alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mbcc-ex1056_85.htm



Exhibit 10.56

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF COMMERCIAL TIME

 

This Amendment dated as of February 14, 2019 by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Quorum Broadcasting of Missouri, Inc. (“Nexstar”), and Mission Broadcasting, Inc., as assignee of VHR Broadcasting of Springfield, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Agreement for Sale of Commercial Time dated February 16, 1999, as amended December 30, 2003 and extended (the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, the Agreement expires by its terms on February 16, 2019; and

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar and Mission desire to extend the Agreement for two additional terms.

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Paragraph 1 of the Agreement (Term of the Agreement) is hereby amended to provide that upon the expiration of the current term, the term of this Agreement will be extended for an additional eight (8) year term (the “Renewal Term”); and that upon expiration of the Renewal Term, unless otherwise terminated by either Party, the term of the Agreement will be extended automatically for an additional eight (8) year term.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full.




 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Shared Services Agreement as of the date first written above.


		
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
Name:
	
 Dennis Thatcher

	
Title:
	
 President

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas E. Carter

	
Name:
	
 Thomas E. Carter

	
Title:
	
 EVP and Chief Financial Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2074

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used in water

treatment and beauty care products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 1999

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical used

in water treatment and beauty care products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.61.03 Phosphonic acid, (1-

hydroxyethylidene)bis-

(CAS No. 2809–21–4)

(provided for in subheading 2931.00.9030) Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2001 ’’.
2

•HR 2074 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Donald G. ANTHONY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
INDIEZONE, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Todd ROOKE, et al.

No. 18-233.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/31/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       39,085
COMMITMENTS
   8,206    1,186      159   20,871   27,674   29,236   29,019    9,849   10,066

CHANGES FROM 07/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        250)
     195    1,003      109     -218     -775       86      337      164      -87

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.0      3.0      0.4     53.4     70.8     74.8     74.2     25.2     25.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       49)
      13        3        4       27       22       40       29
```

----

Updated August 3, 2012
Janice FRANCE, petitioner, v. Sharon PATRICK.

No. 17-1684.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 

4

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 110-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1957
Plaintiff 000264App. 24

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 110-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1958
Plaintiff 000290App. 25

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 110-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1959
Plaintiff 000296App. 26

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 110-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1960
Plaintiff 000297App. 27

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 110-4 Filed 05/17/24 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1961
Jean COULTER, petitioner, v. Cathy BISSOON, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, et al.

No. 18-497.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
GTC TELECOM CORP.
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




To  the  Board  of  Directors
GTC  Telecom  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration  Statements  on  Form  S-8  (File  Nos.  333-88521,  333-94969  and
333-37496)  of  our report dated July 27, 2001 appearing in the Annual Report on
Form  10-KSB  of  GTC Telecom Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30,
2001.



                                         /s/ Corbin & Wertz
                                         CORBIN & WERTZ


Irvine,  California
September  5,  2001
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications





The
undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Jinzanghuang
Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Jinzanghuang Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Jinzanghuang
Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





February
      19, 2010
            /s/ Xue
      BangyiXue Bangyi (Chief Executive Officer)February
      19, 2010
            /s/ Zeng
      YilingZeng Yiling (Chief Financial
Officer)
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/01/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      318,793
COMMITMENTS
  86,261  114,206   37,831  173,351  145,492  297,443  297,529   21,350   21,264

CHANGES FROM 04/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     18,164)
   4,399   12,106    3,868    8,767    2,895   17,034   18,869    1,130     -705

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.1     35.8     11.9     54.4     45.6     93.3     93.3      6.7      6.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      131)
      28       54       52       31       38       95      118
```

----

Updated May 4, 2012
Ellis KEYES, applicant, v. Edison BANKS.

No. 18A365.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Application for stay addressed to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and referred to the Court denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1999

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration

projects.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization

demonstration projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Community

5 Nursing Demonstration Extension Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1999 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MEDICARE COMMUNITY

2 NURSING ORGANIZATION DEMONSTRATION

3 PROJECTS.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law and in

5 addition to the extension provided under section 4019 of

6 the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, demonstration projects

7 conducted under section 4079 of the Omnibus Budget

8 Reconciliation Act of 1987 shall be conducted for an addi9 tional period of 3 years, and the deadline for any report

10 required relating to the results of such projects shall be

11 not later than 6 months before the end of such additional

12 period.

Æ
Solomon David ROBERTS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5742.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         491,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,861,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,352,212
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,976,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          454,631
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,976,903
<SALES>                                          7,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,751
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,983
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,462)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (18.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18.46)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40308

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SHPETIM KONCI, also known as Timi, also known as Kujtim Goxhaj,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-193-3

Before KING, DAVIS and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Shpetim Konci has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Konci has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40308 Document: 00512505770 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2014
No. 13-40308

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40308 Document: 00512505770 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2014
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WALTER CORSE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1752

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 11, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and 

Lisa Lott, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Walter Corse, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CRENSHAW, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Randolph MOORE, petitioner, v. NEVADA, et al.

No. 18-6182.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.
Shane K. FLOYD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5118.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Matthew James DURY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6596.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         803,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 824,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,000
<BONDS>                                        339,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     434,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   824,039
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,588
<CGS>                                           36,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,054
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,549
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1436 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1436

        To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 1999

   Mr. Ballenger (for himself, Mr. Hall of Texas, and Mr. Stenholm) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STANDARDS.

    Section 6(b)(2) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 
(29 U.S.C 655(b)(2)) is amended by inserting after the first sentence 
the following: ``The notice in the Federal Register shall include 
identification of the specific industry or industries to which the 
standard, to be promulgated under the rule, will apply. In promulgating 
a standard, the Secretary shall ensure that the standard, as applicable 
to each such industry, is based upon an assessment of the risks to 
workers in such industry from the hazard which is the subject of the 
standard, the range of estimates and the best estimate of the 
quantifiable and nonquantifiable benefits of the standard in each such 
industry, and an analysis of the costs likely to occur in each such 
industry as a result of compliance with the standard. To the extent 
that information is not available on the specific risks to workers in 
any such industry, the Secretary may determine risks and benefits on 
information from similar industries, operations, or processes.''.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s

request for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

WILLIAM LAMBERT, Jr., 

a.k.a. Duta,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30012

D.C. No. 1:93-cr-00043-JDS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

William Lambert, Jr., appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

FILED

SEP 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30012

and we affirm.

Lambert contends that the district court erred under United States v. Grant,

664 F.3d 276 (9th Cir. 2011), when it imposed a term of imprisonment for the

purpose of rehabilitation. The record reflects that the court did not impose a

custodial sentence to promote Lambert’s rehabilitation. Moreover, given

Lambert’s significant breach of trust, reflected by the fact that he violated

conditions of his supervised release within weeks of being released, the sentence is

substantively reasonable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); United States v. Miqbel, 444

F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (at a revocation sentencing, a district court may

sanction the defendant for his breach of trust).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

TREMUIR ARNAE HARRINGTON

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 4:23-CR-00090

ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND FINDING DEFENDANT GUILTY

The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge for administration of 

a guilty plea under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The Magistrate Judge conducted a 

hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and issued Findings of Fact and 

Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge Defendant guilty on Count One of the Indictment.

The parties have not objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings.

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of 

the United States Magistrate Judge. The court also accepts Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance 

of the plea agreement until after review of the presentence report.

In accordance with Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court finds Defendant Tremuir Arnae 

Harrington GUILTY of Count One of the Indictment, charging a violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 

922(g)(1) - Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon.

Case 4:23-cr-00090-ALM-AGD Document 31 Filed 07/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 71
Case 4:23-cr-00090-ALM-AGD Document 31 Filed 07/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 72