Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0573; FRL-9453-01-R9]
 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) and the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from metal coating operations and general regulatory definitions. We are also finalizing the rescission of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1107, Coating of Metal Parts and Products, as it applies to the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD. We are approving these revisions, including local rules and a rescission, under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
 DATES: This rule is effective on June 8, 2022.
 ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0573. All documents in the docket are listed on the 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov*
                         website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, 
                        *e.g.,*
                         Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through 
                        *https://www.regulations.gov,*
                         or please contact the person identified in the 
                        **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                         section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the 
                        **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                         section.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3024 or by email at 
                        *lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On May 20, 2021,[1]
                    
                     the EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP. Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
Amended
SubmittedMDAQMD
1115
Metal Parts & Products Coating Operations
June 8, 2020
July 24, 2020.PCAPCD
102
Definitions
June 11, 2020
July 24, 2020.
 We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they comply with the relevant CAA requirements. In addition to replacing the previous versions of the submitted rules listed in Table 1, the EPA proposed to rescind South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1107, Coating of Metal Parts and Products, as it applies to the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD, as requested by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).[2] In our May 20, 2021 proposal, the EPA also proposed to approve revisions to SCAQMD Rule 1107; however, we are not finalizing that action at this time. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation. II. Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We received three comments during this period, and each one was supportive of this proposed action. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules and rule rescission discussed above and as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules and rule rescission into the California SIP IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In 
                    ( print page 27527)
                    accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the MDAQMD and the PCAPCD rules described in section I. of this preamble and set forth below in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through 
                    *www.regulations.gov*
                     and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the 
                    **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**
                     section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
                Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
                    *et seq.*);
                Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
                    *et seq.*);
                Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
                Does not have federalism implications as specified inExecutive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
                Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject toExecutive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                Is not a significant regulatory action subject toExecutive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
                Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
                Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, underExecutive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 
                    *et seq.,*
                     as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 8, 2022. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection
Air pollution control
Incorporation by reference
Intergovernmental relations
Ozone
Particulate matter
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Volatile organic compounds
 Dated: April 29, 2022. Martha Guzman Aceves, Regional Administrator, Region IX.
 For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
 1.The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        42 U.S.C. 7401 
                            *et seq.* Subpart F—California
 2.Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(193)(i)(A)( *4*), (c)(419)(i)(B)(
                        *2*), (c)(518)(i)(A)(
                        *6*), and (c)(571) to read as follows: § 52.220
  
 (c) * * * (193) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (
                            *4*) Previously approved on February 1, 1984 in paragraph (c)(193)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted without replacement for implementation in the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (Riverside County), Rule 1107. 
 (419) * * * (i) * * * (B) * * * (
                            *2*) Previously approved on January 31, 2013 in paragraph (c)(419)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in (c)(571)(i)(B)(1), Rule 102, “Definitions,” amended February 9, 2012. 
 (518) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (
                            *6*) Previously approved on February 27, 2020 in paragraph (c)(518)(i)(A)(2) of this section and now deleted with replacement in (c)(571)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1115, “Metal Parts and Products Coating Operations,” amended on January 22, 2018. 
 (571) Amended regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on July 24, 2020 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter dated July 23, 2020. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District. (
                            *1*) Rule 1115, “Metal Parts and Products Coating Operations,” amended on June 8, 2020.
                            ( print page 27528) (
                            *2*) [Reserved] (B) Placer County Air Pollution Control District. (
                            *1*) Rule 102, “Definitions,” amended on June 11, 2020. (
                            *2*) [Reserved] (ii) [Reserved]


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         86 FR 27344. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         CARB's rescission request cites to four Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) provisions for SCAQMD Rule 1107; however, since three of the CFR provisions are previous versions of the Rule that were replaced by more recent versions, and are therefore no longer in the SIP, EPA is interpreting this as a request to remove the latest (and only) version of SCAQMD Rule 1107 applicable in the Riverside County portion of the MDAQMD, namely, the version submitted on May 13, 1993, and listed at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(193)(i)(A)(1). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2022-09726 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P