alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Brad Hunter SMITH, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 18-8002.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

*2667Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000911217
<NAME> ESSEX HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATES III L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              61
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          11,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                     878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         734<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,072
<SALES>                                          1,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,124
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (26)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (26)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (26)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (6)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (6)<F3>
<FN>
<F1>UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET USED
<F2>EQUITY IS PARTNERS' CAPITAL
<F3>ENTITY IS A PARTNERSHIP, EPS IS LOSS PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners.

No. 18-557.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 6, 2018.

The respondents are directed to file a response to the petition on or before 5 *476p.m., Tuesday, November 13, 2018. Petitioners may file a reply brief on or before 2 p.m., Thursday, November 15, 2018. *Amicus curiae* briefs may be filed on or before 5 p.m., Tuesday, November 13, 2018.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Frampton DURBAN, Jr.

No. D-3041.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Frampton Durban, Jr., of Newberry, South Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connectionwith the Annual Report of ARS Networks, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form10-KSB for the period ended January 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Mark Miziolek, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                   The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Mark Miziolek                                                                 Mark Miziolek, Chief FinancialOfficer and TreasurerDate: April 30, 2004
George Adrien BROOKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5164.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH
CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191
<INVENTORY>                                     51,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,557
<PP&E>                                          65,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,327
<BONDS>                                          7,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,782
<SALES>                                        271,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,841
<CGS>                                          235,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,686
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
Ernest Marquis FLOWERS, petitioner, v. Laura URIARTE, et al.

No. 18-8491.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Joel CHAVIRA-NUNEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5615.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
#### MARIE SCHNITZIUS v. FISHER PAPER BOX COMPANY.1

May 28, 1909.

Nos. 16,097—(116).

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $5,050 damages for injuries received while working in defendant’s factory. The answer stated that the injuries were caused by plaintiff’s negligence or the negligence of a fellow servant. The case was tried before Holt, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendant. Prom an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, she appealed.

Affirmed.

*Bdward M. Bash*and *Dodge é Tautges,*for appellant.

*Price Wichersham,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 121 N. W. 1134.

Per Curiam.

Action for personal injuries, in which, after plaintiff had rested her case, the court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial. A careful examination of the record discloses no evidence of negligence on the part of defendant, and the action of the court below was therefore proper. A discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose as a precedent, and we content ourselves with the statement that it has been fully considered with the result stated. The rule of res ipsa loquitur has no application to the facts presented.

Order affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7595** 

CHRISTOPHER MARSHALL , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00568

- RBH )

Submitted : January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Marshall seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or jud ge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court den ies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Mill er - El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the deni al of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marshall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauper is, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AT JUNE 30, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            53,554
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           52,362
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      12,704
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 122,268
<CASH>                                           4,361
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              16,920
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           8,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,415
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 77,976
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             34,733
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  9,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,415
<PREMIUMS>                                      43,933
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,925
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 109
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      27,607
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     11,971
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,620
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Anna PEZHMAN, petitioner, v. CHANEL, et al.

No. 18-402.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Wilton Eugene SANDIFER, Sr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6076.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Vari-L Company, Inc.


     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the
financial statements of Vari-L Company, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and
1998 and for the years then ended in the Company's Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 33-88666), (No. 33-81045), (No. 333-81915), and (No. 333-
45137) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-25173).




                                   /s/Haugen, Springer & Co., P.C.
                                   HAUGEN, SPRINGER & CO., P.C.

March 29, 2000
Michael MARRANCA, petitioner, v. Valery LOYTSKER.

No. 17-1571.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Oscar RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M9.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY L. BILLINGER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 45 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Miguel Anthony MOLINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5745.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned, James L. Busby, Chief Financial Officer of Aviva Petroleum Inc.
(the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report").

The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
9th day of August 2002.


                          /s/ James L. Busby
                          -----------------------------------------------------
                          James L. Busby
                          Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                          (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

h0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147951

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147951

COA: 315498

Wayne CC: 99

- 001344

- FC

ANTHONY G. HUNT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Mario Govan EMMANUEL, petitioner, v. TERRITORY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

No. 18-6179.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                              QUALITY DINING, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Quality Dining, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel B.
Fitzpatrick, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

_/s/ Daniel B. Fitzpatrick
--------------------------
Daniel B. Fitzpatrick
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
February 15, 2005

                                       98
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH Cir. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20044 

Conference Calendar

 

THOMAS P. BUDNICK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-3332

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Thomas P. Budnick appeals the district court’s dismissal, as

frivolous, of his in forma pauperis (IFP) complaint against the

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). We have

reviewed the record and Budnick’s brief and find no reversible

error. See Budnick v. Nat’l Aeronautics and Space Admin., No. H97-CV-3332 (S.D. Tex., Dec. 19, 1997). The appeal is DISMISSED

as frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Budnick’s motion is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted), Linda H. Masterson, Chief Executive Officer of
LifePoint, Inc. (the "Company"), and Craig S. Montesanti, Chief Accounting
Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their
knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "PERIODIC
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 12th,
day of August, 2004.

                             /s/ Linda H. Masterson
                             ----------------------
                             Linda H. Masterson
                             President and Chief Executive Officer


                            /s/ Craig S. Montesanti
                            -----------------------
                            Craig S. Montesanti
                            Chief Accounting Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

RANDY KELLY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv154

ZENA STEPHENS, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Randy Kelly, an inmate at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility located in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action without prejudice. 

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address

provided to the Court. The copy of the Report mailed to Plaintiff was returned to the Court as

undeliverable. Plaintiff, however, has failed to provide the Court with a new address at which

he may be contacted. As of this date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation of United

States Magistrate Judge have been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A separate

Case 1:23-cv-00154-MJT-CLS Document 9 Filed 12/06/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
Final Judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendations.

2

Case 1:23-cv-00154-MJT-CLS Document 9 Filed 12/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22