alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

SIMONE SUE FULLINGIM 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00085-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count Three of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Simone Sue 

Fullingim GUILTY of Count Three of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 31st January, 2024.

Case 6:23-cr-00085-JDK-JDL Document 27 Filed 01/31/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 77
Exhibit 21
 List of Subsidiaries of Olympic Steel, Inc.
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    State of Organization
    
    % OwnershipOlympic Steel Lafayette, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    100%Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.
    
    Minnesota
    
    100%Olympic Steel Iowa, Inc.
    
    Iowa
    
    100%  (a)Oly Steel NC, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%Tinsley Group  PS&W, Inc.
    
    North Carolina
    
    100%  (b)
 
 (a)
    
    Owned 100% by Olympic Steel Minneapolis, Inc.(b)
    
    Owned 100% by Oly Steel NC, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50470

Summary Calendar

EDWARD DESHAN SMITH

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Correctional Institution;

T. LESTER, Warden; SERGEANT TURNER; SERGEANT DAVIS; OFFICER

KNIGHTEN,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CV-128

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Deshan Smith appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

complaint, with prejudice, as time-barred. In his complaint, filed on

February 16, 2011, Smith alleged that on May 21, 2004, and on December 22,

2005, while he was incarcerated, prison officials used excessive force against

him. The magistrate judge construed Smith’s complaint as one alleging a cause

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 3, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 3, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-50470 Document: 00511620134 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2011
No. 11-50470

of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and recommended that it be dismissed for

failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted because Smith’s

claims are barred by the statute of limitations. See Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S.

235, 249–50 (1989) (“where state law provides multiple statutes of limitations

for personal injury actions, courts considering § 1983 claims should borrow the

general or residual statute for personal injury actions”); Moore v. McDonald, 30

F.3d 616, 620 (5th Cir. 1994) (“Texas’ general personal injury limitations period

is two years.”) (citing TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 16.003(a)). The

district court overruled Smith’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

accepted the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss the complaint with

prejudice as time-barred.

In his pro se brief, which we construe liberally, Smith seems to contend

that a four- or five-year statute of limitations should apply to his claims. Even

if we accepted this contention, it would not help Smith, because he filed his

complaint more than five years after the complained-of conduct.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Smith’s motion for

appointment of counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

2

Case: 11-50470 Document: 00511620134 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2011
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham of Gillam & Smith LLP 

enters his appearance in this matter as additional counsel on behalf of Defendants Samsung

Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham may receive all communications from the Court 

and from other parties at Gillam & Smith, LLP, 102 N. College, Suite 800, Tyler, Texas 75702; 

Telephone: (903) 934- 8450; Facsimile: (903) 934-9257; Email: tom@gillamsmithlaw.com.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

INC.; and SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO. LTD., 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 103 Filed 07/10/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 4873
2

Dated: July 10, 2024

 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew T. Gorham

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham 

State Bar No. 24012715

GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P.

102 N. College, Suite 800

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257

Email: tom@gillamsmithlaw.com

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 10th day of July, 2024, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ Andrew T. Gorham

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 103 Filed 07/10/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 4874
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of : No. 2570 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

MILES K. KARSON, JR. : Board File No. C4-16-957 

: (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 

: No. CP-43-CR-2154-2017) 

: Attorney Registration No. 20916 

: (Mercer County) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2019, having indicated that he has no objection 

to being placed on temporary suspension, the Rule is made absolute, and Miles K. 

Karson, Jr., is temporarily suspended. See Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(2). He shall comply with 

all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

HOWARD LAWRENCE 

ELLSWORTH, III, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

DALLAS TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

VETERAN AFFAIRS, et al.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00710-

SDJ-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United 

States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the 

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On April 5, 2024, the Report of the 

Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #44), was entered containing proposed findings of fact and 

recommendation that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #30) be denied

and that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Expedite Rulings (Dkt. #35) and Plaintiffs’ Emergency 

Motion for Expedited Rulings (Dkt. #41) be denied as moot.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no 

timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and 

conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s 

Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 

#30) is DENIED and that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Expedite Rulings (Dkt. #35) and 

Case 4:23-cv-00710-SDJ-AGD Document 51 Filed 04/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1480
2

Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Expedited Rulings (Dkt. #41) are DENIED AS 

MOOT.

Case 4:23-cv-00710-SDJ-AGD Document 51 Filed 04/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1481
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et 

al, 

Defendants. 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00352-JRG-RSP

ORDER

It is ORDERED that Michael Paul is hereby appointed as the Court’s technical advisor in 

the above-captioned case, with his fees and expenses to be assessed equally between Plaintiff and 

Defendants and timely paid as billed. Mr. Paul’s contact information is as follows: 

Michael D. Paul, PLLC

26110 High Timber Pass St. 

San Antonio, TX 78260-8041

Phone: (210) 473-8696 

Email: mdeanpaul@gmail.com

The parties are ORDERED to send courtesy copies of claim construction briefs, exhibits, 

and technology tutorials in PDF form to mdeanpaul@gmail.com. If the document was filed with 

the Court, the copy must include the CM/ECF header. For claim construction materials that have 

already been filed, the filing party is ORDERED to provide copies to Mr. Paul within two business 

days. Otherwise, the filing party is ORDERED to provide copies to Mr. Paul no later than one 

business day after filing future claim construction material.

Case 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP Document 90 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6179
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2135 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2135

            To suspend temporarily the duty on MUB 738 INT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1999

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on MUB 738 INT.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.32.90      2-Amino-4(4-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/
                         Aminobenzoylamino                                                  31/2003          ''.
                         ) Benzene
                         Sulfonic Acid
                         (CAS No. 167614-
                         37-1) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2930.90.29)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
N.K., an Infant, By His Mother and Natural Guardian, Tanja BRUESTLE-KUMRA, petitioner, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES.

No. 18-327.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Ilich VARGAS, aka Ilich Ernesto Vargas Romero, petitioner, v. John McMAHON.

No. 18-6261.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/03/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      180,115
COMMITMENTS
  56,848    9,664   19,215   78,379  123,523  154,442  152,402   25,673   27,713

CHANGES FROM 04/26/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -15,800)
  -1,930    1,718   -7,942   -4,296   -8,298  -14,168  -14,522   -1,632   -1,279

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.6      5.4     10.7     43.5     68.6     85.7     84.6     14.3     15.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      59       24       47       66       82      145      135
```

----

Updated May 6, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    109,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,852
<PP&E>                                          34,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,931
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   291,359
<SALES>                                         46,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,031
<CGS>                                           25,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (28)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge 

Matthew Marcewicz 

Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e
Lucious WILSON, petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden.

No. 18-6012.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jeffrey Allen WARE, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6318.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
W.A. GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., et al.

No. 18-523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*811Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                       1,400,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,036,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   731,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,634,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,854,000
<PP&E>                                      19,152,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,573,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,428,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,787,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,271,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,428,000
<SALES>                                     12,056,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,211,000
<CGS>                                        5,262,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,124,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             363,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (557,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (557,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (557,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000916823
[NAME] UNITED FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORP
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          APR-30-1999             APR-30-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               APR-30-1999             APR-30-2000
[CASH]                                       4,344,937               3,606,156
[SECURITIES]                                         0                       0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0                       0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0                       0
[INVENTORY]                                          0                       0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                            38,946,588              35,799,830
[PP&E]                                         645,519                 705,669
[DEPRECIATION]                               (276,512)               (365,801)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              38,946,588              35,799,830
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                       33,168,004              30,409,360
[BONDS]                                              0                       0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0                       0
[PREFERRED]                                    315,000                 315,000
[COMMON]                                     6,529,332               6,510,938
[OTHER-SE]                                           0                       0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                39,795,236              36,918,230
[SALES]                                      8,571,594               9,051,395
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            10,045,228              10,896,324
[CGS]                                                0                       0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0                       0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             8,230,699               9,575,640
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0                       0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                           1,054,921               1,439,021
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                759,608               (118,337)
[INCOME-TAX]                                   339,228                (75,079)
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            420,380                (43,258)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0                       0
[CHANGES]                                     (67,665)                (38,500)
[NET-INCOME]                                   352,715                (81,758)
[EPS-BASIC]                                        .09                   (.02)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .09                   (.02)
</TABLE>