T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J UA N R I C AR DO P AMAT Z - L UQ UI N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74667 A ge nc yN o. A 071- 945- 716 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J ua n R i c a r do P a m a t z - L uqui n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( I J ) d e n ia l o f h is ap p lic a tio n f

o rc a n c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. W e d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED JU L 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that P a m a tz - L u q u in f

a ile dto s h o w e x c e p tio n a l a n de x tr e m e lyu n u s u a l h a r d s h ip to h is U .S . c itiz e n c h ild r e n . 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ; Mendez- Castro v. Mukasey , 55 2 F . 3d 97 5, 97 9 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). P a m a t z - L uqui n c ont e nds tha tthe br e vi tyof the I J ’ s e xpl a na t i on of

the h a r d s h ip d e te rm in a tio n in h e rd e c is io n , a s w e ll a s h e rf a ilu r e to e x p r e s s lya rtic u la te tha tthe doc um e nt a rye vi de nc e w a s c um ul a t i ve l yc ons i de r e d, e s t abl i s he s tha tthe agencydi d n otful l y c on si der the hardshi p evi dence or consi der i ti n the aggregat e. W e d is a g r e e . T h e r e c o r dr e f le c ts th a t P a m a tz - L u q u in w a s g iv e n a n o p p o rtu n ityto pres entevi dence atthe IJhear i ng and thatthe IJw as aw ar e of thi s e vi dence w hen s h e r e n d e r e dh e rd e c is io n . P a m a tz - L u q u in a ls o c o n te n d s th e B o a r dd idn o t f u lly c o n s i d e rth e h a r d s h i p e v i d e n c e b e c au s e th e B o a r d ’ s d e c i s i o n r e f e r e n c e s o n l ytwo of pet i t i on er ’ s three chi l dren. W e di sa gree , because the re cord ref l ec t s the B oard w as fa m il iar w ith th e r ec o rd an dall ev id en ce th er ein w h en itag re ed w ith th e I J’s hardshi p d et erm i nat i on . A cc ordi ng l y, P am atz- L uq ui n’ s c on t ent i on s do n otra i se a c o lo r ab le d u e p r o c e s s c la im . See M art i nez- R osas v. G on zales , 424 F . 3d 926, 930 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). P am atz- L uq ui n’ s c on t ent i on , thatthe IJappl i ed an i m prop erl egal st andard to th e h a r d s h ip a n a ly s is , is u n e x h au s te d . Se e O n t i v e r o s -Lo p ezv . I NS , 213 F . 3d3

1 1 2 1 , 1 1 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . M o r e v e r , th is c o n te n tio n d o e s n o t r a is e ac o lo r ab le du e proces s c l ai m , w hen the re cord show s the IJac tual l y app l i ed the prop er s t a nda r d i n de t e rm i ni ng the e vi de nc e i n the r e c or d di d note s t abl i s h e xc e pt i ona l a nd e x tr e m e lyu n u s u a l h a r d s h ip . Se e M ar t i nez - R os as , 424 F . 3d a t930. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.