alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints James R. Maronick, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, of Solitario Exploration & Royalty Corp.  and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|NAME                  | DATE         
|--------------------- | -------------
|/s/                   |              
|Mark E. Jones, III    | March 8, 2011
|/s/                   |              
|Brian Labadie         | March 8, 2011
|/s/                   |              
|Christopher E. Herald | March 8, 2011
|/s/                   |              
|Leonard Harris        | March 8, 2011
|/s/                   |              
|John Hainey           | March 8, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that David A. Nelson, of the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan LLP, enters his appearance in this matter for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 

and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and consents to electronic services of all papers in this 

action.

Dated: November 12, 2024 By: /s/ David A. Nelson

David A. Nelson

IL Bar No. 6209623

davenelson@quinnemanuel.com

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 

SULLIVAN, LLP

191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 2700

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone: (312) 705-7400

Attorneys for Defendants

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and

Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 217 Filed 11/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

16926
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document has been served on November 12, 2024 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). 

/s/ David A. Nelson

David A. Nelson

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 217 Filed 11/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

16927
Edwin David CORBETT, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-5806.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2010 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date: May 13, 2010 |                                              |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                              |
|                    |                                              |
|                    | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe                               |
|                    | Thomas F. Wolfe                                   |
|                    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Noel AQUINO-FLORENCIANI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6150.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that James “Travis” Underwood of Gillam & Smith, LLP enters 

his appearance on behalf of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics 

America, Inc.in this matter as additional counsel.

James “Travis” Underwood may receive all communications from the Court and from 

other parties at Gillam & Smith, LLP, 102 N. College, Suite 800, Tyler, Texas 75702; 

Telephone: (903) 934-8450; Facsimile: (903) 934-9257; e-mail travis@gillamsmithlaw.com.

Dated: December 13, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James Travis Underwood

James Travis Underwood

Texas Bar No. 24102587

GILLAM & SMITH, LLP

102 N. College, Suite 800

Tyler, Texas 75702

Telephone: (903) 934-8450

Facsimile: (903) 934-9257

Email: travis@gillamsmithlaw.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONIC CO., LTD; 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,

INC.; and SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO. LTD., 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 293 Filed 12/13/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

21536
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic 

service are being served this 13th day of December 2024, with a copy of this document via the 

Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ James Travis Underwood

 James Travis Underwood

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 293 Filed 12/13/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

21537
Samuel KWUSHUE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Vice-Chairman and President


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Century  Casinos,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations of the
Company.





     Date:  October 29, 2003

     /s/ Peter Hoetzinger
     _________________
     Peter Hoetzinger
     Vice-Chairman and President
Charles S. RENCHENSKI, petitioner, v. Tom McGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 18-5672.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Darrell D. WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8125.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Alejandro AMOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, ex rel. Juan PENA, et al.

No. 18-5710.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 3.2**

*STATE OF DELAWARE*

*SECRETARY OF STATE*

*DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS*

*FILED 09:00 MI 05/20/1999*

*991201701*— *2999595*

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT 

OF 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 

OF 

RUBINCON VENTURES INC. 

RUBINCON VENTURES INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue ofthe General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY: 

FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation at ameeting duly convened and held, adopted the following resolution: 

RESOLVED that the Board of Directors hereby declares it advisable and inthe best interest of the Company that Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read as follows: 

Twenty-Five Million(25,000,000) shares with a par value of One Mil ($0.00**)**per share, amount to Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000). 

SECOND:That the said amendment has been consent to and authorized by the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote by written consent given in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the General CorporationLaw of the State of Delaware. 

THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions ofSection 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused thisCertificate to be signed by Carsten Mide, this 12th day of April A.D., 1999.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6870

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTWOYNE L. WYATT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:03-cr-00173-HEH; 3:07-cv-327)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 25, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antwoyne L. Wyatt, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Antwoyne L. Wyatt seeks to appeal the district court’s

order treating his motion challenging the district court’s

jurisdiction over his criminal case as a successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid

v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Wyatt has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMED ALFER VELASQUEZVELASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

 v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-72040

Agency No. A088-450-626

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 7, 2019** 

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, Hawkins and McKeown, Circuit Judges. 

Amed Alfer Velasquez-Velasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his

FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
application for withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252 and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition. 

Whether a group constitutes a “particular social group” is a question of law

that we review de novo, Perdomo v. Holder, 611 F.3d 662, 665 (9th Cir. 2010), but

we defer to the BIA’s interpretation of governing statutes and regulations,

Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial

evidence the agency’s factual findings. See Silva-Pereira v. Lynch, 827 F.3d 1176,

1184 (9th Cir. 2016). 

The BIA did not err in finding that Velasquez-Velasquez has not established

membership in a cognizable social group. He has not established that “repatriated

young males returning to Guatemala after a lengthy stay in the United States” or

“Guatemalan citizens who have returned from the United States who are targets of

kidnapping and extortion” would be perceived by society as a particular social

group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (explaining

cognizability standard) (citing Matter of M-E-G-V-, 26 I & N Dec. 227, 237 (BIA

2014)). Velasquez-Velasquez’s claim that he belongs to the social group of

returning “Guatemalan adult male[s] who . . . previously resisted recruitment into

the gangs [in Guatemala] and [who were] threatened with death as a result,” was

never presented to the agency and is therefore unexhausted. See Barron v.

2
Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts lack jurisdiction to review

claims not presented to the agency). Finally, Velasquez-Velasquez has not

established that he would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (petitioner’s “desire to be

free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang

members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, Velasquez-Velasquez’s

withholding of removal claim fails. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 

3
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of RF Micro Devices, Inc.; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |
|                                  |
| /s/ ROBERT A. BRUGGEWORTH             |
| Robert A. Bruggeworth                 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 23.2



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors and Stockholders

MetaSolv, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of MetaSolv, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of MetaSolv, Inc. as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period
ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of MetaSolv, Inc.



|             |  |                    
|------------ |  | -------------------
|Form Type    |  | Registration Number
|Form S-8     |  | 333-112685         
|Form S-8     |  | 333-112684         
|Form S-8     |  | 333-103740         
|Form S-8     |  | 333-103742         
|Form S-8     |  | 333-83730          
|Form S-8     |  | 333-83732          
|Form S-8     |  | 333-91435          
|Form S-8     |  | 333-91233          
|Form S-8 POS |  | 333-91435          
|Form S-8 POS |  | 333-91233          
|Form S-8     |  | 333-129586         



/s/    KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas

February 20, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
Of The Keith Companies, Inc.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, U.S.C. §1350, and accompanies the annual report on
Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the period ended December 31, 2002 of The Keith
Companies, Inc. (the Issuer).

I, Aram Keith, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:



| | (i)  |  | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.       

Dated: March 21, 2003

|                  |               |  | 
|----------------- | ------------- |  | 
|/s/ Aram H. Keith |               | 
|Name:             | Aram H. Keith | 
|                  |               | 

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 21st day of March 2003.

|                     |                   |  | 
|-------------------- | ----------------- |  | 
|/s/Linda M. Phillips |                   | 
|Name:                | Linda M. Phillips | 
|                     |                   | 
|Title: Notary Public |                   | 

My commission expires: 05/07/2003
# Europeiska unionens C 6A/6 ja

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 6A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 65 årgången6 januari 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 6A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

65 årgången6 januari 2022

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | Rättelser |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Rättelse till Meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/396/21 – Iriskspråkiga (GA) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 466 A, 18.11.2021 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

Rättelser

2022/C 6 A/01

Rättelse till Meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/396/21 – Iriskspråkiga (GA) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 466 A, 18.11.2021 )

( EUT C 466 A, 18.11.2021 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

Rättelser

| 6.1.2022 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 6/1

---

Rättelse till Meddelande om allmänt uttagningsprov – Epso/AD/396/21 – Iriskspråkiga (GA) juristlingvister (AD 7)

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 466 A av den 18 november 2021
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

Sidan 1, strax under titeln

| I stället för: | ”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 21 december 2021 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  ” |
| --- | --- |

I stället för:

”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 21 december 2021 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  ”

| ska det stå: | ”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 25 januari 2022 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid, Luxemburg)
  ”. |
| --- | --- |

ska det stå:

ska det stå

”
  Sista ansökningsdag: den 25 januari 2022 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid, Luxemburg)
  ”.

Sidan 5, sista stycket

| I stället för: | ”Gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities senast


  den 21 december 2021 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  ” |
| --- | --- |

I stället för:

I stället för

”Gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities senast

den 21 december 2021 kl. 12.00 (centraleuropeisk tid)
  ”

| ska det stå: | ”Gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities senast


  den 25 januari 2022 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid, Luxemburg)
  ”. |
| --- | --- |

ska det stå:

ska det stå

”Gör en webbansökan via Epsos webbplats https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities senast

den 25 januari 2022 kl. 12.00 (lokal tid, Luxemburg)
  ”.

---
<PAGE>


                      [Kaynar Technologies Inc. Letterhead]





January 13, 1999



HAND DELIVERED





Boeing Commercial Airplane Group
Material Division
P.O. Box 3707
Seattle, Washington  98124-2207

Attention: Brian E. Schmidt

        Re:  GENERAL TERMS AGREEMENT NO. BCA-65751-029

Dear Mr. Schmidt:

        Kaynar Technologies Inc. ("KTI") has recently entered into a merger
agreement with The Fairchild Corporation ("Fairchild"), and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Dah-Dah, Inc. (the "Fairchild Sub"). Upon satisfaction of the
conditions set forth in the merger agreement, the Fairchild Sub will merge into
KTI and KTI will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Fairchild.

        KTI has previously entered into the General Terms Agreement, No.
BCA-65751-029, dated as of September 20, 1996 (the "Agreement") with The Boeing
Company ("Boeing"). This notice and request for consent is provided in
accordance with sections 25.1 and 25.3 of the Agreement. In particular, we
request that Boeing waive its right to exercise the license rights in the
Licensed Property (as defined in the Agreement) under subsection 24.0(b) of the
Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, as a result of the merger with
the Fairchild Sub. We understand that the waiver (i) is conditioned upon the
acquisition of Kaynar by Fairchild (or a subsidiary of Fairchild) on or before
June, 1999, after which date the waiver will expire unless it has been extended
in writing by an authorized representative of Boeing, and (ii) applies to
subsection 24.0(b) only. To confirm your acknowledgment, and waiver with respect
to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, please execute and
return this document to my attention.



<PAGE>

        Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. If
you need any additional information, please call me. Because we are in the
process of completing a merger involving publicly traded corporations, we ask
that you keep this request confidential.


                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Jordan A. Law

                                            Jordan A. Law
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

THE BOEING COMPANY
by and through its division
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group


By: /S/ BRIAN E. SCHMIDT
    -------------------------------
Name: BRIAN E. SCHMIDT
      -----------------------------
Title: CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
       ----------------------------
Johnson Christopher JAMERSON, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-5878.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Harvey L. SHOATE, petitioner, v. Jason LEWIS, Warden.

No. 18-6230.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.