alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
AttOrMy Geaeral, h&a hold that under Article 16, !%otion 

40, of the Coaatltotfon of Texa8, a deputy alterMY would 

not be authoriwd to eema and maeopt pay a& bailfir to 

the grnnd jury. 

Thla Uopartamnt held in an o&dnion addressed to 

ia. IGal4 stoekard, zmDtan, nwA8, in opialon so. o-E80 

th a t l oonetable oaaaot mm3 a8 bmirr for the grand 

jury an@ mc6ive pay therecor. 

Rrtlole 6818, isbtisatl Girl1 Seitutea, re*e u 

rollows, 

The quctllr%ed totem or eaoh justioe f;reoinot a t e8oh g ~eml l lecttlon 8balZ elect a eon- 

&able r0r ruoh preainot rOr l ‘totra or tw ymzr8..R 

SOOtiOn $3 Of A?kial~ 16 Of Uw %huS COMtittItiO~, 

mad8 .I5 part, oe r0ii0u: 

*tw 8000mw 0ra~en 0r tbir 6tat0 

ahll nelthmr draw nor pay. a warrant upaa the 

~renmtry in rar0r of any .pereon, for aal*ry 

or oompP+ation ae *at, o~loar or appolntoo, 

who holde at the ma@ tine any other of'ffoa or 

polrltion 0s hoper, trim 6r pmftt, under this 

& a te or the’ vo ito d Sta tem, l x oop t a 0 p ma o r lb - 

od io toia Coa~titutlon.*~ 

seation 40, Artlole 16. of th6i Texas Constitalm, 

providea in part a0 r0rioro: 

9% permm ahall hold or sxsmlse, at the 

atm tha; ~pdm than one air11 orriO of l f~olumnt, .exo@# that of JUSfAM or the peM0, aounty oas&ssioner, Rotary Fmblto md Matmsstsr, 

afflaer 0r taatioud ouara, tha xetioaal cum4 

Raeorvo, emI the offioers Rmene Carp oftbe 

Onited Etntee+as trUllimkU AYSULO~ tke B6tionnl 

Guard, the 8bJ.orm~ Oard Reserve, aad the 0r- 

@uli~d Reserveo Of the United St.&to*, &ad m-. 

ttrrd.otrioerrr of t&r &UmI Stats8 AFIPJ, Rp?y, 

amd Wrine Cortp @ad Fbtimd ?lnrrUrt Otitow8, 

add mtlmd ~limlheii ~85 ati the United State8 

kmy,.Wwy, and L?ariae Carp, unless ottmwiae 

s~'*;uiflaelly'pror~h4 hamln q ' *- 
zeotion 40, Articlo 16, of the Tsxae Cmatitutlqa, 

sum-a. mmhlblts the holdlne at the aame tlma &ore tlzm 

OAi Oitil Office Of MOh5Uiit, .X0+ 

thmelo. 

thoes otfioes Make4 

It. is~nrll ortablkhed that a oonatable 18 a 

puuro orriwfr. rurray ~8. stata, 67 2. ii. (Cd) tZ74 Tax. 

JUC., Vol. 34, p. 601: and Yes. JUT., Vol. w, p. 4 4. 

A grand jury b8illfr l8 also an orrioar, his 

appoiatdumt being provided ror by atatata, hia mum 0r 

0rsi00 bag unftd 8s to ti88, and tm 08th 0r 0fri00 b0- 

tq roquimd rroa hir. ArtfolaS69, ?IsVe, JWb M& WE! 

Cob of Crkl~l Proaedurq CorlL~ va. StAta; 88 .$a #. tw 

MA. 

This deputwnt haa r~peUwl.ly hold that I ooaaUbloa~~taorreaa~1Uiiortha @wwl Juryand a+ 

ooln w tharefoor. 

It 10 la~krlal wbtht4r than ta (pore tan on0 

eooppty in a dlatriot or aot,~tha ma8 xxtla applloe in 811 

oooatias prohIbitlag 00aatabua rrasr aarPi5fg ae batlim 

for tha grand jury md moeiring pay for auoh aenio~. 

Yo u a m mrpeotfully l i!fiaeA that it la thd o&asa t o f a11 8 dep imtuent 'that l 8o Aeta b le & a prombit b y 

tbS C0AStitUtiOA rlF0A~SS~itl6 SAd SOS8 

jwy baiiirr am0 l uoh 00xtatabi8 

tw w SS'S WSAa 

rota & &la Orrio as ooastablo. 

Yourfb very truly 

ATTONEY GZNESAL OF l'EXA#
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      590,426
COMMITMENTS
  73,596   45,501  186,048  289,920  336,827  549,564  568,377   40,863   22,050

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -21,052)
  -3,336   -3,850    3,283  -21,205  -20,392  -21,259  -20,959      207      -92

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.5      7.7     31.5     49.1     57.0     93.1     96.3      6.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      38       26       51       64       61      128      118
```

----

Updated November 26, 2012
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2197

To suspend temporarily the duty on slide fasteners fitted with polished edge

chain scoops of base metal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. SHAYS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on slide fasteners fitted

with polished edge chain scoops of base metal.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.96.01 Slide fasteners

fitted with polished edge chain

scoops of base

metal (provided

for in subheading

9607.11.00) ....... Free Free No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.
2

•HR 2197 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Scott P. ROEDER, petitioner, v. Derek SCHMIDT, Attorney General of Kansas.

No. 17-1407.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jesse L. WESLEY, III, petitioner, v. TOWN SQUARE MEDIA WEST CENTRAL RADIO BROADCASTING, et al.

No. 18-452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cr-00065-7

United States of America

v.

Luis Alfredo Sanchez Vera

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 123. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id. at 2.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the magistrate judge. The court also accepts 

defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until 

after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Luis Alfredo Sanchez Vera guilty of count one of the indictment, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy to Operate an Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business.

So ordered by the court on April 24, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00065-JCB-JDL Document 127 Filed 04/24/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 558
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2





March 18, 2019


Mr. Robert A. Milligan
c/o Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
16435 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 320
Scottsdale, AZ  85254


		
	Re:
	Extension of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement




Dear Robert:


Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between you and Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. (the “Company”), dated as of July 8, 2016 and subsequently amended on July 14, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”).  This letter is to confirm our agreement that the term of the Employment Agreement (as provided in Section 2 of the Employment Agreement) will be extended so that the Expiration Date (as defined in the Employment Agreement) will be March 13, 2023 (such term being subject to earlier termination as provided in Section 7 of the Employment Agreement). 
Except as expressly set forth herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its current terms.  This letter may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
If this letter accurately sets forth our mutual understanding with respect to the foregoing matters, please indicate your acceptance by signing this letter and returning it to the undersigned.  This letter shall be a binding agreement between the Company and you.  A duplicate copy of this letter is included for your records.
                      Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. 

By:  /s/ Scott D. Peters
Its: Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman


Accepted and Agreed:


/s/ Robert A. Milligan
Robert A. Milligan


Date: March18, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2148 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2148

 To make technical corrections regarding the applicability of certain 
     amendments made by Public Law 105-392 to the Health Education 
        Assistance Program under the Public Health Service Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

Mr. Green of Texas (for himself, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Dingell, and Mr. Clay) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make technical corrections regarding the applicability of certain 
     amendments made by Public Law 105-392 to the Health Education 
        Assistance Program under the Public Health Service Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION REGARDING HEALTH EDUCATION ASSISTANCE 
              LOAN PROGRAM UNDER PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

    (a) In General.--The amendments made by section 142 of Public Law 
105-392 (relating to section 707 of the Public Health Service Act) (112 
Stat. 3579) apply to any loan that, under subpart I of part A of title 
VII of the Public Health Service Act, is made by an eligible lender and 
insured by the Secretary of Health and Human Services on or after 
November 13, 1998. In the case of a loan made by an eligible lender and 
insured by the Secretary under such subpart before November 13, 1998, 
section 707 of such Act as in effect on November 12, 1998, applies to 
the loan.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 142 of Public Law 105-392 (112 
Stat. 3579) is amended by striking subsection (c).
    (c) Effective Date.--This section is deemed to have taken effect 
immediately after the enactment of Public Law 105-392.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

REGINALD WHITE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-425 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 22, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Reginald White, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00024-CR

Hai Ho, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3011256, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Hai Ho appeals from orders revoking community supervision and imposing

concurrent ten-year prison sentences for two counts of aggravated assault. Tex. Pen. Code Ann.

§ 22.02 (West 2003. Ho was originally convicted on his pleas of guilty to the offenses.

Ho’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal isfrivolous and

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds

to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485

S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to Ho, was advised of his right to examine the appellate
2

record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed, but a letter from Ho explaining why

he believes the punishment is too harsh has been read and considered by the Court.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The orders revoking community supervision are affirmed.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: August 14, 2003

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                                 REVOLVING NOTE
                                      FROM
                             THE J. JILL GROUP, INC.
                                       TO
                                  HSBC BANK USA


         This First Amendment to Revolving Note from The J. Jill Group, Inc. to
HSBC Bank USA is dated as of July 25, 2002.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         Reference is made to that certain Revolving Note dated as of June 29,
2001 from The J. Jill Group, Inc. to HSBC Bank USA in the face amount of
Seventeen Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($17,500,000) (the "REVOLVING
NOTE").

         NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the REVOLVING NOTE is hereby amended by
deleting the date "June 1, 2003" set forth in the second paragraph of the
REVOLVING NOTE and substituting therefor the words "Termination Date."

         Except as modified hereby, the REVOLVING NOTE remains in full force and
effect and is hereby confirmed and republished.

         EXECUTED as an instrument under seal as of July 25, 2002.

                                THE J. JILL GROUP, INC.

                                By: /s/ Linda L. Trudel
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Linda L. Trudel
                                    Title: Vice President/Corporate Controller


                                HSBC BANK USA

                                By: /s/ George Ahlmeyer
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  George Ahlmeyer
                                    Title: Senior Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

CHRISTINE WILEY STREETER,

Plaintiff,

v. 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE – CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-00081-MJT-ZJH

JUDGE MICHAEL TRUNCALE

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On May 1, 2023, Plaintiff Christine Wiley Streeter (“Streeter”) filed her Complaint. [Dkt. 

1]. On the same day, the Court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court are Two Motions to Dismiss for Insufficient Service 

of Process filed by Defendant Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”). [Dkt. 8, 14]. On 

January 18, 2024, Judge Hawthorn issued his Report and Recommendation, which recommends 

denying both motions as moot because Streeter served TDCJ by the extended deadlines for proper 

service. [Dkt. 22 at 1].

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available 

evidence. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time 

for doing so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that 

the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Case 9:23-cv-00081-MJT-ZJH Document 26 Filed 02/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 185
2

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Judge Hawthorn’s Report and Recommendation denying 

Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process [Dkt. 8, 14] is ADOPTED. 

Accordingly, Defendant TDCJ’s Motions to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process [Dkt. 8, 

14] are DENIED.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 9th day of February, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00081-MJT-ZJH Document 26 Filed 02/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 186
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dani P. Bolognesi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANI P. BOLOGNESI  
|Dani P. Bolognesi      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|May 7, 2004            



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be retained by Trimeris, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
02198-00091/15029113.1 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP

 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF 

LETTER OF REQUEST TO INSPECT DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE 

EVIDENCE CONVENTION 

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for issuance of Letter of Request to Inspect 

Documents Pursuant to the Hague Evidence Convention. After considering the same, the Court 

hereby GRANTS the Motion. 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 57-2 Filed 06/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 936
1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2814

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Bryan W. Wright, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 16, 1999 Filed: December 22, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bryan Wright pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, in violationof 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. He objected to the presentence report’s recommendation that he receive a two-level enhancement for possessing a firearm in connection with the offense, but he withdrew his objection at sentencing. The district court 1 sentenced Wright to 121 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Onappeal, Wright argues that the court erroneously applied the weapon enhancement.-2-

By withdrawing his objection to the weapon enhancement at sentencing, Wright intentionally relinquished or abandoned it, resulting in a waiver that extinguished his claim altogether. Therefore, we need not review it, even for plain error. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993); United States v. Tulk , 171 F.3d 596, 600 (8th Cir. 1999); United States v. Gutierrez , 130 F.3d 330, 332 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Amendment  No. 2 to Form S-3
Registration  Statement No. 33-90818 and in Form S-8 Registration  Statement No.
33-80650 of The Taubman  Realty Group Limited  Partnership  of our reports dated
February 18, 1998, on the  consolidated  financial  statements and the financial
statement  schedules of The Taubman  Realty Group  Limited  Partnership  and the
combined  financial   statements  and  the  financial   statement  schedules  of
Unconsolidated  Joint Ventures of The Taubman  Realty Group Limited  Partnership
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Taubman Realty Group Limited
Partnership for the year ended December 31, 1997.





Deloitte & Touche LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 23, 1998
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2098

To suspend temporarily the duty on dark couverture chocolate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on dark couverture

chocolate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DARK COUVERTURE CHOCOLATE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.18.06 Dark couverture

chocolate (provided for in subheading

1806.20.50) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•HR 2098 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to articles entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Alan BARTLETT, petitioner, v. Susanna C. PINEDA, Judge, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.

No. 18-5720.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.