alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         31,457
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                      188
<INVENTORY>                                    58,709
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              120,233
<PP&E>                                         29,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                  7,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                157,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,499
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          105
<OTHER-SE>                                    120,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  157,830
<SALES>                                       317,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              317,267
<CGS>                                         263,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                40,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                   16,369
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            24,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   24,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                    2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.20



</TABLE>
Jose NIEVES-GALARZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5561.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         2828
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1893
<ALLOWANCES>                                   137
<INVENTORY>                                    1862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6514
<PP&E>                                         7731
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1961
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       42
<OTHER-SE>                                     8373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12380
<SALES>                                        6126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7476
<CGS>                                          5559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                696
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            696
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .20
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc. as general partnerof Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2005 of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained inthe Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.         CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1791 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1791

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for harming 
                animals used in Federal law enforcement.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1791

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for harming 
                animals used in Federal law enforcement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Animal 
Protection Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. HARMING ANIMALS USED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement
    ``(a) Whoever willfully and maliciously harms any police animal, or 
attempts to conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title and 
imprisoned not more than one year. If the offense permanently disables 
or disfigures the animal, or causes serious bodily injury or the death 
of the animal, the maximum term of imprisonment shall be 10 years.
    ``(b) In this section, the term `police animal' means a dog or 
horse employed by a Federal agency (whether in the executive, 
legislative, or judicial branch) for the principal purpose of aiding in 
the detection of criminal activity, enforcement of laws, or 
apprehension of criminal offenders.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 65 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1368. Harming animals used in law enforcement.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Ann Wilma PETERSEN, petitioner, v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., dba Norwegian Cruise Line.

No. 18-832.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **
**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                       |   |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| By:    | /s/ Michael              S. McDevitt                                  |   |   |   |
|   | Michael              S. McDevitt                                           |   |   |        |
|   | Chief              Executive              Officer, Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |
|   | November 2, 2007                                                           |   |   |   |

----
Juan LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9092.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JARRETT WILLIAM RIPLEY

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 04 0

- CR

Appeal from the

112 th District Court

of Pecos C ounty, Texas

(TC# P

- 3892

- 112

- CR )

O R D E R

The Court filed the Clerk’s Record on March 12, 2019 . After review, it appears that the

Nunc Pro Tunc Judgment of Conviction by Jury does not contain the correct date on which

sentence was imposed in open court. The nunc pro tunc judgment recites that the sentence was

imposed in open court on Saturday, November 3, 2018, but the parties have represented t o the

Court in prior correspondence that Appellant’s sentence was not imposed until November 13,

2018. The parties’ representations are consistent with volume 7 of the reporter’s record which

shows that Appellant was not sentenced in open court during the proceedings on November 3,

2018.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS that the Honorable Pedro (Pete) Gomez, Jr., Judge for the

112 th District Court of Pecos County, Texas, enter a nunc pro tunc judgment to include the correct

date sentence was imposed. The nun c pro tunc judgment shall be filed with the District Clerk of2

Pecos County, Texas, and the District Clerk shall prepare a supplemental clerk’s record which will

include the nunc pro tunc judgment and file it with this Court on or before April 2 , 201 9

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 13 th day of March , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before M cClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


Director Compensation Policy


On December 4, 2018 the Compensation Committee of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. (the "Company"), after consultation with the Board, adopted the revised Board of Directors Compensation Policy (the "Board of Directors Compensation Policy"), for all non-employee Board members, which policy was previously amended by the Board on March 27, 2018, May 16, 2017 and December 4, 2016, and currently provides that:


		
	•
	each Board member shall be authorized to receive an annual cash compensation retainer of $40,000 for his or her service as a Board member;




		
	•
	the Lead Director shall be authorized to receive an additional annual cash compensation retainer of $10,000 for his or her service as the Lead Director;




		
	•
	the Non-executive Chair shall be authorized to receive an additional annual cash compensation retainer of $30,000 for his or her service as the Non-executive Chair;




		
	•
	each member of the Company's Audit Committee shall be entitled to receive annual cash compensation of $8,000 for his or her service on such committee;




		
	•
	each member of the Company's Compensation Committee shall be entitled to receive annual cash compensation of $6,000 for his or her service on such committee;




		
	•
	each member of the Company's Nominating and Governance Committee shall be entitled to receive annual cash compensation of $4,500 for his or her service on such committee;




		
	•
	each member of the Company's Science and Technology Committee shall be entitled to receive annual cash compensation of$4,500 for his or her service on such committee;




		
	•
	the Audit Committee Chair shall be authorized to receive annual cash compensation of $18,000 for his or her service as the Chair;




		
	•
	the Compensation Committee Chair shall be authorized to receive annual cash compensation of $12,000 for his or her service as the Chair;




		
	•
	the Nominating and Governance Committee Chair shall be authorized to receive annual cash compensation of $9,000 for his or her service as the Chair;




		
	•
	the Science and Technology Committee Chair shall be authorized to receive annual cash compensation of $9,000 for his or her service as the Chair;




		
	•
	each member of the Board shall receive annually on the second Monday in January a grant of restricted stock with a Black Scholes value of $60,000 with the number of shares to be issued on the grant date calculated based on the grant date fair value with annual vesting at one year from the grant date; and




		
	•
	each newly appointed Board member shall receive an initial grant of restricted stock with a Black Scholes value of $60,000 with the number of shares to be issued on the grant date calculated based on the grant date fair value with one-third vesting annually on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1000
<COMMON>                                         74150
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Company's
Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      14,316,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,564,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,228,000
<INVENTORY>                                 67,207,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           143,020,000
<PP&E>                                     153,408,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             100,110,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             244,297,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       62,066,000
<BONDS>                                    120,967,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,647,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               244,297,000
<SALES>                                    197,992,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           261,779,000
<CGS>                                      146,226,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              202,542,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            49,910,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               350,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,605,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,575,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,164,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,739,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,739,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Walter P. REED, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1336.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NEW PRODUCTS CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC, et al.

No. 18-208.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/27/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       43,719
COMMITMENTS
   3,390      736        0   36,957   41,425   40,347   42,161    3,372    1,558

CHANGES FROM 09/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,368)
   1,054     -256        0    1,190    2,711    2,244    2,455      124      -87

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.8      1.7      0.0     84.5     94.8     92.3     96.4      7.7      3.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       6        2        0       26       28       32       30
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/27/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       57,602
COMMITMENTS
   4,722   17,503      192   47,279   37,403   52,193   55,098    5,409    2,504

CHANGES FROM 09/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,169)
      -2   11,056      192    2,218   -7,124    2,408    4,124     -239   -1,955

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.2     30.4      0.3     82.1     64.9     90.6     95.7      9.4      4.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       69)
      13        5        1       36       22       49       28
```

----

Updated September 30, 2011
M.P.F., petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-5140.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000916394
<NAME>                        GlenGate Apparel, Inc.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996

<CASH>                                         34,917
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,848,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (173,515)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,206,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,404,392
<PP&E>                                         257,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,697,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,283,960
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,114
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,697,839
<SALES>                                        6,229,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,229,728
<CGS>                                          4,150,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,150,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,326,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,449,291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,449,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.22)
        


</TABLE>
Tony McLEOD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8600.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed June 19, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D24

- 0098 Lower Tribunal No s

. 23

- 01722 , 23

- 01723, 23

- 01724

________________ 

### Mario E. Vazquez , Appellant,

vs. 

### B & R Supermarket Inc., et al. ,

Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission. Mario E. Vazquez, in proper person. Katie E. Sabo, Appellate Counsel (Tallahassee), for appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

.

Before EMAS, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Ryals v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n , 722 So. 2d 845, 846 (Fla. 2d DC A 1998) (“[W]here a claimant does not challenge the sufficiency of the [referee’s] findings, but only offers a different version of the facts, there is no legal error

. ”).