alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dino Contreras MEJIA, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5215.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1632

To provide that certain attribution rules be applied with respect to the

counting of certain prisoners in a decennial census of population.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1999

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide that certain attribution rules be applied with

respect to the counting of certain prisoners in a decennial

census of population.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY.

4 This Act applies in the case of an individual if—

5 (1) on the decennial census date involved, such

6 individual is incarcerated (pursuant to having been

7 convicted under the laws of a State) in a prison lo8 cated within a different State; and

9 (2) greater than half of the costs associated

10 with such individual’s incarceration are, under the
2

•HR 1632 IH

1 terms of an agreement to which the States referred

2 to in paragraph (1) are parties, recoverable by the

3 State in which the prison is located.

4 SEC. 2. RULES FOR COUNTING PRISONERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In tabulating the total population

6 of the respective States in a decennial census of popu7 lation, the Secretary of Commerce shall provide that any

8 individual described in section 1 shall be counted as a resi9 dent of the State from which those amounts (relating to

10 the costs of such individual’s incarceration) are so recover11 able.

12 (b) SPECIAL RULES.—In the event that amounts are

13 recoverable from 2 or more States, this section shall be

14 applied in accordance with such special rules as the Sec15 retary of Commerce shall prescribe consistent with car16 rying out the purposes of this Act.

17 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

18 As used in this Act—

19 (1) the terms ‘‘census of population’’ and ‘‘de20 cennial census date’’ have the meanings given them

21 under section 141 of title 13, United States Code;

22 (2) the term ‘‘State’’ includes the District of

23 Columbia; and
3

•HR 1632 IH

1 (3) the term ‘‘prison’’ means a correctional or

2 penal facility.

Æ
Isaiah GALBREATH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5516.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the
period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Gibson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ John W. Gibson     
|John W. Gibson         
|Chief Executive Officer

November 2, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Cleveland FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. AMERICAN ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS, INC.

No. 18-1220.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
Michael J. LITTLES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9024.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/02/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       55,522
COMMITMENTS
  13,711    2,024    6,482   22,952   34,063   43,145   42,569   12,377   12,953

CHANGES FROM 07/26/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,605)
    -131      260     -852      -39   -1,409   -1,022   -2,001     -583      396

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    24.7      3.6     11.7     41.3     61.4     77.7     76.7     22.3     23.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      23        9       16       36       28       64       50
```

----

Updated August 5, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3
- 0147 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEXANDER GARRETT LAFORGE, III,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 20 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 13 2023

11/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0147
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1698

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to provide that a quality grade

label issued by the Secretary of Agriculture may not be used for imported

meat and meat food products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1999

Mr. HILL of Montana (for himself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr.

MCHUGH, and Mr. WATKINS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to provide that

a quality grade label issued by the Secretary of Agriculture may not be used for imported meat and meat

food products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘USDA Grade Rescis5 sion Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1698 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALITY GRADE LABELING OF IMPORTED MEAT

2 AND MEAT FOOD PRODUCTS.

3 Section 1(n) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21

4 U.S.C. 601(n)) is amended—

5 (1) in paragraph (11), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the

6 end;

7 (2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period at

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

9 (3) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(13) if it is an imported carcass, part thereof,

11 meat, or meat food product (including any carcass,

12 part thereof, meat, or meat food product produced

13 from any cattle, sheep, or goats that have not been

14 fed in the United States for at least 90 days) and

15 bears a label that indicates a quality grade issued by

16 the Secretary.’’.

Æ
Javier BAUTISTA-DELACRUZ, petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-1301.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John R. TURNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-106.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of MIAD Systems Ltd.(the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
A.S. Green, the President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                       /s/ MICHAEL A. S. GREEN
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Michael A.S. Green
                                       President, Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Accounting Officer) and
                                        Director

December 28, 2005

The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906. or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to MIAD Systems Ltd. and
will be retained by MIAD Systems Ltd.and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michael W. McBRIDE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9424.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Alfredo PEREZ, Jr., petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-5496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. on Form 10-K, for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Assaf Ran, Chief Executive Officer of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
  Date: March 16, 2011
/s/ Assaf RanAssaf Ran(principal executive officer)
  *   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael A. Doyle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EasyLink Services
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting.


Dated: March 30, 2004

           /s/ Michael A. Doyle
-----------------------------------------
             Michael A. Doyle
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
       (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.49



|     |  |                            
|---- |  | ---------------------------
|LOGO |  | Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|    

October 21, 2008

Marc Rubin, MD

[address]

Dear Marc:

This letter will confirm the amendment to the severance provisions contained in your letter of employment with Titan dated July 31, 2007 (the
Agreement). Please sign this letter where indicated and return it to Titan, retaining a copy for your records.

Section 3(b) of the
Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new last sentence:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if your employment with the Company is
terminated by the Company without Cause or by you for Good Reason within twelve (12) months following a Change in Control of the Company you shall be entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to twenty-four (24) months salary payable
within thirty (30) days following termination.

The following new Section 10 is added to the Agreement:



| | 7. | Code Section 208G. Should the Company reasonably determine that the payment of compensation by the Company to the Executive, including but not limited to compensation
payable under this Agreement and/or the Restricted Stock Agreement of even date herewith, would result in the Executives receiving an excess parachute payment within the meaning of Section 280G(b) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, the Company shall reduce the amount of any payment or payments otherwise payable to the Executive, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion, which reduction shall be reasonably determined by the Company to be the
smallest amount which will prevent the Executive from receiving such an excess parachute payment.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                           
|                                     
|/s/ Sunil Bhonsle                    
|Sunil Bhonsle Chief Operating
Officer



Accepted by:/s/ Marc RubinName: Marc RubinOctober 30, 2008Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            3319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   880261
<ALLOWANCES>                                    200000
<INVENTORY>                                      61200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1053285
<PP&E>                                           65117
<DEPRECIATION>                                   31025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1087377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2030185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           559
<OTHER-SE>                                      845493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1087377
<SALES>                                        2549719
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2549719
<CGS>                                          2274622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2274622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1010945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (44305)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (776318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (776318)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of National R.V. Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Bradley C. Albrechtsen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,and Thomas J. Martini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Bradley C. Albrechtsen |   | /s/ Thomas J. Martini     |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Bradley C. Albrechtsen     |   | Thomas J. Martini         |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer    |   | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|   | and President              |   | (Principal Accounting and |   |
|   | Date: May 14, 2007         |   | Financial Officer)        |   |
|   |                       |   | Date: May 14, 2007        |   |

 

1

----
Reggie RANKINS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-5109.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,907,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,003,832
<PP&E>                                         253,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,278,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          461,211
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,667
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,674,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,278,385
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,421,625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,694,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,461,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (233,635)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,694,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
Ammar Asimfaruq HARRIS, petitioner, v. NEVADA.

No. 18-8652.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.