alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129953 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, ANTHONY E. LAMAR, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 129953 COA: 262800 Ingham CC: 04-000787-AA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/05/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,396
COMMITMENTS
   8,292    5,031    1,157   20,694   21,014   30,143   27,202    8,253   11,194

CHANGES FROM 05/29/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        -34)
  -1,112       -9     -134     -514   -1,181   -1,760   -1,324    1,726    1,290

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.6     13.1      3.0     53.9     54.7     78.5     70.8     21.5     29.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
       9       13        7       27       21       38       39
```

----

Updated June 8, 2012
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2014

t0122 

# Order

Clerk January 29, 2014

147573

CUMMINS BRIDGEWAY, L.L.C. and S AS

PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT,

Petitioners

- Appellees,

v SC: 147573

COA: 312005

Ct of Claims: 11

- 001406

- AA

STATE TAX COMMISSION and LYON

TOWNSHIP,

Respondents

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 2, 2013 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 15.1

IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

IPC Holdings, Ltd.

Hamilton, Bermuda

Re: Registration Statement No. 333- 158264, 149118, 133605, 128905, 126434 and 107052

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 8, 2009, related to our review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG                                           
|Chartered Accountants Hamilton, Bermuda May 8, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

JERRAL W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS, CYNTHIA 

DAVIS f/k/a CYNTHIA DAVISSPENCER

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-00032-RWS

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant Cynthia Davis f/k/a Cynthia Davis-Spencer’s Verified 

Motion for Continuance. Docket No. 131. Defendant Cynthia Davis filed a notice withdrawing the 

motion. Docket No. 145. The motion is also moot in light of the Court’s order granting-in-part 

Defendants’ motion for continuance to respond to Plaintiff’s sanctions motion. See Docket No. 

144. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that Defendant’s Verified Motion for Continuance (Docket No. 131) is 

DENIED-AS-MOOT. 

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17th day of June, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 146 Filed 06/17/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2706
HAYNES TIMBERLAND, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-202.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Steven H. COOK, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6291.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Kay L. Toolson, CEO ofMonaco Coach Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedApril 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents inall material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofMonaco Coach Corporation.

 

 
|         | By:    | /s/ Kay L. Toolson      |   |
|--------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|         |   | Kay L. Toolson          |
| May 11, 2006 |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

I, P. Martin Daley, CFOof Monaco Coach Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedApril 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such QuarterlyReport of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Monaco CoachCorporation.

 

 
|         | By:    | /s/ P. Martin Daley     |   |
|--------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| May 11, 2006 |   | P. Martin Daley         |
|         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original ofthese written statements required by Section 906 has been provided to MonacoCoach Corporation and will be retained by Monaco Coach Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Jesus C. HERNANDEZ, et al., petitioners, v. Jesus MESA, Jr.

No. 17-1678.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Steven Anthony GRAHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.

No. 17-9110.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Carl Lee JONES, petitioner, v. Willie SMITH, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8890.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

ROBERTO RAY DURAN (2) 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00038-JDK 

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable John D. Love, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate 

Judge recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant 

guilty on Count Four of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings. 

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea 

of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers 

acceptance of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Roberto Ray 

Duran (2) GUILTY of Count Four of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 7 U.S.C. § 

2156(b) and 18 U.S.C. §§ 49, 2 – Possession of Animal for Participation in Animal Fighting 

Venture, Aiding and Abetting. 

Case 6:23-cr-00038-JDK-JDL Document 59 Filed 07/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 231
So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10th July, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00038-JDK-JDL Document 59 Filed 07/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 232
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DESMOND MITCHELL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1845 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 8, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# Eiropas Savienības C 516/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 516 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 64. gadagājums2021. gada 21. decembris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 516

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

64. gadagājums2021. gada 21. decembris

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Paziņojumi |
| | EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI |
| | Eiropas Komisija |
| 2021/C 516/01 | Eiropas Savienības lēmumu kopsavilkums par zāļu tirdzniecības atļaujām 2021. gada 20. decembrī
  (Publicēts saskaņā ar 13. vai 38. pantu Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 726/2004) | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

IV   Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Eiropas Komisija

2021/C 516/01

Eiropas Savienības lēmumu kopsavilkums par zāļu tirdzniecības atļaujām 2021. gada 20. decembrī
  (Publicēts saskaņā ar 13. vai 38. pantu Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 726/2004)

(Publicēts saskaņā ar 13. vai 38. pantu Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 726/2004

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

IV Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Eiropas Komisija

| 21.12.2021 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 516/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2021

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 516/1

---

Eiropas Savienības lēmumu kopsavilkums par zāļu tirdzniecības atļaujām 2021. gada 20. decembrī

(Publicēts saskaņā ar 13. vai 38. pantu Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 726/2004 (1))

(2021/C 516/01)

| — | Tirdzniecības atļaujas izsniegšana (13. pants Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 726/2004): Pieņemtas













  Lēmuma datums | Zāļu nosaukums | INN (starptautiskais nepatentētais nosaukums) | Tirdzniecības atļaujas turētājs | Ieraksta numurs Kopienas reģistrā | Farmaceitiskā forma | AĶT kods (Anatomiski ķīmiski terapeitiskais kods) | Paziņojuma datums |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20.12.2021. | Nuvaxovid | COVID-19 vakcīna (rekombinanta, ar adjuvantu) | Novavax CZ, a.s. |
| Bohumil 138, 281 63 Jevany, Česká republika |

—

Tirdzniecības atļaujas izsniegšana (13. pants Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulā (EK) Nr. 726/2004): Pieņemtas

Lēmuma datums

Zāļu nosaukums

INN (starptautiskais nepatentētais nosaukums)

Tirdzniecības atļaujas turētājs

Ieraksta numurs Kopienas reģistrā

Farmaceitiskā forma

AĶT kods (Anatomiski ķīmiski terapeitiskais kods)

Paziņojuma datums

20.12.2021.

Nuvaxovid

COVID-19 vakcīna (rekombinanta, ar adjuvantu)

Novavax CZ, a.s.

Bohumil 138, 281 63 Jevany, Česká republika

EU/1/21/1618

Dispersija injekcijām

J07BX03

20.12.2021.

Ikvienam, kurš vēlas apskatīt publisko novērtējuma ziņojumu par attiecīgajām zālēm un ar tām saistītos lēmumus, jāsazinās ar:

| European Medicines Agency |
| --- |
| Domenico Scarlattilaan 6 |
| 1083 HS Amsterdam |
| NETHERLANDS |

European Medicines Agency

Domenico Scarlattilaan 6

1083 HS Amsterdam

NETHERLANDS

---

(1)  OV L 136, 30.4.2004., 1. lpp.

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0224. L.E. SCHWARTZ & SONS, INC. v. YATECA JACKSON.

On May 12, 2015,the trial court denied defendant L.E. Schwartz & Sons, Inc.’s

motion for summary judgment. The trial court signed a certificate of immediate

review on May 21, 2015, and L.E. Schwartz & Sons, Inc. filed this application for

interlocutory appeal on June 10, 2015.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34(b), an application for interlocutory appeal must be filed

within 10 days of the date on which a timely certificate of immediate review is

entered in the court below. Genter v. State, 218 Ga. App. 311 (460 SE2d 879)

(1995). Because this application was filed 20 days after entry of the certificate of

immediate review, it is untimely and istherefore DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/30/2015

June 30, 2015
Lacey Mark SIVAK, petitioner, v. IDAHO.

No. 17-8257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/15/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      459,780
COMMITMENTS
  36,952   57,968   99,085  299,440  287,425  435,477  444,478   24,303   15,302

CHANGES FROM 05/08/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,919)
  -3,045    4,028   -8,606    6,304    2,208   -5,347   -2,370      428   -2,549

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.0     12.6     21.6     65.1     62.5     94.7     96.7      5.3      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      136)
      25       36       45       70       65      126      118
```

----

Updated May 21, 2012
Maurice Jammorow BEAVERS, aka Chris Stokes, aka Frank Monroe West, aka Shadrian Beavers, aka Reese, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8059.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of
Directors Boss Holdings, Inc.




We have issued our report dated February 14, 2003
(except for the last table of Note 1, as to which the date is March 22, 2005), accompanying the consolidated financial
statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Boss Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Boss Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8, file number 333-54788,
effective February 1, 2001.




/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Atlanta, Georgia March 22, 2005

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,000
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        79
<OTHER-SE>                      (1,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (5,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (5,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (5,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.00)



</TABLE>
Galindo Jose RUIZ-HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5532.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NICO SCOTT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 768 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Richard Eugene HAMILTON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5037.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
(111 So. 263)

No. 28340.

#### STATE v. GUILLORY.

(Jan. 3, 1927.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Criminal law <@=>1020—Sentence actually imposed determines appellate, jurisdiction, where penalty is fine or jail sentence.

Where penalty that may be imposed is fine or imprisonment in parish jail, or both, it is sentence actually imposed that determines appellate jurisdiction.

2. Criminal law <@=>1020—Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of appeal from conviction of defendant fined $150 and given jail sentence which could not exceed 135 days (Act No. 39, Ex. Sess. 1921, § 3; Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10).

Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of appeal from conviction for selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes under Act No. 39, Ex. Sess. 1921, § 3, where defendant was sentenced to 45 days in jail and fine of $150, with provision for 90 additional days in jail for default in paying fine, since sentence must be fine exceeding $300 or jail sentence exceeding six months, under Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10.

Appeal from Twelfth Judicial Dictrict Court, Parish of Avoyelles; L. P. Gremillion, Judge.

*871Leon Guillory was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Wade J. Broussard, of New Orleans; for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lester L. Bordelon, Dist. Atty., of Marksville, and E. R. Scbowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

OVERTON, J.

Defendant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and was sentenced to serve 45 days in jail, to pay a fine of $150, and, in default of the payment of the fine, to’ be imprisoned in the parish jail for 90 days additional. The only bill reserved by him was one to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based on the ground .that the court erred by convicting him on the evidence of a witness unworthy of belief.

[1, 2] The offense for which defendant was convicted is a misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment in the parish jail. Section 3 of Act 39, Extra Session of 1921. Where the penalty that may be imposed is merely a fine or imprisonment in the parish jail, or both, it is the sentence actually imposed that is determinative of our appellate jurisdiction, and to vest us with jurisdiction, where it is dependent on the sentence actually imposed, the sentence must be a fine exceeding $300 or imprisonment in the parish jail exceeding six months. Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10; State v. Roy, 152 La. 933, 94 So. 703. It is obvious that neither a fine exceeding $300 nor imprisonment exceeding six months in jail was imposed on defendant.

Hence, we have no jurisdiction of the appeal in this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal, and do so, which it is our duty to do,ex proprio motu.

The appeal herein is dismissed.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      484,723
COMMITMENTS
  70,892   56,487  144,641  229,912  264,185  445,445  465,313   39,278   19,410

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -21,692)
  -3,332   -2,308    1,437  -20,031  -21,019  -21,926  -21,890      234      198

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.6     11.7     29.8     47.4     54.5     91.9     96.0      8.1      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      32       32       48       64       61      126      117
```

----

Updated November 26, 2012
Ollisha Nicole EASLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8650.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.