alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

30383 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 96 

Wednesday, May 18, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2022–12 of May 12, 2022 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) 

and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treasury[, and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, after carefully considering the reports submitted 

to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration, including the 

report submitted in April 2022, and other relevant factors, including global 

economic conditions, the level of spare capacity, and the availability of 

strategic reserves, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public 

Law 112–81, and consistent with prior determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other 

than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum 

and petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial 

institutions. 

I will continue to monitor this situation closely. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 12, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–10840 

Filed 5–17–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/14/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      467,652
COMMITMENTS
  33,752   40,088  137,754  277,432  273,089  448,938  450,931   18,714   16,721

CHANGES FROM 08/07/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,550)
   2,233    4,606     -814    5,325      334    6,744    4,126   -1,194    1,424

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.2      8.6     29.5     59.3     58.4     96.0     96.4      4.0      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      31       29       51       65       68      126      124
```

----

Updated August 17, 2012
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, et al., petitioners, v. Casey Marie WILKES, et al.

No. 17-1175.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

*2740Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama denied.
Terrance JOHNSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-963]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Scottsdale Research Institute, has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may submit electronic comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before July 22, 2022. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before July 22, 2022.
 ADDRESSES: The DEA requires that all comments be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, which provides the ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on the web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Please go to 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         and follow the online instructions at that site for submitting comments. Upon submission of your comment, you will receive a Comment Tracking Number. Please be aware that submitted comments are not instantaneously available for public view on 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*. If you have received a Comment Tracking Number, your comment has been successfully submitted and there is no need to resubmit the same comment.”


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on January 5, 2022, 5436 East Tapekim Road, Cave Creek, Arizona 85331, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleMarihuana Extract
7350
IMarihuana
7360
ITetrahydrocannabinols
7370
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled substances for the internal research use and for distribution to customers for research purposes. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Matthew J. Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-10973 Filed 5-20-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHN RAY CHEEK,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CV-1308

USDC No. 3:11-CR-157-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Ray Cheek, federal prisoner # 42969-177, seeks a certificate of 

appealability (COA) to challenge the district court’s order transferring his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to this court as an unauthorized second or successive 

§ 2255 motion. The clerk of court docketed the transfer order itself under 14-

10741 and directed Cheek to file an application for authorization to file a 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-10762 Document: 00513265967 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2015
No. 14-10762

2

successive habeas petition. When he failed to do so, that action was dismissed. 

This appeal, then, is from the transfer order itself.

The transfer of an unauthorized § 2255 motion is not a final order under 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th 

Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 2015 WL 5772739 (Nov. 2, 2015) (No. 15-6348). 

Therefore, “the appeal of such an order does not require a COA.” Id. In 

addition, the record reflects that the claims asserted by Cheek were, or could 

have been raised, in his first § 2255 motion. See Crone v. Cockrell, 324 F.3d 

833, 837 (5th Cir. 2003). Cheek has failed to show that the district court erred

by concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to decide Cheek’s application without 

permission from this court and by transferring the motion to this court. 

Accordingly, Cheek’s motion for a COA is DENIED as unnecessary. The

district court correctly transferred the application to this court and that order 

is AFFIRMED; the transferred application has already been dismissed. Thus, 

no further action is available in this appeal.

 Case: 14-10762 Document: 00513265967 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2015
Karen MACKEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5585.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7416

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDRE KEBE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(8:97-cr-00357-DKC; 8:01-cv-02157-DKC)

Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Kebe, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United

States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andre Kebe seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kebe has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit      21**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT**

| Subsidiary                                               |   | Jurisdiction                of Organization |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |   |                                        |
| JRW                Associates, L.P.                      |   | California                                  |
|                                                     |   |                                        |
| RW                Central Valley, Inc.                   |   | California                                  |
|                                                     |   |                                        |
| Byron                Power Partners, L.P.                |   | California                                  |
|                                                     |   |                                        |
| RW                Byron, Inc.                            |   | California                                  |
|                                                     |   |                                        |
| Ridgewood                Providence Power Partners, L.P. |   | Delaware                                    |
|                                                     |   |                                        |

----
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

Yunji Inc. 
  

					
	Number	  		  	Class A Ordinary Share(s)

 Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

Share capital is US$100,000 divided into 20,000,000,000 shares comprising of 

(i) 17,000,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000005 each, 

(ii) 2,000,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000005 each and 

(iii) 1,000,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.000005 each 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY
THAT                                      
  is the registered holder of                            Class A Ordinary
Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. 
 EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on
the        day of            2019 by: 
  

			
	DIRECTOR
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1728

To reauthorize the Trade Adjustment Assistance program through fiscal year

2003, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH (for himself, Mr. LEVIN, and Mr. METCALF) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reauthorize the Trade Adjustment Assistance program

through fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT

4 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

5 (a) ASSISTANCE FOR WORKERS.—Section 245 of the

6 Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2317) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘the period beginning October 1, 1998, and ending

8 June 30, 1999,’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fis9 cal years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003,’’.
2

•HR 1728 IH

1 (b) ASSISTANCE FOR FIRMS.—Section 256(b) of the

2 Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2346(b)) is amended by

3 striking ‘‘for the period beginning October 1, 1998, and

4 ending June 30, 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘for fiscal years

5 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003’’.

6 (c) TERMINATION.—Section 285(c) of the Trade Act

7 of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2771 note) is amended in paragraphs

8 (1) and (2)(A) by striking ‘‘June 30, 1999’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘September 30, 2003’’.

10 (d) TRAINING LIMITATION.—Section 250(d)(2) of

11 the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2330(d)(2)) is amended

12 by striking ‘‘the period’’ and all that follows through

13 ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘any fiscal year shall not ex14 ceed $30,000,000’’.

15 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING PETITIONS FOR

16 WORKER ASSISTANCE.

17 Section 223(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19

18 U.S.C. 2273(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘one year’’ and

19 inserting ‘‘two years’’.

Æ
Reuben STEWART, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5298.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR TALX CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000917524
<NAME> TALX CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                        78
<INVENTORY>                                      1,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,692
<PP&E>                                           6,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,121
<SALES>                                         21,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,273
<CGS>                                           11,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (416)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (374)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Frank Ralph LaPENA, petitioner, v. George GRIGAS, et al.

No. 18-6464.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.2


Certification of Vice-Chairman and President

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Century  Casinos,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.





     Date:  October 29, 2002

     /s/ Peter Hoetzinger
     -----------------
     Peter Hoetzinger
     Vice-Chairman and President
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/24/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      149,047
COMMITMENTS
  34,535   34,280   20,286   77,248   66,602  132,069  121,168   16,977   27,878

CHANGES FROM 04/17/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,221)
  -1,940    1,211   -1,192   -1,016   -4,376   -4,148   -4,358      -73      136

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    23.2     23.0     13.6     51.8     44.7     88.6     81.3     11.4     18.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      36       52       41       62       58      128      130
```

----

Updated April 27, 2012
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/19/12          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      507,881
COMMITMENTS
  56,703   24,869  132,665  301,051  333,987  490,419  491,521   17,462   16,359

CHANGES FROM 06/12/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -38,045)
   6,098      995  -18,946  -21,043  -20,667  -33,892  -38,619   -4,153      574

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.2      4.9     26.1     59.3     65.8     96.6     96.8      3.4      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      34       25       44       67       65      124      112
```

----

Updated June 22, 2012
Serge NAYSHTUT, petitioner, v. COMERCIALIZADORA TRAVEL ADVISORY, S.A. DE C.V., et al.

No. 18-6071.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 7, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Peter Hoetzinger, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Century  Casinos,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this  quarterly  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  disclosed  in this  quarterly  report  any  change in the  registrant's
internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to  materially  affect,   the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
reporting;

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  July 28, 2004


/s/Peter Hoetzinger
________________________________
Peter Hoetzinger
Vice-Chairman and President
David Gerard JEEP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5856.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 10, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.