alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 43/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 43 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6528. ledna 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 43

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6528. ledna 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2022/C 43/01 | Směnné kurzy vůči euru — 27. ledna 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

2022/C 43/01

Směnné kurzy vůči euru — 27. ledna 2022

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

| 28.1.2022 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2022

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 43/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

27. ledna 2022

(2022/C 43/01)

1 euro =

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,1160 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 128,74 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4428 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,83368 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 10,4450 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 1,0391 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 145,20 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 9,9903 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 24,427 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 358,09 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,5592 |
| RON | rumunský lei | 4,9466 |
| TRY | turecká lira | 15,1946 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,5771 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,4161 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 8,6951 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,6872 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 1,5089 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 344,50 |
| ZAR | jihoafrický rand | 17,1112 |
| CNY | čínský juan | 7,1061 |
| HRK | chorvatská kuna | 7,5328 |
| IDR | indonéská rupie | 16 052,42 |
| MYR | malajsijský ringgit | 4,6844 |
| PHP | filipínské peso | 57,295 |
| RUB | ruský rubl | 87,1390 |
| THB | thajský baht | 37,124 |
| BRL | brazilský real | 6,0159 |
| MXN | mexické peso | 23,1430 |
| INR | indická rupie | 83,7893 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,1160

JPY

japonský jen

128,74

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4428

GBP

britská libra

0,83368

SEK

švédská koruna

10,4450

CHF

švýcarský frank

1,0391

ISK

islandská koruna

145,20

NOK

norská koruna

9,9903

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

česká koruna

24,427

HUF

maďarský forint

358,09

PLN

polský zlotý

4,5592

RON

rumunský lei

4,9466

TRY

turecká lira

15,1946

AUD

australský dolar

1,5771

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,4161

HKD

hongkongský dolar

8,6951

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,6872

SGD

singapurský dolar

1,5089

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 344,50

ZAR

jihoafrický rand

17,1112

CNY

čínský juan

7,1061

HRK

chorvatská kuna

7,5328

IDR

indonéská rupie

16 052,42

MYR

malajsijský ringgit

4,6844

PHP

filipínské peso

57,295

RUB

ruský rubl

87,1390

THB

thajský baht

37,124

BRL

brazilský real

6,0159

MXN

mexické peso

23,1430

INR

indická rupie

83,7893

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1871

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make permanent the

special immigrant religious worker program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1999

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make

permanent the special immigrant religious worker program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mother Teresa Reli5 gious Worker Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT THE SPECIAL IMMIGRANT RE7 LIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM.

8 Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended
2

•HR 1871 IH

1 by striking ‘‘before October 1, 2000,’’ each place it ap2 pears.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
                                                                              
<S>      
                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              $  1,127
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         564
<PP&E>                                               187,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                         4,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       189,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  5,164
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                           50,000
<COMMON>                                                 130
<OTHER-SE>                                            73,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         189,945
<SALES>                                                  972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      19,273
<CGS>                                                    613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       9,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     2,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        7,865
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    7,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        $  7,865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.84     
        

</TABLE>
##### 



FIRST AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION
WARRANT TO PURCHASE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
  1. Manner of Exercise; Issuance of Certificates; Payment for Shares .




---



##### 



2. Period of Exercise .
 3. Certain Agreements of the Company .
 (a) Shares to be Fully Paid .
 (b) Reservation of Shares .
 (c) Certain Actions Prohibited .
  2




---



##### 



(d) Adjustments for Changes in Common Stock
 (e) Reorganizations, Etc.
 (f) Stockholder Meeting.
 4. Issue Tax .
  3




---



##### 



5. No Rights as a Stockholder .
 6. Transfer, Exchange, and Replacement of Warrant; Resale of Warrant Shares .
 (a) Restriction on Transfer .
 (b) Replacement of Warrant and Cancellation .
 (c) Register .
 7. Notices .
  4




---



##### 



8. Governing Law .
 9. Miscellaneous .
 (a) Amendments .
 (b) Headings .
   5




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 FIRST AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ John F. Van EngelenJohn F. Van EngelenPresident and Chief Executive Officer  6




---



##### 



FORM OF EXERCISE AGREEMENT
 
   BROOKE CORPORATIONBy:Name:Title:
  7
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER








In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Alan Bigman, Chief Financial
Officer of Equistar Chemicals, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or
      78o(d)); and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Equistar Chemicals, LP.











Date:  March
28,
2008                                                                                                         
/s/ Alan
Bigman


Alan
Bigman


Chief Financial
Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Equistar Chemicals, LP and will be retained by Equistar Chemicals, LP and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1861 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1861

      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 
  deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals subject to 
                       Federal hours of service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1999

 Mr. Collins (for himself and Ms. Dunn) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 
  deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals subject to 
                       Federal hours of service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED DEDUCTIBILITY OF BUSINESS MEAL EXPENSES FOR 
              INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT TO FEDERAL LIMITATIONS ON HOURS OF 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 274(n) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and 
entertainment expenses allowed as deduction) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(3) Special rule for individuals subject to federal hours 
        of service.--In the case of any expenses for food or beverages 
        consumed while away from home (within the meaning of section 
        162(a)(2)) by an individual during, or incident to, the period 
        of duty subject to the hours of service limitations of the 
        Department of Transportation, paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
        substituting `80 percent' for `50 percent'.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.23

                              FINDERS FEE AGREEMENT


December 12, 2003

Bidville Inc.
601 Cleveland Street
Suite 120
Clearwater, FL  33755
Attn: Gerald Parker

Dear Gerald Parker:

     This letter will serve as the agreement  ("Agreement")  between  EU-IR,  an
Austrian  corporation  ("EU-IR"),  with  its  principal  place  of  business  at
Feldkirchnerstr. 113, 8055 Graz, Austria and Bidville Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company")  with its principal  place of business at 601 Cleveland  Street,
Suite 120, Clearwater, FL 33755 with respect to the subject matter hereto.

     On the  Company's  behalf,  EU-IR  will act as a  finder  in  locating  and
introducing various individuals and entities (collectively,  the "Investors") to
the Company that want to participate in the private placement of the Company.

     If the Company  consummates a transaction with an Investor,  EU-IR shall be
entitled to a fee equal to a six and a half  percent  (6.5%) of the value of the
consideration paid for the equity or debt sale.

     There is no relationship of partnership,  agency, employment,  franchise or
joint venture  between the parties - neither party has the authority to bind the
other or incur any  obligation on its behalf.  Seller hereby  acknowledges  that
National acts solely as a finder in connection with the contemplated sale of the
Shares and not as a placement agent or underwriter.  Furthermore, the Company is
relying on its own investment  advisors  and/or legal counsel in connection with
any transaction contemplated by this Agreement.

     This Agreement  shall be governed by the laws of Austria  without regard to
conflict of laws provisions.

     If you are in agreement with the  foregoing,  please execute and return one
copy of this Agreement to Finder.


                                      Sincerely,

                                      EU-IR

                                      By:  /s/ Herbert Strauss
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Name:     Herbert Strauss
                                      Title:    Chief Executive Officer


Agreed to and accepted this 12th day of  December 2003.

By: /s/ Gerald Parker
   ------------------------
Name:    Gerald Parker
         Bidville Inc.
Title:   Chairman/Director
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00631-CV

IN RE Mary DAHLMAN and Lantz HUBBERD

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 31, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the responses and reply of the parties and 

is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ 

of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1986-PC-1440, styled In re Willa Peters Hubberd Testamentary Trust, 

pending in Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tom Rickhoff presiding.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Peter B. Bedford, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date:  May 7, 2004

/s/ Peter B. Bedford

Peter B. Bedford

Chief Executive Officer
Paula Jo KUNSMAN, petitioner, v. Joel WALL.

No. 18-8465.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of DURECT Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew J. Hogan, Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

March 3, 2011



/S/    MATTHEW J.
HOGANMatthew J. Hogan Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE  FISCAL  YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1999,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       (550)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
TRUGREEN, INC., petitioner, v. Kasie STEVENS-BRATTON.

No. 16-1302.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Christina Jay ACKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-5574.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)*(per curiam )* .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4343
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3442
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      19849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          86366
<ALLOWANCE>                                        570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  121542
<DEPOSITS>                                      102547
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1518
<LONG-TERM>                                       5000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                       12470
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  121542
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6978
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1183
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   316
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  8477
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3669
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             4808
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    271
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         271
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       271
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.44
<LOANS-NON>                                         70
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   312
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    941
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   674
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      128
<RECOVERIES>                                         9
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  570
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               570
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Lochild REED, petitioner, v. James FLOOD, Jr., Acting Warden, et al.

No. 18-9028.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.