alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1993-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         376,772
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  509,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               886,568
<PP&E>                                         9,344,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,496,422)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,760,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,582
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,599,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,760,899
<SALES>                                        486,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               495,848
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  359,914<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                58,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            58,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   58,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amorization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

FAEC HOLDINGS 382123 LLC,

v. 

STEVE ARRON INVESTMENT, 

LLC, ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL NO. 4:23-CV-391-SDJ-KPJ

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 11, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed 

findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #12), that Plaintiff FAEC 

Holdings 382123 LLC’s Motion to Remand and Memorandum in Support Thereof (the 

“Motion to Remand”), (Dkt. #7), be granted and this action be remanded to the Justice 

of the Peace Court, Precinct 3, located in Collin County, Texas, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1447. The Magistrate Judge further recommended all other requested relief be 

dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. On July 21, 2023, 

Defendant Steve A. Flores filed an Objection. (Dkt. #13).

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Objection and is of the opinion 

that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the 

Objection is without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. 

Broadly, the Objection asserts that the Magistrate Judge improperly found that 

Defendants had failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal 

Case 4:23-cv-00391-SDJ-KPJ Document 14 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 57
2

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) because the Magistrate Judge failed to properly 

consider the pleading standards articulated by Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 

544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 

129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). But this misinterprets the Report. The 

Report nowhere recommends dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 

12(b)(6). Rather, the Report recommends the Court remand the case due to lack of 

subject-matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. #12 at 7). The two are patently distinct concepts. 

The Court agrees that neither the complaint nor the notice of removal offers any basis

for federal jurisdiction and that remand is therefore proper. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

Accordingly, Defendant Steve A. Flores’s Objection, (Dkt. #13), is

OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s report is ADOPTED as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Motion to Remand, (Dkt. #7), is GRANTED and this action 

is remanded to the Justice of the Peace Court, Precinct 3, located in Collin County, 

Texas, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447. All other requested relief is DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Case 4:23-cv-00391-SDJ-KPJ Document 14 Filed 08/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 58
Terry Lee HINDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1612.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., THROUGH ITS GATE PHARMACEUTICALS DIVISION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. EISAI CO., LTD. AND EISAI MEDICAL RESEARCH, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________ 2009-1593

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in case no. 08-C V -2344, Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr.

__________________________ O R D E R Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States in Eisai Co., Ltd., et al., v. TevaPharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Through Its Gate Pharmaceuticals Division , --- S.Ct. ---- (2011), vacating this court’s judgment,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS v. EISAI CO 2

(1) The mandate of this cour t issued on December 13, 2010 is recalled, the appeal is reinstated, and this court’s October 6, 2010 judgment is vacated. (2) The appeal is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

F OR T HE C OURT

July 21, 2011

—————————— Date /s/ Jan Horbaly

—————————— Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Francis C. Lynch, Esq. Bruce M. Wexler, Esq.
EXHIBIT
31.3
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Larry
Hannappel, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Century Casinos,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date: May
27, 2005
 
 
 /s/ Larry
Hannappel
 ________________________________
 Larry
Hannappel
 Senior
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/05/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      277,015
COMMITMENTS
  66,414   85,618   39,449  149,950  130,213  255,813  255,280   21,202   21,735

CHANGES FROM 05/29/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,427)
   4,111     -316    2,814   -2,552      632    4,373    3,130       54    1,297

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.0     30.9     14.2     54.1     47.0     92.3     92.2      7.7      7.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      126)
      29       53       47       32       37       96      109
```

----

Updated June 8, 2012
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


This
AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of March 26, 2019 by and between Ballantyne
Strong, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Lance V. Schulz, an individual (the “Consultant”).


 


This
Amendment amends the Consulting Agreement, dated November 16, 2018, by and between the Company and the Consultant (the “Agreement”).


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Term. The term of the Agreement is hereby extended beyond March 31, 2019 on a month-to-month basis. Either party may terminate
this Agreement at any time during the term hereof upon notice to the other party. The compensation payable to the Consultant under
the Agreement shall be pro-rated for any partial month and shall be payable through the date of termination of the Agreement.


 


2.
Amendment. This Amendment amends the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms
except as amended hereby.


 


3.
Entire Agreement. The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating
to the subject matter thereof and hereof, and such agreement supersedes all proposals or agreements, written or oral, and all
other communications between the parties relating to such subject matter.


 


4.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, which, when taken together, shall constitute one
and the same instrument.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	BALLANTYNE STRONG, INC.	 	CONSULTANT
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Mark D. Roberson	 	/s/
    Lance V. Schulz
	Name:	Mark
    D. Roberson	 	Lance
    V. Schulz
	Title:	CFO
In Re Melba L. FORD, petitioner.

No. 17-1563.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Carl L. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7970.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITEDSTATES CODE § 1350**

 

Each of theundersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal period ended September 30, 2005 of Lincoln Benefit LifeCompany filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of Lincoln Benefit Life Company.

 

 

November 7, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Casey J. Sylla        |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Casey J. Sylla            |
|   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |
|   |                      |
|   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi      |   |
|   | John C. Pintozzi          |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |
|        |                           |        |  |

 

E-4

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7333

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SCOTT ANTHONY MARTIN, a/k/a Patsy Martin,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CR-00-82)

Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Anthony Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Scott Anthony Martin appeals from the district court’s order

denying his request for preparation of transcripts at government

expense in order to prepare a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin, No. CR00-82 (E.D. Va. filed July 13, 2001; entered July 16, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE SHEET
AND  INCOME  STATEMENTS  DATED  6/30/00  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            7,387,076
<SECURITIES>                                      1,225,592
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8,654,965
<PP&E>                                              322,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                      294,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,682,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               769,393
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       1,141,000
<COMMON>                                         42,170,818
<OTHER-SE>                                      (35,398,468)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,682,743
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,275,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (160,999)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (3,114,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (3,114,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (3,114,732)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.27)



</TABLE>
MICHIGAN STATE A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al., applicants, v. Ruth JOHNSON, Michigan Secretary of State.

No. 18A240.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 7, 2018.

Application to vacate stay presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court denied.

Justice GINSBURG and Justice SOTOMAYOR would grant the application.
William KINNEY, et ux., petitioners, v. ANDERSON LUMBER COMPANY, INC.

No. 18-502.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert R. Bonczek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ ROBERT R. BONCZEK
|---------------------
|Robert R. Bonczek    



Chief
Financial Officer

November 12, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be retained
by Trimeris, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 2

                      List of Cristalerias Subsidiaries
                           As of December 31, 2001


Company Name                                        Jurisdiction

Sociedad Anonima Vina Santa Rita                       Chile
Envases CMF S.A.                                       Chile
Constructora Apoger S.A.                               Chile
Inmobiliaria Don Alberto                               Chile
Cristalchile Comunicaciones S.A.                       Chile
Cordillera Comunicaciones Holding Ltda.                Chile
Cordillera Comunicaciones Ltda.                        Chile
Metropolis Intercom S.A.                               Chile
CIECSA S.A.                                            Chile
Megavision S.A.                                        Chile
Zig-Zag S.A.                                           Chile
Simetral S.A.                                          Chile
Ediciones Chiloe S.A.                                  Chile
Ediciones Financieras S.A.                             Chile
Cristalchile Inversiones S.A.                          Chile
Rayen Cura S.A.I.C.                                    Argentina
Unassociated Document


 


Exhibit 10.4


 




Loan agreement


 


Party A: Shanghai Pengpai Electric Co., LTD


Party B: Lu'an Dongsheng Electric Trading Co., LTD







Based on the Acquisition Letter of Intention between all shareholders of Dongsheng (“Party B”) and Shanghai Pengbai (“Party A”), dated September 28, 2006







The Party A’s refrigerator factory is located in Ningbo, Party A is one of the major suppliers of Party B. Due to lack of funds, complications in cash flow, new refrigerator production lines which lack funds to for further development, outdated production equipment which needs to be updated, improvements needed in production index and quality, Party A’s product lines cannot further develop which requires Party A to seek a large capital investment.







Party B has sold "Guoying" refrigerators for many years, due to the close, long-term business relationship developed between Party A and Party B, Party A now requires Party B to provide financial support. After several rounds of negotiation, the Parties have reached the following acquisition Letter of Intention.








	
  

	
1.

	
Party A requires Party B to provide funding support of approximately 80 million RMB to Party A up until the end of September 2010, the funding shall come in stages, beginning in October 2006, of approximately 20 million RMB per year.













	
  

	
2.

	
Party B will be able to purchase "Guoying" refrigerators from Party A at their most favorable price and their will be no limit as to the purchase quantity.













	
  

	
3.

	
Party B will not participate in the Party A's profit sharing and will not participate in the operation and management of Party A. Party A agrees to use all of its assets as collateral for the loan from Party B.







 


Party A shall repay the loan amount to Party B in four years, beginning in October 2013 up until the end of September 2017. If there is any difficulty in the repayment, Party A will forfeit it’s refrigerator factory buildings, production lines and the equipment, registered brand, land, and sales network to Party B. Party A agrees not to transfer any property and cannot have any objection. If Party A breaches the agreement, Party B maintains the right to investigate for Economic and/or Criminal liability.


 


Both Parties agree to sign and subscribe to this loan agreement, which becomes fully enforceable from the signature date.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial
Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Keith A. SimpsonKeith A. SimpsonVice-President and Chief
Accounting Officer


Date: February 10, 2010

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-4