alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2
  CERTIFICATION
 I, Eran Gilad, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Silicom Ltd.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the Company and have:
  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and;
 
   5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors:
  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; an
  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: October 19, 2010
 /S/ Eran Gilad

Eran Gilad, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TurboChef
Technologies, Inc.Dallas, Texas

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Numbers 333-82518 and 333-117806 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Numbers
333-81571 and 333-76662 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2003, except
as to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements which is as of November 18,
2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TurboChef
Technologies, Inc. appearing in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2002. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP

Dallas, Texas
 Decmeber 6, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VISIGENIC
SOFTWRE, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, MARCH 31, 1996 AND 1997 AND VISIGENIC
SOFTWARE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH
31, 1995, 1996 AND 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (144)
<INVENTORY>                                         23
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,169
<PP&E>                                           4,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,420
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,333
<SALES>                                         17,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,018
<CGS>                                            2,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (351)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,330)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.63)
        

</TABLE>
People's Credit Card Master Trust

      Independent Accountants' Report on Management's Assertion Concerning
                  People's Bank's Compliance with Article IV,
               Section 4.2 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement


                        Independent Accountants' Report

People's Bank
850 Main Street
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604

Bankers Trust Company
Four Albany Street
New York, New York 10006


We have examined the assertion made by the management of People's Bank
("People's") in the accompanying report, entitled Management Report
on People's Bank's Compliance with Article IV, Section 4.2 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement that, as of December 31, 1999, People's was in compliance
with the provisions set forth in Article IV, Section 4.2 of the Amended and
Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated March 18, 1997 (as heretofore
amended, supplemented or otherwise modified), including the applicable
supplements dated March 1, 1995, July 1, 1996, March 18, 1997, September 1,
1997, April 1, 1998 and September 29, 1999 (collectively, the "Pooling and
Servicing Agreement") between Bankers Trust Company, as trustee, and People's
as transferor and servicer.  Management is responsible for People's compliance
with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about People's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about People's compliance with the
aforementioned provisions and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide
a legal determination on People's compliance with those provisions.

In our opinion, management's assertion that People's was in compliance with
the aforementioned provisions of Article IV, Section 4.2 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement as of December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all
material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 10, 2000
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/10/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      146,548
COMMITMENTS
  37,210   32,242   19,235   71,890   66,545  128,335  118,022   18,213   28,526

CHANGES FROM 04/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,550)
     629    4,325    1,383    1,680   -2,904    3,692    2,804     -142      746

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.4     22.0     13.1     49.1     45.4     87.6     80.5     12.4     19.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      39       50       40       58       58      120      129
```

----

Updated April 13, 2012
Filed 1/31/23 P. v. Young CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DESHAWN M. YOUNG,

Defendant and Appellant.

 D080660

 (Super. Ct. No. SCD293752)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, 

Polly H. Shamoon, Judge. Affirmed. 

Nathanael Crowley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for 

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Deshawn M. Young pleaded guilty to possession of a loaded firearm in 

public (Pen. Code, § 25850, subd. (a)) and misdemeanor possession of cocaine 

(Health and Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)). Young was granted probation for 

two years subject to various conditions. One of the conditions of probation 

required that Young use “no marijuana at all.” Young did not object to the 

condition. 
2

Young filed a timely notice of appeal. 

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 

25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) indicating counsel has not been able to identify any 

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the 

record for error as mandated by Wende. We offered Young the opportunity to 

file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Young admitted he possessed a loaded firearm in public and that he 

possessed cocaine. 

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks 

the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and 

in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel 

has identified a possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential 

merits of this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in imposing a “no 

marijuana use” condition in light of the convictions for possession of cocaine 

and a loaded firearm.

We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. 

We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. 

Competent counsel has represented Young on this appeal.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

IRION, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

JERRAL W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS, CYNTHIA 

DAVIS f/k/a CYNTHIA DAVISSPENCER

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-00032-RWS

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Opposed Motion for Continuance and Extension of Time 

to Respond to Jerral W. Jones and the Dismissed Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions for Destruction 

of Evidence Against Alexandra Davis and Cynthia Davis-Spencer. Docket No. 130. Having 

reviewed Defendants’ opposed motion and the deadlines contained in the Docket Control Order 

(Docket No. 38), it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff Jerral W. Jones respond to Defendants’ Opposed Motion for 

Continuance (Docket No. 130) no later than Friday, June 14, 2024 at 12 p.m. CDT. No further 

briefing shall be permitted. 

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SIGNED this 12th day of June, 2024.

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 132 Filed 06/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2567
Travis HORNE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5061.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Clarence D. LEWIS, petitioner, v. Johnny HEDGEMON, et al.

No. 18-5413.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
William KNIGHT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5586.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 15, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 02-20792

____________

THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS &

SURGEONS INC; RON PAUL, Congressman M D; DAWN

RICHARDSON; REBECCA REX; DARRELL MCCORMICK,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES; TOMMY THOMPSON, as Secretary of the U S

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

H-01-CV-2963

Before DUHÉ, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. Ass’n of Am. Physicians & Surgeons v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human
-2-

Servs., 224 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (S.D. Tex. 2002).
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/24/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,835
COMMITMENTS
   8,011      183       50   21,089   28,449   29,150   28,682    9,685   10,153

CHANGES FROM 07/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,952)
     402     -290     -589    1,876    2,370    1,689    1,491    1,263    1,461

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.6      0.5      0.1     54.3     73.3     75.1     73.9     24.9     26.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
      12        1        3       27       24       39       28
```

----

Updated July 27, 2012
Enrique Lopez LARA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9310.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-35-MAC

'

GEORGE LYNN BROWN, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea.

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, George Lynn Brown, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00035-MAC-ZJH Document 21 Filed 09/11/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
2

adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

Case 1:23-cr-00035-MAC-ZJH Document 21 Filed 09/11/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
SSL SERVICES, LLC, petitioner, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 18-468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
In Re Robert N. SMITHBACK, petitioner.

No. 18-5799.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
MAURICE NESBITT ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4800

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 20, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SWANSON, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Kentucky 
Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial statements as of and 
for the three month period ended December 26, 1998 included in this 
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such condensed consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>			0000910394
<NAME>			KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000
<CURRENCY>	     	U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>				        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	        SEP-25-1999 
<PERIOD-START>	        SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>	        DEC-26-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>	                  1         
<CASH>		                134
<SECURITIES>	                  0        
<RECEIVABLES>	             12,444   
<ALLOWANCES>	                440    
<INVENTORY>		             20,281     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	             38,502
<PP&E>		             50,413
<DEPRECIATION>	             15,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	             80,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	             25,506
<BONDS>		             20,000
<COMMON>		                 50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	                  0
<PREFERRED>		                  0
<OTHER-SE>		             34,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         80,502
<SALES>		             25,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	             25,624
<CGS>		             23,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>	             23,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	                553 
<INCOME-PRETAX>	               (142)
<INCOME-TAX>	                (54)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	                (88)
<DISCONTINUED>	                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	                  0
<CHANGES>		                  0
<NET-INCOME>	                (88)
<EPS-PRIMARY>	               (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>	               (.02)

</TABLE>
mchx-ex1043_761.htm



Exhibit 10.43

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO 

PAY-FOR-CALL DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 4 (“Amendment No. 4”), effective as of December 31, 2018 (the “Amendment 4 Effective Date”), is being entered into by and between Marchex Sales LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formerly known as Marchex Sales, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marchex, Inc. (“Marchex”), and Dex Media, Inc, successor in interest to YellowPages.com LLC formerly doing business as AT&T Interactive or ATTi (“DexYP”), to amend the Pay-For-Call Distribution Agreement entered between DexYP and Marchex effective as of January 1, 2011, as amended by Amendment 1 effective December 31, 2012, Amendment 2 effective June 25, 2015, and Amendment 3 effective December 15, 2016 (together, the “Agreement”). DexYP and Marchex may hereinafter be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

WHEREAS, Marchex provides certain pay-for-call advertising services to DexYP pursuant to the terms of the Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to extend the term and amend certain provisions of the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual acknowledgements and agreements hereinafter contained, including to be legally bound, the Parties agree as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Term - Section 7.1. In accordance with the language in Section 7.1 of the Agreement, the Parties hereby agree to renew the Agreement through and including December 31, 2019. Thus, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect through and including December 31, 2019.
	
 





	
 
	
2.
	
Party References. Any reference to ATTi or YP in the Agreement shall be replaced with or deemed to refer to DexYP.
	
 





	
 
	
3.
	
Other Terms of Agreement Unchanged. Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
	
 





	
 
	
4.
	
Authority. Each person signing this Amendment hereby represents and warrants that he or she has full authority to execute this Amendment for the Party on whose behalf he or she is signing.
	
 





	
 
	
5.
	
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. A signature received electronically via facsimile or email shall be as legally binding for all purposes as an original signature.
	
 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 4 effective as of the Amendment 4 Effective Date.

DEX MEDIA, INC.MARCHEX SALES LLC

BY: /s/John GregoryBY: /s/Michelle Paterniti

Name: John Gregory                                               Name: Michelle Paterniti

Title: Vice President                                          Title: President