alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION of BACKWEB'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

I, Erez Lorber, certify that:

    1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BackWeb Technologies
Ltd.;

    2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

    3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

    4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

    5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

                                                 /s/ EREZ LORBER
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                          Erez Lorber
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 30, 2004
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0603

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TRENTON MATTHEW LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and 

including April 15, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 8 2022

03/08/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0603
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHRIS KEITH , ESQ. Appellant,

v.

JENNY EVY RIDDLE , ALAN TAYLOR RIDDLE , and THE PLANK FACTORY, INC. Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 1214

[ December 7, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Karen M. Miller , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2015

- DR

- 012457

- XXXX

- NB

- FI

.
Chris Keith, Okeechobee, for appellant.

Andrew B. Greenlee of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford , for appellee

, The Plank Factory, Inc

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , M AY and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

h0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

142093 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142093 

 COA: 299628 

Wayne CC: 05-001492 

ERNEST GRAY JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/17/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       63,718
COMMITMENTS
   6,435    1,901    8,178   49,101   53,637   63,714   63,716        4        2

CHANGES FROM 01/10/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        975)
     869     -525      356     -254    1,142      971      973        4        2

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.1      3.0     12.8     77.1     84.2    100.0    100.0      0.0      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       20)
       6        2        5        7       11       14       17
```

----

Updated January 20, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

USA FOOTBALL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FFWCT, LLC; USE FLAG, LLC; AND 

TRAVIS BURNETT,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00516-ALM

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS

The Court, after reviewing Defendant USA Football’s Motion to Seal Documents, enters 

this Order GRANTING USA Football’s motion and deeming the following documents, which 

are exhibits to USA Football’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment, filed under seal as of June 21, 2024, the date the Opposition was filed:

1. Exhibit 1-B, Flag Football World Championship Tour Profit and Loss Since September 

18, 2017.

2. Exhibit 1-C, Flag Football World Championship Tour Profit & Loss Statement January 

2020 – December 2022 [FFWCT0007945-46]. 

3. Exhibit 1-D, Flag Football World Championship Tour Statement of Cash Flows January 

2020-December 2022 [FFWCT0007947].

4. Exhibit 1-E, Flag Football World Championship Tour Balance Sheet As of December 31,

2022 [FFWCT0007948-49].

5. Exhibit 1-F, Flag Football World Championship Tour Profit and Loss January 1, 2016 – 

December 15, 2023 [FFWCT0007950]. 

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 71-1 Filed 06/21/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2448
6. Exhibit 1-G, Flag Football World Championship Tour Balance Sheet December 15, 

2023; [FFWCT0007951].

7. Exhibit 1-H, Flag Football World Championship Tour Profit and Loss January 16-

December 2023 [FFWCT0008110]. 

8. Exhibit 1-I, Flag Football World Championship Tour Balance Sheet December 31, 2023 

[FFWCT0008109].

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 71-1 Filed 06/21/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2449
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2020

No. 04-19-00288-CV

DCP SAND HILLS PIPELINE, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Appellee

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-16-0033-CV-A

Honorable Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s second motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s 

brief is due no later than February 3, 2020. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 12.1

                       THRIFTY PAYLESS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                          Predecessor
                                              The Company                   Company
                                 1996      1995      1994       1993          1992
                               -------    -------   -------    -------      -------
<S>                            <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>          <C>
Computation of earnings from
  continuing operations before
  fixed charges:

     Income (loss) from
       continuing operations
       before income taxes.... $  86.3    $  (8.2)  $   18.7   $   (4.3)    $(175.7)
     Fixed charges............   162.8      166.9       94.9       45.7        49.7 
Earnings from continuing
  operations before fixed
  charges..................... $ 249.1    $ 158.7   $  113.6   $   41.4     $(126.0)


Computation of fixed charges:
     Interest expense......... $ 105.0    $ 120.4   $   59.1   $   20.2     $  27.8
     Interest portion of
        rental expense........    57.8       46.5       35.8       25.5        21.9 
                               $ 162.8    $ 166.9   $   94.9   $   45.7     $  49.7 


Ratio of earnings from
   continuing operations to
   fixed charges..............     1.5       N/A         1.2       N/A         N/A  

Excess (deficiency) of
   earnings from continuing
   operations to fixed charges $  86.3    $ (8.2)  $   18.7   $   (4.3)    $(175.7)


</TABLE>
FEDERAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION

                      Computation of Loss Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           For the Three Months Ended                  For the Six Months Ended
                                                                  November 30,                               November 30,
                                                        ----------------------------------        ----------------------------------
                                                             1997               1996                   1997               1996
                                                        ---------------    ---------------        ---------------    ---------------

<S>                                                    <C>                <C>                    <C>                <C>    
Shares  outstanding:                                           164,500            164,500                164,500            164,500
Weighted average shares outstanding                            164,500            164,500                164,500            164,500
Net income (loss)                                       $       10,130     $       (8,463)        $        6,912     $      (17,288)

Net income (loss) per common share                      $         0.06     $        (0.05)        $         0.04     $        (0.11)

</TABLE>
Brian HUFFMAN, petitioner, v. Kirstjen M. NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security.

No. 18-138.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2078 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2078

   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the 
                           textile industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 1999

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in the 
                           textile industry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``     9902.61.06     Phosphonic         Free        No change          No change          On or before 12/
                       acid,(1-                                                             31/2001           ''
                       hydroxyethyliden                                                                        .
                       e)bis-,
                       tetrasodium salt
                       (CAS No. 3794-83-
                       0) (provided for
                       in subheading
                       2931.00.9030)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


Earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by
subtracting preferred stock dividends from net earnings (loss) and dividing
that amount by the weighted average shares outstanding for the period.  
Weighted average shares outstanding for the years
ending September 30, 1996 and 1995 were 1,000. The weighted average shares
outstanding in both periods exclude 333 shares relating to warrants 
outstanding, which entitle the holders to purchase, at a nominal exercise
price, a number of common shares equal in the aggregate to 25% of the total 
number of common shares that would be outstanding immediately after issuance
of all such common shares, since these warrants are antidilutive.
Wilfredo PINEDA, aka Wilfredo Pineda Alarcon, petitioner, v. Kristjen NIELSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

No. 18-432.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE>
                                   THE BEARD COMPANY
                            COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                  For the Three Months Ended      For the Nine Months Ended
                                  --------------------------      ------------------------
                                   September 30,  September 30,   September 30,  September 30,
                                       1998           1997             1998          1997
                                     --------       --------         --------      --------
<S>                               <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Loss from continuing operations   $  (44,000)     $ (292,000)    $  (320,000)   $   (691,000)
                                  ============    ============   ============   ============
Earnings (loss) from discontinued
 operations                       $  168,000      $  246,000     $  (880,000)   $    242,000
                                  ============    ============   ============   ============
Net earnings (loss) per statement
 of operations                    $  124,000      $  (46,000)    $(1,200,000)   $   (449,000)
                                  ============    ============   ===========    ============
Net earnings (loss) attributable 
 to common shareholders per 
 statement of operations          $  124,000      $  (46,000)    $(1,200,000)   $   (449,000)
                                  ============    ============   ============   ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
  Basic and diluted                2,568,000       2,805,000       2,542,000       2,801,000
                                  ============    ============   ============   ============

Net earnings (loss) per average common share outstanding:
  Basic and diluted
    Loss from continuing
     operations                   $     (0.02)    $    (0.10)    $     (0.12)   $      (0.25)
  Earnings (loss) from discontinued
   operations                           (0.07)          0.08           (0.35)           0.09
                                  -----------     -----------    -----------    -----------
  Net earnings (loss)             $      0.05     $    (0.02)    $     (0.47)   $      (0.16)
                                  ===========     ===========    ===========    =========== 

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000910632
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Six

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          4,257,613
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,165,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                      335,264
<INVENTORY>                                        39,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                         19,100,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,389,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,271,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        28,797,846
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,659,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,271,668
<SALES>                                         1,522,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,582,435
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  787,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                588,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      106,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.28
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
ESTATE Of Jason Allen SMALLWOOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-346.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.27




AMENDMENT TO
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is executed on the 18th day of February, 2019 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Innovate Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Sandeep Laumas, MD (the “Executive”).   The Executive and the Company may be referred to herein as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”
Executive and the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of March 11, 2018 the “Employment Agreement”).  Executive and the Company wish to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect Executive’s appointment as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “CEO”) and to provide that if the Board of Directors exercises its discretion to appoint another individual as CEO or otherwise remove Executive’s duties as CEO, that such appointment will not provide Executive with grounds for Good Reason under Section 5(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement.    


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions set forth below and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


1.Employment.  In addition to Executive’s duties under Sections 1 and 2 of the Employment Agreement as Executive Chairman, Executive shall also serve as the CEO, with no additional compensation.  
2.Good Reason.  Executive agrees that the Company may appoint another individual to serve as CEO in place of Executive or otherwise remove Executive’s duties as CEO and that such appointment or removal, as applicable, and the diminishment in Executive’s title, duties, authority and responsibilities that may result, shall not constitute grounds for Good Reason under Section 5(a)(i) of the Employment Agreement.  
3.Effective Date of this Amendment.  This Amendment will become effective immediately upon execution by the Parties.


4.Effect of Amendment.  Except as amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.   This Amendment is effective as of the date set forth above.  


5.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall be deemed a single agreement.


(Signature Page Follows)











(Signature page to Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement)


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of the day and year first written above.






SANDEEP LAUMAS, MD


/s/ Sandeep Laumas            








INNOVATE BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.




By:     /s/ Jay Madan            
Name:  Jay Madan
Title:  President
Gerson Gonzalez TOVAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6006.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Willie McCALL, as Administrator of the Estate of Sandy Jamel McCall, petitioner, v. Samuel MORANT, et al.

No. 17-1508.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.