alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Shannon International Resources Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Blair Coady, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

September 29, 2003               /s/ Blair Coady
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Blair Coady
                                 Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Small Business: SBIR/STTR Commercialization Readiness Pilot (CRP) Program, May 17, 2022, 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 05, 2022, FR Doc. 2022-09591, 87 FR 26768.                

This meeting is being amended to change the format and time from Telephone Conference Call 2:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. to a Virtual Meeting 2:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 10, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10397 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2014

No. 04-14-00878-CR

Matthew Douglas HAYES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10841W

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal is hereby 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of EDGAR
Online, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Farrell, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 2, 2011 |  | By: |  | /S/    ROBERT J.
FARRELL             
|                   |  |     |  | Robert J. Farrell                    
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Ambrose KING, petitioner, v. Mary KING.

No. 18-5119.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1000



<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                      1774
<SECURITIES>                                223
<RECEIVABLES>                               4403
<ALLOWANCES>                                568
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5956
<PP&E>                                      4612
<DEPRECIATION>                              1296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2184
<BONDS>                                     1172
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    1
<OTHER-SE>                                  5981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                9338
<SALES>                                     11276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11276
<CGS>                                       4245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               4245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            5793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1400
<INCOME-TAX>                                560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         840
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                840
<EPS-BASIC>                               .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .16





</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7676

RICHARD S. MAULICK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN EDWARDS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1106-7) Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard S. Maulick, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Richard S. Maulick, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Maulick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ex_137070.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 


AMENDMENT


TO THE PROMISSORY NOTE DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 2018


 


The parties entered into a 12% Promissory Note dated September 19, 2018 in the Original Principal Amount of $120,000, instrument number 33149, (the “Note”), by and between BioLargo, Inc. (the “Issuer”) and Chappy Bean, LLC (the “Holder”) (together referred to as the “Parties”). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning set forth in the Note.


 


WHEREAS, the Note’s original Maturity Date was January 5, 2019, and pursuant to the terms thereof, on January 3, 2019, Issuer notified Holder of its election to extend the Maturity Date by 60 days to March 6, 2019, and in doing so the Principal Amount due under the Note increased as of January 3, 2019 to $132,000.


 


WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to further extend the Maturity Date of the Note as set forth herein.


 


The Parties hereby agree to amend the Note as follows:


 


Maturity: The Maturity Date of the Note shall be extended to June 6, 2019.


 


Optional Extension of June 6, 2019 Maturity Date. So long as an Event of Default (as defined in Section 4 of the Note) has not occurred, Issuer may extend the Maturity Date of the Note to September 6, 2019 by giving written notice to Holder at any time prior to the Maturity Date, and in such event the then outstanding Principal Amount of the Note will increase by ten percent (10%), effective as of the date of the notice.


 


Interest Rate: Effective as of March 7, 2019, the Note shall earn interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum. For the purpose of clarity, all interest accrued prior to March 7, 2019 accrued at 12% per annum.


 


Amendment to Warrant: Issuer issued to Holder a warrant to purchase 600,000 shares of Issuer’s common stock, instrument number 33150, expiring September 19, 2023 (the “Warrant”). As additional consideration for the extension, the Exercise Price of the Warrant (as that term is defined in the Warrant) is hereby reduced from $0.25 to $0.20, and the number of share purchasable under the Warrant is hereby increased from 600,000 to 750,000 shares.


 


ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NOTE AND WARRANT REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated March 5, 2019 by signing below:


 


	/s/Dennis P. Calvert 	 	/s/Jaren Johnson	 
	Dennis P. Calvert	 	Jaren Johnson	 
	BioLargo, Inc.	 	Chappy Bean, LLC	 
	Chief Executive Officer 	 	VP and General Counsel	 
	Date signed: March 5, 2019	 	Date signed: March 5, 2019
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50038

(Summary Calendar)

ALBERT F. PERALTA,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

LLOYD BENTSON; INTERNAL 

REVENUE SERVICE; DEPARTMENT 

OF THE TREASURY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-95-CV-747)

April 17, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se,Plaintiff-Appellant Albert F. Peralta sought

to assert employment discrimination claims against DefendantsAppellees. The magistrate judge to whom the case was referred by
2

the district court recommended granting Peralta’s motion to proceed

in former pauperis (IFP), denying Peralta’s motion for appointment

of counsel, and dismissing all claims with prejudice. Over the

objections of Peralta, the district court approved the report of

the magistrate judge and the recommendations set forth therein, and

dismissed Peralta’s claims as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(d) with prejudice. Peralta timely appealed. 

We have reviewed the record and the document filed with this

court by Peralta which, we assume, purports to be an appellate

brief. That filing fails entirely to comply in either form or

substance with the requirements for a brief to this court and is

thus insufficient to support appellate review. Moreover, our

review of that document and the scant but sufficient record in

these proceedings demonstrates beyond cavil that Peralta presented

nothing to the district court that, no matter how liberally

construed, could form the basis for a claim with any arguable basis

in fact or law, or any likelihood of success. Consequently,

Peralta’s appeal is dismissed with prejudice as wholly without

merit and frivolous as a matter of law. Moreover, Peralta is

cautioned that any further efforts on his part to pursue the

subject matter of this case in any federal court within this

circuit may subject him to sanctions. 

DISMISSED.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P AU L I NO L UI S MAR T I NE Z - ME NA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70946 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 617- 745 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P aul i no L ui s M art i ne z - M e na , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s r e mo v a l o r d e r . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law , L at ter-Si ng h v. H

older , 668 F . 3d 

# FI LED MA Y24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 70946 2 1 1 5 6 , 1 1 5 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 1 2 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A c o rr e c tlyd e te rm in e dth a t M artin e z - M e n ais s ta tu to r ilyin e lig ib le f orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l be c aus e hi s c onvi c t i on unde rC a l i f orni aP e na l C ode § 4 2 2 is f o rac r im e in v o lv in g m o r a l tu rp itu d e . See 8 U . S. C. § § 1 1 8 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( i) ( I ) , 1 2 2 9 b ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C ) ; L at te r- Si ngh , 66 8 F . 3d at11 63 (a c onvi c t i on unde rC a l i f

orni aP e na l C ode § 422 i s c a t e gor i c a l l yac r i m e i nvol vi ng m oralturpi tud e) . M art i ne z - M e na ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons ar e una va i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, CONNECTICUT, et al., petitioners, v. William McKINNEY.

No. 18-46.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Derek Antonio SMITH, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-5299.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China World Trade Corporation,  a Nevada
company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  September 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, John H.W. Hui, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


__/s/ John H.W. Hui__________
John H.W. Hui
Chief Executive Officer
                                                            Date: April 11, 2003
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1203

To encourage the International Monetary Fund to fully implement

transparency and efficiency policies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 1999

Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To encourage the International Monetary Fund to fully

implement transparency and efficiency policies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IMF Transparency and

5 Efficiency Enforcement Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO MAKE LOANS TO

7 THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.

8 Section 17(a) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act

9 (22 U.S.C. 280e-z(a)) is amended by adding at the end

10 the following: ‘‘A loan under the authority granted in this
2

•HR 1203 IH

1 subsection may be made only within 1 year after the Sec2 retary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Board

3 of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, after con4 sultation with the Comptroller General of the United

5 States, have jointly provided to the Committees on Appro6 priations, Foreign Relations, and Banking, Housing, and

7 Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committees on Ap8 propriations and Banking and Financial Services of the

9 House of Representatives a written certification that the

10 Fund has implemented fully the policies described in sec11 tion 601 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing,

12 and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1999 (as con13 tained in section 101(d) of Division A of the Omnibus

14 Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropria15 tions Act, 1999), except that if, in each of the preceding

16 4 years, such a certification has been so provided but a

17 joint resolution approving the certification has not been

18 enacted into law pursuant to this sentence, then such a

19 loan may not be made within 1 year after the provision

20 of the certification unless, during such year, a joint resolu21 tion approving the certification is enacted into law.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Ilife.com, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-87955) on Form S-8 of ilife.com, Inc. (formerly Intelligent Life Corporation)
of our report dated July 23, 1998 relating to the balance sheet of ilife.com,
Inc. as of June 30, 1997, and the related statements of operations, redeemable
stock and stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended June
30, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form
10-K of ilife.com, Inc.

Thomas & Clough Co., P.A.


Palm Beach, Florida
April 14, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 29023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10328]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 29023]]


                Notice of May 9, 2022

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Yemen

                On May 16, 2012, by Executive Order 13611, the 
                President declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security and 
                foreign policy of the United States constituted by the 
                actions and policies of certain members of the 
                Government of Yemen and others that threatened Yemen's 
                peace, security, and stability. These actions include 
                obstructing the political process in Yemen and blocking 
                the implementation of the agreement of November 23, 
                2011, between the Government of Yemen and those in 
                opposition to it, which provide for a peaceful 
                transition of power that meets the legitimate demands 
                and aspirations of the Yemeni people.

                The actions and policies of certain former members of 
                the Government of Yemen and others in threatening 
                Yemen's peace, security, and stability continue to pose 
                an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States. For 
                this reason, the national emergency declared in 
                Executive Order 13611 on May 16, 2012, to deal with 
                that threat must continue in effect beyond May 16, 
                2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of 
                the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 
                in Executive Order 13611 with respect to Yemen.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    May 9, 2022.

[FR Doc. 2022-10328
Filed 5-10-22; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3395-F2-P