alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH DETAIL FOR COMPUTATION OF
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                             (Millions of Dollars)
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                       For the
                                                                                                        period
                                                                                                       December
                                                                                                       1, 1997
                                                                                                     (inception)
                                                                                                          to
                                                                            Year Ended December 31   December 31,
                                                                               1999         1998         1997
                                                                            ----------   ----------   -----------
<S>                                                                <C>      <C>          <C>          <C>
Income from continuing operations before income taxes...........    A        $  32        $ 143         $   7
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense, gross.......................................               182          156            10
  Portion of rentals representative of interest.................                37           37             4
                                                                             -----        -----         -----
     Total fixed charges before capitalized interest............    B          219          193            14
  Capitalized interest..........................................                --           --            --
                                                                             -----        -----         -----
     Total fixed charges including capitalized interest.........    C          219          193            14
                                                                             -----        -----         -----
Earnings (A+B)..................................................    D        $ 251        $ 336         $  21
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (D/C)........................               1.1          1.7           1.5
                                                                             =====        =====         =====
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,494)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,585
<PP&E>                                           1,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (898)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,352)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,281
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (625)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,116
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 12, 2015

No. 04-14-00556-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.L.W., S.S.W., AND L.M.W., Children,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-15199

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to February 11, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Stephanie J. Bandoske

Bandoske, Augustine & Marvel, PLLC

3107 Broadway St.

San Antonio, TX 78209

Jessica L. Lambert

Attorney at Law

118 E. Ashby Place

San Antonio, TX 78212

Dinah L. Gaines

Staff Attorney

Bexar County Civil District Courts

100 Dolorosa, Ste. 1.10

San Antonio, TX 78205
Bonnie R. FOWLER, petitioner, v. UTAH, et al.

No. 18-1340.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Timothy J. RIZZO, petitioner, v. APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., et al.

No. 18-1153.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 156 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 156

Relating to denial of airport access to certain air carriers conducting 
                    operations as a public charter.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mr. Hefley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
Relating to denial of airport access to certain air carriers conducting 
                    operations as a public charter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF AIRPORT ACCESS TO CERTAIN AIR CARRIERS.

    It shall not be considered unreasonable or unjust discrimination or 
a violation of section 47107 of title 49, United States Code, for the 
owner or operator of a covered reliever airport to deny access to any 
air carrier that is conducting operations as a public charter under 
part 380 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, with aircraft 
designed to carry more than 9 passengers per flight.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Covered reliever airport.--The term ``covered reliever 
        airport'' means an airport that--
                    (A) is designated as a reliever airport by the 
                Administrator;
                    (B) does not have an operating certificate issued 
                under part 139 of title 14, Code of Federal 
                Regulations; and
                    (C) is located within 25 miles of an airport that 
                has at least 0.05 percent of the total annual boardings 
                in the United States and has current gate capacity to 
                handle the demands of the public charter operation.
            (2) Public charter.--The term ``public charter'' means 
        charter air transportation for which the general public is 
        provided in advance a schedule containing the departure 
        location, departure time, and arrival location of the flights.
                                 <all>
```
A.R., petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al.

No. 18-8023.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 6, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Nick Montesano, Chief Executive Officer of Datastand Technologies
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Datastand Technologies
Inc.,

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

<PAGE>

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
- - 12 - 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated:      April 6, 2005      By: /s/ Nick Montesano
                                   -----------------------
                                   Chief Executive Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1268

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to ensure the integrity of

the Social Security trust funds by requiring the Managing Trustee to

invest such trust funds in marketable obligations of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. GARY MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to ensure the

integrity of the Social Security trust funds by requiring

the Managing Trustee to invest such trust funds in marketable obligations of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Invest5 ments Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1268 IH

1 SEC. 2. INVESTMENT OF THE FEDERAL OLD-AGE AND SUR2 VIVORS INSURANCE TRUST FUND AND THE

3 FEDERAL DISABILITY INSURANCE TRUST

4 FUND.

5 (a) INVESTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST

6 FUNDS SOLELY IN MARKETABLE OBLIGATIONS OF THE

7 UNITED STATES.—Section 201(d) of the Social Security

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 401(d)) is amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(d) It shall be the duty of the Managing Trustee

10 to invest such portion of the Trust Funds as is not, in

11 his judgment, required to meet current withdrawals. Such

12 investments may be made only in marketable obligations

13 consisting of interest-bearing obligations of the United

14 States or obligations guaranteed as to both principal and

15 interest by the United States. For such purpose, such obli16 gations may be acquired on original issue at the issue price

17 or by purchase of outstanding obligations at the market

18 price.’’.

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 201(e) of

20 such Act (42 U.S.C. 401(e)) is amended by striking ‘‘(ex21 cept public-debt obligations issued exclusively to the Trust

22 Funds)’’.
3

•HR 1268 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; TREATMENT OF CURRENT OBLI2 GATIONS.

3 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 section 2 shall apply with respect to investments made on

5 or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) TREATMENT OF CURRENT OBLIGATIONS.—As

7 soon as possible after the date of the enactment of this

8 Act, the Managing Trustee of the Federal Old-Age and

9 Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Dis10 ability Insurance Trust Fund shall, in accordance with

11 subsection (d) of section 201 of the Social Security Act

12 (as amended by this Act), take such actions as are nec13 essary to convert the obligations which are held by such

14 Trust Funds as of such date and which are not described

15 in such subsection to obligations which are described in

16 such subsection.

Æ
IB

Union Calendar No. 146

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1487

[Report No. 106–252]

To provide for public participation in the declaration of national monuments

under the Act popularly known as the Antiquities Act of 1906.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1999

Mr. HANSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

JULY 22, 1999

Additional sponsors: Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. GOSS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. DUNCAN,

Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. HILL of Montana, Mr.

WALDEN of Oregon, Mr. HEFLEY, and Mr. SCHAFFER

JULY 22, 1999

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 20, 1999]

A BILL

To provide for public participation in the declaration of national monuments under the Act popularly known as

the Antiquities Act of 1906.
2

•HR 1487 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of

2 Representatives of the United States of America in

3 Congress assembled,

4 SECTION 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE DECLARATION

5 AND SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT OF NA6 TIONAL MONUMENTS.

7 Section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 (34 Stat. 225,

8 16 U.S.C. 431; popularly known as the Antiquities Act of

9 1906), is amended—

10 (1) by striking ‘‘SEC. 2. That the’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘SEC. 2. (a) The’’; and

12 (2) by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(b)(1) To the extent consistent with the protection of

14 the historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures,

15 and other objects of historic or scientific interest located on

16 the public lands to be designated, the President shall—

17 ‘‘(A) solicit public participation and comment in

18 the development of a monument declaration; and

19 ‘‘(B) consult with the Governor and congres20 sional delegation of the State or territory in which

21 such lands are located, to the extent practicable, at

22 least 60 days prior to any national monument dec23 laration.

24 ‘‘(2) Before issuing a declaration under this section,

25 the President shall consider any information made avail-
3

•HR 1487 RH

1 able in the development of existing plans and programs for

2 the management of the lands in question, including such

3 public comments as may have been offered.

4 ‘‘(c) Any management plan for a national monument

5 developed subsequent to a declaration made under this sec6 tion shall comply with the procedural requirements of the

7 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.’’.

Union Calendar No. 146

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1487

[Report No. 106–252]

A BILL

To provide for public participation in the declaralarly known as the Antiquities Act of 1906. tion of national monuments under the Act popuJULY 22, 1999

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union,
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1466

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal estate, gift, and

generation-skipping transfer taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. SANDLIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Death Tax Elimination

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE, GIFT, AND GENERATION-SKIP7 PING TRANSFER TAXES.

8 (a) REPEAL OF ESTATE, GIFT, AND GENERATION9 SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES.—Subtitle B of the Internal

10 Revenue Code of 1986 is hereby repealed.
2

•HR 1466 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub2 section (a) shall apply to the estates of decedents dying,

3 and gifts and generation-skipping transfers made, after

4 December 31, 1998.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

BEHAVIOR ANALYST CERTIFICATION 

BOARD, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL MOATES, an individual; 

MISTY KIESCHNICK, an individual; and 

THE GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL 

PRACTITIONERS AND EXAMINERS, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-00194-ALM 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that on September 20, 2023, a true and correct copy of the Court’s 

Order dated September 8, 2023 (Dkt. 44) was emailed and mailed to Defendants addressed as 

follows: 

Misty Kieschnick 

9448 Castlewood Drive 

Fort Worth, TX 76131 

m.kieschnick@att.net 

Michael Moates 

4501 Nautilus Circle, Apt 710 

Fort Worth, TX 76106 

mike@cpmht.com

The Global Institute of Behavioral Practitioners and Examiners 

4501 Nautilus Circle, Apt. 710 

Fort Worth, TX 76106 

mike@cpmht.com 

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 47 Filed 09/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 420
2 

 Respectfully submitted this 20th day of September, 2023. 

HALL, RENDER, KILLIAN, HEATH & LYMAN, P.C. 

s/ Mark L. Sabey 

Mark L. Sabey, pro hac vice 

Lindsay K. McManus, pro hac vice

999 17th Street, Suite 800, Denver, CO 80202 

303-801-3538 / marksabey@hallrender.com 

303-802-1293 / lmcmanus@hallrender.com 

and 

Brandon S. Kulwicki 

HALL, RENDER, KILLIAN, HEATH & LYMAN, P.C. 

603 Munger Avenue, Suite 350, Dallas, TX 75202 

P: 214-615-2025 / F: 214-615-2001 

bkulwicki@hallrender.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

Case 4:23-cv-00194-ALM Document 47 Filed 09/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 421
Olusola OLLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8965.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Greg Grosvenor, ChiefFinancial Officer, in connection with the Report on 10-K of TelesourceInternational, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, (the“Report”) hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Telesource International, Inc.

 
|   | /s/ Greg Grosvenor         |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Greg Grosvenor             |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |   |
|   | Dated: March 31, 2008 |   |

 

 

----
petition for a writ of eoram nob is because they were claims arising from 

alleged factual errors that are on the record, the claims could have been 

raised earlier, or they involved legal and not factual errors. See id. at , 

310 P.3d at 601-02. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the 

petition. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

J. 

Pickering 

J. 

J. 

a.--th et 

Parraguirre 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge 

David August Kille 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(D) 1947A 44Sto