alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
James J. THOLE, et al., petitioners, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 17-1712.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether petitioners have demonstrated Article III standing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ADFGAD
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,545
<INVENTORY>                                    132,367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,589
<PP&E>                                         681,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 291,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,805
<BONDS>                                        685,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (313,705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   655,172
<SALES>                                        191,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,918
<CGS>                                          155,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,681)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
RITZEN GROUP, INC., petitioner, v. JACKSON MASONRY, LLC.

No. 18-938.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
Santos Peter MURILLO, aka Peter Santos Murillo, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7981.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Charles Franklin GLASSCOCK, petitioner, v. Jeri TAYLOR.

No. 18-8920.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeline, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles R. Osenbaugh, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Charles R. Osenbaugh                                      |   | Date: February 13, 2007 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                                               |   |                    |
| Charles R. Osenbaugh,   President and Chief Financial Officer |   |                    |
Brian Kerry O'KEEFE, petitioner, v. Renee BAKER, Warden, et al.

No. 18-5687.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied.
EXHIBIT 21 (i)



SUBSIDIARIES





None



EXHIBIT 99.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the registrant certify, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: April 15, 2003



Airtrax, Inc.



/s/ Peter Amico
Peter Amico

President,

Chief Executive Officer, and

Chief Financial Officer
Terril KINCHEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5739.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Nidal Z Zayed, President and Chief Executive Officer, in connection with theReport on 10-KSB of Telesource International, Inc. for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2005, (the “Report”) hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

1)              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Telesource International,Inc.
|        | /s/ Nidal Z Zayed                     |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Nidal Zayed                           |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | Dated: July 31, 2006                  |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          7,711
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                      180
<INVENTORY>                                    41,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               71,598
<PP&E>                                         28,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                103,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,388
<BONDS>                                         1,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          100
<OTHER-SE>                                     75,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  103,982
<SALES>                                       171,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              171,159
<CGS>                                         144,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 144,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                    7,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,745
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .95
        

</TABLE>
Donell A. THOMAS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5786.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 22, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Jose PALACIOS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5168.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
John STURGEON, petitioner, v. Bert FROST, in His Official Capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the Natural Park Service, et al.

No. 17-949.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of Alaska for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
Kareem Hassan MILLHOUSE, petitioner, v. Ms. DAVIS, P.A., et al.

No. 18-8954.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Zhordrack BLOODYWONE, petitioner, v. Joseph BELLNIER, Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility, et al.

No. 18-8585.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Louis BONANNO, Sr., petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, et al.

No. 18M152.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Joe Homer MARK, petitioner, v. Amy RABEAU.

No. 18-7829.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,685
<SECURITIES>                                    10,524
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,098
<PP&E>                                         129,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,490
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,132
<SALES>                                         96,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,393
<CGS>                                           93,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    342
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
John INGEBRETSEN, petitioner, v. Jack PALMER, Warden, et al.

No. 18-5959.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       37,385
COMMITMENTS
  12,332    2,024    1,658   16,457   25,825   30,447   29,507    6,938    7,878

CHANGES FROM 03/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        941)
     -68      224       24      946      381      902      629       39      312

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.0      5.4      4.4     44.0     69.1     81.4     78.9     18.6     21.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       53)
      13        8       10       25       22       44       35
```

----

Updated March 23, 2012
Jamillo Donte SPIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M26.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Anna Maria AGOLLI, petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.

No. 18-5749.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Juan Francisco VEGA, petitioner, v. Robert W. GERMAINE.

No. 17-9436.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Dorothy A. SMULLEY, petitioner, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, et al.

No. 18-1183.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Dennis D. LINEHAN, petitioner, v. Emily Johnson PIPER.

No. 17-8575.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-26-1997
<CASH>                                             316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,056
<PP&E>                                          11,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,597
<BONDS>                                          5,577
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,487
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,691
<SALES>                                         91,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,966
<CGS>                                           87,166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    947
<INCOME-TAX>                                       397
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Omar Silva MEDINA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        10,182
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 25,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                     180
<INVENTORY>                                   39,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              80,561
<PP&E>                                        29,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               113,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         26,765
<BONDS>                                        1,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         102
<OTHER-SE>                                    82,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 113,124
<SALES>                                      267,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             267,562
<CGS>                                        225,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                225,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               28,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                  11,403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           17,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  17,346 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.76 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.52
        


</TABLE>
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 2991

- 20

CHARLES DEEGAN and

MARIE DEEGAN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR

PLANNING BOARD and

CHARLES STREET DEVELOPERS, LLC,

Defendants

- Respondents.

______________________________

RKH HOLDINGS, LLC, WILLIAM S. ROOHAN, LYNN D. ROOHAN, CRAIG OTTON, PATRICIA K.

D I MARCO

- SHESTON, STEPHEN
M. HARBAUGH, JEFFREY RIHN

, and BERNADETTE M. PARZYCH,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR

PLANNING BOARD and

CHARLES STREET NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court

. " A lthough it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited

. R

. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 2991

- 20

DEVELOPERS, LLC,

Defendants

- Responde n ts.

______________________________

Submitted October 11, 2022

– Decided October 18

, 2022

Before Judges Mayer , Enright

, and Bishop

- Thompson.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cape May County, Docket Nos. L

- 00 98

- 20

and L

- 0 110

- 20.

Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys for appellants (Jack

Plackter and Amanda Mosc illo, on the briefs).

Craig, Annin & Baxter, LLP, attorneys for respondent Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Board (John C. Grady, on the brief).

Hankin, Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, PC, attorneys for respondent Charles Street Developers, LLC (Colin G. Bell, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues

in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly d ismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1761

To amend provisions of title 17, United States Code.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1999

Mr. ROGAN (for himself and Mr. COBLE) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend provisions of title 17, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Copyright Damages

5 Improvement Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. STATUTORY DAMAGES ENHANCEMENT.

7 Section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) in paragraph (1)—

10 (A) by striking ‘‘$500’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘$750’’; and
2

•HR 1761 IH

1 (B) by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$30,000’’; and

3 (2) in paragraph (2)—

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’;

5 (B) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘$150,000’’;

7 (C) by inserting after the second sentence

8 the following:

9 ‘‘(B) In a case where the copyright owner dem10 onstrates that the infringement was part of a re11 peated pattern or practice of infringement, the court

12 may increase the award of statutory damages to a

13 sum of not more than $250,000 per work.’’; and

14 (D) by striking ‘‘The court shall remit

15 statutory damages’’ and inserting the following:

16 ‘‘(C) The court shall remit statutory damages’’.

17 SEC. 3. STATUTORY DAMAGES CLARIFICATION.

18 Section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code, is

19 amended by inserting at the end the following new sen20 tence: ‘‘For purposes of chapter 5 of title 11, ‘willful’ in21 fringement shall be considered to be willful and malicious

22 injury to the property of another.’’.

Æ
MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1023.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Deon Tremell LEE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-8628.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.