alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In Re Daniel RILEY, petitioner.

No. 18-5409.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
In Re Todd BRITTON-HARR, petitioner.

No. 18-5683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until October 22, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 31.02
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Theresa D. Becks, Chief Financial Officer of Campbell & Company, Inc., the general partner ofCampbell Strategic Allocation Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), do hereby certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
-E 4-

 

 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    By: /s/ Theresa D. Becks      Theresa D. Becks Chief Financial Officer May 13, 2005
-E 5-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,240
<SECURITIES>                                    24,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (377)
<INVENTORY>                                        441
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,441
<PP&E>                                          60,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,338)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,620
<SALES>                                         17,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,439
<CGS>                                           17,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (41,431)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (40,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (71)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (40,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (40,288)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.99)


</TABLE>
Benjamin Fredrick Charles ROBINSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5112.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# L_2010062EN.01002101.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 131/2009

of 4 December 2009

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2009 of 17 March 2009 (1).

| (2) | Commission Decision 2008/385/EC of 24 January 2008 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exemptions for applications of lead and cadmium (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Decision 2008/385/EC of 24 January 2008 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exemptions for applications of lead and cadmium (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 12q (Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

| ‘— | 32008 D 0385: Commission Decision 2008/385/EC of 24 January 2008 (OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32008 D 0385: Commission Decision 2008/385/EC of 24 January 2008 (OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2008/385/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2009, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2009.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 28.5.2009, p. 21.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p. 9.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Sandra GRAZZINI-RUCKI, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 18-5035.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Scott PETERS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-9038.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/11/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       43,885
COMMITMENTS
  10,984    1,276    4,445   15,118   27,159   30,547   32,880   13,338   11,004

CHANGES FROM 10/04/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,078)
     557      -26     -246      106      925      417      653      661      425

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    25.0      2.9     10.1     34.4     61.9     69.6     74.9     30.4     25.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       49)
      13        6       15       22       18       45       36
```

----

Updated October 14, 2011
Exhibit
3.1





STATE OF
INDIANA


OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE





CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION





OF





MAS
ACQUISITION XI CORP.








I, SUE
ANNE GILROY, Secretary of State of Indiana, hereby certify that Articles of
Incorporation of the above corporation have been presented to me at my office
accompanied by the fees prescribed by law; that I have found such Articles
conform to law; all as prescribed by the provisions of the Indiana Business
Corporation Law, as amended.





NOW,
THEREFORE, I hereby issue to such corporation this Certificate of Incorporation,
and further certify that its corporate existence will begin October 07,
1996.








In
Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Sate of
Indiana, at the City of Indianapolis, this Seventh day of October,
1996.








/s/


Deputy
Marshall Ray MILLER, petitioner, v. Joseph L. McFADDEN, Warden.

No. 18-8410.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubincon Ventures Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Guy Peckham, Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Guy PeckhamGuy PeckhamChief Executive Officer, President and SecretaryApril 27, 2006
Carlos CORDOBA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9240.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131646 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131646 COA: 268848 Wayne CC: 92-000404-02 JAMES ARTHUR HAYES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

d1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
MAR-BOW VALUE PARTNERS, LLC, petitioner, v. McKINSEY RECOVERY & TRANSFORMATION SERVICES U.S. LLC.

No. 18-974.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

*1602Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                (Before Payment of Capital or Issuance of Stock)


    Cheri S. Hill                    and
------------------------------------      --------------------------------------
    Name of Incorporator                            Name of Incorporator

certify that:

     1.   They constitute at two-thirds of the original incorporators of
          CREATIVE SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation.

     2.   The original Articles were filed in the Office of the Secretary of
          State on February 19, 1997.

     3.   As of the date of this certificate, no stock of the corporation has
          been issued.

     4.   They hereby adopt the following amendments to the articles of
          incorporation of this corporation: Article FIRST is amended to read as
          follows:

          The name of the corporation:  CORE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                        /s/ Cheri S. Hill
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                     Signature


                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                     Signature

State of NEVADA

County of WASHOE

On May 20, 1998, personally appeared before me, a Notary Public
   ------------
Cheri S. Hill, who acknowledged that ___ executed the above
-------------
instrument.

Signature /s/ U.R. Sweet
          -----------------------
Stephen L. PAULMIER, petitioner, v. HAWAII.

No. 18-8046.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii denied.
Khadija DUMA, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY.

No. 17-9035.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of DirectorsThe Keith Companies, Inc.:     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (No. 333-61312 and 333-83097) on Forms S-8 ofThe Keith Companies, Inc. of our reports dated March 4,2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TheKeith Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements ofincome, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear inthe December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K ofThe Keith Companies, Inc.     /s/ KPMG LLPCosta Mesa, CaliforniaMarch 7, 2005
John Joseph ZINKAND, petitioner, v. Carlos HERNANDEZ, Superintendent, Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution, et al.

No. 18-7325.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         42,088
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  57,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               99,980
<PP&E>                                         6,060,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,862,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,298,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,904
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,291,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,298,763
<SALES>                                        85,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               85,287
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56,955<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,125)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Exhibit








Exhibit A
Tier Level
	
		
	Tier I Participants
	Tier II Participants

	Chief Executive Officer
	Chief Financial Officer*
General Counsel*
Chief Human Resources Officer
Chief Information Officer
Business Unit Presidents






Termination Multipliers and Periods


	
					
	Participation Tier
	Non-COC Multiplier
	Non-COC Period
	COC Multiplier
	COC Period

	I
	1.5
	18 months
	2
	24 months

	II
	1
	12 months
	1.5
	18 months






*Termination Multipliers and Periods for David G. Rice and Jay Goldbaum, the Corporation’s existing Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel, respectively, shall be as follows:
	
					
	Participation Tier
	Non-COC Multiplier
	Non-COC Period
	COC Multiplier
	COC Period

	*
	1
	12 months
	2
	24 months








1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6358

GARY RAYSHAWN MOORE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-1459-DKC)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 9, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Rayshawn Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Corcoran, No. CA-96-1459-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 3,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-84659) pertaining to the BackWeb 1996 Israeli Share Option
Plan, the BackWeb 1996 U.S. Share Option Plan, the BackWeb 1998 U.S. Share
Option Plan and the BackWeb 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report
dated January 21, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
BackWeb Technologies Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1999.



                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 28, 2000
Barry L. Friedman, P.C>
Certified Public Accountant

1582 Tulita Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: Office (702) 361-8414 FAX NO (702) 896-0276

To Whom it May Concern:        February 15, 2000

The firm of Barry L. Friedman, P.C., Certified Public Accountant consents to
the inclusion of my report of February 15, 2000, on the Financial Statements
of Shaw International, Inc., as of February 14, 2000, in any filings that
are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Very truly yours,

//  Barry L. Friedman //
Certified Public Accountant
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. Amy M. WOOD.

No. 18-8659.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.