FORM 10-KSB  X   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES    EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.  OR  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For the transition period from  ____________________    to   _____________________  Commission File Number 000-30156  INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)  333-52040 (Commission File Number)  98-0195748 (I.R.S Employer Identification No.)  1628 West 1st Avenue, Suite 216, Vancouver, British Columbia,  V6J 1G1 (Address of principal executive offices)  (604) 659-5005 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)  Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:  Title of Each Class Common Stock, $.001 par value per share  Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered OTC Bulletin Board  Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None   Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]  Check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]      Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes [   ] No [X]  Revenues for its most current fiscal year:  None  Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of June 20, 2006: $4,678,100.  Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of June 20, 2006: 36,932,500.  Documents incorporated by reference:None.  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:  Yes [   ] No [X]      TABLE OF CONTENTS  INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2006    PART I PAGE  Item 1.   Description of Business 4  Item 2.   Description of Property 15  Item 3.   Legal Proceedings 15  Item 4.   Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 15  PART II  Item 5.    Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 16  Item 6.    Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations 16  Item 7.    Financial Statements 20  Item 8.    Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 36  Item 8a. Controls and Procedures 36  Item 8b. Other information 36  PART III  Item 9.    Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act 36  Item 10. Executive Compensation 38  Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 40 and Related Stockholder Matters  Item 12.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 40  Item 13.  Exhibits 41  Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services 41  Signatures 42


PART I   ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS  Cautionary Statement Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:  Except for the historical information presented in this document, the matters discussed in this Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2006, and specifically in the items entitled "Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation", or otherwise incorporated by reference into this document, contain "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements are identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes", "plans", "intend", "scheduled", "potential", "continue", "estimates", "hopes", "goal", "objective", expects", "may", "will", "should" or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties.  The safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, apply to forward-looking statements made by the Company. The reader is cautioned that no statements contained in this Form 10-KSB should be construed as a guarantee or assurance of future performance or results. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those identified within this Form 10-KSB. The actual results that the Company achieves may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, and the Company assumes no obligation to update this information. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company in this Form 10-KSB and in the Company's other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect the Company's business.  The Company  International Energy, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 6, 1998, under the name e.Deal.net, Inc., with an authorized capital of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, and 1,000,000 preferred stock, par value of $0.01.  On June 20, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to effect a change of name to International Energy, Inc.  Through International Energy Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., we plan to be involved in the exploration for petroleum and natural gas in various parts of the United States and Canada. We are also involved in the business of providing online automotive information through a second wholly owned subsidiary, e.Deal Enterprises Corp.  Employees  At March 31, 2006, the Company employed 2 part-time persons. To the best of the Companys knowledge, none of the Companys officers or directors is bound by restrictive covenants from prior employers. None of the Companys employees are represented by labor unions or other collective bargaining groups. We consider relations with our employees to be good. We plan to retain and utilize the services of outside consultants as the need arises.  Risk Factors of the Business  We have sought to identify what we believe to be the most significant risks to our business.  However, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized nor can we guarantee that we have identified all possible risks that might arise. Investors should carefully consider all of such risk factors before making an investment decision with respect to our Common Stock. We provide the following cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business. These are factors that we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. Other factors besides those listed here could adversely affect us.   4   Our early stage of development makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects.  Our business is subject to the risks inherent in the establishment of a new business. Specifically, in formulating our business plan, we have relied on the judgment of our officers, directors and consultants but have not conducted any formal independent market studies concerning the demand for our services. Further, due to our limited operating history, we have difficulty accurately forecasting our revenue, and we have limited historical financial data upon which to base operating expense budgets. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the heightened risks and unexpected expenses and problems we may face as a company in an early stage of development in new and rapidly-evolving industries.  We have a general history of losses and cannot assure you that we will become profitable in the future.  We were formed in 1998, and to date, we have not generated any operating revenues. We have experienced operating losses in each quarterly and annual period since inception. From inception through March 31, 2006, we have accumulated losses of $1,461,703.  Even if we become profitable in the future, we cannot accurately predict the level of, or our ability to sustain profitability. Because we have not yet been profitable and cannot predict any level of future profitability, you bear the risk of a complete loss of your investment in the event our business plan is unsuccessful.  The manner in which we intend to conduct our business from our automotive subsidiary and charge for our services is new and unproven. Due to the cost and delay inherent in obtaining a market or feasibility study we have not commissioned any such study with regard to our proposed business model. Our business model depends upon our ability to generate revenue streams from multiple sources through our web site, including: subscription and advertising fees from consumers; revenue from facilitating automotive e-commerce transactions (such as financing, insurance, warranties and aftermarket products); fees from the online used vehicle sales services; fees from national advertising programs, promotions and services; and fees for enhanced private seller listings.  In order for us to be successful, large numbers of consumers must visit our web site on a regular basis to attract consumers, vendors and advertisers to list vehicles and to advertise and offer products and services through our web site. Therefore, we must not only develop services that directly generate revenue, but also provide information that attracts consumers to our web site frequently. We will need to develop new offerings in each of these areas as consumer preferences change and new competitors emerge. We cannot assure you that we will be able to provide consumers with an acceptable blend of services and information. We provide information to consumers without charge, and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to pay for these services. Accordingly, at this time we cannot be sure that our business model will be successful or that we can generate any operating revenue or become profitable.  With our oil and gas subsidiary, we do not expect positive cash flow from operations in the near term. There is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. In particular, additional capital may be required in the event that:  - the costs to acquire additional leases are more than we currently anticipate; - drilling and completion  costs for additional wells increase beyond our expectations; or - we encounter greater costs associated with general and administrative expenses or offering costs.  The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events could adversely affect our ability to meet our business plans.  Our development of and participation in an increasingly larger number of oil and gas prospects have required and will continue to require substantial capital expenditures.  The uncertainty and factors described throughout this section may impede our ability to economically find, develop, exploit, and acquire natural gas and oil reserves.  As a result, we may not be able to achieve or sustain profitability or positive cash flows from operating activities in the future.  If we do not retain our key management personnel and attract and retain other highly skilled employees, our business will suffer.  Our future success depends on the skills, experience and performance of our senior management team, other key personnel and advisors, and their ability to operate effectively, both individually and as a group. If any of our existing senior management or other key personnel were to leave the company, it would be difficult to replace  5   them, and our business would be materially harmed. There are no employment agreements with any employee, nor do we maintain any key person life insurance policies for any of our key employees.  Our success will also depend on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate additional highly skilled sales, marketing and engineering personnel. We believe we will face significant competition for individuals with the skills required to develop, market and support our products and services.  We may be unable to raise additional capital in the future.  We may not be able to obtain additional funding when needed, which could limit future expansion and marketing opportunities and result in lower than anticipated revenues. We may require additional financing to further develop our business and to pursue other business opportunities.  If the market price of the common stock declines, some potential financiers may either refuse to offer us any financing or will offer financing at unacceptable rates or unfavorable terms.  To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, the terms of such debt could impose additional restrictions on our operations. If we are unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, this unavailability could prevent us from expanding our business, which could materially impact our future potential revenues and our business.  Significant unanticipated fluctuations in our actual or anticipated quarterly revenues and operating results may cause us not to meet investors' expectations and may result in a decline in our stock price.  Our quarterly operating results may vary significantly in the future. Moreover, as a result of our limited operating history it is difficult to accurately forecast our revenue in any given period. Accordingly, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our historical results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of sustainable trends or other future performance. If our revenues, operating results or earnings are below the levels expected by investors, our stock price is likely to decline.  The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and may be negatively affected by factors beyond our ability to control or predict.  The price of our common stock may be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our or our competitors' operating performances. Our stock price and the stock prices of many other companies in the technology and emerging growth sectors have historically experienced wide fluctuations, including rapid rises and declines in stock prices that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. Volatile trends and fluctuations are typically the result of the combination of general economic, political and market conditions.  These factors are beyond our ability to control or predict.  Our principal shareholders, executive officers and directors have significant voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our shareholders.  Our principal shareholders, executive officers, directors and their affiliates, in the aggregate, own more than 69% of our outstanding common stock. These shareholders, if they act together, will be able to control our management and affairs and all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This influence over our affairs might be adverse to the interest of our other shareholders. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control and might have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.  Liquidity of Shares in Market Place  As of June 20, 2006, one of our directors beneficially owns approximately 69% of the Companys outstanding common stock, which could affect the liquidity of the companys shares in the market.  6    Applicable SEC rules governing the trading of Penny Stocks" limits the trading and liquidity of our common stock, which may affect the trading price of our common stock.  Our common stock currently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board.  Since our common  stock  continues  to trade  below $5.00 per share,  our common  stock is considered  a "penny  stock" and is subject to SEC rules and  regulations, which impose  limitations  upon the manner in which our shares can be publicly traded.  These regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the associated risks.  Under these regulations, certain brokers who recommend such securities to persons other than established customers or certain accredited investors must make a special written suitability determination regarding such a purchaser and receive such purchaser's written agreement to a transaction prior to sale.  These regulations have the effect of limiting the trading activity of our common stock and reducing the liquidity of an investment in our common stock.  Stockholders should be aware that, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34- 29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include:  - Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;  - Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;  - "Boiler room" practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;  - Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and  - The wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.  Furthermore, the "penny stock" designation may adversely affect the development of any public market for the Company's shares of common stock or, if such a market develops, its continuation.  Broker-dealers are required to personally determine whether an investment in "penny stock" is suitable for customers.  Penny stocks are securities (i) with a price of less than five dollars per share; (ii) that are not traded on a "recognized" national exchange; (iii) whose prices are not quoted on the NASDAQ automated quotation system  (NASDAQ-listed stocks must still meet  requirement  (i)  above);  or (iv) of an issuer with net tangible  assets  less than  $2,000,000  (if the issuer  has been in  continuous operation  for at least three years) or $5,000,000  (if in continuous  operation for less  than  three  years),  or with  average  annual  revenues  of less than $6,000,000 for the last three years.   Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 15g-2 of the Commission require broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor's account.  Potential investors in the Company's common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any shares that are deemed to be "penny stock."  Rule 15g-9 of the  Commission  requires  broker-dealers  in penny stocks to approve the  account of any  investor  for  transactions  in such stocks  before selling any  penny  stock  to  that investor.   This  procedure  requires  the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial  situation,  investment  experience  and investment  objectives;  (ii) reasonably  determine,  based on that  information,  that  transactions in penny stocks are  suitable for the  investor  and that the  investor  has  sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably  capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock  transactions;  (iii) provide the investor with a written  statement setting forth the basis on which the  broker-dealer  made the determination  in (ii) above;  and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor,  confirming  that it  accurately  reflects  the  investor's  financial situation,  investment experience and investment  objectives.  Compliance with these  7   requirements may make it more difficult for the Company's stockholders to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them.  Future sales of large amounts of common stock could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital.  Future sales of our common stock by existing stockholders pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, or following the exercise of outstanding warrants and future option grants, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.  Our directors and executive officers and their family members are not under lockup letters or other forms of restriction on the sale of their common stock. The issuance of any or all of these additional shares upon exercise of warrants will dilute the voting power of our current stockholders on corporate matters and, as a result, may cause the market price of our common stock to decrease. Further, sales of a large number of shares of common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could materially impair our future ability to generate funds through sales of common stock or other equity securities.  We must adhere to environmental regulations.  The Company believes it conducts its business in compliance with all environmental laws presently applicable to its facilities.  To date, there have been no expenses incurred by the Company related to environmental issues.  We may not have a majority of independent directors.  We cannot guarantee our Board of Directors will have a majority of independent directors in the future. In the absence of a majority of independent directors, our executive officers, who are also principal stockholders and directors, could establish policies and enter into transactions without independent review and approval thereof. This could present the potential for a conflict of interest between the Company and its stockholders generally and the controlling officers, stockholders or directors.  We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.  We have never declared nor paid a dividend on our common stock.  We intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business  and,  therefore,  do  not  anticipate  paying  any  dividends  in  the foreseeable future.  Risk Factors in the Automotive Industry  We currently have no sales and marketing force to generate revenue.  As we remain in the development stage, we have not yet generated any revenues, nor do we have any customers.  Our business will depend heavily on the recognition and value of the e.Deal.net brand. The principal target for our online automotive services are consumers, dealers, vendors and advertisers that are wanting a high-quality experience buying or selling vehicles, automotive products and services, and relevant and useful automotive-related information.  We have not yet adopted any specific sales and marketing plans, nor do we expect in the short-term, the need to hire sales and marketing personnel.  We operate in a market that is intensely and increasingly competitive.  The market for providers of used vehicle information and automotive products and services, including classified advertising, is constantly evolving and intensely competitive, and we expect competition to increase significantly due to a number of factors, including low barriers to entry and the relative ease of establishing web sites. There are a number of web sites that offer vehicle listings, including vehicle manufacturers' own web sites and web sites containing electronic classified advertisements, and automotive products and services. In addition, there are numerous web sites that offer vehicle information and other content, as well as community offerings, directly to the vehicle-purchasing consumer or to targeted audiences such as vintage car enthusiasts. We also face competition from traditional media companies such as newspapers, niche classified publishers and television and  8   radio companies, many of which currently operate web sites. In addition to direct competitors, we also compete indirectly with vehicle brokerage firms, discount warehouse clubs, automobile clubs and vehicle auctioneers. Due to low barrier to entry, we expect additional competitors to enter our market in the future. The automotive e-commerce market is rapidly evolving, and we expect competition among e-commerce companies to increase significantly. We cannot assure you that web sites maintained by our existing and potential competitors will not be perceived by consumers, dealers, other potential automotive vendors or advertisers as being superior to ours. We also cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase the levels of visitors logging onto our web site and the number of leads these visitors generate for sellers of used vehicles and automotive products and services or that competitors will not experience greater growth in these areas than we do.  The existence of these competitors, many of which are larger and better financed, may make it impossible for us to establish ourselves as a viable business in the first place; and, even if we do establish ourselves, our ultimate market share may be less than is needed for us to attain profitability. This is turn may have a significant adverse impact on the value of our shares.  Some of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger installed customer bases, greater name recognition and longer relationships with clients and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and public relations resources than our business. Our competitors may also be better positioned to address technological and market developments or may react more favorably to technological changes. Competitors may develop or offer strategic services that provide significant technological, creative, performance, price or other advantages over the services offered by our business. If we fail to gain market share or lose existing market share, our financial condition, operating results and business could be adversely affected and the value of the investment in us could be reduced significantly. We may not have the financial resources, technical expertise or marketing, distribution or support capabilities to compete successfully.  Our business is dependent on the economic strength of the automotive industry.  We believe that the strength of the automotive industry significantly impacts both the revenues we may potentially derive from our business, other automotive vendors and advertisers and the consumer traffic to our web site. The sales of motor vehicles historically have been subject to cyclical variation characterized by periods of surplus supply and reduced demand. Vehicles are typically discretionary for consumers and may be particularly affected by negative trends in the general economy. The success of our operations in our industry depends to a significant extent upon a number of factors relating to discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions, consumer confidence in the economy, the prospects of war, other international conflicts or terrorist attacks, the level of manufacturer incentives, the level of personal discretionary spending, product quality, affordability and innovation, interest rates, fuel prices, credit availability, unemployment rates and the number of consumers whose vehicle leases are expiring. In addition, because the purchase of a vehicle is a significant investment and is relatively discretionary, any reduction in disposable income in general or an increase in interest rates or tightening of lending may affect us more significantly than companies in other industries.  We cannot assure that our business will not be materially adversely affected as a result of an industry or general economic downturn. If we do not time our entry into the market correctly we may not be able to implement our business due to our limited resources. Moreover, once we have entered the market, any decrease in the level of vehicle sales could have a material adverse effect on our ability to attain revenues and ultimately profitability.  We may be subject to general vehicle-related laws which may require the use of more of our capital.  There are numerous state laws regarding the sale of vehicles. In addition, government authorities may take the position that state or federal insurance licensing laws, vehicle financing laws, motor vehicle dealer laws or related consumer protection or product liability laws apply to aspects of our business. If federal or individual states' regulatory requirements change or additional requirements are imposed on us, we may be required to modify aspects of our business in those states in a manner that might undermine the attractiveness of our web site's products and services to consumers, dealers, automotive vendors or advertisers or require us to terminate operations in that state, either of which could harm our business. As we introduce new services and if we expand our operations to other countries, we could become subject to additional licensing and regulatory requirements. Substantially all states have laws that broadly define brokerage activities, and government authorities may take the position that under these laws we are acting as a broker. If this occurs, we may be required to comply with burdensome licensing requirements or terminate our operations in those states. In either case, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.   9   We must provide a high-quality user experience with a wide range of content and services in order to establish our brand.  Promotion and enhancement of the e.Deal.net brand will depend largely on our success in consistently providing a high-quality consumer experience for buyers and sellers of vehicles and automotive products and services, as well as relevant and useful information. In this regard, we will need to constantly develop and introduce new features, functions and services designed to enhance brand name recognition and loyalty.  If consumers, dealers, automotive vendors and advertisers do not perceive our service offerings to be of high quality, or if we introduce new services or enter into new business ventures that are not favorably received by such groups, the value of our brand could be impaired or diluted. Such brand impairment or dilution could decrease the attractiveness of e.Deal.net to one or more of these groups, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to attract advertising and other revenues. Diminished revenues will not only affect our profitability but the value of our shares as well.  Others could claim that we infringe on their intellectual property rights, which may result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention.  We are in a market in which a growing number of companies provide similar services. We cannot be certain that our services do not infringe on patents or other intellectual property rights of others that may relate to our services. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time in the ordinary course of our business, including claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties. Any claims against us relating to the infringement of third-party proprietary rights, even if not meritorious, could result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and management attention and in injunctions preventing us from distributing these services. A successful infringement claim against us could materially and adversely affect us in the following ways:  - we may be liable for damages and litigation costs, including attorneys' fees;  - we may be enjoined from further use of the intellectual property;  - we may have to license the intellectual property, incurring licensing fees;  - we may have to develop a non-infringing alternative, which could be costly and delay projects; and  - we may have to indemnify users of our web site with respect to losses incurred as a result of our infringement of the intellectual property.  Our strategy will require significant expenditures and our business may not generate sufficient revenues to cover these expenditures.  Our business will depend heavily on the recognition and value of the e.Deal.net brand. In particular, we believe that obtaining recognition as a marketplace destination for used vehicles is critical to attracting consumers, dealers, private sellers, commercial vendors and advertisers to our web site. In order to develop the e.Deal.net brand, we expect that operating expenses, particularly sales and marketing expenditures, will require a large portion of our resources. This high level of expenditures will have a negative impact on our results of operations. If we are unable to generate revenues as a result of these investments in our business, we may never achieve or sustain profitability and may not have the ability to or the resources to continue marketing our services.  Internet commerce has yet to attract significant regulation. Government regulations may result in increased costs that may reduce our future earnings.  There are currently very few laws or regulations that apply directly to the Internet. Since our business is entirely dependent on the Internet, the adoption of new local, state or national laws or regulations may decrease the growth of Internet usage or the acceptance of Internet commerce which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our services and increase our costs or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.   10   Tax authorities in a number of states are currently reviewing the appropriate tax treatment of companies engaged in Internet commerce. New state tax regulations may subject us to additional state sales, use and income taxes in the future.  Risk Factors in the Oil and Gas Industry  We currently have no sales and marketing force to generate revenue.  As we remain in the exploration stage, we have not yet generated any revenues, nor do we have any customers.  The principal target customers for our crude oil production are expected to be refiners, remarketers and other companies, some of which are expected to have pipeline facilities near the producing properties we acquire. In the event pipeline facilities are not conveniently available, we intend to truck or barge crude oil to storage, refining or pipeline facilities.  We intend to sell our oil and gas production under both short-term (less than one year) and long-term (one year or more) agreements at prices negotiated with third parties. Under both short-term and long-term contracts, typically either the entire contract (in the case of short-term contracts) or the price provisions of the contract (in the case of long-term contracts) are renegotiated from intervals ranging in frequency from daily to annual.  We have not yet adopted any specific sales and marketing plans, nor do we expect in the short-term, the need to hire sales and marketing personnel.  Title to Properties  We believe that the title to our leasehold properties is good and defensible in accordance with standards generally acceptable in the oil and gas industry, subject to exceptions that are not so material as to detract substantially from the use of such properties. Our leasehold properties are subject to royalty, overriding royalty and other outstanding interests customary in the industry. The properties may be subject to burdens such as liens incident to operating agreements and current taxes, development obligations under oil and gas leases and other encumbrances, easements and restrictions. We do not believe any of these burdens will materially interfere with our use of these properties.  As is customary in the oil and gas industry, only a preliminary title examination is conducted at the time properties believed to be suitable for drilling operations are acquired by the Company. We rely upon the brokers of the properties to conduct the title examination. We intend to perform necessary curative work with respect to any significant defects in title prior to proceeding with operations.  We operate in a market that is intensely and increasingly competitive.  The oil and gas business is highly competitive. We compete with private, public and state-owned companies in all facets of the oil and gas business, including suppliers of energy and fuel to industrial, commercial and individual customers. Numerous independent oil and gas companies, oil and gas syndicates and major oil and gas companies actively seek out and bid for oil and gas prospects and properties as well as for the services of third-party providers, such as drilling companies, upon which we rely. Many of these companies not only explore for, produce and market oil and natural gas, but also carry out refining operations and market the resultant products on a worldwide basis. A substantial number of our competitors have longer operating histories and substantially greater financial and personnel resources than we do.  Competitive conditions may be substantially affected by various forms of energy legislation and/or regulation considered from time to time by the government of the United States and other countries, as well as factors that we cannot control, including international political conditions, overall levels of supply and demand for oil and gas, and the markets for synthetic fuels and alternative energy sources. Intense competition occurs with respect to marketing, particularly of natural gas.  Government and Environmental Regulation in the Oil and Gas Industry  Domestic development, production and sale of oil and gas are extensively regulated at both the federal and state levels. Legislation affecting the oil and gas industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion, frequently increasing the regulatory burden. Also, numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state,  11   have issued rules and regulations binding on the oil and gas industry and its individual members, compliance with which is often difficult and costly and some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. State statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning wells. Utah and other states in which we intend to conduct operations also have statutes and regulations governing conservation matters and establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells.  Our operations are subject to extensive and developing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental, health and safety matters; petroleum; chemical products and materials; and waste management. Permits, registrations or other authorizations are required for the operation of certain of our facilities and for our oil and gas exploration and production activities. These permits, registrations or authorizations are subject to revocation, modification and renewal. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with these regulatory requirements, the provisions of required permits, registrations or other authorizations, and lease conditions, and violators are subject to civil and criminal penalties, including fines, injunctions or both. Failure to obtain or maintain a required permit may also result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties. Third parties may have the right to sue to enforce compliance.  Some risk of costs and liabilities related to environmental, health and safety matters is inherent in our operations, as it is with other companies engaged in similar businesses, and there can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred. In addition, it is possible that future developments, such as stricter requirements of environmental or health and safety laws and regulations affecting our business or more stringent interpretations of, or enforcement policies with respect to, such laws and regulations, could adversely affect us. To meet changing permitting and operational standards, we may be required, over time, to make site or operational modifications at our facilities, some of which might be significant and could involve substantial expenditures. There can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not arise from these or additional environmental matters that may be discovered or otherwise may arise from future requirements of law.  Our future performance is dependent upon our ability to identify, acquire and develop oil and gas properties.  Our future performance depends upon our ability to find, develop and acquire oil and gas reserves that are economically recoverable. Without successful exploration, exploitation or acquisition activities, we will not be able to develop reserves or generate revenues. No assurance can be given that we will be able to find and develop or acquire reserves on acceptable terms, or that commercial quantities of oil and gas deposits will be discovered sufficient to enable us to recover our exploration and development costs or sustain our business.  The successful acquisition and development of oil and gas properties requires an assessment of recoverable reserves, future oil and gas prices and operating costs, potential environmental and other liabilities and other factors. Such assessments are necessarily inexact and their accuracy inherently uncertain. In addition, no assurances can be given that our exploitation and development activities will result in the discovery of any reserves. Our operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of lack of adequate capital and other factors, such as title problems, weather, compliance with governmental regulations or price controls, mechanical difficulties, or unusual or unexpected formations, pressures and/or work interruptions. In addition, the costs of exploitation and development may materially exceed initial estimates.  We can provide no assurance that oil and gas will be discovered in commercial quantities in any of the properties we currently hold interests in or properties in which we may acquire interests in the future. Our success will depend upon our ability to acquire working and revenue interests in properties upon which gas and oil reserves are ultimately discovered in commercial quantities. We do not have an established history of locating and developing properties that have oil and gas reserves.  The successful implementation of our business plan is subject to risks inherent in the oil and gas business.  Our oil and gas operations are subject to the economic risks typically associated with exploration, development and production activities, including the necessity of significant expenditures to locate and acquire properties and to drill exploratory wells. In addition, the cost and timing of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain. In conducting exploration and development activities, the presence of unanticipated pressure or irregularities in formations, miscalculations or accidents may cause our exploration, development and production activities to be unsuccessful. This could result in a total loss of our investment in a particular property. If exploration efforts are unsuccessful in establishing proved reserves and exploration activities cease, the amounts accumulated as unproved costs will be charged against earnings as impairments.   12   We rely heavily upon reserve estimates when determining whether or not to invest in a particular oil or gas property.  The oil and gas reserve information that we use in evaluating oil and gas prospects is based on reserve estimates involving a great deal of uncertainty. Different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. Reserve estimates depend in large part upon the reliability of available geologic and engineering data which is inherently imprecise. Geologic and engineering data are used to determine the probability that a reservoir of oil and natural gas exists at a particular location, and whether oil and natural gas are recoverable from a reservoir. Recoverability is ultimately subject to the accuracy of data including, but not limited to, geological characteristics of the reservoir structure, reservoir fluid properties, the size and boundaries of the drainage area, reservoir pressure, and the anticipated rate of pressure depletion. The evaluation of these and other factors is based upon available seismic data, computer modeling, well tests and information obtained from production of oil and natural gas from adjacent or similar properties, but the probability of the existence and recoverability of reserves is less than 100% and actual recoveries of proved reserves usually differ from estimates.  Reserve estimates also require numerous assumptions relating to operating conditions and economic factors, including the price at which recovered oil and natural gas can be sold, the costs of recovery, assumptions concerning future operating costs, severance and excise taxes, development costs and workover and remedial costs, prevailing environmental conditions associated with drilling and production sites, availability of enhanced recovery techniques, ability to transport oil and natural gas to markets and governmental and other regulatory factors, such as taxes and environmental laws. A negative change in any one or more of these factors could result in quantities of oil and natural gas previously estimated as proved reserves becoming uneconomic. For example, a decline in the market price of oil or natural gas to an amount that is less than the cost of recovery of such oil and natural gas in a particular location could make production commercially impracticable. The risk that a decline in price could have that effect is magnified in the case of reserves requiring sophisticated or expensive production enhancement technology and equipment, such as some types of heavy oil. Each of these factors, by having an impact on the cost of recovery and the rate of production, will also affect the present value of future net cash flows from estimated reserves.  In addition, the 10% discount factor, which is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to be used to calculate discounted future net cash flows for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor based on interests rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with us or the oil and gas industry in general.  Our ability to produce sufficient quantities of oil and gas from out properties may be adversely affected by a number of factors outside of our control.  The business of exploring for and producing oil and gas involves a substantial risk of investment loss. Drilling oil and gas wells involves the risk that the wells may be unproductive or that, although productive, that the wells may not produce oil and/or gas in economic quantities. Other hazards, such as unusual or unexpected geological formations, pressures, fires, blowouts, loss of circulation of drilling fluids or other conditions may substantially delay or prevent completion of any well. Adverse weather conditions can also hinder drilling operations. A productive well may become uneconomic if water or other deleterious substances are encountered which impair or prevent the production of oil and/or gas from the well. In addition, production from any well may be unmarketable if it is impregnated with water or other deleterious substances.  There can be no assurance that oil and gas will be produced from the properties in which we have interests. In addition, the marketability of oil and gas which may be acquired or discovered may be influenced by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and processing equipment, market fluctuations of prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production and environmental protection. We cannot predict how these factors may affect our business.  In addition, the success of our business is dependent upon the efforts of various third parties that we do not control. We rely upon various companies to assist us in identifying desirable oil and gas prospects to acquire and to provide us with technical assistance and services. We also rely upon the services of geologists, geophysicists, chemists, engineers and other scientists to explore and analyze oil and gas prospects to determine a method in which the oil and gas prospects may be developed in a cost-effective manner. In addition, we rely upon the owners and operators of oil rigs and drilling equipment to drill and develop our prospects to production. Although we have developed relationships with a number of third-party service providers, we cannot assure that we will be  13   able to continue to rely on such persons. If any of these relationships with third-party service providers are terminated or are unavailable on commercially acceptable terms, we may not be able to execute our business plan.  Market fluctuations in the prices of oil and gas could adversely affect our business.  Prices for oil and gas tend to fluctuate significantly in response to factors beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the continued threat of war in the Middle East and actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its maintenance of production constraints, the U.S. economic environment, weather conditions, the availability of alternate fuel sources, transportation interruption, the impact of drilling levels on crude oil and natural gas supply, an the environmental and access issues that limit future drilling activities for the industry.  Changes in commodity prices may significantly affect our capital resources, liquidity and expected operating results. Price changes directly affect revenues and can indirectly impact expected production by changing the amount of funds available to reinvest in exploration and development activities. Reductions in oil and gas prices not only reduce revenues and profits, but could also reduce the quantities of reserves that are commercially recoverable. Significant declines in prices could result in non-cash charges to earnings due to impairment. We do not currently engage in any hedging program to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in oil and gas prices.  Changes in commodity prices may also significantly affect our ability to estimate the value of producing properties for acquisition and divestiture and often cause disruption in the market for oil and gas producing properties, as buyers and sellers have difficulty agreeing on the value of the properties. Price volatility also makes it difficult to budget for and project the return on acquisitions and development and exploitation of projects. We expect that commodity prices will continue to fluctuate significantly in the future.  Title deficiencies could render our leases worthless.  The existence of a material title deficiency can render a lease worthless and can result in a large expense to our business. It is our practice in acquiring oil and gas leases or undivided interests in oil and gas leases to forgo the expense of retaining lawyers to examine the title to the mineral interest to be placed under lease or already placed under lease. Instead, we rely upon the judgment of oil and gas lease brokers or landmen who perform the field work in examining records in the appropriate governmental office before attempting to place under lease a specific mineral interest. This is customary practice in the oil and gas industry. However, we do not anticipate that we, or the person or company acting as operator of the wells located on the properties that we intend to lease, will obtain counsel to examine title to the lease until the well is about to be drilled. As a result, we may be unaware of deficiencies in the marketability of the title to the leases. Such deficiencies may render the lease worthless.  If we or our operators fail to maintain adequate insurance, our business could be materially and adversely affected.  Our operations will be subject to risks inherent in the oil and gas industry, such as blowouts, cratering, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids, fires, pollution, earthquakes and other environmental risks. These risks could result in substantial losses due to injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution and other environmental damage, and suspension of operations. Any offshore operations that we engage in will be subject to a variety of operating risks peculiar to the marine environment, such as hurricanes or other adverse weather conditions, to more extensive governmental regulation, including regulations that may, in certain circumstances, impose strict liability for personal injuries, property damage, oil spills, discharge of hazardous materials, remediation and clean-up costs and other environmental damages. We could be liable for environmental damages caused by previous property owners. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  For projects in which we may act as the operator, we would maintain insurance coverage for our operations with policy limits and retention liability customary in the industry, including limited coverage for sudden environmental damages and for existing contamination. We do not believe that insurance coverage for environmental damages that occur over time or insurance coverage for the full potential liability that could be caused by sudden environmental damages is available at a reasonable cost. As a result, we may be subject to liability or may lose substantial portions of our properties in the event of certain environmental damages.   14   In the projects in which we own a non-operating interest directly or own an equity interest in a limited partnership which owns a non-operating interest, the operator will be required to maintain insurance of various types to cover our operations with policy limits and retention liability customary in the industry. We believe the coverage and types of insurance maintained by the operators of such prospects are adequate and, therefore, have not acquired our own insurance coverage for such prospects. The occurrence of a significant adverse event on such prospects that is not fully covered by insurance could result in the loss of all or part of our investment in a particular prospect which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  Complying with environmental and other government regulations could be costly and could negatively impact our production.  Our business is governed by numerous laws and regulations at various levels of government. These laws and regulations govern the operation and maintenance of our facilities, the discharge of materials into the environment and other environmental protection issues. The laws and regulations may, among other potential consequences, require that we acquire permits before commencing drilling, restrict the substances that can be released into the environment with drilling and production activities, limit or prohibit drilling activities on protected areas such as wetlands or wilderness areas, require that reclamation measures be taken to prevent pollution from former operations, require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former operations, such as plugging abandoned wells and remediating contaminated soil and groundwater, and require remedial measures to be taken with respect to property designated as a contaminated site.  Under these laws and regulations, we could be liable for personal injury, clean-up costs and other environmental and property damages, as well as administrative, civil and criminal penalties. We maintain limited insurance coverage for sudden and accidental environmental damages as well as environmental damage that occurs over time. However, we do not believe that insurance coverage for the full potential liability of environmental damages is available at a reasonable cost. Accordingly, we could be liable, or could be required to cease production on properties, if environmental damage occurs.  The costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations in the future may harm our business. Furthermore, future changes in environmental laws and regulations could occur that result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liability, and increased capital expenditures and operating costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.  ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY  The Company's corporate offices, located at Suite 216, 1628 West 1st Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V6J 1G1, are owned by a privately held corporation controlled by a Director and majority shareholder of the Company. At present, the Company pays rent of C$700.00 per month. ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  The Company is not party to any current legal proceedings.  ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS  There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders in our fiscal fourth quarter of year ended March 31, 2006. It is our intention to schedule a shareholders meeting to elect directors and transact any additional business in the third or fourth quarter of 2006.  15    PART II  ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS  Market Information  The Company's Common Stock is listed on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "IENI". The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for the periods indicated:   High Low Second Quarter 2004 $0.10 $0.06 Third Quarter 2004 $0.08 $0.07 Fourth Quarter 2004 $0.25 $0.07 First Quarter 2005 $0.25 $0.13  Second Quarter 2005 $1.05 $0.13 Third Quarter 2005 $0.90 $0.51 Fourth Quarter 2005 $0.77 $0.60 First Quarter 2006 $1.01 $0.62 April 1, 2006  June 20, 2006 $0.65 $0.41  As of June 20, 2006, there were approximately 58 stockholders of record of the Company's Common Stock.  Dividend Policy  We do not have a history of paying dividends on our Common Stock, and there can be no assurance that we will pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to use any earnings, which may be generated, to finance the growth of our businesses. Our Board of Directors has the right to authorize the issuance of preferred stock, without further shareholder approval, the holders of which may have preferences over the holders of the Common Stock as to payment of dividends.  Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans  Number of securities remaining available for Number of Securities to be Weighted-average exercise future issuance under issued upon exercise of price of outstanding equity compensation plans outstanding options, options, warrants and (excluding securities warrants and rights rights reflected in column (a)) Plan Category (a) (b) (c) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________  Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 7,950,000 $0.13 12,000,000  Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total 7,950,000 $0.13 12,000,000    ITEM 6.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS  The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 7 of this Form 10-KSB. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions as of the date of this filing. The cautionary statements made in this document should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this document. The Company's actual results could differ materially from  16   those discussed here. Factors that could cause differences include those discussed in "Risk Factors", as well as discussed elsewhere herein.  Overview  International Energy, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 6th, 1998, under the name e.Deal.net, Inc., with an authorized capital of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, and 1,000,000 preferred stock, par value of $0.01.  On June 20, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to effect a change of name to International Energy, Inc.  Through International Energy Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., we plan to be involved in the exploration for petroleum and natural gas in various parts of the United States and Canada. We are also involved in the business of providing online automotive information through a second wholly owned subsidiary, e.Deal Enterprises Corp.  International Energy Corp.  International Energy Corp., a subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., is an exploration stage oil and gas company engaged in the exploration for oil and gas in the State of Utah, as well as other parts of the US and Canada.  On June 9, 2005, International Energy Corp. entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc., pursuant to which the two companies plan on purchasing various leases, drilling and completing oil and gas wells. International Energy Corp. and Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc. currently jointly own 312.7 acres of oil, gas and mineral leases located in Sevier County, Utah.   The acreage in Sevier County was previously estimated to be 372.5 acres, however, subsequent to registering the oil, gas and mineral leases with the State of Utah, the tangible workable acreage totaled to 312.7 acres.  e.Deal Enterprises Corp  e.Deal Enterprises Corp. (www.edeal.net), a subsidiary of International Energy, Inc., provides a wide range of automotive information, including maintenance and safety tips, information on how to buy and sell pre-owned vehicles, notice of safety and recalls by email alerts, information on parts and service, quotes on insurance, financing sources, automotive dealers, email alerts for service reminders, new products and accessories.  Results of Operations  Revenues:  The Company generated revenues of $0 for the years ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005.  General and Administrative Expenses:  During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company incurred $836,681 in general and administrative expenses, a increase of 1,496% over year end March 31, 2005 expenses of $52,417.  The increase is primarily attributable to the options issued for services expense of $785,536.  Interest Income:  Interest income was $2,581 and $898 for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest earned in the future will be dependent on Company funding cycles and prevailing interest rates.  Provision for Income Taxes:  As of March 31, 2006, the Company's accumulated deficit was $1,461,703, and as a result, there has been no provision for income taxes to date.  Net Loss:  For the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company recorded a net loss of $842,155, an increase of 1,316%, compared to a net loss of $59,494 for the same period in 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to the options issued for services expense of $785,536.  Liquidity and Capital Resources  At March 31, 2006, the Company had a cash balance of $70,149, compared to a cash balance of $74,866 at March 31, 2005.  During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company used $55,217 of net cash from operating activities, as compared to $54,447 of net cash used in 2005.  17    Net cash used by investing activities was $112,000 for the year ended March 31, 2006 compared to $0 for the same period in 2005.  Net cash provided by financing activities was $162,500 for the year ended March 31, 2006 compared to $0 for the same period in 2005. The Company has financed its operations primarily through loans from shareholders and private placements of Common Shares.  Plan of Operation  The Companys principal source of liquidity is cash in bank, which we anticipate will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.  The Company's future funding requirements will depend on numerous factors, including: the time and investment required to source out and invest in promising technology-based ventures; potential oil and gas reserves; to recruit and train qualified management personnel; and the Company's ability to compete against other, better capitalized corporations in similar businesses.  For the next twelve months the Company and its joint venture partner, Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc. (Reserve), plan to explore and develop its leases in Sevier County, Utah, which are jointly held by the Company and Reserve. Currently, International Energy and Reserve jointly own 312.7 acres of oil, gas and mineral leases located in Sevier County, Utah. The Company may require additional funds to implement our growth strategy in our oil, gas and mineral exploration operations. The Company is also conducting an ongoing evaluation of its Internet business, an automotive portal located at www.edeal.net, to determine the economical viability of this business.  Due to the "start up" nature of the Company's businesses, the Company expects to incur losses as it expands. The Company expects to raise additional funds through private or public equity investment in order to expand the range and scope of its business operations. The Company will seek access to private or public equity but there is no assurance that such additional funds will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms, if at all. See "Risk Factors" for additional details.  Related Party Transactions  Management fees:  During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company paid $9,450 (2005: $7,800) in management fees to three directors, and $202,668 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006.  Accrued management fees: Included in accounts payable, an amount of $162,945 was accrued for management services provided by two directors in previous years. There is no management agreement in place and the Company has not converted any debt to equity.  Notes payable - related party:  The notes payable at March 31, 2006, $110,000, was made up of four separate loans bearing interest at 7.25% per annum advanced to the Company by its former President, Herdev S. Rayat on the following dates: February 13, 2001 ($40,000); April 24, 2001 ($40,000); June 8, 2001 ($20,000); and July 26, 2001 ($10,000).  The entire principal amount and accrued interest is due and payable on demand. Accrued interest on the notes amounted to $35,894 as of March 31, 2006. Interest expenses were $8,055  (2005: $7,975) for year ended March 31, 2006 and $39,624 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006.  Property: The Companys principal office is located at 1628 West 1st Avenue, Suite 216, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6J 1G1. These premises are owned by a private corporation controlled by a Director and majority shareholder. Subsequent to year end, the Company entered into a lease agreement requiring rent payments of C$700.00 per month.  Warrants:  As of March 31, 2006, 1,560,000 share purchase warrants were held by the majority stockholder of the Company. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $0.05 per share and will expire on October 17, 2007.  All related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between related parties and are in the normal course of business.   18   Going Concern  The Company has been a development stage company and has incurred net operating losses of $1,461,703 since inception (November 6, 1998). The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern, which is dependent upon the Companys ability to establish itself as a profitable business.  Due to the start-up nature of the Companys business, the Company expects to incur losses as it expands.  To date, the Companys cash flow requirements have been primarily met by debt and equity financings.  Management believes it has sufficient cash flow to meet its capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.  If the Company is unable to generate profits or unable to obtain additional funds for its working capital needs, it may have to cease operations.  Management is devoting substantially all of its present efforts in securing and establishing a new business and has not generated any revenues. To meet these objectives, the Company plans to raise additional funds through private or public equity investment in order to expand the range and scope of its business operations, but there is no assurance that such additional funds will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms, if at all.  Furthermore, there is no assurance the net proceeds from any successful financing arrangement will be sufficient to cover cash requirements during the initial stages of the Companys operations.  In view of these conditions, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt and dependent upon achieving a profitable level of operations and on the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to fund ongoing operations.  Management believes that its current and future plans enable it to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments which will be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.  19    ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS   INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 21  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 22  Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006 23  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Deficiency for the period from inception 24 (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006   Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and 26 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and 27 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 28  20    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   To The Board of Directors 
International Energy, Inc. Vancouver, British Columbia   We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of International Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries (an exploration stage company) as of March 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency, and cash flows for the year then ended and for the period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.  The financial statements for the cumulative period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors whose report dated June 23, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.  The financial statements for the period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2005, include total revenues and net loss of $0 and $619,548, respectively.  Our opinion on the statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency, and cash flows for the period November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, insofar as it relates to amounts for prior periods through March 31, 2005, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.  In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of International Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2006, and for the cumulative period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has experienced recurring losses from operations since inception and has a substantial accumulated deficit.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.   /s/ Peterson Sullivan PLLC   June 9, 2006 Seattle, Washington  21   REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   The Board of Directors and Stockholders of  INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. (formerly E.Deal.net, Inc.) (An exploration stage company)  We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of International Energy, Inc.(formerly E.Deal.net, Inc.)(an exploration stage company) (the Company) as at March 31, 2005, the related statements of stockholders deficiency, operations and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2005 and for the period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2005.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements as at March 31, 2004 and for the period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2004 and for the cumulative period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2004 were audited by other auditors whose report dated May 5, 2004 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.  The financial statements for the period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2004 include total revenues and net loss of $nil and $70,132, respectively.  Our opinion on the statements of stockholders deficiency, operations and cash flows for the period November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2005, insofar as it relates to amounts for prior periods through March 31, 2004 is based solely on the report of other auditors.  We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.  In our opinion, base on our audit and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2005, for the period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2004 and for the cumulative period from November 6, 1998 (inception) to March 31, 2005 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments are dependent upon the Companys ability to meet its future financing requirements, and the success of future operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.  Managements plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.     Vancouver, Canada Ernst & Young LLP June 23, 2005 Chartered Accountants   22    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(Formerly "e.Deal.net, Inc.")(A Development Stage Company)CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETMarch 31, 2006(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)March 31, 2006ASSETSCurrent assetsCash$70,149Prepaid expenses1,242Total current assets71,391Computer equipment, net (Note 4)934Oil, Gas and Mineral Leases, unproven (Note 5)112,000Total assets$184,325LIABILITIESCurrentAccounts payable and accrued expenses$1,103Accrued management fees - related party (Note 6)162,945Accrued interest - related party (Note 6)35,894Notes payable - related party (Note 6)110,000Total liabilities309,942STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCYStockholders' DeficiencyPreferred stock: $0.01 par value; Authorized: 1,000,000 sharesIssued and outstanding: None-Common stock: $0.001 par value; Authorized: 100,000,000 sharesIssued and outstanding: 36,932,500 shares (3/31/05: 33,762,500 shares)11,611Additional paid-in capital1,324,475Deficit accumulated during the development stage(1,461,703)Total stockholders' deficiency(125,617)Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency$184,325(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)   23    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(Formerly "e.Deal.net, Inc.")(A Development Stage Company)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCYfrom inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006Deficit accumulatedCommon StockAdditionalduring developmentTotal Stockholders'(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)SharesAmountpaid-in capitalstageequity (deficiency)Inception, November 6, 1998-$-$-$-$-Common stock issued at $0.001 per shareto a related party for management services20,000,0005,000--5,000Common stock issued for cash at $0.25 pershare fiscal year ended March 31, 19991,360,00034084,660-85,000Loss, inception (November 6, 1998)to March 31, 1999---(7,470)(7,470)Balance, March 31, 199921,360,0005,34084,660(7,470)82,530Loss, year ended March 31, 2000---(16,185)(16,185)Balance, March 31, 200021,360,0005,34084,660(23,655)66,345Loss, year ended March 31, 2001---(171,793)(171,793)Balance, March 31, 200121,360,0005,34084,660(195,448)(105,448)Common stock issued for cash at $0.10 pershare, October 17, 200110,000,0002,500247,500-250,000Loss, year ended March 31, 2002---(144,541)(144,541)Balance, March 31, 200231,360,0007,840332,160(339,989)11Common stock issued to a relatedparty for services rendered at $0.08 pershare, August 5, 20022,402,50060147,449-48,050Common stock issued to a relatedparty for services rendered at $0.08 pershare, August 5, 20021,200,00030023,700-24,000Cancellation of previously issuedcommon stock, February 4, 2003(1,200,000)(300)(23,700)-(24,000)Loss, year ended March 31, 2003---(149,933)(149,933)Balance, March 31, 200333,762,5008,441379,609(489,922)(101,872)Loss, year ended March 31, 2004---(70,132)(70,132)Balance, March 31, 200433,762,5008,441379,609(560,054)(172,004)  24    Loss, year ended March 31, 2005---(59,494)(59,494)-Balance, March 31, 200533,762,5008,441379,609(619,548)(231,498)Common stock issued upon  exercised ofwarrants, at $0.05 per share3,120,0003,120152,880-156,000Common stock issued upon  exercised ofstock option, at $0.13 per share50,000506,450-6,500Options issued for services--785,536-785,536Loss, year ended March 31, 2006---(842,155)(842,155)Balance, March 31, 200636,932,500$11,611$1,324,475$(1,461,703)$(125,617)(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)  25    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(Formerly "e.Deal.net, Inc.")(A Development Stage Company)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSfor the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005and from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006From Inception(November 6, 1998)to March 31,(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)200620052006Revenue$-$-$-ExpensesDepreciation7167164,738General and administrative40,97943,901270,384Management and consulting fees - related party (Note 6)9,4507,800202,668Rent--27,631Salaries and benefits--95,024Options issued for services (Note 8)785,536-785,536Website fees - related party--48,050836,68152,4171,434,031Operating Loss(836,681)(52,417)(1,434,031)Other income and expensesInterest income2,58189811,952Interest expense(8,055)(7,975)(39,624)(5,474)(7,077)(27,672)Net loss(842,155)(59,494)(1,461,703)Loss per share -basic and diluted$(0.02)$(0.00)Weighted average number of common sharesoutstanding- basic and diluted36,227,04833,762,500(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)  26    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(Formerly "e.Deal.net, Inc.")(A Development Stage Company)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSfor the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005and from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006From Inception(November 6, 1998)to March 31,(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)200620052006Cash flows from (used in) operating activitiesNet Loss$(842,155)$(59,494)$(1,461,703)Adjustments for items not involving cash:Depreciation7167164,738Common stock issued for services--53,050Options issued for services785,536-785,536Change in non-cash working capital items:Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses(1,242)-(1,242)Increase (decrease) in accounts payable(6,052)(3,644)1,103Increase (decrease) in accrued management fees -related party--162,945Increase in accrued interest -related party7,9807,97535,894Net cash flow used in operating activities(55,217)(54,447)(419,679)Cash flows used in investing activitiesPurchase of property and equipment--(5,672)Purchase of oil, gas and mineral leases(112,000)-(112,000)Net cash flow used in investing activities(112,000)-(117,672)Cash flows from financing activitiesProceed from issuance of common stock162,500-497,500Proceed from loan from related parties--110,000Net cash flow from financing activities162,500-607,500Increase (decrease) in cash(4,717)(54,447)70,149Cash, beginning of year74,866129,313-Cash, end of year$70,149$74,866$70,149Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Interest paid in cash$75$-$3,731(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)   27   INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC. (formerly e.Deal.net, Inc.) (A Development Stage Company)  Notes to Financial Statements Years Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (Expressed in U.S. Dollars)  1. Organization and Nature of Operations  International Energy, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on November 6, 1998, under the name e.Deal.net, Inc., with an authorized capital of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, and 1,000,000 preferred stock, par value of $0.01. On June 20, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to effect a change of name to International Energy, Inc. from e.Deal.net, Inc.  On June 9, 2005, the Company incorporated two wholly-owned subsidiaries; International Energy Corp. and e.Deal Enterprises Corp.  Both subsidiaries are incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.  Effective June 20, 2005, the Company completed a reorganization by changing its name to International Energy, Inc. and a forward split of its common stock by issuing four new shares for one old share.  International Energy Corp. is an exploration stage oil and gas company engaged in the exploration for oil and gas in the State of Utah, as well as other parts of the US and Canada.  On June 9, 2005, International Energy Corp. entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc., pursuant to which the two companies plan on purchasing various leases, drilling and completing oil and gas wells. International Energy Corp. and Reserve Oil & Gas, Inc. currently jointly own 312.7 acres of oil, gas and mineral leases located in Sevier County, Utah.  e.Deal Enterprises Corp. provides a wide range of automotive information, including maintenance and safety tips, information on how to buy and sell pre-owned vehicles, notice of safety and recalls by email alerts, information on parts and service, quotes on insurance, financing sources, automotive dealers, email alerts for service reminders, new products and accessories.  Due to the insignificant operations of e.Deal Enterprises Corp., segment disclosures under SFAS 131 have not been included.  2. Going Concern  The Company has been a development stage company and has incurred net operating losses of $1,461,703 since inception (November 6, 1998). The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern, which is dependent upon the Companys ability to establish itself as a profitable business.  Due to the start-up nature of the Companys business, the Company expects to incur losses as it expands.  To date, the Companys cash flow requirements have been primarily met by debt and equity financings.  Management believes it has sufficient cash flow to meet its capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.  If the Company is unable to generate profits or unable to obtain additional funds for its working capital needs, it may have to cease operations.  Management is devoting substantially all of its present efforts in securing and establishing a new business and has not generated any revenues. To meet these objectives, the Company plans to raise additional funds through private or public equity investment in order to expand the range and scope of its business operations, but there is no assurance that such additional funds will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms, if at all.  Furthermore, there is no assurance the net proceeds from any successful financing arrangement will be sufficient to cover cash requirements during the initial stages of the Companys operations.   28   In view of these conditions, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt and dependent upon achieving a profitable level of operations and on the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to fund ongoing operations.  Management believes that its current and future plans enable it to continue as a going concern.  These consolidated financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments which will be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore be required to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in the accompanying financial statements.  3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  (a) Development Stage Company  A business is defined as a development stage company if it is devoting substantially all of its efforts to establishing a new business and its planned principal operations either (i) have not commenced or (ii) have commenced, but have not produced any significant revenues (see Note 2).  (b) Principles of Accounting  These financial statements are stated in U.S. Dollars and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  (c) Use of Estimates  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Management makes its best estimate of the ultimate outcome for these items based on historical trends and other information available when the financial statements are prepared.  Changes in estimates are recognized in accordance with the accounting rules for the estimate, which is typically in the period when new information becomes available to management.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  (d) Related Party Transactions  A related party is generally defined as (i) any person and their immediate families that holds 10% or more of the Companys securities, (ii) the Companys management, (iii) someone that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Company, or (iv) anyone who can significantly influence the financial and operating decisions of the Company.  A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties.  (e) Fair Value of Financial Instruments  Fair value of financial instruments is made at a specific point in time, based on relevant information about financial markets and specific financial instruments. As these estimates are subjective in nature, involving uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, they cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions can significantly affect estimated fair values.  The carrying value of cash and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.  The fair value of accrued management fees, accrued interest, and notes payable have not been disclosed as this amount is not readily determinable.  The Company operates and incurs significant expenditures outside of the United States of America and is exposed to foreign currency risk due to the fluctuation between Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar.   29   (f) Cash and Cash Equivalents  The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The Company did not have any cash equivalents at March 31, 2006.  (g) Computer Equipment  Computer equipment is stated at cost, less depreciation, and is depreciated under the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the asset.  Expenditures for betterments and additions are capitalized, while replacement, maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the lives of the respective assets, are charged to expense when incurred.  (h) Income Taxes  The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.  Under SFAS No 109, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.  Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.  (i) Advertising Expenses  The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.  The Company did not incur any advertising expenses for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.  (j) Earnings (Loss) Per Share  Basic earnings or loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted earnings or loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents.  Basic earnings/loss per share is computed by dividing  net loss (numerator) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) for the period.  All earnings or loss per share amounts in the financial statements are basic earnings or loss per share, as defined by SFAS No 128, Earnings Per Share.  Diluted earnings or loss per share does not differ materially from basic earnings or loss per share for all periods presented.  Convertible securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings (loss) per share in the future, such as warrants, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because to do so would be antidilutive.  All per share and per share information are adjusted retroactively to reflect stock splits and changes in par value, when applicable.  (k) Stock-Based Compensation  Effective April 1, 2005, the Company applies the fair-valued based method of accounting prescribed by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, in accounting for all stock-based compensation arrangements under which compensation cost is determined using the fair value of stock based compensation determined as of the date of grant and is recognized over the periods in which the related services are rendered.  The application of the fair value based method does not have any cumulative effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements as there were no stock option granted before adoption of the policy.  (l) Comprehensive Income  The Company adopted SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", which establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances.  The Company is disclosing this information on its Statements of Stockholders' Deficiency.  Comprehensive income comprises equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners.  The Company has no comprehensive income as of March 31, 2006.  30   (m) Foreign Currency Transactions  The Company maintains both U.S. Dollar and Canadian Dollar bank accounts at a financial institution in Canada. Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency of the Company, which is U.S. Dollars, in the following manner:  At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense is converted into the functional currency by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations are included in the results of operations.  (n) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets  Long-lived assets of the Company are reviewed for impairment when changes circumstances require as to whether their carrying value has become impaired, pursuant to guidance established in the SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.  Management considers assets to be impaired if the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the future projected cash flows from related operations (undiscounted and without interest charges).  If impairment is deemed to exist, the asset will be written down to fair value, and a loss is recorded as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of carrying value or estimated net realizable value.  (o) Intangible Assets  The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which presumes that goodwill and certain intangible assets have indefinite useful lives. Accordingly, goodwill and certain intangibles will not be amortized but rather will be tested at least annually for impairment. SFAS No. 142 also addresses accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition.  The Company did not have any goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite or definite life since its inception.  (p) Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities  The Company adopted SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which requires companies to recognize all derivatives contracts as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and to measure them at fair value.  If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction.  For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change.  The Company has not entered into derivative contracts either to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.  The adoption of this pronouncement does not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.  (q) Oil and Gas Properties  The Company utilizes the full cost method to account for its investment in oil and gas properties. Accordingly, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including such costs as leasehold acquisition costs, capitalized interest costs relating to unproved properties, geological expenditures, tangible and intangible development costs including direct internal costs are capitalized to the full cost pool. As of March 31, 2006, the Company did not have any properties with proven reserves. When the Company obtains proven oil and gas reserves, capitalized costs, including estimated future costs to develop the reserves and estimated abandonment costs, net of salvage, will be depleted on the units-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. Investments in unproved properties and major development projects including capitalized interest, if any, are not depleted until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined. If the future exploration of unproved properties is determined uneconomical, the amount of such properties is added to the capitalized cost to be depleted. As of March 31, 2006, all of the Companys oil and gas properties were unproved  31   and were excluded from depletion. The Company believes that none of its unproved oil and gas properties were considered impaired.  The capitalized costs included in the full cost pool are subject to a ceiling test, which limits such costs to the aggregate of the estimated present value of the future net revenues from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions plus the lower of cost and estimated net realizable value of unproven properties.  Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations.  (r) New Accounting Pronouncements  The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the following pronouncements during the financial year ended March 31, 2006, none of which are expected to have a significant affect on the financial statements:  In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R addresses all forms of share-based payment (SBP) awards, including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123R will require the Company to expense SBP awards with compensation cost for SBP transactions measured at fair value. On March 29, 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 107 which expresses the views of the SEC regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the SEC's views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In April 2005, the SEC issued a release which amends the compliance dates for SFAS No. 123R. Adoption of SFAS No. 123R and SAB 107 do not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.  In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets. The Statement is an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will have no material impact on its financial statements.  In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS No. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. The adoption of this statement does not have material impact on the Company's financial statements.  In November 2005, the FASB issued FSP FAS 123(R)-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards (FSP 123R-3). FSP 123R-3 provides a simplified alternative method to calculate the beginning pool of excess tax benefits against which excess future deferred tax assets (that result when the compensation cost recognized for an award exceeds the ultimate tax deduction) could be written off under Statement 123R. The guidance in FSP 123R-3 was effective on November 10, 2005. The adoption of this statement does not have material impact on the Company's financial statements.   In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments -an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.  This Statement amends FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. This Statement resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will have no material impact on its financial statements.  32   4. Computer Equipment  Computer equipment is stated at a cost of $5,672, less accumulated depreciation of $4,738, for a net book value of $934.  Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $716 and $716 respectively, and for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006 was $4,738.  5. Oil Gas and Mineral Leases, Unproven  On June 13, 2005, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Reserve Oil and Gas, Inc. for the purpose of purchasing oil and gas leases, drilling, completing oil and gas wells and the resale of acquired leases. The Company paid cash $112,000 to purchase four leases totaling 312.7 acres in Sevier County, Utah.  6. Related Party Transactions  Management fees:  During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company paid $9,450 (2005: $7,800) in management fees to three directors, and $202,668 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006.  Accrued management fees: Included in accounts payable, an amount of $162,945 was accrued for management services provided by two directors in previous years. There is no management agreement in place and the Company has not converted any debt to equity.  Notes payable - related party:  The notes payable at March 31, 2006, $110,000, was made up of four separate loans bearing interest at 7.25% per annum advanced to the Company by its former President, Herdev S. Rayat on the following dates: February 13, 2001 ($40,000); April 24, 2001 ($40,000); June 8, 2001 ($20,000); and July 26, 2001 ($10,000).  The entire principal amount and accrued interest is due and payable on demand. Accrued interest on the notes amounted to $35,894 as of March 31, 2006. Interest expenses were $8,055  (2005: $7,975) for year ended March 31, 2006 and $39,624 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006.   Property: The Companys principal office is located at 1628 West 1st Avenue, Suite 216, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6J 1G1. These premises are owned by a private corporation controlled by a Director and majority shareholder. Subsequent to year end, the Company entered into a lease agreement requiring rent payments of C$700.00 per month.  Warrants:  As of March 31, 2006, 1,560,000 share purchase warrants were held by the majority stockholder of the Company. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $0.05 per share and will expire on October 17, 2007.  Mr. Harmel S. Rayat is also an officer, director and majority stockholder of each of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc., Entheos Technologies, Inc. and HepaLife Technologies, Inc.  All related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between related parties and are in the normal course of business.  7. Capital Stock  On June 20, 2005, the Company completed a forward common stock split of 4 new shares for 1 outstanding old share. The financial statements have been retroactively restated to reflect the split.  8. Stock Options  The Companys Board of Directors agreed to enter into 10 year Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreements with certain employees for 8,000,000 out of the 20,000,000 common shares reserved for issuance under the Companys 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, which was approved by shareholders on September 30, 2002. The objective of this plan is to attract and retain the best personnel, providing for additional performance incentives and promoting the success of the Company by providing individuals the opportunity to acquire common stock.  33    The options have an exercise price of $0.13, which was the last sale price on May 3, 2005 and the closing bid price of the Companys shares on June 10, 2005, and all options becoming exercisable in three equal installments of thirty-three and one-third percent, with the first installment exercisable immediately, and an additional thirty-three and one-third percent of shares exercisable in six months and the balance becoming exercisable in 12 months.  The Company recorded stock based compensation expense of $785,536 (2004: $nil) for the year ended March 31, 2006.  The movement of stock options can be summarized as follows:  Number ofWeighted averageoptionsexercise priceBalance, March 31, 2005 and 2004--Granted8,000,0000.13Exercised(50,000)0.13Balance, March 31, 20067,950,0000.13  The number of options exercisable at March 31, 2006 is 5,283,333. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding stock options at December 31, 2005 is 9.2years.  The weighted average fair value of the options granted during the year ended March 31, 2006 was estimated at $0.11 by using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following weighted average assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, expected volatility of 147.69%, risk-free interest rates of 2.9%, and expected lives of three years.  9. Warrants  The movement of stock purchase warrants can be summarized as follows:  Number ofWeighted averagewarrantsexercise priceBalance, March 31, 2005 and 200410,000,000$0.05Exercised(3,120,000)0.05Balance, March 31, 20066,880,0000.05  The warrants will expire on October 17, 2007.  10. Income Taxes  There is no current or deferred tax expense due to the Companys loss position and the benefits of timing differences have not been previously recorded.  The deferred tax consequences of temporary differences in reporting items for financial statement and income tax purposes are recognized, as appropriate.  Realization of the future tax benefits related to the deferred tax assets is dependent on many factors, including the Companys ability to generate taxable income within the net operating loss carryforward period.  Management has considered these factors in reaching its conclusion as to the valuation allowance for financial reporting purposes and has recorded a 100% valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.  A reconciliation of expected federal income tax expense (benefit) based on the U.S. corporate income tax rate of 34% to actual expense (benefit) for 2006 and 2005 is as follows:  34    Inception to20062005March 31, 2006Expected federal income tax benefit$19,250$18,020$197,237Increase in valuation allowance(19,250)(18,020)(197,237)Income tax benefit$-$-$-  At March 31, 2006, non-current deferred tax asset of approximately $197,237 results from the deferred tax benefit of net operating loss carryforwards, which have a 100% valuation allowance, as the ability of the Company to general sufficient taxable income in the future is uncertain. There are no other significant tax assets or liabilities.  As of March 31, 2006, the Company has available net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $580,000, which expire through 2026.  Pursuant to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, annual utilization of the Companys operating loss carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% is deemed to occur within any three-year period.  35   ITEM 8: CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE  We have had no disagreements with our certified public accountants with respect to accounting practices, procedures or financial disclosure.  ITEM 8a: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.  An evaluation was performed under the supervision of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons associated with us to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic reports. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving their control objectives.  There have been no significant changes in internal controls, or in factors that could significantly affect internal controls, subsequent to the date that management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, completed their evaluation.  ITEM 8b: OTHER INFORMATION  None.  ITEM 9: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT  Set forth below is certain information regarding each of the directors and officers of the Company:  DEREK J. COOPER (Age 29).  President, CEO, Director.  Mr. Derek J. Cooper earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Physics at the University of British Columbia in May 2001, specializing in solid state and optics, and initiated further studies in Geological Engineering in September, the same year.  From April 2002 through January 2003, Mr. Cooper tenured at the diversified mining and metals giant Teck-Cominco, where he co-  36   designed and commissioned a hydrometallurgy extraction process for molybdenum.  Subsequently, from January 2003 thru September 2003, Mr. Derek Cooper joined Syncrude Canada Ltd., the worlds largest producer of crude oil from oil sands and the largest single source producer in Canada.  While continuing to pursue his Applied Sciences degree in Geological Engineering, from June 2004 thru September 2004, Mr. Cooper successfully completed a near-term engineering-exploration contract with Stealth Minerals Ltd., a publicly traded precious metals exploration company.  From September 2004 thru April 2005, Mr. Derek Cooper continues to further his applied sciences (engineering) studies. Since June 2005, Mr. Cooper has joined Elk Valley Coal, the worlds second largest producer of  metallurgical coal, as a Drill and Blast Engineer.  Mr. Cooper joined the Company as President, CEO and Director on January 21, 2005.  HARMEL S. RAYAT (Age 45). Secretary, Treasurer, Director.  Mr. Rayat has been in the venture capital industry since 1981. Between January 1993 and April 2001, Mr. Rayat served as the president of Hartford Capital Corporation, a company that provides financial consulting services to emerging growth corporations. From April 2001 through January 2002, Mr. Rayat acted as an independent consultant advising  small  corporations. Since January 2002, Mr. Rayat has been president of Montgomery Asset Management Corporation, a privately held firm providing financial consulting services to emerging growth corporations. Mr. Rayat is also a Director of PhytoMedical Technologies, Inc, Entheos Technologies, Inc. and HepaLife Technologies, Inc. Mr. Rayat has served as a Director of the Company since July 24, 2002.  Except as set forth below, none of the corporations or organizations with whom our directors are affiliated with is a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of ours. Mr. Rayat is an officer, director and majority stockholder of each of Phytomedical Technologies, Inc., Entheos Technologies, Inc. and HepaLife Technologies, Inc  There are no family relationships among or between any of our officers and directors.  There are no arrangements or understandings between him and any other person(s) (naming such person(s)) pursuant to which he was or is to be selected as a director or nominee.  Except as set forth below, during the past five years none of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons have been:  (a) the subject of any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;  (b) convicted in a criminal proceeding or is subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);  (c) subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or  (d) found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law.  Mr. Harmel S. Rayat, EquityAlert.com, Inc., Innotech Corporation and Mr. Bhupinder S. Mann, a former part-time employee of ours (collectively the respondents), consented to a cease-and-desist order pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933. The matter related to the public resale by EquityAlert of securities received as compensation from or on behalf of issuers for whom EquityAlert and Innotech provided  public relation and stock advertising services; Mr. Rayat was the president of Innotech and Equity Alert was the wholly-owned subsidiary of Innotech at the time.  The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission contended and alleged that Equity Alert had received the securities from persons controlling or controlled by the issuer of the securities, or under direct or indirect common control with such issuer with a view toward further distribution to the public; as a result, the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission further alleged that the securities that Equity Alert had received  were restricted securities, not exempt from registration, and hence could not be resold to the public within a year of their receipt absent  37   registration; and, accordingly,  the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission further alleged, since Equity Alert effected the resale within a year of its acquisition of the securities, without registration, such resale violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.  Without admitting or denying any of the findings and/or allegations of the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission the respondents agreed, on October 23, 2003 to cease and desist, among other things, from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.  EquityAlert.com, Inc. and Innotech Corporation agreed to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $31,555.14.  On August 8, 2000, Mr. Harmel S. Rayat and EquityAlert.com, Inc., without admitting or denying the allegations of the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission that EquityAlert did not disclose certain compensation received by it in connection with stock advertisements and promotions, consented to the entry of a permanent injunction enjoining them from, among other things, violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933; in addition, each of Mr. Rayat and EquityAlert agreed to pay a civil penalty of $20,000.  Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act  Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), requires the Company's directors, officers and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("the Commission"). Directors, officers and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners are required by applicable regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file with the Commission pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to the Company, the Company believes that during fiscal year ending March 31, 2006, the Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors and executive officers were satisfied.  ITEM 10:  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  Remuneration and Executive Compensation  The following table shows, for the three-year period ended March 31, 2006, the cash compensation paid by the Company, as well as certain other compensation paid for such year, to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's other most highly compensated executive officers. Except as set forth on the following table, no executive officer of the Company had a total annual salary and bonus for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 that exceeded $100,000.  Summary Compensation Table  Securities  Underlying Name and Options All Other Principal Position               Year Salary Bonus        Other Granted Compensation  Derek Cooper 2006 $0 $0 $4,200 0 $0 President, CEO, 2005 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Director  2004 $0 $0 $0 0 $0  Harmel S. Rayat 2006 $0 $0 $3,600 0 $0 Secretary, Treasurer, 2005 $0 $0 $3,300 0 $0 Director  2004 $30,000 $0 $0 0 $0  Rakesh Shankar (1) 2006 $0 $0 $1,300 0 $0 Director 2005 $0 $0 $0 0 $0  2004 $0 $0 $0 0 $0  38   Terri DuMoulin (2) 2006 $0 $0 $350 0 $0 Former CEO, President, 2005 $0 $0 $4,500 0 $0 Director 2004 $0 $0 $3,100 0 $0  Harvinder Dhaliwal (3) 2006 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Former Secretary, 2005 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Treasurer, Director 2004 $0 $0 $0 0 $0  (1)  Resigned as Director on April 30, 2006  (2)  Resigned as President, CEO and Director on January 21, 2005  (3)  Not re-elected as a Director on October 31, 2003  Stock Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year  Shown below is further information regarding employee stock options awarded during 2006 to the named officers and directors: Number of % of Total Securities Options Granted Underlying to Employees Exercise Expiration Name Options in 2006 Price ($/sh) Date Derek Cooper 0 0 n/a n/a Harmel Rayat 0 0 n/a n/a Rakesh Shankar (1) 0 0 n/a n/a  (1)  Resigned as Director on April 30, 2006  Aggregated Option Exercises During Last Fiscal Year and Year End Option Values  The following table shows certain information about unexercised options at year-end with respect to the named officers and directors:  Common Shares Underlying Unexercised    Value of Unexercised In-the-money  Options on March 31, 2006 Options on March 31, 2006  Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable Derek Cooper 0 0 $0 $0 Harmel Rayat 0 0 $0 $0 Rakesh Shankar (1) 0 0 $0 $0  (1)  Resigned as Director on April 30, 2006  Changes in Control  There are no understandings or agreements, aside from the transaction completed and described under Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, known by management at this time which would result in a change in control of the Company.  If such transactions are consummated, of which there can be no assurance, the Company may issue a significant number of shares of capital stock which could result in a change in control and/or a change in the Companys current management.  ITEM 11:  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT  The following table sets forth, as of June 20, 2006, the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock by each director and executive officer of the Company and each person known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock outstanding as of such date and the executive officers and directors of the Company as a group.  39    Number of Shares Person or Group of Common Stock Percent  Derek Cooper 0 0% 216-1628 West First Avenue Vancouver, B.C.  V6J 1G1 Canada  Harmel S. Rayat (1) (2) 25,522,500 69% 216-1628 West First Avenue Vancouver, B.C.  V6J 1G1 Canada  Directors and Executive Officers 25,522,500 69% as a group (2 persons)  (1) Includes 2,402,500 shares issued to Entheos Technologies for web development and hosting services. Mr. Rayat, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, is also a Director and majority shareholder of Entheos Technologies. Additionally, other members of Mr. Rayat's family hold shares and share purchase warrants. Mr. Rayat disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares and share purchase warrants beneficially owned by other family members. (2) Includes 1,560,000 share purchase warrants.  ITEM 12:  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  Management fees:  During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company paid $9,450 (2005: $7,800) in management fees to three directors, and $202,668 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006.  Accrued management fees: Included in accounts payable, an amount of $162,945 was accrued for management services provided by two directors in previous years. There is no management agreement in place and the Company has not converted any debt to equity.  Notes payable - related party:  The notes payable at March 31, 2006, $110,000, was made up of four separate loans bearing interest at 7.25% per annum advanced to the Company by its former President, Herdev S. Rayat on the following dates: February 13, 2001 ($40,000); April 24, 2001 ($40,000); June 8, 2001 ($20,000); and July 26, 2001 ($10,000).  The entire principal amount and accrued interest is due and payable on demand. Accrued interest on the notes amounted to $35,894 as of March 31, 2006. Interest expenses were $8,055  (2005: $7,975) for year ended March 31, 2006 and $39,624 for the period from inception (November 6, 1998) to March 31, 2006.  Property: The Companys principal office is located at 1628 West 1st Avenue, Suite 216, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6J 1G1. These premises are owned by a private corporation controlled by a Director and majority shareholder. Subsequent to year end, the Company entered into a lease agreement requiring rent payments of C$700.00 per month.  Warrants:  As of March 31, 2006, 1,560,000 share purchase warrants were held by the majority stockholder of the Company. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at $0.05 per share and will expire on October 17, 2007.  All related party transactions are recorded at the exchange amount established and agreed to between related parties and are in the normal course of business.  40   ITEM 13:  EXHIBITS  (a)  The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:  31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)  31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)  32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (b)  During the Companys fourth fiscal quarter, there were no reports filed on Form 8-K  March 17, 2006:  Effective March 13, 2006, the Company dismissed Ernst & Young, LLP, as its independent auditor. The change in the Company's auditors was recommended and approved by the board of directors of the Company. On March 13, 2006, and effective the same date, on the recommendation of the Company's board of directors,  the Company engaged Peterson Sullivan, PLLC as its  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm to audit the Company's financial  statements.  March 30, 2006:  Letter from Ernst & Young LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission dated March 29, 2006.  ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES  The firm of Ernst & Young, LLP served as the Company's independent accountants from June 30, 2005 until their dismissal in March 2006.  The firm of Peterson Sullivan, PLLC currently serves as the Companys independent accountants.  The Board of Directors of the Company, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of different public accountants at any time during the year, if the Board believes that a change would be in the best interests of the stockholders.  The Board of Directors has considered the audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees paid to the Company's accountants, as disclosed below, and had determined that the payment of such fees is compatible with maintaining the independence of the accountants.  Audit Fees:  The aggregate  fees,  including  expenses,  billed by the Company's principal accountant in connection with the audit of our consolidated  financial statements  for the most recent  fiscal year and for the review of our financial information  included in our Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB and our  quarterly reports on Form  10-QSB  during the fiscal  years  ending  March  31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 were $16,812 and $7,686 respectively.  Tax  fees:  The aggregate fees billed to the Company for tax compliance, tax advice and tax  planning by the Companys principal accountant for fiscal 2006 and 2005 were $0.  All Other Fees: The aggregate fees, including expenses, billed for all other services rendered to the Company by its principal accountant during year 2006 and 2005 were $0.  The Company does not currently have an audit committee.  41   SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,  thereunto duly  authorized on this 21st day of June, 2006.   International Energy, Inc.    /s/ Derek Cooper  Derek Cooper  President and CEO    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons  on  behalf of the registrant and in capacities and on the dates indicated.    Signature Title Date   /s/ Derek Cooper Director , President, June 21, 2006 Derek Cooper Chief Executive Officer    /s/ Harmel S. Rayat Director, Secretary June 21, 2006 Harmel S. Rayat Treasurer  42