alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1773 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1773

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
   to provide that any participant or beneficiary under an employee 
 benefit plan shall be entitled to de novo review in court of benefit 
                    determinations under such plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

  Mr. Filner (for himself and Mrs. Emerson) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
   to provide that any participant or beneficiary under an employee 
 benefit plan shall be entitled to de novo review in court of benefit 
                    determinations under such plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Disability Insurance Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. DE NOVO REVIEW OF BENEFIT DETERMINATIONS.

    Section 502(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 (29 U.S.C. 1132(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
    ``(3) Notwithstanding any provision by the plan for the exercise by 
a fidiciary of discretionary authority with respect to any benefit 
determination, any benefit determination under the plan shall be 
subject to de novo review by the court.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 of this Act shall apply with 
respect to causes of action arising after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                       
               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                        YEAR ENDED
                                                       SEPTEMBER 30,
                                          -------------------------------------
                                                   1996               1995    
                                          ------------------  -----------------
                                          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $32,275           $43,516

Weighted average common shares
   outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       23,116            24,389

Common stock equivalents due to
   dilutive effect of stock option . . . . .        1,104               699

Total weighted average common shares
   and equivalents outstanding . . . . . . .       24,220            25,088

Earnings per common and common share
   equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        $1.33             $1.73

Total weighted average common shares
   and equivalents outstanding . . . . . . .       24,220            25,088

Additional dilutive shares using ending 
   period market value versus average 
   market value for the period when 
   utilizing the treasury stock method 
   regarding stock options . . . . . . . . .           57               358

Total shares for fully dilutive
   earnings per share  . . . . . . . . . . .       24,277            25,446

Fully diluted earnings per common and
   common share equivalents  . . . . . . . .        $1.33             $1.71
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
REPORT AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                              84
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                       808
<INVENTORY>                                     44,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,556
<PP&E>                                          67,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,248
<BONDS>                                        122,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,007)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,069
<SALES>                                         85,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,452
<CGS>                                           64,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,244
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Paul WEDDLE, petitioner, v. Alan NUTZMAN, et al.

No. 18-236.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Roger N. POWELL.

No. D-3032.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Roger N. Powell, of Reisterstown, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of *448law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ANTHONY J. SABELLA, Petitioner

v. ESTATE OF GUS MILIDES, MARY SHANNON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND BARBARA RUSH RENKERT, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 702 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
Jesse J. DAVIS, Jr., et ux., petitioners, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.

No. 18-383.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
Guy Ennis SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8382.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
John B. LASCHKEWITSCH, petitioner, v. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 18M22.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
(110 So. 729)

No. 28144.

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Paul COLLINS. In re Paul COLLINS, Applying for Certiorari, Mandamus, and Prohibition.

(Nov. 2, 1926.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1926.)

George W. Smith, of Rayville, and Thomas C. Newton, of Monroe, for relator.

Percy Saint, Att.v. Gen., and David I. Garrett, Dist. Atty., of Monroe, for the State.

BRUNOT, J.

All of the issues presented in this case are disposed of in the opinion and decree handed down this day in No. 28142, State v. W. P. McCall, ante, p. 471, 110 So. 723.

It is therefore decreed that the sentence imposed herein be avoided, that the case be remanded to the lower court for sentence according to. law, and that the writs of mandamus and prohibition applied for be denied.

O’NIELL, C. X, and ST. PAUL, X, concur in the decree.
Exhibit 32.1


                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Fidelity Federal Bancorp
hereby certifies that:

     1.   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity Federal Bancorp for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2004 (the Report) fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Fidelity Federal Bancorp.



Dated:  November 15, 2004



/s/ Donald R. Neel
-----------------------------------
    Donald R. Neel
    President and
    Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of Fidelity Federal Bancorp, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1787 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1787

 To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the 
        Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

Mr. Walden of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the 
        Deschutes Resources Conservancy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deschutes Resources Conservancy 
Reauthorization Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN 
              DESCHUTES RESOURCES CONSERVANCY.

    Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 
(division B of Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-534) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, and up to a total amount of 
        $2,000,000 during each of fiscal years 2002 through 2006''; and
            (2) in subsection (h), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2002 through 2006''.
                                 <all>
```
Jaime TRAVERSO, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-6260.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/11/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       69,368
COMMITMENTS
  19,999    3,276    8,986   24,498   43,017   53,483   55,280   15,886   14,089

CHANGES FROM 01/04/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,267)
    -127       41     -265   -3,186   -2,530   -3,579   -2,755      311     -513

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.8      4.7     13.0     35.3     62.0     77.1     79.7     22.9     20.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       95)
      33       13       25       34       32       78       63
```

----

Updated January 14, 2011
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner, v. Michael PARSONS.

No. 17-1376.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Order entered October 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01038-CV

KARLA C. LIANG, Appellant

V.

SHAWANNA EDWARDS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-00315-2014

ORDER

We GRANT the September 28, 2015 motion of Claudia Webb, Official Court Reporter 

for the Collin County Court at Law No. 4, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. 

The reporter’s record shall be filed WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Marc Anthony Lowell ENDSLEY, aka Marc Endsley, petitioner, v. Edmund G. BROWN, et al.

No. 18-9012.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002



---



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of TurboChef Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                       |  |  |  |                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------
|                                                                      
|/s/ Jeffrey B. Bogatin                                                 |  |  |  |                     
|Jeffrey B. Bogatin Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive
Officer) |  |  |  | Date: April 16, 2003
* Ray Leach

' Board Certifieo-Civil ItfiAL Law

TtxAs Board of Leoal Srecialization

THE U\W OFFICES OF

RAT liEACH

I I I West Olmos Drive

San Antonio, Texas 782 I 2

Of Counsel:

John R. Heard

Board Certified -Oviu IRial Law

TEXAS Board of Leoal Speciauzation

Fourth Court ofAppeals

Clerk ofthe Court, Keith E. Hottle

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037

Re; Vacation Letter

September 16,2015

telephone

(a I O) 930-7700

Facsimile

(2 lO) 930-9353

E-Mail

rayleacb@TayIeachkw.com

•ii' 'ii

Case No: 04-15-00461 from Cause No: 2010-PC-2415

Katherine Sanchez Matthews, v. William H. Matthews, Jr, individually

and asIndependent Executor of the Estateof William H. Matthews, III.

This is to notify all counsel and courts that I will be on vacation and imavailable for any

settings or discovery proceedings on the following dates:

September 30 through October 6 and

October 16 through November 2,2015

Thank you for your professional courtesy in honoring this notice.

RL/gw
r

""'i> -

c=>

na

CVJ

m

o-

<yi

cr

sr

CO

C/?

•V- «

- T^. '

y^L;

r /"»•».
THE LAW OFFICES OF

RAT IiRAOH

( I I West Olmos Drive

San Antonio, Texas 782 I 2

O

iii ItPLI

CTION

SAWANTONIO

TX

;iB SEP "IS

PM 1 i

Fourth Court of Appeals

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037

^f5€SPQs:;5,

02 1P

0001911920 SEP 18 2015

MAILED FROM ZIPCODE78212

PITNEV BOMeS

Attn: Court Clerk Keith E. Hottle

"•B20S303799
James Paul ARLOTTA, petitioner, v. David Anthony HERATY, et al.

No. 18-8669.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Victoria Elia KALDAWI, petitioner, v. STATE OF KUWAIT, et al.

No. 18-5530.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
fzmd-ex105_125.htm



EXHIBIT 10.5

Commercial Property Lease Agreement

This Commercial Property Lease Agreement (“Lease”) is made and effective July 14, 2017, by and between 1565 North Central Expressway, LP (“Landlord”) and Fuse Medical, Inc. (“Tenant”).

Landlord is the Owner of land and improvements commonly known and numbered as 1565 North Central Expressway, Suite 220, Richardson, TX 75080.

Landlord desires to lease the Premises to Tenant and Tenant desires to lease the Premises from Landlord for the term, at the rental and upon the covenants, conditions and provisions herein set forth.

THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, contained and other good and valuable consideration, it is agreed:

1.Term.  Landlord hereby leases the Premises to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases the same from Landlord, for an “Initial Term” beginning July 14, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017, unless terminated earlier by either Landlord or Tenant upon thirty (30) days’ notice.  Tenant shall have possession of the lease premises during Lease Term and be entitled to office related amenities, including, but not limited to parking, restrooms, cleaning services, and employee breakroom.

2.Rent.  Tenant shall pay to Landlord a monthly rent during the initial term and during the renewal period lease of $4,000.00 per month due on the first of each month, with the first full-month payment for August, due by August 1, 2017.  The initial month of July 2017, will be prorated for seventeen (17) days or $2,235.62 due upon occupancy.

3.Use.  Notwithstanding the forgoing, Tenant shall not use the Leased Premises for the purposes of storing, manufacturing or selling any explosives, flammables or other inherently dangerous substance, chemical, thing or device.

4.Insurance.  If the Leased Premises or any other part of the Building is damaged by fire or other casualty resulting from any act or negligence of Tenant or any of Tenant’s agents, employees or invitees, rent shall not be diminished or abated while such damages are under repair, and Tenant shall be responsible for the costs of repair not covered by insurance.

5.Utilities.  Shall be included as part of the monthly rental payment of $4,000.00 per month and during the term of this Lease unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing by Landlord.

6.Entry.  Landlord shall have the right to enter upon the Leased Premises at reasonable hours to inspect the same, provided Landlord shall not thereby unreasonably interfere with Tenant’s business on the Leased Premises.

7.Parking.  During the term of this Lease, Tenant shall have the non-exclusive use in common with Landlord, other tenants of the Building, their guests and invitees, of the non-reserved common automobile parking areas, driveways. and footways, subject to rules and regulations for the use thereof as prescribed from time to time by Landlord.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease on July 14, 2017.

 



 


1565 North Central Expressway, LP


Fuse Medical, Inc.

 

- 2 -
MIN HO KWON, petitioner, v. HYOUN PHIL WON, et al.

No. 18-5489.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Peter Vincent CAPRA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5780.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Robert MARSHALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9264.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      154,794
COMMITMENTS
  60,869   11,137   13,061   62,957  108,905  136,887  133,103   17,907   21,691

CHANGES FROM 09/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,036)
   2,893     -405      543    3,756    5,221    7,192    5,359   -1,156      677

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    39.3      7.2      8.4     40.7     70.4     88.4     86.0     11.6     14.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      64       21       27       59       78      134      117
```

----

Updated September 21, 2012