alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (10)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,641
<PP&E>                                           3,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,723
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,158)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     82
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (14)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 96
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        96
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1




Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2009




Base Salaries




The base salaries for 2009 for the executive officers (the "named executive officers") of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") who will be named in the compensation table that will appear in the Company's upcoming 2009 annual meeting proxy statement are as follows:




Name and Title

Base SalaryGreg A. Steffens
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, Southern
Missouri Bancorp., Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Southern Bank

$
190,292William Hribovsek
Chief Lending Officer, Southern Bank


143,278William Aslin
Market Area President, Southern Bank


117,797








Description of 2009 Bonus Arrangement




The Company has no formal written incentive bonus plan for executive management; however, the compensation committee does have written guidelines regarding bonus payments. The guidelines indicate that the amount of bonus available for award to executive management should be predicated on the Company's performance in meeting
various goals, including return on equity, growth in earnings per share, efficiency and control of non-interest expense, and diversification of revenues. Officers outside of executive management (including market area presidents) generally participate in a bonus program that conditions awards upon reaching employee and branch goals regarding loan and deposit growth, and overall company profitability.




Additional information about the 2009 bonus compensation is incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in October 2009, except for information contained under the heading "Report of the Audit Committee," a copy of which will be filed
not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, petitioner, v. Gregory A. CHRISTIAN, et al.

No. 17-1498.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana granted.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement
Nos.  333-4138  and  333-4146  of Home  Bancorp on Form S-8 of our report  dated
October 12, 1999,  contained in the Annual Report to Shareholders  under Exhibit
13 to Home  Bancorp's  Annual  Report on Form  10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended
September 30, 1999.



                          /s/Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
                          --------------------------------
                          Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP



South Bend, Indiana
December 27, 1999
Case 2:23-cv-00199-JRG Document 6 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 123
Juan Carlos MENDEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6462.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Shondolyn Rochelle BLEVINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5756.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ridgewood Electric Power
      Trust III (the “Trust”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.








/s/
                Randall D. HolmesName:
            Randall
                D. HolmesTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)Dated:
            January
                25, 2008








/s/
                Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
            Jeffrey
                H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)Dated:
            January
                25, 2008
Scott Doyle BARRETT, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-6234.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Solitario Exploration& Royalty Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Christopher E. Herald, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and James R. Maronick, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

	(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Christopher E. Herald                  	                                           /s/James R. Maronick                    

Christopher E. Herald	    	                                                             JamesR. Maronick

Chief Executive Officer	                                                              ChiefFinancial Officer

 

Dated: September 10, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
REPORT AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                             201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                       733
<INVENTORY>                                     35,246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,191
<PP&E>                                          68,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,768
<BONDS>                                        119,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,256
<SALES>                                         43,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,077
<CGS>                                           33,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2218

JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:03-cv-00250-SGW) Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 21, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights complaint for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction and denying his motions for reconsideration and to reopen. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 6, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on November 8, 2006. Because Turner failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       43,073
COMMITMENTS
  14,533    3,143    3,582   15,326   26,616   33,440   33,341    9,633    9,732

CHANGES FROM 01/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        644)
     -96    1,204      205       98      113      207    1,522      437     -878

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    33.7      7.3      8.3     35.6     61.8     77.6     77.4     22.4     22.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      16       10       15       23       21       46       41
```

----

Updated January 27, 2012
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127982 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127982 

 COA: 255024 

Wayne CC: 94-013243

DEMONE J. FOX,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

MARICEL FORTEZA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

PELICAN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS

GROUP, LLC DBA AAP AND AUTO

SERVICE DEPARTMENT, US DEALER

SERVICES, INC. DBA US AUTO,

PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES, INC., SING FOR SERVICE, 

LLC DBA MEPCO

Defendants.

Case No. 4:23-CV-00401-ALM-KPJ

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The Plaintiff, Maricel Forteza, by and through the undersigned counsel, and the belowlisted Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action 

against them, with prejudice, with the respective parties to bear their own fees and costs. This 

Stipulation applies to the below-listed Defendants: 

• Pelican Investment Holdings Group, LLC D/B/A AAP;

• Auto Service Department;

• Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.; and

• Sing For Service, LLC D/B/A MEPCO

Dated: August 6, 2024

/s/ Andrew Roman Perrong

Andrew Roman Perrong (E.D. Tex. # 333687)

Perrong Law LLC 

2657 Mount Carmel Avenue

Glenside, Pennsylvania 19038

Phone: 215-225-5529 (CALL-LAW) 

Facsimile: 888-329-0305

a@perronglaw.com

Case 4:23-cv-00401-ALM-KPJ Document 52 Filed 08/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 293
2

s/ Jason S. Weiss

_______________________________

Jason S. Weiss

WEISS LAW GROUP, P.A.

5531 N. University Drive, Suite 103

Coral Springs, FL 33067

Fla. Bar No. 356890

jason@jswlawyer.com

Phone: 954.573.2800

Walker Steven Young 

SCHEEF & STONE, LLP 

Texas Bar No. 24102676 

2600 Network Blvd., Suite 400 

Frisco, Texas 75034 

(214) 472-2100 Telephone 

walker.young@solidcounsel.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

Pelican Investment Holdings Group, LLC DBA 

AAP and Auto Service Department and Palmer 

Administrative Services, Inc

REID DENNIS & FRICK, P.C.

/s/ William E. Reid 

________________________

WILLIAM E. REID

State Bar No. 16748500

wreid@reiddennis.com

2600 Dallas Parkway, Suite 380

Dallas, Texas 75034

Tel: (214) 618-1400

Fax: (214) 618-1653

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

SING FOR SERVICE, LLC DBA MEPCO

Case 4:23-cv-00401-ALM-KPJ Document 52 Filed 08/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 294
Edward Lee LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6067.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/28/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       37,150
COMMITMENTS
  12,055    1,735    2,333   15,959   25,391   30,347   29,459    6,803    7,691

CHANGES FROM 02/21/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,363)
    -982      224     -472    1,291   -1,198     -163   -1,446   -1,200       83

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.4      4.7      6.3     43.0     68.3     81.7     79.3     18.3     20.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      11        8       10       27       25       45       38
```

----

Updated March 2, 2012
Luis SEGOVIA, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-1463.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000911147
<NAME>                        Century Casinos, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         4,453,243
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    89,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,191,873
<PP&E>                                         14,312,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,778,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,361,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,783,909
<BONDS>                                        7,593,607
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       158,619
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,161,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,361,590
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,468,144
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,645,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,995,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             211,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (345,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (122,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (223,961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (223,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
LaShawn N. LOFTON, petitioner, v. SP PLUS CORP., fka Standard Parking Corporation, et al.

No. 18M63.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Robert Joseph KING, petitioner, v. Robert R. NEALL, Secretary, Maryland Department of Health, et al.

No. 18-5827.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Roberto Gonzalez DELACRUZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6428.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Michael E. BARGO, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-8761.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
In Re DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al.

No. 18A375.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,

IT IS ORDERED that the orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 3, 2018, August 17, 2018, and September 21, 2018, are stayed pending receipt of a response, due on or before October 11, 2018, by 4 p.m., and further order of the undersigned or of the Court.