alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial   Corp.   (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three  months  ended  December  31,  2004 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                  /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Keith A. Simpson
                                                  Vice-President and
                                                  Chief Accounting Officer

Date: February 11, 2005

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

DAINGEAN TECHNOLOGIES LTD., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AT&T CORP., AT&T MOBILITY LLC, 

AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, and AT&T 

SERVICES INC., 

Defendants. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00123-JRG-RSP

ORDER

Before the Court is the Unopposed Motion to Change Lead Counsel Designation for 

Plaintiff filed by Daingean Technologies Ltd. Dkt. No. 83. After consideration, and noting its 

unopposed nature, the Motion is GRANTED. It is 

ORDERED that Amir H. Alavi is designated as lead attorney for Plaintiff Daingean

Technologies Ltd. 

Case 2:23-cv-00123-JRG-RSP Document 84 Filed 02/05/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1313
Zeeshan Khalid SYED, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9256.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1915

AN ACT

reporting of unidentified and missing persons.

To provide grants to the States to improve the
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1915

AN ACT

To provide grants to the States to improve the reporting

of unidentified and missing persons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Jennifer’s Law’’.
2

•HR 1915 EH

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

2 The Attorney General is authorized to provide grant

3 awards to States to enable States to improve the reporting

4 of unidentified and missing persons.

5 SEC. 3. ELIGIBILITY.

6 (a) APPLICATION.—To be eligible to receive a grant

7 award under this Act, a State shall submit an application

8 at such time and in such form as the Attorney General

9 may reasonably require.

10 (b) CONTENTS.—Each such application shall include

11 assurances that the State shall, to the greatest extent

12 possible—

13 (1) report to the National Crime Information

14 Center and when possible, to law enforcement au15 thorities throughout the State regarding every de16 ceased unidentified person, regardless of age, found

17 in the State’s jurisdiction;

18 (2) enter a complete profile of such unidentified

19 person in compliance with the guidelines established

20 by the Department of Justice for the National

21 Crime Information Center Missing and Unidentified

22 Persons File, including dental records, x-rays, and

23 fingerprints, if available;

24 (3) enter the National Crime Information Cen25 ter number or other appropriate number assigned to
3

•HR 1915 EH

1 the unidentified person on the death certificate of

2 each such unidentified person; and

3 (4) retain all such records pertaining to uniden4 tified persons until a person is identified.

5 SEC. 4. USES OF FUNDS.

6 A State that receives a grant award under this Act

7 may use such funds received to establish or expand pro8 grams developed to improve the reporting of unidentified

9 persons in accordance with the assurances provided in the

10 application submitted pursuant to section 3(b).

11 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

12 There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

13 this Act $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000, 2001,

14 and 2002.

Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Atnafu Ras MAKONNEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5105.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
MINNESOTA, petitioner, v. Quentin Todd CHUTE.

No. 18-48.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7491

WILLIE RITTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

AARON JOYNER, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (9:18-cv-01508-TLW)

Submitted: June 29, 2020 Decided: August 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Anne Franklin-Best, ELIZABETH FRANKLIN-BEST, P.C., Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellant. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Ritter seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Ritter’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2018). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ritter has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Jefferson A. McGEE, petitioner, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-1034.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jose Guerrero LOZANO, Jr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5918.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second Circuit denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEAUMONT DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

BRIDGETTE ALLEN RAMIREZ (2)

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

CASE NUMBER 1:23-CR-00023-MJT

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate 

Judge, for administration of a guilty plea under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure. Judge Zack Hawthorn conducted a hearing in the form and manner prescribed by 

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and issued his Findings of Fact and Recommendation on 

Guilty Plea Before the United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommended that 

the court adopt the Defendant’s guilty plea. He further recommended that the court adjudge the 

Defendant guilty on Count Two of the Superseding Indictment filed against the Defendant.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings. The court ORDERS 

that the Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea of the United States Magistrate 

Judge are ACCEPTED. The court accepts the Defendant’s plea but defers acceptance of the 

plea agreement until after review of the presentence report. The court ORDERS the 

Defendant’s attorney to read and discuss the presentence report with the Defendant, and file any 

objections to the report BEFORE the date of the sentencing hearing. 

Case 1:23-cr-00023-MJT Document 80 Filed 02/05/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 289
It is further ORDERED that, in accordance with the Defendant’s guilty plea and the 

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, the Defendant, Bridgette Allen Ramirez (2), is 

adjudged guilty as to Count Two of the Superseding Indictment charging a violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense Methamphetamine (“Actual”).

____________________________

Michael J. Truncale

United States District Judge SIGNED this 5th day of February, 2024.

Case 1:23-cr-00023-MJT Document 80 Filed 02/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 290
Elton Lee BAKER, Sr., petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-8082.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.32









October 6, 2015


Joseph Talamo
27 Brushy Ridge Road
New Canaan, CT 06840


Dear Joe,


This letter serves as an amendment to your offer letter dated June 28, 2011, and confirms your appointment to Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., (the “Company”), reporting to the Chief Executive Officer.  This appointment is effective October 6, 2015.


In accordance with your appointment, your annual base salary shall be $300,000.00 and your target bonus shall be up to 30% of base salary.  With your appointment, you shall serve as a member of the Company’s Executive Committee.


Should the Company terminate your employment without cause, or should you realize a reduction in duties, title, authority or responsibility that occurs by virtue of the Company being acquired, you will be entitled to receive severance in the amount of six (6) months’ base salary and benefits continuation for the severance period.


All other terms and conditions of your employment shall remain the same.


Congratulations on your well-deserved appointment!  We look forward to your continued efforts and success.






Caladrius Biosciences, Inc.
/s/ David Schloss        
David Schloss
Vice President,  Human Resources






Acknowledged and Agreed:





106 Allen Road │ 4th Floor │ Basking Ridge, NJ│ 07920 │ Phone: (908) 842-0100
www.caladrius.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,870
<INVENTORY>                                     49,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,458
<PP&E>                                         211,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 502,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,708
<BONDS>                                        156,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   502,937
<SALES>                                        609,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,034
<CGS>                                          482,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  482,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                161,842
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   153,115
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2 p.m. on Thursday, May 19, 2022.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

      ( print page 29776)    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: May 12, 2022.

Eduardo A. Aleman,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-10571 Filed 5-12-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
In Re Rafael A. JOSEPH, petitioner.

No. 18-5551.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Peter Carl BORMUTH, petitioner, v. JACKSON COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

No. 17-7220.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 24, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Michael Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity Group,Inc., certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Affinity Group,Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)   designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures under our supervision to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures;

 

(c)   presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on ourevaluation; and

 

(d)   disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)   any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 5, 2004 | /s/  Michael  Schneider      |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Michael  Schneider                     |
|                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Jonathan OLDHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-7703.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*54Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, Theresa D. Becks, do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:  /s/ Theresa D. Becks    Theresa D. Becks    Chief Executive Officer
Jesus Manuel LAUREANO-PEREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6083.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Miriam SOLER, petitioner, v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE.

No. 18-8887.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jesus E. TIRREZ, petitioner, v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, et al.

No. 18-180.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.