alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00409

- CR

SAMUEL RIVERA APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered a ppellant ’ s “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal. ” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant the m otion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 26, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2035 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2035

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To correct errors in the authorizations of certain programs administered 
         by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) Motor Vehicle Safety.--Section 30104 of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``$81,200,000'' and inserting 
``$98,313,500''.
    (b) Motor Vehicle Information.--Section 32102 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$6,200,000'' and inserting 
``$9,562,500''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6305

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT LOGAN GORMAN, a/k/a Robert Gorman,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (2:19-cr-00131-1)

Submitted: June 2, 2021 Decided: June 15, 2021

Before MOTZ, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Logan Gorman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Logan Gorman appeals the district court’s order denying his renewed request

for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the 

First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. On appeal, 

we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). 

Gorman’s informal brief argues only that the district court erred in concluding that he did 

not exhaust his administrative remedies before pursuing his renewed motion. Despite its 

findings on exhaustion, the court proceeded to consider the merits of Gorman’s motion, 

denying relief after concluding that he did not demonstrate extraordinary and compelling 

reasons justifying compassionate release. Because Gorman’s informal brief does not 

challenge the district court’s dispositive ruling, he has forfeited appellate review of the

district court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The 

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited 

to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We grant Gorman’s request for leave to file his informal brief out of time. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,581
COMMITMENTS
  12,742      790    4,150   11,982   25,763   28,874   30,703   12,707   10,878

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,448)
     588      -27      -87   -1,404   -1,826     -903   -1,940     -545      492

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.6      1.9     10.0     28.8     62.0     69.4     73.8     30.6     26.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
      20        3       13       27       16       53       32
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                                  179
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         9,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                          31,185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     45,631
<PP&E>                                               29,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                       11,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       69,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                21,275
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                171
<OTHER-SE>                                           16,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         69,391
<SALES>                                             108,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                80,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        23,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       2,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .08
        

</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3403

_____________________________

JAMES BERNARD CAMPBELL,

Appellant,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, 

Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.

George M. Wright, Judge.

May 3, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

James Bernard Campbell, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Dan Johnson, General 

Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Dragomir TASKOV, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-357.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.51


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO


HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.


EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 


 


This Amendment No. 3 to the Harvard Bioscience,
Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of May 18, 2017 (the “Effective Date”).


 


In accordance with Section 18 of the Plan, as
approved by the stockholders of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. on the Effective Date, in order to increase the number of shares of common
stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to One Million Fifty Thousand (1,050,000), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective
as of the Effective Date:


 


		1.	The reference to “Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand (750,000) shares” in the initial paragraph
of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced with “One Million Fifty Thousand (1,050,000) shares”.



 


		2.	The following is added to the end of the Plan:



 


“DATE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PLAN APPROVED BY BOARD OF
DIRECTORS: AUGUST 2, 2011.


DATE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PLAN APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
FEBRUARY 26, 2013.


DATE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PLAN APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS: MAY
23, 2013.


DATE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PLAN APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
MARCH 31, 2017.


DATE AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PLAN APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS: MAY
18, 2017.”


 


		3.	Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
has duly executed this amendment to be effective as the date first above written.


 


	 	 	 	 
	 	HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert E. Gagnon
	 	 	 	Name:  Robert E. Gagnon
	 	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer
Victor O. DEMA, petitioner, v. ALLEGIANT AIR LLC.

No. 18-5589.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1854 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1854

 To temporarily increase the number of visas available for backlogged 
       spouses and children of lawful permanent resident aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1999

  Mr. Shays (for himself, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Ms. Berkley, Mr. 
Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Capuano, Mr. English, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. 
   Frost, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mrs. 
Johnson of Connecticut, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Kolbe, Ms. Lee, Mr. Maloney 
of Connecticut, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Petri, Mr. Schaffer, Ms. 
Schakowsky, and Mr. Underwood) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily increase the number of visas available for backlogged 
       spouses and children of lawful permanent resident aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Immigration Backlog Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. 5-YEAR INCREASE IN VISAS FOR BACKLOGGED SPOUSES AND CHILDREN OF 
              LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENT ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--In addition to any immigrant visa numbers 
otherwise available, 60,000 immigrant visa numbers shall be made 
available in each of the fiscal years 2000 through 2004 for aliens who 
have petitions approved for classification under section 203(a)(2)(A) 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act for the fiscal year.
    (b) Priority.--
            (1) Subject to paragraph (2), visa numbers under this 
        section shall be made available in the order in which a 
        petition, on behalf of each such immigrant for classification 
        under section 203(a)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality 
        Act, is filed with the Attorney General under section 204 of 
        such Act.
            (2) Visa numbers under this section shall first be made 
        available to aliens for whom the petitioning alien did not 
        become an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
        through the operation of section 210 or 245A of the Immigration 
        and Nationality Act.
            (3) The per country numerical limitations of section 202 of 
        such Act shall not apply with respect to visa numbers made 
        available under this section, and visa numbers made available 
        under this section shall not be counted in determining whether 
        there are excess family admissions in a fiscal year under 
        section 201(c)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Rafael TANCO-PIZARRO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5944.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Bobby Ree McGEE, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5263.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/27/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      407,078
COMMITMENTS
  46,877   41,857   87,412  253,265  262,890  387,554  392,159   19,524   14,919

CHANGES FROM 03/20/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,124)
    -161    1,833     -318   17,191   16,162   16,712   17,677   -1,588   -2,553

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.5     10.3     21.5     62.2     64.6     95.2     96.3      4.8      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      127)
      23       31       37       65       59      114      104
```

----

Updated March 30, 2012
Exhibit 10.7

 

JOINDER AGREEMENT

 

This Joinder Agreement is executed by the undersigned pursuant to the Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Agreement”), by and among EQM Midstream Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), and the purchasers party thereto (the “Purchasers”), which is incorporated herein by reference. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement.

 

By the execution of this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned agrees as follows:

 

1.              The undersigned acknowledges that the undersigned is acquiring 51,261 Series A Preferred Units, subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement (including the Schedules and Exhibits thereto).

 

2.              The undersigned hereby joins in, and agrees to be bound by and subject to, the Agreement, with the same force and effect as if the undersigned were originally a Purchaser party thereto.

 

3.              Any notice required or permitted by the Agreement shall be given to the undersigned at the address listed below.

 

4.              The Partnership hereby acknowledges and agrees that the undersigned shall be deemed a Purchaser under the Agreement with respect to the number of Series A Preferred Units set forth above and that such Purchaser shall be entitled to all of the rights and benefits, and subject to all of the obligations, of a Purchaser under the Agreement.

 

(Signature Page Follows)

 











 

EXECUTED AND DATED as of this 18th day of March, 2019.

 

	
 
    	
EQM MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   EQGP Services, LLC, its general partner
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Kirk R. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Kirk   R. Oliver
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    


 

Signature Page to Joinder Agreement to Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement

 











 

	
 
    	
PORTCULLIS PARTNERS, LP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Duane G. Kelley
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Duane   G. Kelley
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Vice   President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Notice   Address:
    	
Portcullis   Partners, LP
    
	
 
    	
11   Greenway Plaza, Suite 2000
    
	
 
    	
Houston,   Texas 77046
    
				


 

Signature Page to Joinder Agreement to Convertible Preferred Unit Purchase Agreement
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed consolidated 
financial statements as of and for the six month period ended 
March 28, 1998 included in this Company's quarterly report on 
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
condensed consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>			0000910394
<NAME>			KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000
<CURRENCY>	     	U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>			        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>	              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	        SEP-26-1998 
<PERIOD-START>	        SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>	        MAR-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>	                  1        
<CASH>		                128   
<SECURITIES>	                  0         
<RECEIVABLES>	             15,564   
<ALLOWANCES>	                565               
<INVENTORY>	             19,036     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	             41,107
<PP&E>		             48,614
<DEPRECIATION>	             12,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	             84,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           28,618
<BONDS>		             20,000
<COMMON>		                 50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>	                  0
<OTHER-SE>	             34,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    84,199
<SALES>		             55,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	             55,630
<CGS>		             49,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>	             49,867
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	              1,222 
<INCOME-PRETAX>	                976 
<INCOME-TAX>	                372 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	                604 
<DISCONTINUED>	                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	                  0
<CHANGES>       	                  0
<NET-INCOME>	                604 
<EPS-PRIMARY>	                .13 
<EPS-DILUTED>	                .13 

</TABLE>
1 

## ... T h is p ro c e e d ing a rise s o u t o f C a u se N o s. 2 0 0 9 -C I-1 1 2 7 2 , s t yl ed E m er al d R od r igu ez and P hi l l i p R od r igu ez v. G eor ge M cL ean , pendi ng i n t he 13 1st Judi ci al D i s t r i ct C our t , B exa r C ount y , T exa s , t he H onorabl e John D

. G abri el p re sid ing , an d 2 0 0 9 -C I-1 1 2 7 4 , s t yl ed D avi d Rodr iguez v . Vi s i on Sour ce LP aka Vi s i on Sour ce Nat i onal, etal

. , pe nd i ng i n t he 16 6t h J udi ci al D i s t r i ct Co ur t , B exa r Co un t y , T exa s , t he H onorabl e M ar t ha T ann er pres i di ng . H owever , t he order c o m p la ine d o f wa s sig n e d b y the H o n o ra b le B a rb a ra N e ller m o e , p re sid ing ju d g e o f t h e 4 5 th J u d ic ia l D istric t C o u rt, B ex ar C o un t y, T ex as. 

### i i i i i i



# MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-09-00608- CV IN RE Em e r ald RO DRIG UE Z and P hill ip R OD RI G UE Z

Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

## PER C URIAM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: October 7, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On September

28, 2009, relators filed a pe tition f o r writ of mandamus. The c ourt has considere d relators’ petition f or writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator s are not entitled to the relief

soug ht. Accor dingly , the petition for writ of mandamus is DENI ED. See T EX 

## . R. A PP 

## . P. 52.8(a). PER C URIAM
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/16/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      424,977
COMMITMENTS
  72,953  160,371   68,558  256,874  169,671  398,385  398,600   26,592   26,377

CHANGES FROM 10/09/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,888)
   3,325    2,620   -1,548   17,176   18,985   18,953   20,057    1,935      831

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.2     37.7     16.1     60.4     39.9     93.7     93.8      6.3      6.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      170)
      53       62       79       38       40      140      145
```

----

Updated June 29, 2007
AT&T INC., petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al.

No. 17-499.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Justice THOMAS, Justice ALITO, and Justice GORSUCH would grant the petition, vacate the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and remand to that court with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot. See *United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EX-10.1


  

  Metrics & Weighting 80% Revenue /
20% Adjusted EBITDA Awards are interpolated between achievement percents (e.g., 100.2% achievement results in award of 102%). Each metric is capped at 200% of award quarterly; overall quarterly award payments are capped at 100% with any
overachievement earned to be reconciled at year end. If the full year metric target is achieved, then any quarters that were paid at less than 100% will be paid out at target for that missed quarter and included in the Q4 award. FY20 financial
targets to be set by mid-April 2019, based on approved budget but adjusted for actual results and currency exchange. FY20 ExCo Incentive Plan Design Maintain FY19 payout scale with updated FY20 financial objectives Exhibit 10.1
Lan Tu TRINH, petitioner, v. Kathleen Lien TRINH.

No. 17-9306.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 22, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.