alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Research Education Program to Enhance Diversity in Health Related Research.                    

*Date:*                         June 24, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shelley Sehnert, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 208-T, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 827-7984,                         *ssehnert@nhlbi.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 10, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10355 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-8011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STEPHEN EDWIN BOTELHO-PEREZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-124) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, Appellant Pro Se. John Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeUnited States v. BotehloPerez , No. CR-02-124 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 13 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00618

- CV

MOHAMED ISMAEEL , Appellant

V.

AMANY GALAL ALY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 25046

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 29, 2014 . On November 5,
2014, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the a ppeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Donovan.
EXHIBIT 14.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

THOMSON:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13178, 333-14224, 333-119938, 333-124241, 333-130657 and 333-137680) of THOMSON of our reports dated May 7, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of THOMSON as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, recognized income and expense, and changes in equity for the year then ended, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F of THOMSON.



|KPMG Audit             
|-----------------------
|A division of KPMG S.A.
|                       
|Isabelle Allen         
|                       



Paris La Défense, France





May
  11, 2007
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1727

To eliminate the fees associated with Forest Service special use permits

that authorize a church to use structures and improvements on National

Forest System lands for religious or educational purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself and Mrs. CHENOWETH) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To eliminate the fees associated with Forest Service special

use permits that authorize a church to use structures

and improvements on National Forest System lands for

religious or educational purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF FEES FOR FOREST SERVICE

4 SPECIAL USE PERMITS ISSUED TO CHURCH5 ES.

6 (a) FEES PROHIBITED.—After the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture may not

8 impose or collect any fee in connection with the issuance
2

•HR 1727 IH

1 to a church of a special use permit described in subsection

2 (b). Nothing in this subsection shall affect those fees col3 lected by the Secretary on or before that date.

4 (b) COVERED SPECIAL USE PERMITS.—A special use

5 permit referred to in subsection (a) is a special use permit

6 in effect after the date of the enactment of this Act that—

7 (1) authorizes a church to occupy and use any

8 structure or improvement located on National Forest

9 System lands for religious or educational purposes;

10 and

11 (2) was issued by the Forest Service before that

12 date, or is issued by the Forest Service on or after

13 that date, under the authority of any special use

14 permit law.

15 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

16 (1) CHURCH.—The term ‘‘church’’ means a

17 church, a convention or association of churches, or

18 an elementary or secondary school that is controlled,

19 operated, or principally supported by a church or a

20 convention or association of churches.

21 (2) SPECIAL USE PERMIT LAW.—The term

22 ‘‘special use permit law’’ includes—

23 (A) the last paragraph under the heading

24 ‘‘FOREST SERVICE’’ in the Act of March 4,

25 1915 (16 U.S.C. 497);
3

•HR 1727 IH

1 (B) section 4(c) of the Land and Water

2 Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C.

3 460l–6a(c));

4 (C) section 7 of the Act of April 24, 1950

5 (16 U.S.C. 580d; commonly known as the

6 Granger-Thye Act); and

7 (D) any other law authorizing the issuance

8 of special use permits by the Forest Service.

Æ
Glenvert GREEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5189.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **765 5** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. ROBERT PETER RUSSELL , Defendant

– Appell ant . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1 : 9 1

- c r - 0 0 056

- AVB

- 1 ; 1:93

- cv - 01036

- JCC )

Submitted : May 2 6 , 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING , SHEDD, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by unpublished per cur iam opinion
.
Robert Peter Russell , Appellant Pro Se
. Michael Edward Rich , Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Peter Russell seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60( d ) (3) motion to reopen judgment in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) proceedings, and a subsequent order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion to alter or amend judgment and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denia l of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitut ional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Russell has not made the requisite showing.
Acco rdingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We further deny Russell’s motion to remand the case3 for an evidentiary hearing, and we dismiss as moot his motion to expedite our decision on that motion. We dispense with oral
argum ent because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Roberto Miramontes ROMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8456.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA-2014-N-1721; FDA-2005-N-0101; FDA-2021-N-0386; FDA-2012-N-0294; and FDA-2018-N-3404]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of information collections that have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-3794, 
                        *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information collections approved recently by OMB under section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements for the information collections are available on the internet at 
                    *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*
                     An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Table 1—List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
Title of collection
OMB control No.
Date approval expiresInvestigational New Drug Regulations
0910-0014
3/31/2025Prescription Drug User Fee Program
0910-0297
3/31/2025Medical Device Reporting
0910-0437
3/31/2025Food Additives; Food Contact Substances Notification System
0910-0495
3/31/2025Generic Drug User Fee Program
0910-0727
3/31/2025
 Dated: May 4, 2022. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 2022-10017 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Patrick EDWARDS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8983.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated May 4, 2012
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/20/12                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      418,381
COMMITMENTS
  77,722  155,592   73,883  242,829  163,575  394,434  393,050   23,947   25,331

CHANGES FROM 11/13/12 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     35,965)
   9,350   16,417   -1,317   30,510   21,192   38,543   36,292   -2,578     -327

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.6     37.2     17.7     58.0     39.1     94.3     93.9      5.7      6.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      64       59       71       41       38      144      138
```

----

Updated November 26, 2012
Alvin S. KANOFSKY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF BETHLEHEM, PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-1215.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial 
Review Group; Mental Health Services Study Section.
    Date: June 7-8, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6136, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-
443-1225, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#650416060d100911002508040c094b0b0c0d4b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8a9bbaba0bda4bcad88a5a9a1a4e6a6a1a0e6afa7be">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 4, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09884 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7761

ROBERT L. DAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HARRY ALLSBROOK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-97-434-5-F)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Davis v. Allsbrook, No. CA-97-434-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of 9278
Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Annual Report"), I, Sajid B. Kapadia, principal accounting officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:        , 2003                                /s/  Sajid B. Kapadia
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   SAJID B. KAPADIA
                                                   Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Louis R. Bucalo, M.D., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

 

Signed at theCity of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9thday of August, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ Louis R. Bucalo    |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Louis R.  Bucalo, M.D. |

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert E. Farrell, J.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

 

Signed at theCity of South San Francisco, in the State of California, this 9thday of August, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert E. Farrell   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert E. Farrell, J.D. |

 

----