alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 209 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                       October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
209) entitled ``An Act to improve the ability of Federal agencies to 
license federally owned inventions.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 21, after line 2, insert:

SEC. 11. TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS OMBUDSMAN.

    (a) Appointment of Ombudsman.--The Secretary of Energy shall direct 
the director of each national laboratory of the Department of Energy, 
and may direct the director of each facility under the jurisdiction of 
the Department of Energy, to appoint a technology partnership ombudsman 
to hear and help resolve complaints from outside organizations 
regarding the policies and actions of each such laboratory or facility 
with respect to technology partnerships (including cooperative research 
and development agreements), patents, and technology licensing.
    (b) Qualifications.--An ombudsman appointed under subsection (a) 
shall be a senior official of the national laboratory or facility who 
is not involved in day-to-day technology partnerships, patents, or 
technology licensing, or, if appointed from outside the laboratory or 
facility, function as such a senior official.
    (c) Duties.--Each ombudsman appointed under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) serve as the focal point for assisting the public and 
        industry in resolving complaints and disputes with the national 
        laboratory or facility regarding technology partnerships, 
        patents, and technology licensing;
            (2) promote the use of collaborative alternative dispute 
        resolution techniques such as mediation to facilitate the 
        speedy and low-cost resolution of complaints and disputes, when 
        appropriate; and
            (3) report quarterly on the number and nature of complaints 
        and disputes raised, along with the ombudsman's assessment of 
        their resolution, consistent with the protection of 
        confidential and sensitive information, to--
                    (A) the Secretary;
                    (B) the Administrator for Nuclear Security;
                    (C) the Director of the Office of Dispute 
                Resolution of the Department of Energy; and
                    (D) the employees of the Department responsible for 
                the administration of the contract for the operation of 
                each national laboratory or facility that is a subject 
                of the report, for consideration in the administration 
                and review of that contract.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 209

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4642-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Iowa; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-4642-DR), dated February 23, 2022, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on May 2, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Andrew P. 
Meyer, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.

    This action terminates the appointment of DuWayne Tewes as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-10232 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

899 

KA 13-00584 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALLEN FARMER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOHN C. TUNNEY OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W.

Latham, J.), rendered February 15, 2006. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10

[1]), defendant contends that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily,

and intelligently entered. We note at the outset that we agree with

defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid because,

inter alia, County Court “improperly conflate[d] the waiver of the

right to appeal with those rights automatically forfeited by a guilty

plea” (People v Bentley, 63 AD3d 1624, 1625, lv denied 13 NY3d 742;

see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 893; People v Campbell, 62 AD3d 1265,

1266, lv denied 13 NY3d 795). Nevertheless, “[a]lthough defendant’s

contention that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and

intelligently entered thus is not precluded by the invalid waiver, he

failed to preserve that contention for our review inasmuch as he did

not move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction”

(People v Jones, 118 AD3d 1354, 1354, lv denied 24 NY3d 961; see

People v Wilson, 117 AD3d 1476, 1477). Defendant likewise failed to

preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of

the plea allocution (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665), and this

case does not fall within the rare exception to the preservation rule

(see id. at 666). In addition, defendant failed to preserve for our

review his contention that the court erred in failing to assign him

new counsel inasmuch as defendant informed the court that he was

attempting to retain new counsel but never sought substitution of his

assigned counsel (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, defendant failed

to show good cause for substitution of his assigned attorney inasmuch
-2- 899 

KA 13-00584 

as his objections to his assigned counsel were vague and

unsubstantiated (see People v Linares, 2 NY3d 507, 511; see also

People v Santiago, 111 AD3d 1383, 1384, lv denied 23 NY3d 1025). 

Finally, although defendant’s invalid waiver of the right to

appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of his

sentence (see e.g. People v Davis, 114 AD3d 1166, 1167, lv denied 23

NY3d 1035; People v Williams, 46 AD3d 1424, 1425), we reject that

challenge.

Entered: October 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/08/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       59,577
COMMITMENTS
   9,455    3,142      180   44,800   53,377   54,435   56,699    5,142    2,878

CHANGES FROM 05/01/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,342)
     603      380       84      -98     -225      589      239      753    1,103

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.9      5.3      0.3     75.2     89.6     91.4     95.2      8.6      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
       8        4        1       28       31       37       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/08/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       85,365
COMMITMENTS
  16,384    3,776      331   57,895   77,008   74,610   81,115   10,755    4,250

CHANGES FROM 05/01/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        737)
      44      131       26       51      329      121      486      616      251

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.2      4.4      0.4     67.8     90.2     87.4     95.0     12.6      5.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      21        8        4       37       37       59       48
```

----

Updated May 11, 2012
Richard ASHBAUGH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1304.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/31/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      440,823
COMMITMENTS
  34,583   30,950  123,614  265,294  273,163  423,491  427,727   17,332   13,096

CHANGES FROM 07/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,176)
    -943   -3,292    5,135    5,657   10,740    9,849   12,583      327   -2,407

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.8      7.0     28.0     60.2     62.0     96.1     97.0      3.9      3.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      32       26       53       68       67      128      125
```

----

Updated August 3, 2012
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7075

OSCAR A. VILLARREAL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LEON DIXON, MD, Nottoway Correctional Center Physician; DAVID CALL, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center; ORTHO VIRGINIA, Contract Practitioner , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv - 00447

- MHL

- EWH )

Submitted : December 21 , 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Oscar Alejandro Villarreal, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7075 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Oscar A. Villarreal appeals the district court’s order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Villarreal ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s
order s
. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7075 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Extensions, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10K, for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Crawford  Shaw, the chief executive officer of the company hereby certify as
of  the  date  hereof, solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my  knowledge:


     (i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K, of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  June 18, 2009

/s/  Crawford  Shaw
-------------------
Crawford  Shaw
Principal  Executive  Officer  and  Director
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1712

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize an estrogenic

substances screening program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1999

Mr. STUPAK (for himself, Mrs. LOWEY, and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce,

and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to

authorize an estrogenic substances screening program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTROGENIC SUBSTANCES SCREENING PRO4 GRAM.

5 Title III of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act

6 (33 U.S.C. 1311–1330) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following:
2

•HR 1712 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 321. ESTROGENIC SUBSTANCES SCREENING PRO2 GRAM.

3 ‘‘In addition to the substances referred to in section

4 408(p)(3)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

5 Act (21 U.S.C. 346a(p)(3)(B)) or in section 1457 of the

6 title XIV of the Public Health Service Act (commonly

7 known as the ‘‘Safe Drinking Water Act’’) (42 U.S.C.

8 300j–17), the Administrator may provide for testing under

9 the screening program authorized by section 408(p) of the

10 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, in accordance

11 with the provisions of section 408(p) of such Act, of any

12 other substance that may be found in discharges of pollut13 ants into navigable waters if the Administrator determines

14 that a substantial population may be exposed to such sub15 stance.’’.

Æ
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       63,901
COMMITMENTS
   9,922    2,541        0   49,921   58,311   59,843   60,852    4,058    3,049

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,323)
   1,173       58        0   -1,780   -1,875     -607   -1,817     -716      494

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    15.5      4.0      0.0     78.1     91.3     93.6     95.2      6.4      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       67)
      10        3        0       33       31       43       34
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      121,240
COMMITMENTS
  21,877   19,976    1,605   86,503   95,488  109,985  117,069   11,255    4,171

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,004)
  -1,516      994       29    4,707    1,074    3,220    2,097   -1,216      -93

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.0     16.5      1.3     71.3     78.8     90.7     96.6      9.3      3.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      129)
      39       12        6       56       41       97       57
```

----

Updated November 26, 2012
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metabolic Research, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended, December 31, 2009, (the "Report"), I, Robert Bakker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: October 11, 2009
By:
/s/  Robert BakkerRobert BakkerChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer













This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Dean LOREN, petitioner, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-5925.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 
NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          58,576
<SECURITIES>                                    35,324
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,287
<PP&E>                                         263,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 512,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,409
<BONDS>                                        217,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     198,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   512,798
<SALES>                                         18,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,703
<CGS>                                           13,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,276
<INCOME-TAX>                                       398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   789.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   789.17
        

</TABLE>
Sharonell FULTON, et al., applicants, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 18A118.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 30, 2018.

Application for injunctive relief presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied.

Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the application.