alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1487

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To provide for public participation in the declaration of national monuments under the Act popularly known as

the Antiquities Act of 1906.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1487 RFS

1 SECTION 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE DECLARATION

2 AND SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT OF NA3 TIONAL MONUMENTS.

4 Section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 (34 Stat. 225,

5 16 U.S.C. 431; popularly known as the Antiquities Act

6 of 1906), is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘SEC. 2. That the’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘SEC. 2. (a) The’’; and

9 (2) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(b)(1) To the extent consistent with the protection

11 of the historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric struc12 tures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest

13 located on the public lands to be designated, the President

14 shall—

15 ‘‘(A) solicit public participation and comment in

16 the development of a monument declaration; and

17 ‘‘(B) consult with the Governor and congres18 sional delegation of the State or territory in which

19 such lands are located, to the extent practicable, at

20 least 60 days prior to any national monument dec21 laration.

22 ‘‘(2) Before issuing a declaration under this section,

23 the President shall consider any information made avail24 able in the development of existing plans and programs

25 for the management of the lands in question, including

26 such public comments as may have been offered.
3

HR 1487 RFS

1 ‘‘(c) Any management plan for a national monument

2 developed subsequent to a declaration made under this

3 section shall comply with the procedural requirements of

4 the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.’’.

5 SEC. 2. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

6 Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this

7 Act shall be construed to enlarge, diminish, or modify the

8 authority of the President to act to protect public lands

9 and resources.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
IB

Union Calendar No. 209

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1615

[Report No. 106–368]

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the designation of

a portion of the Lamprey River in New Hampshire as a recreational

river to include an additional river segment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. SUNUNU introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

OCTOBER 7, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the

designation of a portion of the Lamprey River in New

Hampshire as a recreational river to include an additional river segment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1615 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lamprey Wild and

3 Scenic River Extension Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. LAMPREY RECREATIONAL RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

5 (a) ADDITIONAL SEGMENT.—The paragraph entitled

6 ‘‘LAMPREY RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE’’ in section 3(a) of

7 the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is

8 amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘11.5-mile segment extending

10 from the southern Lee town line’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘23.5-mile segment extending from the Bunker

12 Pond Dam in Epping’’; and

13 (2) by striking ‘‘towns of’’ and inserting ‘‘towns

14 of Epping,’’.

15 (b) MANAGEMENT.—Section 405 of division I of the

16 Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of

17 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 110 Stat. 4149; 16 U.S.C.

18 1274 note) is amended—

19 (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ‘‘Epping,’’

20 before ‘‘Durham’’; and

21 (2) by striking subsection (c).

Union Calendar No. 209

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1615

[Report No. 106–368]

A BILL

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend

the designation of a portion of the LampreyRiver in New Hampshire as a recreational riverto include an additional river segment.

OCTOBER 7, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Jason BROOKS, petitioner, v. Angel MEDINA, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8005.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6267

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DERRICK GREEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR93-180-S, CA-98-4116-HNM)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Green, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Douglas Bennett, MILES &

STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. See United States v. Green, Nos. CR93-180-S; CA-98-4116-HNM (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1998). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           186,847
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      53,205
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 240,052
<CASH>                                           8,337
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,833
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          11,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311,145
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                128,081
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             44,964
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,386
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   311,145
<PREMIUMS>                                      26,915
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,700
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   3
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      57
<BENEFITS>                                      14,858
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      8,219
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 108,928<F1>
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             14,858
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,560
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 7,487
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                114,739<F1>
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES DIFFER FROM THE AMOUNTS REPORTED IN
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BECAUSE OF THE INCLUSION HEREIN OF
REINSURANCE RECEIVABLES OF $13,342 AND $13,502 AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND DECEMBER
31, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HERBERT BROOKS, DOC #S40771, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3289

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 20, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee 

County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and David Campbell, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### Flinn Estate.

Argued September 29, 1955.

Before *Stern, O.*J., Stearne, Jones, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*Thomas V. Douglass,*with him *Griggs, Moreland, Blair é Douglass,*for appellant.

*80November 16, 1955:

*John M. Feeney, Jr.,*with him *William F. Know,*and *Moorhead & Know,*for appellees.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The decree is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Rahauser. Costs to he paid by the appellant.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1718

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to add Hickman, Lawrence, Lewis, Perry, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee, to the

Appalachian region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. BRYANT (for himself and Mr. HILLEARY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of

1965 to add Hickman, Lawrence, Lewis, Perry, and

Wayne Counties, Tennessee, to the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION.

4 Section 403 of the Appalachian Regional Develop5 ment Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App.) is amended in the

6 undesignated paragraph relating to Tennessee—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘Hickman,’’ after ‘‘Hawkins,’’;

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘Lawrence, Lewis,’’ after

9 ‘‘Knox,’’;
2

•HR 1718 IH

1 (3) by inserting ‘‘Perry,’’ after ‘‘Overton,’’; and

2 (4) by inserting ‘‘Wayne,’’ after ‘‘Washington,’’.

Æ
Torrick Johntrelle RODGERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5389.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED 

STATES,

Petitioner

v.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________ 

2020-1974

______________________ 

Petition for review pursuant to 38 U.S.C. Section 502.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JAMES DANIEL RIDGWAY, Bergmann & Moore, LLC, Bethesda, MD, argued for petitioner. Also represented by 

GLENN R. BERGMANN; THOMAS POLSENO. 

 MEEN GEU OH, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, 

DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRIAN M.

BOYNTON, CLAUDIA BURKE, MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.,

NATHANAEL YALE; BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, ANDREW J.

STEINBERG, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. 

Case: 20-1974 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 01/04/2022
 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and CUNNINGHAM,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

January 4, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1974 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 01/04/2022
Exhibit 23.1

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3  (Nos. 333-49870 and 333-39692) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-55076, 333-47972, 333-38610, 333-32554, 333-83783, 333-79043, 333-71278, and 333-96891) of RedbackNetworks Inc. of our report dated January 15, 2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERSLLP

 

San Jose, California 

March 27, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the annual report of Bidville,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Michael  Palandro,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ Michael Palandro
                              -------------------------
                              Michael Palandro
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              April 14, 2005
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/06/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      140,933
COMMITMENTS
  44,296   25,240   23,425   56,206   68,031  123,927  116,696   17,006   24,237

CHANGES FROM 11/29/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,912)
   1,970       66    1,732   -1,265      103    2,437    1,901     -525       11

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    31.4     17.9     16.6     39.9     48.3     87.9     82.8     12.1     17.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      164)
      53       26       35       60       59      126      112
```

----

Updated December 9, 2011
Martinez Orlando BLACK, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 18-5127.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina denied.
Michael SLAGER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9032.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          43,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,377
<INVENTORY>                                     50,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,153
<PP&E>                                         206,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                     112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,726
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   531,949
<SALES>                                        414,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,546
<CGS>                                          329,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                161,842
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   155,002
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Fred HUFFMAN, petitioner, v. Dana METZGER, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8778.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# Uradni list C 28/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 28 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6519. januar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 28

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6519. januar 2022

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2022/C 28/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 18. januar 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2022/C 28/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 18. januar 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 19.1.2022 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 28/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2022

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 28/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

18. januar 2022

(2022/C 28/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1367 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 130,39 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4425 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,83673 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,3185 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0414 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 146,00 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 9,9638 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 24,426 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 357,00 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5260 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,9449 |
| TRY | turška lira | 15,4447 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5833 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4228 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,8576 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6798 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5349 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 355,33 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,5398 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,2212 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5225 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 318,64 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,7554 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 58,553 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 86,7325 |
| THB | tajski bat | 37,635 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,2797 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 23,1443 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 84,8130 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1367

JPY

japonski jen

130,39

DKK

danska krona

7,4425

GBP

funt šterling

0,83673

SEK

švedska krona

10,3185

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0414

ISK

islandska krona

146,00

NOK

norveška krona

9,9638

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

24,426

HUF

madžarski forint

357,00

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5260

RON

romunski leu

4,9449

TRY

turška lira

15,4447

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5833

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4228

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,8576

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6798

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5349

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 355,33

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,5398

CNY

kitajski juan

7,2212

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5225

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 318,64

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,7554

PHP

filipinski peso

58,553

RUB

ruski rubelj

86,7325

THB

tajski bat

37,635

BRL

brazilski real

6,2797

MXN

mehiški peso

23,1443

INR

indijska rupija

84,8130

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1749

AN ACT

To designate Wilson Creek in Avery and Caldwell

Counties, North Carolina, as a component of theNational Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1749

AN ACT

To designate Wilson Creek in Avery and Caldwell Counties,

North Carolina, as a component of the National Wild

and Scenic Rivers System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1749 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILSON CREEK IN NORTH

2 CAROLINA AS A WILD, SCENIC, AND REC3 REATIONAL RIVER.

4 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16

5 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(161) WILSON CREEK, NORTH CAROLINA.—(A)

8 The 23.3 mile segment of Wilson Creek in the State of

9 North Carolina from its headwaters to its confluence with

10 Johns River, to be administered by the Secretary of Agri11 culture in the following classifications:

12 ‘‘(i) The 2.9 mile segment from its headwaters

13 below Calloway Peak downstream to the confluence

14 of Little Wilson Creek, as a scenic river.

15 ‘‘(ii) The 4.6 segment from Little Wilson Creek

16 downstream to the confluence of Crusher Branch, as

17 a wild river.

18 ‘‘(iii) The 15.8 segment from Crusher Branch

19 downstream to the confluence of Johns River, as a

20 recreational river.

21 ‘‘(B) The Forest Service or any other agency of the

22 Federal Government may not undertake condemnation

23 proceedings for the purpose of acquiring public right-of24 way or access to Wilson Creek against the private property

25 of T. Henry Wilson, Jr., or his heirs or assigns, located

26 in Avery County, North Carolina (within the area 36°, 4
3

•HR 1749 EH

1 min., 21 sec. North 81°, 47 min., 37° West and 36°, 3

2 min., 13 sec. North and 81° 45 min. 55 sec. West), in

3 the area of Wilson Creek designated as a wild river.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 29,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Aslam HANDY, petitioner, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al.

No. 18-5381.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.