alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/07/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       40,730
COMMITMENTS
   7,717    1,036      310   21,874   28,048   29,901   29,394   10,829   11,336

CHANGES FROM 07/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,645)
    -489     -150      151    1,003      374      665      375      980    1,270

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.9      2.5      0.8     53.7     68.9     73.4     72.2     26.6     27.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
      10        4        3       29       20       40       26
```

----

Updated August 10, 2012
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50327 Conference Calendar

STEPHEN E. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LARRY LYNCH, Sheriff; JOHNNY MYNAR; JIMMY STONE; ED HARRINGTON; UNNAMED PARA-LEGAL SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CV-120

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Stephen E. Nicholson, Texas prisoner # 1126089, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The district court denied Nicholson’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith. Nicholson challenges the district court’s certification decision pursuant to Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50327 -2- 1997). Nicholson has not addressed the merits of the district court’s certification decision. Accordingly, his request for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of his complaint and this court’s dismissal of his appeal count as two strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Nicholson has had at least one other civil rights complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim, and we dismissed as frivolous his appeal of that dismissal. Nicholson v. McLennan County Comm’rs Court , No. 04-50356, slip op. (5th Cir. August 17, 2004) (unpublished). Nicholson has accumulated four strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Adepegba , 103 F.3d at 387. Nicholson is therefore BARRED from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) SANCTIONS

IMPOSED.
David DUNCAN, petitioner, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 18-108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
ROMAG FASTENERS, INC., petitioner, v. FOSSIL, INC., et al.

No. 18-1233.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.
No. 01-14-00721-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

FIRST DISTRICT, SITTING AT 

HOUSTON 

 ____________ 

JAMES JORDAN, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

STATE=S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO THE HONORABLE COURTOF APPEALS: 

COMES NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, by and through the undersigned 

Assistant District Attorney, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time for 

the State to file its brief in the above styled and numbered cause. In support thereof, 

the State would show the following: 

1. The Clerk=s Record was filed in this case on September 10, 2014. 

Approximately seven supplemental Clerk’s Records were filed, with 

the latest being filed on December 18, 2014. 

2. The Reporter=s Record was filed in this case on October 20, 2014. 

3. The State=s brief in this cause was due on March 9, 2015. The State 

has not filed any previous requests for extension of time. The 

Appellant requested and was granted two extensions of time. 

4. The State’s attorney assigned to this case currently has many other 

pending matters including several pending appeals and writs, including 

a writ in a death penalty case, Andrus v. State. Further, the State’s 

attorney assigned to this case had an absence from the office during the 

period that this brief was due in relation to the birth of his second child. 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00721-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/20/2015 2:52:44 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/20/2015 2:52:44 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
5. The State would request that the deadline for the State’s brief in this 

cause be extended 60 (sixty) days. 

6. This extension is not sought for the sole purpose of delay.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State prays that this 

Honorable Court grant this motion and extend the deadline for filing the State=s brief 

in this case. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jason Bennyhoff 

JASON BENNYHOFF

ASST. DISTRICT ATTORNEY

Fort Bend County, Texas

State Bar Number 24050277

1422 Eugene Heimann Cir.

Richmond, Texas 77469

Phone: (281) 238-3352

Fax: (281) 238-3366

 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Jason Bennyhoff, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Motion was sent to counsel for the Appellant on March 20, 2015, via 

electronic mail through the EFile Texas electronic filing system.

/s/ Jason Bennyhoff

Jason Bennyhoff
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL LEASE

10400 Trademark Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

 

	The terms of that industrial lease dated March 18, 1991 originally between Rancho Cucamonga Business Park as Lessor and U.S. Alcohol Testing of America as Lessee and subsequently by and between Substance Abuse Technologies, Inc.(formerly U.S. Alcohol Testing of America) as Lessee and The Realty Trust (TRT) as Lessor is amended as follows:

	Substance Abuse Technologies (SAT) previously rejected the then existing lease under authority of bankruptcy proceedings.

	U.S. Drug Testing, Inc. (USDT), formerly a subsidiary of Substance Abuse Technologies, continued occupancy of the premises at 10400 Trademark Street under the terms of the FOURTH AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL LEASE executed by theparties in November 1997. U.S. Drug Testing, Inc. changed its name to LIFEPOINT, INC. and executed the FIFTH AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL LEASE in August 1998 the term of which was to expire on March 31, 2000. The SIXTH AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL LEASE extendedthe lease to March 31, 2002.

	The SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL LEASE immediately extends the lease until June 30, 2004 followed by options to extend the lease for three additional periods. The rental schedule and option periods are as follows:

RENT SCHEDULE:

January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002		$6000.00 per month.

April 1, 2002 through June 30, 2004		$6200.00 per month.

July 1, 2004 through April 30, 2005		$6200.00 per month.

May 1, 2005 through April 30, 2007		$6450.00 per month.

May 1, 2007 through April 30, 2009		$6700.00 per month.

 

OPTION SCHEDULE:

FIRST OPTION PERIOD:

		July 1, 2004 through April 30, 2005		$6200.00 per month

	LifePoint may extend this lease for the First option period by notice in writing given at least 90 days before the lease termination date of June 30, 2004.

SECOND OPTION PERIOD:

		May 1, 2005 through April 30, 2007		$6450.00 per month

	LifePoint may extend this lease for the Second option period by notice in writing given at least 90 days before the lease termination date of April 30, 2005.

 

THIRD OPTION PERIOD:

		May 1, 2007 through April 30, 2009		$6700.00 per month

	LifePoint may extend this lease for the Third option period by notice in writing given at least 90 days before the lease termination date of April 30, 2007.

	The terms and conditions of the original lease dated March 18, 1991 and its addendum and amendments shall remain in full force and effect except that LIFEPOINT shall occupy only the premises at 10400 Trademark Street and shall pay only 1/2 of thetotal real estate taxes, insurance, landscaping and exterior maintenance changes levied against the entire building.

	This Seventh Amendment is executed in two (2) originals. One original shall be held by the Lessor, The Realty Trust, and one original shall be held by the Lessee, LIFEPOINT, Inc.

 

Dated:		12/18/00				Dated:		12/11/2000		
LIFEPOINT, INC.					THE REALTY TRUST

 

By:	//Linda H. Masterson				By:	//Simi Dabah			
	President						Trustee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         928,655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               986,706
<PP&E>                                         199,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,182,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          304,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,931,301
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,053,895)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,182,142
<SALES>                                            500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               370,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (311,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (311,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (311,003)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Willis WHEELER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7187.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for the court to consider the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391 (2018).
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

** **

I, Bruce R. Wright, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ultratech, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| May 7, 2004 | /s/ Bruce R.  Wright     |   |
|-------------|--------------------------|--------|
|        | Bruce R.  Wright         |
|        | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FuelNation, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Brodzki, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company as of, and for the periods covered in the report.

                                  FUELNATION, INC.
                                     (Registrant)

                               Dated: September 23, 2003,

                        By: /s/ Charles Brodzki
                        -------------------------------------
                        Charles Brodzki,
                        President
Randall JENNETTE, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-8507.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/31/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      171,354
COMMITMENTS
  29,280   47,556   30,539   89,068   73,148  148,887  151,243   22,467   20,111

CHANGES FROM 01/24/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     19,732)
   4,184    4,711   -8,718    9,596    7,019    5,062    3,012   14,670   16,720

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    17.1     27.8     17.8     52.0     42.7     86.9     88.3     13.1     11.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       80)
      24       23       30       25       21       65       62
```

----

Updated February 3, 2012
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.5b

Lessee Guaranty, dated as of May 1, 2001, by Dynegy Holdings Inc.
B.C., petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES.

No. 18-8809.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Luisa G. MONTOYA, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18M24.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/13/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      131,418
COMMITMENTS
  34,803   24,343   14,913   62,820   66,222  112,536  105,478   18,882   25,940

CHANGES FROM 03/06/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,809)
    -252    5,024       82      578   -3,481      408    1,625    3,401    2,184

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    26.5     18.5     11.3     47.8     50.4     85.6     80.3     14.4     19.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      152)
      34       41       28       48       58       99      114
```

----

Updated March 16, 2012
LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF PORTLAND, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Scott WILCOX, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Jenna Wilcox.

No. 18-1137.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/21/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      370,380
COMMITMENTS
  47,639   27,625   83,299  221,756  241,844  352,694  352,768   17,686   17,612

CHANGES FROM 02/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -17,313)
  -4,822   -1,515   -1,273  -10,027  -13,995  -16,122  -16,783   -1,191     -530

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.9      7.5     22.5     59.9     65.3     95.2     95.2      4.8      4.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      120)
      26       23       38       59       60      109      102
```

----

Updated February 24, 2012
FIRST SOLAR, INC., et al., petitioners, v. MINEWORKERS' PENSION SCHEME, et al.

No. 18-164.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

TUNDRA RESOURCES, INC.CERTIFICATIONS*

I, Fong Lee, certify that;

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB ofTundra Resources, Inc.

2.             Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.             The registrant's other certifying officer and I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based onour evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.             The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.             The registrant's other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other facts that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   January 24, 2005

/s/ Fong Lee    Fong Lee, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,    President and Director

*Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant. See Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14.  The required certification must be in the exact form set forth above.