alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Petitioner

 v.

JOSE VARGAS,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 87 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOSE VARGAS,

 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 89 MAL 2015

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Cross Petitioner
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF: B. G., MINOR 

CHILD. 

No. 83380 

GINA G., 

Appellant, FILE 

vs. 

WASHOE COUNTY HUMAN 

SERVICES AGENCY, 

Res • ondent. 

SEP 2 1 2021 

ELiZEJ A. BROWN 

CLERK OF PREME COURT 

BY 

DtPLITY CLERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a district court order affirming master's 

findings and recommendations. Second Judicial District Court, Family 

Court Division, Washoe County; Paige Dollinger, Judge. 

Review of the notice of appeal, docketing statement, and 

documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. It does not 

appear that the district court has entered a final judgment appealable 

under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 

416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). The order challenged in this 

appeal determines the temporary custody of the minor children, and that 

order is subject to periodic mandatory review and modification by the 

district court. See NRS Chapter 432B. Thus, it appears that the district 

court has not entered a final written judgment. In re Temp. Custody of Five 

Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 443, 777 P.2d 901, 902 (1989); Lee v. GNLV 

Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). No statute or court rule 

authorizes an appeal from an order of the district court affirming a master's 

t 
findings and recommendation and determining temporary custody 

pursuant to NRS Chapter 432B. The right to appeal is statutory, and where 

no statute or rule authorizes an appeal, no right to appeal exists. See Brown 

v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this 

court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). 

Accordingly we lack jurisdiction and 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

, J. 

Cadish 

Pieke4 , J. 

Pickering Herndon 

cc: Hon. Paige Dollinger, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Gina G. 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

'In light of this decision, this court takes no action in regard to 

appellant's transcript request form filed on August 30, 2021. 

SUPREME Coma 

OF 

NEVADA 

(C) 1947A AD, 2 

- 

.1". A • • '"si-Z.' ;;;;E..4: 

,
Milos JIRICKO, petitioner, v. FRANKENBURG JENSEN LAW FIRM, et al.

No. 18-1464.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Karen H. SCOTT, petitioner, v. DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARTNERS, L.P., et al.

No. 18-147.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Tremayne Juandal MABRY, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 17-8653.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Affinity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.             This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.             The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.             The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

 

Date:  May 8,2006

 
|   | /s/ Michael A. Schneider               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael A. Schneider                   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or such other document authenticating, acknowledging,or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of the written statement as required by Section 906,has been provided to Affinity Group, Inc. and will be retained by AffinityGroup, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Shudong Xia, the Chief Executive Officer of
CHINA TRANSINFO TECHNOLOGY CORP. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 29th day of March, 2011.

/s/ Shudong
XiaShudong Xia Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China TransInfo Technology Corp. and will be retained
by China TransInfo Technology Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
Ajohntae HAMMOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5987.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Raymond E. ADAMS, II, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M45.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Philip Andra GRIGSBY, petitioner, v. Juan BALTAZAR, Jr., Warden.

No. 18-8061.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 458 

To prohibit implementation of the revised definition of short-term, limitedduration insurance in order to permit such insurance to provide up 

to 12 months of coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on Education and Labor, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit implementation of the revised definition of shortterm, limited-duration insurance in order to permit such 

insurance to provide up to 12 months of coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Affordable Limited 

5 Health Coverage Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 458 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISED 

2 DEFINITION OF SHORT-TERM, LIMITED-DU3 RATION INSURANCE IN ORDER TO PERMIT 

4 SUCH INSURANCE TO PROVIDE UP TO 12 

5 MONTHS OF COVERAGE. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec7 retary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of 

8 the Treasury, and the Secretary of Labor may not take 

9 any action to implement, enforce, or otherwise give effect 

10 to the final rule, entitled ‘‘Excepted Benefits; Lifetime and 

11 Annual Limits; and Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insur12 ance’’ (81 Fed. Reg. 75317–75319, October 31, 2016) in13 sofar as such final rule relates to a revised definition of 

14 the term ‘‘short-term, limited-duration insurance’’ and the 

15 Secretaries shall implement, enforce, and otherwise give 

16 effect to the definition of such term applied by the Secre17 taries immediately prior to the publication of such final 

18 rule. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32


                         ADVANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC.


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Advance Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary E. Ball, President and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all  material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ GARY E. BALL
_____________________
Gary E. Ball
President and Director
January 14, 2004


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR
OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE
SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF
THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906,  HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO
ADVANCE  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ADVANCE  TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.
Tony J. WALTON, petitioner, v. David BALLARD, Warden.

No. 18-7696.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 26,
1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                              71
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,128
<INVENTORY>                                    133,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               272,645
<PP&E>                                          83,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,334
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,219
<SALES>                                        479,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               479,860
<CGS>                                          367,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  367,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   406
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                       844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                311
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       311
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of National R.V.  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Bradley C.  Albrechtsen,  Chief Executive  Officer and President of the Company,
and Mark D. Andersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material  respects, the  financial  condition  and result of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ BRADLEY C. ALBRECHTSEN                           /s/ MARK D. ANDERSEN
--------------------------                           --------------------
Bradley C. Albrechtsen                               Mark D. Andersen
Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer
and President                                        (Principal Accounting and
                                                      Financial Officer)
May 5, 2003                                          May 5, 2003
Michael W. LISTER, petitioner, v. Tom McGINLEY, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

No. 17-9440.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/13/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      439,939
COMMITMENTS
  34,862   17,047   92,269  280,740  311,069  407,871  420,385   32,068   19,554

CHANGES FROM 09/06/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -17,006)
 -10,057  -13,987  -10,258      348    7,238  -19,967  -17,007    2,961        1

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.9      3.9     21.0     63.8     70.7     92.7     95.6      7.3      4.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      134)
      31       24       43       67       68      120      117
```

----

Updated September 16, 2011
BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                                1582 Tolita Drive
                               Las Vegas, NV 89123

January 4, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

         Re: Resignation as  Independent Auditor for Whatsupmusic.com, Inc.

Gentlemen:

         The undersigned has been provided with a copy of an Amendment No. 1 to
Form 8-K, fax date of January 4, 2001, being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by Angelaudio.com, Inc. relating to the replacement of this
firm by MacKay & Partners, Chartered Accountants. This firm agrees with the
contents of the Form 8-K as presented to us on January 4, 2001.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Barry L. Friedman
---------------------
Barry L. Friedman, P.C.
(702) 361-8414
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-38611) of JDN Realty Corporation and the related
Prospectus, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-90868) pertaining to the
JDN Realty Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and the
related Prospectus, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-1848)
pertaining to the JDN Realty Corporation 1993 Incentive Stock Plan, the JDN
Realty Corporation 1993 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, and the JDN
Realty Corporation 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the related
Prospectus of our report dated February 27, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of JDN Realty Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Atlanta, Georgia
March 18, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Information for inclusion in the 10-QSB, Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         476,030
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,746,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (160,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,976,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,276,927
<PP&E>                                         6,184,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,180,892)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,362,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,180,786
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,866
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,778,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,362,715
<SALES>                                        17,510,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,510,175
<CGS>                                          10,307,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,307,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,193,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,013
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             533,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                473,605
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            473,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   473,605
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17


</TABLE>
Antoinette PIZZINO, petitioner, v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., dba Norwegian Cruise Lines.

No. 18-91.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*245Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Clifford W. JONES, Sr., petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

No. 17-1610.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Robertson B. COHEN, Chapter 7 Trustee, petitioner, v. Andrea CHERNUSHIN.

No. 18-1302.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Joshua CHAPMAN-SEXTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9305.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6821

SHERMAN L. ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-03-205)

Submitted: October 27, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherman L. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sherman L. Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1039-40 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED