alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Purina Mills, LLC (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Knutson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



                                                      By  /s/ Daniel Knutson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                          Daniel Knutson
                                                      Senior Vice President
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
Tony GROSS, petitioner, v. John HAVLIN, Warden.

No. 18-8124.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2991-20

CHARLES DEEGAN and

MARIE DEEGAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR

PLANNING BOARD and 

CHARLES STREET 

DEVELOPERS, LLC,

Defendants-Respondents.

______________________________

RKH HOLDINGS, LLC, WILLIAM

S. ROOHAN, LYNN D. ROOHAN,

CRAIG OTTON, PATRICIA K.

DIMARCO-SHESTON, STEPHEN

M. HARBAUGH, JEFFREY RIHN,

and BERNADETTE M. PARZYCH,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR

PLANNING BOARD and 

CHARLES STREET 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2

A-2991-20

DEVELOPERS, LLC,

Defendants-Respondents.

______________________________

Submitted October 11, 2022 – Decided October 18, 2022

Before Judges Mayer, Enright, and Bishop-Thompson.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law 

Division, Cape May County, Docket Nos. L-0098-20 

and L-0110-20.

Fox Rothschild, LLP, attorneys for appellants (Jack 

Plackter and Amanda Moscillo, on the briefs).

Craig, Annin & Baxter, LLP, attorneys for respondent 

Borough of Stone Harbor Planning Board (John C. 

Grady, on the brief).

Hankin, Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, PC, 

attorneys for respondent Charles Street Developers, 

LLC (Colin G. Bell, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues 

in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with 

prejudice and without costs to either party.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7384** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. JAMES RAYMOND SCHIMMEL , Defendant

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1 :1 2

- c r - 0 0494

- LO

- 1; 1:14

- cv - 00550

- LO )

Submitted : December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. James Raymond Schimmel , Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Sun Ahn, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexander T. H. Nguyen, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Ryan K. Dickey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES AT TORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Raymond Schimmel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order i s not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Schimmel has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Schimmel’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Anthony CIAVONE, petitioner, v. Connie HORTON, Warden.

No. 18-7731.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
MARIA S., as Next Friend for E.H.F. and S.H.F., Minors, and A.S.G., petitioner, v. Ramiro GARZA.

No. 18M141.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/11/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      517,228
COMMITMENTS
  39,829   10,580  132,918  318,850  353,763  491,597  497,261   25,630   19,967

CHANGES FROM 10/04/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        552)
  -2,295   -7,619    4,796       86    3,142    2,586      319   -2,034      233

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.7      2.0     25.7     61.6     68.4     95.0     96.1      5.0      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      136)
      40       15       49       66       70      123      123
```

----

Updated October 14, 2011
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Wild Oats Markets, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 27, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), PerryD. Odak, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best ofhis knowledge, that:

|  | (1)The Report fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2)The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    the Company.
 

 

 
/s/ Perry D. OdakPerry D. OdakChief Executive OfficerMay 6, 2004
 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Wild Oats Markets, Inc. and will be retained by Wild Oats Markets, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael L. Cass, the Chief Executive Officer of Royalite
Petroleum Company Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                    



| | By:    | /s/
      Michael L. Cass            
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | MICHAEL L. CASS                      
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | September 7, 2007                    



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
March 4, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VICENTE A. MENCHACA, Appellant

NO. 14-12-01158-CV V.

INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Insurance 

Company of the State of Pennsylvania, signed September 20, 2012, was heard on 

the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Vicente A. Menchaca, to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Financial Data Schedule represents Consolidated Marcus Cable Company, L.P.
and Subsidiaries as reflected in the Form 10-Q for the three month period ended 
March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910629
<NAME> MARCUS CABLE COMPANY, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,861)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,787
<PP&E>                                         980,140
<DEPRECIATION>                               (255,449)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,739,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,345
<BONDS>                                      1,562,431
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,739,684
<SALES>                                        126,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,850
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (32,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,873)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1609

To amend Public Law 105–188 to provide for the mineral leasing of certain

Indian lands in Oklahoma.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend Public Law 105–188 to provide for the mineral

leasing of certain Indian lands in Oklahoma.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MINERAL LEASING OF CERTAIN INDIAN LANDS

4 IN OKLAHOMA.

5 Public Law 105–188 (112 Stat. 620 and 621) is

6 amended—

7 (1) in the title, by inserting ‘‘and certain

8 former Indian reservations in Oklahoma’’ after

9 ‘‘Fort Berthold Indian Reservation’’; and

10 (2) in section 1—
2

•HR 1609 IH

1 (A) by striking the section heading and in2 serting the following:

3 ‘‘SECTION 1. LEASES OF CERTAIN ALLOTTED LANDS.’’;

4 and

5 (B) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by striking

6 clause (i) and inserting the following:

7 ‘‘(i) is located within—

8 ‘‘(I) the Fort Berthold Indian

9 Reservation in North Dakota; or

10 ‘‘(II) a former Indian reservation

11 located in Oklahoma of—

12 ‘‘(aa) the Comanche Indian

13 Tribe;

14 ‘‘(bb) the Kiowa Indian

15 Tribe;

16 ‘‘(cc) the Apache Tribe;

17 ‘‘(dd) the Fort Sill Apache

18 Tribe of Oklahoma;

19 ‘‘(ee) the Wichita and Affili20 ated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi,

21 Waco, and Tawakonie) located in

22 Oklahoma;

23 ‘‘(ff) the Delaware Tribe of

24 Western Oklahoma; or
3

•HR 1609 IH

1 ‘‘(gg) the Caddo Indian

2 Tribe; and’’.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1692

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility

of including the Gaviota Coast of California in the National Park System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1999

Mrs. CAPPS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability

and feasibility of including the Gaviota Coast of California in the National Park System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gaviota Coast Act of

5 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. GAVIOTA COAST.

7 (a) STUDY REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of the In8 terior shall conduct a study, pursuant to the criteria set

9 forth in section 8(c)(2) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C.

10 1a–5(c)(2); commonly known as the National Park Sys-
2

•HR 1692 IH

1 tem General Authorities Act), of the suitability and feasi2 bility of including the area of California known as the

3 Gaviota Coast in the National Park System. The study

4 area shall extend generally from Coal Oil Point at Santa

5 Barbara to Point Sal, California.

6 (b) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit the

7 findings of such study upon its completion to the Com8 mittee on Resources of the House of Representatives and

9 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the

10 Senate.

Æ
7 NO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OV THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 06-0422

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF

CAROLE M. BOSCH

FILED

JUN 0 2 2020

ORDER.owen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of Montana

Carole M. Bosch has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement

for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of her

application for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for

admission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken

"within three years preceding the date of the application for admission." Rule IV.A.3,

Rules of Admission. Bosch passed the MPRE in 2004 when seeking admission to the

practice of law in California, where she was admitted. Bosch has "practiced law

continuously as a civil litigation lawyer for law firms for 15 years without any ethical or

disciplinary action in any jurisdiction where licensed or admitted to practice law." Good

cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Carole M. Bosch to waive the

three-year test requirement for the MPRE for purposes of her current application for

admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of

the Board of Bar Examin rs at the State Bar of Montana.

DATED this day of June, 2020.

Chief Justice

06/02/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0422
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00366 - CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MARTHA VILLAGOMEZ AND LEONEL ALAMO AND IN THE INTEREST OF L.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 11,931 - L2, Honorable Matthew C. Martindale, Presiding



### January 8 , 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS , JJ. Appellant Martha Villagomez has filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of her appeal. The Court finds the motion complies with the requirements of Rul e of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion does not address costs, costs will be taxed against appellant . T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam
| ·   | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the Company’s financial      condition and results ofoperations. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March      30, 2010 |   | /s/      Julie M. Pierce                                   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                |   | Julie      M. Pierce                                       |
|                |   | Senior      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer |

----
ROYAL GRIP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Three Months Ended                      Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,                          September 30,
                                                 -------------------------------         -------------------------------   
                                                     1996               1995                1996                1995
                                                     ----               ----                ----                ----
<S>                                               <C>                <C>                 <C>                 <C>         
Net income (loss)                                 $     6,366        $   (39,495)        $(1,138,164)        $  (906,234)
                                                  ===========        ===========         ===========         ===========

Weighted Average Shares:
    Common shares outstanding                       2,734,678          2,734,678           2,734,678           2,734,678
    Common equivalent shares issuable upon
        exercise of employee stock options               --                 --                  --                  --
                                                  -----------        -----------         -----------         -----------

Shares used in net income (loss) per share          2,734,678          2,734,678           2,734,678           2,734,678
                                                  ===========        ===========         ===========         ===========

Net income (loss) per share                       $      0.00        $     (0.01)        $     (0.42)        $     (0.33)
                                                  ===========        ===========         ===========         ===========
</TABLE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                       16