alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FILER'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         182,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,157,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                   152,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,051,259
<PP&E>                                       2,698,814
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,398,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,270,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,887,894
<BONDS>                                      3,349,987
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,924,994
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,934,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,270,816
<SALES>                                     75,802,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            75,802,268
<CGS>                                       60,724,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               61,132,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,957,091
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             260,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,506,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,125,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,380,827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,380,827
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40953 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROCKY BERT COZZENS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CR-166-1

- - - - - - - - - -

January 20, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Rocky Cozzens has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cozzens did not file a response

to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.
DeAndre RUSSELL, petitioner, v. REDSTONE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, et al.; and DeAndre Russell, petitioner, v. Anthony Ingegneri, et al.

No. 18-5765.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of National R.V.  Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we,  Bradley C.  Albrechtsen,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  President  of the
Company, and Mark D. Andersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



      /s/ BRADLEY C. ALBRECHTSEN                  /s/ MARK D. ANDERSEN
      --------------------------                  --------------------
      Bradley C. Albrechtsen                      Mark D. Andersen
      Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer
      and President                               (Principal Accounting and
      November 12, 2002                            Financial Officer)
                                                  November 12, 2002
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00560

- CR

Nico Allen

- Antonio COGDILL

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 18th Judicial District Court, Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F45973

Honorable John Edward Neill, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 17, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Francis V. LORENZO, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

No. 17-1077.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 26, 2018.

Motion of the Solicitor General to argue *pro hac vice* granted.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Jean COULTER, petitioner, v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-1288.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 6:23-cv-00106

Angelena Baize,

Plaintiff,

v.

District One et al.,

Defendants.

ORD ER

Plaintiff Angelena Baize, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit 

against defendants on February 24, 2023. Doc. 1. This case was 

referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. Doc. 2. 

On April 19, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report 

recommending that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a 

court order. Doc. 6. Plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the report 

on April 21, 2023. Doc. 7. Plaintiff did not file objections to the 

report.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for 

clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 

1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s 

report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court 

accepts its findings and recommendation (Doc. 6). Plaintiff’s 

complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute

and for failure to comply with a court order. All motions pending 

in this civil action are denied.

So ordered by the court on May 19, 2023.

J. CAMPBELL BARKER

United States District Judge

Case 6:23-cv-00106-JCB-JDL Document 8 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 15
Larun E. MILLER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6596.

Supreme Court of the United States

Aug. 6, 2018.

Petition for rehearing denied.
E.B., petitioner, v. WICOMICO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al.

No. 17-1620.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000030928-MAR-201208:18 AM
Calendar No. 557

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1953

AN ACT

To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99

years on land held in trust for the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the GuidivilleBand of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville IndianRancheria.

MAY 18, 2000

Reported without amendment

II

Calendar No. 557

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 1953

To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on land held in trust

for the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians and the Guidiville Band

of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18, 1999

Received

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

MAY 18, 2000

Reported by Mr. CAMPBELL, without amendment

AN ACT

To authorize leases for terms not to exceed 99 years on

land held in trust for the Torres Martinez Desert

Cahuilla Indians and the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville Indian Rancheria.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1953 RS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF 99-YEAR LEASES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Act enti3 tled ‘‘An Act to authorize the leasing of restricted Indian

4 lands for public, religious, educational, residential, busi5 ness, and other purposes requiring the grant of long-term

6 leases’’, approved August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is

7 amended by inserting ‘‘lands held in trust for the Torres

8 Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, lands held in trust for

9 the Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians of the Guidiville In10 dian Rancheria, lands held in trust for the Confederated

11 Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation’’ after ‘‘Sparks

12 Indian Colony,’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) shall apply to any lease entered into or re15 newed after the date of the enactment of this Act.

16 SEC. 2. REVOCATION OF CHARTER OF INCORPORATION.

17 The request of the Stockbridge-Munsee Community

18 of Wisconsin to surrender the charter of incorporation

19 issued to the Community on May 21, 1938, pursuant to

20 section 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934, (commonly known

21 as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization Act’’) is hereby accepted

22 and that charter of incorporation is hereby revoked.
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD and 

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

DECLARATION OF KATHERINE D. PRESCOTT IN SUPPORT 

OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES

AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

I, Katherine D. Prescott, hereby declare:

1. I am a Principal with the law firm Fish & Richardson P.C., and counsel for 

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. I have personal 

knowledge of the facts contained in the declaration and, if called upon to do so, I could and would 

testify competently to the matters herein.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from 

Headwater’s Response to Samsung’s Third Set of Interrogatories (No. 25), served September 9, 

2024. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from 

Headwater’s Response to Samsung’s Third Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 6-27), served 

September 9, 2024.

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 135-1 Filed 09/10/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 5607
2

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from 

Headwater’s Response to Samsung’s Fourth Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 28-40), served 

September 9, 2024.

5. On September 10, 2024, Kristopher Davis, counsel for Headwater, and I discussed 

Headwater’s objections and responses to Interrogatory No. 25 and Requests for Admission 6, 8, 

and 30-31. The parties did not resolve their disputes.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th

day of September, 2024, in San Carlos, California.

/s/ Katherine D. Prescott

Katherine D. Prescott 

Case 2:23-cv-00103-JRG-RSP Document 135-1 Filed 09/10/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5608
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9


       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               8,711
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                 325
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     1,579
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     4,079
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        106,489
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                            162,055
<ALLOWANCE>                                          2,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     294,425
<DEPOSITS>                                         239,069
<SHORT-TERM>                                         6,534
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  4,280
<LONG-TERM>                                         19,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,994
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     294,425
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      7,668
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    2,914
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       276
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    10,858
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   4,755
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5,774
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                5,084
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                          106
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     703
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      4,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,274
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           2,274
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        8.28
<LOANS-NON>                                            744
<LOANS-PAST>                                           156
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     2,539
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                          150
<RECOVERIES>                                           116
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    2,611
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 2,243
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                368
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hanh Kihara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 10, 2005

/s/ Hanh Kihara

Hanh Kihara

Chief Financial Officer
Clark L. STUHR, petitioner, v. Daniel WHITE, Superintendent, Washington Corrections Center.

No. 18-5067.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
MISSION PRODUCT HOLDINGS, INC., petitioner, v. TEMPNOLOGY, LLC, nka Old Cold LLC.

No. 17-1657.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Micheline BAPTISTE, petitioner, v. Shrusan GRAY.

No. 18-41.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

TEXARKANA DIVISION 

JERRAL W. JONES 

 Plaintiff,

vs. 

ALEXANDRA DAVIS and CYNTHIA 

DAVIS f/k/a CYNTHIA DAVIS-SPENCER,

 Defendants. 

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:23-cv-00032-RWS

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE 

Before the Court is Defendant’s Partially Opposed Motion to Transfer Venue (Docket 

No. 91). Having considered Defendant’s motion and the circumstances of the parties, the Court 

finds that there is good cause to transfer to this matter and this motion is hereby GRANTED. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be transferred to the ____________ District of 

Texas, ___________ Division. 

Ordered the ______ day of May, 2024. 

 ________________________________ 

 ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:23-cv-00032-RWS Document 92 Filed 05/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 1555
Nathaniel TEAMER, petitioner, v. Scott LEWIS, Warden.

No. 18-335.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 29, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 11




                     THE MAXIM GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                    COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS

                     PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE

                  (In Thousands, Except Per Share Information)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                       -------------------------
                                                                       April 30,       April 30,
                                                                          1998            1997
                                                                       =========       =========
<S>                                                                    <C>             <C>
Basic:
    Net earnings                                                       $   3,544       $   3,251
                                                                       =========       =========

    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                  16,424          16,110
                                                                       =========       =========

    Basic earnings per common share                                    $    0.22       $    0.20
                                                                       =========       =========

Diluted:
    Net earnings                                                       $   3,544       $   3,251
                                                                       =========       =========

    Shares:
       Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               16,424          16,110
       Shares issuable from assumed exercise of outstanding stock
         options                                                             823             520
                                                                       ---------       ---------
       Weighted average number of common and common
         equivalent shares                                                17,247          16,630
                                                                       =========       =========

       Diluted earnings per common share                               $    0.21       $    0.20
                                                                       =========       =========
</TABLE>





                           Common equivalent shares represent stock options
                           granted to key employees and directors.
(111 So. 350).

No. 28342.

#### STATE v. BUCKHALT.

(Jan. 3, 1927.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1927.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Indictment and Information <&wkey;5l(l) — Bill of information signed by district attorney was not invalid because indorsement on back thereof was not signed by him.

Bill of information signed by district attorney in his official capacity was not invalid because indorsement on back thereof of the number and title of the case, offense charged, and date of filing, was not signed by him.

*981Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Webster; John S. Richardson, Judge.

O.E. Bucldialt was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Thomas W. Robertson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Percy T. Ogden, Asst. Atty. Gen., W. D. .Goff, Dist. Atty., of Arcadia (E. R. Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

O’NIELL, C. J.

Appellant stands convicted of the offense of having intoxicating liquor in his possession for beverage purposes. The record contains two bills of exception, in which it is contended that the bill of information was invalid because the indorsement, on the back of it, of the number and title of the case, the offense charged and the date of filing, was not signed by the district attorney. There is neither a statutory nor common-law requirement that such an 'indorsement ón a bill of information shall be signed by the district attorney. The bill of information itself was signed by the district attorney in his official capacity, which is all that was necessary to verify the bill.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      513,177
COMMITMENTS
  46,187   29,359  128,690  308,053  334,364  482,930  492,413   30,247   20,764

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     19,796)
  -3,760   12,294    7,561   16,642      255   20,444   20,110     -648     -314

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.0      5.7     25.1     60.0     65.2     94.1     96.0      5.9      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      135)
      32       24       48       67       68      125      118
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011