alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1869

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 16, 1999

Received

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the

prohibition on stalking, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1869 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stalking Prevention

3 and Victim Protection Act of 1999’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE PROHIBITION ON STALKING.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2261A of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘§ 2261A. Stalking

8 ‘‘(a) Whoever—

9 ‘‘(1) for the purpose of stalking an individual,

10 travels or causes another to travel in interstate or

11 foreign commerce, uses or causes another to use the

12 mail or any facility in interstate or foreign com13 merce, or enters or leaves, or causes another to

14 enter or leave, Indian country; or

15 ‘‘(2) within the special maritime and territorial

16 jurisdiction of the United States or within Indian

17 country, stalks an individual,

18 shall be punished as provided in section 2261.

19 ‘‘(b) For purposes of this section, a person stalks an

20 individual if that person engages in conduct—

21 ‘‘(1) with the intent to injure or harass the in22 dividual; and

23 ‘‘(2) that places the individual in reasonable

24 fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury (as de25 fined for the purposes of section 2119) to, that indi26 vidual, a member of that individual’s immediate
3

HR 1869 RFS

1 family (as defined in section 115), or that individ2 ual’s intimate partner.

3 ‘‘(c) The court shall at the time of sentencing for an

4 offense under this section issue an appropriate protection

5 order designed to protect the victim from further stalking

6 by the convicted person. Such an order shall remain in

7 effect for such time as the court deems necessary, and may

8 be modified, extended or terminated at any time after no9 tice to the victim and opportunity for a hearing.’’.

10 (b) DETENTION PENDING TRIAL.—Section

11 3156(a)(4)(C) of title 18, United States Code, is amended

12 by inserting ‘‘, or section 2261A’’ after ‘‘117’’.

13 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

14 at the beginning of chapter 110A of title 18, United States

15 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section

16 2261A and inserting the following:

‘‘2261A. Stalking.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 10,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,334
<SECURITIES>                                    73,463
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,083
<PP&E>                                             878
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (351)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,975
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,123
<OTHER-SE>                                    (73,713)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,626
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,311
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,782)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,782)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.59)


</TABLE>
CONCHISE CONSULTANCY, INC., et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, ex rel. Billy Joe HUNT.

No. 18-315.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11

                          Detroit Diesel Corporation
                Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                          Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                                           1998                   1997
                                                                                        ----------             ---------- 

<S>                                                                                    <C>                    <C>  
 Basic net income per share
                
              Net income                                                                 9,700,000              6,400,000

              Weighted average number of shares outstanding                             24,700,566             24,698,066
                                                                                        ----------             ---------- 
 Basic net income per share                                                                   0.39                   0.26
                                                                                        ==========             ========== 

 Diluted net income per share:
              Net income                                                                 9,700,000              6,400,000

              Weighted average number of shares outstanding                             24,700,566             24,698,066
              Dilutive effect of stock options                                              61,683  (1)               304  (2)
                                                                                        ----------             ---------- 
              Weighted average number of shares outstanding                             24,762,249             24,698,370

 Diluted net income per share                                                                 0.39                   0.26
                                                                                        ==========             ========== 
</TABLE>


(1)  Represents the weighted average dilutive effect of 297,750, 265,500,
     105,000, 20,000 and 2,500 stock options exercisable at $20.00, $17.00,
     $23.75, $21.81 and $23.94 per share, respectively, calculated using the
     treasury stock method.

(2)  Represents the weighted average dilutive effect of 303,750, 217,500,
     108,000 and 5,000 stock options exercisable at $20.00, $17.00, $23.75 and
     $18.00 per share, respectively, calculated using the treasury stock method.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1887 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1887

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the depiction of 
                            animal cruelty.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1887

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the depiction of 
                            animal cruelty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUNISHMENT FOR DEPICTION OF ANIMAL CRUELTY.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 48. Depiction of animal cruelty
    ``(a) Creation, Sale, or Possession.--Whoever knowingly creates, 
sells, or possesses a depiction of animal cruelty with the intention of 
placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial 
gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 
years, or both.
    ``(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply to any depiction 
that has serious religious, political, scientific, educational, 
journalistic, historical, or artistic value.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section--
            ``(1) the term `depiction of animal cruelty' means any 
        visual or auditory depiction, including any photograph, motion-
        picture film, video recording, electronic image, or sound 
        recording of conduct in which a living animal is intentionally 
        maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, if such 
        conduct is illegal under Federal law or the law of the State in 
        which the creation, sale, or possession takes place, regardless 
        of whether the maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding, or 
        killing took place in the State; and
            ``(2) the term `State' means each of the several States, 
        the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the 
        Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the 
        Northern Mariana Islands, and any other commonwealth, 
        territory, or possession of the United States.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``48. Depiction of animal cruelty.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.19
 SUMMARY OF SENIOR MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PLAN
  PURPOSE
 ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
 
    
    Executive Officers
    
    Commercial Vice Presidents
    
    Certain Corporate Vice Presidents and Managers
    
    Others, as determined in accordance with the Plan
  COMPANY PERFORMANCE FACTORS
 AMOUNT OF INCENTIVE
 PAYOUT SCHEDULE
 This
document is not intended, and shall not be construed so as to, confer
any contractual right upon any executive or other employee. The Company
reserves the right to amend the Plan from time-to-time (and at any
time) in any manner, to terminate the Plan, to pay no bonus to any
particular person or group of persons, and to decrease bonus amounts
and/or increase bonus amounts from the level(s) otherwise required by
the Plan as to any particular person or group of persons.
Tyrone HART, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6474.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
GULICK TRUCKING, INC., petitioner, v. WASHINGTON STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT.

No. 18-466.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1925

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit sex offenders from entering

National Parks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit sex

offenders from entering National Parks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Parks Act of

5 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING SEX OFFENDERS FROM ENTERING

7 NATIONAL PARKS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 91 of title 18, United

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing:
2

•HR 1925 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1865. Sex offenders prohibited from entering na2 tional parks

3 ‘‘Whoever, being a person required to register under

4 section 107101 of the Violent Crime Control and Law En5 forcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14071), knowingly en6 ters into a unit of the National Park System, as defined

7 in section 2(a) of the Act of August 8, 1953 (Chapter 384,

8 67 Stat. 496) shall be fined under this title or imprisoned

9 not more than 3 years, or both.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

11 at the beginning of chapter 91 of title 18, United States

12 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

13 item:

‘‘1865. Sex offenders prohibited from entering national parks.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel; Conflicting F and K Grant Applications of 
National Institute of Nursing Research.
    Date: June 13, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Nursing Research, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 22150 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-5966, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a1d06032a070b030644040302440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37405b5e775a565e5b19595e5f19505841">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: June 23-24, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Nursing Research, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 22150 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ming Yan, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 703G, Bethesda 20892, (301) 
435-1776, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a736b646763646d4a676b636624646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2dbc3cccfcbccc5e2cfc3cbce8ccccbca8cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 12, 2022.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10626 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

MARSHALL DIVISION 

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. move 

for Lindsay M. Cooper, to be permitted to withdraw as counsel for Defendants in this case. 

Defendants will continue to be represented by the law firms of Quinn Emanual Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP and Fish & Richardson. The withdrawal of Lindsay M. Cooper will not prejudice 

any party. Plaintiff does not oppose this Motion. 

Defendants further requests the Clerk terminate all CM/ECF notifications as to Lindsay M. 

Cooper for this action. 

Dated: August 26 , 2024 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Kevin (Gyushik) Jang

Kevin (Gyushik) Jang

kevinjang@quinnemanuel.com 

CA State Bar No. 337747 

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 

50 California Street, 22nd Fl

San Francisco, CA 94111

Attorneys for Defendants

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 120 Filed 08/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5109
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that the foregoing document was filed electronically on August 26, 2024 

pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a) and has been served on all counsel who have consented to 

electronic service. 

/s/ Kevin (Gyushik) Jang 

Kevin (Gyushik) Jang 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

On August 1, 2024, counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants met and conferred 

pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h). Defendants do not oppose the relief sought herein. 

/s/ Kevin (Gyushik) Jang 

Kevin (Gyushik) Jang 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 120 Filed 08/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5110
In Re Curtis EVANS, petitioner.

No. 18-8006.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00212

Jay Williams,

Plaintiff,

v.

Botie Hillhouse,

Defendant.

ORD ER

Plaintiff Jay Williams, an inmate at the Henderson County 

Jail, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged 

violations of his rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case 

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On 

May 12, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending 

that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b)(1). Doc. 3. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that dismissal of this case should count as a qualifying 

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 

F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff has not objected to the report 

and recommendation but has filed a handwritten coupon (Doc. 4), 

apparently in attempt to pay the filing fee.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation.

The court agrees that plaintiff’s duplicative, frivolous, and 

malicious filings are an abuse of the judicial process. Plaintiff has 

only continued his pattern of practice since the issuance of the 

report and recommendation, filing numerous additional cases 

with the same deficiencies. See Case Nos. 6:23-cv-00256, 6:23-cv00257, 6:23-cv-00258, 6:23-cv-00260, 6:23-cv-00263, 6:23-cvCase 6:23-cv-00212-JCB-JDL Document 5 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
- 2 -

00298, 6:23-cv-00300, and 6:23-cv-00301. Moreover, as plaintiff 

has been made aware, the filing of a handwritten “coupon” is not 

an acceptable form of payment and does not therefore affect the 

court’s screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See Case No. 

6:23-cv-00258, Doc. 3.

Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The dismissal of this action under 

§ 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 388. Plaintiff is warned that if 

he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed 

in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent 

danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). All motions pending in this civil action are denied.

So ordered by the court on June 30, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00212-JCB-JDL Document 5 Filed 06/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Keith A. SimpsonKeith A. Simpson
Vice-President and Chief Accounting Officer


Date: May 2, 2011

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-4
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00266

- CR
Jose Luis GONZALES , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR12836 Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 12, 2019
DISMISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states: “[T]his criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: ( a ) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or ( b ) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain , establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a04

- 19

- 00266

- CR

- 2

- written motion filed and ruled upon before trial , nor does it indicate the trial court gave its permission to appeal

. See id. The trial court’s certification , therefore, appears to accurately reflect
that this is a plea

- bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal

. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). We issued an order stating this appeal would be dismi ssed unless an amended trial court certification was made part of the appellate record by May 30, 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Accordingly, t his appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25

. 2 (d)

. PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH