alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VARI-L'S
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FOR THE
TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED, INCLUDED WITH THE ANNUAL 1999 10-KSB FILING WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                     10,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,060
<PP&E>                                          38,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,373
<SALES>                                         24,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,543
<CGS>                                           11,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,036
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,098
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,403
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
Juan Manuel SANCHEZ-JARA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
OSAGE WIND, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL.

No. 17-1237.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Motion of American Wind Energy Association for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of Osage County Farm Bureau, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2015

N o. 04

- 13

- 00106

- CV

Barry BROOKS , Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez

Benavides,

Appellant s

v.

EXCELLENCE MORTGAGE, LTD.

,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 01173

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason P ulliam, Justice (not p articipating)

The en banc court has considered Appellees’ motion for en banc reconsideration; the

motion is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.7.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000917321
<NAME>                        FINISHMASTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1.000
<CASH>                                        619
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 30,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1,419
<INVENTORY>                                   56,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              94,508
<PP&E>                                        15,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                8,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                214,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         46,361
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      7,538
<OTHER-SE>                                    45,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  214,235
<SALES>                                       324,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              324,490
<CGS>                                         207,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 98,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            10,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               7,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4,232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  3,711
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.49


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         235,465
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  251,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               486,588
<PP&E>                                         6,054,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,561,183)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,979,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,107
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,971,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,979,560
<SALES>                                        232,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,109
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,556<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                37,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            37,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   37,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Leslie Dominic MUSGROVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5121.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Jabril JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6512.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re George HOUSTON, petitioner.

No. 18-614.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |               
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|Antares LDA                                |  | Portugal      
|Cam2 SRL                                   |  | Italy         
|Faro Benelux BV                            |  | Netherlands   
|Faro Business Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. |  | India         
|Faro Cayman LP                             |  | Cayman Islands
|Faro Cayman Ltd                            |  | Cayman Islands
|Faro Delaware Inc                          |  | Delaware, USA 
|Faro Deutschland Holding GmbH              |  | Germany       
|Faro Europe KG                             |  | Germany       
|Faro FHN Netherlands BV                    |  | Netherlands   
|Faro Japan KK                              |  | Japan         
|Faro Scanning AG                           |  | Germany       
|Faro Scanner Production GmbH               |  | Germany       
|IQ LaserSales (Pty)                       |  | Germany       
|IQ LaserScan (Pty)                        |  | Germany       
|Faro Shanghai Co. Ltd                      |  | China         
|Faro Singapore PTE Ltd                     |  | Singapore     
|Faro Spain SL                              |  | Spain         
|Faro Swiss Holding GmbH                    |  | Switzerland   
|Faro Swiss Manufacturing GmbH              |  | Switzerland   
|Faro Tech Polska                           |  | Poland        
|Faro Verwaltungs GmbH                      |  | Germany       
|Faro Worldwide Inc                         |  | Florida, USA  
|Faro Technologies (Thailand) Ltd.          |  | Thailand      
|3D Measurement Technologies, S de RL de CV |  | Mexico
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VARI-L'S
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PREPARED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND FOR THE
TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED, INCLUDED WITH ITS 10-KSB FILING WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                        18
<INVENTORY>                                      6,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,968
<PP&E>                                          21,639
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,556
<SALES>                                         17,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,571
<CGS>                                            8,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43<F40>
<FN>
<F40>EPS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
In Re Taryn CHRISTIAN, petitioner.

No. 17-8225.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, petitioner, v. Maura HEALEY, Attorney General of Massachusetts.

No. 18-311.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Affinity Group, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures, (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant, and we have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.
| Date: May 9, 2007 | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe        |   |
|-------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|              | Thomas F. Wolfe            |
|              | Senior Vice  President and |
|              | Chief Financial  Officer   |

 

1

----
Amendment to Note Agreement

         This Amendment to Note Agreement (the "Amendment") is entered into as
of March 30, 2000 between EFTC Corporation ("EFTC") and Monfort Family Limited
Partnership I ("Monfort").

                                    Recitals

         A. EFTC authorized and issued subordinated notes to Monfort in an
aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000 due 2000 (the "Original Notes")
pursuant to the Note Agreement (the "Agreement") dated November 11, 1999 between
EFTC and Monfort.

         B.      $2,000,000 in principal amount of the Original Notes has been
paid by EFTC and the  parties  now wish to issue a new note for the  benefit  of
Monfort in order to provide for subordinated notes with a term of four years.

                                    Agreement

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.      The first two full sentences of Section 1a. of the Agreement
shall be deleted and replaced with the following:

         The Company has duly authorized an issue of subordinated notes in an
         aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 in the form of Exhibit 1 to
         this Amendment (the "Notes"). The Notes shall bear interest, be payable
         and have such other terms as provided in Exhibit 1 and shall otherwise
         be governed by the provisions of this Agreement.

         2.      Section 8b. of the Agreement shall be amended with the addition
of the following language at the end of such section:

         ; provided however that interest shall continue to be paid only in the
         form of payment-in- kind notes (the "PIK Notes") issued in lieu of cash
         interest, in such manner as described in the Notes, until such time as
         such default or event of default shall have been cured or waived or
         shall have ceased to exist.

         3.  The parties hereby affirm and ratify the other provisions of the
Agreement.





                                        1

<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this
Amendment as of March 30, 2000.



EFTC Corporation


By:  /s/ Jack Calderon
Name:    Jack Calderon
Title:   Chairman


Monfort Family Limited Partnership I



By:  /s/ Richard Monfort
Name:
Title





                                        2

<PAGE>


                                    Exhibit 1

                           Form of Subordinated Notes



                                        3

<PAGE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELVI FRANCISCA REAL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72306

Agency No. A093-278-161

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2013** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Elvi Francisca Real, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

JAN 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72306

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and

review de novo constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-

92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Real’s motion to reopen as

untimely where it was filed one and a half years after the date of her order of

removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (an alien seeking to reopen and rescind

an in absentia removal order based on exceptional circumstances must file the

motion within 180 days after the date of the removal order), and Real failed to

show the due diligence required for equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see

Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 679-80 (9th Cir. 2011) (equitable tolling is

available to a petitioner who establishes deception, fraud or error, and exercised

due diligence in discovering such circumstances).

It follows that the BIA did not violate Real’s due process rights by denying

the motion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error

and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

In her opening brief, Real fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any

challenge regarding lack of notice of her hearing and statutory ineligibility for

cancellation of removal. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir.

2011) (a petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in the opening brief).
3 11-72306

We lack jurisdiction to review Real’s contention that the absence of a

complete transcript of the proceedings before the IJ violated her due process rights

because she failed to raise this contention before the agency and thereby failed to

exhaust her administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678

(9th Cir. 2004) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before

the agency). 

Real’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Based on
a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2009 of Agree Realty Corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth R. Howe,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The Report,
      containing the financial statements, fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Kenneth R. HoweKenneth
      R. HoweVice
      President, FinanceChief
      Financial Officer





March 12,
2010
Gene WARD, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8345.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Case 2:23-cv-00104-RWS-RSP Document 6 Filed 04/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 128
Jermaine FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6204.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.