alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1961 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1961

To designate certain lands in the Valley Forge National Historical Park 
                 as the Valley Forge National Cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 1999

 Mr. Hoeffel (for himself, Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, Mr. 
 Borski, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Holden, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   Fattah, Mr. English, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Sherwood, Mr. 
 Kanjorski, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Klink, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Gekas, 
  Mr. Mascara, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Coyne, and Mr. Toomey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, and 
 in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate certain lands in the Valley Forge National Historical Park 
                 as the Valley Forge National Cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LANDS AS VALLEY FORGE NATIONAL CEMETERY.

    (a) In General.--The lands described in subsection (b) are hereby 
designated as the Valley Forge National Cemetery. Administrative 
jurisdiction over such lands is hereby transferred to the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs, and such lands shall be administered in accordance 
with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code (relating to national 
cemeteries and memorials).
    (b) Lands Described.--The lands referred to in subsection (a), 
comprised of not more than 100 acres of land, are located within the 
Valley Forge National Historical Park, as generally depicted on a map 
entitled ``Valley Forge National Cemetery--Proposed''.
    (c) Adjustment of Park Boundaries.--Subsection (b) of section 2 of 
the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
establish the Valley Forge National Historical Park in the Commonwealth 
of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes'' (16 U.S.C. 410aa-1) is 
amended by striking ``map entitled `Valley Forge National Historical 
Park', dated June 1979, and numbered VF-91,001'' and inserting ``map 
entitled `Valley Forge National Historical Park', dated ____, and 
numbered ____''.
                                 <all>
```
Elouise BRADLEY, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al.

No. 17-8702.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         287
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,927
<PP&E>                                      19,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,662
<BONDS>                                     27,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       167
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,241
<SALES>                                    107,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                       81,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,890)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,041)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (3.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (3.28)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>







                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Agree Realty Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth
R. Howe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:



        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


        2.   The information contained in the Report fairy presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.





  /s/ KENNETH R. HOWE
-----------------------
Kenneth R. Howe
Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2004
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00348-CV

TRINITY HEALTHCARE, LLC

v.

LILIAN PEACOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF

THE ESTATE OF GLADYS CECILIA KEELS

On Appeal from the

329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV52930

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 4, 2023
AMENDMENT TO KENTUCKY ELECTRIC
STEEL, INC. SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN


		WHEREAS, Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc. ("Company") adopted
the Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc. Salary Continuation Plan ("Plan") for
the benefit of eligible employees; and

	WHEREAS, the Company retained the right to amend the Plan
pursuant to Section 8 thereof; and

	WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to change the
definition of the term "Change of Control":

	NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of May 6, 1999, the Plan is amended
as follows:

1.  Section 4(b) is deleted and replace with the following:

		(b)	The term "change in control of the Company" shall
mean (i) the consummation of (A) any consolidation or merger of the
Company in which the Company is not the continuing or surviving
corporation or pursuant to which shares of the Company's Common Stock
would be converted into cash, securities or other property, other than
a merger of the Company in which the holders of the Company's Common
Stock immediately prior to the merger have substantially the same
proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation
immediately after the merger, or (B) any sale, lease, exchange or
transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of
all or substantially all the assets of the Company, or (ii) the
approval by the shareholders of the Company of any plan or proposal for
the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, other than in connection
with a bankruptcy or reorganization proceeding of the Company under
applicable federal or state bankruptcy laws, or (iii) any "person" (as
such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), other than the
Company or a subsidiary thereof or any employee benefit plan sponsored
by the Company or a subsidiary thereof, becoming the beneficial owner
(within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of securities
of the Company representing 25% or more of the combined voting power of
the Company's then outstanding securities ordinarily (and apart from
rights accruing in special circumstances) having the right to vote in
the election of directors, as a result of a tender or exchange offer,
open market purchases, privately-negotiated purchases or otherwise, or
(iv) at any time during a period of two (2) consecutive years,
individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board
of Directors of the Company ceasing for any reason to constitute at
least a majority thereof, unless the election or the nomination for
election by the Company's shareholders of each new director during such
two-year period was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the
directors then still in office who were directors at the beginning of
such two-year period.

		IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment  is adopted and
effective immediately on the day and year first above written.

			           KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.

			      By:  /s/  Charles C. Hanebuth   5/19/99
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, '

'

Plaintiff, '

'

versus ' NO. 1:23-CR-52-1-MAC

'

JAMELLE ANTOINE PARKER, '

'

Defendant. '

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure. Judge Stetson conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued her Findings of Fact and Recommendation 

on Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. Judge Stetson recommended that 

the court accept the Defendant’s guilty plea. She further recommended that the court adjudge 

the Defendant guilty on Counts Two and Four of the Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to Judge Stetson’s findings. The court ORDERS that the 

Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate Judge are 

ADOPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Jamelle Antoine Parker, is 

Case 1:23-cr-00052-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 60
2

adjudged guilty as to Counts Two and Four of the Indictment charging violations of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 1951—Hobbs Act Robbery and 18 U.S.C. § 2119—Carjacking.

.

Case 1:23-cr-00052-MAC-ZJH Document 23 Filed 01/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 61
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON DIVISION

USA FOOTBALL, INC., et al. §

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-03-4858

§

TIMOTHY B. ROBINSON, §

USA FOOTBALL, INC., §

Defendants/Counterplaintiffs. §

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Memorandum and Order issued this day it is hereby

ORDERED that the NFL’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 41] is

GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs the National Football League and USA Football, Inc.’s use

of the trademark “USA Football” to promote the sport of amateur football at the high school

and youth level in the United States does not infringe the rights of Defendants Timothy

Robinson and USA Football, Inc. because it does not infringe a protected trademark, dilute

a protected trademark, constitute a false designation of origin, or constitute unfair

competition as to Defendants It is further

ORDERED that Robinson shall take nothing by way of his claims in this case.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 20th day of September 2004. 

Case 4:23-cv-00465-ALM Document 75-17 Filed 06/22/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2831 Case 4:03-cv-04858 Document 73 Filed on 09/20/04 in TXSD Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23






Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm











We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-156563), and the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-2320 and File No. 333-127134) of the Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. 1994 and 2003 Stock Option Plans, of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. of our report
dated August 25, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc., which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2009.




/s/BKD,LLP




St. Louis, Missouri


September 25, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

STEPHEN CORTEZ, JR., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-66

§

SKYVIEW UNIT, et al., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING 

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Stephen Cortez, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. The court

previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge,

at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The

magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

recommending that a motion for preliminary injunction be denied as moot. To date, the parties

have not filed objections.

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,

and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and

conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#15) is

ADOPTED. The motion for preliminary injunction (#9) is DENIED. 

Case 9:23-cv-00066-MAC-ZJH Document 18 Filed 02/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 55
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
FinishMaster,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form S-8  (File No.  333-564)  of our
report,  dated  March  20,  1998,  on our  audit of the  consolidated  financial
statements  and  financial   statement   schedule  of  FinishMaster,   Inc.  and
Subsidiaries  as of December  31, 1997 and 1996 and for the year and  nine-month
period then ended which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                                 COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 31, 1998
Moses JACKSON, petitioner, v. ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDON AND PAROLES.

No. 17-8754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
People's Credit Card Master Trust

       Independent Accountants' Report on Management's Assertion Concerning
              Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for the
               Credit Card Services Division of People's Bank

            
                         Independent Accountants' Report

People's Bank
850 Main Street
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604

Bankers Trust Company
Four Albany Street
New York, New York 10006


We have examined the assertion made by the management of People's Bank 
("People's") that its Credit Card Services division (which includes the 
accounts transferred to and serviced for the People's Bank Credit Card Master
Trust) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of 
December 31, 1998 that was sufficient for the prevention and detection of 
errors and fraud in amounts that would be material to People's consolidated 
financial statements.  This assertion is included in the accompanying report
entitled Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for 
the Credit Card Services Division of People's Bank.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included 
obtaining an understanding of the internal control over financial
reporting, testing, and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
the internal control, and such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of the inherent limitations in any internal control, errors
or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods 
are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Credit Card Services division 
of People's maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 1998 that was sufficient for the prevention and detection
of errors and fraud in amounts that would be material to People's
consolidated financial statements is fairly stated, in all material respects, 
based upon criteria described in Internal Control - Integrated Framework 
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

/s/ KPMG LLP
March 18, 1999
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
                             PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-21293) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-141471) of Agree
Realty Corporation of our reports dated March 6, 2007, relating to the
consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear on
pages 28, 29, and F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2006.


                                        /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP

Chicago, IL
December 7, 2007
In Re Gary Ivan TERRY, petitioner.

No. 18-6018.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2066

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize the annual enrollment

of land in the wetlands reserve program, to extend the program through

2005, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. PICKERING (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, and Mr.

CHAMBLISS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to authorize the

annual enrollment of land in the wetlands reserve program, to extend the program through 2005, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WETLANDS RESERVE PROGRAM.

4 (a) ANNUAL ENROLLMENT AUTHORITY.—Section

5 1237(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.

6 3837(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and insert7 ing the following new paragraph (1):
2

•HR 2066 IH

1 ‘‘(1) ANNUAL ENROLLMENT AUTHORITY.—For

2 calendar years 2000 through 2005, the Secretary

3 may enroll up to 250,000 acres annually in the wet4 lands reserve program.’’.

5 (b) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—Section 1237(c) of

6 such Act (16 U.S.C. 3837(c)) is amended by striking

7 ‘‘2002’’ and inserting ‘‘2005’’.

8 (c) ELIGIBLE LANDS.—Section 1237(d) of such Act

9 (16 U.S.C. 3837(d)) is amended—

10 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph

11 (2);

12 (2) by striking the period at the end of para13 graph (3) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

14 (3) by adding at the end the following new

15 paragraph:

16 ‘‘(4) suitable for the establishment of wetland

17 functions and values, and that would contribute sub18 stantially to the habitat objectives of the North

19 American Waterfowl Management Plan, but has not

20 historically been wetlands.’’.

21 (d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—Section 1237F of

22 such Act (16 U.S.C. 3837f) is amended—

23 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub24 section (c); and
3

•HR 2066 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol2 lowing new subsection (b):

3 ‘‘(b) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—Notwithstanding

4 chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary

5 may enter into a cooperative agreement for the acquisition

6 of goods or services, including personal services, with a

7 State, a political subdivision or agency of a State, a public

8 or private agency, an organization, or any other person,

9 without regard to any requirements for competition, if the

10 Secretary determines that—

11 ‘‘(1) the objectives of the agreement will serve

12 a mutual interest of the parties to the agreement in

13 wetland conservation;

14 ‘‘(2) all parties will contribute resources to the

15 accomplishment of the objectives; and

16 ‘‘(3) the agreement will further the purposes of

17 this subchapter.’’.

Æ
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

4/5/23

Case 2:23-cv-00152-JRG Document 6 Filed 04/05/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 20
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) . I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

. My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:23-cv-00152-JRG Document 6 Filed 04/05/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 21