alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge f or the Eastern 1 District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2162

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Tommy Dale Christopher, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 22, 1997 Filed: September 3, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Tommy Dale Christopher appeals the 75-month sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to transmitting in interstate commerce a communication 1 containing a threat to injure, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(b). We affirm.-2-

The sole issue on appeal is whether Christopher & s 1994 California conviction for second -degree burglary of a commercial building constituted a “crime of violence ” within the meaning of U.S. Sentencing Guideli nes Manual § 4B1.2(1) (1995) (defining “crime of violence” to include crimes involving “conduct that presents a seriou s potential risk of physical injury to another”), thereby qualifying Christopher for a career-offender enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1. 1 (1995). As Christopher concedes, in United States v. Hascall , 76 F.3d 902, 904-0 5 (8th Cir. ), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 358 (1996), we determined that second-degre e burglaries of commercial buildings involve conduct that presents a ser ious potential risk of physical injury to another. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Kyle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David L. Kyle      
|David L. Kyle          
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 3, 2006       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ONEOK Partners, L.P. and will be retained by ONEOK Partners, L.P.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Stephen R. WINN, petitioner, v. Dana METZGER, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8800.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
March 4, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VICENTE A. MENCHACA , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01158

- CV V.
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNS YLVANIA , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, signed September 20, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the re cord and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Vicente A. Menchaca, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary  financial information extracted from
Kentucky Electric Steel, Inc.'s condensed consolidated financial
statements as of and for the nine month period ended July 1, 2000
included in this Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such condensed consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>			0000910394
<NAME>			KENTUCKY ELECTRIC STEEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000
<CURRENCY>	     	U.S. DOLLARS

<S>			        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>			   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	        SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>	        SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>	        JUL-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>	                  1
<CASH>		                141
<SECURITIES>	                  0
<RECEIVABLES>	             15,017
<ALLOWANCES>	                520
<INVENTORY>	             20,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	             42,049
<PP&E>		             53,090
<DEPRECIATION>	             21,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	             79,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             26,704
<BONDS>		             20,000
<COMMON>		                 50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>	                  0
<OTHER-SE>	             35,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      79,334
<SALES>		             89,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	             89,106
<CGS>		             81,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>	             81,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>	                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	              1,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>	              1,067
<INCOME-TAX>	                405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	                662
<DISCONTINUED>	                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	                  0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>	                662
<EPS-BASIC>	                .16
<EPS-DILUTED>	                .16

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID 2022 DMID Omnibus BAA (HHS-
NIH-NIAID-BAA2022-1) Research Area 3--The Antiviral Program for 
Pandemics (APP): Development of Antivirals for Specific RNA Viral 
Families of Pandemic Potential.
    Date: June 9-10, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F30, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Scott Jakes, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F30, Rockville, MD 
20852, (240) 669-5931, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5238333937212137123f333b3e7c3c3b3a7c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83e9e2e8e6f0f0e6c3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 10, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10400 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michael Edward MOORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8153.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 16 - 00316 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF R .K., A CHILD On Appeal from the 72nd District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015 - 518,299, Honorable Kara L. Darnell, Presiding



### September 14 , 2016 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant s , J.W.K. and A .S. , attempt to appeal an order terminating their parental rights to their child, R.K. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and because appellant s failed to comply with this court’s order requiring a written explanation for their late notice of appeal. The order of termination was signed on July 26, 2016
. Consequently, a ppellant s ’ notice of appeal was due on August 15, 2016
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1 (b)
. Appellant s filed a notice of appeal on August 18 , 2016 , but did not file a motion requesting an extension of time to file the notice of appeal.2

Under Tex as Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, the court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline expires, the appellant files the notice of appeal along with a motion requesting an extension that reasonably explains the n eed for an extension. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3, 10.5(b). Although a motion for extension is implied when the appellant tenders a notice of appeal within 15 days after the notice deadline, it is still necessary for the appellant to reasonably explain the need for an extension. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Jones v. City of Houston , 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998). Because appellant s filed a notice of appeal within 15 days after the deadline, a motion for extension was implied. However, by letter dated August 22, 2016, the court ordered appellant s to file a written response by September 2, 2016 , explaining why the ir notice of appeal was filed late. The court also informed appellant s that failure to comply with the court’s directive would result in dismissal of the ir appeal. Appellants have not respon d e d to the court’s directive for a written explanation. As such, appellants’ late n otice of appeal failed to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and because appellants failed to comply with an order from this court
. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a), (c)
. Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas L. Cronan III, Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Finance Officer of Redback Networks Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 27, 2006 |  | By: |  | /S/ THOMAS L. CRONAN III                                                                         
|                     |  |     |  | Thomas L. Cronan III Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versions of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Form 10-K to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant (whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-K under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
David WILEY, petitioner, v. Jennifer WILEY.

No. 18-8918.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1511 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1511

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require certain 
    additional information in statements of explanation of benefits 
     provided to Medicare beneficiaries under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1999

Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require certain 
    additional information in statements of explanation of benefits 
     provided to Medicare beneficiaries under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Truth in Billing Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WITH RESPECT TO ACTUAL 
              PAYMENT AMOUNTS MADE TO HOSPITALS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1806 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395b-7) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Sunshine in Billing.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of an item or service 
        consisting of inpatient hospital services furnished during a 
        cost reporting period by a subsection (d) hospital (as defined 
        in section 1886(d)(1)(B)) to individuals entitled to benefits 
        under this part, the Secretary shall include in a statement 
        under subsection (a) the following additional listed 
        information:
                    ``(A) The amount of payment made by the Secretary 
                with respect to such item or service.
                    ``(B) The amount equal to the difference between 
                the amount of payment customarily charged by the 
                hospital during such cost reporting period with respect 
                to such item or service and the amount of payment 
                described in subparagraph (A).
            ``(2) Presentation on statement.--(A) The Secretary shall 
        arrange the listed information required under this section in a 
        manner that is readily comprehensible by such individuals.
            ``(B) The amount described in paragraph (1)(B) shall be 
        referred to as the `hospital discount amount' on the 
        statement.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to statements of explanation of benefits under the 
medicare program prepared for items and services furnished on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Matthew WINTERS, petitioner, v. CITY OF WEST JORDAN, UTAH, et al.

No. 18-8284.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  374,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,300
<INVENTORY>                                    345,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               793,900
<PP&E>                                         495,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,283,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,500
<BONDS>                                         66,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                     378,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,283,700
<SALES>                                        591,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               591,500
<CGS>                                          452,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  452,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<FN>
<F1>Amount represents basic earnings per share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**     The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AlliedHoldings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for theperiods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.     This 14th day of November, 2006.       /s/ Thomas H. King         *Thomas H. King*    *Executive Vice President and*    *Chief Financial Officer*  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference inany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,787
<SECURITIES>                                    22,772
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                       497
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,398
<PP&E>                                           2,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,188
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,942
<SALES>                                          5,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,208
<CGS>                                              534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    116
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                116
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
Brandon LISI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8198.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.