alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Andrew K. BONNER, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-5600.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
H. R. 1379

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To amend the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations

Act, 1999, to make a technical correction relating to international narcotics control

assistance.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Western Hemisphere Drug Elimination Technical Corrections Act’’.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS RELATING TO

RESOURCES FOR ILLICIT NARCOTICS IN CERTAIN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Subtitle B of title VIII

of division C of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105–277), is amended

by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SEC. 826. FURTHER MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONAL RESOURCES.

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appropriated

for the Department of State for fiscal year 1999 such sums as

may be necessary to carry out section 481 of the Foreign Assistance

Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291).

‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Amounts appropriated pursuant

to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) are in addition to amounts made available to carry out section 481 of such

Act under any other provision of law.’’.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Title VIII of division C of such

Act (Public Law 105–277) is amended in the table of contents

in section 801(b) by adding at the end of the item relating to

subtitle B the following:

‘‘Sec. 826. Further miscellaneous additional resources.’’.
H. R. 1379—2

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section

shall take effect as if included in subtitle B of title VIII of division

C of such Act (Public Law 105–277).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Joe Leonard LAMBRIGHT, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-5854.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two denied.
Erik BENHAM, petitioner, v. David R. HAGEN.

No. 18M163.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Paul LEWIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent from the denial of certiorari for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, --- L.E.2d ---- (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Liban H. ABDIRAHMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-243.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Petition for rehearing granted. The order entered June 28, 2018, denying the petition for writ of certiorari vacated as to petitioner Michael Biggs. Petition for writ of certiorari as to Michael Biggs granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for further consideration in light of *United States v. Mangahas,*77 M.J. 220 (2018).
Jeanetta CARTER, petitioner, v. LABOR READY MID-ATLANTIC, INC., et al.

No. 17-7074.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
Maurice Edward CARTER, petitioner, v. Mike PARRIS, Warden.

No. 18-9022.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
ex_134996.htm


Exhibit 10.12


 


Compensation of Non-Employee Directors


 


Directors who are not employees of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $50,000 and each of such directors is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Marine Holding Inc.'s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.5 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Gary LONG, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6119.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Bill Paul MARQUARDT, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-5738.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1809

To prohibit the importation of dangerous firearms that have been modified

to avoid the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 13, 1999

Mr. NADLER (for himself, Mr. WEINER, Mr. RUSH, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms.

DEGETTE, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MCDERMOTT,

Mr. WEXLER, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms.

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. TIERNEY, Ms. KILPATRICK, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the importation of dangerous firearms that have

been modified to avoid the ban on semiautomatic assault

weapons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assault Weapon Ban

5 Enhancement Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1809 IH

1 SEC. 2. BAN ON IMPORTATION OF DANGEROUS FIREARMS

2 THAT HAVE BEEN MODIFIED TO AVOID THE

3 BAN ON SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAP4 ONS.

5 Section 925 of title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(g) The Secretary shall prohibit the importation or

8 bringing into the United States of any semiautomatic as9 sault weapon (including the frame or receiver of any such

10 weapon) that is of a type which, as of May 1, 1998, was

11 determined under subsection (d)(3) to be not generally

12 recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable

13 to sporting purposes, or that includes any of the following

14 characteristics:

15 ‘‘(1) The weapon has a thumb hole stock that

16 functions as a pistol grip.

17 ‘‘(2) The weapon can accept a detachable large

18 capacity ammunition magazine.

19 ‘‘(3) The weapon has a fixed magazine which

20 can be readily modified to accept a large capacity

21 ammunition magazine.

22 ‘‘(4) The weapon uses .22 caliber ammuni23 tion.’’.

Æ
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 5, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12358

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00518-CR-T-27-EAJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

JAVIER MARTINEZ, 

 a.k.a. Victor Manuel

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 5, 2008)

Before DUBINA, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Howard Anderson, an Assistant Federal Public Defender and appointed
2

counsel for Javier Martinez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by

a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,

18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Martinez’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.
Charles Alfred JACKSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5635.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1762

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs to expand the scope of the respite care program of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. STEARNS, and Mr.

SAXTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to expand the scope of

the respite care program of the Department of Veterans

Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS RESPITE

4 CARE PROGRAM.

5 Section 1720B of title 38, United States Code, is

6 amended—

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘eligible’’ and

8 inserting ‘‘enrolled’’;
2

•HR 1762 IH

1 (2) in subsection (b)—

2 (A) by striking ‘‘the term ‘respite care’

3 means hospital or nursing home care’’ and in4 serting ‘‘the term ‘respite care services’ means

5 care and services’’;

6 (B) by striking ‘‘is’’ at the beginning of

7 each of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) and insert8 ing ‘‘are’’; and

9 (C) by striking ‘‘in a Department facility’’

10 in paragraph (2); and

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section:

13 ‘‘(c) In furnishing respite care services, the Secretary

14 may enter into contract arrangements.’’.

Æ
By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the 

case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8024-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8014-1(c).

File Name: 20b0008n.06

BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

IN RE: ORMET CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; 

ORMET PRIMARY ALUMINUM CORPORATION; ORMET

ALUMINUM MILL PRODUCTS CORPORATION; SPECIALTY 

BLANKS HOLDINGS CORPORATION; SPECIALTY 

BLANKS, INC.; FORMCAST DEVELOPMENT INC.; ORMET 

RAILROAD CORPORATION,

Debtors.

┐

│

│

│

│

│

│

│

┘

No. 20-8007

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court 

for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.

No. 2:04-bk-51255—C. Kathryn Preston, Judge.

Decided and Filed: September 28, 2020

Before: DALES, PRICE SMITH, and WISE, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

_________________

LITIGANT

ON BRIEF: Jeffrey D. Butler, Jackson, Tennessee, pro se.

_______________________

OPINION AND ORDER

_______________________

JESSICA E. PRICE SMITH, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. The issue on appeal 

before the Panel is whether the bankruptcy court erred in denying Jeffrey Butler’s motion for a 

new hearing. After reviewing the record, Mr. Butler’s brief, and applicable law, the Panel 

concludes that the bankruptcy court did not err in denying Mr. Butler’s motion as moot. 

The bankruptcy case has concluded and there is no further relief available. Accordingly, 

we AFFIRM.

>
Matthew E. JACKSON, Jr., et al., petitioners, v. Frances Edith JACKSON.

No. 18-867.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1894 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1894

 To provide that a plaque be placed at the diplomatic entrance of the 
                          Department of State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 1999

  Mr. Leach introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that a plaque be placed at the diplomatic entrance of the 
                          Department of State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

    The Secretary of State shall cause to be placed at the diplomatic 
entrance of the Department of State a plaque containing the following 
text:

                   ``principles for prudent diplomacy

    ``(1) Good intentions are a necessary but insufficient grounds for 
action; consequences and costs must be taken into consideration before 
policies are put into effect.
    ``(2) Intervention in civil wars seldom works.
    ``(3) Hubris is a hallmark of all politics; it is always dangerous.
    ``(4) Moralizing is no substitute for acting morally; while nothing 
is more compelling than a good example, little is more resented than 
gratuitous lecturing.
    ``(5) Trade embargoes tend to be counter-productive.
    ``(6) Great powers don't need to threaten; the greater the power, 
the more cautious should be its application.
    ``(7) Power can be illusory; many conflicts do not yield to its 
application.
    ``(8) Beware of domino decisionmaking processes which prevent 
changes in strategy when initial judgments prove frail.
    ``(9) Never fail to put yourself in an adversary's shoes; leaving 
an opponent without an exit reduces options for both sides.
    ``(10) Nationalism is a force which policy makers habitually 
underestimate.
    ``(11) There are more similarities than differences in religions of 
the world, but dissimilarities become accentuated in the way religion 
mixes with politics in various cultures.
    ``(12) Policies which lack support of the American people are 
unsustainable.
    ``(13) Great causes may necessitate great sacrifice, but force 
should be the last resort; peace is preferable to war.''.
                                 <all>
```
Stephen D. LEONARD, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5602.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 4.2



 Share Certificate of UP Fintech Holding   Limited (the “Company”) An Exempted Company incorporated in the Cayman   Islands Authorised capital of the Company is USD50,000.00 divided into   5,000,000,000 shares of USD0.00001 each (i)4,662,388,278 Class A Ordinary   Shares of US$0.00001 par value per share and, (ii)337,611,722 Class B   Ordinary Shares of US$0.00001 par value per share. This is to certify that   the undermentioned person is the registered holder of the shares specified   hereunder in the Company, subject to the Memorandum and Articles of   Association of the Company. Date of Issue:Given under the common seal of the   Company on the date stated herein. Director / Officer NO TRANSFER OF ANY OF   THE ABOVE SHARES CAN BE REGISTERED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS CERTIFICATE   Name & Address of the Shareholder: Certificate No.: [] No. of Shares: []   Class A Ordinary Consideration Paid: []
In Re Brent COLE, petitioner.

No. 18-5579.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Nicholas MASLONKA, petitioner, v. Noah NAGY, Warden.

No. 18-7208.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jason J. MONT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8995.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 2, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/14/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      364,829
COMMITMENTS
  75,868  138,950   53,960  201,545  146,012  331,373  338,922   33,456   25,907

CHANGES FROM 08/07/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     28,927)
  -1,303   11,694    1,918   17,113   13,276   17,728   26,888   11,199    2,039

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.8     38.1     14.8     55.2     40.0     90.8     92.9      9.2      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      149)
      44       63       61       32       35      114      126
```

----

Updated August 17, 2012
Peter GAKUBA, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9041.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/29/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      184,059
COMMITMENTS
  24,710   20,609   34,455  104,093  113,604  163,258  168,668   20,801   15,391

CHANGES FROM 03/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     13,836)
   6,435    5,115       -3    4,070    9,543   10,502   14,655    3,334     -819

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.4     11.2     18.7     56.6     61.7     88.7     91.6     11.3      8.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      105)
      38       29       40       24       26       88       80
```

----

Updated April 1, 2011
Adam LONGORIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5439.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Travis Michael EASTER, petitioner, v. Brigitte AMSBERRY, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution.

No. 18-5559.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Juan FLORES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5916.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Catherine Rose DREYER, petitioner, v. COUNTY COURT OF TEXAS, COLEMAN COUNTY.

No. 18-136.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       41,951
COMMITMENTS
   3,350      490        0   35,018   40,337   38,368   40,827    3,583    1,124

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,073)
     852        0        0      634    1,967    1,486    1,967    1,587    1,106

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.0      1.2      0.0     83.5     96.2     91.5     97.3      8.5      2.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
       7        1        0       30       27       37       28
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       55,242
COMMITMENTS
   5,330    6,427        1   42,641   43,236   47,972   49,664    7,270    5,578

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,998)
    -206      -20        1    2,296       53    2,091       34      907    2,964

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.6     11.6      0.0     77.2     78.3     86.8     89.9     13.2     10.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       66)
      14        3        1       36       26       50       30
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011
ARTHUR ANDERSEN








                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated February 4, 2000 and February 17, 2000 for Cavion
Technologies, Inc. and May 18, 1999 for LanXtra, Inc. included in this
Form 10-KSB, into the Company's previously filed SB-2 File No. 333-80421,
SB-2 File No. 333-93929, and S-8 File No. 333-93579.



                                   /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Denver, Colorado,
   March 7, 2000.