alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                       880
<INVENTORY>                                     31,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,901
<PP&E>                                         148,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,764
<BONDS>                                         94,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,102
<SALES>                                        159,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,595
<CGS>                                          135,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,004)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,379)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,846)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.42)
        

</TABLE>
Marlon L. WATFORD, petitioner, v. Erik FOSSUM, et al.

No. 18-5130.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Australian Oil & Gas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E. Geoffrey Albers, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Dated: March 29, 2011                                                        /s/ E. Geoffrey Albers


E. Geoffrey Albers


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1677

To restrict the sale of cigarettes in packages of less than 15 cigarettes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1999

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. MATSUI, and Mr. BROWN of

California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To restrict the sale of cigarettes in packages of less than

15 cigarettes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti ‘Kiddie-Pack’

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. SMALL PACKAGES.

7 Cigarettes may not be offered for sale in packages

8 which—

9 (1) contain less than 15 cigarettes; and
2

•HR 1677 IH

1 (2) are offered for sale to the consumer at less

2 than $2.

3 SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT.

4 A violation of section 2 shall be considered a violation

5 of section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

6 Act (21 U.S.C. 331).

7 SEC. 4. PREEMPTION.

8 This Act shall not be construed as affecting the au9 thority of the Food and Drug Administration with respect

10 to tobacco products.

11 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 This Act shall take effect upon the expiration of 180

13 days after the date of its enactment.

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DARRELL TODD MCCRAE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

.

No. 4D 202 3

- 2029

[ June 5, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Steven J. Levin , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562022CF000805A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter , Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña

, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

M AY
, J.

The defendant appeals the revocation of his probation and consequent sentence. The defendant argues the trial c ourt erred in revoking hi s probation and impos ing the minimum prison sentence. He also argues the trial court erred in adjudicating him guilty a second time. We find no merit in the first argument and affirm without further comment. The State agrees the trial court erred in adjudicating the defendant a second time for the probation violation

, and we agree. We reverse on the second issue.

“An appellate court reviews a trial court decision on violations of probation under an abuse of discretion standard.” Davis v. State , 48 So. 3d 176, 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ( quoting Ubiles v. State , 23 So. 3d 1288,

129 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ).

Because the d efendant failed to object contemporaneously and raise fundamental error in his initial brief, the d efendant’s sentencing error arguments are unpreserved on appeal. Regardless, they also lacked merit

, as the trial court had discretion to sentence the defendant as it did.2 However, “ [d] uplicative adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous, are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings.” Butler v. Stat e , 195 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). In Butler

, t he Second District held

the trial court erred in adjudicating the defendant a second time because the trial court had already adjudicated the defendant guilty of the underlying offense. Id. at 1149

. The same result is dictated here

. See

Witham v. State , 311 So. 3d 34, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (“[I]t appears that duplicate final judgments were entered. On remand, the [trial] court should also strike one of these judgments.”).

We reverse and remand the case to the trial court to strike the second adjudication of guilt. We affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part

.

D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Walter Ronaldo Martinez ESCOBAR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8202.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                              Exhibit 10.51

FIRST AMENDMENT TO ASSIGNMENT
AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


     This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Assignment and
Assumption Agreement dated December 22, 2000 (the "Agreement") by and
between SBC Telecom, Inc. ("SBCT"), and Network Access Solutions
Corporation ("NAS") (each individually a "Party", and collectively the
"Parties") is entered into on this 28th day of February, 2001.  All terms
not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms
in the Agreement.

R E C I T A L S


     WHEREAS, the Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions for the
assignment of Collocation Arrangements in certain GTE Corp., d/b/a Verizon
Communications ("GTE") central offices from NAS to SBCT; and

     WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth
below;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, SBCT and NAS agree as follows:

     The Parties hereby agree that NAS shall have the option, in its sole
discretion and upon advance written notice to SBCT, of either forfeiting
to GTE or assigning to any other carrier any Collocation Arrangement
marked on Schedule A with two (2) asterisks, rather than assigning such
Collocation Arrangement to SBCT in accordance with the Terms of Assignment
and Assumption under Section 2 of the Agreement.  In the event NAS elects
to forfeit or assign any Collocation Arrangement as provided in this
paragraph, the Parties agree that SBCT shall have no liability,
whatsoever, associated with any such forfeiture or assignment and shall
have no liability, whatsoever, under the Agreement associated with such
Collocation Arrangement.

     2.   If NAS does not elect to forfeit or assign a Collocation
Arrangement as provided in this Amendment, the Parties shall continue to
be governed by the Terms of Assignment and Assumption as provided in
Section 2 of the Agreement; provided, however, that, in addition, NAS
agrees to prepare any required documents associated with SBCT's forfeiture
of the Collocation Arrangement to GTE.

     Except as provided herein, all terms of the Agreement shall continue
       in
effect and remain binding.

     This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with
the same effect as if the signatures to each such counterpart were upon
the same instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have signed this Amendment or
have caused this Amendment to be signed in their respective names by a
duly authorized officer on the date first written above.



NETWORK ACCESS SOLUTIONS CORPORATION


BY:  /s/ Nick Williams
     Name: Nick Williams
     Title: President



SBC TELECOM, INC.


BY:  /s/ Lea Ann Champion
     Name: Lea Ann Champion
     Title: President & CEO
Lloyd Michael BLAIR, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-7478.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Desmond SMITH, petitioner, v. J.A. TERRIS, Warden.

No. 18-7966.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1823

To authorize the sponsor of the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport in California to impose noise restrictions on operations at the airport without

the approval of the Federal Aviation Administration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 1999

Mr. ROGAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the sponsor of the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena

Airport in California to impose noise restrictions on operations at the airport without the approval of the Federal

Aviation Administration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding chapter 475 of title 49, United

4 States Code, and any other provision of law, the sponsor

5 of the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport in California

6 may impose noise restrictions on operations (including

7 curfews and limits on the number of daily take-offs and
2

•HR 1823 IH

1 landings) at the airport without the approval of the Fed2 eral Aviation Administration.

Æ
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Matthew L. Chretien, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of GlobalWise Investments, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 30, 2014



| | /s/
    Matthew L. Chretien
| | ---------------------------
| | Matthew L. Chretien        
| | Chief Executive Officer
Shirley A. STEWART, petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., et al.

No. 18-5106.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Pedro MONTALVO, Jr., petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-1202.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Knox County denied.
Edward R. STOLZ, dba Royce International Broadcasting Company, petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.

No. 18-23.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1676

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1965 to prevent motorist stops motivated by race or other bias.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1999

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control

and Safe Streets Act of 1965 to prevent motorist stops

motivated by race or other bias.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FAIRNESS IN MOTOR STOPS.

4 Section 1702(d) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Con5 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding

6 at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(3) ADDITIONAL ELIGIBILITY REQUIRE8 MENT.—In conjunction with the application sub9 mitted under this section, an applicant for a grant

10 shall provide assurances to the Attorney General
2

•HR 1676 IH

1 that the applicant has adopted, implemented, and is

2 enforcing a policy that prohibits motorist stops moti3 vated by race or other bias.’’.

Æ
Michael A. YOUNG, petitioner, v. Thomas DUNCAN, et al.

No. 18-8765.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
XIAOHUA HUANG, petitioner, v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

No. 18-1275.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Order entered October 16, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01007-CV

IN RE J.C. PENNEY COMPANY INC., ET AL., Relators

Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-00735

ORDER

The Court has received the parties’ October 14, 2013 joint status report. The Court 

ORDERS the parties to submit an updated joint status report by November 4, 2013. On its own 

motion, the Court EXTENDS the deadline responses to the petition for writ of mandamus until 

thirty days from the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#



EXHIBIT 99.12



May 9, 2003

|Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re:

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bedford Property Investors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hanh Kihara, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Hanh Kihara

Hanh Kihara

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bedford Property Investors, Inc. and will be retained by Bedford Property Investors, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



05/09/03 7:41 AM
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/18/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       40,381
COMMITMENTS
   1,313    1,336        0   36,312   37,640   37,625   38,976    2,756    1,405

CHANGES FROM 10/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -924)
    -275     -151        0     -593     -340     -868     -491      -56     -433

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     3.3      3.3      0.0     89.9     93.2     93.2     96.5      6.8      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
       3        4        0       27       29       30       33
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/18/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       65,079
COMMITMENTS
   6,087    6,196      286   52,630   39,226   59,003   45,708    6,076   19,371

CHANGES FROM 10/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        318)
     -96  -13,589       29      -93   13,472     -160      -88      478      406

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.4      9.5      0.4     80.9     60.3     90.7     70.2      9.3     29.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       67)
      12        4        1       34       24       46       29
```

----

Updated October 21, 2011
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB of Stanford
      Management Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Vera
      McCullough, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary-Treasurer and Director, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Vera
      McCullough


Secretary-Treasurer,
      Chief


Financial
      Officer and Director








-1-
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President  Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of Allied Holdings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, which accompanies this certification fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied
Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

This 14th day of November, 2003.

|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel H. Popky                                                           
|                                                                              
|Daniel H. Popky
Executive Vice President  Finance and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Allied Holdings, Inc.
and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it
be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
filing.

43