alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

TERENCE BUTLER VIDOVIC, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS, ET 

AL.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00731-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the 

United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore 

referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 9, 2024, 

the Magistrate Judge entered a Report, (Dkt. #34), recommending that Defendants’ 

Motions to Dismiss be granted and that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed without 

prejudice. On September 20, 2024, Plaintiff filed objections to the Report (Dkt. #36).

Having received the Report of the Magistrate Judge, considered Plaintiff’s 

objections, (Dkt. #36), and having conducted a de novo review, the Court is of the 

opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and 

adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. #23; Dkt. 

#26; Dkt. #27) are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ original 

Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. #11; Dkt. #12) and Motion to Strike (Dkt. #14) are DENIED 

Case 4:23-cv-00731-SDJ-AGD Document 37 Filed 09/24/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 184
- 2 -

AS MOOT. It is finally ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE.

Case 4:23-cv-00731-SDJ-AGD Document 37 Filed 09/24/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 185
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory

commuter tax on nonresidents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2014 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING DISCRIMINATORY

2 COMMUTER TAX ON NONRESIDENTS.

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—A State may not impose a tax on

4 the income earned in the State by nonresidents unless the

5 tax is of substantial equality of treatment for the citizens

6 of the State and the nonresidents so commuting.

7 (b) STATE.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term

8 ‘‘State’’ includes the District of Columbia and any political

9 subdivision of a State.

Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ZAYMOR, LLC

, Appellant,

v.

CORAL SPRINGS GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2197

[ February 6, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Raag Singhal , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 14541 CACE (21)

.

Stephen Karaski, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Edward F. Holodak of Edward F. Holodak, P.A., Plantation, for appell ee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, C ONNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00382

v. (Lead Case)

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/BA VERIZON

WIRELESS.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00380

v. (Member Case)

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T SERVICES, 

INC., AND AT&T CORP., 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00381

(Member Case)

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Defendants.

ERICSSON INC.,

Intervenor,

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID S. FRIST

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, David S. Frist, enters his 

appearance in the above-referenced proceedings for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 11/29/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 156
-2-

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp. (collectively, “AT&T” or “Defendants”). Defendants

respectfully request that the court take note of this Notice of Appearance and makes David S. 

Frist their lead counsel of record in this lawsuit. Copies of all communications and other 

documents filed in the above-referenced proceedings that are not filed via ECF should be 

emailed or faxed to David S. Frist at the address set forth below.

Dated: November 29, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David S. Frist

David S. Frist (GA Bar No. 205611)

 david.frist@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street

Suite 4900

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404)881-7000

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T 

Mobility LLC, and AT&T Corp. 

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 11/29/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 157
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 29th day of November, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send notification of such filing 

upon Counsel of Record.

/s/ David S. Frist

David S. Frist (GA Bar No. 205611)

 david.frist@alston.com

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

1201 West Peachtree Street 

Suite 4900

Atlanta, GA 30309

Telephone: (404)881-7000

Facsimile: (404)881-7777

Counsel for Counsel for Defendants AT&T 

Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, and AT&T 

Corp.

Case 2:23-cv-00382-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 11/29/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 158
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Exclusive Physical Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Szeser Michal, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Country-Wide Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Petre and Zabokritsky, P.C. (Zachary Rozenberg, Esq.), for appellant.Jaffe &amp; Koumourdas, LLP (Jean H. Kang, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered December 2, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, denied the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment upon so much of the complaint as sought to recover upon claims for the sums of $246.40 and $985.60, and granted the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it sought to recover upon those claims.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, by order entered December 2, 2014, the Civil Court denied the branches of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment upon so much of the complaint as sought to recover upon claims for the sums of $246.40 and $985.60, and granted the branches of defendant's cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it sought to recover upon those claims.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>MT Servs. P.T., P.C., as Assignee of Richardson Steven v Country-Wide Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-155 Q C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 22, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Agree,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


        2.   The information contained in the Report fairy presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.




  /s/ RICHARD AGREE
-----------------------
Richard Agree
Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2004
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2059

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to

extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for higher

education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, and

local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. KING (for himself and Mr. STUPAK) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968 to extend the retroactive eligibility dates

for financial assistance for higher education for spouses

and dependent children of Federal, State, and local law

enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2059 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RETROACTIVE ELIGIBILITY

2 DATES FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR

3 HIGHER EDUCATION FOR SPOUSES AND

4 CHILDREN OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

5 KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1216(a) of the Omnibus

7 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.

8 3796d–5(a)) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘May 1, 1992,’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘May 1, 1978,’’; and

11 (2) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1997,’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘October 1, 1978,’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) shall take effect October 1, 1999.

Æ
James Michael ALVIS, petitioner, v. Leland W. SCHILLING.

No. 18-665.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          24,541
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,336,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,269,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        596,301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    126,013
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     432,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,269,890
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,157
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 48,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,724
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on whether the proposed transaction complies with the standards enumerated in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 22, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

                    1.                     *Fidelity Federal Bancorp, Evansville, Indiana;*                     to become a savings and loan company, following its conversion to a bank holding company for a moment in time in connection with its acquisition of Community Banks of Shelby County, Cowden, Illinois.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-11009 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 14

                                 CODE OF ETHICS
                                     FOR THE
      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND OTHER
                           SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS


APPLICABILITY

This Code of Ethics applies to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer, the President and other senior financial officers and has been adopted
by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Olympic Steel, Inc., which
is authorized to amend this Code.

STANDARDS OF CONDUCT

In performing his or her duties, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the
Chief Financial Officer and other senior financial officers shall:
     -    exhibit and promote honest and ethical behavior within the Company,
          including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of
          interest between personal and professional relationships as described
          in the Company's Business Ethics Policy;
     -    promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in
          reports and documents that the Company files with or submits to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications
          made by the Company;
     -    comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; and
     -    report promptly any violation of this Code of Ethics to the Chairman
          of the Audit Committee.

ACCOUNTABILITY/ADMINISTRATION

The Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Chief Financial Officer and
other senior financial officers are expected to adhere to this Code of Ethics.
The Chairman of the Audit Committee will assess compliance with this Code of
Ethics and report any material violations to the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee will consider such reports and shall recommend to the Board of
Directors appropriate responsive actions.

Any request for a waiver under this Code of Ethics shall be submitted in writing
to the Chairman of the Audit Committee who has authority to grant or deny it.
Any amendment to or waiver from this Code of Ethics shall be promptly disclosed
on the Company's web site or through a current report filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
In Re William M. BAILEY, petitioner.

No. 18-6787.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Kevin WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Eric SAFIRE, et al.

No. 18-6340.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 10/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 298
Jason Randall HOWARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6206.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
David L. WOODWARD, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 17-9346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In Re Jessie D. McDONALD, petitioner.

No. 17-1556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0167 

# FILED STATE OF MONTANA, 

### DEC 2 2 2020

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. ALAN TODD RUFF,

Defendant and Appellant. Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Start. nt Montana ORDER

Counsel for the Appellant Alan Todd Rufffiled a rnotion and brief asking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Ruffresponded to counsel's briefand objected to counsel's motion. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We conclude a nonfrivolous issue exists as to whether the District Court imposed an illegal sentence by imposing certain probation conditions that lack a nexus with the underlying offense orto the offender. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that counsel's motion to be allowed to withdraw is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant's opening brief shall be due within thirty days ofthe date ofthis Order. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellantpersonally. Q.) DATED thiszz--

day ofDecember,2020.

ChiefJustice 12/22/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0167

# ( -W,,__,

( g31 /0 211.,_

?"."—ib

‘Justices f

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         940,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,803,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   693,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,318,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,701,000
<PP&E>                                      19,418,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,192,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,753,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,859,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<COMMON>                                        69,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,831,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,753,000
<SALES>                                     23,665,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,049,000
<CGS>                                       10,452,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,211,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             696,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,326,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,326,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,326,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2189

To compensate certain former American hostages held in Lebanon and certain

members of their families.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To compensate certain former American hostages held in

Lebanon and certain members of their families.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Former Hostage Com5 pensation Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

7 It is the policy of the Congress that the Department

8 of State should make a full effort to assist former Amer9 ican hostages, taken as victims of international terrorism,
2

•HR 2189 IH

1 in matters of compensation for injuries related to their

2 imprisonment.

3 SEC. 3. COMPENSATION OF VICTIMS OF CERTAIN TER4 RORIST ACTS.

5 Subject to the availability appropriated funds, and

6 subject to such conditions as the Secretary of State may

7 prescribe to prevent unjust enrichment, the Secretary shall

8 pay, to each plaintiff in the case of Cicippio v. Islamic

9 Republic of Iran (Civil Action No. 96–1805(TPJ),

10 brought in the United States District Court for the Dis11 trict of Columbia) who requests such payment, the fol12 lowing amounts:

13 (1) To a former hostage, a sum not to exceed

14 $10,000,000.

15 (2) To the spouse of a former hostage, a sum

16 not to exceed $4,000,000.

Æ