alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/03/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       58,819
COMMITMENTS
   5,566    2,426    7,822   45,431   48,571   58,819   58,819        0        0

CHANGES FROM 12/27/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:          .)
       .        .        .        .        .        .        .        .        .

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.5      4.1     13.3     77.2     82.6    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       5        3        5        6       10       11       18
```

----

Updated January 6, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      19,130,440
<SECURITIES>                                   500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,752,340
<PP&E>                                         474,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204,202
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,046,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,381,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                    52,222,909
<OTHER-SE>                                (38,557,808)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,046,218
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,715,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,396,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,396,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/10/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      425,007
COMMITMENTS
  38,248   49,765   86,930  273,408  267,409  398,586  404,104   26,421   20,903

CHANGES FROM 04/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,681)
     963    6,490     -943    6,600    1,234    6,620    6,781    6,061    5,900

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.0     11.7     20.5     64.3     62.9     93.8     95.1      6.2      4.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      127)
      26       30       35       64       58      113      103
```

----

Updated April 13, 2012
#### NIKANNIS COMPANY and Another v. CITY OF DULUTH.1

May 21, 1909.

Nos. 16,139—(115).

Orders Not Appealable.

Neither an order for judgment nor an order denying a motion to amend the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law is appealable.

An assessment against the lots of appellants having been levied *84by the board of public works of Duluth for the repaving and improving of a certain street, an appeal from the assessment was taken to the district court for St. Louis county. The matter was heard before Cant, J., who made findings and ordered judgment confirming the assessment. Judgment was entered pursuant to the order. From an order refusing to grant their motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and from the order for judgment, the lot owners appealed.

Dismissed.

*A. E. McManus,*for appellants.

*Coryate 8. Wilson*and *E. M. Morgan,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 121 N. W. 212.

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order for judgment, and also from an order refusing to grant a motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law. An order for judgment is not appealable. Ryan v. Kranz, 25 Minn. 362; Croft v. Miller, 26 Minn. 317, 4 N. W. 45; St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318, 69 N. W. 1077.

An order denying a motion to amend the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law is not appealable. Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Ry. Co., 86 Minn. 509, 515, 91 N. W. 29, and cases cited.

Appeal dismissed.
In Re Andre Rene SCOTT, petitioner.

No. 18-8805.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

FERNANDA TORRES (7) 

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 4:21-CR-00047-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration 

of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge 

conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of 

Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court 

accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Fifth

Superseding Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Fernanda 

Torres GUILTY of Count Two of the Fifth Superseding Indictment, charging a violation of 

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) - Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering in violation of 

18 U.S.C. §§ 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), 1956(a)(2)(A) and 1956(a)(2)(B)(i). 

Case 4:21-cr-00047-JDK-KPJ Document 314 Filed 08/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1403
So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28th August, 2023.

Case 4:21-cr-00047-JDK-KPJ Document 314 Filed 08/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1404
POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL  PERSONS BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned,  Ralph O.
Hellmold,  appoints Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn,  and each of them, as
his true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  with full power to act and do all things
necessary,  advisable or  appropriate,  in their  discretion,  to execute on his
behalf as an  Independent  Trustee of Ridgewood  Electric  Power Trust II and of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 for each of the above-named  trusts,  and all amendments
or documents relating thereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 18th day of March, 2000, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

                                                    /s/Ralph O. Hellmold
                                                           Ralph O. Hellmold

<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the undersigned,  Jonathan C.
Kaledin,  appoints  Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn,  and each of them, as
his true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  with full power to act and do all things
necessary,  advisable or  appropriate,  in their  discretion,  to execute on his
behalf as an  Independent  Trustee of Ridgewood  Electric  Power Trust II and of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 for each of the above-named  trusts,  and all amendments
or documents relating thereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 18th day of March, 2000, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

                                                     /s/Jonathan C. Kaledin
                                                     Jonathan C. Kaledin
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned,  Joseph Ferrante,
Jr.,  appoints  Robert E. Swanson and Martin V. Quinn,  and each of them, as his
true and  lawful  attorneys-in-fact  with  full  power to act and do all  things
necessary,  advisable or  appropriate,  in their  discretion,  to execute on his
behalf as an  Independent  Trustee of Ridgewood  Electric  Power Trust II and of
Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III, the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 for each of the above-named  trusts,  and all amendments
or documents relating thereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
this 18th day of March, 2000, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

                                                     /s/ Joseph Ferrante, Jr.
                                                       Joseph Ferrante, Jr.
Exhibit 10.45

 

[***] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

AMENDMENT #4 TO

LICENSE AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment #4 to License Agreement is entered into the 23rd day of October, 2018,  between UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, having an office at 910 Madison Avenue, Suite 827, Memphis, Tennessee 38163 (“UTRF”), and GTx, Inc., a Delaware corporation located at 175 Toyota Plaza, 7th Floor, Memphis, TN 38103 (“LICENSEE”).

 

BACKGROUND

 

THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (“UTRF”) and LICENSEE  entered into a License Agreement dated as of March 1, 2015 (“LICENSE AGREEMENT”) with respect to Selective Androgen Receptor Degraders (“SARDs”);

 

WHEREAS, the UT Contributors have developed new SARDs and disclosed the same to UTRF;

 

WHEREAS, UTRF and LICENSEE would like to amend and modify the LICENSE  AGREEMENT to add the new material;

 

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that the LICENSE AGREEMENT is hereby amended, as  follows:

 

DEFINITIONS. Article 1.7 is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

 

1.7 “Invention Disclosures” means UTRF file numbers [***], submitted to UTRF on [***], [***], submitted to UTRF on [***], [***], submitted to UTRF on [***], [***], submitted to UTRF on [***], and [***], submitted to UTRF on [***].

 

APPENDIX A. Appendix A is hereby deleted in its entirety and Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, is substituted in lieu thereof.

 

ALL OTHER PROVISIONS shall remain in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first  written above.

 

	
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
    	
GTx, INC.
    
	
RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By: 
    	
/s/Richard Magid
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Henry P. Doggrell
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name: 
    	
Richard Magid
    	
 
    	
Name: 
    	
Henry P. Doggrell
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title: 
    	
Vice President
    	
 
    	
Title: 
    	
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
    	
November 15, 2018
    	
 
    	
Date: 
    	
November 13, 2018
    


 











 

APPENDIX A to LICENSE AGREEMENT between

 

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION

 

and GTx, Inc.

 

LICENSED PATENTS

 

	
[***]
    	
[***]
    	
[***]
    	
[***]
    	
[***]
    	
[***]
    	
[***]
    


 

(three pages omitted)

 




[***] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
HENRY SCHEIN, INC., et al., petitioners, v. ARCHER AND WHITE SALES INC.

No. 17-1272.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioners to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal granted.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 30383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10840]



[[Page 30381]]

Vol. 87

Wednesday,

No. 96

May 18, 2022

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2022-12 of May 12, 2022--Presidential 
Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87 , No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 30383]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2022-12 of May 12, 2022

                
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 
                1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary 
                of the Treas- ury[, and] the Secretary of Energy

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, after 
                carefully considering the reports submitted to the 
                Congress by the Energy Information Administration, 
                including the report submitted in April 2022, and other 
                relevant factors, including global economic conditions, 
                the level of spare capacity, and the availability of 
                strategic reserves, I determine, pursuant to section 
                1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112-
                81, and consistent with prior determinations, that 
                there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum 
                products from countries other than Iran to permit a 
                significant reduction in the volume of petroleum and 
                petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through 
                foreign financial institutions.

                I will continue to monitor this situation closely.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 12, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-10840
Filed 5-17-22; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors
Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc
Poplar Bluff, Missouri

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-2320)of the Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan of our report, dated July 16, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc and subsidiary as of June 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2004, which report appears in the June 30, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.

St. Louis, Missouri 
September 28, 2004
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 589

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CV-13-527

SALINE COUNTY JUDGE and AAC

RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES

APPELLANTS

V.

THOMAS CROUCH

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered October 23, 2013

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

COMMISSION

[NO. G110162]

AFFIRMED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

The Saline County Judge and AAC Risk Management Services appeal the Arkansas

Workers’ Compensation Commission’s order finding that Thomas Crouch suffered a

compensable injury and was entitled to additional medical treatment. Specifically, the

Commission ruled that Crouch, who had previously undergone back surgery, sustained a

compensable injury, while working for the Sardis Volunteer Fire Department, after he and

other firefighters lifted a small wall to put out a fire. At one point during his treatment for

the compensable injury, Crouch reported feeling a “pull” in his back after bending over to

pick up his son. The Commission determined that the physical therapist’s notes indicating

“decrease lumbar lordosis” constituted the necessary objective medical findings for a

compensable injury. The Commission also found that Crouch’s bending over to pick up his

son was not unreasonable conduct under the circumstances. Appellants argue that the

Commission’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence given the lack of objective
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 589

findings and the presence of an independent intervening injury. 

The Commission exercised its duty to make determinations of credibility, weigh the

evidence, and resolve any conflicting medical testimony and other evidence. Ark. Methodist

Med. Ctr. v. Blansett, 2013 Ark. App. 480. Because the Commission’s opinion adequately

explains its decision, and that decision is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm by

memorandum opinion. In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63

(1985).

Affirmed.

GRUBER and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.

Michael E. Ryburn, for appellants.

The McNeely Law Firm, PLLC, by: Steven R. McNeely, for appellee.

2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00484

- CR

Abel Garcia A/K/A Abel Garcia Perez v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 476th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR

- 1114

- 22

- M

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 5, 2024
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/13/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       36,444
COMMITMENTS
  12,400    1,800    1,634   15,511   25,444   29,545   28,878    6,899    7,566

CHANGES FROM 03/06/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:          8)
    -306      575       93       59     -424     -154      244      162     -236

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.0      4.9      4.5     42.6     69.8     81.1     79.2     18.9     20.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
      13        8       11       22       24       42       37
```

----

Updated March 16, 2012
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act, I, Marshall Witzel, certify that:

 

Tothe best of my knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 8, 2003 by DiaSysCorporation and to which this certification is appended fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of DiaSysCorporation.

 

 
|   |   | /s/  Marshall Witzel                      |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Marshall  Witzel, Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to DiaSys Corporation and will be retained by DiaSys Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Eric E. JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 18-5645.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States *447Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Jael WATTS, petitioner, v. Michael ALLEN, et al.

No. 18-412.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
NO. 07-00-0349-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	JANUARY 8, 2003

	______________________________

	KEVIN WAYNE GILBERT, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 240TH DISTRICT COURT OF FORT BEND COUNTY;

	NO. 32179; HONORABLE OGDEN BASS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.*

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	Following a plea of not guilty, appellant was convicted by a jury of indecency with a child and punishment was assessed at five years confinement and a $3000 fine, suspended for ten years.  By a sole issue, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine to bar the testimony of Reverend Ronnie Linden.  Based upon the rationale expressed herein, we affirm.

	We hold that appellant did not preserve his complaint for appellate review.  It is well settled that the denial of a motion in limine is not sufficient to preserve error for review, but rather there must be a proper objection to the proffered evidence.  McDuff v. State, 939 S.W.2d 607, 618 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 844, 118 S.Ct. 125, 139 L.Ed.2d 75 (1997), citing Basham v. State, 608 S.W.2d 677, 679 (Tex.Cr.App. 1980).  During Linden’s direct testimony no objections were made, and upon cross-examination the only objection lodged by defense counsel was that the witness’s answer was nonresponsive.  Appellant’s sole issue is overruled.

	Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.