alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 6A/6. l

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 6A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 656. ledna 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 6A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 656. ledna 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Opravy |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Oprava oznámení o otevřeném výběrovém řízení – EPSO/AD/396/21 – právníci-lingvisté (AD 7) irského jazyka (GA) ( Úř. věst. C 466 A, 18.11.2021 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Opravy

2022/C 6 A/01

Oprava oznámení o otevřeném výběrovém řízení – EPSO/AD/396/21 – právníci-lingvisté (AD 7) irského jazyka (GA) ( Úř. věst. C 466 A, 18.11.2021 )

( Úř. věst. C 466 A, 18.11.2021 )

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

Opravy

| 6.1.2022 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 6/1

---

Oprava oznámení o otevřeném výběrovém řízení – EPSO/AD/396/21 – právníci-lingvisté (AD 7) irského jazyka (GA)

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 466 A ze dne 18. listopadu 2021
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

Strana 1, pod názvem:

| místo: | „Lhůta pro registraci: do 21. prosince 2021, 12:00 hodin (poledne) bruselského času“, |
| --- | --- |

místo:

„Lhůta pro registraci: do 21. prosince 2021, 12:00 hodin (poledne) bruselského času“,

| má být: | „Lhůta pro registraci: do 25. ledna 2022, 12:00 hodin (poledne) lucemburského času“. |
| --- | --- |

má být:

má být:

„Lhůta pro registraci: do 25. ledna 2022, 12:00 hodin (poledne) lucemburského času“.

Strana 5, poslední pododstavec:

| místo: | „Přihlášku podejte elektronicky prostřednictvím internetových stránek EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities, a to:

  do 21. prosince 2021, 12:00 hodin (poledne) bruselského času“, |
| --- | --- |

místo:

místo:

„Přihlášku podejte elektronicky prostřednictvím internetových stránek EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities, a to:

do 21. prosince 2021, 12:00 hodin (poledne) bruselského času“,

| má být: | „Přihlášku podejte elektronicky prostřednictvím internetových stránek EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities, a to:

  do 25. ledna 2022, 12:00 hodin (poledne) lucemburského času“. |
| --- | --- |

má být:

má být:

„Přihlášku podejte elektronicky prostřednictvím internetových stránek EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities, a to:

do 25. ledna 2022, 12:00 hodin (poledne) lucemburského času“.

---
John BACCUS, petitioner, v. Edgar L. CLEMENTS, III, et al.

No. 18-8297.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Robert A. ESPINOZA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5210.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    [LETTERHEAD OF BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.]



To Whom It May Concern:                                  January 21, 2000

The firm of Barry L. Friedman, P.C., Certified Public Accountant consents to the
inclusion of their report of January 21, 2000, on the Financial Statements of
Bahamas Enterprises, Inc., as of December 31, 1999, in any filings that are
necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.



Very truly yours,


/s/ BARRY L. FRIEDMAN
---------------------------
Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40828

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LARUE JOHNSON, also known as Juggy,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-641-1

Before OWEN, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In June 2010, Larue Johnson, federal prisoner # 64812-279, was 

convicted by guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute 92.4 grams of 

cocaine base and was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment and five years 

of supervised release. He now requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

(IFP) from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, in 

which he sought a sentence reduction pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40828 Document: 00512590372 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2014
No. 13-40828

2010 (FSA). By moving to proceed IFP, Johnson challenges the district court’s 

implicit certification that the appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh 

v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

The Government has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal due to 

Johnson’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal or, in the alternative, to grant 

it a 10-day extension to file an appellate brief. The record supports the 

Government’s contention. Johnson’s notice of appeal was filed after the 

expiration of the time for filing a timely notice of appeal and beyond the time 

during which the district court could have extended the time for filing a notice 

of appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). We therefore dismiss this 

appeal as untimely. See id.; see also United States v. Garcia-Cabrera, 472 F. 

App’x 340, 341 (5th Cir. 2012)(dismissing sentencing appeal as untimely).1 

The Government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is 

DISMISSED as untimely. All other motions are DENIED.

1Mindful that the time to appeal is not jurisdictional in a criminal case, we note that 

even if we pretermitted the issue of whether Johnson filed a timely notice of appeal and 

addressed the merits of the case, his appeal would fail. See United States v. Martinez, 496 

F.3d 387, 389 (5th Cir. 2007). As Johnson was sentenced before the FSA’s effective date to 

the statutory minimum of 120 months of imprisonment, he was not eligible for a § 3582(c)(2) 

reduction. See United States v. Kelly, 716 F.3d 180, 181 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 439 

(2013). Accordingly, Johnson cannot present a nonfrivolous issue, and the appeal would have 

to be dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 

220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 

 Case: 13-40828 Document: 00512590372 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 165 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 165

 Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school 
                   buses that do not have seat belts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Kleczka introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school 
                   buses that do not have seat belts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    No person shall manufacture, sell, deliver, or import any school 
bus, constructed after the effective date of this Act, for use by a 
person described in section 2 to provide transportation service, unless 
such school bus is equipped with a seat belt for each passenger riding 
in such school bus.

SEC. 2. PERSONS TO WHICH PROHIBITION APPLIES.

    The prohibition set forth in section 1 shall apply to--
            (1) any school bus, as such term is defined in section 
        4221(d)(7)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
            (2) any Federal, State, or local government entity, school 
        district, or other public or private entity providing 
        transportation to passengers by school bus.

SEC. 3. CIVIL PENALTIES; SECRETARY'S AUTHORITY TO COMPROMISE.

    (a) Amount of Penalties.--Whoever violates any provision of this 
Act, or any regulation issued thereunder, shall be subject to a civil 
penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each such violation. A violation with 
respect to each school bus shall constitute a separate violation, 
except that the maximum civil penalty shall not exceed $800,000 for any 
related series of violations.
    (b) Compromise of Penalties.--Any such civil penalty may be 
compromised by the Secretary of Transportation. In determining the 
amount of such penalty, or the amount agreed upon in compromise, the 
appropriateness of such penalty to the size of the business of the 
person charged and the gravity of the violation shall be considered.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of its enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Andres A. LOPEZ-MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5053.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Hersy JONES, Jr., petitioner, v. SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, et al.

No. 18-8248.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Case No. DA 20-0464 

__________________________________________________________________ 

JOSEPH RICHARD GOSS, 

 Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 vs. 

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES A-D, Inclusive, 

 Defendant and Appellee. 

GRANT OF EXTENSION 

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time up 

to and including January 22, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellee’s answer brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 17 2020

12/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0464
Noah Richard LOVELL, III, petitioner, v. Noah NAGY, Warden.

No. 18-8321.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Euroopa Liidu C 34/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 34 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 65. aastakäik24. jaanuar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 34

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

65. aastakäik24. jaanuar 2022

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2022/C 34/01 | Euro vahetuskurss — 21. jaanuar 2022 | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2022/C 34/01

Euro vahetuskurss — 21. jaanuar 2022

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 24.1.2022 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 34/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

21. jaanuar 2022

(2022/C 34/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,1348 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 129,14 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4431 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,83633 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 10,4140 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,0353 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 145,60 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 10,0523 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria leev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 24,347 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 358,19 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,5318 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 15,2230 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,5774 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,4211 |
| HKD | Hongkongi dollar | 8,8370 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,6884 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,5260 |
| KRW | Korea vonn | 1 351,89 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 17,1546 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 7,1946 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,5280 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 16 244,20 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,7508 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 58,171 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 86,8380 |
| THB | Tai baat | 37,358 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 6,2063 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 23,2229 |
| INR | India ruupia | 84,4190 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,1348

JPY

Jaapani jeen

129,14

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4431

GBP

Inglise nael

0,83633

SEK

Rootsi kroon

10,4140

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,0353

ISK

Islandi kroon

145,60

NOK

Norra kroon

10,0523

BGN

Bulgaaria leev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

24,347

HUF

Ungari forint

358,19

PLN

Poola zlott

4,5318

RON

Rumeenia leu

4,9453

TRY

Türgi liir

15,2230

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,5774

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,4211

HKD

Hongkongi dollar

8,8370

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,6884

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,5260

KRW

Korea vonn

1 351,89

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

17,1546

CNY

Hiina jüaan

7,1946

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,5280

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

16 244,20

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,7508

PHP

Filipiini peeso

58,171

RUB

Vene rubla

86,8380

THB

Tai baat

37,358

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

6,2063

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

23,2229

INR

India ruupia

84,4190

---

(1)  Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
Michael WILLIAMSON, petitioner, v. Karen SLUSHER, et al.

No. 18-8142.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 03-4073

MARTY SHANE ATWELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-01-21-V)

Submitted: October 27, 2003

Decided: December 4, 2003

Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Eric A. Bach, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Douglas Scott

Broyles, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Marty Shane Atwell pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to

distribute Oxycodone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846

(2000). Atwell was sentenced to 108 months in prison. He now

appeals. His attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising three claims but stating that

there are no meritorious issues for review. Atwell was advised of his

right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not filed such a brief.

Atwell and his coconspirators obtained prescriptions for OxyContin through prescription fraud. Atwell also distributed the drug. Investigators estimated that Atwell was accountable for approximately

28,592 dosage units of OxyContin. 

Our review of the record discloses full compliance with Fed. R.

Crim. P. 11. Further, there is no merit to the claim that the district

court should have required the United States to move for downward

departure based upon substantial assistance. We note that the Government must move for such a departure, and there is no suggestion that

the United States’ decision not to make a motion was based upon

improper motive or that the United States ceded to the district court

its authority to make the departure decision. See United States v. Butler, 272 F.3d 683, 686 (4th Cir. 2001). Finally, we conclude that the

district court correctly calculated Atwell’s guideline range of 108-135

months and did not err in sentencing him to 108 months in prison. 

We therefore affirm. As required by counsel, we have reviewed the

entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We

deny counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation at this time.

This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his

right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further

review. If Atwell requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes

that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this

court to withdraw representation. Counsel’s motion must state that

counsel served a copy of the motion on Atwell. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre2 UNITED STATES v. ATWELL
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. ATWELL 3
Edward JoRodge GLADNEY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9084.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF IBM, et al., petitioners, v. Larry W. JANDER, et al.

No. 18-1165.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1692 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1692

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
    feasibility of including the Gaviota Coast of California in the 
                         National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1999

  Mrs. Capps introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
    feasibility of including the Gaviota Coast of California in the 
                         National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gaviota Coast Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. GAVIOTA COAST.

    (a) Study Requirement.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct 
a study, pursuant to the criteria set forth in section 8(c)(2) of 
Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)(2); commonly known as the National 
Park System General Authorities Act), of the suitability and 
feasibility of including the area of California known as the Gaviota 
Coast in the National Park System. The study area shall extend 
generally from Coal Oil Point at Santa Barbara to Point Sal, 
California.
    (b) Submission.--The Secretary shall submit the findings of such 
study upon its completion to the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 
the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                0000909724
<NAME>               The Leather Factory, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                             13,963
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,884,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                       40,000
<INVENTORY>                                     7,032,041
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,160,308
<PP&E>                                          2,561,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,583,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,728,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,032,606
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           23,648
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,042,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,728,614
<SALES>                                         5,710,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,710,832
<CGS>                                           3,296,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,296,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                240,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (118,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (29,556)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (88,528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (88,528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.01)
                                                 
        



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of IA Global, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derek Schneideman,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        July 15, 2008
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Board  of  Directors
Information  Highway.com,  Inc.

     We  consent  to  the  use  of  our  report  dated September 10, 2001 on the
financial  statements  of  Information  Highway.com, Inc. as of May 31, 2001 and
2000  that  are  included in the Form 10-KSB, which is included, by reference in
the  Company's  Form  SB-2  for  the registration of shares of its common stock.

Dated this 17th day of September, 2001.

MANNING  ELLIOTT
Chartered  Accountants


/s/ Manning  Elliott

Manning  Elliott


<PAGE>