alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF BACKWEBS PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Ken Holmes, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BackWeb Technologies Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Ken Holmes
Ken Holmes
Vice President, Finance Date: March 29, 2006
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

I N 

### R E 

### DAVID C.

Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Sevier County

No. 15

- 000312 Jeffrey D. Rader, Judge

No. E2016

- 01114

- COA

- R3

- PT

- FILED

- JULY 13, 2016

This is an appeal by the appellant, David C., from an order terminating his parental rights to his minor child of the same name. The order terminating the appellant

= s parental rights was
entered on April 29, 2016. The Notice of Appeal was not filed until June 1, 2016, more than thirty (30) days from the date of entry of the final order. The Attorney General, on behalf of the appellee, Tennessee Department of Children

= s Services, has filed a motion to dismiss
this appeal based upon the untimely filing of the Notice of Appeal. Because the Notice of Appeal was not timely filed, we have no jurisdiction to consider this appeal and grant the

motion to dismiss.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

J OHN W. M C C LARTY

, C HARLES D. S USANO

, J R

., AND T HOMAS R. F RIERSON

, II, JJ.

William Lee Wheatley, Sevierville, Tennessee, for the appellant, David C.

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter, and W. Derek Green, Assistant Attorney General, General Civil Division, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, Tennessee Department of Children

= s Services.

Heidi M. Wegryn, Knoxville, Tennessee, Guardian Ad Litem.MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

1 Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides as follows:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedentia l value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated

A MEMORANDUM OPINION, @ shall not be published, and shall not be
cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case. A notice of appeal must A be filed with and received by the clerk of the trial court
within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from. @ Tenn. R. App. P. 4(a).

A The thirty

- day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional in

civil cases. @ Albert v. Frye , 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004). The appellant has filed no
response to the motion to dismiss and the cert ified copy of the final order attached to the motion confirms that the date of entry of the final order was April 29, 2016.

Because the Notice of Appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. The motion to dism iss is granted and this appeal is dismissed. Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, for which execution may issue if necessary.

PER CURIAM
In Re Christopher JOHNSON, petitioner.

No. 18-9403.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Feliciano VILLA-SARIANA, aka Feliciano Villa, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5624.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, William G. Gerber, President and Chief Executive Officer of Epoch
Biosciences, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: November 10, 2004
    By:
    /s/ William G. GerberWilliam G. GerberPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Studio II Productions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Dominick Pope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  February 15, 2008 /s/ Dominick Pope Chief Financial Officer
Victoriano VEGA-JIMENEZ, aka Jose Raul Hernandez, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5552

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Martha J. Valentine HARRIS, petitioner, v. HARDEMAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al.

No. 16-7300.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1813

To prohibit the export to Hong Kong of certain high-speed computers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 13, 1999

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To prohibit the export to Hong Kong of certain high-speed

computers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPORTS TO HONG KONG OF

4 CERTAIN HIGH-SPEED COMPUTERS.

5 The proposed export to Hong Kong of a Cray SV1

6 computer, pending on May 12, 1999, shall be denied, and

7 any proposed export to Hong Kong of any computer of

8 similar or greater speed shall also be denied.

Æ
----

----

| (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                  |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Date:  February 29,      2008 | /s/ Patrick J.      Goodman                                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         | Patrick      J. Goodman                                                       |   |
|                                         | Senior      Vice    President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                         | (principal      financial officer)                                            |   |

----

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000910678
<NAME> PINNACLE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       9,466,575
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               721,661
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            86,714,315
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    136,743,935
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,956,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             245,270,941
<DEPOSITS>                                 207,476,426
<SHORT-TERM>                                   770,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,138,800
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,680,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,843,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             245,270,941
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,086,033
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,823,610
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,909,643
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,710,302
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,712,090
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,197,553
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  171,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,172
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,549,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,415,627
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,424,427
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,424,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     8.8
<LOANS-NON>                                    170,506
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,418,678
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               225,157
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                823,101
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,842,152
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   75,038
<RECOVERIES>                                    18,798
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,956,912
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           421,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,535,912
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0715 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WOLFGANG ALEXANDER LUCAS VASQUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until July 16 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 11 2021

06/11/2021
Exhibit
32.1





STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The
undersigned, George L. Engelke, Jr., is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Astoria Financial Corporation (the “Company”).





This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
(the “Report”).





By
execution of this statement, I certify that:





(A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





(B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





May 7, 2010
                  
                  /s/
                  George L. Engelke, Jr.Dated
                  
                  
                  George
      L. Engelke, Jr.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/16/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      180,185
COMMITMENTS
  56,698   10,469   31,341   69,018  111,931  157,057  153,741   23,128   26,444

CHANGES FROM 08/09/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        234)
     124   -3,752      741      -38    5,930      827    2,920     -593   -2,686

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.5      5.8     17.4     38.3     62.1     87.2     85.3     12.8     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      59       28       59       68       78      149      149
```

----

Updated August 19, 2011
Devonte BROWN, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-5698.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lucas County denied.
Carolyn D. ROBINSON, petitioner, v. Linda HALL.

No. 18M158.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Anthony WEST, petitioner, v. Mary BERGHUIS, Warden.

No. 17-8230.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/18/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      527,313
COMMITMENTS
  61,474   56,633  153,353  292,501  300,153  507,328  510,139   19,985   17,174

CHANGES FROM 09/11/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,952)
   5,052    2,573   -4,283    4,517    6,150    5,286    4,440     -334      512

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.7     10.7     29.1     55.5     56.9     96.2     96.7      3.8      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      31       30       51       66       66      129      121
```

----

Updated September 21, 2012
NO. 07-06-0333-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	SEPTEMBER 5, 2006

	______________________________

	EMILIO H. CHAVEZ, JR.,

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS,

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2006-411367; HON. JIM B. DARNELL, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ORDER OF DISMISSAL

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Appellant, Emilio H. Chavez, Jr., appeals his conviction for theft.  The certification of right to appeal executed by the trial court states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case and the Defendant has NO right of appeal.”  This circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant, and opportunity was granted him to obtain an amended certification entitling him to appeal.  No such certification was received within the time we allotted.  Having received no certification authorizing an appeal, we dismiss the appeal per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).

	The appeal is dismissed.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/26/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       32,483
COMMITMENTS
   1,417      671        0   27,749   30,725   29,166   31,396    3,317    1,087

CHANGES FROM 07/19/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,192)
    -141      -20        0     -385   -1,406     -526   -1,426     -666      234

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     4.4      2.1      0.0     85.4     94.6     89.8     96.7     10.2      3.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       47)
       3        2        0       28       26       31       28
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/26/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       48,211
COMMITMENTS
   3,987    1,975        0   37,922   42,758   41,909   44,733    6,302    3,478

CHANGES FROM 07/19/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        691)
     444       -8        0      567    1,569    1,011    1,561     -320     -870

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.3      4.1      0.0     78.7     88.7     86.9     92.8     13.1      7.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       63)
      10        5        0       34       23       44       28
```

----

Updated July 29, 2011
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: November 5, 2020

CASE OF: DUANE EUGENE OWEN V. STATE OF FLORIDA

DOCKET NO.: SC18-810 OPINION FILED: June 25, 2020

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE 

OPINION:

On page 2, second paragraph, “Owen has also been convicted of the first-degree 

murder of another victim, Georgianna Worden, who was murdered five days after 

Slattery in a scenario “substantially similar to [that] of the Slattery murder.” Id. at 

691.” has been changed to “Owen has also been convicted of the first-degree 

murder of another victim, Georgianna Worden, who was murdered approximately 

two months after Slattery in a scenario “substantially similar to [that] of the 

Slattery murder.” Id. at 691-92; Owen v. State (Owen I), 560 So. 2d 207, 209 (Fla. 

1990).”

On p.3, first full paragraph, “Even though Owen murdered Slattery five days 

before he murdered Worden, his death sentence for the murder of Slattery is in a 

different posture with respect to our Hurst-related precedent. The reason for this 

difference is that Owen’s original conviction and sentence of death for Slattery’s 

murder was reversed and remanded for a new trial, see Owen v. State (Owen I), 

560 So. 2d. 207, 212 (Fla. 1990), which delayed the finality date of his conviction 

and sentence for that murder.” has been changed to “Even though Owen murdered 

Slattery before he murdered Worden, his death sentence for the murder of Slattery 

is in a different posture with respect to our Hurst-related precedent. The reason for 

this difference is that Owen’s original conviction and sentence of death for 

Slattery’s murder were reversed and remanded for a new trial, see Owen I, 560 So. 

2d at 212, which delayed the finality date of his conviction and sentence for that 

murder.”

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK