alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.50


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
MASTER COLLOCATION AGREEMENT

      This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Master Collocation
Agreement dated December 22, 2000 (the "Agreement") by and between SBC
Communications Inc. ("SBC")  and Network Access Solutions Corporation
("NAS") (each individually a "Party", and collectively the "Parties") is
entered into on this 28th day of February, 2001.  All terms not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement.


R E C I T A L S


      WHEREAS, the Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions for the
assignment of certain NAS Collocation Arrangements to SBC Telecom, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of SBC; and

      WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below;

      NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, SBC and NAS agree as follows:

      Notwithstanding any provision set forth  in Section 3  and Section 4
         of
the Agreement to the contrary, the Parties hereby agree that if NAS elects,
in its sole discretion, either to forfeit to the ILEC or assign to another
carrier any  Collocation Arrangement marked on Schedule A of the applicable
Assignment and Assumption Agreement with two (2) asterisks, NAS may use the
line of credit as provided in the Agreement to discharge  payment
obligations to the ILEC with respect to any such Collocation Arrangement
that NAS forfeits or assigns.  Further, if NAS uses such line of credit to
discharge payment obligations to an ILEC applicable to any Collocation
Arrangement that it so forfeits or assigns, NAS shall  promptly apply to
the balance due on the Senior Note any and all payments received, as the
case may be,  (a) from the ILEC upon the ILEC's subsequent sale or reuse of
the forfeited Collocation Arrangement, or (b) from the assignee upon the
assignee's reimbursement of NAS's payment obligations.

      2.   Except as otherwise provided herein, all terms of the Agreement
shall continue in effect and remain binding.

      This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with
the same effect as if the signatures to each counterpart were upon the same
instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have signed this Amendment or
have caused this Amendment to be signed in their respective names by a duly
authorized officer on the date first written above.



NETWORK ACCESS SOLUTIONS CORPORATION


BY:   /s/ Nick Williams
      Name: Nick Williams
      Title: President



SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.


BY:   /s/ James S. Kahan
      Name: James S. Kahan
      Title: Sr. Executive Vice President
              Corporate Development
TYPE:  EX-23.3

eCom Corporation

EXHIBIT 23.3 Consent from G. Brad Beckstead, CPA

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
330 E. Warm Springs
Las Vegas, NV 89119
702.528.1984
425.928.2877 (efax)

March 29, 2000

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report of
March 29, 2000, on the Financial Statements of eCom Corporation for the period
October 18, 1998 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 1999, in any filings which
are necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
--------------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
Nevada License #2701


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
                           EXHIBIT 27
                                
                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            (in thousands except per share amounts)
                                
        
   <S>                                         <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1998
   <CASH>                                             $    1,070 
   <SECURITIES>                                                0 
   <RECEIVABLES>                                               0 
   <ALLOWANCES>                                                0 
   <INVENTORY>                                                 0 
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,909 
   <PP&E>                                                499,894 
   <DEPRECIATION>                                        (10,908)
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        500,557 
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  13,296 
   <BONDS>                                               135,847 
   <COMMON>                                                  452
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0 
   <PREFERRED>                                                 0  
   <OTHER-SE>                                            346,841 
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          500,557 
   <SALES>                                                     0 
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       15,408 
   <CGS>                                                       0 
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0 
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (6,316)
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0 
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (1,606)
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                         7,457 
   <INCOME-TAX>                                                0 
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     7,457 
   <DISCONTINUED>                                              0 
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0 
   <CHANGES>                                                   0 
   <NET-INCOME>                                          $ 7,457 
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                         $  0.33 
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                         $  0.33 
        


</TABLE>
SECOND
AMENDMENT TO SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT


 


This
SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBLICENSE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of January 30, 2019, by and
between Nephros, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Sublicensor”), and Camelbak Products, LLC (“Sublicensee”),
and sometimes referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.


 


RECITALS


 


A.
Sublicensee and Sublicensor are parties to that certain Sublicense Agreement entered into as of May 6, 2015, (the “Agreement”),
whereby the Parties agreed to an exclusive sublicense arrangement for the individual water treatment devices, referred to as “Sublicensed
Products” in the Agreement.


 


B.
The Parties have agreed to make certain amendments to the Agreement relating to the consideration of minimum fee payments.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual representations, warranties and covenants contained herein, the
Parties agree as follows:


 


2.3
Payments.


 


(b)
Sublicensee shall complete its $100,000 minimum fee obligation to Sublicensor for year 3 of the contract period ending May 6,
2018. $50,000 was paid in October of 2018 and balance of $50,000 will be paid in April of 2019. Minimum fee obligation for years
4-8 are eliminated and Sublicensee has no minimum fee obligation for any amount beyond the year 3 obligation. Upon completion
of year 4 of the contract both parties agree to negotiate in good faith possible reintroduction of minimum fees with terms to
be mutually agreed by both parties at that time.


 


C.
No Further Amendment. Except as expressly modified hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. In the event that any
provision of this Amendment, or any provision of the Agreement as amended hereby, is or becomes legally ineffective, this shall
not affect the validity of the remaining provisions hereof or thereof, and in lieu of the invalid provisions, the Parties shall
agree upon a valid provision that approaches best the commercial purposes of the intended provision.


 


D.
Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, all of which, when executed, shall
be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. Signatures provided by facsimile
transmission shall be deemed to be original signatures.


 


E.
Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Agreement.


[Signature
page follows.]


 




    	1



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	NEPHROS,
    INC.	 	CAMELBAK
    PRODUCTS, LLC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Andy Astor 	 	By:	/s/
    Greg Williamson 
	 	Andy
    Astor	 	 	Greg
    Williamson
	 	Chief
    Financial Officer	 	 	President


 




    	2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the use in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) of Healthnet
International Inc. of our report dated April 24, 2000 with respect to the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended February 29,
2000.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-92285) pertaining to the 1999 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
of Healthnet International Inc. of our report dated April 24, 2000 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Healthnet International Inc.
included in this Annual Report for the year ended February 29, 2000.



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Vancouver, Canada
June 12, 2000                                              Chartered Accountants
**Exhibit
      13.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Pharmaceuticals International
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, FAN Di, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
      officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Fan
      Di


FAN
      Di


Chief
      Executive Officer


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,554
<INVENTORY>                                     62,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,946
<PP&E>                                         341,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 564,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,526
<BONDS>                                        343,937
<COMMON>                                             5
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   564,744
<SALES>                                        818,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               818,024
<CGS>                                          685,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  685,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   709
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (199)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,871)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.16)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133847 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan In re Estate of JAMES W. MILTENBERGER, Deceased. Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

_____________ _______________ ___________ SUSAN EIFLER, Personal Representative of the Estate of James W. Miltenberger, Deceased, Appellee, and

SHARON MILTENBERGER, Petitioner-Appellee, SC: 133847

v COA: 270716 Calhoun Probate Ct: 2004-000287-DE SANDRA SWARTZ, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of App eals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are to discuss whether the dower election in MCL 700.2202(2)(c), as de fined in MCL 558.1, violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the Michigan a nd federal constitutions as set forth in Const 1963, art 1, § 2 and the F ourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the April 2008 session calendar for argument and submission. Appella nts’ brief and appendix must be filed no later than January 28, 2008, and appellees’ brief and appendi x, if appellees choose to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than February 21, 2008.

Persons or groups interested in the determ ination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than March 6, 2008.

t1213 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 13, 2007

Clerk2
Arthur JONES, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-8761.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District denied.
Odere SULEITOPA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 26 , 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00014
- CV
TE LUN WANG , Appellant

V. XIANGYU CAO, SI HAN, RUOTIAN LI, AND LINGCHAO CHEN , Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 04995
- 2017 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown

Opinion by Justice Brown Appellant appe als from an interlocutory order granting appellees’ motions to dismiss under

c hapter 27 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Se e T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. 27.003 (West 2017). Before the Court is appellee Lingchao Chen’s February 2, 2018 motion to dismiss
the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellee asserts in the motion that the appealed order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. Appellant did not file a response to the motion. Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over final judgme nts and certain interlocutory orders as permitted by statute. See Lehmann v. Har

– Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final judgment is one that disposes of all parties and all claims. See id. Additionally, only interlocutory orders denying a c hapter 27 motion to dismiss are appealable. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. 51.014(a)(12) (West 2017).– 2

–

In the notice of appeal, appellant states she is appealing the “final order” granting appellees’ motion s to dismiss. In the motion to dismiss, appellee expl ains that he has counterclaims that remain pending. Accordingly, the order granting the chapter 27 motions to dismiss is interlocutory as it did not dispose of all pending claims. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at
195. Moreover, the order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. See T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. 51.014(a)(12) (West 2017). Because the appealed order is neither final nor an appealable interlocutory order, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

180014F.P05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
TE LUN WANG, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 00014

- CV V.
XIANGYU CAO, SI HAN, RUOTIAN LI, AND LINGCHAO CHEN, Appellees On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429

- 04995

- 2017. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Evans participating.

In accordan ce with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees XIANGYU CAO, SI HAN, RUOTIAN LI, AND LINGCHAO CHEN recover their costs of this appeal from appellant TE LUN WANG.

Judgment entered this 26th day of February , 2018.
# Úradný vestník C 59/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 59 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 654. februára 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 59

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 654. februára 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2022/C 59/01 | Výmenný kurz eura — 3. februára 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2022/C 59/01

Výmenný kurz eura — 3. februára 2022

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 4.2.2022 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2022

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 59/1

---

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

3. februára 2022

(2022/C 59/01)

1 euro =

| | Mena | Výmenný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Americký dolár | 1,1286 |
| JPY | Japonský jen | 129,63 |
| DKK | Dánska koruna | 7,4388 |
| GBP | Britská libra | 0,83208 |
| SEK | Švédska koruna | 10,3870 |
| CHF | Švajčiarsky frank | 1,0407 |
| ISK | Islandská koruna | 142,40 |
| NOK | Nórska koruna | 9,9545 |
| BGN | Bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Česká koruna | 24,135 |
| HUF | Maďarský forint | 353,94 |
| PLN | Poľský zlotý | 4,5315 |
| RON | Rumunský lei | 4,9461 |
| TRY | Turecká líra | 15,3047 |
| AUD | Austrálsky dolár | 1,5849 |
| CAD | Kanadský dolár | 1,4334 |
| HKD | Hongkongský dolár | 8,7966 |
| NZD | Novozélandský dolár | 1,7001 |
| SGD | Singapurský dolár | 1,5212 |
| KRW | Juhokórejský won | 1 358,42 |
| ZAR | Juhoafrický rand | 17,2864 |
| CNY | Čínsky juan | 7,1795 |
| HRK | Chorvátska kuna | 7,5295 |
| IDR | Indonézska rupia | 16 243,28 |
| MYR | Malajzijský ringgit | 4,7215 |
| PHP | Filipínske peso | 57,608 |
| RUB | Ruský rubeľ | 86,1788 |
| THB | Thajský baht | 37,424 |
| BRL | Brazílsky real | 5,9843 |
| MXN | Mexické peso | 23,2359 |
| INR | Indická rupia | 84,5180 |

Mena

Výmenný kurz

USD

Americký dolár

1,1286

JPY

Japonský jen

129,63

DKK

Dánska koruna

7,4388

GBP

Britská libra

0,83208

SEK

Švédska koruna

10,3870

CHF

Švajčiarsky frank

1,0407

ISK

Islandská koruna

142,40

NOK

Nórska koruna

9,9545

BGN

Bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

Česká koruna

24,135

HUF

Maďarský forint

353,94

PLN

Poľský zlotý

4,5315

RON

Rumunský lei

4,9461

TRY

Turecká líra

15,3047

AUD

Austrálsky dolár

1,5849

CAD

Kanadský dolár

1,4334

HKD

Hongkongský dolár

8,7966

NZD

Novozélandský dolár

1,7001

SGD

Singapurský dolár

1,5212

KRW

Juhokórejský won

1 358,42

ZAR

Juhoafrický rand

17,2864

CNY

Čínsky juan

7,1795

HRK

Chorvátska kuna

7,5295

IDR

Indonézska rupia

16 243,28

MYR

Malajzijský ringgit

4,7215

PHP

Filipínske peso

57,608

RUB

Ruský rubeľ

86,1788

THB

Thajský baht

37,424

BRL

Brazílsky real

5,9843

MXN

Mexické peso

23,2359

INR

Indická rupia

84,5180

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

---
Reinaldo SANTOS v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-7096

Supreme Court of the United States.

Decided May 20, 2019

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on March 21, 2019.

Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissenting.

The Court grants, vacates, and remands in this case, apparently because it harbors doubt that petitioner's 1987 conviction under Florida law for battery on a law enforcement officer qualifies as a "violent felony" as defined by the Armed Career Criminal Act's elements clause, which covers a felony offense that "has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another." 18 U. S. C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(i). I share no such doubt: As the case comes to us, it is undisputed that petitioner was convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer after he " 'struck [an] officer in the face using a closed fist.' " App. to Pet. for Cert. A-1, p. 11. See Fla. Stat. § 784.03(1)(a) (2018) (a person commits battery when he "[a]ctually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other," among other things). Because the record makes "perfectly clear" that petitioner "was convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer by striking, which involves the use of physical force against the person of another," App. to Pet. for Cert. A-1, at 11, I would count the conviction as a "violent felony" under the elements clause and would therefore deny the petition. *Mathis* v. *United States* , 579 U. S. ----, ----, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 2267, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016) (ALITO, J., dissenting).