alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         473,169
<SECURITIES>                                 5,066,067
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,989,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                   169,993
<INVENTORY>                                 14,081,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,205,569
<PP&E>                                       9,020,994
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,709,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,814,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,005,076
<BONDS>                                        246,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,007
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,471,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,814,896
<SALES>                                      8,831,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,831,357
<CGS>                                        5,637,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,637,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                231,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                    81,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,965
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
Ronald LONG, petitioner, v. George ROBINSON, Administrator, Northern State Prison, et al.

No. 18-5290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 223 SSM 34 Miriam Levy Oates, as Administratrix of the Estate of Rachel Levy, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted by Lawrence Heisler, for appellant. Submitted by Paige R. Butler, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly determined that legally sufficient evidence supported the jury's findings of negligence and entitlement to damages for decedent's conscious pain and suffering. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided November 17, 2016
DAISY T., petitioner, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, et al.

No. 18-8939.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
Mustafa Ahmad NAUSHAD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8256.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Gustavo TORRES-MEDEL, petitioner, v. Jacqueline LASHBROOK, Warden.

No. 18-6015.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.01**CERTIFICATION**I, TheresaD. Becks, do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks Theresa D. BecksChief Executive OfficerCampbell & Company, Inc.General PartnerCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.May 15, 2007  
E-2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

May 24, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-202-599-1426, Code: 399 176 570#; or via web:                         *https://teams.microsoft.com/​l/​meetup-join/​19%3ameeting_​MTc0MDQyNDctYzE3My00NTUwLWI1ODQtOTU1MTY2NmEyM2Ji%40thread.v2/​0?​context=​%7b%22Tid%22%3a%223f6323b7-e3fd-4f35-b43d-1a7afae5910d%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%227c8d802c-5559-41ed-9868-8bfad5d44af9%22%7d*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Open Session

1. Approval of the April 26, 2022 Board Meeting Minutes

2. Approval of the October 19, 2021 ETAC Meeting Minutes

3. Monthly Reports

(a) Participant Activity Report

(b) Investment Report

(c) Legislative Report

4. Quarterly Report

(d) Metrics

5. L Funds Study

6. Converge Update

7. Office of Communications and Education Annual Report
      ( print page 29862)    
*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).                

Dated: May 11, 2022.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-10496 Filed 5-16-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
. ..

GENERAL T~EECATTOHNEY

OF TEXAS

PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEY

GENERAL January 16, 1952

Hon. Qeorge L. Murphy OpinionNo. V-1387 County Auditor Johnson County Rez Authority of the ComCleburne, Texas missioners'Court to require the County Auditor to handle pay roll deductions,accounts, and reports 3overing social security Dear Mr. Murphy% for countyemployees.

Your request 

### for an opinionfrom this offlee contains the following question;

Does the Commissioners1Court of Johnson County, Texas have the authority to order the County Auditor of Johnson County to make the necessary payrolldeductlons, accounts and reports for the program set up under House Bill 603, ch. :&&Acts of the 52nd Legislature,R.S.

1951, ch. to social provldesr Section g of H.B. 603,Acts 52nd Leg., R.S.

500, p. 1480 (Art. 692, V.C.S.), relating security for county end municipal employees,
*When the governing body of a county ormunlcipallty elects to enter Into an agreement with a Ftate agency, it shall become the duty of the county treasurer In the respective counties, end of the person or am-sons who hold comnarablenositlons In themunlclpalltles, to iisess aid collect the required contributions of the various employees in the respective counties ormunlclpalltles, and transmit the same to the State agency. Each plan approved by the State agency will specify the responsible personnel of the undertaking county ormunicipality who will be chargedwith the duty’

.

.

Hon. George L. Murphy, page 3 (V-1387)

salary,and notify the county auditor and the county clerk of these computations. The countyauditor and the county clerk In laauIng the warrants for the compensation of the various county employees, should make the necessary deductions as set by the asseaaments of the county treasurer.

You are accordinglyadvised that the commissioners' courthas no authority to designate any officer other than the county treasureras the reapons:ble agent to assess and collect the required payments of the-~varlous

countyemployees, and the commissioners' court cannot order the county auditor to perform these duties. SUMMARY

A commissioners'court cannot order the countyauditor to assess, collect,and transmit thepayments under thenew soclel securityplan. This la the duty of the county treasurer. Sec. 9, H.B. 603 Acts

R S 1951, ch. 500,p. 1480 (Art. Z~~~,Li%Is.

# j.‘, It Is the duty of the county auditor to supervise, compare,and audit the funds paid under H.B. 603, end to certify the accounts and make the reports to the proper authority. Art. 1651,V.C.S. yours very truly, APPROVED1 J. C. Davis, Jr. CountyAffairs Division E. Jacobson ReviewingAssistant Charles D. Mathews First Assistant PRICE DAHIEL Attorney General

By~~~:~./,..l~~l~,~~/' _~ Rib&t H.'Hdghea

Assistant

RHHYmh
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Penn-America  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jon S.
Saltzman , Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jon S. Saltzman
--------------------------------------------

Jon S. Saltzman
Chief Executive Officer
August 7, 2002
Ex. 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of MetaSolv, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



CEO CERTIFICATION



I, T. Curtis Holmes, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of MetaSolv, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of that section.



I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                            |  | 
|--------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ T. Curtis Holmes, Jr.   |  | 
|Name: T. Curtis Holmes, Jr. |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer     |  | 
|February 20, 2006           |  |
----

(2004/C 70 E/021)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3750/02

by Mario Mauro (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 December 2002)

Subject:   Relations between the EU and the Republic of Surinam

In May 2000, presidential elections were held in Surinam which radically altered the state of political instability which had characterised the preceding years.

The return of Ronald Venetiaan has prompted fresh action: better control over public expenditure, a reduction in subsidies and an increase in tax revenue. Furthermore, the government has decided to base exchange rates on the market and to cease financing the public deficit by increasing the amount of money in circulation.

Nonetheless, the new government has inherited a country which is on the verge of financial collapse and further reforms are called for if bankruptcy is to be staved off.

Will the Commission say what role it is playing in the democratisation of the country and what strategy it is pursuing in order to foster Surinam's social and economic development?

In particular, does the Commission intend to establish bilateral agreements with Surinam?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(28 February 2003)

The Community contributed EUR 2 million to the electoral process leading to the general elections of May 2000, which were perceived as free and fair. Election observers from Member States participated.

The democratic process, which the country has gone through during the past years, is positively appreciated by the Commission and the international community. Its consolidation is now a priority and this is the subject of a continuous dialogue between Government, civil society and the international community. The Commission plays an active role in co-ordination with the Member States.

During the period 2001-2002, the government improved public finances. Due to global macro-economic setbacks and a 30 % increase in public sector wages in 2002, the situation is now deteriorating. Government has very recently concluded agreements in the mining sector which should help, but the effects can only be expected in the medium term.

With respect to agreements, Surinam has benefited from all the Lomé Conventions and has ratified the Cotonou Agreement. A Country Strategy Paper under the Cotonou Agreement was signed by the Commission and Surinam in July 2002. The Strategy (EUR 19,1 million) is concentrated on transport infrastructure including the improvement of its institutional and legal aspects, actions to create conditions for economic growth. Furthermore, Surinam benefits from the Special Framework of Assistance for Traditional Suppliers of Bananas (EUR 11 million allocated over the past four years) and the preferential treatment on imports of rice into the Union.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  7
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                7,107,440
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                       0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                         0
<EQUITIES>                                                  0
<MORTGAGE>                                                  0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                               0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                      7,107,440
<CASH>                                              3,595,567
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                          0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              1,215,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     13,711,850
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                             0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                         0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                              0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                               2,529,064
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              561,474
<OTHER-SE>                                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       13,711,850
<PREMIUMS>                                            495,417
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                   139,639
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                          0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                         13,158
<BENEFITS>                                                  0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                            80,939
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        48,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                           48,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        14
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                               14
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.000
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        761,808
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   160,708
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                           0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                          0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                            0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       922,516
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report), I,  James K. Price, President and Chief
Executive Officer of TurboChef Technologies, Inc. (the Company), do hereby
certify, pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

| | (i) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and  results of operation of the Company.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  March
30, 2004

| | /s/
        James K. Price                                
| | ----------------------------------------------------------
| | James K. Price
      President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1813 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1813

  To prohibit the export to Hong Kong of certain high-speed computers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1999

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the export to Hong Kong of certain high-speed computers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPORTS TO HONG KONG OF CERTAIN HIGH-SPEED 
              COMPUTERS.

    The proposed export to Hong Kong of a Cray SV1 computer, pending on 
May 12, 1999, shall be denied, and any proposed export to Hong Kong of 
any computer of similar or greater speed shall also be denied.
                                 <all>
```