alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      21.1**

**Subsidiaries      of the Company**

| 1.   | Intra-Asia              Entertainment Corporation, a Delaware corporation, 100% held by Intra-Asia              Entertainment Co., a Nevada company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Intra-Asia              Entertainment (Asia Pacific) Limited, a directly wholly owned subsidiary              of the Company and Samoan corporation, 100% hold by Intra-Asia              Entertainment Co., a Nevada company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Intra-Asia              Entertainment (China) Limited, a directly wholly-owned subsidiary of              the              Company and a Hong Kong corporation, 100% hold by Intra-Asia Entertainment              Co., a Nevada company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | Oriental              Intra-Asia Entertainment (China) Limited, an indirectly wholly-owned              subsidiary of the Company and a PRC corporation. Intra-Asia Entertainment              (Asia Pacific) Limited and Intra-Asia Entertainment (China) Limited              owns              40% and 60% of Oriental Intra-Asia Entertainment (China) Limited,              respectively. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/15/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      597,335
COMMITMENTS
  53,737   23,876  133,780  384,393  414,565  571,910  572,221   25,425   25,114

CHANGES FROM 03/08/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -10,738)
   6,291   -4,064   -8,914  -11,919   -2,289  -14,542  -15,267    3,804    4,529

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.0      4.0     22.4     64.4     69.4     95.7     95.8      4.3      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      127)
      35       21       47       61       64      119      112
```

----

Updated March 18, 2011
<PAGE>

                     THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of
January 11, 2000, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
("Employer") and Thomas Martin ("Executive").


                                    RECITALS

         A)  On March 31, 1998 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into
             by and between Employer and Executive.

         B)  On March 31, 1999 a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was
             made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

         C)  On November 22, 1999, a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
             was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.

         D)  Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment
             Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:

                                    AGREEMENT

         1)  Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which provides:

               3.1 TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall
               commence on April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31,
               2000 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter
               provided (the "Employment Term").

               is hereby amended, effective as of January 11, 2000, to provide
               as follows:

               3.1 TERM. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall
               commence on April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31,
               2001 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter
               provided (the "Employment Term").

         2)  All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall
             remain unaltered and fully effective.



<PAGE>




Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.



EXECUTIVE                                        EMPLOYER
---------                                        --------
                                                PriceSmart, INC.

Thomas Martin                                   By: /s/ Kurt May

/s/ Thomas Martin                               Name: Kurt May

                                                Its: Chief Operating Officer
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/03/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      571,951
COMMITMENTS
  56,338   14,115  137,064  352,123  402,687  545,524  553,866   26,427   18,085

CHANGES FROM 04/26/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,265)
  -1,730      659    4,223    4,774    4,266    7,267    9,148      998     -883

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.9      2.5     24.0     61.6     70.4     95.4     96.8      4.6      3.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      36       26       48       67       67      129      117
```

----

Updated May 6, 2011
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45027

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOSHUA LEO VESELY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 674

Filed: December 18, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of ten years, with two 

and one-half years determinate, for three counts of possession of a controlled 

substance with intent to deliver, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenevieve C. Swinford, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Joshua Leo Vesely was found guilty of one count of possession of morphine with intent 

to deliver, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a); one count of possession of hydrocodone with intent to 

deliver, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a); one count of possession of amphetamine with intent to deliver, 

Idaho Code § 37-2732(a); and one count of misdemeanor possession of “bath salts,” Idaho 

Code §§ 37-2732(c), 37-2705(f)(3). The district court imposed concurrent unified sentences of 

ten years, with two and one-half years determinate, for each count of possession with intent to 

deliver. For the misdemeanor, the district court sentenced Vesely to 120 days in jail, with 
2

120 days of credit for time served. Vesely appeals, contending that his sentences for possession 

with intent to deliver are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Vesely’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Marvin Jay CAUKIN, aka Jay Caukin, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9547.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Uradni list C 18/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 18 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6514. januar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 18

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6514. januar 2022

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2022/C 18/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 13. januar 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2022/C 18/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 13. januar 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 14.1.2022 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 18/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2022

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 18/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

13. januar 2022

(2022/C 18/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1463 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 130,98 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4409 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,83545 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,2380 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0453 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 147,00 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 9,9333 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 24,458 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 355,24 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5361 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,9440 |
| TRY | turška lira | 15,5744 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5709 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4304 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,9289 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6676 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5427 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 359,24 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,6381 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,2913 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5202 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 379,02 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,7875 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 58,572 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 86,6030 |
| THB | tajski bat | 38,080 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,3518 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 23,3894 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 84,7170 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1463

JPY

japonski jen

130,98

DKK

danska krona

7,4409

GBP

funt šterling

0,83545

SEK

švedska krona

10,2380

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0453

ISK

islandska krona

147,00

NOK

norveška krona

9,9333

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

24,458

HUF

madžarski forint

355,24

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5361

RON

romunski leu

4,9440

TRY

turška lira

15,5744

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5709

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4304

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,9289

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6676

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5427

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 359,24

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,6381

CNY

kitajski juan

7,2913

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5202

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 379,02

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,7875

PHP

filipinski peso

58,572

RUB

ruski rubelj

86,6030

THB

tajski bat

38,080

BRL

brazilski real

6,3518

MXN

mehiški peso

23,3894

INR

indijska rupija

84,7170

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
NUMBER 13-16-00278-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MELISSA MOYA AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

M.O., A MINOR CHILD, Appellant,

v.

RENE GUTIERREZ IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT 

FOR THE EDINBURG CONSOLIDATED 

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Melissa Moya as next friend of M.O., a minor child, filed an appeal from 

a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number 

C-1583-16-I. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to nonsuit the appeal. We 
2

construe the motion to nonsuit as a motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.1(a)(1). See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant’s 

motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed 

against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the 

court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s

request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of July, 2016.
Russell BERGER, petitioner, v. James GIBSON, et al.

No. 18-8211.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1749

To designate Wilson Creek in Avery and Caldwell Counties, North Carolina,

as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1999

Mr. BALLENGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To designate Wilson Creek in Avery and Caldwell Counties,

North Carolina, as a component of the National Wild

and Scenic Rivers System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILSON CREEK IN NORTH

4 CAROLINA AS A WILD, SCENIC, AND REC5 REATIONAL RIVER.

6 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

7 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(161) WILSON CREEK, NORTH CAROLINA.—(A)

10 The 23.3 mile segment of Wilson Creek in the State of
2

•HR 1749 IH

1 North Carolina from its headwaters to its confluence with

2 Johns River, to be administered by the Secretary of Agri3 culture in the following classifications:

4 ‘‘(i) The 2.9 mile segment from its headwaters

5 below Calloway Peak downstream to the confluence

6 of Little Wilson Creek, as a scenic river.

7 ‘‘(ii) The 4.6 segment from Little Wilson Creek

8 downstream to the confluence of Crusher Branch, as

9 a wild river.

10 ‘‘(iii) The 15.8 segment from Crusher Branch

11 downstream to the confluence of Johns River, as a

12 recreational river.

13 ‘‘(B) The Forest Service or any other agency of the

14 Federal Government may not undertake condemnation

15 proceedings for the purpose of acquiring public right-of16 way or access to Wilson Creek against the private property

17 of T. Henry Wilson (or his heirs or assigns) located in

18 Avery County, North Carolina (within the area 36°, 4

19 min., 21 sec. North 81°, 47 min., 37° West and 36°, 3

20 min., 13 sec. North and 81° 45 min. 55 sec. West), in

21 the area of Wilson Creek designated as a wild river.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 13, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Shipbuilding Research Program (“NSRP”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Conrad Industries, Inc., Morgan City, LA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NSRP intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 13, 1998, NSRP filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 29, 1999 (64 FR 4708).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 19, 2019. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 02, 2019 (84 FR 18864).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-10243 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Peter B. Bedford, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date:  November 9, 2004

/s/ Peter B. Bedford

Peter B. Bedford

Chief Executive Officer
Ignacio RUIZ, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-8557.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence J. Blanford, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 7, 2009 

/s/ Lawrence J. Blanford             

Lawrence J. Blanford* 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.