alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

MUSTAFA EL SHABAZZ BEY, also 

known as NOLAND ROOSEVELT 

BYRD

VS.

MICHAEL TANG, ET AL.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL CASE NO. 4:23-CV-151-SDJ

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest 

Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #30) concluding that 

Plaintiff’s lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution for 

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order to file a second amended complaint 

and any request to proceed in forma pauperis using his full legal name, Noland 

Roosevelt Byrd, or, alternatively, to pay all regular filing fees required by the Clerk 

of Court ($402.00). Plaintiff filed objections.

In the objections, Plaintiff continues to urge he does not need to file a second

amended complaint and request to proceed in forma pauperis using his full legal 

name, Noland Roosevelt Byrd. However, he has not submitted proof that his name 

has been legally changed from Noland Roosevelt Byrd to Mustafa El Shabazz Bey 

under the laws of the United States and/or the State of Texas. Plaintiff has not filed 

a second amended complaint and request to proceed in forma pauperis using his full 

legal name, Noland Roosevelt Byrd. Nor has Plaintiff paid all regular filing fees 

required by the Clerk of Court ($402.00). Plaintiff’s objections are without merit.

Case 4:23-cv-00151-SDJ-KPJ Document 33 Filed 02/03/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 119
2

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s Order; thus, he has failed to prosecute his 

case.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains 

proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has 

been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections 

raised by Plaintiff to the Report, the Court concludes that the findings and 

conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the same as the findings 

and conclusions of the Court. 

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s amended complaint is DISMISSED

without prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby 

DENIED.

Case 4:23-cv-00151-SDJ-KPJ Document 33 Filed 02/03/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 120
```

```

----

Updated January 21, 2011
Jack SLINEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5042.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001081078
<NAME>                        RUBINCON VENTURES INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                            0

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<CASH>                                            1,428
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,428
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11,987
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         12,601
<OTHER-SE>                                      (23,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,428
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 23,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (23,160)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANYS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      233
<SECURITIES>                                                 22
<RECEIVABLES>                                              6260
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (219)
<INVENTORY>                                                4509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          11633
<PP&E>                                                    15413
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (7459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            24738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      9979
<BONDS>                                                    6968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                     49
<OTHER-SE>                                                 7619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              24738
<SALES>                                                   18432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          18673
<CGS>                                                     15018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             15018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           3121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (6)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (148)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.03)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6327

WAYNE A. GARRETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director; D. A.

GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden, Virginia Department

of Corrections; J. D. OATES, III, Medical

Administrator, Virginia Department of

Corrections; DOCTOR SHAW; DOCTOR BHULLER,

M.D., Orthopedics; ROBERT C. WRENN, Clerk,

Circuit Court of the County of Greensville,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RONALD ANGELONE, Director; DONALD SWETTER,

Doctor, Medical Director, Greensville

Correctional Center; GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL

CENTER; S. ROBINSON, Lieutenant, Correctional

Officer; A. MILLNER; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;

ROBERT G. O'HARA, Judge, Circuit Court of the

County of Greensville,

Defendants.
2

No. 03-6502

WAYNE A. GARRETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD SWETTER, Doctor, Medical Director,

Greensville Correctional Center; A. MILLNER,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RONALD ANGELONE, Director; RUFUS FLEMING,

Regional Director; D. A. GARRAGHTY, Chief

Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections; J.

D. OATES, III, Medical Administrator, Virginia

Department of Corrections; GREENSVILLE

CORRECTIONAL CENTER; S. ROBINSON, Lieutenant,

Correctional Officer; DOCTOR SHAW; DOCTOR

BHULLER, M.D., Orthopedics; COMMONWEALTH OF

VIRGINIA; ROBERT G. O'HARA, Judge, Circuit

Court of the County of Greensville; ROBERT C.

WRENN, Clerk, Circuit Court of the County of

Greensville,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-00-154-AM)

Submitted: July 31, 2003 Decided: August 11, 2003
3

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne A. Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Michael John Otten, LECLAIR

RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John

David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; John

Adrian Gibney, Jr., THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
4

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Wayne A. Garrett seeks to

appeal the orders granting motions to dismiss and for summary

judgment as to some, but not all, defendants. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders that Garrett seeks to

appeal do not dispense with all claims as to all parties.

Therefore, the orders are neither final orders nor appealable

interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Garrett’s motion for a

stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Medifast, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Bradley T. MacDonald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I Michael S. McDevitt, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.



By: /s/ Bradley T. MacDonald
    ------------------------
        Bradley T. MacDonald
        Chief Executive Officer
        August 14, 2006

By: /s/ Michael S. McDevitt
    ------------------------
        Michael S. McDevitt
        Chief Financial Officer
        August 14, 2006



                                       21
Law Office of David A. Schulman

Post Office Box 783

Austin, Texas 78767

Tel. 512-474-4747

Fax: 512-532-6282

 

Motion for Extension of Time To File

Appellant's Brief on Appeal

 

No. 04-14-00338-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL

DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT SAN ANTONIO 

Benny Cavazos Valverde, Appellant 

 

v.

 

The State of Texas, Appellee

 

On Appeal in Case No. 2012CR3980, from the 290th District

Court of Bexar County, the Hon. Melissa Skinner, Judge Presiding

 

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Benny Cavazos Valverde, Appellant in the

above styled and numbered cause (“Appellant”), by and through

his retained counsel, David A. Schulman, his undersigned

attorney of record, and respectfully enters this “Motion for

Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief on Appeal,” and in

support of such Motion would show the Court:

 

I

 

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder in the 290th

District Court of Bexar County, then timely perfected his appeal. 

The deadline for filing Appellant's Brief with the Court is the 23rd

day of March, 2015. Appellant's request for an extension is based

upon the inability of the undersigned attorney to complete his

1

ACCEPTED

04-14-00338-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/23/2015 12:07:59 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/23/2015 12:07:59 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
review of the record, which runs in excess of 1200 pages, and to 

finish research on the issues raised by the trial of the case. 

 

II

Said attorney would further show that he will require an

additional thirty (30) days in which to complete the research and

prepare Appellant's Brief on Appeal. This is Appellant's second

request for an extension of time in which to file his brief.

 

Prayer

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays this

Honorable Court to grant his “Motion for Extension of Time to File

Brief on Appeal,” and Order that the deadline for filing such be

extended an additional thirty (30) days, until April 22, 2015, or

until such time as set by this Court.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________________

 David A. Schulman

Attorney at Law

Post Office Box 783

Austin, Texas 78767-0783

Tel. 512-474-4747

Fax: 512-532-6282

zdrdavida@davidschulman.com

State Bar Card No. 17833400

Attorney for Appellant

2
 

Certificate of Compliance and Delivery

This is to certify that: (1) this document, created using WordPerfectTM

X7 software, contains 320 words, excluding those items permitted by Rule

9.4 (i)(1), Tex.R.App.Pro., and complies with Rules 9.4 (i)(2)(B) and 9.4 (i)(3),

Tex.R.App.Pro.; and (2) on March 23, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing motion for extension was transmitted via the eService

function on the State’s eFiling portal, to Laura E. Durbin

(laura.durbin@bexar.org), counsel of record for the State of Texas.

______________________________________

David A. Schulman

3
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: October 26, 2005        /s/ James P. Bryce     Name: James P. Bryce  Title: Chief Executive OfficerThe foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)and is not being filed as part of the Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1872 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1872

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program to 
designate as an Interstate Oasis certain facilities near the interstate 
                            highway system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1999

   Mr. Moran of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Terry, and Mr. 
   Barcia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program to 
designate as an Interstate Oasis certain facilities near the interstate 
                            highway system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interstate Oasis Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. INTERSTATE OASIS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end the following:
``Sec. 165. Interstate Oasis Program
    ``(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act and in consultation with the States and other 
interested parties, the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a 
program to designate as Interstate Oases facilities near the Interstate 
System that offer products and services to the public, if such 
facilities meet standards to be determined by the Secretary.
    ``(b) Standards for Designation.--The standards for designation 
under subsection (a) shall include standards relating to the appearance 
of a facility and its proximity to the Interstate System.
    ``(c) Eligibility for Designation.--Any facility meeting the 
standards established by the Secretary under this section shall be 
eligible for the designation under this section.
    ``(d) Logo.--The Secretary shall design a logo to be displayed by 
facilities designated under this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for such chapter is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``165. Interstate Oasis Program.''.
                                 <all>
```
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/27/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      304,339
COMMITMENTS
  78,891  108,518   30,384  172,225  138,420  281,500  277,322   22,839   27,017

CHANGES FROM 03/20/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -59,544)
 -21,909   -6,825   -9,284  -20,035  -37,267  -51,228  -53,376   -8,316   -6,168

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.9     35.7     10.0     56.6     45.5     92.5     91.1      7.5      8.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      119)
      26       51       43       27       33       83      104
```

----

Updated March 30, 2012
Exhibit 3.2

                             State of New Hampshire


Filing fee $35.00                                                    Form No. 14
Use black print or type                                          RSA 293-A:10.06


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT, THE
UNDERSIGNED CORPORATIONADOPTS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES OF AMENEDMENT TO ITS
ARTICLES OF INCORPROATION:

      FIRST: the name of the incorporation is
      Ameri-can Railway Systems, Incorporated
      ---------------------------------------

      SECOND: The text of each amendment adopted is:
            RESOLVED THAT ARTICLE 1 OF THE CORPORATION'S ARTICLES OF
            INCORPORATION IS NOW AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: THE NAME OF THE
            CORPORATION IS ARS NETWORKS, INCORPORATED.
            THIS ACTION SHALL BE EFFECTIVE THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2000.

      Third: If the amendment provides for an exchange, reclassification, or
      cancellation of issued shares the provision for implementing the
      amendment(s) if not contained in the above amendment are:

            N/A

      FOURTH: The amendment(s) were adopted on (date) March 23, 2000
                                                      --------------

      FIFTH: (Check one)
            A:  X   The amendments(s) were adopted by the incorporators or board
               ---  of directors without shareholder action and shareholder
                    action was not required.
            B: ___  The amendment(s) were approved by the shareholders.


                                                           Number of votes
   Designation                              Number of        indisputably
(class of shares)       Number of        votes entitled    represented at
 of voting group   shares outstanding      to be cast        the meeting
-----------------  ------------------    --------------    ---------------

      N/A




                                       27
<PAGE>


   Designation                                               Total number of
(class of shares)       Total number of votes cast   OR        undisputed
of voting shares           FOR         AGAINST               Votes cast FOR
----------------           ---         -------               --------------

      N/A


      SIXTH: The number cast for the amendment(s) by each voting group was
      sufficient for approval by each voting group.

      Dated   March 23, 2000
            ----------------


                                    Ameri-can Railway Systems, Incorporated
                                    ---------------------------------------

                                    By:   /s/ Sydney Harland
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Signature of the Chairman and CEO

                                    Sydney Harland
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Print or type name
Roger WILSON, petitioner, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT CUMBERLAND et al.

No. 18-5340.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Robert L. MAYFIELD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8894.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.