alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,274,700
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,808,159
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                168,270,907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      18,861,416
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        19,119,093
<LOANS>                                    227,322,668
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,973,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             439,114,500
<DEPOSITS>                                 282,942,123
<SHORT-TERM>                                35,244,333
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         14,136,440
<LONG-TERM>                                 64,108,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,241
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,634,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             439,114,500
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             17,509,318
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           12,472,811
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               539,277
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            30,521,406
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          13,431,142
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,342,511
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,178,895
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  177,050
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              42,643
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,631,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,462,511
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,645,167
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,645,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.49
<LOANS-NON>                                    911,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,200,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,126,225
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  403,896
<RECOVERIES>                                    74,031
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,973,410
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            50,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,923,410
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

JUAN A. VILLARREAL §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv121

STILES UNIT §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Juan A. Villarreal, an inmate at the Beto Unit, proceeding pro se, brought this

civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Stiles Unit. 

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States

Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders

of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available

evidence. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address

provided to the Court. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge have been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are

correct and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A separate 

Case 1:23-cv-00121-MJT-CLS Document 14 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 32
Final Judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s

recommendations.

2

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 4th day of January, 2024.

Case 1:23-cv-00121-MJT-CLS Document 14 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 33
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Liberty Media Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Liberty Media Corporation of our report dated March 26, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Telewest Communications plc and
subsidiaries ("the Group") as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears as an exhibit in the December 31, 2002
annual report on Form 10-K/A of Liberty Media Corporation.

<Table>
<Caption>

FORM        REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO.                                       DESCRIPTION
----        --------------------------                                       -----------
<S>         <C>                                  <C>

S-8         333-67276                            Liberty Media 401(k) Savings Plan

S-8         333-67296                            Liberty Media Corporation Incentive Plan

S-3         333-66034 (Post Effective Amendment  $3 Billion Shares of Series A Common Stock, Debt Securities, or
            No. 1 to Form S-1)                   Warrants

S-3         333-64746                            3 1/2% Senior Exchangeable Debentures

S-3         333-67538                            3 1/4% Senior Exchangeable Debentures

S-8         333-104154                           Liberty Media Corporation 2002 Nonemployee Director Incentive Plan

S-3         333-104241                           13,336,976 Shares of Series A Common Stock

</Table>


Our report dated March 26, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company is undergoing financial restructuring which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.

As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting for intangible assets in 2002 and derivative
financial instruments in 2001.


                                                KPMG Audit plc


London, England
April 2, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
ENAMELON, INC. BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONDENSED 
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,352,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,440,919
<PP&E>                                         360,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,347,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,904,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,641
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,347,157
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,886,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (93,500)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,793,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,793,168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,793,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Nidal Z Zayed, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, in connection with the Report on 10-KSB of Telesource International,Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, (the “Report”) hereby certifyin accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1)              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Telesource International,Inc.
| /s/ Nidal Z Zayed |   |
|-------------------|--------|

 
| Nidal Zayed                            |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| Dated: April 2,  2007             |   |

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL CERTAIN REVENUES, AGREEMENTS, AND DOCUMENTS

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 09/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5126
1

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC’s Motion to Compel Certain 

Revenues, Agreements, and Documents. Having considered the matter, and for good cause 

shown, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 09/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5127
KPMG (LOGO)

Suite 2700, Independent Square
One Independent Drive
P.O. Box 190
Jacksonville, FL 32201-0190

                          Independent Auditors' Report

The Board of Directors
HomeSide Lending, Inc.:

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries'  (the Company's)  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards
set forth in the  Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of  America's  Uniform  Single
Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers and that the Company had in effect a
fidelity bond and errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of $76 million and
$20  million,  respectively,  as of and for the year ended  September  30, 1999,
included in the  accompanying  management  assertion  letter dated  December 17,
1999.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In  our  opinion,   management's  assertion  that  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  has  complied in all  material  respects  with the  aforementioned
minimum  servicing  standards and that the Company had in effect a fidelity bond
and errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of $76 million and $20  million,
respectively,  as of and for the year ended September 30, 1999 is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

December 17, 1999

KPMG LLP
Cedric CARTER, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-6059.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County denied.
Lou TYLER, petitioner, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 18-6254.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 28, 1997 AND FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 CONTAINED IN THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON 
FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910721
<NAME> DM MANAGEMENT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,388
<SECURITIES>                                     3,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,936
<PP&E>                                           7,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,132
<BONDS>                                          4,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,995
<SALES>                                         57,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,428
<CGS>                                           25,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09674]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 87 FR 23862.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Tuesday, April 26, 
2022 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open 
meeting on April 28, 2022.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Information the premature disclosure of which 
would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the 
implementation of a proposed Commission action.
* * * * *

CONTACT FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: 
(202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-09674 Filed 5-2-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Ilich VARGAS, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

No. 18-5570.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6537

ANTHONY GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director; ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; PHILLIP MCLEOD, Associate Warden; JAMES STUCKEY, Major; SERGEANT LEDBETTER; DAVE J. EVANS, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-97-918-4-22BE) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Green, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. Green’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Green that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Green failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Green has waived appellate review byfailing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                    1,754
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          1,754
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            1,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    47,484
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    225
<OTHER-SE>                                              (45,955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              1,754
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          4,706
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (4,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (4,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (4,706)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0


</TABLE>
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 80 24

- 1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 801 4

- 1(c).

File Name: 20b0008n.06 

## BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

O F THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

I N R E : O RMET C ORPORATION , a Delaware Corporation; O RMET P RIMARY A LUMINUM C ORPORATION ; O RMET A LUMINUM M ILL P RODUCTS C ORPORATION ; S PECIALTY B LANKS H OLDINGS C ORPORATION ; S PECIALTY B LANKS , I NC .; F ORMCAST D EVELOPMENT I NC .; O RMET R AILROAD C ORPORATION , Debtor s

. ┐ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┘ 

### No. 20

- 8007

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus. No. 2:04

- bk

- 51255

— C. Kathryn Preston, Judge.

Decided and Filed: September 28, 2020

Before: DALES
, PRICE SMITH
, and WISE , Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

_________________ LITIGANT

ON B RIEF : Jeffrey D. Butler, Jackson, Tennessee, pro se.

_______________________ OPINION AND 

### O RDER

_______________________ JESSICA E. PRICE SMITH , Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. The issue on appeal before the Panel is whether the bankruptcy court erred in denying Jeffrey Butler’s motion for a new hearing. After reviewing the record, Mr. Butler’s brief, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court did not err in denying Mr. Butler’s motion as moot.
The bankruptcy case has conc luded and there is no further relief available. Accordingly,

we AFFIRM

. 

### >