alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40478

Conference Calendar

 

DONALD R. SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; 

MICHAEL A. WILSON, Senior Warden,

Michael Unit; DIRECTOR’S REVIEW 

COMMITTEE, Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-CV-925

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald R. Smith, Texas prisoner # 669727, appeals from 

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous under 28

U.S.C. § 1915 and the denial of his second “motion for

reconsideration.”
No. 97-40478

-2-

Smith’s notice of appeal from the dismissal of his § 1983

complaint is not timely because it was filed more than thirty

days after the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4(a)(1), 59(e); Gribble v. Harris, 625 F.2d 1173, 1174 (5th

Cir. 1980). 

Although the notice of appeal was timely from the district

court’s denial of his second “motion for reconsideration,” that

motion is not an authorized motion. The motion challenges the

district court’s denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. “Rule 4(a)(4)

does not embrace a second Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.” See

United States v. One 1988 Dodge Pickup, 959 F.2d 37, 39 (5th Cir.

1992). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Monserrate ZAPATA, petitioner, v. PECO, et al.

No. 18M29.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to proceed as veteran denied.
Jorge ROBLES-AVALOS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6297.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jose Francisco PUENTES, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-5815.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated April 6, 2012
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/25/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       71,593
COMMITMENTS
  20,186    3,263    9,407   25,439   43,397   55,032   56,067   16,561   15,527

CHANGES FROM 01/18/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,547)
     205      157      371      848      523    1,424    1,051      123      496

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.2      4.6     13.1     35.5     60.6     76.9     78.3     23.1     21.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       89)
      30       14       24       32       30       74       58
```

----

Updated January 28, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.7

                     CONFIRMATION OF GUARANTY AND AGREEMENT

         Reference is made to that certain Guaranty (the "Guaranty") by the
undersigned of all obligations of The J. Jill Group, Inc. (the "Borrower")
executed on June 24, 2001 to Citizens Bank of Massachusetts ("Citizens"),
individually and as Agent for the benefit of, and on behalf of, all Lenders, as
such term is defined in that certain Fifth Amended and Restated Loan Agreement
among Borrower, Citizens, HSBC Bank USA, and Banknorth, N.A. f/k/a Peoples
Heritage Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Bank of New Hampshire, N.A. dated as
of June 29, 2001, as amended as of August 28, 2001, July 25, 2002, and as the
same may hereafter be amended (collectively, the "Loan Agreement"), a copy of
which Guaranty is annexed hereto. The undersigned hereby confirms to Citizens
individually and as Agent that (i) the Guaranty is valid, binding and
enforceable against the undersigned and the undersigned's successors and assigns
in accordance with its terms and (ii) without limiting the definition of
"Obligations" thereunder, the undersigned remains and is liable to Citizens
individually and as Agent for all "Obligations" as defined in the Guaranty.

         Reference is also made to the Loan Agreement. The undersigned hereby
confirms that any representation, warranty or covenant in said Loan Agreement
made to Citizens individually and as Agent as aforesaid by the Borrower
regarding the undersigned including, without limitation, any representation
about the undersigned or any covenant that Borrower will cause the
undersigned to perform or to refrain from performing any act shall be deemed
to be a direct representation, warranty or covenant to Citizens individually
and as Agent from the undersigned, and said Citizens individually and as
Agent may rely upon the same as if such representation, warranty or covenant
had been made directly to Citizens individually and as Agent from the
undersigned.

         Executed as an instrument under seal this 25th day of July, 2002.

                                          J. JILL DIRECT, INC.

                                          By: /s/ John J. Hayes
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Name: John J. Hayes
                                              Title: President and Treasurer
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/19/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      174,320
COMMITMENTS
  50,336   13,651   31,286   72,825  103,008  154,447  147,945   19,872   26,375

CHANGES FROM 07/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -943)
   4,793   -2,373      902   -4,979    2,671      716    1,199   -1,659   -2,142

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.9      7.8     17.9     41.8     59.1     88.6     84.9     11.4     15.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      49       34       53       60       73      133      141
```

----

Updated July 22, 2011
Exhibit 101


		
			
		

		
			Pain Therapeutics, Inc.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			March 20, 2019
		

		
			Via Email and Registered Mail 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			James E. Brown, DVM 
		

		
			President & CEO 
		

		
			Durect Corporation 
		

		
			10260 Bubb Road 
		

		
			Cupertino, CA  95014-4166
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Dear Jim,
		

		
			As you know, Pain Therapeutics, Inc. (“PTI”) is exclusive licensee of certain rights granted by Durect Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Southern BioSystems Inc., (together, “Durect”), as set forth in a DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT dated December 19, 2002 (the “DLA”) and amended from time-to-time.  
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			This letter is to inform that PTI hereby provides written notice of termination of the DLA in its entirely, without cause. Pursuant to Section 15.2 of the DLA, such termination of the DLA shall be effective automatically without further action by either party ninety (90) days from today, or June 18, 2019.  Of course, you may terminate the DLA sooner than June 18, 2019 by providing us with the appropriate written notice.  For clarity, we are not aware of any disputes, claims or controversies regarding the DLA.  
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Within thirty (30) days, we will endeavor to send you a copy of Confidential Information, as that term is defined in Section 13.1 of the DLA.  We intend to keep one copy of any such Confidential Information for record-keeping purposes.
		

		
			﻿
		

		

		

		 


		

			Page 1 of 2

		


		

			 

		




 

		On a personal note, I look back with pride at our collective ability to conceive, build and test a highly abuse-deterrent oxycodone drug product from scratch, and for doing so at a time when pundits told us it couldn’t be done.  As a direct result of our collective efforts, we successfully moved the entire opioid industry towards safer drug formulations. This alone has saved more lives than we’ll ever know.    For this reason, I feel the journey was worth the effort, even if the destination isn’t quite what we expected.  In closing, I salute all your scientists, thinkers and professionals who participated in our remarkable journey together.  I wish you the best as you move Durect in novel scientific directions.    
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Sincerely,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/ Remi Barbier
		

		
			Remi Barbier
		

		
			Chairman, President & CEO
		

		
			Pain Therapeutics, Inc.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Cc: Michael H. Arenberg, J.D, Chief Financial Officer, Durect Corporation
		

		
			﻿
		

		 


		

			Page 2 of 2
ELECTRONIC RECORD // %% "fty

COA # 01-12-01075-CR

71.02 (Engaging in Organized

OFFENSE: Crim Activity) .

Marcus Lee Jefferson v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 180th District Court

DATE: 08/14/2014 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 1321017

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UZMt

U2T-JV Marcus Lee Jefferson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

PRO 3E

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: OSL-fpi'/zOtr

JUDGE: &M UstAss*-!—

f>j{0 SB PETITION

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

th ^ZPtfifJs

t»atr />«(&!Mir.

• JUDGE

Petition

CCA#:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HANSHOW TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Plaintiff,

v. 

SES-IMAGOTAG SA and SESIMAGOTAG

GMBH,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00174-RWS-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Nokia Patent Allegations 

(Counts II and III) Under FRCP 12(b)(6). Docket No. 55. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report 

and Recommendation recommending the denial of Defendants’ motion. Docket No. 100. 

Because no objections have been received, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the 

District Judge of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and, 

except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings 

and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville,

Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203-

RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined the report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (where 

no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, 

abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, it is 

Case 2:23-cv-00174-RWS-RSP Document 108 Filed 10/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2999
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED that the report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 100) is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Nokia Patent Allegations 

(Counts II and III) Under FRCP 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 55) is DENIED. 

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of October, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00174-RWS-RSP Document 108 Filed 10/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3000
# Uradni list C 7/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 7 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 657. januar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 7

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 657. januar 2022

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2022/C 7/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 6. januar 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2022/C 7/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 6. januar 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 7.1.2022 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 7/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2022

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 7/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

6. januar 2022

(2022/C 7/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1315 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 131,05 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4393 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,83593 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,3265 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0395 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 146,80 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 10,0350 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 24,528 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 359,84 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5614 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,9435 |
| TRY | turška lira | 15,5504 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5778 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4451 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,8272 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6752 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5388 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 362,06 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,7932 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,2187 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5197 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 291,88 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,7670 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 57,943 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 86,5088 |
| THB | tajski bat | 37,962 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,4420 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 23,2549 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 84,2475 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1315

JPY

japonski jen

131,05

DKK

danska krona

7,4393

GBP

funt šterling

0,83593

SEK

švedska krona

10,3265

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0395

ISK

islandska krona

146,80

NOK

norveška krona

10,0350

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

24,528

HUF

madžarski forint

359,84

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5614

RON

romunski leu

4,9435

TRY

turška lira

15,5504

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5778

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4451

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,8272

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6752

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5388

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 362,06

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,7932

CNY

kitajski juan

7,2187

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5197

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 291,88

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,7670

PHP

filipinski peso

57,943

RUB

ruski rubelj

86,5088

THB

tajski bat

37,962

BRL

brazilski real

6,4420

MXN

mehiški peso

23,2549

INR

indijska rupija

84,2475

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
Carline CURRY, petitioner, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, OHIO, et al.

No. 18-5567.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 30, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance *359with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DEFENDANT

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 6:YY-cr-XXX-JDK

DEFENDANT’S WAIVER BEFORE SENTENCING HEARING

I acknowledge receipt of the conditions of supervised release or probation 

recommended by the probation office in its Presentence Investigation Report. I 

understand those conditions, including the standard conditions, which are set forth 

in E.D. Tex. General Order 17-3, and I waive the oral pronouncement of them at 

sentencing. When the Court imposes the conditions, I agree to be bound by them and 

acknowledge that my supervised release or probation is subject to revocation, without 

a jury, for violating any of them. 

I am advised that the law provides a defendant a right to appeal a conviction 

and sentence and to seek court-appointed counsel and permission to appeal free of 

cost if unable to pay for an appeal. With few exceptions, any notice of appeal must 

be filed within 14 days of the date judgment is entered or within 14 days of the filing 

of a notice of appeal by the Government. If I have entered into a plea agreement that 

waives certain appellate rights, I am advised that such waiver is generally 

enforceable but may be challenged on appeal if I believe it to be invalid or 

Case 6:23-cr-00049-JDK-KNM Document 28 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 261
2

unenforceable. Understanding my appellate rights, I waive the oral advisement in 

court of those rights.1

Signed: _______________________ Date: _________

Defendant

Witnessed: _______________________

Attorney for Defendant

1 See FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(j).

Case 6:23-cr-00049-JDK-KNM Document 28 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 262
William Christopher HOGAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5775.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--America's Datahub Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 9, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), America's DataHub Consortium 
(``ADC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Accenture Federal Services LLC, Arlington, VA; Clarivate 
Analytics (US) LLC, Chandler, AZ; Dakota Consulting Inc., Silver 
Spring, MD; ICF Incorporated LLC, Fairfax, VA; Integrated Systems 
Solutions, Inc., Tysons Corner, VA; Map-Collective Inc., Washington, 
DC; Research Triangle Institute, dba RTI International, Research 
Triangle Park, NC; TalTeam Inc, Herndon, VA; Trewon Technologies, 
Stafford, VA; Westat, Rockville, MD have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ADC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 11, 2021, ADC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72628).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10270 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000910632

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          1,754,458
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  70,528,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                      476,364
<INVENTORY>                                       173,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                         19,371,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,697,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 74,838,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        27,961,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,917,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   74,838,694
<SALES>                                         1,878,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,878,227
<CGS>                                             643,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  468,636
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                665,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      100,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.26
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
Roberto Moreno RAMOS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6680 (18A510).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 14, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.