alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1672

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require States Medicaid

plans to provide for payment for costs of medical services under individualized education programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act after they exceed $3,500 in a school year.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1999

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require

States Medicaid plans to provide for payment for costs

of medical services under individualized education programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act after they exceed $3,500 in a school year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smart IDEA Act of

5 1999’’.
2

•HR 1672 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF COSTS OF MEDICAL SERV2 ICES UNDER INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION

3 PROGRAMS UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH

4 DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT BEYOND $3,500

5 IN A SCHOOL YEAR.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title XIX of the Social Security

7 Act is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating section 1935 as section

9 1936, and

10 (2) by inserting after section 1934 the following

11 new section:

12 ‘‘COVERAGE OF COSTS OF MEDICAL SERVICES UNDER IN13 DIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAMS UNDER THE

14 INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT

15 AFTER THEY EXCEED $3,500 IN A SCHOOL YEAR

16 ‘‘SEC. 1935. (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any

17 other provision of this title—

18 ‘‘(1) each State plan under this title shall pro19 vide medical assistance described in subsection (b);

20 and

21 ‘‘(2) such medical assistance is not required to

22 be provided to individuals other than children de23 scribed in such subsection.

24 ‘‘(b) CONFORMING DEFINITION OF MEDICAL ASSIST25 ANCE.—For purposes of this title, the term ‘medical as26 sistance’ includes payment for all of the costs of medical
3

•HR 1672 IH

1 services furnished to any child pursuant to, and in accord2 ance with, an individualized education program (as de3 fined in section 614(d)(1)(A) of the Individuals with Dis4 abilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)(A)) for that

5 child, but only insofar as such costs exceed $3,500 in any

6 school year.’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 subsection (a) take effect on the date of the enactment

9 of this Act and apply to medical services furnished on or

10 after such date, without regard to whether or not final

11 regulations to carry out such amendments have been pro12 mulgated by such date.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1781 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1781

 To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to prohibit the donation of 
competitive foods of minimal nutritional value in schools participating 
   in Federal meal service programs before the end of the last lunch 
                         period of the schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

 Mr. Hinchey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to prohibit the donation of 
competitive foods of minimal nutritional value in schools participating 
   in Federal meal service programs before the end of the last lunch 
                         period of the schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Nutrition for School Children 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

    The purposes of this Act are--
            (1) to close the loophole that allows competitive foods of 
        minimum nutritional value that cannot be sold during meals in 
        schools participating in the school breakfast and lunch 
        programs to instead be given away to students during or before 
        breakfast or lunch;
            (2) to protect 1 of the major purposes of the Child 
        Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) and the National 
        School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.), which is to promote 
        better nutrition among school children participating in the 
        school breakfast and lunch programs; and
            (3) to promote better nutritional habits among school 
        children and improve the health of school children 
        participating in the school breakfast and lunch programs.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON DONATION OF COMPETITIVE FOODS OF MINIMAL 
              NUTRITIONAL VALUE.

    Section 10 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1779) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(b) The'' and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Donation of Competitive Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value.--
            ``(1) Sales.--The''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Donations.--The regulations shall prohibit the 
        donation of competitive foods of minimal nutritional value in a 
        school participating in a meal service program authorized under 
        this Act or the National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et 
        seq.) before the end of the last lunch period of the school.''.
                                 <all>
```
Tony LIPSCOMB, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6177.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in light of *Stokeling v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 544, 202 L.E.2d 512 (2019).
Harold HALL, petitioner, v. ALABAMA.

No. 18-7635.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Gary Jefferson BYRD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-30.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*211Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Martin E. GRANT, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-8371.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
Michael APELT, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8386.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Terry WALKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8763.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Zvi Alon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report,
for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.

                               By:    /s/ Zvi Alon
                                  ---------------------------
                               Name:  Zvi Alon
                               Title: Chief Executive Officer

         I, Michael Peckham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report,
for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.

                               By:    /s/ Michael Peckham
                                  ---------------------------
                               Name:  Michael Peckham
                               Title: Chief Financial Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 175

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the State ceiling

on the low-income housing credit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. WELLER, Mr.

LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. METCALF, Mr. LAZIO, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. COYNE, Ms. DUNN, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. ENGLISH,

Mr. CARDIN, Mr. WATKINS, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr.

BECERRA, Mr. MCINNIS, Mrs. THURMAN, and Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the State ceiling on the low-income housing credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Affordable Housing

5 Opportunity Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 175 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN STATE CEILING ON LOW-INCOME

2 HOUSING CREDIT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 42(h)(3)(C)

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to State

5 housing credit ceiling) is amended by striking ‘‘$1.25’’ and

6 inserting ‘‘$1.75’’.

7 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATE CEILING FOR IN8 CREASES IN COST-OF-LIVING.—Paragraph (3) of section

9 42(h) of such Code (relating to housing credit dollar

10 amount for agencies) is amended by adding at the end

11 the following new subparagraph:

12 ‘‘(H) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT.—

13 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a

14 calendar year after 2000, the dollar

15 amount contained in subparagraph (C)(i)

16 shall be increased by an amount equal to—

17 ‘‘(I) such dollar amount, multi18 plied by

19 ‘‘(II) the cost-of-living adjust20 ment determined under section 1(f)(3)

21 for such calendar year by substituting

22 ‘calendar year 1999’ for ‘calendar

23 year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) there24 of.

25 ‘‘(ii) ROUNDING.—If any increase

26 under clause (i) is not a multiple of 5
3

•HR 175 IH

1 cents, such increase shall be rounded to

2 the next lowest multiple of 5 cents.’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to calendar years after 1999.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.3

                          [ON ERNST & YOUNG LETTERHEAD]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              <S>                                                     <C>
                              ALLIED FOR ACCOUNTING & AUDITING                        Phone: + 20 2 336 2000

                              Ragheb, Hamouda, Istanboull, Tageldeen & El-Kilany      Fax:   + 20 2 760 0813

                              37 El Ahrar Street, Mobica Tower                        Cairo.office@eg.ey.com

                              P.O. Box 97 Dokki, Giza-Egypt                           www.ey.com/eyme
</TABLE>


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-12608, 333-13716 and 333-102247) of Delta Galil Industries
Ltd. of our report dated 30 March 2006, with respect to the financial statements
of Delta Textile Egypt - Free Zone (S.A.E.) for the year ended 31 December 2004,
included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Delta Galil Industries Ltd. for the
year ended 31 December 2005.



                                            /S/ Allied for Accounting & Auditing
                                            Allied for Accounting and Auditing
                                            Member Firm of Ernst & Young Global

Cairo, Egypt
15 June 2006

<PAGE>

                          [ON ERNST & YOUNG LETTERHEAD]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              <S>                                                     <C>
                              ALLIED FOR ACCOUNTING & AUDITING                        Phone: + 20 2 336 2000

                              Ragheb, Hamouda, Istanboull, Tageldeen & El-Kilany      Fax:   + 20 2 760 0813

                              37 El Ahrar Street, Mobica Tower                        cairo.office@eg.ey.com

                              P.O. Box 97 Dokki, Giza-Egypt                           www.ey.com/eyme
</TABLE>


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-12608, 333-13716 and 333-102247) of Delta Galil Industries
Ltd. of our report dated 30 March 2006, with respect to the financial statements
of Delta Egypt Sourcing (Limited Liability Company) for the year ended 31
December 2004, included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Delta Galil
Industries Ltd. for the year ended 31 December 2005.

                                     /S/ Allied for Accounting & Auditing
                                     Allied for Accounting and Auditing
                                     Member Firm of Ernst & Young Global

Cairo, Egypt
15 June 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     WHEREAS, Equistar Chemicals, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Partnership"), intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, with such amendment or
amendments thereto, in each case as may be necessary or appropriate, together
with any and all exhibits and other documents relating thereto (the
"Form 10-K");

     NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as a member
of the Partnership Governance Committee of the Partnership (the "Committee"),
does hereby appoint Gerald A. O'Brien and Kelvin R. Collard, and each of them,
as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with power to act and
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute in his or her
name, place and stead, in his or her capacity as a member of the Committee, as
the case may be, of the Partnership, the Form 10-K, and all instruments
necessary or incidental in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or any of them shall deem necessary or appropriate

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this instrument on
this 29th day of March, 2000.


                                         William M. Landuyt
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         William M. Landuyt


                                         John E. Lushefski
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         John E. Lushefski


                                         George Robbins
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         George Robbins


                                         Dr. Ray R. Irani
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         Dr. Ray R. Irani


                                         Stephen I. Chazen
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         Stephen I. Chazen


                                         J. Roger Hirl
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         J. Roger Hirl


                                         Dan F. Smith
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         Dan F. Smith


                                         Jeff Pendergraft
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         Jeff Pendergraft


                                         Kevin DeNicola
                                  ---------------------------------
                                         Kevin DeNicola
Quincy MAGEE, petitioner, v. The WALT DISNEY COMPANY, et al.

No. 18-8613.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Form 10-KSB/A of DOMAIN  REGISTRATION,  CORP.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Amy
Hadley,  President and Director of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: July 25, 2005


/s/ AMY HADLEY
______________________________________
Amy Hadley
President and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DOMAIN REGISTRATION CORP. AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY DOMAIN  REGISTRATION  CORP.  AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Luis G. ROGERS, petitioner, v. LIBERTY BELL BANK.

No. 17-9503.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Peter B. Bedford, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bedford Property Investors, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date:August 2, 2003

/s/ Peter B. Bedford



Peter B. Bedford

Chief Executive Officer