alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1723

To encourage States to require a holding period for any student expelled

for bringing a gun to school.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To encourage States to require a holding period for any

student expelled for bringing a gun to school.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HOLDING PERIOD FOR STUDENTS BRINGING A

4 GUN TO SCHOOL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 222 of

6 the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of

7 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5632) or any other provision of law, for

8 fiscal year 2000 and each fiscal year thereafter, the

9 amount that would otherwise be allocated to a State under

10 that section for a fiscal year shall be increased for preven-
2

•HR 1723 IH

1 tion and intervention related to school violence by 25 per2 cent, if the State has in effect a State law described in

3 subsection (b) by not later than the first day of that fiscal

4 year.

5 (b) STATE LAW DESCRIBED.—A State law is de6 scribed in this subsection if it requires that—

7 (1) any administrator or employee of a public

8 or private school who has reasonable cause to believe

9 that a student is or has been in possession of a fire10 arm while in or on the premises of a school building

11 in violation of Federal or State law, shall imme12 diately report the student’s conduct to an appro13 priate law enforcement agency and to an appropriate

14 juvenile department or agency of the State;

15 (2) upon receipt of a report under paragraph

16 (1), the appropriate law enforcement agency shall

17 immediately cause an investigation to be made to de18 termine whether there is probable cause to believe

19 that the student, while in or on the premises of a

20 public building, possessed a firearm in violation of

21 Federal or State law;

22 (3) if a determination of probable cause is made

23 under paragraph (2)—

24 (A) the student shall immediately be de25 tained by the appropriate law enforcement
3

•HR 1723 IH

1 agency for not more than 72 hours in an appro2 priate juvenile justice setting for purposes of

3 psychological evaluation and for a judicial de4 termination (pursuant to a hearing) regarding

5 whether the student is a danger to himself or

6 herself or to others; and

7 (B) a parent, guardian, or other adult with

8 responsibility for the student shall be notified of

9 that detention and the purposes of that deten10 tion; and

11 (4) if the court makes a determination under

12 paragraph (3)(A) that the student is a danger to

13 himself or herself or others, the student shall be

14 placed in an appropriate juvenile justice setting to

15 receive professional psychological counseling.

16 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

17 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be

18 necessary to carry out this section.

Æ
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. James T. BLOMO.

No. 18-9148.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Jennifer PERKINS, petitioner, v. U.S. AIRWAYS, INC., et al.

No. 18-134.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
In Re Walter E. KOSTICH, petitioner.

No. 18-6962.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 10(b)

         WRITTEN CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


<PAGE>



                      [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of ML of New York Variable
Annuity Separate Account A on Form N-4 of our reports on (i) ML Life Insurance
Company of New York dated February 28, 2000, and (ii) ML of New York Variable
Annuity Separate Account A dated February 14, 2000, appearing in the Statement
of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is a
part of such Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
April 14, 2000
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6635** 

JEROME MYERS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden of Turbeville Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 6:09

- cv - 01076

- CMC )

Submitted : July 29, 2011 Decided: August 11, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jerome Myers, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerome My ers seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabi lity. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Myers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/23/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       40,646
COMMITMENTS
   2,696      540       20   34,589   39,021   37,305   39,581    3,341    1,065

CHANGES FROM 08/16/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        862)
    -155       80       20      966    1,563      831    1,663       31     -801

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.6      1.3      0.0     85.1     96.0     91.8     97.4      8.2      2.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       51)
       5        1        1       29       28       35       29
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/23/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       54,844
COMMITMENTS
   4,046    2,399        0   42,768   46,570   46,814   48,969    8,030    5,875

CHANGES FROM 08/16/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,692)
     514     -721        0     -181      737      333       16    1,359    1,676

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     7.4      4.4      0.0     78.0     84.9     85.4     89.3     14.6     10.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       57)
      11        2        0       29       24       40       26
```

----

Updated August 26, 2011
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50214 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ABEL MALDONADO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-95-CA-218

- - - - - - - - - - August 22, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Abel Maldonado, #31962-138, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict him for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and that § 841 is unconstitutional.No. 96-50214 - 2 - This court has determined that § 841 is a valid exercise of Congress’ commerce power. See United States v. Owens , 996 F.2d 59, 61 (5th Cir. 1993). Federal courts have jurisdiction over any criminal prosecution charging a violation of federal law. 18 U.S.C. § 3231; United States v. Drobny , 955 F.2d 990, 997 (5th Cir. 1992). Maldonado’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Maldonado that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Maldonado is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Gregory D. KILPATRICK, petitioner, v. Jennifer HENKIN.

No. 18-5813.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                       IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

   (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for share amounts)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") is given in the
following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          (Loss) income    Shares         Amount per
                                          -------------    ------         ----------
Quarter ended September 30, 2001                                            Share
--------------------------------                                            ------
<S>                                      <C>             <C>              <C>
Basic EPS                                $  (68,979)     25,063,905         $(2.75)
No Effect of Options: anti-dilutive
Diluted EPS                              $  (68,979)     25,063,905         $(2.75)

Quarter ended September 30, 2000
--------------------------------

Basic EPS                                $   15,029      25,033,932         $ 0.60
Effect of Dilutive Options                                  603,746
Diluted EPS                              $   15,029      25,637,678         $ 0.59
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nine months ended September 30, 2001
------------------------------------

Basic EPS                                $  (24,239)     25,062,540         $(0.97)
No Effect of Options: anti-dilutive
Diluted EPS                              $  (24,239)     25,062,540         $(0.97)

Nine months ended September 30, 2000
------------------------------------

Basic EPS                                $   28,316      25,033,932         $ 1.13
Effect of Dilutive Options                                  261,170
Diluted EPS                              $   28,316      25,295,102         $ 1.12
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.40

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (“Settlement Agreement”) is made effective the 28th day of  December, 2018 by and between Mr. Martin Wolfe and  Bravo Multinational, Inc. (BRVO).

Whereas BRVO paid Mr. Wolfe, $19,500US, an amount agreed to settle outstanding amounts owed to Mr. Wolfe’s from his past employment with BRVO. 

Whereas, Mr. Wolfe agreed to accept from BRVO, $19,500US (Nineteen Thousand Five Hundred US Dollars) in consideration for settlement on a judgment obtained in the “Small Claims Court” Superior Court of Justice, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada on August 3, 2018, Case # SC-18-00003754-0000.

Whereas All parties, now desire to enter into this agreement to conclude and resolve the issues referred to herein and to resolve all disputes that the parties may have relating to any matters before the execution of this agreement, case# SC-18-00003754-0000.

Whereas all parties understand and agree that this “Settlement Agreement” is made with full, final and complete satisfaction in compromise of the disputed matter over amounts owed during Mr. Wolfe employment with BRVO, and, Mr. Wolfe agrees to "voluntary dismissal with prejudice,” and agrees to take NO further action against BRVO.

In Witness of which, the parties hereto have executed this agreement, effective as the date first written,

Bravo Multinational, Inc.

 

/s/ Rich Kaiser

Rich Kaiser-Authorized Officer

 

/s/ Martin Wolfe

Martin Wolfe, Individually
Samuel RANDOLPH, IV, petitioner, v. John E. WETZEL, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18M162.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Vincent BEATTY, aka Jamaal Beatty, aka Vincent Daward Beatty, aka Mozzi, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7862.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Gabriel SUAREZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9445.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeline, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles R. Osenbaugh, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| /s/ CHARLES R. OSENBAUGH                                                                 |   | Date: February 10, 2005 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                                                                          |   |                    |
| Charles R. Osenbaugh,   President, Chief Executive Officer   and Chief Financial Officer |   |                    |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 22, 2019

Order 

Clerk

February 22, 2019

155198(90)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155198

v COA: 327063

Wayne CC: 14-007222-FH

HAROLD LAMONT WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to file a postargument supplement to his brief is GRANTED. The supplement filed on February 20, 

2019, is accepted for filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1693 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1693

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the overtime 
     exemption for employees engaged in fire protection activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF FIRE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES.

    Section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(y) `Employee in fire protection activities' means an employee, 
including a firefighter, paramedic, emergency medical technician, 
rescue worker, ambulance personnel, or hazardous materials worker, 
who--
        ``(1) is trained in fire suppression, has the legal authority 
    and responsibility to engage in fire suppression, and is employed 
    by a fire department of a municipality, county, fire district, or 
    State; and
        ``(2) is engaged in the prevention, control, and extinguishment 
    of fires or response to emergency situations where life, property, 
    or the environment is at risk.''.

SEC. 2. CONSTRUCTION.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall not be construed to reduce or 
substitute for compensation standards: (1) contained in any existing or 
future agreement or memorandum of understanding reached through 
collective bargaining by a bona fide representative of employees in 
accordance with the laws of a State or political subdivision of a 
State; and (2) which result in compensation greater than the 
compensation available to employees under the overtime exemption under 
section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AND THE
NOTES THERETO) CONTAINED IN SUCH REPORT.

       
<S>                             <C>
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           490,854
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      75,611
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 578,359
<CASH>                                          57,521
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           6,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 708,104
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 58,129
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             58,428
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                           250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     564,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   708,104
<PREMIUMS>                                      23,778
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,413
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,545
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      16,773
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,370
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        



</TABLE>