alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

March 1, 2019 
 BY HAND DELIVERY 

[Executive Name] 
 [Address] 

[City], [State] [Zip] 
 Re:
Notice of Non-Extension of Term 
 Dear [Executive Name]: 

Reference is made to (1) the [Year] [Amended and Restated] Employment Agreement, effective as of [Date] (the
“Employment Agreement”), by and among BB&T Corporation (“BB&T”), Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BBTC”), and you; and (2) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
February 7, 2019 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between BB&T and SunTrust Banks, Inc. Capitalized terms used herein without definitions have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement. 

Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Employment Agreement, BB&T and BBTC are hereby providing you with notice that BB&T and BBTC are
not extending the Term of the Employment Agreement, such that the Term will be fixed to the thirty-six (36) month period commencing on the date hereof and will therefore expire on March 1, 2022,
unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 1.6 of the Employment Agreement. After the date hereof, no further automatic extensions of the Term shall occur. Notwithstanding the expiration of the Term and Section 1.6 (clause (i))
and Section 1.7.1 of the Employment Agreement, your employment shall not automatically terminate on March 1, 2022 and, for the avoidance of doubt, in the event of your termination of employment for any reason following March 1, 2022,
your obligations under Section 2.1 ([Noncompetition][Nonsolicitation]) of the Employment Agreement shall be inapplicable. 
 If the
Merger Agreement is terminated by the parties thereto without the consummation of the Merger (as defined in the Merger Agreement), this notice shall be null and void ab initio and of no force or effect, and the Term as of the date hereof
shall be reinstated, unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 1.6 of the Employment Agreement. 
 Please feel free to
contact [                ] at [                ] should you have any questions. 

 

			
	Sincerely,
	
	BB&T CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	        
		 	Name: Kelly S. King
		 	Title:   Chairman & CEO
Exhibit 99.1


             Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                       Title 18 of the United States Code

I, K.J. Semikian, the Chief Executive Officer of Telesource International, Inc.
("Telesource"), certify that (i) the Form 10-K for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telesource.


                                               /s/ K.J. Semikian
                                               --------------------------------
                                               K.J. Semikian Chief
                                               Executive Officer
                                               Telesource
                                               International, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Melo Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Fung Ming, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  February 16, 2010 /s/ Fung Ming
 Principal Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING

Before the Court is Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Having considered 

the matter, and for good cause shown, the Court DENIES the Motion. 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 203-1 Filed 11/04/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:

12581
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. Paul PENZONE, et al.

No. 18-8658.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P. AS OF AND FOR 
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          93,392
<SECURITIES>                                   161,378
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,770
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 254,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   254,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,604
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,604
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    69.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    69.63
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   126351
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1256
<INVENTORY>                                      96954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                229969
<PP&E>                                          291823
<DEPRECIATION>                                  143626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  460422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            77439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           262
<OTHER-SE>                                      216393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    460422
<SALES>                                         183693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                183693
<CGS>                                           136171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   136171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  23298
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00497-CV
Silverton Custom Homes, Inc., Appellant

v. Bruce C. Covill and Candice Wade Covill, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN102089, HONORABLE PATRICK O. KEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Silverton Custom Homes, Inc. and appellees Bruce C. Covill and Candice Wade Covill hav e filed a notice of settlement and a joint motion to remand the cause to the trial court. We grant the motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment, and remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to render judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Vacated and Remanded Filed: March 4, 2004
Frizzell Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8839.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Nathan MOSLEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5866.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
LAND OF LINCOLN MUTUAL HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Nonprofit Mutual Insurance Corporation, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1038.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted. The case is consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
Robert VEAL, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 17-1510.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE                    
                      AND EQUIVALENT SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
                                   (Unaudited)                               
                 (thousands except share and per share amounts)
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                                                          

                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                   ----------------------     
                                                   March 29,     March 30,   
                                                     1997          1996
                                                   --------      --------

   Average Shares Outstanding             
   1.  Weighted average number of shares of       
      common stock outstanding during the                                  
      period                                      8,162,831     6,145,220    
                                                                          
   2.  Net additional common equivalent shares 
      assuming exercise of common stock                                      
      warrants as computed under the treasury                            
      stock method                                   10,751        14,041    
                                                  ---------     ---------   

   3.  Weighted average number of shares and      
      equivalent shares of common stock    
      outstanding during the period               8,173,582     6,159,261   
                                                  =========     =========  

   Income (Loss)                                                             
   4.  Net (loss) available for common stock     $   (5,190)  $    (6,174)
                                                  =========     =========
                                         
   Per Share Amounts                                                         
   5.  Earnings (loss)                           $    (0.63)  $     (1.00)  
                                                  =========     =========  
                                             

     Earnings (loss)  per share is computed by dividing net income (loss)
   available for common stock, by weighted average number of shares of common
   stock and common stock equivalents (warrants), unless anti-dilutive,
   outstanding during the periods.
Robert N. TAYLOR, III, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1405.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1693

AN ACT

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

to clarify the overtime exemption for employeesengaged in fire protection activities.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1693

AN ACT

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify

the overtime exemption for employees engaged in fire

protection activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1693 EH

1 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF FIRE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES.

2 Section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

3 (29 U.S.C. 203) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘(y) ‘Employee in fire protection activities’ means an

6 employee, including a firefighter, paramedic, emergency

7 medical technician, rescue worker, ambulance personnel,

8 or hazardous materials worker, who—

9 ‘‘(1) is trained in fire suppression, has the legal

10 authority and responsibility to engage in fire sup11 pression, and is employed by a fire department of a

12 municipality, county, fire district, or State; and

13 ‘‘(2) is engaged in the prevention, control, and

14 extinguishment of fires or response to emergency sit15 uations where life, property, or the environment is at

16 risk.’’.

17 SEC. 2. CONSTRUCTION.

18 The amendment made by section 1 shall not be con19 strued to reduce or substitute for compensation standards

20 (1) contained in any existing or future agreement or

21 memorandum of understanding reached through collective

22 bargaining by a bona fide representative of employees in

23 accordance with the laws of a State or political subdivision

24 of a State, and (2) which result in compensation greater

25 than the compensation available to employees under the
3

•HR 1693 EH

1 overtime exemption under section 7(k) of the Fair Labor

2 Standards Act of 1938.

Passed the House of Representatives November 4,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
Calvin Raymond JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7857.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Robert Joe LONG, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-9358 (18A1202).

Supreme Court of the United States

May 23, 2019.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00656-CR

RONALD ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 209th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1036165).

TO THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 18th day of June 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on July 31, 2014. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms 

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered June 18, 2015.
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bland.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

October 2, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/07/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      335,902
COMMITMENTS
  77,171  127,256   52,042  184,432  132,736  313,645  312,034   22,257   23,868

CHANGES FROM 07/31/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     23,022)
  12,176    1,019    2,762    7,340   17,861   22,278   21,642      744    1,380

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    23.0     37.9     15.5     54.9     39.5     93.4     92.9      6.6      7.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      143)
      40       62       63       28       34      109      125
```

----

Updated August 10, 2012
EXHIBIT
10.14





SUMMARY
OF KEY TERMS OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


WITH
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY


NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS





MidAmerican
Energy Holdings Company’s (“MEHC”) continuing named executive officers each
receive an annual salary and participate in health insurance and other benefit
plans on the same basis as other employees, as well as certain other
compensation and benefit plans described in MEHC’s Annual Report on Form
10-K.





The named
executive officers are also eligible to receive a cash incentive award under
MEHC’s Performance Incentive Plan (“PIP”). The PIP provides for a discretionary
annual cash award that is determined on a subjective basis and paid in December.
In addition to the PIP, the named executive officers are eligible to receive
discretionary cash performance awards periodically during the year to reward the
accomplishment of significant non-recurring tasks or projects. Messrs. David L.
Sokol and Gregory E. Abel have not been granted cash performance awards in the
past five years. Messrs. Patrick J. Goodman and Douglas L. Anderson and Ms.
Maureen E. Sammon are participants in MEHC’s Long-Term Incentive Partnership
Plan (“LTIP”). Messrs. Sokol and Abel do not participate in the LTIP. A copy of
the LTIP is attached as Exhibit 10.11 to the MEHC Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Messrs. Sokol and Abel are participants in MEHC’s Incremental Profit
Sharing Plan (“IPSP”). Messrs. Goodman and Anderson and Ms. Sammon do not
participate in the IPSP. A copy of Mr. Sokol’s IPSP and Mr. Abel’s
IPSP are attached as Exhibits 10.3 and 10.6, respectively, to the MEHC Annual
Report on Form 10-K.





Base
salary for continuing named executive officers for MEHC’s fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009, is shown in the following table:





Name
      and Title
            Base
      SalaryDavid
      L. Sokol
              Chairman
      of the Board
            $750,000Gregory
      E. Abel
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
            $1,000,000Patrick
      J. Goodman
              Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
            $340,000Douglas
      L. Anderson
              Senior
      Vice President and General Counsel
            $308,000Maureen
      E. Sammon
              Senior
      Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
            $221,000





Messrs.
Sokol and Abel are directors of MEHC, but do not receive additional compensation
for their service as directors other than what they receive as employees of
MEHC. The other members of the MEHC board of directors do not receive
compensation for their service as directors.
Tracey L. BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5658.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.