alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Kali LORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8161.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NetREIT;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has material affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 29, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Jack K. HeilbronJack K. HeilbronChief Executive Officer
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Norris R. Harris, the Chief Executive Officer of Royalite
Petroleum Company Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  



| | By:    | /s/
      Norris R. Harris
| | ------ | --------------------------
| |        |                           
| | Name:  | NORRIS R. HARRIS          
| |        |                           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer   
| |        |                           
| | Date:  | August
      13, 2008     





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# CA2006297EN.01000101.xml

| 7.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 297/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Studio II Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), I, Cheung Sing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date: August 8, 2011 /s/Cheung Sing     Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          50,901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,690
<PP&E>                                         875,989
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,155,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          813,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,535
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,797,470)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,155,081
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,803,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,803,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,803,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,803,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)


</TABLE>
M. G., FATHER OF M. G., 

MINOR CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5872

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County.

Jennifer J. Ellison, Judge.

Patricia Smith Wihnyk, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and Families, 

Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IBETH C. CORRAL, AKA Ibeth Christina 

Corral, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70985 

Agency No. A095-343-778 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 6, 2020**

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Ibeth C. Corral, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen her 

proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de novo 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-70985 

questions of law. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny in 

part and grant in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen as 

untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)-(3).

In reviewing the BIA’s decision not to reopen Corral’s proceedings sua 

sponte, our jurisdiction is limited to “reviewing the reasoning behind the decision[]

for legal or constitutional error.” Bonilla, 840 F.3d at 588. It appears the BIA 

erred in concluding Corral was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal 

based on her failure to comply with her grant of voluntary departure, where her 

prior petition for review would have automatically terminated her grant of 

voluntary departure. See Garfias-Rodriguez v. Holder, 702 F.3d 504, 523-25 (9th 

Cir. 2012) (recognizing that 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(i) automatically terminates a grant 

of voluntary departure when an alien files a petition for review); 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1240.26(i) (stating “the penalties for failure to depart voluntarily . . . shall not 

apply to an alien who files a petition for review”). We remand for the BIA to 

consider whether it erred as to Corral’s eligibility, and if so, to reassess Corral’s 

request for sua sponte reopening. See Bonilla, 840 F.3d at 588 (“If, upon exercise 

of its jurisdiction, this court concludes that the Board relied on an incorrect legal 

premise, it should remand to the BIA so it may exercise its authority against the 

correct legal background.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
3 18-70985 

The government must bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; 

REMANDED.
Jimmy L. THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6774.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ LEE E. BECKELMAN

Name: Lee E. Beckelman
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   May 2, 2007
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual Report of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. on Form 10-K, for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Inbar Evron-Yogev, Chief Financial Officer of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.




Date: March 16, 2011
/s/ Inbar Evron-YogevInbar Evron-Yogev(principal financial and accounting officer)




*   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00542-CV

In re The Honorable Richard “Opey” Watkins

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM MILAM COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The Honorable Barbara Vansa, Milam County Clerk, is hereby directed not to print

or mail ballots for the 2014 general election pending further order of this Court.

It is so ordered September 3, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, IAN HERMAN, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Aircraft
Solutions, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 30, 2005



                                            /s/  Ian Herman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ian Herman,
                                            Principal Executive Officer
Skye Ely GIPSON, petitioner, v. Cynthia Y. TAMPKINS, Warden.

No. 18-7370.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# C_2011219EN.01001601.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/16

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2011 — Eurallumina v Commission

(Case T-62/06 RENV R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

2011/C 219/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eurallumina SpA (Portoscuso, Italy) (represented by: R. Denton and L. Martin Alegi, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, N. Khan, D. Grespan and K. Walkerová, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2006/323/EC of 7 December 2005 concerning the exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in Gardanne, in the Shannon region and in Sardinia respectively implemented by France, Ireland and Italy (OJ 2006 L 119, p. 12) in so far as it concerns the applicant

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Coady, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Shannon International
Resources Inc.


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
     is being prepared;

     b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
     internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
     supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
     financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
     external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
     principles;


     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting.


Date: October  27, 2004


/s/ Blair Coady
---------------
Blair Coady
Chief Financial Officer
James MacDONALD, petitioner, v. Martin Dori SINGER, et al.

No. 18-5320.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/29/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      474,377
COMMITMENTS
  43,660   18,825  146,091  262,857  293,047  452,609  457,964   21,769   16,413

CHANGES FROM 11/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,927)
   1,942   -4,730    6,825   -4,138    1,285    4,629    3,381    1,298    2,546

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2      4.0     30.8     55.4     61.8     95.4     96.5      4.6      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      121)
      33       13       42       60       64      110      106
```

----

Updated December 2, 2011