alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1








Certification of Co Chief Executive Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  May 10, 2010








/s/ Erwin Haitzmann


Erwin Haitzmann


Co Chief Executive Officer
Francisco MELGAR-CABRERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6302.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.16


 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


 


THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
is made, executed and delivered as of the 5th day of November 2018, by and between Jacoby & Co. Inc., a Nevada corporation
(“Assignor”), Warehouse Goods LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), and
Aaron LoCascio (“Executive”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, Assignor is party to an
employment agreement dated October 28, 2015 with Executive (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, in accordance with Section
7(a) of the Employment Agreement, Assignor desires to assign all of its right, title and interest in and to the Employment Agreement
to Assignee; and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive wishes to
work for Assignee under the terms of the Employment Agreement.


 


WITNESSETH, THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION
of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby bargains, sells, assigns and transfers unto Assignee, its successors and assigns, all
of Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to and under the Employment Agreement.


 


TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto
Assignee, its successors and assigns from and after the date hereof for all the rest of the term of such Employment Agreement (and
any renewals, extensions and other options therein contained), subject to the covenants, conditions and provisions therein contained.


 


ASSIGNEE HEREBY assumes and agrees
to perform any and all liabilities and obligations under the Employment Agreement.


 


EXECUTIVE HEREBY consents to the
assignments of the Employment Agreement to Assignee and agrees to perform services for Assignee pursuant to the terms of the Employment
Agreement. From and after the date hereof, Executive shall look only to Assignee for performance under the Employment Agreement.


 


This Agreement shall inure to the benefit
of and be binding upon Assignor, Assignee and Executive and their respective successors and assigns.


 


This instrument is subject to the terms
and conditions of the Employment Agreement and shall be governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware
without regard to conflicts of law principles.


 






    1


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending
to be legally bound hereby, Assignor, Assignee, and Executive have caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be executed
and delivered by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.


 





	 	ASSIGNOR
	 	 	 	 
	 	JACOBY
    & CO. INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	Adam
                                         Schoenfeld



	 	 	Name:	Adam
                                         Schoenfeld




	 	 	Title:	CSO
	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE
	 	 	 	 
	 	WAREHOUSE
    GOODS LLC
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Adam Schoenfeld
	 	 	Name:	Adam
                                         Schoenfeld




	 	 	Title:	CSO
	 	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Aaron LoCascio
	 	 	Name:	Aaron
                                         LoCascio






   






    2
Kazim Oladotun Oyenuga

12255 W. University Drive #505

Frisco TX 75033

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

101 E. PECAN ST., SUITE 112

SHERMAN, TEXAS 75090

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

M

¦R

¦ TT

' T'O ¦ S ETO

n o 

PITNEY BOWES

02 ip $ 000.84 

000091 7696 MAY 02 2023

MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 75090

Case 4:23-cv-00389-ALM-AGD Document 12 Filed 09/18/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 50
CHIEFTAIN ROYALTY COMPANY, petitioner, v. Charles David NUTLEY, et al.

No. 18-301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
(111 So. 62)

No. 28099.

#### STATE v. Joseph B. FIFE and Walter W. Fife.* In re Joseph B. and Walter W. FIFE, Praying for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

(Nov. 29, 1926.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 3, 1927.)

Donelson Caffery and Anna C. McCay, both of New Orleans, for relators.

T. S. Walmsley, Eugene D. Saunders, and G. B. Harrison, Jr., all of New Orleans, for the State.

*

 Judgment affirmed 47 S. Ct. —, 71 L. Ed. —.

OVERTON, J.

Relators herein, who are the defendants in the case of Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Joseph B. Fife and Walter W. Fife, 111 So. 58,1 No. 26S44, this day decided, were ruled into the-civil district court for the parish of Orleans, for contempt of court, for violating the writ of injunction which issued in that case, and were found guilty and sentenced to jail. For the purpose of obtaining their freedom, they applied to us for a writ of habeas corpus. Their application is based upon the alleged unconstitutionality of Act 56 of 1914, as amended by Act 54 of 1918, their contention being that, since the act, as amended, is unconstitutional, the writ of injunction that issued to enforce it is null, and, since the injunction is null, and was issued without authority, it was not a contempt to violate it. The grounds of unconstitutionality set, forth in their application are identical with those considered in the case of the Louisiana state board of medical examiners against them.. Since we have decided those grounds adversely to them in the case cited, holding that the act, as amended, is constitutional, relators are not entitled to relief under the writ of habeas corpus that issued herein.

For the reasons assigned, relators’ demand is rejected, and the writ is discharged.

1

 Ante, p. 681.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2071 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2071

   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the 
                textile industry and in water treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the 
                textile industry and in water treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``     9902.61.00     Phosphonic acid    Free        No change          No change          On or before 12/
                       [[(phosphonometh                                                     31/2001           ''
                       yl)                                                                                     .
                       imino]bis[2,1-
                       ethane-
                       diylnitrilobis
                       (methylene)]tetr
                       akis- (CAS No.
                       15827-60-8)
                       (provided for in
                       subheading
                       2931.00.9030)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Jackie Lee O'NEAL, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1791 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1791

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for harming 
                animals used in Federal law enforcement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1999

 Mr. Weller (for himself, Mr. Rothman, and Mr. Chabot) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for harming 
                animals used in Federal law enforcement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Animal 
Protection Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. HARMING ANIMALS USED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement
    ``(a) Whoever willfully harms any police animal, or attempts to 
conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not 
more than one year. If the offense disables or disfigures the animal, 
or causes the death of the animal, the maximum term of imprisonment 
shall be 10 years.
    ``(b) In this section, the term `police animal' means a dog or 
horse employed by a Federal agency (whether in the executive, 
legislative, or judicial branch) for the principal purpose of aiding in 
the detection of criminal activity, enforcement of laws, or 
apprehension of criminal offenders''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement.''.
                                 <all>
```
Samuel David SILVA-RAMIREZ, petitioner, v. HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, et al.

No. 18-186.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2065 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2065

         To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Neal of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on instant print film.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``     9902.37.01      Instant print film  2.4%         No change         No change         On or before 12/
                        for color                                                            31/2004          ''
                        photography                                                                            .
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3701.20.0030)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-32

'

KYLE MACKENZIE RINGER, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Kyle Mackenzie Ringer, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00032-MAC-CLS Document 25 Filed 08/02/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 58
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C § 922(n) 

(Illegal Receipt of a Firearm by a Person Under Indictment).

Case 1:23-cr-00032-MAC-CLS Document 25 Filed 08/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 59
Calvin WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. SAMSON RESOURCES CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-5661.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
M.E.D., petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY.

No. 18-6152.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
Tiffany A. PRINCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
G. David JANG, petitioner, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, et al.

No. 17-1332.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Celestino QUINTANA, petitioner, v. Matthew HANSEN, et al.

No. 18-5486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
In Re Steven D. TURNER, Jr., petitioner.

No. 18-5955.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.
Darren K. BYLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5942.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

*433Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Batu SHAKARI, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, et al.

No. 18-1135.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/19/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       72,882
COMMITMENTS
  16,554      353    5,252   51,076   67,277   72,882   72,882        0        0

CHANGES FROM 06/12/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -816)
    -335        0      202     -683   -1,018     -816     -816        0        0

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.7      0.5      7.2     70.1     92.3    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       4        4        4        9       11       14       18
```

----

Updated June 22, 2012
Eric Londrey GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8260.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew L. Graham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ANDREW L. GRAHAM                                                                 
|Andrew L. Graham Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Accounting Officer)

May 12, 2009

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



31
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20666

Summary Calendar

DIETER M. FINCH

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON

,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12

- CV

- 3676

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See 5 th Cir. R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH

C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

July 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk Case: 13-20666 Document: 00512690312 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         118,190
<SECURITIES>                                   104,175
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               307,261
<PP&E>                                          52,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                     286,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,323
<SALES>                                        117,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,067
<CGS>                                           71,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,321)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>