alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.28

                              Management Bonus Plan

         EFTC Corporation (the "Company") has established a Management Bonus
Plan. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") of
the Company has established that, for 1998, in accordance with the Company's
executive compensation policies, a bonus plan based on achieving certain
performance levels will provide an incentive to executives to enhance the
financial performance of the Company. The 1998 Bonus Plan provided for the
President of Manufacturing, the President of Services, the Senior Vice President
of Sales, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief
Administrative Officer and the Chief Information Officer with the opportunity to
receive cash bonuses for achieving certain performance levels as determined by
the Committee.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1 8 , 2021
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00071

- CV

TERENCE DANIELS , Appellant

V. CHARLES SCHWAB INC. , Appellee
On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- DCV

- 272672

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from a final judgment signed on September 28, 2020

. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on October 16, 2020

. The notice of appeal must be filed w ithin 90 days after the judgment is signed when a timely post

-

judgment motion is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (a)(1) . The ninetieth day after the judgment was signed was Sunday, December 27, 2020. The deadline was extended to Monday, December 28, 2020. Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until February 4 , 20 21

.2

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting i n good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the 15

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617

– 18 (1997) (construing the predecess or to Rule 26). Appellant s’ notice of appeal was not filed within the 15

- day period provided by Rule 26.3. A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal that was not timely perfected. When the court lacks jurisdiction, it must dismiss the appeal. See Baker v. Baker , 469 S.W.3d 269, 272 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2015, no pet.). On February 1, 2021 , we notified the parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless, within 10 days, any party showed meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not respond to the notice directly, but he filed a “Motion for Reconsideration of Appeal.” The motion fails to demonstrate w e have jurisdiction.
T he appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant

.
James Everett DUTSCHKE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5788.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of ARSNetworks, Incorporated, a New Hampshire corporation (the "Company"), on Form10-KSB for the period ended January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark P. Miziolek,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

                (1)                The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

                (2)                The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

By  /s/ Mark P. Miziolek                                                    Mark P. Miziolek    Chief Financial Officer of    ARS Networks, Incorporated

    May 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2076 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2076

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in peroxide 
                      stabilizer and compounding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in peroxide 
                      stabilizer and compounding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``     9902.61.05     Phosphoric acid,   Free        No change          No change          On or before 12/
                       [nitrilostris                                                        31/2001           ''
                       (methylene)]tris-                                                                       .
                        (CAS Nos. 6419-
                       19-8; 10294-56-
                       1; 7732-18-5)
                       (provided for in
                       subheading
                       2931.00.9030)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      157,525
COMMITMENTS
  41,668   15,857   17,123   79,938  102,067  138,729  135,047   18,796   22,478

CHANGES FROM 12/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        331)
  -7,318    2,974   -1,817    9,183      454       48    1,611      283   -1,280

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.5     10.1     10.9     50.7     64.8     88.1     85.7     11.9     14.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      48       34       32       57       77      124      128
```

----

Updated December 21, 2012
Dawud RAHIM, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES.

No. 18-6231.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
             
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000 
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars                
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997          
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997    
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1    
<CASH>                                 2,788   
<SECURITIES>                               0   
<RECEIVABLES>                            437   
<ALLOWANCES>                               0   
<INVENTORY>                              301   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       3,943   
<PP&E>                                 6,663   
<DEPRECIATION>                         4,399   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         6,945   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  3,776      
<BONDS>                                3,500   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0   
<PREFERRED>                                0   
<COMMON>                                  73   
<OTHER-SE>                            (2,348)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           6,945  
<SALES>                                  488   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         488   
<CGS>                                    311   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            311   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       2,807   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        68   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            6   
<INCOME-TAX>                               0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        6   
<DISCONTINUED>                             0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0   
<CHANGES>                                  0   
<NET-INCOME>                               6   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .00   
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .00   
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Jason Daniel SIMS.

No. 17-766.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 24, 2018.

Joint motion of respondents for divided argument denied. Motion of respondent *51Jason D. Sims for appointment of counsel granted, and Jeffrey L. Fisher, of Stanford, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Jason D. Sims in No. 17-766.
Urvashi BHAGAT, petitioner, v. Andrei IANCU, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office.

No. 18-277.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Motion of Independent Investors, et al. for leave to file out of time a brief as *amici curiae* denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1923

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exclusion from

gross income for damage awards for emotional distress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 1999

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. FROST, Ms. SANCHEZ, and

Mrs. THURMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the exclusion from gross income for damage awards for

emotional distress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS IN4 COME FOR DAMAGE AWARDS FOR EMO5 TIONAL DISTRESS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 104 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to compensa8 tion for injuries or sickness) is amended—
2

•HR 1923 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘physical’’ each place it appears

2 in paragraph (2), and

3 (2) by striking the last 2 sentences and insert4 ing the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of

5 paragraph (2), the term ‘personal injuries or sick6 ness’ includes emotional distress.’’

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) shall apply to amounts received after De9 cember 31, 1998, in taxable years ending after such date.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 29647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10576]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 29647]]

                Memorandum of May 6, 2022

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                and Section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
                1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the following authorities, subject 
                to fulfilling the requirements of section 614(a)(3) and 
                section 652 of the FAA, in order to provide assistance 
                to Ukraine:

                    (1) the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the 
                FAA to determine whether it is important to the 
                security interests of the United States to furnish up 
                to $150 million in assistance without regard to any 
                provision of law within the purview of section 
                614(a)(1) of the FAA; and
                    (2) the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the 
                FAA to direct the drawdown of up to $150 million in 
                defense articles and services of the Department of 
                Defense, and military education and training, to 
                provide assistance to Ukraine and to make the 
                determinations required under such section to direct 
                such a drawdown.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 6, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-10576
Filed 5-13-22; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Michael LUCERO, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6176.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

XR COMMUNICATIONS LLC D/B/A

VIVATO TECHNOLOGIES

Plaintiff,

v.

AT&T INC., ET AL.

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:23-CV-0202-JRG-RSP

LEAD CASE

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham of Gillam & Smith LLP 

enters his appearance in this matter as additional counsel on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA, 

Inc.

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham may receive all communications from the Court and 

from other parties at Gillam & Smith, LLP, 102 N. College, Suite 800, Tyler, Texas 75702; 

Telephone: (903) 934- 8450; Facsimile: (903) 934-9257; Email: tom@gillamsmithlaw.com.

Dated: July 19, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew T. Gorham

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham

State Bar No. 24012715

GILLAM & SMITH, L.L.P.

102 N. College, Suite 800 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Telephone: (903) 934-8450 

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257 

Email: tom@gillamsmithlaw.com

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 07/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 906
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 19th day of July 2023, with a copy of this document via the Court’s 

CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ Andrew T. Gorham

Andrew Thompson (“Tom”) Gorham

Case 2:23-cv-00202-JRG-RSP Document 27 Filed 07/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 907
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0273

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

ZACKARY MATTHEW MAAS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING SXITH EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for a sixth extension of time to 

file his opening brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of 

time to and including March 22, 2024 within which to file his opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 20 2024

02/20/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0273
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

June 9, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131176 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE DUSHAWN MA RQUIS ROSS and TAVONE DONALD RUFFIN, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, f/k/a FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 131176 COA: 265277 Oakland CC

ROMUNDA WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellant. Family Division: 03-684203-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ap ril 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0606 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 9, 2006
Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as an officer of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.



|Date: | September 28, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Greg A. SteffensGreg A. Steffens
President
(*Principal Executive and Principal Financial and*Accounting Officer*)*
|----- | ------------------ |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    1,943
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          1,943
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            1,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    46,940
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    225
<OTHER-SE>                                              (45,222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              (1943)
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          3,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (3,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (3,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (3,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

I, Matthew Markin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB of Anglotajik
Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 29, 2004

/s/ Matthew Markin
------------------------------
President, CEO, and
Acting Chief Financial Officer