alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           313
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Hilario SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5499.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Carlos WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8746.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting form the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Daniel Clate ACKER, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-6075 (18A310).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 27, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

MARVIN EUGENE GATES, JR. § 

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-62

CHRISTOPHER L. NORSWORTHY § 

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

Plaintiff Marvin Eugene Gates, Jr., an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Christopher L. Norsworthy.

Discussion

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in

which the claim arose. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and

in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division

where it could have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only

for an abuse of discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989).

Plaintiff complains of incidents that occurred at the Stiles Unit. The Stiles Unit is located

in the Beaumont Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, but

Plaintiff filed this action in the Lufkin Division. The court has considered the circumstances and has

determined that the interests of justice would be served by transferring this action to the division in

Case 1:23-cv-00130-MJT-ZJH Document 3 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
which the claims arose. Therefore, the action should be transferred to the Beaumont Division. It

is accordingly

ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Beaumont Division of

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 30th day of March, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00130-MJT-ZJH Document 3 Filed 03/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-18

'

MARVIN RAMON RAMOS PONCE '

A/K/A EDDIE PONCE CONTRERAS, '

A/K/A EDDIE PONCE '

A/K/A RAFAEL RAMOS-EGARDEO '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

Case 9:23-cr-00018-MAC-ZJH Document 27 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 102
2

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Marvin Ramon Ramos Ponce, 

is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 

1326(a) (Reentry of a Deported Alien).

Case 9:23-cr-00018-MAC-ZJH Document 27 Filed 10/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 103
NO. 07-04-0317 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D APRIL 12, 2005

______________________________ GILBERT E SCOBE DO, Appellant

v. THE STATEOF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 364 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2002-439,33 7; HON. BRADLEY UNDE RW OOD, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPB ELL, JJ Appellant Gilbert Escobedo appeals from his conviction for capital m urd er a nd h is sentence of life imprisonment. The two iss ues bef ore us involvewhe ther thetrial court erred in de nyin g hismo tion to change venue and by failing to afford him a hearing on the mot ion. W e affirm thejudgm ent of the trial court. The State represents in its brief that the trial court did err, but that the error was harmless. Yet, statute requi res a defendant seeking to transfe r venue under art. 31.03 of the Code of Crim inal Procedure (as did appellant here) to support the m otion notonly with2

affidavits of at l ea st two credible persons but also with the defe ndant’s “ow n affidavit.” T EX . C ODE C R IM . P ROC . A NN . art. 31.03(a) (V ern on 1 989 ). While appellant accompan ied his mo tion with three affidavi ts, none were his ow n. Because t he m otion did not satisfy the requirementsof art. 31 .03(a ), the trial court did not err in either its decision to deny appellant a hearing or its decision to deny the mot ion itself. Accordingl y, we ov er ru le th e t wo points of error and affirm t he judgm ent of the trial court.

Brian Quinn Justice
Do not publish.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/03/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       32,124
COMMITMENTS
   6,503      874      295   18,254   21,808   25,051   22,976    7,073    9,147

CHANGES FROM 06/26/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -382)
     427   -1,045       29   -1,106    1,453     -651      436      269     -818

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    20.2      2.7      0.9     56.8     67.9     78.0     71.5     22.0     28.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       9        4        3       27       25       36       32
```

----

Updated July 3, 2012
Masoud BAMDAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2266

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase certain payment

amounts made to hospitals furnishing services under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1999

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. QUINN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase

certain payment amounts made to hospitals furnishing

services under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare HEAL (Hos5 pital Emergency Assistance Legislation) Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CERTAIN MEDICARE HOSPITAL PAY7 MENT AMOUNTS.

8 (a) PAYMENTS FOR PPS HOSPITALS.—Section

9 1886(b)(3)(B)(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

10 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(i)) is amended—
2

•HR 2266 IH

1 (1) by striking subclauses (XV) and (XVI);

2 (2) by redesignating subclause (XVII) as sub3 clause (XVI);

4 (3) by inserting after subclause (XIV) the fol5 lowing new subclause:

6 ‘‘(XV) for each of fiscal years 2000 through

7 2002, the market basket percentage increase minus

8 1.0 percentage point for hospitals in all areas, and’’.

9 (b) INDIRECT MEDICAL EDUCATION.—Section

10 188(d)(5)(B)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

11 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(ii)) is amended—

12 by striking subclauses (III), (IV), and (V) and

13 inserting the following new subclasue:

14 ‘‘(III) on or after October 1, 1998, ‘c’ is

15 equal to 1.6.’’.

16 (c) PAYMENTS FOR DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE AD17 JUSTMENTS.—Section 1886(d)(5)(F)(ix) of such Act (42

18 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(ix)) is amended—

19 (1) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end of subclause

20 (II); and

21 (2) by striking subclauses (III), (IV), (V), and

22 (VI) and inserting the following new subclause:
3

•HR 2266 IH

1 ‘‘(III) during fiscal year 2000 and each subse2 quent fiscal year, such additional payment amount

3 shall be reduced by 0 percent.’’.

Æ
```

```

----

Updated August 2, 2013
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Solitario Resources Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher E. Herald, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 3, 2006
By: /s/ Christopher E. HeraldChristopher E. Herald
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

v. Civil No. ______________________

CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

On this ________ day of __________________, 20 _____, it appearing from the affidavit(s) 

in support of default of ____________________________, attorney for plaintiff, that each of the

defendants named below has failed to plead or otherwise defend herein as provided by the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure;

Now, therefore, the DEFAULT of each of the following named defendants is hereby entered:

DAVID	, CLERK

By: _________________________

 Deputy Clerk

p:\DFLT.ord

2:23-cv-00233-JRG

Randall Garteiser

CDNetworks Co., Ltd.

TOUCHPOINT PROJECTION

INNOVATIONS, LLC,

CDNETWORKS CO., LTD

Case 2:23-cv-00233-JRG Document 6 Filed 10/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 78
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000917464
<NAME> BOTT ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  704,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,266
<INVENTORY>                                    169,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               888,839
<PP&E>                                         213,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,026,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          910,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,173<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,026,197
<SALES>                                      7,469,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,469,730
<CGS>                                        7,320,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,437,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,809
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50<F2>
<FN>
<F1>"Other SE" represents consolidated Partners' Capital.
<F2>EPS represents earnings per Common Unit.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

RA/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALICIA HERNANDEZ LOZANO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73456

Agency No. A075-711-362

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Alicia Hernandez Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have

FILED

JAN 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RA/Research 2 07-73456

jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo constitutional questions,

including claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400

F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

Even if Lozano complied with the requirements set forth in Matter of

Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (BIA 1988), Lozano failed to establish that her

former attorney’s alleged ineffective assistance resulted in prejudice, and thus her

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails. See id. at 793-94 (to prevail on an

ineffective assistance of counsel claim a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

l0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137884 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137884 

 COA: 288391 

St. Joseph CC: 07-014051-FH 

JAMES JOSEPH LAWSON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00140

- CV

RICARDO MALDONADO DAVILA

v. M & M TOWING AND RECOVERY, INC.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 19

- 5371

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF AP PEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. E a ch pa r ty s hall bear the ir own costs relating to this appeal

. We further orde r this decision certified bel ow for observance. August 26, 2021
LAND OF LINCOLN MUTUAL HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Nonprofit Mutual Insurance Corporation, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1038

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,425
<SECURITIES>                                     9,232
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (800)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,742
<PP&E>                                         424,696
<DEPRECIATION>                               (219,282)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,597
<BONDS>                                        276,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                    (35,024)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,514
<SALES>                                         48,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,129
<CGS>                                           20,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,444)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,539)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,539)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
 LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of LodgeNet.
 th
 /s/ Scott C. PetersenScott C. PetersenChief Executive Officer/s/ Frank P. ElsenbastFrank P. ElsenbastChief Financial Officer Page 47