alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

LUFKIN DIVISION

DAVID KING, JR. §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:23-CV-75

TEX. DEP’T CRIM. JUST., ET AL. § 

 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff David King, Jr., an inmate confined at the Wainwright Unit of the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

This action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), a prisoner bringing a civil rights action in forma pauperis

shall be required to pay the full filing fee. When insufficient funds exist to pay the full filing fee at

the time of filing, a prisoner requesting to proceed in forma pauperis is required to pay an initial

partial filing fee of twenty percent of the greater of the average monthly balance in or deposits into

the prisoner’s account. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, twenty percent of each month’s

income is deducted from the prisoner’s inmate account until the full filing fee is paid.

Plaintiff did not submit an account statement from an authorized prison official. Thus, the

court is unable to assess an initial partial filing fee in accordance with § 1915(b). However, on his

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff stated that he owns a United States Bond

Case 9:23-cv-00075-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 04/24/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 91
valued at approximately $100,000,000.00. In light of Plaintiff’s assertions concerning his financial

status, made under penalty of perjury, Plaintiff has sufficient funds to pay the full filing fee. 

Accordingly, his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied. 

Recommendation 

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied, and Plaintiff should

be allowed thirty days to pay the filing fee of $402.00.

Objections

Within fourteen days after receipt of the magistrate judge’s report, any party may serve and

file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the

magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and

recommendations contained within this report within fourteen days after service shall bar an

aggrieved party from the entitlement of de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings,

conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal

conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United

Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.

CIV. P. 72. 

2

_________________________

Zack Hawthorn

United States Magistrate Judge SIGNED this 24th day of April, 2023.

Case 9:23-cv-00075-MAC-ZJH Document 5 Filed 04/24/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 92
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

NATHAN PHILLIP WEBSTER

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL NO. 4:23-CR-96-ALM-KPJ

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, 

this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

The Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #16) that

Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for term of

twenty (20) months, to run consecutive to any other term of imprisonment, with no supervised 

release to follow. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that Defendant receive three 

hundred and seventy (370) days credit to his term of imprisonment for over-serving on his previous 

sentence.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #16) and having 

received Defendant’s waiver of his right to object to the proposed findings and recommendations 

of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #15), the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of 

the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and 

conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Defendant is hereby sentenced to a term of twenty (20) 

months, to run consecutive to any other term of imprisonment, with no supervised release to 

follow. The Court further recommends that Defendant receive three hundred and seventy (370) 

days credit to his term of imprisonment for over-serving on his previous sentence. The Court 

further recommends Defendant be placed at FCI Seagoville in Seagoville, Texas, if appropriate.

Case 4:23-cr-00096-ALM-KPJ Document 16 Filed 05/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 49
2

Case 4:23-cr-00096-ALM-KPJ Document 16 Filed 05/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 50
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50854

____________

Kaylee Lartigue, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Northside Independent School District, 

Defendant—Appellee.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CV-393

______________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before Higginbotham, Smith, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. At the request of one 

of its members, the court was polled, and a majority did not vote in favor of 

rehearing (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35). 

In the en banc poll, five judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc

(Richman, Jones, Smith, Duncan, and Oldham) and twelve voted against 

(Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho,

Engelhardt, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 1, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the general partner ofCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland              Bruce L. Cleland    Chief Executive Officer    November 14, 2005  
-E 2-
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/06/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      127,609
COMMITMENTS
  35,055   19,319   14,831   62,242   69,703  112,128  103,853   15,481   23,756

CHANGES FROM 02/28/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,420)
    -425   -3,309     -703   -2,348     -638   -3,476   -4,650     -944      230

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    27.5     15.1     11.6     48.8     54.6     87.9     81.4     12.1     18.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      153)
      36       38       24       48       60       99      111
```

----

Updated March 9, 2012
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as general partner of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Campbell Strategic
Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                                        CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                                        By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general
                                            partner

                                        By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bruce L. Cleland
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            May 13, 2003

                                      -E 2-
H. R. 1959

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 643 East Durango Boulevard in San

Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Adrian A. Spears Judicial Training Center’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 643 East Durango Boulevard

in San Antonio, Texas, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Adrian A. Spears Judicial Training Center’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Adrian

A. Spears Judicial Training Center’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
SECURIFORCE INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, LLC, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-37.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

No. 17-1335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Motion of respondent Robert Thompson for Attorney's fees and expenses granted. The Court approves the parties' agreed upon attorney's fees of $14,732.50, and expenses of $1,152.63, to be paid by Consolidation Coal Co.
John A. MORIARTY, et ux., petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-1234.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 21
                                          Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Jurisdiction of
                                                   Incorporation/Formation       Percent of Ownership
Parent(s)           Subsidiary
<S>                                                                                 <C>
MFB Corp.           MFB Financial                          Federal                  100%
MFB Financial       Mishawaka Financial Services, Inc.     Indiana                  100%
MFB Financial       MFB Investments I, Inc.                Nevada                   100%
                    ("MFB I")
MFB I               MFB Investments II, Inc.               Nevada                   100%
                    ("MFB II")
MFB I and MFB II    MFB Investments, LP                    Nevada                   100%

</TABLE>
Alvin S. KANOFSKY, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-1227.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7285

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARL ERIC HOPKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1)

Submitted: January 27, 2022 Decided: February 1, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Eric Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Eric Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Hopkins, No. 3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 20, 2021). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Randolph Johnson SPAIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6451.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99-3




                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                        -------------------------------



Board of Directors and Stockholders
WVS Financial Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of WVS Financial
Corporation and subsidiary as of September 30, 2002, and the related
consolidated statement of income and cash flows for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated statement of changes in
stockholders' equity for the three-month period ended September 30, 2002. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated July 26, 2002, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
------------------------
Wexford, PA
November 8, 2002
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the "Registrant")
hereby  certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended  December 31, 2003 fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained  therein  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                   /s/ David J. Bursic
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   David J. Bursic
                                                   President and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 17, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-3
Jeffery Dana SPARKS, petitioner, v. Jeff PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

No. 18-5985.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO. 5:23-CR-9

§

ZACHARY ARZOLA; AKA ZACHARY 

CASTANEDA

§

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable J. Boone Baxter, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Baxter conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 39). Judge 

Baxter recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and conditionally approve the 

plea agreement. He further recommended that the Court finally adjudge Defendant as guilty of 

Count 2 of the Indictment. Count 2 of the Indictment charges violation of 18 U.S.C. ' 2423(b), 

travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct. The Court is of the opinion that the Report 

and Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 39) is ADOPTED. It is 

further

ORDERED that the Defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. 

Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence 

report. It is finally 

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant’s plea agreement, the Court finds the 

Defendant GUILTY of Count 2 of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a

Case 5:23-cr-00009-RWS-JBB Document 40 Filed 10/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 116
2

JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count 2 of the Indictment.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of October, 2024.

Case 5:23-cr-00009-RWS-JBB Document 40 Filed 10/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 117
James E. WHITNEY, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

No. 18-6444.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Carlos Rafael ACOSTA-JOAQUIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6198.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Exhibit
      32.4








Certification
      of Chief Accounting Officer





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.

















Date:
      November 3, 2005








/s/
      Ray Sienko


Ray
      Sienko


Chief
      Accounting Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Century Casinos, Inc. and will be retained by Century Casinos, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.