alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

4/3/23

Case 4:23-cv-00281-SDJ Document 4 Filed 04/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 184
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 4:23-cv-00281-SDJ Document 4 Filed 04/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 185
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1852 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1852

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow a judge to whom a case 
   is transferred to retain jurisdiction over certain multidistrict 
                      litigation cases for trial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 1999

 Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Coble, and Mr. Berman) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow a judge to whom a case 
   is transferred to retain jurisdiction over certain multidistrict 
                      litigation cases for trial.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Multidistrict Trial Jurisdiction Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION.

    Section 1407 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the third sentence of subsection (a), by inserting 
        ``or ordered transferred to the transferee or other district 
        under subsection (i)'' after ``terminated''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Any action transferred under this section by the panel may be 
transferred for trial purposes, by the judge or judges of the 
transferee district to whom the action was assigned, to the transferee 
or other district in the interest of justice and for the convenience of 
the parties and witnesses.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any civil action 
pending on or brought on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/24/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      143,211
COMMITMENTS
  34,480   35,170   16,930   75,227   64,249  126,637  116,349   16,574   26,862

CHANGES FROM 04/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,813)
  -2,037    1,625   -1,031     -677   -4,571   -3,745   -3,977      -68      164

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.1     24.6     11.8     52.5     44.9     88.4     81.2     11.6     18.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      34       53       38       62       54      125      126
```

----

Updated April 27, 2012
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 10

- 00244

- CR

David CALZADA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009

- CR

- 7747 Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 19, 2010
DIS MISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the underlying case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2).04

- 10

- 00244

- CR

- 2

- Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d). Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification show ing that he has the right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. Ap p.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires t his court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Noris BABB, petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 18-882.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted limited to the following question: Whether the federal-sector provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which provides that personnel actions affecting agency employees aged 40 years or older shall be made free from any "discrimination based on age," 29 U.S.C. § 633a(a), requires a plaintiff to prove that age was a but-for cause of the challenged personnel action.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/10/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      144,035
COMMITMENTS
  12,003   32,216   30,617   85,494   67,914  128,114  130,747   15,921   13,288

CHANGES FROM 01/03/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,767)
   1,688    7,727     -519   12,995   10,992   14,164   18,200    1,603   -2,433

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.3     22.4     21.3     59.4     47.2     88.9     90.8     11.1      9.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      27       20       25       24       23       64       58
```

----

Updated January 13, 2012
Sandra Lee BART, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-143.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 11

                      IVC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                FOR THE YEARS ENDED JULY 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
        (Dollars in Thousands, Except as Noted or Per Share Information)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Years Ended
                                                                    July 31,
                                                                    --------
                                                      1998            1997           1996
                                                      ----            ----           ----
<S>                                               <C>             <C>             <C>        
Net income                                        $     1,147     $     1,346     $       296

Less - preferred stock dividends                           --              --              --
                                                  -----------     -----------     -----------
Net income for basic income per common share      $     1,147     $     1,346     $       296
                                                  ===========     ===========     ===========

Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding during the year - Basic             17,145,530      17,091,159      17,084,726

Add - common equivalent shares (determined
   using the "treasury stock" method)
   representing shares issuable upon exercise
   of employee stock options and incentive
   performance shares                                  89,390          39,618         133,663
                                                  -----------     -----------     -----------

Weighted average number of common shares -
  Diluted                                          17,234,920      17,130,777      17,218,389
                                                  ===========     ===========     ===========

Income per common share - Diluted                 $      0.07     $      0.08     $      0.02
                                                  ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>


                                       E-1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

ARMANDO COOK §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23cv94

BRYAN DOBBS, ET AL. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Armando Cook, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas,

proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate

Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this 

Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action without prejudice. The Court 

has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 

filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. A copy 

of the report and recommendation was mailed to plaintiff at the address provided to the 

Court. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 

have been filed.

O R D E R

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are 

correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in 

this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations.

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 10th day of May, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00094-MJT-ZJH Document 5 Filed 05/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         116,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,926,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,043,785
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,678,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,678,122
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,229
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.23
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10472]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2022-049]


Advisory Committee on the Records of Congress; Meeting

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing an upcoming meeting of the Advisory 
Committee on the Records of Congress in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act. The committee advises NARA on the full range of 
programs, policies, and plans for the Center for Legislative Archives 
in the Office of Legislative Archives, Presidential Libraries, and 
Museum Services (LPM).

DATES: The meeting will be on June 10, 2022, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. 
(ET).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the U.S. Capitol Visitor 
Center, South Congressional Meeting Room, CVC-217, U.S. Capitol at 
First Street and East Capitol Street.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public. Due to 
restricted access at the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center, members of the 
public who wish to attend the Advisory Committee on the Records of 
Congress meeting are required to register for access to the meeting no 
later than Friday, June 3, 2022, by emailing the Office of Art and 
Archives at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761704151e1f001305361b171f1a581e1903051358111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e08192838889968593a08d81898cce888f959385ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a> with your name and contact 
information.
    Due to building security measures, attendees will be screened 
before entry and cannot bring certain items into the building. Please 
see https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/plan-visit/prohibited-items for a 
list of prohibited items.

Agenda

(1) Chair's Opening Remarks--Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives
(2) Recognition of Co-chair--Secretary of the U.S. Senate
(3) Recognition of the Acting Archivist of the United States
(4) Approval of the minutes of the last meeting
(5) House Archivist's report
(6) Senate Archivist's report
(7) Center for Legislative Archives update
(8) Other current issues and new business

Tasha Ford,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-10472 Filed 5-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                             REDBACK NETWORKS INC.
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                             Pursuant to Item 503
                                Regulation S-K

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Year Ended December 31,
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         2001             2000             1999         1998          1997
                                                     -----------       -----------     -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>
Net loss before extraordinary gain ...............   $(4,128,333)      $(1,007,545)        $(7,919)      $(9,876)      $(4,411)
Interest .........................................        27,091            19,955             319           223            60
Amortization of interest expense related
  to warrants issued .............................           177               264              28            28            25
Amortization of deferred financing costs .........         1,782             1,299              --            --            --
Lease rental expense representative of
  interest (1) ...................................         5,500             1,932             414           147            48
Net loss before fixed charges ....................    (4,093,783)         (984,095)         (7,158)       (9,478)       (4,278)
Less: fixed charges
Interest .........................................       (27,091)          (19,955)           (319)         (223)          (60)
Amortization of interest expense related
  to warrants issued .............................          (177)             (264)            (28)          (28)          (25)
Amortization of deferred financing costs .........        (1,782)           (1,299)             --            --            --
Lease rental expense representative of
  interest (1) ...................................        (5,500)           (1,932)           (414)         (147)          (48)
Total fixed charges ..............................       (34,550)          (23,450)           (761)         (398)         (133)
Net loss .........................................   $(4,128,333)      $(1,007,545)        $(7,919)      $(9,876)      $(4,411)
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...............           N/A               N/A             N/A           N/A           N/A
Deficiency in earnings ...........................   $(4,128,333)      $(1,007,545)        $(7,919)      $(9,876)      $(4,411)
</TABLE>
--------------
(1)  Calculated as one-third of rentals, which is a reasonable approximation of
     the interest factor.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JERRAL W. JONES, DALLAS COWBOYS 

FOOTBALL CLUB, LTD., JAMES 

WILKINSON, TRAILRUNNER 

INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and DONALD 

JACK, JR. 

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:23-cv-00032-RWS 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 On this date, the Court considered the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint filed by Defendants Jerral W. Jones, Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd., James 

Wilkinson, TrailRunner International, LLC, and Donald Jack, Jr (the “Motion”). The Court, 

having considered the Motion, briefing in support of the Motion, arguments, and evidence, as well 

as responses, pleadings, and papers on file, hereby orders that the Motion be GRANTED. 

 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendants Jerral W. Jones, Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Ltd., James Wilkinson, TrailRunner 

International, LLC, and Donald Jack, Jr. are DISMISSED in their entirety with PREJUDICE. 

 

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 59-15 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1077
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Keith A. SimpsonKeith A. SimpsonVice-President and Chief Accounting Officer


Date: March 4, 2014

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be
retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-4
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.




Date:
September 21, 2011

By:
/s/ Greg A. Steffens

Greg A. Steffens

President

(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
September 21, 2011

By:
/s/ Matthew T. Funke

Matthew T. Funke

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)