alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00099

- CV

ELLIS CENTRAL APPRAI SAL DISTRICT

AND ELLIS CENTRAL APPRAI SAL

REVIEW BOARD

, Appellant s

v.

HOLNAM TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

, Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Cour t No. 66519

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal was filed on December 7, 2011. In

the motion, the parties assert that they have reached an agreement to settle all matters

and issues in controversy between them. They further assert that a dismissal of the

appeal will allow the settlement agreement to be effective and will end the litigation

between the parties. The motion is signed by counsel for both parties.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).Ellis Central Appraisal Dist. v. Holnam Page 2

Justice Scoggins did not participate in this decision.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, and

Justice Davis,

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 14, 2011

[CV06]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 195

To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to certain

water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself and Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31,

1994, to certain water resistant wool trousers that were

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption,

after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN

4 ENTRIES.

5 Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of

6 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request

7 filed with the Customs Service within 180 days after the
2

•HR 195 IH

1 date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal

2 from warehouse for consumption—

3 (1) that was made after December 31, 1988,

4 and before January 1, 1995, and

5 (2) that, if it had been made on January 1,

6 1995—

7 (A) would have been claimed under sub8 heading 6203.41.05 or 6204.61.10 of the Har9 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States,

10 and

11 (B) would have had a lower duty,

12 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such entry or with13 drawal had been made on January 1, 1995.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2204

EMMANUEL EDOKOBI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

M & M MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; JUAN GONZALEZ; MORTGAGE 

SPECIALIST, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-

cv-03707-PWG)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Edokobi, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen James Marshall, 

Andrew Thor Stephenson, FRANKLIN & PROKOPIK, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Edokobi appeals the district court’s order 

granting the motion to dismiss filed by M & M Mortgage Services, 

Inc., and Juan Gonzalez and dismissing his complaint against all 

Defendants as barred by the doctrine of res judicata.∗

 We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edokobi 

v. M & M Mortg. Servs., Inc., No. 8:13-cv-03707-PWG (D. Md. Oct. 

22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 ∗ Although the prefiling injunction determination remains 

pending in the district court, it appears that the district 

court has completed its consideration of the merits of this case 

based on its dismissal of Edokobi’s claims. See Ray Haluch 

Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of the Int’l Union of Operating 

Eng’rs & Participating Emp’rs, 134 S. Ct. 773, 779 (2014)

(holding pending motion for attorney’s fees collateral to merits 

for finality purposes). We therefore conclude that the district 

court’s order dismissing Edokobi’s complaint as barred by res 

judicata is final and appealable.
Theodore C. SHOVE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-9005.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAffinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.             This statement is providedpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.             The Periodic Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.             The information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of dates and for theperiods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date: November 12, 2009 |                                  |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |                                  |
|                         | /s/ Michael A. Schneider              |
|                         | Michael A. Schneider                  |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q/A-1 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       815,081
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,849,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                (104,094)
<INVENTORY>                               11,658,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          19,533,039
<PP&E>                                     8,025,180
<DEPRECIATION>                            (4,284,675)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            35,317,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     26,736,057
<BONDS>                                    9,127,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,966
<COMMON>                                       1,700
<OTHER-SE>                                  (551,936)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              35,317,634
<SALES>                                   56,442,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          56,442,962
<CGS>                                     29,613,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             35,369,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           9,716,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,701,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (19,957,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (21,453,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (870,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (22,323,757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.76)


</TABLE>
Allen R. BLAIR, petitioner, v. YUM BRANDS, et al.

No. 17-8471.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Bani MORENO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M25.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

*302Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL L. SHORT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Chief District

Judge. (CR-01-10039; CA-04-642-7)

Submitted: September 6, 2006 Decided: September 27, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Rebecca Bockhorst,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Short seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Short has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
APPLE INC., petitioner, v. Robert PEPPER, et al.

No. 17-204.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Alfredo MARTINEZ-REY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 24

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc. (formerly known as NationsLink Funding Corporation), as depositor for Commercial Loan Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-LTL-1, (the "Depositor"), under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 15, 1999  (the "PSA"), does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee under the PSA ("LaSalle"), as its true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the limited purpose of preparing, executing and filing, in the Depositor's name, SEC Form 10-K with all required attachments and any other items specifically provided in the PSA to be executed and filed by LaSalle on behalf of the Depositor.

The Depositor hereby undertakes to ratify and confirm any and all action that LaSalle may do or cause to be done within the scope of the authority conferred hereby.  LaSalle is authorized to deliver copies of this Limited Power of Attorney to third parties, who may rely hereon.

This Limited Power of Attorney shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York and shall be irrevocable from the date hereof and shall remain in full force and effect until due written notice of its revocation is given by the undersigned to LaSalle by registered mail.

Dated:  March 28, 2003		Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
					(formerly known as NationsLink Funding Corporation)

By: /s/

CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF North Carolina 	)
	)	ss:
COUNTY OF Mecklenburg	)

On the 28thday of March, 2003, before me, a notary public in and for said County and State, came George G. Ellison, to me known to be the Senior Vice President of Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.  (the "Corporation"), who acknowledged that he signed the foregoing instrument in the name and on behalf of the Corporation as its voluntary act and deed, pursuant to authority duly conferred upon him as an officer of the Corporation.

/s/ Cheryl D. FaustNotary Public

My Commission Expires May 19, 2006
Terrance SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*376Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
No. 6:23-cr-00033

United States of America

v.

Dontaevion Ladell Roquemore

ORDER

This criminal action was referred to United States Magistrate 

Judge K. Nicole Mitchell for administration of a guilty plea under 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate judge conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 and 

issued findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea. Doc. 31. 

The magistrate judge recommended that the court accept defendant’s guilty plea and adjudge defendant guilty on count one of the 

indictment. Id. at 2. Defendant waived his right to object to the magistrate judge’s findings. Id.

The court hereby accepts the findings of fact and recommendation on guilty plea of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court 

also accepts defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the plea 

agreement until after review of the presentence report. 

In accordance with defendant’s guilty plea, the court finds defendant Dontaevion Ladell Roquemore guilty of count one of the indictment, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) - Felon in 

Possession of a Firearm.

So ordered by the court on September 12, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cr-00033-JCB-KNM Document 33 Filed 09/12/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 73
Ronald L. GREEN, petitioner, v. Steven T. MNUCHIN, Secretary of the Treasury.

No. 17-1481.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1737 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1737

  To prohibit United States reconstruction assistance for the Federal 
Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) as a result of Operation 
                             Allied Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1999

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit United States reconstruction assistance for the Federal 
Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) as a result of Operation 
                             Allied Force.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RECONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE FOR THE FEDERAL 
              REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO).

    (a) Prohibition.--No funds appropriated or otherwise made available 
in any Act (for any fiscal year) may be obligated or expended for the 
provision of reconstruction assistance for the Federal Republic of 
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) as a result of Operation Allied 
Force.
    (b) Operation Allied Force.--In this section, the term ``Operation 
Allied Force'' means operations of the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization (NATO) conducted against the Federal Republic of 
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) during the period beginning on March 
24, 1999, and ending on such date as NATO may designate, to resolve the 
conflict with respect to Kosovo.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First American Capital
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Vincent L. Rocereto, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
covered by the Report.

Date  3/31/03			/s/ Vincent L. Rocereto
     ----------------           ------------------------
     	                        Vincent L. Rocereto
                   	        President and Chief
                                Executive Officer
Burdette LOWE, petitioner, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

No. 18-5883.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

*432Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/09/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       39,314
COMMITMENTS
   3,604      490        0   32,266   37,586   35,870   38,076    3,444    1,238

CHANGES FROM 08/02/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,681)
     245     -226        0    3,673    3,556    3,918    3,330     -237      351

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2      1.2      0.0     82.1     95.6     91.2     96.9      8.8      3.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       6        1        0       29       25       35       26
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/09/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       47,692
COMMITMENTS
   3,201    1,199        0   37,057   41,907   40,258   43,106    7,434    4,586

CHANGES FROM 08/02/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -669)
    -618        0        0     -641   -1,311   -1,259   -1,311      590      642

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.7      2.5      0.0     77.7     87.9     84.4     90.4     15.6      9.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
       9        2        0       30       25       39       27
```

----

Updated August 12, 2011
Paul Allen ANDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5709.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Donald S. HARDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6036.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Early A. ATTERBERRY, petitioner, v. John VARGA, Warden.

No. 18-8573.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

1.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

Date:       August 5, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/  Thomas F. Wolfe                     |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas F. Wolfe                                    |
|   | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided to AffinityGroup, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Hector TELLEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-8921.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.