alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Juan L. LEONOR, petitioner, v. Scott R. FRAKES, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services.

No. 18-5632.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.
John Parker MURPHY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5230.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed financial statements as of
and for the six month period ended March 29, 1997, included in this
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such condensed financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000910394
<NAME>              KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
<CURRENCY>          U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           SEP-27-1997 
<PERIOD-START>              SEP-29-1996               
<PERIOD-END>                MAR-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1     
<CASH>                              124    
<SECURITIES>                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                    11,716
<ALLOWANCES>                        530
<INVENTORY>                      15,157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 33,771
<PP&E>                           45,267
<DEPRECIATION>                    9,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   77,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            23,726
<BONDS>                          20,000
<COMMON>                             50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                       33,695 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     77,965
<SALES>                          46,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 46,541
<CGS>                            47,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    47,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                1,048 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (4,890)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (1,847)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (3,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (3,043)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.66)

</TABLE>
Frank KONARSKI, dba FGPJ Apartments and Development, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF TUCSON, ARIZONA, et al.

No. 18-279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ryan Lawrence STECK, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-1478.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Omar Odale BROCKMAN, petitioner, v. Erick BALCARCEL, Acting Warden.

No. 18-5990.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Deborah Elizabeth GOUCH-ONASSIS, petitioner.

No. 18-5454.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Archie BRADFIELD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9569.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

§

v. § CASE NO. 5:23-CR-8

§

JACOBY BLOCK §

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above-styled matter was referred to the Honorable J. Boone Baxter, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Baxter conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by Federal Rule 

of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued a Report and Recommendation (Document No. 32). Judge 

Baxter recommended that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea and conditionally approve the 

plea agreement. He further recommended that the Court finally adjudge Defendant as guilty of 

Count 1 of the Indictment. Count 1 of the Indictment charges a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1)

924 (a)(2)1

, possession of a firearm by a prohibited person. The Court is of the opinion that the 

Report and Recommendation should be accepted. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report 

and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Document No. 32) is ADOPTED. It 

is further

ORDERED that the Defendant’s guilty plea is accepted and approved by the Court. 

Further, the plea agreement is approved by the Court, conditioned upon a review of the presentence 

report. It is finally 

1 Judge Baxter noted that the reference to 18 U.S.C. § 924 (a)(2) cited in the Indictment, Plea Agreement and Factual 

Basis was a typographical error. The error was acknowledged, and the citation was corrected on the record to 18 

U.S.C. § 924 (a)(8). The Defendant, his counsel, and counsel for the Government approved the modification.

Case 5:23-cr-00008-RWS-JBB Document 33 Filed 06/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 92
2

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Defendant’s plea agreement, the Court finds the 

Defendant GUILTY of Count 1 of the Indictment in the above-numbered cause and enters a

JUDGMENT OF GUILTY against the Defendant as to Count 1 of the Indictment.

 

____________________________________

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of June, 2023.

Case 5:23-cr-00008-RWS-JBB Document 33 Filed 06/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 93
Tatyana E. DREVALEVA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT.

No. 18-8746.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Kevin WILMOT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5958.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of TALX Corporation (the"Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William W. Canfield,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                             By: /s/ William W. Canfield
                                                -------------------------------
                                             William W. Canfield
                                             Chairman, President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             TALX Corporation
                                             May 22, 2003
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TurboChef
Technologies, Inc.Dallas, Texas

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Numbers 333-82518 and 333-117806 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Numbers
333-81571 and 333-76662 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2003, except
as to Note 1 of the Notes to Financial Statements which is as of November 18,
2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of TurboChef
Technologies, Inc. appearing in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2003. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 22, 2004
Troy LYNDON, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 18-131.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 

COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MORGAN 

STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 

2007-HE7 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HE7

Plaintiff,

v.

SEAN ANDRE SIMON, TONYA JORESSA 

SIMON, 

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-127-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The District Court referred Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. 9] to the 

Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration and disposition. 

On November 17, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation 

[Dkt. 11] in which she recommended granting (1) a judgment declaring Plaintiff is the owner and 

holder of Note, beneficiary of Security Instrument and mortgagee as defined under Texas 

Property Code section 51.001; (2) a judgment declaring that Plaintiff’s statutory probate lien 

against the Property can be enforced by a non-judicial foreclosure at a public auction and that 

through the foreclosure the Defendants are divested, and the purchaser at foreclosure sale is 

vested, of all of Decedent’s right title and interest to the Property; (3) a writ of possession against 

any Occupant of the Property if the Occupant fails or refuses to leave the Property after 

foreclosure or auction; (4) court costs when properly submitted, and (5) attorney’s fees when 

Case 1:23-cv-00127-MJT Document 12 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 116
2

properly submitted, not as a personal judgment but as an additional debt secured by the Security 

Instrument. (Doc. #1.)

Judge Stetson further recommend that Plaintiff should either request a hearing on 

attorney’s fees or submit a proper motion within 14 days of any order ruling on this Report and 

Recommendation, and that failure to do so should result in a final judgment being awarded 

without an award of attorneys’ fees. Judge Stetson recommends denying all other relief.

To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report. The Court received and 

considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

such referral, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. After careful review, 

the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are correct. 

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 

11] is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. 8] is GRANTED, in part, and 

Plaintiff is ORDERED to request a hearing on attorney’s fees or submit a proper motion within 14 

days, or a final judgment will be awarded without an award of attorney’s fees. 

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 4th day of December, 2023.

Case 1:23-cv-00127-MJT Document 12 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 117
C.B., petitioner, v. Thomas N. FISCHGRUND.

No. 18-5798.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Stevie Andre ROBERSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5947.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2



Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002



---



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of TurboChef Technologies, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                      |  |  |  |                     
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------
|                                                                     
|/s/ John C. Shortley                                                  |  |  |  |                     
|John C. Shortley Controller & Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |  |  |  | Date: April 16, 2003
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                              HEALTHGATE DATA CORP.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of HealthGate Data Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Veronica Zsolcsak,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of December 31, 2003 (the last date of the period
          covered by the Report).


                                                        /s/ Veronica Zsolcsak
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Veronica Zsolcsak
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        March 29, 2004
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40298 

(Summary Calendar)

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GABRIEL RESENDEZ-GARCIA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. M-94-CR-157-9)

- - - - - - - - - -

February 9, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to

possess marijuana with intent to distribute and aiding and abetting

possession with intent to distribute, complaining of insufficiency

of the evidence, material variance between the evidence and the

indictment, and prosecutorial misconduct. Our review of the record

and the arguments and authorities convince us that no reversible

error was committed. The evidence was not insufficient. See

United States v. Ivey, 949 F.2d 759, 766 (5th Cir. 1991), cert.
2

denied, 113 S. Ct. 64 (1992). There was no material variance

between the evidence and the indictment. See United States v.

Faulkner, 17 F.3d 745, 762 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 193

(1994). The prosecutor's questioning and statements did not rise

to the level of plain error. See United States v. Brown, 887 F.2d

537, 542 (5th Cir. 1989). 

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of China Organic Fertilizer, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Chen Yu


Chen Yu


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


July 14, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Organic Fertilizer, Inc. and will be retained by China Organic Fertilizer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
Starsha M. SEWELL, petitioner, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.

No. 18-219.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,098
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,616,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,130,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,798
<OTHER-SE>                                    (515,014)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,616,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               263,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (263,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (263,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (263,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

Independent Auditors Consent

The Board of Directors
VL Dissolution Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-88666, 33-81045, 333-45137, and 333-81915) on Form S-8 of VL
Dissolution Corporation of our report dated August 1, 2003, with respect to the
statement of net assets in liquidation as of June 30, 2003, the related
statements of changes in net assets in liquidation and stockholders equity for
the period from May 6, 2003 to June 30, 2003, the balance sheet as of June 30,
2002, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and
for the period from July 1, 2002 to May 5, 2003 and all
related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the June 30,
2003, annual report on Form 10-K of VL Dissolution Corporation.

Our
report dated August 1, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph
that states, as described in Note 1 to the financial statements, the stockholders of Vari-L
Company, Inc. approved a plan of liquidation on May 5, 2003, and the Company
commenced liquidation shortly thereafter. As a result, the Company has changed
its basis of accounting for periods subsequent to May 5, 2003, from the
going-concern basis to a liquidation basis. Also on May 5, 2003, Vari-L
Company, Inc. changed its name to VL Dissolution Corporation.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
September 23, 2003
David LIBRACE, petitioner, v. Deborah Helton WRIGHT, et al.

No. 18-6002.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
LINH THI MINH TRAN, petitioner, v. KATHY HUNG PHAM.

No. 18-6114.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 3, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133688 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133688 COA: 274434 Genesee CC: 05-016280-FC RODRIQUES DARNELL RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk