alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
                           EXHIBIT 27

                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            (in thousands except per share amounts)
       
<S>                                                                   
                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           $  1,505 
<SECURITIES>                                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0 
<INVENTORY>                                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,706 
<PP&E>                                            560,860 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (13,031)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    563,109 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              13,305 
<BONDS>                                           197,963 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                             0 
<COMMON>                                              453 
<OTHER-SE>                                        347,368 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      563,109 
<SALES>                                                 0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   32,572 
<CGS>                                                   0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (13,374)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (3,816)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    15,325 
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                15,325 
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0               
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     $ 15,325 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $   0.68 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $   0.67 
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.4

SOA Section 906 Certification

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended April 24, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of § 13(a) or § 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|DATED the 21st day of July, 2005. |  |                   |                                                             
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                                  |  | /s/ALAIN BOUCHARD
|                                  |  | Name:             | Alain Bouchard                                              
|                                  |  | Title:            | Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1371 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1371

To amend the Federal tort claims provisions of title 28, United States 
  Code, to repeal the exception for claims arising outside the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 1999

     Ms. Norton (for herself, Ms. Carson, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Farr of 
  California, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Frost, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Gekas, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. King, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, 
Mrs. Lowey, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Payne, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Shays, Mr. 
Stark, and Mr. Wynn) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal tort claims provisions of title 28, United States 
  Code, to repeal the exception for claims arising outside the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLAIMS ARISING OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) Exception.--Section 2680 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (k).
    (b) Applicable Law.--In an action brought under section 1346(b) of 
title 28, United States Code, for a claim arising in a foreign country, 
the court shall apply the law of the domicile of the plaintiff in such 
claim.

SEC. 2. CLAIMS FOR GROSS NEGLIGENCE.

    Sections 2674 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``Notwithstanding section 8116(c) of title 5, United States Code, 
an officer or employee of the United States may bring an action under 
this chapter against the United States which is based on the gross 
negligence of an officer or employee of the United States.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by sections 1 and 2 shall apply with respect to 
actions which occurred on or after April 3, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29413-29414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94875; File No. SR-PEARL-2022-11]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX PEARL Options Fee 
Schedule To Increase Certain Connectivity Fees

May 9, 2022.
    On April 1, 2022, MIAX PEARL LLC (``MIAX Pearl'' or ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to 
amend the MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule to increase certain 
connectivity fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was immediately effective upon filing with 
the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ On April 
20, 2022, the proposed rule change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register and, pursuant to Section

[[Page 29414]]

19(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\4\ the Commission: (1) Temporarily suspended 
the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings under Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ On May 2, 2022, the Exchange 
withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-PEARL-2022-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). A proposed rule change may take 
effect upon filing with the Commission if it is designated by the 
exchange as ``establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge 
imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, whether 
or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory organization.'' 
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94721 (April 14, 
2022), 87 FR 23573.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10259 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 22, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROGER DALE STEWART Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hawkins County No. 13CR81 John F. Dugger , Jr., Judge

No. M2015 - 0 0820 - CCA - R3 - CD

– Filed October 18, 2016

N ORMA M C G EE O GLE , J. , concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with most of the conclusions set forth in the majority opinion. I write separately, however, to respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the trial co urt’s merger of the defendant’s reckless endangerment convictions does not constitute plain error. The majority addresses this issue in a footnote of the opinion and correctly concludes that the trial court erred by merging the defendant’s reckless endan germent convictions because the State elected to prosecute the defendant in Counts 2 and 3 for criminal acts committed against individually named victims. See State v

. Cross , 362 S.W.3d 512, 519 n.5 (Tenn. 2012). Moreover, such dual convictions do not vi olate double jeopardy. See State v. Watkins , 362 S.W.3d 520, 556

- 57 (Tenn. 2012). However, the majority also concludes, without any explanation, that the trial court’s error does not rise to the level of plain error because “our consideration of such is not necessary to do substantial justice” under Adkisson . This is where the majority and I disagree. This court has repeatedly held that a trial court’s improper merger of offenses constitutes plain error. See State v. Jonathan Downey , No. M2013

- 01099

- CCA

- R3

- CD, 2014 WL 820274, at *10 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Feb. 28, 201 4), perm. to appeal denied , (Tenn. June 25, 2014), State v. David Eugene Breezee , No. W2011

- 01231

- CCA

- R3

- CD, 2012 WL 6728345, at *8 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Jackson, Dec. 28, 2012), perm. to appeal denied , (Tenn. May 14, 2013); State v. David E. Offutt , No. M2 007

- 02728

- CCA

- R3

- CD, 2009 WL 2567870, at *7 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Aug. 20, 2009), perm. to appeal denied , (Tenn. Mar. 1, 2010). Moreover, in Downey , a panel of this court specifically concluded that consideration of such error was necessary to d o substantial justice because the erroneous merger deprived the State of the benefit of the jury’s verdict for the merged offense. No. M2013

- 01099

- CCA

- R3

- CD, 2014 WL 820274, at *10.- 2

-

In sum, I believe the trial court committed plain error by merging the defendant’s reckless endangerment convictions. Therefore, I would remand this case in order for the court to reinstate the conviction of reckless endangerment in Count 3 and to resentence the defendant.

_________________________________ NORMA MCGEE OGL E , JUDGE
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50581

Conference Calendar

__________________

DARNELL JOHNSON,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-155

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Darnell Johnson has filed with this court motions for a

certificate of probable cause (CPC) and to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Although Johnson filed his habeas

petition in the district court pursuant to both §§ 2241 and 2254,

his petition is more properly construed as arising under 
No. 95-50581

-2-

§ 2241(c)(3) because Johnson was in custody due to revocation of

his parole by the parole board and not pursuant to a state-court

judgment. See § 2254(a). A § 2241 petition must be filed in the

district where the petitioner is incarcerated. A CPC is not

necessary in an appeal from the denial of § 2241 habeas because a

CPC is required only in an appeal from the denial of habeas

relief "where the detention complained of arises out of process

issues by a state court." 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

When Johnson filed his habeas petition, he was incarcerated

at the Eastham Unit in Lovelady, Texas, where he remains. 

Lovelady is in Houston County, which is located in the Eastern

District of Texas. See 28 U.S.C. § 124(c)(7). Johnson filed his

petition in the Western District of Texas. The district court

was thus without jurisdiction to consider Johnson's petition. 

Accordingly, Johnson's motion for CPC is DENIED as

unnecessary. Because the district court lacked subject-matter

jurisdiction to consider Johnson's petition, his motion for IFP

is DENIED and the appeal dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
DOE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18M166.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Shannon International Resources Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Blair Coady, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

September 29, 2003               /s/ Blair Coady
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Blair Coady
                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; and King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc., petitioner, v. United States.

No. 18-984.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                              SASKATCHEWAN LEASES
# Euroopa Liidu C 10/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 10 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 65. aastakäik10. jaanuar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 10

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

65. aastakäik10. jaanuar 2022

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2022/C 10/01 | Euro vahetuskurss — 7. jaanuar 2022 | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2022/C 10/01

Euro vahetuskurss — 7. jaanuar 2022

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 10.1.2022 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2022

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 10/1

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

7. jaanuar 2022

(2022/C 10/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,1298 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 130,90 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4380 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,83430 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 10,2839 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,0422 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 146,00 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 10,0288 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria leev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 24,439 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 358,68 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 4,5496 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 4,9451 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 15,7206 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,5804 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,4374 |
| HKD | Hongkongi dollar | 8,8133 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 1,6748 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,5356 |
| KRW | Korea vonn | 1 359,96 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 17,6701 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 7,2060 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,5214 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 16 188,43 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,7553 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 58,046 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 85,2980 |
| THB | Tai baat | 38,074 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 6,4343 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 23,1109 |
| INR | India ruupia | 83,9780 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,1298

JPY

Jaapani jeen

130,90

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4380

GBP

Inglise nael

0,83430

SEK

Rootsi kroon

10,2839

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,0422

ISK

Islandi kroon

146,00

NOK

Norra kroon

10,0288

BGN

Bulgaaria leev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

24,439

HUF

Ungari forint

358,68

PLN

Poola zlott

4,5496

RON

Rumeenia leu

4,9451

TRY

Türgi liir

15,7206

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,5804

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,4374

HKD

Hongkongi dollar

8,8133

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

1,6748

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,5356

KRW

Korea vonn

1 359,96

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

17,6701

CNY

Hiina jüaan

7,2060

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,5214

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

16 188,43

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,7553

PHP

Filipiini peeso

58,046

RUB

Vene rubla

85,2980

THB

Tai baat

38,074

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

6,4343

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

23,1109

INR

India ruupia

83,9780

---

(1)  Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          77,046
<SECURITIES>                                    47,470
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,984)
<INVENTORY>                                     60,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               298,404
<PP&E>                                          62,951
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (34,332)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 365,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,297
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   365,911
<SALES>                                        123,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,671
<CGS>                                           67,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,619
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,885
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
Order entered July 15 , 202 2

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 21
- 01087
- CR
CHRISTOPHER ANTON SIMON , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Cr i m inal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19
- 76381
- H
O RDER Appellant ’ s brief was o riginally due on March 30 , 2022. We granted t hree motions for extensions of time, making the brief due on June 20 , 2022

. We caution ed appellant further extensions were not favored

. To date , no brief has been filed , and appellant has not communicated further about the appeal.
W e ORDER th e trial court to co nduct a hearing to determine why
app ellant’s b rief has not been filed. In this regard, th e tr ia l court shall make
appro priat e finding s and recommendations and determine whether appell antdesires to p rosecute th is a ppeal , w he t h er appellan t has abandoned the appeal , or whether appointed co u nse l has aba ndoned the appeal

. See T E X
. R. A PP
. P. 38 .8 ( b ). If the trial court cannot obtai n appel lant’s presence at the hearing, the trial c ourt shal l conduct the he aring in ap pe llant’s ab s enc e. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W. 2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 198 7, no pet.) (per curiam). If appel lant is indig en t, the t rial court is ORDERED to t ake s uch m easures as may be necessary to assure effec tive repres entation, which may incl ude appointme n t of new counsel

. We ORDER the tria l court to transmit a record of t he proce edings, which shall include w ritten findin gs and r ec ommendations, to this Cour t wit hin
T WENTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DI RECT the Cl erk to send copi es of th is order to t h e Hon orable Tina Clinton , Presidi ng Judge, C r iminal District Court No. 1 ; and to counsel for all
par ties.
Th is appeal i s ABATE D to allow the trial court to com ply with the above order. The a pp eal shall b e r e instate d t wenty days from the date of this order or

w hen the Court finds it approp riate to do so. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE