alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,560)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,924
<PP&E>                                           1,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (926)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,029
<BONDS>                                         10,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,327)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,505
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,751
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    972
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/09/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      179,951
COMMITMENTS
  56,574   14,221   30,600   69,056  106,001  156,230  150,822   23,721   29,130

CHANGES FROM 08/02/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,295)
    -417      861   -2,537    2,579      364     -375   -1,312    1,670    2,608

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.4      7.9     17.0     38.4     58.9     86.8     83.8     13.2     16.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      182)
      60       28       58       67       74      145      146
```

----

Updated August 12, 2011
(110 So. 336)

No. 28078.

#### STATE v. DELOMBRE.

(Nov. 2, 1926.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Criminal law &wkey;>! 158(1).

Supreme Court cannot consider facts affecting accused’s guilt or innocence to ascertain whether verdict is justified by evidence, in view of Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10, and article 19, § 9.

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; N. E. Humphrey, Judge.

Amidee Delombre was convicted of murder, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

A. J, Hollander and Charles A. Byrne, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., and Henry Mooney, Dist. Atty., of New Orleans, for the State.

LAND, J.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence to death for the crime of murder.

The appeal is based on the sole ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence. Counsel for defendant contend that this is not a case of murder where the death penalty should be inflicted, but, in 'its worst aspect, might be a case of manslaughter, and requests us to review the facts set out in the motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the trial judge.

Since the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court extends to criminal cases on questions of law alone, we have repeatedly held that we cannot consider the facts affe'cting the guilt or innocence of the accused, in order to ascertain whether the verdict is justified by the evidence. Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10; State v. Minor, 154 La. 595, 97 So. 873; State v. Steuer, 138 La. 303, 70 So. 233; State v. Easley, 118 La. 690, 43 So. 279.

The jury in all criminal eases are the judges of the facts on the question of guilt or innocence. Const. 1921, art. 19, § 9.

The conviction and sentence, appealed from are therefore affirmed.
Carlos Antonio RAYMOND, petitioner, v. Martin Joseph ROY, et al.

No. 18-8804.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until July 1, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, et al., petitioners, v. Amanda KONDRAT'YEV, et al.

No. 18-351.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *American Legion v. American Humanist Assn.* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2067, --- L.E.2d ---- (2019).
Brandon Lamar HAWKINS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-7558.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Ronnie Keith DAVIS, petitioner v. Benjamin MADDIE.

No. 18-5794.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
*       *       *       *       *


EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications














The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Sxan Biotech, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Sxan Biotech, Inc. and will be retained by China Sxan Biotech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








October 12, 2009
/s/ Feng Zhen Xing


Feng Zhen Xing Chief Executive Officer


and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 25, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   138768
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4231
<INVENTORY>                                     131250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                278371
<PP&E>                                           85748
<DEPRECIATION>                                   36168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  368752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            92244
<BONDS>                                         100000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    368752
<SALES>                                         805222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                805222
<CGS>                                           619187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   619187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                158282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   873
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9743
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4388
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5355
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7648
KEITH W. SHEPPARD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAR OLINA; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-893-3-1BD) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith W. Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sheppard v. South Carolina , No. CA-94-893-3-1BD (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Pamela B. STUART, petitioner, v. Catherine S. RYAN, et al.

No. 18-85.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
_

                                                                   Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Penn-America  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Jon S. Saltzman,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and Joseph F. Morris,
Chief Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jon S. Saltzman
-------------------------------------

Jon S. Saltzman
President and Chief Executive Officer


November 6, 2003

/s/ Joseph F. Morris
-------------------------------------

Joseph F. Morris
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

November 6, 2003
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Richard Alan Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Deutsche

Bank National Trust Company

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00854

- CV

Trial court case number: 07

- DCV

- 161177

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

On October 12, 2021, Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company filed a n opposed

Motion to Abate Appeal and to Direct the District Court [to] T ake Up the Second Motion for

Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc Under T e xas Rule of Civil Procedure 316. To the e xtent it seeks

abate ment of the present appeal, A ppell ee ’ s motion is granted

.

Thi s case is abated, treated as a closed case, removed from this Court’s active docket , and

remand ed to the trial court

. Th is ap peal will be re instated on this Court’s active docket when the

tri al court rules on Appellee ’ s S econd Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc and either party

informs the Clerk of this Court of the ruling with a certified copy of the order . This Court wi ll

also consider a mot i on to re ins ta te by eithe r party or may reinstate on its own order

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Ver onica Rivas Molloy

Acting individually

Date: November 2 , 2021
NO. 07-03-0532 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L B JANUA RY 14, 2004

______________________________ FIRST PER MIAN, L.L.C. and E NERGEN RESOU RCES C O., Appellants
v. JAME S P. GR

AHAM , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE286 TH DISTRICT COURT OF COCHRAN COUNT Y; NO. 02-12-3789 ; HON. HAROLD PHELAN, P RESIDING

_______________________________

ORDER

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ. Pending beforethe court is the application of First Permian, L.L.C. and Energen Resources Company for interlo cutory appeal under §51.014 (d) of the Texas Civi l Practice and Rem edies Code. Having reviewed theapplication, the clerk’s record and the pertinent statutory provisions, we deny the application.

Per Curiam
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITYGROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

1.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

 
| Date:  November 8, 2004 |                       |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    |                       |
|                    |                       |
|                    | /s/  Thomas F. Wolfe       |   |
|                    | Thomas  F. Wolfe           |
|                    | Senior  Vice President and |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided to AffinityGroup, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1571 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 211
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1571

                          [Report No. 106-588]

   To designate the Federal building under construction at 600 State 
   Street in New Haven, Connecticut, as the ``Merrill S. Parks, Jr., 
                          Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1999

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             April 13, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal building under construction at 600 State 
   Street in New Haven, Connecticut, as the ``Merrill S. Parks, Jr., 
                          Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building under construction at 600 State Street in New 
Haven, Connecticut, shall be known and designated as the ``Merrill S. 
Parks, Jr., Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Merrill S. Parks, 
Jr., Federal Building''.

                                                 House Calendar No. 211

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1571

                          [Report No. 106-588]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate the Federal building under construction at 600 State 
   Street in New Haven, Connecticut, as the ``Merrill S. Parks, Jr., 
                          Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 13, 2000

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           373,858
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      63,947
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 437,805
<CASH>                                          20,172
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               9,443
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          33,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 682,187
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                226,680
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            143,785
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,661
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,497
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   682,187
<PREMIUMS>                                     162,189
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             18,126
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               4,038
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   7,525
<BENEFITS>                                      94,183
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     53,568
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,595
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,595
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 161,353<F1>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             94,183
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              22,207
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                47,580
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                185,749<F1>
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES DIFFER FROM THE AMOUNTS REPORTED IN
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE INCLUSION HEREIN OF
REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES OF $40,931 AND $26,710 AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
DECEMBER 31, 1999, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, William Heye, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that, to the best of my knowledge, the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. at the dates and for
the periods indicated. /s/ William Heye
William Heye
Chief Executive Officer Date: March 25, 2005 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ken Holmes, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that, to the best of my knowledge, the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. at the dates and for
the periods indicated. /s/ Ken Holmes
Ken Holmes
Vice President, Finance Date: March 25, 2005