alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

         FILED
  IN THE OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE
     STATE OF NEVADA

       JUN 10 1998

                 CERTIFICATE AMENDING ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                      INTERNATIONAL TEXAS INDUSTRIES, INC.

     The undersigned, being the President and Secretary of INTERNATIONAL TEXAS
INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, hereby certify that by vote of the Board
of Directors, with consent from the controlling majority stockholder, at a
meeting held on the 1st day of June, 1998, it was agreed by unanimous vote that
this CERTIFICATE AMENDING THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION be filed.

     The undersigned further certify that the original Articles of Incorporation
of INTERNATIONAL TEXAS INDUSTRIES, INC., were filed with the Secretary of State
of Nevada on the 6th day of May, 1968. The undersigned further certify that
ARTICLE FIRST of the original Articles of Incorporation, filed on the 6th day of
May, 1968, herein is amended to read as follows:

                                  ARTICLE FIRST

               THE NAME OF THE CORPORATION IS KENTEX ENERGY, INC.

     The undersigned hereby certify, that they have on this 4 day of June, 1998,
executed this Certificate Amending the original Articles of Incorporation
heretofore filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada.

                                              /s/ Janis Barnard
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Janis Barnard, President/Secretary

STATE OF Oregon     )
         -----------
                    ) SS.
COUNTY OF Yamhill   )
          ----------

     On this 4th day of June, 1998, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public,
personally appeared: Janis Barnard, known to me to be the person(s) whose
name(s) are subscribed to the foregoing Certificate Amending the Articles of
Incorporation and acknowledged to me that they executed the same.

                                              /s/ Julie Snow
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Notary Public

====================================
           OFFICIAL SEAL
            JULIE SNOW
      NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON
      COMMISSION NO. A053646
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 30, 2000
====================================
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                                                   10,600
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             2,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                155
<INVENTORY>                                                              38,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         54,575
<PP&E>                                                                  145,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           39,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          233,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    49,956
<BONDS>                                                                  29,543
<COMMON>                                                                     21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              150,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            233,803
<SALES>                                                                 159,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        159,643
<CGS>                                                                   111,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           111,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         51,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                            (4)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                          250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (3,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              2,445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       1,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                   281
<NET-INCOME>                                                             (1,438)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              (.06)



</TABLE>
National City
Mortgage

March 14,2000

National City Mortgage Co.
3232 Newmark Drive *  Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Telephone (937) 910-1200

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1820
Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE:    Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year.

(A)      I have reviewed the activities and  performance of the Servicer  during
         the preceding  fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
         Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer
         Guide and to the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has
         fulfilled all of its duties responsibilities or obligations under these
         Agreements  throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or
         failure of the servicer to perform any of such duties, responsibilities
         or obligations, a description of each default or failure and the nature
         and status thereof has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;
(B)      I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or
         FHLMC servicer in good standing;
(C)      I have  confirmed  that the  Fidelity  Bond,  the Errors and  Omissions
         Insurance  Policy and any other bonds  required  under the terms of the
         Servicing Agreement,  Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement
         and/or Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;
(D)      All premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy
         (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage  Insurance Policy (if applicable),
         with respect to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid and that all
         such insurance policies are in full force and effect;
(E)      All real estate taxes,  governmental assessments and any other expenses
         accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance
         on any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been  paid,  or if any such costs or
         expenses have not been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the
         reason for the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota,
         N.A.;
(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly  funded;and (G)
All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgage Property
         required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue
         Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified By:

Officer

Vice President
Title

March 14, 2000
Date
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 02/01/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      167,414
COMMITMENTS
  10,669   33,905   38,275   99,455   81,623  148,399  153,803   19,015   13,611

CHANGES FROM 01/25/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     16,195)
      52      161    8,012    4,429    6,264   12,492   14,437    3,702    1,758

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.4     20.3     22.9     59.4     48.8     88.6     91.9     11.4      8.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      103)
      25       30       38       29       35       80       89
```

----

Updated February 4, 2011
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7148

FRANKIE LEE MCGEE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 5:21

- cv - 02777

- RMG )

Submitted : February 21 , 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ , Circuit Judge s , and MOTZ , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Frankie Lee McGee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7148 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Frankie Lee McGee seeks to appeal the ma gistrate judge’s report recommending that relief on McGee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition be denied . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The decision McGee seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7148 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; R43/R44: Technologies for Assessment of Risk and Early Diagnosis of T1D.                    

*Date:*                         July 11, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy Two, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lan Tian, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 496-7050,                         *tianl@niddk.nih.gov.*
      ( print page 28838)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 5, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-10057 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00415-CV

VICTOR AND JAYME CANTU, Appellants

V.

JOHN AND DONNA MOSES, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-00761-2022

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Nowell, and Smith

Opinion by Justice Osborne

By postcard dated September 6, 2022, we directed appellants to file their

overdue brief within ten days and cautioned them that failure to comply would result 

in dismissal of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellants have 

not complied. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id.

220415f.p05

/Leslie Osborne//

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

VICTOR AND JAYME CANTU, 

Appellants

No. 05-22-00415-CV V.

JOHN AND DONNA MOSES, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 3, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-00761-

2022.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne, Justices Nowell and Smith 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 3rd day of October 2022.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00244

- CV

RUSSELL CALDWELL D/B /A RW CALDWELL CONSTRUC TION , Appellant

v.
JACKIE WRIGHT , Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 85781

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s Exhibits 77, 81 , and 82, and Defendant’s Exhibit 119 were not included
in the reporter’s record in this appeal. A notation in the exhibit volume of the reporter’s
record indicates the exhibits were large and unable to be scanned.
Original exhibits are kept by the trial c ourt clerk but upon the reporter’s request,
are given to the reporter for use in preparing the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.Caldwell v. Wright Page 2

34.6(g)(1). After copying the exhibits for inclusion in the reporter’s record, the reporter

must return the exhibits to the trial court clerk. Id . If a person other than the trial court
clerk possesses an original exhibit, we may order that person to deliver the exhibit to the
trial court clerk. Further, on the motion of any party or on our own initiative, we may

direct the trial court clerk to deliver to this Court any original exhibit. Id. (g)(2).
Because the trial court clerk retains possession of the original exhibits after the
reporter has copied the exhibits to be used in the reporter’s record, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
34.6(g)(1), the trial court clerk should currently be in possession of all the original exhibits.
Accordingly, the trial court clerk is ordered to send the original of Plaintiff’s Exhibits 77,

81 , and 82 and Defendant’s Exhibit 119 to this Court within 14 days from the date of this

order. See id. (g)(2).

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, and Justice Davis O rder issued and filed May 5, 2016
Theodore E. SUHL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1687.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Andrew Ndubisi UCHEOMUMU, petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.

No. 18-1342.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Bankrate, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-87955) on Form S-8 of Bankrate, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bankrate, Inc. and subsidiary as
of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, redeemable stock and stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, the six months ended
December 31, 1998 and the year ended June 30, 1998, which report appears in the
December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Bankrate, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6068

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY EARL HARDRICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-02-7; CA-03-556-BO)

Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: February 10, 2005

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Earl Hardrick, Appellant Pro Se. Winnie Jordan Reaves,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Earl Hardrick seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hardrick has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EX-10(aa)
                 MCNIC Pipeline & Processing Company
                      150 West Jefferson Avenue
                           Suite 1700
                      Detroit, Michigan 48226



                    					30 October, 1998					


VIA FACSIMILE
(405) 842-9901 and
FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Herb Mee, Jr.
Beard Technologies, Inc.
5600 North May Avenue
Suite 320
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112

Re:	Amendment to Operation and Maintenance Agreement among CRC No. 1 LLC,
CRC No. 2 LLC, CRC No. 3 LLC, CRC No. 4 LLC, CRC No. 5 LLC and CRC No. 6 LLC 
and Beard Technologies, Inc.

Dear Mr. Mee:

When fully executed by the parties, this letter agreement shall reflect 
our agreement regarding amending Section 8.1 of the Operation and 
Maintenance Agreement (the "Agreement") among CRC No. 1 LLC, CRC 
No. 2 LLC, CRC No. 3 LLC, CRC No. 4 LLC, CRC No. 5 LLC and CRC 
No. 6 LLC and Beard Technologies, Inc.  The parties agree that 
Section 8.1 of the Agreement is to be replaced in its entirety 
with the following language effective October 30, 1998:

       8.1   Term.  Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, 
       the term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective 
       date of this Agreement and shall expire on December 31, 1998 
       (the "Initial Term").  After the expiration of the Initial 
       Term, this Agreement may be terminated without cause by 
       either party upon thirty days written notice to the other.

If the above accurately sets forth our agreement, please execute two copies 
of this letter agreement where indicated below and return one copy to the 
undersigned.


                                      CRC No. 1 LLC
                                      CRC No. 2 LLC
                                      CRC No. 3 LLC
                                      CRC No. 4 LLC
                                      CRC No. 5 LLC
                                      CRC No. 6 LLC

                                      BRUCE SCHLANSKER
                                  Bruce Schlansker, Chairman


Agreed to and accepted this 30th day of October 1998.

Beard Technologies, Inc.

           W. M. BEARD
        
Its:       W. M. Beard, President



cc:   William Kraemer
      R.G. Ryan
      Steve Richardson, Esq.
Muriel FIEDLER, petitioner, v. Mace BRINDLEY, et al.

No. 18-5382.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Robert L. CLARK, petitioner, v. Christopher M. CARR, Attorney General of Georgia.

No. 18-8206.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.