alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 59/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 59 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 65.° ano4 de fevereiro de 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 59

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

65.° ano4 de fevereiro de 2022

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Comissão Europeia |
| 2022/C 59/01 | Taxas de câmbio do euro — 3 de fevereiro de 2022 | 1 |

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

2022/C 59/01

Taxas de câmbio do euro — 3 de fevereiro de 2022

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

| 4.2.2022 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | C 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2022

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

C 59/1

---

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

3 de fevereiro de 2022

(2022/C 59/01)

1 euro =

| | Moeda | Taxas de câmbio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dólar dos Estados Unidos | 1,1286 |
| JPY | iene | 129,63 |
| DKK | coroa dinamarquesa | 7,4388 |
| GBP | libra esterlina | 0,83208 |
| SEK | coroa sueca | 10,3870 |
| CHF | franco suíço | 1,0407 |
| ISK | coroa islandesa | 142,40 |
| NOK | coroa norueguesa | 9,9545 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | coroa checa | 24,135 |
| HUF | forint | 353,94 |
| PLN | zlóti | 4,5315 |
| RON | leu romeno | 4,9461 |
| TRY | lira turca | 15,3047 |
| AUD | dólar australiano | 1,5849 |
| CAD | dólar canadiano | 1,4334 |
| HKD | dólar de Hong Kong | 8,7966 |
| NZD | dólar neozelandês | 1,7001 |
| SGD | dólar singapurense | 1,5212 |
| KRW | won sul-coreano | 1 358,42 |
| ZAR | rand | 17,2864 |
| CNY | iuane | 7,1795 |
| HRK | kuna | 7,5295 |
| IDR | rupia indonésia | 16 243,28 |
| MYR | ringgit | 4,7215 |
| PHP | peso filipino | 57,608 |
| RUB | rublo | 86,1788 |
| THB | baht | 37,424 |
| BRL | real | 5,9843 |
| MXN | peso mexicano | 23,2359 |
| INR | rupia indiana | 84,5180 |

Moeda

Taxas de câmbio

USD

dólar dos Estados Unidos

1,1286

JPY

iene

129,63

DKK

coroa dinamarquesa

7,4388

GBP

libra esterlina

0,83208

SEK

coroa sueca

10,3870

CHF

franco suíço

1,0407

ISK

coroa islandesa

142,40

NOK

coroa norueguesa

9,9545

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

coroa checa

24,135

HUF

forint

353,94

PLN

zlóti

4,5315

RON

leu romeno

4,9461

TRY

lira turca

15,3047

AUD

dólar australiano

1,5849

CAD

dólar canadiano

1,4334

HKD

dólar de Hong Kong

8,7966

NZD

dólar neozelandês

1,7001

SGD

dólar singapurense

1,5212

KRW

won sul-coreano

1 358,42

ZAR

rand

17,2864

CNY

iuane

7,1795

HRK

kuna

7,5295

IDR

rupia indonésia

16 243,28

MYR

ringgit

4,7215

PHP

peso filipino

57,608

RUB

rublo

86,1788

THB

baht

37,424

BRL

real

5,9843

MXN

peso mexicano

23,2359

INR

rupia indiana

84,5180

---

(1)  Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

---
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc.
as general partner of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify that (i)
the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Campbell Strategic
Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                                   CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                                   By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner

                                   By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Bruce L. Cleland
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 12, 2004

                                      -E 6-
United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

FREDERICK NYANTAKYI (1) 

§

§

§

§

§

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:23-CR-00068-

ALM-AGD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the above-referenced criminal action, the Court having 

heretofore referred the request for the revocation of Defendant’s supervised release to the United 

States Magistrate Judge for proper consideration. The Court has received the Report and 

Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to its order. With Defendant 

having waived allocution before the Court as well as his right to object to the report of the 

Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate 

Judge are correct. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s supervised release is hereby REVOKED. 

It is further ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the Bureau of 

Prisonsto be imprisoned for a term of thirty-six (36) months, with no term of supervised release to 

follow. 

Case 4:23-cr-00068-ALM-AGD Document 14 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:

48
2 

The Court also recommends that Defendant be housed in a Bureau of Prisons facility in the 

Fort Worth, Texas area, if appropriate. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 4:23-cr-00068-ALM-AGD Document 14 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:

49
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Annual Report of Northstar Electronics, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant  Dated: May 17, 2011/s/ Wilson RussellWilson RussellChief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Larry Lamont WHITE v. KENTUCKY.

No. 17-9467.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 14, 2019.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kentucky for further consideration in light of *Moore v. Texas* , 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1039, 197 L.Ed.2d 416 (2017).

Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS and Justice GORSUCH join, dissenting.

The Court grants, vacates, and remands this case in light of *Moore v. Texas* , 581 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1039, 197 L.Ed.2d 416 (2017). But *Moore* was handed down on March 28, 2017-almost five months before the Supreme Court of Kentucky reached a decision in this case. I would accordingly deny the petition for the reasons previously stated in my dissent in *Kaushal v. Indiana* , 585 U.S. ----, ----, 138 S.Ct. 2567, 201 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2018), and in Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in *Webster v. Cooper,*558 U.S. 1039, 1040, 130 S.Ct. 456, 175 L.Ed.2d 506 (2009).
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Bruce L. Cleland, Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the general partner ofCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland         Bruce L. Cleland    Chief Executive Officer    August 15, 2005  
E 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1956

To prohibit the Department of State from imposing a charge or fee for

providing passport information to the general public.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1999

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr.

MCNULTY, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. CANADY of Florida, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr.

HOLDEN, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. CLEMENT, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. MOORE,

Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. FARR of

California, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. ACKERMAN, and Mr. SHIMKUS) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International

Relations

A BILL

To prohibit the Department of State from imposing a charge

or fee for providing passport information to the general

public.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Passport

5 Information Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1956 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AND REQUIREMENT CONCERNING

2 DEPARTMENT OF STATE PASSPORT INFOR3 MATION SERVICES.

4 For fiscal year 2000 and for each subsequent fiscal

5 year, the Secretary of State shall provide for a United

6 States passport information telephone inquiry service for

7 the general public which shall be available without charge

8 or fee imposed by the Department of State or any other

9 entity under contract to the Department of State.

Æ
Tyrone L. ROBINSON v. LEWIS, Warden, et al.

No. 16-8987 (R46-020).

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 20, 2017.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.16(a)
 
Summary of Unwritten Compensation Arrangements
Applicable to Non-Employee Directors of Overstock.com, Inc.




During 2019 the Company expects to pay its non-employee directors other than the Chairwoman of the Board $75,000 annually at the rate of $18,750 per quarter, and expects to pay the Chairwoman of the Board $150,000 annually at the rate of $37,500 per quarter. The Company also expect to continue to grant restricted stock units to its non-employee directors, generally at the first Board meeting after a non-employee director first joins the Board, and typically annually thereafter, but subject to the total compensation limitations established in the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive plan, as amended from time to time. The Company also reimburses non-employee directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Haverford Valley, L.C., an affiliate of the Company, and certain affiliated entities which make travel arrangements for the Company's executives, also occasionally make travel arrangements for non-employee directors to attend Board meetings.
Robert HOMRICH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9045.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

*375Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Damian PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-270.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

          - [Notice-PCLOB-2022-02; Docket No. 2022-0009; Sequence No. 2]

# AGENCY:

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The PCLOB, or Board, is issuing this notice to provide additional information relating to a notice published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 4, 2022, which announced a public forum regarding privacy and civil liberties issues concerning the government's efforts to counter domestic terrorism.                    

# DATES:

*Applicable:*                         May 19, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Silverleib, Public and Legislative Affairs Officer at 202-997-7719;                         *pao@pclob.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Board has been directed by Congress to submit a report assessing privacy and civil liberties impacts stemming from government efforts to counter significant threats to the United States associated with foreign racially motivated violent extremist organizations.

                    As part of its earlier request for public comments regarding its upcoming domestic terrorism forum                     *(https://www.regulations.gov/​document/​GSA-GSA-2022-0009-0001*), published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 87 FR 19536, PCLOB also encourages comments relating to this congressional report requirement, which can be found in Section 824 at                     *https://www.congress.gov/​bill/​117th-congress/​house-bill/​2471/​text.*

David Coscia,

Agency Liaison Officer, Office of Presidential & Congressional Agency Liaison Services, General Services Administration.

[FR Doc. 2022-10712 Filed 5-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-B5-P
Milton BALKANY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1433.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99-1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the "Registrant")
hereby  certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
therein fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.




                                                  /s/ David J. Bursic
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  David J. Bursic
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 13, 2003



                                      E-1
Renee L. McCRAY, petitioner, v. John E. DRISCOLL, III, et al.

No. 18-8408.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Studio II Productions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  February 15, 2008 /s/ Dominick Pope Chief Financial Officer
William J. O'BRIEN, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5679.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,032
<INVENTORY>                                     30,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,970
<PP&E>                                         147,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,356
<BONDS>                                         93,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,363
<SALES>                                         51,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,729
<CGS>                                           45,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,754)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,720)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.27)
        

</TABLE>
Crystal Nicole KURI, petitioner, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BOARD OF REVIEW.

No. 18-6074.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 5, 2010

jm 

# Order

January 5, 2010

140298 (14)

RAYMOND BETTISON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140298
COA: 293823 PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive f ees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisone r pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this orde r shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Dion Terry TAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.