United States District Court

Eastern District of Texas,

Sherman Division

Case No. 4:23-cv-00732-ALM

June 24, 2024

FILED

JUN 2 4 2024

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Texas Eastern

SECONDARY NOTICE TO THE COU T REGARDING CONTINUED MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

To the Honorable Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and to ail parties of record:

I, Nelson Willis, plaintiff in the above-captioned case, hereby submit this secondary notification to bring

to the Court s attention the continued malicious prosecution that I am experiencing at the hands of

Defendants Richard A. lmer and Meghann Reeves.

On December 22, 2023, Defendants re-filed the petition for a protective order against me in Case No.

04:23-cv-00732 in this honorable court. This action mirrors their previous attempts in the 235th District

Court of Texas, Cooke County, presided over by Judge Janelle M. Haverkamp. These repeated efforts to

obtain a protective order against Plaintyiff are without merit and seek to suppress Plaintiff's legitimate

concerns regarding multiple fraudulent activities by AMC Theatres and its executives, including CEO

Adam Aron.

As of June 15, 2023, at 7:00 AM, when I was served with the petition for the protective order, I have

ceased all communication with CEO Adam Aron. Since that time, I have not initiated any contact with

him or any other AMC representative, respecting the court's indication that further communication was

unwelcome.

It is crucial to note that Plaintiff's communication with AMC's CEO and Investor Relations prior to June

15, 2023, was a direct response to the grave charges of fraud, illegal shareholder voting, an pernicious

financial engineering committed by the CEO and the board of directors, and the vile conduct of a

perverted sexual nature involving the sending of sexually explicit images of himself being by

another figure and sending them to a purported 17 year old Russian Ballerina named Mia. Had Ms.

Sakoya Blackwood been a FBI Agent, this pervert CEO would have been arrested. As a matter of fact, he

shoul still be arrested for this act. Did the board remove him as CEO? No. Why? Because they're

compromised.

At no point was Plaintiff legally advised or directed to cease communication with these parties, nor was

Plaintiff informed of any lawful restrictions in the communications with them until process was served

on Plaintiff during the early hours of June 15, 2023.

Moreover, Plaintiff's emails to AMC's CEO and Investor Relations, were expressions of intent to pursue

legal actions against defendant and other implicated parties for their pernicious financial criminal

activities. In these emails, Plaintiff made a direct promise to this pervert CEO that Plaintiff, would see

defendant, penniless and in prison . And this is a promise Plaintiff intends to keep.

These communications were made in the context of whistleblowing and exercising Plaintiff's rights

under the First Amendment to express contempt and demand accountability for their crimes.

Case 4:23-cv-00732-ALM-KPJ Document 54 Filed 06/24/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1034
Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully reiterate that this case is not about the content or tone of Plaintiff s

emails but rather about the serious crimes and ethical breaches committed by AMC's leadershi , which

continue to harm shareholders and undermine the integrity of corporate governance. Plaintiff s promise

to prosecute in those emails reflects Plaintiff's commitment to seeking justice and accountability

through le al means.

In light of these ongoing developments and the continued malicious prosecution, Plaintiff requests the

Court's attention and vigilance in ensuring fair roceedings and upholding Plaintiff's rights under the

Constitution and applicable laws.

And lastly, but certainly not the least, if Plaintiff's emails were such a threat, this CEO, who did in fact

email me on April 3, 2023 at 3:07 AM (SEE EXHIBIT A) and specifically claims and Plaintiff quotes, this is

your fifth hate field email this week very impressive. I hope your parents are alive to see your hateful

emails not that I wish harm on anyone. 

Plaintiff, felt endangered for himself and his sisters from this out of left field email from the defendant.

Plaintiff's parents are deceased.

Defendant had Plaintiff s email address, actual name, not a pseudonym. He could've responded with a

warning or a declaration of harassment, but he did nothing until Plaintiff sent the SEC an email.

If this had been a basketball court, instead of the 235th District Court of Texas and the Paul Brown

courthouse United States, District Court, Eastern District of Texas Sherman division , Plaintiff's emails

would've been considered trash talk, and nothing more. There is not one lie in Plaintiff's emails.

The bottom line is this hedge fund mole CEO received thousands of hateful emails from shareholders

that have been ripped off and had 90% of their shares stolen and we are calling him out and he comes

after Plaintiff? This defendant enriched himself and his two sons over the last 3 years by approximately

$300 million US Dollars off the exploitation of shareholders. In the words of Jim Cramer, If you've never

met Adam Aron, you are in for a real treat. Not only is Adam a wonderful person he is one CEO WHO

KNOWS HOW TO USE A SHAREHOLDER-BASE FOR FUN AND FOR PROFITS. 

Then he pays himself $25 million dollar bonuses for destroying the share price and rigging shareholder

votes.

Respectfully- ubmitted,

Nelson Willis

Plaintiff, Pro Se

Case 4:23-cv-00732-ALM-KPJ Document 54 Filed 06/24/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1035
United States District Court

Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division

NELSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ADAM . ARON,

Defendant

Case No.: 4:23-CV-732-AL -KPJ

Certificate of Ser ice

I, Nelson Willis, hereby certify that on June 24, 2024, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document

was, by filing with the Clerk Of The Court, sent via electronically mail to the parties that are registered

or otherwise entitled to receive electronic notices in this case pursuant to the Electronic Filing

Procedures in this District.

Pro Se Litigant

Case 4:23-cv-00732-ALM-KPJ Document 54 Filed 06/24/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1036