alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial   Corp.   (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three  months  ended  December  31,  2008 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                             /s/ Keith A. Simpson
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Keith A. Simpson
                                             Vice-President and
                                             Chief Accounting Officer

Date: February 13, 2009

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.

                                       E-4
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2002

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study

on mortality and adverse outcome rates of Medicare patients of providers

of anesthesia services, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. STARK (for himself, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mrs. THURMAN,

and Mr. BECERRA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee

on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services

to conduct a study on mortality and adverse outcome

rates of Medicare patients of providers of anesthesia

services, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anesthesia Outcomes

5 Study Act of 1999’’.
2

HR 2002 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANESTHESIA OUTCOME STUDY.

2 (a) STUDY.—(1) The Secretary of Health and

3 Human Services shall conduct a study of mortality and

4 adverse outcome rates of Medicare patients by providers

5 of anesthesia services. In conducting the study, the Sec6 retary shall analyze the impact of physician supervision

7 of providers of anesthesia services, or lack thereof, on such

8 mortality and adverse outcome rates.

9 (2) In conducting the study, the Secretary shall con10 sult with appropriate national professional organizations

11 with respect to the methodology of the study, and shall

12 use Medicare operating room anesthesia data, adjusted for

13 patient acuity and other relevant scientific variables.

14 (b) REPORT.—Not later than June 30, 2000, the

15 Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the

16 results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

17 (c) CONSIDERATION OF REPORT IN RULEMAKING.—

18 The Secretary shall consider the results of such study

19 when determining if any modification or change to the ex20 isting Medicare regulations in effect on January 1, 1999,

21 dealing with physician supervision of anesthesia services

22 may be appropriate.

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6464** 

STEVEN PREVONCE LAMB , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00268

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : August 18, 2015 Decided: August 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Steven Prevonce Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven Prevonce Lamb appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing this action without prejudice becaus e of the absence of a case or controversy . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. Clarke , No. 1:15

- cv - 00268

- CMH

- TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Ludwig P. SAMSON, Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Christine R. Samson, Deceased, petitioner, v. Jack W. GORDON, et al.

No. 18-87.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Emmanuel ADEYINKA, petitioner, v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, et al.

No. 18-8709.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Pamela Suzanne HARNDEN, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

No. 17-8616.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Corey WIGGINS, petitioner, v. Stanley PAYNE, Warden.

No. 18-8727.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Damon Antonio GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9473.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000910639
<NAME> FARADAY FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,371
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  88
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (88)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (88)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (88)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)


</TABLE>
Avniel Awan ANTHONY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8274.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Omer AL OBAIDY, petitioner, v. Kevin K. McALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

No. 18-8823.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Gregory BUTLER, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 18-8955.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
John LASCHKEWITSCH, petitioner, v. LEGAL & GENERAL AMERICA, INC., dba Banner Life Insurance Company.

No. 18-5931.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1916 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1916

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce to 36 months the 
 amortization period for reforestation expenditures and to increase to 
  $25,000 the maximum annual amount of such expenditures which may be 
                               amortized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 1999

 Mr. Turner (for himself, Mr. Frost, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. 
  Pombo, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Sandlin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce to 36 months the 
 amortization period for reforestation expenditures and to increase to 
  $25,000 the maximum annual amount of such expenditures which may be 
                               amortized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATIONS OF AMORTIZATION DEDUCTION FOR REFORESTATION 
              EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Reduction in Amortization Period.--Subsection (a) of section 
194 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amortization of 
reforestation expenditures) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``84 months'' and inserting ``36 months'', 
        and
            (2) by striking ``84-month period'' and inserting ``36-
        month period''.
    (b) Increase in Maximum Amount Which May Be Amortized.--
            (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 194(b) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``$10,000 ($5,000'' and inserting 
        ``$25,000 (half such amount''.
            (2) Inflation adjustment of maximum amount.--Subsection (b) 
        of section 194 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Cost-of-living adjustment.--In the case of taxable 
        years beginning in a calendar year after 2000, the $25,000 
        amount set forth in paragraph (1) shall be increased by an 
        amount equal to--
                    ``(A) $25,000, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year by 
                substituting `calendar year 1999' for `calendar year 
                1992' in subparagraph (B) thereof.
        If any increase under the preceding sentence is not a multiple 
        of $100, such increase shall be rounded to the nearest multiple 
        of $100.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Jim MILLER, petitioner, v. Eric OLSEN, et al.

No. 18-1364.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
27, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,524
<INVENTORY>                                    127,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,330
<PP&E>                                          80,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,006
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,633
<SALES>                                        191,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,110
<CGS>                                          145,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   448
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,753)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)


</TABLE>
----

----

----

----

| **DISTRIBUTOR**             | **DIASYS CORPORATION**     |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------|
| Diagnostic Bioserve Limited |                       |
|                        |                       |
|                        |                       |
| By: S/ RAEWYN JONES         | By: S/ JEFFREY B. AARONSON |
| Print Name: RAEWYN JONES    | JEFFREY B. AARONSON        |
| Title: Director             | President and C.F.O.       |
| Date: 4th May, 2005         | Date: 5/15/05              |
|                        |                       |
|                        |                       |

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act, I, Jeffrey Aaronson, certify that:

 

Tothe best of my knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 8, 2003 by DiaSysCorporation and to which this certification is appended fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of DiaSysCorporation.

 
|   |   | /s/  Jeffrey Aaronson    |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to DiaSys Corporation and will be retained by DiaSys Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                       0
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,814,660
<ALLOWANCES>                           464,511
<INVENTORY>                            867,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     2,546,475
<PP&E>                               3,308,297
<DEPRECIATION>                       1,387,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       7,619,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                2,136,156
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 2,741
<OTHER-SE>                           4,840,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         7,619,688
<SALES>                              2,471,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     2,471,683
<CGS>                                2,072,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        1,217,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        18,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      28,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (803,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (803,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                          (803,415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.29)
        

</TABLE>
Gabriel Alexander ACOSTA, petitioner, v. Rick RAEMISCH Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9000.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 9, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Miguel PEDRAZA, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-5295.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Dan REED, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7490.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif v. United States,* 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, --- L.E.2d ---- (2019).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elliot Noss, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 13,  2009 | /s/  Elliot Noss                       |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                               | Elliot  Noss                           |
|                               | Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

KENYATTA BERNARD STEPPES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-10243

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00100-GMNGWF-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 11, 2016

San Francisco, California

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Kenyatta Steppes challenges the sentence imposed upon his conviction

under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) for one count of credit union robbery, one count of bank

robbery, and two counts of attempted bank robbery. Because the facts are known

to the parties, we do not repeat them here.

FILED

JUN 10 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I

The district court did not err in applying a career offender enhancement

under the federal sentencing guidelines. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 4B1.1 (U.S. Sentencing Comm’n 2014). Notwithstanding the residual clause in

section 4B1.2(a)(2), each of Steppes’s prior crimes of conviction categorically

qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the remainder of the definition provided in

section 4B1.2(a). See United States v. Selfa, 918 F.2d 749, 751–52 (9th Cir. 1990);

United States v. Potter, 895 F.2d 1231, 1237 (9th Cir. 1990); cf. United States v.

Ruiz-Apolonio, 657 F.3d 907, 911 (9th Cir. 2011) (holding that a conviction under

Cal. Penal Code § 261(a)(2) is a “crime of violence” under section 2L1.2 of the

sentencing guidelines). None of the cases cited by Steppes is “clearly

irreconcilable” with our prior opinions holding these crimes categorically to be

crimes of violence. Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en

banc).

II

The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Steppes’s sentence

to be served consecutively to the sentence imposed upon revocation of his

supervised release. The court properly consulted relevant factors under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) when making that decision. See, e.g., United States v. Shouse, 755 F.3d

2
1104, 1108 (9th Cir. 2014) (upholding sentence ordered to run consecutively, in

part, because offense was committed while defendant was on probation); United

States v. Dowd, 417 F.3d 1080, 1089 (9th Cir. 2005) (affirming consecutive

sentence based on district court’s concerns over recidivism).

III

The government concedes that it should have moved to reduce Steppes’s

offense level by an additional point under sentencing guidelines section 3E1.1(b). 

We therefore vacate Steppes’s sentence and remand for a resentencing hearing, at

which the government will file such a motion.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

3
Johnny Ray BENNETT, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-5991.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.