alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer





I, Larry
Wei Fan, Principal Financial Officer, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China World Trade
Corporation.





2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)* for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
*;





c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information (all of which do not apply); and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





*  Indicates
material omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986.








Date:  March
      31, 2008
              
              
              /s/
      Larry Wei Fan
              Larry
      Wei Fan
              Principal
      Financial Officer
Louis Alfred PICCONE, petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-8745.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.2b

Site Sublease, dated as of May 8, 2001, between Dynegy Danskammer, L.L.C. and
Danskammer OL LLC.
Ellord WELLS, petitioner, v. Mary POTTER, Warden.

No. 18-5162.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES,
Petitioner

v.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

______________________

2020

- 1974

______________________

Petition for review pursuant to 38 U.S.C. Section 502.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J AMES D ANIEL R IDGWAY

, Bergmann & Moore, LLC, Bethesda, MD, argued for petitioner. Also represented by
G LENN R. B ERGMANN ; T HOMAS P OLSEN O

.

M EEN G EU O H

, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by B RIAN M.
B OYNTON

, C LAUDIA B URKE

, M ARTIN F. H OCKEY

, J R

., N ATHANAEL Y ALE ; B RIAN D. G RIFFIN

, A NDREW J.
S TEINBERG , Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veteran s Affairs , Washington, DC

. Case: 20-1974 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 01/04/2022______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, P ROST

, and C UNNINGHAM

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 4, 2022
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 20-1974 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 01/04/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,134
<SECURITIES>                                    79,092
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,042
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,547
<PP&E>                                          10,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           697
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,566
<SALES>                                         35,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,707
<CGS>                                            1,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        73
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
Kelvin Wayne HEATH, petitioner, v. Melinda K. BRAMAN, Warden.

No. 18-8564.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Floyd Daniel SMITH, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-7094.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1809 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1809

   To prohibit the importation of dangerous firearms that have been 
      modified to avoid the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1999

Mr. Nadler (for himself, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Rush, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Ms. 
   DeGette, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
 Wexler, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. George Miller of California, Ms. Schakowsky, 
Mr. Tierney, Ms. Kilpatrick, and Mr. Davis of Illinois) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the importation of dangerous firearms that have been 
      modified to avoid the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assault Weapon Ban Enhancement Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. BAN ON IMPORTATION OF DANGEROUS FIREARMS THAT HAVE BEEN 
              MODIFIED TO AVOID THE BAN ON SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT 
              WEAPONS.

    Section 925 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) The Secretary shall prohibit the importation or bringing into 
the United States of any semiautomatic assault weapon (including the 
frame or receiver of any such weapon) that is of a type which, as of 
May 1, 1998, was determined under subsection (d)(3) to be not generally 
recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to 
sporting purposes, or that includes any of the following 
characteristics:
            ``(1) The weapon has a thumb hole stock that functions as a 
        pistol grip.
            ``(2) The weapon can accept a detachable large capacity 
        ammunition magazine.
            ``(3) The weapon has a fixed magazine which can be readily 
        modified to accept a large capacity ammunition magazine.
            ``(4) The weapon uses .22 caliber ammunition.''.
                                 <all>
```
Rolander BROWN, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 18-9037.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
Clayton Prince TANKSLEY, petitioner, v. Lee DANIELS, et al.

No. 18-701.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
# C_2015371EN.01000602.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2015 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — J.B.G.T. Miljoen (C-10/14), X (C-14/14), Société Générale SA (C-17/14) v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Joined Cases C-10/14, C-14/14 and C-17/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Direct taxation - Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Taxation of dividends from portfolios of shares - Withholding tax - Restriction - Final tax burden - Factors for comparing the tax burdens of resident and non-resident taxpayers - Comparability - Taking into account income tax or corporation tax - Conventions for the avoidance of double taxation - Neutralisation of the restriction by means of a convention))

(2015/C 371/08)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: J.B.G.T. Miljoen (C-10/14), X (C-14/14), Société Générale SA (C-17/14)

Applicants:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which imposes a withholding tax on dividends distributed by a resident company both to resident taxpayers and non-resident taxpayers and provides a mechanism for deducting or reimbursing the tax withheld only for resident taxpayers, while for non-resident taxpayers, both natural persons and companies, the tax withheld is a final tax, in so far as the final tax burden relating to those dividends, borne in that Member State by non-resident taxpayers, is greater than that borne by resident taxpayers, which it is for the referring court to determine in the main proceedings. For the purposes of determining those tax burdens, the referring court must take account, in Cases C-10/14 and C-14/14, of the taxation of residents in relation to all shares held in Netherlands companies in the calendar year, of capital which is exempt from tax under national legislation, and in Case C-17/14, of expenses which are directly linked to the actual payment of the dividends.

If the existence of a restriction on the movement of capital is established, it may be justified by the effects of a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation concluded by the Member State of residence and the Member State in which the dividends are paid, provided that the difference in treatment, relating to the taxation of dividends, between taxpayers residing in the latter Member State and those residing in other Member States ceases to exist. In circumstances such as those at issue in Cases C-14/14 and C-17/14, and without prejudice to the determinations to be made by the referring court, the restriction on the free movement of capital, if established, cannot be regarded as justified.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 28.4.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10429]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting is open to the public. Out of an abundance of 
caution related to current and potential coronavirus developments, the 
public's means to observe this Board meeting will be via a Webcast live 
on the internet and subsequently made available on-demand approximately 
one week after the event. Visit https://youtu.be/qsDyG2_IdDU to view 
the meeting. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our 
Video Help page at: https://www.fdic.gov/video.html.
    Observers requiring auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language 
interpretation) for this meeting should call 703-562-2404 (Voice) or 
703-649-4354 (Video Phone) to make necessary arrangements.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to the provisions of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby 
given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of 
Directors will meet in open session to consider the following matters:

Summary Agenda

    No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. 
These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of 
the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion 
agenda.
    Disposition of Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously 
Distributed.
    Memorandum and resolution re: Amendments to the Guidelines for 
Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule on False Advertising, 
Misrepresentation of Insured Status, and Misuse of the FDIC's Name or 
Logo.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on May 10, 2022.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10429 Filed 5-11-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit 10.02 - Schedule of Indemnification Agreements



		

			Exhibit 10.02

		




		
			Schedule of Indemnification Agreements 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Mike Brooks 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Jason S. Brooks 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Glenn E. Corlett 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Michael L. Finn
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			G. Courtney Haning 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			William L. Jordan
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Curtis A. Loveland
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Robert B. Moore, Jr. 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			James L. Stewart
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Thomas D. Robertson 
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Richards Simms
		

		
			

		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1689 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1689

To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor 
 vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a 
            place in another State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1999

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit States from imposing restrictions on the operation of motor 
 vehicles providing limousine service between a place in a State and a 
            place in another State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATION OF INTERSTATE LIMOUSINE SERVICE.

    No State or political subdivision of the State and no interstate 
agency or other political agency of 2 or more States may enact or 
enforce any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having 
the force and effect of law that restricts the operation of a motor 
vehicle providing limousine service between a place in a State and a 
place in another State.

SEC. 2. LICENSING OF PERSONS PROVIDING INTERMUNICIPAL LIMOUSINE SERVICE 
              WITHIN A STATE.

    No State or political subdivision of the State may enact or enforce 
any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the 
force and effect of law that would require a person engaged in 
intermunicipal limousine service within the State to obtain a license, 
permit, or other form of permission from more than 1 State agency or 
agency of a political subdivision of the State in order to engage in 
such intermunicipal limousine service. Nothing in this section shall 
prohibit any local authority from regulating limousine service if 
during the course of the service the same passenger is picked up within 
the local authority's jurisdictional area and the last stop of the 
passenger's service is also within the local authority's jurisdictional 
area.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Limousine service.--The term ``limousine service'' 
        means prearranged, passenger transportation in a motor vehicle 
        (other than a taxicab) with a seating capacity of not to exceed 
        14 passengers in addition to the driver that is provided at a 
        premium fare on a non-scheduled, charter basis and is not on a 
        regular route.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' means the 50 States and the 
        District of Columbia.
                                 <all>
```
Wylmina HETTINGA, petitioner, v. Timothy P. LOUMENA.

No. 18-8270.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Brian E. FROSH, Attorney General of Maryland, et al., petitioners, v. ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES.

No. 18-546.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

*1169Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         662,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,368,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                   204,196
<INVENTORY>                                 12,465,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,693,359
<PP&E>                                       7,994,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,011,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,554,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,493,920
<BONDS>                                      6,367,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,461
<COMMON>                                         1,112
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,835,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,554,305
<SALES>                                     23,059,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,059,559
<CGS>                                       11,273,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,839,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             482,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                463,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            463,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (26,183)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   359,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of API Nanotronics Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Claudio Mannarino, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    CLAUDIO
MANNARINOClaudio MannarinoChief Financial Officer and Vice PresidentAugust 22, 2007