alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 194 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 194

 To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to allow duty drawback 
     for grape juice concentrates, regardless of color or variety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

Mr. Meehan (for himself, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, and Mr. Hastings of 
 Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to allow duty drawback 
     for grape juice concentrates, regardless of color or variety.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBSTITUTION OF GRAPE JUICE CONCENTRATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1313) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(x) Grape Juice Concentrates.--Any grape juice concentrate of 
degrees brix 68-70 shall be considered as `of the same kind and 
quality' for purposes of subsection (b) of this section, regardless of 
color, variety, or any other characteristic.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to any 
drawback claim filed on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2068

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the sunset

and numerical limitation on Medicare participation in Medicare+Choice

medical savings account (MSA) plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. BAKER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr.

STUMP, Mr. PAUL, Mr. GOSS, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. COOKSEY, Mr. COBURN, Mr. MCCRERY, Mrs.

KELLY, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, and Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means,

and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove

the sunset and numerical limitation on Medicare participation in Medicare+Choice medical savings account

(MSA) plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Medical Sav5 ings Account (MSA) Expansion Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 2068 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF SUNSET AND NUMERICAL LIMITATION

2 ON PARTICIPATION IN MEDICARE+CHOICE

3 MEDICAL SAVINGS ACCOUNT (MSA) PLANS.

4 Section 1851(b)(4) of the Social Security Act (42

5 U.S.C. 1395w–21(b)(4)) is amended—

6 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking the first

7 sentence; and

8 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the second

9 sentence.

Æ
Kimberly BALTIMORE, petitioner, v. Frank Stephen BUCK.

No. 18-5178.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT LEE TATE, JR. , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 2023

- 2226

[ May 16, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Rosemarie Scher and Howard K. Coates, Jr. , Judge s ; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2014

- CF

- 008562

- AXXX

MB

.
Rachael E. Reese of Rachael Reese, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance requir ed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as an officer of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

|Date: | September 22, 2003 |  | By: | /s/ Greg A. SteffensGreg A. SteffensPresident (*Principal Executive and Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer*)
|----- | ------------------ |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

T-MOBILE USA, INC., 

Defendants.

 Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-00204-JRG 

 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

T-MOBILE’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc., by and 

through its undersigned counsel, hereby discloses that: 

T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile 

US, Inc., a Delaware corporation. T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is a publicly-traded 

company listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of NASDAQ Stock Market LLC 

(“NASDAQ”). Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V., a limited liability company (besloten 

vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheidraies) organized and existing under the laws of the 

Netherlands (“DT B.V.”), owns more than 10% of the shares of T-Mobile US, Inc. DT B.V. is a 

direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH, a Gesellschaft mit 

beschränkter Haftung organized and existing under the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany 

(“Holding”). Holding, is in turn a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile Global 

Zwischenholding GmbH, a Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung organized and existing under 

the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany (“Global”). Global is a direct, wholly-owned 

subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG, an Aktiengesellschaft organized and existing under the laws 

of the Federal Republic of Germany (“Deutsche Telekom”). The principal trading market for 

Case 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP Document 16 Filed 07/14/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 879
2 

Deutsche Telekom’s ordinary shares is the trading platform “Xetra” of Deutsche Börse AG. 

Deutsche Telekom’s ordinary shares also trade on the Frankfurt, Berlin, Düsseldorf, Hamburg, 

Hannover, München and Stuttgart stock exchanges in Germany. Deutsche Telekom’s American 

Depositary Shares (“ADSs”), each representing one ordinary share, trade on the OTC market’s 

highest tier, OTCQX International Premier (ticker symbol: “DTEGY”).

Dated: July 14, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Melissa R. Smith 

Melissa R. Smith 

Texas State Bar No. 24001351 

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP 

303 South Washington Avenue 

Marshall, Texas 75670 

Telephone: (903) 934-8450 

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 

melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 

Counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP Document 16 Filed 07/14/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 880
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to 

electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system 

per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on July 14, 2023. 

Melissa R. Smith 

/s/ Melissa R. Smith 

Case 2:23-cv-00204-JRG-RSP Document 16 Filed 07/14/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 881
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXA

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

cV*'-'

5/13/2015 COA No. 

MCCREARY, JODY FORD Tr. Ct. No. 007-1110-10 

On this day, the Appellant's Pro Se petition for discretionary r

refused. ^^£#

A

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/06/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      522,864
COMMITMENTS
  76,279   53,081  145,892  259,171  304,692  481,342  503,665   41,522   19,199

CHANGES FROM 10/30/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        909)
   6,820   -5,144   -2,289     -724    5,328    3,807   -2,105   -2,898    3,014

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.6     10.2     27.9     49.6     58.3     92.1     96.3      7.9      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      150)
      39       31       55       68       63      140      123
```

----

Updated November 9, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1953 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1953

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on land held in 
     trust for the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the 
  Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1953

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on land held in 
     trust for the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the 
  Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF 99-YEAR LEASES.

    (a) In General.--The first section of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
authorize the leasing of restricted Indian lands for public, religious, 
educational, residential, business, and other purposes requiring the 
grant of long-term leases'', approved August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 
415(a)), is amended by inserting ``lands held in trust for the Torres 
Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, lands held in trust for the 
Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria, 
lands held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian 
Reservation'' after ``Sparks Indian Colony,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to any lease entered into or renewed after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORATION.

    The request of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community of Wisconsin to 
surrender the charter of incorporation issued to the Community on May 
21, 1938, pursuant to section 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934, (commonly 
known as the ``Indian Reorganization Act'') is hereby accepted and that 
charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Elizabeth CRUZ, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-9526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10150]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11727]


Determination Pursuant to Section 451 of the Foreign Assistance 
Act for the Use of Funds To Support South Sudan Peace Agreement 
Monitoring Mechanisms

    Pursuant to section 451 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the 
``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2261), section 1-100(a)(1) of E.O. 12163 and 
Delegation of Authority 513, I hereby authorize, notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, the use of up to $3,000,000 made available to 
carry out provisions of the Act (other than the provisions of chapter 1 
of part I of the Act) to provide assistance authorized by part I of the 
Act to support countries that participate in the Reconstituted Joint 
Monitoring and Evaluation Commission and the Ceasefire and Transitional 
Security Arrangements Monitoring and Verification Mechanism in South 
Sudan.
    This Determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be promptly reported to the Congress. This Determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 24, 2022.
Brian P. McKeon,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2022-10150 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     114
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       114
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             225
<OTHER-SE>                                           (49,397)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         114
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (8,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (8,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (8,598)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Ronnie R. ROLLAND, petitioner, v. CARNATION BUILDING SERVICES, INC.

No. 18-5920.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 4.13




 


Dr. Moshe Eliash


Barrister-at-law, Advocate and Notary


2 Hasoreg St., POB 433



	Telephone 651681, 6054281	
Tuesday, July 3, 2018







Fax 6254282


Jerusalem 91003


Eliash7@bezeqint.net







Sol Gel Technologies Ltd.


7 Golda Meir Street


Ness Siona












Dear Sirs,


re: Tenancy agreement dated January 30, 2017 respecting the fourth floor







It is agreed by the landlords that there will be added to the area that is leased to you according to section 2 of the above agreement a net area of 91 m2 as delineated and hatched in the plan attached hereto as appendix “A” and there will further be added the remainder of the lobby area in a net area of 4 m2. The lobby is similarly delineated and hatched on the plan it being agreed that a moiety thereof was already leased you under the above agreement. In light of the foregoing, the provision contained in section 2 of the above agreement to the effect that the lobby will remain vacant, will be removed, and the lobby, in its entirety, will be comprised in the premises.







Hence, a net area of 95 m2 will be added to the net area of 151 m2 of the premises in accordance with section 2 of the agreement, and the area of the premises in its entirety shall be a net area of 246 m2, constituting a gross area of 307.5 m2.







All the terms of the agreement dated January 30, 2070 will apply to the extended premises area described above, mutatis mutandis.







For the sake of formality, please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing on the copy of this letter, and return the same to me.







Yours faithfully,







/s/Moshe Eliash







Dr. Moshe Eliash, Advocate







We acknowledge and agree


Agreed and acknowledged. It is clarified that the said addition (95 m2 net) commences from June 1, 2018


/s/


SOL-GEL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

I,  Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”);

2.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

3.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.
| Date: August 13, 2007 |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
|                  | /s/ Michael A. Schneider |   |
|                  | Michael A. Schneider |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orsuch other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided to AffinityGroup, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Lamar Atu BLACKWELL, petitioner, v. Matthew HANSEN, Warden, et al.

No. 18-6023.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

3D SCAN GUIDE LLC,

2:23-cv-194

CHROME FULL ARCH GUIDED SYSTEMS; and 

ROE DENTAL LABORATORY, INC.,

ROE Dental Laboratory, Inc. 

c/o Dana A. Banks 

7165 East Pleasant Valley Road 

Independence, Ohio 44131

M. Scott Fuller 

Garteiser Honea - IP Trial Attorneys 

119 W Ferugson St. 

Tyler, TX 75702

04/27/2023

Case 2:23-cv-00194-JRG Document 3-1 Filed 04/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 35
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-194 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00194-JRG Document 3-1 Filed 04/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 36
Dawn MOSBY, petitioner, v. Matthew G. PARILLA.

No. 18-434.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

ALEXANDRA DAVIS,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v. 

JERRAL W. JONES, DALLAS COWBOYS 

FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD., JAMES 

WILKINSON, TRAILRUNNER 

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, DONALD JACK, 

JR.,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs,

&

CYNTHIA DAVIS-SPENCER,

 Third-Party Defendant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-00032-RWS

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint.

Docket No. 59. Defendants requested an oral hearing on this motion. Id. The Court hereby SETS

a hearing for this matter on Wednesday February 7, 2024, at 10 a.m. in Texarkana, Texas.

.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of December, 2023.

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 60 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1078
Thomas BLACKLEDGE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5668.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated December 14, 2012
Albon C. DIAMOND, III, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-313.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District denied.