<PAGE>

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-KSB

      (Mark One)
      |X|      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
               EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

                    For the fiscal year ended MAY 31, 2007.

      |_|      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
               SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

       For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

                         Commission file number 0-27063

                      AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP.
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)


              Nevada                                82-0381904
----------------------------------     -------------------------------------
 (State or other jurisdiction of       (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  incorporation or organization)


121G Shuswap Street NW, Salmon Arm B.C. Canada          V1E 4P2
-----------------------------------------------       -------------
   (Address of principal executive offices)            (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone number, including area code: (250) 833-1985
                                                    --------------

Securities registered under 12(b) of the Exchange Act:       None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:        Common Stock

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  |X|  No |_|

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one): Yes |_| No |X|

The issuer had equity in earnings for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 of
$250,224

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates on May 31,
2007 was approximately $3,300,000 based on the average of the bid and asked
prices of the issuer's common stock in the over-the-counter market on such date
as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. As of November 5, 2007, 100,000,000
shares of the issuer's common stock were outstanding.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


<PAGE>


                                     PART I

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP. ("Aquatic", "the Company" or "AQCI") is a
Nevada Corporation originally organized as Aquatic Cellulose Ltd. ("ACL") and
was incorporated in March of 1996. Aquatic is an independent oil and gas
investment, development and production company, engaged in the acquisition and
development of crude oil and natural gas reserves and production initially in
the state of Texas of the United States.

         Located in Salmon Arm, British Columbia, Canada, Aquatic Cellulose
International was originally organized as a forest-based company focusing on
accessing and recovering submerged timber. Aquatic's principal activity was the
procurement of contracts for the salvage and harvest of submerged timber and the
sale of lumber derived from such timber. In March of 2003, new management
decided on the new business direction in Oil and Gas due to continued losses
from operations and lack of progress in underwater wood project development.

         Aquatic plans to grow its business by investing in acquisitions,
development, and production and sale of natural gas and crude oil. Aquatic plans
to further expand its investments and cash flow by capitalizing on modern
technological developments in the area of oil and gas production development.
New technology since the development of the computer industry has allowed for
better identification of by-passed reserves in previously discovered oil and gas
fields. Geological analysis using "Direct Hydrocarbon Indicator" (DHI) tools and
methods, as well as improved 3D seismic data processing have been successfully
used to enhance and revitalize previously developed and currently developed oil
and gas producing sites.

         In April of 2007, Stockholders approved the amendment to the Company's
articles of incorporation to change the Company name to Valor Energy Corp to
better identify with the Company's new business focus. In June of 2007, the
Company filed PRER 14/C information statement including the name change. The
Company is presently addressing comments received from the Securities and
Exchange Commission in July and August 2007.

         Aquatic's overall goal is to maximize corporate value through
profitable growth in our oil and gas reserves. This will be achieved through
balanced portfolio consisting of;

                  o        Development of existing production wells.
                  o        Application of new technology to historically
                           producing reservoirs targeting significant by-passed
                           reserves.
                  o        Acquisitions of producing reserves.
                  o        Acquisitions of working production interests and
                           royalties.


OIL & GAS PROPERTY INTERESTS


         Effective March 2004 the Company completed a reorganization of its core
business, shifting from the underwater wood business to that of investment and
development of oil and natural gas. In March 2004, pursuant to an agreement with
Century Resources Inc. (now New Century Energy Corp. herein referred to as
"Century"), the Company acquired a 20 percent ownership position and a 16
percent net revenue interest in the Hamill lease, a 3,645-acre natural gas
producing property located in Matagorda County, Texas. The agreement for the
purchase of the Hamill lease also included an exclusive, optional, "New Project
and Exploration Drilling Participation' agreement, under which in July 2004 the
Company exercised its right for the acquisition of a 50 percent ownership
position and a 45 percent net revenue interest in a 1,280-acre lease in the
Prado Oil Field (Prado), located in Jim Hogg County, Texas. The lease has 20
existing wells that were originally producing in the 1960's, 4 of which are
still producing.

         Effective January 1, 2005, the exclusive, optional, "New Project and
Exploration Drilling Participation' agreement with Century was modified,
wherein, both the Company's three successive one year term options for
participation on all Century deals and Century's 15 percent ownership percentage
were deleted from the agreement. These clauses were replaced by an agreement
whereby the Company purchased the option to participate on two specific projects
of interest to the Company for a 7.5 percent ownership stake in the Company.
Under the revised agreement the Company has an exclusive right, but not the
obligation, to participate with Century, by acquiring (a) up to seventy-five
percent (75%) working interest in up to two (2) new drilling (exploration or
development drilling) prospects in Wharton or Jackson Counties, Texas, developed
by Century under the Viking International 3D Agreement and (b) up to fifty
percent (50%) working interest to participate in the drilling of the initial
test well on oil and gas leases comprising the twenty five acre Isaac Holliday
tract in the William Cooper Survey in Waller County, Texas (Brookshire Dome
Field Area).

         Effective March 1, 2004, the Company has a Lease Operating Agreement in
place with Century. The operating agreement outlines the various
responsibilities of both the Company and Century in regards to the management
and operations of Hamill Lease.


                                       2
<PAGE>


         As of June 24, 2005 Aquatic elected to participate in the initial test
well on the twenty five acre Isaac Holliday tract in the William Cooper Survey
in Waller County, Texas (Brookshire Dome Field Area).

         During October 2006, the Company sold all of its 50 percent Prado field
working interest to New Century Energy Corp. in exchange for $300,000 in cash
and a relinquishment by New Century of all of New Century's 7.5 percent interest
in the Company's issued and outstanding stock to be issued following a proposed
restructuring of the Company. This 7.5 percent interest in the Company's stock
was as per the January 1, 2005 First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale and
Exploration Agreement with New Century. (See Note 6 - Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements)

- HAMILL LEASE - SOUTH SARGENT FIELD, MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS:

         The Company acquired 20% of the working interest in the Sargent South
Field from Century Resources Inc in March 2004. The Sargent South Field is
located onshore in Matagorda County, Texas, east of Matagorda Bay. The leasehold
is approximately 3,645 acres.

         At the time of this acquisition there were two producing wells, the
Hamill #2 and Hamill #19. In March 2004, the Hamill #10 well, a shut-in well on
the lease, was recompleted with established production in the 3,345 foot sand.
One of the original producing wells at the time of acquisition, the Hamill #19,
ceased flowing gas in May of 2004 after producing 615 MMCF of gas from the
original completion at 3,917 foot. This Hamill #19 well was recompleted in July
2004, in a sand at 4,324 feet and this sand produced 107 MMCF of gas until it
was depleted in October 2004. A workover was attempted in 2006 on the Hamill #19
at the 6,700 sand level, however this sand proved to be non-productive.

         At present, there are five (5) producing wells on the Hamill Lease;
Hamill #2, Hamill #10, Hamill #11, Hamill #14 and Hamill #17, with daily
production in excess of approximately 750 MCF of gas per day (MCFGPD), however,
the Company can provide no assurances that the current completions will continue
to produce at this rate, if at all.

         The Hamill Lease development benefits from a license to a 10 square
mile 3-D seismic survey ("3-D") that was acquired by Century. This 3-D seismic
survey is currently being used in the development planning of the property and
new drilling locations have already been identified for drilling in 2007 and
2008. The process of interpreting the 3-D data will be an ongoing, with results
from any new wells being integrated into the interpretation.

         We are participating in an ongoing workover and recompletion project
underway in the Sargent South Field. The first well work began in January 2005,
when work over operations were commenced on the Hamill #17 well, which had been
shut-in since 2001 by a previous owner and operator. The wellhead and surface
equipment were replaced and remedial operations commenced to drill out and
remove various cement and cast iron bridge plugs set inside the well casing by
previous operators. The well bore was cleaned out to a depth of 4,500 feet, and
tests were run in the well to evaluate potential productive sands in this well.
In March 2005, the Hamill #17 well was recompleted in a stray sand at 4,230
feet; and is currently producing gas at the rate of approximately 100 MCF per
day on a 8/64 inch choke. Additional probable and proven behind pipe gas sands
have been identified in the Hamill #17 well for future recompletion attempts,
when the current completion at 4,230 feet depletes.

         During June 2005, work over operations commenced on the Hamill #14
well, which had also been shut-in since 2001. The wellhead and surface equipment
were repaired and remedial operations commenced to drill out and remove a number
of cement and cast iron bridge plugs set inside the well casing by previous
operators. The well bore was cleaned out to a depth of 5,905 feet, and tests
were run in the well to evaluate potential productive sands in this well. In
March 2005, the Hamill #14 was recompleted in a stray sand at 4,230 feet. The
Hamill #14 well went off production in April of 2007 when the producing sand at
4230 feet depleted. In June 2007, the well was recompleted in another sand and
is currently producing at the rate of 350 MCF per day. Additional probable and
proven behind pipe gas sands have been identified in the Hamill #14 well for
future recompletion attempts, when the current completion depletes.

         During August 2006, a third workover operation commenced on the Hamill
#10 well after the well ceased producing gas earlier in this month. Remedial
operations commenced to clean out produced sand from the well bore and a sand
control screen and gravel pack were installed in the well. Production was
restored on September 5, 2006 to 3,270 feet. Additional probable and proven
reserves behind pipe gas sands have been identified in the Hamill #10 well for
future recompletion attempts, when the current completion at 3,270 feet
depletes. This well is currently producing at the rate of approximately 345 MCF
per day on a 7/64 inch choke with a flowing tubing pressure of 650 psi.

         During August 2005 work over operations commenced on the Hamill #2
well. This well was a marginal producer and a number of cast iron bridge plugs
set inside the well casing by previous operators were removed. The well was
cleaned out to a depth of 6,170 feet. In October of 2005, the Hamill #2 was
recompleted in the 5,940 foot sand at the rate of 950 MCF per day. During the
first quarter of 2006 the Hamill #2 well was shut in due to the formation sand
entering the well bore. The well was cleaned out and gravel packed in March of
2006 and the well is currently producing at the rate of approximately 320 MCF
per day on a 7/64 inch choke with a flowing tubing pressure of 550 psi.


                                       3
<PAGE>


         During November of 2005, work over operations commenced on the Hamill
#11 well. This well was a marginal producer and a number of cast iron bridge
plugs set inside the well casing by previous operators were removed. The well
was cleaned out to a depth of 6,000 feet. In February of 2006, the Hamill #11
was recompleted in the 2,760 foot sand at the rate of 275 MCF per day. The well
is currently producing at the rate of 55 MCF per day on a 7/64 inch choke with a
flowing tubing pressure of 240 psi.

         During August of 2006 the Company elected to participate in the
redevelopment of the Hamill #1-R well, that was originally drilled by Gulf Oil
Corporation to a depth of 16,200' in 1961 and subsequently plugged and abandoned
by Gulf in June 1967. Recent operations included milling out and removing
numerous cement and bridge plugs set in the well when it was originally
abandoned by Gulf. The well has been cleaned out to a depth of 11,000 feet
inside the existing 9-5/8" casing. Cased hole logs were run in the well in
October of 2006 and the well is being evaluated for possible gas sands for
testing and possible production. The first recompletion attempted in November of
2006, at a depth of 5,560 feet produced gas, but in non-commercial quantities.

         Compression was installed in the Sargent Field during July of 2006.
Presently three producing wells are on compression, wells number 11, 14 and 17.

         On September 18, 2006 the Company paid to New Century its 20 percent
pro-rata share, totaling $68,634.30 for 1,610 acres State of Texas oil and gas
leases in the offshore area of Matagorda County, Texas. Four new leases totaling
1,610 acres have been acquired by the Company, and this acreage is contiguous
with our onshore Sargent South Field acreage. The new leases are subject to our
Joint Operating Agreement with New Century Energy Corp and have a term of five
years and expire on April 4, 2011.

         On or about March 16, 2007 the Company executed a Partial Assignment of
Oil and Gas Lease and Bill of Sale, whereby the Company conveyed to the
Company's working interest partner, Century Resources Inc., all of the Company's
rights title and interest in Hamill and Hamill leasehold for all depths below a
depth of 7,000 feet below the surface. In addition the Company assigned all of
its interests, regardless of depth, in Hamill & Hamill well numbers 19 and 1-R.
In return, Century repaid the Company all deposits made toward the Hamill 1-R
workover and released the Company of all prior commitments made regarding that
well.

- PRADO FIELD LEASES, JIM HOGG COUNTY, TEXAS:

         During July 2004, the Company, under the terms of the agreement with
Century exercised its option to participate for a 50% working interest in the
comprising of 1,280 acres in the Prado Field located in Jim Hogg County, Texas.
As of June 30, 2006, there are four (4) active wells on this lease and twenty
(20) inactive well bores.

         On June 1, 2005, 47,300,000 share certificates of Titan Oil and Gas
(formerly Titan Consolidated Inc. and herein referred to as "Titan"), were
received by the Company. Titan represented that the shares were valued, and the
Company agreed, at $460,000. These shares were issued to the Company as
consideration for a 40 percent working interest in the Company's Prado field
interest (See Notes 6 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). An
agreement was also reached with Titan, whereby the Prado field property interest
would be switched to a different property interest that the Company may elect to
participate on in the future, the Wharton 3D project. During the three-month
period ended November 30, 2005, the Company anticipated utilizing these funds
for the Wharton 3D project. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, the
Company sold Titan shares to third parties for $286,715 in cash, exchanged 7.3
million Titan shares with Gary Ackles, the Company's former CEO, for a $32,000
increase in the amount on deposit with Ackles and with respect to the ongoing
negotiation to settle all amounts owed to Ackles and exchanged $37,500 in
Company debt for approximately 3,500,000 shares of Titan common stock. During
November 2005, Titan notified the Company that it was no longer interested in
acquiring a 40 percent interest in the Wharton 3D project (switched from the
Prado lease), and decided to terminate their agreement with the Company. On
December 1, 2005, Titan signed an agreement to accept $100,000 in cash as full
renumeration of their initial investment in Wharton 3D (switched from Prado). As
of February 28, 2006, the Company had paid the settlement amount to Titan in
full and Titan has acknowledged that they no longer have any claim or rights to
the Company's Wharton 3D or Prado field interest. During the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2006, the Company recorded a $256,218 gain on settlement of Wharton 3D
project (See Notes 6 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         The Company has in the past had an ongoing agreement with Strong
Petroleum Inc. of Houston Texas for the development of the Prado field. On
September 21, 2006 that agreement between the Company, New Century Energy Corp
and Strong Petroleum Group (Strong) ended. On September 28, 2006 a Memorandum
Concerning the Termination of the Development Agreement with Strong was signed
by the Company, New Century and Strong. This termination any right title or
interest that Strong has in the Prado field project.

         During October 2006, the Company sold all of its 50 percent Prado field
working interest to New Century Energy Corp. in exchange for $300,000 in cash
and a relinquishment by New Century of all of New Century's 7.5 percent interest
in the Company's issued and outstanding stock to be issued following a proposed
restructuring of the Company. This 7.5 percent interest in the Company's stock
was as per the January 1, 2005 First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale and
Exploration Agreement with New Century (See Notes 1 and 6 - Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements)


                                       4
<PAGE>

- BROOKSHIRE DOME FIELD AREA:

         In June of 2005, the Company used $19,930 of loan proceeds for the
purchase of a 50% working interest in a 26 lease program in Waller County in the
area of the Brookshire Dome Field. This project is the first of two planned
development projects the company acquired the rights to participate in by means
of the amended agreement with Century dated January 1, 2005. Also in June of
2005, the Company used approximately $95,000 in loan proceeds to participate in
drilling of the first test well on June 15, 2005. The well was temporarily
plugged at a depth of 5,200 feet on June 27, 2005. This project is currently
under evaluation to determine what direction the Company will take in respect to
future operations. Seventeen of the original 26 leases taken over this prospect
have expired. The project evaluation includes the viability of extending these
leases and deepening of the test well.


RISK FACTORS OF THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

VOLATILE OIL AND GAS PRICES CAN MATERIALLY AFFECT THE COMPANY.

         The Company's future financial condition and results of operations will
depend upon the prices received for the Company's oil and natural gas production
and the costs of acquiring, finding, developing and producing reserves. Prices
for oil and natural gas are subject to fluctuations in response to relatively
minor changes in supply, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors
that are beyond the control of the Company. These factors include worldwide
political instability (especially in the Middle East and other oil-producing
regions), the foreign supply of oil and gas, the price of foreign imports, the
level of drilling activity, the level of consumer product demand, government
regulations and taxes, the price and availability of alternative fuels and the
overall economic environment. A substantial or extended decline in oil and gas
prices would have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position,
results of operations, quantities of oil and gas that may be economically
produced, and access to capital. Oil and natural gas prices have historically
been and are likely to continue to be volatile. This volatility makes it
difficult to estimate with precision the value of producing properties in
acquisitions and to budget and project the return on development projects
involving the Company's oil and gas properties. In addition, unusually volatile
prices often disrupt the market for oil and gas properties, as buyers and
sellers have more difficulty agreeing on the purchase price of properties.

UNCERTAINTY IN CALCULATING RESERVES; RATES OF PRODUCTION; DEVELOPMENT
EXPENDITURES; CASH FLOWS:

         There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
oil and natural gas reserves of any category and in projecting future rates of
production and timing of development expenditures, which underlie the reserve
estimates, including many factors beyond the Company's control. Reserve data
represent only estimates. In addition, the estimates of future net cash flows
from the Company's proved reserves and their present value are based upon
various assumptions about future production levels, prices and costs that may
prove to be incorrect over time. Any significant variance from the assumptions
could result in the actual quantity of the Company's reserves and future net
cash flows from them being materially different from the estimates. In addition,
the Company's estimated reserves may be subject to downward or upward revision
based upon production history, results of future development, prevailing oil and
gas prices, operating and development costs and other factors.

OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL COSTS AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS
ECONOMIC RISKS:

         The oil and gas operations of the Company are subject to the economic
risks typically associated with development and production activities, including
the necessity of significant expenditures to locate and acquire producing
properties and to drill exploratory wells. In conducting development activities,
the presence of unanticipated pressure or irregularities in formations,
miscalculations or accidents may cause the Company's development and production
activities to be unsuccessful. This could result in a total loss of the
Company's investment. In addition, the cost and timing of drilling, completing
and operating wells is often uncertain.

SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS:

         The Company must make a substantial amount of capital expenditures for
the acquisition, and development of oil and gas reserves. To date, the Company
has paid for acquisitions and expenditures with cash from the issuance of debt,
convertible notes and operating activities. The Company's revenue or cash flows
could be reduced because of lower oil and gas prices or for some other reason.
If the Company's revenue or cash flows decrease, it may not have the funds
available to replace its reserves or to maintain production at current levels.
If this occurs, it would reduce production over time. Other sources of financing
may not be available if the Company's cash flows from operations are not
sufficient to fund its capital expenditure requirements. Where the Company is
not the majority owner or operator of an oil and gas project, it may have no
control over the timing or amount of capital expenditures associated with the
particular project. If the Company cannot fund its capital expenditures, its
interests in some projects may be reduced or forfeited.


                                       5
<PAGE>

COSTS INCURRED TO CONFORM TO GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY.

         Costs incurred due to changes at the federal or state level of the oil
and natural gas regulatory environment could adversely affect the Company's
ability to conduct business.

COSTS INCURRED RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS.

         The Company, as a part owner or lessee of oil and gas properties, is
subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to
discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and
regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil
and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from operations,
subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages, and require suspension or
cessation of operations in affected areas.

         The Company is not aware of any environmental claims existing as of
November 5, 2007, which would have a material impact upon the Company's
financial position or results of operations.

DEVELOPMENT HAZARDS:

         Production development of oil and natural gas can be hazardous,
involving unforeseen occurrences such as blowouts, cratering, fires and loss of
well control, which can result in damage to or destruction of wells or
equipment, injury to persons, loss of life, or damage to property or the
environment.

GENERAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS:

         Virtually all of the Company's operations are subject to the risks and
uncertainties of adverse changes in general economic conditions, the outcome of
pending and/or potential legal or regulatory proceedings, changes in
environmental, tax, labor and other laws and regulations to which the Company is
subject, and the condition of the capital markets utilized by the Company to
finance its operations.

SEASONALITY OF BUSINESS

         Weather conditions affect the demand for and prices of natural gas and
can also delay drilling activities, disrupting our overall business plans.
Demand for natural gas is typically higher in the second and third quarters due
to increased heating demands resulting in higher natural gas prices. Due to
these seasonal fluctuations, results of operations for individual quarterly
periods may not be indicative of results that would be realized on an annual
basis.

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS IN THE BUSINESS

         The petroleum and natural gas industry is highly competitive and we
compete with a substantial number of other companies that have greater
resources, such as, GulfWest Energy Inc. and TransTexas Gas Corp. Many such
companies, not only explore, produce and market petroleum and natural gas but
also carry on refining operations and market the resultant products on a
worldwide basis. There is also competition between petroleum and natural gas
producers and other industries producing energy and fuel. Furthermore,
competitive conditions may be substantially affected by various forms of energy
legislation and/or regulation considered from time to time by the governments
(and/or agencies thereof) of the United States and Canada; however, it is not
possible to predict the nature of any such legislation and/or regulation which
may ultimately be adopted or its effects upon our future operations. Such laws
and regulations may, however, substantially increase the costs of exploring for,
developing or producing oil and gas and may prevent or delay the commencement or
continuation of a given operation. The exact effect of these risk factors cannot
be accurately predicted.

DISTRIBUTION

         Aquatic sells its production through contracts with existing pipeline
operating companies and crude oil brokers. Due to the consistent demand for
domestic energy as well as the maturity of the industry, Aquatic is able to
achieve 100 percent sales of its production and have little to no difficulty in
renewing distribution contracts as required.


                                       6
<PAGE>

GOING CONCERN

         Aquatic Cellulose International Corporation has experienced recurring
losses, has a working capital deficiency of $18,633,428 and an accumulated
deficit of $23,598,452 as of May 31, 2007. At the end of fiscal year ended May
31, 2004 the Company had reorganized its core business, shifting from the
underwater wood business to that of investment and development of oil and
natural gas. Though the Company has acquired a significant revenue producing
asset, the Hamill lease working interest, its difficulty in raising further
capital required for ongoing development could result in the Company having to
scale back its operations. This factor, among others, raises substantial doubt
as to its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard
to these matters are also discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements - Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

EMPLOYEES

As of May 31, 2007, the Company is utilizing two employees and one consultant to
manage 100 percent of the administration and business development, for which
there is two employees under contract and one consultant operating on a month to
month basis.

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

         Prior to October 2006, AQCI's offices were located at 2504 43rd Street,
Suite 5, Vernon, British Columbia, VIT 6L1. There is no lease and the rent is
due on a monthly basis at the rate of $280.00.

         During October 2006, AQCI moved its office to the new location at 331
4th Street, NE, Salmon Arm, British Columbia, V1E 4P2. There is no lease and the
rent is due on a monthly basis at the rate of $534.00.

         During July of 2007 AQCI moved its office to the new location at 1210 G
Hudson St. Salmon Arm, British Columbia, V1E 4P2. There is no lease and the rent
is due on a monthly basis at the rate of $700.00.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

         During April 2007, the Holders of the Company's convertible notes (the
"investors") proposed that the Company hire a consultant designated by the
investors. The Company declined the proposal, deciding instead to conserve
resources for addressing specific needs of the Company. On April 25, 2007, the
investors filed with the Company a letter claiming an Event of Default as
defined in the terms of the notes. On April 29, 2007, the Company and the
investors agreed to cancel the claim of Event of Default and increase the
discount percentage on the notes from 70% to 75%.

         As of the date of this filing the Company is not a party to any
material pending legal proceedings and, to the best of its knowledge, no such
action by or against the Company has been threatened.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS

On or about April 24, 2007, the Company received written consent in lieu of a
meeting of Stockholders from(i) shareholders holding 950,000 shares of common
stock entitled to one vote per share; and (ii) shareholders holding 2,700,000
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock entitled to 1000 votes per share,
a total of 2,700,950,000 votes, approving an amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation of the Company (the "Amendment"), to change the name of the
Company to Valor Energy Corporation and to increase the maximum number of shares
of stock that the Company shall be authorized to have outstanding at any time to
three billion (3,000,000,000) shares of common stock at par value of $.001 with
no preemptive rights. These additional shares will have the same rights,
privileges, preferences and restrictions as the Company's shares of common stock
which are currently authorized. As the holders of the Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock, these shareholders have the right to vote one thousand times
for each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held on all matters
submitted to the shareholders.

         On June 11, 2007 the Company filed with the Commission a revised
PRER14C information statement informing shareholders of the amendments to the
Company's Articles of Incorporation. The Company is presently addressing
comments received from the Securities and Exchange Commission in July and August
2007.

The increase in authorized shares will allow the Company to facilitate the
conversion to equity of existing convertible debt, amounts due to related
parties and issue stock commitments to professionals. The change of our Company
name will better identify the Company in the new business. (See Note 16 - Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements)


                                       7
<PAGE>

                                     PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

         Our common stock currently trades on the Pink Sheets, under the trading
symbol "AQCI". The following table set forth the quarterly high and low bid
prices per share for our common stock. The bid prices reflect inter-dealer
prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not represent
actual transactions.

                                                   HIGH BID      LOW BID
         FISCAL 2005
         First Quarter 2005                              .005         .002
         Second Quarter 2005                            .0015        .0015
         Third Quarter 2005                             .0014        .0014
         Fourth Quarter (5/31/05)                        .005        .0032

         FISCAL 2006
         First Quarter 2006                              .004         .003
         Second Quarter 2006                            .0035         .002
         Third Quarter 2006                             .0024         .002
         Fourth Quarter (5/31/06)                        .017         .015

         FISCAL 2007
         First Quarter 2007                              .045         .038
         Second Quarter 2007                             .035         .035
         Third Quarter 2007                               .03         .025
         Fourth Quarter (5/31/07)                        .033         .028

         To date, AQCI has not declared or paid dividends on its common stock.

         As of May 31, 2007, there were approximately 398 shareholders of record
(that are not in street name) of AQCI's Common Stock.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

         During June 2001, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of restricted
stock at $0.05 per share for deposit on the purchase of equipment (price
reflected market price) for a total value of $125,000. As of May 31, 2004, the
seller formally canceled the agreement. Therefore, the value of the shares of
$125,000 has been presented as a contra equity item, as the Company determined
that the amount no longer represents an asset as defined in Statement of
Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5 "Recognition and Measurement in Financial
Statements of Business Enterprises". The Company had difficulty in retrieving
the original restricted share certificates due to the death of Mr. Raymond
Lefebvre. As of May 31, 2004, the Company had received from the executor of Mr.
Lefebvre's estate a letter informing the Company that they are unable to return
the original stock certificates due to their being lost or destroyed and
instructions to the Company's transfer agent to cancel the certificates. During
July 2006, the company finalized the cancellation of the 2,500,000 shares of
restricted stock that were originally on deposit for the purchase of equipment.
Subsequently the Board of Directors approved the issuance of these shares as
compensation to the Company's CEO. At the time of issuance the stock was valued
at $3,750. (See Notes 14 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)

         During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of
1,350,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to Sheridan Westgarde
as settlement of the Company's long standing obligation to make Mr. Westgarde a
twenty seven percent owner of the Company's issued and outstanding shares,
calculated following all issuances of stock to certain stake holders (See Note
14 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of
1,350,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to Lonnie Hayward as
settlement of the Company's long standing obligation to make Mr. Hayward a
twenty seven percent owner of the Company's issued and outstanding shares,
calculated following all issuances of stock to certain stake holders (See Note
14 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).


                                       8
<PAGE>

         During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of
446,349 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to Sheridan Westgarde as
settlement of $184,308, as of March 31, 2007, owed to Mr. Westgarde for
consulting and stock Mr. Westgarde previously loaned to the Company (See Note 14
- Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of
166,151 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to Lonnie Hayward as
settlement of $59,190, as of March 31, 2007, owed to Mr. Hayward for consulting
and an additional 49,200 shares as additional bonus compensation for the
$180,000 that Mr. Hayward loaned to the Company during July and September of
2006. (See Note 14 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of
421,690 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to United Business
Associates (UBA), a Company controlled by our CEO Sheridan Westgarde and a
consultant Mr. Lonnie Hayward. The stock is issued as full settlement of the
amount owed to UBA, as previously recorded in the Company's notes payable (See
Note 10 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

CONVERTIBLE NOTES ISSUED (THE INVESTORS OF THE SECURITIES WERE ACCREDITED
INVESTORS).

         During December 2003, the Company entered into an agreement whereby,
the repayment of the outstanding debentures is intended to be made by an Equity
Line of Credit instrument negotiated between the convertible debenture holders
and the Company. Based on this arrangement, the Company and the convertible
debenture holders further agreed to an additional funding of $900,000. While
these new funds are secured as a convertible debt, the repayment is intended to
be managed through the Equity Line of Credit. The Company signed a $100,000
convertible promissory note as an advance on the $900,000 and paid $80,000 as a
deposit to acquire the Hamill Lease and Options (See Note 9 - Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).

         On March 22th, 2004 Aquatic issued three convertible debentures of
$433,333, $433,334 and $33,333 respectively, in cash each for an aggregate of
$900,000 in accordance with ss. 4(2) and Rule 506 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended. The investors of these securities were accredited investors.
Proceeds were used to acquire a working interest in Hamill Lease and pay a
portion of outstanding consulting fees (See Note 5 and 9 - Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).

         On August 6th, 2004 Aquatic issued four convertible debentures of
$40,000, $7,500, $92,500 and $110,000 respectively, in cash each for an
aggregate of $250,000 in accordance with ss. 4(2) and Rule 506 under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The investors of these securities were
accredited investors. Proceeds were used to acquire a working interest in Prado
and pay a portion of outstanding consulting fees as of May 31, 2004 (See Note 6
and 9 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         In June of 2005, the Company agreed to an amendment to the convertible
debentures dated March 19, 2004 having a total aggregate of $900,000. The
agreement amends the applicable percentage of discount from 60 to 70 percent
(See Note 9 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         On April 29, 2007, the Company and the investors agreed to increase the
discount percentage on the notes from 70% to 75% (See Note 9 - Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).

WARRANTS AND OPTIONS ISSUED (THE INVESTORS OF THE SECURITIES WERE ACCREDITED
INVESTORS).

         On March 22nd, 2004, Aquatic issued common stock purchase warrants for
the right to purchase 900,000 shares of Common Stock of AQCI at $.0004 per
share. These warrants were issued in accordance with ss. 4(2) and Rule 506 under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The investors of these securities were
accredited investors. These warrants expired on March 22nd, 2006.

         On August 6th, 2004, Aquatic issued common stock purchase warrants for
the right to purchase 250,000 shares of Common Stock of AQCI at $.0004 per
share. These warrants were issued in accordance with ss. 4(2) and Rule 506 under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The investors of these securities were
accredited investors. These warrants expired on August 6th, 2006.

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

         The Company's transfer agent is Oxford Transfer & Registrar located at
1000 Southwest Broadway, Suite 920, Portland, Oregon, 97205.


                                       9
<PAGE>

ITEM 6.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
           RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

         This report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27a of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21e of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. These forward looking statements are subject to certain
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from historical results or anticipated results, including those set forth under
"Risk Factors" in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this report. The following
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with "Selected Financial
Data" and the Company's financial statements and notes thereto included
elsewhere in this report.

PLAN OF OPERATIONS
-------------------

         The Company has reorganized its core business, shifting from the
underwater wood business to that of investment and development of oil and
natural gas and currently focusing on the Hamill lease, including the newly
acquired approximately 1600-acre addition and the 26 lease program in Waller
County in the area of the Brookshire Dome Field.

HAMILL LEASE

         The 3645-acre Hamill Lease is secured by the property's natural gas
production from five of the seven existing wells; Hamill #2, Hamill #10, Hamill
#11, Hamill #14 and Hamill #17., with our portion of the daily production in
excess of approximately 160 MCF of gas per day, (MCFGPD) however, the Company
can give no assurances that the wells will continue to produce at this rate, if
at all. With a regulatory well spacing requirement of 40 acres per well the
property has wells spanning approximately 300 acres with the remaining 3,345
acres largely available for drilling of new wells. The property has historically
produced natural gas from multiple stacked pay sands supported by a 10 square
mile area of mutual interest.

         The four new leases covering 1,610 acres in the offshore area of
Matagorda County, Texas is contiguous with our onshore Sargent South Field
acreage. The new leases are subject to our Joint Operating Agreement with New
Century Energy Corp and have a term of five years and expire on April 4, 2011.
The Company plans to participate in drilling opportunities on these leases
expected to commence in 2008.

         The Hamill Lease development benefits from a license to a 10 square
mile 3-D seismic survey ("3-D") that was acquired by Century. This 3-D seismic
survey is currently being used by Century in the development planning of the
property and new drilling locations have already been identified for drilling in
2007 and 2008. The process of interpreting the 3-D data will be an ongoing, with
results from any new wells being integrated into the interpretation.

         The Company plans to participate in the development of the property
throughout 2007 and 2008 by continuing recompletion work of existing well bores,
as well as drilling of identified prospects. A report by R. A. Lenser &
Associates, independent petroleum engineers located in Houston, Texas, prepared
estimates of the net proved natural gas reserves as of January 1, 2007 for the
South Sargent Field, Hamill Lease. The report discusses the Company's proved
undeveloped (PUD) reserves primarily relate to reserves that are to be recovered
from six new proved drilling locations. Since our Hamill Lease located in the
South Sargent field in Matagorda County, Texas is in an area with multiple pay
zones, this property has proved producing, proved non-producing and proved
undeveloped reserves (See Note 18 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)

BROOKSHIRE DOME FIELD AREA

         In June of 2005, the Company used $19,930 of loan proceeds for the
purchase of a 50% working interest in a 26 lease program in Waller County in the
area of the Brookshire Dome Field. This project is the first of two planned
development projects the company acquired the rights to participate in by means
of the amended agreement with Century dated January 1, 2005. Also in June of
2005, the Company used approximately $95,000 in loan proceeds to participate in
drilling of the first test well on June 15, 2005. The well was temporarily
plugged at a depth of 5,200 feet on June 27, 2005. This project is currently
under evaluation to determine what direction the Company will take in respect to
future operations. Seventeen of the original 26 leases taken over this prospect
have expired. The project evaluation includes the viability of extending these
leases and deepening of the test well.

OTHER DEVELOPMENTS

         As reported in Item 12 - Certain Relationships And Related Transaction
and Note 19 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the
Company has completed the acquisition of the TigeroLynk(TM) large scale
underwater manipulator technology. The Company management believes this
technology represents a significant addition to the systems used in the
off-shore oil and natural gas industry. The Company plans to finish the
construction of the first commercial model of the TigeroLynk(TM) 120 in 2007,
following which the Company will engage in a marketing and sales campaign
focusing on the off-shore oil and natural gas and other underwater related
industries. The Company may also consider leveraging the TigeroLynk(TM)
technology to finance its oil and natural gas developments. (See Note 4) - Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements)

                                       10
<PAGE>


SUMMARY OF OBJECTIVES

         The SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES of Aquatic are to achieve successful growth
in the two focus areas of the Company's business plan. They are as follows;

         OIL AND NATURAL GAS RESERVES AND REVENUE:

         1)       Development of its current working interest in the Hamill
                  Lease in Matagorda County Texas. Re-assessment of its current
                  working interest in the Brookshire Dome Area in Waller County
                  Texas.

         2)       Completing the assessment and potential acquisition of the
                  Wharton and Jackson County prospect development opportunities,
                  made known to the Company through its amended agreement with
                  Century.

         TIGERoLYNK(TM) LARGE SCALE UNDERWATER MANIPULATOR TECHNOLOGY:

         1)       Finalize the completion of the commercial TigeroLynk(TM)
                  AR-120 unit currently under construction in Kamloops, British
                  Columbia, Canada.

         2)       Developing the Company's existing contacts with industry
                  professionals that could result in the implementation of the
                  first TigeroLynk(TM) system into commercial use.

         3)       Explore opportunities to leverage the TigeroLynk(TM)
                  technology to further the Company's oil and natural gas
                  interest.

         Aquatic's LONG-TERM OBJECTIVES are as follows:

         1)       Develop a balanced investment portfolio of oil and natural gas
                  producing properties and, eventually, exploration of
                  undeveloped project with potential for high rate of return in
                  production proceeds and reserves.


OUTLOOK

Over the next twelve months, management is confident that existing cash flows
from the Hamill lease production will be sufficient to meet the Company's cash
commitments as they become payable. Management believes that the current plan to
increase the Company's authorized shares is key to the Company's near and long
term success. A more detailed discussion of the Company's liabilities and
managements opinion's regarding those liabilities is as follows;

o        Our objective in 2007 and on into 2008 is to continue to use our cash
         flows from operations to meet our operating expenses and working
         capital requirements. In the past the revenue generated from the sale
         of our proportionate share of natural gas from the Hamill lease has
         been sufficient to pay the Company's share of lease operating expenses
         and most of the Company's general operating expenses. With warmer than
         expected 2006-2007 winter months followed by cooler that expected 2007
         summer temperatures throughout the US, stored reserves of natural gas
         have been uncharacteristically high resulting in lower than expected
         prices for natural gas. We expected those prices to remain at current
         levels or possibly increase in price through fall of 2007 into 2008,
         however, management can provide no guarantees. Should the price of
         natural gas fall significantly it would severely impact our ability to
         maintain current levels of operations and would likely result in us
         having to curtail existing operations.

o        We have successfully used loans from private investors, Company
         officers and a consultant, as well as cash raised from the sale of
         working interests, to pay for capital improvements to the Hamill and
         Brookshire leases. Through the issuance of preferred stock for debt we
         have been able to reduce the demand for cash that would otherwise be
         needed to pay these notes.

o        The Company has a substantial amount of debt in the form of convertible
         debentures that, for a number of years, we have operated without making
         any payments on, and which, continues to accrue interest. Though we
         have been able to avoid being defaulted, the terms of payment for these
         notes will have to be met to avoid any such action. Since the Company
         does not have sufficient cash to pay these notes, any event of default
         would certainly result in the note holders seeking relief by exercising
         their first priority interest in the Company's assets. Such action
         would, in all likelihood, result in the discontinuation of our
         operations. The convertible debt also contains freestanding embedded
         derivatives which resulted in the recording of derivative liabilities
         on the Company's balance sheet that significantly exceed our ability to
         pay with cash. Because these derivative liabilities are calculated on a
         quarterly basis and based on the market price of the Company's stock
         our financial condition and results of operations are subject to high
         volatility.


                                       11
<PAGE>

         We plan to solve these issues by increasing the total number of
authorized shares of the Company. Doing so will allow us to meet the terms of
the convertible debentures by making conversion of debt for equity.
Additionally, increasing the authorized shares will allow us to use equity
positions as incentive for attracting and paying professionals, as well as sell
additional shares for cash to help us execute and finance our business plan.
Though no plans exist at this time, we may in the future use equity as payment
for mergers and acquisitions. Such issuances of additional Company stock will
have a dilutive effect on common stock holders.

OTHER EVENTS

         During April 2007, the Holders of the Company's convertible notes (the
"investors") proposed that the Company hire a consultant designated by the
investors. The Company declined the proposal, deciding instead to conserve
resources for addressing specific needs of the Company. On April 25, 2007, the
investors filed with the Company a letter claiming an Event of Default as
defined in the terms of the notes. On April 29, 2007, the Company and the
investors agreed to cancel the claim of Event of Default and increase the
discount percentage on the notes from 70% to 75%.

         On March 30, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new series of
convertible preferred stock allocated from the Company's 10,000,000 authorized
preferred shares. A Certificate of Designation was filed with the Nevada
Secretary of State assigning certain preferential rights to these shares
including; i) one Series A Convertible Preferred share has the equivalent of
1000 common share votes, ii) one Series A Convertible Preferred share will have
the right, at the exclusive option of the holder, to convert to 61 common shares
of the Company, once such shares become available through the increase in the
Company's authorized common shares, iii) these shares also have ratchet
provision rights, registration rights and piggy back registration rights, as
well as 8:1 liquidation rights. Shareholders can determine all of the rights and
preferences of the Series A Convertible Preferred shares by consulting the
Certificate of Designation as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State.

         On May 2, 2007, the Company Sole Board of Director approved the
appointment of Mr. Lonnie Hayward to the Board of Directors. Mr. Hayward was
appointed to fill a vacancy and as permitted by the Company's Articles of
Incorporation and By-laws.

         During October 2006, the Company reached an agreement settling all
amounts owed to Gary Ackles, the Company's former CEO, which results in the
Company owning a major component to the TigeroLynk(TM) AR-120 large-scale
underwater manipulator system currently under construction in Kamloops, British
Columbia, Canada (Formerly known as the ATH equipment) (See Note 4 - Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements)

         As of May 31, 2007, the Company is utilizing two employees and one
consultant to manage 100 percent of the administration and business development,
for which there is two employees under contract and one consultant operating on
a month to month basis.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2007 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2006

         The company earned revenue of $250,224 for the year ended May 31, 2007,
compared with $457,243 for fiscal 2006 for an decrease of $207,019. The decrease
in equity interest is primarily due to overall decrease in the price of natural
gas and lower production levels.

         Operating costs and expenses for the year ended May 31, 2007, were
$821,260 and $592,234 for the year ended May 31st, 2006, for an increase of
$229,026. This increase is attributable to higher selling, general and
administrative expenses in 2007 of $510,487, and increase of $202,760 over the
2006 figure of $307,727. Additionally, while financing fees were reduced by
$28,355 the depreciation and depletion expenses in 2007 increased to $278,273, a
increase of $54,621 over the 2006 figure of $223,652. This increase is directly
attributable to the depletion of the Hamill acquisition. Also, interest expense
on the derivative liability contributed a significant increase to operating
expenses.

         The Company incurred a loss from operations in fiscal 2007 of $571,036
compared with a loss of $134,991 in fiscal 2006. This increase in losses is
mainly attributable to the decrease in natural gas prices reducing revenue from
the Hamill lease combined with increases in selling, general and administration
and depreciation and depletion expenses.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

         Net cash used by operating activities in fiscal 2007 amounted to
($161,610) compared to net cash provided by $256,961 in fiscal 2006 for a
decrease in cash provided by operating activities of $418,571. The decrease in
cash provided is attributable to a gain on write off of debt of $264,754, a gain
on sale of investment in Prado lease of $255,157, which was offset by $278,309
in depreciation and depletion, $31,680 in accretion of convertible debt
discount, $8,131,154 change in derivative liability, a $16,226 change in warrant
liability, a $29,298 in undistributed equity in losses of leases, a $85,811
issuance of preferred shares to officers, and an increase in accounts payable
and accrued liabilities of $247,176.

                                       12
<PAGE>


The Company has the following contractual obligations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                           <C>       <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Accounts Payable                        $    73,075     $    73,075                                                       $      --
Accrued Expenses                          1,342,445          42,819                                                       1,299,626
Amounts due related parties                 148,996          24,996                                                         124,000
Convertible debentures (1) (Note 9)       1,930,800       1,930,800
Derivative Liability                     14,969,891      14,969,891
Warrant Liability                            34,455          34,455
Notes payable (Note 10)                     176,717          99,926                                                          76,791
                                        -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

                                         18,676,379         240,816            --              --              --        18,435,563

Other (2)                                   538,320         164,580         164,580         164,580          14,580          30,000
                                        -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------

Total contractual obligations (3)       $19,214,699     $   405,396     $   164,580     $   164,580     $    14,580     $18,465,563
                                        ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE>

(1)   Amounts include interest expense based upon contractual terms through May
      2008.

(2)   Other commitments comprise employment agreements with officers and
      operating lease agreeement with New Century Resources (through May 2011)

(3)   Comprised of the following:

      Liabilities recorded on the balance sheet        $18,676,379
     Commitments not recorded on the balance sheet         538,320
                                                       -----------

                                                       $19,214,699
                                                       ===========

         Net cash used in financing activities was ($7,920) in fiscal 2007
compared with $70,116 of cash generated in fiscal 2006. The cash used in
financing activities for fiscal year 2007 resulted from payments to related
party debt, proceeds from the issuance of notes payable of $235,000 offset by
payments on notes payable of $160,463.

         The Company experienced an excess of cash from investment activities of
$129,043 in fiscal 2007 and used cash of $326,572 for fiscal 2006. The Company
had a reduction in the amount of cash invested in working interests of $420,113
during the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period. During fiscal 2007, the
Company's investing was offset by proceeds received from the sale of the
Company's Prado field interest (See Notes 1 and 6 - Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).

         For the period ended May 31, 2006, the Company utilized $200,000 in
working capital loaned to the Company by United Business Associates ("UBA"), a
company owned by the Company's current CEO and Lonnie Hayward, a consultant. In
November 2005 the Company revised the UBA agreement terms such that the loan
will have a six-month interest free period commencing on January 1, 2005,
following which it will bear interest at 20% and be payable on demand. As of May
31, 2006, the Company had used $195,073 of these funds for the purchase and
development of the Brookshire lease and additional investment in Hamill lease to
increase production. During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the
issuance of 421,690 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to UBA. The
stock is issued as full settlement of the amount owed to UBA, principle plus
interest as of March 31, 2007, of $226,363 that was previously recorded in the
Company's notes payable (See Note 10 - Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).

         On June 1, 2005, 47,300,000 share certificates of Titan Oil and Gas
were received by the Company. Titan represented that the shares were valued, and
the Company agreed, at $460,000. These shares were issued to the Company as
consideration for a 40 percent working interest in the Company's Prado field
interest. During the three-month period ended November 2005, the Company sold
Titan shares to third parties for $286,715 in cash and exchanged $37,500 in
Company debt for approximately 3,500,000 shares of Titan common stock. During
the three-month period ended February 28, 2006, the Company exchanged 7.3
million Titan shares with Gary Ackles, the Company's former CEO, for a $32,000
increase in the amount on deposit with Ackles and with respect to the ongoing
negotiation to settle all amounts owed to Ackles. During November 2005, Titan
notified the Company that it was no longer interested in acquiring a 40 percent
interest in the Prado lease, or other existing properties, and decided to
terminate there agreement with the Company. While negotiating the final
settlement, the Company paid Titan $80,000. On December 1, 2005, Titan signed an
agreement to accept $100,000 in cash as full remuneration of there initial
investment in Prado. As of May 31, 2006, the Company had paid the settlement
amount to Titan in full and Titan has acknowledged that they no longer have any
claim or rights to the Company's Prado field interest (See Note 6 - Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).



                                       13
<PAGE>


         During February 2006, the Company received a loan of $50,000 from a Mr.
Don Morgan of Portland Oregon. The Company agreed to repay the loan in over 24
monthly payments with 10 percent interest. The principle balance owing of
$40,388, as at May 31, 2006, is included in notes payable.

         During July and September 2006, the Company received a loan from Mr.
Lonnie Hayward, a consultant to the Company, and a Company controlled by Mr.
Hayward for an aggregate amount of $180,000. Funds were used to cover costs
associated with the development of the Hamill lease. The Company agreed to pay
Mr. Hayward $200,000 in return for his loan at such time as the Company is able.
In October 2006, the Company made a partial payment to Mr. Hayward in the amount
of $120,000.

         During November 2006, the Company accepted a loan from Mr. Peter
Matousak for $15,000. The proceeds were paid directly to NewsUSA, a North
American news media service, and on the Company's behalf representing the first
month payment on the Company's contract with NewsUSA. In the agreement the
Company Board of Directors approved to issue Mr. Matousak 500,000 shares of
Company stock with piggy back registration rights and to be issued pending the
increase in the Company's authorized shares and change the Company name (See
Note 10 and 16 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         For the period ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had issued the
maximum number of its authorized common shares and was thus unable to raise cash
by the issuance of additional common shares. Cash raised was therefore raised by
the issuance of debt and preferred stock.

         At May 31, 2007 the Company had cash of $42,737 for total current
assets of $42,951.

         As of May 31, 2007, the Company had a working capital deficiency of
$18,633,428 and an accumulated deficit of $23,598,452. Over the next twelve
months, management is confident that sufficient working capital will be obtained
from a combination of revenue and external financing to meet the Company's cash
commitments as they become payable as they become payable. The Company has in
the past successfully relied on private placements of common stock, loans from
private investors and the exercise of common stock warrants, in order to sustain
operations. The Company plans to increase the total number of authorized shares
to provide for the conversion of debentures for equity, use equity positions as
incentive for attracting professionals, payment of professionals, sell
additional shares for cash and potentially use equity as payment for mergers and
acquisitions (See Note 16 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). There
can be no assurance that management plans will be successful. Failure to obtain
sufficient working capital from external financing will cause the Company to
curtail its operations.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

         Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets
liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to impairment of long-lived assets. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Significant estimates include DD&A of oil
and gas properties. Oil and gas reserve estimates, which are the basis for unit
of production DD&A and the impairment analysis, are inherently imprecise and are
expected to change as future information becomes available. In addition,
alternatives may exist among various accounting methods. In such cases, the
choice of accounting method may also have a significant impact on reporting
amounts. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions; however, we believe that our estimates are
reasonable.

         There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
oil and natural gas reserves of any category and in projecting future rates of
production and timing of development expenditures, which underlie the reserve
estimates, including many factors beyond the Company's control. Reserve data
represent only estimates. In addition, the estimates of future net cash flows
from the Company's proved reserves and their present value are based upon
various assumptions about future production levels, prices and costs that may
prove to be incorrect over time. Any significant variance from the assumptions
could result in the actual quantity of the Company's reserves and future net
cash flows from them being materially different from the estimates. In addition,
the Company's estimated reserves may be subject to downward or upward revision
based upon production history, results of future development, prevailing oil and
gas prices, operating and development costs and other factors.

OIL AND GAS PROPERTY ACCOUNTING

         Oil and gas companies may elect to account for their property costs
using either the "successful efforts" or "full cost" accounting method. Under
the success efforts method, lease acquisition costs and intangible development
costs on successful wells and development dry holes are capitalized. Selection
of the oil and gas accounting method can have a significant impact on a
company's financial results. We use the successful efforts method of accounting
and generally pursue investments and development of proved reserves as opposed
to exploration activities.


                                       14
<PAGE>

         Capitalized costs relating to producing properties are depleted on the
units-of-production method. Proved developed reserves are used in computing unit
rates for drilling and development costs and total reserves for depletion rates
of leasehold, platform and pipeline costs. Expenditures for geological and
geophysical testing costs are generally changed to expense unless the costs can
be specially attributed to determining the placement for a future developmental
well location. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense
as incurred, renewals and betterments are capitalized. The costs and related
accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of properties sold or
otherwise retired are eliminated from the accounts, and gains or losses on
disposition are reflected in the statements of operation.

         Costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of
unproved properties are excluded from the amortization base until the related
properties are evaluated. Unproved properties are periodically assessed and any
impairment in value is charged to impairment expense. The costs of unproved
properties which are determined to be productive are transferred to proved oil
and gas properties and amortized on a unit of production.

OIL AND GAS RESERVES

         The process of estimating quantities of natural gas and crude oil
reserves is very complex, requiring significant decisions in the evaluation of
all available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. The data
for a given field may also change substantially over time as a result of
numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity,
evolving production history and continual reassessment of the viability of
production under varying economic conditions. As a result, material revisions to
existing reserve estimates may occur from time to time. Although every
reasonable effort is made to ensure that reserve estimates reported represent
the most accurate assessments possible, the subjective decisions and variances
in available data for various fields make these estimates generally less precise
than other estimates included in the financial statement disclosures. We use the
units-of-production method to amortize our oil and gas properties. This method
requires us to amortize the capitalized costs incurred in developing a property
in proportion to the amount of oil and gas produced as a percentage of the
amount of proved reserves contained in the property. Accordingly, changes in
reserves estimates as described above will cause corresponding changes in
depletion expense recognized in periods subsequent to the reserve estimate
revision.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS


         There are no new accounting pronouncements not previously disclosed
that are not yet effective but expected to effect the Company's consolidated
financial statements


ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         Please refer to pages beginning with F-1.

ITEM 8.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
         FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

         There were no other "reportable events" as that term is described in
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurring within the Registrant's two most
recent fiscal years and the fiscal year ending May 31, 2007.

1. A FORM 8-K/A WAS FILED ON MAY 12TH, 2005, REPORTING A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
FIRMS.

         By way of letter dated April 11, 2005 Wong Johnson and Associates, a
Professional Corporation, (the "Former Accountants") confirmed to Aquatic
Cellulose International Corp. (the "Company") their earlier verbal notification
that they resigned as the Company's principal accountants effective March 6,
2005 because they ceased auditing publicly traded companies.

         The Former Accountants' reports on the consolidated financial
statements for the years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse
opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified as to audit scope or
accounting principles.

         The Former Accountants' report on the consolidated financial statements
of the Company as of and for the year ended May 31, 2004, contained two
explanatory paragraphs, which read as follows:

         Aquatic Cellulose International Corporation (the "Company") has
experienced recurring losses, has negative working capital and an accumulated
deficit as of May 31, 2004. These factors raise substantive doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern Management's plans in regard to
these matters is disclosed in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements.


                                       15
<PAGE>

         Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities or other adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

         The Company's Board of Directors has received and accepted the
resignation of the Former Accountants.

         During the last two years preceding the Former Accountants' resignation
and for the interim period from June 1, 2004 through April 11, 2005, there were
no disagreements with the Former Accountants on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the
Former Accountants, would have caused the Former Accountants to make reference
to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with the Former
Accountants' reports.

         During the last two years preceding the Former Accountants' resignation
and for the interim period from June 1, 2004 through April 11, 2005, there were
no "reportable events" as defined by regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(v)(A)
through (D).

         After receiving the letter of resignation of the Former Accountants and
on April 20, 2005, the Company engaged Peterson Sullivan, PLLC, of Seattle,
Washington (the "New Accountants") as the principal accountants to audit the
Company's financial statements. Prior to formally engaging the New Accountants,
the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors approved said action
with respect to the New Accountants.

         A letter from the Former Accountants addressed to the Securities &
Exchange Commission ("SEC") stating that the Former Accountants agree with the
statements contained herein has been filed as an exhibit to this report

ITEM 8A. CONTROL AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Mr. Sheridan B. Westgarde, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange
Act), as of end of fiscal year end May 31, 2007. Based on this evaluation, Mr.
Westgarde concluded that during the period of this report our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that our
disclosure and controls are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal
executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.

During fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 and 2007, Mr. Westgarde became aware of
potential problems in our disclosure controls and procedures in connection with
the filing of a Proxy statement on Schedule 14/A ("Schedule 14/A") on November
8, 2005, and in the customary course of the Commission's review of the Schedule
14/A and other Company filings, during which time the Commission issued a
comment letter (the "Comment Letter") to the Company dated December 8, 2005. The
Comment Letter included comments indicating a number of deficiencies in the
Company's filings. These deficiencies included such items as the omission of
certain agreements that the Company has entered into as exhibits to the
Company's quarterly and annual reports, filed with the commission, and as
required by Item 601 of Regulation S-B. Additionally and after further
consultation with accounting professionals Mr. Westgarde became aware that the
Company's convertible debenture debt is not conventionally convertible and does
not qualify for the scope exceptions from the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, rules for accounting for
derivative instruments, and therefore, such debt derivative liabilities were not
accounted for in the Company's' financial reports in accord with SFAS No. 133.
Additionally, the Comment Letter indicated that certain Company quarterly and
annual reports filed with the commission contained certifications that did not
conform to the format provided in Item 601 (b)(31) of Regulation S-B. As a
result, certain quarterly and annual reports of the Company had not been filed
in a timely fashion.

As a result of these issues with our disclosure controls and procedures, we
embarked on a process that was completed by fiscal year end May 31, 2007, that
addressed and corrected certain deficiencies in our filings done with the
commission, as well as completed and filed our outstanding quarterly and annual
reports. This process included the re-filing of certain quarterly and annual
reports to include the missing exhibits and correct certification formats. In
review of the Company's accounting for the liability of the existing convertible
debt we continue to engaged additional financial professionals in the
calculation of these liabilities in accord with SFAS 133 rules for accounting
for derivative instruments and include these in our quarterly and annual
reports.

In connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the year
ended May 31, 2007, certain additional internal control weaknesses became
evident to Mr. Westgarde, that, in the aggregate, represent material weakness,
including;


                                       16
<PAGE>

      (i) lack of segregation of incompatible duties;
      (ii) Insufficient Board of Directors representation.

As part of the communications by Peterson Sullivan, PLLC, or Peterson Sullivan,
with Mr. Westgarde, our sole director and chief executive officer, with respect
to Peterson Sullivan's audit procedures for fiscal 2007, Peterson Sullivan
informed Mr. Westgarde that these deficiencies constituted material weaknesses,
as defined by Auditing Standard No. 2, "An Audit of Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial
Statements," established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or
PCAOB.

In accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we intend to
take appropriate and reasonable steps to make the necessary improvements to
remediate these deficiencies. We intend to consider the results of our
remediation efforts and related testing as part of our on-going assessment of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.




CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
----------------------------

         During fiscal year-ended May 31, 2006, the Company initiated changes in
our internal controls and procedures to provide for accurate, effective and
timely disclosures. This change involved the training of existing staff to
assemble documents required to be filed in our disclosures as well as manage
certain financial processes that were previously performed by outside
accountants. This change has given the Company effective control over our
required disclosures by streamlining the processes involved in recording,
processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
Additionally, this change has improved the segregation of incompatible duties
due to the use of additional staff in preparing financial disclosures. During
fiscal year-ended May 31, 2007, on April 26, 2007, the Company's sole Board of
Director approved the appointment of Mr. Lonnie Hayward to the Company Board of
Directors. This change improves the lack of representation that previously
existed on our Board of Directors.

         Other than these changes implemented during the period ended May 31,
2006 and 2007 there have been no additional changes (including corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our
internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal
year-ended May 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 (Christine - Does this comply with Item 308(c) of Reg SB)

                                    PART III

ITEM 9.         DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
                COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

         NAME                           AGE          POSITION
         -----                          ---          --------
         Sheridan B. Westgarde           38          Director & President
         Lonnie Hayward                  38          Director & Vice President

         The officers and Directors of Aquatic will devote only such time as
they deem appropriate in the business affairs of our Company. It is, however,
expected that the officers will devote the time deemed necessary to perform
their duties for the business of our Company. The amount devoted by our director
is discussed below.

         The directors of Aquatic are elected to hold office until the next
annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors have been
elected and qualified.

BIOGRAPHIES OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

         Sheridan B. Westgarde: Mr. Westgarde was appointed to the Board of
directors March 27, 2003. As a C.A.S. Tech. graduate of UCC British Columbia and
a recognized specialist in the robotics and automation industry, Mr. Westgarde
has been extensively involved in the design and development of the
TigeroLynk(TM) manipulator technology. In addition, Mr. Westgarde has valuable
knowledge and experience in the Oil and Gas industry, providing his technical
expertise in down-hole tool management and implementation.

                                       17
<PAGE>

         Mr. Westgarde does not sit on the Board of any other public company.
Mr. Westgarde dedicates approximately 90% of his time to Aquatic.

         On May 2, 2007, Mr. Lonnie Hayward was appointed as a member of the
Board to fill the vacancy left by Mr. Kerpan. This action was performed without
a vote of the Company's security holders as provided for in the Company's
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws when such an appointment is to fill a
vacancy left by prior resignations. Mr. Hayward will also serve as Vice
President of the Company.

         Mr. Hayward is 38 years old and has served as a key consultant to the
Company since 2004. Mr. Hayward has worked with the Company to find various oil
and gas opportunities, ranging from production to drilling prospects, and had
worked to bring various forms of financing to the Company. Prior to joining the
Company, from 2002 to 2004, Mr. Hayward was a director for Inouye Technologies,
Inc. ("Inouye"), a small producer of Powerline products in Canada. In that role,
he assisted with financing and getting Inouye listed on the CNQ exchange. From
1993 to 2002, Mr. Hayward worked for AAA International ("AAA"), an international
law center Mr. Hayward founded in 1993. During his time at AAA, Mr. Hayward
consulted with many large international firms, assisting them with collection
and legal procedures, and credit granting policies.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the
Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of
a registered class of the Company's equity securities to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of
changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company.
Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file.

         To the Company's knowledge, based solely on its review of the copies of
such reports furnished to the company and written representations that no other
reports were required during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, all Section
16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than
10% beneficial owners were complied with.

CODE OF ETHICS FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

         On May 31, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the Code
of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which is
included in Item 13 as an Exhibit 99.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

         The following table sets forth certain summary information regarding
compensation paid by the Company for services rendered during the fiscal year
ended May 31, 2007 to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and
Director during such period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         CHART - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

      Payouts                    Annual Compensation                                Long Term Compensation Awards
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        (a)          (b)      (c)       (d)           (e)               (f)              (g)            (h)             (i)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name and Principal   Year    Salary    Bonus      Other Annual      Restricted       Securities         LTIP         All Other
     Position                                     Compensation     Stock Awards      Underlying     Payouts ($)   Compensation ($)
                                                      ($)               ($)        Options/SAR (#)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                  <C>     <C>                                      <C>                 <C>
Sheridan B.          2007    86,000                                   29,700              0
Westgarde            2006    60,000                                                       0
President/CEO        2005    60,000                                                       0
Lonnie Hayward       2007    10,000                                   29,700              0
Director / Vice      2006                                                                 0
President (*)        2005                                                                 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

(*) Appointed as Director and Vice President on May 2, 2007


                                       18
<PAGE>

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION:

         On April 1, 2006, the Company's three-year consulting agreement with
it's CEO, Director and President expired. Under that agreement Mr. Westgarde
received the monthly consulting fee to $5,000 per month and $1,500 per month in
stock compensation. During October 2006, the Company's Board of Directors
approved a new contract for Mr. Westgarde with a three-year term commencing
September 1, 2006 and providing for monthly consulting fees of $7,500, of which
$6,000 is payable in cash and the remaining $1,500 in stock for services
rendered. Additionally, this new contract contains a termination provision
providing Mr. Westgarde a 24 month severance and a guarantee on his un-issued
stock. In addition, on April 20, 2007, the Board of Directors approved the
issuance of 1,350,000 Series A Convertible Preferred Shares to Mr. Westgarde,
fulfilling a commitment to make Mr. Westgarde a significant shareholder in the
Company. At the time of the transaction the Company recorded these shares as
additional compensation at a value of $29,700.

         During April 2007 Mr. Westgarde agreed to accept and the Board of
Directors approved the issuance of 446,349 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred stock as settlement of $184,308 of amounts owed to Mr. Westgarde for
consulting and stock Mr. Westgarde previously loaned to the Company and had been
previously recorded in the Company's Amounts Due to Related Parties (See Note 14
- Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

         Mr. Westgarde, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, has
his compensation as detailed above.

         Mr. Lonnie Hayward is compensated under the terms of a prior consulting
agreement on a month-to-month basis. The agreement was for $3,500 in cash and
$1,500 in stock compensation (See Notes 14 - Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).


ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

COMMON STOCK:

         The following information table sets forth certain information
regarding the Company's common stock owned on May 31, 2007, by (i) each
shareholder who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of its
outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each director and officer, and (iii) all officers
and directors as a group:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Names and Address of
Directors, Officers and                         Number of               Percentage of Common Stock Owned On
5% Stockholders                            Common Shares Owned                  May 31, 2007 (1)
-----------------------                   --------------------         -----------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                                      <C>
Sheridan Westgarde
2504 27th Ave.
Vernon, BC. V1T 1T1                                    950,000                            1.0%

Lonnie Hayward
7120 205th St.
Langley, B.C. V2Y 1T1                                  500,000                            0.5%

ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AS A GROUP (1 IN NUMBER)                    1,450,000                                1.5%
</TABLE>

(1)  Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 100,000,000 shares of common
     stock outstanding as of April 24, 2007.

PREFERRED STOCK:

The following information table sets forth certain information regarding the
Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock owned on May 31, 2007, by (i)
each shareholder who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of
its outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) each director and
officer, and (iii) all officers and directors as a group:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Names and Address of                                     Number of
Directors, Officers and                             Series A Preferred                    Percentage of Preferred Stock owned On
5% Stockholders  (1)                                   Shares Owned                                    May 31, 2007(1)
------------------------                            ------------------                   ---------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>                                           <C>
Sheridan Westgarde
2504 27th Ave.
Vernon, BC. V1T 1T1                                        2,007,194                                      53.05%

Lonnie Hayward
7120 205th St.
Langley, B.C. V2Y 1T1                                      1,776,196                                      46.95%

ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AS A GROUP (1 IN NUMBER)                          3,783,390                                     100.00%
</TABLE>

(1) Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 3,783,390 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of May 31, 2007.


                                       19
<PAGE>


VOTING RIGHTS OF COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK:

The following information table sets forth certain information regarding the
votes associated with the Company's shares of Common Stock and Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock as of May 31, 2007. The chart shows the voting
information of stock held by (i) each shareholder who is known by the Company to
own beneficially more than 5% of its outstanding voting stock,(*) (ii) each
director and officer, and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. The
Common Stock and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock vote together as one class
on all matters requiring a shareholder vote:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Names and
Address of
Directors,
Officers and         Total Number of Votes      Total Number of Votes from
5% Stockholders      from Common Shares Held      Preferred Shares Held         Total Number of Votes     Percentage of Total Votes
(1)                          (1)                          (2)                                                       (3)
-------------------  -----------------------   ---------------------------     -----------------------   ---------------------------
<S>                           <C>                      <C>                          <C>                              <C>
Sheridan Westgarde
2504 27th Ave.
Vernon, BC. V1T 1T1             950,000                 2,007,194,000               2,008,144,000                    51.71%
Lonnie Hayward
7120 205th St.
Langley B.C. V2Y
1T1                             500,000                 1,776,196,000               1,776,696,000                    45.75%


Total                         1,450,000                3, 783,390,000               3,883,390,000                    97.46%
</TABLE>

(1)      Based on one vote per Common share held.
(2)      Based on one thousand votes per Series A Convertible Preferred Share
         held.
(3)      Based on (i) 100,000,000 Common shares outstanding with one vote per
         share and (ii) 3,783,390 Series A Convertible Preferred shares
         outstanding with one thousand votes per share for a total of
         3,783,390,000 total votes from preferred shares, voting together as one
         class. There are 3,883,390,000 total possible votes.

(*)      A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be
         acquired by such person within 60 days from the date of the
         registration statement upon the exercise of options or warrants. Each
         beneficial owner's percentage ownership is determined by assuming that
         options or warrants that are held by such person and which are
         exercisable within 60 days of the date of this registration statement
         have been exercised. Unless otherwise indicated, the company believes
         that all persons named in the table have voting and investment power
         with respect to all shares of common and preferred stock beneficially
         owned by them.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION

         During July 2004, the Company received short term loans from Sheridan
Westgarde, the Company's CEO, Lonnie Hayward, consultant, and Robert Marchand in
an amount aggregating $42,000 which was used, along with Company's available
cash, to fund the purchase of the 50 percent working interest in the Prado Field
lease. The Company agreed to repay the loan amount borrowed once funding becomes
available and agreed to pay an additional 20 percent of the amount borrowed over
the next 12 months. Following the closing of the $250,000 convertible debentures
in August 2004, Mr. Westgarde and Mr. Hayward were repaid their principal
amounts plus 10 percent, while Mr. Marchand declined repayment in favor of
re-investing his principal and proceeds with the Company. The remaining 10
percent will be paid within the next 10 months. As of fiscal year ended May 31,
2007 the remaining 10 percent has not been paid.

                                       20
<PAGE>

         In June of 2005, the Company entered into a working capital loan
agreement with United Business Associates ("UBA"), a company owned by the
Company's current CEO and Lonnie Hayward, a consultant. In November 2005 the
Company revised the UBA agreement terms such that the loan will have a six-month
interest free period commencing on January 1, 2006, following which it will bear
interest at 20% and be payable on demand. As of November 30, 2005 the Company
had used $195,073 of these funds for the purchase and development of the
Brookshire lease and additional investment in the Hamill Lease to increase
production. These advances from UBA are included in Notes Payable in the
consolidated balance sheet. During April 2007, the Board of Directors approved
the issuance of 421,690 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock to United
Business Associates (UBA), a Company controlled by our CEO Sheridan Westgarde
and a consultant Mr. Lonnie Hayward. The stock was issued as full settlement of
the amount owed to UBA, as previously recorded in the Company's notes payable
(See Note 10 and 14 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         Pursuant to an agreement with a manufacturer, which was controlled by
the Company's former CEO, Gary Ackles ("Ackles"), the Company had, in the past,
advanced $100,000 towards the purchase of an aquatic timber harvesting (ATH)
machine that is now known and referred to as TigeroLynk(TM) AR-120. In June
2003, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Legacy Systems Corp
("Legacy"), a company controlled by Ackles, to merge the public Company with
Legacy and the TigeroLynk(TM) robotic technology. During July 2004, the Company
revised this agreement to end the merger plan and return the remaining aquatic
timber harvesting equipment so as to settle the amount due Ackles and Legacy as
of May 31, 2004. Due to the delay in consummating that agreement the Company and
Ackles began negotiating a new settlement agreement. As of May 31, 2006, the
Company had paid Ackles and Legacy $196,970 while terms of the settlement were
being finalized. In October of 2006 the Company completed a final settlement
agreement with Ackles. This agreement resulted in the Company purchasing from
Ackles all rights, title and interest to the TigeroLynk(TM) patents (US & CAN),
blueprints, drawings and concepts for $250,000 (plus $20,000 in late payment
penalties) as condition upon Ackles agreeing to accept $25,000 payment for
unpaid expenses and relinquishing the remaining total of $450,889 in other
amounts owed to him. The purchase of the TigeroLynk(TM) technology involve the
following commitments to Ackles; 1) a 50/50 (percent) profit share agreement
with Ackles on the first 5 TigeroLynk(TM) machines sold, 2) a 7.5 percent
royalty assignment on the first five machines, reducing to 5 percent on each
successive machine. Additionally, the Company has committed to issue to Ackles 5
percent of its issued and outstanding stock to Ackles, pending the increase in
authorized shares, as incentive to completing the settlement agreement. As of
November 2006, the Company had paid Ackles the $25,000 payment for expenses, the
$196,970 that was on deposit with him at May 31, 2006, as well as additional
payments made subsequent to May 31, 2006 of $40,000, for a total aggregate of
payments made of $261,970. The agreement was consummated as final even though a
remaining balance of $33,070 is yet owing to Ackles, of which, Ackles has agreed
will be left in the Company's notes payable with Ackles holding an option to
convert this balance to the Company's stock following the increase in authorized
shares (See Note 4 and 16 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

         Also in October 2006, the Company completed a settlement agreement with
Legacy, whereby the Company will exchange 1.08 percent of its issued and
outstanding shares, pending the increase in the Company's authorized shares, for
the total of $124,000 owed to Legacy, comprised of $80,000 for unpaid licensing
fees and a $44,000 loan (See Note 4 and 16 - Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). Previous to this agreement the Company was operating under the
expectation that the mechanical assembly and components of the TigeroLynk(TM)
AR-120 machine, constructed and stored at a manufacturing facility in Kamloops,
British Columbia Canada, would be exchanged for amounts owed Legacy, however
this is no longer the case. The final settlement reached relinquishes Ackles and
Legacy of any rights, title or interest in the equipment.

ITEM 13.            EXHIBITS, LIST AND REPORTS IN FORM 8-K

(A) EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number        Description
-------       -----------

3.1           Articles of Incorporation of the Company filed February 28 th ,
              1997. (1)
3.2           Certificate Amending Articles of Incorporation filed November
              19th , 1997. (1)
3.3           Bylaws of the Company. (1)
4.1           Form of Common Stock Certificate. (2)

                                       21
<PAGE>

4.2           Form of Warrant Agreement with Form of Warrant Election to
              Purchase. (2)
10.1          Form of Secured Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreement. (2)
10.2          Form of Registration Rights Agreement. (2)
10.3          Form of 12% Convertible Debenture. (2)
10.4          Form of Security Agreement. (2)
10.5          December 2003 Convertible Promissory Note  (3)
10.6          UBA Loan Agreement (November 2005) (4)

                (MARCH 2004 CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AGREEMENTS - 10.7 THRU 10.21)

10.7          Cross-Receipt (5)
10.8          Secretary and Officers Certificates  (5)
10.9          Amendment Agreement  (5)
10.10         Escrow Agreement  (5)
10.11         Guaranty and Pledge Agreement  (5)
10.12         Intellectual Property Security Agreement  (5)
10.13         Security Agreement  (5)
10.14         Registration Rights Agreement  (5)
10.15         Stock Purchase Warrant  (5)
10.16         Stock Purchase Warrant  (5)
10.17         Stock Purchase Warrant  (5)
10.18         Secured Convertible Debenture  (5)
10.19         Secured Convertible Debenture  (5)
10.20         Secured Convertible Debenture  (5)
10.21         Securities Purchase Agreement  (5)
10.22         New Purchase & Sale and Exploration Agreement  (5)
10.23         Operating Agreement  (5)

              (AUGUST 2004 CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AGREEMENTS - 10.24 THRU 10.39)
10.24         Cross Receipt (6)
10.25         Escrow Agreement (6)
10.26         Guaranty and Pledge Agreement (6)
10.27         Intellectual Property Security Agreement (6)
10.28         Registration Rights Agreement (6)
10.29         Secured Convertible Debenture $40000 (6)
10.30         Secured Convertible Debenture $92500 (6)
10.31         Secured Convertible Debenture $110000 (6)
10.32         Secured Convertible Debenture $7500 (6)
10.33         Securities Purchase Agreement (6)
10.34         Security Agreement (6)
10.35         Stock Purchase Warrant AJW Offshore Ltd (6)
10.36         Stock Purchase Warrant AJW Partners LLC (6)
10.37         Stock Purchase Warrant AJW Qualified Partners LLC (6)
10.38         Stock Purchase Warrant NMC Partners LLC (6)
10.39         Secretary's and Officer's Certificate (6)
10.40         Purchase and Sale Agreement - Titan (6)
10.41         Agreement to Back Out of the Purchase of Working Interest as set
              forth in the Purchase and Sale Agreement Dated July 30, 2004 and
              the Amendment Dated June 1, 2005. (7)
10.42         Settlement Agreement Sept 6, 2004 (8)
10.43         January 1, 2005 Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (9)
10.44         First Amendment to P&S Agreement Prado (10)
10.45         Debenture Amendments (11)

10.46         Estimated Reserves And Future Income Attributable to Certain
              Leasehold Interest as of January 1, 2005 (12)
10.47         Estimated Reserves And Future Income Attributable to Certain
              Leasehold Interest as of January 1, 2006 (12)

                                       22
<PAGE>

10.48         Letter Agreement Ackles Dated Oct 17, 2006 (13)
10.49         Agreement between Ackles Legacy and Aquatic dated
              October 23, 2006 (13)
10.50         Technology Purchase and Sale Agreement Dated Oct 30th 2006 (13)
10.51         Agreement Regarding the Purchase and Sale of Aquatic's Interest in
              the Prado Field (13)
10.52         Letter Agreement regarding New Century relinquishment of rights to
              Aquatic Shares (13)
10.53         Memorandum Concerning The Termination Of The Development
              Agreement (13)
10.54         Employment Agreement of Sheridan Westgarde (13)
10.55         Consultant Agreement of Les Westgarde (13)
10.56         Certificate of Amendment to Company's Articles of
              Incorporation (14)
10.57         Estimated Reserves And Future Income Attributable to Certain
              Leasehold Interest as of January 1, 2007
10.58         Certificate of Designation - (Preferred Shares)
10.59         Debenture Amendment Agreement
10.60         Preferred Share Letter Agreements UBA
10.61         Preferred Share Letter Agreements Sheridan Westgarde
10.62         Preferred Share Letter Agreements Lonnie Hayward
10.63         Default Notice and Default Cancellation Agreement

14            Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial
              Officers
31.1          Certification of the Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial
              Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1          Certification of the Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial
              Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

-------------------------

(1)           Previously filed with the Commission on August 16 th , 1999 as
              part of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Registration
              Statement (File N0.000-27063) on Form 10SB12G and incorporated by
              reference herein.
(2)           Previously filed with the Commission on August 21 st , 2000 as
              part of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Registration (File
              NO: 333-44184) on Form SB-2 filed on August 21 st , 2000 and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(3)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 2 , 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended February 29, 2004, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(4)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 5 , 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(5)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 16 , 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Annual Report on Form
              10-KSB/A for the year ended May 31, 2004, and incorporated by
              reference herein.
(6)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 16 , 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended August 31, 2004, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(7)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 21 , 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(8)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 26, 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended November 30, 2004, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(9)           Previously filed with the Commission on February 26, 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended February 28, 2005, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(10)          Previously filed with the Commission on February 26, 2007 as part
              of Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on
              Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended August 31, 2005, and
              incorporated by reference herein.
(11)          Previously filed with the Commission on March 13, 2007 as part of
              Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Report on Form 8-K, and
              incorporated by reference herein.

                                       23
<PAGE>

(12)          Previously filed with the Commission on April 17, 2007 as part of
              Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Annual Report on Form
              10-KSB/A for the year ended May 31, 2006, and incorporated by
              reference herein.
(13)          Previously filed with the Commission on May 25, 2007 as part of
              Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s Quarterly Report on Form
              10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006, and incorporated by
              reference herein.
(14)          Previously filed with the Commission on June 14, 2007 as part of
              Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.'s PRER 14C Information
              Statement, and incorporated by reference herein.


(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:

1. Form 8-K dated March 31st, 2003 reported Gary Ackles has resigned as Chairman
of Board of Directors and CEO of Aquatic Cellulose International Corporation
effective March 26th, 2003 to dedicate his time to his technology and corporate
development for personal reasons.

2. Form 8-K dated April 13th, 2004 reported that on March 22, 2004 Aquatic
Cellulose International Corporation ("AQCI") completed a $900,000 financing with
a New York based investor group. The financing has been structured as a
convertible debenture. On March 22, 2004 Aquatic Cellulose International
Corporation ("AQCI") completed a purchase and sale agreement with Century
Resource Inc. of Houston Texas, for the acquisition of a 20% working interest
and 16% net revenue interest in the 3,645 acre Hamill Lease natural gas property
in Matagorda County, Texas. This agreement, with three successive one year terms
and an exclusive renewal option on each year, provides Aquatic the exclusive
option to participate in purchase or exploration of any and all future projects
by Century. The cost of this acquisition and exclusive optional participation
agreement was $580,000 dollars and a 15% ownership stake in the company. The
decision to approve the terms of the financing and subsequent working interest
acquisition was approved by the Board of Directors.

3. Form 8- K/A dated April 20th, 2005 reported by way of letter dated April 11,
2005 Wong Johnson and Associates, a Professional Corporation, (the "Former
Accountants") confirmed to Aquatic Cellulose International Corp. (the "Company")
their earlier verbal notification that they resigned as the Company's principal
accountants effective March 6, 2005 because they ceased auditing publicly traded
companies. The Former Accountants' reports on the consolidated financial
statements for the years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse
opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified as to audit scope or
accounting principles. During the last two years preceding the Former
Accountants' resignation and for the interim period from June 1, 2004 through
April 11, 2005, there were no disagreements with the Former Accountants on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of the Former Accountants, would have caused the Former Accountants
to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with
the Former Accountants' reports. After receiving the letter of resignation of
the Former Accountants and on April 20, 2005, the Company engaged Peterson
Sullivan, PLLC, of Seattle, Washington (the "New Accountants") as the principal
accountants to audit the Company's financial statements. Prior to formally
engaging the New Accountants, the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of
Directors approved said action with respect to the New Accountants.

4. Form 8- K dated March 9, 2007 reported that on February 27, 2007, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Sheridan B. Westgarde,
concluded that the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended May
31, 2005, which are included in the Company's Form 10-KSB for that period, can
no longer be relied upon. Additionally, the Company's unaudited financial
statements for the three, six and nine months ended August 31, 2005, November
30, 2005 and February 28, 2006, respectively, which are included in the
Company's Form 10-QSB's for those periods, can no longer be relied upon.
Specifically, the Company's consolidated balance sheet will be affected, with a
substantial decrease in stockholders' equity and a corresponding increase in
liabilities due to an accounting error resulting in financial restatements.
Additionally, there will be a material change in the consolidated statement of
operations.

         In the customary course of the Commission's review of a Schedule 14/A
and other Company filings, the Commission issued a comment letter (the "Comment
Letter") to the Company dated December 8, 2005. The Comment Letter included
comments indicating that the way the Company had been accounting for its
convertible debt may have been incorrect. During the course of preparing the
financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2006, and the related Form 10KSB
for 2006, and after further consultation with accounting professionals, Mr.
Westgarde concluded that the Company's accounting for the secured convertible
debt ("Convertible Note") was not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Specifically, the Convertible Note was deemed to not meet
the definition of a "conventional convertible note," and therefore, embedded
derivatives included therein such as the Convertible Note feature and stock
warrants issued to the lender, and certain other provisions, should have been
accounted for as derivative liabilities and not initially recorded as beneficial
conversion features within stockholders' equity.


                                       24
<PAGE>

         The Company restated its audited May 31, 2005 financials to record its
derivative and warrant liabilities associated with convertible debentures, as
well as, record the accretion expenses related thereto. Additionally, such
restatements to the Company's May 31, 2005 audited financial statements also
required us to make similar material modifications and to restate our unaudited
financial statements for the three months ended August 31, 2005, the three and
six months ended November 30, 2005, and the three and nine months ended February
28, 2006. All of the modifications and adjustments to the Company's audited May
31, 2005 financial statements and the Company's unaudited August 31, 2005,
November 30, 2005 and February 28, 2006 financial statements have been described
in detail in the footnotes to the restated financials appearing in the Company's
Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 filed with the Commission
on April 17, 2007.

5. Form 8- K dated March 13, 2007 reported that on March 9, 2007, the Company
management discovered that certain agreements, that are required to be filed in
accord with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, were not filed as exhibits to the
Company's amended August 31, 2005 quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A and the
Company's November 30, 2005, quarterly report on Form 10-QSB. These agreements
are summarized as follows;

In June of 2005, the Company agreed to an amendment to the convertible
debentures dated March 19, 2004 having a total aggregate of $900,000. The
agreement amends the applicable percentage of discount from 60 to 70 percent. In
September of 2005, the Company agreed to an amendment to the convertible
debentures dated August 6, 2004 having a total aggregate of $250,000. The
agreement amends the applicable percentage of discount from 60 to 70 percent.

Both of these debenture amendment agreements have been combined into one
document and filed herein as exhibit to this filing. All of the Company's
related financial statements, as filed with the Commission, have taken in
account adjustments, as necessary, due to these agreements.

6. Form 8- K dated April 24, 2007, announcing a change in control of the
registrant, reported that on April 20, 2007, the Company issued one million
three hundred fifty thousand (1,350,000) shares of the Company's authorized
Series A Convertible Preferred Shares to Sheridan B. Westgarde, and one million
three hundred fifty thousand (1,350,000) shares of the Company's authorized
Series A Convertible Preferred Shares to Lonnie Hayward. Pursuant to the
Certificate of Designation, each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
shall be convertible into sixty-one (61) shares of Common Stock. The Common
Stock into which the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible shall, upon
issuance, have all of the same voting rights as other issued and outstanding
Common Stock of the Company, and none of the rights of the Preferred Stock.
Additionally, the Series A Preferred Stock shall have one thousand (1000) votes
for every share, and shall vote together as one class with the Common Stock. As
a result, the current capitalization of the company consists of (i) 100,000,000
shares of Common Stock, each entitled to one vote per share; and (ii) 2,700,000
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares, each entitled to 1000 votes per
share. Accordingly, together with Mr. Westgarde's 950,000 shares of Common Stock
that were previously held, these two shareholders are entitled to 2,700,950,000
of 2,800,000,0000 total possible votes, or approximately 96.46% of the total
voting power of the Company (See Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements -
Note 13)

7. Form 8- K dated May 31, 2007, reported that effective December 20, 2003, Mr.
Shane Kerpan resigned from the Board of Directors ("Board") of Aquatic Cellulose
International Corporation (the "Company"). To the knowledge of the Board and
executive officers of the Company, Mr. Kerpan did not resign because of any
disagreement with the Company on any matter related to the Company's operations,
policies or practices.

Effective February 24, 2004, Mr. Claus Wagner-Bartak resigned from the Board. To
the knowledge of the Board and executive officers of the Company, Mr.
Wagner-Bartak did not resign because of any disagreement with the Company on any
matter related to the Company's operations, policies or practices.

On May 2, 2007, Mr. Lonnie Hayward was appointed as a member of the Board to
fill the vacancy left by Mr. Kerpan. This action was performed without a vote of
the Company's security holders as provided for in the Company's Articles of
Incorporation and By-laws when such an appointment is to fill a vacancy left by
prior resignations. Mr. Hayward will also serve as Vice President of the
Company.

Mr. Hayward is 38 years old and has served as a key consultant to the Company
since 2004. Mr. Hayward has worked with the Company to find various oil and gas
opportunities, ranging from production to drilling prospects, and had worked to
bring various forms of financing to the Company. Prior to joining the Company,
from 2002 to 2004, Mr. Hayward was a director for Inouye Technologies, Inc.
("Inouye"), a small producer of Powerline products in Canada. In that role, he
assisted with financing and getting Inouye listed on the CNQ exchange. From 1993
to 2002, Mr. Hayward worked for AAA International ("AAA"), an international law
center Mr. Hayward founded in 1993. During his time at AAA, Mr. Hayward
consulted with many large international firms, assisting them with collection
and legal procedures, and credit granting policies.

No transactions have occurred in the last two years to which the Company was a
party in which Mr. Hayward had or is to have a direct or indirect material
interest. Mr. Hayward does not have an employment agreement with the Company.

                                       25
<PAGE>


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

1)  AUDIT FEES & AUDIT-RELATED FEES

During fiscal year 2006, the Company incurred a total of $42,734 that was
directly associated with the preparation of annual audit reports and quarterly
reports and related fees.

During fiscal year 2007, the Company incurred a total of $40,815 that was
directly associated with the preparation of annual audit reports and quarterly
reports and related fees.

2) TAX FEES

During fiscal year 2005, there were no fees billed associated with the
preparation of tax filings.

During fiscal year 2006, there was $4,000 in fees billed associated with the
preparation of tax filings.

During fiscal year 2007, there were no fees billed associated with the
preparation of tax filings.

3) ALL OTHER FEES

During fiscal year 2005, there were no other fees billed by the Company's
principal accountant for services other than those reported for audit and audit
related fees.

During fiscal year 2006, there were no other fees billed by the Company's
principal accountant for services other than those reported for audit and audit
related fees.

During fiscal year 2007, there were no other fees billed by the Company's
principal accountant for services other than those reported for audit and audit
related fees.

AUDIT COMMITTEE'S PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The Company now has two members of the Board of Directors, Mr. Sheridan
Westgarde, our Chairman and CEO, and Mr. Lonnie Hayward who was appointed May 2,
2007. While this is an increase in the representation on our Board we as yet do
not have sufficient members to appoint an audit committee at this time.

PERCENTAGE OF HOURS EXPENDED

The amount of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit
the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were
attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's
full-time, permanent employees was less than 50%.


<PAGE>


                                AQUATIC CELLULOSE
                               INTERNATIONAL CORP.
                        May 31, 2006 and 2005 (Restated)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                         Page
                                                                                                   --------------
                      INDEX TO AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


<S>                                                                                                            <C>
Independent Auditors' Report                                                                                 F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 31, 2007                                                                F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006                              F-4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006                      F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006                   F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006                              F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                   F-9
</TABLE>



                                      F-1
<PAGE>


             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Aquatic Cellulose International Corp.
Salmon Arm, B.C.
CANADA


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Aquatic Cellulose
International Corp. and Subsidiary ("the Company") as of May 31, 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders'
deficit, and cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company
has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Aquatic Cellulose
International Corp. and Subsidiary as of May 31, 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, the Company has not generated positive cash
flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit at May 31, 2007. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern. Management's plan regarding those matters is also described in
Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/S/ PETERSON SULLIVAN PLLC


Seattle, Washington
October 22, 2007



                                      F-2
<PAGE>

                                      AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP


                                                CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
==========================================================================

                                                                 31-MAY-07
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSETS

Current Assets
    Cash                                                      $     42,737
    Accounts Receivable                                                214
                                                              ------------
    Total Current Assets                                            42,951
Property and equipment, net                                          7,115
Investment in Hamill lease                                         745,806
Investment in Brookshire lease                                     105,758
Advance on equipment purchase                                      100,000
Intangible assets                                                   50,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Assets                                              $  1,051,630
==========================================================================

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current Liabilities
    Accounts payable                                          $     73,075
    Accrued expenses                                             1,342,445
    Amounts due to related parties                                 148,996
    Convertible debentures                                       1,930,800
    Derivitive liability                                        14,969,891
    Warrant liability                                               34,455
    Notes payable                                                  176,717
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total current liabilities                                 18,676,379
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stockholders' Deficit
    Preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share
      10,000,000 shares authorized. 3,783,390 shares
      issued and outstanding.                                        3,783
    Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000
         shares authorized, 100,000,000 shares issued and
        outstanding.                                               100,000
    Additional paid in capital                                   5,915,330
    Accumulated deficit                                        (23,598,452)
    Foreign currency translation                                   (45,410)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total stockholders' deficit                              (17,624,749)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit                   $  1,051,630
==========================================================================


                                                   See accompanying notes.

                                      F-3
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP


                                                     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                  FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                             MAY 31, 2007      MAY 31, 2006
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                        <C>                      <C>
Equity in earnings of lease                                $     250,224            457,243


Operating expenses
      Selling, general and administrative                        510,487            307,727
      Financing fees                                              32,500             60,855
      Depreciation and depletion                                 278,273            223,652
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Total operating expenses                              821,260            592,234
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Loss from operations                                            (571,036)          (134,991)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other income (expense)
      Interest expense                                          (334,499)          (346,968)
      Interest expense related to convertible debt            (8,179,060)        (5,029,517)
      Gain from settlement of debt                               264,754            108,755
      Gain from settlement of investment in Wharton 3D                              256,218
      Gain from sale of Interest - Prado                         255,157             40,000
      Other income                                                 3,095
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total other income (expense)                                  (7,990,553)        (4,971,512)
============================================================================================


Net loss                                                   $  (8,561,589)     $  (5,106,503)
                                                                              =============

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                   100,000,000        100,000,000
                                                                              =============

Loss Per Common Share (Basic and fully diluted)            $       (0.09)     $       (0.05)
                                                                              =============

                                                                    See accompanying notes.

</TABLE>


                                      F-4
<PAGE>

                                        AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP


                               Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              For the Years Ended
                                      May 31, 2007             May 31, 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Net loss                              $ (8,561,589)            $ (5,106,503)

Foreign currency translation                  (593)                    198
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comprehensive loss                    $ (8,562,182)            $ (5,106,305)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                         See accompanying notes.


                                      F-5
<PAGE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP



                                                                                    Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit



                                                                                                        Preferred     Preferred
                                                                                                          Stock         Stock
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  <S>                                                                                                      <C>        <C>
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as previously
  reported

  Restatement of convertible debt liabilities
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as restated

  Return of stock for purchase of equipment
  Issued to officer for compensation
  Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Net loss
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Balance at May 31, 2006
  =================================================================================================================================

  For Year 2006 Activities
  ------------------------

  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                    1,350,000  $       1,350
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                    1,350,000          1,350
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                       446,349            446
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement and compensation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007      215,351            215
  Issued of preferred stock for settlement of note payable, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007            421,690            422
  Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Net loss
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Balance at May 31, 2007                                                                                3,783,390  $       3,783
  =================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>



[table continued]


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                             AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP



                                                                                  Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit



                                                                                                       Common           Common
                                                                                                        Stock            Stock
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                                   <C>          <C>
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as previously
  reported                                                                                            100,000,000  $     100,000

  Restatement of convertible debt liabilities
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as restated                                                                100,000,000        100,000

  Return of stock for purchase of equipment                                                            (2,500,000)        (2,500)
  Issued to officer for compensation                                                                    2,500,000          2,500
  Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Net loss
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Balance at May 31, 2006                                                                             100,000,000        100,000
  ================================================================================================================================

  For Year 2006 Activities
  ------------------------
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement and compensation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock for settlement of note payable, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Net loss
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Balance at May 31, 2007                                                                              100,000,000  $     100,000
  ================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


[table continued]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP



                                                                                     Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit


                                                                                                           Paid
                                                                                                            In          Advance on
                                                                                                          Capital          Deposit
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  <S>                                                                                                       <C>             <C>

  Balance at May 31, 2005, as previously
  reported                                                                                            $   7,389,493  $    (125,000)

  Restatement of convertible debt liabilities                                                            (1,904,802)
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as restated                                                                    5,484,691       (125,000)

  Return of stock for purchase of equipment                                                                (122,500)       125,000
  Issued to officer for compensation                                                                          1,250
  Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Net loss
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Balance at May 31, 2006                                                                                 5,363,441             --
  ==================================================================================================================================

  For Year 2006 Activities
  ------------------------
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                        28,350
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                        28,350
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                        183,862
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement and compensation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007        85,386
  Issued of preferred stock for settlement of note payable, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007             225,941
  Foreign currency translation adjustment
  Net loss
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Balance at May 31, 2007                                                                             $   5,915,330             --
  ==================================================================================================================================

</TABLE>

[table continued]


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP



                                                                                     Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit


                                                                                                          Foreign
                                                                                                          Currency   Accumulated
                                                                                                         Translation    Deficit
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                                  <C>               <C>
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as previously
  reported                                                                                           $     (45,015)    (9,330,518)

  Restatement of convertible debt liabilities                                                                            (599,842)
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as restated                                                                     (45,015)    (9,930,360)

  Return of stock for purchase of equipment
  Issued to officer for compensation
  Foreign currency translation adjustment                                                                      198
  Net loss                                                                                                             (5,106,503)
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Balance at May 31, 2006                                                                                  (44,817)   (15,036,863)
  ==================================================================================================================================

  For Year 2006 Activities
  ------------------------
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement and compensation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Issued of preferred stock for settlement of note payable, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007
  Foreign currency translation adjustment                                                                    (593)
  Net loss                                                                                                              (8,561,589)
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Balance at May 31, 2007                                                                            ($     45,410)  ($ 23,598,452)
  ==================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>

[table continued]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP



                                                                   Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit


                                                                                                         Total
                                                                                                      Stockholders'
                                                                                                          Deficit
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                                 <C>
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as previously
  reported                                                                                          $  (2,011,040)

  Restatement of convertible debt liabilities                                                          (2,504,644)
  Balance at May 31, 2005, as restated                                                                 (4,515,684)

  Return of stock for purchase of equipment                                                                   --
  Issued to officer for compensation                                                                         3,750
  Foreign currency translation adjustment                                                                      198
  Net loss                                                                                              (5,106,503)
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Balance at May 31, 2006                                                                               (9,618,239)
  =================================================================================================================

  For Year 2006 Activities
  ------------------------
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                       29,700
  Issued of preferred stock to settle obligation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                       29,700
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007                       184,308
  Issued of preferred stock for debt settlement and compensation, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 200        85,601
  Issued of preferred stock for settlement of note payable, at $0.001 per share, April 20, 2007            226,363
  Foreign currency translation adjustment                                                                    (593)
  Net loss                                                                                             (8,561,589)
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Balance at May 31, 2007                                                                           ($ 17,624,749)
  ================================================================================================================

                                                                                            See accompanying notes.
</TABLE>

                                      F-6
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP


                                                              Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                                    MAY 31, 2007     MAY 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>              <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
    Net loss                                                        $(8,561,589)     $(5,106,503)
    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
      net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
      Depreciation and depletion                                        278,309          223,652
      Amortization of defered financing costs                                             60,855
      Accretion of convertible debt discount                             31,680          637,498
      Common stock issued for Officer compensation                                         3,750
      Undistributed equity in losses (earnings) of leases                29,298          (80,709)
      Gain on settlement of investment in Wharton 3D                   (256,218)
      Gain on write off and settlement of liabilities                  (264,754)        (108,755)
      Gain on sale of investment of Prado                              (255,157)         (40,000)
      Issuance of Preferred Shares to Officers for compensation          85,811
Change in operating assets and liabilities
      Accounts receivable                                                  (214)
      Change in derivative liability                                  8,131,154        4,379,532
      Change in warrant liability                                        16,226           12,487
      Due to related parties                                            100,450
      Accounts payable and accrued expenses                             247,176          531,372
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities              (161,610)         256,961
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
    Purchase of interest in Brookshire lease                                            (19,930)
    Reimbursement of partial investment in Brookshire lease                               9,315
    Proceeds from sale of Prado                                         300,000
    Additional investment in Hamill lease                              (114,540)        (439,510)
    Additional investment in Brookshire lease                                            (95,143)
    Acquisition of patent                                               (50,000)
    Acquisition of equipment                                             (6,417)             (22)
    Proceeds from sale of Titan Consolidated Inc. common stock                           318,718
    Payments on settlement of investment in Wharton 3D                                  (100,000)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities               129,043         (326,572)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash flows from financing activities:
    Proceeds from the issuance of notes payable                         235,000          295,073
    Payments on notes payable                                          (160,463)         (59,611)
    Unpaid fees and expenses due to stockholders                                          31,624
    Payments on related party debt                                      (82,457)        (196,970)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                (7,920)          70,116
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Effect of foreign currency exchange rate on cash balance               (593)             198
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net increase (decrease) in cash                                         (41,080)             703

Cash at beginning of period                                              83,817           83,114
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash at end of period                                               $    42,737      $    83,817
================================================================================================

                                                                         See accompanying notes.
</TABLE>


                                      F-7
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                          AQUATIC CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP


                                                                                Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                                                                                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                                                                     MAY 31, 2007   MAY 31, 2006


     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

     DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2007, THE COMPANY ENTERED INTO THE
     FOLLOWING NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:

<S>         <C>                                                                                         <C>
     Issued 2,749,210 Series A Preferred Shares for Director/Officer compensation                       $ 85,811       _______
     Issued 612,500 Series A Preferred Shares for Amounts Due to Related Parties                        $243,498       _______
     Issued 421,690 Series A Preferred Shares canceling a notes payables                                $226,363       _______


     DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2006, THE COMPANY ENTERED INTO THE
     FOLLOWING NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:

     Issued 3,500,000 Titan Consolidated Inc. common shares in exchange for debt                        ________      $ 37,500
     Cancellation of 2,500,000 common shares related to cancellation of equipment purchase              ________      $125,000
     Issuance of 2,500,000 common shares to officer for compensation                                    ________      $  3,750

</TABLE>



                                      F-8
<PAGE>


NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS COMBINATION


Aquatic Cellulose International Corp. (the "Company", "Aquatic" or "AQCI") was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada in 1996. During the fiscal
year ended May 31, 2003, the Company ceased its underwater timber recovery
operations and entered the oil and gas industry by acquiring and holding
non-operating interests in oil and gas properties in the US.

Effective March 1, 2004, the Company acquired a 20 percent ownership position
and a 16 percent net revenue interest in the Hamill lease, a 3,645-acre natural
gas producing property located in Matagorda County, Texas, pursuant to an
agreement with Century Resources Inc. (now publicly traded as New Century Energy
Corp and herein referred to as "Century"). The purchase was made on the basis of
the property having existing production and revenues as compared to an
exploration property with no production. Thus, the Company agreed to assume an
increased percentage of the costs for a lesser percentage of the revenue on a
1/3 to 1/4 ratio, resulting in the 20 percent ownership stake and 16 percent net
revenue interest before royalty expense. Century has an interest in various oil
and natural gas properties. The cost of this acquisition and exclusive optional
participation agreement that was originally agreed to was $580,000 in cash and
prior to the subsequent amendment, a 15 percent ownership stake in the Company.

During July 2004, the Company completed an acquisition of a 50 percent ownership
position and a 45 percent net revenue interest of an approximately 1,400-acre
lease in the Prado Oil Field ("Prado"), located in Jim Hogg County, Texas. The
Company's 50 percent portion of the acquisition cost was $70,000. (See Notes 6)

Effective January 1, 2005, the exclusive, optional, "New Project and Exploration
Drilling Participation' agreement with Century was modified, whereby the Company
purchased the option to participate on two specific projects of interest to the
Company for a 7.5 percent ownership stake in the Company. Under the revised
agreement the Company has an exclusive right, but not the obligation, to
participate with Century, by acquiring working interests in two projects. The
first of these projects was a fifty percent (50%) working interest participation
in the drilling of the initial test well on oil and gas leases comprising the
twenty five acre Isaac Holliday tract in the William Cooper Survey in Waller
County, Texas (Brookshire Dome Field Area) (See Note 7). In June of 2005, the
Company used $19,930 of loan proceeds for the purchase of this interest as well
as approximately $96,000 in loan proceeds to participate in drilling of the
first test well on June 15, 2005. The well was temporarily plugged at a depth of
5,200 feet on June 27, 2005. This project is currently under evaluation to
determine what direction the Company will take in respect to future operations.
Seventeen of the original 26 leases taken over this prospect have expired. The
project evaluation includes the viability of extending these leases and
deepening of the test well. The second of these projects is a seventy-five
percent (75%) working interest in up to two (2) new drilling (exploration or
development drilling) prospects in Wharton or Jackson Counties, Texas developed
by Century under the Viking International 3D Agreement. New Century has since
provided the Company with written authorization to deal directly with the Viking
3D people in determining the Company's interest in pursuing this project and
other drilling projects controlled by Viking without any involvement by New
Century.


BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiary, Aquatic Cellulose Ltd. ("ACL"). All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.


BUSINESS OPERATIONS

As of May 31, 2007, the Company operated primarily in the United States,
although its corporate office is in Canada. The Company currently operates in a
single business segment and a brief description of the business operations of
each company is as follows:

ACL provides management services to AQCI and its working interests in the
Hamill, and Brookshire properties (See Notes 5, and 7).

In the past ACL has worked closely with a manufacturer on the construction of an
aquatic manipulator system now known as TigeroLynk(TM). In October of 2006 the
Company completed an agreement that resulted in the Company purchasing all
rights, title and interest to the TigeroLynk(TM) patents (US & CAN), blueprints,
drawings and concepts (See Note 4). ACL now provides management services to AQCI
and its interests in TigeroLynk(TM).


                                      F-9
<PAGE>

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

GOING CONCERN

The Company has experienced recurring losses, has a working capital deficiency
of $18,633,428 and an accumulated deficit of $23,598,452 as of May 31, 2007. Its
current investments are limited to its investments in certain oil and natural
gas producing properties in Texas. At the present time, the Company is receiving
minimal cash flow from its oil and natural gas investments. Future realization
of the Company's investment will depend upon obtaining debt and/or equity
financing to allow for the development of oil and gas properties, of which there
can be no assurance. Over the next twelve months, management is confident that
sufficient working capital will be obtained from a combination of revenue and
external financing to meet the Company's cash commitments as they become
payable. The Company has in the past successfully relied on private placements
of common stock, loans from private investors and the exercise of common stock
warrants, in order to sustain operations. The Company plans to increase the
total number of authorized shares to provide for the conversion of debentures
for equity, use equity positions as incentive for attracting professionals,
payment of professionals, sell additional shares for cash and potentially use
equity as payment for mergers and acquisitions (See Note 16). There can be no
assurance that management plans will be successful. Failure to obtain sufficient
working capital from external financing will cause the Company to curtail its
operations.

Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements are accounted for as if the
Company is a going concern and do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities or other adjustments that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company currently has no operating activities other than its working
interests in oil and gas producing properties (Notes 5, 6, and 7). The Company
recognizes revenue from its investments in oil and gas properties on the accrual
basis in proportion to its ownership interest. Net revenues include revenue from
oil and gas sales less direct lease operating expenses. Lease operating expenses
include monthly obligations to monitor and maintain production, including
monitoring personnel, electricity and sales equipment rental fees.

The Company records estimated amounts of natural gas revenue based on volumetric
calculations under its natural gas sales contract.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using
declining balance and straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of
the depreciable assets. The estimated useful lives used range from three to five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life
of the asset or the lease term. Management evaluates useful lives regularly in
order to determine recoverability taking into consideration current
technological conditions. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as
incurred; additions and betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation of the disposed assets are
removed, and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to operations.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company performs a review for impairment of proved natural gas properties on
a depletable unit basis when circumstances suggest there is a need for such
review in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 144,
ACCOUNTING FOR THE IMPAIRMENT OR DISPOSAL OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS (SFAS No. 144).
To determine if a depletable unit is impaired, the Company compares the carrying
value of the depletable unit to the undiscounted future net cash flows by
applying managements' estimates of future natural gas prices to the estimated
future production of natural gas reserves over the economic life of the
property. Future net cash flows are based upon estimates of proved reserves. In
addition, other factors such as probable and possible reserves are taken into
consideration when justified by economic conditions and actual or planned
drilling or other development activities. For a property determined to be
impaired, an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value
and the estimated fair value of the impaired property will be recognized. Fair
value, on a depletable unit basis, is estimated to the present value of the
aforementioned expected future net cash flows. Any impairment charge incurred is
recorded in accumulated depreciation, depletion, impairment and amortization to
reduce the recorded basis in the asset. Each part of this calculation is subject
to a large degree of judgment, including the determination of the depletable
units' reserves, future cash flows and fair value. For the fiscal years ended
May 31, 2007 and 2006, no impairments have been recorded on proved properties.

Unproved natural gas properties are periodically assessed and any impairment in
value is charged to impairment expense. The costs of unproved properties, which
are determined to be productive, are transferred to proved natural gas
properties and amortized on a unit of production basis. For the fiscal years
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, no impairments have been recorded on unproved
properties.

INVESTMENT IN HAMILL, PRADO AND BROOKSHIRE LEASES

The Company accounts for its investments in the Hamill, Prado and Brookshire
leases at cost initially, and the cost is adjusted for the Company's net revenue
interest in the respective leases net revenue. The cost of the investments are
increased by additional contributions to and reduced by distributions from the
respective leases.


                                      F-10
<PAGE>

The Company depletes the acquisition cost of the respective lease using
the units-of-production method as the related gas and oil reserves are produced
so that each unit of gas or oil produced is assigned a pro rata portion of the
unamortized acquisition cost plus additional improvements. The unit cost is
computed on the basis of the total estimated units of gas or oil reserves (See
Note 18). In the case of the Brookshire lease where the Company owns a 50
percent interest, the Company does not believe that consolidation is appropriate
as the other 50 percent owner has controlling interest through management of the
property (See Note 7).

AMOUNTS DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

All amounts due to related parties are non-interest bearing and payable on
demand.

 INCOME TAXES

The Company utilizes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires the recognition of deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events
that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary
differences between the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income and
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in
the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in
the financial statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the
period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be
realized or settled. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Prior to June 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based awards under the
intrinsic value method, which followed the recognition and measurement
principles of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees",
and related Interpretations. The intrinsic value method of accounting resulted
in compensation expense for stock options to the extent that the exercise prices
were set below the fair market price of the Company's stock at the date of
grant.

As of June 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) "share-based payment"
using the modified prospective method, which requires measurement of
compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant
and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to
vest. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes
valuation model, which is consistent with the Company's valuation techniques
previously utilized for options in footnote disclosures required under SFAS No.
123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation", as amended by SFAS No. 148,
"Accounting for Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure".

Since the Company did not issue stock options to employees during the fiscal
year ended May 31, 2007, there is no effect on net loss or earnings per share
had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R)
to stock-based employee compensation. When the Company issues shares of common
stock to employees and others, the shares of common stock are valued based on
the market price at the date the shares of common stock are approved for
issuance.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," requires presentation of basic earnings per
share ("Basic EPS") and diluted earnings per share ("Diluted EPS").

Basic EPS is computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by
the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares during the period.

As of May 31, 2007 and 2006, the effect of all outstanding warrants would be
anti-dilutive due to the Company's net losses. No adjustments were made to
reported net loss in the computation of EPS.

WARRANTS ISSUED IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONVERTIBLE DEBT

The Company allocates the proceeds received from convertible debt between the
liability and the warrants issued in conjunction with the debt, based on their
relative fair values, at the time of issuance. The amount allocated to the
warrants is recorded as additional paid-in capital and as a discount to the
related convertible debt. The discount is amortized to interest expense on a
yield basis over the term of the related convertible debt using the effective
interest method.

                                      F-11
<PAGE>


COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company has determined that the Company's net loss and foreign currency
translation adjustments were the only components of its comprehensive income as
of May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" effective in 1998. SFAS No.
131 requires enterprises to report financial information and descriptive
information about reportable operating segments. It also establishes standards
for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major
customers. The Company evaluated SFAS No. 131 and determined that the Company
operates in only one segment (See Note 15).

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 107, "Disclosure about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments," requires certain disclosures regarding the fair
value of financial instruments. The fair values of the Company's cash, accounts
payable, accrued expenses, amounts due to related parties and convertible
debentures approximate their carrying values due to the relatively short periods
to maturity of these instruments. The amounts shown for notes payable also
approximate fair value because current interest rates offered to the Company for
debt of similar maturities are substantially the same.

CONVERTIBLE DEBT FINANCING AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

The Company has issued convertible debt securities with non-detachable
conversion features and detachable warrants. The Company accounts for such
securities in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue Nos. 98-5, 00-19,
00-27, 05-02, 05-04 and 05-08, and SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" as amended.

In accordance with SFAS 133, the holder's conversion right provision, interest
rate adjustment provision, liquidated damages clause, cash premium option, and
the redemption option (collectively, the debt features) contained in the terms
governing the notes are not clearly and closely related to the characteristics
of the notes. Accordingly, the debt features qualify by SFAS 133 to be accounted
for separately from the debt instrument and recorded as derivative financial
instruments.

At each balance sheet date, the Company adjusts the derivative financial
instruments to their estimated fair value and analyzes the instruments to
determine their classification as a liability or equity. At May 31, 2007, the
estimated fair value of the Company's derivative liability was $14,969,891, as
well as a warrant liability of $34,455. The estimated fair value of the debt
features was determined using the probability weighted averaged expected cash
flows / Lattice Model. The model uses several assumptions including: historical
stock price volatility (utilizing a rolling 120 day period), risk free interest
rate (3.50%), remaining maturity, and the closing price of the Company's commons
stock to determine estimated fair value of the derivative liability. In valuing
the debt features at May 31, 2007, the Company used the closing price of $0.033
and the respective conversion and exercise prices for the warrants. For the
fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, there was an increase in the market value of the
Company's common stock from $0.016 at May 31, 2006 to $0.033 at May 31, 2007.

TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCY

The Company's functional currency and its reporting currency is the United
States dollar. The Company's subsidiary, ACL, operates in Canada and its
operations are conducted in Canadian currency and therefore its functional
currency is the Canadian dollar. In consolidation, foreign currency translation
gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

There are no new accounting pronouncements not previously disclosed that are not
yet effective but expected to affect the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

ESTIMATES

The preparations of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and
expenses during the period presented. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.


                                      F-12
<PAGE>

NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment is summarized as follows at May 31, 2007:

                                               2007

          Computer equipment                 $ 5,769
          Furniture and equipment             10,231
          Leasehold improvements               4,853
                                             -------
                                              20,853
          Less: accumulated depreciation      13,738
                                             -------
                                             $ 7,115
                                             =======

Depreciation expense was $1,466 and $408 for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively.


NOTE 4 - ADVANCE ON EQUIPMENT PURCHASES AND SETTLEMENT OF DEBT

The Company has an advance of $100,000 put towards the purchase of one
TigeroLynk machine, at a total expected cost of $750,000. While the contract
with the original contractor has terminated, the Company has the mechanical arm
and assembly, representing a significant portion of the machine construction,
stored at Beaver Manufacturing Ltd, in Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. The
Company has since acquired all patents and associated blueprints and drawings
with the intention of completing the construction and eventual marketing of the
technology (See below).

In addition to the 100,000 on deposit for the TigeroLynk equipment, the Company
has, since the period ended November 30, 2005, been in negotiations on a
settlement agreement with Gary Ackles regarding amounts owed Ackles. As of the
period ended August 31, 2006, the Company had on deposit with Ackles a 25,000
payment and additional deposits aggregating to $196,970.

In October of 2006 the Company closed the final settlement agreement with Gary
Ackles, the Company's former CEO. This agreement resulted in the Company
purchasing from Ackles all rights, title and interest to the TigeroLynk(TM)
patents (US & CAN), blueprints, drawings and concepts for $250,000 (including
$20,000 in late payment penalties) as condition upon Ackles agreeing to accept
the $25,000, on deposit with him, as payment for unpaid expenses and
relinquishing the remaining total of $450,889 in other amounts owed to him. The
payment to Ackles was the $196,970 that was also on deposit with him, as well as
an additional payment of $40,000 on the deal closing date. The purchase of the
TigeroLynk(TM) technology involved the following commitments to Ackles; 1) a
50/50 (percent) profit share agreement with Ackles on the first 5 TigeroLynk(TM)
machines sold, 2) a 7.5 percent royalty assignment on the first five machines,
reducing to 5 percent on each successive machine. Additionally, the Company has
committed to issue 5 percent of its issued and outstanding stock to Ackles, as
incentive to completing the settlement agreement, pending the completion of the
process to increase the authorized shares.

Also in October 2006, the Company completed a settlement agreement with Legacy,
whereby the Company will exchange 1.08 percent of its issued and outstanding
shares, when new shares become available, for the total of $124,000 owed to
Legacy, comprised of $80,000 for unpaid licensing fees and a $44,000 loan. The
final settlement reached relinquishes Ackles and Legacy of any rights, title or
interest in the equipment.

The consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year-ended May 31, 2007,
include an intangible asset of $50,000 for the US and Canadian patents and
associated blueprints and drawings.

                                      F-13
<PAGE>

NOTE 5 - INVESTMENT IN HAMILL LEASE

The investment in Hamill lease consists of the following for fiscal year ended
May 31, 2007:


          Balance at beginning of fiscal year             $ 932,305
          Additional investment                             114,538
          Proportionate equity in natural gas revenue       326,862
          Receipt of earnings in Hamill lease              (351,085)
          Depletion of investment cost                     (276,814)
                                                          ---------
                                                          $ 745,806
                                                          =========

The Hamill lease represents a significant equity investment of the Company. The
following table presents the total revenue, expenses and net income for the
Hamill lease, as well as the Company's proportionate share.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED ENDED                           MAY 31, 2007                         MAY 31, 2006
                                                     LEASE TOTAL          AQCI %          LEASE TOTAL         AQCI %
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>                  <C>             <C>                 <C>
TOTAL REVENUE                                            $2,042,894           $326,862        $3,336,350          $533,816
TOTAL LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES                             $381,565            $76,638          $396,405           $79,281
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME                                               $1,661,329           $250,224        $2,939,945          $454,535
</TABLE>



On September 18, 2006 the Company paid to New Century its 20 percent pro-rata
share, totaling $68,634.30 for 1,610 acres State of Texas oil and gas leases in
the offshore area of Matagorda County, Texas. Four new leases totaling 1,610
acres have been acquired by the Company, and this acreage is contiguous with the
Company's onshore Sargent South Field acreage. The new leases are subject to the
Company's Joint Operating Agreement with New Century Energy Corp and have a term
of five years and expire on April 4, 2011.

During March 2007, the Company executed a Partial Assignment of Oil and Gas
Lease and Bill of Sale, whereby the Company conveyed to the Company's working
interest partner, Century Resources Inc., all of the Company's rights title and
interest in Hamill and Hamill leasehold for all depths below a depth of 7,000
feet below the surface. In addition the Company assigned all of its interests,
regardless of depth, in Hamill & Hamill well numbers 19 and 1-R. In return,
Century repaid the Company all deposits made toward the Hamill 1-R work over and
released the Company of all prior commitments made regarding that well.

NOTE 6 - INVESTMENT IN PRADO LEASE

The investment in Prado lease consists of the following for fiscal year ended
May 31, 2007:

       Balance at beginning of fiscal year                           $  49,918
       Uncollectible accounts receivable in disposition of asset        (5,075)
       Sale of all working interest to New Century                    (300,000)
       Gain on Disposition of Asset                                    255,157
                                                                     ---------
                                                                     $       0
                                                                     =========

On September 21, 2006 the Company's (together with New Century Energy Corp)
agreement with Strong Petroleum Group ended. On September 28, 2006 a Memorandum
Concerning the Termination of the Development Agreement with Strong was signed
by the Company, New Century and Strong.

On October 6, 2006 the Company sold all of its 50% Prado field working interest
to New Century Energy Corp. in exchange for $300,000 in cash and a
relinquishment by New Century of all of New Century's 7.5% interest in the
Company's issued and outstanding stock to be issued following the Company's
restructuring. This 7.5 percent interest in the Company's stock was as per the
January 1, 2005 First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale and Exploration
Agreement with New Century.

NOTE 7 - INVESTMENT IN BROOKSHIRE LEASE

The investment in Brookshire lease consists of the following for fiscal year
ended May 31, 2007:


     Initial investment in Brookshire lease (See Notes 1 and 10)     $  19,930

     Additional investment (See Note 10)                                95,143

     Reimbursement of drilling costs                                    (9,315)
                                                                     ---------

                                                                     $ 105,758
                                                                     =========

                                       F-14
<PAGE>

NOTE 8 - AMOUNTS DUE TO RELATED PARTIES


Amounts due to related parties consist of the following at May 31, 2007:



          Unpaid license agreement between Legacy

             Systems and Company  (See Note 4)                   80,000

          Unpaid consulting fees due to Sheridan Westgarde

             (See Note 14)                                        3,000

          Unpaid consulting fees to Harvey Smith

                                                                 19,000

          Unpaid consulting fees to Lonnie Hayward

              (See Note 14)                                       2,996

          Funds borrowed from Legacy Systems


               (See Note 14)                                     44,000
                                                               --------

                                                               $148,996
                                                               ========


All amounts due to related parties are non-interest bearing and payable on
demand.

Also in October 2006, the Company completed a settlement agreement with Legacy,
whereby the Company will exchange 1.08 percent of its issued and outstanding
shares, pending the increase in the Company's authorized shares, for the total
of $124,000 owed to Legacy, comprised of $80,000 for unpaid licensing fees and a
$44,000 loan.

NOTE 9 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES AND WARRANTS

Convertible debentures aggregating $780,800 are payable and bear interest at 12
percent, due on a quarterly basis, and are secured by a first priority interest
in the Company's assets. Any amount of principal or interest due under the
debentures, which is not paid when due will bear interest at 15 percent per
annum from the due date thereof until the amount is paid. These debentures are
convertible, at the investors' sole option, into common shares at the lesser of
$0.078 per share (fixed conversion price) or 75 percent of the average of the
lowest three inter-day sales prices during the twenty days immediately preceding
the conversion date.

During March 2004 and August 2004, the Company issued a $900,000 and $250,000,
respectively, of convertible notes and warrants. Convertible debentures payable
bear interest at 10 percent, due on a quarterly basis, and are secured by a
first priority interest in the Company's assets. Any amount of principal or
interest due under the debentures, which is not paid when due will bear interest
at 15 percent per annum from the due date thereof until the amount is paid.
These debentures are convertible, at the investors' sole option, into common
shares at the lesser of $0.004 per share (fixed conversion price) or 75 percent
of the average of the lowest three inter-day sales prices during the twenty days
immediately preceding the conversion date.

On April 29, 2007, the Company and the investors agreed to increase the discount
percentage on the notes from 70% to 75%. If, at any time, the Company issues or
sells any shares of common stock for no or below market consideration (dilutive
issuance), then immediately upon the dilutive issuance, the fixed conversion
price will be reduced to the amount of the consideration per share received by
the Company in such dilutive issuance. The number of common shares issuable upon
the conversion of the debentures is limited to 4.9 percent in beneficial
ownership by the debenture holders and its affiliates of the outstanding shares
of common stock. Once the maximum amount of common shares has been issued, in
lieu of any further right to convert the debentures, the Company shall pay to
the debenture holder, an amount equal to 130 percent of the then outstanding
principal amount of the debenture plus accrued and unpaid interest and other
related charges within fifteen business days of the maximum conversion date. If
the Company exercises its right to prepay the debentures, the Company will make
payment to the debenture holders in an amount equal to 150 percent of the sum of
the then outstanding principal amount of the debentures plus accrued and unpaid
interest on the unpaid principal amount of the debenture to the optional
prepayment date plus any other related penalties. The debentures do not
automatically convert to common shares on their due dates.


                                      F-15
<PAGE>

After a thorough analysis and review of the terms of the note and respective
covenants, the Company has determined the appropriate method of accounting is
including the entire debt as a current liability on the balance sheet, since the
debt is immediately convertible at the option of the holder.

The proceeds from the financing transactions were allocated to the debt features
and to the warrants based upon their fair values. After the latter allocations,
the remaining value, if any, is allocated to the Note on the financial
statements.

The debt discount is being accreted using the effective interest method over the
term of the note. The value of the discount on the converted notes on the books
is being accreted over the term of the note (two years). For the fiscal years
ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company accreted $31,680 and $637,498,
respectively, of debt discount related to the notes.

Warrants Issued

The estimated fair values of the warrants at issuance were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Initial
                                   Number of          Value at           Volatility
  Date of Warrants Issued          Warrants           Issuance             Factor
-----------------------------    --------------    ----------------    ---------------
<S>                                    <C>         <C>                        <C>
March 22, 2004                         900,000     $        3,585             254  %
August 6, 2004                         250,000     $          552             254  %
</TABLE>


These amounts have been classified as a derivative instrument and recorded as a
liability on the Company's balance sheet in accordance with current
authoritative guidance. The estimated fair value of the warrants was determined
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with a closing price of on the date
of issuance and the respective exercise price, a 5 year term, and the volatility
factor relative to the date of issuance. The model uses several assumptions
including: historical stock price volatility (utilizing a rolling 120 day
period), risk-free interest rate (3.50%), remaining time till maturity, and the
closing price of the Company's common stock to determine estimated fair value of
the derivative liability. In valuing the warrants at May 31, 2007, the Company
used the closing price of $0.033, the respective exercise price, the remaining
term on each warrant, and a volatility of 124%. In accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments, the Company
is required to adjust the carrying value of the instrument to its fair value at
each balance sheet date and recognize any change since the prior balance sheet
date as a component of Other Income (Expense). For the fiscal year ended May 31,
2006, the warrant derivative liability had increased to a value of $18,229, due
in part to an increase in the market value of the Company's common stock to
$0.016 from $0.005 at May 31, 2005, which resulted in an "Other Expense" item of
$12,487 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006. For the fiscal year ended May
31, 2007, the warrant derivative liability had increased to a value of $34,455,
due in part to an increase in the market value of the Company's common stock to
$0.033 from $0.016 at May 31, 2006, which resulted in an "Other Expense" item of
$16,226 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007. The Company used a closing price
of $0.033 the respective exercise prices, remaining time till maturity and a
124% volatility factor.

The recorded value of such warrants can fluctuate significantly based on
fluctuations in the market value of the underlying securities of the issuer of
the warrants, as well as in the volatility of the stock price during the term
used for observation and the term remaining for the warrants.

Debt Features
--------------

In accordance with SFAS 133, the debt features provision (collectively, the
features) contained in the terms governing the notes are not clearly and closely
related to the characteristics of the notes. Accordingly, the features qualified
as embedded derivative instruments at issuance and, because they do not qualify
for any scope exception within SFAS 133, they were required by SFAS 133 to be
accounted for separately from the debt instrument and recorded as derivative
financial instruments.


                                      F-16
<PAGE>

Pursuant to the terms of the notes, these notes are convertible at the option of
the holder, at anytime on or prior to maturity. There is an additional interest
rate adjustment feature, a liquidated damages clause, a cash premium option as
well as the redemption option. The debt features represents an embedded
derivative that is required to be accounted for apart from the underlying notes.
At issuance of the notes, the debt features had an estimated initial fair value
as follows, which was recorded as a discount to the Notes and a derivative
liability on the consolidated balance sheet.


                          Amount of       Debt Features           Initial
       Date of Note         Notes       Value at Issuance      Carrying Value
--------------------    -------------   -----------------    -----------------
May 31, 2003            $    780,800    $       1,281,362     $              -
March 22, 2004          $    900,000    $         768,413     $        128,002
August 6, 2004          $    250,000    $         209,989     $         39,459

In subsequent periods, if the price of the security changes, the embedded
derivative financial instrument related to the debt features will be adjusted to
the fair value with the corresponding charge or credit to Other Expense or
Income. The estimated fair value of the debt features was determined using the
probability weighted averaged expected cash flows / Lattice Model with the
closing price on original date of issuance, a conversion price based on the
terms of the respective contract, a period based on the terms of the notes, and
a volatility factor on the date of issuance. The model uses several assumptions
including: historical stock price volatility (utilizing a rolling 120 day
period), risk-free interest rate (3.50%), remaining maturity, and the closing
price of the Company's common stock to determine estimated fair value of the
derivative liability. In valuing the debt features at May 31, 2007, the Company
used the closing price of $0.033 and the respective conversion price, a
remaining term coinciding with each contract, and a volatility of 124%. For the
fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, due in part to an increase in the market value
of the Company's common stock to $0.016 from $0.005 at May 31, 2005, the Company
recorded Other Expense on the consolidated statement of operations for the
change in fair value of the debt features of approximately $4,379,532. At May
31, 2006, the estimated fair value of the debt features was approximately
$6,838,737. For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, the estimated value of the
debt features increased to $14,969,891, thus the Company recorded Other Expense
on the consolidated statement of operations for the change in fair value of the
debt features related to these notes of $8,131,154 for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2007.

The recorded value of the debt features related to the notes can fluctuate
significantly based on fluctuations in the fair value of the Company's common
stock, as well as in the volatility of the stock price during the term used for
observation and the term remaining for the warrants.

The significant fluctuations can create significant income and expense items on
the financial statements of the Company.

Because the terms of the 2003 - 2005 convertible notes ("notes") require such
classification, the accounting rules required additional convertible notes and
non-employee warrants to also be classified as liabilities, regardless of the
terms of the new notes and / or warrants. This presumption has been made due to
the Company no longer having the control to physical or net share settle
subsequent convertible instruments because it is tainted by the terms of the
notes. Were the notes to not have contained those terms or even if the
transactions were not entered into, it could have altered the treatment of the
other notes and the conversion features of the latter agreement may have
resulted in a different accounting treatment from the liability classification.
The 2005 notes and warrants, as well as any subsequent convertible notes or
warrants, will be treated as derivative liabilities until all such provisions
are settled.

For the fiscal years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded Other
Expense of $8,179,060 and $5,029,517, respectively, related to the derivative
features of the convertible debt, as shown in the following chart:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   INTEREST EXPENSE RELATED TO CONVERTIBLE DEBT           May 31, 2007    May 31, 2006
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>
        2003 and 2004 Derivative Liability                $(8,131,154)     $(4,379,532)
        2003 and 2004 Warrant Liability                       (16,226)         (12,487)
        Accretion of 2003 convertible debt                         (1)        (271,245)
        Accretion of 2004 convertible debt                    (31,679)        (366,253)
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Total Interest Expense related to Convertible Debt      (8,179,060)      (5,029,517)
   ===================================================================================
</TABLE>

                                      F-17
<PAGE>


The balance of the carrying value of the convertible debt as of May 31, 2007 is:



          $1,899,120     May 31, 2006 value
              31,680     accretion of convertible debt
          ----------
          $1,930,800     May 31, 2007 carrying value of debt


The balance of the carrying value of the derivative liability as of May 31, 2007
is:


          $ 6,838,737     May 31, 2006 value of derivative liability
            1,008,246     increase in values of 2003 derivative liability
            7,122,908     increase in values of 2004 derivative liability
          -----------
          $14,969,891     May 31, 2007 value of derivative liability

The balance of the carrying value of the warrant liability as of May 31, 2007
is:

          $18,229     May 31, 2006 value of warrant liability
                0     expense, increase in values of 2003 warrant liability
           16,226     expense, increase in values of 2004 warrant liability
          -------
          $34,455     May 31, 2007 value of warrant liability

In connection with these convertible debentures, the Company had $1,272,640 of
accrued interest at May 31, 2007 which is included in accrued expenses in these
consolidated financial statements.

All convertible debentures are issued to the same group, thus no conflict exists
with security in the first priority interest in the Company's assets.

During April 2007, the Holders of the Company's convertible notes (the
"investors") proposed that the Company hire a consultant designated by the
investors. The Company declined the proposal, deciding instead to conserve
resources for addressing specific needs of the Company. On April 25, 2007, the
investors filed with the Company a letter claiming an Event of Default as
defined in the terms of the notes. On April 29, 2007, the Company and the
investors agreed to cancel the claim of Event of Default and increase the
discount percentage on the notes from 70% to 75%.

NOTE 10 - NOTES PAYABLE

In November 2003, the Company signed a loan agreement with an investor for
$25,000, to be repaid in three equal payments over the course of sixty months.
The Company agreed to issue 200,000 shares pending increase in the Company's
authorized shares (See Note 16). The Company used $15,000 of these investment
proceeds to engage First Line Capital LLC of New York to perform legal services
in relation to future funding and financing of the Company.

In September 2003, the Company signed an agreement with an investor to provide a
loan of approximately $28,000 that would be exchanged for shares pending the
Company increasing its authorized shares. The note is convertible into 200,000
shares of the Company's common stock. During July 2004, the Company received an
additional short-term loan in the amount of approximately $8,000, which was
used, along with Company's available cash, to fund the purchase of the 50
percent ownership interest in the Prado field lease. The Company agreed to repay
the $8,000 once funding became available and agreed to pay interest at 20
percent of the amount borrowed over the next 12 months. Following the closing of
the $250,000 convertible debentures in August 2004, the investor declined the
repayment in favor of re-investing his principal and 20 percent proceeds with
the Company. Thus, the total aggregate of the loan is $36,791 and is included in
notes payable in these consolidated financial statements.


                                      F-18
<PAGE>

In June of 2005, the Company entered into a working capital loan agreement with
United Business Associates ("UBA"), a company owned by the Company's current CEO
and Lonnie Hayward, a consultant. In November 2005 the Company revised the UBA
agreement terms such that the loan will have a six-month interest free period
commencing on January 1, 2006, following which it will bear interest at 20% and
be payable on demand. As of November 30, 2005 the Company had used $195,073 of
these funds for the purchase and development of the Brookshire lease and
additional investment in the Hamill Lease to increase production. During April
2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 421,690 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred stock to UBA. The stock is issued as full settlement of
the amount owed to UBA, principle plus interest as of March 31, 2007, of
$226,363 that was previously recorded in the Company's notes payable (See Note
14).

On June 1, 2005, 47,300,000 share certificates of Titan Oil and Gas (formerly
Titan Consolidated Inc. and herein referred to as "Titan"), were received by the
Company. Titan represented that the shares were valued, and the Company agreed,
at $460,000. These shares were issued to the Company as consideration for a 40
percent working interest in the Company's Prado field interest (See Note 6). An
agreement was also reached with Titan, whereby the Prado field property interest
would be switched to a different property interest that the Company may elect to
participate on in the future, the Wharton 3D project. During the three-month
period ended November 30, 2005, the Company anticipated utilizing these funds
for the Wharton 3D project. During the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, the
Company sold Titan shares to third parties for $286,715 in cash, exchanged 7.3
million Titan shares with Gary Ackles, the Company's former CEO, for a $32,000
increase in the amount on deposit with Ackles and with respect to the ongoing
negotiation to settle all amounts owed to Ackles and exchanged $37,500 in
Company debt for approximately 3,500,000 shares of Titan common stock. During
November 2005, Titan notified the Company that it was no longer interested in
acquiring a 40 percent interest in the Wharton 3D project (switched from the
Prado lease), and decided to terminate their agreement with the Company. On
December 1, 2005, Titan signed an agreement to accept $100,000 in cash as full
remuneration of their initial investment in Wharton 3D (switched from Prado). As
of February 28, 2006, the Company had paid the settlement amount to Titan in
full and Titan has acknowledged that they no longer have any claim or rights to
the Company's Wharton 3D or Prado field interest. During the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2006, the Company recorded a $255,157 gain on settlement of Wharton 3D
project. (See Note 1)

During January 2006, the Company received a loan of $50,000 from a Mr. Don
Morgan of Portland Oregon. The Company agreed to repay the loan in over 24
monthly payments with 10 percent interest. The principle balance owing of
$19,926 as at May 31, 2007, is included in notes payable.

During July and September 2006, the Company received a loan from Mr. Lonnie
Hayward, a consultant to the Company, and a Company controlled by Mr. Hayward
for an aggregate amount of $180,000. Funds were used to cover costs associated
with the development of the Hamill lease. The Company agreed to pay Mr. Hayward
$200,000 in return for his loan at such time as the Company is able. In October
2006, the Company made a partial payment to Mr. Hayward in the amount of
$120,000 (See Note 14).

During November 2006, the Company accepted a loan from Mr. Peter Matousak for
$15,000. The proceeds were paid directly to NewsUSA, a North American news media
service, and on the Company's behalf representing the first month payment on the
Company's contract with NewsUSA. In the agreement the Company Board of Directors
approved to issue Mr. Matousak 500,000 shares of Company stock with piggy back
registration rights and to be issued following the increase in the Company's
authorized shares and change the Company name.

NOTE 11 - INCOME TAXES

The reconciliation of the effective income tax rate to the Federal statutory
rate is as follows for the fiscal years ended May 31:

                                    2007        2006
                                   -------     ------
Federal Income Tax Rate            (34.0)%    (34.0)%
Effect of Valuation Allowance       34.0%      34.0%
                                  -------     ------
Effective Income Tax Rate            0.0%       0.0%
                                  =======     ======

At May 31, 2007, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards for Federal
income tax purposes of approximately $4,800,000. Because of the current
uncertainty of realizing the benefit of the tax carry-forwards, a valuation
allowance equal to the tax benefit for deferred taxes has been established. The
full realization of the tax benefit associated with the carry-forwards depends
predominantly upon the Company's ability to generate taxable income during the
carry-forward period.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant
components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:


                                      F-19
<PAGE>

          Deferred Tax Assets
               Loss Carry-forwards           $(2,486,075)
               Less: Valuation Allowance      (2,486,075)
                                             -----------
          Net Deferred Tax Asset             $      --
                                             ===========

Net operating loss carry-forwards expire starting in 2012 through 2026. Per year
availability is subject to change of ownership limitations under Internal
Revenue Code Section 382.

NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LEASE OPERATING AGREEMENT

The Company has a Lease Operating Agreement in place with Century. The agreement
requires the Company to pay its 20% share of lease operating fees, with the
amount totaling approximately $76,000 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007.
The agreement also details the Company's responsibility for 20% of all lease
operating expenses, unscheduled repair, maintenance or re-completion of the
lease or wells on an as required basis and of all future development costs. The
lease agreement continues for as long as the Company has a working interest in
the Hamill lease.

NOTE 13 - COMMON STOCK

COMMON STOCK

The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of $0.001 par common stock. As of
May 31, 2007 and 2006, 100,000,000 shares were issued and outstanding. The
Company plans to increase the total number of authorized shares to provide for
the conversion of debentures for equity, use equity positions as incentive for
attracting professionals, payment of professionals, sell additional shares for
cash and potentially use equity as payment for mergers and acquisitions (See
Note 16).

During June 2001, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of restricted stock at
$0.05 per share for deposit on the purchase of equipment (price reflected market
price) for a total value of $125,000. As of May 31, 2004, the agreement has been
formally canceled by the seller. Therefore, the value of the shares of $125,000
has been presented as a contra equity item, as the Company determined that the
amount no longer represents an asset as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Concepts No. 5 "Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements
of Business Enterprises". The Company has had difficulty in retrieving the
original restricted share certificates due to the death of the stockholder. As
of May 31, 2005, the Company had received from the executor of the stockholder's
estate a letter informing the Company that they are unable to return the
original stock certificates due to their being lost or destroyed and
instructions to the Company's transfer agent to cancel the certificates. During
the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006, the Company received notice of cancellation
of the original stock certificates by the transfer agent. After cancellation of
the stock certificates related to the purchase of equipment, the Company issued
the 2,500,000 shares of its common stock to its CEO for compensation totaling
$3,750 (See Note 14).

In accordance with the debenture agreement (See Note 9), the Company is required
to, during the period the conversion rights exists, reserve from its authorized
and unissued common stock a sufficient number of shares to provide for the
issuance of common stock upon the full conversion of the debentures.

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of $0.001 par Preferred stock. The
Board of Directors has the authority to issue preferred stock and to fix and
determine its series, relative rights and preferences.

On March 30, 2007, the Board of Directors approved a new series of 5,000,000
convertible preferred stock allocated from the Company's 10,000,000 authorized
preferred shares. A Certificate of Designation was filed with the Nevada
Secretary of State assigning certain preferential rights to these shares
including; i) one Series A Convertible Preferred share has the equivalent of
1000 common share votes, ii) one Series A Convertible Preferred share will have
the right, at the exclusive option of the holder, to convert to 61 common shares
of the Company, once such shares become available through the increase in the
Company's authorized common shares, iii) these shares also have ratchet
provision rights, registration rights and piggy back registration rights, as
well as 10:1 liquidation rights. Shareholders can determine all of the rights
and preferences of the Series A Convertible Preferred shares by consulting the
Certificate of Designation as filed with the Nevada Secretary of State.


                                      F-20
<PAGE>

As of May 31, 2007, 3,783,390 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock are
issued.

NOTE 14 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On May 2, 2007, the Company Sole Board of Directors approved the appointment of
Mr. Lonnie Hayward to the Board of Directors. Mr. Hayward was appointed to fill
a vacancy and as permitted by the Company's Articles of Incorporation and
By-laws.

During March 2004, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Lonnie
Hayward, a Consultant who was instrumental in the Company acquiring the working
interest in the Hamill lease. The consulting agreement, effective December 15,
2004, was for one year and provided for consulting fees of $3,500 cash and
$1,500 worth of Company common stock. As of fiscal year ended May 31, 2007, the
Company has continued to honor the terms of Mr. Hayward's original contract and
have been doing so on a month to month basis. As of March 31, 2007,
approximately $59,190 was owed to Mr. Hayward for unpaid consulting fees. During
July and September 2006, the Company received a loan from Mr. Lonnie Hayward, a
consultant to the Company, and a Company controlled by Mr. Hayward for an
aggregate amount of $180,000. Funds were used to cover costs associated with the
development of the Hamill lease. The Company agreed to pay Mr. Hayward $200,000
in return for his loan at such time as the Company is able. In October 2006, the
Company made a partial payment to Mr. Hayward in the amount of $120,000. During
April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 166,151 shares of
Series A Convertible Preferred stock to Lonnie Hayward as settlement of all
amounts owed to Mr. Hayward for consulting and 49,200 shares as additional bonus
compensation for the $180,000 that Mr. Hayward loaned to the Company during July
and September of 2006. In addition, the Company had committed to make Mr.
Hayward a 27 percent shareholder in the issued and outstanding shares following
initial issuance to stakeholders. During April 2007, the Board of Directors
approved the issuance of 1,350,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
stock to Lonnie Hayward as settlement of the Company's long standing obligation
to make Mr. Hayward a twenty seven percent owner of the Company's issued and
outstanding shares, calculated following all issuances of stock to certain stake
holders (See Note 10 and 13 - Preferred Stock).

The Company had a three-year consulting agreement with it's CEO, Director and
President that commenced April 1, 2003. Effective, March 1, 2004, this agreement
was modified to reduce the cash portion of the monthly consulting fee to $5,000
per month and include $1,500 per month in stock compensation. During October
2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved a new contract for Mr. Sheridan
Westgarde, the Company's CEO. The contract has a three-year term commencing
September 1, 2006 and providing for monthly consulting fees of $7,500, of which
$6,000 is payable in cash and the remaining $1,500 in stock for services
rendered. In addition, the Board of Directors renewed the commitment, made in
the previous April 1, 2003 agreement, to make the CEO a significant shareholder
in the Company with a share position of 5 percent of the new authorized share
volume of the Company or at Westgarde's option, a 27 percent ownership position
in the issued and outstanding shares following initial issuance to stakeholders.
Additionally, this new contract contains a termination provision providing Mr.
Westgarde a 24 month severance and a guarantee on his un-issued stock. During
April 2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 1,350,000 shares of
Series A Convertible Preferred stock to Sheridan Westgarde as settlement of the
Company's commitment to make Mr. Westgarde a twenty seven percent owner of the
Company's issued and outstanding shares, calculated following all issuances of
stock to certain stake holders (See Note 13 - Preferred Stock).

As of March 31, 2007, approximately $137,948 was owed to Mr. Westgarde for
unpaid consulting fees and $46,360 for stock loaned to the Company. During April
2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 446,349 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred stock to Sheridan Westgarde as settlement of all amounts
owed to Mr. Westgarde for consulting and stock Mr. Westgarde previously loaned
to the Company (See Notes 8 and 13 - Preferred Stock).

During July 2006, the company finalized the cancellation of the 2,500,000 shares
of restricted stock that were originally on deposit for the purchase of
equipment. Subsequently the Board of Directors approved the issuance of these
shares as compensation to the Company's CEO. At the time of issuance the stock
was valued at $3,750 (See Note 13).


During July 2004, the Company received short term loans from its CEO, a
consultant and another individual for a total of $42,000, which was used, along
with Company's available cash, to fund the purchase of the 50 percent ownership
position in the Prado Field lease (See Note 6). The Company agreed to repay the
loan amount borrowed once funding becomes available and agreed to pay an
additional 20 percent of the amount borrowed over the next 12 months. Following
the closing of the $250,000 convertible debentures in August 2004, the CEO and
the consultant were repaid their principal amounts plus 10 percent, while the
other individual declined repayment in favor of re-investing his principal and
proceeds with the Company. As of the date of this filing the remaining 10
percent has not been paid.

During May 2004, the Company borrowed $44,000 from Legacy Systems Corporation, a
Company owned by the former CEO. The security for the loan was the aquatic
timber harvesting equipment (See Note 4 and 8).

                                      F-21
<PAGE>

In June of 2005, the Company entered into a working capital loan agreement with
United Business Associates ("UBA"), a company owned by the Company's current CEO
and Lonnie Hayward, a consultant. In November 2005 the Company revised the UBA
agreement terms such that the loan will have a six-month interest free period
commencing on January 1, 2006, following which it will bear interest at 20% and
be payable on demand. As of November 30, 2005 the Company had used $195,073 of
these funds for the purchase and development of the Brookshire lease and
additional investment in the Hamill Lease to increase production. During April
2007, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 421,690 shares of Series A
Convertible Preferred stock to UBA. The stock is issued as full settlement of
the $226,363, principle plus interest as of March 31, 2007, owed to UBA, that
was previously recorded in the Company's notes payable and accrued interest.
(See Note 10)

During November 2005, the Company received a short term loan from a Company
owned by a consultant to the Company for a total of $50,000, which was used,
along with Company's available cash, to fund the settlement payments to Ackles
and a related party (See Note 4). During December 2005, the Company repaid the
loan in full.

During February 2006, Mr. Les Westgarde, a related party to the Company's
current CEO, has been providing business and administrative consulting services
to the Company for $3,000 per month and $500 per month in expenses. In October
2006 the Company's Board of Directors approved a new agreement to pay Mr.
Westgarde $5,000 per month for the three months period of October through
December 2006, following which the Company will have the option to pay 20
percent in stock for services rendered.

NOTE 15 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

During the fiscal years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had foreign
assets in Canada. The following geographic area data for trade revenues is based
on product or service delivery location, and property, plant, and equipment is
based on physical location.


Net earnings from external sources at May 31:

                                           2007           2006
                                        ----------     ----------
          United States                 $  250,224     $  457,243
          Canada                              --             --
                                        ----------     ----------
                                        $  250,224     $  457,243
                                        ==========     ==========
          Segment assets at May 31:
                                              2007           2006
                                        ----------     ----------
          United States                 $  991,476     $1,368,769
          Canada                            10,154        102,190
                                        ----------     ----------
                                        $1,001,630     $1,470,959
                                        ==========     ==========


NOTE 16 - SCHEDULE 14C INFORMATION STATEMENT

On or about April 24, 2007, the Company received written consent in lieu of a
meeting of Stockholders from (i) shareholders holding 950,000 shares of common
stock entitled to one vote per share; and (ii) shareholders holding 2,700,000
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock entitled to 1000 votes per share,
a total of 2,700,950,000 votes, approving an amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation of the Company (the "Amendment"), to change the name of the
Company to Valor Energy Corporation and to increase the maximum number of shares
of stock that the Company shall be authorized to have outstanding at any time to
three billion (3,000,000,000) shares of common stock at par value of $.001 with
no preemptive rights. These additional shares will have the same rights,
privileges, preferences and restrictions as the Company's shares of common stock
which are currently authorized. As the holders of the Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock, these shareholders have the right to vote one thousand times
for each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held on all matters
submitted to the shareholders.

On April 24, 2007, pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes ("NRS") 78.315, the Board
of Directors of the Company approved the above-mentioned actions, subject to the
Commissions review.

The increase in authorized shares will allow the Company to facilitate
conversion of existing convertible debt (See Notes 9).


                                      F-22
<PAGE>

The change of our Company name will better identify the Company in the new
business.

The Company has made certain stock commitments to consultants and key
individuals and they are as follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL                                      PROPOSED PERCENTAGE OF ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING STOCK FOLLOWING
                                                               ISSUANCE TO MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS
<S>                                                                         <C>
Gary Ackles for settlement of amounts due
(See Notes 4 and 8)                                                         5.00%

Harvey Smith for expertise & consulting                                     4.89%
</TABLE>


(See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 17 Subsequent Events)

NOTE 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On May 11, 2007, the Company received a letter from the Securities and Exchange
Commission containing comments regarding the Company's PRER 14/C filing. On June
14, 2007 the Company filed with the Commission a revised PRER 14/C Shareholder
information statement with certain changes to address those comments (See Note
16).

During July and August the Company received two comment letters from the
Securities and Exchange Commission in regards to the Company's PRER 14/C
information statement filed on June 14, 2007, and the Company's prior financial
filings. As of the date of this filing the Company is presently working to
respond to these comments.

NOTE 18 - ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF PROVED OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND PRESENT VALUE
OF ESTIMATED FUTURE NET REVENUE This section provides information required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69, Disclosures about Oil and
Gas Producing Activities.

During fiscal year ending May 31, 2007, the Company received a new report for
the period as of January 1, 2007 produced by R.A. Lenser and Associates,
registered petroleum engineers and geologists. The proved reserves estimates in
the report conform to the definitions as set forth in the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation S-X Part 210.4-10 (a) as clarified by various
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletins and to the definitions endorsed by the
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), the Society of Petroleum Evaluation
Engineers (SPEE) and the World Petroleum Congresses (WPC)."

R. A. Lenser & Associates, independent petroleum engineers located in Houston,
Texas, prepared estimates of the net proved natural gas reserves as of January
1, 2007 for the South Sargent Field, Hamill Lease. The reserve estimates were
prepared using constant prices and costs in accordance with the guidelines of
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The prices used in preparation
of the reserve estimates were based on the market prices in effect as of
December 31 2006, with the appropriate adjustments (transportation, gravity,
basic sediment and water ("BS&W,") purchasers' bonuses, Btu, etc.) applied to
each field. The reserve estimates represent the gross property revenue for the
Hamill Lease (South Sargent Field).

Our proved undeveloped (PUD) reserves primarily relate to reserves that are to
be recovered from six new proved drilling locations. Since our Hamill Lease
located in the South Sargent field in Matagorda County, Texas is in an area with
multiple pay zones, this property has proved producing, proved non-producing and
proved undeveloped reserves.

Proved undeveloped reserves associated with the Hamill Lease in the South
Sargent field in Matagorda County, Texas accounts for approximately 100% of our
proved undeveloped gas reserves. We consider these reserves to be lower risk
than other proved undeveloped reserves that require drilling at locations
offsetting existing production. All of these proved undeveloped reserves are
located in favorable structural locations within known producing fault blocks,
with multiple pay zones, in a field with reservoirs that historically produced
substantial volumes of gas under primary production. The main reason these
reserves are classified as undeveloped is because they require significant
additional capital investment associated with drilling new wells and building
additional sales facilities in order to produce the reserves.


                                      F-23
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              AQUATICS CELLULOSE INTERNATIONAL CORP.
                                              ESTIMATED NET RESERVES AND INCOME DATA
                                            ATTRIBUTABLE TO CERTAIN LEASEHOLD INTERESTS


                                                  As of January 1, 2007                            As of January 1, 2006
                           ------------------------------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------
                              Proved              Proved                         Proved            Proved
Remaining Reserves          Producing          Undeveloped    Total Proved      Producing        Undeveloped         Total Proved

<S>                                     <C>             <C>               <C>            <C>                <C>                <C>
Oil/Condensate - Mbbls                  0               0                 0              0                  0                  1
Gas - MMCF                             44             205               249            122                205                328
Income Data

Future Gross Revenue      $       268,892    $  1,266,577    $    1,535,470   $    947,892   $      1,591,741   $      2,539,633
Deductions
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Production Taxes                    4,355          94,993            99,348              -            119,381            119,381
Ad Valorem Taxes                   10,006          44,315            54,321         35,854             55,692             91,546
Operating Costs                    38,420          40,000            78,420         63,946             40,000            103,946
Development Costs                       -         314,000           314,000         10,000            314,000            324,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Deductions          $        52,781    $    493,308    $      546,089   $    109,800   $        529,073   $        638,873

Future Net Income         $       216,111    $    773,269    $      989,380   $    838,092   $      1,062,668   $      1,900,760
Discounted FNI @ 10%      $       198,964    $    566,116    $      765,080   $    772,238   $        751,028   $      1,523,266
</TABLE>


REPRESENTATIVE GAS PRICES : Natural gas - $6.17 and $7.25 for 2007 and 2006
respectively - Determined based on year-end unescalated prices and costs in
accordance with the guidelines of the SEC, discounted at 10% per annum.

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved oil
and natural gas reserves and their values, including many factors beyond our
control. The reserve data included herein represents only estimates. Reserve
engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of
oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of
any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available geological,
geophysical, engineering and economic data, the precision of the engineering and
judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers often vary. The
estimates of reserves, future cash flows and present value are based on various
assumptions, including those prescribed by the SEC relating to oil and natural
gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and
availability of funds, and are inherently imprecise. Actual future production,
cash flows, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities
of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves may vary substantially from our
estimates. Such variations may be significant and could materially affect
estimated quantities and the present value of our proved reserves. Also, the use
of a 10% discount factor for reporting purposes may not necessarily represent
the most appropriate discount factor, given actual interest rates and risks to
which the Company or the oil and natural gas industry in general are subject.

The present values referred to herein should not be assumed to represent the
current market value of estimated oil and natural gas reserves. In accordance
with requirements of the SEC, the estimates of present values are based on
prices and costs as of the date of the estimates, which was January 1, 2007.
Actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower than the prices
and costs as of the date of the estimate.

Quantities of proved reserves are estimated based on economic conditions,
including oil and natural gas prices in existence at the date of assessment. Our
reserves and future cash flows may be subject to revisions based upon changes in
economic conditions, including oil and natural gas prices, as well as due to
production results, results of future development, operating and development
costs and other factors. Downward revisions of our reserves could have an
adverse affect the Company's financial condition, operating results and cash
flows.

Due to recurring net operating losses, which can be utilized to offset projected
discounted future net cash flows, no provision for income taxes is considered
necessary.

The future gross revenues are determined before deduction of production and ad
valorem taxes. Future net income is determined after deduction of the normal
costs of operating the wells, development costs, production taxes and ad valorem
taxes. The operating costs and development costs were held constant with no
future price escalation due to inflation. The future net income is before
deduction of any state and federal income taxes that may be payable and has not
been adjusted for outstanding loans, which may exist. It does not include any
adjustment for cash on hand or undistributed income.


                                      F-24
<PAGE>

No reserve estimates have been filed with any other Federal authority or agency.

CHANGES NET QUANTITIES OF PROVED RESERVES

The following table shows the changes in the Company's estimated net quantities
of proved reserves:

                                 As of            As of
                              January 1          January 1          Net
                                2007                2006           Change

 Remaining Reserves         Total Proved       Total Proved     Total Proved

    Oil/Condensate - Mbbls               0               1              (1)
    Gas - MMCF                         249             328             (79)
 Income Data
    Future Gross Revenue       $ 1,535,470     $ 2,539,633     $(1,004,163)
    Deductions
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Production Taxes              99,348         119,381         (20,033)
      Ad Valorem Taxes              54,321          91,546         (37,225)
      Operating Costs               78,420         103,946         (25,526)
      Development Costs            314,000         324,000         (10,000)
 =========================================================================
 Total Deductions              $   546,089     $   638,873     $   (92,784)

 Future Net Income             $   989,380     $ 1,900,760     $  (911,380)
 Discounted FNI @ 10%          $   765,080     $ 1,523,266     $  (758,186)

CHANGES IN REMAINING RESERVES

The reduction in the Company's oil reserves of 1 Mbbls over the 2006 and 2007
periods is a result of the Company's divesting of the Prado Field. The reduction
of the Company's gas reserves of 79 MMCF over the 2006 and 2007 periods is a
direct result of the Company's continued production of those reserves.

CHANGES IN FUTURE INCOME

The reduction in the company's future net income of $911,380 and reduction in
discounted future net income of $758,186 over the 2006 and 2007 periods is a
result of the Company's depletion of the reserves through continued production
combined with the reduction in estimated future natural gas prices. The
representative gas price used in the 2006 reserve report by R.A Lenser was $7.25
/ mcf, whereas in 2007, the price was reduced to $6.17 / mcf.

                                      F-25
<PAGE>

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned.


   DATED: November 13, 2007                       By: /s/ Sheridan B. Westgarde
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Chief Executive Officer