alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/27/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-243

HAPPY SMOKE LLC d/b/a HAPPY SMOKE, AHMED

ALDHAMARI, ALEXANDER ALHADDAD, and SAM

MOHAMED ALDHAMARI,

ALEXANDER ALHADDAD

530 SEMINOLE TRL

MURPHY, TX 75094

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00243-ALM Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 18
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-243

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00243-ALM Document 3 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 19
Melissa MAY, petitioner, v. CONTINENTAL TOWERS CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-6219.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
Igor POLSHYN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6305.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit
      32.2








Certification
      of President and Co Chief Executive Officer








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:  November
      8, 2007






/s/
      Peter
      Hoetzinger


Peter
      Hoetzinger


President
      and Co Chief Executive Officer
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

JAY WILLIAMS, #2300216, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOB MONGARE, 

 Defendant. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-151-JDK-KNM 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Jay Williams, a Henderson County Jail inmate proceeding pro se, 

brings this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to 

United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

On May 31, 2023, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with a Court order. Docket No. 17. Judge Mitchell found that, 

despite being ordered to do so, Plaintiff failed to submit the requisite filing fee or a 

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff filed objections. Docket 

Nos. 19, 20. 

Where a party timely objects to the Report and Recommendation, the Court 

reviews the objected-to findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo. 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire 

record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United 

Case 6:23-cv-00151-JDK-KNM Document 21 Filed 03/19/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 189
2 

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other 

grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from 

ten to fourteen days). 

Plaintiff’s objections are largely indecipherable, make no mention of the filing 

fee, and identify no error in Judge Mitchell’s Report. Accordingly, the Court overrules 

Plaintiff’s objections. 

Having conducted a de novo review of the record in this case and the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court has determined that the Report of the 

Magistrate Judge is correct, and Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. Accordingly, 

the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 17) as 

the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without 

prejudice for failure to comply with a Court order. 

Signed this

Mar 19, 2024

Case 6:23-cv-00151-JDK-KNM Document 21 Filed 03/19/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 190
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/24/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,695
COMMITMENTS
  11,480    2,220    1,599   19,612   26,740   32,691   30,559    7,004    9,136

CHANGES FROM 04/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        441)
  -1,395    1,347      940    1,889   -1,723    1,434      564     -993     -123

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.9      5.6      4.0     49.4     67.4     82.4     77.0     17.6     23.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      13        6        7       30       25       46       37
```

----

Updated April 27, 2012
EXHIBIT H

REDACTED IN ENTIRETY

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 84-8 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3066
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   565
<PP&E>                                           6,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,953
<BONDS>                                          3,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,722
<SALES>                                          1,719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,719
<CGS>                                              770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,581)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,581)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,581)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

THE ESTATE OF ROBERT A. WHETTS, JR.; KIMBERLY L. WILLIAMS, RIKON WILLIAMS, KHALIF WILLIAMS, LOUISE B. WILLIAMS, AND CYNTHIA WHITFIELD,

Petitioners

v.

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., BRENNTAG NORTHEAST, INC., BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP; MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP; AND BARLEY SNYDER,
LLP.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 656 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                                   0000911217
<NAME>                                  ESSEX HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATES III L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          518
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>                                     UNCLASSIFED BALANCE SHEET USED
</FN>
<PP&E>                                       11,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               11,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           227
<BONDS>                                      10,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (68)
<FN>
<F2>                                      EQUITY IS PARTNERS' CAPITAL
</FN>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 11,100
<SALES>                                       1,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,089
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  31
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              31
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                     31
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8
<FN>
<F3>                                      ENTITY IS A PARTNERSHIP, EPS IS LOSS 
                                           PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DECLARATION OF KRISTOPHER DAVIS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF 

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 203 Filed 11/04/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 12578
1

1. I, Kristopher Davis, declare as follows:

2. I am counsel for Headwater Research LLC (“Headwater”) in the above-captioned 

action. I provide this declaration in support of Headwater’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ 

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, 

and if called upon to testify, could and would testify competently thereto.

3. Exhibits 1-14 listed in the Table of Exhibits of Headwater’s Response were 

previously filed on October 25, 2024.

4. Attached as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of an ItsOn presentation titled 

“Rewiring the Mobile Internet,” dated October 23, 2008.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on November 4, 2024 at Los Angeles, California

By: /s/ Kristopher Davis

Kristopher Davis

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 203 Filed 11/04/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 12579
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 4, 2024, all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via email.

/s/ Kristopher Davis

Kristopher Davis

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 203 Filed 11/04/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 12580
Steve SPENCER, petitioner, v. Chris ABBOTT, et al.

No. 17-1397.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Michael Jerome HENRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8629.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Studio II Brands, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Leung Kin Wah, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date: August 8, 2011 /s/ Leung Kin Wah
 Chief Financial Officer
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/20/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       38,195
COMMITMENTS
  12,123    2,043    1,971   16,740   25,959   30,835   29,974    7,360    8,221

CHANGES FROM 03/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        961)
     -89      216       22      857      338      790      575      171      386

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.7      5.3      5.2     43.8     68.0     80.7     78.5     19.3     21.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
      12        9       11       26       23       45       37
```

----

Updated March 23, 2012
Jose Ramon ZUNIGA, aka Josue Ararel Zuniga-Zaragoza, aka Jose Ramon Zuniga-Garcia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6833.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Vernon L. BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-5045.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                      CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Health Power, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-91956), Form S-8 (File
No. 33-91958), Form S-8 (33-91852), Form S-8 (File No. 333-20535), and Form S-8
(File No. 333-45857) of our report dated March 8, 2000, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Health Power, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, and
1997 which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Columbus, Ohio                           /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                         ------------------------------
March 30, 2000                            PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Jason Lee BOYD, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-39.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, petitioner, v. Gilbert P. HYATT.

No. 17-1299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Dementia Care.                    

*Date:*                         June 22, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 827-3101,                         *dario.dieguez@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 17, 2022. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10955 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       57,728
COMMITMENTS
   8,147    2,417        0   44,130   52,761   52,277   55,178    5,451    2,550

CHANGES FROM 04/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,930)
   1,305     -356      -55    1,412    2,734    2,662    2,323     -732     -393

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.1      4.2      0.0     76.4     91.4     90.6     95.6      9.4      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       59)
       7        3        0       30       30       37       33
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       83,580
COMMITMENTS
  15,614    3,746      243   56,249   74,390   72,106   78,379   11,474    5,201

CHANGES FROM 04/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,604)
   1,088     -654       -5      189    1,447    1,272      788      332      816

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    18.7      4.5      0.3     67.3     89.0     86.3     93.8     13.7      6.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       87)
      20        8        2       39       34       59       44
```

----

Updated April 27, 2012