alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         477,166
<SECURITIES>                                 7,309,431
<RECEIVABLES>                                  583,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    686,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,332,883
<PP&E>                                         547,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                 242,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,743,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          810,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,852
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,743,288
<SALES>                                      2,788,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,802,364
<CGS>                                        2,306,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,999,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,941,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,941,413)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)


</TABLE>
CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO, et al., petitioners, v. Derrick WHEATT, et al.

No. 18-259.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Ex. 32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of MetaSolv, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



CFO CERTIFICATION



I, Glenn A. Etherington, Chief Financial
Officer of MetaSolv, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of that section.



I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                            |  | 
|--------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Glenn A. Etherington    |  | 
|Name: Glenn A. Etherington, |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer     |  | 
|February 20, 2006           |  |
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Solitario Exploration
& Royalty Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Christopher E. Herald, Chief Executive Officer, and James
R. Maronick, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                         |                        
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         |                        
|/s/Christopher E. Herald | /s/James R. Maronick   
|Christopher E. Herald    | James R. Maronick      
|Chief Executive Officer  | Chief Financial Officer



Dated: April 25, 2017
Akash DIXIT, petitioner, v. Tanya Singh DIXIT.

No. 18-5197.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
FORT PECK HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al., petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al.

No. 17-1353.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Eastern District of Texas XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., et al., 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP XR Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies 05/24/2023 /s/ Neil S. Rubin Neil S. Rubin (CA SBN 250761)

Russ August & Kabat 

12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

nrubin@raklaw.com (310) 826-7474 (310) 826-6991 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 17 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 870
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

MARK MALLOY,

v. 

THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE 

CITY OF COMMERCE, TEXAS ET 

AL

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-333-SDJ-KPJ

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in 

this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 14, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed 

findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #17), that Defendants 

Mayor Teddy Reel, City Council Member Jim Ayres, City Council Member Beckey 

Thompson, City Council Member Stephanie Mueller, Mayor Pro Tem Anthony Henry, 

City Manager Howdy Lisenbee, Code Enforcement Officer Grant Cowell, and the 

Municipality of the City of Commerce, Texas’s (together, “Defendants”) Motion to 

Dismiss and Brief in Support (the “Motion to Dismiss”), (Dkt. #13), be granted. The 

Magistrate Judge recommended Plaintiff Mark Malloy’s (“Plaintiff”) Takings Clause 

claim against Defendants be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge further 

recommended that to the extent Plaintiff is asserting any state law claims, the state 

law claims be dismissed without prejudice.

Case 4:23-cv-00333-SDJ-KPJ Document 18 Filed 03/08/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
2

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no 

timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and 

conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s 

Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #13), is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s 

Takings Clause claim against Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To

the extent Plaintiff is asserting any state law claims, the state law claims are

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Case 4:23-cv-00333-SDJ-KPJ Document 18 Filed 03/08/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/05/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       67,249
COMMITMENTS
   8,089    3,763      343   54,354   60,493   62,786   64,599    4,463    2,650

CHANGES FROM 05/29/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,286)
   1,149      717      343    3,506    4,211    4,998    5,271      288       15

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.0      5.6      0.5     80.8     90.0     93.4     96.1      6.6      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       64)
      11        5        2       30       30       42       36
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/05/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      107,172
COMMITMENTS
  15,825    8,964    1,851   79,252   88,467   96,928   99,282   10,244    7,890

CHANGES FROM 05/29/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,915)
    -214    2,224      835    8,747    4,888    9,368    7,947      547    1,968

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.8      8.4      1.7     73.9     82.5     90.4     92.6      9.6      7.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       88)
      21       12        4       34       34       56       49
```

----

Updated June 8, 2012
Party Name Case Number Case Title Court Da

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2023cv00772 Moates v. State of North Carolina et al Texas Northern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (dft) 4:2023cv00194 Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. v. 

Moates et al

Texas Eastern District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 3:2022cv04478 Moates et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al California Northern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2022cv00154 Moates v. Holt et al Georgia Southern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2022cv00526 Moates v. Holt et al Texas Northern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael Steven (pla) 6:2022cv00626 Moates v. Biden et al Texas Western 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (dft) 1:2022cv01247 Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. v. 

Moates et al

Colorado District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2022cv00262 Moates v. Arismendez et al Texas Northern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael S. (dft) 4:2021cv03023 Lone Star College System v. Moates Texas Southern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pet) 4:2021mc02080 Moates v. Lone Star College System Texas Southern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2021cv00694 Moates et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al Texas Eastern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2021cv00631 Moates v. Lone Star College System et al Texas Eastern 

District Court

0

Moates, Michael (pla) 4:2020cv00896 Moates v. Facebook Inc. et al Texas Eastern 

District Court

1

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 42-13 Filed 08/24/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

IOT INNOVATIONS LLC

2:23-cv-00177

MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., d/b/a 

BRINKS HOME

MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., d/b/a BRINKS HOME 

c/o Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Inc. 

211 E. 5th Street, Suite 620, 

Austin, Texas 78701

C. Matthew Rozier 

ROZIER HARDT MCDONOUGH PLLC 

2590 Walnut Street, Suite 10 

Denver, Colorado 80205 

Telephone: (720) 820-3006 

Email: matt@rhmtrial.com 4/19/23

Case 2:23-cv-00177-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 04/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 372
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

2:23-cv-00177 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 2:23-cv-00177-JRG-RSP Document 4 Filed 04/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 373
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

C.M.,

Appellant,

v.

A.M. and W.M.,

Appellees.

No. 2D23-523

April 3, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Caroline TescheArkin, Judge.

Mark A. Neumaier, Tampa, for Appellant.

Raymond T. Elligett, Jr., of Buell & Elligett, P.A., Tampa; Jeanne T. Tate 

of Jeanne T. Tate, P.A., Tampa; and Michael L. Lundy of Older & Lundy, 

Tampa, for Appellees.

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Affirmed in all respects, except that the appeal as to the court's 

ruling on entitlement to sanctions is dismissed as premature. See Kelly 

v. HSBC Bank USA Nat'l Ass'n, 240 So. 3d 107, 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) 

("We dismiss the attempt to appeal the order granting in part HSBC's 

motion for sanctions, because the order only addressed entitlement and 
2

not the amount of attorney's fees to be imposed against Kelly. That 

attempt was premature, and the order on entitlement to sanctions was 

not an appealable order.").

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. 

NORTHCUTT and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Samuel ROSS, petitioner, v. CLERK OF COURTS OF the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 18-5862.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

AMERICA’S HOME PLACE, INC.,

 Plaintiff, 

versus

CRAIG FLORES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND 

D/B/A CA FLORES CONSTRUCTION,

 Defendant. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 NO. 1:23-cv-00196-MAC-ZJH

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 18, 2023, the court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United 

States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial management. Doc. No. 18. Pending before the court is

Plaintiff America’s Home Place’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30). On May 1, 

2024, Judge Hawthorn issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 34), which 

recommended granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) and issuing a 

Final Judgment in favor of America’s Home Place for $36,507.00 in damages and $27,176.36 

pursuant to the fee shifting provision of the Employment Agreement, for a total of $63,683.36. 

Doc. No. 34 at 10. 

The court has received and considered the report of the United States Magistrate Judge. 

No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the time for doing so has 

passed.

Case 1:23-cv-00196-MAC-ZJH Document 35 Filed 05/24/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 271
2

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 34) is ADOPTED and the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

(Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered separately.

Case 1:23-cv-00196-MAC-ZJH Document 35 Filed 05/24/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 272
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

PHILLIP TURNER and JAMES WHITE,

 Plaintiffs,

VS.

CITY OF CORRIGAN,

OFFICER ALBERT L. RICHARD,

OFFICER FITZPATRICK D. FOSTER,

OFFICER TRACY M. BROWN, and

OFFICER JONATHAN D. REYNOLDS,

 Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-00065

 JUDGE MICHAEL J. TRUNCALE

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Before the Court is the Parties’ Revised Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment [Dkt. 24].

In consideration of the arguments presented in the motion, the Court GRANTS the same and enters 

the following Permanent Injunction:

It is therefore ORDERED that the City of Corrigan is enjoined from enforcing the ordinance 

made the basis of this suit against Plaintiffs Phillip Turner and James White, said ordinance being 

specifically identified as Ordinance 2021-07-04, Chapter 8 Section 600, previously enacted on July 20, 

2021, and repealed on July 30, 2021.

It is further ORDERED that this judgment bars any present or future claims or suits against 

any past, present, or future employee, elected official, officer, representative or attorney of or for each 

and every Defendant herein relating to the referenced Ordinance and the alleged stop, detention or 

arrest, and seizure of property, or First Amendment claims of retaliation or otherwise, of Plaintiffs 

Phillip Turner and James White.

It is further ORDERED that all relief not expressly granted herein is denied, and that all claims 

of Plaintiffs against the City of Corrigan and the remaining Defendants, Albert Richard, Fitzpatrick 

Case 9:23-cv-00065-MJT Document 26 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 139
2

Foster, Tracy Brown, and Jonathan Reynolds are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the refiling 

of the same.

This judgment does not include a finding of liability.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 8th day of December, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00065-MJT Document 26 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 140
Duan Leonard WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-6508.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-00248

KMA 3 LLC d/b/a KRAZY 4 SMOKE, VAPE, CBD & 

KRATOM, KASSIM MURAD ABDULLAH, and SYED 

ANSARUDDIN HASAN,

KASSIM MURAD ABDULLAH 

5105 OLD BULLARD RD APT L22 

TYLER, TX 75703 

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire 

Minocha Law Firm 

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue 

Suite 700 

Dallas, Texas 75219

3/27/23

Case 4:23-cv-00248-ALM Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00248 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

Case 4:23-cv-00248-ALM Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 19