alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***EPR***

 

**EVANCIC PERRAULTROBERTSON**

**CERTIFIEDGENERAL ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

April 14,2004

 

 

 

**JamesB. Parsons**

ParsonsLaw Firm

Suite 2070 Skyline Tower

10900 N.E. 4th Avenue

Bellevue,WA 98004

 

DearJames:

 

**Re:   Prime Equipment Inc.**

 

We hereby consent to theParsons Law Firm to use the following financial statements with our attachedindependent accountants' report in the form 10-KSB report.

 

-  Consolidated    financial statements of Prime Equipment Inc. for the year ended December 31,    2003 and 2002.
If you have anyquestions, please contact our office at (604) 936-4377.

 

 

Yourstruly

 

/s/  RobertTanaka

 

RobertTanaka, CA

 

/tw

 

cc:   Perry Gugleilmi

 

 

 

 

 

 

2ndFloor Herco Centre, 566 Lougheed Highway, Coquitlam, B.C. V33K 3S3

Telephone(604) 936-4377   Fax (604) 936-8376

Websitewww.eprcoq.com   Email:  epr@eproq.com
Winston Grey BRAKEALL, petitioner, v. Robert DOOLEY, Warden.

No. 18-8866.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of 9278
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Annual Report"), I, Sajid B. Kapadia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:        , 2003                                /s/  Sajid B. Kapadia
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   SAJID B. KAPADIA
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40828 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LARUE JOHNSON, also known as Juggy , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09

- CR

- 641

- 1

Before OWEN, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In June 2010, Larue Johnson, federal prisoner # 64812

- 279, was convicted by guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute 92.4 grams of cocaine base and was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. He now reques ts leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) from the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, in which he sought a sentence reduction pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 9, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40828 Document: 00512590372 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2014No. 13

- 40828

2010 (FSA). By moving to proceed IFP, Johnson challenges the district court’s implicit certification that the appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). The Government has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal due to Johnson’s failure to file a timely notice of appe al or, in the alternative, to grant
it a 10

- day extension to file an appellate brief. The record supports the Government’s contention. Johnson’s notice of appeal was filed after the expiration of the time for filing a timely notice of appeal and beyond t he time during which the district court could have extended the time for filing a notice of appeal. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). We therefore dismiss this appeal as untimely. See id.; see also United States v. Garcia

- Cabrera , 472 F. App’x 340, 341 (5th Cir. 2012) (dismissing sentencing appeal as untimely)

. 1 The Government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED , and the appeal is DISMISSED as untimely. All other motions are DENIED.

1 Mindful that the time to appeal is not jurisdictional in a criminal case, we note that

e ven if we pretermitted the issue of whether Johnson filed a timely notice of appeal and addressed the merits of the case, his appeal would fail. See United States v. Martinez , 496 F.3d 387, 389 (5th Cir. 2007). As Johnson was sentenced before the FSA’s effective date to the statutory minimum of 120 months of imprisonment, he was not eligible for a § 3582(c)(2) reduction. See United States v. Kelly , 716 F.3d 180, 181 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 134 S. Ct. 439 (2013). Accordingly, Johnson cannot present a nonfrivolous issue, and the appeal would have to be dismissed as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40828 Document: 00512590372 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2014
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XC031]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of webconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) Trawl 
Electronic Monitoring Committee will meet May 31, 2022.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 31, 2022, from 8 a.m. 
to 5 p.m., Alaska Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a webconference. Join online through the 
link at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2937.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1007 W 
3rd Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 271-2809. 
Instructions for attending the meeting are given under SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION, below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Henry, Council staff; phone: 
(907) 271-2809 and email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#64250a0a054a2c010a161d240a0b05054a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d5c73737c335578736f645d73727c7c337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>. For technical support, 
please contact administrative Council staff, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfa1bfa9a2ace1aeaba2a6a18fa1a0aeaee1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2bca2b4bfb1fcb3b6bfbbbc92bcbdb3b3fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Tuesday, May 31, 2022

    The agenda will include committee discussion and recommendations 
for the Trawl EM Initial Review analysis. The Agenda is subject to 
change, and the latest version will be posted at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2937 prior to the meeting, along 
with meeting materials.

Connection Information

    You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or 
smartphone; or by phone only. Connection information will be posted 
online at: https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2937.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
electronically to https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2937.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 9, 2022.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-10336 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Andre Ralph HAYMOND.

No. 17-1672.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted, and William D. Lunn, Esq., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 10489-020]
 On August 26, 2021, the City of River Falls Municipal Utilities (City of River Falls) filed an application for a subsequent minor license for the 250-kilowatt River Falls Hydroelectric Project (River Falls Project; FERC No. 10489). The River Falls Project is located on the Kinnickinnic River in the City of River Falls in Pierce County, Wisconsin. The project does not occupy federal lands. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on March 2, 2022, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to relicense the River Falls Project. The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The application will be processed according to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
January 2023.1Comments on EA
February 2023.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Michael Davis at (202) 502-8339 or 
                    *michael.davis@ferc.gov*. Dated: May 6, 2022. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         The Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations under 40 CFR 1501.10(b)(1) require that EAs be completed within 1 year of the federal action agency's decision to prepare an EA. This notice establishes the Commission's intent to prepare an EA for the River Falls Project. Therefore, in accordance with CEQ's regulations, the EA must be issued within 1 year of the issuance date of this notice. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2022-10202 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         171,989
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               353,259
<PP&E>                                         6,116,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,851,007)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,618,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,120
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,611,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,618,791
<SALES>                                        497,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               504,356
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  460,380<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of DURECT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

March 15, 2006
Lester James SMITH, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 18-8851.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kay L. Toolson, CEO of MonacoCoach Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation onForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Monaco Coach Corporation.
|   | By:    | /s/ Kay L. Toolson      |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Kay L. Toolson          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, P. Martin Daley, CFO of Monaco Coach Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report of Monaco Coach Corporation onForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Monaco Coach Corporation.
|   | By:    | /s/ P. Martin Daley     |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | P. Martin Daley         |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of these written statements required bySection 906 has been provided to Monaco Coach Corporation and will be retainedby Monaco Coach Corporation and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      166,198
COMMITMENTS
  20,479   35,418   33,990   93,558   79,030  148,027  148,438   18,171   17,760

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,906)
  -1,192      350   -4,626    5,624    4,746     -194      470    4,100    3,436

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.3     21.3     20.5     56.3     47.6     89.1     89.3     10.9     10.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      105)
      26       29       49       28       28       92       88
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011
EXHIBIT 23.1


                               KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA








                                                                   July 25, 2005


To Whom It May Concern:


The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of his report of
February 21, 2005 accompanying the audited financial statements of Domain
Registration, Corp., as at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, in the Form
10KSB/A filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
____________________________
    Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC





















P.O. Box 50329, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452, Fax: (702)
436-4218, e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att.net
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Hugh E. Sawyer, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allied Holdings, Inc;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        May 23, 2005   /s/ Hugh E. Sawyer       *Date*   *Hugh E. Sawyer*     *Chief Executive Officer and President*
Keith GREGORY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1664.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT M ay 10, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 10501 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 0 6 4 - C R - T - 2 6 - MAP U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s T H O M A S W I L L I A M S C H W A R T Z , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( M ay 10, 2007) B efo re T JO F L A T , B IR C H an dH IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: J . S t anf or d L i f s e y , c ouns e l f

orT hom a s W i l l i a m S c hw artz , ha s f i l e d am ot i on2

t o w i thdr aw on appe a l s upport e d byabr i e f pr e par e d pur s uantt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 ( 1967) . O uri nde pe nde nt r e vi e w of

the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s tha tc ouns e l ’ s a s s e s s m e ntof the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c au s e in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o arg u ab l e i ssu es o f m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and S chw artz’ s c on vi ct i on s and se nt ence s are A FFI R M ED .