alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 396

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1327

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported by Mr. THOMPSON, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the United States Postal Service building located at 34480 Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, as the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger United States Post

Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Postal Service building located at

5 34480 Highway 101 South in Cloverdale, Oregon, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger

7 United States Post Office’’.
2

•HR 1327 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Postal Service building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Maurine B. Neuberger

6 United States Post Office’’.

Calendar No. 396

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1327

AN ACT

To designate the United States Postal Service

building located at 34480 Highway 101 South inCloverdale, Oregon, as the ‘‘Maurine B.Neuberger United States Post Office’’.

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Globalwise Investments, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 27, 2007 /s/ Donald R. Mayer Donald R. Mayer Principal Executive Officer
### NUMBER 13

- 16

- 002 7 8

- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ MELISSA MOYA AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.O., A MINOR CHILD , A ppellant ,

v.

RENE GUTIERREZ IN HI S OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINT ENDENT FOR THE EDINBURG CON SOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL D ISTRICT , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 398 th District Court of Hidalgo County, T exas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Melissa Moya as next friend of M.O., a minor child
, filed an appeal from
a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number

C

- 1583

- 16

- I . Appellant has filed a n unopposed motion to nonsuit the appeal . We2

construe the motion to nonsuit as a motion to dismiss pursuant to Texa s Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.1(a)(1). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a)(1).
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed
against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the
court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at a ppellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 21st day of July , 20 16

.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/12/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      519,612
COMMITMENTS
  59,431   23,163  119,184  314,416  356,536  493,031  498,883   26,580   20,728

CHANGES FROM 07/05/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,536)
  -3,941    7,964    9,328   16,330    7,778   21,717   25,070     -180   -3,534

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.4      4.5     22.9     60.5     68.6     94.9     96.0      5.1      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      139)
      41       20       49       69       67      130      121
```

----

Updated July 15, 2011
Order entered June 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01115-CV

DAVID S BAGWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE DAVID S. 

BAGWELL TRUST, ET AL., Appellants

V.

RIDGE AT ALTA VISTA INVESTMENTS I, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-04398-E

ORDER

The Court has before it appellants’ June 11, 2013 motion to reinstate appeal. The Court 

GRANTS the motion, REINSTATES this appeal, and ORDERS appellants to file their brief 

within thirty days of the date of this order. The Court further ORDERS the trial court to hear the 

joint motion to determine amount of supersedeas bond filed by appellants on July 2, 2012, within 

thirty days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.2(c)(2).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Kenneth D. Naumann, Chief Executive Officer of Ditech
Networks, Inc. (the "Company"), and William J. Tamblyn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011, and to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and

2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28th Day of July, 2011.

/s/ KENNETH D. NAUMANN Kenneth D. Naumann CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN William J. Tamblyn CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


The
foregoing certification is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Bruce L. SMALL, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-8384.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

March 11, 2019 
 The undersigned hereby commits
that, if funds are needed by GS Acquisition Holdings Corp (the “Company”) through June 12, 2020 to pay ordinary course expenses, upon request by the Company, the undersigned will provide liquidity of up to an aggregate of $2,000,000
to the Company. The undersigned shall not receive any additional interest in the Company in exchange for any such contributions, and any liquidity provided hereunder will be in the form of a contribution with respect to shares already owned by an
affiliate of the undersigned. 
  

			
	GS SPONSOR LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Raanan A. Agus
		 	Name: Raanan A. Agus
		 	Title: President
Exhibit 24
                                                            
                       POWER OF ATTORNEY



      The undersigned, a member of the Board of Directors or

officer  of  MidAmerican Energy Holdings  Company,  an  Iowa

corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints

Steven A. McArthur and Douglas L. Anderson and each of them,

as  his/her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with

full  power of substitution and resubstitution, for  and  in

his/her stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on his/her

behalf  the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal

year  ending December 31, 1998 and to execute any amendments

thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and

all  other  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the

Securities  and  Exchange Commission  and  applicable  stock

exchanges,  with  the  full power and authority  to  do  and

perform  each and every act and thing necessary or advisable

to  all intents and purposes as he/she might or could do  in

person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all  that  said

attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or  his/her   substitute   or

substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done  by  virtue

hereof.



                       POWER OF ATTORNEY




Executed as of March 29, 1999


______________________________
______________________________
DAVID L. SOKOL                RICHARD R. JAROS


______________________________
______________________________
GREGORY E. ABEL                    DAVID R. MORRIS


______________________________
______________________________
ALAN L. WELLS                      JOHN R. SHINER


______________________________
______________________________
PATRICK J. GOODMAN                 BERNARD W. REZNICEK


______________________________
______________________________
EDGAR D. ARONSON                   WALTER SCOTT, JR.


______________________________
______________________________
JUDITH E. AYRES                    DAVID E. WIT
Tyron JAMES, petitioner, v. Paul SNYDER, Warden, et al.

No. 18-5339.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*256Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Form  10-KSB of DOMAIN  REGISTRATION,  CORP.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Scott Curtis  Nilson,  Treasurer,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Director of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 13, 2007


/s/ SCOTT CURTIS NILSON
______________________________________
Scott Curtis Nilson
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DOMAIN REGISTRATION CORP. AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY DOMAIN  REGISTRATION  CORP.  AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Order entered December 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00983-CV

MEREDITH HICKS-CAPLETON DBA GEMSTONE MANAGEMENT AND 

CONSULTING, LLC, Appellants

V.

DESOTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-05372-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 4, 2014, motion to extend deadline for 

production of clerk and court reporter’s record. In its motion, appellant requests ninety days to 

pay for the reporter’s and clerk’s records. We GRANT appellant’s request to the extent that we 

extend the time to pay for or make arrangements to pay for the records for THIRTY DAYS. 

Appellant shall provide this Court with written proof of payment or arrangements to pay for the 

reporter’s and clerk’s records within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. The reporter’s 

and the clerk’s records shall be due THIRTY DAYS after appellant provides written proof of 
payment or arrangements to pay for the records. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Jonathan R. CURSHEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6996.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Darrius DaJuan COHEE, petitioner, v. James YATES, Warden.

No. 18-7901.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         116,290
<SECURITIES>                                    71,777
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,912
<PP&E>                                          33,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,397
<SALES>                                         70,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,619
<CGS>                                           35,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,092)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
Jacob BEN-ARI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

Jacob Ben-Ari, petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

No. 18-5272.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
THI HOUNG LE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9350.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with The Beard Company’s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William M. Beard, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                |                                                                                                           |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  May 20, 2008 | By:  /s/ William M. Beard

William M. BeardChairman of the Board and    Chief Executive Officer |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5, 2017

a0329 

# Order

Clerk April 5, 2017

154253

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154253

COA: 332050

Emmet CC: 15

- 004131

- FC;

MICHAEL JAY HOULE, 15

- 004132

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  333,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    350,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               750,700
<PP&E>                                         544,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 234,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,246,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          560,600
<BONDS>                                         85,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                     393,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,246,100
<SALES>                                        536,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               536,200
<CGS>                                          402,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  402,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               115,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .43<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of First Asia Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2014  (the Report), I, Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations. Date:  January 13, 2015 /s/ Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy
     Chief Executive Officer