alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 50/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.050.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 50 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5521 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.050.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 50

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5521 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 050/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 050/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 050/02 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2012/C 050/03 | Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 050/02

Euro exchange rates

4

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2012/C 050/03

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

5

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 050/04 | State aid — Malta — State aid SA.33015 (12/C) — Air Malta plc — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2012/C 050/04

State aid — Malta — State aid SA.33015 (12/C) — Air Malta plc — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1683

For the relief of Paul Green.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1999

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Paul Green.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING APPLICATION

4 FOR CHILD’S INSURANCE BENEFIT AND

5 LUMP SUM DEATH BENEFIT UNDER TITLE II

6 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

7 If an application for a child’s insurance benefit under

8 section 202(d) of the Social Security Act is filed by or

9 on behalf of Paul Green of Walnut Street in Newton, Mas10 sachusetts, within 1 year after the date of the enactment

11 of this Act, then—
2

•HR 1683 IH

1 (1) the application shall be considered, for pur2 poses of section 202(d) of such Act, to have been

3 filed in the month in which his mother, Marie

4 Pendola Grardina (social security account number

5 019–16–2579), died; and

6 (2) the application shall also be considered to

7 be an application for a lump-sum death benefit

8 under section 202(i) of such Act, and for purposes

9 of such section 202(i), to have been filed in that

10 month.

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEROY DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-384

[April 9, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 82-004054 CF10B.

Leroy Davis, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,332,950
<SECURITIES>                                    29,979
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,415,675
<PP&E>                                         199,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,636,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          485,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,467
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,003,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,636,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,711
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,004,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,767,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,837,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  70,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,767,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
### 484

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN =-GhIAW ~-~CWlUL

c18rk ill TheOountr

thi deputy Olerks in that offloe. offiO8X'8 s&iXy 1~18 asalary only

the O0Ulit.yOlexk O? 1 0m08 after he 1s m, is he entitled to ty Olexk? . sea. 40, Art. 16, aonstitution de that noperson shall hold ox mn8 tiae more than one offfoe of amolunmt, exoept that of Yurtloe oi the Pea00 CGPOtr cOJidSf3iOll~C, Blotaxy R8blio and Pooetma~~8x,

inoluding OertF&l rOSOn80 1x1the ArrsJ hTY, 238, end retired peXDOlUIC& Of the Armf, kWJ an4 MarLo*. It Is arsummdthe County Olerk rlll ontar the A- thI'oU@l SbleOtiTO 38X400, M(LRonorable OoMdl~ MOhy, %%tgO 2

thoxefore, the quertlon is would he **be**an ottfasr oxsmpt under the Constitution fxim holding bin 01~11 oifioe andbein,%in the amy. Carpenter WI.Sheppard, 145 Ss8(2) 562, does not seem **to**br applloable to this situation but the reoent dsolslon of the SupremeCourt in the oase of Oxamx web Sheppard probably in in point. I donot hats this oa6s as yet. Vlth several 4eputle8 In th8 ofrioe the County Olsrk oould PerfoXmthe duties of ths ofiloo throu& and by them.

*It Seem that if Judge Dixon in the axamx 0608 f8 a rOS8ftS @flO8? illth. k xa of the United States, **thca it**  **lpi&t al80**  **be** true t a selsotes 1s axesoxve enlisted man, a8 I und*xHand, to tmrve ror the duration plus six raontha. -the?, it seem+ that under Title 94, Mllltla, every able bodied m~ils'ln Texas 1s in the Ressne Militia. 'PhaW let Rl8haTs all OQilliOllfrOIIiYOUXdspartaent ooono8ming these quostlons.* Zt is not speoltioally stated rlmther or not the * county olr*’ Is bsing Induoted lnto the military senloe 0r the United **Staten** a8 aprivate or aoome&mloned offloor, Bonever, In the absenoe of any raots to the aontrw weaseumethat the oounty olerk is **being** lndwted Into ths Aray as aprivate.

Heretofore this dsparbent has rendered several opinions 011questions rery similar to the one pxosented in faux lnqulr~. In oux opinion No, O-5017 It was held "that aperson whowas duly eleoted oounty olexk aadhas sinso bean lnduotod Into the mllltary serrlos of the United States as a private Is antitled to qualif’y by flllng the required oath **and**bond"..

In oux.opInlon lo. O-4873 it was held "that no provision o? the Texas Constltutlon or 8tatUtes prevents the private in the United Stat88 Amy frombeing a osndidate for elsotlon to the orrioe OSoouaty assessor-oolleotor or taxes. If such person be 8leOted to that offfioe, the faot alone t&t he Is a pxloats In the United Stat88 Army will not diequalify himto take and hold th8 oirioe snd Moeits the oompensation attaohed thereto.. See opinion Bo..O-3448, rsrerrrd to above.*

### 486

, t Eonorabls Oonnallr )1IoKatalr, %s 3

IJI+icr or tlw ror~oiog fop sr~ respSothl1~ adtlsod t&t it is 

### ouropinionthatthetaotalonethat 

### the oounty olerk is a private in ths United States h&t will notdiaqtulte hir to hold suoh OfilOS and r808iTS th8 ODE ~satlon attaohed thereto.

In sop rt of our summer to your qwstlon 10 dlroot Tour attent.an tothe following 

### oplnloacl Nos. O-3448, r 0465, O-50$7,O-4673awlO-4599,so+ss of those opinlolu belly

### enolosed

hwewttb.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DAMAR LAMONT JORDAN,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 273 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/31/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      498,451
COMMITMENTS
  65,683    7,365  107,978  295,339  360,194  469,000  475,537   29,451   22,914

CHANGES FROM 05/24/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,449)
   6,529   -2,834     -470   -5,229    6,497      830    3,193    2,619      256

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.2      1.5     21.7     59.3     72.3     94.1     95.4      5.9      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      134)
      40       16       47       68       64      128      112
```

----

Updated June 3, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Todd G. Simpson, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Ditech
Networks, Inc. (the "Company"), and William J. Tamblyn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2009, and to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and

2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 1st Day of July, 2009.

/s/ TODD G. SIMPSON, PHD Todd G. Simpson, PhD CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN William J. Tamblyn CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


The
foregoing certification is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
William CLARK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5276.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Auqusf <«>? 2015

Twelfth Courf^f Appeals

1517 Wesf Front Sfv^ef, Suite 35^

Ty lev, Texas 75" 702^

REC'D IN COURT OFAPPEALS

12thCourt o? Ajgpeals District

TYLER TEXAS

CATHY S.LUSK,CLEHK

RECEIVED IN

OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Re; FDR EVtensu>trv,appeaUt 12-14-00201-CR C0URT TW«4 *t 31189 ; C*a<rtcfc Uwi* ^ The Sfelc c£ r«wis AUG 26 2015

D«a^ Tvs/«t"F+K Courf c^F Arepealsr ' AbelAcosta,CSerk

TWts kt+er te t~o request" ^»^ extension of -thirty days \o

/fUe a pte.t"itt<m -for D>iscv>»+\ortary RevwtW (pdr\

Teday AucjusV tfc92o1S X recewed a letter fh>*\ my attorney PKlfp C WeUMer 6oo M. fallaniPaleshne, Te*Gs7$£of dat«4 Aucjusf 4? 2o\5"$ f<^*^j iv>e "tmt v^y ^pps^| was afc<Yn&(

oa July 22, ads' cwsj have +hiHy (30) days ti> fife a josfojyiAy PDR i* mv^ cctse, because of "the !«•+£ r»<7tice from ^Y^Horr^ey,

X Cedwcfe B«mav-c| Uwis , recast*} ^row\ ^e Tv^iftK Court aP Appeals *r> e>cre^-twA <»f -thirty (3o)days -ft> draft

aA<i file <t*he FOR c*>nrecfiy to a o+herw/ise^t^^fy »^cmr>er;

Respect *»\<k «*>d pursuant to 1«ica2» &*le <?f Appe4Mc fVocetkjtre b8,

C Ge^fcR ©err^rtil lewis «vvatee ^y Ut**\bk ng^cKsH- cf tfa exfattoo'

-fc> tfce tweAPfk Gsvurt <;£ Appeals.

GeduHek ^>e*-r«^ Uw(S it \<i3hb1Z

M\r*A 0*vif

2-101 F«M 3(^k1.

lou)4 F^rfet TeX45 lb5bl

£**ft&RKto. 70O& ^Ioooo4 -(477 bl86

rn,,DT FILED /A/

AW6S7Za;5

^e/Acosta,QerK
Dennis MILLER, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9426.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5, 2017

s0329 

# Order

Clerk April 5, 2017

154209

BRANDI CRAMER f/k/a BRANDI

BITTER MAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 154209

COA: 330736

Shiawassee CC: 15

- 007371

- CZ

VILLAGE OF OAKLEY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE as moot Part III of the Court of Appeals

opinion, see 316 Mich App ___ n 1, ___ n 7 (2016), and we REMAND this case to the

Shiawassee Circuit Court for dismissal of the plaintiff’s Freedom of Information Act

claims. See Federated Publications, Inc v Lansing , 467 Mich 98, 101 (2002). In all

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

remai ning question presented should be reviewed by this Court. Thus, the award of

attorney fees, costs, and disbursements remains vacated.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1405 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1405

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2000

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 143 West Liberty Street, 
       Medina, Ohio, as the ``Donald J. Pease Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 143 West Liberty Street, Medina, 
Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ``Donald J. Pease Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Donald J. Pease 
Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Javier CHAVEZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-1087.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
| Date:  August      14, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Jerome J. Gassen                                                          |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Name:  Jerome      J. Gassen                                             |
|                                  |   | Title:  President      and Chief Executive Officer                       |
|                                  |   |                                                                               |
| Date:  August      14, 2009 | By:    | /s/      John J. Letter                                                            |
|                                  |   | Name:  John      J. Letter                                               |
|                                  |   | Title:  Senior      Vice President – Treasurer and                 |
|                                  |   |                Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Texas Prison Qatem 

liuntsv1lle. Texas 

Atteatlont m. 3.4. w. Wright 

Ilear Sir: 
n*. L. Y, %lH@&s, .ztwe r ‘.‘... 

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50748 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ABELARDO MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-52-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Abelardo Mendoza on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mendoza has responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Mendoza’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3186

SARAH ARENIVAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-94-368-2)

Argued: September 26, 1996 Decided: November 26, 1996

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and MICHAEL, Senior

United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia,

sitting by designation.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: H. Russell Vick, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant.

J. Patrick Powers, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Frank W.

Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Walter C. Holton, Jr., United

States Attorney, Mary Ann Sloan, Acting Chief Counsel, Region IV,

Mack A. Davis, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel, Haila Naomi Kleinman,

Supervisory Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Sarah Arenivas appeals from the denial of social security disability benefits by the district court. A careful review

of the record, the briefs, and the oral argument before this court

compels the conclusion that the Secretary's decision was supported

by substantial evidence and that the appropriate law was properly

applied, all as set out in the comprehensive opinion of the Magistrate Judge below. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Craig v. Chater, 76

F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the district court's

decision below is affirmed.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Energy Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey W. Flannery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: April
          6, 2011/s/ Jeffrey W. FlanneryJeffrey W. FlanneryChief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LATEISHA SMITH
, Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 187

[ February 11, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Carol

- L isa Phillips , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 15

- 015505

.

Erin M. Berger and Melis s a A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Paulo R. Lima and Eli z abeth K. Rus so of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, and Steven Chackman of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.