alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DERRICK VERNON COLE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

EDUCATIONAL CREDIT 

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-56924 

D.C. No. 5:17-cv-00974-JFW-SP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Derrick Vernon Cole appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 

and state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an 

abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal pursuant to its local rules. Ghazali 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-56924 

v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Cole’s action 

because Cole did not file an opposition to defendant’s motion for judgment on the 

pleadings, or request an extension of time to do so. See id. at 53-54 (discussing 

factors to guide the court’s evaluation of dismissal pursuant to local rules); see also 

C.D. Cal. R. 7-9 (requiring the filing of an opposition or statement of nonopposition to a motion no later than twenty-one days before the scheduled hearing 

date); C.D. Cal. R. 7-12 (providing that the failure to file a required document may 

be deemed consent to the granting of the motion); Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 

1175 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[T]he decision of a trial court is reversed under the abuse of 

discretion standard only when the appellate court is convinced firmly that the 

reviewed decision lies beyond the pale of reasonable justification under the 

circumstances.”).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider the merits of Cole’s claims.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1535 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1535

 To extend the milk price support program through 2002 at the rate in 
                            effect for 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 1999

  Mr. Peterson of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. Holden, Mr. McHugh, Mr. 
Boehlert, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Condit, Mr. Kind, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Gutknecht, 
   Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Calvert, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
Stenholm, Mr. Obey, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Wise, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Shows, and 
 Mr. Clement) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the milk price support program through 2002 at the rate in 
                            effect for 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MILK PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAM.

    (a) Extension of Program.--Subsection (h) of section 141 of the 
Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7251) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1999'' both places it appears and 
        inserting ``2002''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
        ``During the period of effectiveness of the program, section 
        201 of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1446), including 
        subsection (c) of such section, shall not apply to milk.''.
    (b) Continuation of Current Price Support Rate.--Subsection (b)(4) 
of such section is amended by striking ``year 1999'' and inserting 
``years 1999 through 2002''.
    (c) Delay in Recourse Loan Program for Processors.--Section 142(e) 
of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7252(e)) is amended 
by striking ``2000'' and inserting ``2003''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1666 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1666

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 200 
  East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, as the ``Captain Colin P. 
                        Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 
East Pinckney Street in Madison, Florida, is hereby designated as the 
``Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference to such facility in a law, regulation, map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States shall be considered to be a 
reference to the ``Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr. Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Blue Heron Venture Fund, Ltd.                                       Exhibit 10.1
Nassau, New Providence, The Bahamas

February 9th, 1999

Attention: Mr. Steve Berry
CyPost Corporation

Suite #101
260 West Esplanade
North Vancouver, B.C.

            Re: Debt Financing for CyPost Corp.

Dear Steve,

Thank you so very much for the  information  and overview of CyPost.  I am quite
sure  that the  results  of your  efforts  will be of great  benefit  to all the
shareholders, including the fund.

Further to our  discussions  this week I wish to offer the following  terms with
regards to the one million dollar U.S. funding:

1)    CyPost will provide the lender with a promissory demand note

2)    the note will bear interest at 8% payable on demand

3)    CyPost will agree to the lender's demands to waive presentment of payment

4)    the debt may be converted into equity, (at $1.00 U.S.) to 1,000,000 common

      shares of CyPost Corporation upon demand of the lender. In doing so the
      lender waives any interest owed on said notes

5)    CyPost will provide a copy of a board resolution acknowledging the
      promissory note and the conditions set forth

If these  terms are  agreeable  to you then  please  sign  below and  return the
original  to me.  Upon  receipt of this  signed  letter you may at any time,  in
writing or by verbal request draw up to U.S.  $1,000,000.00  from the Blue Heron
Venture Fund.

Signed,

Kelly Shane Montalban
Monet Management
Blue Heron Venture Fund

Steve Berry

CEO

CyPost Corporation
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1460

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and

Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to

decrease the requisite blood quantum required for membership in the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1460 RFS

1 That section 108(a)(2)(i) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and

2 Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g–7) is amended by striking ‘‘1 3 ⁄8’’

and inserting ‘‘1 4 ⁄16’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29357-29358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: June 8, 2022.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of

[[Page 29358]]

Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Margaret A. Morris Fears, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-5444, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#234e4244444a460d4e4c51514a504546425150634d4a4b0d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e885898f8f818dc685879a9a819b8e8d899a9ba8868180c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 10, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10395 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Stephen GILMORE, et al., petitioners, v. Neil R. HOLLAND, et al.

No. 18-1328.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010
|                       
|/s/ Sunil Bhonsle      
|Name:                   |  | Sunil Bhonsle                                                          
|Title:                  |  | President (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

April 18, 2000 Session

MARTHA BOWEN LANGSCHMIDT v. CARL H. LANGSCHMIDT

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County

No. 155250 R.D. Russell Lee Moore, Jr., Special Judge

No. W1999-00434-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 1, 2001

W. Frank Crawford, J., Dissents in Part, Concurs in Part

I concur in part and dissent in part. I dissent in the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s

award of fifty percent of the increased value of Husband’s IRA accounts. The trial court’s decision

and that of the majority is based on the finding that such increased value constitutes marital property.

I do not agree with that conclusion. While I can agree that some IRA accounts or increase therein

are marital property, I cannot agree that all IRA accounts are marital property. Because a spouse,

prior to marriage, puts separate property in an IRA account as opposed to any other type of

investment account, it does not change the nature of the investment. It is still an investment for the

owner thereof. When the spouse marries, this does not, in my opinion, ipso facto change the

involved account into something other than the personal account of the investor. 

The definition of “marital property” in T.C.A. § 36-4-121(1)(A)(B) includes any marital

funds used by a spouse to fund an IRA account. Those funds and the increase in value thereof would

rightfully be subject to a division. However, in the absence of proof that marital funds were added

to the separate funds, marital property should be limited to the increase in value attributed to a

spouse’s contribution, as specified in T.C.A. § 36-4-121(1)(B). 

I must respectfully disagree with the unpublished decisions of other sections of this Court

cited in the majority opinion holding that an increase in the value of an IRA held separately by a

spouse without any marital contribution is marital property. In my opinion, the language in the

statute, “the value of vested pension, retirement, or other fringe benefit rights accrued during the

period of the marriage,” T.C.A. § 36-4-121(b)(1)(B), contemplates the use of marital funds or

benefits provided by an employer as a part of the compensation package, which, in and of itself,

would be marital funds. Therefore, I would treat the IRA accounts which have no contribution of

marital funds in the same manner as the majority treated the non-IRA accounts. The importance of

this question in domestic cases warrants review by the Supreme Court.
-2-

Moreover, I disagree with the majority that an equal division of marital property in this case

is an equitable division. The majority points out that the trial court commented that but for the

division of marital property, periodic alimony would be appropriate. I also cannot agree with the

trial court on this point. Perhaps some rehabilitative alimony could be justified, but beyond that, I

cannot agree.

I concur in the remainder of the majority opinion. Accordingly, I concur in part and dissent

part as indicated herein.

__________________________________________

W.FRANKCRAWFORD,PRESIDINGJUDGE,W.S.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ended
December 30, 2003 (the "Report") of Centrex, Inc. (the "Registrant"),  as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Thomas R.
Coughlin,  Jr., the Chief Executive  Officer and the Chief Financial  Officer of
the Registrant  certify,  to the best of my knowledge,  information  and belief,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Registrant.

                            /s/ Thomas R. Coughlin, Jr.
                           -----------------------------------
                           Name: Thomas R. Coughlin, Jr.

Date: March 30, 2004
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1599

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949

to authorize the purchase of information technology related to the Year

2000 computer conversion by State and local governments through Federal supply schedules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, and Mrs.

MORELLA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services

Act of 1949 to authorize the purchase of information

technology related to the Year 2000 computer conversion

by State and local governments through Federal supply

schedules.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Year 2000 Compliance

5 Assistance Act’’.
2

•HR 1599 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR ACQUISITION OF YEAR 2000

2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BY STATE AND

3 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THROUGH FEDERAL

4 SUPPLY SCHEDULES.

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO USE CERTAIN SUPPLY SCHED6 ULES.—Section 201(b) of the Federal Property and Ad7 ministrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 481(b)) is

8 amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph:

10 ‘‘(3)(A) The Administrator may provide for the use

11 by State or local governments of Federal supply schedules

12 of the General Services Administration for automated data

13 processing equipment (including firmware), software, sup14 plies, support equipment, and services (as contained in

15 Federal supply classification code group 70) related to the

16 Year 2000 computer conversion.

17 ‘‘(B) In any case of the use by a State or local gov18 ernment of a Federal supply schedule pursuant to sub19 paragraph (A), participation by a firm that sells to the

20 Federal Government through the supply schedule shall be

21 voluntary with respect to a sale to the State or local gov22 ernment through such supply schedule.

23 ‘‘(C) The authority provided in this paragraph shall

24 expire on December 31, 2002.

25 ‘‘(D) As used in this paragraph, the term ‘State or

26 local government’ includes any State, local, regional, or
3

•HR 1599 IH

1 tribal government, or any instrumentality thereof (includ2 ing any accredited public school district or public edu3 cational institution).’’.

4 (b) PROCEDURES.—Not later than 30 days after the

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall

6 establish procedures to implement section 201(b)(3) of the

7 Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949

8 (as added by subsection (a)).

9 (c) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2003, the

10 Administrator of General Services shall submit to the

11 Committee on Government Reform of the House of Rep12 resentatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs

13 of the Senate a report on the implementation and effects

14 of the amendment made by subsection (a).

Æ
Reginald KNOX, petitioner, v. UNKNOWN PARTIES.

No. 18-8877.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reinstate the DSH 
      allotment level for Minnesota to the fiscal year 1995 level.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1999

    Mr. Luther (for himself, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Vento, Mr. Sabo, Mr. 
   Ramstad, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Minge, and Mr. Gutknecht) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to reinstate the DSH 
      allotment level for Minnesota to the fiscal year 1995 level.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATING MINNESOTA MEDICAID DSH ALLOTMENT LEVEL.

    Section 1923(f)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-
4(f)(2)) is amended, in the table contained in such section and in the 
DSH Allotments for Minnesota for each of fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 
2002, by striking ``16'' and inserting ``33''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

November 27, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00676

- CV

IN RE Kristin KERBOW

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

On October 3, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The real party in interest filed a response and relator filed a reply. After considering the petition, response, reply, and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Acco rdingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on November 27, 2019

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of November, 2019

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019

- CI

- 13768, styled In the Interest of L.J.K

- B., M.J.K

- B

. , and L.K.K

- B

. , Children , pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, Bex ar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.