alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000910675
<NAME> COMMERCIAL ASSETS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      612
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,900
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,444
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,155
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
Charles G. KINNEY, petitioner, v. Michele Renee CLARK.

No. 18-1347.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
David V. ROCK, petitioner, v. Charmaine BRACY, Warden.

No. 18-5447.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1197

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska

Onorio Noriega-Sanchez, also *

known as Victor Noriega, also * [UNPUBLISHED]

know as Martin Rocha, also known *

as Jose Lamberto Noriega-Leon, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 6, 2002

 Filed: December 23, 2002

___________

Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Onorio Noriega-Sanchez appeals from the final judgment entered in the District

Court1

 for the District of Nebraska after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess

with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing
-2-

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. The district court

sentenced Noriega-Sanchez to 120 months imprisonment, the statutory minimum, and

5 years supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising for reversal that NoriegaSanchez’s sentence is too severe. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

Initially, we note that Noriega-Sanchez stipulated to a drug quantity that

triggered the imposition of the statutory minimum sentence. See United States v.

Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant who explicitly and voluntarily

exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal).

In any event, Noriega-Sanchez’s severity argument fails, because mandatory

minimum penalties for drug offenses do not violate the Eighth Amendment. See

United States v. Johnson, 988 F.2d 859 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). 

Having found no nonfrivolous issues following our independent review of the

record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw. We further deny Noriega-Sanchez’s motion for appointment of

new counsel. 

Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.23
        
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS UNDER
REAL ESTATE sale agreement
For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, THE PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“Assignor”), hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to ASHBURN FARM STATION LLC (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest as Purchaser in and to that certain Real Estate Sale Agreement dated October 20, 2018, as same may have been or may be amended, including any addendum thereto (“Agreement”) with Regency Realty Group, Inc. (“Seller”), as Seller, with respect to the land and improvements thereon known as Ashburn Farm Market Center located in Ashburn, Virginia, more particularly described in the Agreement, including, but not limited to, its right, title and interest in and to the Deposit (as defined in the Agreement).  
	
		
	Dated:  January 11, 2019
	THE PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP LLC, 
An Ohio limited liability company
By:   Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating 
         Partnership I L.P., a Delaware limited 
         partnership, its sole member
By:   Phillips Edison Grocery Center OP GP I LLC, 
         A Delaware limited liability company,
         Its General Partner

	 
	 

	 
	By:    /s/Robert F. Myers___________________
          Robert F. Myers, Senior Vice President 

	 
	 




The undersigned, Assignee, hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of Assignor’s obligations under the Agreement and hereby releases, indemnifies and holds Assignor harmless from any loss, cost, liability or expense which may be suffered by Assignor in connection with such Agreement, except for any such loss, cost, liability or expense resulting from the acts of Assignor in connection with the Agreement taken prior to the date of this Assignment without the applicable authorization or consent of the undersigned.
	
		
	Dated:  January 11, 2019
	ASHBURN FARM STATION LLC, 
A Delaware limited liability company 


By:   Phillips Edison Grocery Center Operating
         Partnership III, L.P., a Delaware limited 
         partnership, its sole member
By:   Phillips Edison Grocery Center OP GP III 
         LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 
         its General Partner



	 
	By:/s/ Joe Schlosser__________________
     Joe Schlosser, Senior Vice President
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, et al.

No. 17-71.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Motion of respondents Markle Interests, LLC, et al. for divided argument denied.
Ramon VASQUEZ, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-8134.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office denied.
Order filed September 19, 2017

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00356

- CV

____________ DONALD E KILPATRICK , Appellant

V.
NOBLE CAPITAL SERVIC ING LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1088694



### ORDER
On August 8, 2017, we ordered appellant to file a brief in this appeal by September 7, 2017. We cautioned that if appellant failed to comply with our order, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Hurricane Harvey struck the Texas coast on August 25, 2017. On August 28, 2017, the Supreme Court of Texas issued Misc. Docket No. 17

- 9091, an e mergency order directing all courts in Texas to consider disaster

- related delays as good cause2

for modifying or suspending all deadlines in any case.
Accordingly, if appellant does not file a brief by October 2, 2017 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
CLARA HEARD, ET AL.,

Appellant,

v.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4745

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Thomas R. Ellinor, Judge.

Clara Heard, pro se, Appellant.

Nancy M. Wallace and Thomas A. Range of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, and 

William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10-21

      

   

      

   

      

  EXHIBIT A

  

  

  

  

  PARTICIPANTS IN THE

  ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. EXECUTIVE

  CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN

  as of February 21, 2019

  

  

  	
          Tier I Participants

        	 	
          Chief Executive Officer

        	 
	
           

              

          Tier II Participants

        	 	
           

            

          Chief Operating Officer

          Chief Financial Officer

          Group Presidents

          Vice President of Administration

          Corporate Controller

        	 
	
           

              

          Tier III Participants

        	 	
           

            

          Subsidiary Presidents
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                      
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars            
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998           
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998     
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998     
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1     
<CASH>                                  571    
<SECURITIES>                              0    
<RECEIVABLES>                            65    
<ALLOWANCES>                              0    
<INVENTORY>                              46    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        945    
<PP&E>                                4,277    
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,184    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        2,038    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,189    
<BONDS>                                   0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0    
<PREFERRED>                               0    
<COMMON>                                101     
<OTHER-SE>                           (2,252)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          2,038   
<SALES>                                 330    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        330    
<CGS>                                   688    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           688    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,907    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (2,253)    
<INCOME-TAX>                              0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (2,253)    
<DISCONTINUED>                            0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0    
<CHANGES>                                 0    
<NET-INCOME>                         (2,253)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.22)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.22)          
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Kay L. Toolson, CEO of Monaco Coach Corporation, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco CoachCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchQuarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MonacoCoach Corporation.

 

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/ Kay L. Toolson      |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Kay L. Toolson          |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

I, P. Martin Daley, CFO of Monaco Coach Corporation, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 29, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such QuarterlyReport of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MonacoCoach Corporation.

 

 
|   |   | By:    | /s/ P. Martin Daley     |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | P. Martin Daley         |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  7
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                    <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                8,732,812
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                       0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                         0
<EQUITIES>                                                  0
<MORTGAGE>                                                  0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                               0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                      8,732,812
<CASH>                                              1,356,745
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                          0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              1,110,377 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     13,280,259
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                             0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                         0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                              0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                               2,103,558
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              557,984
<OTHER-SE>                                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       13,280,259
<PREMIUMS>                                            912,296
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                   437,647
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                          0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                        (63,090)
<BENEFITS>                                                  0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                           251,305
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (93,848) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                          106,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (200,248) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (200,248)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.036)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.036)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        379,920
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   268,120
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                           0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                          0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                            0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       648,040
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
People's Credit Card Master Trust

          Independent Accountants' Report on Management's Report on the
           Internal Control Structure Over Financial Reporting for the
                      Credit Card Division of People's Bank

                          Year ended December 31, 1996


                         Independent Accountants' Report

People's Bank
850 Main Street
Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604

Bankers Trust Company
Four Albany Street, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10006

Gentlemen:

We have examined the assertion made by the management of People's Bank 
("People's") that the credit card division of People's, inclusive of the 
servicing of People's Bank Credit Card Master Trust, maintained an internal
control structure over financial reporting as of December 31, 1996 that was
sufficient for the prevention and detection of errors and irregularities in 
amounts that would be material to the consolidated financial statements of
People's included in the accompanying management report entitled Management
Report on the Internal Control Structure Over Financial Reporting for the
Credit Card Division of People's Bank.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included 
obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure over financial
reporting, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
the internal control structure, and such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a 
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of the inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors
or irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control structure to future periods are subject
to the risk that the internal control structure may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the credit card division of
People's maintained an internal control structure over financial reporting as
of December 31, 1996 that was sufficient for the prevention and detection
of errors and irregularities in amounts that would be material to the
consolidated financial statements of People's is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based upon criteria described in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
March 20, 1997
John Garrett SMITH, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-5387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.
John BOWLING, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-8981.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         218,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               323,553
<PP&E>                                         322,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 685,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,404,636
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,327
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,070,109)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   685,467
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,903,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             699,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,326,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,396,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  70,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,326,918)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1826

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel THE ENTERPRIZE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 1999

Mr. YOUNG of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

THE ENTERPRIZE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106

6 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 1826 IH

1 trade for the vessel THE ENTERPRIZE (United States

2 official number 1077571).

Æ
Charles Gregory REECE, petitioner, v. Amrick BASI, et al.

No. 17-9373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Roger WILSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-5344.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.