T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). I H / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSE L I DI O CABRAL- CABR AL, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 75182 A ge nc yN o. A 090- 176- 653 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e L i di o C abr a l - C abr a l , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s um m ar i l y a ff i rm i ng an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) deci si on denyi ng hi s app l i cat i on for a§ 2 12 (h) w ai ver 

# FI LED DE C 07 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSI H / Res ea r ch 05- 75182 2 of i nadm i ss abi l i ty. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew d e n o v o c la im s o f

du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s , Sa n ch ezCr u zv . I NS , 2 5 5 F .3 d7 7 5 , 7 7 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) , an dw e d e n yin p art an dd is m is s in p art th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . C abra l -C abra l ’ s c on t ent i on concerni ng the re troac t i ve appl i cat i on of 8 C . F . R . § 2 1 2 . 7 (d ) i s fo recl o sedb y Mej i a v. G on zales , 4 9 9 F .3 d9 9 1 , 9 9 7 - 9 9 ( 9 th C i r. 20 07 ). C abra l -C abra l ’ s c on t ent i on thathi s c on vi ct i on un der C al i forni a P enal C o d e § 2 8 8 ( a ) is n o t ac r im e o f v io le n c e is a ls o f

o r e c lo s e d . Me

jia , 499 F . 3d a t999. W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th e I J ’s d is c r e tio n aryd e n ia l o f C ab r a lC abr a l ’ s appl i c a t i on f

oraw a i ve rof

i na dm i s s i bi l i tyunde r§ 212( h) of the I m m ig r a tio n a n dN a tio n a lityA c t. See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( i) ; Me jia , 499 F . 3d a t999. C abr a l - C abr a l ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe I Jvi ol a t e d hi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s by di s r e gar di ng hi s e vi de nc e of har ds hi p t o hi s w i f

e a nd m i s appl y i ng the l aw t o the f a c ts o f h is c a s e is n o t s up p o rte db yth e r e c o r da n dd o e s n o t a m o u n t to ac o lo r ab le du e p r o c e s s c la im . See M art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 42 4 F . 3d 92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . C ab r a l- C ab r a l’s du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts w e r e n o t v io la te db yth e a d m is s io n o f h is prob at i on offi ce r’ s r eportbecause the re po rtw as prob at i ve and i t s a dm i ss i on w as n o t f u n d a m e n ta llyu n f

a ir . Se e Es

p i n o z a v . I

NS , 45 F . 3d 30 8, 31 0-11 (9th C i r.I H / Res ea r ch 05- 75182 3 1995) ( not i ng tha t“ [ t ] he s ol e t e s tf ora dm i s s i on of

e vi de nc e [ i n ade port a t i on p r o c e e d in g ] is w h e th e rth e e v id e n c e is p r o b a tiv e a n dits a d m is s io n is f u n d a m e n ta llyf

a ir ” ) ; Tr i a s - H

e rn a n dezv . I

NS , 528 F . 2d 366, 369 ( 9th C i r . 1975) ( “H e ar s ayis a d m is s ib le in a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e e d in g s , w h ic h n e e dn o t s tr ic tly fol l ow conv ent i on alevi dence rul es . ”) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.