alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11226 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE SANTOS PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-235-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Santos Perez (Perez) appeals the sentence he received on his guilty-plea convictions of conspiracy to possess stolen mail and possession of stolen mail. We AFFIRM. Perez’s sole contention is that the district court clearly erred by enhancing his sentence on the ground that there were more than 50 victims of his offenses. Section 2B1.1(b)(2)(B) of the Sentencing Guidelines authorizes a four-level increase in a defendant’s offense level if that occurred. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 22, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-11226 -2- The district court based its finding on the presentence report and testimony of a Secret Service special agent that more than 150 government checks were stolen and some 71 check-cashers and other endorsers were victimized during the conspiracy of which Perez was a leader. This evidence was plausible and uncontradicted by any defense evidence. Thus the district court’s finding was not clearly erroneous, and Perez’s sentence must be affirmed. See United States v. Young , 981 F.2d 180, 185 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
Michael PARNELL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6246.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32-B

FARO Technologies, Inc.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FARO Technologies, Inc., (the Company), and the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of the Company for the period covered
the Report, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/    KEITH S.
BAIR
|Keith S. Bair       
|March 10, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-14595 and 333-02522) of Sun Communities Operating Limited
Partnership of our report dated February 19, 2004 relating to the 2003
consolidated financial statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the aforementioned
registration statements of our reports dated February 3, 2004 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Origen Financial Inc. and Origen Financial,
L.L.C. which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Southfield, Michigan
March 15, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1982 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Rome, 
 New York, as the ``Donald J. Mitchell Department of Veterans Affairs 
                          Outpatient Clinic''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1982

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To name the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Rome, 
 New York, as the ``Donald J. Mitchell Department of Veterans Affairs 
                          Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Rome, New 
York, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Donald J. Mitchell Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference to such outpatient clinic in a law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Donald J. Mitchell Department of 
Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 9:23-CR-7

'

VERNON TAYLOR, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed 

by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate 

judge recommended that the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further 

recommended that the court adjudge the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed 

against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Vernon Taylor, is adjudged 

Case 9:23-cr-00007-MAC-ZJH Document 39 Filed 12/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 145
2

guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) -

Possession with the Intent to Distribute Phencyclidine (PCP).

Case 9:23-cr-00007-MAC-ZJH Document 39 Filed 12/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 146
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/29/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      512,468
COMMITMENTS
  38,293   41,272  129,820  323,464  325,539  491,577  496,631   20,890   15,837

CHANGES FROM 05/22/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     14,761)
  -1,841   -4,647   13,599    3,296    5,137   15,054   14,089     -293      672

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.5      8.1     25.3     63.1     63.5     95.9     96.9      4.1      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      24       31       45       65       63      122      112
```

----

Updated June 5, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000910280
<NAME>                        Cinemark Mexico USA INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      11,082,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     97,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,497,782
<PP&E>                                      27,377,822
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,012,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,250,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,425,532
<BONDS>                                     34,645,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,045
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,675,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,250,790
<SALES>                                     16,904,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,904,941
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,692,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,045,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,325,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   103,422
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,429,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,429,059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11098]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, May 25, 2022, 10-11 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will be held remotely.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Briefing Matter:
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Safety Standard for Recreational 
Off-Highway Vehicle and Utility Task/Terrain Vehicle Debris Penetration 
Hazards.
    All attendees should pre-register for the Commission meeting using 
the following link: https://cpsc.webex.com/cpsc/onstage/g.php?MTID=e7b57b48965ca252d4a0572526961419a.
    After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing 
information about joining the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: May 18, 2022.
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-11098 Filed 5-19-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2049 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2049

 To rename Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts as ``Wolf Trap 
                National Park for the Performing Arts''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

    Mr. Davis of Virginia (for himself and Mr. Wolf) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rename Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts as ``Wolf Trap 
                National Park for the Performing Arts''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING.

    The park in Fairfax County, Virginia, established under Public Law 
89-671 (16 U.S.C. 284 et seq.) and known as Wolf Trap Farm Park for the 
Performing Arts, is hereby renamed ``Wolf Trap National Park for the 
Performing Arts''. Any reference to such park in any law, regulation, 
map, document, paper, or other record of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Wolf Trap National Park for the 
Performing Arts''.
                                 <all>
```
John THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONAC0 COACH
CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 4, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                     50,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,207
<PP&E>                                          64,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,750
<BONDS>                                         10,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,773
<SALES>                                        137,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               137,169
<CGS>                                          118,822
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
Virginia S. CAUDILL, petitioner, v. Janet CONOVER, Warden.

No. 18-5880.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         110,240
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  64,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,333
<PP&E>                                         6,098,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,447,986)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,824,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,997
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,816,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,824,352
<SALES>                                        94,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               99,026
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  465,296<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (413,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (413,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (413,818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Ruby BLACKMON, petitioner, v. EATON CORPORATION.

No. 18-6388.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

*809Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2054 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2054

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce for individuals 
   the maximum rate of tax on unrecaptured section 1250 gain from 25 
                         percent to 20 percent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

Mr. English (for himself, Mr. Ose, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. 
     Shays, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. Foley, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Gary Miller of 
  California, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Sandlin, and Mr. Davis of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce for individuals 
   the maximum rate of tax on unrecaptured section 1250 gain from 25 
                         percent to 20 percent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION FOR INDIVIDUALS IN MAXIMUM CAPITAL GAINS RATES ON 
              UNRECAPTURED SECTION 1250 GAIN.

    (a) Regular Tax.--
            (1) Paragraph (1) of section 1(h) of the Internal Revenue 
        Code of 1986 (relating to maximum capital gains rate) is 
        amended by adding ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (C), by 
        striking subparagraph (D), and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (E) as subparagraph (D).
            (2) Paragraph (4) of section 1(h) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``the sum of--'' and all that follows and inserting 
        ``28-percent rate gain.''
            (3) Subsection (h) of section 1 of such Code is amended by 
        striking paragraph (7) and by redesignating paragraphs (8) 
        through (12) as paragraphs (7) through (11), respectively.
            (4) Paragraph (8) of section 1(h) of such Code (as 
        redesignated by paragraph (3)) is amended by striking ``, gain 
        described in paragraph (7)(A)(i), and''.
            (5) Paragraph (13) of section 1(h) of such Code is hereby 
        repealed.
    (b) Minimum Tax.--
            (1) Clause (ii) of section 55(b)(3)(A) of such Code is 
        amended to read as follows:
                            ``(ii) the adjusted net capital gain, 
                        plus''.
            (2) Paragraph (3) of section 55(b) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``plus'' at the end of subparagraph (C) and 
        inserting a period and by striking subparagraph (D).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

AKOUSTIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET 

AL.

v.

QORVO, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-CV-0180-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Previously, the Court appointed Michael Paul as the technical advisor to the Court in this 

action with his costs to be assessed equally between Plaintiff and Defendant and timely paid as 

billed. The Court has received Mr. Paul’s invoice for services through October 24, 2024 in the 

amount of $5,805.63 and hereby ORDERS payment to be promptly made as follows:

Plaintiff: $2,902.81

Defendants: $2,902.82

Case 2:23-cv-00180-JRG-RSP Document 159 Filed 12/11/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

5573
Bobby Joe ROSA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5587.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.