alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**
     The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AlliedHoldings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for theperiods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
     This 14th day of January, 2005.         /s/ David A. Rawden       *David A. Rawden*   *Executive Vice President and*   *Chief Financial Officer*
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference inany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.
# Official Journal C 297A/29 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 297A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4829 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 297A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4829 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 297A/1 | Publication of a vacancy for President of the Community Plant Variety Office (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10015 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2005/C 297A/1

Publication of a vacancy for President of the Community Plant Variety Office (Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2005/10015

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

III Notices

Commission

| 29.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 297/1

---

PUBLICATION OF A VACANCY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

(Grade A*14)

(Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/10015

(2005/C 297 A/01)

The Community Plant Variety Office is seeking to appoint its President.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The President shall be appointed by the Council from a list of candidates which shall be proposed by the Commission after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the Communities. The Community Plant Variety Office and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.

Job description, application forms and instructions for sending applications can be downloaded from the Internet at the following address:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

or

http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

The delay for the receipt of applications is 31 December 2005 (see details in application instructions).

---
Jabbar WALLACE, petitioner, v. Kevin KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

No. 18-5031.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Kerry KRUSKAL, petitioner, v. Allan MELTZER, et al.

No. 18-5200.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New Mexico denied.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Central African Republic

On May 12, 2014, by Executive Order 13667, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in and in relation to the Central African Republic, which has been marked by a breakdown of law and order; intersectarian tension; the pervasive, often forced recruitment and use of child soldiers; and widespread violence and atrocities, including those committed by Kremlin-linked and Yevgeniy Prigozhin-affiliated entities such as the Wagner Group, and which threatens the peace, security, or stability of the Central African Republic and neighboring states.

                        The situation in and in relation to the Central African Republic continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13667 on May 12, 2014, to deal with that threat must continue in effect beyond May 12, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared with respect to the Central African Republic. This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2022-10325

Billing code 3395-F2-P
In Re Urvashi BHAGAT, petitioner.

No. 18-1274.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion of Mr. Marcos Gonzales for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2197

In re: JERMAINE ANTWAN TART,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-ct-03207-D)

Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Antwan Tart, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Antwan Tart petitions this court for a writ of mandamus compelling 

North Carolina state prison officials to turn over legal documents and shoes allegedly 

stolen from Tart. We deny the petition.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, 907 

F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Moreover, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant 

mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cty., 411 

F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). 

Tart seeks an order directing action by state officials, but the relief he seeks is not 

available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.21
NANOSTRING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This amendment (the "Amendment") is made by and between Mary Tedd Allen ("Executive") and NanoString Technologies, Inc. (the "Company," and together with Executive, the "Parties") on the dates set forth below.


WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an employment agreement effective June 8, 2009 (the "Employment Agreement");


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement in order to clarify the timing of the severance payment, as set forth below, in accordance with Section V.I.B.3 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2010-6, as amended by Internal Revenue Service Notice 2010-80.


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, Executive and the Company agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows.


1.Section 409A. Section 13 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to insert the following paragraph immediately following the first paragraph thereof:


"Any severance payments or benefits under this Agreement that would be considered "deferred compensation" under Section 409A will be paid on, or, in the case of installments, will not commence until, the sixtieth (60th) day following Executive's Separation From Service, of, if later, such time is required by the final paragraph of this Section 13. Except as required by the final paragraph of this Section 13, any installment payments that would have been made to Executive during the 60 day period immediately following Executive's Separation From Service but for the preceding sentence will be paid to Executive on the sixtieth (60th) day following Executive's Separation from Service and the remaining payments shall be made as provided in this Agreement."


2.Full Force and Effect. To the extent not expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


3.Entire Agreement. This Amendment and the Agreement constitute the full and entire understanding and agreement between the Parties with regard to the subjects hereof and thereof. This Amendment may be amended at any time only by mutual written agreement of the Parties.


4.Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one instrument, and each of which may be executed by less than all of the parties to this Amendment.


5.Governing Law. This Amendment will be governed by the laws of the State of Washington (with the exception of its conflict of laws provisions).




















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, on the dates set forth below.






	
		
	NANOSTRING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

	 
	 

	/s/ Wayne D. Burns

	 
	 

	By:
	Wayne D. Burns

	 
	Sr. VP, Operations & Administration

	 
	 

	Date:
	December 26, 2012

	 
	 

	 
	 



             	
		
	Mary Tedd Allen

	 
	 

	/s/ Mary Tedd Allen

	 
	 

	By:
	Mary Tedd Allen

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Date:
	December 28, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1693 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1693

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the overtime 
     exemption for employees engaged in fire protection activities.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1693

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the overtime 
     exemption for employees engaged in fire protection activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF FIRE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES.

    Section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(y) `Employee in fire protection activities' means an employee, 
including a firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, 
rescue worker, ambulance personnel, or hazardous materials worker, 
who--
            ``(1) is trained in fire suppression, has the legal 
        authority and responsibility to engage in fire suppression, and 
        is employed by a fire department of a municipality, county, 
        fire district, or State; and
            ``(2) is engaged in the prevention, control, and 
        extinguishment of fires or response to emergency situations 
        where life, property, or the environment is at risk.''.

SEC. 2. CONSTRUCTION.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall not be construed to reduce or 
substitute for compensation standards (1) contained in any existing or 
future agreement or memorandum of understanding reached through 
collective bargaining by a bona fide representative of employees in 
accordance with the laws of a State or political subdivision of a 
State, and (2) which result in compensation greater than the 
compensation available to employees under the overtime exemption under 
section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Mohamad E. TAHA, et ux., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M134.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari by Ali M. Taha denied.
Jose Christian NUNEZ-BELEMONTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9109.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Consent of Beard Miller Company LLP, Independent Auditors

Regarding:

Registration Statements, File No. 333-82043 and No. 333-35344

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the above listed  Registration
Statements  of  our  report  dated  January  17,  2003,   with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial  statements of Steelton  Bancorp,  Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ BEARD MILLER COMPANY LLP



Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. DA 20-0464

__________________________________________________________________ JOSEPH RICHARD GOSS,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

vs.
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES A-D, Inclusive,

Defendant and Appellee.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of

Time, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time up

to and including January 22, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve

Appellee’s answer brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court December 17 2020

12/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0464
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1640

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make permanent

the exclusion from gross income for amounts received under qualified

group legal services plans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1999

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

and make permanent the exclusion from gross income

for amounts received under qualified group legal services

plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER

4 QUALIFIED GROUP LEGAL SERVICES PLANS

5 RESTORED AND MADE PERMANENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 120 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read

8 as follows:
2

HR 1640 IH

1 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section and

2 section 501(c)(20) shall apply to taxable years begin3 ning.—

4 ‘‘(1) after December 31, 1976, and before July

5 1, 1992, and

6 ‘‘(2) after June 30, 1999.’’

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

9 June 30, 1999.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09900]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14975-000]


Lock\+TM\ Hydro Friends Fund XXII, LLC; Notice of Surrender of 
Preliminary Permit

    Take notice that Lock<SUP>+TM</SUP> Hydro Friends Fund XXII, LLC, 
permittee for the proposed Little Pine Creek Dam Hydropower Project, 
has requested that its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was 
issued on December 6, 2019 and would have expired on November 30, 
2023.\1\ The project would have been located at the Pennsylvania 
Department of Conservation and Natural Resources' Little Pine Creek Dam 
on Little Pine Creek in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 169 FERC ] 62,138 (2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The preliminary permit for Project No. 14975 will remain in effect 
until the close of business, June 2, 2022. But, if the Commission is 
closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the close 
of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.\2\ New 
applications for this site may not be submitted until after the permit 
surrender is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2021).

    Dated: May 3, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09900 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of API Nanotronics Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Claudio Mannarino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    CLAUDIO
MANNARINO
|Claudio Mannarino       
|Chief Financial Officer 

August 25, 2008
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 40783 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Julian Solorzano**

**- Gonzalez,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 999

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges.

**Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julian Solorzano

- Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Solorzano

- Gonzalez has not filed a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40783 Document: 00515931575 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021No. 20

- 40783

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue f or appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. We note, however, that there is an apparent clerical error in the written judgment with respect to the date when the offense ended. Accordingly, we **REMAND** for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Crim inal Procedure 36. Case: 20-40783 Document: 00515931575 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
Scott BOOKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9081.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00015-CR

Ronald Lee Verdi, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 391ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-11-0505-SA, HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Robert Lee Verdi, Jr. was charged with aggravated sexual assault of a

child, a first degree felony. Tex. Penal Code § 22.021(a)(2)(B). Verdi pleaded guilty to the offense,

and the trial court placed him on probation for six years. In July 2014, the State filed a motion to

revoke Verdi’s probation based on eight violations of his probation. Verdi admitted that four of the

alleged violations were true and, after a bench trial, the trial court found that six of the alleged

violations were true. The trial court revoked Verdi’s probation and assessed punishment at 50 years’

confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Institutional Division.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 86–87 (1988).

Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that he has provided copies of the

motion and the brief to the appellant; advised the appellant of his right to examine the appellate

record and file a pro se brief; and provided the appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the

appellate record along with the mailing address of this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,

319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. We

have not received a pro se brief from the appellant.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at

766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that

the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field 

Affirmed

Filed: November 20, 2015

Do Not Publish

2