alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 99.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Robert S.
Bland, the Chief Executive Officer of Quotesmith.com, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the "Report")
to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ ROBERT S. BLAND
------------------------------
Name: Robert S. Bland
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 22, 2003
David DERRINGER, petitioner, v. Isidro SAENZ.

No. 18-7785.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Mexico denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1476

S. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, MD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; HEALTH NET FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC, 

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (7:11-cv-00268-FL)

Submitted: December 8, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2015

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey S. Miller, Jacksonville, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Matthew L. Fesak, 

Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee United States of 

America. Christopher Flynn, CROWELL & MORING LLP, Washington, 

D.C.; James R. Holland, Wilmington, North Carolina, Elizabeth 

Brooks Scherer, SMITH MOORE LEATHERWOOD LLP, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee Health Net Federal Services, LLC.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dr. S. Douglas Taylor appeals the district court’s March 

19, 2014 grant of the respective motions to dismiss filed by the 

defendants, the United States and Health Net Federal Services, 

LLC. After carefully reviewing the district court’s opinion, 

the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the 

applicable law, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the 

convincingly written opinion of the district court. Taylor v. 

United States, No. 7:11-cv-268-FL (E.D.N.C. March 19, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fitzgerald HORTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9522.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/04/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       70,282
COMMITMENTS
  21,609    3,179    7,338   25,995   45,334   54,942   55,851   15,340   14,431

CHANGES FROM 12/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,225)
   1,741      506       96     -333      621    1,504    1,223     -279        2

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.7      4.5     10.4     37.0     64.5     78.2     79.5     21.8     20.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      36       10       22       34       28       79       56
```

----

Updated January 7, 2011
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KINGFISH INVESTMENT, LLC
, Appellant,

v.

WAWA FLORIDA, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1406

[ December 22, 2022 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; G. Joseph Curley , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 502020CA014072XXXXMBAI

.

S. Brian Bull of Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A., Palm

Beach Gardens , for appellant.

Robert Rivas, Victor R. Berwin, and Joel D. Kenwood of Sachs Sax Caplan, PL, Boca Raton

, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and A RTAU , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      154,282
COMMITMENTS
  64,704    8,118   18,887   50,610  104,422  134,201  131,427   20,081   22,855

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -9,606)
     713     -876   -5,214   -3,233   -2,306   -7,734   -8,396   -1,872   -1,210

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    41.9      5.3     12.2     32.8     67.7     87.0     85.2     13.0     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      185)
      66       19       46       51       71      133      129
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
GHASSEN M ONC EF B EN YOUNES, AKA Gha sse n B e n Youne s, Pe titione r,
v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 10-71824 Age n c y No. A079-638-202
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

April 7, 2014 * * San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : B ENAVIDES, *** TALLM A N, a nd C LIFTON, C irc uit Judge s. Gha sse n B e n Youne s (“ Youne s” ), a native and c itiz e n of Tunisia , pe titions for re vie w of the fina l orde r of re m ova l e n te re d a ga inst him by the B oa rd of 

# FIL E D
APR 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2). *** The Honora

ble Fortuna

to P. B e nav ide s, Se nior C irc uit Judgefor the U.S. C ourt of Appe a l s for the Fifth C i rc uit, sitting by de s igna tion.Im

m i gration Appe a l s . The orde r dism isse d his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a

pplic a tion for withholding of re m o va l a nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e
re vie w the a g e nc y ’ s le ga l de te rm inations denovo, a nd fa c tua l findings for substa ntia l e vide nc e . N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w . Youne s ha s not shown tha t he wa s pe rse c ute d in the pa st a n d doe s not de m onstra

te a we ll-founde d fe ar of future pe rse c ution tha t is both subje c tive ly ge nuine a nd obje c tive ly

re a sona ble
. Duarte deGuinac

v . IN S , 179 F.3d 1156, 1159 (9th C ir. 1999). Youne s ha s fa ile d to de m onstra te tha t it is more like ly

tha n not tha t he will be pe rse c ute d we re he to re turn to Tunisia
. Id. ; 8 C .F.R . § 208.16(b)(2). Like wise , Youne s ha s fa i le d to bring e vide nc e showing tha t it is
m ore like ly

tha n not tha t he will be torture d should here turn to Tunisia
. Lanza v
. Ashc roft , 389 F.3d 917, 936 (9th C ir. 2004). PETITION FOR

REVIEW

DENIED
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/04/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      230,873
COMMITMENTS
  69,883    7,728   37,251   91,039  154,781  198,173  199,761   32,700   31,113

CHANGES FROM 12/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,125)
    -336    1,676    1,043      349     -440    1,055    2,278    2,069      846

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.3      3.3     16.1     39.4     67.0     85.8     86.5     14.2     13.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      223)
      80       27       62       64       91      165      167
```

----

Updated January 7, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1729 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1729

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2000

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the Federal facility located at 1301 Emmet Street in 
       Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Pamela B. Gwin Hall''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAMELA B. GWIN HALL.

    The Federal facility located at 1301 Emmet Street in 
Charlottesville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Pamela B. Gwin Hall''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Pamela B. Gwin 
Hall''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas H. King, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allied Holdings, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.              October11, 2007   /s/ Thomas H. King         *Date*   *Thomas H. King*      *Executive Vice President*      *and Chief Financial Officer*
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, James P. Bryce, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Holdings, Ltd.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)  [Omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238]
(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: October 28, 2003 /s/ James P. BryceJames P. Bryce
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41017

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS MORALES-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-912-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Morales-Sanchez pleaded guilty to a charge of illegal reentry and 

was sentenced to 41 months of imprisonment. His sentence was based in part 

on a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) for an 

aggravated felony conviction: a Texas conviction of aggravated assault. 

Morales-Sanchez argues that the district court plainly erred by characterizing 

the Texas aggravated assault offense as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 8, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41017 Document: 00513789458 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2016
No. 15-41017

2

§ 1101(a)(43)(F) and as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) for the 

purposes of convicting and sentencing him under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). 

Relying on Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), Morales-Sanchez

argues that the definition of a crime of violence in § 16(b), which is incorporated 

by reference into § 1101(a)(43)(F)’s definition of an aggravated felony, is 

unconstitutionally vague on its face. He further contends that this court 

cannot apply § 16(b) in this case without violating due process.

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance, urging that Morales-Sanchez’s arguments are foreclosed by our 

recent decision in United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 

2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). The 

Government is correct.1 See id. Accordingly, the motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED.

 

1 The recent grant of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court on the issue 

whether § 16(b) is unconstitutional in light of Johnson in Lynch v. Dimaya, ___ S. Ct. ___, 

2016 WL 3232911 (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 15-1498), does not alter our analysis. This court is 

bound by its own precedent unless and until that precedent is altered by a decision of the 

Supreme Court. See Wicker v. McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157-58 (5th Cir. 1986).

 Case: 15-41017 Document: 00513789458 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2016
ORIX (LOGO)

February 18, 2000

PricewaterhouseCoopers
2001 Ross Avenue
Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75201-2997

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, ORIX Real Estate Capital Markets
("ORECM"),  which was doing business as Banc One Mortgage Capital  Markets,  LLC
until July 12,  1999,  has complied in all  material  respects  with the minimum
servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's
Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") (except,  for
commercial loan and multifamily loan servicing,  minimum servicing standards V.4
and VI. 1., which the MBA has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing.) As
of and for this same period,  ORECM had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amount of $25 million.

The Company has  established  and maintains  custodial  accounts with  federally
insured  depository  institutions  in accordance  with the servicing  agreements
requirement for Eligible Accounts. Custodial balances are invested in accordance
with the servicing agreements requirement for Permitted  Investments.  Permitted
Investments  may include  commercial  paper and money  market  mutual funds with
non-federally  insured  financial  institutions  which meet the  minimum  rating
requirements specified by the applicable servicing agreement.

Edgar L. Smith, II
Chief Operating Officer
EXHIBIT 10.12  CASH COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS  Annual Retainer*:  Board Members

$
25,000Chairman of the Board (additional)

$
15,000Audit Committee Chairperson (additional)

$
7,500Compensation Committee Chairperson (additional)

$
5,000Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee   Chairperson (additional)

$
5,000  
 *  Paid quarterly in arrears.  Meeting Fees:  Board of DirectorsAnnual offsite regular meeting

$
2,500Regular meeting

$
1,000Special (telephonic)

$
500Audit CommitteeRegular meeting

$
2,500Special (in person)

$
1,000Special (telephonic)

$
750Compensation CommitteeRegular meeting

$
2,000Special

$
750Corporate Governance and Nominating CommitteeRegular meeting

$
2,000Special

$
750
Darryl Brian BARWICK, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5354.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0165

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JACOB ANDREW HOWARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 15, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 7 2021

01/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0165