alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0265-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	JANUARY 31, 2008

	______________________________

	JUSTIN CURTIS OEHLERT,

				Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

				Appellee

								_________________________________

	FROM THE 251st DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 15,547-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and BOYD, S.J.1

	Justin Curtis Oehlert (appellant) appeals from his conviction for aggravated robbery.  He filed his notice of appeal on July 6, 2007.  The clerk’s record was filed on October 1, 2007, and the reporter’s record on November 19, 2007.  Therefore, appellant’s brief was due on December 19, 2007.  On January 2, 2008, a letter was sent to appellant’s attorney notifying him the brief was overdue and that the brief or response was due January 14, 2008.  In response, appellant’s counsel filed a motion for extension of time to file a brief, which was granted to January 18, 2008.  To date, no brief or extension motion has been filed in this Court.

 	Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District Court (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

	1.	whether appellant is indigent; 

	2.	whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

	3.  	whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to appellate counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate brief.  See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83 L. Ed.2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as of right and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and submitting an appellate brief).

	We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subjects.  Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, we further direct it to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal.  The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new counsel, if any, who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 3, 2008.  Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before March 3, 2008.

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Jaime DAVILA-REYES, aka Peluche, aka Pai, aka Jaime, aka Chezina, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5108.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1876

To amend the Clean Air Act to incorporate certain provisions of the

transportation conformity regulations, as in effect on March 1, 1999.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 19, 1999

Mr. TALENT (for himself and Ms. DANNER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to incorporate certain provisions

of the transportation conformity regulations, as in effect

on March 1, 1999.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF TRANSPORTATION CON4 FORMITY.

5 Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

6 7506(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(6) DETERMINATION OF TRANSPORTATION

8 CONFORMITY.—Notwithstanding any other provision

9 of this section, the following provisions of title 40,

10 Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on March
2

HR 1876 IH

1 1, 1999, are incorporated in this Act: section

2 93.102(a)(1); section 93.102(c); section

3 93.118(e)(1); section 93.120(a)(2); section

4 93.121(a)(1); and section 93.124(b).’’.

Æ
# Úradný vestník C 55/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 55 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 652. februára 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 55

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 652. februára 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2022/C 55/01 | Výmenný kurz eura — 1. februára 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2022/C 55/01

Výmenný kurz eura — 1. februára 2022

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 2.2.2022 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2022

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 55/1

---

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

1. februára 2022

(2022/C 55/01)

1 euro =

| | Mena | Výmenný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Americký dolár | 1,1260 |
| JPY | Japonský jen | 129,12 |
| DKK | Dánska koruna | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Britská libra | 0,83498 |
| SEK | Švédska koruna | 10,4438 |
| CHF | Švajčiarsky frank | 1,0374 |
| ISK | Islandská koruna | 143,80 |
| NOK | Nórska koruna | 9,9638 |
| BGN | Bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Česká koruna | 24,335 |
| HUF | Maďarský forint | 356,38 |
| PLN | Poľský zlotý | 4,5804 |
| RON | Rumunský lei | 4,9465 |
| TRY | Turecká líra | 15,0644 |
| AUD | Austrálsky dolár | 1,5868 |
| CAD | Kanadský dolár | 1,4299 |
| HKD | Hongkongský dolár | 8,7779 |
| NZD | Novozélandský dolár | 1,7032 |
| SGD | Singapurský dolár | 1,5199 |
| KRW | Juhokórejský won | 1 353,61 |
| ZAR | Juhoafrický rand | 17,1633 |
| CNY | Čínsky juan | 7,1625 |
| HRK | Chorvátska kuna | 7,5275 |
| IDR | Indonézska rupia | 16 126,29 |
| MYR | Malajzijský ringgit | 4,7129 |
| PHP | Filipínske peso | 57,516 |
| RUB | Ruský rubeľ | 86,3238 |
| THB | Thajský baht | 37,378 |
| BRL | Brazílsky real | 5,9572 |
| MXN | Mexické peso | 23,1296 |
| INR | Indická rupia | 84,1970 |

Mena

Výmenný kurz

USD

Americký dolár

1,1260

JPY

Japonský jen

129,12

DKK

Dánska koruna

7,4407

GBP

Britská libra

0,83498

SEK

Švédska koruna

10,4438

CHF

Švajčiarsky frank

1,0374

ISK

Islandská koruna

143,80

NOK

Nórska koruna

9,9638

BGN

Bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

Česká koruna

24,335

HUF

Maďarský forint

356,38

PLN

Poľský zlotý

4,5804

RON

Rumunský lei

4,9465

TRY

Turecká líra

15,0644

AUD

Austrálsky dolár

1,5868

CAD

Kanadský dolár

1,4299

HKD

Hongkongský dolár

8,7779

NZD

Novozélandský dolár

1,7032

SGD

Singapurský dolár

1,5199

KRW

Juhokórejský won

1 353,61

ZAR

Juhoafrický rand

17,1633

CNY

Čínsky juan

7,1625

HRK

Chorvátska kuna

7,5275

IDR

Indonézska rupia

16 126,29

MYR

Malajzijský ringgit

4,7129

PHP

Filipínske peso

57,516

RUB

Ruský rubeľ

86,3238

THB

Thajský baht

37,378

BRL

Brazílsky real

5,9572

MXN

Mexické peso

23,1296

INR

Indická rupia

84,1970

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

---
Alwasi YONG, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 17-1575.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 15, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
**EXHIBIT 10.5**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO**

**STANCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.**

**1999 EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN**

 

In accordance with Section 19 of the StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. 1999 Employee SharePurchase Plan (“the Plan”), the Board of Directors of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (“the Company”) has approved and the Company hereby adopts the following amendment to the Plan: 

 

Section 5(a) of the Plan is amended to provide in its entirety as follows: 

 

5. **Offerings.**

 

(a) ***Offering Periods***. The Plan shall be implemented by aseries of offering periods of approximately six months’ duration or such other duration as the Board of Directors shall determine (“Offering Periods”), commencing on or about January 1 of each year and on or about June 16 of eachyear. An Offering Period commencing on or about January 1 shall end on or about the next June 15. An Offering Period commencing on or about June 16 shall end on or about the next December 15. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors mayestablish different commencement or ending dates or a different duration for one or more future Offering Periods; provided however, that no Offering Period may have a duration exceeding twenty-seven (27) months. 

 

The first day of each Offering Period is an “Offering Date” and thelast day of each Offering Period is “Purchase Date” for the Offering Period. If an Offering Date or a Purchase Date falls on a day on which the public equity securities markets in the United States are not open for trading, the Companyshall, by announcement at least ten days before the date on which the Offering Date or Purchase Date would otherwise fall, specify the trading day that will be deemed that Offering Date or Purchase Date, as the case may be. 

 

Date approved by Board of Directors: November 4, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 26, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                             645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   109218
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4383
<INVENTORY>                                     113127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                231393
<PP&E>                                           77358
<DEPRECIATION>                                   32667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  312705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            69924
<BONDS>                                         100000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    312705
<SALES>                                         667024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                667024
<CGS>                                           509740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   509740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                140668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        91
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
Ronald JONES, et al., petitioners, v. Michael KEITZ, et al.

No. 18-1333.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
				EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

		THIS AGREEMENT made on the 12th day of February, 1999, by
and between Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc. (the "Company"), and William
J. Jessie (the "Executive").

					WITNESSETH :

	WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive executed an Employment
Agreement effective as of June 7, 1994 (the "Agreement"); and

	WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to change the
definition of the term "Change of Control":

	NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows:

	1. Paragraph  III.B.3 is revised to read as follows:

	3.	The term "Change of Control" shall mean (i) the
consummation of (A) any consolidation or merger of the Company in which
the Company is not the continuing or surviving corporation or pursuant
to which shares of the Company's Common Stock would be converted into
cash, securities or other property, other than a merger of the Company
in which the holders of the Company's Common Stock immediately prior to
the merger have substantially the same proportionate ownership of
common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger,
or (B) any sale, lease, exchange or transfer (in one transaction or a
series of related transactions) of all or substantially all the assets
of the Company, or (ii) the approval by the shareholders of the Company
of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of the
Company, other than in connection with a bankruptcy or reorganization
proceeding of the Company under applicable federal or state bankruptcy
laws, or (iii) any "person" (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and
14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), other than the Company or a subsidiary thereof or any
employee benefit plan sponsored by the Company or a subsidiary thereof,
becoming the beneficial owner (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act) of securities of the Company representing 25% or more
of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding
securities ordinarily (and apart from rights accruing in special
circumstances) having the right to vote in the election of directors,
as a result of a tender or exchange offer, open market purchases,
privately-negotiated purchases or otherwise, or (iv) at any time during
a period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning
of such period constituted the Board of Directors of the Company
ceasing for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof,
unless the election or the nomination for election by the Company's
shareholders of each new director during such two-year period was
approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still
in office who were directors at the beginning of such two-year period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment on this 12th
day of February, 1999.

					KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.

				    By: /s/  Charles C. Hanebuth

	              	        /s/  William J. Jessie

/s/  Joseph E. Harrison
WITNESS
(LOGO) Pricewaterhouse Coopers

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
Bank of America Corporate Center
100 N. Tryon Street
Suite 5400
Charlotte NC 28202
Telephone (704)344 7500

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

February 28, 2000

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Bank of America, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion about compliance by BA Mortgage, LLC and
the Mortgage  division of Bank of America,  N.A.(collectively,  the "Company"),
which together comprise an operating division of Bank of America, N.A., with the
minimum servicing standards (the "Standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
("USAP") as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1999 included in the
accompanying  management assertion, attached hereto as Exhibit I. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the Standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on  management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance  with the
Standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis for
our  opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination  on the
Company's compliance with the Standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, except as indicated in Exhibit I,
the Company  complied with the  aforementioned Standards as of and for the year
ended December 31,1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/25/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       42,796
COMMITMENTS
   9,261    1,065    1,107   21,885   30,758   32,253   32,930   10,543    9,866

CHANGES FROM 09/18/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,670)
     444      264      273      866    1,352    1,583    1,889       87     -219

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    21.6      2.5      2.6     51.1     71.9     75.4     76.9     24.6     23.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
      16        3        6       26       19       44       27
```

----

Updated September 28, 2012
JTEKT CORPORATION, petitioner, v. GKN AUTOMOTIVE LTD.

No. 18-750.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Joseph H. HOLMES, petitioner, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES.

No. 18M173.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2056

STEPHEN GRANVILLE RULE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-184-1) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 30, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen Granville Rule, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Flynn, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Stephen Granville Rule appeals from the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Rule’s claim for disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rule v. Massanari , No. CA-99-184-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Aug. 17, 2001; entered Aug. 22, 2001). We deny Rule’s motion to mediate and dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the annual report of Bidville,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Michael  Palandro,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Michael Palandro
                              -------------------------
                              Michael Palandro
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              September 29, 2004
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                       TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                               CORE SYSTEMS, INC.


The undersigned certifies that, pursuant to the provisions of the Nevada Revised
Statutes, the shareholders of CORE SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada corporation, adopted
the following resolutions to amend its articles of incorporation on April 3,
2000.


1.   All of the directors consented in writing to the following resolution dated
     April 3, 2000:

          "RESOLVED that the secretary of the Corporation is directed to obtain
          from the shareholder owning at least a majority of the voting power of
          the outstanding stock of the Corporation their written consent to the
          amendment of article one of the articles of incorporation to change
          the name of the Corporation from CORE SYSTEMS, INC. to
          ANGELAUDIO.COM.INC."

2.   A majority of the shareholders holding 51.98% of the Corporation shares
     outstanding of Core Systems, Inc. consented in writing to the following
     resolution dated April 3, 2000:

          RESOLVED that the Corporation's articles of incorporation be amended
          as follows:

          "1.      The name of the Corporation is "ANGELAUDIO.COM, INC."


Dated this 3rd day of April, 2000.

CORE SYSTEMS, INC.



/s/ Ian Stuart
----------------------------------------------
Ian Stuart, President, Secretary and Director
Charles G. KINNEY, petitioner, v. Frances ROTHSCHILD, et al.

No. 18-1095.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
John FERREIRA, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 18-8093.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.