alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DAVID BRIDGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOPAC CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 

 Case No. 4:23-cv-547-KPJ-ALM

 

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss this matter with prejudice. Having 

considered the same, and the evidence and argument presented, if any, it is the opinion of this 

Honorable Court that said Motion should be in all things granted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant is hereby 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Case 4:23-cv-00547-ALM-KPJ Document 10-1 Filed 02/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 47
Juan CONCEPCION, petitioner, v. Tom McGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 18-5724.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ONHEALTH
NETWORK COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         13,751
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     506
<ALLOWANCES>                                      275
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,266
<PP&E>                                          1,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                    843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,724
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          160
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,037
<SALES>                                           200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  200
<CGS>                                              30
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      30
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                4,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0165 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRUCE SCHRODER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 15, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 15 2022

06/15/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0165
Tron Lakey DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5095.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVEN LEE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-902

[October 22, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-MH000582-XXXX-NB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert Gregg, 

Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## In the United Sta tes Cour t of A

ppeals For the Seventh Cir c uit

____________________ No. 16-2475 T E RE N C E S

. C H AN C E L L O R , Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. S E L E C T P O R

TF OL I O S E R

V I C I N G and JPM O RG A N C H A S E B A N K , N.A., Defendants-Appellees

.

____________________ A ppea l fro m the U ni ted S ta tes Di stri ct Co urt fo r the No rthern Di stri ct o f Il l i no i s, Ea stern Di v i s i o n. No . 1 4 C 7 7 1 2 — Sha ron Johnson Cole ma n , Judg e .

____________________ S UB MI T T E D J UL Y 5, 2017

— D E C I D E D J UL Y 19, 2017

____________________ Befor e P O S N E R

, K A N N E, and S YK E S

, Circuit Judges

. P O S N E R , Circuit Judge

. The p lai ntif f r e ached an or al agr eement to settle a li ti gati on a r i sing out of a home mor tgage loan to hi m, but the defe n da n t s i nsi sted that as p ar t of the settl e m e n t he would hav e to r elease any c lai m s h e had agai nst another bank, and als o a t r ust company, nei ther of whi ch had been a par ty to the l i ti gati on. Although the dis

tr i ct j udge agr e e d wi th the defendants’ posi ti on, i t hasn’t been pr ov ed that a nyone had t o l d the plai nti ff dur i ng the2 No. 16-2475

s e t tlement confer ence that by agr eei n g to the settlement he would also be r e leasing any clai m he mi ght hav e agai nst the two nonpar ti es to the li ti gati o n . B ecause ther e was no ev i

denti a r y pr oceedi ng, ther e was no basi s for the j udge’s dec id in g that the plai nti ff had agr eed to r elease the claim s agai nst the n onpa r t i es. The judgment must ther efor e be v a cated and the c ase r emanded for a fa c tual i nqui r y i nto the par ti es’ di sagr eement.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

FREDERICK M. LINZ,

Plaintiff,

v. 

VIKING RESIDENTIAL 

PARTNERS, LLC,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00670-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this Motion having been referred to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 3, 2024, the Report of 

the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #21), was entered containing proposed findings of fact 

and recommendation that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #12) be granted and 

that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #5) and Defendant’s Counterclaim (Dkt. 

#11) both be dismissed without prejudice.

On September 17, 2024, Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report (Dkt. 

#22). The Court has conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff’s objections (Dkt. #22)

and the portions of the Report to which Plaintiff specifically objects. Having done so, 

the Court is of the opinion that the findings of the Magistrate Judge are correct and 

adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings of the Court.

Case 4:23-cv-00670-SDJ-AGD Document 23 Filed 09/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 637
2

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #12) is 

GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #5) and Defendant’s 

Counterclaim (Dkt. #11) are both DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that any request for relief not addressed by the Report 

(Dkt. #21) is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case 4:23-cv-00670-SDJ-AGD Document 23 Filed 09/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 638
Exhibit 4

United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen,

     Pursuant to SEC Release 33-8070 (34-45590), the Company hereby
acknowledges receipt from Langton Clarke the "Auditor") (formerly Arthur
Andersen Langton Clarke), a letter containing the following representations:
(a) the Auditor has audited the consolidated financial statements of the
Company and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001,
(b) this audit was subject to the Auditor's quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, and
(c) there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on
the audit, availability of national office consultation and availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant
portions of the audit.



Very truly yours,



CRISTALERIAS DE CHILE S.A.



 /s/ Cirilo Elton Gonzalez
---------------------------
Cirilo Elton Gonzalez
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2022-N-0619]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice entitled “Advisory Committee; Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee; Renewal” that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of May 11, 2022. The document announced the renewal of the Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee. The document was published with the incorrect docket number. This document corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rhea Bhatt, Division of Advisory Committee and Consultant Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2434, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-9001, email:                         *GIDAC@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of Wednesday, May 11, 2022 (87 FR 28834), in FR Doc. 2022-10040, on page 28834, the following correction is made:                

1. On page 28834, in the first column of the header of the document, “Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0619” is corrected to read “Docket No. FDA-2022-N-0619”.

Dated: May 13, 2022.

Lauren K. Roth,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10941 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Adam BRAKE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6347.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 99**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Boardof Directors and Stockholders 

WVS Financial Corp. 

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of WVS Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2009; the related consolidated statement of income for the three and six-monthperiods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008; the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the six-month period ended December 31, 2009; and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods endedDecember 31, 2009 and 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

We conducted our reviewsin accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of personsresponsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of anopinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

Based on our reviews, we are notaware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet ofWVS Financial Corp. as of June 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated September 4, 2009, weexpressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relationto the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. 

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. 

Wexford, PA 

February 10, 2010 

 

E-5
Exhibit 32




                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Wickes Inc, a Delaware  corporation
(the  "Company"),  on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 29, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  James J. O'Grady ,
President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company  and James A.  Hopwood,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  respectively,
do each hereby certify,  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ James J. O'Grady
--------------------
James J. O'Grady
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 21, 2003

/s/ James A. Hopwood
--------------------
James A. Hopwood
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 21, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellant,

v.

VANDA VIGIL

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 0273

- CR

Appeal from the

County C ourt at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120C10835 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’ s motion for extension of time to file the brief until

February 18, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSI ON OF TIME TO FILE THE

STATE ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State ’ s Attorney, prepare the

State ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 18, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of January, 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

EARL ST. CLAIRE §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-158 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Earl St. Claire, a prisoner previously confined at the United States Penitentiary in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

On July 19, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended granting Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the

action. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. Proper notice was given to Petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P.

5(b)(2)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 7] is ADOPTED. 

Case 1:23-cv-00158-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 08/17/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss [Dkt. 6] is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case

in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. 

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 17th day of August, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00158-MJT-ZJH Document 8 Filed 08/17/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

AUTOSCRIBE CORPORATION

2:23-CV-00349

REPAY HOLDINGS CORPORATION and REPAY 

HOLDINGS, LLC

Repay Holdings, LLC

c/o The Corporation Trust Company

Corporation Trust Center,

1209 Orange Street,

Wilmington, DE 19801

Jason McManis 

Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing, PLLC

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2500

Houston, Texas 77010

08/01/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 4 Filed 08/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31
I{{Tiz
{{ Vyrsvtw{nu{f{$lzmo{hxnvu{Pgkj{{

GlBIr.aGURr'U	r*r

	
	

 & !& "&!&&&$!&!&"!&" &"&%&&
&
#&& 	&&

R)L d{0J<'8D/Y{<<%{%J{[1){%JRKJU#Z5JG{ZR^WZ{

)<C_r_iNMUR_r6VXr(%<+<(64#<(<22#
< !<,(9< %JAM Dd{

m+_rX1.1Cl1/r,prN1rURr2<  

r !rW1X_UR+JIpr_1Yl1/ra<1r_iOMUR_rURra<1rCR/ClC/i+Jr+br-#<

URr2< rUYr

r "rI1:rc=1r_jONUR_r+cra<1rCR/ClC/i+J_rY1_C/2R.1rUYri_j+JrWK+.1rU3r+,U/1rmCc>r*&<

r+rW2X_URrU3r_jCc+,I1r+;1r+R/r/C_.X1cCURrm?UrZ1_D/1_rd>1Z1r

 +c1r

URr2< r+R/rN+CI1/r+r.UWprcUre@1rBR/ClE/i+J_rI+_crHRUmRr+/0[1_`rU[r

qr #r_1Yl1/rf@1r_iSPUR_rURr(%<+<(75#< 


	

/1_C;R+a1/r,prJ+mrcUr+..1War_1YlC.1rU4rWYU.1__rURr,1<+J4rU4r(%<+<+/;2+
<

Q)Ld{2J;'pD/X{;;%{%J{[2){%JQLJQ [4JD{

[R_Y[{%J>M Ee{ URr2< 
{ 

r ?{

r $rY1gk^1/rc<1r_iONUR_riR1o1.ic1/r,1.+i_1r

r (c>1Yr.":	<

&pr511_r+Y1r 7VYraY+l1Jr+R/rr 7VXr_1[lG.1_r8Yr+rcUd+LrU3r

%r/1.J+Y1riR/1YrW1R+IaprU3rW1]iXpra<+grb-C_rCR9XQ+hCURrC_raYj1
r

9J{

/(2<('<)<2 3$<

rU\r

{D{@"R:)[{Y\c4=C6F/[JG{&({{

//GbCUR+IrCR7V[N+aCUTrX1;+X/CT;r+cc1NWc1/r_1XlC.1r1b.r

'J%`@)E[Y{Y)Sa)'{

Y`@AJEY{5G{!{%8b4;{ %]7JE{N; 4D[q-.Y{JQ8/4D <{

%JAL; 8E[{.JR{O {[)E[{8E.QpH/)@,E	{%8b8<{%Jb*Q{Y0++[{

[[%3B)E[{

	




/8/0</11<

rnAUrF_r

rU[r



Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 4 Filed 08/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 32
Exhibit
      32.1








Certification
      of Chairman of the Board and Co Chief Executive Officer





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
              and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
      November 8, 2006








/s/
      Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin
      Haitzmann


Chairman
      of the Board and Co Chief Executive Officer