alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1800

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to ensure

that certain information regarding prisoners is reported to the Attorney General.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death in Custody Reporting

Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. REPORTING OF INFORMATION.

Section 20104(a) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 13704(a)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1)—

(A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(1)’’; and

(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as

clauses (i) and (ii), respectively;

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(B)’’;

(3) in paragraph (3)—

(A) by striking ‘‘(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(C)’’;

(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as

clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; and

(C) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

(4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(2) such State has provided assurances that it will follow

guidelines established by the Attorney General in reporting,

on a quarterly basis, information regarding the death of any

person who is in the process of arrest, is en route to be incarcerated, or is incarcerated at a municipal or county jail, State

prison, or other local or State correctional facility (including

any juvenile facility) that, at a minimum, includes—

‘‘(A) the name, gender, race, ethnicity, and age of the

deceased;

‘‘(B) the date, time, and location of death; and
H. R. 1800—2

‘‘(C) a brief description of the circumstances surrounding the death.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                               TAKE-OUT NOTICE


                                                                    June 3, 1997


AIM Management Group, Inc.
AIM Distributors, Inc.
AIM Advisors, Inc.
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1919
Houston, Texas 77046

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of May 2, 1995
(as amended and supplemented, the Purchase Agreement) among AIM Management
Group Inc., Citibank, N.A. and the undersigned Citicorp North America, Inc., we
hereby deliver this Take-out Notice advising you that on April 21, 1997 the
Purchaser completed a Take-out Transaction in connection with the Series 1997-2
Asset Backed Certificates issued by the Mutual Fund Fee Trust IV.  The
"Take-out Adjustment Amount" in connection with such Take-out Transaction is
$71,100,000.  Capitalized terms used herein and which are not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Purchase
Agreement.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        CITICORP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,  
                                        as Program Agent


                                        By:  Illegible 
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Authorized Signatory
<PAGE>   2
Page 2
Take-Out Notice
June 3, 1997


Acknowledged and agreed as of the date
first written above:

AIM MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

By: /s/ CAROL F. RELIHAN 
    ------------------------------
    Authorized Signatory



AIM DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

By: /s/ CAROL F. RELIHAN 
    ------------------------------
    Authorized Signatory
                                  


AIM ADVISORS, INC.

By: /s/ CAROL F. RELIHAN 
    ------------------------------
    Authorized Signatory
EXHIBIT 32


                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Advance Technologies, Inc.
(The "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I Gary Ball, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my
knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: January 14, 2006            /s/ GARY BALL
                                   --------------------------------------
                                       Gary Ball
                                       President and Director




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR
OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE
SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS
WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ADVANCE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ADVANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
Cartson Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8266.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1816

MICHAEL W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN E. POTTER, United States Postmaster General, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA01-1348-DKC) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 4, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Diamond, WALDMAN & DIAMOND, CHARTERED, Kensington, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Paul E. Soeffing, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael W. Walker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on his claim under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeWalker v. Henderson , No. CA-01-1348-DKC (D. Md. June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

ServStor Technologies LLC

2:23-cv-00184

Inventec Corporation

Inventec Corporation

No. 66, Hougang Street

Shin-Lin District

Taipei City, 11170, Taiwan

Fabricant LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Ave., Suite 206 South, Rye, NY10580

c/o Vincent J. Rubino, III

Case 2:23-cv-00184-JRG-RSP Document 7 Filed 04/21/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 28
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00184

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00184-JRG-RSP Document 7 Filed 04/21/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 29
Order entered December 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01493-CV

MICHAEL GAY COOK, Appellant

V.

CAROLINE D. COOK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CI15-070

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion to reduce supersedeas bond. Although the clerk’s record has 

been filed in this appeal, the record does not contain a copy of the order setting the amount of the 

bond. Accordingly, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER 

Shelli Miller, Rockwall County Clerk, to file, no later than December 28, 2015, a supplemental 

clerk’s record containing a copy of that order or written verification such order cannot be 

located. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c). We further ORDER Deborah K. Hamon, Official Court 

Reporter of Rockwall County Court at Law No. 1, to file, no later than December 28, 2015, the 

reporter’s record of the hearing setting the supersedeas bond.

The Court will take no action on appellant’s motion until the requested records are filed.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2073 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2073

  To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in water 
                               treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in water 
                               treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``     9902.61.02     Phosphonic acid,   Free        No change          No change          On or before 12/
                       [1,6-                                                                31/2001           ''
                       hexanediylbis[ni                                                                        .
                       trilobis
                       (methylene)]
                       tetrakis-
                       potassium salt
                       (CAS No. 38820-
                       59-6) (provided
                       for in
                       subheading
                       2931.00.9030)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Thomas Lee SWAN, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6236.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Daniel Lee THORNBERRY, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 18-6040.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit  99.4


                       SECRETARY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the Annual Report of Rubincon Ventures Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for  the  year ended January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Irene Campany, Chief Financial
Officer,  Secretary  Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                               /s/  "Irene  Campany"
                               ---------------------
                    Chief  Financial  Officer,  Secretary  Treasurer
                                    and  Director

March  21,  2005
Carltez TAYLOR, petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 18-81.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.
Thomas S. ROSS, petitioner, v. APPLE, INC.

No. 18-494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS, et al., petitioners, v. Eric C. DARDEN.

No. 17-1476.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ISHMAEL A. EVANS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-164

BRYAN COLLIER, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Ishmael A. Evans, an inmate at the Stiles Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff complains that he was denied adequate access to the law library while confined at

the Byrd Unit. See Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. #2 at *4-9).

Analysis

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not

contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28

U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bales, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th

Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28

U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside

or in which the claim arose. 

Case 1:23-cv-00164-MJT-CLS Document 3 Filed 05/10/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
At the time of the incidents which form the basis of Plaintiff’s complaint he was confined

at the Byrd Unit. His claims therefore arose at the Byrd Unit, which is located in Huntsville, Walker

County, Texas. In addition all of the Defendants involved in Plaintiff’s claims appear to reside in

Walker County. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Walker County is located within the jurisdictional

boundaries of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. 

As Walker Countyis located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Texas, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not proper. When

venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case

to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This case

should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

Division. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

2

.

___________________________________

Christine L Stetson

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED this the 10th day of May, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00164-MJT-CLS Document 3 Filed 05/10/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17
Robert E. COTNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR the TENTH CIRCUIT.

No. 18M56.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
Eric D. GATHINGS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/24/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,962
COMMITMENTS
  15,017    3,136    2,777   14,719   26,483   32,513   32,396    9,449    9,566

CHANGES FROM 01/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        596)
     -83    1,201      168       68      114      153    1,483      443     -887

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    35.8      7.5      6.6     35.1     63.1     77.5     77.2     22.5     22.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      17        9       13       22       20       45       38
```

----

Updated January 27, 2012
EXHIBIT 23.1


                     [McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP NAME & LOGO]





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S


We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report, dated August 1, 2000,
except for the first paragraph of Note 7 as to which the date is August 21,
2000, included in this Form 10-KSB in the previously filed registration
statement of Hi-Shear Technology on Form S-8 (No.33-868989).



                                                   /s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                        McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




Anaheim, California
August 22, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000911147
<NAME>                        Century Casinos Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         2,160,087
<SECURITIES>                                   1,550,772
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    76,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,327,324
<PP&E>                                         16,284,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,115,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,764,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,469,573
<BONDS>                                        10,346,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       158,619
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,789,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,764,076
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,525,989
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,542,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,002,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             526,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (534,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (102,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (432,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (171,860)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (604,445)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)
        


</TABLE>
Return to:

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street, Suite 354

Tyler, Texas 75702

F1l£D IN COURT OF APPEALS

12tfi Court o( Appeals District

NOS. 12-15-00139-CR

and 12-15-00140-CR

[TEXAS

PAM ESTES. CLERK

STATE OF TEXAS

VS.

RONNY LEE WILLIAMS

§ IN THE TWELFTH

§

§ COURT OF APPEALS

§

§ TYLER, TEXAS

Pro se Motion for Access to Appellate Record

On November 16, 2015, Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in the

above styled and numbered cause pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967).

Ronny Lee Williams, Appellant, moves this Court to provide him access to a

copy of the appellate record including the clerk's record and the court reporter's

record.

Appellant requests an extension oftime of 30 days from the date he receives

the appellate record to file apro se response to counsel's Anders brief.

Respectfully submitted,

RONNVXEE WILLIAMS

TDCJ-ID#02001514

Pro se Appellant