alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Louis R. Bucalo, M.D., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9thday
of November, 2005.



/s/ Louis R. BucaloLouis R. Bucalo, M.D.




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert E. Farrell, J.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.



Signed at the City of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this
9thday of November, 2005.



/s/ Robert E. FarrellRobert E. Farrell, J.D.
Dale GILES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9215.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.1

                   Globalwise Investments, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Globalwise Investments, Inc. certifies pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date:   March 24, 2005
                                   /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                  ____________________________________
                                  Donald R. Mayer
                                  Principal Executive Officer
                                  Principal Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133589 & (80) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JODI K. MORGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Justices Appellant/Cross-Appellee, 

v SC: 133589 

 COA: 261236 

Oakland CC: 02-668349-DC 

ROBERT L. HIGGINSON,

Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
# Order

December 14, 2007

133626 133627

TRENDA JONES, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Jamar Cortez Jones, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

BOOKER T. JONES and MARGARET A. JONES, Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jamar Cortez Jones, Deceased,

Plaintiffs,

v

DETROIT MEDI CAL CENTER and SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellees,

and

DANNY F. WATSON, M.D., and WILLIAM M. LEUCHTER, P.C., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/ Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

SC: 133626, 133627 COA: 262343, 262347 Wayne CC: 03-327528-NH

By order of September 24, 2007, the appli cation for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in ab eyance pending the decision in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of th e Court, the case having been decided on Nove mber 28, 2007, ___ Mi ch ___ (2007), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G )(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, REINSTAT E the order of the_______________________________________ __ 2

Wayne Circuit Court denying the defendant s' motion for summary disposition, and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further pr oceedings not inconsistent with this order and the order in Mullins . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the remaini ng questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14, 2007

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 171 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.171

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New 
                     Jersey, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 6 of Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``$1,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$4,000,000''; and
        (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``five'' and inserting 
    ``10''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHERMAN BALCH,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-0959

[March 9, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CA5002.

Sherman Balch, Palm City, pro se.

Hallie S. Evans of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, 

Georgia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Inv. Tr. Servs., LLC v. DLJ Mortg. Cap., Inc., 225 So. 3d 

833, 833 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (stating that “[t]he law is well settled that a 

purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene or otherwise be made 

a party to the ongoing lawsuit”); Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 

531, 531 (Fla. 1927) (explaining that “[t]his court is committed to the 

doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene”).

CONNER, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15



                         NON-RECOURSE PROMISSORY NOTE
                         ----------------------------


$100,000                                              San Francisco, California
                                                               January 28, 2000

     For value received, the undersigned promises to pay Aeneid Corporation, a
California corporation (the "Company"), at its principal office the principal
                             -------
sum of $100,000, together with interest on the sum of the outstanding principal
balance, plus accrued but unpaid interest, at the rate of 5.73% per annum,
compounded monthly. Such principal and interest shall be due and payable on
January 28, 2003.

     Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of
America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME WITHOUT INTEREST
OR PENALTY.

     Should suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note, such sum
as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees. The
makers and endorsers have severally waived presentment for payment, protest,
notice of protest, and notice of nonpayment of this Note.

     This Note, which is non-recourse, is secured by a pledge of certain shares
of Common Stock of the Company owned by the undersigned and is subject to the
terms of a Pledge and Security Agreement between the undersigned and the Company
of even date herewith.

     THIS NOTE IS NON-RECOURSE TO THE UNDERSIGNED. The Company shall look solely
to any collateral securing this Note for payment of any unpaid amounts due under
this Note, whether or not the value of such collateral is sufficient to
liquidate the entire amount due. The Company shall have no claim against the
undersigned for payment of any amount due under this Note other than to the
extent of the interest of the undersigned in the collateral securing this Note
in accordance with the aforementioned Pledge and Security Agreement.

     In the event that any one or more provisions of this Note shall be held to
be illegal, invalid or otherwise unenforceable, the same shall not affect any
other provision of this Note, and the remaining provisions of this Note shall
remain in full force and effect.

     This Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws
of the State of California without regard to conflicts of laws principles.

                                        /s/ Robert Ainsbury
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Robert Ainsbury
Glenn S. SOLBERG, petitioner, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. OF WILLISTON, et al.

No. 18-8060.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AND THE
NOTES THERETO) CONTAINED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           489,214
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      80,810
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 570,024
<CASH>                                          33,966
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           5,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 681,182
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 91,494
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             48,873
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     531,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   681,182
<PREMIUMS>                                      50,710
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             15,064
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              30,178
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      65,915
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      7,001
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             4,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,129
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,129
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1719 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1719

 To authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out the National Guard 
civilian youth opportunities program for fiscal year 2000 in an amount 
                      not to exceed $110,000,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1999

 Mr. DeFazio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out the National Guard 
civilian youth opportunities program for fiscal year 2000 in an amount 
                      not to exceed $110,000,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE PROGRAM.

    (a) Fiscal Year 2000 Authority.--Notwithstanding the expenditure 
limitation contained in subsection (b) of section 509 of title 32, 
United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may obligate funds during 
fiscal year 2000 in an amount not to exceed $110,000,000 for the 
National Guard civilian youth opportunities program authorized by that 
section and known as the National Guard Challenge Program.
    (b) Elimination of Annual Expenditure Limitation.--Section 509(b) 
of title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking out ``, except 
that Federal expenditures under the program may not exceed $50,000,000 
for any fiscal year''.
                                 <all>
```
Randy HOLKESVIG, petitioner, v. NORTH DAKOTA.

No. 17-1608.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                        Holmes Herbs Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Holmes Herbs Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
       or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:  March 21, 2006
                                          /s/ John F. Metcalfe
                                          ___________________________________
                                          John F. Metcalfe
                                          Principal Executive Officer
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Michael BORDMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6758.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Christopher COUNTS, petitioner, v. Eddie WILSON, Warden, et al.

No. 18-5275.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Financial Data Schedule represents Consolidated Marcus Cable Company, L.P.
and Subsidiaries as reflected in the Form 10-Q for the period ended 
September 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910629
<NAME> MARCUS CABLE COMPANY, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,503)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,165
<PP&E>                                         868,290
<DEPRECIATION>                               (200,365)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,718,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,985
<BONDS>                                      1,478,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,718,748
<SALES>                                        348,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,977
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (79,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (79,099)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Oliver WILLIAMS, et al., petitioners, v. The NATIONAL GALLERY, LONDON, et al.

No. 18-997.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 52E/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 52E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5126 February 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 52E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5126 February 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2008/C 052E/01 | Common Position (EC) No 1/2008 of 20 December 2007 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the banning of exports and the safe storage of metallic mercury (1) | 1 |
| 2008/C 052E/02 | Common Position (EC) No 2/2008 of 21 January 2008 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2008/C 052E/01

Common Position (EC) No 1/2008 of 20 December 2007 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the banning of exports and the safe storage of metallic mercury (1)

1

2008/C 052E/02

Common Position (EC) No 2/2008 of 21 January 2008 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration file Nos. 333-86311,
333-30044, 333-43178, 333-60882, 333-70224, 333-82624 and 333-100107) and in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (Registration file No. 333-43420) of Ditech Communications Corporation of our reports dated May 21, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San
Jose, California
July 11, 2003

---

QuickLinks