alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 19 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00355
- CR
EX PARTE J EFFREY WAYNE FUJISAK A On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416
- 80264
- 2015



### O R DER Appellant has appealed the trial court’s order denying him the relief sought by his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking to have section 43.25 of the Texas Penal Code declared unconstitutional. This is an accelerated appeal under Te xas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.
We ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to appeal for inclusion in the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
We ORDER the Collin County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record containing the documents related to the case, including the trial court’s order ruling on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus, by APRIL 6, 2015

.We ORDER Susan Maienschein, official court reporter of the 416th Judicial District

Court, to file, by APRIL 6, 2015 , the complete reporter’s record, including any exhibits, of all hearings conducted on the application for writ of habeas corpus.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by MAY 1, 2 015 . We ORDER the State to file its brief by MAY 26, 2015 . If any party does not file its brief by the date specified, the appeal will be submitted without that party’s brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 31.1. Absent further order of the Court, the appeal will be submitted without argument on JULY 1, 2015 before a panel consisting of Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 31.1, 31.2.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Chris Oldner, Pr esiding Judge, 416th Judicial District Court; Susan Maeinschein, official court reporter, 416th Judicial District Court; Andrea Stroh Thompson, Collin County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Exhibit 21


                  THE TAUBMAN REALTY GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



                                    JURISDICTION
NAME                                OF FORMATION     DOING BUSINESS AS
----                                ------------     -----------------

Biltmore Shopping Center Partners     Arizona        Biltmore Fashion Park

La Cienega Associates                 California     Beverly Center

Briarwood                             Michigan       Briarwood

TL-Columbus Associates                Michigan       Columbus City Center

Fairlane Town Center                  Michigan       Fairlane Town Center

Richmond Associates                   Michigan       Hilltop

La Cumbre Shopping Center Associates  California     La Cumbre Plaza

Lakeforest Associates                 Maryland       Lakeforest

Short Hills Associates                New Jersey     The Mall at Short Hills

TKL-East                              Michigan       Marley Station

Taubman Western Associates No. 2      Michigan       Meadowood Mall

Katy-Gessner Associates Limited       
  Partnership                         Delaware       Memorial City Mall (Leased)

Paseo Nuevo Associates                California     Paseo Nuevo

Stoneridge Properties                 California     Stoneridge Mall

Taub-Co Management, Inc.              Michigan       N/A

The Taubman Company Limited
  Partnership                         Delaware       The Taubman Company

Tuttle Crossing Associates            Ohio           The Mall at Tuttle Crossing
John Patrick WALLACE, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6105.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/10/13                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      387,342
COMMITMENTS
 105,879  179,211   96,327  161,056   86,767  363,262  362,305   24,080   25,037

CHANGES FROM 12/03/13 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,070)
   5,069   16,351   -7,388    8,154   -3,774    5,835    5,189      235      881

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.3     46.3     24.9     41.6     22.4     93.8     93.5      6.2      6.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      171)
      48       67       66       37       38      128      140
```

----

Updated December 19, 2013
```

```

----

Updated April 26, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

JAMEOUS SMITH, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-136

§

DANA T. WILLIAMS, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Jameous Smith, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. 

The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge recommending the case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#8) is

ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit. 

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of March, 2024.

Case 9:23-cv-00136-MAC-CLS Document 10 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 12
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DANIEL J. DOCZY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

VERIFONE SYSTEMS, INC., VERIFONE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2017-2571

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 0:16-cv-62370-WPD, 

Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KEVIN N. MALEK, Malek Moss, PLLC, New York, NY, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

 RYAN J. MARTON, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang 

LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. 

Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 August 23, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Helen of Troy Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., chapter 63, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | June 27, 2011                                                                                    |   | /s/ Gerald J. Rubin |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Gerald J. Rubin                                                                                       |
|   | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Director   and Principal Executive Officer |
|   |                                                                                                  |
|   |                                                                                                  |
|   | /s/ Thomas J. Benson                                                                                  |   |
|   | Thomas J. Benson                                                                                      |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                                                     |

 

 

This certification is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
Law Office of David A. Schulman

Post Office Box 783 Austin, Texas 78767 Tel. 512-474-4747 Fax: 512-532-6282



# Motion for Extension of Time To File

Appellant's Brief on Appeal

No. 04-14-00338-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT SAN ANTONIO 

### Benny Cavazos Valverde , Appellant

v. 

### The State of Texas , Appellee On Appeal in Case No. 2012CR3980, from the 290th District Court of Bexar County, the Hon. Melissa Skinner, Judge Presiding

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Benny Cavazos Valverde, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause (“Appellant”), by and through his retained counsel, David A. Schulman, his undersigned attorney of record, and respectfully enters this “Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief on Appeal,” and in support of such Motion would show the Court:

I Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder in the 290th District Court of Bexar County, then timely perfected his appeal. The deadline for filing Appellant's Brief with the Court is the 23rd day of March, 2015. Appellant's request for an extension is based upon the inability of the undersigned attorney to complete his

1 ACCEPTED 04-14-00338-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/23/2015 12:07:59 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERKreview of the record, which runs i n ex cess o f 1200 pages, and to finish research on the issues raised by the trial of the case.

I I Said attorney would further sh o w t hat he w ill require an additional thirty (30) days in which to complete the r esearch and
p repare Appellant's Brief on Appeal. This is Appellant's seco n d request for an extension of time in which to file his brief. 

### Prayer
W H E R E F O R E P R E M I S E S C O N S I D E R E D , A p p e l l a n t p r a y s t h i s Honorable Court to grant his “Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on Appeal,” a n d O r d er that the deadline f or filing such be extended an additional thirty (30) days, until April 22, 2 0 1 5 , or until such time as set by this Court. Respectfully submitted,

____________________________________ David A. Schulman Attorney at Law Post Office Box 783 Austin, Texas 78767-0783 Tel. 512-474-4747 Fax: 512-532-6282 zdrdavida@davidschulman.com

State Bar Card No. 17833400 Attorney for Appellant

2

### Certificate of Compliance and Delivery

T his is to certify that: (1) this document, created using WordPerfectTM

X7 software, contains 320 words, excluding those items permitted by Rule

9.4 (i)(1), T ex.R.App.Pro., and complies with Rules 9.4 (i)(2)(B) and 9.4 (i)(3),

T ex.R.App.Pro.; and (2) o n March 23, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing motion for extension was transmitted via the eService

function on t he State’s eFiling portal, to Laura E. Durbin (laura.durbin@bexar.org), counsel of record for the State of Texas.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ David A. Schulman

3
#### CALIFORNIA *v.*HAMILTON

No. A-805.

Decided May 6, 1986

Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.

Applicant, the State of California, asks that I stay pending disposition of its petition for certiorari the enforcement of the judgment of the California Supreme Court, which invalidated the death sentence imposed on respondent Hamilton for the 1979 murder of a woman near San Diego. 41 Cal. 3d 408, 710 P. 2d 981 (1985). The jury was not instructed that it was required, as a matter of state law under *Carlos*v. *Superior Court,*35 Cal. 3d 131, 672 P. 2d 862 (1983), to find that Hamilton intended to kill his victim before it could impose the death penalty. The California Supreme Court held that this failure to properly instruct the jury on the issue of intent violated Hamilton’s right to due process under this Court’s decision in *Sandstrom*v. *Montana,*442 U. S. 510 (1979). 41 Cal. 3d, at 431, 710 P. 2d, at 995. The court also held that such *1302
      *Sandstrom*error was not harmless under the four-part test for harmlessness set forth in *People*v. *Garcia,*36 Cal. 3d 539, 554-557, 684 P. 2d 826, 835-837 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1229 (1985). In particular, the court concluded that the fourth part of the *Garcia*test, under which a *Sandstrom*error may be found harmless if “the record not only establishes the necessary intent as a matter of law but shows the contrary evidence not worthy of consideration,” *Garcia, supra,*at 556, 684 P. 2d, at 835, did not apply to the instant case. 41 Cal. 3d, at 432, 710 P. 2d, at 995-996.

The State requests a stay so that it can petition for certiorari, raising the following question: “What is the proper standard of prejudice under the United States Constitution for errors in jury instructions regarding intent to kill in capital cases?” The State argues that the California Supreme Court misconstrued this Court’s decision in *Connecticut*v. *Johnson,*460 U. S. 73 (1983), when it set up in *Garcia*its four-part harmlessness test for *Sandstrom*errors, and that under a proper test the *Sandstrom*error in the instant case would be found harmless. The State also points out that, under California law, it will be forced to begin a new trial on the issue of Hamilton’s sentence by May 12, 1986, or be forever barred from seeking the death penalty. See Cal. Penal Code Ann. § 1382(2) (West 1982). On the other hand, since the California Supreme Court affirmed Hamilton’s murder conviction, he will remain confined whether or not a stay is granted.

This Court currently has before it the case of *Rose*v. *Clark,*No. 84-1974, which involves the question whether a *Sandstrom*error may ever be found harmless and, if so, under what circumstances. Our decision in *Rose*v. *Clark*may well affect the outcome of the instant case. For this reason, I believe that a majority of this Court would not want to dispose of the petition for certiorari in this case before a decision is rendered in *Rose*v. *Clark.*I therefore stay the *1303enforcement of the judgment of the California Supreme Court pending further action by me or by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            166,699
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       324,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,104,864
<PP&E>                                         17,988,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                    742,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,602,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,914,051
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           23,619
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,035,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,602,552
<SALES>                                         1,731,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,731,401
<CGS>                                             585,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,432,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (322,280)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                126,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,505,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,505,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 1,325,986
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (179,084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Vernon CARTER, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8702.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/26/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       72,136
COMMITMENTS
  14,758      277    5,702   51,676   66,156   72,136   72,135        0        1

CHANGES FROM 06/19/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -746)
  -1,796      -76      450      600   -1,121     -746     -747        0        1

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.5      0.4      7.9     71.6     91.7    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       4        2        4        9       13       14       18
```

----

Updated June 29, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE USA,

INC., AND SPRINT CORP.,

Defendants. 

 Civil Action No: 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

The undersigned attorney hereby enters an appearance as additional counsel of record for 

Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Corp. (“Defendants”), and certifies 

that he is authorized to receive service of all pleadings, notices, orders and other papers in the 

above-captioned matter on behalf of the above-named Defendants.

Andrew Robb 

California Bar No. 291438 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

310 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301 

Telephone: (650) 849-5334 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5034 

ARobb@gibsondunn.com 

JURY DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/02/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 313
Dated: November 2, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew Robb 

Andrew Robb 

California Bar No. 291438 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

310 University Avenue 

Palo Alto, CA 94301 

Telephone: (650) 849-5334 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5034 

Email: ARobb@gibsondunn.com 

 Counsel for Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/02/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 314
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on November 2, 2023, to all counsel of record who are deemed to 

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

 

/s/ Andrew Robb 

Case 2:23-cv-00377-JRG-RSP Document 30 Filed 11/02/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 315
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-40406 and 333-82626 of FiberCore, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 of our
report dated April 29, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) the Company's change in
accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 and (2) the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FiberCore,
Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Hartford, Connecticut

May 19, 2003
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC T-MOBILE USA, INC 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP COBBLESTONE WIRELESS, LLC 09/06/2023 /s/ Christian W. Conkle Christian W. Conkle SBN 306374

RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 

12424 Wilshire Blvd, 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025

cconkle@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00381-JRG-RSP Document 16 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 75