alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Portal Software, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Little, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN E. LITTLE                                                       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By:     John E. Little Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



In connection with the Annual Report
of Portal Software, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard A. Bain III, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



(2)    The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    HOWARD A. BAIN III                                                                      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By:     Howard A. Bain III Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00289

- CR

RANDALL EUGENE BROOK S APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 4 OF TA RRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 0386 824D

----------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered Randal l Eugene Brooks’s “Defendant’s Motion to

Wit hdraw Notice of Appeal Pro Se.”

To the extent Brooks moves to abate his appeal, his motion is denied.

To the extent Brooks moves to dismiss his appeal, his motion complies

with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appel late procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 Because we have not yet issued a decision in his case, we grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: A ugust 9, 2018
```
  
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/21/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       62,255
COMMITMENTS
  19,483    1,092    6,395   21,674   40,913   47,552   48,400   14,703   13,854

CHANGES FROM 06/14/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        592)
  -1,575     -124      436    3,672      270    2,534      583   -1,942        9

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.3      1.8     10.3     34.8     65.7     76.4     77.7     23.6     22.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       78)
      30        6       21       35       29       72       52
```

----

Updated June 24, 2011
**EXHIBIT
      10.27**








**SUMMARY
      OF KEY TERMS OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS**


**WITH
      MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY**


**NAMED
      EXECUTIVE OFFICERS and directors**





MidAmerican
      Energy Holding Company’s (“MEHC”) continuing named executive officers each
      receive an annual base salary and participate in health insurance and other
      benefit plans on the same basis as other employees, as well as certain other
      compensation and benefit plans described in MEHC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.





The
      named
      executive officers are also eligible to receive a cash incentive award under
      MEHC’s Performance Incentive Plan (“PIP”). The PIP provides for a discretionary
      annual cash award that is determined on a subjective basis and paid prior to
      year-end. In addition to the PIP, the named executive officers are eligible
      to
      receive discretionary cash performance awards periodically during the year
      to
      reward the accomplishment of significant non-recurring tasks or projects.
      Messrs. David L. Sokol and Gregory E. Abel have not been granted cash
      performance awards in the past five years. Messrs. Patrick J. Goodman, Douglas
      L. Anderson and Ms. Maureen E. Sammon are participants in MEHC’s Long-Term
      Incentive Partnership Plan (“LTIP”). Messrs. David L. Sokol and Gregory E. Abel
      do not participate in the LTIP. A copy of the LTIP is attached as Exhibit 10.71
      to the MidAmerican Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
      2004, and incorporated by reference herein. Base salary for continuing named
      executive officers for MEHC’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, is shown in
      the following table:





**Name
                and Title**
            
            **Base
                Salary**David
                L. Sokol
              Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
            
            $
            850,000Gregory
                E. Abel
              President
                and Chief Operating Officer
            
            $
            775,000Patrick
                J. Goodman
              Senior
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
            
            $
            320,000Douglas
                L. Anderson
              Senior
                Vice President and General Counsel
            
            $
            291,500Maureen
                E. Sammon
              Senior
                Vice President, Human Resources,Information
                Technology and Insurance
            
            $
            191,000





Messrs.
      David L. Sokol and Gregory E. Abel are directors of MEHC, but do not receive
      additional compensation for their service as directors other than what they
      receive as employees of MEHC. The other members of the MEHC board of directors
      do not receive compensation for their service as directors.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

   (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for share amounts)

A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") is given in the
following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Shares
                                                                         ------
                                                        Income       outstanding and    Amount per
                                                        ------       ---------------    ----------
                                                      (unaudited)      equivalents        Share
                                                      -----------      -----------        -----
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>               <C>
Quarter ended June 30, 2003

Basic EPS                                             $     65,588     48,187,912      $       1.36

Diluted EPS                                           $     65,588     48,281,119      $       1.36

Quarter ended June 30, 2002

Basic EPS                                             $     48,646     48,172,776      $       1.01

Diluted EPS                                           $     48,646     48,272,420      $       1.01
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Shares
                                                                         ------
                                                        Income       outstanding and    Amount per
                                                        ------       ---------------    ----------
                                                      (unaudited)      equivalents        Share
                                                      -----------      -----------        -----
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>               <C>
Six months ended June 30, 2003

Basic EPS                                             $    133,116     48,183,858      $       2.76

Diluted EPS                                           $    133,116     48,270,385      $       2.76

Six months ended June 30, 2002

Basic EPS                                             $     92,153     48,172,776      $       1.91

Diluted EPS                                           $     92,153     48,269,061      $       1.91
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                          24,110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                       167
<INVENTORY>                                     25,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,323
<PP&E>                                         112,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,419
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,490
<SALES>                                        287,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,062
<CGS>                                          197,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (600)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 11.1 IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for share amounts) A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is given in the following
table: SharesNet Income
    
    
    outstanding and
    
    
    Amount per(unaudited)
    
    
    equivalents
    
    
    ShareQuarter
ended March 31, 2005Basic EPS
    
    $
    43,955
    
    
    
    48,330,812
    
    
    $
    0.91Diluted EPS
    
    $
    43,955
    
    
    
    48,429,102
    
    
    $
    0.91Quarter ended March 31, 2004Basic EPS
    
    $
    73,628
    
    
    
    48,249,825
    
    
    $
    1.53Diluted EPS
    
    $
    73,628
    
    
    
    48,459,653
    
    
    $
    1.52
 19
Charles D. RABY, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-8214.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 10, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CECIL WARD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-536

)

JAMILA GIBBS, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 8, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Anne-Leigh Gaylord 

Moe, Judge.

Henry G. Gyden of Gyden Law Group, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTELLIGENT
LIFE CORPORATIONS BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FROM ITS FILING ON FORM
10-K FOR THE SIX-MONTH TRANSITION PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,633,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  563,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,847)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,281,124
<PP&E>                                       1,153,133
<DEPRECIATION>                               (339,474)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,099,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,622,944
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       12,198,303
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,532
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,025,436)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,099,352
<SALES>                                      3,469,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,469,191
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,551,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,095,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,095,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,095,218)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.63)


</TABLE>
Timothy M. BARRETT, petitioner, v. Valerie Jill MINOR.

No. 18-111.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
vray-ex1051_526.htm



 

 

Exhibit 10.51

 

Amendment 

 


		
	
Amendment Date:
	
December 20, 2018

	
Parties:
	
ViewRay, Inc. 

Scott Drake

 

	
Original Agreement:
	
Employment Agreement dated July 22, 2018




 

The below signatories are parties to the Original Agreement.  The parties hereby agree to amend the Original Agreement as follows:

 

1.Section 4 of the Original Agreement is amended with the addition of the following clause:  

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Original Agreement, as of October 22, 2018, Executive’s office location shall be Denver, Colorado or a Colorado-based home office, and the “stipend” provided under the Original Agreement shall be deemed terminated of even date therewith.

 

2.This Amendment is effective as of the date set forth above.  This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts all of which together will constitute one instrument.  This Amendment is made a part of the Original Agreement.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Original Agreement will remain in full force and effect without addition, deletion or change.  

 

 


		
	
ViewRay, Inc.

 

 

By:  

(signature)

 

Printed Name:

 

Title:

 
	
Executive

 

 

By:  

(signature)

 

Printed Name:Scott Drake

 

Title:President, CEO

 




 

 

[Type here]
Terrence L. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-8532.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
<PAGE>

23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-41154, 333-41156, 333-43060, 333-59776 and 333-76578) on Form S-3 and (Nos.
333-135334, 333-96151, 333-31356, 333-39586, 333-97437 and 333-107737) on Form
S-8 of EasyLink Services Corporation of our report dated April 11, 2005, except
as to Note 21 which is as of December 5, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss),
and cash flows of EasyLink services Corporation for year ended December 31,
2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of EasyLink Services Corporation and subsidiaries.

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 have
been restated.

Our report dated April 11, 2005, except as to Note 2 which is as of December 31,
2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has a
working capital deficiency and an accumulated deficit that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.

                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 2007


                                       70
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 28,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                         161,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,500
<INVENTORY>                                    569,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,192,699
<PP&E>                                       4,072,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,452,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,154,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,744
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,155,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,452,077
<SALES>                                      2,711,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,797,890
<CGS>                                        2,907,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,689,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (22,779)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (868,926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (868,926)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (23,844)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (892,770)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
In Re Mark GARRETT, petitioner.

No. 18-8622.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Elaine STEELE, et al., petitioners, v. Sylvester McCAULEY, et al.

No. 18-1152.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131646 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131646 

 COA: 268848 
 Wayne CC: 92-000404-02

JAMES ARTHUR HAYES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk