alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AQUA CARE SYSTEMS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Heffner, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Heffner
-----------------
Scott Heffner
President
August 9, 2002
In the Senate of the United States,

October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1695) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the conveyance of certain Federal public lands in the Ivanpah Valley,

Nevada, to Clark County, Nevada, for the development of an

airport facility, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the

following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 2, lines 24 and 25, strike out øassessment¿ and

2 insert: assessment, using the airspace management plan re3 quired by section 4(a),

4 Ω2æPage 3, strike out lines 15 through 22 and insert:

5 (2) DEPOSIT IN SPECIAL ACCOUNT.—(A) The

6 Secretary shall deposit the payments received under

7 paragraph (1) into the special account described in

8 section 4(e)(1)(C) of the Southern Nevada Public

9 Land Management Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2345).

10 Such funds may be expended only for the acquisition
2

HR 1695 EAS

1 of private inholdings in the Mojave National Preserve

2 and for the protection and management of the

3 petroglyph resources in Clark County, Nevada. The

4 second sentence of section 4(f) of such Act (112 Stat.

5 2346) shall not apply to interest earned on amounts

6 deposited under this paragraph.

7 (B) The Secretary may not expend funds pursu8 ant to this section until—

9 (i) the provisions of section 5 of this Act

10 have been completed; and

11 (ii) a final Record of Decision pursuant to

12 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

13 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) has been issued which

14 permits development of an airport at the

15 Ivanpah site.

16 Ω3æPage 3, strike out all after line 22 over to and includ17 ing line 2 on page 4 and insert:

18 (d) REVERSION AND REENTRY.—If, following comple19 tion of compliance with section 5 of this Act and in accord20 ance with the findings made by the actions taken in compli21 ance with such section, the Federal Aviation Administra22 tion and the County determine that an airport should not

23 be constructed on the conveyed lands—
3

HR 1695 EAS

1 Ω4æPage 4, line 23, strike out øSecretary,¿ and insert:

2 Secretary, prior to the conveyance of the land referred to

3 in section 2(a),

4 Ω5æPage 5, line 18, after ‘‘agencies.’’ insert: Any actions

5 conducted in accordance with this section shall specifically

6 address any impacts on the purposes for which the Mojave

7 National Preserve was created.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1695

AMENDMENTS
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/22/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      192,346
COMMITMENTS
  55,284    8,547   32,408   80,397  123,143  168,089  164,098   24,258   28,249

CHANGES FROM 03/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,667)
    -770       46   -2,633      396   -1,496   -3,007   -4,083   -1,661     -584

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.7      4.4     16.8     41.8     64.0     87.4     85.3     12.6     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      206)
      69       26       60       65       86      158      155
```

----

Updated March 25, 2011
Jamal James CARMOUCHE, petitioner, v. Jason KENT, Warden.

No. 18-8681.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated May 11, 2012
Jay Maurice THARPS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7914.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Inyang Peter ODUOK, petitioner, v. Julie E. CARNES, et al.

No. 18M10.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certifications**

 

I,Kay L. Toolson, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Monaco Coach Corporation;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: | August 10,  2004 |                    |   | /s/:  Kay L. Toolson |   |
|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |                  | Kay  L. Toolson         |
|   |                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

h0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145025

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145025

COA: 307920

Calhoun CC: 2011-001363-FC

MELVIN TROY NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 Certification

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), Stephen S. Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of Asyst Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company"), and David L. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

      1. The Company's Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2004, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report")
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Dated:  August 5, 2004

/s/ STEPHEN S. SCHWARTZ                                 /s/ DAVID L. WHITE
---------------------------------------------------     ------------------
Stephen S. Schwartz, Ph.D.                              David L. White
Chief Executive Officer                                 Chief Financial Officer

This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Ronald LUNSFORD, Jr., petitioner, v. INDIANA.

No. 18-8969.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00627

- CR

Trial court case number: 1362336

Trial court: 182nd District Cou rt of Harris County

Although the record reflects that the appellant has the right to appeal, the trial court’s certification indicates that appellant both does and does not have the right of appeal. The Rules of Appellate Procedure require that a certifi cation from the trial court of the appellant’s right to appeal be filed in every criminal case in which the trial court enters a judgment or other appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (appellate court has ability to examine a certification for defectiveness and obtain another certification whenever appropriate).

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remove it from this Court’s active docket so that a certification showing that appell ant has the right to appeal may be executed.

We direct the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and appellant’s counsel, Timothy A. Hootman , shall be

present

. Appellant shall also be pr esent for the hearing in person, or he may appear by closed

video teleconferenc e. 1

At the hearing, the trial court shall complete a certification of the appellant’s right to appeal. The certification must be signed by the trial court, appellant, and appel lant’s counsel. If appellant appears by video teleconference, appellant’s signature on the certification may be obtained by mailing the certification to appellant following the hearing.

1 Any such teleconference must use a closed

- circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound bet ween the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing

the State.A supplemental clerk’s record containing the completed certification of appellant’s right

to appeal shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

do cket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental

clerk’s record is filed in this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and not ify the parties of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individ ually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 11, 2014
Charles Russell RHINES, petitioner, v. Darin YOUNG, Warden.

No. 18-8029.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion of Law Professors for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Motion of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Todd G. Simpson, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Ditech
Networks, Inc. (the "Company"), and William J. Tamblyn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2010, and to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and

2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th Day of July, 2010.

/s/ TODD G. SIMPSON, PHD Todd G. Simpson, PhD CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN William J. Tamblyn CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


The
foregoing certification is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document and is not
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Diversified Product Inspections, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Van Zyll, Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated: March 31, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      John Van ZyllJohn
      Van ZyllChief
      Executive Officer,
                    Chairman
      of the Boardand
      Chief Financial
Officer
Anthony FRANKLIN, petitioner, v. Patrick NOGAN, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 18-8639.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Colton W. SIEVERS, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 18-1166.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
CORONA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, et al. v. Marlyn SALI, et al.

No. 18-1262 (R46-016).

Supreme Court of the United States

May 3, 2019.

The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
Zachary Wayne JONES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9183.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
      Report of Bankrate, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended
      December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
      its
      results of operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended
      December 31, 2006.




March
              16, 2007
            
            /s/ Thomas
              R.
              EvansThomas R. Evans
              President and Chief Executive
                Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
Randall Clark WALL, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 17-9525.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
EXHIBIT 99.4


           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2003, amended by
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (collectively, the "Report"), I,
David V. Harmsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    May 15, 2003


/s/  David V. Harmsen
-----------------------------
     David V. Harmsen, Chief Financial Officer
     Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc.
HANCOCK
JAFFE LABORATORIES, INC


AMENDED
AND RESTATED 2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Award
Agreement


 


This
Award Agreement evidences an Award of Restricted Stock Units (the “RSUs”) pursuant to the provisions of the Hancock
Jaffe Laboratories, Inc.’s Amended and Restated 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to the individual whose
name appears below (the “Grantee”), on the following express terms and conditions (capitalized terms not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Plan):


 


	1.	Name of Participant:
	 	 
	2.	Number of RSUs:
	 	 
	3.	Purchase Price / Consideration: 1
	 	 
	4.	Grant Date:
	 	 
	5.	Commencement Date for Vesting: 
	 	 
	6.	Restricted Period / Risk of Forfeiture:2
	 	 
	7.	Change in Control:3
	 	 
	8.	Settlement of RSUs:4
	 	 
	9.	Additional Terms:5




 


The
Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan as presently in effect. The text and all of the terms and provisions
of the Plan are incorporated herein by reference, and this RSU is subject to these terms and provisions in all respects. The Grantee
shall remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy the required withholding tax obligation of the Company that arises
upon settlement of the RSUs.


 


HANCOCK
JAFFE LABORATORIES, INC.


 


	By:
    	 	 	 
	Name:	Robert
    A. Berman	 	Dated
	Title:
    	Chief
    Executive Officer	 	 


 
Agreed
                                         to and Accepted by:


 


	 	 	 
	 	 	Dated


 





 























1
If a purchase price is required, provide it here. If the grant is in consideration for services rendered, say so here. If
payment in cash is required, you may include any alternatives other than cash payment that the board will accept (for
example, shares, keep in mind withholding for employees).


2
Consideration needs to be given here as to what happens in the event there is a termination of service.



3 State the impact of a change in control upon the RSU. The plan provides flexibility to the board to provide for one or
more of the following: (i) accelerate vesting of the RSU, (ii) cause for the assumption, continuation or substitution of the
RSU or (iii) cash-out the RSU. See Section 15.2 in the plan.



4 Indicate here whether RSUs will be settled for short term deferrals. If not, specify upon which events the RSUs will
be settled.



5 The plan provides that RSU holders may have voting rights / dividend rights if provided for in the agreement. You
would indicate if there are voting rights / dividend rights here.


 



    	1