alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, John E. Jackson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover
Compressor Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date:
May 7, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ John E. JacksonName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTitan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc Rubin, M.D.,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California,this 8th day of November, 2007. 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Farrell, J.D., Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for theperiod certified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State ofCalifornia, this 8th day of November, 2007.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 1494** 

KOFI AMAKONA , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for R eview of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

S ubmitted : March 18, 2010 Decided: May 1 7 , 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Kofi Amakona, Petitioner Pro Se. Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Theo Nickerson, Offic e of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kofi Amakona, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an o rder of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal. Amakona cha llenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determina tion denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483

- 84 (1992). We have rev iewed the evidence of record and conclude that Amakona fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Amakona cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza

- Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we uphold the finding below that Amakona did not demonstrate eligibility for protection under the Convention Against Torture. See 8
C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2), (3) (2009).

A ccordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Weale, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Holdings, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 29, 2003

                                            /s/ John R. Weale           .
                                      -----------------------------------
                                              John R. Weale
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0083. WILLIAM A. ACREE v. THE STATE.

In November 2014, the trial court entered an order revoking William A.

Acree’s first-offender probation. Thereafter, Acree’s application seeking a

discretionary appeal of that order was dismissed as untimely. See Case No.

A17D0053 (dismissed September 14, 2016). Acree filed a second application for

discretionary appeal of the same order asserting his right to file a timely application

was frustrated by ineffective assistance of counsel. We dismissed this second

untimely application, but noted that the trial court must first determine whether Acree

was constitutionally entitled to counsel at the revocation hearing and, if so, whether

that right was violated by following the procedures set forth in In the Interest of B.

R. F., 299 Ga. 294, 298-299 (788 SE2d 416) (2016). See Case No. A17D0140

(dismissed November 9, 2016). Acree subsequently filed pro se motions to set aside

his conviction and sentence and for transcripts of his probation revocation hearing in

the trial court. On July 27, 2018, the trial court entered an order dismissing the pro

se motions and advising Acree that he could still file a motion to determine whether

he was entitled to counsel at his probation revocation. Acree then filed this

application for discretionary appeal on August 29, 2018. We, however, lack

jurisdiction.

To be timely, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30

days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). 

The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept

an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190

Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Because Acree did not file his application

September 18, 2018
for discretionary appeal until 33 days after the entry of the order he seeks to appeal,

his application is untimely. Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED for

lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/18/2018
Order entered December 2 7 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 13 - 01459 - CV SANTANDER CONSUMER U SA, INC., Appellant V. PALISADES COLLECTION LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 11 - 14916 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s December 19, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief filed no later than January 13, 2014

. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
---





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
  Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
  27, 2004 (Registration No. 333-114879) with respect to the registration of 12,500,000
  shares of common stock of Worldbid Corporation (the "Company") issuable pursuant
  to the Company's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of our Auditors' Report, dated July
  12, 2004, on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of April 30,
  2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
  deficit and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the
  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Company for the year ended April 30, 2004.



|Vancouver, Canada | "Morgan & Company"   
|----------------- | ---------------------
|July 28, 2004     | Chartered Accountants

|Tel: (604) 687-5841 |                                     | P.O. Box 10007 Pacific Centre
|------------------- | ----------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|fax: (604) 687-0075 | Sute 1488 - 700 West Georgia Street
|www.morgan-cas.com  | Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1A1            

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN GORDON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 510 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          89,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  244,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,463
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               319,842
<PP&E>                                       2,252,233
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,528,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,047,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,400,180
<BONDS>                                      3,180,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,451
<COMMON>                                        13,879
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,824,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,047,859
<SALES>                                      2,599,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,599,522
<CGS>                                        2,108,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,884,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                83,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               190,347
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,368,124)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,368,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,368,124)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)


</TABLE>
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       43,094
COMMITMENTS
   1,881    1,308        0   37,912   39,665   39,793   40,973    3,301    2,121

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,427)
    -180   -1,451        0   -3,916   -3,011   -4,096   -4,462     -331       35

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     4.4      3.0      0.0     88.0     92.0     92.3     95.1      7.7      4.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       4        3        0       26       29       30       32
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       63,978
COMMITMENTS
   4,996   21,289      389   52,547   39,842   57,932   61,520    6,046    2,458

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,081)
    -323     -299      -31   -2,733   -2,577   -3,087   -2,907        6     -174

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.8     33.3      0.6     82.1     62.3     90.5     96.2      9.5      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       68)
      10        6        2       36       26       47       33
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

       
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's consolidated balance sheets and consolidated  statements of operations
for its fiscal  quarter  ended June 29,1 997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S>                                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                                            227,529
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     469,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       54,036
<INVENTORY>                                                       735,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                1,860,143
<PP&E>                                                          5,353,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    489,257
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  7,758,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           3,108,263
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                           84,699
<OTHER-SE>                                                      4,650,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    7,758,503
<SALES>                                                         3,776,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                3,776,738
<CGS>                                                             904,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   4,328,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   55,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                143,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (1,289,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (607,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   (682,115)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (1,289,282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
Brian Lee FLOWERS, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA.

No. 17-9574.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/13/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      150,430
COMMITMENTS
  14,296   22,550   33,804   85,003   79,620  133,103  135,974   17,327   14,456

CHANGES FROM 12/06/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,936)
  -4,457    4,850    1,311    3,006   -7,163     -140   -1,002    2,076    2,938

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.5     15.0     22.5     56.5     52.9     88.5     90.4     11.5      9.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      27       20       29       24       25       67       61
```

----

Updated December 16, 2011