alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000911167
<NAME>                        Ariel Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         11,122,527
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,028,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                   923,763
<INVENTORY>                                    3,104,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,460,681
<PP&E>                                         5,730,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,270,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,287,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,351,967
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,068,570
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,081,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,094,463
<SALES>                                        2,072,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,072,221
<CGS>                                          868,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  868,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,016,856
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             110,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,812,977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,812,977)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.24)



</TABLE>
Summary English Translation of Amendment



 Exhibit 4.16 
 Summary English Translation of Amendment dated December 13, 2011, to Investment Agreement dated August 2, 2010, by and among Shanghai Zizhu Science-based Park Development Co., Ltd., BCD
(Shanghai) Semiconductor Manufacturing Limited and BCD (Shanghai) Micro-Electronics Ltd. 
 Party A: Shanghai Zizhu Hi-Tech Zone (Group)
Co., Ltd. 
 Registered Address: 468 Jianchuan Road, Shanghai 
 Legal Representative: Wen SHEN 
 Party B: BCD (Shanghai) Microelectronics Ltd. 

Registered Address: 1600 Zixing Road, Shanghai 

Legal Representative: Jiwei SUN 
 Date:
December 13, 2011 
 BACKGROUND: 

1. Party A and Party B entered into an Investment Agreement on August 2, 2010 (“Investment Agreement”), pursuant to which Party A agrees
to bear certain costs for the construction of the power delivery infrastructure to meet Party B’s power requirement (“Facilities Costs”). 
 2. Party B subsequently paid the Power Company a total of RMB49.584705 million in power engineering costs as estimated by the Power Company, while the Power Company invoiced Party A for the same amount
(“Invoice for Engineering Costs”). 
 AGREEMENT: 
  

	1.	Upon completion of the power delivery infrastructure, a duly qualified third-party auditor shall be appointed to audit the engineering costs. Such appointment shall be
agreed by both parties. If Party A desires to appoint an auditor not approved by Party B, then Party B shall only bear the auditing costs up to RMB300,000 and Party A shall bear the balance. 


 

	2.	Depending on the final determination of the engineering costs, Party B shall receive a refund of any overpayment or make up any shortfall, and Party B shall work with
the Power Company to produce a correct invoice in replacement of the Invoice for Engineering Costs. 

  

	3.	Party A shall work with Party B to determine the amount of the Facilities Costs within 15 working days following the determination of the Engineering Costs.


  

	4.	Party A shall pay Party B, on or before December 20, 2011 and January 15, 2012, RMB20 million and RMB10 million, respectively, in Facilities Costs.


  

	5.	Within 15 working days after the parties confirm the final amount of the Facilities Costs in writing, Party A shall refund Party B any overpayment or collect from Party
B any shortfall.
Opinion issued August 4, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00351-CR

———————————

KELVIN BENTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1486410

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kelvin Benton, pleaded guilty to the third-degree felony offense of 

evading arrest or detention with a vehicle, which was enhanced to a second-degree 

felony offense because he had one prior felony conviction. See TEX. PENAL CODE 

ANN. §§ 12.42(a), 38.04(a)(2)(A) (West Supp. 2015). Pursuant to a plea bargain, 

the State agreed to recommend that appellant’s punishment be assessed at fifteen
2

years’ confinement. In accordance with the terms of his plea bargain with the State,

the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at fifteen years’ 

confinement. See id. § 12.33(a) (West Supp. 2015). The trial court certified that 

this was a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Nevertheless, appellant timely filed a pro se notice of appeal in the trial court, 

contending, among other things, that his trial counsel was ineffective. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2)(A), 26.2(a)(1). Appellant also filed pro se letter-motions for the 

appointment of appellate counsel in this Court. We dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction and dismiss the motions as moot.

In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s

permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West Supp. 2015); 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing 

that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the notice of appeal and states 

that this is a plea-bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal, and the trial 

court did not give its permission to appeal any matters. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615. The clerk’s record, filed in this Court, 
3

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615. Because 

appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal without further action.

See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of 

appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who pleabargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a), must dismiss a prohibited appeal 

without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R. APP.

P. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Corey E. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. BUTLER LAW FIRM.

No. 18-5863.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/26/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      409,106
COMMITMENTS
  93,691  188,880   71,850  213,036  118,323  378,577  379,053   30,529   30,053

CHANGES FROM 02/19/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -16,664)
 -10,367   -3,318    2,486   -7,242  -17,669  -15,123  -18,501   -1,541    1,837

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.9     46.2     17.6     52.1     28.9     92.5     92.7      7.5      7.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      52       59       66       35       32      129      125
```

----

Updated March 1, 2013
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 24 Filed 10/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 222
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 20

- 0156 Filed August 4, 2021

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

SHANE MICHAEL DAVIS , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Floyd County, DeDra Schroeder

, Judge.

Shane Davis appeals following a guilty plea. APPEAL DISMISSED.

Thomas M. McIntee

, Waterloo , for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Israel Kodiaga , Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J. , and Mullins and May, JJ.2

MAY , Judge

. Shane Davis appeals after pleading guilty to lascivious acts with a child and

indecent contact with a child.

We begin by consider ing whether we have authority to hear Davis’s appeal.

Under Iowa Code section 814.6 (1)(a)(3) (2020) , there is no right of appeal “from

. . . [a] conviction where the de fendant has pled guilty.” This does not apply,

however, “to a guilty plea for a class ‘ A ’ felony or in a case where the defendant

establishes good cause.” Iowa Code § 814.6(1)(a)(3) (emphasis added). But

there is no class “A” felony at issue here. And Davis has not addressed good

cause, although it is his burden to establish it. See id. ; State v. Damme , 944

N.W.2d 98, 104 (Iowa 2020) (“Damme bears the burden of establishing good

cause to pursue an appeal of her conviction based on a guilty plea.”). 1

Be cause Davis has not “ establishe [ d ] good cause, ” he has no right of

appeal. Iowa Code § 814.6(1)(a)(3)

. We must dismiss.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

1 We note Davis had notice of the good

- cause requirement

— both through enactment of section 814.6(1)(a)(3) and the many judicial opinions interpreting it

— as well as an opportunity to be heard through his appellate brief. Section 814.6 (1)(a)(3) has been effective since July 1, 2019. Damme , 944 N.W.2d at 103 ( discussing 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140, § 28 (codified at Iowa Code § 814.6(1)( a ) (2020))

. Davis did not file his brief until December 2, 2020. By then, our appellate courts had issued several opinions interpreting section 814.6(1)(a)(3). See, e.g. , State v. Thompson , 951 N.W.2d 1, 2 (Iowa 2020) ; Damme , 944 N.W.2d at 103

– 05 ; State v. Draine , 936 N.W.2d 205, 206 (Iowa 2019) ; State v. Castorena

, No. 19

- 1652, 2020 WL 6157797, at * 1 n.1 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2020); State v. Nunez Cabara , No. 19

- 2058, 2020 WL 5650606, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2020) ; State v. Harden , No. 19

- 0442, 2020 WL 4814085, at *1 n.2 (Iowa Ct. App. Aug. 19, 2020)

.
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 32
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 33
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 34
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 35
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 36
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 37
Case 9:23-cv-00092-MJT Document 3 Filed 05/18/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 38
ex_139082.htm


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT, INC. EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN


 


The Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. Executive Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of March 22, 2019, as set forth below. All capitalized terms used but not defined in this First Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Section 2.9 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

			



 


“Executive or Participant” means the persons holding one or more of the officer positions with the Company listed on Appendix A, or any other person or position designated by the Committee to be eligible to participate in this Plan. The Committee may modify Appendix A from time to time, in its sole discretion.


 


	 	
			2.

				
			Section 4.1(a)(iii) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

			



 


(iii)     an amount equal to three (3) times the sum of the Executive’s Annual Base Salary and the Annual Bonus.


 


	 	
			3.

				
			Article V (Certain Limitations on Payments by the Company) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

			



 


Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, if any payment which an Executive has the right to receive from the Company or any affiliated entity or any payment or benefits under any plan maintained by the Company or any affiliated entity (collectively, the “Payments”) would otherwise constitute an “excess parachute payment” (as defined in Code Section 280G), the Payments shall be reduced to the extent necessary so that no portion thereof shall be subject to the Excise Tax, but only if, by reason of such reduction, the net after-tax benefit received by the Executive shall exceed the net after-tax benefit that would be received by the Executive if no such reduction was made. The Company shall apply the limitations of Code Section 280G, and regulations thereunder, in good faith using the interpretation that is most likely to avoid the imposition of the excise tax on the Employee and ensures the deductibility of payments by the Company.


 


	 	
			4.

				
			Appendix A of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with Appendix A attached hereto.

			



 


	 	
			5.

				
			All other terms and conditions of the Plan shall be unchanged and remain in full force and effect.

			



 



 




 




 


This First Amendment was duly adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. on the date first written above, and shall be effective as of such date.


 


 


 


Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.


 


 


/s/ Bryan F. Peery


Bryan F. Peery


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


 



 




 




 


 


Appendix A


 


Any position that includes any of the following titles at the Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. level:


 


Executive Chairman of the Board


Chief Executive Officer


President


Executive Vice President
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-6642.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA, applicant.

No. 18A669.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2019.

Application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court denied. The administrative stay previously entered by THE CHIEF JUSTICE is vacated.
Marie-Therese ASSA'AD-FALTAS, petitioner, v. CITY OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 17-8688.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
`DTCC Repo-US Treasury <30 YR - NYSE LIFFE - NYPC                     Code-045L2T
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/14/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF $5,000,000)                            OPEN INTEREST:       19,038
COMMITMENTS
   2,920    7,773    1,192   14,066    9,309   18,178   18,274      860      764

CHANGES FROM 08/07/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,235)
   2,007    1,751      329    1,282    1,449    3,618    3,529      617      706

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.3     40.8      6.3     73.9     48.9     95.5     96.0      4.5      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       26)
       7        5        5       11       12       19       21`

---

Updated August 17, 2012
Schedule of Intra-group Memorandums



 Exhibit 4.16.1 
 SCHEDULE OF INTRA-GROUP MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CERTAIN PRC SUBSIDIARIES OF SOUFUN HOLDINGS LIMITED AND A CONSOLIDATED CONTROLLED ENTITY 

 

							
	  	  	 Date of

Memorandum
	  	 Party A
	  	 Party B

	 1.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Shanghai China Index Consultancy Co., Ltd.

	 2.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Shanghai SouFun Advertising Co., Ltd.

	 3.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Beijing China Index Information Co., Ltd.

	 4.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Beijing SouFun Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.

	 5.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Tianjin Jia Tian Xia Advertising Co., Ltd.

	 6.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Shanghai Jia Biao Tang Real Estate Broking Co., Ltd.

	 7.
	  	 February 15, 2008
	  	 Beijing SouFun Network Technology Co., Ltd.
	  	 Beijing SouFun Internet Information Service Co., Ltd.



  
 1
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/17/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      432,042
COMMITMENTS
  38,464   27,961  112,328  260,705  274,482  411,497  414,771   20,545   17,271

CHANGES FROM 07/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,314)
  -7,063    5,388    1,125    2,362  -13,025   -3,576   -6,512   -1,738    1,198

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.9      6.5     26.0     60.3     63.5     95.2     96.0      4.8      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      120)
      27       24       45       63       65      114      112
```

----

Updated July 20, 2012
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/16/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      162,515
COMMITMENTS
  55,480   11,667   17,310   71,485  112,497  144,275  141,474   18,240   21,041

CHANGES FROM 10/09/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,081)
   2,066      965     -628     -459    1,059      979    1,396      102     -315

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    34.1      7.2     10.7     44.0     69.2     88.8     87.1     11.2     12.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      184)
      63       22       28       66       85      137      127
```

----

Updated June 29, 2007
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, William A. Priddy, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Corporate VicePresident of Administration and Secretary of RF Micro Devices, Inc. (the"Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 27, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/William A. Priddy, Jr.                                  William A. Priddy, Jr.     Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Vice      President of Administration and Secretary     November 6, 2008

                                                                              

                                                                              

                                                                              

** **

** **

** **

----

** **