Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2022 / Notices 28841 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2 87 FR 16453 and 87 FR 16458 (March 23, 2022). 

collection: The estimated total annual 

cost burden associated with this 

collection of information is $0. Costs for 

this collection of information are 

included in those reported for USCIS 

Form I–485 (OMB Control Number 

1615–0023) and USCIS Form I–140 

(OMB Control Number 1615–0015). 

Dated: May 2, 2022. 

Samantha L. Deshommes, 

Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, 

Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship 

and Immigration Services, Department of 

Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10062 Filed 5–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–97–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[223.LLAK941200.L1440000.ET0000; A– 

023002] 

Public Land Order No. 7907; Extension 

of Public Land Order No. 6244, as 

Extended by Public Land Order No. 

7514; Davis Range Tract M, Alaska 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Public Land Order. 

SUMMARY: This Public Land Order (PLO) 

extends the withdrawal created by PLO 

No. 6244, as extended by PLO No. 7514, 

which would otherwise expire on May 

12, 2022, for an additional 20-year term. 

PLO No. 6244 withdrew approximately 

3,264.32 acres of public land, known as 

the Davis Range Tract M, from operation 

of surface land and mining laws, but not 

mineral leasing, and reserved for use by 

the Department of the Air Force for cold 

weather survival and infantry tactical 

training purposes in Fort Richardson, 

Alaska. PLO No. 7514 extended PLO 

No. 6244 for an additional 20-year term. 

This PLO also corrects the acreage in 

PLO 6244 and gives effect to the 2005 

Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 

recommendation and subsequent 

creation of Joint Base ElmendorfRichardson in 2010, with the 

Department of the Air Force as the 

supporting agency. 

DATES: This PLO takes effect on May 13, 

2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chelsea Kreiner, Bureau of Land 

Management Alaska State Office, 222 

West Seventh Avenue, Mailstop 13, 

Anchorage, AK 99513–7504, 907–271– 

4205, or ckreiner@blm.gov. Individuals 

in the United States who are deaf, 

deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a 

speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, 

TDD, or TeleBraille) to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

Individuals outside the United States 

should use the relay services offered 

within their country to make 

international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

purpose for which the withdrawal was 

first made requires this extension to 

continue the military training use of 

Davis Range Tract M. 

Order 

By virtue of the authority vested in 

the Secretary of the Interior by Section 

204 of the Federal Land Policy and 

Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 

1714, it is ordered as follows: 

Public Land Order No. 6244, (47 FR 

20590 (1982)), as extended by Public 

Land Order No. 7514 (67 FR 10433 

(2002)), which withdrew approximately 

3,264.32 acres of public land from 

settlement, sale, location, entry 

selection, or other disposal under the 

public land laws, including the Alaska 

Native Claims Settlement Act of 

December 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 688, the 

Alaska Statehood Act, 72 Stat. 339, and 

the mining laws, 30 U.S.C. Ch. 2, but 

not the mineral leasing laws, and 

reserved it for military use by the 

Department of the Air Force, subject to 

valid existing rights, is hereby extended 

for an additional 20-year period. 

The May 13, 1982, Federal Register 

publication (47 FR 20590) identified 

3,340 acres of public lands for the Davis 

Range Tract M withdrawal. 

Supplemental plats of survey 

delineating the boundaries of the lands 

withdrawn by PLO No. 6244 were 

officially filed on April 21, 2020. The 

revised legal description and acreage set 

forth herein are consistent with the 

Specifications for Descriptions of Lands 

(2017) and are used in place of the land 

description in the application and the 

original PLO issued in 1982. The Alaska 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor reviewed the 

legal description and plats within the 

withdrawal boundary against all records 

of survey, and determined the acreage to 

be 3,264.32, a difference of 75.68 acres 

from the PLO issued in 1982. For the 

purpose of this withdrawal extension, 

the withdrawal boundary remains 

unchanged, and the total acreage reflects 

the more accurate calculation of 

3,264.32 acres, which are described as: 

Seward Meridian, Alaska 

T. 12 N., R. 1 W., 

Sec. 6, lots 3 thru 7, SE1/4NW1/4, and E1/ 

2SW1/4; 

Sec. 7, lots 1 thru 4, E1/2NW1/4, and E1/ 

2SW1/4; 

Sec. 18, lots 1 and 6, NE1/4NW1/4, and 

N1/2SE1/4NW1/4. 

T. 12 N., R. 2 W., 

Secs. 1 and 2; 

Sec. 3, lots 1 and 2, and SE1/4NE1/4; 

Sec. 11, NE1/4, NE1/4NW1/4, and NE1/ 

4SE1/4; 

Sec. 12; 

Sec. 13, N1/2NE1/4, N1/2SW1/4NE1/4, 

N1/2SE1/4NE1/4, N1/2NW1/4, and N1/ 

2SE1/4NW1/4; 

tract F; 

tract G. 

The area described contains 3,264.32 acres. 

2. The withdrawal extended by this 

Order will expire on May 12, 2042, 

unless as a result of a review conducted 

prior to the expiration date, pursuant to 

Section 204(f) of the Federal Land 

Policy and Management Act of 1976, 43 

U.S.C. 1714(f), the Secretary determines 

that the withdrawal shall be further 

extended. 

Robert T. Anderson, 

Solicitor. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10128 Filed 5–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–667 and 731– 

TA–1559 (Final)] 

Organic Soybean Meal From India 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of organic soybean meal from India, 

provided for in subheadings 1208.10.00 

and 2304.00.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that have 

been found by the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’), and to be subsidized by the 

government of India.2

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective March 31, 2021 

following receipt of petitions filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by the 

Organic Soybean Processors of America, 

Washington, DC, American Natural 

Processors, LLC, Dakota Dunes, South 

Dakota, Organic Production Services, 

LLC, Weldon, North Carolina, 

Professional Proteins Ltd., Washington, 

Iowa, Sheppard Grain Enterprises, LLC, 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
28842 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2022 / Notices 

Phelps, New York, Simmons Grain Co., 

Salem, Ohio, Super Soy, LLC, Brodhead, 

Wisconsin, and Tri-State Crush, 

Syracuse, Indiana. The final phase of 

the investigations was scheduled by the 

Commission following notification of 

preliminary determinations by 

Commerce that imports of organic 

soybean meal from India were 

subsidized within the meaning of 

section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV within the 

meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of 

the final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on 

November 19, 2021 (86 FR 64956). The 

Commission conducted its hearing on 

March 16, 2022. All persons who 

requested the opportunity were 

permitted to participate. 

The Commission made these 

determinations pursuant to §§ 705(b) 

and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It 

completed and filed its determinations 

in these investigations on May 5, 2022. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5321 

(May 2022), entitled Organic Soybean 

Meal from India: Investigation Nos. 701– 

TA–667 and 731–TA–1559 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 5, 2022. 

William Bishop, 

Supervisory Hearings and Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10052 Filed 5–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Petition for Modification of Application 

of Existing Mandatory Safety 

Standards 

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice is a summary a 

petition for modification submitted to 

the Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA) by the party 

listed below. 

DATES: All comments on the petitions 

must be received by MSHA’s Office of 

Standards, Regulations, and Variances 

on or before June 10, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Docket No. MSHA–2022– 

0026 by any of the following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments 

for MSHA–2022–0026. 

2. Fax: 202–693–9441. 

3. Email: petitioncomments@dol.gov. 

4. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: 

MSHA, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th 

Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington, 

Virginia 22202–5452. 

Attention: S. Aromie Noe, Director, 

Office of Standards, Regulations, and 

Variances. Persons delivering 

documents are required to check in at 

the receptionist’s desk in Suite 4E401. 

Individuals may inspect copies of the 

petition and comments during normal 

business hours at the address listed 

above. Before visiting MSHA in person, 

call 202–693–9455 to make an 

appointment, in keeping with the 

Department of Labor’s COVID–19 

policy. Special health precautions may 

be required. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S. 

Aromie Noe, Office of Standards, 

Regulations, and Variances at 202–693– 

9440 (voice), Petitionsformodification@

dol.gov (email), or 202–693–9441 (fax). 

[These are not toll-free numbers.] 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and 

Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

44 govern the application, processing, 

and disposition of petitions for 

modification. 

I. Background 

Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine 

Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine 

Act) allows the mine operator or 

representative of miners to file a 

petition to modify the application of any 

mandatory safety standard to a coal or 

other mine if the Secretary of Labor 

determines that: 

1. An alternative method of achieving 

the result of such standard exists which 

will at all times guarantee no less than 

the same measure of protection afforded 

the miners of such mine by such 

standard; or 

2. The application of such standard to 

such mine will result in a diminution of 

safety to the miners in such mine. 

In addition, sections 44.10 and 44.11 

of 30 CFR establish the requirements for 

filing petitions for modification. 

II. Petition for Modification 

Docket Number: M–2022–011–M. 

Petitioner: Nevada Gold Mines, LLC, 

1655 Mountain City Highway, Elko, 

Nevada, 89801. 

Mine: Goldrush Mine, MSHA ID No. 

26–02822, located in Eureka County, 

Nevada. 

Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 

57.11052(d), Refuge areas. 

Modification Request: The petitioner 

requests a modification of 30 CFR 

57.11052(d) to permit the use of sealed 

purified drinking water in lieu of 

providing potable water through 

waterlines in the existing refuge 

chambers and future refuge chambers 

and locations. 

The petitioner states that: 

(a) The mine is an underground portal 

gold mine with three refuge chambers 

located throughout the underground 

portion of the mine. In the refuge areas, 

drinkable water is supplied via 

commercially purchased water in sealed 

pouches. 

(b) The refuge chambers are MineARC 

refuge chambers and are made out of 

steel. 

(c) The refuge chambers are equipped 

for a maximum capacity of 16 miners 

each. The capacity of the three 

underground refuge chambers exceeds 

the normal work crew of approximately 

40 miners underground on any shift. 

(d) Each refuge chamber is provided 

with a waterline. The water flowing 

through these lines is not potable due to 

the configuration of the waterlines and 

the water source. Installing waterlines to 

provide potable drinking water to each 

refuge chamber is not feasible due to the 

lack of essential infrastructure. 

(e) The waterlines are susceptible to 

damage during an emergency and under 

normal working conditions. The water 

supply could be cut off completely. 

(f) In an emergency, there can be no 

guarantee of potable drinking water via 

the waterline for miners using the refuge 

area. Application of the standard could 

adversely impact the safety of the 

affected miners if they were to rely on 

waterlines running from the portal to 

the refuge chambers, as these lines are 

subject to interruption and are 

inherently less safe than sanitary sealed 

water pouches located inside the refuge 

chambers. Sealed water stored inside 

each refuge chamber ensures that 

affected miners will have sanitary 

drinking water available to them in an 

emergency. 

(g) The refuge chambers at the mine 

are portable. Allowing the use of refuge 

chambers which do not have to be 

connected to waterlines provides greater 

flexibility in the location of the refuge 

chambers. Refuge chambers can be 

located in direct relation to where 

miners are working and relocated 

quickly to working areas as needed for 

the protection of miners. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1