alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.             This statement is providedpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.             The Periodic Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.             The information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of dates and for theperiods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date: November 12, 2009 |                      |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                         |                      |
|                         | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |
|                         | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|                         | Senior Vice President and |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
NICHIA CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., Ltd., et al.

No. 17-1707.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pernix      Group, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Greg Grosvenor         |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Greg      Grosvenor             |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer    |   |
| Dated:      March 31, 2010 |   |
Garland E. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-5623.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DURECT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew J. Hogan, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 29, 2017

 

| /S/    Matthew J. Hogan                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Matthew J. Hogan

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
James Paul ARLOTTA, petitioner, v. NIAGARA FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 18-8637.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Affinity Group, Inc., certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Affinity Group, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2006 |   |  /s/ Michael A. Schneider               |   |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   |  Michael A.  Schneider                  |
|                  |   |  President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Cecilio Cuero PAYAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8273.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      165,677
COMMITMENTS
  55,613   15,929   19,168   69,699  108,533  144,480  143,630   21,197   22,047

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,973)
  -7,537    1,515    1,306      607   -6,803   -5,624   -3,982      651     -991

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.6      9.6     11.6     42.1     65.5     87.2     86.7     12.8     13.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      63       26       34       56       85      132      134
```

----

Updated November 26, 2012
Jerry L. GATER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9121.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. MARICOPA COMMISSIONERS.

No. 18-8657.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Joseph P. HAGAN, et al., petitioners, v. Karim KHOJA.

No. 18-1010.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Armando ANGELES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5292.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         May 11, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on May 2, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 132 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-54, CP2022-59.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-10107 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely
 -E 4-




---



##### 



affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 By:
    
    /s/ Gregory T. DonovanGregory T. DonovanSenior Vice President of Accounting and FinanceCampbell & Company, Inc.General PartnerCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.August 14, 2008
 -E 5-
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eli Barkat, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of BackWeb
Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that, to the best of my knowledge, the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
BackWeb Technologies Ltd. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                   By:      /s/ ELI BARKAT
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                   Name:    Eli Barkat
                                   Title:   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                   Date:    March 31, 2003





                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Morgan, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual
Report of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that, to the best of my
knowledge, the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. at the dates and for the periods
indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                        By:      /s/ MICHAEL A. MORGAN
                                              ----------------------------------
                                        Name:    Michael A. Morgan
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer
                                        Date:    March 31, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I, Thomas Murawski, the Chief Executive Officer of EasyLink Services
Corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the Company's amended Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: April 30, 2007                   By: /s/ Thomas Murawski
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Thomas Murawski
                                            Chief Executive Officer
In Re Christopher DAWSON, petitioner.

No. 18-223.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pernix      Group, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Nidal Z Zayed                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Nidal      Zayed                           |   |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Dated:      March 31, 2010            |   |
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/13/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       44,386
COMMITMENTS
  10,250    2,317    1,268   21,591   31,636   33,109   35,221   11,277    9,165

CHANGES FROM 11/06/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,525)
     217      -44      -61    2,196    2,427    2,352    2,322      173      203

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.1      5.2      2.9     48.6     71.3     74.6     79.4     25.4     20.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       54)
      17        3        9       28       25       47       36
```

----

Updated November 16, 2012
Alvin DAVIS, Jr., petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-8118.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 24
- 00072
- CR IN RE CODY JAY RILEY
Original Proceeding
From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F45054

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” was filed on March 11, 2024. There are procedural problems with this petition, such as no service on the trial court judge as the respondent and no service on the State as the real

- party

- in

- interest , 1 no certification, no record, and no certified or sworn

- to copy of any document showing the matter complained of as required by the Rules of App ellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5, 52.3(j), (k)(1)(A), and 52.7. However, to expedite this decision, we use Rule 2 to suspend the operation of these rules and proceed to a disposition of the petition

. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

1 We do not serve documents for parties, even if indigent and in prison. Relator could handwrite extra copies of the petition and serve those copies on the respondent and real

- party

- in

- interest.In re Riley Page 2 P. 2

. B ecause the petition and/or brief was apparently never filed, there is no thing that prevents the petitioner from again seeking the appointment of counsel to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus
is denied wi thout prejudice to the petitioner’s ability to file a motion for the appointment
of counsel in the trial court

.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed Mar ch 2 1, 2024 Do not publish [OT06]
REDIGI INC., et al., petitioners, v. CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, et al.

No. 18-1430.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Motion of OmniQ for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Willie HOUSTON, III, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-8641.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.