T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GA BI NO VEGA - J I M ENEZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70223 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 915- 578 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G abi no V ega- Ji m enez , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s r e que s tf orac ont i nua nc e a nd d e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e m a n d . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . 

# FI LED OC T 02 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70223 2 W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f ac o n tin u a n c e . A hm ed v. H older , 569 F . 3d 1009, 1012 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . W e de nyi n pa rta nd di s m i s s i n pa rtthe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e ag en cy d i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n i n d en yi n g V eg a-Ji m en ez’ s req u est f o rac o n tin u a n c e w h e r e h e f a ile dto s h o w g o o dc au s e . Se e id. a t 1 0 1 2 . T o the e xt e ntV e ga - J i m e ne z c ha l l e nge s the a ge nc y ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha the d idn o t m e r it v o lu n ta ryd e p a rtu r e a s am a tte ro f d is c r e tio n , w e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w th is d e te rm in a tio n . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( i) ; G i l v. H older , 651 F . 3d 10 00 , 10 06 (9th C i r. 20 11 ). W e a l s o l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tthe e vi de nc e V e ga - J i m e ne z s ubm i tt e d w i th hi s m ot i on t o r e m a nd w oul d nota l t e rthe p r io rd is c r e tio n a ryd e te rm in a tio n d e n y in g v o lu n ta ryd e p a rtu r e . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 4 3 9 F. 3 d5 9 2 , 6 0 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 6 ) ( h o l d i n g th a t8 U . S. C. § 1 25 2(a) (2)( B )( i ) bar s thi s c ou rtfr om re vi ew i ng the deni al of a m ot i on t o reopen w here “ the on l y quest i on pres ent ed i s w hether [ the] new evi dence al t er ed the pri or, unde r l y i ng di s c r e t i ona ryde t e rm i na t i on tha t[ the pe t i t i one r ] ha d notm e tthe h a r d s h ip s ta n d a r d .” ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n s a n db r a c k e ts o m itte d ) ) ; s e e al s o Movs is i an v . A s h c r o ft , 3 9 5 F .3 d1 0 9 5 , 1 0 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ( A m o tio n to r e o p e n f ile dw h ile12- 70223 3 a n appe a l i s pe ndi ng be f or e the B I A i s tr e a t e d a s am ot i on t o r e m a nd t o the I Jf or further procee di ng s) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .