UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 2258

YURI J. STOYANOV

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy United States Department of the Navy; JAMES H. KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; DAVID L. MAYO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 743 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; MARK THOMAS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as EEO Chief and Commander of Code 00 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; CATHERINE L. KESSMEIER, In dividually and in her Official Capacity as Counsel of Code 004 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; JACK K. TEMPLETON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 20 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; KENNETH GOLDMAN , Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 71 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; KENNETH FORMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 73 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; SAM HAN,
Individua lly and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 74 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; CIRO MINOPOLI, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 75 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; WILLIAM SNYDER, Individually a nd in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 20 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; M. WADE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 21 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; M. J. BABERICH, Individually and in her O fficial Capacity as Head of Code 64 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; BRUCE CROCK, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 741 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; WILLIAM MARTIN, Individually and in his Officia l Capacity as Head of Code 722 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; USCA4 Appeal: 23-2258 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 42 CHARLES R. REEVES, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Product Area Director of Code 09 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center; L. MURPHY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 22 Carderock
Division Naval Surface Warfa re Center; DAVID WINTER, Dr., Former Secretary of the Navy U.S. Department of the Navy; GARY ROGHEAD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Navy Operations; ARCHER MACY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commander of NSWC; PAUL E . SULLIVAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commander of SEA 00; MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; ROBERT K. HUR, U.S. Attorney; MARGARET W. LONG, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Administrative/Technical Specialist Code 39; GA RY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70; GARTH JENSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Head of Code 70; ELAINE B. MCKINNEY, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Deputy EEO Chief Code 004; M IKE MULLEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Naval Operations; WAYNE WEIKERT, Individually and in her Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70; CHRIS D. MEYER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as EEO Chief and Commander of Cod e 00; JEROME CARRUBBA, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Security Manager of Code 03; NEACLESA ANDERSON, Individually and in her Official Capacity as general Counsel of Code 04; JOSEPH VIGNALLI, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the H ead of Code 7204; PAUL SHANG, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 707; SUN HAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74; ROBERT WINGO, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7502; RO BERT KOLLARS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7102; MIKE WADE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 203; N. P. ANDERSON, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39; JAMES

SH ANNON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of NSWC; KEVIN MCCOY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of NAVSEA; GARY ROUGHHEAD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chief of Naval Operations; BARBARA REDINGER, Individu ally and in her Official Capacity as Security Manager Code 40; E. CAHILL, Ms., Individually and in her Official Capacity as Head of Workforce Relations Branch Code 39

,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake

, Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv

- 03479

- CCB )

Submitted : April 11, 2024 Decided: April 15, 2024 USCA4 Appeal: 23-2258 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 2 of 43 Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-2258 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 3 of 44 PER CURIAM:

Yuri J. Stoyanov seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying Stoyanov’s

(1) most recent of several motions attempting to stay the district court proceedings; and

(2) motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying the motion to stay. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order s Stoyanov see ks to appeal are neither

final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s . Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-2258 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 4 of 4