alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

February 13, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

DEBORAH L. CARSON, )

next of kin and parent of )

MALLORY D. LEDBETTER, )

deceased, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Montgomery Circuit

) No. C10-846

VS. )

)

AGRI-PRODUCTS SPECIAL MARKETS, ) Appeal No. 

INC. d/b/a SUNCOAST, and ) 01A01-9708-CV-00420

ARMOR-ALL PRODUCTS CORP., )

and ORGAIN BUILDING SUPPLY, CO., )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

This appeal involves a wrongful death case filed by the parent of a six-year-old

child. The parent filed suit in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County alleging that

her daughter’s death was caused by exposure to a household cleaning product

marketed and distributed by Armor-All Corporation. The complaint named as

defendantsArmor-AllCorporation,Agri-Products Special Markets,Inc., the company

from whom Armor-All had purchased the line of household cleaning products, and

Orgain Building Supply Company, the company from whom the parents had

purchased the product. The complaint also alleged four causes of action including

negligence, strict liability, misrepresentation, and breach of warranty.

Agri-Products moved for a summary judgment seeking dismissal of all claims

on the ground that “the undisputed evidence establishes that Agri-Products has no

connection with the events upon which the plaintiff bases her cause of action” and

supported this motion with evidence that it had sold the entire product line to ArmorAll in January 1994 and that the product allegedly causing the child’s death had been

manufactured in March 1994. In an order entered on July 21, 1997, the trial court

grantedAgri-Products’s summary judgment motion and certified its judgment asfinal
-2-

in accordance with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02. The deceased child’s parent has perfected

this appeal as of right. 

After the parties filed their briefs, they filed a stipulation in accordance with

Tenn. Ct. App. R. 13 on January 9, 1998 seeking an accelerated appeal. This court

heard oral argument on February 6, 1998. Based upon consideration of the parties’

briefs and arguments and the record on appeal in the cause, this court announced in

open court following argument that the order granting Agri-Products’s motion for

summary judgment should be affirmed.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order entered on July 21,

1997, granting Agri-Products’s motion for summary judgment be and is hereby

affirmed and that the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

It is furthered ordered that Argi-Products’s request for damages for a frivolous

appeal pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-1-122 (1980) be and is hereby denied.

It is further ordered that the costs of this appeal be and are hereby taxed to

Deborah L. Carson, principal, and Joe Bednarz, surety, for which execution, if

necessary, may issue.

ENTER, this _____ day of February , 1998.

__________________________________

HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE

MIDDLE SECTION 

__________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE 

__________________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
TENNESSEE WINE AND SPIRITS RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, petitioner, v. Clayton BYRD, Executive Director of the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission, et al.

No. 18-96.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 27, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
GARDA CL NORTHWEST, INC., fka AT Systems, Inc., petitioner, v. Lawrence HILL, et al.

No. 18-1083.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
Patrick Henry MURPHY, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5948.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 171

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritpurposes. age Trail Route in New Jersey, and for other
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 171

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail

Route in New Jersey, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 171 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 6 of Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244

3 note) is amended—

4 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking

5 ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$4,000,000’’; and

6 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘five’’ and in7 serting ‘‘10’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 23,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00047-CV

Style: In re MarOpCo, Inc.

Date motion filed*: February 19, 2016

Type of motion: Motion for Permission to Participate Pro Hac Vice

Party filing motion: Counsel for Amicus Curiae, Finley L. Hilliard

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The motion for permission to participate pro hac vice is denied. The motion is not accompanied by the proof of 

payment or proof of indigency acknowledgement issued by the Texas Board of Law Examiners. See TEX. GOV’T.

CODE ANN § 82.0361 (Vernon 2013) (providing for non-resident attorney fee); TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR 

ADM’N R. XIX(a) (requiring compliance with section 82.0361 as “initial mandatory requirement”); (c) (requiring 

non-resident attorney’s motion to include proof of payment or proof of indigency acknowledgement). Further the 

motion is not accompanied by “the motion of the resident practicing attorney Texas attorney with whom the nonresident attorney will be associating.” TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR ADM’N XIX(b).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 for the Court

Date: March 3, 2016
Deborah M. WAGNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5934.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Courven Terrel ThomasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 17, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00756

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

v.

Courven Terrel THOMAS

, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No 2, Guadalupe County, Texa s Trial Court No. CCL

- 14

- 0533 Honorable Frank Follis, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The Appellee ’ s brief is due July 15, 2015.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Cour t
Barbara E. BROWN, petitioner, v. Daven T. WELLMAN, et al.

No. 18M6.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134322 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SANDRA FELDKAMP, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134322 COA: 272855 Washtenaw CC: 03-000642-NI FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

t1017 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 24, 2007

Clerk
Robert Allen WILKINS, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-5514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charles CHUBB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF MARC FENSTER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF HEADWATER 

RESEARCH LLC’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT OF NO INVALIDITY BASED ON THE MOTOROLA E815

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 234-1 Filed 11/12/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID

#: 17276
1

1. I, Marc Fenster, declare as follows:

2. I am counsel for Headwater Research LLC (“Headwater”) in the above-captioned 

action. I provide this declaration in support of Headwater’s Reply In Support of Its Motion for 

Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on the Motorola E815. I have personal knowledge of 

the facts set forth herein, and if called upon to testify, could and would testify competently thereto.

3. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Rebuttal Expert 

Report of Erik de la Iglesia, dated October 14, 2024.

4. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Samsung’s Petition for Inter 

Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,406,733 in IPR2024-00341, Paper 4, dated January 23, 2024.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on November 12, 2024 at Los Angeles, California

By: /s/ Marc Fenster

Marc Fenster

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 234-1 Filed 11/12/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID

#: 17277
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 12, 2024, all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via email.

/s/ Marc Fenster

Marc Fenster

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 234-1 Filed 11/12/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID

#: 17278
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY PAGE 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS, 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

vs. 

JERRAL W. JONES, DALLAS COWBOYS 

FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD., JAMES 

WILKINSON, TRAILRUNNER 

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and DONALD 

JACK, JR., 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ThirdParty Plaintiffs,

vs. 

CYNTHIA DAVIS-SPENCER, 

 Third-Party Defendant. 

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:23-cv-00032-RWS 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY 

Defendants Jerral W. Jones, Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd., James Wilkinson, 

TrailRunner International, LLC, and Donald Jack, Jr. (collectively, “Defendants”) respectfully 

provide this supplemental authority from the Texas Supreme Court which was handed down last 

week in Polk County Publishing Co., et al. v. Tommy Lamar Coleman, No. 22-0103 (Tex. Feb. 16, 

2024). The Polk opinion is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 72 Filed 02/20/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1240
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY PAGE 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

FOLSOM ADR PLLC JACKSON WALKER LLP 

/s/ David Folsom /s/ Charles L. Babcock 

David Folsom 

State Bar No. 07210800 

david@folsomadr.com 

6002-B Summerfield Dr. 

Texarkana, TX 75503 

(903) 277-7303 

 Charles L. Babcock 

State Bar No. 01479500 

cbabcock@jw.com 

Nancy W. Hamilton 

State Bar No. 11587925 

nhamilton@jw.com 

1401 McKinney Street 

Suite 1900 

Houston, TX 77010 

(713) 752-4210 

(713) 752-4221 - Fax 

David T. Moran 

State Bar No. 14419400 

dmoran@jw.com 

Edwin Buffmire 

State Bar No. 24078283 

ebuffmire@jw.com 

Cody Martinez 

State Bar No. 24102146 

cmartinez@jw.com 

2323 Ross Avenue 

Suite 600 

Dallas, TX 75201 

(214) 953-6000 

(214) 953-5822 – Fax 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS JERRAL W. JONES, 

DALLAS COWBOYS FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD., JAMES 

WILKINSON, TRAILRUNNER INTERNATIONAL, LLC 

AND DONALD JACK, JR. 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 72 Filed 02/20/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1241
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY PAGE 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On February 20, 2024, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with the clerk of 

the court of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, using the electronic case filing 

system of the court. I hereby certify that I will serve all counsel and/or pro se parties of record 

electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2). 

/s/ Charles L. Babcock 

Charles L. Babcock 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 72 Filed 02/20/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1242
Marco Antonio GARCIA-ECHAVERRIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5190.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 8, 2002,
on the financial statements of Centrex, Inc. (the "Company") at December 31,
2001, for the period from inception (October 6, 1998) to December 31, 2001, and
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, included in this Form 10-KSB
Annual Report of Centrex, Inc. as of December 31, 2001, into the Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File number 333-73972 and 333-65448).

         Our report, dated February 8, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph
that states that Centrex, Inc. is a development stage company with insufficient
revenues to fund development and operating expenses, which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.

/s/ TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 1, 2002
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. MAT T HE W VAN L I T H, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 30118 D . C . N o. 3: 11 -c r- 00 17 6-E JL -2 ME MOR AN DU M *

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. KA I L E Y D OA N, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 30119 D . C . N o. 3: 11 -c r- 00 17 6-E JL -1

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

I da ho E dw a r d J . L odge , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng 

# FI LED MA R 15 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 2 S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 5, 2013 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , W . F L E T C H E R , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A ppe l l a nt s M a tthe w V a n L i th a nd K a i l e yD oan, w ho w e r e c onvi c t e d of m ar i j uana po ss es si on atan Idaho cam pg roun d, chal l enge the di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al o f th ei r m o t i o n s t o sup p ress. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l yde ni e d the m ot i ons t o s uppr e s s be c aus e , unde rthe t ot a l i tyof

c i r c um s t a nc e s , the B ur e au of L a nd M a na ge m e ntr a nge r“ ha d a part i cul ar i ze d and obj ec t i ve basi s f or suspec t i ng ” thatV an L i th and D oan w er e e n g a g e din c r im in a l a c tiv ity . U ni ted States v. B asher , 6 2 9 F .3 d1 1 6 1 , 1 1 6 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) . AF F I RME D.
William WOMACK, petitioner, v. Landan ADAMS, et al.

No. 18-5555.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2


              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Bud  Curley,  the Chief
Financial Officer of Telesource International, Inc. ("Telesource"), certify that
(i) the Form 10-K for the  twelve  months  ended  December  31,  2003 (the "Form
10-K") fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in the Form
10-K fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of Telesource.


Dated: July 7, 2004                     /s/ Bud Curley
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bud Curley
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Telesource International, Inc.
<PAGE>
                                                Exhibit 11.1

                                               Share Computation
                                                  Year Ended
                                               December 28, 1996
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Common Stock
                                            --------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Prefered                                  Total less             Weighted
                                 Stock         Total       Treasury       Treasury           Average Shares
                             -------------  ------------  ----------  -----------------  -----------------------
<S>                          <C>            <C>           <C>         <C>                <C>
Shares outstanding at
  December 30, 1995........       18,418      11,626,475     (71,100)      11,555,375             11,555,375
Preferred stock
  conversions..............      (14,198)      5,490,946                    5,490,946              3,940,173
Issuance of common
  shares...................                      300,000                      300,000                291,346
Exercise of stock
  options..................                      636,699                      636,699                562,824
Exercise of warrants.......                       20,000                       20,000                 18,956
Acquisitions of treasury
  stock....................                                 (270,241)        (270,241)              (235,166)
Debt conversions...........                                                         0
                             -------------  ------------  ----------  -----------------         ------------
Shares outstanding at
  December 28, 1996........        4,220      18,074,120    (341,341)      17,732,779             16,133,508
                             -------------  ------------  ----------  -----------------         ------------
                             -------------  ------------  ----------  -----------------         ------------
Net Loss...................                                                                     $(19,401,000)
Weighted average shares....                                                                       16,133,508
Loss per share.............                                                                           ($1.20)
                                                                                                ------------
                                                                                                ------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000917464
<NAME> EOTT ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  968,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,732
<INVENTORY>                                    120,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,133,444
<PP&E>                                         544,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,558,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,197,522
<BONDS>                                        235,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,117<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,558,661
<SALES>                                      8,664,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,664,401
<CGS>                                        8,452,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,638,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,747
<NET-INCOME>                                     (468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
<FN>
<F1>(1)  "Other SE" represents consolidated Partners' Capital.
<F2>(2)  "EPS Primary" represents Basic Common EPS of $(0.06) and Basic Subordinated
         EPS of $0.06.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with The Beard Company's (the "Company") Report on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Herb Mee, Jr., President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  June 2, 2006                     By:  /s/ Herb Mee, Jr.
                                             Herb Mee, Jr.,
                                             President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer