alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

AMENDED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Northstar Electronics, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report, to which this amended certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant



|                        |  |                                                     | 
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        |  |                                                     | 
|Dated: December 1, 2010 |  | /s/ Wilson Russell                                  | 
|                        |  | Wison Russell                                       | 
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer |
Robert Wallace SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6049.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

*395Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Diario Oficial C 59A/13 d

| | ISSN 1725-244X |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 59A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 52o año13 de marzo de 2009 |

ISSN 1725-244X

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 59A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

52o año13 de marzo de 2009

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2009/C 059A/01 | Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposición general EPSO/AD/142/08 para la constitución de una lista de reserva a efectos de la contratación de administradores lingüistas (AD 5) de lengua española en el ámbito de la traducción (DO C 303 A de 26.11.2008) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2009/C 059A/01

Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposición general EPSO/AD/142/08 para la constitución de una lista de reserva a efectos de la contratación de administradores lingüistas (AD 5) de lengua española en el ámbito de la traducción (DO C 303 A de 26.11.2008)

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 13.3.2009 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2009

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 59/1

---

Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposición general EPSO/AD/142/08 para la constitución de una lista de reserva a efectos de la contratación de administradores lingüistas (AD 5) de lengua española en el ámbito de la traducción

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 303 A de 26 de noviembre de 2008
  )

(2009/C 59 A/01)

En la página 5, en el título II:

en lugar de:

«Se invitará a los candidatos que obtengan las mejores notas (2) (véase el cuadro que figura a continuación) en el conjunto de las pruebas de acceso, así como el mínimo requerido en cada una de ellas, a presentar su solicitud completa para su posible admisión en la oposición general.

| OPCIÓN 1 | OPCIÓN 2 |
| --- | --- |
| 240 | 120» |

OPCIÓN 1

OPCIÓN 2

240

120»

léase:

léase:

«Se invitará a los candidatos que obtengan las mejores notas (2) (véase el cuadro que figura a continuación) en el conjunto de las pruebas de acceso, así como el mínimo requerido en cada una de ellas, a presentar su solicitud completa para su posible admisión en la oposición general.

| OPCIÓN 1 | OPCIÓN 2 |
| --- | --- |
| 120 | 60» |

OPCIÓN 1

OPCIÓN 2

120

60»

---
Filed 1/31/23 P. v. Young CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DESHAWN M. YOUNG

,

Defendant and Appellant. D080660

(Super. Ct. No. SCD293752 )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Polly H. Shamoon, Judge. Affirmed.

Nathanael Crowley

, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Deshawn M. Young pleaded guilty to possession of a loaded firearm in

public (Pen. Code, § 25850, subd. (a)) and misdemeanor possession of cocaine

(Health and Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)). Young was granted probation for

two y ears subject to various conditions. One of the conditions of probation

required that Young use “no marijuana at all.” Young did not object to the

condition.2

Young filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Peop le v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) indic a ting counsel has not been able to identify any

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the

record for error as mandated by Wende . We offered Young the opportunity to

file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Young admitted he possessed a loaded firearm in public and that he

possessed cocaine.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks

the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review

, and

in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 ( Anders ), counsel

has identified a possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential

merits of this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in imposing a “no

marijuana use” condition in light of the convictions for possession of cocaine

and a loaded firearm.

We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders

.

We have not discovered any arguable i ssues for reversal on appeal.

Competent counsel has represented Young on this appeal.3 DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

IRION, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of income of ARM Financial Group, Inc's form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,175,587
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      33,020
<MORTGAGE>                                      13,649
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               5,895,646
<CASH>                                         279,941
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         137,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,042,380
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              6,751,175
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 38,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     75,000
<COMMON>                                           238
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,042,380
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            136,468
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (351)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   6,652
<BENEFITS>                                     107,089
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      4,364
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            11,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,405
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2440

SAMUEL D. QUINN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-97-695-R)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel D. Quinn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel D. Quinn appeals the district court's order dismissing

his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (West 1994

& Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we

dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Quinn v. Franklin

Cnty Board of Supervisors, No. CA-97-695-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 15,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Mark Richard HILLSTROM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8999.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Martin TOVAR, petitioner, v. Dushan ZATECKY, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

No. 18-8189.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94873; File No. SR-MIAX-2022-14]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities 
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
the MIAX Fee Schedule To Increase Certain Connectivity Fees

May 9, 2022.
    On April 1, 2022, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC 
(``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the Exchange's Fee 
Schedule to increase certain connectivity fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ On April 
20, 2022, the proposed rule change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register and, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\4\ 
the Commission: (1) Temporarily suspended the proposed rule change; and 
(2) instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to 
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ 
On May 2, 2022, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-
MIAX-2022-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94719 (April 14, 
2022), 87 FR 23600.
    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10257 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
II

Calendar No. 392

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 197

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported by Mr. THOMPSON, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

at 410 North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas, as

the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 410 North 6th Street in Garden City, Kansas,

6 is hereby designated as the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Of7 fice’’.
2

•HR 197 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

Calendar No. 392

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 197

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 410 North 6th Street in Garden

City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Clifford R. Hope Post Office’’.

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported without amendment
ADDENDUM
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED


October
18, 2018


BY
AND BETWEEN


NEW
WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


(the
“Company”)


and


ANDREW
FITZPATRICK


(the
“Employee”)


 


This
Addendum (“Addendum”), made and entered into this 4th day of March, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), shall
modify and, to the extent inconsistent with, amend that Employment Agreement between NEW WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the “Company”)
and ANDREW FITZPATRICK (the “Employee”) (the “Agreement”). Except as expressly set forth in the Addendum,
all capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Preprinted Employment Agreement. The Preprinted Employment
Agreement, as modified and amended by this Addendum and all riders and exhibits attached hereto, shall be referred to as the “Agreement”.


 


For
further clarity and confirmation of Agreement terms, the Company and Employee agree that the Base Salary as provided for in the
Agreement was intended to be, fully and mutually executed upon and shall remain thirty thousand (30,000) one (1) year restricted
shares of the Company’s common stock. As such, in order to better clarify and define terms of the Agreement, the Company
and Employee agree to the following updates and/or changes to the Agreement:


 


Section
4. Cash Compensation. shall be replaced, in its entirety, to the following language:


 


Section
4. Compensation.


 


Section
4(a) Base Salary shall be replaced, in its entirety, to the following language:


 


(a)
Base Salary. In consideration of the services to be rendered by the Employee to the Company and in consideration of the
Employee’s other covenants hereunder, the Company will compensate the Employee with thirty thousand (30,000) one (1) year
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, commencing on the term defined in Section 2 above, issuable within 90 days
of signing of this Agreement.


 


All
other provisions and conditions of the original Employment Agreement remain the same except as adjusted herein.


 


In
witness thereof, the parties have executed this employment agreement addendum on the day and year first above written.


 


	By:	 	By:	 
	 	Officer / Director	 	Andrew Fitzpatrick
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

TRISTAN JAVAHN DURDEN

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

 CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00028-JDK

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS

OF FACT AND RECOMMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable K. Nicole Mitchell, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. 

The Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge 

Recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on 

Count One of the Indictment. 

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Tristan Javahn 

Durden GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 

841(a)(1) - Possession with Intent to Distribute and Distribution of 50 Grams or More of Actual 

Methamphetamine.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16th May, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00028-JDK-KNM Document 25 Filed 05/16/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 59
Exhibit 31.1



302 CERTIFICATION



I, Wilson Russell, Principal Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of  Northstar Electronics, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  14 and 15d  14, for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information

relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of

the end of the period covered by this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the

disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit

committee of the registrant's board of directors or persons performing the equivalent functions:

a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could

adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who

have a role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether there were changes in internal controls or in other factors that could affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 6, 2009             /s/  Wilson Russell

Wilson Russell, President and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DURECT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 29, 2017

 

| /S/    James E. Brown |
|-------------------------------------------|
| James E. Brown

Chief Executive Officer   |
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/26/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       31,620
COMMITMENTS
   6,199    1,919       40   18,799   20,154   25,038   22,113    6,582    9,507

CHANGES FROM 06/19/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,945)
     602   -1,731      -40   -1,922      351   -1,360   -1,420     -585     -525

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.6      6.1      0.1     59.5     63.7     79.2     69.9     20.8     30.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
       9        6        1       29       22       38       29
```

----

Updated June 29, 2012