alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1784 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1784

   To terminate certain sanctions with respect to India and Pakistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 1999

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee 
  on Banking and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To terminate certain sanctions with respect to India and Pakistan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO INDIA AND 
              PAKISTAN.

    (a) India and Pakistan.--Effective on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the sanctions contained in the following provisions of law 
shall not apply to India and Pakistan, with respect to any grounds for 
the imposition of sanctions under those provisions arising before such 
date of enactment:
            (1) Section 101 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2799aa).
            (2) Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2799aa-1).
            (3) Section 2(b)(4) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 
        (12 U.S.C. 635(b)(4)).
    (b) Certain Persons.--Effective on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the sanctions contained in sections 821 and 824 of the 
Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Act (22 U.S.C. 3201 note) shall not 
apply to any person, with respect to any grounds for the imposition of 
sanctions under those provisions arising before such date of enactment, 
relating to the detonation by India or Pakistan of nuclear explosive 
devices.
    (c) Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this Act prohibits the 
imposition of sanctions by the President under any provision of law 
specified in subsections (a) and (b) by reason of any grounds for the 
imposition of sanctions under that provision of law arising on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REPEALS.

    The India-Pakistan Relief Act of 1988 (title IX of the Agriculture, 
Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1999, as contained in section 101(a) of Public Law 
105-277), is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Keenan JOYNER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9128.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005534 26-FEB-2016 08:41 AM
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 **CEO
Certification**
 
 I,
Sheridan Westgarde, certify that:
 
 The
undersigned certifies that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aquatic Cellulose International
corporation (the "Company");
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual report;
and
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this Annual report.
 
 4. The
Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The
Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
March 18, 2005
 
 /s/ Sheridan
Westgarde
 Sheridan
Westgarde, Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40862

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BERNARDO REYES-HERNANDEZ, also known as Juan Antonio ReyesHernandez, also known as Nayo Reyes-Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CR-1429-1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Bernardo Reyes-Hernandez pled guilty to illegal reentry after removal. 

The district court sentenced him to 44 months in prison and three years of 

supervised release. On appeal, Reyes-Hernandez seeks reformation of the 

judgment to reflect conviction and sentencing under 8 U.S.C § 1326(b)(1) 

rather than Section 1326(b)(2). We reform the judgment and affirm.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 15, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40862 Document: 00514515386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2018
No. 17-40862

2

Reyes-Hernandez’s first argument is that Section 1326(b)(2) is 

inapplicable because the supposedly predicate conviction, a 2006 Texas state 

conviction for indecency by contact with a child under 17, did not actually 

precede the 2003 removal date specified in the factual basis for his guilty plea. 

We need not reach this issue, though, because we conclude that his second 

argument clearly mandates the reformation of the judgment. 

The second argument is that his 2006 Texas state conviction for 

indecency by contact with a child under 17 is not an aggravated felony under 

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) because the incorporated “crime of violence” 

definition found in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague. The Supreme 

Court has recently held that such arguments are correct. See Sessions v. 

Dimaya, 138 S. Ct. 1204, 1223 (2018). Reyes-Hernandez has thus shown a 

clear or obvious error in the district court’s application of Section 1326(b)(2).

See Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468 (1997). 

Despite the validity of the vagueness challenge, Reyes-Hernandez has 

admitted that the error had no effect on his substantial rights. That is because 

his within-Guidelines sentence was below the 10-year statutory maximum in 

Section 1326(b)(1) for removals following non-aggravated felony convictions 

and the record does not indicate that the error influenced the district court’s

determination of the sentence. See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 

F.3d 357, 369 (5th Cir. 2009). Resentencing is therefore not warranted, but 

reformation of the judgment to reflect that Reyes-Hernandez was convicted 

and sentenced under Section 1326(b)(1) is proper. See id. 

We REFORM the district court’s judgment to reflect conviction and 

sentencing under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), and AFFIRM as modified. 

 Case: 17-40862 Document: 00514515386 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2018
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-41154, 333-41156, 333-43060 and 333-59776) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-96151,
333-31356 and 333-39586) on Form S-8 of EasyLink Services Corporation of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
EasyLink Services Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December
31, 2001, Annual Report on Form 10-K of EasyLink Services Corporation.

Our report dated February 15, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since
inception and has a working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
that uncertainty.

                                                     /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 1, 2002
EXHIBIT31.3

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, intheir capacities as CEO and CFO, respectively, of NetREIT, Inc. (the “**Company**”)that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(i)   the Annual Report for theyear ended December 31, 2014 of the Company on Form 10-K (the “**Report**”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(ii)  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and the results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: June ­18,  2015 | By:  |  */s/ Jack K.  Heilbron*                           |
|----------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |      | Jack K. Heilbron,                                       |
|                       |      | Chief Executive  Officer                                |
|                       |      |                                                    |
| Date: June ­18,  2015 | By:       |  */s/ Kenneth W.  Elsberry*                        |
|                       |      | Kenneth W.  Elsberry,                                   |
|                       |      | Chief Financial  Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
|                       |      |                                                    |
|                       |      |                                                    |

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to NetREIT, Inc. and will be retained by NetREIT, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.*

 

 

 

 

----
William F. SORIN, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

No. 18-1277.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTimeline, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period endedJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Charles R. Osenbaugh, President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| /s/ CHARLES R. OSENBAUGH                |   | Date:     August   15, 2005 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         |   |                                                 |
| Charles R.   Osenbaugh,                 |   |                                                 |
| President   and Chief Financial Officer |   |                                                 |
Roummel INGRAM, petitioner, v. John PRELESNIK, Warden.

No. 18-8621.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,278
<SECURITIES>                                    76,237
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,982
<PP&E>                                             817
<DEPRECIATION>                                     302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,579
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,017
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,324)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,513
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,071)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,071)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Mail.com, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-41154, 333-41156, 333-43060 and 333-45930) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-96151,
333-31356 and 333-39586) on Form S-8 of Mail.com, Inc. of our report dated
February 10, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mail.com, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report
appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mail.com, Inc.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 16, 2001



                                      114
petition for a writ of eoram nob is because they were claims arising from

alleged factual errors that are on the record, the claims could have been raised earlier, or they involved legal and not factual errors. See id. at , 310 P.3d at 601-02. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

J. Pickering
J.

J. 

### a.--th et Parraguirre

Saitta cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge David August Kille Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (D) 1947A 44Sto
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                  /s/ Michael S. McDevitt                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael                S. McDevitt                              |
| Chief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer |
| May                10, 2007                                     |

----
Alfredo MENDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8468.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  Exhibit 11

                          CHECKMATE ELECTRONICS, INC.

                      COMPUTATION OF  PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three months ended        Six months ended
                                                           June 30,              June 30,
                                                   --------------------      --------------------------
                                                     1997       1996             1997          1996
                                                   ---------  ----------     ------------   -----------
<S>                                                <C>        <C>            <C>            <C>
PRIMARY:
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding during the period                       5,354       5,122            5,306         5,105
 
Net effect of dilutive stock options and stock
   warrants - based on the treasury stock
   method using the average market price                   0         484                0           481
                                                   ---------    --------         --------      --------
Total common and common equivalent shares              5,354       5,606            5,306         5,586
                                                   =========    ========         ========      ======== 
Net income (loss)                                  $  (1,139)   $  1,190         $   (478)     $  1,720
                                                   =========    ========         ========      ======== 
Net income (loss) per share                        $   (0.21)   $   0.21         $  (0.09)     $   0.31
                                                   =========    ========         ========      ======== 
FULLY DILUTED:
Weighted average common shares
   outstanding during the period                       5,354       5,122            5,306         5,105
 
Net effect of dilutive stock options and stock
   warrants - based on the treasury stock
   method using the ending market price,
   if higher than the average market price                 0         513                0           513
                                                   ---------    --------         --------      --------
Total common and common equivalent shares              5,354       5,635            5,306         5,618
                                                   =========    ========         ========      ========  
Net income (loss)                                  $  (1,139)   $  1,190         $   (478)     $  1,720
                                                   =========    ========         ========      ======== 
Net income (loss) per share                        $   (0.21)   $   0.21         $  (0.09)     $   0.31
                                                   =========    ========         ========      ======== 
</TABLE>