alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          33,746
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,022
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            60,066
<LOANS>                                        729,862
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 882,504
<DEPOSITS>                                     790,803
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,165
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 882,504
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 53,819
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,680
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                61,499
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              31,979
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,038
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           28,461
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,838
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (4)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 32,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (350)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (350)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (357)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.68
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,298
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                12,001
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 20,528
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,745
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,889
<RECOVERIES>                                       440
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,134
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,134
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      151,622
COMMITMENTS
  25,096   42,845   39,257   79,472   66,129  143,825  148,231    7,797    3,391

CHANGES FROM 01/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,679)
  11,104   11,548    5,944   -4,463   -4,540   12,585   12,952  -15,264  -15,631

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.6     28.3     25.9     52.4     43.6     94.9     97.8      5.1      2.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      28       21       26       23       21       63       58
```

----

Updated January 27, 2012
**Amendment
No. 1 to**
 
 **Employment
Agreement**
 
 **By
and Between**
 
 **EDGAR
Online, Inc. and**
 
 **Susan
Strausberg**
 
 
 This
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement is dated as of January 31, 2005 and
amends that certain Employment Agreement by and between EDGAR Online, Inc. and
Susan Strausberg dated as of April 26, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”).
  WHEREAS,
the parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:
  1. The
following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 7(b):
 
 “However,
in the event of termination of the Employee’s employment pursuant to this
Section 7(b), on the date of the death of the Employee or the 181rst day after
the Employee is deemed physically or mentally disabled for the purposes of this
Agreement, all stock options and other awards under the Company’s stock option
plans shall immediately vest and remain exercisable by the Employee or the
Employee’s representative or Estate for the period of the lesser of (i) the
original term of the stock option or (ii) five years.”
 
 2.  In
Section 7(c), the third to last word shall read “or” instead of “and.”
  3. The
following sentence shall be added after the first sentence in Section
7(f):
 
 “In
addition, if the Agreement if terminated by either the Company or the Employee
pursuant to this Section 7(f), all stock options and other awards under the
Company’s stock option plans shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for
the period of the lesser of (i) the original term of the stock option or (ii)
five years.”
 
  Other
than as provided for herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
 
 The
parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.
  **EDGAR ONLINE,
      INC.**Date: January 31,
    2005
    By:
    /s/ Greg D.
AdamsCOO and
CFO
  ****By:
    /s/ SUSAN
  STRAUSBERGSusan Strausberg
Exhibit 99-1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the "Registrant")
hereby  certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter  ended March 31, 2003 fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
therein fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

     A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.




                                                /s/ David J. Bursic
                                                --------------------------------
                                                David J. Bursic
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 15, 2003

                                      E-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial 
statements as of and for the nine month period ended June 27, 1998 
included in this Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such condensed consolidated 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>			0000910394
<NAME>			KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000
<CURRENCY>	     	U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>			        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	        SEP-26-1998 
<PERIOD-START>	        SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>	        JUN-27-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>	                  1            
<CASH>		                136
<SECURITIES>	                  0         
<RECEIVABLES>	             14,057   
<ALLOWANCES>	                445               
<INVENTORY>	             21,605     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	             40,873
<PP&E>		             48,803
<DEPRECIATION>	             13,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	             82,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             26,676
<BONDS>		             20,000
<COMMON>		                 50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>	                  0
<OTHER-SE>	             35,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      82,979
<SALES>		             83,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	             83,381
<CGS>		             74,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>	             74,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	              1,816 
<INCOME-PRETAX>	              2,027 
<INCOME-TAX>	                771 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	              1,256 
<DISCONTINUED>	                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	                  0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>	              1,256 
<EPS-PRIMARY>	                .27 
<EPS-DILUTED>	                .27 

</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

3/27/23

Eastern District of Texas

GS HOLISTIC, LLC

4:23-cv-243

HAPPY SMOKE LLC d/b/a HAPPY SMOKE, AHMED

ALDHAMARI, ALEXANDER ALHADDAD, and SAM

MOHAMED ALDHAMARI,

SAM MOHAMED ALDHAMARI

530 SEMINOLE TRL

MURPHY, TX 75094

Sanjay K. Minocha, Esquire

Minocha Law Firm

3300 Oak Lawn Avenue

Suite 700

Dallas, Texas 75219

Case 4:23-cv-00243-ALM Document 5 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 22
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

4:23-cv-243

0.00

Case 4:23-cv-00243-ALM Document 5 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 23
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00168-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.L.T. AND T.K.T., CHILDREN

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 50574

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jeremy Kyle Timmons appeals the “final decision of the parent modification” of 

K.L.T. and T.K.T. By letter dated May 26, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified Timmons 

that he must complete the docketing statement and return it to us within twenty-one 

days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32. By letter dated June 24, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified 

Timmons that the docketing statement had not been received and that the docketing 

statement must be filed within twenty-one days from the date of the letter. In the same 

letter, the Clerk warned Timmons that the appeal would be dismissed unless the 

docketing statement was filed within the time period specified. See id. 42.3(b), (c). 

More than twenty-one days have passed, and we have not received the docketing 

statement from Timmons. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See id.
In the Interest of K.L.T. and T.K.T. Page 2

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 3, 2016

[CV06]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000910632
<NAME>                        ICON Cash Flow Partners L.P. Six


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          2,845,716
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,320,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                      316,533
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> *                                      0
<PP&E>                                         19,100,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,436,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,997,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> **                                0
<BONDS>                                        17,665,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,865,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,997,586
<SALES>                                         3,954,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,997,578
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,645,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,244,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,108,255
<EPS-BASIC>                                        2.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2.89
<FN>
*    The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.

**   The  Partnership  has  an  unclassified  balance  sheet  in  its  financial
     statements due to the nature of its industry.  A value of "0" was used for
     current assets and liabilities.
</FN>




</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1953

To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on land held in trust

for the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the Guidiville Band

of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1999

Mrs. BONO (for herself and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on

land held in trust for the Torres Martinez Desert

Cahuilla Indians and the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF 99-YEAR LEASES.

4 The first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to au5 thorize the leasing of restricted Indian lands for public,

6 religious, educational, residential, business, and other pur7 poses requiring the grant of long-term leases’’, approved

8 August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended by insert-
2

•HR 1953 IH

1 ing ‘‘lands held in trust for the Torres Martinez Desert

2 Cahuilla Indians, lands held in trust for the Guidiville

3 Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian

4 Rancheria,’’ after ‘‘the Soboba Indian Reservation,’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to any

7 lease entered into or renewed after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act.

Æ
Raul VILLARREAL and Fidel Villarreal, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5468.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 26, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 26, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0196. JOEY SINGLETARY v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2019R12482 2019R12579
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/15/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      326,566
COMMITMENTS
  72,640  111,615   47,110  181,176  139,639  300,926  298,364   25,640   28,202

CHANGES FROM 05/08/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -219)
  -1,787      579    5,890   -5,354   -9,101   -1,251   -2,632    1,032    2,413

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    22.2     34.2     14.4     55.5     42.8     92.1     91.4      7.9      8.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      31       57       64       34       38      112      123
```

----

Updated May 21, 2012
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

ISRAEL ANTONIO TORRES, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

KEITH FOUST, et al., 

 Defendants. 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

Case No. 6:23-cv-145-JDK-JDL 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Plaintiff Israel Antonio Torres, a Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmate 

proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case 

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636. 

On April 10, 2023, Judge Love issued a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that the Court dismiss this case with prejudice as malicious. Docket 

No. 14. As the Report explained, Plaintiff raised the same claims that he raises in 

this lawsuit in a previous lawsuit, case number 6:23-cv-107. Plaintiff objected. 

Docket No. 12. 

Where a party timely objects to the Report and Recommendation, the Court 

reviews the objected-to findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo. 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire 

record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United 

Case 6:23-cv-00145-JDK-JDL Document 25 Filed 06/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 101
2 

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other 

grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from 

ten to fourteen days). 

While Plaintiff raises several issues in his objections, he does not address the 

conclusion that this lawsuit is malicious based on the previous lawsuit based on the 

same claims. Pittman v. Moore, 980 F.2d 994, 994-95 (5th Cir. 1993); Sowell v. Estelle 

Medical Department, 2022 WL 3229982 (5th Cir. 2022) (affirming dismissal of 

duplicative case as frivolous). 

Having conducted a de novo review of the record in this case and the 

Magistrate Judge’s Report, the Court has determined that the Report of the 

Magistrate Judge is correct, and Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. Accordingly, 

the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 14) as 

the opinion of the District Court. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

The dismissal of this case shall not prevent Plaintiff from pursuing his claims in case 

number 6:23-cv-107 and shall have no effect upon the progress of that case. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of

___________________________________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7th June, 2023.

Case 6:23-cv-00145-JDK-JDL Document 25 Filed 06/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 102
In Re Melvin T. BELL, petitioner.

No. 18-6514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.