alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1804

AN ACT

To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to

establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its

environs to soldiers who have lost their lives during

peacekeeping operations, humanitarian efforts, training,

terrorist attacks, or covert operations.
2

•HR 1804 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Pyramid of Remembrance

5 Foundation is authorized to establish a memorial on Fed6 eral land in the District of Columbia or its environs to

7 honor members of the Armed Forces of the United States

8 who have lost their lives during peacekeeping operations,

9 humanitarian efforts, training, terrorist attacks, or covert

10 operations.

11 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMO12 RATIVE WORKS.—The Pyramid of Remembrance Founda13 tion shall establish the memorial authorized by this Act

14 in accordance with the Commemorative Works Act (40

15 U.S.C. 1001, et seq.), except that section 3(c) of that Act

16 shall not apply.

17 SEC. 2. FUNDS FOR MEMORIAL.

18 (a) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Except

19 as provided by the Commemorative Works Act, no Federal

20 funds may be used to pay any expense of the establish21 ment of the memorial.

22 (b) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—If—

23 (1) upon payment of all expenses of the estab24 lishment of the memorial, including payment to the

25 Treasury of the maintenance and preservation
3

•HR 1804 EH

1 amount required by section 8(b) of the Commemora2 tive Works Act; or

3 (2) upon expiration of the authority for the me4 morial under section 10(b) of the Commemorative

5 Works Act,

6 there remains a balance of funds received for the establish7 ment of the memorial, the Pyramid of Remembrance

8 Foundation shall transmit that balance to the Secretary

9 of the Treasury for deposit in the account provided for

10 in section 8(b)(1) of the Commemorative Works Act.

11 SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

12 For the purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘the District

13 of Columbia and its environs’’ has the meaning given that

14 term in section 2 of the Commemorative Works Act.

Passed the House of Representatives October 24,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1804

AN ACT

To authorize the Pyramid of Remembrance Foundation to establish a memorial in the District of

Columbia or its environs to soldiers who have losttheir lives during peacekeeping operations, humanitarian efforts, training, terrorist attacks, orcovert operations.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/10/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      519,212
COMMITMENTS
  55,182   23,562  109,275  322,548  358,788  487,005  491,625   32,207   27,587

CHANGES FROM 05/03/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,676)
  -2,072    7,410   -2,394   -8,059  -20,821  -12,525  -15,805    7,849   11,129

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.6      4.5     21.0     62.1     69.1     93.8     94.7      6.2      5.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      38       22       53       64       63      130      117
```

----

Updated May 13, 2010
Francis O. ROSSY, petitioner, v. Sgt. LUPKIN, et al.

No. 18-8588.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,226,734
<SECURITIES>                                77,638,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,127,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            85,325,234
<PP&E>                                         716,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                 256,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,801,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,199,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   145,361,421
<OTHER-SE>                                (63,000,734)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,801,092
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               335,371
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,045,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,648,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,648,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,648,520)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00237-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-001942-1

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

CHARLES LITTIG AND TERESA LITTIG, Appellants

V.

HERMAN LEE LITTIG JR., Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellants’ request for dismissal of the appeal. We grant 

the request and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 29, 2022
Marcus Lionel SCOTT, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-9293.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Donald David DILLBECK, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9375.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/24/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       57,754
COMMITMENTS
  21,572      949    3,562   19,428   39,303   44,562   43,814   13,192   13,940

CHANGES FROM 05/17/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,664)
     985      -48      543      254    1,024    1,782    1,519     -118      145

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    37.4      1.6      6.2     33.6     68.1     77.2     75.9     22.8     24.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      35        5       15       27       26       66       43
```

----

Updated May 27, 2011
Blueprint





  Exhibit
4.2









 


March
14, 2019


 


Re:
Extension of expiration date for Class N Warrants and Class O
Warrants


 


SANUWAVE
Health, Inc. Warrantholder:


 


Pursuant
to Section 5(l) of the Class N Warrant and Section 5(l) of the
Class O Warrant, the Company has determined to amend each such
warrant to extend the Termination Date of each of the Class N
Warrants and Class O Warrants has been extended from March 17, 2019
to June 28, 2019. This extension is effective as of March 1, 2019,
the date the extension was approved by the board of directors of
SANUWAVE Health, Inc. All other terms and conditions of the Class N
Warrants and Class O Warrants will continue in full force and
effect.


 


If
there are any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me
at (678) 578-0117, or by email at lisa.sundstrom@sanuwave.com.
Thank you.


 


 


 


Best
regards,


 


/s/
Lisa Sundstrom


 


 


 


Lisa
Sundstrom, Controller and Chief Financial Officer


 


SANUWAVE Health,
Inc.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/18/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       67,480
COMMITMENTS
  21,588    3,031    6,970   22,740   42,646   51,298   52,647   16,182   14,833

CHANGES FROM 01/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        473)
     105     -206     -101      -86     -136      -82     -443      555      916

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.0      4.5     10.3     33.7     63.2     76.0     78.0     24.0     22.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       90)
      35        9       20       29       26       73       51
```

----

Updated January 21, 2011
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, et al., petitioners, v. Angel MENDEZ, et al.

No. 18-746.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: ELKE MAGDALENA LESSO, Debtor, FUCHS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant,
v. ELKE MAGDALENA LESSO, Appellee. No. 13-60077 BAP No. 12-1515
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Montali, Markell and Taylor , Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 4, 2015 Pasadena, California Before: FISHER, BYBEE and BEA, Circuit Judges. Fuchs & Associates (Fuchs) appeal s the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (BAP) decision affirming the bankruptcy c ourt’s order approving the sale of two properties owned by Elke Le sso and her former husband, Piotr Andrzejewski, free 

# FILED
JUN 25 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.and clear of all liens, claims and intere st. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We “independently review[] the bankruptcy court’s rulings on appeal from the BAP,” and we affirm. In re Mantle , 153 F.3d 1082, 1084 (9th Cir. 1998). 1. The bankruptcy court properly concluded Fuchs’ claims against the properties were subject to bona fide disputes. See 11 U.S.C. § 363(f)(4). Fuchs’ $625,000 charging lien against Lesso for a lleged unpaid attorney’s fees was invalidated by the arbitration award, wh ich has been confirmed by the California Court of Appeal. Fuchs’ $375,000 judgment lien against Andrzejewski was invalidated by the California Superior C ourt, which concluded Fuchs was “not a bona fide judgment creditor and . . . not entitled to a Writ of Execution for $375,000 against . . . Andrzejewski.” The $375,000 judgment Fuchs seeks to enforce against Andrzejewski was awarded to Lesso under California Family Code §§ 2030 & 2032 to ensure she had access to legal representation to maintain or defend the dissolution proceeding. Because Lesso does not owe Fuchs any money, Fuchs has no claim to her judgment against Andrzejewski. See Marquette v. State Bar of Cal. , 44 Cal. 3d 253, 265 (1988). 2. We reject Fuchs’ argument that the bankruptcy court improperly invalidated the $375,000 judgment contrary to principles of res judicata , collateral
2estoppel and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The bankruptcy court did not determine the validity of the $375,000 judgment. It simply applied the superior court’s order, which invalidated Fuchs’ judgment lien. We also reject Fuchs’ argument that Lesso is judicially estopped from disputing the judgment lien because she previously acknowledged in the superior court that it was valid. The evidence shows only that Lesso consented to Fuchs’ attempts, while representing her, to obtain the $375,000 from Andrzejewski on her behalf. AFFIRMED.

3
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.23



Amendment # 1 to
UPLAND SOFTWARE, INC.


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Amendment #1 to the Executive Employment Agreement by and between Upland Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Michael D. Hill (“Executive”) dated March 28, 2017 (“Original Agreement”), is entered into as of March 13, 2019.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend Paragraph 3(b) of the Original Agreement as of the Effective Date.
AMENDMENT


Paragraph 3(b) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


“3(b) Target Bonus. During the Employment Term, Executive will be eligible to receive an annual bonus of up to 125% of Executive’s Base Salary, less applicable withholdings, upon achievement of performance objectives to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, 50% of which shall be based upon achievement of EBITDA targets and 50% of which shall be based upon the achievement of acquisition targets (the “Target Bonus”).  Any Bonus will be earned only if the Company achieves the annual performance objectives during the designated time period and Executive is continuously employed by the Company on the dated that such performance objectives are achieved.  The Company shall pay such Bonus at the same time as bonuses are normally paid to senior management, unless the Board approves an exception for payment of a particular bonus on a case by case basis, but in any event, any earned Bonus shall be paid no later than two months and 15 days after the end of the Company’s taxable year in which such Bonus was earned.”


Except as specified in this Amendment #1, all terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and otherwise remain unchanged.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment # 1 to the Agreement, in the case of the Company by their duly authorized officers, as of the day and year first above written.


“COMPANY”
Upland Software, Inc.




By:  /s/ Kin Gill            
Name: Kin Gill
Title:  SVP, General Counsel and Secretary
Address:    401 Congress Ave., Ste. 1850
Austin, TX 78701


“EXECUTIVE”


/s/ Michael D. Hill        
Michael D. Hill
Address:    401 Congress Ave., Ste. 1850
Austin, TX 78701
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         124,190
<SECURITIES>                                   103,785
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,461
<PP&E>                                          45,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   331,118
<SALES>                                         56,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,896
<CGS>                                           35,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,432)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Shannon International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Blair Coady, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






October 20, 2005                 /s/  Blair Coady
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Blair Coady
                                 Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
Scott B. MISERENDINO, Sr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8935.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CEO Certification

I, Sheridan Westgarde, certify that: The undersigned certifies that:

         1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aquatic
Cellulose International corporation (the "Company");

         2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Annual report; and

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report.

         4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

         5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 26, 2004

/S/ SHERIDAN WESTGARDE
-----------------------
Sheridan Westgarde,
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter B. Bedford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 7, 2004

/s/ Peter B. Bedford

Peter B. Bedford

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.