alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AQUA CARE SYSTEMS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry
Rector, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(s)1350, as adopted pursuant to (s)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Harry Rector
----------------
Harry Rector
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2002
David E. KELLY, petitioner, v. Joseph M. ARPAIO, et al.

No. 18-8986.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH U.S.A., applicant, v. Brian EDWARDS, Judge, Jefferson Circuit Court, et al.

No. 18A1126 (18-1441).

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Application for stay addressed to Justice GORSUCH and referred to the Court denied.
Ronald Ray HORNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9055.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated August 31, 2012
EXHIBIT 10.1

                            Agreement with Management




                                       28
<PAGE>





                                    AGREEMENT

We, Seventh Business Service Group, Inc., a Florida  corporation,  do agree with
you, our president,  director and management,  Michael T. Williams, as of May 1,
1999, as follows.

o     We will not sell any securities prior to the location of an acquisition or
      merger candidate.

o     The  costs  of   identifying,   investigating,   and  analyzing   business
      combinations  not  obtained  from  the  merger  fee  paid  to  us  by  the
      acquisition  candidate  will be paid with funds  contributed  as a capital
      contribution by our president.  Management will fund our cash requirements
      until an acquisition is closed. Management has placed no cap on the amount
      of funds they will lend.

o     We may not borrow funds and use the loan  proceeds to make payments to any
      officer, director, promoter or affiliate or associate of us.

o     We will not enter into a business combination with any company which is in
      any way wholly or partially  beneficially owned by any officer,  director,
      promoter or affiliate or associate of us.

o     We will not pay a finder's fee to any member of management  for locating a
      merger or acquisition candidate.

o     No member  of  management  intends  to or may seek and  negotiate  for the
      payment of finder's fees.

o     Other  fees may be paid to our  management  if and only if it is agreed by
      the acquisition  candidate in the merger  agreement.  Any such fee will be
      funded  by a fee the  acquisition  candidate  agrees to pay as part of the
      merger agreement. There is no minimum or maximum amount of fee that can be
      paid. The amount will be determined in  arms'-length  negotiations  in the
      merger agreement.

o     The only other  pecuniary  benefit to be  received  by  management  is the
      retention of a to-be-agreed percent of stock after the acquisition closes.
      There is no minimum or maximum amount of stock which can be retained.  The
      amount  will be  determined  in  arms'-length  negotiations  in the merger
      agreement.

o     Except as  described  above,  we will not  utilize  any other  methods  of
      payments by which management or current shareholders receive funds, stock,
      other assets or anything of value whether tangible or intangible

Seventh Business Service Group, Inc.,
a Florida corporation



By: /s/ Michael T. Williams ______________________
Michael T. Williams; president, director and management

/s/ Michael T. Williams
Michael T. Williams

                                       29
<PAGE>
Ivan Rodrigo CAMPILLO RESTREPO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5754.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1663

AN ACT

To recognize National Medal of Honor sites in

California, Indiana, and South Carolina.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1663

AN ACT

To recognize National Medal of Honor sites in California,

Indiana, and South Carolina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1663 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Medal of

3 Honor Memorial Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

5 Congress makes the following findings:

6 (1) The Medal of Honor is the highest military

7 decoration which the Nation bestows.

8 (2) The Medal of Honor is the only military

9 decoration given in the name of Congress, and there10 fore on behalf of the people of the United States.

11 (3) The Congressional Medal of Honor Society

12 was established by an Act of Congress in 1958, and

13 continues to protect, uphold, and preserve the dig14 nity, honor, and name of the Medal of Honor and

15 of the individual recipients of the Medal of Honor.

16 (4) The Congressional Medal of Honor Society

17 is composed solely of recipients of the Medal of

18 Honor.

19 SEC. 3. NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR SITES.

20 (a) RECOGNITION.—The following sites to honor re21 cipients of the Medal of Honor are hereby recognized as

22 National Medal of Honor sites:

23 (1) RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA.—The memorial

24 under construction at the Riverside National Ceme25 tery in Riverside, California, to be dedicated on No26 vember 5, 1999.
3

•HR 1663 EH

1 (2) INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.—The memorial at

2 the White River State Park in Indianapolis, Indiana,

3 dedicated on May 28, 1999.

4 (3) MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA.—The

5 Congressional Medal of Honor Museum at Patriots

6 Point in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, currently

7 situated on the ex-U.S.S. Yorktown (CV–6).

8 (b) INTERPRETATION.—This section shall not be con9 strued to require or permit Federal funds (other than any

10 provided for as of the date of the enactment of this Act)

11 to be expended for any purpose related to the sites recog12 nized in subsection (a).

Passed the House of Representatives October 5,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          26,823
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,260)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,614
<PP&E>                                          58,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,360)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,204
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,281
<SALES>                                         51,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,947
<CGS>                                           34,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,401
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    241
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,027
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.014
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.014
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned,  Shmuel Shneibalg,  Chief Executive Officer,  President,  Chief
Financial Officer, and Director of Green Mountain Capital, Inc. (the "Company"),
certifies,  under the  standards  set forth and  solely for the  purposes  of 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that, to his  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 fully complies with the  requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 8, 2006



By:       /s/ Shmuel Shneibalg
         -------------------------------------------------
Name:    Shmuel Shneibalg
Title:   Chief Executive Officer,
         President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director
         (Principal executive and financial officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/21/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      182,522
COMMITMENTS
  52,974   10,396   25,234   80,724  115,859  158,932  151,489   23,590   31,033

CHANGES FROM 06/14/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,404)
  -3,255     -752      687      368   -4,508   -2,200   -4,573   -1,204    1,170

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.0      5.7     13.8     44.2     63.5     87.1     83.0     12.9     17.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      181)
      55       29       57       68       77      148      143
```

----

Updated June 24, 2011
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED, et al., petitioners, v. Joe R. WHATLEY, Jr., WD Trustee.

No. 18-1094.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Timothy P. O'LEARY, petitioner, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 18-1266.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1000
<COMMON>                                         74150
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF the PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 388, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 79-1578.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 17, 1981.

Roger A. Rapaport, D. Michael Dudley, Sablich, Ryan, Dudley, Rapaport & Bobay, Lansing, Mich., for petitioner.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Penny Pilzer, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N. L. R. B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Circuit Judge, and LIVELY and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon cross-petitions for review and enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board reported at 245 N.L.R.B. No. 160, determining that petitioner Local No. 388 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices violated section 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the National Labor Relations Act by discriminatorily refusing to refer one William Long, a member of sister Local No. 639, from a hiring hall operated by Local 388 in Lansing, Michigan.

The sole question is whether substantial evidence supports the finding of the Board that Local 388 Business Agent Douglas Griffith refused to refer Long because Long had been accused of causing a work slowdown at a job within Local 388’s jurisdiction, an action taken without the prior approval of the local union. Local 388’s defense was that the refusal to refer Long was because Long had limited his employment availability to welding work, which, it was claimed, was not available on the date in question. For his part, Long claimed that while he had not specifically asked for work other than welding, his referral slip made it clear he was interested in work both as a welder and as a pipefitter, and that he was equally qualified for pipefitting jobs which were available on the date in question. It is manifest to the court that the issue was one of fact which was resolved against petitioner since substantial evidence supports the findings of fact made by the Administrative Law Judge and adopted by the Board.

IT IS ORDERED that its order entered pursuant thereto is enforced and Local 388’s petition is denied.
Tajie COLEMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8931.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

*2655Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al.

No. 17-1335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Kourtney HERMAN, petitioner, v. Crystal YOUNG, et al.

No. 18-5761.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
Gustav KLOSZEWSKI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8902.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Ronald David JONES, petitioner, v. GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 18-5198.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1791 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1791

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 1999

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for harming 
                animals used in Federal law enforcement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Animal 
Protection Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. HARMING ANIMALS USED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement
    ``(a) Whoever willfully and maliciously harms any police animal, or 
attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title and 
imprisoned not more than one year. If the offense permanently disables 
or disfigures the animal, or causes serious bodily injury or the death 
of the animal, the maximum term of imprisonment shall be 10 years.
    ``(b) In this section, the term `police animal' means a dog or 
horse employed by a Federal agency (whether in the executive, 
legislative, or judicial branch) for the principal purpose of aiding in 
the detection of criminal activity, enforcement of laws, or 
apprehension of criminal offenders.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Caster Delaney WHETSTONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7639.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
XIU JIAN SUN, petitioner, v. Oren L. ZEKE.

No. 18-173.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Mark D. WHITFIELD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5890.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Steve L. WRIGHT, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7169.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1208Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTitan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis R. Bucalo, M.D.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9th day of November, 2006. 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Farrell, J.D., Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for theperiod certified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9th day of November, 2006.