alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LAURA PERRYMAN, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. STIMWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § No. 256, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2019-1003 § § § § § Submitted: August 9, 2022 Decided: August 29, 2022

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR , Justices.

ORDER After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that: (1) On July 26, 2022, the pro se appellant, Laura Perryman, filed a notice of appeal from a letter order dated July 14, 2022, in which the Court of Chancery denied Perryman’s motion to lift a status quo order that had previously been entered in the case. The notice of appeal also identifies rulings made by the Court of Chancery during a telephonic hearing on May 4, 2022, when the court denied an earlier motion to lift and vacate the status quo order, and a hearing held in November 2020. The July 14, 2022 order denying the motion to lift the status quo order states2 that on July 7, 2022, the court lifted a stay in the action and that “the matter shall proceed to trial.” (2) The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Perryman to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 in taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. In response, Perryman contends that she complied with Rule 42 because she filed an application for certification of an interlocutory appeal of the Court of Chancery’s May 4, 2022 ruling, and the Court of Chancery denied that application on June 9, 2022. Perryman asserts that she did not pursue an interlocutory appeal of the May 4, 2022 ruling because “the case was on stay,” instead moving to lift the stay and then filing a second motion to lift the status quo order. (3) Absent compliance with Supreme Court Rule 42, the appellate jurisdiction of this Court is limited to the review of final orders. 1 Moreover, a notice of appeal must be timely filed to invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction. 2 Although Perryman filed an application for certification of an interlocutory appeal from the Court of Chancery’s May 4, 2022 ruling, she decided not to file an interlocutory appeal at that time. And she did not file an application for certification of an interlocutory appeal from the July 14, 2022 order, or otherwise comply with the

1 Hines v. Williams , 2018 WL 2435551 (Del. May 29, 2018). 2 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).3 procedural requirements of Rule 42 as to that order. Perryman’s failure to comply with Rule 42 leaves this Court without jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal from the July 14, 2022 order, and her failure to file a timely notice of interlocutory appeal from the May 4, 2022 or November 2020 rulings leaves the court without jurisdiction to hear an interlocutory appeal from those rulings. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Faraday Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank
J. Gillen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Frank J. Gillen
-----------------------------
Frank J. Gillen
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2004
Jaime Shakur GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5847.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, C. Baker Cunningham,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



/s/ C. Baker Cunningham

C. Baker Cunningham
Chairman of the Board, President and
    Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Tyrone GARDEN, petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 18-7947.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
EXHIBIT 99





              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350 as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinnacle Financial Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: NOVEMBER 8, 2002              By: /S/ L. JACKSON MCCONNELL
      ----------------                  ------------------------
                                            L. Jackson McConnell
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: NOVEMBER 8, 2002              By: /S/ H. THOMAS WARREN III
      ----------------                  ------------------------
                                            H. Thomas Warren III
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Dustin DRESSNER, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-7693.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

*2692Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
Adolfo LOPEZ-GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5828.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Martin R. VANDEMERWE, petitioner, v. Steve LANGFORD, Warden.

No. 18-5483.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAYMUNDO CARRANZA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00298-CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D00299)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until April 18, 2017. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Natalie A. Martinez, Court Reporter for the 409th District 

Court, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and 

numbered cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before April 18, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7

th day of March, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Andrew COX, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9200.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
William Arthur McINTOSH, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-8936.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Contrice TRAVIS, petitioner, v. EXEL, INC., dba DHL Supply Chain (USA), et al.

No. 18-533.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/02/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      390,364
COMMITMENTS
  69,032  160,918   60,534  236,373  144,015  365,939  365,467   24,425   24,897

CHANGES FROM 09/25/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,238)
  -8,277  -11,587   -1,020    8,850    9,774     -447   -2,833   -2,791     -405

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.7     41.2     15.5     60.6     36.9     93.7     93.6      6.3      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      157)
      43       62       71       37       41      124      139
```

----

Updated October 5, 2012
Nexis Rene GOMEZ, petitioner, v. Ken CLARK, Acting Warden.

No. 18-8888.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Joyce SIMMONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5743.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Uradni list C 39/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 39 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6526. januar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 39

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6526. januar 2022

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2022/C 39/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 25. januar 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2022/C 39/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 25. januar 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 26.1.2022 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2022

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 39/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

25. januar 2022

(2022/C 39/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1268 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 128,49 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4437 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,83713 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,5020 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0364 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 146,00 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 10,1385 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 24,500 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 359,44 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5751 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,9448 |
| TRY | turška lira | 15,2723 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5814 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4247 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,7725 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6911 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5157 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 350,71 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,2669 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,1325 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5295 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 169,54 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,7213 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 57,753 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 88,7384 |
| THB | tajski bat | 37,280 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,2049 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 23,2909 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 84,2770 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1268

JPY

japonski jen

128,49

DKK

danska krona

7,4437

GBP

funt šterling

0,83713

SEK

švedska krona

10,5020

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0364

ISK

islandska krona

146,00

NOK

norveška krona

10,1385

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

24,500

HUF

madžarski forint

359,44

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5751

RON

romunski leu

4,9448

TRY

turška lira

15,2723

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5814

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4247

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,7725

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6911

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5157

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 350,71

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,2669

CNY

kitajski juan

7,1325

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5295

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 169,54

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,7213

PHP

filipinski peso

57,753

RUB

ruski rubelj

88,7384

THB

tajski bat

37,280

BRL

brazilski real

6,2049

MXN

mehiški peso

23,2909

INR

indijska rupija

84,2770

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
Deanna BROOKHART, Acting Warden, petitioner, v. Anthony D. LEE, Sr.

No. 18-1197.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10348]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Market Solar ProjectCo 1, LLC.......................     EG22-48-000
New Market Solar ProjectCo 2, LLC.......................     EG22-49-000
Sapphire Sky Wind Energy LLC............................     EG22-50-000
Waiawa Solar Power LLC..................................     EG22-51-000
Highland Solar Transco Interconnection LLC..............     EG22-52-000
Madero Grid, LLC........................................     EG22-53-000
Ignacio Grid, LLC.......................................     EG22-54-000
Rabbitbrush Solar, LLC..................................     EG22-55-000
Corazon Energy Services, LLC............................     EG22-56-000
Panorama Wind, LLC......................................     EG22-57-000
Victoria WLE, LP........................................     EG22-58-000
Brookfield White Pine Hydro LLC.........................     EG22-59-000
Number Three Wind LLC...................................     EG22-60-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of April 2022, the status of the 
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) 
(2021).

    Dated: May 9, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10348 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         May 11, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on May 4, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 739 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-55, CP2022-60.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-10108 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Gene N. BARRY, petitioner, v. Scott M. FRESHOUR, et al.

No. 18-1483.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 10.21****Termination Agreement**This Termination Agreement is made as of this l2th day of December 2007, andis between Brooke Capital Corporation (formerly named First American CapitalCorporation), a Kansas corporation (“Buyer”), and Brooke Brokerage Corporation, aKansas corporation (“Seller”).1. Buyer and Seller are party to that certain Stock Purchase Agreement, datedFebruary 14, 2007 (the “Agreement”), whereby Seller was to sell to Buyer all thecapital stock of Brooke Savings Bank, a Federally-chartered savings and loaninstitution (the “Transaction”). 2. The parties have since determined that closing the Transaction is no longer inthe best interests of either. 3. Concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Termination Agreement,Seller has agreed to pay Buyer the amount of $151,542 in reimbursement of all of thecosts and expense incurred by Buyer in pursuing the transaction contemplated bythe Agreement.Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, the mutual promises, covenantsand undertakings described herein and the sum of $10.00 paid by each party to theother, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged, theparties agree that the Agreement shall be terminated pursuant to Section 9.3(a)(l)thereof, effective as of the date set forth above.The parties have executed this Termination Agreement below by the signatures of theirduly-authorized representatives.         **SELLER:**   **Buyer:**             Brooke Brokerage Corporation Brooke Capital Corporation           Signed: /s/ Gary L. Baugh  Signed: /s/ Kyle L. Garst   Printed name: Gary L. Baugh Printed name: Kyle L. Garst  Title: President Title: President & CEO  Date: 12/13/07 Date:
John GOODMAN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-179.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
Francisco ILLARRAMENDI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9335.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Scooter L. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. Frank SHAW, Warden, et al.

No. 18-5102.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Christopher D. SCHNEIDER, petitioner, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.

No. 18-7701.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
James Aren DUCKETT, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-8683.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-90135) of fashionmall.com, Inc
of our report dated February 26, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of fashionmall.com, Inc. appearing in the Annual Report on Form
10K-SB for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                      /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                      --------------------
                                                      BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
April 6, 2001
Arrez MELITON-SALTO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9026.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-40777 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Domingo Hernandez-Perez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:22-CR-1162-1 

______________________________ 

Before Jones, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Domingo 

Hernandez-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Perez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

May 30, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40777 Document: 00516768126 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2023
No. 22-40777 

2 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 22-40777 Document: 00516768126 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2023