alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
People's Credit Card Master Trust

       Independent Accountants' Report on Management's Assertion Concerning
              Internal Control Over Financial Reporting for the
               Credit Card Services Division of People's Bank


                         Independent Accountants' Report

People's Bank
850 Main Street
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604

Bankers Trust Company
Four Albany Street, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006


We have examined the assertion made by the management of People's Bank
("People's") that its Credit Card Services division (which includes the
accounts transferred to and serviced for the People's Bank Credit Card Master
Trust) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2000 that was sufficient for the prevention and detection of
misstatements due to errors or fraud in amounts that would be material to
People's consolidated financial statements.  This assertion is included in the
accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
for the Credit Card Services Division of People's Bank, dated March 15, 2001.
Management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the internal control over financial
reporting, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
the internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of the inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatements due
to errors or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Credit Card Services division
of People's maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2000 that was sufficient for the prevention and detection
of misstatements due to errors or fraud in amounts that would be material to
People's consolidated financial statements is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based upon criteria described in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 15, 2001
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/12/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      153,461
COMMITMENTS
  37,517   24,390   18,933   72,315   76,396  128,765  119,719   24,696   33,742

CHANGES FROM 06/05/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,849)
     158      506    1,476     -137     -195    1,497    1,787    3,352    3,062

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.4     15.9     12.3     47.1     49.8     83.9     78.0     16.1     22.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      39       41       47       58       58      127      126
```

----

Updated June 15, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-249 and 731-TA-262-263 and 265 (Fifth 
Review)]


Iron Construction Castings From Brazil, Canada, and China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on heavy iron 
construction castings from Brazil, the antidumping duty order on heavy 
iron construction castings from Canada, and the antidumping duty orders 
on iron construction castings from Brazil and China would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to pertinent 
industries in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on December 1, 2021 (86 FR 
68283) and determined on March 7, 2022, that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (87 FR 21136, April 11, 2022).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on May 13, 2022. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5324 (May 2022), entitled 
Iron Construction Castings from Brazil, Canada, and China: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-249 and 731-TA-262-263 and 265 (Fifth 
Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 13, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-10694 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Ernest WHITFIELD, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-8724.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

# Certification Pursuant
to 18.U.S.C. Section 1350, As adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report
of Silicom Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signature: /s/ Eran Gilad

Eran Gilad, Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 26, 2008



---

---
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Eastern District of Texas

3/20/23

Case 4:23-cv-00215-ALM Document 4 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 285
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 4:23-cv-00215-ALM Document 4 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 286
Mady CHAN, aka Maddy, aka Mandy, aka Manny, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6285.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Opinion filed August 31, 2012

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

Nos. 11-12-00237-CR & 11-12-00238-CR

__________

ISMAEL VILLARREAL JR., Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 17243-B & 17244-B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Ismael Villarreal Jr., filed a pro se notice of appeal in each cause on 

August 13, 2012. In the notices, appellant states his desire to appeal “from the judgment of 

conviction and sentence” rendered against him. In both cases, appellant was convicted of the 

offense of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver in a drug-free zone. We 

dismiss the appeals. 

The papers on file in this court indicate that the sentence was imposed in these cases on 

November 18, 2009, and October 28, 2009, respectively. On August 13, 2012, upon receiving
2

appellant’s notices of appeal and the docketing statements, this court notified the parties by letter 

that the notices of appeal appeared to be untimely, with one being filed 999 days after the date of 

sentencing and the other being filed 1,020 days after the date of sentencing. We requested that 

appellant respond and show grounds for continuing the appeals. We also informed appellant that 

the appeals may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, the notices of appeal were due to be filed within thirty 

days after the date the sentences were imposed in open court. The August 13, 2012 notices of 

appeal were filed over two years after the due date. Appellant did not file a motion for extension 

of time as provided for in TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Rule 26.3 mandates that the notice of appeal and 

the motion for extension must be filed within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice 

of appeal. Absent a timely notice of appeal or compliance with Rule 26.3, this court lacks 

jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); 

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1993).

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

August 31, 2012

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000916823
<NAME> UNITED FINANCIAL MORTGAGE CORP

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998             APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998             APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,974,011               4,344,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,885,708              38,946,588
<PP&E>                                         342,771                 645,519
<DEPRECIATION>                               (200,484)               (276,512)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,808,084              39,795,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,536,555              33,168,004
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,065,000                 315,000
<COMMON>                                     2,382,895               6,529,332
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,808,084              39,795,236
<SALES>                                      6,730,416               8,571,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,382,596              10,045,228
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,125,087               8,230,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             975,953               1,054,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                281,556                 759,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,127                 339,228
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            241,429                 420,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                (67,665)
<NET-INCOME>                                   241,429                 352,715
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07                     .09


</TABLE>
Manuel LAMPON-PAZ, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.

No. 18-5911.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/24/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       43,421
COMMITMENTS
   9,537    1,969      691   22,769   30,964   32,997   33,624   10,424    9,797

CHANGES FROM 12/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,954)
    -266       -6       69   -2,243   -3,055   -2,440   -2,992     -514       38

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.0      4.5      1.6     52.4     71.3     76.0     77.4     24.0     22.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
      15        2        7       29       26       46       34
```

----

Updated December 28, 2012
Mark TEMPLETON, petitioner, v. Brigitte AMSBERRY, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, et al.

No. 18-5519.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
INVESTPIC, LLC, petitioner, v. SAP AMERICA, INC.

No. 18-1199.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,025
<PP&E>                                         531,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 622,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          617,007
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,297
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (115,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   622,912
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,093,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,128,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,128,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,128,218)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trimeris, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Skolsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ STEVEN D. SKOLSKY  
|Steven D. Skolsky      
|Chief Executive Officer



May 10, 2005



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Trimeris, Inc. and will be retained by Trimeris, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

Karim Azero,

Plaintiff,

v.

Pennsylvania Higher Education 

Assistance Agency dba FedLoan 

Servicing; and

Equifax Information Services, LLC,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Case No. 4:23-cv-00235-

ALM

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO DEFENDANT PENNSYLVANIA HIGER

EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY DBA FEDLOAN SERVICING

Plaintiff Karim Azero, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby notifies the Court 

that Plaintiff has reached a settlement in the above-referenced matter with Defendant 

Pennsylvania Higer Education Assistance Agency dba FedLoan Servicing (“FedLoan”). 

Plaintiff and FedLoan are in the process of finalizing the settlement, whereupon Plaintiff 

will move for dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiff anticipates that the settlement and 

dismissal of claims against FedLoan will be finalized within the next sixty (60) days. 

Plaintiff has now reached settlements with all Defendants. 

Dated: December 27, 2023

/s/ Joseph Panvini

Joseph Panvini

McCarthy Law, PLC

4250 North Drinkwater Blvd, Suite 320

Case 4:23-cv-00235-ALM Document 21 Filed 12/27/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 73
2

Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Telephone: (602) 612-5016

Fax: (602) 218-4447

joe.panvini@mccarthylawyer.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 27, 2023, I electronically transmitted the foregoing 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice 

of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants of record in this matter.

/s/ Joseph Panvini

Case 4:23-cv-00235-ALM Document 21 Filed 12/27/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 74
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/03/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      431,927
COMMITMENTS
  58,620   20,990  101,461  250,528  292,614  410,609  415,065   21,318   16,862

CHANGES FROM 06/26/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,428)
   7,609   -2,879     -941       93    9,939    6,761    6,119      667    1,309

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.6      4.9     23.5     58.0     67.7     95.1     96.1      4.9      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      127)
      33       23       50       64       64      121      116
```

----

Updated July 3, 2012