alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned, a member of the Board of Directors or an officer of MIDAMERICAN
ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY, an Iowa corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes
and  appoints  Steven A.  McArthur  and Paul J.  Leighton  and each of them,  as
his/her  true  and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  with  full  power  of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for  and in  his/her  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for
the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2000 and to execute any amendments  thereto
and to file the same,  with all  exhibits  thereto,  and all other  documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and applicable
stock  exchanges,  with the full power and  authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes as he/she
might or could do in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all that said
attorney-in-fact  and agent, or his/her substitute or substitutes,  may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Executed as of March 30, 2001

/s/ David L. Sokol                                    /s/ Gregory E. Abel
------------------                                    ------------------------
DAVID L. SOKOL                                        GREGORY E. ABEL


/s/ Patrick J. Goodman                                /s/ Stanley J. Bright
----------------------                                ------------------------
PATRICK J. GOODMAN                                    STANLEY J. BRIGHT


/s/ Edgar D. Aronson                                  /s/ Walter Scott Jr.
--------------------                                  ------------------------
EDGAR D. ARONSON                                      WALTER SCOTT, JR.


                                                      /s/ Warren Buffett
--------------------------                           -------------------------
RICHARD R. JAROS                                      WARREN BUFFETT


/s/ Marc D. Hamburg                                   /s/ W. David Scott
-------------------                                   ------------------------
MARC D. HAMBURG                                       W. DAVID SCOTT


/s/ John Boyer
--------------
JOHN BOYER
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/13/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      160,145
COMMITMENTS
  60,863    9,719   23,665   54,555  101,507  139,083  134,890   21,062   25,255

CHANGES FROM 09/06/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:         93)
  -2,471    1,514      816    1,450   -3,942     -204   -1,611      298    1,704

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    38.0      6.1     14.8     34.1     63.4     86.8     84.2     13.2     15.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      176)
      52       24       47       57       74      127      134
```

----

Updated September 16, 2011
Exhibit 32.1


                   Globalwise Investments, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned officer of Globalwise Investments, Inc. certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date:   March 12, 2004              /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                    _________________________________________
                                    Donald R. Mayer
                                    Principal Executive and Financial Officer
ChiefJustice James T. Worthen 

### Twelfth Court ofAppeals Justices Sam Griffith Diane DeVasto Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Mr. James W. Volberding One American Center 909 ESE Loop 323 Suite 700 Tyler, TX 75701 Mr. Michael J. West 

### Assistant District Attorney 4th Floor, Courthouse 100 North Broadway Tyler, TX 75702 RE: Case Number: 12-04-00251-CV Trial Court Case Number: 02-3596-D Style: In the Interest ofL. S. B. and K. H., children Clerk Cathy S. Lusk
Chief StaffAttorney Margaret Hussey



### Enclosed is a copy of the Memorandum Opinion issued this date in the above styled and numbered cause. Also enclosed is a copy ofthe court'sjudgment. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK 

# By: KtijUJIA. Mflfk Depirft ( 

### KatrinaMcClenny, ChiefDeputyClerk Judge Carole W. Clark Hon. John Ovard 

### Ms. Lois Rogers CC:

1517 West Front Street • Suite 354 • Tyler, TX 75702 • Tel: 903-593-8471 • Fax: 903-593-2193 ServingAnderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, SanAugustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

### NO. 12-04-00251-CV 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

### TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT 

## TYLER, TEXAS § APPEAL FROM THE 321ST IN THE INTEREST OF L.S.B. AND K.H., § JUDICIAL DISTRICTCOURTOF CHILDREN § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM 

### Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, and all other parties to the appeal have been given notice ofthe filing ofthis motion. Also included in the motion to dismiss is counsel's 

### motion to withdraw and a motion for cancellation oforal argument. Because Appellant met the requirements ofTexas Rule ofAppellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), all motions are granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Opinion delivered December 7, 2005. Panel consisted ofWorthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

### COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

### JUDGMENT
DECEMBER 7, 2005
NO. 12-04-00251-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L.S.B. AND K.H., CHILDREN Appeal from the 321st Judicial District Court 

### ' ofSmith County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 02-3596-D) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the Appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal herein, counsel's motion to withdraw and motion for cancellation of 

### oral argument, and the Court having heard and fully considered said motion is ofthe opinion the
same should be Granted. 

### It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED andDECREEDby the Court that this appealbe, and the same is, Hereby Dismissedand that all costs ofthis appeal be, and the same are, 

### adjudged against the Appellant, Amanda Hayes, for which execution may issue, and that this decision be certified to the trial court below for observance. Byper curiam opinion. 

### Panel consisted ofWorthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al.

No. 18-976.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,005-03

EX PARTE SONNY D. SILVAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. A-37,468-B IN THE 70TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault

and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Silvas v. State, No 11-11-00169-CR (Tex. App.—Eastland June 6, 2013) (not designated

for publication).

In a single ground, Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to argue that the trial

court erred in assessing $3,000.00 in attorney’s fees. See Mayer v. State, 309 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2010). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.
2

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334

S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.

The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use

anymeans set out in TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court

may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

After reviewing appellate counsel’s response, the trial court shall make findings of fact and

conclusions of law as to whether: (1) the trial court assessed $3,000.00 in attorney’s fees; (2) if so,

these fees were improperly assessed, see Mayer, 309 S.W.3d at 556 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); (3)

appellate counsel knew or should have known that $3000.00 in attorney’s fees were assessed and

could have litigated the assessment of fees on appeal; (4) appellate counsel was deficient; and (5)

Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions

of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas

corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be
3

requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 20, 2019

Do not publish
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Cole National Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.


Date: May 16, 2003
                                          /s/ Jeffrey A. Cole
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name: Jeffrey A. Cole
                                          Title:  Chief Executive Officer


                                          /s/ Lawrence E. Hyatt
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name: Lawrence E. Hyatt
                                          Title:  Chief Financial Officer



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Antonio DICKERSON, aka Girbaud, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8224.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

*2746Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Carman L. DECK, petitioner, v. Richard JENNINGS, Warden.

No. 18-8820.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60580

Summary Calendar

YANG XIN CHUN, also known as Chun Yan Xin, also known as Xing Chun

Yang,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A70 852 201

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Yang Xin Chun (“Yang”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of

China, petitions this court to review the denial by the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) of his motion to reopen asylum and withholding of removal

proceedings. This court has jurisdiction to review Yang’s petition because it

seeks relief based on alleged changed circumstances in China. See Panjwani v.

Gonzales, 401 F.3d 626, 632 (5th Cir. 2005). “The BIA’s denial of a motion to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 29, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60580

2

reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion and its factual findings are reviewed

for substantial evidence.” Id. That discretion will not be disturbed unless the

decision is “capricious, racially invidious, utterly without foundation in the

evidence, or otherwise so aberrational that it is arbitrary rather than the result

of any perceptible rational approach.” Pritchett v. INS, 993 F.2d 80, 83 (5th Cir.

1993) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Whether Yang made a prima facie case for the relief he seeks is not

relevant to whether the BIA abused its discretion when it denied his motion. See

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). Yang was required to show changed country conditions in

China to overcome the 90-day time limit on his motion to reopen. See

§ 1003.2(c)(2)–(3)(ii). Yang did not show that his fear of persecution for

practicing Falun Gong and fathering two children in this country was based on

changed conditions in China, as opposed to self-induced changes in his personal

circumstances. He has not shown that the BIA’s determination lacked an

evidentiary foundation. See Pritchett, 993 F.2d at 83. Therefore, the BIA’s

denial of Yang’s motion to reopen based on the motion’s untimeliness was not an

abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145025

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145025

COA: 307920

Calhoun CC: 2011

- 001363

- FC

MELVIN TROY NELSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Official Journal C 238/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 238 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6022 July 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 238

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6022 July 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 238/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8354 — Fox/Sky) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 238/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8354 — Fox/Sky) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 238/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 238/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF David Ben MANDELBAUM.

No. D-3040.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Disbarment order entered.
Veronika MARCOSKI, petitioner, v. Jan RATH.

No. 18-146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*267Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50038

(Summary Calendar)

ALBERT F. PERALTA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LLOYD BENTSON; INTERNAL

REVENUE SERVICE; DEPARTMENT

OF THE TREASURY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-95-CV-747)

April 17, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Proceeding pro se ,Plaintiff-Appellant Albert F. Peralta sought

to assert employment discrimination claims against DefendantsAppellees. The magistrate judge to whom the case was referred by2

the district court recommended granting Peralta’s motion to proceed

in former pauperis (IFP), denying Peralta’s motion for appointment

of counsel, and dismissing all claims with prejudice. Over the

o bjections of Peralta, the district court approved the report of

the magistrate judge and the recommendations set forth therein, and

dismissed Peralta’s claims as frivo lous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(d) with prejudice. Peralta timely appealed.

We have reviewed the record and the document filed with this

court by Peralta which, we assume, purports to be an appellate

brief. That filing fails entirely to comply in either form or

substance with the requirements for a brief to this court and is

thus insufficient to support appellate review. Moreover, our

review of that document and the scant but sufficient record in

these proceedings demonstrates beyond cavil that Peralta presented

nothing to the district court that, no matter how liberally

construed, could form the basis for a claim with any arguable basis

in fact or law, or any likelihood of success. Consequently,

Peralta’s appeal is dis missed with prejudice as wholly without

merit and frivolous as a matter of law. Moreover, Peralta is

cautioned that any further efforts on his part to pursue the

subject matter of this case in any federal court within this

circuit may subject him to sanctions.

DISMISSED.
Chadwick WILLACY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9548.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 300

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE SUPREME COURT

COMMITTEE ON MODEL

JURY INSTRUCTIONS –

CRIMINAL

Opinion Delivered July 2, 2015

PER CURIAM

Honorable Dan Ritchey, Circuit Judge, of Blytheville, Honorable Carlton Jones,

Circuit Judge, of Texarkana, Honorable Brent Haltom, Circuit Judge, of Texarkana,

Honorable Robin Carroll, Circuit Judge, of El Dorado, and Honorable Chuck Graham,

Prosecuting Attorney, of Lonoke, are reappointed to the Committee on Model Jury

Instructions–Criminal for three-year terms to expire on February 28, 2018. We thank these

members for their continued service on this important committee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      311
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   333
<PP&E>                                           1,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                     953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,156
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,571
<SALES>                                            733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   733
<CGS>                                            1,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,990)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)
        

</TABLE>