alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of TALX Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William W. Canfield,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                 By :  /s/ William W. Canfield
                                       -----------------------
                                 William W. Canfield
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 TALX Corporation
                                 June 4, 2004
Exhibit 13.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18.U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the annual report of Silicom Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Signature: /S/ Shaike Orbach
 Shaike Orbach, Chief Executive Officer
  Date: March 17, 2010
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/13/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      382,416
COMMITMENTS
  68,372  139,175   75,200  212,319  142,383  355,891  356,758   26,525   25,658

CHANGES FROM 11/06/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,807)
   2,793  -12,764    1,132   -5,298   11,621   -1,373      -11     -434   -1,796

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.9     36.4     19.7     55.5     37.2     93.1     93.3      6.9      6.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      56       62       65       36       36      131      131
```

----

Updated November 16, 2012
Kenton W. STEPHENS, petitioner, v. ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18M5.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under Rule 14.5 denied.
COUNTY OF AMADOR, CALIFORNIA, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, et al.

No. 17-1432.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00168

Randal W. Wright,

Plaintiff,

v.

TDCJ Telford Unit Guards et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Randal W. Wright, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a 

civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without paying the filing 

fee. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On June 28, 2023, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion to proceed as a pauper and ordered him to pay an initial partial filing fee of 

$27, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, within thirty 

days of receipt of the order. Doc. 12. The plaintiff has not complied 

with that order or moved for additional time to do so. On August 17, 

2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this

case be dismissed without prejudice due to the plaintiff’s failure to 

pay the required initial fee and to comply with the court’s order. Doc. 

13. A copy of the report was mailed to the plaintiff, who did not file 

written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass 

v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it 

contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

Case 6:23-cv-00168-JCB-KNM Document 15 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 46
- 2 -

So ordered by the court on October 13, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00168-JCB-KNM Document 15 Filed 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 47
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                           3,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,863
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,538,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,282,196
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,732
<OTHER-SE>                                    (745,915)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,538,013
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               494,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (494,102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (494,102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (494,102)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 13a-14(a)/15D-14(a) 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James R. Maronick, certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Solitario Resources Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: March 28, 2006
/s/ James R. Maronick
James R. Maronick
Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18.U.S.C. Section
1350,
As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Silicom Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I the undersigned,
being the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Signature:                                 | /s/ Shaike
  Orbach
|------------------------------------------ | -------------------
|                                           |                    
|                                          
|Shaike
  Orbach, Chief Executive
  Officer
|                                          
|Date: June 30, 2004                       

---

---
Exhibit 1 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 59-1 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 987
App. 001

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 59-1 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 988
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/27/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-00250

ALKARIM ENTERPRISES LLC d/b/a MACTOWN

SMOKE & VAPE and SAJID SULTAN ALI,

ALKARIM ENTERPRISES LLC d/b/a MACTOWN SMOKE & VAPE

REGISTERED AGENT: SAJID SULTAN ALI

108 N MCDONALD ST

MCKINNEY, TX 75069

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00250-SDJ Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 21
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-00250

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00250-SDJ Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  281,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,934
<INVENTORY>                                    288,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               629,198
<PP&E>                                         294,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,254,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          310,433
<BONDS>                                        994,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (187,157)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,254,931
<SALES>                                        294,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,464
<CGS>                                          214,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   455
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,190)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,959)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2014 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2014

  To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory commuter tax on 
                             nonresidents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 1999

  Mr. Franks of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Frelinghuysen, and Mrs. 
   Roukema) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit a State from imposing a discriminatory commuter tax on 
                             nonresidents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING DISCRIMINATORY COMMUTER TAX ON 
              NONRESIDENTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--A State may not impose a tax on the income earned 
in the State by nonresidents unless the tax is of substantial equality 
of treatment for the citizens of the State and the nonresidents so 
commuting.
    (b) State.--For purposes of subsection (a), the term ``State'' 
includes the District of Columbia and any political subdivision of a 
State.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's 10-Q for March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,907,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,523,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,935,000
<PP&E>                                       1,354,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 922,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,200,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,099,000
<BONDS>                                     12,738,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,479,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,200,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,560,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,814,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               439,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             311,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (579,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (579,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (579,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Lenard James PHILMORE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9556.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. Justice THOMAS, concurring in the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in *Reynolds v. Florida,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, ---L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Reynolds v. Florida,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 27, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      Dated: October 26, 2005        /s/ John Weale       Name: John R. Weale   Title: Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)and is not being filed as part of the Report.