alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 16, 2020

No. 04-17-00835-CR

James STRIBLIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4270

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This court issued its mandate in appeal number 04-17-00835-CR on March 6, 2019. On 

March 12, 2020, appellant James Striblin filed a pro se motion for a copy of the appellate record 

so he may prepare a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. 

This court’s plenary power in appeal number 04-17-00835-CR has expired; this court no 

longer has jurisdiction in that appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1 (plenary power period); id. 19.3 

(“After its plenary power expires, the court cannot vacate or modify its judgment.”). 

Further, this court has “no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in 

felony cases.” In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. 

proceeding); accord TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07. Post-conviction writs of habeas 

corpus are to be filed in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained and made returnable 

to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07(b). 

To obtain a free copy of the record to prepare a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus, 

Appellant must file a motion in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained and 

demonstrate that his claim is not frivolous and that the record is needed to decide the issues 

presented. See United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 325–26 (1976); Escobar v. State, 880 

S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, no pet.). 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Robert WHARTON, petitioner, v. Donald T. VAUGHN.

No. 18-5791.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Marvin K. LOCKE, petitioner, v. Daniel PARAMO, Warden.

No. 18-6414.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated July 20, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Trials SEP (UG3, U24, R61, R34).
    Date: June 29, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Zhihong Shan, Ph.D., MD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 205-J, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7085, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed9785848582838ac39e858c83ad838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="592331303136373e772a31383719373031773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 12, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10635 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JOSEPH ALLEN MOORE

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00046-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count One of the Information. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Joseph Allen Moore

GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 371 -

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25th April, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00046-JDK-KNM Document 16 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 46
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of TALX Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig N. Cohen, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                              By:  /s/ Craig N. Cohen
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Craig N. Cohen
                              Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                              TALX Corporation

December 23, 2002
Melba FORD, applicant, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18A1104.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Application for stay addressed to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and referred to the Court denied.
Preston PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9248.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | BORROWER:                                                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | DIASYS CORPORATION                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   | By: S/ GREGORY WITCHEL                                                                      |
|   | Gregory Witchel       Chief Executive Officer                                               |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   | LENDER:                                                                                     |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   |                                                                                        |
|   | S/ MORRIS SILVERMAN                Morris Silverman |
|   |                                                                                        |

----
No. 6:23-cr-00041

United States of America

v.

Austin Alan Hall

ORD ER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). Judge Love

held a final revocation hearing on April 2, 2024, and issued a report 

and recommendation (Doc. 15) recommending that defendant’s 

term of supervised release should be revoked. Defendant waived his

right to object to the report, agreed to the revocation of his supervised release, agreed to the sentence below, and waived his right to 

be present for sentencing. Doc. 14.

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and 

recommendation. The court orders that the defendant be sentenced 

to a prison term of six months with no supervised release to follow.

The court further recommends that the defendant serve his sentence at FMC Ft. Worth, Texas, if available.

So ordered by the court on April 9, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00041-JCB-JDL Document 16 Filed 04/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 46
Syed K. RAFI, petitioner, v. BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 18-6166.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1511

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require certain additional

information in statements of explanation of benefits provided to Medicare

beneficiaries under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1999

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

certain additional information in statements of explanation of benefits provided to Medicare beneficiaries

under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Truth in Bill5 ing Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1511 IH

1 SEC. 2. INFORMATION FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES

2 WITH RESPECT TO ACTUAL PAYMENT

3 AMOUNTS MADE TO HOSPITALS FOR INPA4 TIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1806 of the Social Secu6 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395b–7) is amended by adding at

7 the end the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(c) SUNSHINE IN BILLING.—

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an item or

10 service consisting of inpatient hospital services fur11 nished during a cost reporting period by a sub12 section (d) hospital (as defined in section

13 1886(d)(1)(B)) to individuals entitled to benefits

14 under this part, the Secretary shall include in a

15 statement under subsection (a) the following addi16 tional listed information:

17 ‘‘(A) The amount of payment made by the

18 Secretary with respect to such item or service.

19 ‘‘(B) The amount equal to the difference

20 between the amount of payment customarily

21 charged by the hospital during such cost report22 ing period with respect to such item or service

23 and the amount of payment described in sub24 paragraph (A).

25 ‘‘(2) PRESENTATION ON STATEMENT.—(A) The

26 Secretary shall arrange the listed information re-
3

•HR 1511 IH

1 quired under this section in a manner that is readily

2 comprehensible by such individuals.

3 ‘‘(B) The amount described in paragraph

4 (1)(B) shall be referred to as the ‘hospital discount

5 amount’ on the statement.’’.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 subsection (a) applies with respect to statements of expla8 nation of benefits under the medicare program prepared

9 for items and services furnished on or after the date of

10 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of theundersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form10-Q for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2007 of Lincoln Benefit Life Companyfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of LincolnBenefit Life Company.

 

 
| August 6, 2007 |                    |
|----------------|-------------------------|
|           |                    |
|           | /s/ James E. Hohmann    |   |
|           | James E. Hohmann        |
|           | President and           |
|           | Chief Executive Officer |
|           |                    |
|           | /s/ John C. Pintozzi    |   |
|           | John C. Pintozzi        |
|           | Vice President and      |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

E-4

----
Amil DINSIO, petitioner, v. APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.

No. 18-6202.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

ASYMMETRIC IP LLC

2:23-cv-00111

SITECORE USA, INC.

SITECORE USA, INC. through its Registered Agent

National Registered Agents, Inc.

1999 Bryan St., Ste. 900

Dallas, Texas 75201-3136

Eric H. Findlay

Findlay Craft, P.C.

7270 Crosswater Avenue, Suite B

Tyler, Texas 75703

3/13/23

Case 2:23-cv-00111-JRG Document 4 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 52
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00111 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00111-JRG Document 4 Filed 03/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 53
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION

§

LARRY B. JOHNSON §

§

Plaintiff §

§

v. § Case No. 5:23cv34-JRG-JBB

§

J. HUGHES, ET AL. §

§

Defendants §

§

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Larry Johnson, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights 

lawsuit complaining of alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to 

the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On February 26, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the lawsuit 

be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. Plaintiff 

received a copy of this Report on March 6, 2024, but no objections have been filed. Accordingly, 

Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and 

recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjectedto factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. Duarte v. City 

of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. 

Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See 

United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (where 

no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, 

abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”) It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 15) is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of the District Court. It is further

Case 5:23-cv-00034-JRG-JBB Document 17 Filed 06/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11
2

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure 

to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court. It is further

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby

DENIED.

So Ordered this

Jun 21, 2024

Case 5:23-cv-00034-JRG-JBB Document 17 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12
No. 6:23-cr-00037

United States of America

v.

Trevaughn Terrell Traylor

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge John D. Love for administration of a guilty plea under Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued 

findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 35. The 

magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s 

guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate 

judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the magistrate judge. The court also accepts 

defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea agreement until 

after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Trevaughn Terrell Traylor guilty of count one of the indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) – Possession with 

the Intent to Distribute and Distribution of Fentanyl (N-phenyl-N-

[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide.

So ordered by the court on July 28, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00037-JCB-JDL Document 37 Filed 07/28/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 93
Mitchell MIORELLI, et al., petitioners, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISE LINES, LTD.

No. 18-1187.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Lou TYLER, petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 18-6259.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

DAVID DARRIGAN & DAR-JKTA §

ENTERPRISES, LLC §

Plaintiffs, §

§ CIVIL ACTION No.: 4:23-cv-00360

v. § 

§ DISTRICT JUDGE SEAN D. JORDAN

KAVA CULTURE FRANCHISE §

GROUP CORPORATION §

Defendant. §

REPLY DECLARATION OF EVAN M. GOLDMAN

I, EVAN M. GOLDMAN, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney-at-law and a partner at the law firm of Greenspoon Marder LLP.

I am admitted to practice in the States of New Jersey and New York, the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia. I am also admitted in eleven federal district courts and 

four federal courts of appeal. I am admitted in this case pro hac vice, and have represented Kava 

Culture Franchise Group Corp., in its dispute with Plaintiffs – and others – since April 2023.

As such, I have personal knowledge of the facts and events described herein. 

2. Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of 

the Order Directing the Parties to Mediation, dated July 5, 2023, filed in the matter of Kava Culture 

Franchise Grp. Corp. v. Dar-Jkta Enter, LLC, in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial District 

in and for Lee County, Florida, under Case No. 23-CA-6682 (the “Florida State Action”). 

3. Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of 

the Order “Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Injunction,” dated July 5, 2023, filed in the 

Florida State Action. 

Case 4:23-cv-00360-SDJ Document 17-1 Filed 07/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1957
2

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Dated: July 7, 2023 /s/ Evan M. Goldman

Evan M. Goldman

Case 4:23-cv-00360-SDJ Document 17-1 Filed 07/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1958