alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belden Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, C. Baker Cunningham,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ C. Baker Cunningham

C. Baker Cunningham
Chairman of the Board, President and
    Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00190-CV

In re Bryan P. Suhre

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In a petition for writ of mandamus, Bryan P. Suhre alleges that he filed an application

for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus in the 264th District Court on August 4, 2009. See Tex.

Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2009). He asks the Court to issue a writ of mandamus

to compel the district court to act on the habeas corpus application, which he asserts the court has

failed to do.

Post-conviction habeas corpus applications pursuant to article 11.07 are returnable

to the court of criminal appeals. Id. § 3(a). In these cases, the convicting court acts as a fact-finder,

and it is the court of criminal appeals that ultimately grants or denies relief. Id. § 3(c), (d). This

Court has no jurisdiction and plays no role in these proceedings. If Suhre believes that the district

court is not carrying out its duties under article 11.07, he should seek mandamus relief in the court

of criminal appeals, the court for which the district court acts under the statute.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Filed: April 15, 2010

2
George Wayne BROOKS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-8279.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Kenneth Eugene CARTER, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-9058.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Afshin BAHRAMPOUR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7985.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION 

EDWARD BENTON GLASS §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-119-JRG-RSP

UPSHUR COUNTY MEDICAL, ET AL. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff Edward Glass, an inmate currently confined at the Upshur County Jail, 

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights lawsuit complaining of alleged 

violations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge 

Roy S. Payne for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition 

of the case. 

On November 8, 2023, Judge Payne issued a Report (Dkt. No. 30), recommending 

that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 15) be denied. A copy of this Report was 

sent to Plaintiff at his last-known address. To date, however, Plaintiff has neither filed objections 

to the Report nor otherwise communicated with the Court. The objection period has expired. 

Because objections to Judge Payne’s Report have not been filed, Petitioner is barred from 

de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, 

except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual 

findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. 

United Services Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). 

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate 

Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge 

is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918

 §

 §

Case 2:23-cv-00119-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 03/26/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 284
2

(1989) (holding that where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of 

review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 30) 

is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 

15) is DENIED. 

.

____________________________________

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE So ORDERED and SIGNED this 26th day of March, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00119-JRG-RSP Document 32 Filed 03/26/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 285
APPLIED UNDERWRITERS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. CITIZENS OF HUMANITY, LLC, et al.

No. 18-175.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 30219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR22-38-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  284.123 Rate Filing: SOC rates effective April 
29 2022 to be effective 4/29/2022.
    Filed Date: 5/10/22.
    Accession Number: 20220510-5070.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/31/22.

    Docket Numbers: PR22-39-000.
    Applicants: Cranberry Pipeline Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  284.123(g) Rate Filing: Cranberry Pipeline 
Corporation Revised Statement of Operating Conditions to be effective 
5/12/2022.
    Filed Date: 5/11/22.
    Accession Number: 20220511-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 6/1/22.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/2022.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-921-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TGP PCG Pooling Service to be 
effective 7/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 5/11/22.
    Accession Number: 20220511-5088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/23/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: May 12, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10679 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

```

----

Updated February 24, 2012
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/03/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       31,148
COMMITMENTS
   6,607      874       67   17,735   21,509   24,409   22,450    6,739    8,698

CHANGES FROM 06/26/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -472)
     408   -1,045       27   -1,064    1,355     -629      337      157     -809

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.2      2.8      0.2     56.9     69.1     78.4     72.1     21.6     27.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       45)
       9        4        2       27       23       36       29
```

----

Updated July 3, 2012
Eusebio ESCOBAR DE JESUS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5811.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


     In connection with Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of Extensions, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-K, for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, BB Tuley, the chief financial officer of the company hereby certify as of the
date  hereof, solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:


     (i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K, of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  September 30, 2009

/s/  BB  Tuley
--------------
BB  Tuley
Principal  Financial  Officer
In Re Brandon LEE, petitioner.

No. 18-5265.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ILIFE.COM,
INC.'S FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      22,503,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,715,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (235,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,367,736
<PP&E>                                       3,424,605
<DEPRECIATION>                               (936,211)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,461,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,223,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       135,410
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,310,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,461,757
<SALES>                                     12,117,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,117,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,709,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,292,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             232,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (33,769,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (33,769,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (33,769,330)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.34)


</TABLE>
Scott Richard PENDERGRAFT, et ux., petitioners, v. NETWORK OF NEIGHBORS, INC.

No. 18-7191.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Steve CHABOT, et al., applicants, v. OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.

No. 18A1166.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 24, 2019.

Application for stay presented to Justice SOTOMAYOR and by her referred to the Court is granted, and it is ordered that the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, case No. 1:18-CV-00357, entered May 3, 2019, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court or further order of this Court.
Amilka DEL MONTE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8801.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Úřední věstník C 34/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 34 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6524. ledna 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 34

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6524. ledna 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2022/C 34/01 | Směnné kurzy vůči euru — 21. ledna 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

2022/C 34/01

Směnné kurzy vůči euru — 21. ledna 2022

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

| 24.1.2022 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 34/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

21. ledna 2022

(2022/C 34/01)

1 euro =

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,1348 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 129,14 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4431 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,83633 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 10,4140 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 1,0353 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 145,60 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 10,0523 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 24,347 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 358,19 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,5318 |
| RON | rumunský lei | 4,9453 |
| TRY | turecká lira | 15,2230 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,5774 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,4211 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 8,8370 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,6884 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 1,5260 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 351,89 |
| ZAR | jihoafrický rand | 17,1546 |
| CNY | čínský juan | 7,1946 |
| HRK | chorvatská kuna | 7,5280 |
| IDR | indonéská rupie | 16 244,20 |
| MYR | malajsijský ringgit | 4,7508 |
| PHP | filipínské peso | 58,171 |
| RUB | ruský rubl | 86,8380 |
| THB | thajský baht | 37,358 |
| BRL | brazilský real | 6,2063 |
| MXN | mexické peso | 23,2229 |
| INR | indická rupie | 84,4190 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,1348

JPY

japonský jen

129,14

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4431

GBP

britská libra

0,83633

SEK

švédská koruna

10,4140

CHF

švýcarský frank

1,0353

ISK

islandská koruna

145,60

NOK

norská koruna

10,0523

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

česká koruna

24,347

HUF

maďarský forint

358,19

PLN

polský zlotý

4,5318

RON

rumunský lei

4,9453

TRY

turecká lira

15,2230

AUD

australský dolar

1,5774

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,4211

HKD

hongkongský dolar

8,8370

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,6884

SGD

singapurský dolar

1,5260

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 351,89

ZAR

jihoafrický rand

17,1546

CNY

čínský juan

7,1946

HRK

chorvatská kuna

7,5280

IDR

indonéská rupie

16 244,20

MYR

malajsijský ringgit

4,7508

PHP

filipínské peso

58,171

RUB

ruský rubl

86,8380

THB

thajský baht

37,358

BRL

brazilský real

6,2063

MXN

mexické peso

23,2229

INR

indická rupie

84,4190

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
Aurelio Fidencio SALDIVAR, petitioner, v. G.D. LEWIS, Warden.

No. 18-5772.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Abdul Karim BANGURA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9133.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Eddie Lee SHULAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6662.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.
John Anthony DOBBS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-8379.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District denied.
Johnnie STERLING, Jr., petitioner, v. Ronda PASH, Warden.

No. 18-9000.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exabyte Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig G. Lamborn, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Craig G. Lamborn

Craig G. Lamborn 
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
Ernest MORRIS, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-5676.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

BANK OZK

v. 

AMAC, LLC d/b/a SWEETWATERS 

COFFEE & TEA, et al.

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-00222-

ALM-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 13, 2024, the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #18), was 

entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendation that Bank OZK’s Motion for 

Default Judgment against Defendants AMAC, LLC, Akinyele Macaulay, Adejumoke AdesuyiMacaulay, and Akinsmac, Inc. (Dkt. #14) be granted as to Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract 

as to all Defendants in the amount of $261,649.10 in contract damages plus interest in the amount 

of $43.01 per annum from March 20, 2023, until the date of the final judgment; post-judgment 

interest at the prevailing federal rate; and reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and costs of 

court in the amount of $7,323.50; and that Defendants AMAC, LLC, Akinyele Macaulay, 

Adejumoke Adesuyi-Macaulay, and Akinsmac, Inc. should be jointly and severally liable for the 

judgment awarded in the Report. 

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections 

being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge 

are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

Case 4:23-cv-00222-ALM-AGD Document 20 Filed 03/28/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 154
2

It is therefore ORDERED that Bank OZK’s Motion for Default Judgment against 

Defendants AMAC, LLC, Akinyele Macaulay, Adejumoke Adesuyi-Macaulay, and Akinsmac, Inc. 

(Dkt. #14) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claim for breach of contract as to all Defendants in the 

amount of $261,649.10 in contract damages plus interest in the amount of $43.01 per annum from 

March 20, 2023, until the date of the final judgment; post-judgment interest at the prevailing 

federal rate; and reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees and costs of court in the amount of 

$7,323.50; and that Defendants AMAC, LLC, Akinyele Macaulay, Adejumoke Adesuyi-Macaulay, 

and Akinsmac, Inc. should be jointly and severally liable for the judgment awarded in the Report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 4:23-cv-00222-ALM-AGD Document 20 Filed 03/28/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 155
Michael C. REDIFER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5357.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
David Keith WILLS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-821.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.