alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF 

PENNSYLVANIA, CARMEN FEBO SAN 

MIGUEL, JAMES SOLOMON, JOHN 

GREINER, JOHN CAPOWSKI, 

GRETCHEN BRANDT, THOMAS 

RENTSCHLER, MARY ELIZABETH 

LAWN, LISA ISAACS, DON LANCASTER, 

JORDI COMAS, ROBERT SMITH, 

WILLIAM MARX, RICHARD MANTELL, 

PRISCILLA MCNULTY, THOMAS 

ULRICH, ROBERT MCKINSTRY, MARK 

LICHTY, LORRAINE PETROSKY,

Petitioners

v.

THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA; THE PENNSYLVANIA 

GENERAL ASSEMBLY; THOMAS W. 

WOLF, IN HIS CAPACITY AS 

GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA; 

MICHAEL J. STACK III, IN HIS CAPACITY 

AS LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF 

PENNSYLVANIA AND PRESIDENT OF 

THE PENNSYLVANIA SENATE; 

MICHAEL C. TURZAI, IN HIS CAPACITY 

AS SPEAKER OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; 

JOSEPH B. SCARNATI III, IN HIS 

CAPACITY AS PENNSYLVANIA SENATE 

PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE; ROBERT 

TORRES, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ACTING 

SECRETARY OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; 

JONATHAN M. MARKS, IN HIS 

CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE 

BUREAU OF COMMISSIONS, 

ELECTIONS, AND LEGISLATION OF 

THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE,

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 159 MM 2017
[159 MM 2017] - 2

Respondents :

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9

th day of November, 2017, this Honorable Court, having 

determined that the present case involves issues of immediate public importance

requiring this Court’s assumption of plenary jurisdiction, it is hereby ordered that 

Petitioners’ Application for Extraordinary Relief is GRANTED. 

On October 16, 2017, the Commonwealth Court granted an Application for Stay

filed by Respondents Joseph B. Scarnati, President Pro Tempore of the Pennsylvania 

Senate, Michael C. Turzai, Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, and 

the General Assembly of Pennsylvania. This stay is hereby vacated and the case will 

proceed expeditiously forthwith.

Under the continuing supervision of this Court, the case is hereby remanded to 

the Commonwealth Court and directed to President Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt for 

assignment to a commissioned judge of the Commonwealth Court with instructions to 

conduct all necessary and appropriate discovery, pre-trial and trial proceedings so as to 

create an evidentiary record on which Petitioners’ claims may be decided. The 

Commonwealth Court shall file with the Prothonotary of this Court its findings of fact and 

conclusions of law no later than December 31, 2017.

Petitioners’ Application for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Petitioner’s 

Application for Extraordinary Relief, Application for Leave to Supplement the Application 
[159 MM 2017] - 3

for Extraordinary Relief, and Praecipe to Provide Supplemental Authority in Support of 

Petitioners’ Application for Extraordinary Relief, treated as an application for leave to 

supplement the Application for Extraordinary Relief, are hereby GRANTED. The 

Legislative Respondents’ Motion for Oral Argument is hereby DENIED. 

Jurisdiction retained.

Chief Justice Saylor, Justice Baer and Justice Mundy note their dissent.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2907

___________ In re: Burma Jean Martin, * * Debtor, * *

--------------------- * * John Paul Martin; Hazel Victoria * Martin, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Burma Jean Martin, * * Appellee, * *

--------------------- * * Richard L. Cox, * * Trustee-Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 22, 1998 Filed: February 20, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

___________The Ho norable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. The Honorable Mary D. Scott, Uni ted States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern 2 District of Arkansas. -2- PER CURIAM. John Paul Martin and Hazel Victoria Marti n, husband and wife, appeal from the Dis trict Court order affirming the Bankruptcy Court order denying their motion fo r

1 2 abandonment of two parcels of property from their daught er & s bankruptcy estate. After care fully reviewing the record and the parties & briefs, we conclude the Bankruptc y Court & s decision was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
A.L., the Father, petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

No. 18-5830.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
Todd Jesse GARTON, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-5660.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Cornelius LYNCH, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-6270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
John DOE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5917.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRIS KEITH,ESQ.

Appellant,

v.

JENNY EVY RIDDLE, ALAN TAYLOR RIDDLE,

and THE PLANK FACTORY, INC.

Appellees.

No. 4D17-1214

[December 7, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-DR-012457-

XXXX-NB-FI.

Chris Keith, Okeechobee, for appellant.

Andrew B. Greenlee of Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Sanford, for appellee, 

The Plank Factory, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
John THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5789.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Ward T. EVANS, petitioner, v. DELAWARE.

No. 18-9394.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SIGNATURES**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

 

I, Nidal Z Zayed, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Kof Telesource International, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) forthe registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|   | Date: March 31, 2008 | /s/ Nidal Z Zayed                     |
|--------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                      | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                              ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                     1998 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS, ARM Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
has adopted the ARM Financial Group, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan (the "Plan"; terms used herein without definition shall have the
meanings ascribed to them as set forth in the Plan);

     WHEREAS, Section 12 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the
Company to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time in whole or in part;
and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan in the manner set
forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     1.   Paragraph (i) under the definition of "CHANGE IN CONTROL OF THE
COMPANY" in Section 2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read
as follows:

          (i)  any Person (other than the Company, any Subsidiary of the
     Company, any employee benefit plan of the Company or of any Subsidiary of
     the Company, or any person or entity organized, appointed or established by
     the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company for or pursuant to the terms
     of any such plan), alone or together with its Affiliates and Associates
     (collectively, an "ACQUIRING PERSON"), shall become the Beneficial Owner of
     fifty-one percent (51%) or more of the then outstanding shares of Common
     Stock or the Combined Voting Power of the Company; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that
     for purposes of Options granted under the Plan prior to April 19, 1999, a
     Change in Control of the Company under this Section 2(a)(i) shall have
     occurred when an Acquiring Person shall become the Beneficial Owner of
     twenty percent (20%) or more of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock
     or the Combined Voting Power of the Company;

     2.   Except as set forth herein, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed
in all respects.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the ARM Financial Group, Inc.
1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan has been executed as of the 19th
day of April, 1999.


                                   ARM FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


                                   By:    /s/ Martin H. Ruby
                                          ------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Martin H. Ruby
                                   Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

ATTESTED TO:


By:    /s/ Patricia L. Tackett
       -----------------------
Name:  Patricia L. Tackett
Title: Secretary
This opinion is subject to a dministrative correction before final disposition.

Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and ATTANASIO , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Anthony D. PEREZ Private (E

- 1 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201900118
Decided: 14 November 2019

. Appeal from the United States Navy

- M arine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Military Judge : Lieutenant Colonel Lawrence C. Lee, USMC

. Sentence adjudged 21 February 2019 by a speci al court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton , California , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sen tence approved by the convening authority: reduction to E

- 1 , confinement for 120 days , 1 and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Erin L. Alexander , JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinio n does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)
.

_________________________

1 The convening a uthority suspe nded confinement in excess of 90 days pursuant to a pretrial agreement.United States v. P e rez , No. 201 900118

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the a ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Robert H. GRAY, petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 17-1679.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 2, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.
Ken LIANG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-199.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
[ERNST & YOUNG LETTERHEAD]



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 File No. 333-68804 pertaining to the 1996 Israeli Employee Stock
Option Plan, the 1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, on Form S-8 File No. 333-84659 pertaining to the 1996 Israeli Employee
Stock Option Plan, the 1996 U.S. Option Plan, the 1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan
and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, on Form S-8 File No. 333-51098 pertaining
to the 1996 Israeli Employee Stock Option Plan, the 1998 U.S. Stock Option Plan
and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and on Form S-3 File No. 333-42384 of
BackWeb Technologies Ltd. of our report, dated January 29, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated financial statement of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. included in
the annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.





                                                            Yours truly,

                                                      /s/ KOST, FORER AND GABBAY

Tel-Aviv, Israel                                         KOST, FORER and GABBAY
March 31, 2002                          A Member of Ernst & Young International











      Kost Forer & Gabbay is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.
EXHIBIT 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION

	Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Linda H. Masterson, Chief Executive Officer of LifePoint, Inc. (the "Company"), and Michele A. Clark, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

- The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the " *Periodic Report*") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 
 
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
** 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th, day of November, 2002.

 

 

	/s/ Linda H. Masterson	
Linda H. Masterson

Chief Executive Officer

 

	/s/ Michele A. Clark	
Michele A. Clark

Chief Accounting Officer

 

 **
Martyn BAYLAY, petitioner, v. ETIHAD AIRWAYS P.J.S.C.

No. 17-1691.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Quillie Merle SPRAY, petitioner, v. Kelly A. RYAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Shirley.

No. 18-8715.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Timothy BURNS, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-1420.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1719

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out the National Guard

civilian youth opportunities program for fiscal year 2000 in an amount

not to exceed $110,000,000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out the National Guard civilian youth opportunities program for

fiscal year 2000 in an amount not to exceed

$110,000,000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE PRO4 GRAM.

5 (a) FISCAL YEAR 2000 AUTHORITY.—Notwith6 standing the expenditure limitation contained in sub7 section (b) of section 509 of title 32, United States Code,

8 the Secretary of Defense may obligate funds during fiscal
2

•HR 1719 IH

1 year 2000 in an amount not to exceed $110,000,000 for

2 the National Guard civilian youth opportunities program

3 authorized by that section and known as the National

4 Guard Challenge Program.

5 (b) ELIMINATION OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURE LIMI6 TATION.—Section 509(b) of title 32, United States Code,

7 is amended by striking out ‘‘, except that Federal expendi8 tures under the program may not exceed $50,000,000 for

9 any fiscal year’’.

Æ
Michael Alexander LaJEUNESSE, petitioner, v. IOWA.

No. 18-5609.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
Ercil K. RAYFORD, petitioner, v. Blair LEIBACH, Warden.

No. 18-5768.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          50,307
<SECURITIES>                                     2,596
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (955)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,203
<PP&E>                                          66,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,449)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 451,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,638
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   451,676
<SALES>                                         37,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,140
<CGS>                                           25,607
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,122)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     84
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (37)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.024
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.024
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/21/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      204,578
COMMITMENTS
  64,836   69,514   18,906  100,056   98,141  183,798  186,561   20,780   18,017

CHANGES FROM 02/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,976)
  21,155    8,288   -8,121  -12,342   -2,570      692   -2,403   -5,668   -2,573

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.7     34.0      9.2     48.9     48.0     89.8     91.2     10.2      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      30       26       25       26       28       70       71
```

----

Updated February 24, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of National R.V.  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we,  Bradley C.  Albrechtsen,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  President  of the
Company, and Joseph W. Hansen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




--------------------------                             --------------------
Bradley C. Albrechtsen                                 Joseph W. Hansen, Esq.
Chief Executive Officer                                Chief Financial Officer
and President                                          (Principal Accounting and
November 12, 2004                                      Financial Officer)
                                                       November 12, 2004