alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter B. Bedford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 10, 2005

/s/ Peter B. Bedford

Peter B. Bedford

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001081192
<NAME>     2TheMart.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-22-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     2521770
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          16076528
<PP&E>                                    13225916
<DEPRECIATION>                              372099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            16076528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4051623
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                      2948
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              16076528
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           9772752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             117030
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (9655722)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.40)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward F. Calesa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Women First HealthCare,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during this period in which this report is being prepared; and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Dated: March 30, 2004                   /s/ Edward F. Calesa
                                        Edward F. Calesa
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Alexander  International  Ltd.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert Tsuida, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
30th day of March 2004.


/s/ Robert Tsuida
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 1999 and the consolidated statement
of operations for the nine months ended October 2, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                          20,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                       189
<INVENTORY>                                     42,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,147
<PP&E>                                         185,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,532
<BONDS>                                         88,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   323,669
<SALES>                                        478,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,163
<CGS>                                          331,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,892
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          281
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,755
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 5, 2017

a0329

Order 

Clerk

April 5, 2017

154253

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154253

COA: 332050 

Emmet CC: 15-004131-FC;

MICHAEL JAY HOULE, 15-004132-FH

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Taylor Don FREDERIKSEN, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-5141.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.
Abdul COLE, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-8438.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Order entered November 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00920-CV

RODRICK SAMPLES, Appellant

V.

THE DALLAS COUNTY SPECIAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC12-11245

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 18, 2014 second motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellant tendered his brief on November 18, 2014. The Court has notified 

appellant that the brief was not filed because it was improperly bookmarked. See TEX. R. APP. P.

9.4(k). We GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent that appellant shall file his corrected brief 

by NOVEMBER 26, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: July 30, 2007 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ James P. Bryce     
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | James P. Bryce         
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report.
Jason Lee TINCHER, petitioner, v. Tim BERNERS-LEE.

No. 18-8757.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Stephen Daniel LEONARD, petitioner, v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 18-7408.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

*2690Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Carlos CORDOBA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M148.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              640908
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       45,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                           8110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    694416
<PP&E>                                               31373
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (628)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      725161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               709271
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             20000
<OTHER-SE>                                           (4110)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        725161
<SALES>                                              62613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     62772
<CGS>                                                18075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        18075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     52993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (8296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (8,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (8296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
Lavont FLANDERS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8889.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Cindy J. McPike, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 18, 2004                     
|                                          
|/s/ Cindy J. McPike                       
|Cindy J. McPike                           
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and will be retained by StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1643

To establish a moratorium on large fishing vessels in Atlantic herring and

mackerel fisheries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1999

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To establish a moratorium on large fishing vessels in Atlantic

herring and mackerel fisheries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MORATORIUM.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of

5 the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage6 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), no large fishing vessel

7 may engage in fishing for Atlantic herring or Atlantic

8 mackerel within the United States exclusive economic zone

9 until—
2

•HR 1643 IH

1 (1) the National Marine Fisheries Service has

2 completed a new population survey into the abun3 dance of the discrete spawning stocks of Atlantic

4 herring and Atlantic mackerel; and

5 (2) the Secretary of Commerce has approved

6 and implemented fishery management plans devel7 oped by the appropriate regional fishery manage8 ment council for Atlantic herring and Atlantic mack9 erel, which specifically allow large fishing vessels to

10 participate in those fisheries.

11 (b) LARGE FISHING VESSEL DEFINED.—In this sec12 tion, the term ‘‘large fishing vessel’’—

13 (1) except as provided in paragraph (2), means

14 a fishing vessel (as that term is defined in section

15 3 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation

16 and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802)) of the

17 United States that is equal to or greater than 165

18 feet in length overall and has an engine of more

19 than 3,000 horsepower; and

20 (2) does not include such a vessel that engages

21 only in processing fish harvested by fishing vessels

22 of the United States.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 06-70005

__________________________

ROBERT JAMES NEVILLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY JOHNSON, etc., et al,

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

___________________________________________________

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert James Neville appeals the dismissal of his action seeking injunctive relief and a stay

of execution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that a particular lethal injection protocol as well as

related procedures violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The district

court dismissed Neville’s action because he was dilatory in filing his action for equitable relief. We

AFFIRM.

A challenge to a method of execution may be filed any time after the plaintiff’s conviction has

become final on direct review. White v. Johnson, 429 F.3d 572, 574 (2005). Neville’s death penalty

conviction was affirmed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 1999. Neville then waited until
two days before his scheduled execution to file a method of execution challenge with the district

court. He, therefore, “‘delayed unnecessarilyin bringing his claim.’” Harris v. Johnson, 376 F.3d 414,

416 (5th Cir. 2004) (quoting Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637, 650 (2004)).

A cognizable § 1983 claim “”does not warrant the entry of a stay as a matter of right.”” See

White, 429 F.3d at 573 (quoting Nelson, 541 U.S. at 649). Rather, this “court may consider the lastminute nature of an application to stay execution in deciding whether to grant equitable relief.” Id.

In addition, the court may consider the last-minute nature of all types of equitable requests, including

permanent injunctions. See id. at 574. This court “‘must take into consideration the State’s strong

interest in proceeding with itsjudgment and . . . attempts at manipulation.’” Id. (quoting Nelson, 541

U.S. at 649) (alteration in original).

Neville offers no excuse for delaying his claim until the last minute, and, therefore, we find

it improper to grant the equitable relief he seeks. Although the Supreme Court has granted a writ of

certiorari in Hill v. Crosby, 05-8794, – S. Ct. –, 2006 WL 171583 (Jan. 25, 2006), “our precedent

. . . remains binding until the Supreme Court provides contrary guidance.” In re: Elizalde, No. 06-

70002 (5th Cir. Jan. 31, 2006) (citations omitted). Therefore, we AFFIRM the district court’s

dismissal of Neville’s claims.