alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert L. ROSE, petitioner, v. Leroy KIRKEGARD, Warden, et al.

No. 18-6064.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)  of the Security Exchange Act
of 1934 for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,855
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (50)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,817
<PP&E>                                         230,872
<DEPRECIATION>                               (154,415)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,195
<SALES>                                          4,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,405
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (833)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEUDLE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL  POSITION AT MARCH 31, 2000;  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000;  AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000910739
<NAME>                                         Lincoln Benefit Life
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           157,608
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 161,609
<CASH>                                         1,277
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             8,084,171
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,875,100
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                448,807
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          7,627,403
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,875,100
<PREMIUMS>                                     0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            2,784
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (3)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 0
<BENEFITS>                                     0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,755
<INCOME-TAX>                                   964
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,791
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Century  Casinos,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material aspects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.





Date: July 28, 2004

/s/Erwin Haitzmann

-----------------
Erwin Haitzmann
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
- 1 -

No. 6:23-cv-00195

Deion Sanders,

Plaintiff,

v.

Rick Hagan,

Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff Deion Sanders, a former inmate of the Gregg County 

Jail proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit complaining of alleged 

deprivations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell.

Plaintiff sued his defense attorney, Rick Hagan, and the sole 

requested relief was that the charges against plaintiff be dismissed. Doc. 1. After review of the pleadings, the magistrate judge 

issued a report recommending that the lawsuit be dismissed as 

frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted. Doc. 4 at 3. A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at 

his last known address, but it was returned as undeliverable because plaintiff had been discharged. Doc. 5.

The complaint form that plaintiff filed contains a declaration 

stating: “I understand if I am released or transferred, it is my responsibility to keep the Court informed of my current mailing address and failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this lawsuit.” Doc. 1 at 5. The Local Rules similarly state that a pro se 

litigant “must provide the court with a physical address . . . and is 

responsible for keeping the clerk advised in writing of his or her 

current physical address.” Local Rule CV-11(d); see also Anderson 

v. Munger, No. 5:17-cv-175, 2019 WL 2929056, at *1 (E.D. Tex. 

July 8, 2019) (“The Court has no duty to locate litigants, particularly where a litigant has been advised of his responsibility to 

keep a current address with the Court.”). 

Case 6:23-cv-00195-JCB-KNM Document 6 Filed 11/22/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16
- 2 -

It has been approximately seven months since the magistrate 

judge issued her report, and to date, no objections have been filed. 

Nor has plaintiff advised the court of his present mailing address 

or current whereabouts.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation. The lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief may be granted. All pending motions are denied 

as moot.

So ordered by the court on November 22, 2024.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00195-JCB-KNM Document 6 Filed 11/22/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17
Scott Mitchell BUMMER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6225.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/03/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,001
COMMITMENTS
  12,716    1,016    1,362   17,683   27,791   31,761   30,169    7,240    8,832

CHANGES FROM 03/27/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        878)
    -107     -520     -365      535    1,534       63      649      815      229

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.6      2.6      3.5     45.3     71.3     81.4     77.4     18.6     22.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      15        4        7       27       24       44       34
```

----

Updated April 6, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000910675
<NAME> COMMERCIAL ASSETS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,076
<SECURITIES>                                    13,334
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,630
<PP&E>                                          64,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,966
<BONDS>                                         18,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,953
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,727
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,124
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
Margaret CAMPISE, petitioner, v. NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF LABOR.

No. 18-5670.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

*640Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) 

TO: Mail Stop 8

Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court on the following

G Trademarks or G Patents. ( G the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR

TRADEMARK NO.

DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to Director

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy

Eastern District of Texas ✔

3/10/2023 Eastern District of Texas

Headwater Research LLC Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics 

America, Inc., Samsung Display Co., Ltd. 

8,406,733 3/26/2013 Headwater Research LLC 9,198,117 11/24/2015 Headwater Research LLC 9,615,192 4/4/2017 Headwater Research LLC Print Save As... Reset

2:23-cv-00103

Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all

claims and causes of action asserted in the above referenced action are DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

ch

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 24 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 868
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/17/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      156,948
COMMITMENTS
  54,412   12,079   12,466   70,555  109,313  137,433  133,858   19,515   23,090

CHANGES FROM 07/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      6,853)
   4,819     -160     -726    2,795    7,091    6,888    6,205      -35      648

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.7      7.7      7.9     45.0     69.6     87.6     85.3     12.4     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      58       20       32       56       81      123      128
```

----

Updated July 20, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 31051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10831]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11741]


Review of the Designation as Foreign Terrorist Organizations of 
al-Qa'ida (and Other Aliases)

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the bases for the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have 
not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the 
designation and that the national security of the United States does 
not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 18, 2022.
Antony J. Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-10831 Filed 5-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner, v. Michael D. LOOS.

No. 17-1042.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Julian BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1604.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.28


 





 


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to the Executive Employment
Agreement (“Amendment”) is made effective as of the 1st day of July, 2018.


 


BETWEEN:


ZOMEDICA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., a body corporate duly incorporated
pursuant to the laws of the Province of Alberta and having its registered office in the City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta
(hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation")


 


- and -


 


GERALD SOLENSKY JR., an individual residing in the City
of Orchard Lake, Michigan USA (hereinafter referred to as the "Executive")


 


WHEREAS the Corporation and the Executive are
parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”), between the parties and
pursuant to which Executive serves as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to further
amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects as provided in this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing
and other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the Company and Executive hereby agree as
follows:


 


ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION


 


1.1                   
Definitions.


 


Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment
shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Employment Agreement. References in the Employment Agreement and this Amendment
to this “Agreement" mean the Employment Agreement as amended by this Amendment and as further amended from time to time
as provided in the Employment Agreement.


 


ARTICLE 2

AMENDMENTS


 


2.1                   
The Employment Agreement is hereby amended in the following respects:


 


2.2                   
Section 5.1 is amended to increase the Executive’s Annual Base salary to $325,000usd effective July 1, 2018.


 






     


     


    

ARTICLE 3

GENERAL


 


3.1                    
No other changes to the Executive Employment Agreement, except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms of the
Executive Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 






     


     


    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this
Agreement as of the date and year first above written.


 


	 	ZOMEDICA PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	/s/ James Lebar
	 	 	James Lebar
	 	 	Director (& Compensation Committee Chairman)


 


 


 


 


 


	_______________	 	/s/ Gerald Solensky Jr.
	Witness	 	Gerald Solensky Jr.
	Name:
Abdul Salam BADMUS, petitioner, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 17-7884.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6562
JAMES E. MCKISSICK, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID CLARY; DOUG WHITAKER; GAFFNEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-135-7-HMH) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. McKissick, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Dean Jolly, Jr., Stacey Todd Coffee, LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James E. McKissick, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in which he recommended granting summary judgment to Defendants. The district court adopted the report and recommendation, finding that McKissick failed to file specific objections. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). On appeal, McKissick does not challenge the district court’s conclusion that his objections were merely general. See4th Cir. R. 34(b) (failure to raise claim in informal brief waives consideration of that claim). Accordingly, we conclude that McKissick has waived appellate review of both the substance of the magistrate judge’s report and the district court’s construction of his objections. Thus, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED