Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 30105 

1 42 U.S.C. 7661a. 

2 40 CFR part 70. 

3 61 FR 2720 (Jan. 29, 1996). 

4 42 U.S.C. 7411(d), 7429(b)(2). 

5 42 U.S.C. 7429(a). 

6 Id. 7429(a)(4). 

7 Id. 7429(b)(2). 

3–Digit zip code prefix 

group 

SCF serving the destination office 

962–966 * .................. San Francisco CA 

940. 

* Priority Mail and First-Class Package 

Service destinating to these ZIP Codes is 

served by Chicago IL 606. 

* * * * * 

[Revise the text of item c by deleting 

the last three sentences.] 

* * * * * 

9.4.2 Nonlocal Zone 

Nonlocal zones are defined as follows: 

[Revise the text of item a to read as 

follows:] 

a. The zone 1 price applies to pieces 

not eligible for the local zone in 9.4.1 

that are mailed between two Post 

Offices with the same 3-digit ZIP Code 

prefix identified in L002, Column A. 

Zone 1 includes all units of area outside 

the local zone lying in whole or in part 

within a radius of about 50 miles from 

the center of the area. 

* * * * * 

Index 

* * * * * 

P 

* * * * * 

Parcel Select 

[Revise the Parcel Select entry by 

adding ‘‘cubic 253.2.1’’ alphabetically.] 

* * * * * 

Notice 123 (Price List) 

[Revise Notice 123 (Price List) as 

applicable.] 

* * * * * 

Joshua J. Hofer, 

Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10245 Filed 5–17–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 60, 61, 62, and 70 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0732; FRL–9829–02– 

R8] 

Approval of Clean Air Act Operating 

Permit Program Revisions; Negative 

Declaration of Existing Hospital/ 

Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators 

and Administrative Updates; South 

Dakota 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: With this direct final rule, the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 

or the ‘‘Agency’’) is promulgating 

approval of revisions to the South 

Dakota operating permit program for 

stationary sources under Clean Air Act 

(CAA) title V (the ‘‘title V program’’), a 

Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129 

negative declaration for incinerators 

subject to the Hospital/Medical/ 

Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) 

Emissions Guidelines, and making 

administrative updates. EPA is taking 

this final action in accordance with the 

CAA. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on July 18, 2022 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse written 

comments on or before June 17, 2022. If 

adverse comments are received, EPA 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0732. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

electronically in www.regulations.gov. 

To reduce the risk of COVID–19 

transmission, for this action we do not 

plan to offer hard copy review of the 

docket. Please email or call the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section if you need to make 

alternative arrangements for access to 

the docket. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carson Coate, Air and Radiation 

Division, EPA, Region 8, Mail code 

8ARD, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado, 80202–1129, telephone 

number: (406) 457–5042, email address: 

coate.carson@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ means EPA. 

I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule? 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial action 

and anticipates no adverse comments. 

However, elsewhere in this issue of the 

Federal Register publication, EPA is 

publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve 

South Dakota’s title V program 

revisions, the negative declaration for 40 

CFR part 60, subpart Ce, and the 

administrative updates to 40 CFR 60.4 

and 61.04, if relevant adverse comments 

are filed. 

If EPA receives adverse comments, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in 

the Federal Register informing the 

public that this direct final rule will not 

take effect. EPA will address all public 

comments in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting must do so at this time. 

II. Background 

Title V of the CAA as amended (42 

U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) directs states to 

develop and submit to EPA programs for 

issuing operating permits to all major 

stationary sources and to certain other 

sources.1 As required under title V, EPA 

promulgated regulations establishing 

the minimum elements of an approvable 

state title V program and defined the 

corresponding procedures by which the 

EPA will approve, oversee and, when 

necessary, withdraw approval of a state 

title V program.2 South Dakota received 

final, full approval of its title V program 

effective on February 28, 1996.3

Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA 

require states to submit plans to control 

certain pollutants (designated 

pollutants) at existing solid waste 

combustor facilities (designated 

facilities) whenever standards of 

performance have been established 

under section 111(b) for new sources of 

the same type, and EPA has established 

emissions guidelines for such existing 

sources.4 CAA section 129 directs EPA 

to establish standards of performance 

for new sources (NSPS) and emissions 

guidelines for existing sources for each 

category of solid waste incineration 

unit.5 Under CAA section 129, NSPS 

and emissions guidelines must contain 

numerical emissions limitations for 

particulate matter, opacity (as 

appropriate), sulfur dioxide, hydrogen 

chloride, oxides of nitrogen, carbon 

monoxide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and 

dioxins and dibenzofurans.6 While 

NSPS are directly applicable to affected 

facilities, emissions guidelines for 

existing units are intended for states to 

use to develop a state plan to submit to 

EPA.7 When an affected facility is 

located in a state, the state must then 

develop and submit a plan for the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
30106 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

8 Id. See also id. 7411(d)(1). 

9 Id. 

10 40 CFR 60.23(b). 11 40 CFR 60.39e. 12See South Dakota 111d Package to EPA, p. 100, 

120, 123–124, January 3, 2020 (public notice 

explaining purpose of the regulations and Proposed 

Amendments explaining requested changes). 13Letter from Hunter Roberts, Secretary, South 

Dakota Department of Environment and Natural 

Resources, to Gregory Sopkin, Regional 

Administrator, EPA Region 8, January 3, 2020. This 

letter contained multiple requests. In this action we 

are addressing only the request to revise South 

Dakota’s title V operating permit program. See id. 

at p. 5–6. 

14South Dakota 111d Package to EPA, p. 793– 

797. 15Letter from Brian Limoges, Assistant Vice 

President of Facilities Management, University of 

South Dakota, to Kyrik Rombough, South Dakota 

Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 

Re: Incinerator Permit 28.2201–19, July 13, 2019. 16Letter from Kyrik Rombough, South Dakota 

Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 

to Carl Daly, Acting Director of Air & Radiation 

Division, EPA Region 8, June 7, 2021. 

17SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, January 21, 

2022, p. 27–28, Letter from Steven R. Blair, 

Assistant Attorney General, South Dakota Office of 

Attorney General, to Deb Thomas, Acting Regional 

Administrator, EPA Region 8, Re: Establishment of 

South Dakota Department of Agriculture and 

Natural Resources, April 16, 2021. 

18SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 1, Letter 

from Hunter Roberts, Secretary, South Dakota 

Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 

to KC Becker, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

8, January 20, 2022. 

19SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p. 27–28. 

control of the designated pollutant.8

Once approved by EPA, the state plan 

becomes federally enforceable. If a state 

does not submit an approvable state 

plan to EPA, EPA is responsible for 

developing, implementing, and 

enforcing a federal plan.9

The regulations at 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart B (Subpart B), contain general 

provisions applicable to the adoption 

and submittal of state plans for 

controlling designated pollutants. 

Additionally, 40 CFR part 62, subpart A, 

provides the procedural framework by 

which EPA will approve or disapprove 

such plans submitted by a state. 

However, 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06 

provide that if there are no existing 

sources of the designated pollutant in 

the state, the state may submit a letter 

of certification to that effect (i.e., a 

negative declaration) in lieu of a plan. 

The negative declaration exempts the 

state from the requirements of Subpart 

B that require the submittal of a CAA 

section 111(d)/129 plan.10

EPA promulgated the HMIWI NSPS 

and emissions guidelines in 1997 and 

2009. The emissions guidelines are 

codified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce. 

Thus, states were required to submit 

plans for incinerators subject to the 

HMIWI emissions guidelines pursuant 

to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act 

and Subpart B or negative declarations 

pursuant to 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 

62.06.11

III. State Submittal 

On January 3, 2020, in accordance 

with 40 CFR 70.4(i), South Dakota 

submitted a request for approval of title 

V program revisions to incorporate 

updated federal regulations through July 

1, 2018, thereby aligning state rules in 

South Dakota’s Administrative Rules of 

South Dakota (ARSD) with federal rules 

at 40 CFR part 70.12 Specifically, South 

Dakota requested this change to Chapter 

74:36:05—Operating Permits for Part 70 

Sources (sections 74:36:05:04(2) and (3), 

and 74:36:05:16.01(4), (8), (9), (17) and 

(18)) and Chapter 74:36:13—Continuous 

Emission Monitoring Systems (section 

74:36:13:08).13 South Dakota’s submittal 

included clean and redlined copies of 

the revised ARSD, which are available 

in the docket for this action. The 

submittal also included evidence that 

public notice of the State’s proposed 

submittal ran in eleven South Dakota 

newspapers, that impacted sources and 

other interested parties were notified, 

and a public hearing was held on 

October 17, 2019.14 The State received 

no adverse public comments on the 

requested changes to 74:36:05 and 

74:36:13. 

On June 7, 2021, South Dakota 

submitted a negative declaration for the 

HMIWI emissions guidelines in 

accordance with CAA sections 111(d) 

and 129 and 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. 

The negative declaration certified that 

no incinerators subject to the HMIWI 

emissions guidelines and the 

requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 

of the CAA exist in South Dakota. 

Specifically, South Dakota had one 

facility, located at the University of 

South Dakota, that was considered a cofired combustor under the HMIWI 

NSPS. The University of South Dakota 

disconnected the natural gas supply line 

to the incinerator in 2012 and requested 

that the incinerator be removed from its 

title V air quality operating permit in 

2019.15 Therefore, South Dakota 

determined that there were no longer 

any sources subject to the HMIWI 

emissions guidelines.16

On April 16, 2021, South Dakota’s 

Office of Attorney General submitted a 

letter notifying EPA of the establishment 

of the South Dakota Department of 

Agriculture and Natural Resources 

(DANR). The letter stated that on 

January 19, 2021, South Dakota 

Governor, Kristi Noem, executed 

Executive Order 2021–03, which 

provided for the merger of the South 

Dakota Department of Agriculture 

(DOA) and the South Dakota 

Department of Environment and Natural 

Resources (DENR) into one 

department—the DANR. According to 

the South Dakota Constitution, 

executive reorganization orders become 

effective ‘‘within ninety days after 

submission’’ of the executive order to 

the South Dakota Legislature 

(Legislature) unless one of the two 

houses of the Legislature disapproves of 

the executive reorganization (S.D. 

Constitution, Article IV, Section 8).17

During the 2021 session, neither house 

of the Legislature passed a resolution of 

disapproval of Governor Noem’s 

Executive Order 2021–03 and the Order 

became effective April 19, 2021.18

In the April 16, 2021 letter, Assistant 

Attorney General Steven R. Blair stated 

that all State programs previously 

authorized to carry out EPA programs 

would continue to function in the same 

manner and all current environmental 

protection activities conducted under 

existing EPA approved or delegated 

programs under the DOA and/or the 

DENR would continue intact under the 

newly established DANR. Further, Mr. 

Blair stated that the merger caused no 

substantive budgetary or personnel 

changes, that the new DANR has all the 

authorities, powers, and duties of the 

previous DOA and DENR, and that the 

laws in effect at the time EPA approved 

or delegated authority to DOA and/or 

DENR continue to be fully effective and 

enforceable. Mr. Blair explained that the 

merger did not require any substantive 

changes to state law or administrative 

rules; the statutes and rules were merely 

updated to reflect the name of the new 

department.19

In a January 20, 2022 letter, the 

Secretary of the DANR, Hunter Roberts 

(the Governor’s designee), submitted a 

request that EPA recognize the merger of 

South Dakota’s DOA with the DENR to 

form the new DANR and incorporate 

corresponding revisions to the ARSD 

related to South Dakota’s state 

implementation plan (SIP). Secretary 

Roberts stated that the ARSD provisions 

were automatically updated with the 

DANR’s new name during the merger 

process. Additionally, Secretary Roberts 

stated that South Dakota’s Board of 

Minerals and Environment approved the 

DANR’s request to ask EPA to recognize 

the department’s new name in South 

Dakota’s SIP during a public hearing on 

December 16, 2021. Secretary Roberts 

further confirmed that the merger did 

not cause a substantive change to state 

law or administrative rules and that 

DANR maintains the same authorities, 

powers, and duties covered and 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 30107 

20SD DANR Merger SIP Submittal, p.1, Letter 

from Hunter Roberts, Secretary, South Dakota 

Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 

to KC Becker, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

8, January 20, 2022. 21See Email dated March 4, 2022, from Kyrik 

Rombough, Engineer Manager III, South Dakota 

Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 

to Monica Morales, Acting Deputy Director, EPA 

Region 8 Air and Radiation Division. 

implemented under the previous 

department name.20

IV. Final Action 

South Dakota submitted the necessary 

information for EPA to review the title 

V program revisions, the 111(d) negative 

declaration, and the non-substantive 

revisions to South Dakota’s ARSD to 

reflect the merger of South Dakota’s 

DOA with the DENR to form the new 

DANR. EPA is now acting to fully 

approve South Dakota’s January 3, 2020 

and January 20, 2022 title V program 

revisions under 40 CFR 70.4(i). 

Specifically, we are approving changes 

to ARSD 74:36:05:04(2) and (3), 

74:36:05:16.01(4), (8), (9), (17) and (18), 

and 74:36:13:08 so that they align with 

federal regulations promulgated through 

July 1, 2018. 

In addition, we are approving the 

department name change to the DANR 

in South Dakota’s title V program fees 

rule at ARSD 74:37:01:08. In its SIP 

submittal dated January 20, 2022, South 

Dakota inadvertently included this nonSIP provision. In a March 4, 2022 email, 

Kyrik Rombough, South Dakota’s State 

Air Director, confirmed that ARSD 

74:37:01:08 contains the fee provision 

for the State’s title V operating permit 

program and should be included in the 

update to the title V program.21 Thus, 

EPA is taking action to approve the 

change to ARSD 74:37:08 in this direct 

final rule. We are also updating 40 CFR 

part 70, appendix A to reference the 

January 3, 2020, and January 20, 2022 

requested revisions. We are also making 

an administrative update to 40 CFR part 

70, appendix A to delete reference to the 

expiration of an outdated interim 

approval and instead include reference 

to our full approval of South Dakota’s 

title V program in 1996. 

EPA is also approving South Dakota’s 

June 7, 2021 negative declaration 

certifying that no incinerators subject to 

the HMIWI emissions guidelines and 

the requirements of sections 111(d) and 

129 of the CAA exist in South Dakota 

per CAA sections 111(d) and 129 and 40 

CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06. We are also 

updating 40 CFR part 62, subpart QQ, 

and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A. The 

negative declaration fulfills South 

Dakota’s obligations under CAA 

sections 111(d) and 129. The submittal 

of this negative declaration exempts 

South Dakota from the requirement to 

submit a state plan for incinerators 

subject to the HMIWI emissions 

guidelines under 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Ce. 

EPA is also changing ‘‘Department of 

Environment and Natural Resources’’ to 

‘‘Department of Agriculture and Natural 

Resources’’ in 40 CFR 60.4(b)(43) and 

changing ‘‘Department of Water and 

Natural Resources’’ to ‘‘Department of 

Agriculture and Natural Resources’’ in 

61.04(b)(43). These are non-substantive, 

administrative changes that reflect 

DANR’s new name. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a state title V 

program submittal that complies with 

the provisions of the Act and applicable 

federal regulations; 40 CFR 70.4(i). 

Thus, in reviewing title V program 

submittals, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided they meet the 

criteria of the CAA and the criteria, 

standards and procedures defined in 40 

CFR part 70. The Administrator is also 

required by the CAA to approve a CAA 

section 111(d)/129 submission that 

complies with the provisions of the Act 

and applicable Federal regulations. 42 

U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C. 7429; 40 CFR 

part 60, subparts B and Ce; and 40 CFR 

part 62, subpart A. Accordingly, this 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. 

For that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In 

addition, this action is not approved to 

apply in Indian country, as defined at 

18 U.S.C. 1151, or in any other area 

where EPA or an Indian tribe has 

demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. As such, this rule does not 

have tribal implications and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by July 18, 2022. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 60 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
30108 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

Air pollution control, Aluminum, 

Beverages, Carbon monoxide, 

Chemicals, Coal, Electric power plants, 

Fluoride, Gasoline, Glass and glass 

products, Grains, Greenhouse gases, 

Hazardous substances, Household 

appliances, Industrial facilities, 

Insulation, Intergovernmental relations, 

Iron, Labeling, Lead, Lime, Metals, 

Motor vehicle pollution, Natural gas, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Petroleum, Phosphate, 

Plastics materials and synthetics, 

Polymers, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Rubber and rubber 

products, Sewage disposal, Steel, Sulfur 

oxides, Vinyl, Volatile organic 

compounds, Waste treatment and 

disposal, Zinc. 

40 CFR Part 61 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Arsenic, Asbestos, 

Benzene, Beryllium, Hazardous 

substances, Intergovernmental relations, 

Mercury, Radioactive materials, Radon, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Uranium, Vinyl chloride. 

40 CFR Part 62 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Aluminum, 

Fertilizers, Fluoride, Industrial 

facilities, Intergovernmental relations, 

Methane, Ozone, Phosphate, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds, 

Waste treatment and disposal. 

40 CFR Part 70 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Title V. 

Dated: May 8, 2022. 

KC Becker, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR parts 60, 61, 62 and 70 are 

amended as follows: 

PART 60—STANDARDS OF 

PERFORMANCE FOR NEW 

STATIONARY SOURCES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 60 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 42 U.S.C. 

7401–7601. 

Subpart A—General Provisions 

■ 2. In § 60.4, revise paragraph (b)(43) 

to read as follows: 

§ 60.4 Address. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(43) State of South Dakota, Air 

Quality Program, Department of 

Agriculture and Natural Resources, Joe 

Foss Building, 523 East Capitol, Pierre, 

SD 57501–3181. 

* * * * * 

PART 61—NATIONAL EMISSION 

STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR 

POLLUTANTS 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 61 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart A–General Provisions 

■ 4. In § 61.04, revise paragraph (b)(43) 

to read as follows: 

§ 61.04 Address. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(43) State of South Dakota, 

Department of Agriculture and Natural 

Resources, Air Quality Program, Joe 

Foss Building, 523 East Capitol, Pierre, 

SD 57501–3181. 

* * * * * 

PART 62—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS 

FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND 

POLLUTANTS 

■ 5. The authority citation for part 62 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart QQ—South Dakota 

■ 6. Revise § 62.10360 to read as 

follows: 

§ 62.10360 Identification of plan. 

The State of South Dakota submitted 

a letter on June 7, 2021, certifying that 

there are no designated facilities subject 

to the emissions guidelines for existing 

hospital medical infectious waste 

incinerators under 40 CFR part 60, 

subpart Ce, operating within the State’s 

jurisdiction. 

§§ 62.10361 and 62.10362 [Removed] 

■ 7. Remove §§ 62.10361 and 62.10362. 

PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT 

PROGRAMS 

The authority citation for part 70 

continues to read as follows: 

■ 8. The authority citation for part 70 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

■ 9. In appendix A to part 70 the entry 

‘‘South Dakota’’ is amended by revising 

paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (d) 

to read as follows: 

Appendix A to Part 70—Approval 

Status of State and Local Operating 

Permits Programs 

* * * * * 

South Dakota 

(a) South Dakota Department of Agriculture 

and Natural Resources: Submitted on 

November 12, 1993; full approval effective on 

February 28, 1996. 

* * * * * 

(d) The State of South Dakota submitted 

operating permit program revisions on 

January 3, 2020 and January 22, 2022. On 

January 3, 2020, South Dakota submitted for 

program approval revisions to the 

Administrative Rules of South Dakota, 

Chapters 74:36:05:04(2), 74:36:05:04(3), 

74:36:05:16.01(4), 74:36:05:16.01(8), 

74:36:05:16.01(9), 74:36:05:16.01(17), 

74:36:05:16.01(18), and 74:36:13:08. The state 

effective date of these revisions is November 

25, 2019. On January 22, 2022, South Dakota 

submitted for program approval revisions to 

Administrative Rules of South Dakota, 

Chapter 74:37:01:08. The state effective date 

is April 19, 2021. The revisions are effective 

on July 18, 2022. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–10224 Filed 5–17–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Docket No. 16–271; DA 22–484; FR 

ID 86215] 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 

Adopts Drive Test Parameters and 

Model for Alaska Plan Participants 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final order; Alaska Plan. 

SUMMARY: In the document, the Wireless 

Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) of 

the Federal Communications 

Commission (Commission) adopts the 

drive test parameters and a drive test 

model required of two Alaska Plan 

mobile-provider participants: GCI 

Communication Corp (GCI) and Copper 

Valley Wireless (CVW). The Bureau also 

requests comment on requiring these 

mobile providers to submit new drivetest data if they fail to demonstrate 

compliance with their approved 

performance plan. 

DATES: The Order is adopted and 

effective on June 17, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information on this 

proceeding, contact Matthew Warner of 

the Wireless Telecommunications 

Bureau, Competition & Infrastructure 

Policy Division, Matthew.Warner@

fcc.gov, (202) 418–2419. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1