alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of China  Pharmaceuticals  International
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 20-F for the period  ending  December 31,
2004, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  ZHOU Li Yang,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ ZHOU LI YANG
-------------------------------------------
ZHOU Li Yang
Chief Financial Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-10-00190- CV
In re Bryan P . Suh re

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM B ELL COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N I n a petition for writ of mandamus, Br y an P. Suhre alleg es that he filed an application for post-c onviction writ of habe as cor pus in the 264th D istrict Court on Aug ust 4, 2009. SeeTex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2009). He asks the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the dis trict court to act on the habeas corpus application, which he asserts the cour t has failed to do. Post-conviction habea s corpus applications pursuant to article 11.07 are returna ble to the court of criminal appea ls. Id . § 3(a) . I n these case s, the convicting court acts as a fac t-finder , and it is the court of criminal appea ls that ultimately g rants or denies relief . Id . § 3(c) , (d). This Court ha s no jurisdiction a nd play s no role in these proce eding s. I f Suhre believes that the district court is not car

rying out its duties under article 11.07, he should seek mandamus relief in the court of cr iminal appeals, the c ourt for which the district cour t acts under

the statute.The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and He nson Filed: Apr il 15, 2010

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard G. Vincent, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Women First HealthCare,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during this period in which this report is being prepared; and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Dated: March 30, 2004                /s/ Richard G. Vincent
                                     Richard G. Vincent
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1856

To direct the Attorney General to establish a panel to study the issue

of Federal benefits received by persons convicted of drug offenses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 18, 1999

Mr. THORNBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To direct the Attorney General to establish a panel to study

the issue of Federal benefits received by persons convicted of drug offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tough on Drugs Act

5 of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF PANEL.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall estab8 lish a panel to study, and make findings, conclusions, and

9 recommendations, with regard to the issues related to
2

•HR 1856 IH

1 Federal benefits received by persons convicted of drug of2 fenses.

3 (b) ISSUES TO BE EXAMINED.—The panel estab4 lished in subsection (a) shall examine the following issues

5 as they relate to Federal benefits received by persons con6 victed of drug offenses:

7 (1) The number of individuals in the United

8 States receiving Federal benefits who have been con9 victed of a drug offense.

10 (2) The amount of Federal money, per Federal

11 benefit program, that goes to individuals convicted

12 of a drug offense.

13 (3) The legal and constitutional implications,

14 limitations, or impediments related to a denial of

15 Federal benefits to individuals convicted of a drug

16 offense.

17 (4) The specific Federal and State drug of18 fenses which could be utilized as a trigger for a de19 nial of Federal benefits.

20 (5) Ways in which the Federal and State Gov21 ernments could improve the exchange of information

22 about individuals convicted of a drug offense.

23 (6) The length of time for which Federal bene24 fits might be denied to individuals convicted of a

25 drug offense, and the effect of such denial on such
3

•HR 1856 IH

1 convicted individual, as well as on any dependent of

2 any such individual.

3 (7) The cost-effectiveness of a denial of Federal

4 benefits to individuals convicted of a drug offense,

5 including any savings to the Federal Government re6 sulting from such a denial of Federal benefits.

7 (c) DEFINITION OF FEDERAL BENEFIT.—In this

8 Act, the term ‘‘Federal benefit’’ means any program or

9 entitlement in which the Federal Government provides a

10 payment of money or a direct financial benefit to the re11 cipient, including Federal housing benefits, Medicaid,

12 Medicare, food stamps, and Social Security.

13 (d) REPORT.—The panel shall submit a report to

14 Congress detailing its methodology, findings, conclusions,

15 and recommendations, not later than one year after the

16 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
25, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-2000
<CASH>                                             286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   100947
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4105
<INVENTORY>                                     141628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                250630
<PP&E>                                           89907
<DEPRECIATION>                                   38169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  344197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            86584
<BONDS>                                         100000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    344197
<SALES>                                         215754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                215754
<CGS>                                           162081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   162081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 51080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1761
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1709)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3199)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3199)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS

The undersigned chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Registrant do hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant at the dates and for the periods shown in such
report.


                                   FUELNATION, INC.
                                     (Registrant)

                                 Dated:  August 14, 2002

                                 By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. SALMONSON
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Christopher R. Salmonson,
                                     President
Raymond Sanchez LOPEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5304.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Daniel Roger HOOD, petitioner, v. Ralph DIAZ, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

No. 17-9195.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mark HENRY, aka Weida Zheng, aka Scott Russel, aka Bob Wilson, aka Joanna Zhong, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7471.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Order entered October 17, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00699 - CV KIRK WEST, Appellant

V. MIKE COLLINS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 002 - 00091 - 2014



### O RDER By order dated August 25, 2014, appellant, who is pro se, was granted an extension of time to file his brief

. The brief was to be filed no later than September 30, 2014. To date, however, the brief has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his brief, along with an extension motion that complies with rule of appellate procedure 10.5(b), no later than October 27, 2014. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.5(b). A ppellant is cautioned that failure to comply may result in dismissal o f the appeal without further notice. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7676

RICHARD S. MAULICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN EDWARDS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-1106-7)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard S. Maulick, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard S. Maulick, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken from the final order

in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Maulick has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0016]


Meetings To Implement Pandemic Response Voluntary Agreement Under 
Section 708 of the Defense Production Act

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) previously 
announced a series of meetings under the Plan of Action to Establish a 
National Strategy for the Coordination of National Multimodal 
Healthcare Supply Chains to Respond to COVID-19, to implement the 
Voluntary Agreement for the Manufacture and Distribution of Critical 
Healthcare Resources Necessary to Respond to a Pandemic. The meetings 
listed below have been cancelled.

DATES:  The meetings scheduled for the dates listed below were 
cancelled:
    <bullet> Wednesday, March 16, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern 
Time (ET).
    <bullet> Wednesday, March 30, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.
    <bullet> Wednesday, April 13, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.
    <bullet> Wednesday, April 27, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.
    <bullet> Wednesday, May 11, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.
    <bullet> Wednesday, May 25, 2022, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Anne Lyle, Office of Business, 
Industry, and Infrastructure Integration, via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#733c31403a3315161e125d171b005d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="034c41304a4365666e622d676b702d646c75">[email protected]</span></a> or via phone at (202) 212-1666.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 10, 2022, FEMA announced a series 
of meetings to be held pursuant to section 708(h)(8) of the Defense 
Production Act (DPA), 50 U.S.C. 4558(h)(8).\1\ The meeting scheduled 
for March 2, 2022, took place as planned, but in light of other efforts 
to address the draft recommendations of the National Multimodal 
Healthcare Supply Chains Plan of Action, as well as incremental 
improvement in the overall multimodal transportation situation, the 
Sponsor of the Voluntary Agreement,\2\ the FEMA Administrator, no 
longer sees the need to conduct the other meetings, and has cancelled 
them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 87 FR 13742 (Mar. 10, 2022).
    \2\ ``[T]he individual designated by the President in subsection 
(c)(2) [of section 708 of the DPA] to administer the voluntary 
agreement, or plan of action.'' 50 U.S.C. 4558(h)(7).

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-10219 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT LEE TATE, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2226

[May 16, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Rosemarie Scher and 

Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judges; L.T. Case No. 50-2014-CF-008562-AXXXMB.

Rachael E. Reese of Rachael Reese, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

```

----

Updated June 29, 2007
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/05/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      605,646
COMMITMENTS
  55,997   21,631  138,324  382,446  419,072  576,768  579,027   28,878   26,618

CHANGES FROM 03/29/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     31,023)
   5,471     -115   12,660   11,367   12,471   29,498   25,016    1,525    6,007

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2      3.6     22.8     63.1     69.2     95.2     95.6      4.8      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      38       20       51       67       68      131      120
```

----

Updated April 8, 2011
SUPPLY PRO SORBENTS, LLC, petitioner, v. RINGCENTRAL, INC.

No. 18-1381.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Brandon Wade MORAGNE-EL, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-5256.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
Gregory GREEN, petitioner, v. HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.

No. 17-9226.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 22, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Leslie Ann HAYMOND, petitioner, v. HELMAND INVESTMENT, LLC.

No. 18-7891.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

s0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146994

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146994

COA: 314131

Wayne CC: 75-007704-FC

RICKY RIMMER-BEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Mark Madison LOWE, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 18-5490.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FuelNation Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Chris R. Salmonson, as Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sec. 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| |                               
| | Dated: November 21, 2008      
| |                               
| | /s/ Chris R. Salmonson        
| | Chris R. Salmonson            
| | President & CEO and           
| | Acting Chief Financial Officer