alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November
3,  1997,  on the  consolidated  financial  statements  of MFB  Corp.  which  is
incorporated by reference in MFB Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended  September  30, 1997, in MFB Corp.'s  Registration  Statements on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-84340) and Registration No. (333-13051).



                                             Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

South Bend, Indiana
December 23, 1997
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  The
        following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
        of United Financial Mortgage Corp. on the basis of such officer's knowledge
        and
        belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  **CERTIFICATION**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of United Financial Mortgage Corp. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended April 30, 2005 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
        Steve
        Khoshabe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 Date:
                August 12, 2005
              
              /s/
                Steve Y. KhoshabeSteve
                Y. KhoshabePresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        United Financial Mortgage Corp. and will be retained by United Financial
        Mortgage Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
        its
        staff upon request.
Arthur DENNISON, petitioner, v. Mark HOOKS, Warden.

No. 18-5666.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH
CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                       172
<INVENTORY>                                     67,635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,316
<PP&E>                                          67,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,084
<BONDS>                                          6,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,815
<SALES>                                        425,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               425,060
<CGS>                                          367,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,652
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.77
        

</TABLE>
Akash DIXIT, petitioner, v. Christopher BRASHER, Judge, Superior Court of Georgia, Atlanta Judicial Circuit.

No. 18-7213.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/27/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

 4:23-cv-00241

DENTON SMOKE SHOP LLC d/b/a DENTON

SMOKE STOP and SHAHZAD S ALI,

SHAHZAD S ALI

19009 PRESTON RD SUITE 205A

DALLAS, TX 75252

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00241-SDJ Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

 4:23-cv-00241

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00241-SDJ Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEHAVIOR ANALYST CERTIFICATION 

BOARD, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL MOATES, an individual; 

MISTY KIESCHNICK, an individual; and 

THE GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL 

PRACTITIONERS AND EXAMINERS, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00194-ALM 

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT 

I hereby certify that I am the attorney of record for the Plaintiff in the above case, and that 

Defendants Michael Moates (“Moates”) and The Global Institute of Behavioral Practitioners and 

Examiners (“GIBPE”) were served by the following methods: 

Service upon Defendant Moates 

 Personal service on May 22, 2023 (Dkt. 20) 

 Certified mail, return receipt requested, on May 30, 2023 (Ex. B) 

Service upon Defendant GIBPE 

 Personal service upon Misty Kieschnick as Director on May 19, 2023 (Dkt. 25) 

 Personal service upon Michael Moates as Director on May 22, 2023 (Dkt. 19) 

 Certified mail, return receipt requested, on May 30, 2023 (Ex. B) 

I further certify that Defendants Moates and the GIBPE have failed to serve an answer or 

other responsive pleading; no extension has been granted or any extension has expired; the 

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 36-1 Filed 08/02/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 279
2 

Defendants are neither an infant (under age 21) nor an incompetent person; the Defendants are not 

in the active military service of the United States of America or its officers or agents and were not 

six months prior to the filing of the case. 

The Clerk is requested to enter a default against Defendants Moates and the GIBPE. 

Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of August, 2023. 

HALL, RENDER, KILLIAN, HEATH & LYMAN, P.C. 

s/ Mark L. Sabey 

Mark L. Sabey, pro hac vice 

Lindsay K. McManus, pro hac vice

999 17th Street, Suite 800, Denver, CO 80202 

303-801-3538 / marksabey@hallrender.com 

303-802-1293 / lmcmanus@hallrender.com 

and 

Brandon S. Kulwicki 

HALL, RENDER, KILLIAN, HEATH & LYMAN, P.C. 

603 Munger Avenue, Suite 350, Dallas, TX 75202 

P: 214-615-2025 / F: 214-615-2001 

bkulwicki@hallrender.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 36-1 Filed 08/02/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 280
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 The undersigned certifies that on August 2, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was served upon the following: 

Misty Kieschnick

9448 Castlewood Dr. 

Fort Worth, TX 76131 

m.kieschnick@att.net 

Defendant – pro se 

Michael Moates 

4501 Nautilus Circle, Apt. 710 

Fort Worth, TX 76106 

mike@cpmht.com

Defendant – pro se 

The Global Institute of Behavioral Practitioners and Examiners 

4501 Nautilus Circle, Apt. 710 

Fort Worth, TX 76106 

mike@cpmht.com

Defendant – pro se 

s/ Crystal J. Sebastiani 

Crystal J. Sebastiani, Paralegal 

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 36-1 Filed 08/02/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 281
Amy M. HICKS, petitioner, v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGES.

No. 18-8553.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Ahmad Sayed HASHIMI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5184.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *McCoy v. Louisiana,* 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1500, 200 L.Ed.2d 821 (2018).
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

No. 6:23-cv-00225

Jay Williams,

Plaintiff,

v.

Terisa Richardson, 

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Jay Williams, an inmate of the Henderson County Jail 

proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. 

The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the 

lawsuit be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief 

may be granted and, alternatively, for failure to prosecute or to 

obey an order of the court. Doc. 5. Plaintiff received a copy of this 

report on June 16, 2023, but filed no objections. Doc. 6. 

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation. The lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted and, alternatively, for failure to prosecute or 

to obey an order of the court. 

So ordered by the court on September 7, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00225-JCB-KNM Document 7 Filed 09/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statement of Income of Monaco Coach
Corporation as of and for the Quarter ended March 30, 1996, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1996
<CASH>                                             635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132
<INVENTORY>                                     71,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,416
<PP&E>                                          34,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,433
<BONDS>                                         31,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,872
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,025
<SALES>                                         61,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,964
<CGS>                                           55,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                       440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                634
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1



ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors

Bankrate, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.33-87955) on Form S-8 of Bankrate, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2005, relating to the balance sheets of Bankrate, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting  as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Bankrate, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP



Fort Lauderdale, Florida

March 16, 2005
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00321-CR

Orlando Campos

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-16-2070-0-CR-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2019
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAffinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement isprovided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date: June 5, 2009 |                                  |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |                                  |
|                    | /s/ Michael A. Schneider              |
|                    | Michael A. Schneider                  |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Michael CLARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 18-8817.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-153.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the President Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant To  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Melo Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fung Ming, President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Fung MingFung Ming, President February 13, 2008
Susan Wells VAUGHAN, petitioner, v. Jennifer VAUGHAN, et al.

No. 18-5316.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2062 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2062

  To amend the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 with respect to 
        financial exploitation of older or disabled individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

 Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself and Mr. Castle) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 with respect to 
        financial exploitation of older or disabled individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Privacy Act Amendments of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION.

    Section 1103(d) of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (12 
U.S.C. 3403(d)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (2) the 
following:
    ``(3) Nothing in this title shall preclude a financial institution, 
or officer, employee, or agent thereof, from reporting suspected 
financial exploitation of an older or disabled individual to State, 
Federal, or local law enforcement entities, or government-regulated 
adult protective services entities. Such report may include only the 
name or other identifying information concerning an older or disabled 
individual, the account involved, and the nature of any suspected 
financial exploitation, including pertinent documentation. Any 
financial institution, or officer, employee, or agent thereof, making a 
disclosure of information and documentation pursuant to this paragraph 
shall not be liable to the customer under any law or regulation of the 
United States or any constitution, law, or regulation of any State or 
political subdivision thereof, for such disclosure. For purposes of 
this paragraph, the term ``older or disabled individual'' means an 
individual who is 65 years of age or older or disabled, and the term 
``exploitation'' means any fraud, abuse, or other conduct that 
constitutes a violation of any Federal or State law, including any 
legally enforceable professional standard applicable with regard to any 
profession or occupation, and the unauthorized use of an older or 
disabled individual's funds, property, or resources for another 
person's profit or advantage.''.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      398,243
COMMITMENTS
  54,459  149,497   72,149  245,352  146,706  371,960  368,352   26,283   29,891

CHANGES FROM 12/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -11,500)
  -1,942  -14,858  -11,460     -690   12,280  -14,092  -14,038    2,592    2,538

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.7     37.5     18.1     61.6     36.8     93.4     92.5      6.6      7.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      164)
      54       59       65       35       39      126      134
```

----

Updated December 21, 2012