alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.33


                                  ALLOY, INC.
DESCRIPTION OF OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING
                                JANUARY 31, 2006


         For services rendered during fiscal year ending January 31, 2006,
("Fiscal 2005"), Alloy, Inc. (the "Company") will pay to each non-employee
member (each, an "Outside Director") of the Company's Board of Directors (the
"Board") a quarterly retainer of $6,000. Additionally, the Company will pay to
each Outside Director $1,000 for each meeting of the Board attended, whether in
person or telephonically. The Company also will pay to each Outside Director a
quarterly amount of $2,000 per standing committee on which such member serves
and an additional $1,500 per quarter for each standing committee on which such
member serves as chairman. In addition, the Company will pay the lead
independent director of the Board $35,000 per fiscal year, which amount is
payable quarterly in equal installments.

         In addition to the cash compensation described above, upon the
appointment or initial election of an Outside Director, such director is
automatically granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Company common stock
under one or more of the then existing stock option plans of the Company. These
options vest equally on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date,
provided that the optionee is still an Outside Director of the Company at the
opening of business on such date. Each option has a term of ten years and the
exercise price for each option is equal to the closing price for the common
stock on the business day immediately preceding the date of grant, as reported
on the NASDAQ National Market or other principal amount on which the Company's
common stock is listed for trading. The Company also issues to each Outside
Director on an annual basis, without cost to such director, the number of shares
of Company common stock that could be purchased for $50,000 at the closing price
of such common stock on the trading date immediately preceding the award of such
shares. These restricted stock shares are issued pursuant to one or more of the
existing stock option plans of the Company as restricted stock. These shares are
subject to lapsing rights of repurchase on the part of the Company under the
applicable plan documents, which repurchase entitles the Company to repurchase
the shares at $0.01 per share and which rights to lapse equally on each of the
first three anniversaries of the grant date. Such shares are also subject to the
terms and conditions of the applicable option plan of the Company under which
they are awarded and the execution and delivery of the execution and delivery of
restricted stock agreements with each recipient. To the extent practical, these
shares of restricted stock are to be issued to February 1st of each year, except
that the shares issuable in respect of Fiscal 2005 will be issued on May 1,
2005.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T SERVICES INC., AT&T MOBILITY 

LLC and AT&T CORP.,

Defendants,

ERICSSON INC. and 

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP

(Lead Case)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba 

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant,

ERICSSON INC. and

NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Intervenors.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP

(Member Case)

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO U.S. PATENT 10,594,376

Plaintiff XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies (“Plaintiff”), Defendant TMobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile”); and Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation and Ericsson Inc. 

( “Intervenors”) (collectively, Plaintiffs, T-Mobile, and Intervenors are “Parties”) jointly request 

and stipulate to, pursuant to Red. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s 

claim for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,594,376 (“the ’376 Patent”) (i.e., Count III) and 

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 72 Filed 02/23/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1526
2

dismissal without prejudice of Intervenors’ counterclaims against Plaintiff for Declaratory 

Judgment of Non-Infringement of the ’376 Patent, i.e., the Third Counterclaim. See Dkt. Nos. 59 

and 62. For the sake of clarity, this Stipulation of Dismissal is limited to the claims and 

counterclaims applicable to the ’376 Patent and does not apply to claims, or counterclaims 

applicable to the other asserted patents. The Parties further stipulate that Plaintiff (on the one hand) 

and Defendants and Intervenors (collectively on the other hand) shall bear their own costs, 

expenses, and attorney’s fees with respect to the dismissed claims and counterclaims concerning 

the ’376 patent.

Dated: February 23, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

Reza Mirzaie

RUSS AUGUST & KABAT

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90025

Telephone: 310.826.7474

Facsimile: 310.826.6991

COUNSEL FOR T-MOBILE 

DEFENDANT AND INTERVENORS

/s/ Matthew Yungwirth

Matthew S. Yungwirth

msyungwirth@duanemorris.com

DUANE MORRIS LLP

1075 Peachtree Street NE

Suite 1700

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Telephone: 404.253.6900

Facsimile: 404.253.6901

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 72 Filed 02/23/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1527
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that on February 23, 2024, a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing was filed with the Court’s CM/ECF service, which will provide an electronic 

notification of the service of such pleading to all counsel of record.

/s/ Reza Mirzaie

 Reza Mirzaie 

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 72 Filed 02/23/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1528
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1689

To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor

vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and

a place in another State, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1999

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a place in another State,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REGULATION OF INTERSTATE LIMOUSINE

4 SERVICE.

5 No State or political subdivision of the State and no

6 interstate agency or other political agency of 2 or more

7 States may enact or enforce any law, rule, regulation,

8 standard, or other provision having the force and effect
2

•HR 1689 IH

1 of law that restricts the operation of a motor vehicle pro2 viding limousine service between a place in a State and

3 a place in another State.

4 SEC. 2. LICENSING OF PERSONS PROVIDING INTERMUNIC5 IPAL LIMOUSINE SERVICE WITHIN A STATE.

6 No State or political subdivision of the State may

7 enact or enforce any law, rule, regulation, standard, or

8 other provision having the force and effect of law that

9 would require a person engaged in intermunicipal lim10 ousine service within the State to obtain a license, permit,

11 or other form of permission from more than 1 State agen12 cy or agency of a political subdivision of the State in order

13 to engage in such intermunicipal limousine service. Noth14 ing in this section shall prohibit any local authority from

15 regulating limousine service if during the course of the

16 service the same passenger is picked up within the local

17 authority’s jurisdictional area and the last stop of the pas18 senger’s service is also within the local authority’s jurisdic19 tional area.

20 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

21 In this Act, the following definitions apply:

22 (1) LIMOUSINE SERVICE.—The term ‘‘limousine

23 service’’ means prearranged, passenger transpor24 tation in a motor vehicle (other than a taxicab) with

25 a seating capacity of not to exceed 14 passengers in
3

•HR 1689 IH

1 addition to the driver that is provided at a premium

2 fare on a non-scheduled, charter basis and is not on

3 a regular route.

4 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the 50

5 States and the District of Columbia.

Æ
Exhibit 10.35


 





AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE






 


WHEREAS, SFE VCF, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Lender”), made a loan on September
18. 2017 in the principal sum of $1,500,000.00 to Envision Solar International, Inc., a Nevada corporation ('”Borrower”);


 


WHEREAS, said loan is evidenced by a Promissory Note executed
by Borrower;


 


WHEREAS, the Maturity Date under the Promissory Note was September
16, 2018, and was extended to December 1, 2018; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to further extend the Maturity Date.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree that the Maturity Date
is extended to the earlier of (i) June 30, 2019, or (ii) the closing of an initial public offering by Borrower. In consideration
of the foregoing extension, Borrower agrees to pay a fee equal to $30,000.00 on or before the Maturity Date, which shall not be
credited towards interest or principal. In addition, Borrower shall pay all attorneys' fees incurred by Lender in connection with
the extension of the loan.


 


In all other respects the Promissory Note between the parties
remains in full force and effect, and all other terms of the loan shall be as set forth in said Promissory Note.


 


Executed as of December l, 2018.


 


 





	SFE VCF, LLC	 	ENVISION SOLAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	a California limited liability company	 	a Nevada corporation
	 	 	 
	By: /s/ William H. Scripps              	 	By: /s/ Desmond Wheatley                     
	William H. Scripps	 	Desmond Wheatley, CEO
	Manager	 	 
	 	 	 
	By: /s/ Kathy A Scripps              	 	 
	Kathy A. Scripps	 	 
	Manager
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

BHISHAN KHADKA (4)

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:22-CR-00255

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the First Superseding 

Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Bhishan Khadka

GUILTY of Count One of the First Superseding Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 

U.S.C. § 846 - Conspiracy to Distribute and Possess with Intent to Distribute Fentanyl.

Case 4:22-cr-00255-ALM-AGD Document 105 Filed 05/16/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 261
Case 4:22-cr-00255-ALM-AGD Document 105 Filed 05/16/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 262
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial   Corp.   (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three  months  ended  September  30, 2005 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Keith A. Simpson
                                        Vice-President and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer

Date: November 10, 2005

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-4
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/28/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      359,935
COMMITMENTS
  78,715  143,064   63,387  194,215  128,185  336,317  334,636   23,618   25,299

CHANGES FROM 08/21/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -43,673)
  -4,209    2,102   -4,648  -25,834  -35,314  -34,691  -37,860   -8,982   -5,813

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    21.9     39.7     17.6     54.0     35.6     93.4     93.0      6.6      7.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      151)
      36       68       62       30       37      111      132
```

----

Updated August 31, 2012
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       65,848
COMMITMENTS
   6,086    4,623        0   55,249   58,514   61,335   63,137    4,513    2,711

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,216)
    -136     -247        0   -1,016     -313   -1,152     -560      -64     -656

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.2      7.0      0.0     83.9     88.9     93.1     95.9      6.9      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       72)
       8        7        0       35       34       43       41
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      122,470
COMMITMENTS
  21,240   17,780      567   86,266   99,065  108,073  117,412   14,397    5,058

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        622)
    -617    3,746      -82      722   -2,655       23    1,009      599     -387

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.3     14.5      0.5     70.4     80.9     88.2     95.9     11.8      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      101)
      27       15        2       41       35       69       51
```

----

Updated August 24, 2012
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial
Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident and Chief Executive
Officer


Date: February 10, 2010

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

EARL ST. CLAIRE §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-158 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Earl St. Claire, a prisoner currently confined at the United States Penitentiary in

Coleman, Florida, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act.

The action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

On July 17, 2023, Plaintiff moved to dismiss this action. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff is entitled to dismiss the action voluntarily prior to the service of an

answer or motion for summary judgment by any adverse parties. Because Defendant has not served

a responsive pleading, Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss should be granted.

Recommendation

Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss should be granted, and the action should be

dismissed without prejudice.

Case 1:23-cv-00158-MJT-ZJH Document 7 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18
Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 19th day of July, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00158-MJT-ZJH Document 7 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 19
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 197

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice’’. City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Of- al Service at 410 North 6th Street in Garden
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 197

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

at 410 North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, as

the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 197 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 410 North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas,

4 is hereby designated as the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Of5 fice’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be a ref10 erence to the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e R a y m ond J . D e a r i e , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** the E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof

N e w Y ork, s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A N U E L P A R E J O , P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t, v. S C O T T F R A K E S , R es po nd ent -A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 35374 D . C . N o. 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 5 7 6 4 - RBL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on B e nj a m i n H . S e tt l e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r6, 2012

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B ef ore: W . F L E T C H E R and F IS H E R , C i rc ui tJudg es , and D E A R IE , D i stri ct Judg e. ** 

# FI LED DE C 04 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA pp el l antM anuel P ar ej o app ea l s the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderdi sm i ss i ng as

tim e - b a rr e d h is p e titio n f o raw r it o f

h ab e a s c o rp u s u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 . R e v ie w in g th e o r d e rd e n o v o , R e dd v . Mc G r a th , 34 3 F . 3d 10 77 , 10 80 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) , w e h o ld th a t th e p e titio n w a s tim e ly a n d r e v e r s e . In det erm i ni ng thatP ar ej o w as aw ar e of the “ fa ctual predi ca t e” of hi s habea s c l a i m s a s e a r l y a s 1995, the di s tr i c tc our tm i s c ons true d the appl i c abl e s e c t i on of the habe a s l i m i t a t i ons s t a tut e , 28 U . S . C . § 2244( d) ( 1) ( D ) . U nde rthi s c our t ’ s de c i s i on i n Sh e lb y v . B a r tle tt , 391 F . 3d 1061 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , w hi c h w a s ba s e d on R e dd a nd r e a f f i rm e d i n M

a rde s ic h v . C a te , 6 6 8 F .3 d 1 1 6 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 2 ) , w h e n , a s h e r e , a habe a s pe t i t i on c ha l l e nge s a n a dm i ni s tr a t i ve de c i s i on r a the rtha n the unde r l y i ng j u d g m e n to f

c o n v i c t i o n , th e “ f

a c tu a l p r e d i c a t e ” u n d e rs e c t i o n 2 2 4 4 ( d ) ( 1 ) ( D) tr ig g e r in g th e o n e - y e a rlim ita tio n s p e r io d is o r d in a r ily th e a d m in is tr a tiv e d e c is io n . See M ardesi ch , 6 6 8 F .3 d a t 1 1 7 1 - 7 2 ; She lby , 3 9 1 F .3 d a t 1 0 6 2 - 6 6 ; R e dd , 343 F . 3d a t 1 0 8 1 - 8 5 . W e f

in d n o r e a s o n f

o rd e p a r tin g f

r o m th a t f

r a m e w o rkh e r e . W e f urther c on cl ud e thatthe adm i ni stra t i ve deci si on the pet i t i on chal l enges i s the then-l at es tdeni al of parol e, i ss ued b y the Indet erm i nat e S ent ence R evi ew B oa r d on D e c e m be r27, 2007. R e s ponde ntc onc e de d a tor a l a r gum e nta nd w e now ho l d thatso construed, the pet i t i on i s t i m el y und er R e dd a nd Sh elby. RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.
Alfred Lewis PATTERSON, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8298.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
James DAWSON, et ux., petitioners, v. Dale W. STEAGER, West Virginia State Tax Commissioner.

No. 17-419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Erwin Eugene SEMIEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.