alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Fidelity Federal Bancorp
hereby certifies that:

     1.   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fidelity Federal Bancorp for the
          quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
          Exchange Commission on May 13, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Fidelity Federal Bancorp.



Dated:  May 13, 2004



/s/ Mark A. Isaac
-----------------------------------
    Mark A. Isaac
    Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference to any filing of Fidelity Federal Bancorp, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of National RV Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Bradley C.Albrechtsen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and ThomasJ. Martini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Bradley C. Albrechtsen  |                        | /s/ Thomas J. Martini |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Bradley C. Albrechtsen      | Thomas J. Martini           |
| Chief Executive Officer     | Chief Financial Officer     |
| and President               | (Principal Accounting and   |
| Date: November 4, 2005 | Financial Officer)          |
|                        | Date: November 4, 2005 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hanh Kihara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   May 7, 2004

/s/ Hanh Kihara

Hanh Kihara

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
M. G., FATHER OF M. G., MINOR CHILD

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5872

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County

. Jennifer J. Ellison , Judge

. Patricia Smith Wihnyk, Gainesville , for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Co unsel, Department of Children and Families, Jacksonville , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, ROWE

, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Luis A. NIEVES, et al., petitioners, v. Russell P. BARTLETT.

No. 17-1174.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 26, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Section 1350 Certification

         In connection with the Annual Report of Datastand Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

/s/ Nick Montesano
-----------------------------------
NICK MONTESANO
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Nick Montesano
-----------------------------------
NICK MONTESANO
Chief Financial Officer
Lester J. SMITH, petitioner, v. Greg DOZIER, et al.

No. 18-8606.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/06/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       63,451
COMMITMENTS
   6,967    3,447        0   51,644   57,484   58,611   60,931    4,840    2,520

CHANGES FROM 10/30/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,088)
     119   -1,470        0   -1,774       81   -1,655   -1,389      567      301

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.0      5.4      0.0     81.4     90.6     92.4     96.0      7.6      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       69)
       8        5        0       36       31       44       36
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/06/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      116,743
COMMITMENTS
  22,908   19,292    1,586   80,618   91,804  105,112  112,682   11,631    4,061

CHANGES FROM 10/30/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,841)
  -1,211      968       84    3,753    1,921    2,626    2,973      215     -132

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    19.6     16.5      1.4     69.1     78.6     90.0     96.5     10.0      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      128)
      39       12        8       56       38       98       55
```

----

Updated November 9, 2012
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30487

RALPH ABRAHAM, M.D.;

RANDY W. HEAD, M.D.; and,

RON MORGAN, M.D.;

Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants,

v.

RICHLAND PARISH HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT 1-B,

D/B/A RICHLAND PARISH MEDICAL CENTER; and,

DAVID KERVIN;

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

ROBERT MADDOX, M.D.; and,

SPECTRUM EMERGENCY CARE, INC.;

Defendants-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-760)

May 10, 1999

Before JONES, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In light of the court’s recent en banc decision in

Surgical Care Ctr. v. Hospital Serv. Dist. No. 1, No. 97-30887,

1999 WL 163430 (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 1999), Richland Parish Hospital

Service District 1-B and David Kervin are not entitled to Parker
2

immunity from antitrust liability. Accordingly, the district

court’s contrary judgment must be reversed and remanded for

proceedings consistent with Surgical Care. Further, the appeal

filed by Dr. Robert Maddox and Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc.,

challenging the district court’s denial of immunity to them must be

dismissed, as it involves an interlocutory, non-final order.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
WONG
      JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, A
      PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION


CERTIFIED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


SUITE
      102


28936
      OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590


TELEPHONE
      951 - 693 - 1120 • FACSIMILE 951 - 693 -1189














October
      24, 2005







**CONSENT
        OF WONG JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, APC**
   
 To
        the
        Board of Directors
 Aquatic
        Cellulose International Corp.
 
 We
        consent to the inclusion on Form 10-KSB the use of our report dated March
        11,
        2005 with respect to the May 31, 2004 audited financial statements. Our report
        dated March 11, 2005 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company
        has incurred significant losses from operations, has negative working capital
        and shareholders’ deficit, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to
        continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any
        adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
 
 /s/
          WONG
          JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES
 
 WONG
        JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES
 A
        Professional Corporation
 Temecula,
        California
ChiefJustice

James T. Worthen

Twelfth Court of Appeals

Justices

Sam Griffith

Diane DeVasto

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Mr. James W. Volberding

One American Center

909 ESE Loop 323

Suite 700

Tyler, TX 75701

Mr. Michael J. West

Assistant District Attorney

4th Floor, Courthouse

100 North Broadway

Tyler, TX 75702

RE: Case Number: 12-04-00251-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 02-3596-D

Style: In the Interest ofL. S. B. and K. H., children

Clerk

Cathy S. Lusk

Chief Staff Attorney

Margaret Hussey

Enclosed is a copy of the Memorandum Opinion issued this date in the above styled and

numbered cause. Also enclosed is a copy ofthe court's judgment.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: KtijUJIA. Mflfk

KatrinaMcClenny, Chief Deputy Depirft (Clerk

Judge Carole W. Clark

Hon. John Ovard

Ms. Lois Rogers

CC:

1517 West Front Street • Suite 354 • Tyler, TX 75702 • Tel: 903-593-8471 • Fax: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur,

Van Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us
NO. 12-04-00251-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§ APPEAL FROM THE 321ST

IN THE INTEREST OF

L.S.B. AND K.H., § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

CHILDREN

§ SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, and all other parties to the appeal have

been given notice ofthe filing ofthis motion. Also included in the motion to dismiss is counsel's

motion to withdraw and a motion for cancellation of oral argument. Because Appellant met the

requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), all motions are granted, and the

appeal is dismissed.

Opinion delivered December 7, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 7, 2005

NO. 12-04-00251-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.S.B. AND K.H.,

CHILDREN

Appeal from the 321st Judicial District Court

' ofSmith County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 02-3596-D)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the Appellant's

motion to dismiss the appeal herein, counsel's motion to withdraw and motion for cancellation of

oral argument, and the Court having heard and fully considered said motion is ofthe opinion the

same should be Granted.

It istherefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that this

appeal be, and the same is, Hereby Dismissed and that all costs ofthis appeal be, and the same are,

adjudged against the Appellant, Amanda Hayes, for which execution may issue, and that this

decision be certified to the trial court below for observance.

Byper curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
Bruce Earl WARD, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 17-9159.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

*322Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
Marion TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, WARDEN.

No. 18-7667.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
David E. MILLER v. Tony PARKER, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction, et al.

No. 18-6906 (18A578).

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 6, 2018.

The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice SOTOMAYOR and by her referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari.

Tennessee is scheduled to electrocute David Miller tonight. Miller is the second inmate in just over a month who has chosen to die by the electric chair in order to avoid the State's current lethal injection protocol. See *Zagorski v. Haslam* , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 20, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting from denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari). Both so chose even though electrocution can be a dreadful way to die.* They did so against the backdrop of credible scientific evidence that lethal injection as currently practiced in Tennessee may well be even worse. See *id* ., at ----, 139 S.Ct., at 21 ; *Irick v. Tennessee* , 585 U.S. ----, ---- - ----, 139 S.Ct. 1, 1-2, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018) (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting from denial of application for stay).

The decision that the Court leaves undisturbed in this case rests in part on the fiction that Miller's choice was voluntary, and in part on predictions about the efficacy of electric chairs made over a century ago. App. to Pet. for Cert. 19a; see *In re Kemmler* , 136 U.S. 436, 443-444, 10 S.Ct. 930, 34 L.Ed. 519 (1890). Another decision that the Court today declines to review faulted Miller for not proving an available alternative means of his own execution. See No. 18-6739, *Miller v. Parker* , *supra* , p. ----. It did so while effectively permitting the State to turn that "perverse requirement" into a moving target. See *McGehee v. Hutchinson* , 581 U.S. ----, ----, 137 S.Ct. 1275, 1276, 197 L.Ed.2d 746 (2017) (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting from denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari). These cases are the unfortunate byproducts of this Court's decision in *Glossip v. Gross* , 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2726, 192 L.Ed.2d 761 (2015). Such madness should not continue. Respectfully, I dissent.

*

See *State v. Mata* , 275 Neb. 1, 66, 745 N.W.2d 229, 278 (2008) (concluding that "electrocution will unquestionably inflict intolerable pain unnecessary to cause death in enough executions so as to present a substantial risk that any prisoner will suffer unnecessary and wanton pain").
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Nidal Zayed, President and Chief Executive Officer, inconnection with the Report on 10-K of Telesource International, Inc. for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2004, (the “Report”) hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1)              The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Telesource International, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Nidal Zayed                       |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Nidal Zayed                           |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| Dated:  March 15, 2006      |   |   |

 

1

----
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/11/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      148,758
COMMITMENTS
  57,976   11,542   12,518   59,201  103,684  129,695  127,744   19,063   21,014

CHANGES FROM 09/04/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,762)
     963     -311    1,577   -2,456      652       84    1,918    1,678     -156

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    39.0      7.8      8.4     39.8     69.7     87.2     85.9     12.8     14.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      181)
      60       22       27       58       76      129      116
```

----

Updated September 14, 2012
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/05/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      148,612
COMMITMENTS
  37,359   23,884   17,457   72,452   76,591  127,268  117,932   21,344   30,680

CHANGES FROM 05/29/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     10,153)
   1,129    1,933    3,061    1,715    1,744    5,905    6,738    4,248    3,415

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.1     16.1     11.7     48.8     51.5     85.6     79.4     14.4     20.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      151)
      37       41       42       53       56      118      116
```

----

Updated June 8, 2012
David HILL, petitioner, v. Brent REINKE, et al.

No. 18-5460.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133847 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

In re Estate of JAMES W. MILTENBERGER,

Deceased. 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices _______________________________________ 

SUSAN EIFLER, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of James W. Miltenberger,

Deceased, 

Appellee,

and 

SHARON MILTENBERGER,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

 SC: 133847 

v COA: 270716

 Calhoun Probate Ct:

 2004-000287-DE 

SANDRA SWARTZ,

 Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are to 

discuss whether the dower election in MCL 700.2202(2)(c), as defined in MCL 558.1, 

violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the Michigan and federal constitutions as set 

forth in Const 1963, art 1, § 2 and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States 

Constitution. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the April 2008 session 

calendar for argument and submission. Appellants’ brief and appendix must be filed no 

later than January 28, 2008, and appellees’ brief and appendix, if appellees choose to 

submit an appendix, must be filed no later than February 21, 2008. 

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later 

than March 6, 2008. 

t1213 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 13, 2007 

Clerk 
2
James PELLO, petitioner, v. Dushan ZATECKY, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

No. 18-5753.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Thomas J. ARNOLD, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-5708.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Dereck PELLETIER, petitioner, v. Wendy KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

No. 18-1396.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
Steven CIOTTA, petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, Warden.

No. 17-8248.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
William SAPPINGTON, petitioner, v. Bill OLDHAM, Sheriff, Shelby County, Tennessee.

No. 17-6147.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
Claude THELEMAQUE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6151.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.