alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Steven PINDER, petitioner, v. Alva Green McDOWELL, et al.

No. 18-5733.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2119

In re: JONATHAN CORNISH , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 1:07

- cr - 00592

- RDB

- 1 , 1:07

- cr - 00604

- RDB

- 1 )

Submitted : December 20, 2019 Decided: January 6, 2020

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jonathan Cornish, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jonathan Cornish petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling modification of his sentence. We conclude that Cornish is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circum stances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy

- Brown, LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Cornish is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit
31.2**
 **CFO
Certification**
 
 
 I,
Sheridan Westgarde, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aquatic Cellulose International
Corporation (the "Company");
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual report;
and
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Annual report.
 
 4. The
Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The
Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
March 18, 2005
 
 
 
 /s/
Sheridan Westgarde
 Sheridan
Westgarde
 Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITYGROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.                                       Thisstatement is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connectionwith the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

1.                                       ThePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof dates and for the periods indicated therein.

 

 

Date:  November 2, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Art LARSON, petitioner, v. Michael HOENIG, General Counsel, National Indian Gaming Commission, et al.

No. 18-8693.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Marlon WATFORD, petitioner, v. Thomas LaFOND, et al.

No. 18-5792.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

AKARI S. WILLIAMS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-155

 

WARDEN, FCI BEAUMONT §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Akari S. Williams, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in

Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred thismatterto theHonorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. 

On October 31, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the Petition. To date, the

parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. Proper notice was given to Petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P.

5(b)(2)(C). After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,

and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 2] is ADOPTED. A

Case 1:23-cv-00155-MJT-CLS Document 3 Filed 12/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 166
final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. 

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 15th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00155-MJT-CLS Document 3 Filed 12/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 167
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2307-083]


Alaska Electric Light & Power Company; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC) 
regulations, 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 380, Commission 
staff reviewed Alaska Electric Light and Power Company's application 
for an amendment to the license of the Annex Creek and Salmon Creek 
Hydroelectric Project No. 2307 and have prepared an Environmental 
Assessment (EA). The licensee proposes to replace the aging Annex Creek 
penstock. The valvehouse would also be expanded to include an automated 
valve and controls located immediately downstream of the originally 
manually operated gate valve. The project is located on Annex and 
Salmon Creeks in the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska. The project 
occupies federal lands within the Tongass National Forest administered 
by the U.S. Forest Service.
    The EA contains Commission staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental effects of the proposed amendment to the license, and 
concludes that the proposed amendment, with appropriate environmental 
protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that 
would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA may be viewed on the Commission's website at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``elibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number (P-2307) in the docket number field to access the document. At 
this time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's 
Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National 
Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued 
by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d79192859498b9bbbeb9b284a2a7a7b8a5a397b1b2a5b4f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f393a2d3c30111316111a2c0a0f0f100d0b3f191a0d1c51181009">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    For further information, contact Marybeth Gay at 202-502-6125 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99d4f8ebe0fbfcedf1b7def8e0d9fffcebfab7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d499b5a6adb6b1a0bcfa93b5ad94b2b1a6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 16, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10873 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

VICTOR ANDREW APODACA §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23cv63

UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Victor Andrew Apodaca, an inmate confined in the Michael Unit of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, brings this civil rights action against several

unidentified defendants who are employed at the Michael Unit.

Analysis

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, et. seq., under which this case is brought, does not

contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. When,

as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391

provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the

claim arose. 

Plaintiff complains of events which occurred at the Michael Unit, which is located in

Anderson County. In addition, the defendants are employed at the Michael Unit and appear to reside

in Anderson County. Plaintiff’s claims concerning such events therefore arose in Anderson County

and the defendants apparently reside there. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Anderson County is located

in the Eastern District of Texas. As a result, venue regarding plaintiff’s claims is proper in this

court.

However, while Anderson County is in the Eastern District of Texas, it is in the Tyler

Division, rather than the Lufkin Division. None of the events complained of in this lawsuit 

occurred within the Lufkin Division. Nor do the defendants reside in the Lufkin Division.

When a case is filed in the wrong division, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interests

of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28

Case 6:23-cv-00156-JDK-JDL Document 3 Filed 03/30/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 12
U.S.C. § 1406(a). Accordingly, plaintiff's claims will be transferred to the Tyler Division of this

court.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, it is ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the Tyler

Division of this court.

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 30th day of March, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00156-JDK-JDL Document 3 Filed 03/30/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 13
Wayne THOMAS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6104.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Order entered December 27, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01459-CV

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., Appellant

V.

PALISADES COLLECTION LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-14916

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s December 19, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of time to 

file brief and ORDER the brief filed no later than January 13, 2014. No further extensions will 

be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

L2 MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) 

CO., LTD., 

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:23-cv-00087

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL

Before the Court is Plaintiff L2 Mobile Technologies LLC’s Motion for leave to file 

under seal its Complaint against OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. After 

consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:23-cv-00087-JRG Document 1-1 Filed 03/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3
Timothy Joseph McGHEE, petitioner, v. Ron DAVIS, Warden.

No. 18M54.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David J. BursicDavid J. BursicPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 4, 2014

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be
retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-3
James GOFF, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-8016.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           19389
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   392234
<ALLOWANCES>                                     75000
<INVENTORY>                                      61200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                627990
<PP&E>                                          209165
<DEPRECIATION>                                  143925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  693230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           902073
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           559
<OTHER-SE>                                      845493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    693230
<SALES>                                        6278599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6278599
<CGS>                                          4863355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4863355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1558541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               46441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (189738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (327660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
Glenn Lee SELDEN, petitioner, v. Elizabeth A. KOVACHEVICH, Judge, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, et al.

No. 18-5017.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

KENNETH A. THOMAS, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-68

§

SERGIO J. PEREZ, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Kenneth A. Thomas, a prisoner previously confined at the Gib Lewis Unit of the

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se,

brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sergio J. Perez, Heather M.

Glover, Bryan Collier, and Bobby Lumpkin.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this court. The magistrate judge recommends denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. 

To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of

the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. 

Case 9:23-cv-00068-MAC-CLS Document 25 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 93
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#13) is

ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (#11) is DENIED. 

2

________________________________________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of December, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00068-MAC-CLS Document 25 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 94
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, S. Paul Sandhu, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this First Amended Anual Report on Form  10-KSB/A of  GTC
Telecom Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Registrant");

2.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report.

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)
designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  report is being prepared; b) evaluated the
effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report  based  on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in
the  registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the  registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably  likely  to  affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;  and;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  a)  all  significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process, summarize and report financial
information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or  other  employees  who  have  a significant role in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting.

Date: April 10, 2007

/s/ S. Paul Sandhu
------------------
S. Paul Sandhu
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)