alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Anton io, Texas

February 22, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00034

- CV

INTEREST OF D.M.H., JR.

, From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00016 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant T.W. has filed a motion for extension of time to fi le appellant’s brief. Appellant T.W. ’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief is due on March 11, 2019.

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of February, 2 019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
(LOGO) Pricewaterhouse Coopers

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
Bank of America Corporate Center
100 N. Tryon Street
Suite 5400
Charlotte NC 28202
Telephone (704)344 7500



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



February 28, 2000



To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Bank of America, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion about compliance by BA Mortgage, LLC and
the Mortgage  division of Bank of America,  N.A.(collectively,  the "Company"),
which together comprise an operating division of Bank of America, N.A., with the
minimum servicing standards (the "Standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
("USAP") as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1999 included in the
accompanying  management assertion, attached hereto as Exhibit I. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the Standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on  management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance  with the
Standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis for
our  opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination  on the
Company's compliance with the Standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, except as indicated in Exhibit I,
the Company  complied with the  aforementioned Standards as of and for the year
ended December 31,1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
In Re Robert A. McNEIL, et al., petitioners.

No. 17-1715.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with The Beard Company’s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herb Mee, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                     |                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 19, 2008 | By:  /s/ Herb Mee, Jr.               

Herb Mee, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer |
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                                             |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  August 23, 2010 | By:  /s/  Herb Mee, Jr.                                      |
|                             | Herb Mee, Jr.                                                                    |
|                             |         President and Chief Financial Officer |

----
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





The
      Board
      of Directors


Bankrate,
      Inc.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-87955) on Form S-8 of Bankrate, Inc. of our reports dated March 15,
      2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bankrate, Inc. and
      subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
      statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
      years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, management’s
      assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
      as
      of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the
      December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Bankrate, Inc.





/s/
      KPMG
      LLP





Fort
      Lauderdale, Florida


March
      15,
      2006


Certified
      Public Accountants
Meryl S. McDONALD, petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-7822.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29381-29382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 23, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Advanced Media Workflow 
Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Appear, Oslo, NORWAY; Broadcast Solutions GmbH, 
Rheinland-Pfalz, GERMANY; Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; One 
Diversified, LLC, Kenilworth, NJ; and Joost Rovers (individual member), 
Senhora de Hora,

[[Page 29382]]

PORTUGAL, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, 
Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 16, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 13, 2022 (87 FR 2181).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10280 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.5

CHINA NETTV HOLDINGS INC.

NASD OTCBB:CNHD                             June 7, 2001

TOP BOX CONTRACT IN GUANGDONG PROVINCE

Further to the press release of December 4, 2000, China NetTV Holdings wishes to
announce that Sichuan Qianfeng Digital Audio/Video Equipment Co. Ltd. ("QF
Digital") has signed an agreement with Guangzhou New Data Broadband Technology
Company Limited for 2,000 Set-Top Boxes. A deposit will be made and this will be
an initial order of possibly more orders to follow. The Set-Top Boxes will be
customized to the buyer's specifications. QF Digital is also finalizing another
order for 1,000 satellite signal Set-Top Boxes. This represents an order outside
of the company's base of Sichuan province. Guangzhou, provincial capital of
Guangdong, is the commercial and political center of Southern China. Earlier, a
complete headend system and 300 Set-Top Boxes were delivered to Sichuan Cable
and are currently undergoing trial broadcasts.

Based in Sichuan Province, QF Digital is a pioneer and leader in China in
Proprietary Digital Data Transmission Technology and Solutions for the
Television Broadcasting and Cable industries. It has proprietary technology
based on the patented ASIC "L64769QAM", offering complete turnkey Digital TV
Broadcasting solutions consisting of Set-Top Boxes and headend systems. There
are currently over 350 million TV sets in China and over 90 million cable
subscribers, the largest cable market in the world. The conversion from analog
TV to digital TV through Set-Top Boxes is still at its infancy. Trial digital
cable projects are underway in Shenzhen, Shanghai and other major cities. It is
the company's intention to expand from its current stronghold of Sichuan to
other parts of the country. QF Digital also plans to incorporate Smart Card and
WebTV capabilities into their Set-Top Boxes.

The Company has filed its Form 10QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2001.
Please visit our web site: " www.chinanettvholdings.com".

Any forward-looking statement in this press release is made pursuant to the
"safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Investors are cautioned that actual results may differ substantially from
such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties including, but not limited to, economical and political factors,
technological developments and changes in international and local markets, as
well as the inherent risks of the technology related business.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CHINA NETTV HOLDINGS INC.

"Signed"
------------------------
Ernest Cheung, President

For further information, please contact: Ernest Cheung (604) 689-4407
Earnest PEEL, petitioner, v. H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY.

No. 18-859.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and Statement of Operation and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,504,797
<SECURITIES>                                   500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,232,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,569,757
<PP&E>                                         481,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                 233,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,922,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,411,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    49,622,782
<OTHER-SE>                                (50,852,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,922,458
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,155,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,772,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,772,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.98)
        

</TABLE>
Dale SHOOP, petitioner, v. Ralph TERRY, Acting Warden.

No. 18M147.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DAG Media, Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Assaf Ran, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Assaf Ran
--------------------------------------
    Assaf Ran, Chief Executive Officer

February 25, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 1, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30065 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ARCADIO VILLALOVOS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:06-CR-30008-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Arcadio Villalovos appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute. He argues that the evidenc e was not sufficient to prove that he knew cocaine was secreted in a hidden compartment ofthe vehicle that he was driving when he was stopped by a Louisiana patrol officer for alleged traffic violations.No. 07-30065

2 The argument fails. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, there was ample circumstantial evidence of guilty knowledge. See United Statesv. Mendoza, 226 F.3d 340, 343 (5th Cir. 2000). Villalovos was the driver of a vehicle containing over 30 kilograms of cocaine, valued at approximately $600,000, which had been placed inside a hidden compartment in the rear cargo area. On the basis of Villalovos’s nervous behavior during his interaction with lawenforcement, the implausible and inconsistent statements Villalovos made during questioning, the substantial modifications made to the vehicle, and the largeamount ofcocaine involved, therewas morethan sufficient evidence to support an inference by the jury that Villalovos knew that the vehicle contained cocaine. See United Statesv. Ortega Reyna, 148 F.3d 540, 544 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Villarreal , 324 F.3d 319, 324 (5th Cir. 2003). Villalovos additionally argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence recovered during the search ofthe vehicle. He argues that his detention was impermissibly extended and that he did not voluntarily consent to the search. Our review of the record shows that the district court did not err in determining that the initial stop of Villalovos’s vehicle was permissibly extended based on reasonable suspicion of other criminal activity. See United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 506-07 (5th Cir. 2004) (en banc). The district court also did not err in determining that Villalovos voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle. See United States v. Solis, 299 F.3d 420, 435-37 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. Shabazz, 993 F.2d 431, 437-39 (5th Cir. 1993). Villalovos has not shown that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. AFFIRMED.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/13/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      142,425
COMMITMENTS
  43,595   25,071   25,104   56,376   68,191  125,075  118,366   17,350   24,059

CHANGES FROM 12/06/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,491)
    -701     -169    1,679      170      160    1,147    1,669      344     -178

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.6     17.6     17.6     39.6     47.9     87.8     83.1     12.2     16.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      51       30       36       60       60      129      115
```

----

Updated December 16, 2011
Wiliam Oneal WATTERS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-8398.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Juan Francisco VEGA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-8686.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Jesse LOOR, petitioner, v. Jenny BAILEY, et al.

No. 18-43.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/01/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      160,407
COMMITMENTS
  18,049   27,431   32,562   90,254   85,038  140,865  145,031   19,542   15,376

CHANGES FROM 02/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,180)
   2,493      773   -1,815     -249      557      429     -485   -2,609   -1,695

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.3     17.1     20.3     56.3     53.0     87.8     90.4     12.2      9.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      100)
      30       27       39       24       28       78       83
```

----

Updated March 4, 2011
Jackie MADORE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9049.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1610

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reinstate the DSH allotment

level for Minnesota to the fiscal year 1995 level.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. LUTHER (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. VENTO, Mr. SABO, Mr.

RAMSTAD, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. MINGE, and Mr. GUTKNECHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reinstate

the DSH allotment level for Minnesota to the fiscal

year 1995 level.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATING MINNESOTA MEDICAID DSH AL4 LOTMENT LEVEL.

5 Section 1923(f)(2) of the Social Security Act (42

6 U.S.C. 1396r–4(f)(2)) is amended, in the table contained

7 in such section and in the DSH Allotments for Minnesota
2

•HR 1610 IH

1 for each of fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002, by striking

2 ‘‘16’’ and inserting ‘‘33’’.

Æ