alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/17/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       35,883
COMMITMENTS
   7,609      473      639   19,213   26,079   27,461   27,191    8,422    8,692

CHANGES FROM 07/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,856)
     858     -511       29       95    2,690      982    2,208      874     -352

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.2      1.3      1.8     53.5     72.7     76.5     75.8     23.5     24.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
      12        2        5       28       27       42       34
```

----

Updated July 20, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,893
<SECURITIES>                                        50
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                       703
<INVENTORY>                                     52,778
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,257
<PP&E>                                          76,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         42
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   199,359
<SALES>                                        185,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               185,512
<CGS>                                          129,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,914
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,870
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
        

</TABLE>
# L_2014092EN.01002801.xml

| 27.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 92/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 92/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 202/2013

of 8 November 2013

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2013/21/EU of 18 December 2012 on equivalences between categories of driving licences (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2013/21/EU of 18 December 2012 on equivalences between categories of driving licences (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 24fa (Commission Regulation (EU) No 383/2012) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘24fb. | 32013 D 0021: Commission Decision 2013/21/EU of 18 December 2012 on equivalences between categories of driving licences (OJ L 19, 22.1.2013, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘24fb.

32013 D 0021: Commission Decision 2013/21/EU of 18 December 2012 on equivalences between categories of driving licences (OJ L 19, 22.1.2013, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2013/21/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 November 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2013.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Thórir IBSEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 19, 22.1.2013, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INVALIDITY BASED ON THE MOTOROLA E815 

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

of No Invalidity Based on the Motorola E815. Having considered the matter, and for good cause 

shown, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 179-8 Filed 10/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 9259
Charles G. KINNEY, petitioner, v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of First Asia Holdings Limited. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2012 (the Report), I, Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  January 14, 2013 /s/ Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy     Chief Executive Officer
James CHAVEZ, petitioner, v. Robert LeGRAND, Warden, et al.

No. 18-6060.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF**

 

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Nidal Z Zayed, President and Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Report on 10-K of Pernix Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, (the “Report”) hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pernix Group, Inc.

 
| /s/   Nidal Z Zayed                     |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| Nidal   Zayed                           |   |
|                                    |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                    |   |
| Dated:   April 13, 2011            |   |

 

----
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              IVC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law

              ----------------------------------------------------

      IVC Industries, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

      FIRST: At a special meeting of shareholders held on June 5, 2000, a
majority of the holders of the shares of common stock entitled to vote
authorized the amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation so that the Article
thereof numbered "FOURTH" shall read as follows:

      "FOURTH: The Corporation shall have authority to issue 4,500,000 shares of
      Common Stock of the par value of $0.08 per share and 250,000 shares of
      preferred stock of the par value of $0.01 per share. The Board of
      Directors is hereby expressly authorized to provide for the issuance of
      the preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix for each such series
      such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such
      designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
      special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions
      thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions
      adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issuance of such
      series."

      SECOND: The said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed this Certificate this 5th
day of June, 2000.

                                        IVC INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ E. Joseph Edell
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            E. Joseph Edell
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Attest:


By: /s/ Domenic Golato
    ------------------------------------
    Domenic Golato
    Secretary


                                       2
Fortino PIMENTEL-SOTO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5405.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        STATE OF
                                      INCORPORATION
         SUBSIDIARY                  OR ORGANIZATION             DBA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                <C>
BKCAP Corporation                       Delaware        Burger King restaurant
BKCAP, LLC                              Delaware        Burger King restaurant
BKCN Corporation                        Delaware        Burger King restaurant
BKCN, LLC                               Delaware        Burger King restaurant
Bravogrand, Inc.                        Indiana         Burger King restaurant
Bravokilo, Inc.                         Indiana         Burger King restaurant
Chili's Of Christiana, Inc.             Delaware        Chili's restaurant
Chili's Of Mount Laurel, Inc.           New Jersey      Chili's restaurant
Full Service Dining, Inc.               Indiana         Spageddie's restaurant
GAGHC, Inc.                             Delaware        Grady's American Grill restaurant
GAGLC, Inc.                             Texas           Grady's American Grill restaurant
Grady's American Grill Restaurant
  Corporation                           Indiana         Grady's American Grill restaurant
Grady's American Grill, L.P.            Texas           Grady's American Grill restaurant
Grady's, Inc.                           Tennessee       Grady's American Grill restaurant
GRAYCAP Corporation                     Delaware        Chili's restaurant
GRAYCAP, LLC                            Delaware        Chili's restaurant
GRAYCN Corporation                      Delaware        Chili's restaurant
GRAYCN, LLC                             Delaware        Chili's restaurant
Grayling Corporation                    Delaware        Chili's restaurant
Grayling Management Corporation         Virginia        Chili's restaurant
QDI Management, L.L.C.                  Indiana         Management company
Southwest Dining, Inc.                  Indiana         Chili's restaurant
SWCAP Corporation                       Delaware        Chili's restaurant
SWCAP, LLC                              Delaware        Chili's restaurant
SWCN Corporation                        Delaware        Chili's restaurant
SWCN, LLC                               Delaware        Chili's restaurant
Tri-State Construction Co. Inc.         Indiana         Tri-State Construction Co., Inc.
</TABLE>

                                       71
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

PHILLIP TURNER and JAMES WHITE,

 Plaintiffs,

VS.

CITY OF CORRIGAN,

OFFICER ALBERT L. RICHARD,

OFFICER FITZPATRICK D. FOSTER,

OFFICER TRACY M. BROWN, and

OFFICER JONATHAN D. REYNOLDS,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-00065

 JUDGE MICHAEL J. TRUNCALE

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw Request for Entry of Judgment [Dkt. 

23]. On October 27, 2023, the Parties filed their Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment [Dkt. 21], 

requesting that the Court enter a proposed order. After considering the motion and other pleadings and 

applicable law, the Court issued the Order Setting Telephonic Status Conference [Dkt. 22]. During the 

conference that took place on November 17, 2023, the Parties advised the Court that they will file a 

revised Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment within twenty days from the date of the 

conference. Subsequently, the Parties filed the Revised Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment 

[Dkt. 24]. The parties also filed the Joint Motion to Withdraw Request for Entry of Judgment, asking 

that the Court not enter the proposed judgment as requested in the Joint Motion for Entry of Consent 

Judgment. After considering the Parties’ motion and reviewing the pleadings on file and all applicable 

law, the Court grants the Joint Motion to Withdraw Request for Entry of Judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Motion to Withdraw Request for Entry of 

Judgment [Dkt. 23] is hereby GRANTED.

Case 9:23-cv-00065-MJT Document 25 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 137
2

It is further ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment [Dkt. 21] is 

hereby TERMINATED and WITHDRAWN.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 8th day of December, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00065-MJT Document 25 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 138
Joseph FAULKNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5966.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Laurence Arthur BATES, et ux., petitioners, v. VILLAGE OF PENTWATER, MICHIGAN.

No. 17-1651.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Australian Oil &
Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, E. Geoffrey Albers, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 3, 2008                                /s/ E. Geoffrey Albers
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    E. Geoffrey Albers
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer






<PAGE>
Valerie MASON, petitioner, v. Dan A. POLSTER, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, et al.

No. 18-5591.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                          53,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,683
<PP&E>                                           7,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       486,887
<OTHER-SE>                                    (184,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .004
        


</TABLE>
Keith William DEICHERT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5414.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
James H. BRADY, petitioner, v. Barbara UNDERWOOD, Attorney General of New York.

No. 18-157.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Affinity Group, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures, (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
| Date:  August 13, 2007 | /s/ Thomas F.  Wolfe      |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                   | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|                   | Senior Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
Nicolas COBO-COBO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8073.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.