alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/27/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      448,245
COMMITMENTS
  46,189   18,027  107,375  245,251  282,037  398,815  407,439   49,430   40,806

CHANGES FROM 12/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,118)
   4,251    1,596     -545   -1,068    3,960    2,639    5,011   -4,757   -7,129

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.3      4.0     24.0     54.7     62.9     89.0     90.9     11.0      9.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      116)
      37       13       41       59       57      110      100
```

----

Updated December 30, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 108th District Court of Potter County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on February 24,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Andrew Walter Pettis, Jr. v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-13-00183-CR Trial Court Number: 66,617-E

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated February 24, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on May 12, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
Sonja COLBERT, petitioner, v. Cleveland MITCHELL.

No. 18-1303.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
```

```

----

Updated June 22, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1876 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1876

  To amend the Clean Air Act to incorporate certain provisions of the 
 transportation conformity regulations, as in effect on March 1, 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 1999

Mr. Talent (for himself and Ms. Danner) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to incorporate certain provisions of the 
 transportation conformity regulations, as in effect on March 1, 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY.

    Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Determination of transportation conformity.--
        Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the 
        following provisions of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, 
        as in effect on March 1, 1999, are incorporated in this Act: 
        section 93.102(a)(1); section 93.102(c); section 93.118(e)(1); 
        section 93.120(a)(2); section 93.121(a)(1); and section 
        93.124(b).''.
                                 <all>
```
Michael Duane ZACK, III, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9549.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of DURECT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Brown, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

March 3, 2011
Dwight MUNDLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5686.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Eric G. ZAHND, petitioner, v. OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.

No. 18-226.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JERMAINE CHAPMAN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00022-HCM-JEB-1)

Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Chapman appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Chapman, No. 4:07-cr-00022-HCM-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 9, & 

entered Jan. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Pressley Bernard ALSTON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 18-5641.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Antonio Dean BLACKSTONE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9368.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
In Re Martize J. SEVION-EL, petitioner.

No. 17-8425.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
ENDORSEMENT
                                      NO. 1

                                     to the

                       PROPERTY CATASTROPHE EXCESS OF LOSS
                              REINSURANCE CONTRACT
                                (the "Contract")

                                     between

                         PENN-AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
                           PENN-STAR INSURANCE COMPANY
                         PENN-PATRIOT INSURANCE COMPANY
                              Hatboro, Pennsylvania
        and any additional company established or acquired by the Company
                                 (the "Company")

                                       and

                                 CONVERIUM LTD.
                          (the "Subscribing Reinsurer")


IT IS AGREED, effective 12:01 am., Eastern Standard Time, October 1,2004, with
respect to business in force at that time and date or issued or renewed at or
after that time and date, that the Subscribing Reinsurer's participations under
the Contract shall be increased as follows on the following layers:

   First Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Layer from 14.50% to
   35.50% Second Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Layer from
   10.00% to 3 1.00% Third Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Reinsurance Layer
   from 17.00% to 38.00%

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto by their duly authorized representatives
have executed this Endorsement as of the dates specified below:

Signed this  12th  day of    October     , 2004.

PENN-AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
PENN-STAR INSURANCE COMPANY
PENN-PATRIOT INSURANCE COMPANY

By __________________________________________

Signed this  28th  day of    September  , 2004.

Converium Ltd

By __________________________________________

                                    Converium
                             The next Re generation

                                  Converium Ltd
                               Zurich, Switzerland
                                                                          Willis
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                     15,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,220
<PP&E>                                          12,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,695
<BONDS>                                          6,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,370
<SALES>                                         67,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,819
<CGS>                                           58,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
Deante DIXON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8853.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,773
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  51,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,833
<PP&E>                                         6,103,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,836,181)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,319,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,524
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,308,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,319,668
<SALES>                                        38,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,657
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30,969<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Ryan JENNINGS, petitioner, v. DUETSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, et al.

No. 18-5478.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
Exhibit 23.4



CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TO: ARS Networks Incorporated

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  under the Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 of ARS Networks, Incorporated for the
year ended January 31, 2003 of our report dated April 25, 2003 which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern,  and  contained  in the  Registration Statement No.
333-112473 of ARS Networks, Incorporated Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial statements of ARS Networks, Incorporated for the year ended January 31, 2003.

s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP -----------------------------------------------------------------------Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, NY 
April 29, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of March 29, 1997 and the consolidated statement
of operations for the three months ended March 29, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          11,443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       306
<INVENTORY>                                     17,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,431
<PP&E>                                          48,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,999
<SALES>                                         69,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,729
<CGS>                                           47,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    71
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
Jeremel Remymartin SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8493.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1872

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program to designate

as an Interstate Oasis certain facilities near the interstate highway system.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1999

Mr. MORAN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. TERRY, and Mr. BARCIA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a

program to designate as an Interstate Oasis certain facilities near the interstate highway system.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Oasis Act

5 of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1872 IH

1 SEC. 2. INTERSTATE OASIS PROGRAM.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United

3 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘§ 165. Interstate Oasis Program

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after

7 the date of enactment of this Act and in consultation with

8 the States and other interested parties, the Secretary of

9 Transportation shall establish a program to designate as

10 Interstate Oases facilities near the Interstate System that

11 offer products and services to the public, if such facilities

12 meet standards to be determined by the Secretary.

13 ‘‘(b) STANDARDS FOR DESIGNATION.—The stand14 ards for designation under subsection (a) shall include

15 standards relating to the appearance of a facility and its

16 proximity to the Interstate System.

17 ‘‘(c) ELIGIBILITY FOR DESIGNATION.—Any facility

18 meeting the standards established by the Secretary under

19 this section shall be eligible for the designation under this

20 section.

21 ‘‘(d) LOGO.—The Secretary shall design a logo to be

22 displayed by facilities designated under this section.’’.

23 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for such

24 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘165. Interstate Oasis Program.’’.

Æ
```

```

----

Updated June 29, 2012
EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of National R.V.  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Bradley C.  Albrechtsen,  Chief Executive  Officer and President of the Company,
and Mark D. Andersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



     /s/ BRADLEY C. ALBRECHTSEN                   /s/ MARK D. ANDERSEN
     --------------------------                   --------------------
     Bradley C. Albrechtsen                       Mark D. Andersen
     Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
     and President                                (Principal Accounting and
     August 7, 2002                                Financial Officer)
                                                  August 7, 2002
Justin Michael ROSSI, petitioner, v. THE CROWN.

No. 18-7539.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TO: ARS Networks Incorporated

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  under the Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 of ARS Networks, Incorporated for the
year ended January 31, 2003 of our report dated April 25, 2003 which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern,  and  contained  in the  Registration Statement No.
333-107587 of ARS Networks, Incorporated Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial statements of ARS Networks, Incorporated for the year ended January 31, 2003.

s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP -----------------------------------------------------------------------Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, NY 
April 29, 2004
EXHIBIT 10.21  CONTINGENT STOCK PURCHASE COMMITMENT OF PREMIUM MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, LTD.

Premium Management Services, Ltd. (Letterhead)
Windsor Place, Hamilton Hm 12 Bermuda

February 10, 2000

Mr. John W. Bush
President
Harrison Digicom, Inc
401 Hariton Court
Norfolk, VA 23505

Dear Mr. Bush,

PREMIUM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LTD. hereby irrevocably issues this corporate
letter of intent to purchase $10,000,000 of HARRISON DIGICOM, INC. free trading
common stock.  This corporate commitment is contingent upon the completion of
the pending audit, completing the name change to Infinite Networks Corporation
along with the acquisition of INFINITE NETWORKS CORPORATION, a Florida company.

Upon the completion of the proper filing with the SEC to issue free trading
stock under a private or public offering PREMIUM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LTD. will
purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office.

Sincerely,


William J. Windsor, CEO





















(Letterhead)
                 315 Stan Drive, Suite 6, Melbourne, Florida 32904
                      Tel: (321) 733-8933 Fax: (321) 733-3301