alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,900
<INVENTORY>                                    301,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               692,400
<PP&E>                                         446,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 146,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,143,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          528,700
<BONDS>                                         81,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,143,600
<SALES>                                      1,595,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,601,200
<CGS>                                        1,235,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,235,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               319,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50214

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABEL MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-95-CA-218

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abel Maldonado, #31962-138, appeals from the district

court’s order dismissing his motion to vacate, set aside, or

correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues

that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict him for

violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and that § 841 is

unconstitutional. 
No. 96-50214

- 2 -

This court has determined that § 841 is a valid exercise of

Congress’ commerce power. See United States v. Owens, 996 F.2d

59, 61 (5th Cir. 1993). Federal courts have jurisdiction over

any criminal prosecution charging a violation of federal law. 18

U.S.C. § 3231; United States v. Drobny, 955 F.2d 990, 997 (5th

Cir. 1992). 

Maldonado’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Maldonado that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Maldonado is further cautioned to review all pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

A report summarizing the closed meeting activities of the Art Advisory Panel during Fiscal Year 2021 has been prepared. A copy of this report has been filed with the Assistant Secretary for Management of the Department of the Treasury.

# DATES:

*Applicable Date:*                         This notice is applicable May 11, 2022.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The report is available at                         *https://www.irs.gov/​compliance/​appeals/​art-appraisal-services.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robin B. Lawhorn, AP:SPR:AAS, Internal Revenue Service/Independent Office of Appeals, 400 West Bay Street, Suite 252, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Telephone number (904) 661-3198 (not a toll free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

It has been determined that this document is not a major rule as defined in Executive Order 12291 and that a regulatory impact analysis is, therefore, not required. Additionally, this document does not constitute a rule subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6).

*Authority:*                     5 U.S.C. app. 2, section 10(d), of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and 5 U.S.C. 552b, of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

Andrew J. Keyso Jr.,

Chief, Independent Office of Appeals.

[FR Doc. 2022-10492 Filed 5-16-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           132,142
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      22,323
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 154,465
<CASH>                                          11,949
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,329
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           8,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,435
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 92,848
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             30,413
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,435
<PREMIUMS>                                      53,330
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              5,772
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 235
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     203
<BENEFITS>                                      29,883
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     16,863
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,604
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  68,246<F1>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             29,883
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               4,594
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                11,840
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 81,695
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES DIFFER FROM THE AMOUNTS REPORTED
IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE INCLUSION HEREIN OF
REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES OF $11,153 AND $9,440 AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND 
DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES, et al., appellants, v. Golden BETHUNE-HILL, et al.

No. 18-1134.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See *Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill,* 587 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 1945, --- L.E.2d ---- (2019).
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/31/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      326,066
COMMITMENTS
  52,014  130,293   61,143  192,398  114,228  305,555  305,664   20,511   20,402

CHANGES FROM 12/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,128)
  -1,734  -12,490    2,554   -6,558    6,688   -5,738   -3,248    1,610     -880

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.0     40.0     18.8     59.0     35.0     93.7     93.7      6.3      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      141)
      52       47       60       30       31      114      113
```

----

Updated January 4, 2013
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/09/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      404,089
COMMITMENTS
  69,628  157,751   70,106  239,698  150,686  379,432  378,543   24,657   25,546

CHANGES FROM 10/02/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     13,725)
     596   -3,167    9,572    3,325    6,671   13,493   13,076      232      649

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.2     39.0     17.3     59.3     37.3     93.9     93.7      6.1      6.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      163)
      49       63       76       35       38      135      137
```

----

Updated October 12, 2012
Rash B. GHOSH, petitioner, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-6813.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1666 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1666

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 
  East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as the ``Captain Colin P. 
                       Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1666

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 
  East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as the ``Captain Colin P. 
                       Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 
East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, is hereby designated as the 
``Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference to such facility in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Vaughn S. ARCHER, petitioner, v. Daniel PARAMO, Warden.

No. 18-9004.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
| ·   | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the Company’s financial      condition and results ofoperations. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      31, 2010 |   | /s/Craig      E. Dahl                          |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
| Date                |   | Craig      E. Dahl                             |
|                |   | President      andChief      Executive Officer |

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF BACKWEBS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, William Heye, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BackWeb Technologies Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ William Heye
William Heye
Chief Executive Officer Date: March 25, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1666 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 614
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1666

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2000

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             June 21, 2000

              Reported by Mr. Thompson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 
  East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as the ``Captain Colin P. 
                       Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 
East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, is hereby designated as the 
``Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference to such facility in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 614

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 1666

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 
  East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as the ``Captain Colin P. 
                       Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 21, 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1000
<COMMON>                                         74150
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2018

NO. 03-18-00242-CV

Andrew Shadoian, Appellant

v.

Nicole Shook, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 31, 2016. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133614 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133614 

 COA: 266550 

Wayne CC: 05-005310-01

KEWAYNE HERSEL CARTER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
ESTATE OF Juanita JACKSON, et al., petitioners, v. Rubin SCHRON.

No. 18-27.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.