alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,099,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,154,978
<PP&E>                                       7,388,256
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,429,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,753,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,475,071
<BONDS>                                      1,335,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,799,219
<PREFERRED>                                      2,752
<COMMON>                                        70,872
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,069,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,753,128
<SALES>                                          7,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,932,551)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (73,389)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,796,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,796,492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Rosenberg, Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2003


/s/ David Rosenberg
-------------------
David Rosenberg, Director, President, and Chief
   Executive Officer
Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc.
Jerome HENDERSON, petitioner, v. Terry COLLINS, Warden.

No. 18-8194.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection
with this amended annual report of Cannapharmarx Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 22, 2020 (the “Report”), we,
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated:  June 22, 2020 | s/ Dominic
        Colvin
        Dominic Colvin, Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                          
|Dated:  June 22, 2020 | s/ John Cassels                                                          
|                      | John Cassels, Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

PROPEL CHARTER SCHOOLS,

Petitioner

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH 

(STATE CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL 

BOARD),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 50 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Michigan Supreme 

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2015

Order 

June 23, 2015

150846(154)

DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY, a/k/a DETROIT

EDISON COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

JOSEPH CONSTANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 150846

COA: 317976

Oakland CC: 2013-132055-CH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the third motion of defendant-appellant to extend the 

time for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on June 12, 2015, is

accepted for filing.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2907

___________

In re: Burma Jean Martin, *

*

Debtor, *

*

--------------------- *

*

John Paul Martin; Hazel Victoria *

Martin, *

* Appeal from the United States

Appellants, * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

v. *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Burma Jean Martin, *

*

Appellee, *

*

--------------------- *

*

Richard L. Cox, *

*

Trustee-Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 22, 1998

 Filed: February 20, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

The Honorable Mary D. Scott, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern 2

District of Arkansas.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

John Paul Martin and Hazel Victoria Martin, husband and wife, appeal from the

District Court order affirming the Bankruptcy Court order denying their motion for

1 2

abandonment of two parcels of property from their daughter&s bankruptcy estate. After

carefully reviewing the record and the parties& briefs, we conclude the Bankruptcy

Court&s decision was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Seungjin KIM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION.

No. 18-5423.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Adam Darrick TOGHILL, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 18-5146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Shomari Salim DALEY, petitioner, v. MARYLAND, et al.

No. 18-6878.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Lindsey Brooke LOWE, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 18-7134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 07/19/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      166,152
COMMITMENTS
  51,032   13,311   26,050   70,069  101,412  147,151  140,773   19,001   25,379

CHANGES FROM 07/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,136)
   4,097   -2,305    1,038   -4,553    2,331      582    1,064   -1,718   -2,200

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.7      8.0     15.7     42.2     61.0     88.6     84.7     11.4     15.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      178)
      54       27       51       54       70      127      136
```

----

Updated July 22, 2011
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 5, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20427

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NHAN KIEM (TONY) TRAN, also known as Tony Tran,

also known as Larry Tran,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-89-CR-135-2

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nhan Kiem Tran (“Tran”), federal prisoner # 48684-079,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582

motion to reduce his sentence based on amendment 640 to the

sentencing guidelines.

Amendment 640 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(a)(3) is not listed in

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c). Therefore, this amendment may not be

applied retroactively to reduce Tran’s sentence. See United
No. 03-20427

-2-

States v. Drath, 89 F.3d 216, 217-18 (5th Cir. 1996). Tran has

not shown that the court abused its discretion in denying his

motion for a modification of sentence. The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
Robert TRINGHAM, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9208.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1   GLOBALWISE INVESTMENTS, INC.   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Globalwise Investments, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  March 16, 2011/s/ Donald R. Mayer
Donald R. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Alexandro GERANDINO-ARACENA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9218.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
J^t* H??EAL..HO. 02-15-00 W-CA. ZN THE 

### d10 CoudT ofWW AT AUSTIN, TBkfs

7
v. 

### THE MTt Of TExA$ ^RECEIVED\ OCT 1 0 2016

,THIRDCOURTOFAPPEALS, 

### h??m of ctmMM .c/?-tr-o603 f[kOf\ TUB WW 

### MXCm pjjffllcrCOURT OF ffWCOuHFf

.TO) M01JM FPU EXTFJMUl OFTflf. TO fTlf, 

### 0EUM'fMoj£ mm oiiFufmE to mm MZEF TO THE HOMMLF- WLC£* OF w com Of fiftBMS: f Comes now ZoutfS Anfam IUmDJ'. Afpellm pro Je. a 

### \jr\<T{;or rtjooriel L SimMys. In. ivjoof^. hpywM If^

0^ WCfJd /W ml ~Tbl\o\y\l\% 

## On Qddkc24 ^15 it jawfml fyfdw.iJk.. cr AmmA^ njsojJr wm /Jemy k/#mn. TieJury /meuoJ /*nWM/n *f 15 yturs iMjtriSotohiMT mw te*u Pe{ of CfiM\mS$\mct, _.. ..;_. ptrTWT ir 

### Or\, OMtr24 loft /k/t//y toml AppeJLl fully <£ ^Mrui^d faswf w\lf\ju Wy W&Mm> The Jury oj^sm fifteen)' &.1?ye*rt inprteonmcnT iVi.w Tcku vepMVnefli ur/AiiViJi. l/vjspce, if

nr. 

## Qi\. Z&lyJyjxdA ,v^cKoiff. r#/W /U^ /yw( rto-Z-ree -fid ^flfetaM' Aid * rMfo tile projc brief or

retiforvSe h we AmcS J>ciQJ. 

## ®*AuQcstfZ%20l6 j Jiie AppelUe recori woj -firJr Khoie MtilMi io App^wr* %e deall\me -h>rfi/fnf nfpdlmw

Qhtf.--.9r reJfonse /J\ OcfoUr ?4) 2°l£-r ~Z



### i#rf*-7 V*-""^ty **U*u />/^
XT 

## Orresponse in 6uffoA /tyeX*& t/f*l, ' 

# f «V* ^ ^ JF/>eLpJ/r/Je Utr ram Reg/eofoU* cfi^ed Aepewr. pro JeT Yereby Cerh'fy +W- OY) Octohec_J_ J^r)l6/ cl \we. OiYli Correct copy of Afpellfi>>^K<> motion for eytan$/'<?r? \o file Wl Irtet or fc^ponSe Uat? ymleJ. +° the aHornty for fk? 5-fet+e by tt$. F/6+ Ck#? yneul dMr^<6eA 

### +o Jeffrey D> kyle &+ ?& M &W7j fabnJeWb Appellant, ?Co Sa ij Loo\^ RtLrto5y Tb£Sitr30'&l60, beinfl pce6&nt\y \MorleratU 'in 7^e Byrd Un!-t of the lefa6 Depart/nwt &-f_Crfmmal Jt^hu: Tr)$ii±vhonaI Dillon in Udfer County, A3&S,

l/en'fy <XnA Active under penalty of perjur) iM~ the. 

### foregoing 6htements cure true. mA Correct. ^XeoAed. 0/? ty\& the—Z—daJ of October,2014.
Loufy ft, fyimo5•si Q) •si
I h) in •si £s



### 3*15$?^

= \J\ c U r- s ~ • <Q> tf- Tf ^
c: ^ 0^ 5?T >o ~rc \ -C 3 3 sj n/ 0 vN N/ -*• VA/ r3 VZ-7

<J 1

•A 0 3
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/18/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      508,131
COMMITMENTS
  37,078   10,777  128,000  315,044  350,802  480,122  489,579   28,009   18,552

CHANGES FROM 10/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -9,097)
  -2,751      197   -4,919   -3,806   -2,961  -11,476   -7,682    2,379   -1,414

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.3      2.1     25.2     62.0     69.0     94.5     96.3      5.5      3.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      133)
      36       16       48       64       69      120      119
```

----

Updated October 21, 2011
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio , Texas September 21, 2022 N o s . 04 - 22 - 00513 - CR , 04 - 22 - 00514 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00515 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00516 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00517 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00518 - CR, and 04 - 22 - 00519 - C R The STATE of Texas, Appellant v. Jaime F rancisco FLORES , Gr acie Yvette Lopez, Cristal Ann Ramirez, Martin Eli Perez,

Rodney Anthony Ortiz, and Enrique Cibrian ,

Appellee s From the 229th Judicial District Court , Duval County, Texas Trial Court N o s . 19 - CRD - 43 , 21 - CRD - 07 , 21 - CRD - 12 , 21 - CRD - 93 , 2 2 - CRD - 15 , 22 - CRD - 16 , and 22 - C RD - 07 Honorable Baldemar Garza , Judge Presiding



### ORDER On September 9, 2022, appellant filed an unopposed motion to consolidate appeal numbers 04 - 22 - 00513 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00514 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00515 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00516 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00517 - CR, 04 - 22 - 00518 - CR, and 04 - 22 - 00519 - CR. Due to the similarities between the cases, this court has determined that the seven cases should be consolidated for briefing and argument. It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to consolidate is GRANTED. The parties s hall file all motions, briefs, and other documents as if the seven appeals were one case, but shall include all appeal numbers with the style of the case. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.3(a). The records for the seven appeals shall remain separated. If the cour t hears oral argument in these appeal numbers, all of the cases shall be argued together, as a single appeal, and the total time limit for each side at o ral argument shall equal the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the en t ire case with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. It is so ORDERED September 21 , 2022. PER CURIAM ATTESTED TO:

__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ , CLERK OF COURT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JAMES DAVID THORNBRUGH, Defendant - Appellant. No. 18-5082 (D.C. Nos. 4:17-CV-0 0462-CVE-FHM & 4:89-CR-00067-CVE-1) (N.D. Okla.)

________________ _________________ ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 

________________ _________________ Before LUCERO , KELLY , and MORITZ , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ James David Thornbrugh, a federa l prisoner appearing pro se, ha s filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his “Motion t o Vacate, Set Aside or
Correct a Sentence Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Second-In -Time by a Person in Federal Custody and/or Federal Civil Rule 60(b) (5) & (6),” as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 petition and di smissing it for lack of jurisd iction. We dismiss the appeal. Thornbrugh filed a timely notice of appeal from the above-menti oned district court order, which is Appeal No. 18-50 82. At the same time, Thornbru gh filed a notice of

 This order is not binding prec edent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral esto ppel. It may be cited, howeve r, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P . 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### November 13, 2018
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 appeal from the district court order that authorized the govern ment to withdraw payments from his prison trust account, whi ch is Appeal No. 18-5083. Th is order concerns only Appeal No. 18-5082. On October 9, 2018, Thornbrugh f iled a combined opening brief i n both appeals. The brief, however, never mentions the district court’s order t hat denied his motion as second or successive; instead, the brief is confined exclusively to the court’s order regarding the withdrawal of payments from his prison trust acco unt. “Although we liberally construe pro se filings, we do not assume the role of advocate.” Yang v. Archuleta , 525 F.3d 92 5, 927 n.1 (10th Cir. 20 08) (internal quotation marks omitted). Indeed, a pro s e litigant must “comply with th e fundamental requirements of the Federal R ules of . . . Appellate Procedure. ” Id . (internal quotation marks omitted). One of those fund amental requirements is that a party actually make an argument in his opening brief. See, e.g. , Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A). Therefore, where a party fails to make “any argument on the merits of the claims i nvolved, we deem them waived under the general rule t hat even issues designated for r eview are lost if they are not actually argued in the party’s brief.” Phillips v. Calhoun , 956 F.2d 949, 954 (10th Cir. 1992). Thornbrugh’s brief mak es no contentions regarding the district court’s jurisdictional dismissal of his unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. The appeal is dismissed.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Bruce R. Wright, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                         the QuarterlyReport of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October2, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

•                         the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Bruce R. Wright*    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Bruce Wright            |
|   |   |                    |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Ultratech, Inc. and will beretained by Ultratech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

----
Luis Alberto ARMENDARIZ-CHAVEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8795.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129953 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ANTHONY E. LAMAR, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129953 

 COA: 262800 

Ingham CC: 04-000787-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
CLARA HEARD, ET AL.

,

Appellant,

v.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4745

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Thomas R. Ellinor , Judge

.

Clara Heard, pro se , Appellant.

Nancy M. Wallace and Thomas A. Range of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, and

William P. Hell er of Akerman LLP, Fort Lau derdale , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, ROWE

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Joe RIBAKOFF, petitioner, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 18-1235.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.