alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Elliot Noss, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, herebycertify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 13, 2010 | /s/  Elliot Noss                       |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                 | Elliot  Noss                           |
|                                 | Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report, dated
November 12, 2002, on the consolidated financial statements of MFB Corp., which
is incorporated by reference in MFB Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2002, in MFB Corp.'s Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 33-84340 and Registration No. 33-47891).


/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

South Bend, Indiana
December 24, 2002
Milton THOMAS, Sr., petitioner, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 18-9103.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

*2704Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/04/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       72,636
COMMITMENTS
  20,126    3,236    9,251   27,684   45,547   57,061   58,034   15,574   14,602

CHANGES FROM 12/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,235)
   1,697      476      141     -317      615    1,521    1,232     -286        3

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.7      4.5     12.7     38.1     62.7     78.6     79.9     21.4     20.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      33       13       25       35       30       80       61
```

----

Updated January 7, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF MONACO COACH CORPORATION
AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                       124
<INVENTORY>                                     42,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,354
<PP&E>                                          55,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,961
<BONDS>                                         14,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,432
<SALES>                                        320,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               320,799
<CGS>                                          277,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  304,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,821
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO HERRERA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

B. FLEMING; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-16026

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01965-WBSEFB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2014** 

Before: TASHIMA, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Roberto Herrera appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process

violations in connection with his gang validation proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to

FILED

APR 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892

(9th Cir. 2011). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Herrera’s due process claim because,

even assuming that Herrera had a liberty interest in avoiding confinement in the

Security Housing Unit, Herrera failed to allege facts sufficient to show that he was

denied due process. See Bruce v. Ylst, 351 F.3d 1283, 1287 (9th Cir. 2003) (prison

officials need only provide the inmate with notice of the charges against him and

an opportunity to present his views and a prison gang validation need only be

supported by “some evidence”); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 448 (9th Cir.

2000) (a prisoner possesses a liberty interest only when a change occurs in

confinement that imposes an “atypical and significant hardship . . . in relation to

the ordinary incidents of prison life” (citation and internal quotation marks

omitted)). 

To the extent that Herrera intended to allege a claim for retaliation, the

district court properly dismissed Herrera’s retaliation claim because Herrera failed

to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants retaliated against him for

exercising his constitutional rights. See Bruce, 351 F.3d at 1288 (explaining

elements of a prison retaliation claim under § 1983). 

2 13-16026
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Herrera’s motions

for appointment of counsel because Herrera failed to demonstrate exceptional

circumstances. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991) (setting

forth standard of review and explaining “exceptional circumstances” requirement). 

AFFIRMED.

3 13-16026
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITTEE, INC., petitioner, v. Xavier BECERRA, Attorney General of California, et al.

No. 18-1092.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Roger W. MURRAY, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

No. 18M20.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Jonathan SANDOVAL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9171.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       (327,000)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,323,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (6,248,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,401,000
<PP&E>                                       1,348,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 869,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,700,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,403,000
<BONDS>                                     12,377,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,901,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,700,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,463,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,978,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (20,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               778,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             328,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (601,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (601,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (601,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .017
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .017
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as general partner of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of Campbell Strategic
Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                                 CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                                 By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner


                                 By: /s/ Bruce Cleland
                                     --------------------------
                                     Bruce Cleland
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     August 8, 2002





                                     -E 2-
TOWN OF KEARNY, NEW JERSEY, petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY.

No. 17-1650.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/30/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,650
COMMITMENTS
   9,605    2,300    1,455   20,049   29,159   31,109   32,914   11,541    9,736

CHANGES FROM 10/23/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        322)
     432      517       59      145      330      636      906     -314     -584

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    22.5      5.4      3.4     47.0     68.4     72.9     77.2     27.1     22.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       56)
      19        4        9       26       24       47       36
```

----

Updated November 2, 2012
Louis B. GASKIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5415.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Jeffrey Lynn CHRONISTER, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 18M33.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Exhibit 23.3



CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TO: ARS Networks Incorporated

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  under the Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 of ARS Networks, Incorporated for the
year ended January 31, 2003 of our report dated April 25, 2003 which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern,  and  contained  in the  Registration Statement No.
333-110007 of ARS Networks, Incorporated Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial statements of ARS Networks, Incorporated for the year ended January 31, 2003.

s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP -----------------------------------------------------------------------Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, NY 
April 29, 2004
Corey D. PHILLIPS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8734.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District denied.
Joel HAYDEN, petitioner, v. MAINE.

No. 18-9242.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

** **

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2008 |                                   |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                               |                                   |
|                               |                                   |
|                               |   /s/  Thomas F.  Wolfe |
|                               |  Thomas F. Wolfe                  |
|                               |  Senior Vice  President and       |
|                               |  Chief Financial  Officer         |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 14.2















Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

THOMSON:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13178, 333-14224, 333-119938, 333-124241, 333-130657 and 333-137680) of THOMSON of our report dated March 24, 2006 (except for the Note 40 for which the date is May 10, 2006 and Notes 5 and 41 for which the date is May 7, 2007), with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of THOMSON as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, recognized income and expense, and changes in equity for each of the years then ended and our reports dated May 7, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of THOMSON as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, recognized income and expense, and changes in equity for the year then ended, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of THOMSON.



|Mazars & Guérard  
|------------------
|Mazars            
|                  
|Frédéric Allilaire
|                  



Courbevoie, France



July 24, 2007
Richard CLARK, petitioner, v. D.J. HARMON, Warden.

No. 18-7115.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         I, Theresa D. Becks, the Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as general partner, of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                              CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                              By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner


                              By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks
                                  -----------------------------
                                   Theresa D. Becks
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   November 14, 2002


                                      -E3-
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.44





AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO COLLABORATION EXPANSION AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) to the Collaboration Expansion Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made on December 6, 2018, by and among ABT Holding Company, a Delaware corporation (“ATHX”), Athersys, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Athersys”), and HEALIOS K.K., a Japanese company (“Healios”).  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


WHEREAS, ATHX, Athersys and Healios entered into the Agreement on June 6, 2018 and entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement on August 31, 2018;  
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.6 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended, supplemented or modified in a writing signed by the Parties; 
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2018, Athersys issued and sold Healios a warrant (as amended, the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement as described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants herein and for other valuable consideration, ATHX, Athersys and Healios, pursuant to Section 10.6 of the Agreement, agree as follows: 
1.    The first sentence of 5.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
“During the period that begins on the Effective Date and ends on December 14, 2018 (“China ROFN Period”), ATHX hereby grants to Healios the exclusive right of first negotiation with respect to Athersys’ proprietary MultiStem stem cell technology, as follows.” 
2.    Athersys and Healios acknowledge and agree that each reference in the Warrant to the “China ROFN Period” is to such term as defined in the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.    


[Signature Page to Follow.]


    


NAI-1505693925v1 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized as of the date first above indicated.    


	
					
	ABT HOLDING COMPANY

	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Gil Van Bokkelen

	 
	 
	Name:  Gil Van Bokkelen
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Title:  Chairman & CEO
	 
	 

	




	ATHERSYS, INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ Gil Van Bokkelen

	 
	 
	Name:  Gil Van Bokkelen
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Title:  Chairman & CEO
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	HEALIOS K.K.

	 

	By:
	/s/ Hardy TS Kagimoto

	 
	Name:  Hardy TS Kagimoto, MD
	 

	 
	Title:  Chairman & CEO
	 








NAI-1505693925v1
Frankie L. McCOY, petitioner, v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-5077.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, GregGrosvenor, Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Report on 10-KSB ofTelesource International, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005,(the “Report”) hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

1)              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Telesource International,Inc.
|        | /s/ Greg Grosvenor      |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Greg Grosvenor          |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | Dated: July 31, 2006    |   |

 

----