27090 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2022 / Notices 

Nutrition Monitoring and Related 

Research Act of 1990, Title III) the 

Secretaries of USDA and HHS are 

directed to publish the Dietary 

Guidelines for Americans jointly at least 

every five years. The law instructs that 

this publication shall contain 

nutritional and dietary information and 

guidelines for the general public, shall 

be based on the preponderance of 

scientific and medical knowledge 

current at the time of publication, and 

shall be promoted by each Federal 

agency in carrying out any Federal food, 

nutrition, or health program. Recent 

editions of the Dietary Guidelines 

provide dietary advice for Americans 

across the lifespan. By translating the 

Dietary Guidelines into consumer 

friendly nutrition education 

communication materials, CNPP and 

partnering agencies are able to help 

Americans make better or healthier food 

and beverage choices that can help 

improve health. One of the primary 

ways CNPP helps Americans apply the 

nutrition guidance in their daily lives is 

by developing and maintaining 

interactive, digital tools. CNPP’s digital 

resources and tools provide hands-on 

learning opportunities that empower 

Americans to think critically about their 

food and health choices. Maintaining 

and enhancing CNPP’s digital resources 

and tools are key in reversing the trend 

of childhood obesity and building a 

healthier next generation. 

USDA’s MyPlate icon is supported by 

a robust consumer nutrition education 

program to assist Americans in selecting 

foods for a dietary pattern that is 

consistent with the Dietary Guidelines. 

Ensuring that MyPlate resources and 

related tools are useful to intended 

audiences is critical to CNPP’s work and 

is a major activity included in its 5-year 

strategic plan in fulfillment of the 

Government Performance and Results 

Act of 1993 (31 U.S.C. 9701). 

Affected Public: Individual/ 

Households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

57,700. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 1.006932 (One for focus 

group screeners, interview screeners, 

focus groups, journaling, interviews, 

web-based collections and consent 

forms. Three for consumer panels.). 

Estimated Total Annual Responses: 

58,100. 

Estimated Time per Response: 12.759 

minutes (0.21265 hours). 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 12,354.96 rounded up to 

12,355 hours. See the table below for 

estimated total annual burden for each 

type of respondent. 

The total estimated annual burden is 

12,355 hours and 58,100 responses. 

Thus, we are requesting 37,065 three 

year burden estimates and 174,300 total 

responses for three year approval 

period. Current estimates are based on 

both historical numbers of respondents 

from past projects as well as estimates 

for projects to be conducted in the next 

three years. 

Cynthia Long, 

Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09724 Filed 5–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD 

INVESTIGATION BOARD 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS

ANNOUNCEMENT: (87 FR 23164), April 19, 

2022, FR Doc. 2022–08473. 

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF

THE MEETING: May 5, 2022, 1:00 p.m. 

EDT (4 hours) on Zoom. 

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Chemical 

Safety Board (CSB) unanimously voted 

on May 3, 2022, to cancel the meeting 

on the Loy-Lange Box Company 

Investigation Report previously 

scheduled for May 5, 2022. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Hillary Cohen, Communications 

Manager, at public@csb.gov or (202) 

446–8094. Further information about 

this public meeting can be found on the 

CSB website at: www.csb.gov. 

Dated: May 4, 2022. 

Tamara Qureshi, 

Assistant General Counsel, Chemical Safety 

and Hazard Investigation Board. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09897 Filed 5–4–22; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6350–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–106] 

Wooden Cabinet and Vanities and 

Components Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

Qufu Xinyu Furniture Co., Ltd. (Qufu 

Xinyu), did not make sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR) 

October 9, 2019, through March 31, 

2021; Shanghai Beautystar Cabinetry 

Co., Ltd. (Beautystar), is part of the 

China-wide entity; and Jiang Su 

Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Rongxin Wood), is the successor-ininterest to Jiangsu Rongxin Cabinets Co., 

Ltd. (Rongxin Cabinets). Commerce is 

also rescinding the review with respect 


JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1EN06MY22.024</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2022 / Notices 27091 

1See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 22126 

(April 21, 2020) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 86 FR 17137 

(April 1, 2021). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

31282, 31296 (June 11, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

4See Memoranda, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities and Components Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

August 6, 2021; ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Second Respondent Selection,’’ dated 

September 17, 2021; and ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities and Components Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Third Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated October 20, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities and Components Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China: Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the 

First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See Company Letters, ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated June 29, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities and Components Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China—Withdrawal of Fujian Senyi’s 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 9, 

2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China; Withdrawal of Request for Review,’’ dated 

July 12, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from 

the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 13, 

2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from the 

People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 21, 2021; 

‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China— 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated August 27, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated August 30, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and 

Vanities and Components Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China, A–570–106; Withdrawal of 

Request for Review,’’ dated September 3, 2021; 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Withdrawal of Administrative Review Request— 

Jiangsu Beichen Wood Co., Ltd.,’’ dated September 

7, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China; Withdrawal of Administrative Review 

Request,’’ dated September 7, 2021; ‘‘Wooden 

Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

September 8, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities 

from the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

September 8, 2021; ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities 

and Components Thereof from the People’s 

Republic of China—Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated September 8, 2021; 

and ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from The People’s Republic of 

China: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated September 9, 2021; see also 

Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and Vanities 

and Components Thereof from: Withdrawal of 

Review Request for The Ancientree Cabinet Co., 

Ltd.,’’ dated August 26, 2021. 

7See Appendix II; see also Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum at the ‘‘Separate Rate Determination’’ 

section for more details. 

8See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

9See Order. 

10See Initiation Notice (‘‘All firms listed below 

that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME countries 

must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described below.’’); 

see also Appendix II for the list of companies that 

are subject to this administrative review that are 

considered to be part of the China-wide entity. 

11See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 13– 

14. 

to 40 companies. Interested parties are 

invited to comment on these 

preliminary results of review. 

DATES: Applicable May 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacob Keller, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4948. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 21, 2020, the Department of 

Commerce published in the Federal 

Register the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on wooden cabinets and vanities 

and components thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China (China).1 On 

April 1, 2021, Commerce published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the Order.2 On June 11, 2021, 

based on timely requests for an 

administrative review, Commerce 

initiated the administrative review of 

the Order.3 The administrative review 

covers 66 companies, including three 

mandatory respondents, Beautystar, 

Qufu Xinyu, and Rongxin Cabinets.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 

are wooden cabinets and vanities that 

are for permanent installation 

(including floor mounted, wall 

mounted, ceiling hung or by attachment 

of plumbing), and wooden components 

thereof. A full description of the scope 

of the Order is provided in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5

Rescission of Review in Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested a review 

withdraws its request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation. The requests for an 

administrative review of the 40 

companies listed in Appendix II to this 

notice were withdrawn within 90 days 

of the date of publication of the 

Initiation Notice.6 As a result, 

Commerce is rescinding this review 

with respect to these companies, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

Separate Rates 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that 15 companies, not individually 

examined, are eligible for separate rates 

in this administrative review.7 The 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) 

and Commerce’s regulations do not 

address the establishment of a separate 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for separate-rate 

respondents which Commerce did not 

examine individually in an 

administrative review. For the 

preliminary results of this review, 

Commerce has determined the 

estimated dumping margin for Qufu 

Xinyu to be zero. For the reasons 

explained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, we are assigning this rate 

to the non-examined respondents which 

qualify for a separate rate in this review. 

China-Wide Entity 

Under Commerce’s policy regarding 

the conditional review of the Chinawide entity,8 the China-wide entity will 

not be under review unless a party 

specifically requests, or Commerce selfinitiates, a review of the entity. Because 

no party requested a review of the 

China-wide entity in this review, the 

entity is not under review, and the 

entity’s rate (i.e., 251.64 percent) is not 

subject to change.9 Commerce considers 

all other companies for which a review 

was requested (none of which filed a 

separate rate application) listed in 

Appendix II to this notice, to be part of 

the China-wide entity.10 We find 

mandatory respondent Beautystar to be 

a part of the China-wide entity in the 

instant review because it withdrew from 

participation and failed to submit a 

response to the initial AD questionnaire, 

thereby failing to establish its eligibility 

for a separate rate.11

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. For a full description of the 


JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
27092 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2022 / Notices 

12 Id. at 6–11; see also Memorandum, 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Bona Fides Sale Analysis for Dalian 

Hualing Wood Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with 

this notice (Bona Fides Memorandum). 

13 Id. 

14 Id. 

15See Appendix II. 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020) 

(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs 

via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date 

for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs 

are filed (while these modifications remain in 

effect).’’). 

17See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

18See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also 19 

CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

20See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. A list of 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

an appendix to this notice. In addition, 

a complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Preliminary Rescission of the 

Administrative Review 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum and as 

expounded upon in the Bona Fides 

Memorandum, Commerce preliminarily 

finds that the sale made by Dalian 

Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. (Hualing) 

serving as the basis for administrative 

review is not a bona fide sale of 

cabinets.12 Commerce reached this 

conclusion based on the totality of the 

record information surrounding 

Hualing’s reported sale, including, but 

not limited to, the price and quantity of 

the sale, the timing of the sale, the resale 

price and profit, and other relevant 

factors such as the single sale made 

during the POR, the ‘‘specialty’’ nature 

of the product, and the likelihood of 

future sales.13

Because the non-bona fide sale was 

the only reported sale of subject 

merchandise during the POR, we 

preliminarily find that Hauling had no 

reviewable transactions during this POR 

and is ineligible for an administrative 

review. Accordingly, we intend to 

rescind this administrative review with 

respect to Hualing if our determination 

remains the same in the final results of 

this administrative review.14

Regarding Rongxin Cabinets, as 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, we preliminarily find 

that Rongxin Wood, is the successor-ininterest to Rongxin Cabinets. 

Consequently, we are preliminarily 

rescinding the review with respect to 

Rongxin Cabinets based on Rongxin 

Wood’s timely withdrawal of its review 

request and because there are no other 

outstanding requests for review of 

Rongxin Cabinets or Rongxin Wood. For 

the complete successor-in-interest 

analysis, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Should the final results of review 

remain the same as these preliminary 

results of review, we intend to rescind 

the review of Rongxin Cabinets and in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

Additionally, effective the date of 

publication of the final results of 

review, we will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to apply 

the AD cash deposit rate applicable to 

Rongxin Cabinets to entries of subject 

merchandise exported by Rongxin 

Wood. 

Preliminary Results of the 

Administrative Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the 

administrative review covering the 

period October 9, 2019, through March 

31, 2021: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Qufu Xinyu Furniture Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 0.00 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate Rate 15 ................................................................................... 0.00 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

parties to the proceeding the 

calculations performed for these 

preliminary results of review within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.16 Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs.17 Commerce modified certain of 

its requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information until further notice.18

Parties who submit case briefs or 

rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.19

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, within 30 days after the 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, telephone number, the number 

of participants, whether any participant 

is a foreign national, and a list of the 

issues to be discussed. If a request for 

a hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

by telephone the date, time, and 

location of the hearing two days before 

the scheduled date. 

Unless the deadline is extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this review, including the 

results of its analysis of the issues raised 

in any written briefs, no later than 120 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.20 If the preliminary results are 


JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2022 / Notices 27093 

21See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011). 

unchanged for the final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 251.64 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were exported by the 

companies considered to be a part of the 

China-wide entity listed in Appendix II 

of this notice. If Commerce determines 

that an exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number (i.e., 

at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated 

at the China-wide rate.21

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act: (1) For the subject 

merchandise exported by the company 

listed above that has a separate rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, then zero cash 

deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for 

all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during these 

PORs. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the preliminary results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 

751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: May 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. No-Shipment Certifications 

VI. Discussions of the Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of 

the Act 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Subject to Rescission of Review 

1. Anhui Swanch Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

2. Anhui Xinyuanda Cupboard Co., Ltd. 

3. Dalian Jiaye Wood Products Co., Ltd. 

4. Dandong Laroyal Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

5. Foremost Worldwide Company Limited 

6. Fujian Senyi Kitchen Cabinet Co., Ltd. 

7. Fuzhou CBM Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

8. Fuzhou Minlian Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

9. Hangzhou Entop Houseware Co., Ltd. 

10. Hangzhou Hoca Kitchen & Bath Products 

Co., Ltd. 

11. Hangzhou Home Dee Sanitary Ware Co., 

Ltd. 

12. Hangzhou Royo Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

13. Heyond Cabinet Co., Ltd. 

14. Honsoar New Building Material Co., Ltd. 

15. HS Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd. 

16. Jiang Su Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

17. Jiangsu Beichen Wood Co., Ltd. 

18. Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

19. Jiangsu Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd. 

20. Kunshan Baiyulan Furniture Co., Ltd. 

21. Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. 

22. Linyi Kaipu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

23. Morewood Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

24. Pizhou Ouyme Import & Export Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

25. Qingdao Shousheng Industry Co., Ltd. 

26. Rizhao Foremost Woodwork 

Manufacturing Company Ltd. 

27. Shandong Huanmei Wood Co., Ltd. 

28. Shanghai Zifeng International Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

29. Sheen Lead International Trading 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

30. Shouguang Jinxiangyuan Home 

Furnishing Co., Ltd. 

31. Shouguang Sanyang Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

32. Tech Forest Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

33. The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd. 

34. Weifang Fuxing Wood Co., Ltd. 

35. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. 

36. Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

37. Xiamen Goldenhome Co., Ltd. 

38. Xuzhou Yihe Wood Co., Ltd. 

39. Yichun Dongmeng Wood Co., Ltd. 

40. Yixing Pengjia Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

Companies Considered To Be Part of the 

China-Wide Entity 

1. Deqing Meisheng Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

2. Fuzhou Pyrashine Trading Co., Ltd. 

3. Jiang Su Rongxin Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

4. Linshu Meibang Furniture Co., Ltd. 

5. Shanghai Beautystar Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

6. Shanghai Zifeng Industries Development 

Co., Ltd. 

7. ZBOM Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

8. Zhongshan KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

Receiving a Separate Rate 

1. Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. 

2. Fujian Dushi Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. 

3. Guangzhou Nuolande Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

4. Jiangsu Xiangsheng Bedtime Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

5. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

6. Linyi Bomei Furniture Co., Ltd. 

7. Nantong Aershin Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

8. Senke Manufacturing Company 

9. Shandong Longsen Woods Co., Ltd. 

10. Shenzhen Pengchengzhirong Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

11. Shouguang Fushi Wood Co., Ltd. 

12. Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

13. Taishan Oversea Trading Company Ltd. 

14. Zhangzhou OCA Furniture Co., Ltd. 

15. Zhoushan For-strong Wood Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09813 Filed 5–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


JSPEARS on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1