NUMBER 13-14-00504-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOHN LOZANO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 148th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, John Lozano, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for 

robbery. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on June 19, 2014, and notice of appeal was 

filed on August 26, 2014. On September 8, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was 
2

advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten 

days from the date of receipt of the Court’s directive. Appellant has not filed a response 

to the Court’s directive. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when 

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended 

in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). 

Where a timely motion for new trial has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within 

ninety days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. TEX. R. APP. P. 

26.2(a)(2). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days 

after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion 

complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before July 21, 2014.

1

 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file 

his notice of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 and did not 

file his notice of appeal until August 26, 2014.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed 

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent 

a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address 

the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss 

 

 1 Because the thirtieth day fell on a Saturday, appellants had until the following Monday, July 21, 2014 to 

file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1.
3

the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ 

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the 

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

13th day of November, 2014.