alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/14/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      248,976
COMMITMENTS
  22,941   44,430   52,685  147,279  128,275  222,905  225,390   26,071   23,586

CHANGES FROM 06/07/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,313)
  -5,099     -774   -2,185    8,152    3,874      868      915    3,445    3,398

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.2     17.8     21.2     59.2     51.5     89.5     90.5     10.5      9.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      137)
      49       35       64       32       29      120      110
```

----

Updated Jun 17, 2011
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 10772

RANDY J. AUSTIN , Plaintiff

–

Appellant , v. KROGER TEXAS L.P., doing business as Kroger Store #209 , Defendant

– Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11

- cv
- 1169

Before ELROD and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges, and JACKSON, District Judge

. * PER CURIAM: * * Plaintiff

- A ppellant Randy Austin appealed the district court ’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant

- A ppellee Kroger Texas L.P. We certified a question of state law to the Supreme Court of Texas. Austin v. Kroger Texas L.P. , 746 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2014). The Supreme Court of Texas answered our question in a thorough opinion. Austin v. Kroger Te xas L.P. , No.

* Chief Judge of the Middle District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

∗ * Pursuant to Fifth Cir . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this o pinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth Cir . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 28, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-10772 Document: 00513173339 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2015No. 12

- 10772

2 14

- 0216, 2015 WL 3641066 (Tex. June 12, 2015). Under Texas law, “an employer’s premises

- liability duty to its employee includes only the duty to protect or warn the employee against concealed hazards of which the employer is aware, or reasona bly should have been aware, but the employee is not.” Id. at *3. Because there is no contention that Austin was unaware of the hazards of the spill leading to his fall and injury , and because he cannot claim the benefit of either of the two narrow exceptio ns provided for by Texas law , the district court correctly granted summary judgment on this claim. The Supreme Court of Texas further cl arified that Austin’s necessary instrumentalities claim is independent of his premises

- liability claim and that Kroger o wed him “ duties in addition to its premises

- liability duty and its duty not to engage in negligent activities, including the duty to provide Austin with necessary instrumentalities .” Id. at * 15

. The district court did not consider whether Austin could pursue a claim based on Kroger’s alleged failure to provide a necessary instrumentality of his employment. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the distr ict court ’s grant of summary judg ment on Austin’ s premises

- defect claim. We REMAND to the district court so that it may consider Austin’ s claim of ordinary negligence in the first instance. 1

1 We have already affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Kroger on Austin’s gross negligence claim, and the Te xas Supreme Court’s decision does not disturb that holding. See Austin , 746 F.3d at 196 & n.2. Case: 12-10772 Document: 00513173339 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2015
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 99.1



                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE



To the Board of Directors
of HealthGate Data Corp.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements of HealthGate Data Corp.
referred to in our report dated March 29, 2004 (which report and consolidated
financial statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also
included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of
this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 2004


<Page>


                                   HEALTHGATE DATA CORP
                     SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

<Table>
<Caption>

                                          BALANCE AT             CHARGES TO                      BALANCE AT
                                         BEGINNING OF            COSTS AND                         END OF
                                             YEAR                 EXPENSES        DEDUCTIONS        YEAR
                                         ------------            ----------       ----------     ----------
<S>                                     <C>                    <C>               <C>            <C>
2003
Allowance for doubtful accounts.......     $3,781                  $--             $(1,963)        $1,818

2002
Allowance for doubtful accounts.......     20,740                   --             (16,959)         3,781

2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts.......    190,625                   --            (169,885)        20,740
</Table>
Frederick L. ALLEN, et al., petitioners, v. Roy A. COOPER, III, Governor of North Carolina, et al.

No. 18-877.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

*2665Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.
# Úradný vestník C 39/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 39 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6526. januára 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 39

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6526. januára 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2022/C 39/01 | Výmenný kurz eura — 25. januára 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2022/C 39/01

Výmenný kurz eura — 25. januára 2022

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 26.1.2022 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2022

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 39/1

---

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

25. januára 2022

(2022/C 39/01)

1 euro =

| | Mena | Výmenný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Americký dolár | 1,1268 |
| JPY | Japonský jen | 128,49 |
| DKK | Dánska koruna | 7,4437 |
| GBP | Britská libra | 0,83713 |
| SEK | Švédska koruna | 10,5020 |
| CHF | Švajčiarsky frank | 1,0364 |
| ISK | Islandská koruna | 146,00 |
| NOK | Nórska koruna | 10,1385 |
| BGN | Bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Česká koruna | 24,500 |
| HUF | Maďarský forint | 359,44 |
| PLN | Poľský zlotý | 4,5751 |
| RON | Rumunský lei | 4,9448 |
| TRY | Turecká líra | 15,2723 |
| AUD | Austrálsky dolár | 1,5814 |
| CAD | Kanadský dolár | 1,4247 |
| HKD | Hongkongský dolár | 8,7725 |
| NZD | Novozélandský dolár | 1,6911 |
| SGD | Singapurský dolár | 1,5157 |
| KRW | Juhokórejský won | 1 350,71 |
| ZAR | Juhoafrický rand | 17,2669 |
| CNY | Čínsky juan | 7,1325 |
| HRK | Chorvátska kuna | 7,5295 |
| IDR | Indonézska rupia | 16 169,54 |
| MYR | Malajzijský ringgit | 4,7213 |
| PHP | Filipínske peso | 57,753 |
| RUB | Ruský rubeľ | 88,7384 |
| THB | Thajský baht | 37,280 |
| BRL | Brazílsky real | 6,2049 |
| MXN | Mexické peso | 23,2909 |
| INR | Indická rupia | 84,2770 |

Mena

Výmenný kurz

USD

Americký dolár

1,1268

JPY

Japonský jen

128,49

DKK

Dánska koruna

7,4437

GBP

Britská libra

0,83713

SEK

Švédska koruna

10,5020

CHF

Švajčiarsky frank

1,0364

ISK

Islandská koruna

146,00

NOK

Nórska koruna

10,1385

BGN

Bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

Česká koruna

24,500

HUF

Maďarský forint

359,44

PLN

Poľský zlotý

4,5751

RON

Rumunský lei

4,9448

TRY

Turecká líra

15,2723

AUD

Austrálsky dolár

1,5814

CAD

Kanadský dolár

1,4247

HKD

Hongkongský dolár

8,7725

NZD

Novozélandský dolár

1,6911

SGD

Singapurský dolár

1,5157

KRW

Juhokórejský won

1 350,71

ZAR

Juhoafrický rand

17,2669

CNY

Čínsky juan

7,1325

HRK

Chorvátska kuna

7,5295

IDR

Indonézska rupia

16 169,54

MYR

Malajzijský ringgit

4,7213

PHP

Filipínske peso

57,753

RUB

Ruský rubeľ

88,7384

THB

Thajský baht

37,280

BRL

Brazílsky real

6,2049

MXN

Mexické peso

23,2909

INR

Indická rupia

84,2770

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William G. Gerber, President and Chief Executive Officer of Epoch
Biosciences, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                                                                                                          

|                       |  |     |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ William G. Gerber                                  
|                       |  |     |  |                                                        
|                       |  |     |  | William G. Gerber
President and Chief Executive Officer
Roger WILSON, petitioner, v. DELTA AIRLINES, et al.

No. 18-5342.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      133,931
COMMITMENTS
  21,633   16,257   29,346   66,735   74,841  117,714  120,444   16,217   13,487

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,772)
   2,925   -5,442   -1,697  -14,746   -5,276  -13,518  -12,415     -254   -1,357

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    16.2     12.1     21.9     49.8     55.9     87.9     89.9     12.1     10.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       81)
      26       23       29       22       23       67       63
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
Lynette GREGORY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District

1

Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

___________

No. 95-2102

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Stephen Edward Cooper, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 17, 1995

 Filed: December 5, 1995

___________

Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Stephen Cooper of distributing and conspiring to

distribute methamphetamine. The district court subsequently sentenced

1

Cooper to 164 months (13 years and 8 months) imprisonment. Cooper appeals,

alleging that insufficient evidence exists to support the convictions.

Cooper argues that he was convicted upon uncorroborated evidence presented

by non-credible witnesses.

When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence

in the light most favorable to the government, giving the government the

benefit of all inferences that may reasonably be drawn, and we will reverse

only if no reasonable jury could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt

that the defendant was guilty as charged. United States v. Wilcox, 50 F.3d

600, 602 (8th Cir.
-2-

1995). A conviction may be based upon the uncorroborated testimony of an

accomplice if that testimony is not otherwise incredible or unsubstantial

on its face. United States v. Sublet, 644 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir. 1981)

(citing United States v. Haskins, 536 F.2d 775, 779 (8th Cir.), cert.

denied, 429 U.S. 898 (1976)). 

Two of Cooper's co-conspirators testified at trial that Cooper

participated in joint purchases of methamphetamine and that he subsequently

distributed the drug to others. We have examined the record and conclude

that there is sufficient evidence to support the convictions.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Scott Howard KIMBALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Compressor
Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Chad C. Deaton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Chad C. Deaton
------------------------------
Name:  Chad C. Deaton
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 13, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Trevonte JENKINS, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-7825.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         108,102
<SECURITIES>                                   121,046
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,783
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294,326
<PP&E>                                          16,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,801
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     252,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,754
<SALES>                                        155,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,015)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.29)


</TABLE>
Cameron BROWN, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-8853.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

PHILADELPHIA MASJID,

INCORPORATED., RAFIQ KALAM

ID-DIN, AND THE PHILADELPHIA

MASJID, INCORPORATED.,

 Petitioners

 v.

GREGORY JONES, AKA SEFULLAH

MUHAMMAD, STANLEY INGRAM, AKA

SALAAM MUSHIN, ISHAQ SAMAI, WALI

BILAL, AKA HARRY MIMS, KHALILAH

AZIZ, AKA DONALD ABNEY, RODNEY

DUNN, SHAKRI BEYAH, BENJAMIN

SULUKI, GILFORD HART,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 413 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Purina Mills, LLC (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Robert
DeGregorio, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                   By  /s/ Robert DeGregorio
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                       Robert DeGregorio
                                                           President
                                                          and Manager
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 20, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 20, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20A1949. YOLANDA WARD v. VICTOR WHITE, JR.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
Jonathan Samuel SAGE, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-7146.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/23/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      478,563
COMMITMENTS
  50,611   19,643  110,075  288,765  328,894  449,451  458,612   29,112   19,951

CHANGES FROM 08/16/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -24,255)
  -2,780    3,132  -17,005   -8,791  -12,503  -28,576  -26,376    4,322    2,121

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.6      4.1     23.0     60.3     68.7     93.9     95.8      6.1      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      124)
      31       16       37       68       66      115      106
```

----

Updated August 26, 2011