alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0088. JAMES DANDY UYANNA v. THE STATE.

James DandyUyanna pled guilty to financial card fraud. According to Uyanna,

he filed a motion to contest his conviction on the basis that his trial counsel failed to

inform him of the immigration consequences of his plea.1 The trial court entered an

“Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Sentence” on June 18, 2018. On July

25, 2018, Uyanna filed an application for discretionary appeal to the Supreme Court,

which transferred the application to this Court. See Case No. S18D1632 (transferred

August 23, 2018). We, however, lack jurisdiction. 

First, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of

entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA

§ 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not

made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57)

(1989). Because Uyanna filed his discretionary application in the Supreme Court 37

days after the trial court issued its order, his application is untimely.

Second, even if Uyanna’s application had been timely filed, this Court would

still lack jurisdiction. “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to

claimsthat – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the

sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically

because it exceeds the mostsevere punishment for which the applicable penal statute

provides.” Von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). 

1 Uyanna has not included a copy of the motion with his application, as is

required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e).

October 01, 2018
Uyanna has not raised that claim. Moreover, to the extent that Uyanna’s motion

could be construed as seeking to vacate or modify his convictions, “a petition to

vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal

case,” id. at 218 (1), and any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a

motion must be dismissed. See id. at 218 (2); see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532,

532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider

Uyanna’s application, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/01/2018
Robert S. BEYER, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       91,761
COMMITMENTS
  10,794    5,048    3,840   71,288   78,844   85,922   87,732    5,839    4,029

CHANGES FROM 12/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     26,296)
     517    1,107    3,417   21,236   20,500   25,170   25,024    1,126    1,272

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.8      5.5      4.2     77.7     85.9     93.6     95.6      6.4      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       73)
      10        8        5       35       32       49       41
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      167,738
COMMITMENTS
  29,440   20,776    3,628  108,785  124,321  141,853  148,725   25,885   19,013

CHANGES FROM 12/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,895)
   6,073      472   -3,189    3,727    5,190    6,611    2,473   10,284   14,422

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.6     12.4      2.2     64.9     74.1     84.6     88.7     15.4     11.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      132)
      38       13        6       66       42      107       58
```

----

Updated December 21, 2012
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1973

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national cemetery

for veterans in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, metropolitan area.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. DOYLE (for himself, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. COYNE, Mr.

KLINK, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr.

FATTAH, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. PETERSON of

Pennsylvania, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. GEKAS, Mr. GOODLING, and Mr. PITTS) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a

national cemetery for veterans in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, metropolitan area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL CEMETERY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

5 shall establish, in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38,

6 United States Code, a national cemetery in the Pitts7 burgh, Pennsylvania, metropolitan area to serve the needs

8 of veterans and their families.
2

•HR 1973 IH

1 (b) REPORT.—As soon as practicable after the date

2 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit

3 to Congress a report that sets forth a schedule for the

4 establishment of the national cemetery under subsection

5 (a) and an estimate of the costs associated with such es6 tablishment.

Æ
MONTANANS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, petitioner, v. Jeffrey A. MANGAN, et al.

No. 18-377.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Casey PEEBLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9315.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Willie DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7317.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Amos CHASSON, aka Roee Alias, aka Roee Hason, applicant, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General.

No. 18A16.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Application for stay addressed to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and referred to the Court denied.
Arthur J. FREER, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, et al.

No. 18-7347

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ronald COLLINS, Jr., petitioner, v. Kristen KELLER.

No. 18-8962.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Thomas McCLARY, et al., petitioners, v. COMMODORES ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

No. 18-47.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19-0455 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JACOB WILLIAM ABEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing as well as agreement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 2, 2020, within which to prepare, file and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 23 2020

09/23/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0455
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2162

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Tommy Dale Christopher, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 22, 1997

 Filed: September 3, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tommy Dale Christopher appeals the 75-month sentence imposed by the district

court after he pleaded guilty to transmitting in interstate commerce a communication 1

containing a threat to injure, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(b). We affirm. 
-2-

The sole issue on appeal is whether Christopher&s 1994 California conviction for

second-degree burglary of a commercial building constituted a “crime of violence”

within the meaning of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.2(1) (1995) (defining

“crime of violence” to include crimes involving “conduct that presents a serious

potential risk of physical injury to another”), thereby qualifying Christopher for a

career-offender enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1

(1995). As Christopher concedes, in United States v. Hascall, 76 F.3d 902, 904-05

(8th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 358 (1996), we determined that second-degree

burglaries of commercial buildings involve conduct that presents a serious potential risk

of physical injury to another.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Gabriel RIVERO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Barry J. BLUEFELD, petitioner, v. Barry S. COHEN, et al.

No. 17-7891.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2



                            CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                             18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report of Zow, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Marc
Seely,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

         (1)      The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section
                  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all  material  respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations  of  the  Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Zow,  Inc.,  and  will  be  retained by Zow, Inc. and furnished to
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/s/  Marc  Seely
-  --------------------------
Marc  Seely
Chief  Executive  Officer
April  14,  2004
Assane FAYE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5972.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40953 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROCKY BERT COZZENS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-166-1

- - - - - - - - - - January 20, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Rocky Cozzens has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cozzens did not file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Joseph ROBERTS, petitioner, v. FNB SOUTH OF ALMA, GEORGIA.

No. 17-1495.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-0225V 

Filed: July 20, 2017 

Unpublished 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

NATHALIE COLLADO, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Causation-in-Fact; Influenza (Flu) 

 * Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration (SIRVA);

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (SPU) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. 

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On February 16, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered left shoulder injuries caused in fact 

by the influenza vaccination she received on October 22, 2015. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 13. 

Petitioner further alleges that she received the vaccination in the United States, has 

suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that neither she 

nor any other party has filed an action or received compensation for her injury alleged 

as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 2, 13-15. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On July 17, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, respondent “has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

 

1

 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

SIRVA . . . caused-in-fact by the flu vaccination she received on October 22, 2015.” Id.

at 2. Respondent further indicates that “based on the current record, petitioner has 

satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 3. 

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.02

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Theresa D. Becks, the Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as general partner, of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                                        CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                                        By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general
                                            partner

                                        By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Theresa D. Becks
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            November 13, 2003

                                      -E 7-
MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, petitioner, v. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 18-18.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 2, 2018.

*452Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Rodney HOWARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5152.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
BANCA UBAE, S.P.A., petitioner, v. Deborah D. PETERSON, et al.

No. 17-1530.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 

AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC’s Opposed Motion for Leave to File 

and Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 146). Plaintiff had previously moved to amend the Docket 

Control Order to extend the deadline to file motions to compel. (Dkt. No. 132). The Court 

GRANTS the Motion for Leave to File. The Court does not yet rule on the Motion to Compel. It 

is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, (Dkt. No. 146), is timely filed. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the DCO, (Dkt. No. 132), 

is DENIED as moot. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 149 Filed 09/24/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 6001
Alvin RAMIREZ-DE JESUS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5973.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
David LIBRACE, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration.

No. 18-5566.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (80)
<INVENTORY>                                        374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,983
<PP&E>                                          34,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              889
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,780
<SALES>                                          1,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,272
<CGS>                                            1,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (500)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (56)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,048)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
Telson OKHIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUIS RODRIGUEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00053-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D00948)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s fourth request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until July 28, 2018. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BECONSIDERED 

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Bertha A. Prieto, Official Court Reporter for the 41st District 

Court, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and 

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before July 28, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00169-CV

In re Nationwide Insurance Company of America,

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company,

Nationwide Life Insurance Company, Nationwide General Insurance Company,

Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, and Ronni B. Poe

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the district court’s

order denying their motion to dismiss pursuant to a forum-selection clause. On this record, the Court

denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Filed: April 3, 2015