alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 168 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 168

 To revise the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

   Mr. Lantos (for himself, Ms. Pelosi, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Campbell, Mr. 
George Miller of California, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Stark, Mrs. Tauscher, and 
   Ms. Lee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Golden Gate National Recreation Area 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 1999.''

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.

    Section 2(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish the Golden 
Gate National Recreation Area in the State of California, and for other 
purposes'' (16 U.S.C. 460bb-1(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``The recreation area shall also include the lands generally 
depicted on the map entitled `Pacifica additions to Golden Gate 
National Recreation Area', numbered NPS-80,070 and dated June 1998.''
                                 <all>
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 May 10, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-10501

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00064-CR-T-26-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

THOMAS WILLIAM SCHWARTZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(May 10, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

J. Stanford Lifsey, counsel for Thomas William Schwartz, has filed a motion
2

to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Schwartz’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29386-29387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Mobile Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 19, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Mobile Alliance (``OMA'') 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Swift Navigation 
Inc., San Francisco, CA; Comtech Telecommunications Corp., Melville, 
NY; Tartabit, LLC, Boca Raton, FL, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, Advantech B&B Smartworx, Oranmore, IRELAND; Carota 
Corporation, Xuhui District, Shanghai, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; 
Cisco Systems, San Jose, CA; EDF R&D, Palaiseau, FRANCE; ETRI 
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Yuseong-Gu, 
Daejeon,

[[Page 29387]]

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Hansung University, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 
KOREA; Mavenir Systems, Inc., Ra'anana, ISRAEL; NextNav LLC., 
Sunnyvale, CA; NTT DOCOMO, Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; RobotnMore Co., Ltd., 
Incheon, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Sierra Wireless, Richmond, British 
Columbia, CANADA; Telecommunications Technology Association, Seongnam-
si, Gyeonggi-do, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Thales Group, Amsterdam, 
NETHERLANDS; Traxens, Marseille, FRANCE; u-blox AG, Thalwil, 
SWITZERLAND, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OMA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 18, 1998, OMA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 
31, 1998 (63 FR 72333).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 12, 
2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 27, 2020 (85 FR 31808).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10249 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Derrick ALLEN, petitioner, v. ENVIROGREEN LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONALS, INCORPORATED.

No. 18-8288.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jesus GOMEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7318.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF KPMG LLP




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





The Board of Directors
Synergy Technologies Corporation


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-84318) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-89366) on Form S-8,
the registration statement (No. 333-100508) on Form S-8 each of Synergy
Technologies Corporation of our report dated March 28, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Synergy Technologies Corporation (and
subsidiaries) (a development stage enterprise) as of December 31, 2001 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in
stockholders' equity for the year ended December 31, 2001 and for the period
from February 10, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 2001 which report is included
in the Company's December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-KSB. The
consolidated cumulative statements of operations, cash flows and changes in
stockholders' equity for the period from February 10, 1997 (inception) to
December 31, 2001 include amounts for the period from February 10, 1997
(inception) to December 31, 1999 which were audited by other auditors whose
report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the
amounts included for the period February 10, 1997 (inception) to December 31,
1999 is based solely on the report of other auditors.

Our report dated March 28, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered negative cash flows from operations and requires
additional financing that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


(Signed) KPMG LLP

Calgary, Canada
May 16, 2003
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined *

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

September 20, 2007

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

ADRIAN PLASCENCIA-GOMEZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-3343

(D.C. No. 06-CR-10095-WEB)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

*

Before HARTZ, Circuit Judge, BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge and

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Due to a clerical error, this matter was originally terminated in an order,

rather than an order and judgment. We vacate the order entered on September 20,

2007. In its place we are issuing this order and judgment nunc pro tunc to

September 20, 2007. 
-2-

Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Remand is GRANTED. We

decline to consider the issue addressed in the parties’ appellate briefing, which

was raised for the first time on appeal. See Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120

(1976); Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust, 994 F.2d 716, 720-21 (10th Cir. 1993). 

Appellee’s Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is DENIED. This case is

REVERSED and REMANDED to the district court for re-sentencing.

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court

Timothy M. Tymkovich

Circuit Judge
Michael DeVaughn JOHNSON, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-8199.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-344, OMB Control No. 3235-0391]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form T-6

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form T-6 (17 CFR 269.9) is an application for eligibility and 
qualification for a foreign person or corporation under the Trust 
Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa et seq.). Form T-6 provides the 
basis for determining whether a foreign person or corporation is 
eligible to serve as a trustee for qualified indenture. Form T-6 is 
filed on occasion. The information collected must be filed with the 
Commission and is publicly available. Form T-6 takes approximately 17 
burden hours per response and is filed by approximately one respondent 
annually. We estimate that 25% of the 17 hours (4.25 hours) is prepared 
by the filer for an annual reporting burden of 4 hours (4.25 hours per 
response x 1 response).
    An agency may conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
by June 13, 2022 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) 
David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, or by sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#257577647a68444c49474a5d655640460b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="633331223c2e020a0f010c1b231006004d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 9, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10297 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      14,103,540
<SECURITIES>                                   500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,713,075
<PP&E>                                         540,524
<DEPRECIATION>                               (242,677)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,026,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,186,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                    52,294,220
<OTHER-SE>                                (43,454,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,026,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,098,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,378,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,378,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1469

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reestablish the marketing

aspects of farmers’ cooperatives in relation to adding value to a farmer’s

product by feeding it to animals and selling the animals and to grant

a declaratory judgment remedy relating to the status and classification

of farmers’ cooperatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reestablish

the marketing aspects of farmers’ cooperatives in relation

to adding value to a farmer’s product by feeding it

to animals and selling the animals and to grant a declaratory judgment remedy relating to the status and classification of farmers’ cooperatives.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COOPERATIVE MARKETING INCLUDES VALUE4 ADDED PROCESSING THROUGH ANIMALS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1388 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions and special
2

•HR 1469 IH

1 rules) is amended by adding at the end the following new

2 subsection:

3 ‘‘(k) COOPERATIVE MARKETING INCLUDES VALUE4 ADDED PROCESSING THROUGH ANIMALS.—For purposes

5 of section 521 and this subchapter, the term ‘marketing

6 the products of members and other producers’ includes

7 feeding the products of members and other producers to

8 cattle, hogs, fish, chickens, or other animals and selling

9 the animals (or animal products) which were fed such feed

10 products.’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

13 the date of the enactment of this Act.

14 SEC. 2. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT REMEDY RELATING TO

15 STATUS AND CLASSIFICATION OF FARMERS’

16 COOPERATIVES.

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 7428(a)

18 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to creation

19 of remedy) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub20 paragraph (B), and by inserting after subparagraph (C)

21 the following new subparagraph:

22 ‘‘(D) with respect to the initial qualifica23 tion or continuing qualification of an organiza24 tion as a cooperative described in section
3

•HR 1469 IH

1 521(b) which is exempt from tax under section

2 521(a), or’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall apply with respect to pleadings filed with

5 the United States Tax Court, the district court of the

6 United States for the District of Columbia, or the United

7 States Court of Federal Claims after the date of enact8 ment of this Act but only with respect to determinations

9 (or requests for determinations) made after January 1,

10 1998.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 31, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (“CableLabs”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Specifically, VMED O2 UK Limited, London, UNITED KINGDOM; Telenet Holding Group N.V./S.A., Brussels, BELGIUM; UPC Holding B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS; UPC Slovakia Group Holding B.V., Bratislava, SLOVAKIA, and Liberty Global, Inc., London, UNITED KINGDOM have been added as a party to this venture. Also, General Communications, Inc. has changed its name to GCI Liberty, Inc., Englewood, CO, and Ziggo B.V. has changed its name to VodafoneZiggo Group Holding B.V., Utrecht, NETHERLANDS.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CableLabs intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 8, 1988, CableLabs filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 7, 2022. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13755).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-10264 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#



EXHIBIT 99.6



November 13, 2002

|Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re:

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter B. Bedford, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Peter B. Bedford  Peter B. Bedford
  Chairman and 
  Chief Executive Officer

11/12/02 9:39 AM
Duane Allen SHORT, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-8057.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                      |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer