alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 59A/13 d

| | ISSN 1725-2482 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 59A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 52.o ano13 de Março de 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2482

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 59A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

52.o ano13 de Março de 2009

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rectificações |
| 2009/C 059A/01 | Rectificação ao anúncio de concurso geral EPSO/AD/143/08 para a constituição de uma reserva de recrutamento de administradores linguistas (AD 5) de língua portuguesa no domínio da tradução (JO C 315 A de 10.12.2008) | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

Rectificações

2009/C 059A/01

Rectificação ao anúncio de concurso geral EPSO/AD/143/08 para a constituição de uma reserva de recrutamento de administradores linguistas (AD 5) de língua portuguesa no domínio da tradução (JO C 315 A de 10.12.2008)

1

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Rectificações

| 13.3.2009 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2009

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 59/1

---

Rectificação ao anúncio de concurso geral EPSO/AD/143/08 para a constituição de uma reserva de recrutamento de administradores linguistas (AD 5) de língua portuguesa no domínio da tradução

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 315 A de 10 de Dezembro de 2008
  )

(2009/C 59 A/01)

Na página 5, no título II «Testes de acesso», no último parágrafo:

em vez de:

«Os candidatos que, no conjunto dos testes de acesso, tenham obtido as melhores classificações (ver quadro infra), bem como a pontuação mínima exigida em cada um dos testes, serão convidados a apresentar uma candidatura completa com vista à sua eventual admissão ao concurso geral.

| OPÇÃO 1 | OPÇÃO 2 |
| --- | --- |
| 120 | 144», |

OPÇÃO 1

OPÇÃO 2

120

144»,

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se:

«Os candidatos que, no conjunto dos testes de acesso, tenham obtido as melhores classificações (ver quadro infra), bem como a pontuação mínima exigida em cada um dos testes, serão convidados a apresentar uma candidatura completa com vista à sua eventual admissão ao concurso geral.

| OPÇÃO 1 | OPÇÃO 2 |
| --- | --- |
| 60 | 72». |

OPÇÃO 1

OPÇÃO 2

60

72».

---
(110 So. 416)

No. 28127.

#### STATE v. RICKS. In re RICKS.

(Nov. 2, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

1. Trespass &wkey;>87 — Information charging entry on railroad right of way, within year, held not objectionable because failing to charge that possession did not continue for one year (Rev. St. 1870, § 818).

In prosecution, under Rev. St. 1870, § 818, for taking possession of railroad right of way, information filed June 24th charging defendant with taking possession on June 11th of same year is not objectionable, on motibn in arrest for failure to charge that possession did not continue for one year, without disturbance.

2. Trespass &wkey;>87.

Information charging that defendant, without legal right, took possession of part of right of way contiguous to certain street *held*to sufficiently charge crime, under Rev. St. 1870, § 818.

O.D. Ricks was convicted of an offense, and he applies for writs of certiorari and prohibition.

Rule nisi discharged.

Shelby Taylor, of Baton Rouge, and Moss & Moss, for relator.

ROGERS, J.

Relator seeks relief from a conviction under an information based upon Rev. Stat.' § 818, charging that he “did, without any legal right so to do, take possession of a part of the right of way, belonging to the Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company, a private corporation,' said portion of the right of.way, so taken, being contiguous to and adjoining Corn street, in Dixie, a suburb of the city of Baton Rouge.”

[1,2] In a motion in arrest of judgment, yelator alleges that the information is defective and not in conformity with the stat„ute, in that it fails to charge that his possession of the land did not continue for one year, without disturbance.

The district judge, in his return to the order issued by this court, calls attention to the fact, that the information was filed on the 24th day of June, 1926, and that it sets forth the date on which relator took possession of the property was June 11, 1926. Since the specific date of relator’s offense is alleged in the information, and as said date is well within the year of filing the charge, the omission of the words of the statute complained of in the. motion in arrest is immaterial. The facts alleged constituted the crime charged and were sufficiently definite to apprise relator of the accusation he was called upon to answer.

For the reasons assigned, the rule nisi herein issued is discharged at relator’s cost.
Melissa J. POIRIER, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 18-5401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 30, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

I,Michael Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity Group,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

3.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

Date:       August 5, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/  Michael Schneider      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael Schneider                     |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided to AffinityGroup, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Dan Wayne STREETMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5893.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

EXHIBIT 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Goodman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MidAmerican Energy
   Holdings Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  February 9, 2004
                             /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
                            ------------------------
                               Patrick J. Goodman
                Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
James LaCONTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5732.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Brian DERONCELER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6180.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
John Richard TACQUARD, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-5628.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

WHITBURN, LLC, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-1056 

 ) 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; BASHEER ) 

ALLY; ROOSHNEE ALLY; and ) 

RIVERCREST COMMUNITY ) 

ASSOCIATION, INC., ) 

 ) 

 Appellees. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed January 15, 2016. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Raul C. Palomino, Jr., 

Senior Judge. 

Stuart Jay Levine and Heather A. DeGrave 

of Walters, Levine, Klingensmith & 

Thomison, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. 

Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Rottmann, 

and Taylor L. Broadhead of McGuire 

Woods LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee 

Wells Fargo Bank. 

No appearance for remaining Appellees. 

MORRIS, Judge. 
- 2 - 

 We convert this proceeding to an appeal of a final order and affirm for the 

reasons explained in Whitburn, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2D14-5563 (Fla. 2d 

DCA Dec. 18, 2015). 

SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aquatic Cellulose International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10KSB for the period ending May 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sheridan Westgarde Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and
belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                                /s/  Sheridan Westgarde
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Sheridan Westgarde
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                February 27, 2004
Janet FAWEMIMO, petitioner, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

No. 18M130.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
FOOD MARKETING INST. v. ARGUS LEADER MEDIA.

No. 18A146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 29, 2018.

The application to recall and stay the mandate, presented to Justice Gorsuch and by him referred to the Court, is granted, and the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in case No. 17-1346 is recalled and stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.

Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would deny the application.
Melissa L. BURNETT, petitioner, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, et al.

No. 17-8208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Juan Carlos MARTINEZ-BARRIENTOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5900.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7595

CHRISTOPHER MARSHALL,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(3:11-cv-00568-RBH)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Marshall seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Marshall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of National RV Holdings, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, Bradley C. Albrechtsen, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, and Thomas J. Martini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Bradley C. Albrechtsen                                     |   | /s/ Thomas J. Martini                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Bradley C. Albrechtsen                                         |   | Thomas J. Martini                                                     |
| Chief Executive Officer and President  Date: November 10, 2006 |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and  Financial Officer) |
|                                                           |   | Date: November 10, 2006                                               |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                                NEW WORLD PASTA

                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
                           TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                            (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 1996             1997            1998          1999               2000
                                                ------           ------          ------        ------              ------
<S>                                         <C>             <C>              <C>           <C>                  <C>
Earnings before income taxes..........         31,144           41,720          41,868           3,234                (2,597)
Interest expense......................           --               --             --             26,325                28,903
                                           -------------    -------------   -------------  --------------       ---------------
                                               31,144           41,720          41,868          29,559                26,306
                                           =============    =============   =============   =============       ===============

Interest expense......................           --               --             --             26,325                28,903
Dividends on preferred stock..........           --               --             --             12,611                13,695
                                           -------------    -------------   -------------  --------------       ---------------
                                                 --               --             --             38,936                42,598
                                           =============    =============   =============   =============       ===============
Ratio of Earnings to Combined
     Fixed Charges....................          N/A*             N/A*            N/A*                 .76/( 1)/             .62/(1)/
</TABLE>

*     Historically, New World Pasta has not incurred indebtedness or related
      interest expense as a division of Hershey Foods Corporation.

/(1)/ Combined fixed charges exceed earnings before income taxes for the year
      ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 by $16,292,000 and $9,377,000,
      respectively.
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


 


Date: March 11, 2019


 


Leow Yoon Liang

Director


Venvici Partners Limited


45 Ubi Crescent


Singapore 408590


 


Dear Mr Leow,


 


Re: Appointment of Venvici Partners
Limited As Trustee and Nominee For Share Issuance


 


Noble Vici Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”) will
be issuing an aggregate total of up to Fifteen Million (15,000,000) shares of common stock of the Corporation (“Shares”),
at a per share price of Two Dollars (US $2.00) to all eligible members of the Sales Team (“Members”).


 


Venvici Partners Limited (“VVP”) is hereby appointed
to serve as the trustee and nominee to hold, administer and distribute the Shares on behalf of and, as applicable, to the Members.
Specifically, in its capacity as nominee and trustee, VVP shall:


 


		·	Hold the Shares in its name in trust for and on behalf of the Members;



		·	Administer and retain beneficial ownership records of the Shares;



		·	Distribute, upon a Member’s request and receipt of all relevant
and proper documentation, the Shares to such Member or its designee(s) (“Distribution”), which Distribution shall be
made through VVP’s appointed Brokerage firm (“Broker”); and



		·	Vote the Shares at its discretion at any annual, special or other
meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, or pursuant to any consent in lieu
of a meeting or otherwise, with respect to any matter that may be submitted for a vote of stockholders of the Corporation.



 


The Corporation shall provide to VVP Shareholder Representation
Letters of all Members and any other documents as the Corporation may deem necessary or desirable to assist VVP in fulfilling its
obligations as trustee and nominee hereunder.


 


Thank you.


 


 


Yours Sincerely,


 


 


	/s/ Eldee Tang	 
	Eldee Tang	 
	Chief Executive Officer & Director	 
	Noble Vici Grpu, Inc.	 
	 	 



 


 


------------------------------------------------------------------





Acceptance of Appointment


 


I, Leow Yoon Liang, director and representative
of Noble Infotech Limited, accept the appointment set forth above.


 


Dated this 11th day, March 2019


 


 


/s/ Leow Yoon Liang


Leow Yoon Liang


 


 


1
Raffles Place, #33-02, One Raffles Place Tower One, Singapore 048616
Demian PINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7505.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.