alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Arthur W. Zafiropoulo,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ultratech, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| August 6,  2004 | /s/ Arthur  W. Zafiropoulo |   |
|-----------------|----------------------------|--------|
|            | Arthur W.  Zafiropoulo     |
|            | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Medifast,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31,  2006,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Bradley T. MacDonald,
Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company  and I  Michael  S.  McDevitt,  Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the financial  condition  and results of the  operations of the
      Company.


By: /s/ Bradley T. MacDonald
   -------------------------
   Bradley T. MacDonald
   Chief Executive Officer
   May15, 2006

By: /s/ Michael S. McDevitt
   ------------------------
   Michael S. McDevitt
   Chief Financial Officer
   May 15, 2006


                                       20
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. Marvin LEWIS.

No. 18-989.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 28, 2019.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARL E. BROWN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JOE D. DRIVER,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 13-35026

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00150-RRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Ralph R. Beistline, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2015** 

Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Alaska state prisoner Carl E. Brown appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the district court’s

decision that a Section 2254 habeas petition is untimely, see Bills v. Clark, 628

F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm. 

FILED

MAY 19 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Brown contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling for three periods:

December 6, 2009 to April 5, 2010; October 12, 2010 to November 1, 2010; and

November 8, 2000 to April 14, 2011. Even assuming that Brown is entitled to

equitable tolling for the first two periods, he is not entitled to equitable tolling on

the last, rendering his section 2254 petition untimely. 

Brown contends that Jimenez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113 (2009), entitles

him to equitable tolling from November 8, 2010 to April 14, 2011. Brown is

incorrect. The Alaska Court of Appeals order did not restore the pendency of

Brown’s direct appeal, nor render his conviction capable of modification on direct

appeal to the state court or to the Supreme Court on certiorari review. See Randle

v. Crawford, 604 F.3d 1047, 1056-57 (9th Cir. 2010). Jimenez therefore does not

apply. See id. 

We need not reach the issue of whether the mailbox rule applies to Brown’s

state court filings, as it does not affect the result. Brown’s petition is untimely

regardless of whether the mailbox rule is applied. 

Finally, because we affirm on timeliness grounds, we do not address whether

Brown’s failure to name the proper party separately justifies affirmance. 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-35026
In Re Wilma PENNINGTON-THURMAN, petitioner.

No. 18-5400.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Michael Allen GRIFFIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5174.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*229Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1729 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1729

   To designate the Federal facility located at 1301 Emmet Street in 
       Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Pamela B. Gwin Hall''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 1999

 Mr. Goode (for himself, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Pickett, Mr. Scott, 
Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Bateman, and Mr. Moran of 
  Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Federal facility located at 1301 Emmet Street in 
       Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Pamela B. Gwin Hall''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAMELA B. GWIN HALL.

    The Federal facility located at 1301 Emmet Street in 
Charlottesville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Pamela B. Gwin Hall''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to reference to the ``Pamela B. Gwin Hall''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Kay Toolson, CEO of Monaco Coach Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco CoachCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report ofMonaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respectsthe financial condition and results of operations of Monaco Coach Corporation.

 

 
|   |                     | By: | /s/ Kay Toolson |   |
|--------|--------------------------|-----|-----------------|--------|
|   | Kay Toolson              |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

I, P. Martin Daley, CFO of Monaco Coach Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Monaco CoachCorporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2002 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report ofMonaco Coach Corporation on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respectsthe financial condition and results of operations of Monaco Coach Corporation.

 

 
|   | By:                      | /s/ P. Martin Daley |   |
|--------|--------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | P. Martin Daley          |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

 

----
James GREENE, petitioner, v. WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.

No. 18-8633.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for First Circuit denied.
George BERKA, petitioner, v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, CONNECTICUT.

No. 18-7806.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed until May 6, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 10ZZ
                                                                    ------------

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$150,000.00                                                        April 1, 2000
                                                           Boston, Massachusetts


         On demand for value received, Advanced Deposition Technologies, Inc.
(the "Borrower") promises to pay to the order of Glenn J. Walters (the "Lender")
the sum of $150,000, together with interest on unpaid balances payable monthly
in arrears on the first day of each calendar month or earlier on demand at the
Prime Rate in effect from time to time plus one percentage point. Each change in
such interest rate shall take effect simultaneously with the corresponding
change in such Prime Rate. "Prime Rate" shall mean the rate of interest
published in the Wall Street Journal from time to time. Interest shall be
calculated on the basis of actual days elapsed and a 360 day year. If this note
is not paid in full on the due date, whether as stated or by acceleration,
interest on unpaid balances shall thereafter be payable on demand at a
fluctuating rate per annum equal to two percentage points above the Prime Rate
in effect from time to time.

         The Borrower and every endorser and guarantor of this note hereby waive
presentment, demand, notice, protest and all other demands and notices in
connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement
hereof and consent that this note may be extended from time to time and that no
such extension or other indulgence, and no substitution, release or surrender of
collateral, and no discharge or release of any other party primarily or
secondarily liable hereon, shall discharge or otherwise affect the liability of
the Borrower or any such endorser or guarantor. No delay or omission on the part
of the holder in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any
such right or of any other right hereunder and a waiver of any such right on any
one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to or waiver of any such right on
any future occasion.

         The Borrower and every endorser and guarantor hereof agree to pay on
demand, all costs and expenses (including legal costs and attorneys fees)
incurred or paid by the holder in enforcing this note on default.

         This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and shall be
governed by the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

                                        Advanced Deposition Technologies, Inc.


Glenn J. Walters                        By:/s/ Alexander P. Boxall
----------------                           -------------------------
Witness                                    Alexander P. Boxall
                                           President
Cody R. BROWN, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-8696.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit denied.
In Re Steven WESTE, petitioner.

No. 18-9437.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1306

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an additional place

of holding court for the Western Division of the Central Judicial District

of California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mrs. CAPPS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an

additional place of holding court for the Western Division

of the Central Judicial District of California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN

4 WESTERN DIVISION OF CENTRAL DISTRICT

5 OF CALIFORNIA.

6 Section 84(c)(2) of title 28, United States Code, is

7 amended by inserting ‘‘and Santa Barbara’’ after ‘‘Los

8 Angeles’’ the second place it appears.

Æ
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of ARSNetworks, Incorporated, a New Hampshire corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended January 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sydney A. Harland,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

                (1)                The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

                (2)                The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

By  /s/ Sydney A. Harland                                                    Sydney A. Harland    Chief Executive Officer of    ARS Networks, Incorporated

    May 14, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 05/05-0298]


LaSalle Capital Group II-A, L.P.; Surrender of License of Small 
Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 05/05-0298 issued to 
LaSalle Capital Group II-A, L.P., said license is hereby declared null 
and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Michele Schimpp,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-10160 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Alonzo FISHBACK, petitioner, v. Mike PARRIS, Warden.

No. 18-7396.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aquatic Cellulose International
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10KSB for the period ending May 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sheridan Westgarde, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and
belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




                                                /s/  Sheridan Westgarde
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Sheridan Westgarde
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                February 26, 2004
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Companys previously filed Registration Statements (Nos. 333-136586,
333-140413 and 333-147075) of our report dated August 10, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of API Technologies Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC
|New Brunswick, New Jersey
|                         
|August 10, 2010
James A. BROWN, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-8867.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Sabrina D. DAVIS, petitioner, v. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.

No. 18-8835.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER BADEN and CHRISTOPHER BADEN, derivatively on behalf of PALMA SOLA DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida Corporation,

Appellants,

v. VIRGINIA BADEN and JOANNA BADEN,

Appellees. No. 2D20-3427 September 15, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge. E. Blake Melhuish of E. Blake Melhuish, P.A., Bradenton, for Appellants. Stuart Jay Levine and Michael A. Gold, of Walters Levine Lozano & DeGrave, Tampa, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 10.30

Paul Parliament

November 19, 2018

 

Bravo Multinational, Inc

2020 General Booth Blvd, Unit 230

Virginia Beach, VA 23454

 

Dear Executives,

I, Paul Parliament, hereby resign as Chairman of the Board, CEO and President of Bravo Multinational, Inc. (BRVO: OTCPINK).  My decision to leave as both an officer and the Chairman of the Company are personal in nature, and that I had no disagreements or arguments with the current management and directors at Bravo Multinational, Inc.  My resignation is effective immediately on this date, November 19, 2018.

I agree to have my resignation letter posted in the FORM 8-K as an exhibit, as such.

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Paul Parliament

Paul Parliament

Retired Officer/Chairman of the Board
# Europos Sąjungos C 6A/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 6A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 65 metai2022m. sausio 6d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 6A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

65 metai2022m. sausio 6d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Pranešimas apie viešąjį konkursą. EPSO/AD/396/21 – airių kalbos (GA) teisininkai lingvistai (AD 7) – klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 466 A, 2021 11 18 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2022/C 6 A/01

Pranešimas apie viešąjį konkursą. EPSO/AD/396/21 – airių kalbos (GA) teisininkai lingvistai (AD 7) – klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 466 A, 2021 11 18 )

( OL C 466 A, 2021 11 18 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 2022 1 6 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2022 1 6

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 6/1

---

Pranešimas apie viešąjį konkursą. EPSO/AD/396/21 – airių kalbos (GA) teisininkai lingvistai (AD 7) – klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 466 A, 2021 m. lapkričio 18 d.
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

1 puslapis, po pavadinimu:

| yra: | „Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2021 m. gruodžio 21 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“, |
| --- | --- |

yra:

„Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2021 m. gruodžio 21 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“,

| turi būti: | „Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2022 m. sausio 25 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Liuksemburgo laiku.“ |
| --- | --- |

turi būti:

turi būti:

„Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2022 m. sausio 25 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Liuksemburgo laiku.“

5 puslapis, paskutinė pastraipa:

| yra: | „Paraišką pateikite EPSO interneto svetainėje https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities iki

  2021 m. gruodžio 21 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“, |
| --- | --- |

yra:

yra:

„Paraišką pateikite EPSO interneto svetainėje https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities iki

2021 m. gruodžio 21 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“,

| turi būti: | „Paraišką pateikite EPSO interneto svetainėje https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities iki

  2022 m. sausio 25 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Liuksemburgo laiku.“ |
| --- | --- |

turi būti:

turi būti:

„Paraišką pateikite EPSO interneto svetainėje https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities iki

2022 m. sausio 25 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Liuksemburgo laiku.“

---