alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SIGNATURES**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Nidal Zayed, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of Telesource International, Inc..;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  March 15, 2006 |   | /s/ Nidal Zayed                       |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
(110 So. 424)

No. 28137.

#### STATE v. METOYER.

(Nov. 2, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff./*

1. Criminal law <&wkey;>llli(3).

Bill of exceptions to alleged error in refusing to allow defendant to answer question was without effect, where court’s per curiam stated that such right was not refused.

2. Criminal iaw @=451(4) — Testimony of witnesses’ opinions as to why defendant did not stop after running over deceased held inadmissible.

Testimony in manslaughter prosecution of witnesses riding with defendant at time of running over deceased as to why he had not stop-lied car *held,*inadmissible as merely calling for opinion.

3. Criminal law @=1(15(2).

Bill of exceptions did not show error in refusing defendant’s request to await attachment of juror of regular panel before calling tales juror, in absence of showing of incompetency of tales juror.

Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Natchitoches; J. F. Stephens, Judge.

Joe Metoyer was convicted of manslaughter, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Jas. W. Jones, Jr., of Natchitoches, "for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., and S. R. Thomas, Dist. Atty., of Natchitoches (E. R. Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

ST. PAUL, J.

The defendant was convicted of manslaughter (by running over the deceased), and we find four bills of exception in the record.

I.

[1] The first bill of exception represents that the trial judge refused to allow the defendant to answer why he did not stop his car after striking the deceasepl. The trial judge in his per curiam says that, the defendant was not refused the right to answer, and did answer that he did not .stop because there was a “rough house” near by and he was afraid to stop; and that no bill was [or could be] reserved to the railing of the court.

II.

[2] The second and third bills of exception represent that the witnesses who were in the car with defendant at the time of the occurrence were not allowed to testify why the defendant did not stop after striking the deceased. The trial judge says that these witnesses had testified that nothing was said by the defendant at the time as to why he had not stopped the car, and that the question therefore merely called for the opinion of the witnesses, which was not admissible. We see no error herein.

III.

[3] The fourth bill of exceptions represents that when selecting a jury, a member of the regular panel being absent and an attachment having issued for said juror, the defendant requested that the return upon the attachment be awaited before proceeding to call tales juror (the regular panel being exhausted), but that said request was refused and the defendant was thereby compelled to accept tales juror. Aside from the fact that the bill fails to show that the tales juror was incompetent or in any way objectionable to the defendant, the trial judge' further says that no such occurrence took place in this case, the same being confused with some other matter. The bill has no merit.

Decree.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
James Ray BOOTH, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-6026.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 

### 129503(30) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PATRICIA MOAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 129503 COA: 260389 St. Clair CC: 90-002681-DZ ARTHUR MURFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of December 27, 2005 is considered , and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
Mario ZUNIGA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5620.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1
to the Quarterly Report of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lawrence J. Blanford, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Lawrence J. Blanford             
|Lawrence J. Blanford*                
|President and Chief Executive Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green
Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1289

PAMMALLA SHANNON UPLINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REES BROOME, P.C.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325-

BFK)

Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pammalla Shannon Uplinger, Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Draim, 

Amanda Murray Schwartz, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Pammalla Shannon Uplinger appeals the district court’s 

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary 

judgment for Defendant in her action filed pursuant to the Fair 

Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant Uplinger’s motions to take 

judicial notice and to supplement the record, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the lower courts. Uplinger v. Rees Broome, 

P.C., Nos. 1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325-BFK

(E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

JUDDSON CHARLES CULPEPPER

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00045-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count One of the Information. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Juddson Charles 

Culpepper GUILTY of Count One of the Information, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

371 - Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25th April, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00045-JDK-KNM Document 18 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 49
# Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treas-ury[, and] the Secretary of Energy

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, after carefully considering the reports submitted to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration, including the report submitted in April 2022, and other relevant factors, including global economic conditions, the level of spare capacity, and the availability of strategic reserves, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112-81, and consistent with prior determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions.

I will continue to monitor this situation closely.

                        The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2022-10840

Billing code 4710-10-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 11746]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the designation of the Mujahidin Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation.

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of Mujahidin Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem (and other aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be revoked.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*Authority:*8 U.S.C. 1189.                

Dated: May 11, 2022.

Antony J. Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-10826 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            716,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,783,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,689,000
<INVENTORY>                                    61,467,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               93,178,000
<PP&E>                                         33,191,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,614,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                132,429,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          65,646,000
<BONDS>                                        37,976,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          155,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,423,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  132,429,000
<SALES>                                       221,864,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              221,864,000
<CGS>                                         228,592,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 228,592,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               36,044,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,516,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,223,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,180,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,403,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,403,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (4.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (4.66)



</TABLE>
II

Calendar No. 249

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 211

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3, 1999

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 920 West Riverside Avenue in Spokane,

Washington, as the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley United States

Courthouse’’, and the plaza at the south entrance of

such building and courthouse as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan

Plaza’’.
2

HR 211 PCS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United

5 States courthouse located at 920 West Riverside Avenue

6 in Spokane, Washington, shall be known and designated

7 as the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley United States Courthouse’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

10 States to the Federal building and United States court11 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be

12 a reference to the ‘‘Thomas S. Foley United States Court13 house’’.

14 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF PLAZA.

15 (a) DESIGNATION.—The plaza located at the south

16 entrance of the Federal building and United States court17 house referred to in section 1(a) shall be known and des18 ignated as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

19 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg20 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
3

HR 211 PCS

1 States to the plaza referred to in subsection (a) shall be

2 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.

Passed the House of Representatives August 2,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

By MARTHA C. MORRISON,

Deputy Clerk.
Calendar No. 249

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 211

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

courthouse as the ‘‘Walter F. Horan Plaza’’.plaza at the south entrance of such building andS. Foley United States Courthouse’’, and theAvenue in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘ThomasStates courthouse located at 920 West Riverside

AUGUST 3, 1999

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

Slyde Analytics LLC

2:23-cv-00172

Zepp Health Corporation

Zepp Health Corporation

Huami Global Innovation Center, Building B2

Zhing’an Chuanggu Technology Park

No. 900 Wangjiang West Road

Hefei, 230088

People’s Republic of China

Fabricant LLP

411 Theodore Fremd Ave., Suite 206 South, Rye, NY10580

c/o Vincent J. Rubino, III

Case 2:23-cv-00172-RWS-RSP Document 7 Filed 04/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 38
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00172

0.00

Case 2:23-cv-00172-RWS-RSP Document 7 Filed 04/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 39