alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Heinz Fraunhoffer, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of GloTech Indiustries, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and I have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
     being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
     filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as
     of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
     have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses
     in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                                  /s/ Heinz Fraunhoffer
June 30, 2003                     __________________________
                                   Heinz Fraunhoffer
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer
Jean BULTMAN, petitioner, v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 18-8813.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1374 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1374

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. 
Highway 130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, as the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1374

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. 
Highway 130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, as the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN K. RAFFERTY HAMILTON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office building located at 680 U.S. Highway 
130 in Hamilton, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 
``John K. Rafferty Hamilton Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the United States Post Office 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``John K. Rafferty Hamilton Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135344 & (10) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ANTHONY O’NEAL WILSON, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 135344 

 COA: 281069 

Genesee CC: 07-086972-AV 

GENESEE COUNTY CONCEALED 

WEAPONS BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. Costs of $250 are assessed against the plaintiff in 

favor of the defendant under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal. The 

plaintiff is barred from submitting additional filings in this Court until he offers proof that 

he has paid any outstanding court-imposed sanctions. 

KELLY, J., would simply deny leave to appeal. 

d0325 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 28, 2008 

Clerk
HAVASUPAI TRIBE, petitioner, v. Heather C. PROVENCIO, et al.

No. 18-1239.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated September 21, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1481 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1481

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las 
 Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Lloyd D. George 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1999

 Ms. Berkley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las 
 Vegas Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ``Lloyd D. George 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LLOYD D. GEORGE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 333 Las Vegas 
Boulevard South in Las Vegas, Nevada, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lloyd D. George 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 15**

**ACCOUNTANTS’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT**

We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the March 23, 1995 and theApril 19, 2006, Registration Statements on Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (formerly known as InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated October 30, 2007 included with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2007. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

November 7, 2007
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1701

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain polyethylene base materials.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 5, 1999

Mr. MCDERMOTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain polyethylene

base materials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN POLY4 ETHYLENE BASE MATERIALS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:
2

•HR 1701 IH

‘‘ 9902.39.20 Polyethylene

base materials

that are under

250mm in

width, sanded

on 1 side and

surface-treated for use in

the manufacture of skis

(provided for

in subheading

3920.10.00) .. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2001 ’’.

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by this

2 section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from ware3 house for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the

4 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Charles C. LYNCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8426.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                     14,799
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                  211
<INVENTORY>                                45,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           66,861
<PP&E>                                    191,873
<DEPRECIATION>                             44,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            327,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      72,836
<BONDS>                                    93,655
<COMMON>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                    21
<OTHER-SE>                                156,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              327,179
<SALES>                                   332,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          332,850
<CGS>                                     231,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             231,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           96,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,737
<INCOME-TAX>                                  298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         3,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                     281
<NET-INCOME>                                3,158
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.14



</TABLE>
Lowell Edward JACKSON, petitioner, v. Eddie CLIMMER, et al.

No. 18-8258.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Enamelon, Inc. Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1999 and the Condensed
Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             302,213
<SECURITIES>                                       506,737
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,642,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                       141,542
<INVENTORY>                                      2,492,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,434,700
<PP&E>                                           3,502,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,121,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,085,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,295,026
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              963,324
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            14,014
<OTHER-SE>                                          29,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,085,360
<SALES>                                         14,384,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,384,489
<CGS>                                            5,780,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,780,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,157,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (194,948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,358,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,358,399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,358,399)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.54)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1377 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1377

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 13234 
South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``John J. Buchanan 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 1999

  Mr. Weller (for himself, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Hastert, Mr. 
Crane, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Porter, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. 
   Evans, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Blagojevich, Mrs. Biggert, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, Mr. Costello, Mr. Rush, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
   LaHood, and Mr. Phelps) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 13234 
South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``John J. Buchanan 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13234 
South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, is hereby designated as 
the ``John J. Buchanan Post Office Building''. Any reference to such 
facility in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 
the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the ``John 
J. Buchanan Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 130 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 130

 To designate the United States Courthouse located at 40 Centre Street 
    in New York, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mr. Engel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States Courthouse located at 40 Centre Street 
    in New York, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any references in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the annual report on form 10-K of Empire Global Corp.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael
Ciavarella, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2015                 By: /s/ Michele Ciavarella
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michele Ciavarella
                                         Chief Executive Officer, and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 21, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), AI Infrastructure Alliance, Inc. (“AIIA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Superb AI, Inc., San Mateo, CA; YData Labs Inc., Seattle, WA; InfuseAI Inc., Taipei City, TAIWAN; Seldon Technologies Limited, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Comet ML, Inc., New York, NY; Aporia, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL; Modzy, Inc., Vienna, VA; TheSequence, Coral Gables, FL; Iguazio, Hertzelia, ISRAEL; Valohai, Turku, FINLAND; Nvidia, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Data-Centric AI Community, Seattle, WA; and WhyLabs Inc., Seattle, WA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and AIIA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On January 5, 2022, AIIA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13759).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-10216 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P