alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
Enterprise Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan
2019 Addendum


This Addendum to the Enterprise Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is effective for the Plan year commencing on January 1, 2019 (the "2019 Plan Year") and is intended to set forth certain provisions of the Plan that are determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Enterprise Bancorp Board of Directors (the "Compensation Committee").  Plan eligibility and Plan contributions will be reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee.


Plan Eligibility
The Chief Executive Officer and individuals with an officer status of Executive Vice President will be eligible for Plan contributions. 


Employer Plan Contribution
Plan contributions will be made annually on or before March 15 of the year following the plan year and will be as follows for 2019:


Service Based ContributionsA service-based contribution of $18,000 will be made for the following Executive Vice Presidents for 2019: 
		
	•
	Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer        


		
	•
	Managing Director of Wealth Management & Chief Operating Officer




A service-based contribution of $75,000 will be made for the Chief Executive Officer for 2019.


Performance Based Contributions
Executive Vice Presidents will each receive an additional contribution if the specified performance metric is met:


	
						
	 
	.5
	.75
	Target
	1.25
	1.5

	Net Income Metric
	$28.50M
	$30.679M
	$32.857M
	$33.857M
	$34.857M

	Contribution Amount
	$3,500
	$5,250
	$7,000
	$14,000
	$21,000






Chief Executive Officer will receive an additional contribution if the specified performance metric is met:


	
						
	 
	.5
	.75
	Target
	1.25
	1.5

	Net Income Metric
	$28.50M
	$30.679M
	$32.857M
	$33.857M
	$34.857M

	Contribution Amount
	$12,500
	$18,750
	$25,000
	$37,500
	$50,000
Martin VEGA-ORTIZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8527.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the annual report of Bidville,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Robert W. Pearce, Chief Financial Officer (or the equivalent
thereof) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Robert W. Pearce
                              -------------------------
                              Robert W. Pearce, Acting Treasurer
                              Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              September 29, 2004
Arlow Antone KAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5693.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      431,265
COMMITMENTS
  70,467  162,570   73,458  255,792  165,187  399,717  401,215   31,548   30,050

CHANGES FROM 09/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     24,307)
  -3,128    4,106    4,475   23,216   16,989   24,563   25,570     -256   -1,263

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.3     37.7     17.0     59.3     38.3     92.7     93.0      7.3      7.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      163)
      41       74       80       32       37      127      148
```

----

Updated September 21, 2012
Exhibit 11

     Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings


         SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
     STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                         Year Ended June 30,
                                     1998          1997        1996

Primary
   Average shares outstanding    1,532,910     1,549,032   1,639,509

   Net income                   $1,064,463    $1,054,687  $1,466,522

    Earnings per share          $      .69    $      .68  $      .89

Fully Diluted
   Average shares outstanding    1,532,910     1,549,032   1,639,509

 Net effect of dilutive stock
  options - based on the treasury
     stock method                   51,563        38,072      40,481

  Average diluted shares
   outstanding                   1,584,473     1,587,104   1,679,990

        Net income              $1,064,463    $1,054,687  $1,466,522

       Earnings per share       $      .67    $      .67  $      .87
Exhibit 99

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

WVS
Financial Corp.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of WVS Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2010;
the related consolidated statement of income for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009; the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010; and the
consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheet of WVS Financial Corp. as of June 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein),
and in our report dated September 14, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|                        
|Wexford, PA             
|November 4, 2010        



E-5
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/23/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      376,801
COMMITMENTS
  67,021  157,118   60,072  223,991  132,887  351,084  350,077   25,717   26,724

CHANGES FROM 10/16/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -48,176)
  -5,932   -3,253   -8,486  -32,883  -36,784  -47,301  -48,523     -875      347

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.8     41.7     15.9     59.4     35.3     93.2     92.9      6.8      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      158)
      53       57       64       34       37      125      129
```

----

Updated October 26, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 130 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 130

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 1999

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street 
    in New York, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any references in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Vilaychith KHOUANMANY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6314.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Michael J. PERSICO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-456.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies Verizon Communications, Inc., et al. 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies 05/24/2023 /s/ Neil S. Rubin Neil S. Rubin (CA SBN 250761)

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00203-JRG-RSP Document 14 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 861
Linda SHAO, petitioner, v. McMANIS FAULKER, LLP.

No. 18-344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 21.1



SOLITARIO EXPLORATION & ROYALTY CORP.
Schedule of Subsidiaries

December 31, 2008

Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp. [Colorado]
Subsidiaries-[jurisdiction] - percentage owned

- Altoro Gold Corp. [British Columbia, Canada] - 100%
      - Altoro Gold (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%
            - Minera Altoro (BVI) Ltd. [British Virgin Islands]- 100%
            - Minera Andes (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] -100%
                  - Compania Minera Andes del Sur S.A. [Bolivia] - 100%
            - Minera Altoro Brazil (BVI) Corp. [British Virgin Islands] - 100%
                  - Altoro Mineracao, Ltda. [Brazil] - 100%
- Pedra Branca do Mineracao, Ltda. [Brazil] -70% owned
- Minera Chambara, S.A [Peru] - 85% owned
- Minera Solitario Peru, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Minera Bongara, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Minera Soloco, S.A. [Peru] - 100%
- Mineracao Solitario Brazil, Ltd [Brazil]- 100%
HATFIELD ENTERPRIZES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. WASHINGTON STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT.

No. 18-464.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3 denied.
Willie SAFFORD, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

RAQUEL HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-120

JUDGE MICHAEL TRUNCALE

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable law and orders of this court. The court has 

received and considered the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such order, 

along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report of the United States Magistrate 

Judge were filed and the deadline for doing so has passed. After careful review, the court finds 

that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #16) is ADOPTED. 

A Final Judgment will be entered separately.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 23rd day of September, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00120-MJT-ZJH Document 17 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1213
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7670

RAPHAEL ADOLFO THOMAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97-

2053-AMD)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Denise Charlotte Barrett, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The district court granted a certificate of appealability

only as to whether it correctly applied the doctrine of procedural

default to all but one of Thomas’s claims. It did not grant a

certificate of appealability regarding the jury instruction issue,

rather, the court found Thomas failed to meet his burden of showing

this claim was not properly adjudicated in the state court’s post

conviction review proceedings. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(d) (West

Supp. 1998).

2

PER CURIAM:

Raphael A. Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm that portion of the district court’s order finding all but

one of Thomas’ claim procedurally defaulted; we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the portion of the district court’s

order which held that the trial court’s jury instruction, regarding

witness credibility, was not reversible error.* See Thomas v.

Corcoran, No. CA-97-2053-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 22, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2004 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2004

  To provide that for taxable years beginning before 1980 the Federal 
     income tax deductibility of flight training expenses shall be 
  determined without regard to whether such expenses were reimbursed 
      through certain veterans educational assistance allowances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1999

 Mrs. Tauscher (for herself, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Bilbray, Mrs. Bono, 
 Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Evans, Mr. Frost, 
    Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Inslee, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Ms. 
 Kilpatrick, Mr. Kuykendall, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Lantos, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. 
Mascara, Mr. Matsui, Mr. McGovern, Mr. McKeon, Mr. Metcalf, Mr. George 
   Miller of California, Mr. Gary Miller of California, Mrs. Mink of 
  Hawaii, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Stark, Mr. 
    Towns, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Weiner, and Mr. Wynn) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that for taxable years beginning before 1980 the Federal 
     income tax deductibility of flight training expenses shall be 
  determined without regard to whether such expenses were reimbursed 
      through certain veterans educational assistance allowances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN REIMBURSED FLIGHT TRAINING EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--In the case of a taxable year beginning before 
January 1, 1980, the determination of whether a deduction is allowable 
under section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for flight 
training expenses shall be made without regard to whether the taxpayer 
was reimbursed for any portion of such expenses under section 1677(b) 
of title 38, United States Code (as in effect before its repeal by 
Public Law 97-35).
    (b) Statute of Limitations.--If refund or credit of any overpayment 
of tax resulting from the application of subsection (a) is prevented at 
any time before the close of the 1-year period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of law 
(including res judicata), refund or credit of such overpayment (to the 
extent attributable to the application of subsection (a)) may, 
nevertheless, be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the 
close of such 1-year period.
                                 <all>
```
My Van TRAN, petitioner, v. Ed SHELDON, Warden.

No. 18-5513.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Al ZEINY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-1232.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Alejandro VERDUZCO-RANGEL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5684.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Chuck DEVLIN, petitioner, v. MONTANA.

No. 17-7633.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
! ! "#$ %%%%%%%%%%!#"%%%%%%%%%% 

&'()*+),, 	
 	
 -.,.*/(*+ 01223405467585967:534 ;<-.,.*/(*+=>*(?.(*/(//@.>>A B$C"DEF
 G$DF"##	"$FE$DFF#	DH#IDF"F #$D#DEFJ#""##KF"$DD#CDLD

	
 M
#NHF#	$K""B#$$DK#D#" $LD#"	M#D#
$B##C#	D$K""#K""O#FJ B$DDD##; "F"#KDJPDECFD"BC#DEF"#$#"DDD$K
 Q"F#B##B$$#
 RSTUVWXRWYUZ !; [)\*(+]@.^,R'.@_^@-.`]+aR'.@_



EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Marshall Division

LIFETIME BRANDS, INC.,

QIMA LTD.,

2:23-cv-00216-JRG

QIMA LTD.

Sino Plaza, 8th Floor

255-257 Gloucester Road 

Causeway Bay, Hong Kong

Evan H. Langdon

FABRICANT LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Suite 206 South

Rye, New York 10580

(212) 257-5797

5/15/23

Case 2:23-cv-00216-JRG Document 9 Filed 05/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 77
	

	 	
  !!"!"#$ %&'$ ()*+,,-./+01,*023410/5-6+3-47+/*/*-.028/213-,,8-92+8-45:;-4<=<>+?<@<A(3BB CDEFGHIJKLMNHONPNOQIRIHOSNSRKTNMIHUV WF	XYZGOISKV 


[ \]FZF	XDDX	XG^RI_KVGOISKV `F

[ \EDDX	XaFXF]EYXWDGHIJKV b]FEYXXFWDFXDFb GOISKV bXX]ZDX	XacWXXF`F [ \F	XDGHIJKLMNHONPNOQIRV bWD XXYZW]F	E]FYDEEGHIJKLMLdeIHNfISNLHV GOISKV `F

[ \FFXDgXY `F [ DFGh^K_NMUVi 


jZEFk EFF	Xk EFF	bEFEk 


\XFXF]ZE]FlFZDDEFF
 mn oKdPKdphhNeHISQdK qdNHSKOHIJKIHOSNSRK oKdPKdphIOOdKhh XXEFFFX]XF	bn

rsrr

2:23-cv-00216-JRG

Case 2:23-cv-00216-JRG Document 9 Filed 05/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 78
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT (10)(a) 

Consent of Counsel 







 [Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP] 

April 16, 2012 
 Board of Directors

 Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company 
 Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate Account D 
 4333 Edgewood Road, NE 

Cedar Rapids, IA. 52499-0001 
  

			
	RE:	 	Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate Account D
		 	Merrill Lynch Investor Choice
AnnuitySM (IRA Series)
		 	File No. 333-119364/811-21127

 Gentlemen: 
 We hereby consent to the use of our name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the Prospectus contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the Registration Statement to Form N-4 (File
No. 333-119364) of the Merrill Lynch Life Variable Annuity Separate Account D filed by Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category
of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frederick R. Bellamy

		 	Frederick R. Bellamy