alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Michael D. Siegal, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Olympic Steel, Inc. (the Company), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of this annual report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2006 of the Company (the Report):

1.  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                       |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|By:                                                    |  | /s/ Michael D. Siegal
|Michael D. Siegal                                     
|Olympic Steel, Inc. Chairman & Chief
Executive Officer
|                                                      
|March 13, 2007                                        

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Olympic Steel, Inc. and will be retained by Olympic Steel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM DAVID MASON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-22, CA-95-1941-6-3)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William David Mason, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Raymond Hawley,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. See United

States v. Crittendon, 883 F.2d 326, 330-31 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Mason, Nos. CR-92-22; CA-95-1941-6-3 (D.S.C. July 27,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Zachery Joseph COOLEY, aka Red, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6971.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
NO. 07-04-0317-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

APRIL 12, 2005

______________________________

GILBERT ESCOBEDO, 

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2002-439,337; HON. BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ

Appellant Gilbert Escobedo appeals from his conviction for capital murder and his

sentence of life imprisonment. The two issues before us involve whether the trial court

erred in denying his motion to change venue and by failing to afford him a hearing on the

motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. 

The State represents in its brief that the trial court did err, but that the error was

harmless. Yet, statute requires a defendant seeking to transfer venue under art. 31.03 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure (as did appellant here) to support the motion not only with
2

affidavits of at least two credible persons but also with the defendant’s “own affidavit.”

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 31.03(a) (Vernon 1989). While appellant accompanied

his motion with three affidavits, none were his own. Because the motion did not satisfy the

requirements of art. 31.03(a), the trial court did not err in either its decision to deny

appellant a hearing or its decision to deny the motion itself.

Accordingly, we overrule the two points of error and affirm the judgment of the trial

court.

Brian Quinn 

 Justice

Do not publish.
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

NOTICE OF THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung” or 

“Defendants”), will serve the attached subpoenas on Nokia of America Corporation and 

Blackberry Corporation. 

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 03/11/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 679
- 2 - 

Dated: March 11, 2024 

By /s/ Nagendra Setty 

Nagendra Setty 

Alex V. Chachkes 

SETTY CHACHKES PLLC 

133 Cherry Street, Suite 54517 

Seattle, WA 98104 

nick@sechalaw.com 

415.766.1149 

Counsel for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 03/11/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 680
- 3 - 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that, on March 11, 2024, Plaintiff’s counsel of record are being served 

with a copy of the foregoing by email. 

Dated: March 11, 2024 /s/ Nagendra Setty

Nagendra Setty

SETTY CHACHKES PLLC

Case 2:23-cv-00285-JRG-RSP Document 47 Filed 03/11/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 681
Afelix DESIR, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5637.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
William BURKE, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 18-5751.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
EXHIBIT 32.02**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     I, Theresa D. Becks, the Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as generalpartner, of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarterended March 31, 2006 of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) theinformation contained in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell StrategicAllocation Fund, L.P.        CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.  By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner       By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks         Theresa D. Becks    Chief Financial Officer    May 15, 2006
-E 7-
Tadareous JACKSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5479.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Marian MEREDITH, petitioner, v. Peter O'ROURKE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17-9040.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10107]



[[Page 28848]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: May 11, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
May 2, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 132 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2022-54, CP2022-59.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-10107 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of TALX Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Keith Graves, Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                          By: /s/ L. Keith Graves
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            L. Keith Graves
                                              Vice President, Chief Financial
                                              Officer
                                            and Assistant Secretary

TALX Corporation
June 3, 2005
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

CYPRESS ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. 

2013 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE CYPRESS ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. 2013 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (this “Amendment”), is made and adopted as
of March 18, 2019 (the “Amendment Date”), by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Cypress Energy Partners GP, LLC (the “Company”), the general partner of Cypress Energy Partners, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below). 

WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the Cypress Energy Partners, L.P. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Plan may be amended by the Board at any time or from time to time; and 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein, to become effective upon the approval of this Amendment by the unitholders
of the Partnership. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, subject to approval by the unitholders of the Partnership, the Plan be and
hereby is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows, with capitalized terms
not defined in the Plan having the meaning set forth in this Amendment: 


 “Subject to adjustment as provided in
Section 4(c), the number of Units that may be delivered with respect to Awards under the Plan is 2,500,000. If any Award is forfeited, cancelled, exercised, paid, or otherwise terminates or expires without the actual delivery of Units pursuant
to such Award (for the avoidance of doubt, except after the 10th anniversary of the Amendment Date, the grant of Restricted Units is not a delivery of Units for this purpose unless and until such
Restricted Units vest and any restrictions placed upon them under the Plan lapse), the Units subject to such Award that are not actually delivered pursuant to such Award shall again be available for Awards under the Plan. To the extent permitted by
applicable law and securities exchange rules, Substitute Awards and Units issued in assumption of, or in substitution for, any outstanding awards of any entity (including an existing Affiliate of the Partnership) that is (or whose securities are)
acquired in any form by the Partnership or any Affiliate thereof shall not be counted against the Units available for issuance pursuant to the Plan. There shall not be any limitation on the number of Awards that may be paid in cash.” 

 

	 	2.	 The last sentence of Section 9 of the Plan is hereby deleted. 















	 	3.	 This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. 



 

	 	4.	 Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 



*            *           
 *
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Life
Insurance Company. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

      (1)   the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
            31, 2004, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.


Dated: March 31, 2005
                                        /s/ STEVEN FINCH
                                        ----------------
                                        Name:  Steven Finch
                                        Title: Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
| SUBSIDIARY                                   |   | JURISDICTION OF  ORGANIZATION |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                         |   |                          |
| Agree      – Columbia Crossing         |   |                          |
| Project,      L.L.C.                         |   | Delaware                      |
| ACCP      Maryland, LLC                      |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      – Milestone Center          |   |                          |
| Project,      L.L.C.                         |   | Delaware                      |
| AMCP      Germantown, LLC                    |   | Delaware                      |
| Ann      Arbor Store No 1, LLC               |   | Delaware                      |
| Phoenix      Drive, LLC                      |   | Delaware                      |
| Indianapolis      Store No. 16, LLC          |   | Delaware                      |
| Boynton      Beach Store No. 150, LLC        |   | Delaware                      |
| Oklahoma      City Store No. 151, L.L.C.     |   | Delaware                      |
| Omaha      Store No. 166, L.L.C.             |   | Delaware                      |
| Tulsa      Store No. 135, LLC                |   | Delaware                      |
| Tulsa      Store No. 264, L.L.C.             |   | Delaware                      |
| Mt      Pleasant Shopping Center L.L.C.      |   | Michigan                      |
| Agree      Facility No. 1, L.L.C.            |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Bristol & Fenton Project, LLC |   | Michigan                      |
| Agree      Realty South-East, LLC            |   | Michigan                      |
| AC      Realty Company, LLC                  |   | Georgia                       |
| Agree      Port St. John LLC                 |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Charlotte County, LLC             |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Marion Oaks, LLC                  |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Silver Springs Shores, LLC        |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      St. Augustine Shores, LLC         |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Plainfield, LLC                   |   | Michigan                      |
| Agree      Elkhart, LLC                      |   | Michigan                      |
| Agree      103-Middleburg Jacksonville, LLC  |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Brighton, LLC                     |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Lowell,, LLC                      |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree Hastings, LLC                          |   | Delaware                      |
| Agree      Atlantic Beach, LLC               |   | Delaware                      |

----
Michael J. BIESTEK, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-1184.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Jarrett Terrell EDWARDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8359.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

CARL GREIG,

Plaintiff, 

v.

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 

TEXARKANA,

Defendant.

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-00030-JRG-JBB

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel. Dkt. No. 

23. The Court, having considered the motion and noting it is unopposed, is of the opinion that 

the motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Assistant Attorney General 

Farha Rizvi be withdrawn as Counsel of Record, and that Assistant Attorney General Evan W. 

Weltge be entered as Attorney in Charge for Defendant in this cause. The Clerk is directed to 

withdraw Ms. Rizvi from filing notifications and send all filing notices to Assistant Attorney 

General Evan W. Weltge. 

SO ORDERED. 

.

____________________________________

J. Boone Baxter

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SIGNED this the 26th day of February, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00030-JRG-JBB Document 24 Filed 02/26/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 118
##### 



Exhibit 23.01 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-17833, No.
333-72319, No. 333-30814, No. 333-56092, No. 333-71218, No. 333-88716, No. 333-105389 and No.
333-121210) on Form S-8 and the registration statements (No. 333-35415, No. 333-82397, No.
333-87091, No. 333-50222, No. 333-63576, No. 333-108133, No. 333-110790, No. 333-111625, No.
333-120609, No. 333-117915 and No. 333-115684) on Form S-3 of Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. of our
reports dated March 3, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Guilford
Pharmaceuticals Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders equity for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2), managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of
Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP McLean, Virginia
March 4, 2005
Felix J. BRUETTE, Jr., petitioner, v. Ryan ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior.

No. 18-6345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Andre JACKSON, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-5892.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/10/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,377
COMMITMENTS
  12,359    1,090    1,086   17,883   28,513   31,329   30,689    8,048    8,688

CHANGES FROM 04/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -585)
    -204       59     -656      -41      519     -902      -78      316     -508

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.4      2.8      2.8     45.4     72.4     79.6     77.9     20.4     22.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      12        5        7       31       26       47       35
```

----

Updated April 13, 2012
Jesus SANTIAGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6729.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Jose Vazquez PRESTEGUI, petitioner, v. Raymond MADDEN, Warden.

No. 17-8645.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Janette DUNKLE, petitioner, v. Jennifer DALE, et al.

No. 18-643.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas Headwater Research LLC T-Mobile US, Inc. et al 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Headwater Research LLC 11/29/2023 /s/ Qi Tong Qi Tong, CA SBN 300347

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, Ca 90025

ptong@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00379-JRG-RSP Document 39 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 300
Kultar Singh GORAYA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-7364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Arthur DENNISON, petitioner, v. Mark HOOKS, Warden.

No. 18-5666.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.