Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2022 / Notices 30941 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

II. Registration Applications 

EPA has received applications to 

register pesticide products containing 

active ingredients not included in any 

currently registered pesticide products. 

Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA 

section 3(c)(4) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA 

is hereby providing notice of receipt and 

opportunity to comment on these 

applications. Notice of receipt of these 

applications does not imply a decision 

by the Agency on these applications. 

For actions being evaluated under EPA’s 

public participation process for 

registration actions, there will be an 

additional opportunity for public 

comment on the proposed decisions. 

Please see EPA’s public participation 

website for additional information on 

this process (http://www2.epa.gov/ 

pesticide-registration/publicparticipation-process-registrationactions). 

Notice of Receipt—New Active 

Ingredients 

1. EPA File Symbols: 10163–GIU and 

10163–GIL. Docket ID number: EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2022–0302. Applicant: Gowan 

Company in cooperation with SDS 

Biotech K.K., c/o Landis International, 

Inc., P.O. Box 5126, 3185 Madison 

Highway, Valdosta, GA 31603. Product 

names: SB–950 Technical and SB–9503. 

Active ingredient: Fungicide—Bacillus 

amyloliquefaciens strain AT–332 at 

82.5% and 30.0%. Proposed use: For 

aerial and ground applications. Contact: 

BPPD. 

2. EPA File Symbols: 95374–R and 

95374–E. Docket ID number: EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2022–0278. Applicant: Trafalgar 

Land Company, LLC, P.O. Box 38, 

Orosi, CA 93647. Product names: CPCC 

TGAI and CPCC 40.5. Active ingredient: 

Rodenticide—Cellulose from powdered 

corn cobs at 45.1% and 40.5%. 

Proposed use: For use indoors to control 

mice. Contact: BPPD. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: May 12, 2022. 

Brian Bordelon, 

Acting Director, Information Technology and 

Resources Management Division, Office of 

Program Support. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10850 Filed 5–19–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[FR ID 87793] 

Open Commission Meeting Thursday, 

May 19, 2022 

May 12, 2022. 

The Federal Communications 

Commission will hold an Open Meeting 

on the subjects listed below on 

Thursday, May 19, 2022, which is 

scheduled to commence at 10:30 a.m. 

Due to the current COVID–19 

pandemic and related agency telework 

and headquarters access policies, this 

meeting will be in an electronic format 

and will be open to the public only on 

the internet via live feed from the FCC’s 

web page at www.fcc.gov/live and on the 

FCC’s YouTube channel. 

Item No. Bureau Subject 

1 .............................. Consumer & Governmental Affairs and 

Wireline Competition.

Title: Combatting Illegal Robocalls (CG Docket No. 17–59); Call Authentication 

Trust Anchor (WC Docket No. 17–97). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing foreignoriginated and other illegal robocalls from multiple angles. 

2 .............................. Wireline Competition ............................. Title: Expanding Broadband Service Through the A–CAM Program (WC Docket 

No. 10–90); ETC Annual Reports and Certifications (WC Docket No. 14–58); 

Telecommunications Carriers Eligible to Receive Universal Service Support 

(WC Docket No. 09–197); Connect America Fund—Alaska Plan (WC Docket 

No. 16–271). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

seeking comment on a proposal by the ACAM Broadband Coalition to 

achieve widespread deployment of 100/20 Mbps broadband service throughout the rural areas served by carriers currently receiving Alternative Connect 

America Model support, and proposing targeted modifications to the Commission’s rules to improve the efficiency and efficacy of the high-cost program. 

3 .............................. Public Safety & Homeland Security ...... Title: Modernizing Priority Services for National Security and Emergency Response (PS Docket No. 20–187). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Report and Order that would update 

and streamline its rules providing priority provision and restoration of service 

for national security and emergency response users. 

4 .............................. Media ..................................................... Title: Updating FM Radio Directional Antenna Verification (MB Docket No. 21– 

422). 

Summary: The Commission will consider a Report and Order to allow applicants proposing directional FM antennas the option of verifying the directional antenna pattern through computer modeling. 

5 .............................. Enforcement .......................................... Title: Enforcement Bureau Action. 

Summary: The Commission will consider an enforcement action. 

* * * * * 

The meeting will be webcast with 

open captioning at: www.fcc.gov/live. 

Open captioning will be provided as 

well as a text only version on the FCC 

website. Other reasonable 

accommodations for people with 

disabilities are available upon request. 

In your request, include a description of 

the accommodation you will need and 

a way we can contact you if we need 

more information. Last minute requests 

will be accepted but may be impossible 

to fill. Send an email to: fcc504@fcc.gov 

or call the Consumer & Governmental 

Affairs Bureau at 202–418–0530. 

Additional information concerning 

this meeting may be obtained from the 

Office of Media Relations, (202) 418– 

0500. Audio/Video coverage of the 

meeting will be broadcast live with 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30942 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2022 / Notices 

1 12 U.S.C. 4806(a). 

2 12 U.S.C. 4806(f)(2). 

3 12 U.S.C. 4806(b). 

4 60 FR 15923 (Mar. 28, 1995). 

5 86 FR 6880 (Jan. 25, 2021). 

open captioning over the internet from 

the FCC Live web page at www.fcc.gov/ 

live. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10915 Filed 5–19–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE 

CORPORATION 

RIN 3064–ZA20 

Guidelines for Appeals of Material 

Supervisory Determinations 

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance 

Corporation. 

ACTION: Notice and request for comment. 

SUMMARY: On May 17, 2022, the Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) 

adopted revised Guidelines for Appeals 

of Material Supervisory Determinations. 

The revisions generally restore the 

Supervision Appeals Review Committee 

as the final level of review in the 

supervisory appeals process, consistent 

with the agency’s longstanding practice 

of providing Board-level review of 

material supervisory determinations. 

DATES: The revised Guidelines for 

Appeals of Material Supervisory 

Determinations took effect on May 17, 

2022. Written comments must be 

received by the FDIC on or before June 

21, 2022 for consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are 

invited to submit written comments, 

identified by RIN 3064–ZA20, by any of 

the following methods: 

• Agency website: https://

www.fdic.gov/resources/regulations/ 

federal-register-publications/. Follow 

the instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: comments@FDIC.gov. 

Include ‘‘Guidelines for Appeals of 

Material Supervisory Determinations— 

RIN 3064–ZA20’’ in the subject line of 

the message. 

• Mail: James P. Sheesley, Assistant 

Executive Secretary, Attention: 

Comments—RIN 3064–ZA20, Federal 

Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th 

Street NW, Washington, DC 20429. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard 

station at the rear of the 550 17th Street 

NW building (located on F Street NW) 

on business days between 7:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m. (EST). 

• Public Inspection: Comments 

received, including any personal 

information provided, may be posted 

without change to https://www.fdic.gov/ 

resources/regulations/federal-registerpublications/. Commenters should 

submit only information that the 

commenter wishes to make available 

publicly. The FDIC may review, redact, 

or refrain from posting all or any portion 

of any comment that it may deem to be 

inappropriate for publication, such as 

irrelevant or obscene material. The FDIC 

may post only a single representative 

example of identical or substantially 

identical comments, and in such cases 

will generally identify the number of 

identical or substantially identical 

comments represented by the posted 

example. All comments that have been 

redacted, as well as those that have not 

been posted, that contain comments on 

the merits of this notice will be retained 

in the public comment file and will be 

considered as required under all 

applicable laws. All comments may be 

accessible under the Freedom of 

Information Act. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Colohan, Associate Director, 

Division of Risk Management 

Supervision, pcolohan@fdic.gov, 202– 

898–7283; Tara Oxley, Associate 

Director, Division of Depositor and 

Consumer Protection, toxley@fdic.gov, 

202–898–6722; James Watts, Counsel, 

Legal Division, jwatts@fdic.gov, 202– 

898–6678. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Section 309(a) of the Riegle 

Community Development and 

Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 

required the FDIC (as well as the other 

Federal banking agencies and the 

National Credit Union Administration) 

to establish an ‘‘independent intraagency appellate process’’ to review 

material supervisory determinations.1

The statute defines the term 

‘‘independent appellate process’’ to 

mean ‘‘a review by an agency official 

who does not directly or indirectly 

report to the agency official who made 

the material supervisory determination 

under review.’’ 2 In the appeals process, 

the FDIC is required to ensure that: (1) 

An IDI’s appeal of a material 

supervisory determination is heard and 

decided expeditiously; and (2) 

appropriate safeguards exist for 

protecting appellants from retaliation by 

agency examiners.3

In 1995, the FDIC adopted Guidelines 

for Appeals of Material Supervisory 

Determinations to implement section 

309(a). At that time, the FDIC’s Board of 

Directors established the Supervision 

Appeals Review Committee (SARC) to 

consider and decide appeals of material 

supervisory determinations.4 The Board 

has modified the composition of the 

SARC over the years, but as of 2021, the 

SARC included: One inside member of 

the FDIC’s Board of Directors (serving as 

Chairperson); one deputy or special 

assistant to each of the other inside 

Board members; and the General 

Counsel as a non-voting member. 

In January 2021, the FDIC adopted 

Guidelines that generally replaced the 

SARC as the final level of review in 

appellate process with a standalone 

office within the FDIC, designated the 

Office of Supervisory Appeals (Office).5

This Office was granted delegated 

authority to consider and resolve 

appeals of material supervisory 

determinations, and would be staffed by 

reviewing officials with bank 

supervisory or examination experience. 

After appealing a material supervisory 

determination to the relevant Division 

Director, an institution would have the 

option to appeal to the Office. If a 

material supervisory determination was 

appealed to the Office, a three- or fivemember panel of reviewing officials 

would consider the appeal and issue a 

written decision to the institution. The 

Guidelines did not provide for 

additional review beyond the Office. 

Restoring Committee Structure 

Prior to the establishment of the 

Office, the FDIC’s supervisory appeals 

process had always provided for Boardlevel review by including a Board 

member on the SARC. The FDIC’s 

experience suggests that its 

longstanding practice of providing 

Board-level review of material 

supervisory determinations would 

better promote independence and 

accountability in the appellate process. 

Allowing material supervisory 

determinations to be appealed to a 

Board-level committee underscores the 

significance of an independent review 

and lends credibility to the process. 

Furthermore, Board-level review has 

historically ensured that accountability 

for the FDIC’s supervisory 

determinations ultimately remains with 

the agency’s Board of Directors, 

consistent with sound corporate 

governance principles. 

The FDIC also believes that restoring 

the SARC as the final level of review for 

supervisory appeals will address 

staffing concerns that were inherent in 

the Office structure and may potentially 

threaten to hinder the effectiveness of 

the process going forward. The 

Guidelines provided that the Office 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES