30928 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2022 / Notices 

VI. Award Administration Information 

1. Award Notices: If your application 

is successful, we notify your U.S. 

Representative and U.S. Senators and 

send you a Grant Award Notification 

(GAN); or we may send you an email 

containing a link to access an electronic 

version of your GAN. We may notify 

you informally, also. 

If your application is not evaluated or 

not selected for funding, we will notify 

you. 

2. Administrative and National Policy 

Requirements: We identify 

administrative and national policy 

requirements in the application package 

and reference these and other 

requirements in the Applicable 

Regulations section of this notice. 

We reference the regulations outlining 

the terms and conditions of an award in 

the Applicable Regulations section of 

this notice and include these and other 

specific conditions in the GAN. The 

GAN also incorporates your approved 

application as part of your binding 

commitments under the grant. 

3. Open Licensing Requirements: 

Unless an exception applies, if you are 

awarded a grant under this competition, 

you will be required to openly license 

to the public grant deliverables created 

in whole, or in part, with Department 

grant funds. When the deliverable 

consists of modifications to pre-existing 

works, the license extends only to those 

modifications that can be separately 

identified and only to the extent that 

open licensing is permitted under the 

terms of any licenses or other legal 

restrictions on the use of pre-existing 

works. Additionally, a grantee or 

subgrantee that is awarded competitive 

grant funds must have a plan to 

disseminate these public grant 

deliverables. This dissemination plan 

can be developed and submitted after 

your application has been reviewed and 

selected for funding. For additional 

information on the open licensing 

requirements please refer to 2 CFR 

3474.20. 

4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a 

grant under this competition, you must 

ensure that you have in place the 

necessary processes and systems to 

comply with the reporting requirements 

in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive 

funding under the competition. This 

does not apply if you have an exception 

under 2 CFR 170.110(b). 

(b) At the end of your project period, 

you must submit a final performance 

report, including financial information, 

as directed by the Secretary. If you 

receive a multiyear award, you must 

submit an annual performance report 

that provides the most current 

performance and financial expenditure 

information as directed by the Secretary 

under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary 

may also require more frequent 

performance reports under 34 CFR 

75.720(c). For specific requirements on 

reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/ 

fund/grant/apply/appforms/ 

appforms.html. 

5. Performance Measures: For the 

purposes of Department reporting under 

34 CFR 75.110, we have established a 

set of performance measures for the 

CCAMPIS Program. The success of the 

CCAMPIS Program will be measured by 

the postsecondary persistence and 

degree completion rates of the 

CCAMPIS Program participants. All 

CCAMPIS Program grantees will be 

required to submit an annual 

performance report documenting the 

persistence and degree attainment of 

their participants. Although students 

may choose to use child care services at 

different points in their college 

enrollment, the goal is to measure the 

outcomes of student-parents based on 

their completion of their program 

within 150 percent or 200 percent of the 

published program length. The cohort 

model of evaluation will track a studentparent’s child care utilization 

throughout enrollment at the institution 

and will provide results based on the 

long-term academic success of the 

student-parent. The Department will 

aggregate the data provided in the 

annual grantee performance reports to 

determine the accomplishment level. 

This will not increase grantee reporting 

burden as CCAMPIS grantees already 

are gathering and maintaining the 

necessary data. 

6. Continuation Awards: In making a 

continuation grant under 34 CFR 

75.253, the Secretary considers, among 

other things: Whether a grantee has 

made substantial progress in achieving 

the goals and objectives of the project; 

whether the grantee has expended funds 

in a manner that is consistent with its 

approved application and budget; and, 

if the Secretary has established 

performance measurement 

requirements, whether the grantee has 

made substantial progress in achieving 

the performance targets in the grantee’s 

approved application. 

In making a continuation grant, the 

Secretary also considers whether the 

grantee is operating in compliance with 

the assurances in its approved 

application, including those applicable 

to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit 

discrimination in programs or activities 

receiving Federal financial assistance 

from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 

104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). 

VII. Other Information 

Accessible Format: On request to the 

program contact person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 

individuals with disabilities can obtain 

this document and a copy of the 

application package in an accessible 

format. The Department will provide the 

requestor with an accessible format that 

may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or 

text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 

file, braille, large print, audiotape, or 

compact disc, or other accessible format. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. You may access the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 

www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can 

view this document, as well as all other 

documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Portable Document Format 

(PDF). To use PDF you must have 

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Michelle Asha Cooper, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for the Office of 

Postsecondary Education. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10847 Filed 5–19–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Peer Review Opportunities With the 

U.S. Department of Education’s Office 

of Elementary and Secondary 

Education (OESE), Office of 

Postsecondary Education (OPE), and 

Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) 

AGENCY: Office of Elementary and 

Secondary Education, Office of 

Postsecondary Education, and Office of 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services, Department of Education. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Education (Department) announces 

opportunities for individuals to 

participate in its peer review process for 

competitive grant funding under the 

programs administered by OESE, OPE, 

and OSERS. 

DATES: Requests to serve as a peer 

reviewer for fiscal year 2022 will be 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2022 / Notices 30929 

1Please note that the Institute of Education 

Sciences (IES) uses different peer review processes 

and procedures than those described in this notice. 

More information on the IES peer review process 

can be found at: https://ies.ed.gov/director/sro/ 

application_review.asp. IES also administers its 

research grant competitions on a different timeline 

from other offices in the Department. 

accepted on an ongoing basis, aligned 

with this year’s grant competition 

schedule. Requests to serve as a peer 

reviewer should be submitted at least 

four weeks prior to the program’s 

application deadline noted on the 

Department’s website under ‘‘Forecast 

of Funding Opportunities’’ at 

www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/find/edliteforecast.html. This notice highlights the 

specific needs of OESE, OPE, and 

OSERS. 

ADDRESSES: An individual interested in 

serving as a peer reviewer must register 

and upload his or her resume in the 

Department’s grants management 

system known as ‘‘G5’’ at www.g5.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

OESE: Richard Wilson, U.S. 

Department of Education, 400 Maryland 

Avenue SW, Room 3W101, Washington, 

DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453–6709. 

Email: richard.wilson@ed.gov. 

OPE: Tonya Hardin, U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue 

SW, Room 2C205, Washington, DC 

20202. Telephone: (202) 453–7694. 

Email: tonya.hardin@ed.gov. 

OSERS: Kate Friday, U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue 

SW, Room 5081B, Potomac Center 

Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–5076. 

Telephone: (202) 245–7605. Email: 

kate.friday@ed.gov. 

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or 

have a speech disability and wish to 

access telecommunications relay 

services, please dial 7–1–1. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

mission of the Department is to promote 

student achievement and preparation 

for global competitiveness by fostering 

educational excellence and ensuring 

equal access. The Department pursues 

its mission by funding programs that 

will improve access to high-quality 

educational opportunities and programs 

that pursue innovations in teaching and 

learning with a focus on underserved 

students. The Department also funds 

programs in other areas as authorized by 

statute. Grant funds are awarded to State 

educational agencies; local educational 

agencies (i.e., school districts); State, 

local, or Tribal governments; nonprofit 

organizations; institutions of higher 

education (IHEs), including IHEs that 

have experience in the operation of 

American Indian Vocational 

Rehabilitation Service programs; and 

other entities through a competitive 

process referred to as a grant 

competition. 

Each year the Department convenes 

panels of external education 

professionals and practitioners to serve 

as peer reviewers.1 Peer reviewers 

evaluate and score submitted 

applications against competitionspecific criteria and announced 

priorities. Application scores are then 

used to inform the Secretary’s funding 

decisions. 

Executive Order 13985, Advancing 

Racial Equity and Support for 

Underserved Communities Through the 

Federal Government, directs Federal 

agencies to ‘‘assess whether 

underserved communities and their 

members face systemic barriers in 

accessing benefits and opportunities 

available pursuant to those policies and 

programs.’’ The Department is 

committed to increasing the racial and 

ethnic diversity of peer reviewers—an 

important element of the Department’s 

efforts to implement this Executive 

order. Moreover, the Department is 

particularly interested in peer reviewers 

who represent diverse experiences and 

perspectives, including experiences 

working with diverse and underserved 

communities, and whose expertise 

pertains to OESE, OPE, and OSERS 

grant competitions. 

This year, OESE is managing more 

than 20 grant competitions to fund a 

range of projects that support, among 

others, education innovation and 

research; educator growth and diversity; 

magnet schools; charter schools; gifted 

and talented programs; arts education; 

family engagement; equity technical 

assistance centers; Indian education; 

and assessments. 

Similarly, OPE is conducting nearly 

30 grant competitions to fund a wide 

range of projects, including projects to 

support improvements in educational 

quality, management, and financial 

stability at colleges and universities that 

enroll high numbers of underserved 

students; projects to provide highquality support services to improve 

retention and completion rates of 

students who are low income or firstgeneration college students or 

individuals with disabilities; projects 

designed to strengthen foreign language 

instruction, area and international 

studies, teaching and research, 

professional preparation and 

development for educators, and 

curriculum development at the K–12, 

graduate, and postsecondary levels; and 

other innovative projects designed to 

improve postsecondary education. 

OSERS is managing nearly 20 grant 

competitions. The competitions in 

OSERS’ Office of Special Education 

Programs (OSEP) include those under 

the following programs: State Personnel 

Development Grants; Personnel 

Development; Technical Assistance and 

Dissemination; Educational Technology, 

Media, and Materials; and Parent 

Training and Information. The 

remaining competition in OSERS’ 

Rehabilitation Services Administration 

(RSA) is the Disability Innovation Fund. 

The Department seeks to expand its 

pool of peer reviewers to ensure that 

applications are evaluated by 

individuals with up-to-date and relevant 

knowledge of educational interventions 

and practices across the learning 

continuum, from early education to 

college and career, in a variety of 

learning settings. Department peer 

reviewers are education professionals 

and practitioners who have gained 

subject matter expertise through their 

education and work as teachers, 

professors, principals, administrators, 

school counselors, researchers, 

evaluators, content developers, or 

vocational rehabilitation professionals 

or interpreters. Peer reviewers can be 

active education professionals in any 

educational level or sector, or those who 

are retired but stay informed of current 

educational content and issues. No prior 

experience as a peer reviewer is 

required. 

Peer reviewers for each competition 

will be selected based on several factors, 

including each reviewer’s programspecific expertise, the number of 

applications to be reviewed, and the 

diversity and availability of prospective 

reviewers. Individuals selected to serve 

as peer reviewers are expected to 

participate in training; independently 

read, score, and provide written 

evaluative comments on assigned 

applications; and participate in 

facilitated panel discussions with other 

peer reviewers. Panel discussions are 

held via conference calls or in-person, 

as identified for the specific 

competition. The time commitment for 

peer reviewers is usually several hours 

a day over a period of two to four weeks. 

Peer reviewers receive an honorarium 

payment as monetary compensation for 

successfully reviewing applications. 

If you are interested in serving as a 

peer reviewer for the Department, you 

should first review the program web 

pages of the grant programs that match 

your area of expertise. You can access 

information on each grant program from 

the link provided on the Department’s 

grants forecast page at www2.ed.gov/ 

fund/grant/find/edlite-forecast.html. If 

you have documented experience that 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
30930 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2022 / Notices 

you believe qualifies you to serve as a 

peer reviewer for one or more specific 

grant programs, please register in G5, at 

www.g5.gov, which allows the 

Department to manage and assign 

potential peer reviewers to competitions 

that may draw upon their professional 

backgrounds and expertise. A toolkit 

that includes helpful information on 

how to be considered as a peer reviewer 

for programs administered by the 

Department can be found at 

www2.ed.gov/documents/peer-review/ 

peer-reviewer-toolkit.pptx. Neither the 

submission of a resume nor registration 

in G5 guarantees you will be selected to 

be a peer reviewer. 

In addition to registering in G5, some 

OPE and OSERS/RSA peer reviews may 

require being registered in the System 

for Award Management (SAM). Since 

registration for this process can take 

longer than a week, interested 

individuals are encouraged to register in 

advance of being contacted by the 

Department. In addition to registering in 

G5, some OSERS/OSEP peer reviews 

require being approved to serve on the 

Office of Special Education’s Standing 

Panel. Individuals should express their 

interest to serve as a peer reviewer for 

OSEP competitions directly to the 

competition manager listed in the 

Notice Inviting Applications at least 

four weeks prior to the application 

closing date. 

If you have interest in serving as a 

reviewer specifically for OESE 

competitions (Chart 2 of the Forecast of 

Funding Opportunities), you must also 

send your resume to 

OESEPeerReviewRecruitment@ed.gov. 

If you have interest in serving as a 

reviewer specifically for RSA 

competitions (Chart 4B) also send your 

resume to RSAPeerReview@ed.gov and 

osersprs@ed.gov. The subject line of the 

email should read ‘‘Prospective 2022 

Peer Reviewer.’’ In the body of the 

email, list all programs for which you 

would like to be considered to serve as 

a peer reviewer. 

Requests to serve as a peer reviewer 

should be submitted at least four weeks 

prior to the program’s application 

deadline, noted on the forecast page, to 

provide program offices with sufficient 

time to review resumes and determine 

an individual’s suitability to serve as a 

peer reviewer for a specific competition. 

If you are selected to serve as a peer 

reviewer, the program office will contact 

you. 

Accessible Format: On request to the 

person(s) listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document 

and a copy of the application package in 

an accessible format. The Department 

will provide the requestor with an 

accessible format that may include Rich 

Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), 

a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc, or 

other accessible format. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. You may access the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 

www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can 

view this document, as well as all other 

documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Portable Document Format 

(PDF). To use PDF you must have 

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Program Authority: Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965, as 

amended (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.), 

Higher Education Act of 1965, as 

amended (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), 

Individuals with Disabilities Education 

Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), and the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended 

by the Workforce Innovation and 

Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.). 

Roberto J. Rodriguez, 

Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation 

and Policy Development. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10834 Filed 5–19–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

Voting System Manufacturer 

Registration, Application for Testing, 

Anomaly Reporting and Root Cause 

Analysis; Survey and Submission to 

OMB of Proposed Collection of 

Information 

AGENCY: Election Assistance 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comment. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

EAC announces an information 

collection and seeks public comment on 

the provisions thereof. The EAC intends 

to submit this proposed information 

collection to the Director of the Office 

of Management and Budget for 

approval. The U.S. Election Assistance 

Commission (EAC) is publishing four 

information collecting forms for its 

Voting System Testing and Certification 

Program. The information collected is to 

be used to improve the quality of voting 

systems used in federal elections, and to 

collect necessary key information on 

voting system manufacturers and their 

systems. Participation in this program is 

voluntary. The program is mandated by 

the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

5 p.m. on Friday, July 19, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submission of Comments: 

Comments on the proposed Testing and 

Certification forms should be submitted 

electronically via https://

www.regulations.gov (docket IDs: EAC– 

2022–0001, EAC–2022–0002, EAC– 

2022–0003, EAC–2022–0004). Written 

comments on the proposed information 

collection can also be sent to the U.S. 

Election Assistance Commission, 633 

3rd Street NW, Suite 200, Washington, 

DC 20001, Attn: Testing & Certification. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Aumayr, Senior Election Technology 

Specialist, Testing and Certification 

Program, Washington DC (301)–563– 

3919. All requests and submissions 

should be identified by the title of the 

information collection. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title and OMB Number: Manufacturer 

Registration, Application for Testing, 

Voting System Anomaly Reporting and 

Root Cause Analysis; OMB Numbers 

Pending. 

Purpose 

Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), Federal Agencies must obtain 

approval from the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 

information they conduct or sponsor. 

‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined 

in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 

1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests 

or requirements that members of the 

public submit reports, keep records, or 

provide information to a third party. 

Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA 

requires Federal Agencies to provide a 

60-day notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each proposed 

extension of an existing collection of 

information, before submitting the 

collection to OMB for approval. To 

comply with this requirement, the EAC 

is publishing notice of the proposed 

collection of information set forth in 

this document. 

HAVA requires that the EAC certify 

and decertify voting systems. Section 

231(a)(1) of HAVA (52 U.S.C. 20971) 

specifically requires the EAC to 

‘‘provide for the testing, certification, 

decertification and recertification of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES