alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

29645 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 93 

Friday, May 13, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of May 12, 2022 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Securing the Information and Communications Technology and 

Services Supply Chain 

On May 15, 2019, by Executive Order 13873, the President declared a 

national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States constituted by the unrestricted acquisition and use of certain information and communications technology and services transactions. 

The unrestricted acquisition or use in the United States of information 

and communications technology or services designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the 

jurisdiction or direction of foreign adversaries augments the ability of these 

foreign adversaries to create and exploit vulnerabilities in information and 

communications technology or services, with potentially catastrophic effects. 

This threat continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the 

national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For 

this reason, the national emergency declared on May 15, 2019, must continue 

in effect beyond May 15, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13873 with 

respect to securing the information and communications technology and 

services supply chain. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

May 12, 2022. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10561 

Filed 5–12–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with FR_PREZDOC1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
```

```

----

Updated November 16, 2012
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTitan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis R. Bucalo, M.D.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9th day of August, 2006. 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Farrell, J.D., Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified. 

Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9th day of August, 2006.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HERBERT BROOKS, DOC #S40771, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3289 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 20, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2022-0053]


Notice To Establish the Advisory Committee on Transportation 
Equity

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation 
(DOT).

ACTION: Notice of the establishment of the Advisory Committee on 
Transportation Equity.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) announces 
the establishment of the Advisory Committee on Transportation Equity. 
The Secretary has determined that establishing the Advisory Committee 
on Transportation Equity is necessary and in the public interest.

DATES: The Advisory Committee on Transportation Equity will operate for 
two years after the filing date of its charter that will meet the 15-
days requirements of the Federal Register Notice, unless otherwise 
renewed in accordance with FACA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Advisory Committee on Transportation 
Equity Designated Federal Officer, Portia Allen-Kyle, Senior Advisor, 
Departmental Office of Civil Rights, Office of the Secretary, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0c0dfc2c4d9d19ed1dcdcd5dedbc9dcd5f0d4dfc49ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa8a95888e939bd49b96969f949183969fba9e958ed49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  This notice announces the establishment of 
the Advisory Committee on Transportation Equity as a Federal Advisory 
Committee in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. app. 2) to provide information, advice, and 
recommendations to the Secretary on comprehensive, interdisciplinary 
issues related to civil rights and transportation equity in the 
planning, design, research, policy, and advocacy contexts. The 
Committee is tasked with providing advice and recommendations to the 
Secretary about approaches to achieving the Department's equity goals. 
The Committee will only undertake tasks assigned to it by the 
Secretary. The Federal Register Notice will be published 15 days prior 
to filing the charter with Congress.
    This notice is provided in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. Please see the Advisory Committee on Transportation 
Equity website at https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights/acte.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 11, 2022.
Irene B. Marion,
Director, Departmental Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of 
Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2022-10489 Filed 5-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. TRACEY DEVON PETERSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00116-JBF-8)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracey Devon Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Ne wport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tracey Devon Peterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peterson , No. 2:99-cr-00116-JBF-8 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2008). We deny Peterson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 14, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0120. TEVIN YOUNG v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

09CR136
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            8905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   119127
<ALLOWANCES>                                       813
<INVENTORY>                                      94263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                228857
<PP&E>                                          297920
<DEPRECIATION>                                  140207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  457629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            81730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           261
<OTHER-SE>                                      203430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    457629
<SALES>                                         368571
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                368571
<CGS>                                           273676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   273676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 44753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  46626
<INCOME-TAX>                                     18301
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              28325
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     28325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/27/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      141,900
COMMITMENTS
  38,826   20,294   26,398   58,293   71,092  123,518  117,784   18,382   24,117

CHANGES FROM 12/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -386)
  -1,279   -3,146      705     -395    2,506     -969       64      583     -451

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.4     14.3     18.6     41.1     50.1     87.0     83.0     13.0     17.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      162)
      52       21       38       60       58      128      110
```

----

Updated December 30, 2011
Gary Dewayne OATMAN, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5206.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99.1

                      Report of Independent Accountants on
                          Financial Statement Schedule

To the Board of Directors
of HealthGate Data Corp.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements of HealthGate Data Corp.
referred to in our report dated March 21, 2002 (which report and consolidated
financial statements are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K) also
include an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 14 (a)(2) of
this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth herein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2002


<PAGE>

                              HealthGate Data Corp
                 Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Balance at   Charges to                  Balance at
                                   Beginning of  Costs and    Write-offs/      End of
                                       Year       Expenses     reversals        Year
                                  -------------  ----------  ------------    ----------
<S>                               <C>            <C>         <C>             <C>
2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts   $ 190,625.00    $      -   $(169,885.00)   $20,740.00

2000
Allowance for doubtful accounts        50,000      165,122        (24,497)      190,625

1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts        20,000       30,000              -        50,000

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual report of Airtrax, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William F.
Hungerville, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Airtrax, Inc. and will be
retained by Airtrax, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April
      15, 2008
            By:/s/ WILLIAM F.
      HUNGERVILLEWilliam
      F. HungervilleChief
      Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10333 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MATTHEW WAYNE AUSTIN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:18

- CR

- 73

- 1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Matthew Wayne
Austin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Austin has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allo w us to make a fair evaluation of Austin ’s claim of
ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 23, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10333 Document: 00515171213 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2019No. 19

- 10333

2 without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Austin ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assess ment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 19-10333 Document: 00515171213 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2019
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--AI Infrastructure Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 21, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), AI Infrastructure Alliance, Inc. 
(``AIIA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Superb AI, Inc., San Mateo, CA; YData Labs Inc., Seattle, 
WA; InfuseAI Inc., Taipei City, TAIWAN; Seldon Technologies Limited, 
London, UNITED KINGDOM; Comet ML, Inc., New York, NY; Aporia, Tel Aviv, 
ISRAEL; Modzy, Inc., Vienna, VA; TheSequence, Coral Gables, FL; 
Iguazio, Hertzelia, ISRAEL; Valohai, Turku, FINLAND; Nvidia, Inc., 
Santa Clara, CA; Data-Centric AI Community, Seattle, WA; and WhyLabs 
Inc., Seattle, WA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AIIA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On January 5, 2022, AIIA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13759).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10216 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Iris McCLAIN, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.

No. 18-8257.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Charmaine CLEMENT, petitioner, v. Thomas DURBIN, et al.

No. 18-1310.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Transitional Report of Studio II Productions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the transitional period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Cheung Ming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 14, 2008 /s/ Cheung Ming Chief Financial Officer
ALPENGLOW BOTANICALS, LLC, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1122.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
---

Exhibit 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Jurisdiction of OrganizationSubsidiariesCabowise International Ltd.
    BVIOriental Intra-Asia Entertainment (China) Limited
    Hong
      KongIntra-Asia Entertainment (Asia-Pacific) Limited
    SamoaOriental Intra-Asia Entertainment (China) Limited
    PRCVariable Interest EntitiesChina TransInfo Technology Group Co., Ltd.
    PRCBeijing PKU Chinafront High Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCBeijing Zhangcheng Culture and Media Co, Ltd.
    PRCBeijing Zhangcheng Science & Technology Co, Ltd.
    PRCBeijing UNISITS Technology Co. Ltd.
    PRCShanghai Yootu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCBeijing Tian Hao Ding Xin Science and Technology Co, Ltd.
    PRCChina TranWiseway Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCBeijing PKU Chinafront High Technology Co., Ltd., Shanxi
      Branch
    PRCBeijing PKU Chinafront High Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu
      Branch
    PRCShanghai PKU Chinafront High Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCChongqing JiaoKai Information Technology Co., Ltd
    PRCChongqing Qianfang Industrial Co., Ltd
    PRCErdos Qianfang Hongxin Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCXinjiang Zhangcheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCDalian Dajian Zhitong Information Service Co., Ltd.
    PRCZhangcheng Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Neimeng Branch
    PRCHangzhou Ziguang Jietong Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCHenan Ziguang Jietong Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCBeijing Ziguang Jinzhidun Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCHebei TranWiseway Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCHunan TranWiseway Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRCGuizhou TranWiseway Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    PRC


---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Medifast, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. McDevitt, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





By:
              /s/ Michael S. McDevittMichael
      S. McDevittChief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial OfficerMay
      8, 2009
Bobby Allen RALEIGH, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.