alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

SHERMAN DIVISION 

KARIM AZERO 

V. 

PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER 

EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY 

D/B/A FEDLOAN SERVICING, ET AL. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

Civil Action No. 4:23cv235 

Judge Mazzant 

 

ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS

 

 The Court has been notified by Plaintiff, through counsel, that all claims in the above-styled 

civil action have been settled. 

 Therefore, it is ORDERED that, on or before February 26, 2024, all parties shall file with 

the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of 

this Court. If such papers are not received by the Court by the scheduled deadline, the Court may 

order counsel to appear at a hearing for the purpose of determining which party is responsible for 

the delay. Thereafter, the Court may enter such orders as are just and necessary to ensure prompt 

resolution of this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 4:23-cv-00235-ALM Document 22 Filed 01/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 75
People's Bank Credit Card Master Trust

                    Index to Monthly Servicer's Certificates

 Schedule No.          Due Period Ended                  Distribution Date

    20.1               January 31, 1996                  February 10, 1996

    20.2               February 28, 1996                 March 10, 1996

    20.3               March 31, 1996                    April 10, 1996

    20.4               April 30, 1996                    May 18, 1996

    20.5               May 31, 1996                      June 9, 1996

    20.6               June 30, 1996                     July 10, 1996

    20.7               July 31, 1996                     August 10, 1996

    20.8               August 31, 1996                   September 8, 1996

    20.9               September 30, 1996                October 10, 1996

   20.10               October 31, 1996                  November 9, 1996

   20.11               November 30, 1996                 December 8, 1996

   20.12               December 31, 1996                 January 10, 1997
Shawn J. GIESWEIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5538.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN and Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Eddie Lee JACKSON, petitioner, v. Sandy McCAIN, Warden.

No. 18-8661.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1893

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that certain individuals

who would be eligible for military retired pay for nonregular service

but for the fact that they did not serve on active duty during a period

of conflict may be paid such retired pay if they served in the United

States merchant marine during or immediately after World War II.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1999

Mr. LANTOS (for himself and Ms. ESHOO) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that

certain individuals who would be eligible for military

retired pay for nonregular service but for the fact that

they did not serve on active duty during a period of

conflict may be paid such retired pay if they served

in the United States merchant marine during or immediately after World War II.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1893 IH

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF LIMITATION ON PAYMENT OF

2 MILITARY RETIRED PAY FOR CERTAIN PER3 SONS WHO SERVED IN THE MERCHANT MA4 RINE.

5 (a) REMOVAL OF LIMITATION.—Section 12731(c)(1)

6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by striking out ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara8 graph (A);

9 (2) by striking out the period at the end of sub10 paragraph (B) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; or’’;

11 and

12 (3) by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(C) the person served in the United States

14 merchant marine after May 26, 1940, and before

15 January 1, 1948—

16 ‘‘(i) while documented by an officer or em17 ployee of the United States authorized by law

18 to do so; and

19 ‘‘(ii) as a crew member of a vessel which

20 at the time of that service—

21 ‘‘(I) was documented in the United

22 States;

23 ‘‘(II) was operated under the flag of

24 the United States in waters other than in25 land waters of the United States; and
3

•HR 1893 IH

1 ‘‘(III) was under contract or charter

2 to, or was the property of, the Government

3 of the United States.’’.

4 (b) LUMP SUM PAYMENT OF ACCRUED RETIRED

5 PAY.—The Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101

6 of title 10, United States Code) shall, within 60 days after

7 the date of the enactment of this Act, make a lump sum

8 payment to each person eligible for military retired pay

9 under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, by

10 reason of the amendments made by subsection (a). Such

11 payment shall be in the amount equal to the total amount

12 of retired pay that the person would have received before

13 the date of the first payment to that person pursuant to

14 those amendments if those amendments had been in effect

15 on the date that the person became 60 years of age.

Æ
# ORICINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0162

IN THE MATTER OF: J.D.D.,A.J.D.and M.T.D.,

Youths in Need ofCare. 

### F 

# r, AUG 1 2 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Counsel for the appellant mother ofJ.D.D.,A.J.D.,and M.T.D. filed a motion and briefasking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal,pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother was granted time to file a response,but no response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant mother personally.

"a" DATED this i Z., day ofAugust,2020.
ChiefJustice 08/12/2020

# g-I m 2,11,__ ,.e..13, e

: Justices

2
Carston Carrell WOODSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8264.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Michael A. LANTERI, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT.

No. 18-6384.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 19, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until December 10, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 54 1 . DONALD FUTCH v . THE STATE.

Do n al d Fu t ch fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal fro m t h e tri al co u rt ’ s ord er rev o k i n g h i s
p ro b at i o n fo r v i o lat i n g s p eci al co n d i t i o n s o f h i s p ro b at io n

. An ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p e al
, h owev er, i s req u i red t o ap p eal ord ers reg ard i n g p ro b at i o n

rev o cat i on

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (5 ); W h i t e v. S t a te , 2 3 3 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 3
, 8 7 3 -8 7 4 (5 0 5
SE2 d 2 2 8 ) (1 9 98 ) (wh ere t he u n d erl y i n g su b j ect m at ter i s p ro bat i o n rev o cat i o n , t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u re ap p l i e s )

. F u t ch ’ s fai l ure t o co m pl y wi t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f j u ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i der t h i s ap p eal
, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 20, 2017

04/20/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1715 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1715

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of 1950.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1715

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of 1950.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERMINATION DATE.

    Section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 
App. 2166(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2000'' and 
inserting ``September 30, 2001''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 711(b) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 
App. 2161(b)) is amended by striking ``2000'' and inserting ``2001''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 18, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1972

For the relief of Ashley Ross Fuller.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26, 1999

Mrs. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Ashley Ross Fuller.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ASHLEY

4 ROSS FULLER.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Ashley Ross Fuller shall be eligible for issuance of

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status

12 to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 1972 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Ashley Ross Fuller

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible,

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the

7 enactment of this Act.

8 (c) WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR INELIGIBILITY FOR

9 ADMISSION AND REMOVAL.—

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para11 graph (2), and notwithstanding sections 212(a) and

12 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Ash13 ley Ross Fuller may not be considered to be within

14 a class of aliens ineligible to be admitted to the

15 United States, or a class of deportable aliens, at any

16 time on or after the date of the enactment of this

17 Act on any ground reflected in the records of the

18 Immigration and Naturalization Service of the De19 partment of Justice, or the Visa Office of the De20 partment of State, on the date of the enactment of

21 this Act.

22 (2) EXCEPTIONS.—The waiver provided under

23 paragraph (1) shall not apply to any ground for in24 eligibility for admission, or any ground for removal,

25 described in section 212(a)(3), or paragraph (2)(D)
3

•HR 1972 IH

1 or (4) of section 237(a), of the Immigration and Na2 tionality Act.

3 (d) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

4 FEES.—Subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall apply only if

5 the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the

6 application for adjustment of status is filed with appro7 priate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment

8 of this Act.

9 (e) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

10 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res11 idence to Ashley Ross Fuller, the Secretary of State shall

12 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur13 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im14 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

15 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

16 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

17 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

18 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

19 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
WESTERN RADIO SERVICES COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. John ALLEN, et al.

No. 18-228.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
2002 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-6-2002

PA Psychiatric v. Green Spring Health

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 0-3403

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"PA Psychiatric v. Green Spring Health" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 154.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/154
<!TOF>
PRECEDENTIAL 

 Filed March 6, 2002 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 00-3403 

PENNSYLVANIA PSYCHIATRIC SOCIETY, 

 Appellant 

v. 

GREEN SPRING HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; 

MAGELLAN HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; 

HIGHMARK, INC.; 

KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN WEST, INC.; 

KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN CENTRAL, INC.; 

KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN EAST, INC. 

On Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Pennsylvania 

D.C. Civil Action No. 99-cv-00937 

(Honorable Gary L. Lancaster) 

Argued October 31, 2000 

Before: SCIRICA, NYGAARD and BARRY, Circuit Ju dges
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the caption of the slip 

opinion in the above case, filed February 6, 2002, be 

amended at page 3 as follows: 

Delete: RICHARD D. RASKIN, ESQUIRE 

 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 

 10 South Dearborn Street 

 Chicago, Illinois 60603 

 Attorney for Amici Curiae-Appellant, 

 The American Medical Association and 

 Pennsylvania Medical Society 

Insert: JACK R. BIERIG, ESQUIRE 

 Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 

 10 South Dearborn Street 

 Chicago, Illinois 60603 

 Attorney for Amici Curiae-Appellant, 

 The American Medical Association and 

 Pennsylvania Medical Society 

 By the Court, 

 /s/Anthony J. SiricaCircuit Judge 

Dated: March 6, 2002 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
John WASHEK, petitioner, v. VERMONT.

No. 18-1408.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-1-2022]

On January 13, 2022, BMW Manufacturing Company, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 38A, in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (87 FR 3761, January 25, 2022). On May 13, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: May 13, 2022.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-10683 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Jamie ELMHIRST, petitioner, v. McLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN HOSPITAL, dba Northern Michigan Emergency Medicine Center, et al.

No. 18-132.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Lawrence L. THOMPSON, petitioner, v. Pete COPELAND, et al.

No. 18-5584.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1721

To amend the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Program

Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2000 through 2005.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention Program Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2000 through 2005.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 506 of the Incentive Grants for Local Delin4 quency Prevention Program Act (42 U.S.C. 5785) is

5 amended by striking ‘‘such sums’’ and all that follows

6 through ‘‘1996’’, and inserting ‘‘$250,000,000 for each of

7 the fiscal years 2000 through 2005’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         I, Bruce Cleland, the Chief Executive Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as general partner of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of Campbell Strategic
Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                              CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                              By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner

                              By: /s/ Bruce L. Cleland
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Bruce L. Cleland
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  August 5, 2003

                                     -E 6-
Nicholas HACHENEY, petitioner, v. Mike OBENLAND, Superintendent, Monroe Correctional Complex.

No. 18-5964.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/21/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,103
COMMITMENTS
   8,515    1,186      779   22,101   28,811   31,395   30,776    9,708   10,327

CHANGES FROM 08/14/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,013)
     597       64       78    1,075      921    1,750    1,063     -737      -50

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.7      2.9      1.9     53.8     70.1     76.4     74.9     23.6     25.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       55)
      12        5        4       33       22       48       29
```

----

Updated August 24, 2012
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Theresa D. Becks, the Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company,
Inc. as general partner, of Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P., certify
that (i) the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of Campbell Strategic
Allocation Fund, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P.

                              CAMPBELL STRATEGIC ALLOCATION FUND, L.P.
                              By: Campbell & Company, Inc., general partner

                              By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Theresa D. Becks
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  August 5, 2003

                                     -E 7-
In Re Veronica HOLLOWELL and Vivian Epps, petitioners.

No. 18-1008.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gene Lemay BARRIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5996.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Sami ALBRA, petitioner, v. SELENE FINANCE, et al.

No. 18-8144.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.