Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 29205 

34See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market 

Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (April 11, 2022), 

available at: https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/ 

market_statistics/. 

35See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 

(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005). 

36NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. 

Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release 

No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782– 

83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)). 

37 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

38 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). 

39 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

As previously discussed, the Exchange 

operates in a highly competitive market. 

In such an environment, the Exchange 

must continually review, and consider 

adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain 

competitive with other exchanges. 

Members have numerous alternative 

venues that they may participate on and 

direct their order flow, including other 

equities exchanges, off-exchange 

venues, and alternative trading systems. 

Additionally, the Exchange represents a 

small percentage of the overall market. 

Based on publicly available information, 

no single equities exchange has more 

than 17% of the market share.34

Therefore, no exchange possesses 

significant pricing power in the 

execution of order flow. Indeed, 

participants can readily choose to send 

their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels 

at those other venues to be more 

favorable. Moreover, the Commission 

has repeatedly expressed its preference 

for competition over regulatory 

intervention in determining prices, 

products, and services in the securities 

markets. Specifically, in Regulation 

NMS, the Commission highlighted the 

importance of market forces in 

determining prices and SRO revenues 

and, also, recognized that current 

regulation of the market system ‘‘has 

been remarkably successful in 

promoting market competition in its 

broader forms that are most important to 

investors and listed companies.’’ 35 The 

fact that this market is competitive has 

also long been recognized by the courts. 

In NetCoalition v. Securities and 

Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit 

stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes 

that competition for order flow is 

‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n 

the U.S. national market system, buyers 

and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing 

agents, have a wide range of choices of 

where to route orders for execution’; 

[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its 

market share percentages for granted’ 

because ‘no exchange possesses a 

monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in 

the execution of order flow from broker 

dealers’. . . .’’.36 Accordingly, the 

Exchange does not believe its proposed 

fee changes imposes any burden on 

competition that is not necessary or 

appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

The Exchange neither solicited nor 

received comments on the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 

of the Act 37 and paragraph (f) of Rule 

19b–4 38 thereunder. At any time within 

60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 

change, the Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. If the 

Commission takes such action, the 

Commission will institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

change should be approved or 

disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

CboeBYX–2022–016 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CboeBYX–2022–016. This 

file number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549 on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change. 

Persons submitting comments are 

cautioned that we do not redact or edit 

personal identifying information from 

comment submissions. You should 

submit only information that you wish 

to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CboeBYX–2022–016, and 

should be submitted on or before June 

2, 2022. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.39

J. Matthew DeLesDernier, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10146 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–94864; File No. SR– 

CboeEDGX–2022–026] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe 

EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing 

and Immediate Effectiveness of a 

Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its 

Fee Schedule 

May 6, 2022. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on May 2, 

2022, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the 

‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II, and 

III below, which Items have been 

prepared by the Exchange. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
29206 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 

3See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market 

Volume Summary, Month-to-Date (April 22, 2022), 

available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/ 

market_statistics/. 

4See Exchange Rule 11.8(g). 

5See Exchange Rule 11.8(g)(10). 

6See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89007 

(June 4, 2020), 85 FR 35454 (June 10, 2020) (SR– 

CboeEDGX–2020–010). 

7See Cboe EDGA Exchange Fee Schedule, Fee 

Code and Associated Fees, Fee Code DQ. 

8 15 U.S.C. 78f. 

9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the 

‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) proposes to 

amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the 

proposed rule change is provided in 

Exhibit 5. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is also available on the Exchange’s 

website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/ 

options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/) 

[sic], at the Exchange’s Office of the 

Secretary, and at the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of and basis for 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

Exchange has prepared summaries, set 

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of 

the most significant aspects of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to amend its 

Fee Schedule applicable to its equities 

trading platform (‘‘EDGX Equities’’) by 

amending the fee associated with fee 

code DQ. The Exchange proposes to 

implement these changes effective May 

2, 2022. 

The Exchange first notes that it 

operates in a highly competitive market 

in which market participants can 

readily direct order flow to competing 

venues if they deem fee levels at a 

particular venue to be excessive or 

incentives to be insufficient. More 

specifically, the Exchange is only one of 

16 registered equities exchanges, as well 

as a number of alternative trading 

systems and other off-exchange venues 

that do not have similar self-regulatory 

responsibilities under the Exchange Act, 

to which market participants may direct 

their order flow. Based on publicly 

available information,3 no single 

registered equities exchange has more 

than 16% of the market share. Thus, in 

such a low-concentrated and highly 

competitive market, no single equities 

exchange possesses significant pricing 

power in the execution of order flow. 

The Exchange in particular operates a 

‘‘Maker-Taker’’ model whereby it pays 

rebates to members that add liquidity 

and assesses fees to those that remove 

liquidity. 

The Exchange’s Fee Schedule sets 

forth the standard rebates and rates 

applied per share for orders that provide 

and remove liquidity, respectively. 

Currently, for orders in securities priced 

at or above $1.00, the Exchange 

provides a standard rebate of $0.00160 

per share for orders that add liquidity 

and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per share 

for orders that remove liquidity. For 

orders in securities priced below $1.00, 

the Exchange provides a standard rebate 

of $0.00009 per share for orders that add 

liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of 

total dollar value for orders that remove 

liquidity. 

Specifically, the proposed rule change 

amends the fee assessed to orders that 

yield fee code DQ under the Fee Codes 

and Associated Fees table of the Fee 

Schedule. Fee code DQ is appended to 

Midpoint Discretionary Orders 

(‘‘MDOs’’) 4 using the Quote Depletion 

Protection (‘‘QDP’’) order instruction.5

QDP is designed to provide enhanced 

protections to MDOs by tracking 

significant executions that constitute the 

best bid or offer on the EDGX Book and 

enabling Users to avoid potentially 

unfavorable executions by preventing 

MDOs entered with the optional QDP 

instruction from exercising discretion to 

trade at more aggressive prices when 

QDP has been triggered.6 Currently, 

MDOs entered with the QDP instruction 

are appended the fee code DQ and are 

assessed a fee of $0.00020 per share in 

securities at or above $1.00 and 0.30% 

of dollar value for securities priced 

below $1.00. The proposal would 

increase the fee assessed under fee code 

DQ to $0.00040 per share in securities 

at or above $1.00. The Exchange seeks 

to align the fee assessed to orders 

appended with fee code DQ with the 

current fee assessed by the Exchange’s 

affiliate exchange, Cboe EDGA 

Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’), which 

currently assesses a fee of $0.00040 per 

share in securities at or above $1.00 and 

0.30% of dollar value for securities 

priced below $1.00.7 The Exchange does 

not propose to change the fee assessed 

for orders yielding fee code DQ priced 

below $1.00. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes the proposed 

rule change is consistent with the 

objectives of Section 6 of the Securities 

and Exchange Act of 1933 [sic] (the 

‘‘Act’’),8 in general, and furthers the 

objectives of Section 6(b)(4),9 in 

particular, as it is designed to provide 

for the equitable allocation of reasonable 

dues, fees and other charges among its 

Members and issuers and other persons 

using its facilities. The Exchange also 

believes that the proposed rule change 

is consistent with the objectives of 

Section 6(b)(5) 10 requirements that the 

rules of an exchange be designed to 

prevent fraudulent and manipulative 

acts and practices, to promote just and 

equitable principles of trade, to foster 

cooperation and coordination with 

persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 

settling, processing information with 

respect to, and facilitating transactions 

in securities, to remove impediments to 

and perfect the mechanism of a free and 

open market and a national market 

system, and, in general, to protect 

investors and the public interest, and, 

particularly, is not designed to permit 

unfair discrimination between 

customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. 

As described above, the Exchange 

operates in a highly competitive market 

in which market participants can 

readily direct order flow to competing 

venues if they deem fee levels at a 

particular venue to be excessive or 

incentives to be insufficient. The 

proposed rule change reflects a 

competitive pricing structure designed 

to incentivize market participants to 

direct their order flow to the Exchange, 

which the Exchange believes would 

enhance market quality to the benefit of 

all Members. 

In particular, the Exchange believes 

that the proposed amendment to 

increase the fee associated with fee code 

DQ is reasonable, equitable and not 

unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange 

believes the proposed increase is 

reasonable because the proposed change 

represents a modest fee increase for an 

optional order instruction. Members 

may continue to submit MDOs without 

the QDP order instruction if they do not 

wish to incur the slightly increased fee. 

Users may also opt to disfavor the 

Exchange’s pricing if they believe that 

alternatives offer them better value. The 

Exchange further believes that the 

proposed change is reasonable because 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 29207 

11Nasdaq’s Midpoint Extended Life Orders are 

non-displayed orders pegged to the midpoint of the 

NBBO that do not execute until the passage of at 

least 10 milliseconds after the order has been 

accepted by the System. See Nasdaq Rules, Equity 

4, Section 4702(b)(14). 

12See Nasdaq Rules, Equity 7, Pricing Schedule, 

Section 118(a)(1), (2), (3). Nasdaq assesses a fee of 

$0.0004 per share when executed at a price at or 

above $1.00. Nasdaq does not charge a fee for 

M–ELO executions in securities priced below $1.00. 

See Nasdaq Rules, Equity 7, Pricing Schedule, 

Section 118(b). 

13Supra note 3. 

14See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 

(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005). 

15NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. 

Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release 

No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782– 

83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)). 

16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). 

the proposed fee remains consistent 

with pricing offered by the other 

exchanges and does not represent a 

significant departure from the 

Exchange’s general pricing structure. 

Specifically, the proposed fee applicable 

to fee code DQ is equal to that of the 

Exchange’s affiliate, EDGA, which 

currently assesses a fee of $0.00040 for 

MDOs submitted to EDGA with a QDP 

order instruction. In addition, the 

proposed fee is equal to the fee 

currently offered by the Nasdaq Stock 

Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), for its Midpoint 

Extended Life Order (‘‘M–ELO’’) 11 in 

securities priced at or above $1.00.12

The Exchange believes that the 

proposed fee is reasonable as it is 

competitive with the fee assessed by 

EDGA for its MDOs appended with the 

QDP order instruction and the fee 

Nasdaq charges for M–ELO executions, 

which offer similar protective features 

to MDOs entered with the QDP order 

instruction on the Exchange. The 

Exchange believes the proposed rule 

change is equitable and not unfairly 

discriminatory because both the MDO 

order type and the associated QDP order 

instruction are available to all Users on 

an equal and non-discriminatory basis, 

and any User that chooses to use the 

QDP instruction would be uniformly 

subject to the same proposed fee. The 

Exchange notes that the QDP instruction 

is optional and market participants who 

do not wish to incur the increased flat 

fee can continue to enter MDOs without 

the QDP instruction. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. 

The Exchange believes the proposed 

rule change does not impose any burden 

on intramarket competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, 

the proposed change to the fee assessed 

on orders that yield fee code DQ will 

apply to all such orders equally in that 

all MDO orders utilizing the QDP order 

instruction will be assessed the 

proposed slightly higher fee. The 

Exchange believes the proposed rule 

change does not impose any burden on 

intermarket competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act as the 

proposed change does not represent a 

significant departure from pricing 

currently offered by the Exchange or 

pricing offered by other equities 

exchanges. Members may opt to disfavor 

the Exchange’s pricing if they believe 

that alternatives offer them better value. 

Accordingly, the Exchange does not 

believe that the proposed change will 

impair the ability of Members or 

competing venues to maintain their 

competitive standing in the financial 

markets. As previously discussed, the 

Exchange operates in a highly 

competitive market. Members have 

numerous alternative venues that they 

may participate on and direct their 

order flow, including other equities 

exchanges, off-exchange venues, and 

alternative trading systems. 

Additionally, the Exchange represents a 

small percentage of the overall market. 

Based on publicly available information, 

no single equities exchange has more 

than 16% of the market share.13

Therefore, no exchange possesses 

significant pricing power in the 

execution of order flow. Indeed, 

participants can readily choose to send 

their orders to other exchange and offexchange venues if they deem fee levels 

at those other venues to be more 

favorable. Moreover, the Commission 

has repeatedly expressed its preference 

for competition over regulatory 

intervention in determining prices, 

products, and services in the securities 

markets. Specifically, in Regulation 

NMS, the Commission highlighted the 

importance of market forces in 

determining prices and SRO revenues 

and, also, recognized that current 

regulation of the market system ‘‘has 

been remarkably successful in 

promoting market competition in its 

broader forms that are most important to 

investors and listed companies.’’ 14 The 

fact that this market is competitive has 

also long been recognized by the courts. 

In NetCoalition v. Securities and 

Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit 

stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes 

that competition for order flow is 

‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n 

the U.S. national market system, buyers 

and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing 

agents, have a wide range of choices of 

where to route orders for execution’; 

[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its 

market share percentages for granted’ 

because ‘no exchange possesses a 

monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in 

the execution of order flow from broker 

dealers’ . . .’’.15

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

The Exchange neither solicited nor 

received comments on the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 

of the Act 16 and paragraph (f) of Rule 

19b–4 17 thereunder. At any time within 

60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 

change, the Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. If the 

Commission takes such action, the 

Commission will institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

change should be approved or 

disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

CboeEDGX–2022–026 on the subject 

line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CboeEDGX–2022–026. This 

file number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
29208 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 

18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20549 on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of the Exchange. Persons 

submitting comments are cautioned that 

we do not redact or edit personal 

identifying information from comment 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR– 

CboeEDGX–2022–026, and should be 

submitted on or before June 2, 2022. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.18

J. Matthew DeLesDernier, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10144 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[License No. 05/05–0298] 

LaSalle Capital Group II–A, L.P.; 

Surrender of License of Small 

Business Investment Company 

Pursuant to the authority granted to 

the United States Small Business 

Administration under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended, under Section 309 of the Act 

and Section 107.1900 of the Small 

Business Administration Rules and 

Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 

function as a small business investment 

company under the Small Business 

Investment Company License No. 05/ 

05–0298 issued to LaSalle Capital Group 

II–A, L.P., said license is hereby 

declared null and void. 

United States Small Business 

Administration. 

Michele Schimpp, 

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of 

Investment and Innovation. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10160 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

[Disaster Declaration #17438 and #17439; 

Texas Disaster Number TX–00627] 

Administrative Declaration of a 

Disaster for the State of Texas 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an 

Administrative declaration of a disaster 

for the State of Texas dated 05/05/2022. 

Incident: Severe Storms and 

Tornadoes. 

Incident Period: 03/21/2022. 

DATES: Issued on 05/05/2022. 

Physical Loan Application Deadline 

Date: 07/05/2022. 

Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 

Application Deadline Date: 02/06/2023. 

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan 

applications to: U.S. Small Business 

Administration, Processing and 

Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 

Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. 

Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, 

U.S. Small Business Administration, 

409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, 

Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that as a result of the 

Administrator’s disaster declaration, 

applications for disaster loans may be 

filed at the address listed above or other 

locally announced locations. 

The following areas have been 

determined to be adversely affected by 

the disaster: 

Primary Counties: Bastrop, Grayson, 

Houston, Jack, Montague, 

Nacogdoches, Upshur, Williamson. 

Contiguous Counties: 

Texas: Anderson, Angelina, Archer, 

Bell, Burnet, Caldwell, Camp, 

Cherokee, Clay, Collin, Cooke, 

Denton, Fannin, Fayette, Gregg, 

Harrison, Lee, Leon, Madison, 

Marion, Milam, Morris, Palo Pinto, 

Parker, Rusk, San Augustine, 

Shelby, Smith, Travis, Trinity, 

Walker, Wise, Wood, Young. 

Oklahoma: Bryan, Jefferson, Love, 

Marshall. 

The Interest Rates are: 

Percent 

For Physical Damage: 

Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ...................... 2.875 

Homeowners without Credit 

Available Elsewhere .............. 1.438 

Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ...................... 5.880 

Businesses without Credit 

Available Elsewhere .............. 2.940 

Non-Profit Organizations with 

Credit Available Elsewhere ... 1.875 

Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 1.875 

For Economic Injury: 

Businesses & Small Agricultural 

Cooperatives without Credit 

Available Elsewhere .............. 2.940 

Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere ..................................... 1.875 

The number assigned to this disaster 

for physical damage is 17438 C and for 

economic injury is 17439 0. 

The States which received an EIDL 

Declaration # are Oklahoma, Texas. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number 59008) 

Isabella Guzman, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10161 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8026–03–P 

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN 

COMMISSION 

Grandfathering Registration Notice 

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice lists 

Grandfathering Registration for projects 

by the Susquehanna River Basin 

Commission during the period set forth 

in DATES. 

DATES: April 1–30, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin 

Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 

Harrisburg, PA 17110–1788. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel and 

Secretary to the Commission, telephone: 

(717) 238–0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 

238–2436; email: joyler@srbc.net. 

Regular mail inquiries may be sent to 

the above address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice lists GF Registration for projects, 

described below, pursuant to 18 CFR 

806, Subpart E for the time period 

specified above: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES