alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TYLER DIVISION 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

v. 

LINDSEY DASHAY JONES, 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CASE NUMBER 6:23-CR-00021-JDK

 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON 

GUILTY PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), this matter has been referred by the District Court for 

administration of a plea of guilty under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

On May 3, 2023, this cause came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge 

for a plea of guilty to an Indictment charging the Defendant in Count One with a violation of Title 

18 U.S.C. § 751(a) – Escape from Custody. After conducting said proceeding in the form and 

manner prescribed by FED. R. CRIM. P. 11, the undersigned finds that: 

a. Defendant, after consultation with counsel of record, has knowingly and voluntarily 

consented to the administration of the Guilty Plea in this cause by a United States Magistrate Judge, 

subject to a final acceptance and imposition of sentence by the District Judge; 

b. Defendant and the government have entered into a plea agreement which has been 

filed and disclosed in open court pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(2); 

c. Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that the 

defendant is aware of the nature of the charges, the maximum penalties, and the consequences of 

the plea, and that the plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea supported by an independent 

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense; and 

Case 6:23-cr-00021-JDK-JDL Document 28 Filed 05/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
d. Defendant understands each of the constitutional and statutory rights enumerated 

in Rule 11(b) and wishes to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury. 

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the District Court accept the Plea 

Agreement and the Guilty Plea of the defendant and that LINDSEY DASHAY JONES should be 

finally adjudged guilty of that offense. 

Defendant has waived her right to object to the findings of the Magistrate Judge in this 

matter, and the Government also waived its right to object, so the Court will present this Report 

and Recommendation to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle for adoption immediately upon 

issuance. 

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of May, 2023.

Case 6:23-cr-00021-JDK-JDL Document 28 Filed 05/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
Cathy CARDILLO, petitioner, v. Mark NEARY, Clerk, Supreme Court of New Jersey, et al.

No. 18-1311.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
HMONG 1, et al., petitioners, v. LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, et al.

No. 18-1315.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Blueprint





  Exhibit 10.1








STOCK AGREEMENT


 


 


WHEREAS, the
Executive is employed by the Company as Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) of the Company and its subsidiaries
(“Subsidiaries”), and has performed duties of his
employment in a capable and efficient manner, resulting in
substantial benefit to the Company; and

 


WHEREAS, the
Company desires to modify and extend the Stock Agreement dated
April 13, 2017 (Original Agreement), of the Executive, and
Executive is desirous of committing himself to continued service to
the Company on the terms herein provided. The terms herein
supersede and replace the terms of the Original
Agreement.

 


WHEREAS, The Board
of Directors has previously awarded 1,500,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock (the “stock”), subject to
certain milestones and forfeiture clauses to the
Executive.


 


The
Board of Directors acknowledges that the Original Agreement
Milestone 1 and Milestone 2 were successfully achieved, and in an
effort to incentivize the employee, has modified and extended
Milestone 3 and 4 as set forth below to the following
terms:


 



3. $80 Million Market Cap


When
the company obtains a $80 Million average market cap for any 5
consecutive days, the employee will retain 25% of the stock
(375,000 shares). If not obtain within 18 months of the date of
this agreement, 25% of the stock will be forfeited by the
employee.


 



4. Up-list to NASDAQ or NYSE


The
date the Company up-list to NASDAQ or NYSE, the employee will
retain 25% of the stock (375,000 shares). If not obtain within 18
months of the date of this agreement, 25% of the stock will be
forfeited by the employee.


 


 



ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:


 



Christopher Spencer


 


By:
/s/ Christopher
Spencer                            



Name: Christopher
Spencer


 


 


 



Liberated Syndication Inc.


 



By: /s/ John G.
Smith                                   








Name:
John G. Smith


Title:
Board Member and Chair of Compensation Committee
John CANNICI, petitioner, v. VILLAGE OF MELROSE PARK, ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 18-193.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 27,
1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                              68
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,936
<INVENTORY>                                    117,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,990
<PP&E>                                          76,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,889
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,307
<SALES>                                        405,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,887
<CGS>                                          308,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  308,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,630)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,013)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aquatic Cellulose International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10KSB for the period ending May 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sheridan Westgarde Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and
belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                                /s/  Sheridan Westgarde
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Sheridan Westgarde
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                February 26, 2004
Jimmy Wayne BROWN, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-8884.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District denied.
# Amtsblatt C 6A/6. J

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 6A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 65. Jahrgang6. Januar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 6A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

65. Jahrgang6. Januar 2022

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung eines allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/396/21 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die irische Sprache (GA) ( ABl. C 466 A vom 18.11.2021 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

2022/C 6 A/01

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung eines allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/396/21 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die irische Sprache (GA) ( ABl. C 466 A vom 18.11.2021 )

( ABl. C 466 A vom 18.11.2021 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

| 6.1.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 6/1

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung eines allgemeinen Auswahlverfahrens EPSO/AD/396/21 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die irische Sprache (GA)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 466 A vom 18. November 2021
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

Seite 1:

| Anstatt: | „
  Bewerbungsschluss: 21. Dezember 2021 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit
  “ |
| --- | --- |

Anstatt:

„
  Bewerbungsschluss: 21. Dezember 2021 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit
  “

| muss es heißen: | „
  Bewerbungsschluss: 25. Januar 2022 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Luxemburger Ortszeit
  “. |
| --- | --- |

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„
  Bewerbungsschluss: 25. Januar 2022 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Luxemburger Ortszeit
  “.

Seite 5:

| Anstatt: | „Bewerben Sie sich online über die EPSO-Website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities bis zum


  21. Dezember 2021 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.
  “ |
| --- | --- |

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Bewerben Sie sich online über die EPSO-Website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities bis zum

21. Dezember 2021 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Brüsseler Ortszeit.
  “

| muss es heißen: | „Bewerben Sie sich online über die EPSO-Website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities bis zum


  25. Januar 2022 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Luxemburger Ortszeit.
  “ |
| --- | --- |

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bewerben Sie sich online über die EPSO-Website https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities bis zum

25. Januar 2022 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags) Luxemburger Ortszeit.
  “

---
Anne A. SEARS, petitioner, v. Lucas D. BOTTORFF, et al.

No. 18-9226.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
```

```

----

Updated January 20, 2012
EXHIBIT 99.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the GTC Telecom Corp. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald A. DeCiccio, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)     Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)     The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





By:  /s/  GERALD  A.  DECICCIO
          --------------------
          GERALD  A.  DECICCIO
          Chief Financial Officer and Director
          August 28, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DWAYNE CUNNINGHAM,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 15 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,410,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,853,000
<PP&E>                                         966,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (872,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,328,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,125,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,097,073)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,328,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,469,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,082,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (201,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                68,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                409,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    48,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   361,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      49.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    40.25<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Effective March 21, 2000, MHM's Board approved a 500 to 1 reverse stock split.
Prior financial data schedules have not been restated for the
recaptialization.
</FN>


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRUNO DIPASQUALE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-5145 ) LISETTE DIPASQUALE, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge. David R. Hazouri and Raymond J. Rafool of Rafool, LLC, Miami, for Appellant. Cynthia B. Hall and Brian M. Silverio of Silverio & Hall, Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                              HEALTHGATE DATA CORP.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of HealthGate Data Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William S. Reece, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of December 31, 2002 (the last date of the period
          covered by the Report).


                                   /s/ William S. Reece
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                  William S. Reece
                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  March 28, 2003
NUMBER 13-22-00190-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

PAUL ANDREW ARANDA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant Paul Andrew Aranda filed a notice of appeal from his judgment of 

conviction for robbery in trial court cause number 21FC-0131D in the 105th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.02. The trial court has certified 

that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the Defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On April 26, 2022, this Court ordered appellant’s counsel to review the 
2

record and determine whether appellant has a right to appeal. In response, appellant’s 

counsel filed a letter indicating that appellant has no right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

See id. R. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed on the

26th day of May, 2022.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                                 Ending
Class            Interest                 Principal         Losses               Balance
<S>               <C>                    <C>                <C>              <C>
A-1A                  9,797,185.93        9,063,353.02         0.00           209,724,646.98
A-1B                 33,246,632.25                0.00         0.00           686,205,000.00
A-2                   2,914,906.50                0.00         0.00            58,887,000.00
A-3                   3,304,690.92                0.00         0.00            65,085,000.00
A-4                     965,132.37                0.00         0.00            18,596,000.00
B-1                   2,576,849.16                0.00         0.00            46,489,000.00
B-2                     858,986.67                0.00         0.00            15,497,000.00
B-3                   1,603,861.92                0.00         0.00            37,191,000.00
B-4                     935,596.89                0.00         0.00            21,695,000.00
B-5                     400,976.28                0.00         0.00             9,298,000.00
B-6                     514,165.59                0.00         0.00            12,397,000.00
B-7                     514,207.08                0.00         0.00            12,398,000.00
B-8                     514,165.59                0.00         0.00            12,397,000.00
C                     1,024,346.70                0.00         0.00            24,794,562.00
D-1                           0.00                0.00         0.00                     0.00
D-2                           0.00                0.00         0.00                     0.00
R-I                           0.00                0.00         0.00                     0.00
R-II                          0.00                0.00         0.00                     0.00
R-III                         0.00                0.00         0.00                     0.00
S                     9,322,938.87                0.00         0.00                     0.00


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Kay L. Toolson, CEO of Monaco Coach Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended July 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Monaco Coach Corporation.

 

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/  Kay L. Toolson |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | Kay L. Toolson           |   |
|   |   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

 

I,P. Martin Daley, CFO of Monaco Coach Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended July 3, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Monaco CoachCorporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Monaco Coach Corporation.

 

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/  P. Martin Daley |   |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | P.  Martin Daley          |   |
|   |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer  |   |

 

 

Asigned original of these written statements required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Monaco Coach Corporation and will be retained by Monaco CoachCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----