,186)
    -870        0        0    2,056    1,186    1,186    1,186        0       -0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.4      0.3      4.3     86.3     95.4    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       3        3        4        9       13       14       18
```

----

Updated August 17, 2012
Javier A. CARRILLO, et al., petitioners, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER GUILLEN §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv17

DAVID R. BASSE, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Christopher Guillen, an inmate at the Lewis Unit of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against David R. Basse, Gerald Buluti, Lannette Linthincum, Tedd L.

Mitchell, Ben G. Raimer, and Owens J. Murray.

1

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff complains of his medical care, as well as the doctors’ credentials, at a prison facility

located in Fort Stockton, Texas. 

Analysis

Plaintiff does not assert jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. When jurisdiction

is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only

in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Plaintiff is currently

1

Plaintiff’s claims against the defendants in this action were filed as part of an amended complaint in another

pending lawsuit and were severed in order to form this case. See Guillen v. Davis, 9:19cv187 (E.D. Tex,).

Case 9:23-cv-00017-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 01/26/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
confined at the Lewis Unit located in Woodville, Texas. However, his claims arose at a prison

facility located in Fort Stockton, Texas. Fort Stockton is located in Pecos County, Texas. When

public officials are parties to an action in their official capacities, they reside, for venue purposes,

in the county where they perform their official duties, which in this case is Pecos County. 

Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1982); Lowrey v. Estelle, 433 F.2d 265 (5th Cir. 

1976). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 124, Pecos County, Texas is located within the 

jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, 

Pecos Division. 

As Fort Stockton, Texas is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United 

States District Court for the Western District of Texas, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not 

proper. When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, 

transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 

1406(a). This case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Texas, Pecos Division. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the 

undersigned.

2

Case 9:23-cv-00017-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 01/26/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

Patent Armory Inc., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bose Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Civil No. 2:23-cv-335-JRG 

 

 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jeremy P. Oczek of the firm Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC 

appears as attorney of record on behalf of Defendant Bose Corporation in the above-captioned matter. 

Dated: August 4, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Jeremy P. Oczek

 

Jeremy P. Oczek 

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC 

200 Delaware Avenue 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 416-7037 

Email: jpoczek@bsk.com 

Counsel for Defendant Bose Corporation

Case 2:23-cv-00335-JRG Document 6 Filed 08/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 61
Exhibit 10-22

  

   

  

  AMENDMENT TO “APPENDIX A” OF THE

  ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

  SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

  

  

  

  

  THIS AMENDMENT to “Appendix A” of the Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008
      (the “Plan”), is adopted by Astec Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), effective as of January 1, 2019.

  

  

  WHEREAS, Article 2 of the Plan permits the
      Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) to designate participants in the Plan from time to time, whose names and effective dates of participation shall be set forth on Exhibit A to the Plan;

  

  

  NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends
      “Appendix A” of the Plan in the form attached hereto, to update the same for changes in Plan participation approved by the Board, by action taken on February 21, 2019.

  

  

  Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.

  

  

  ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

  

  

  Date: February 21, 2019         By: /s/ Stephen C. Anderson

        

  Name: Stephen C. Anderson

  Title:   Secretary

  

  

  
    1

    
      


  

  

  

  	
          “APPENDIX A”

        
	
          Each Participant’s Date of Participation

        
	 	 	 
	
          Name of Participant

        	 	
          Effective Dates of Participation

        
	
          W. Norman Smith

        	 	
          January 1, 1995

        
	
          Tim Gonigam

        	 	
          August 1, 2000

        
	
          Stephen C. Anderson

        	 	
          January 1, 2003

        
	
          Richard Dorris

        	 	
          January 3, 2005

        
	
          David C. Silvious

        	 	
          July 1, 2005

        
	
          Neil Peterson

        	 	
          January 1, 2008

        
	
          Joe Cline

        	 	
          February 1, 2008

        
	
          Chris Colwell

        	 	
          May 31, 2011

        
	
          Robin Leffew

        	 	
          August 1, 2011

        
	
          Matthew B. Haven

        	 	
          January 1, 2013

        
	
          Jeff May

        	 	
          October 1, 2013

        
	
          Tom Wilkey

        	 	
          January 1, 2014

        
	
          Jeff Schwarz

        	 	
          July 1, 2014

        
	
          John Irvine

        	 	
          April 28, 2016

        
	
          Jaco Van Der Merwe

        	 	
          October 1, 2016

        
	
          Scott Barker

        	 	
          April 3, 2017

        
	
          Neil Whitworth

        	 	
          May 30, 2017

        
	
          Michael G. Anderson

        	 	
          July 7, 2017

        
	
          Jody Volner

        	 	
          November 1, 2017

        
	
          Robert Kilgore

        	 	
          August 2, 2018

        
	
          Greg Renegar

        	 	
          January 1, 2019

        


  

  

  2
Tellis T. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6761.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2035

AN ACT

To correct errors in the authorizations of certain

Traffic Safety Administration.programs administered by the National Highway
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2035

AN ACT

To correct errors in the authorizations of certain programs

administered by the National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2035 EH

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 49, UNITED STATES

2 CODE.

3 (a) MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY.—Section 30104 of

4 title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking

5 ‘‘$81,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$98,313,500’’.

6 (b) MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION.—Section 32102

7 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking

8 ‘‘$6,200,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$9,562,500’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 12, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

435 

TP 15-01811 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF DEATRICK MARSHALL, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK 

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M.

Mohun, A.J.], entered October 27, 2015) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the amended petition is dismissed. 

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 13a-14(a)/15D-14(a) 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher E. Herald certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Solitario Resources Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

               a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

               b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

               c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Timothy EDWARDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6718.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/03/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      143,920
COMMITMENTS
  39,662   16,945   26,374   59,541   76,145  125,577  119,464   18,343   24,456

CHANGES FROM 12/27/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,020)
     836   -3,349      -24    1,247    5,053    2,060    1,680      -40      339

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.6     11.8     18.3     41.4     52.9     87.3     83.0     12.7     17.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      161)
      52       25       39       59       58      126      112
```

----

Updated January 6, 2012
<PAGE>

                              CERTIFICATE OF ELIMINATION

                                          OF

                             SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK OF

                            NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION

                             Pursuant to Section 151(g)
                     under the Delaware General Corporation Law

     Northwest Airlines Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"CORPORATION"),

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth the proposed elimination of the
Series B Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "SERIES B PREFERRED
STOCK"), of the Corporation (for which a Certificate of Designation was
originally filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on July
20, 1989) as set forth herein:

          RESOLVED, that no authorized shares of the Series B Preferred Stock of
     the Corporation are outstanding and none will be issued;

          RESOLVED, that a Certificate of Elimination be prepared, which shall
     have the effect when filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
     Delaware of eliminating from the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of
     Incorporation of the Corporation all matters set forth in the Certificate
     of Designations previously filed with respect to the Series B Preferred
     Stock of the Corporation, and that the appropriate officers of the
     Corporation be, and they hereby are, authorized to execute and file on
     behalf of the Corporation such Certificate of Elimination with the
     Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     SECOND: That none of the authorized shares of the Series B Preferred
Stock of the Corporation are outstanding and none will be issued.

<PAGE>

                                                                          2

     THIRD: That in accordance with the provisions of Section 151 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Second Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to
eliminate all matters set forth in the Certificate of Designations previously
filed with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock of the Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by Douglas M. Steenland, its Secretary, on this 31st day of January,
1998.

                                        NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION

                                        By: /s/ Douglas M. Steenland
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Name:  Douglas M. Steenland
                                           Title: Secretary
James D. RUSSIAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6504.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2176

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to modify

the tariff treatment of certain categories of raw cotton.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States to modify the tariff treatment of certain categories

of raw cotton.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TARIFF TREATMENT OF RAW COTTON.

4 Chapter 52 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

5 United States is amended as follows:

6 (a) RAW COTTON SUBJECT TO QUOTAS.—

7 (1) Such chapter is amended by striking sub8 heading 5201.00.22 and inserting the following, with

9 the article description for subheading 5201.00.22
2

•HR 2176 IH

1 having the same degree of indentation as the article

2 description for subheading 5201.00.24:

‘‘ Described in general note 15 of

the tariff schedule and entered

pursuant to its

provisions....

5201.00.22 Having a staple length of

11⁄8 inches or

more but

under 11⁄4

inches ............. kg Free Free (CA, E,

IL, J, MX)

15.4¢/kg

5201.00.23 Having a staple length of

11⁄4 inches or

more but

under 13⁄8

inches ............. kg 4.4¢/kg Free (CA, E,

IL, J, MX)

15.4¢/kg

’’.

3 (2) Such chapter is amended by striking sub4 heading 5201.00.34 and inserting the following, with

5 the article description for subheading 5201.00.34

6 having the same degree of indentation as the article

7 description for subheading 5202.99.05:

‘‘ Described in additional

U.S. note 6 of this chapter and entered pursuant

to its provisions....

5201.00.34 Having a staple length

of 11⁄8 inches or more

but under 11⁄4 inches .. kg Free Free (CA, E,

IL, J)

15.4¢/kg

5201.00.35 Having a staple length

of 11⁄4 inches or more

but under 13⁄8 inches .. kg 4.4¢/kg Free (CA, E,

IL, J)

15.4¢/kg

’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

9 this section apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                     
                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Oct-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         20,846,524
<SECURITIES>                                   6,010,337
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,891,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,116,756
<PP&E>                                         1,709,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                 530,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,282,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,412,500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       46,231
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,712,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,282,561
<SALES>                                        37,928,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,928,719
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,846,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,290,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,535,221
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,398,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,136,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,136,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .48
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.3








Certification
      of Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:  November
      8, 2007











/s/
      Larry Hannappel


Larry
      Hannappel


Senior
      Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)