FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J ULY 26, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 14 50 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 8 :1 0- cr-0 00 69 -VMC- MAP-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us EVER ANTON IO-HERNANDEZ, a.k .a. Rube n M un oz -Me nd ez, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J ul y 26 , 20 11 ) Befo re BARKETT, HULL andMARCUS , Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Afte r pl ead in g g ui lt y , Ever An to ni o- Hern an de z ap pe al s h is 36 -m on th
se nt en ce fo r il le ga l re en try of anali ende po rte d a fte r a fel on y co nv ic ti on , invi ol at io n o f 8 U.S.C . § 1 32 6( a) an d (b )(1 ). Afterrev ie w, we affi rm . I. BACKG ROUND FACTS A. Pres ente nce I nv es tig at io n Repo rt Acco rd in g t o t he pre se nt en ce i nv es ti ga ti on rep ort (“ PSI” ), Ant on io
Hern an de z, a ci ti zen of M ex ic o, was de po rte d i n J an ua ry 20 03 an d a ga in in Feb ru ary 20 03 aft er i ll eg al ly ent eri ng th e Uni te d S ta te s. In May 200 7, An to ni oHern an de z was co nv ic te d o f pu rch as e o f co cai ne in Flo rid a st at e co urt. Aft er co m pl et in g h is sen te nc e, Ant on io -Hern an de z was de po rte d ath irdti m e in Apri l 20 08 . In J ul y

20 08 , Ant on io -Hern an de z was de po rte d afou rth ti m e. InJan uary

20 09 , Im m ig rat io n a ndCu st om s En fo rcem en t o ffi ci al s en co un te redAnt on io -Hern an de z in th e Pi ne ll as Co un ty, Fl or id a jail , wher e h e was be in g h el d p en di ng ch arg es forpo ss es si on of d ex tro am ph et am in e. InFeb ru ary 20 10 , Ant on io -Hern an de z was ch arg edwit h t he in st an t i ll eg al
reen try offe ns e. InMay 201 0, the di st ric t co urt ac cep te d An to ni o- Hern an de z’s gu il ty ple a. The P SI rec omm en de d ato ta l o ffen se lev el of 1 0 a nda cri m in al hi st ory cat eg ory of V, wh ic h re su lt edin anadvi so ry gu id el in es ran ge of 2 1 t o 2 7
m on th s’ im

pr is on m en t. An to ni o- Hern an de z d idno t o bjec t t o t he PSI. B. Sent enci ng At s en te nc in g i n S ep te m

be r 20 10 , th e d is tri ctco urt, wi th ou t o bjec ti on ,

2ad op te d t he PSI an d c al cu la te d an a dv is ory gu id el in es ran ge of 2 1 t o 2 7 m on th s. The di st ric t co urt t he n a sk edth e p art ie s fo r st at em en ts as t o t he ap pr op ria te
se nt en ce. The go ve rn m en t n ot edth atAnt on io -Hern an de z was “ ab ou t t o b e d ep orte d fo r a fi fth ti m e,” an d a rg ue d t ha t An to ni o- Hern an de z n eed edto be sen t a m es sa ge th at“ hi s co nduc t [wo ul d] no t b e to le rat edfurth er.” Th e g ov ern m en t as ke d t he di st ric t co urt “ to de pa rt t hr ee l ev el s up” to anoff en se lev el 13 , whi ch wou ldres ul t in a “ hi gh en d o f th e g ui de li ne s” at 3 7 m on th s. Th e g ov ern m en t as ke d fo r a 3 6-
m on th sen te nc e. Inres po ns e, Ant on io -Hern an de z as ke d the di st ric t co urt “ to st ay withi n t he gu id el in es ,” an d a rg ue d t ha t a s en te nc e wit hi n the advi so ry gu id el in es ran ge of 2 1 to 27 m on th s was reas on ab le . In m it ig at io n, An to ni o- Hern an de z p oi nt edto hi s

“ ro ug h c hi ld ho od ,” an d t he factth atAnt on io -Hern an de z n eed edto care forhi s wid owe d g ran dm ot he r in Mex ic o. An to ni o- Hern an de z ad dr es se d t he co urt, ap ol og iz edforhi s cr im e an d s ta te d t ha t h e u nd ers to odhe ne ed edto return t o Mex ic o a ndcare forhi s g ran dm ot he r. The di stric t co urt i m

po se d a36 -m on th sen te nc e. The d is tri ctco urt s ta te d th atth e “ gu id el in es are ad vi so ry , whi ch m ean s t ha t I h av e th e ri gh t t o d ep art up ward , whi ch is whatI ha ve do ne , if I d eem itap pr op ria te , andif the
3ci rcu m st an ces warran t i t.” Th e d is tri ctco urt n ot edth atitha d “ de pa rte d upwa rd s”

on ly a han df

ul of t im es , andpo in te d t o An to ni o- Hern an de z’s reci di vi sm an d
se rio us cri m in al hi st ory

forit s d eci si on to do so in Ant on io -Hern an de z’s cas e: Thi s is y ou r fif

th ti m e co m in g il le ga ll y in to th e Un i t e d S t a te s. The fif th ti m e. And qu it e fran kl y , if y ou jus t c r os se d th e bo rd er an d di dn ’t vi ol at e th e la w whe n y ou were he re, y ou wou ld n’t be in cri m in al co urt, an d y ou wou ld ha ve a lo t m or e sym pa th y fro m th e pe rs on who is se nt en ci ng y ou . Bec au se , y ou kn ow, aft er al l, th e Uni te d St at es is
. . . th e la ndof o pp ortu ni ty. Obv io us ly y ou ha ve to fo ll ow th e ru le s an d th e la w, an d th at ’s - - th at ’s fir st an d fo rem os t wha t w e s h o u l d do
. Bu t wha t is pa rti cu la rly up s et ti ng is whe n y ou co m e he re il le ga ll y an d th en br eak th e l a w . I m ean , . . . it , in es se nc e, ad ds in su lt to in jury. And in y ou r cas e it ’s ov er an d ov er an d ov er ag ai n. And no t jus t co m m it ti ng li tt le cri m es , bu t it ’s co m m it ti ng cri m es th atare s eri ou s cr im es . Comm it ti ng dru g c rimes. The di st ric t co urt re vi ewedAnt on io -Hern an de z’s cri m in al hi st ory , whi ch in cl ud ed
co nv ic ti on s fo r pu rch as e o f co cai ne , po ss es si on of c oc ai ne , bu rg la ry an d g iv in g fal se in fo rm at io n t o t he po li ce. The di stric t co urt p oi nt edou t t ha t An to ni oHern an de z’s m os t re cen t arres t an d d ep orta ti on st em m edfro m a drug po ss es si on ch arg e. The d is tri ctco urt s ta te d t ha t “ it ’s juston an d o n a ndon ” an d “ atso m e po in t i t ju stha s t o e nd ” an d “ a m es sa ge ne ed s t o b e se ntto y ou th aten ou gh is
en ou gh .” The d is tri ctco urt co nc lu de d t ha t “ ci rcu m st an ces warran te d my de pa rti ng up ward ,” an d s ta te d, “ I do n’t wan t you t o l eav e th is co urtro om wit ho ut
un de rs ta nd in g t ha t you c an no t co m e b ackin to th e Uni te d S ta te s u nl es s you f ol lo w

4th e p ro pe r pr ot oc ol .”

Whe n t he di st ric t co urt as ke d fo r fi na l o bjec ti on s, d efen se co un se l s ta te d,

“ You r Hon or , justto th e rea so nabl en es s o f th e se nt en ce.” Th e d is tri ctco urt
res po nd ed , “ Oka y . I un de rs ta nd , and
. . . I be li ev e I’ve s ta te d my reas on s wh y

I de pa rte d upwa rd s.” C. Sta tement of

Reas on s Init s s ta te m en t o f rea so ns fil edaft er s en te nc in g, t he di st ric t co urt ch eck ed bo xe s i nd ic at in g t ha t i t h adde pa rte d abo ve th e ad vi so ry gu id el in es ran ge ba se d o n th e g ov ern m en t’s m ot io n. Ho wev er, the di stric t co urt d idno t co m pl et e th e co rres po nd in g S ect io n V o f th e fo rm , whi ch li st edpo ss ib le reas on s fo r a d ep artur e by gu id el in es pro vi si on , in cl ud in g U.S.S.G. § 4A1 .3 fo r cri m in al hi st ory in ad equa cy . In st ead , th e d is tri ctco urt co m pl et edSect io n VI, wh ic h c orres po nd s t o a se nt en ce i m

po se d o ut si de th e ad vi so ry gu id el in e syst em

(i.e ., a var ia nc e) an d a sk s th e co urt t o e xp la in th e fac ts jus ti fy in g s uc h asen te nc e. Sp eci fic al ly, in Sect io n VI, th e d is tri ctco urt s ta te d: “ The Co urt g ran te d t he go ve rn m en t’s o ral m ot io n fo r anup wardde pa rtu re o f 3 l ev el s b as edon ag gr av at in g fa ct or s i nc lu di ng th e de fen da nt ’s fiv e p rio r de po rta ti on s, an d t he de fen da nt ’s on go in g c riminal hi st ory in cl ud in g d ru g s al es , dru g p os se ss io n, b ur gl ary, an d p ro vi di ng fal se na m es to law
5en fo rcem en t.” An to ni o- Hern an de z fi le d thi s ap pe al
. II . DISCUSSI ON On ap pe al , Ant on io -Hern an de z arg ue s t ha t h is 36 -m on th sen te nc e was th e res ul t o f an up wardde pa rtu re u nd er U.S.S.G. § 4 A1.3 (a) a ndth atth e d is tri ctco urt
erre d b y no t g iv in g p rio r no ti ce p ur su an t t o F ed eral Ru le of C riminal Pro cedur e 32 (h ) or fol lo win g t he pro cedur es in § 4 A1.3 (a). Bec au se Ant on io -Hern an de z rai se s the se ob jecti on s fo r th e fi rs t t im e o n ap pe al , we rev ie w for

pl ai n e rro r. See Un it edSta te s v . Olan o, 5 07 U.S. 72 5, 7 31
- 32 , 11 3 S . Ct. 1 77 0, 1 77 6 (1 99 3)
. Und er p la in erro r rev ie w, Ant on io -Hern an de z 1
m us t s ho w (1) erro r, (2 ) th atis pl ai n, (3 ) th ataffe ct edhi s s ub st an ti al rig ht s, an d (4 ) th at“ se rio us ly affect s t he fai rn es s, i nt eg rit y or p ub li c rep ut at io n o f jud ic ia l pr oc eed in gs .” See i d. at73 2, 1 13 S. Ct. at17 76 (qu ot at io n m ark s an d b rack et s om it te d)
. Sect io n 4 A1.3 (a) aut ho riz es a di st ric t co urt t o d ep artup ward“ if r el iabl e in fo rm at io n i nd ic at es th atth e d efen da nt ’s cri m in al hi st ory cat eg ory subs ta nt ia ll y We rejec t Antonio-Herna ndez’s contention that his g ener al objection to the 1 rea sonablene ss of his sentence prese rved the issues he now ra ises on appea l. At sentencing , Antonio-Her

nandez did not argue that he w as entitled to Rule 32(h) notice or that the district court ha d not complied with U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(a). See United States v. Gallo-Chamorr o, 48 F.3d 502, 507 (11th Cir. 1995) (“ To prese rve a n issue for a

ppeal, a g ener al objection or a

n objection on other grounds will not suffice.” ); United States v. Hoff er, 129 F .3d 1196, 1202 (11th Cir. 1997) (“ To prese rve a

n issue for a

ppeal, a n objection must be sufficie ntly detailed to allow the trial court a

n opportunity

to corre ct any

arguable e rror s befor e an a ppeal is take n.”) 6un de r-re pr es en ts th e se rio us ne ss of t he de fen da nt ’s cri m in al hi st ory or t he li ke li ho odth atth e d efen da ntwil l co m m itot he r cri m es .” U.S.S.G. § 4 A1.3 (a)( 1)
. If the de fen da nt ’s cri m in al hi st ory cat eg ory is lo wer tha n acat eg ory

VI, th e de pa rtu re m

us t p ro ceed“ on on ly the ho riz on ta l ax is ” o f th e se nt en ci ng tab le , in crea si ng or d ecre as in g t he cri m in al hi st ory cat eg ory , no t t he off

en se lev el
. Uni te d S ta te s v . Sm it h, 2 89 F.3d69 6, 7 10 (11 th Cir . 20 02 ); s ee al so U.S.S.G. § 4 A1.3 (a)( 4) (A). Ru le 32 (h ) requi res th e d is tri ctco urt t o p ro vi de no ti ce b efo re i t i m po se s a gu id el in es de pa rtu re o n agro un d n otid en ti fie d i n t he PSI o r a p art y ’s pre he ari ng subm is si on . See Fed . R. Cri m . P. 32 (h ); s ee al so Bu rn s v . Uni te d S ta te s, 5 01 U.S. 12 9, 1 31 , 11 1 S . Ct. 2 18 2, 2 18 3 (1 99 1) . Howev er, Ru le 32 (h )’s no ti ce requi rem en t ap pl ie s o nl y

to de pa rtu res un de r th e se nt en ci ng gu id el in es , no t t o va ria nc es fro m

th e ap pl ic ab le gu id el in es ran ge . Iriz arry v. Uni te d S ta te s, 5 53 U.S. 70 8, 7 14 -1 6, 1 28 S. Ct. 2 19 8, 2 20 2- 04 (20 08 ). W e h av e co nc lu de d t ha t an ab ov e-g ui de li ne s s en te nc e in vo lv es a varianc e fro m th e ad vi so ry

ran ge , rathe r th ana de pa rtu re, wh enth e d is tri ctco urt co rrec tl y cal cu la te d t he gu id el in es ran ge , fou ndth atth e ran ge di d n otad dr es s ad equa te ly all of th e 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a) fa ct or s an d d idno t ci te a sp eci fic de pa rtu re p ro vi si on . See, e.g ., Uni te d S ta te s v . Iriz arry, 458 F.3d12 08 , 12 11 -1 2 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 6) , aff’d,
755 3 U.S. 7 08 , 12 8 S . Ct. 2 19 8 (2 00 8) ; Un it edSta te s v . Eld ic k, 4 43 F.3d78 3, 7 88

n.2 (11 th Cir . 20 06 ). W e h av e d on e so ev enwhen th e d is tri ctco urt s ta te d i t was gr an ti ng a “ m ot io n fo r an up wardde pa rtu re.” Un it edSta te s v . Kapo rd el is , 56 9 F.3 d 1 29 1, 1 31 6 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 9) , cert . den ie d, 1 30 S. Ct. 1 31 5 (2 01 0) (rel y in g o n factth atdi stric t co urt d idno t ci te a de pa rtu re p ro vi si onan d b as edit s s en te nc in g rat io na le on § 3 55 3( a) fa ct or s an d ade te rm in at io n tha t a g ui de li ne s s en te nc e was in ad equa te ). Here, t he di st ric t co urt d idno t i m po se anup wardde pa rtu re u nd er t he
se nt en ci ng gu id el in es . Rath er, the di st ric t co urt ca lc ul at edth e ad vi so ry gu id el in es ran ge an d i nv it edth e p art ie s t o s ug ge stanap pr op ria te sen te nc e. Alt ho ug h t he di st ric t co urt u se d t he ph ras e “ up wardde pa rtu re” dur in g t he pro ceed in gs an d i n th e st at em en t o f rea so ns , itne ve r ci te d asp eci fic de pa rtu re p ro vi si on inth e gu id el in es as t he ba si s fo r th e in crea se d s en te nc e. The d is tri ctco urt al so di d n ot
m ak e a fi nd in g t ha t An to ni o- Hern an de z’s cri m in al hi st ory cat eg ory V subs ta nt ia ll y un de r-re pr es en te d the ser io us ne ss of h is cri m in al hi st ory or t he li ke li ho odhe
wou ldco m

m itothe r cri m es . Fu rth er, the di stric t co urt’s ra ti on al e fo r th e 3 6- m on th sen te nc e was th e se rio us ne ss of An to ni o- Hern an de z’s cri m in al hi st ory , hi s p ro pe ns it y forreci di vi sm an d t he ne edto de te r hi m fro m furth er cri m in al co nduc t, wh ic h i m pl ic at e se ve ral
8§ 3 55 3( a) fa ct or s, i nc lu di ng th e d efen da nt ’s hi st ory an d c haract eri st ic s, t he ne ed fo r affo rdad equa te de te rren ce an d t he ne edto pro te ctth e p ub li c fro m futur e cri m es by the de fen da nt . See 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a)( 1) , (2) (B), (2 )(C) . On th e reco rdas awho le , we con cl ud e th e d is tri ctco urt i m po se d adi sc ret io na ry

ni ne m on th up wardva ria nc e b as edon th e § 35 53 (a) fa ct or s, an d n otanup ward de pa rtu re b as edon U.S.S.G. § 4 A1.3 (a). At am in im um , gi ve n o urpl ai n e rro r rev ie w, Ant on io -Hern an de z h as no t carri edhi s b ur de n t o s ho w th e d is tri ctco urt pl ai nl y co nduc te d a§ 4 A1.3 (a) d ep artur e as he arg ue s. Giv enth atth e d is tri ctco urt i m po se d a n upwa rdva ria nc e, itwas n ot requi redto gi ve Ru le 32 (h ) no ti ce o r to co m pl y wit h the pro cedur es inU.S.S.G. § 4 A1.3 (a). An to ni o- Hern an de z h as no t s ho wn p la in erro r. AFFIRMED.

9