alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DALE E. YEILDING and SANDRA 

YEILDING,

 Defendants, Counterclaim and Third- 

 Party Plaintiffs Below,

 Appellants,

v.

COUNCIL OF ASSOCIATION OF 

UNIT OWNERS OF PELICAN COVE 

CONDOMINIUM, ROBERT and 

KAREN LANGDON, CATHERINE 

ROBINSON, DONALD and 

LORRAINE FORD, PAUL LUISI, 

LURRAINE LUISI, MICHAEL 

GAVRON, CATHERINE GAVRON, 

ROBERT and DEBORAH GAVRON, 

RICHARD and KAROLYN 

SCHRUFER, WILLIAM and 

KATHERINE LUCAS, and SHERRY 

GRETH,

 Plaintiffs, Counterclaim Defendants, 

 and Third-Party Defendants Below,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 421, 2020

Court Below – Court of Chancery

of the State of Delaware

 C.A. No. 12793-VCG

Submitted: July 14, 2021

Decided: August 4, 2021

Before VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.

ORDER
On this 4

th day of August, 2021, after careful consideration of all briefs and 

the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Court of 

Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the June 3, 

2019 memorandum opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery

isAFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves

Justice
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/25/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      595,781
COMMITMENTS
  52,407   10,958  134,886  380,789  430,936  568,082  576,780   27,700   19,001

CHANGES FROM 01/18/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,948)
  -7,405   -7,710   -7,202   -3,599   -2,009  -18,206  -16,921    4,258    2,973

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.8      1.8     22.6     63.9     72.3     95.4     96.8      4.6      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      124)
      35       15       42       63       65      114      109
```

----

Updated January 28, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned executive officer of WVS Financial Corp. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ David J. Bursic
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David J. Bursic
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 17, 2004

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-3
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated March 26, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand schedule included in the Annual Report of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in thepreviously filed Registration Statements of BackWeb Technologies Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File No.333-119432, effective October 1, 2004, File No. 333-101224, effective November 15, 2002, File No.333-68804, effective August 31, 2001, File No. 333-51098, effective December 1, 2000, and File No.333-84659, effective August 6, 1999) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-42384, effective July 27, 2000)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPSan Jose, CA
Josh A. WAIRI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6229.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN BARRON MCCARTY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:05-cr-00259-BO-2)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Barron McCarty, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Justin Barron McCarty appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2018) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. McCarty, No. 5:05-cr-00259-BO-2 (E.D.N.C., July 1, 2019). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Zachary CHAMBERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6035.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
VIOLET DOCK PORT, INC., LLC, petitioner, v. ST. BERNARD PORT, HARBOR, & TERMINAL DISTRICT.

No. 17-1656.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Motion of NFIB Small Business Legal Center, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1423 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1423

To amend title 18, United States Code, to restrict the mail-order sale 
                             of body armor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 1999

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to restrict the mail-order sale 
                             of body armor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Body Armor Restriction Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. UNLAWFUL MAIL-ORDER SALE OF BODY ARMOR.

    Title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new chapter:

                       ``CHAPTER 44A--BODY ARMOR

``Sec.
``941. Unlawful acts.''.
``Sec. 941. Unlawful acts
    ``(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, it 
shall be unlawful for a person to sell or deliver body armor unless the 
transferee meets in person with the transferor to accomplish the sale, 
delivery, and receipt of the matter.
    ``(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to body armor used by law 
enforcement officers.
    ``(c) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `body armor' means any product sold or 
        offered for sale as personal protective body covering whether 
        the product is to be worn alone or is sold as a complement to 
        other products or garments; and
            ``(2) the term `law enforcement officer' means any officer, 
        agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a 
        political subdivision of a State, authorized by law or by a 
        government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, 
        detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of 
        criminal law.''.
    ``(d) Whoever knowingly violates this section shall be fined under 
this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.''.
                                 <all>
```
Darrell Darcell DARBY, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-5848.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
                           EXHIBIT 27
                                
                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
       
<S>                                                                    
                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        $       945
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,316
<PP&E>                                            263,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (5,963)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    264,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               6,643
<BONDS>                                            55,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        50,000
<COMMON>                                              223
<OTHER-SE>                                        149,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      264,341
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    9,156
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (3,953)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (1,523)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     3,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 3,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $     3,655
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 $      0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 $      0.27
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

24, 2019
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -01106- CR
RICKY HARRELL, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1562109

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Ricky Harrell has signed and filed a written motion to withdraw his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy (DoN), Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Department of the Navy, after carefully weighing the strategic, operational, and environmental consequences of the Proposed Action (Patuxent River Complex Final Environmental Impact Statement published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 25, 2022), announces its decision to conduct testing and training as identified in Alternative 2, the Navy's Preferred Alternative, of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Testing and Training Activities in the Patuxent River Complex (PRC).                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Implementation of Alternative 2 will enable the Navy and other U.S. military services to meet their respective missions. The Navy's mission, under Title 10 United States Code (U.S.C.) section 8062, is to maintain, train, and equip combat-ready military forces capable of winning wars, deterring aggression, and maintaining freedom of the seas. The Navy will continue to implement the full suite of mitigation measures detailed in Table 3.10-1 (Impact Avoidance and Minimization Measures) of the PRC Final EIS to avoid or reduce potential environmental impacts during testing and training activities. The complete text of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the PRC Final EIS is available on the project website at                     *www.prceis.com,*                     along with the March 2022 PRC Final EIS and supporting documents. Single copies of the ROD are available upon request by contacting: Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Atlantic, Attention: Code EV21JB, 6506 Hampton Boulevard, Norfolk, VA 23508.                

J.M. Pike,

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-10743 Filed 5-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., petitioners, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

No. 18-447.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Order entered April 2 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01285 - CV ARUBA PETROLEUM, INC ., Appellant V. LISA PARR, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . CC - 11 - 01650 - E 

### O RDER W e GRANT court reporter Vi k ki L. Ogden’s March 30, 2015 request for extension of time and ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than June 5, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
H. R. 1887

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the depiction of animal cruelty.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUNISHMENT FOR DEPICTION OF ANIMAL CRUELTY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code,

is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘§ 48. Depiction of animal cruelty

‘‘(a) CREATION, SALE, OR POSSESSION.—Whoever knowingly creates, sells, or possesses a depiction of animal cruelty with the

intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce

for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned

not more than 5 years, or both.

‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply to any depiction

that has serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value.

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section—

‘‘(1) the term ‘depiction of animal cruelty’ means any visual

or auditory depiction, including any photograph, motion-picture

film, video recording, electronic image, or sound recording of

conduct in which a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, if such conduct is illegal

under Federal law or the law of the State in which the creation,

sale, or possession takes place, regardless of whether the

maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding, or killing took place

in the State; and

‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ means each of the several States,

the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,

the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth

of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other commonwealth,

territory, or possession of the United States.’’.
H. R. 1887—2

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for such

chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘48. Depiction of animal cruelty.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
FLORIDA, plaintiff, v. GEORGIA.

No. 142, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

Sept. 25, 2018.

The August 9, 2018, Order in this case is amended to provide that the compensation of a legal assistant for the Special Master shall be charged against and borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct. The cost of printing the Special Master's Reports, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be submitted to the Court.
NO. 07-04-0349-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D SEPTEMBER 21, 2004

______________________________ AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
v. EDWARD VAUGHN,

Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 251 st DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNT Y; NO. 52,395-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. American Home Ass urance C ompany ap peals fro m an orde r o n appell ee’s application f

or atto rney fees. The clerk’s record was filed on Au gust 3, 2004. The reporter’s record was due on September 2, 2004. On S eptember 10, 2 004, a letter was sentto the co urt reporter reques ting a re porter’s status. No response has been received, though d ue by Se ptember 2 0, 2004.2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District Court of Randall C ounty (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediatelycause notice o f a hearin g to be g iven and , thereafter, condu ct a heari ng to determine the following: 1. why the r

eporter’s record ha s not bee n filed; 2. when the reporter’s record can reasonably be filed in amanner tha t does not have the practical effect of depriving the appell ant of his right to appea l or dela ying theresoluti on of thi s appeal

. The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too sh all it 1) exec ute fi ndin gs of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record co ntaining its findings of fact and conclusions of lawand all orders it may issue as a resu lt of its hearing in this m atter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporte r’s record transcrib ing the e vidence and argu ments pres ente d at th e aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental record and reporter’s record transcribing the hearing with theclerk of this cour t on or be fore October 20, 2004. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before October 20, 2004. It is so ordered. Per Curiam
Order entered June 25, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 01115 - CV DAVID S BAGWELL, INDIVIDUALL Y AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE DAVID S. BAGWELL TRUST, ET AL . , Appellant s V. RIDGE AT ALTA VISTA INVESTMENTS I, LLC, Appel lee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 10 - 04398 - E 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellants’ June 11, 2013 motion to reinstate appeal. The Court GRANTS the motion, REINSTATES this appeal, and O RDERS appellants to file their brief within thirty days of the date of this order. The Court further ORDERS the trial court to hear the joint motion to determine amount of supersedeas bond filed by appellants on July 2, 2012, within thirty days of the dat e of this order. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 24.2(c)(2).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/12/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       72,441
COMMITMENTS
   7,246    3,925       13   59,316   64,760   66,575   68,698    5,866    3,743

CHANGES FROM 06/05/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,192)
    -843      162     -330    4,962    4,267    3,789    4,099    1,403    1,093

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.0      5.4      0.0     81.9     89.4     91.9     94.8      8.1      5.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       62)
       8        5        1       32       30       41       35
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/12/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      136,137
COMMITMENTS
  15,073    7,473    2,381  103,321  112,234  120,775  122,088   15,362   14,049

CHANGES FROM 06/05/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     28,965)
    -752   -1,491      530   24,069   23,767   23,847   22,806    5,118    6,159

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.1      5.5      1.7     75.9     82.4     88.7     89.7     11.3     10.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       87)
      21       13        5       35       35       59       50
```

----

Updated June 15, 2012
Zachary David WARNELL, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-5459.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.