alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.50


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.


THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 2000 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN



 


This Second Amendment to the Harvard Bioscience,
Inc. Third Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is effective as of May 28, 2015 (the
“Effective Date”).


 


Pursuant to the authorization and approval of
the Board of Directors and stockholders of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. in accordance with Section 17 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby
amended as follows, effective as of the Effective Date:


 


	 	1.	
        Section 3(a): The first sentence in Section 3(a) is hereby deleted
        in its entirety and replaced with the following in its stead:

         

        “a) Stock Issuable. Subject to
        adjustment as provided in Section 3(b), the maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan
        shall be 17,508,929 shares of Stock which number reflects the total of 3,750,000 shares originally reserved, plus the effect of
        an evergreen provision through December 31, 2005, plus an additional 2,000,000 shares added to the Plan in 2006, plus an additional
        2,500,000 shares added to the Plan in 2008 plus an additional 3,700,000 shares added to the Plan in 2011 plus an additional 1,941,254
        shares to account for the adjustment required by Section 3(b) pertaining to the Awards issued in connection with the spin-off of
        Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology, Inc. by Harvard Bioscience, Inc. plus an additional 2,500,000 shares added to the Plan
        in 2015.”

         

	
         

         
	2.	The following is added to the end of the Plan: 


 


“DATE SECOND AMENDMENT TO HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 2000 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: APRIL 3, 2015.


 


DATE SECOND AMENDMENT TO HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC. THIRD
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2000 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS: MAY 28, 2015.”


 


	 	3.	Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Harvard Bioscience, Inc. has
duly executed this amendment to be effective as the date first above written.


 


	 	 	 	 
	 	HARVARD BIOSCIENCE, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 /S/ Jeffrey A. Duchemin
	 	 	 	Name:  Jeffrey A. Duchemin 
	 	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
Daniel JONES, petitioner, v. Frank A. SEDITA, III, et al.

No. 18M19.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Sandra FORQUER, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18-9054.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Maryland, Harford County denied.
Raszell REEDER, petitioner, v. E. WHELDON, et al.

No. 18-8990.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF THE MAXIM GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF
OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          41,226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,500
<INVENTORY>                                     48,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,414
<PP&E>                                         168,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,873
<BONDS>                                        126,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,848
<SALES>                                        276,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,796
<CGS>                                          189,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    785
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,233
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
David L. PIERCE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5845.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Gary MALONE, petitioner.

No. 18-6470.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94872; File No. SR-EMERALD-2022-15]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX Emerald, LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Emerald Fee 
Schedule To Adopt a Tiered-Pricing Structure for Additional Limited 
Service MIAX Emerald Express Interface Ports

May 9, 2022.
    On April 1, 2022, MIAX Emerald, LLC (``MIAX Emerald'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend the Exchange's Fee Schedule to adopt a 
tiered-pricing structure for additional limited service express 
interface ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ On April 
20, 2022, the proposed rule change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register and, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\4\ 
the Commission: (1) Temporarily suspended the proposed rule change; and 
(2) instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to 
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ 
On May 2, 2022, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-
EMERALD-2022-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94718 (April 14, 
2022), 87 FR 23633.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10256 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
FATHER, petitioner, v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

No. 18M1.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal granted.
Lisa M. AUBUCHON, et al., petitioners, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al.

No. 18-215.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1411

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 2-month extension

for the due date for filing a tax return for any member of a uniformed

service on a tour of duty outside the United States for a period which

includes the normal due date for such filing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Ms. GRANGER (for herself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. MCCRERY,

Mr. WELLER, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a 2-month extension for the due date for filing a tax

return for any member of a uniformed service on a

tour of duty outside the United States for a period

which includes the normal due date for such filing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Uniformed Services

5 Filing Fairness Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1411 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AND PAY TAXES FOR

2 MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES ON

3 DUTY ABROAD.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 77 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to miscellaneous provisions)

6 is amended by inserting after section 7508A the following:

7 ‘‘SEC. 7508B. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AND PAY TAXES

8 FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES ON

9 DUTY ABROAD.

10 ‘‘In the case of any taxpayer (and the spouse of such

11 taxpayer) who serves as a member of a uniformed service

12 (as defined in section 3121(n)), or in support of such uni13 formed service, in an area outside the United States or

14 the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, for a tour of duty

15 which includes the date for filing tax returns under section

16 6071 (determined without regard to extensions), the Sec17 retary shall provide that a 2-month period beginning on

18 such date shall be disregarded in determining under the

19 internal revenue laws, in respect of any tax liability (in20 cluding any interest, penalty, additional amount, or addi21 tion to the tax) of such taxpayer—

22 ‘‘(1) whether any of the acts described in para23 graph (1) of section 7508(a) were performed within

24 the time prescribed therefor, and

25 ‘‘(2) the amount of any credit, refund, or inter26 est on any overpayment.’’
3

•HR 1411 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec2 tions for chapter 77 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

3 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section

4 7508A the following:

‘‘Sec. 7508B. Extension of time to file and pay taxes for members

of uniformed services on duty abroad.’’

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply to returns due for taxable years

7 beginning after December 31, 1997.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      IVC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 2001, 2000 AND 1999
        (Dollars in Thousands, Except as Noted or Per Share Information)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEARS ENDED JULY 31,
                                                       ----------------------------------------
                                                           2001           2000         1999
                                                       -----------    -----------   -----------
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                                      $    (2,548)   $     5,074   $    (7,041)
Less - preferred stock dividends                              --             --            --
                                                       -----------    -----------   -----------

Net income (loss) for basic income per common  share   $    (2,548)   $     5,074   $    (7,041)
                                                       ===========    ===========   ===========

Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding during the year - Basic                  2,096,195      2,088,092     2,148,143

Add - common equivalent shares
    (determined using the "treasury stock" method)
    representing shares issuable upon exercise of
    employee stock options and incentive
    performance shares)                                        153          2,414           766
                                                       -----------    -----------   -----------

    Weighted average number of common shares             2,096,348      2,090,506     2,148,909
                                                       ===========    ===========   ===========
    outstanding during the year - Diluted

Income (loss) per common share - Diluted               $     (1.22)   $      2.43   $     (3.28)
                                                       ===========    ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


 


March 12, 2019


 


Name: Manish Shah


 


 





Dear Manish,


 


 


I am pleased to inform you that the board
had approved your promotion to “President and Chief Product Officer” with effect from March 15, 2019.


 


Additionally, Effective
as of April 1, 2019, the Compensation Committee of the Board has approved and increased in your base salary to $350,000 (Three
Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) per year.


 


In addition, effective
as of April 1, 2019, your target bonus under Majesco’s Performance Bonus Plan will be up to $175,000 (One Hundred and Seventy-Five
Thousand Dollars) per year.


 


All other terms and conditions of your
employment agreement remain unchanged.


 


Going forward, as you play a larger role
I am counting on you to deliver even greater results for Majesco. I am confident that you will meet the challenging expectations
in your new role as well. I wish you the very best in your new role.


 





 


Regards,





 


/s/ Adam Elster


 


Adam Elster


 


Chief Executive Officer
Jose ROMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8885.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 3, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00415

- CV

VICTOR AND JAYME CAN TU , Appellants

V.
JOHN AND DONNA MOSES , Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003

- 00761

- 2022

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Osborne, Nowell, and Smith Opinion by Justice Osborne
By postcard dated September 6, 2022, we directed appel lants to file the ir

overdue brief within ten days and cautioned them that failure to comply would result

in dismissal of the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellants have

not complied. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id.

220415f.p05 /Leslie Osborne//
LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

VICTOR AND JAYME CANTU, Appellants

No. 05

- 22

- 00415

- CV V.

JOHN AND DONNA MOSES, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003

- 00761

- 2022. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, Justices Nowell and Smith participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 3 rd day of O ctober 2022.
#### PATRICK H. HYLAND v. F. C. BISHOP.1

May 10, 1909.

Nos. 16,140—(210).

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to obtain possession of certain *519premises. The ease was tried before Charles L. Smith, J., who found that plaintiff was entitled to restitution of the premises. From the judgment entered pursuant to the findings and order for judgment, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*Accel A. Bberhart,*for appellant.

*Manley L. Fosseen,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 121 N. W. 1134.

Pee Cubiam.

This is an action brought by Patrick H. Hyland against F. C. Bishop for the possession of certain real estate in the city of Minneapolis. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff. It appears that on June 6, 1905, the Minneapolis Brewing Company, being the owner of certain premises in the city of Minneapolis, leased the same to William C. Fust for a period of three years from May 1, 1905. The lease contained a provision for an extension of the term at the option of the lessee; but the court found that the lessee never availed himself of the privilege, and the lease expired May 1, 1908. Before that date the appellant, Bishop, obtained a lease from the assignees of Fust; but his rights, whatever they were, came to an end at the expiration of his lessor’s term. Thereafter, on June 8, 1908, the brewing company leased the same premises to the respondent, Hyland, who on July 1, 1908, leased the two upper floors of the building to the appellant, Bishop, for the term of one month. On the same day Hyland served a notice on Bishop to vacate the premises on or before August 1, 1908. This was not done, and the present action was commenced. Bishop attempted to assert rights under the lease which he had obtained from Fust’s assignees. The court properly found in favor of the plaintiff, and the judgment is affirmed.
Annamalai ANNAMALAI, petitioner, v. Parvathi SIVANADIYAN.

No. 18-5758.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

*426Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Kwame GYAMFI, petitioner, v. R. Alexander ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, et al.

No. 18-1377.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Gilberto GARZA, Jr., petitioner, v. IDAHO.

No. 17-1026.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-37-MAC

'

DAMARCUS RESHAUD JACKSON, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Damarcus Reshaud Jackson, 

Case 1:23-cr-00037-MAC-ZJH Document 39 Filed 05/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 169
2

is adjudged guilty as to Count One of the Indictment charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.

Signed this date

May 21, 2024

Case 1:23-cr-00037-MAC-ZJH Document 39 Filed 05/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 170
Lawrence ABELA, petitioner, v. Heidi E. WASHINGTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections.

No. 17-8424.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gary THACKER, et ux., petitioners, v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY.

No. 17-1201.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 27, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 27, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the Thirty-nine Weeks Ended December 27, 1997
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           1,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,542
<INVENTORY>                                    119,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,988
<PP&E>                                         718,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                 352,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,513
<BONDS>                                        685,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (424,950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   655,718
<SALES>                                        334,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               334,320
<CGS>                                          243,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  243,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,572)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>