alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JTK/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RIGOBERTO REYES-ESPITIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-74590

Agency No. A077-279-970

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Rigoberto Reyes-Espitia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision finding him ineligible for adjustment of status. Our

FILED

DEC 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JTK/Research 2 06-74590

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,

Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny in part

and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Reyes-Espitia’s contention that a conviction under California Health &

Safety Code § 11360(a) does not categorically constitute a controlled substance

offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) is foreclosed by Mielewczyk v.

Holder, 575 F.3d 992, 997-98 & n.1 (9th Cir. 2009) (removability based on

conviction under a law relating to a controlled substance does not turn on whether

the law includes solicitation offenses); see also Hernandez-Aguilar v. Holder, No.

06-71945, 2009 WL 4067644 (9th Cir. Nov. 25, 2009) (applying same conclusion

to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Reyes-Espitia’s contention regarding the

Federal First Offender Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3607, because he failed to exhaust this

contention before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th

Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6264

ISMAIL ABDUR RASHID, a/k/a Ismail AbdurRashid, a/k/a Ezekiel Thomas,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. RAIBEL, Ms., Nurse; MS. GREENE, Nurse;

MS. GANDY, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-726-4-OBE)

Submitted: June 3, 1997 Decided: June 16, 1997

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ismail Abdur Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. James Miller Davis, Jr.,

Alfred Johnston Cox, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rashid v. Raibel,

No. CA-96-726-4-OBE (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ATTORNEY SIGN-IN SHEET

Judge Roy S. Payne

2:23-CV-0103-JRG-RSP

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsun Electronics America, Inc., et al.

December 16,2024 9:00 a.m.

PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY

ATTORNEY NAME REPRESENTING

arc

H { e 

Pa [ roe e '

aAx-j-C 

/\ gI re r 14 

vv\< sc jA<2 

0

( x 

c 6 v\ 

'j

/u v r

'3 G\ -TS a o 

/ 0 o

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 297-1 Filed 12/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID

#: 21565
Mark Francis HONISH, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5135.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Adrian Francis WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.

No. 17-7664.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen T. Wills, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Palatin Technologies, Inc., hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
of Palatin Technologies, Inc. (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Palatin Technologies, Inc.

|Dated:  November 7, 2005 | /s/ Stephen T. WillsStephen T. WillsExecutive Vice President
     and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

    CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated September 27, 1999, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Ride, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1999. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-92034) pertaining to the Ride Snowboard
Company 1994 Stock Option Plan and Ride Snowboard Company 1994 Directors
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-81029) pertaining to Ride, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Ride,
Inc. foreign Subsidiary 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and in Amendment No.
3 to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-44637).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Seattle, Washington
September 27, 1999

                                       70
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAINER AMIN BERNAL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-70165

Agency No. A077-117-811

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 24, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Rainer Amin Bernal, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying him asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

FILED

FEB 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings,

Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition

for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Bernal filed his untimely

asylum application within a reasonable period of time after he learned of threats

against his uncles in Mexico. See Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1181 (9th

Cir. 2008). Thus, Bernal’s asylum claim fails.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Bernal did not

establish that it is more likely than not that he would be persecuted if returned to

Mexico. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (speculative

fear was insufficient to compel a finding of a well-founded fear of future

persecution). Accordingly, Bernal’s withholding of removal claim fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Bernal’s CAT

claim because he did not establish it is more likely than not that he would be

tortured if returned to Mexico. See Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073. Thus, Bernal’s CAT

claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 14-70165
Arick Justin RINALDO, petitioner, v. Bryan MAHAN, et al.

No. 18-239.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11083]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Release of Land Affecting Federal Grant Assurance 
Obligations at Reno-Stead Airport, Reno, Washoe County, Nevada

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a 
proposal and invites public comment to change a portion of the airport 
from aeronautical use to non-aeronautical use at the Reno-Stead Airport 
(RTS), Reno, Washoe County, Nevada. The proposal consists of 
approximately 178.5 acres at the southwest end of the RTS property 
between Army Aviation Drive and Rail Spur Road at the airport property 
line.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 23, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the request may be mailed or delivered to the 
FAA at the following address: Mr. Mike N. Williams, Manager, Phoenix 
Airports District Office, Federal Aviation Administration, 3800 N 
Central Ave., Suite 1025, 10th Floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85012. In 
addition, one copy of the comment submitted to the FAA must be mailed 
or delivered to Daren Griffin, President/CEO, Reno-Tahoe Airport 
Authority, P.O. Box 12490, Reno, Nevada 89510-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The land was originally acquired by the City 
of Reno through the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 
1947 and the Surplus Property Act of 1944, by the Administrator of 
General Services on December 19, 1966, with corrected Quitclaim Deeds 
on August 29, 1967 and August 14, 1968. The land was transferred to the 
Washoe County Airport Authority by the City of Reno on June 25, 1979. 
The land will be released from aeronautical obligations for a future 
non-aeronautical use. Such use of the land represents a compatible land 
use that will not interfere with the airport or its operation, thereby 
protecting the interests of civil aviation. The airport will be 
compensated for the fair market value of the use of the land.
    In accordance with the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and 
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), Public Law 10-181 (Apr. 5, 
2000; 114 Stat. 75), this notice must be published in the Federal 
Register 30 days before the DOT Secretary may waive any condition 
imposed on a federally obligated airport by surplus property conveyance 
deeds or grant agreements.

    Issued in El Segundo, California, on May 18, 2022.
Brian Q. Armstrong,
Manager, Safety and Standards Branch, Airports Division, Western-
Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2022-11083 Filed 5-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, CaseyJ. Sylla, certify that:

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lincoln Benefit Life Company;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)                        Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)                       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                        Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)                       Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

August 8,2006

|        | /s/ Casey J. Sylla                   |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                 |
|   | Casey J. Sylla                       |
|   | Chairman of the Board and  President |

 

 

E-3

----
June HARPER, petitioner, v. Arthur LEAHY, et al.

No. 18-339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF QPQ CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1996,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                799,472
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         261,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                            68,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    1,401,558
<PP&E>                              2,904,463
<DEPRECIATION>                       (611,585)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      4,060,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,328,767
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                               75,570
<OTHER-SE>                          2,655,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        4,060,308
<SALES>                             1,610,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1,610,897
<CGS>                               2,345,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       2,345,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    1,392,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     28,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (2,155,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (2,155,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                       (2,155,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.33)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel; NEI RFA: Ocular Surface Innervation from Cell Types to Circuit Functions (U01).                    

*Date:*                         June 8, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892  (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ashley Fortress, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official Division of Extramural Activities, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Suite 3400, Bethesda, MD 20892,  (301) 827-8613,                         *ashley.fortress@nih.gov.*
      ( print page 32033)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 22, 2022.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-11328 Filed 5-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

' NO. 9:23-CR-19

'

versus

IVAN OMAR DIAZ VELASQUEZ, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant. 

The parties waived objections to the magistrate judge’s findings at the hearing

on January 29, 2024. The court ORDERS that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts 

the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of 

the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Ivan Omar Diaz-Velaquez, is 

Case 9:23-cr-00019-MAC-ZJH Document 34 Filed 01/30/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 134
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) 

and (b) - Reentry of a Deported Alien.

Case 9:23-cr-00019-MAC-ZJH Document 34 Filed 01/30/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 135
Jean COULTER, petitioner, v. Thomas FORREST, et al.

No. 17-1538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 Eastern District of Texas

Autoscribe Corporation

Repay Holdings Corporation and Repay Holdings, LLC

2:23-cv-00349-JRG

Repay Holdings Corporation and Repay Holdings, LLC

10/10/2023 /s/ Samuel Drezdzon

Samuel Drezdzon, Texas Bar No. 24117374

Haynes and Boone, LLP

2801 N. Harwood Street, Suite 2300

Dallas, TX 75201

samuel.drezdzon@haynesboone.com

(214) 651-5000

(214) 200-0615

Case 2:23-cv-00349-JRG Document 18 Filed 10/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 138