alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, v. CITIZENS FOR DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVES IN 1980, Appellant.

No. 80-1256.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Jan. 12, 1981.

Decided May 19, 1981.

Certiorari Denied Oct. 13, 1981.

See 102 S.Ct. 397.

*398Stephen G. Ryan, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Kathleen I. Perkins, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Election Commission, Washington, D. C., with whom Charles N. Steele, Gen. Counsel and Miriam Aguiar, Atty., Federal Election Commission, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for appellee.

Before TAMM and WALD, Circuit Judges and HAROLD H. GREENE *, United States District Court Judge for the District of Columbia.

*

Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 292(a).

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

WALD, Circuit Judge:

This case raises issues identical to those in *Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League,*No. 80-1136, 655 F.2d 380, which we decide today. Respondent here is one of the so-called “draft-Kennedy” groups which in 1979 allegedly received contributions in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act, 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(C), (2)(C). *See also*2 U.S.C. § 441a(f) (“No ... political committee shall *knowingly*accept any contribution ... in violation of the provisions of this section. No officer or employee of a political committee shall *knowingly*accept a contribution *made for the benefit or use of a candidate*... in violation of ... this section”) (emphasis supplied).

For the reasons stated in our opinion in No. 80-1136, we hold that the Commission has no jurisdiction over allegations that this respondent received contributions for its “draft-Kennedy” effort in excess of some supposed statutory limit. The subpoena issued to respondent by the Commission was therefore outside the scope of the Commission’s investigative powers, and thus the district court’s enforcement order must be vacated. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in No. 80-1136.

*So ordered.*
EVE-USA, INC., et al. v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION.

No. 17-804 (R46-034).

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 17, 2018.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Quawn M. FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Justice THOMAS, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in *Reynolds v. Florida,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Reynolds v. Florida,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,626
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         639,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 749,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         42
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     373,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   749,686
<SALES>                                         67,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
LABMD, INC., petitioner, v. TIVERSA, INC.

No. 18-435.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Chad Allen DORTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5469.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2020

p0122 

# Order

Clerk January 29, 2020

160111

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160111

COA: 349062

Ingham CC: 18

- 000054

- FC

AMBER SHAUNAMARIE KOHLS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2019 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Eric Lamont JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5825.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Walter D. BOOKER, petitioner, v. T. JOHNSON, et al.

No. 18-8377.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Exhibit 25.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned, acting in the capacity or capacities stated opposite
their respective names below, hereby severally constitute and appoint Jeffery A.
Safford, William R. Luraschi and Peter K. Ingerman and each of them with full
power to act alone, our true and lawful attorneys and agents to do any and all
acts and things and to execute any and all instruments which they deem necessary
or advisable to enable AES China Generating Co. Ltd., a Bermuda company, to
comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with
Section l3 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Form
10K Annual Report and any related registration statements, amendments,
post-effective amendments or supplements thereto, including specifically, but
without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the power and authority to
sign the name of the Company and the names of the undersigned directors and
officers in the capacities indicated below.

         This Power of Attorney may be executed in counterparts, which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.

Signature                           Title                     Date

/s/Roger W. Sant           Chairman of the Board and          February 28, 1997
Roger W. Sant              Class B Director

/s/Dennis W. Bakke         Vice Chairman and                  February 27, 1997
Dennis W. Bakke            Class B Director

/s/Robert F. Hemphill      Vice Chairman and                  February 27, 1997
Robert F. Hemphill, Jr.    Class B Director

/s/Thomas Tribone          Class B Director                   February 28, 1997
Thomas Tribone

/s/Thomas I. Unterberg     Class B Director                   February 28, 1997
Thomas I. Unterberg

/s/William Dykes           Class A Director                   February 26, 1997
William Dykes

/s/Xiliang Feng            Class A Director                   February 26, 1997
Xiliang Feng

/s/William H. Taft         Class A Director                   February 28, 1997
William H. Taft, IV

/s/Victor Hao Li           Class A Director                   February 28, 1997
Victor Hao Li

/s/Jeffery A. Safford      Vice President, Chief Financial    February 26, 1997
Jeffery A. Safford         Officer and Secretary
Brent F. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5800.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Spencer BOWENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, dissenting from denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, --- S.Ct. ----, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) ( SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting).
<PAGE>
 
 
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Quality Dining, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-84698 and File No. 333-38571) of
our report dated December 18, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Quality Dining, Inc. as of October 25, 1998 and October 26, 1997,
and for the fifty-two week periods ended October 25, 1998, October 26, 1997 and
October 27, 1996, which report is included in the amended to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A.



 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois
    
April 12, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation 
Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required) and NIAID SBIR 
Phase II Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U44 
Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: June 16, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G76, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marci Scidmore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of Allergy & 
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Room 3G76, Bethesda, MD 20892, (240) 627-3255, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb969a899892d58898929f9694899ebb959293d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e984889b8a80c79a8a808d84869b8ca9878081c78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: May 13, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10667 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
vray-ex1052_527.htm



 

 

Exhibit 10.52

 

Amendment 

 


		
	
Amendment Date:
	
December 20, 2018

	
Parties:
	
ViewRay, Inc. 

Shahriar Matin

 

	
Original Agreement:
	
Employment Agreement dated July 22, 2018




 

The below signatories are parties to the Original Agreement.  The parties hereby agree to amend the Original Agreement as follows:

 

1.Section 4 of the Original Agreement is amended with the addition of the following clause:  

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Original Agreement, as of January 23, 2019, Executive’s office location shall be Denver, Colorado or a Colorado-based home office, and the “stipend” provided under the Original Agreement shall be deemed terminated of even date therewith.

 

2.This Amendment is effective as of the date set forth above.  This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts all of which together will constitute one instrument.  This Amendment is made a part of the Original Agreement.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Original Agreement will remain in full force and effect without addition, deletion or change.  

 

 


		
	
ViewRay, Inc.

 

 

By:  

(signature)

 

Printed Name:

 

Title:

 
	
Executive

 

 

By:  

(signature)

 

Printed Name:Shahriar Matin

 

Title:Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 4.11

  

   

  

   

  

  
    THIS AMENDMENT is made this 23rd
      day of May 2018 BETWEEN:

    
      
        	(1)	
                CHAMPION OCEAN NAVIGATION CO., having its registered
                    office at the Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, MH96960 Majuro, Marshall Islands (the “Owners”); and

              


      

    

    
      
        	(2)	
                V.SHIPS LIMITED, of Zina Kanther 16-18, Agia Triada,
                    3035 Limassol, Cyprus (the “Managers”).

              


      

    

    WHEREAS:

    
      
        	(A)	
                The Owners and the Managers have entered into a Ship Technical Management Agreement  with respect to the motor vessel CHAMPIONSHIP (IMO no. 9403516) dated
                    September 1, 2015 (the “Management Agreement”);

              


      

    

    
      
        	(B)	
                The Owners have proceeded with the change of their country of incorporation from the Republic of Liberia to the Republic of Malta and are provisionally
                    registered under the name “CHAMPION OCEAN NAVIGATION CO. LIMITED” as continuing in Malta as a limited liability company as from the 23rd day of May, 2018; and

              


      

    

    
      
        	(C)	
                The Owners will cease to be registered in the Republic of Liberia and be permanently registered as continuing in Malta as a limited liability company (the “Re-domiciliation”).

              


      

    

    IT IS NOW THEREFORE MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HEREOF AS FOLLOWS:

    With effect from the date of the Re-domiciliation of the Owners, all references in the Management Agreement to “CHAMPION
        OCEAN NAVIGATION CO.”, “80 Broad Street, City of Monrovia, Republic of Liberia” and “Liberia” shall mean “CHAMPION OCEAN NAVIGATION CO. LIMITED”, “147/1, St. Lucia Street, Valletta, VLT 1185, Malta” and “Malta” respectively.

    Except as provided hereinabove, the terms and conditions of the Management Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
        force and effect.

    
      1

      
        


    

    

    

    

    

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed by their duly authorised representatives on the date written above.

    

    

    	
            EXECUTED

          	
            )

          	 
	
            By Stamatios Tsantanis

          	
            )

          	
            /s/ Stamatios Tsantanis

          
	
            for and on behalf of

          	
            )

          	
            ......................

          
	
            CHAMPION OCEAN NAVIGATION CO.

          	
            )

          	 
	 	 	 
	
            EXECUTED

          	
            )

          	 
	
            ByPhilippos Charalambides

          	
            )

          	
            /s/ Philippos Charalambides

          
	
            for and on behalf of

          	
            )

          	
            ......................

          
	
            V.SHIPS LIMITED

          	
            )

          	 


  

   

    

  2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000910675
<NAME> COMMERCIAL ASSETS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,004
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,387
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,011
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,364
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of China TransInfo Technology Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shudong
Xia, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Shudong XiaShudong
      Xia
                President
      & Chief Executive Officer





March 25,
2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China TransInfo Technology Corp. and will be retained by China TransInfo
Technology Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial   Corp.   (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three  months  ended  December  31,  2004 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                  /s/ David J. Bursic
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  David J. Bursic
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 11, 2005

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-3
Christopher D. MARTIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7989.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the remaining portion of Samsung’s Motion to Supplement Expert 

Reports. Dkt. No. 241. On November 20, 2024, the Court granted the part of Samsung’s Motion 

regarding rebuttal to Headwater’s supplemental expert report. Dkt. No. 245. The Court also

deferred ruling on the part of the motion related to supplementing Samsung’s expert reports in 

response to Headwater’s expert disclosing a “new” claim construction opinion in a deposition. Id. 

In that Order, the Court directed Headwater to respond to the remaining portion. Id. Headwater 

has now filed its opposition. Dkt. No. 284. 

The Court does not find that Samsung has shown good cause to supplement. Both parties’ 

experts are bound to the opinions expressed in their timely disclosed reports. If Samsung believes 

that Mr. de la Iglesia goes beyond his, then they may object at trial. Accordingly, the remaining 

portion of the Motion is denied.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 11/27/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

21072
2

It is ORDERED that Samsung does not have leave to supplement the expert reports of 

Drs. Foster and Perryman in response to Mr. de la Iglesia’s deposition. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 275 Filed 11/27/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

21073