alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Eastern District of Texas ✔

Eastern District of Texas

L2 MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD.,

US8,179,913 5/15/2012 L2 Mobile Technologies LLC US8,064,460 11/22/2011 L2 Mobile Technologies LLC US8,483,144 7/9/2013 L2 Mobile Technologies LLC

2:23-cv-00087 3/1/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00087-JRG Document 7 Filed 03/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 372
Marilyn Kaye FREEMAN, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

No. 18-5379.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1836 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1836

    To properly balance the wind and water erosion criteria and the 
wildlife suitability criteria to be used in the 18th signup of land in 
                   the conservation reserve program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1999

 Mr. Bereuter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To properly balance the wind and water erosion criteria and the 
wildlife suitability criteria to be used in the 18th signup of land in 
                   the conservation reserve program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CRITERIA FOR SIGNUP OF HIGHLY ERODIBLE LANDS UNDER 
              CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM.

    (a) Covered Lands.--This section applies with respect to highly 
erodible lands that--
            (1) are included, as of the date of the enactment of this 
        section, in the conservation reserve under subchapter B of 
        chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act 
        of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3831 et seq.);
            (2) meet the wind and water erosion criteria established 
        for conservation reserve lands; and
            (3) have an established plant cover.
    (b) Treatment of Lands in Signup.--Highly erodible lands described 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to meet the criteria regarding 
suitability for wildlife and shall receive maximum points for wildlife 
benefits in the 18th signup of land in the conservation reserve and 
subsequent signups.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: : NO. 825

:

ORDER REGARDING RULE : SUPREME COURT RULES

322 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA :

BAR ADMISSION RULES : DOCKET

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1 3 th day of February, 2020, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s order

dated January 15, 2020, amending Rule 322 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Bar Admission

, is stayed pending further order of the Court.
Sonya Patrice WYATT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9481.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1783 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1783

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deadline for 
filing estate tax returns from 9 months to 24 months after a decedent's 
                                 death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

 Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deadline for 
filing estate tax returns from 9 months to 24 months after a decedent's 
                                 death.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR FILING ESTATE TAX RETURN FROM 9 
              MONTHS TO 24 MONTHS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6075 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to time for filing estate and gift tax returns) is amended by 
striking ``9 months'' and inserting ``24 months''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to decedents dying after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for Testing and Training Activities in 
the Patuxent River Complex

AGENCY: Department of the Navy (DoN), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Department of the Navy, after carefully 
weighing the strategic, operational, and environmental consequences of 
the Proposed Action (Patuxent River Complex Final Environmental Impact 
Statement published in the Federal Register on March 25, 2022), 
announces its decision to conduct testing and training as identified in 
Alternative 2, the Navy's Preferred Alternative, of the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Testing and Training 
Activities in the Patuxent River Complex (PRC).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Implementation of Alternative 2 will enable 
the Navy and other U.S. military services to meet their respective 
missions. The Navy's mission, under Title 10 United States Code 
(U.S.C.) section 8062, is to maintain, train, and equip combat-ready 
military forces capable of winning wars, deterring aggression, and 
maintaining freedom of the seas. The Navy will continue to implement 
the full suite of mitigation measures detailed in Table 3.10-1 (Impact 
Avoidance and Minimization Measures) of the PRC Final EIS to avoid or 
reduce potential environmental impacts during testing and training 
activities. The complete text of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the 
PRC Final EIS is available on the project website at www.prceis.com, 
along with the March 2022 PRC Final EIS and supporting documents. 
Single copies of the ROD are available upon request by contacting: 
Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Atlantic, Attention: Code 
EV21JB, 6506 Hampton Boulevard, Norfolk, VA 23508.

J.M. Pike,
Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-10743 Filed 5-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
I,  Gerald  A  DeCiccio,  certify  that:

1.     I  have  reviewed  this  report  on  Form 10-KSB of GTC Telecom Corp. and
subsidiaries  (the  "Registrant");

2.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report.

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)
designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report  based  on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the  registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the  registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably  likely  to  affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;  and;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)  all  significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process, summarize and report financial
information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or  other  employees  who  have  a significant role in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting.

Date:  September  28,  2004

/s/  Gerald  A.  DeCiccio
Gerald  A.  DeCiccio
Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Accounting  Officer)
J.E., aka J.E.C., petitioner, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

No. 18-7153.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Matthew Joseph BUSSING, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-5557.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Bob Lee JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6361.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
1 ... S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DI STRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 26 2- CV I N R E J E R OM E D. B R OW N R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NAL P R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o r w r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is of th e o pi ni on t hat r el i ef s houl d be de ni ed. Accor di ngl y, r el at or ’ s pet i t i on f or w r i t of m and am us i s den i ed.
P E R CU R I AM P A N E L A : C A Y C E , C .J .; W A L K E R a n d M C C O Y , J J . DEL I VERE D: J ul y 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 11

                      IVC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
        (Dollars in Thousands, Except as Noted or Per Share Information)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Years Ended
                                                                     July 31,
                                                                     --------
                                                         2000          1999            1998
                                                         ----          ----            ----
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>             <C>
Net income (loss)                                     $    5,074    $   (7,041)     $    1,147
Less - preferred stock dividends                              --            --              --
                                                      ----------    ----------      ----------
Net income (loss) for basic income per common
share                                                 $    5,074    $   (7,041)     $    1,147
                                                      ==========    ==========      ==========

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding during the year - Basic                 2,088,092     2,148,143       2,143,191

Add- common equivalent shares
  (determined using the "treasury stock" method)
  representing shares issuable upon exercise of
  employee stock options and incentive
  performance shares                                       2,414           766          11,174
                                                      ----------    ----------      ----------

Weighted average number of common shares - Diluted     2,090,506     2,148,909       2,154,365
                                                      ==========    ==========      ==========

Income (loss) per common share - Diluted              $     2.43    $    (3.28)     $     0.53
                                                      ==========    ==========      ==========
</TABLE>


                                       E-1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Docket Control 

Order, Discovery Order, and Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC and 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Dkt. No. 52.

After consideration, and noting its joint nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff Headwater Research and Defendant Samsung 

to file a proposed docket control order, discovery order, and protective order in the abovecaptioned case is extended to October 26, 2023. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 53 Filed 10/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1863
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust III (the “Trust”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
            Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            March
      17, 2008








/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
            Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Dated:
            March
      17, 2008
**EXHIBIT 23.2**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 File No.333-119432 pertaining to the 1996 Israeli Employee Stock Option Plan, the 1998 U.S. Stock OptionPlan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, on Form S-8 File No. 333-101224 pertaining to the 1996Israeli Employee Stock Option Plan, the 1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee StockPurchase Plan, on Form S-8 File No. 333-68804 pertaining to the 1996 Israeli Employee Stock OptionPlan, the 1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, on Form S-8 File No.333-84659 pertaining to the 1996 Israeli Employee Stock Option Plan, the 1996 U.S. Option Plan, the1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, on Form S-8 File No. 333-51098pertaining to the 1996 Israeli Employee Stock Option Plan, the 1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan and 1999Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and on Form S-3 File No. 333-42384 of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. ofour report, dated January 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofBackWeb Technologies Ltd. included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2005.              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP         
March 27, 2006
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



| | (a) |  | MetaSolv Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------

| | (b) |  | MetaSolv Canada Inc., a Canadian (Nova Scotia) corporation
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

| | (c) |  | MetaSolv Canada Holdings Inc., a Canadian (Nova Scotia) corporation
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (d) |  | MetaSolv Software Canada Inc., a Canadian (Nova Scotia) corporation
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (e) |  | MetaSolv Holdings (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom private limited company
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (f) |  | Orchestream Holdings Ltd., a United Kingdom private limited company
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (g) |  | MetaSolv Software (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom private limited company
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emory WATKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7996.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of *United States v. Davis,* 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2319, --- L.E.2d ---- (2019).
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely
 -E 4-




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 By:
    /s/ Gregory T. DonovanGregory T. DonovanSenior Vice President of Accounting and Finance
Campbell & Company, Inc.
General Partner
Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. 
May 15, 2008 -E 5-