alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ANIBAL A. RIOS-MULERO §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv137

WARDEN BANTLEIT, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Anibal A. Rios-Mulero, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit against Warden Bantleit,

Assistant Warden Doabs, HSS Franks Medical, and Officer Illbola.

TheCourtreferred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

The magistrate judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has

received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed

pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. 

A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address provided

to the Court. The copy of the Report mailed to Plaintiff was returned to the Court with as

undeliverable. Plaintiff, however, has failed to provide the Court with a new address at which he

may be contacted. As of this date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge have been filed.

Case 1:23-cv-00137-MJT-CLS Document 9 Filed 06/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 15
O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct

and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case

in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 8th day of June, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00137-MJT-CLS Document 9 Filed 06/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 16
Roger WILSON, petitioner, v. McKEESPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 18-5343.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1999 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1999

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration 
                               projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 1999

 Mr. Ramstad introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration 
                               projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Community Nursing 
Demonstration Extension Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MEDICARE COMMUNITY NURSING ORGANIZATION 
              DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law and in addition to the 
extension provided under section 4019 of the Balanced Budget Act of 
1997, demonstration projects conducted under section 4079 of the 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 shall be conducted for an 
additional period of 3 years, and the deadline for any report required 
relating to the results of such projects shall be not later than 6 
months before the end of such additional period.
                                 <all>
```
Lance R. MARTIN, petitioner, v. Edmund Gerald BROWN, Jr., et al.;

Lance R. Martin, petitioner, v. California.

No. 18-5919.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2029 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2029

To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to require that 
   Federal agencies consult with State agencies and county and local 
            governments on environmental impact statements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1999

 Mr. Radanovich (for himself, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Herger, Mr. Skeen, Mr. 
Sessions, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Hill of Montana, Mr. Stump, Mr. Walden of 
 Oregon, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. Istook, Mr. Chambliss, and Mr. 
  Peterson of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to require that 
   Federal agencies consult with State agencies and county and local 
            governments on environmental impact statements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Government 
Participation Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. CONSULTATION WITH STATE AGENCIES AND COUNTY AND LOCAL 
              GOVERNMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS.

    Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) is amended in the first sentence after clause 
(v) by striking ``the comments of any Federal agency which has'' and by 
inserting ``any comments submitted by any Federal agency, State agency, 
county government, or local government that has''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy (DoN), Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Secretary of the Navy, with the concurrence of the Department of Defense General Counsel, has authorized Deputy Commandant, Installations and Logistics, current incumbent Lieutenant General Edward D. Banta, United States Marine Corps (USMC); Command Sergeant Major for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (Headquarters USMC), current incumbent Sergeant Major Rafael Rodriguez, USMC; and Chief of Naval Personnel Fleet Master Chief Petty Officer, current incumbent Master Chief Petty Officer Wesley K. Koshoffer, United States Navy, and successors to these positions, to serve without compensation on the Board of Directors of the Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society. Authorization to serve on the Board of Directors has been made for the purpose of providing oversight and advice to, and coordination with, the Navy-Marine Corps Relief Society. Participation of the above officials in the activities of the Society will not extend to participation in day-to-day operations.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander Jonathan T. Flynn, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Administrative Law Division, 703-614- 7479.

Dated: May 13, 2022.

J.M. Pike,

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-10745 Filed 5-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
(110 So. 768)

No. 28051.

#### STATE of Louisiana v. D. W. LOWERY.

(Nov. 29, 1926.)

Appeal from Eirst Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; J. H. Stephens, Judge.

Thomas W. Robertson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., L. C. Blanchard, Dist. Atty., and Aubrey M. Pyburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport (E. R. Schowalter, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

ST. PAUL, J.

Defendant was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes.

The record contains neither bill of exception nor assignment of errors, and there is no error patent on the face of the record.

The judgment appealed *from is*therefore affirmed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133688 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133688 

 COA: 274434 

Genesee CC: 05-016280-FC 

RODRIQUES DARNELL RUSSELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
H. R. 2035

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To correct errors in the authorizations of certain programs administered by the

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 49, UNITED STATES CODE.

(a) MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY.—Section 30104 of title 49, United

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$81,200,000’’ and inserting

‘‘$98,313,500’’.

(b) MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION.—Section 32102 of title 49,

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$6,200,000’’ and

inserting ‘‘$9,562,500’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Paul E. COOPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1423.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
EX-10.30.4





 Exhibit 10.30.4 

 
 



 
 June 26, 2018 

2018 Long Term Incentive Award Letter – Clarification 

Dear PSU participant, 
 You recently received your 2018 Long
Term Incentive Award Letter dated June 6, 2018. In order to avoid any misunderstanding, we would like to make this amending clarification. 

Consistent with 2017, the two indices for the determination of the achievement level of the Performance Condition shall be: 

 

	 	•	 	 S&P MidCap 400 Materials Index, and 



 

	 	•	 	 S&P SmallCap 600 Materials Index. 



All else in the original Award Letter remains unchanged. 
 Thank
you for taking note. 
 Corporate Human Resources 

  
 2018 LTIP Award Letter - Clarification
J. 

motion to hold a party in contempt for noncompliance with a court order is 

not appealable. See Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners Ass'n, 116 

Nev. 646, 649, 5 P.3d 569, 571 (2000). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction 

over this appeal, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

- 

Douglas 

, J. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. William B. Gonzalez, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Ferdinando L. Robinson, Jr. 

Tracy Robinson 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Integrated Photonics Institute for 
Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American 
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 12, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Integrated Photonics 
Institute for Manufacturing Innovation operating under the name of the 
American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics (``AIM 
Photonics'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH; Worcester Polytechnic 
Institute, Worcester, MA; and General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc., 
Fairfax, VA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Coventor, Inc., Cary, NC; TTM Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, 
MO; The Regents of the University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; 
UChicago Argonne, LLC, Lemont, IL; Keysight Technologies, Inc., 
Englewood, CO; The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK; REDCOM Laboratories, 
Inc., Victor, NY; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Quinsigamond 
Community College, Worcester, MA; Microcircuit Laboratories LLC, 
Kennett Square, PA and The Pennsylvania State University, State 
College, PA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AIM Photonics intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 16, 2016, AIM Photonics filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 25, 2016 (81 FR 48450).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 23, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 13, 2022 (87 FR 2178).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10221 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with The Beard Company's (the "Company") Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William M. Beard, Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 18, 2005               By:         /s/ William M. Beard
                                                       William M. Beard
                                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bay LS Medical Supplies, Inc., as Assignee of Ana Valdizon, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered November 1, 2013, deemed from a judgment of the same court, entered November 25, 2013 (see CPLR 5512 [a]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the November 1, 2013 order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denying defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,715.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, the order entered November 1, 2013 is vacated, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered November 1, 2013, which granted plaintiff's motion and denied defendant's cross motion. A judgment was subsequently entered pursuant to the November 1, 2013 order, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $1,715, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken (<i>see</i> CPLR 5512 [a]).</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2016/2016_50319.htm" target="_blank"><i>Bay LS Med. Supplies, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co.</i> (50 Misc 3d 147</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50319[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016]), the judgment is reversed, the order entered November 1, 2013 is vacated, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Solomon and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: January 05, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 99.5

SOA Section 906 Certification

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended April 24, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of § 13(a) or § 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|DATED the 21st day of July, 2005. |  |                   |                                                     
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                                  |  | /s/RICHARD FORTIN
|                                  |  | Name:             | Richard Fortin                                      
|                                  |  | Title:            | Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
Robert Earl TIPPENS, Jr., petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-5941.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Haroutyun KARABAJAKYAN, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration.

No. 17-8098.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Roderick Jermaine HALL, petitioner, v. SPRINT CORPORATION.

No. 18-8517.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# Euroopa Liidu C 53/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 53 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 65. aastakäik1. veebruar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 53

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

65. aastakäik1. veebruar 2022

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2022/C 53/01 | Euro vahetuskurss — 31. jaanuar 2022 | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2022/C 53/01

Euro vahetuskurss — 31. jaanuar 2022

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 1.2.2022 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2022

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 53/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

31. jaanuar 2022

(2022/C 53/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,1156 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 128,79 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4419 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,83153 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 10,4890 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,0404 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 143,20 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 10,0085 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria leev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 24,372 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 357,19 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,5892 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 4,9475 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 14,9310 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,5820 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,4233 |
| HKD | Hongkongi dollar | 8,6994 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,6983 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,5110 |
| KRW | Korea vonn | 1 349,08 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 17,3734 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 7,0963 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,5293 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 16 036,76 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,6693 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 56,985 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 86,7251 |
| THB | Tai baat | 37,144 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 6,0030 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 23,1856 |
| INR | India ruupia | 83,3655 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,1156

JPY

Jaapani jeen

128,79

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4419

GBP

Inglise nael

0,83153

SEK

Rootsi kroon

10,4890

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,0404

ISK

Islandi kroon

143,20

NOK

Norra kroon

10,0085

BGN

Bulgaaria leev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

24,372

HUF

Ungari forint

357,19

PLN

Poola zlott

4,5892

RON

Rumeenia leu

4,9475

TRY

Türgi liir

14,9310

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,5820

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,4233

HKD

Hongkongi dollar

8,6994

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,6983

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,5110

KRW

Korea vonn

1 349,08

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

17,3734

CNY

Hiina jüaan

7,0963

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,5293

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

16 036,76

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,6693

PHP

Filipiini peeso

56,985

RUB

Vene rubla

86,7251

THB

Tai baat

37,144

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

6,0030

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

23,1856

INR

India ruupia

83,3655

---

(1)  Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---