alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.3








Certification
of Senior Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  November
10, 2008







/s/ Larry Hannappel


Larry
Hannappel


Senior
Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation 
Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required) and NIAID SBIR 
Phase II Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U44 
Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: June 14, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G76, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marci Scidmore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of Allergy & 
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Room 3G76, Bethesda, MD 20892, (240) 627-3255, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f121e0d1c16510c1c161b12100d1a3f11161751181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="204d415243490e534349444d4f5245604e49480e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 13, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10666 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Joseph WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Tamyra JARVIS, Warden.

No. 17-7974.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1




PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS                KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN
                                      TRADE TOWER, 25 HAMERED STREET
                                      TEL AVIV 68125, ISRAEL
                                      TEL:  +-972-3-7954555
                                      FAX: +-972-3-7954556

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-12608 and 333-13716 and
333-102247) of Delta Galil Industries Ltd. of our report dated June 16, 2004
relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
TEL AVIV, ISRAEL
JUNE 16, 2004
Robert H. GRAY, petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17-1679.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See *United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
#### CHARLES SPURR v. GEORGE SPURR.1

May 14, 1909.

Nos. 16,084—(70).

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $512.50, alleged to have been paid defendant upon fraudulent representations. The case was tried Before Hallam, J., who made findings in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the findings and decision, it appealed.

Affirmed.

*O. D. & R. D. O’Brien,*for appellant.

*Owen Morris,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 121 N. W. 121.

Pee Cubiam.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey denying his motion to set aside its decision and findings. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor certificate of the trial judge that the record contains everything offered or considered on the hearing of the motion, nor the certificate of the clerk of the district court that the return contains a true and correct transcript of all the records and files in the action.

Held, following Hospes v. Northwestern Mnfg. & Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 43 N. W. 180, that the order appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2037
In Re: ELDRIDGE HARMON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-99-1814-8) Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eldridge Harmon, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eldridge Harmon has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to challenge the district court’s order transferring his action to the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (1994). The proper cause of action to challenge the transfer is for Harmon to file a motion in the District Court for the District of Columbia and to transfer the case to the Maryland district court, and appeal to any adverse ruling to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals once the district court enters a final order.Because Harmon has failed to demonstrate a clear and undisputable right to relief, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35-36 (1980) (per curiam); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) filed by The Hain Celestial Group,
Inc. (the Company) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Irwin D. Simon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 10, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Irwin D. Simon                   
|Irwin D. Simon                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



29
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Medifast, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. McDevitt,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





By:
              /s/ Michael S. McDevittMichael
      S. McDevittChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      9, 2010





By:
              /s/ Brendan N. ConnorsBrendan
      N. ConnorsChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      9, 2010
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Tavares,
hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, of API Technologies Corp. for the year ended November
30, 2015; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: March 24, 2016

|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Robert E. Tavares                                  
|Robert E. Tavares
President and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00034-CR

Eddie Calvin Dorris, II

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1166471D)

February 14, 2013

Opinion by Justice McCoy

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By_________________________________

 Justice Bob McCoy
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00034-CR

NO. 02-12-00035-CR

EDDIE CALVIN DORRIS, II APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant Eddie Calvin Dorris II appeals his two convictions for assault 

after the trial court revoked his deferred adjudication community supervision,

adjudicated him guilty of both offenses, and sentenced him to ten years’ 

confinement in each case concurrently but consecutive to his sentence for a third 

assault conviction.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
3

Dorris’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw 

as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet 

the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 

U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Dorris had the opportunity to file a pro se brief

and has done so; the State has not filed a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and Dorris’s pro se 

brief. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without 

merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See 

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also 

Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we 

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BOB MCCOY

JUSTICE
4

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MCCOY and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 14, 2013
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/29/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      138,459
COMMITMENTS
  36,230   21,951   14,396   70,737   74,847  121,363  111,194   17,096   27,265

CHANGES FROM 05/22/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        909)
     296   -3,726      259   -1,506    2,521     -951     -946    1,860    1,855

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.2     15.9     10.4     51.1     54.1     87.7     80.3     12.3     19.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      154)
      34       44       37       55       58      114      117
```

----

Updated June 5, 2012
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Trust. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/                Randall D. Holmes                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                                                                    | Randall              D. Holmes |
| Title:            | Chief              Executive Officer (Principal                Executive Officer) |
| Dated:                                                                   |  December              13, 2007 |
|                                                                     |
|                                                                     |
|                                                                     |
|  /s/                Jeffrey H. Strasberg                            |
| Name:                                                                    | Jeffrey              H. Strasberg |
| Title:                                                                   | Executive              Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| Dated:                                                                   | December              13, 2007 |

----
**Exhibit 23**
**Consent of Auditors
******KRAFT, MILES & TATUM, LLCCERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
-----------------------------------------

1650 WEST HARPER, POPLAR BLUFF, MISSOURI 63901-4196(573) 785-6438FAX  (573) 785-0114

Consent of Independent Accountants

We have issued our report dated July 25, 2001, accompanying the Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated byreference in the Annual Report of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2001.We hereby consent to the incorporation of reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Southern MissouriBancorp, Inc. on the Form S-8 (File No. 333-2320, effective March 13, 1996.)

/s/ Kraft, Miles & Tatum, LLC
Kraft, Miles & Tatum, LLCPoplar Bluff, MissouriSeptember 27, 2001****
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 13,
2011

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS
Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-3
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                      TO
                            JDN REALTY CORPORATION
                           1993 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN


     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO JDN REALTY CORPORATION 1993 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
(the "Amendment") is adopted effective as of the 8th day of November, 2000, by
JDN Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the "Company").

          WHEREAS, effective December 17, 1993, as amended and restated
effective May 19, 1999, the Company established the JDN Realty Corporation
Incentive Stock Plan (the "Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in accordance with
Section 10.6 of the Plan as set forth herein.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of
the date first written above, as follows:

          1.   Amendment to Plan.  The first sentence of section 6.2 of the Plan
               -----------------
is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

               6.2  An Award shall be exercisable on the date of grant or on any
          other date established by the Committee or provided for in an
          Agreement; provided, however, that unless otherwise provided in an
          Agreement, Awards granted to officers or directors subject to Section
          16 of the Exchange Act shall not be exercisable, and restrictions on
          Restricted Stock shall not lapse, until at least six months after the
          Award is granted.

          2.   Definitions.  Unless otherwise defined herein, terms shall have
               -----------
the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

          3.   Governing Law.  The Amendment shall be construed in accordance
               -------------
with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Maryland.

          4.   Other Provisions.  Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall
               ----------------
remain unmodified and in full force and effect.
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has adopted this Amendment No. 1
to JDN Realty Corporation 1993 Incentive Stock Plan on the day and year first
above written.

                                    JDN REALTY CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ Craig Macnab
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer
Timothy WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5930.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Lan Tu TRINH, petitioner, v. Kathleen Lien TRINH.

No. 17-9306.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1959 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1959

To designate the Federal building located at 743 East Durango Boulevard 
  in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Adrian A. Spears Judicial Training 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1999

 Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 743 East Durango Boulevard 
  in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Adrian A. Spears Judicial Training 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 743 East Durango Boulevard in San 
Antonio, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Adrian A. Spears 
Judicial Training Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to reference to the ``Adrian A. Spears 
Judicial Training Center''.
                                 <all>
```
Robert R. SNYDER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.

No. 18-171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Thaddeus JONES, et al., petitioners, v. Michelle MARKIEWICZ-QUALKINBUSH, et al.

No. 18-336.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.