alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1630 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1630

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend permanently 
                    environmental remediation costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1999

 Mr. Coyne (for himself and Mr. Rangel) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend permanently 
                    environmental remediation costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brownfields Clean-up Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXPENSING OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION 
              COSTS.

    Section 198 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
expensing of environmental remediation costs) is amended by striking 
subsection (h).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of International Energy, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Derek Cooper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC.Date:  June 20, 2006By:/s/ Derek CooperDerek Cooper
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/11/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      167,200
COMMITMENTS
  46,501   20,196   36,424   61,631   82,157  144,555  138,777   22,644   28,423

CHANGES FROM 10/04/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,993)
  -4,673    1,541     -121    3,484   -2,468   -1,310   -1,048   -1,684   -1,945

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    27.8     12.1     21.8     36.9     49.1     86.5     83.0     13.5     17.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      180)
      53       37       58       61       65      143      140
```

----

Updated October 14, 2011
Exhibit 4.1

 

Share certificate

 

	
Number of certificate
    	
 
    	
Number of shares
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

Ruhnn Holding Limited
 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands)

 

Share capital is US$1 divided into 1,000,000,000 shares comprising of
 (i) 812,295,750 Class A Ordinary Shares with a par value of US$0.000000001 each and 
 (ii) 187,704,250 Class B Ordinary Shares with a par value of US$0.000000001 each

 

This is to certify that [Name] of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] [Share Class] shares in the above-named company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company.

 

	
EXECUTED for and on behalf of the   Company on
    	
by:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Director
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1618

To amend section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968

to improve the housing counseling program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 to improve the housing counseling

program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Counseling

5 Enhancement Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

7 (a) EMERGENCY HOMEOWNERSHIP COUNSELING.—

8 Section 106(c)(9) of the Housing and Urban Development
2

•HR 1618 IH

1 Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701x(c)(9)) is amended by strik2 ing ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30,

3 2000’’.

4 (b) PREPURCHASE AND FORECLOSURE PREVENTION

5 COUNSELING DEMONSTRATION.—Section 106(d)(13) of

6 the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12

7 U.S.C. 1701x(d)(12)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year

8 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’.

9 SEC. 3. NOTIFICATION OF DELINQUENCY ON VETERANS

10 HOME LOANS.

11 Subparagraph (C) of section 106(c)(5) of the Hous12 ing and Urban Development Act of 1968 is amended to

13 read as follows:

14 ‘‘(C) NOTIFICATION.—Notification under

15 subparagraph (A) shall not be required with re16 spect to any loan for which the eligible home17 owner pays the amount overdue before the expi18 ration of the 45-day period under subparagraph

19 (B)(ii).’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 16, 2017

jam

Order 

Clerk

May 16, 2017

155660 (18)

JOHNNY TIPPINS,

Appellant, 

v SC: 155660

CoA: 336747

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Ingham CC: 16-000594-AA

Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Court, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED 

because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing 

fees. Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for an appeal to be 

filed, appellant must resubmit a copy of this order, and shall refile the copy of the 

pleadings which is being returned with this order within 21 days. By doing this, 

appellant becomes responsible for paying the $375.00 filing fee. Failure to comply with 

this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court.

If appellant timely refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the 

Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s 

account until the payments equal the total amount of the filing fee stated above. That 

amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court 

until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant and 

return appellant’s pleadings with this order.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1737

To prohibit United States reconstruction assistance for the Federal Republic

of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) as a result of Operation Allied Force.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To prohibit United States reconstruction assistance for the

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)

as a result of Operation Allied Force.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RECONSTRUCTION ASSIST4 ANCE FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF

5 YUGOSLAVIA (SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO).

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds appropriated or other7 wise made available in any Act (for any fiscal year) may

8 be obligated or expended for the provision of reconstruc9 tion assistance for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
2

•HR 1737 IH

1 (Serbia and Montenegro) as a result of Operation Allied

2 Force.

3 (b) OPERATION ALLIED FORCE.—In this section, the

4 term ‘‘Operation Allied Force’’ means operations of the

5 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) conducted

6 against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and

7 Montenegro) during the period beginning on March 24,

8 1999, and ending on such date as NATO may designate,

9 to resolve the conflict with respect to Kosovo.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1663 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To recognize National Medal of Honor sites in California, Indiana, and 
                            South Carolina.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1663

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To recognize National Medal of Honor sites in California, Indiana, and 
                            South Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Medal of Honor Memorial 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The Medal of Honor is the highest military decoration 
        which the Nation bestows.
            (2) The Medal of Honor is the only military decoration 
        given in the name of Congress, and therefore on behalf of the 
        people of the United States.
            (3) The Congressional Medal of Honor Society was 
        established by an Act of Congress in 1958, and continues to 
        protect, uphold, and preserve the dignity, honor, and name of 
        the Medal of Honor and of the individual recipients of the 
        Medal of Honor.
            (4) The Congressional Medal of Honor Society is composed 
        solely of recipients of the Medal of Honor.

SEC. 3. NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR SITES.

    (a) Recognition.--The following sites to honor recipients of the 
Medal of Honor are hereby recognized as National Medal of Honor sites:
            (1) Riverside, california.--The memorial under construction 
        at the Riverside National Cemetery in Riverside, California, to 
        be dedicated on November 5, 1999.
            (2) Indianapolis, indiana.--The memorial at the White River 
        State Park in Indianapolis, Indiana, dedicated on May 28, 1999.
            (3) Mount pleasant, south carolina.--The Congressional 
        Medal of Honor Museum at Patriots Point in Mount Pleasant, 
        South Carolina, currently situated on the ex-U.S.S. Yorktown 
        (CV-6).
    (b) Interpretation.--This section shall not be construed to require 
or permit Federal funds (other than any provided for as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act) to be expended for any purpose related to 
the sites recognized in subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-13-00153-CR & 

 06-13-00154-CR

GABRIEL LOUIS MENDOZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. F12-55612-T & F12-55613-T

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Gabriel Louis Mendoza appeals convictions of robbery in our cause numbers 06-13-

00153-CR and 06-13-00154-CR. The clerk’s records that have been filed in this Court do not 

include certified bills of costs. As a result, the State has moved this Court for an order requiring 

the Dallas County District Clerk to supplement the records in each of these cases with certified 

bills of costs. 

“[A]n officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have 

been accrued and send the bill of costs to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . 

appealed.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 103.006 (West 2006). Costs may not be collected 

from the person charged with the costs until a written bill containing the items of cost is 

produced and signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive 

payment for the cost. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 103.001 (West 2006).

We point out that all that is required by the Rules is a request by letter from an appellate 

court or any party to require a district clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a 

supplement containing the omitted item. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). However, it appears 

that the procedure used by the Dallas Court of Appeals requires us in these transfer cases to 

instead formally order the clerk to supplement the record in each of these matters with the 

appropriate certified bill of costs. See Franklin v. State, 402 S.W.3d 894, 895 (Tex. App.—

Dallas 2013, no pet.); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 103.006 (“shall certify” costs). 

Under the authority of Rule 34.5(c)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we order the 

Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and electronically file, within ten days of the date of this 
3

order, supplemental records containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in our cause 

numbers 06-13-00153-CR and 06-13-00154-CR. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 28, 2014
Curtis R. LEACHMAN, petitioner, v. Thomas WINN, Warden.

No. 18-7826.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Shan Edward CARTER, petitioner, v. John W. SHERRILL, et al.

No. 17-9427.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 165

Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation of school buses

that do not have seat belts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. KLECZKA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

Prohibiting the manufacture, sale, delivery, or importation

of school buses that do not have seat belts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 No person shall manufacture, sell, deliver, or import

5 any school bus, constructed after the effective date of this

6 Act, for use by a person described in section 2 to provide

7 transportation service, unless such school bus is equipped

8 with a seat belt for each passenger riding in such school

9 bus.
2

•HR 165 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERSONS TO WHICH PROHIBITION APPLIES.

2 The prohibition set forth in section 1 shall apply to—

3 (1) any school bus, as such term is defined in

4 section 4221(d)(7)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code

5 of 1986; and

6 (2) any Federal, State, or local government en7 tity, school district, or other public or private entity

8 providing transportation to passengers by school

9 bus.

10 SEC. 3. CIVIL PENALTIES; SECRETARY’S AUTHORITY TO

11 COMPROMISE.

12 (a) AMOUNT OF PENALTIES.—Whoever violates any

13 provision of this Act, or any regulation issued thereunder,

14 shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000

15 for each such violation. A violation with respect to each

16 school bus shall constitute a separate violation, except that

17 the maximum civil penalty shall not exceed $800,000 for

18 any related series of violations.

19 (b) COMPROMISE OF PENALTIES.—Any such civil

20 penalty may be compromised by the Secretary of Trans21 portation. In determining the amount of such penalty, or

22 the amount agreed upon in compromise, the appropriate23 ness of such penalty to the size of the business of the per24 son charged and the gravity of the violation shall be con25 sidered.
3

•HR 165 IH

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act shall take effect 90 days after the date of

3 its enactment.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Lucatz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May 19, 2011
/s/ David LucatzDavid LucatzChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered November 22, 2017 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01129-CV 

IN RE PATRICK DAUGHERTY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 12-04005 

ORDER 

Before the Court is relator’s unopposed motion for leave to file reply brief. We GRANT

the motion. Relator’s reply brief shall be filed on or before December 20, 2017. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

 JUSTICE
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/14/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      521,846
COMMITMENTS
  65,244   13,210  119,307  304,221  364,001  488,772  496,518   33,074   25,328

CHANGES FROM 06/07/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,318)
   4,453   -7,031   12,926    2,723   14,237   20,103   20,133   -3,785   -3,815

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.5      2.5     22.9     58.3     69.8     93.7     95.1      6.3      4.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      145)
      47       18       53       70       66      138      122
```

----

Updated Jun 17, 2011
In Re Michael Leon HALEY, Sr., petitioner.

No. 18-9289.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of API Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Pudles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stephen Pudles     
|Stephen Pudles         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 10, 2010
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of First Asia Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September  30, 2011 (the Report), I, Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  January 13, 2012 /s/ Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy    Chief Financial Officer