alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.65





 Exhibit 4.65 

Power of Attorney 
 I, Hailong Xiang, a
citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) with ID No. and the shareholder holding 0.5% equity interests in Beijing Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Baidu Netcom”), hereby irrevocably authorizes
pursuant to the Proxy Agreement dated hereof by myself and Baidu, Inc. and designation of Baidu, Inc., Hailong Xiang with the following powers and rights in connection with my current and future shareholding in the Baidu Netcom during the term of
this Power of Attorney: 
 To exercise solely and exclusively on my behalf all of the voting rights as a shareholder at the shareholders’ meeting of
Baidu Netcom under the PRC laws and the articles of association of Baidu Netcom, including without limitation any vote on sale or transfer of any or all of equity interests in Baidu Netcom, and designating and appointing the general manager of Baidu
Netcom as my authorized representative on the shareholders’ meeting of Baidu Netcom. 
 Such authorization is premised on the condition that Hailong
Xiang is an employee of Baidu, Inc. and its affiliates, and Baidu, Inc. agrees to such authorization. Once Hailong Xiang is no longer an employee of Baidu, Inc. or I am notified by Baidu, Inc. to terminate such authorization, I will immediately
withdraw such authorization to him and designate/authorize any other person nominated by Baidu, Inc. to exercise all of the voting rights on my behalf at the shareholders’ meeting of Baidu Netcom. 

Unless otherwise expressly provided herein and as long as I am a holder of equity interests in Baidu Netcom, this Power of Attorney is irrevocable and
continues to have effect as of the date hereof . 
  

			
	(Signature):	 	 /s/ Hailong Xiang

	Date:	 	March 31, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of National R.V.  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Bradley C.  Albrechtsen,  Chief Executive  Officer and President of the Company,
and Mark D. Andersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ BRADLEY C. ALBRECHTSEN                            /s/ MARK D. ANDERSEN
--------------------------                            --------------------
Bradley C. Albrechtsen                                Mark D. Andersen
Chief Executive Officer                               Chief Financial Officer
 and President                                        (Principal Accounting and
May 12, 2004                                          Financial Officer)
                                                      May 12, 2004
Ronnie JOHNSON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5179.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Thomas F. GEHRMANN, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-325.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 11.1

Carson Pirie Scott & Co. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Per Share Earnings
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                        Three months ended
                                  -----------------------------
                                   May 3, 1997      May 4, 1996
                                  -----------------------------
Net income                             $2,609           $9,686
                                  ===========       ==========
Primary:
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding        15,922,242       16,325,904
Weighted average number of
  common share equivalents--
  stock options                       587,362          474,584
                                   ----------       ----------
Total common and
  common share equivalents         16,509,604       16,800,488
                                   ----------       ----------
Primary net income per share            $0.16            $0.58
                                   ==========       ==========
Fully Diluted:
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding        15,922,242       16,325,904
Weighted average number of
  common share equivalents--
  stock options                       618,543          531,968
                                   ----------       ----------
Total common and common
  share equivalents                16,540,785       16,857,872
                                   ----------       ----------
Fully diluted net
  income per share                      $0.16            $0.57
                                   ==========       ==========

Primary  net income per share was  computed  using the  treasury  stock  method,
assuming common share purchases at the average market price of the common shares
for the period.

Fully diluted net income per share was computed using the treasury stock method,
assuming  common share  purchases at the greater of the average  market price of
the common shares for the period or the ending price of the common shares.











                                     Page 12
(110 So. 340)

No. 28167.

#### STATE v. W. M. PILGREEN.

(Nov. 2, 1926.)

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Claiborne; John S. Richardson, Judge.

T. T. Land, of Homer, and J. W. Elder, of Earmerville. for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., W. D. Goff, Dist. Atty., of Arcadia (E. R. Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

O’NIELL, G. J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of having intoxicating liquor in his possession for sale. He relies upon a bill of exceptions taken to the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The motion was founded upon the allegation that the evidence did not show either an actual possession of the liquor or an intention to sell it. The judge had charged, or. maintained as correct principles of law, at the request of the defendant’s counsel, after hearing the evidence, (1) that the finding of a keg of whisky buried in the ground, about 15 yards from the house rented and occupied by the defendant, and on land not rented by him or under his control, was not sufficient proof of possession of the liquor, and (2) that there could be no conviction of the offense charged without proof of a sale or an intention to sell. In the motion for a new trial, the defendant’s attorneys set forth what they alleged were the only facts that were proven, and alleged that those facts did not prove either that the defendant had possessed the liquor or that he had intended to sell it. They averred that the judge, in convicting the defendant, overlooked the principles of law which he had charged or maintained as correct doctrines. The allegations of fact in the motion for a new trial were not approved by the judge, for they were not stated as facts in the bill of exceptions reserved to the overruling of the motion for a new trial. On the contrary, the judge stated in the per curiam attached to the bill of exceptions that the evidence-in the case convinced him of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the judge made it plain that the proof went further than the facts alleged in the motion for a new trial. The bill of exceptions, therefore, does not present a question of law for decision.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jeremy Austin Carroll, Appellant

No. 06-18-00052-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 411th District Court of 

Trinity County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 09954). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Jeremy Austin Carroll, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Sharon LEE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-6084.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Lawrence Eugene SHAW, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5894.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Tracy Neil TRUELOVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8202.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Euroopa Liidu C 43/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 43 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 65. aastakäik28. jaanuar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 43

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

65. aastakäik28. jaanuar 2022

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2022/C 43/01 | Euro vahetuskurss — 27. jaanuar 2022 | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2022/C 43/01

Euro vahetuskurss — 27. jaanuar 2022

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 28.1.2022 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2022

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 43/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

27. jaanuar 2022

(2022/C 43/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,1160 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 128,74 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4428 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,83368 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 10,4450 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,0391 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 145,20 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 9,9903 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria leev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 24,427 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 358,09 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,5592 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 4,9466 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 15,1946 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,5771 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,4161 |
| HKD | Hongkongi dollar | 8,6951 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,6872 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,5089 |
| KRW | Korea vonn | 1 344,50 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 17,1112 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 7,1061 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,5328 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 16 052,42 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,6844 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 57,295 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 87,1390 |
| THB | Tai baat | 37,124 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 6,0159 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 23,1430 |
| INR | India ruupia | 83,7893 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,1160

JPY

Jaapani jeen

128,74

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4428

GBP

Inglise nael

0,83368

SEK

Rootsi kroon

10,4450

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,0391

ISK

Islandi kroon

145,20

NOK

Norra kroon

9,9903

BGN

Bulgaaria leev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

24,427

HUF

Ungari forint

358,09

PLN

Poola zlott

4,5592

RON

Rumeenia leu

4,9466

TRY

Türgi liir

15,1946

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,5771

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,4161

HKD

Hongkongi dollar

8,6951

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,6872

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,5089

KRW

Korea vonn

1 344,50

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

17,1112

CNY

Hiina jüaan

7,1061

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,5328

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

16 052,42

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,6844

PHP

Filipiini peeso

57,295

RUB

Vene rubla

87,1390

THB

Tai baat

37,124

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

6,0159

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

23,1430

INR

India ruupia

83,7893

---

(1)  Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

SERGIO LARA §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-cv-57

MAIL ROOM FERGUSON UNIT, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff Sergio Lara, an inmate at the Ferguson Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Plaintiff complains that his request to send $50.00 to a pen-pal service was changed to

$500.00 instead. Plaintiff brings this action against officials at the Ferguson Unit seeking the

replacement of $500.00 in his prisoner trust fund account or $75,000.00 in damages. 

Analysis

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not

contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28

U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bales, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th

Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28

Case 9:23-cv-00057-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 03/23/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside

or in which the claim arose. 

At the time of the incidents which form the basis of Plaintiff’s complaint he was confined

at the Ferguson Unit. His claims therefore arose at the Ferguson Unit, which is located in Midway,

Madison County, Texas. In addition all of the Defendants appear to reside in Madison County. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Madison County is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the

United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. 

As Madison County is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Texas, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not proper. 

When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such

case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This case

should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

Division. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

2

Case 9:23-cv-00057-MAC-CLS Document 3 Filed 03/23/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17
Bernabe LUGO-SANTIAGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit
23.2
 
 
 
 Consent
of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-3 No. 333-82518 and No. 333-117806) and in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-81571 and No. 333-76662) of our report dated March 14, 2005 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of TurboChef
Technologies, Inc., TurboChef Technologies, Inc. management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of TurboChef Technologies, Inc.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2004.
 
 /s/ Ernst
& Young LLP
 
 Atlanta,
Georgia
 March 14,
2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>
  <ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Registrant's  unaudited interim financial statements the year ended December 31,
1999  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  those  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000917032
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         603,922
<SECURITIES>                                23,202,879<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               611,418<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,814,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,114<F3>
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,751,183<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,814,297
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,185,879
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               840,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,345,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,345,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,345,368
<EPS-BASIC>                                    5,985
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    5,985

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Includes $80 due from affiliates.
<F3>Includes $11,438 due to affiliates.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest
in Trust with capital accounts of $23,844,706 less
managing shareholder's accumulated deficit of $93,523.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00078

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE

Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorney, Vincent J. Rubino, III, enters his 

appearance in this matter for Plaintiff Jawbone Innovations, LLC for purposes of receiving notices 

and orders from the Court.

Dated: February 28, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III

Vincent J. Rubino, III

NY Bar No. 4557435

Email: vrubino@fabricantllp.com

FABRICANT LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Avenue, 

Suite 206 South

Rye, New York 10580

Telephone: (212) 257-5797

Facsimile: (212) 257-5796

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

JAWBONE INNOVATIONS, LLC

Case 2:23-cv-00078 Document 6 Filed 02/28/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 69
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on February 28, 2023, all counsel of record who are 

deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via 

the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III

 Vincent J. Rubino, III

Case 2:23-cv-00078 Document 6 Filed 02/28/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 70
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                        TALX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
            Subsidiaries of TALX Corporation, a Missouri corporation

1. Net Profit, Inc. - a South Carolina corporation

2. TALX FasTime Services, Inc. - a Texas corporation

3. TALX UCM Services, Inc. - a Missouri corporation (d/b/a TALX UC eXpress)

4. TALX Employer Services, LLC - a Missouri limited liability company

5. TBT Enterprises, Incorporated - a Maryland corporation

6. UI Advantage, Inc. - a Maryland corporation

7. Johnson & Associates, LLC - a Nebraska limited liability company

8. Jon-Jay Associates, Inc. - a Massachusetts corporation

9. TALX Tax Incentive Services, LLC - a Missouri limited liability company
Edmund ZAGORSKI, petitioner, v. Tony MAYS, Warden.

No. 18-6525 (18A465).

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 1, 2018.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Rochelle DRIESSEN, petitioner, v. ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND.

No. 18-5774.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Billie Faye KEYES, et al., petitioners, v. Philip GUNN, et al.

No. 18-341.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Fidelity Federal Bancorp
hereby certifies that:

     1.   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity Federal Bancorp for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2004 (the Report) fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Fidelity Federal Bancorp.



Dated:  November 15, 2004

/s/ Mark A. Isaac
-----------------------------------
    Mark A. Isaac
    Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of Fidelity Federal Bancorp, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00448-CR

EX PARTE HOWARD LEWIS

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1326736

ORDER

A supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’s order signed 

on February 3, 2014 denying appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus. 

The State’s brief is due 20 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed February 27, 2014