alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CertificationPursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)**
     The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Allied Holdings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledgeand belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September30, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Holdings,Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification ismade pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. §1350) andshall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
     This7th day of January, 2005.    */s/ David A. Rawden*  *David A. Rawden* *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer*
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Allied Holdings, Inc.and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall itbe deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in suchfiling.
41
Michael ST. HUBERT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5269.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Entertainment Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hamon Fytton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Hamon Fytton       
| | Hamon Fytton           
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | May 31, 2017
[Cite as State ex rel. Bobo v. McDonnell, 2011-Ohio-5840.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 97370

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. 

VICTOR BOBO

RELATOR 

vs. 

JUDGE NANCY McDONNELL, ET AL.

RESPONDENTS 

JUDGMENT: 

WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus 

Motion No. 448813 

Order No. 448900 

RELEASE DATE: November 8, 2011 

FOR RELATOR
Victor Bobo, pro se 

Cuyahoga County Jail 

P.O. Box 5600 

Cleveland, Ohio 44101 

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS

William D. Mason 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

James E. Moss 

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 

The Justice Center 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44113

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.: 

{¶ 1} Victor Bobo has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Bobo 

seeks an order from this court, which requires Judge Nancy McDonnell to 

render a ruling with regard to a motion for jail-time credit as filed in the 

criminal case of State v. Bobo, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case 

No. CR-544152. Bobo also seeks an order that requires the Cuyahoga 

County Sheriff to provide him with additional jail-time credit in the amount 

of ten days. 

{¶ 2} Attached to the joint motion for summary judgment, as filed by 

Judge McDonnell and the Cuyahoga County Sheriff, is a copy of a journal 

entry, as journalized on October 21, 2011, which demonstrates that Bobo has 

been granted an additional ten days of jail-time credit for a total of 212 days 

of jail-time credit. Bobo’s request for mandamus is thus moot. State ex rel. 
Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 

1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio 

St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163. In addition, the Cuyahoga County Sheriff 

possesses no duty to calculate jail-time credit. State ex rel. Dunbar v. 

Saffold, Cuyahoga App. No. 89260, 2007-Ohio-1143; State ex rel. Griffin v. 

McFaul, Cuyahoga App. No. 84360, 2004-Ohio-3863. 

{¶ 3} Accordingly, we grant the respondents’ motion for summary 

judgment. Costs awarded to Bobo with costs waived. It is further ordered 

that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve notice of this 

judgment upon all parties as required by Civ.R. 58(B). 

Writ denied. 

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., JUDGE 

MELODY J. STEWART, P.J., and 

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
1

Opinion issued November 18, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 14 - 00549 - CV

——————————— GERARDO GONZALEZ AND CLAUDIA GONZALEZ , Appellant s V. RAY GARNER IN HIS OFFICIAL CA PACITY AS POLICE CHIEF AND POLICE FIREF IGHTERS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY

OF LAREDO, TEXAS , Appellee s
On Appeal from the 341st District Court

Webb County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014 - CVZ - 000391 - D3 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant s , Gerardo Gonzalez and Claudia Gonzalez , have neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R.2

A PP . P. 5, 20.1 ; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § § 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 ( West 201 3 ); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Cour t and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX . R. A PP . P . app. A § B(1)
. Further, appellants have not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee fo r pre paring the clerk’s record
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3(b)
. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant s did not adequately respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 ; 42.3 (b)
. We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution . We dismiss any pending motions as moot
.
PER CURIAM Panel con sists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown
.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0008. GABRIEL KOTSIS v. JAN SUTTKUS et al. 

Upon consider of the application for discretionary review, it is hereby

DENIED.

 The respondents’ request for a frivolous appeal penalty is also hereby DENIED.

See Court of Appeals Rule 41 (b); Ridley v. Turner, 335 Ga. App. 108, 113 (6) (778

SE2d 844) (2015).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 13, 2019

08/13/2019
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of GlobespanVirata, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
McMullan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Saranes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Robert McMullan
-------------------------------------
Robert McMullan
Chief Financial Officer
April 30, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Energy Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey W. Flannery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: May 24, 2011/s/ Jeffrey W. FlanneryJeffrey W. FlanneryChief Executive Officer
Alberic ISRAEL, on Behalf of Minor Children A.I. and E.I., petitioner, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, et al.

No. 18-7343.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Regiss Blake ROSS, petitioner v. ARIZONA.

No. 18-66.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied.
ALTITUDE EXPRESS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Melissa ZARDA, as Executor of the Estate of Donald Zarda, et al.

No. 17-1623.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petitioner in No. 17-1618, respondents in No. 17-1623, and respondent Aimee Stephens in No. 18-107 shall file their briefs on the merits, pursuant to Rule 33.1(g)(v), on or before Wednesday, June 26, 2019. Respondent in No. 17-1618, petitioners in No. 17-1623, and petitioner and respondent EEOC in No. 18-107 shall file their briefs on the merits, pursuant to Rule 33.1(g)(vi), on or before Friday, August 16, 2019. Reply briefs, if any, pursuant to Rule 33.1(g)(vii), shall be filed on or before Monday, September 16, 2019. *Amicus curiae* briefs shall be filed pursuant to Rule 37.3.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1651 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                         June 26, 2000.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1651) entitled ``An Act to amend the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967 
to extend the period during which reimbursement may be provided to 
owners of United States fishing vessels for costs incurred when such a 
vessel is seized and detained by a foreign country, and for other 
purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 13, line 3, strike out [$60,000,000.] and insert: $60,000,000 
for each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003.

                        TITLE IV--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 401. USE OF AIRCRAFT PROHIBITED.

    Section 7(a) of the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975 (16 
U.S.C. 971e(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after the semicolon in paragraph 
        (1);
            (2) by striking ``fish.'' in paragraph (2) and inserting 
        ``fish; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) for any person, other than a person holding a valid 
        Federal permit in the purse seine category--
                    ``(A) to use an aircraft to locate or otherwise 
                assist in fishing for, catching, or retaining Atlantic 
                bluefin tuna; or
                    ``(B) to catch, possess, or retain Atlantic bluefin 
                tuna located by use of an aircraft.''.

SEC. 402. FISHERIES RESEARCH VESSEL PROCUREMENT.

    Notwithstanding section 644 of title 15, United States Code, and 
section 19.502-2 of title 48, Code of Federal Regulations, the 
Secretary of Commerce shall seek to procure Fisheries Research Vessels 
through full and open competition from responsible United States 
shipbuilding companies irrespective of size.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1651

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
Gilbert MENDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-842.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ELVIR A B AR TOLO-SEB ASTIAN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-70912 Age n c y No. A029-376-043 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 * * B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Elvira B artolo-Se b a stia

n, a native and c itiz e n of Gua te m a l a , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing he r a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing he r a pplic ation for 

# FIL ED

OCT 3 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).withholding of rem o v a l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e grant

the p e tition for re v i e w a

nd re m and. In de ny ing B artolo-Se ba stia n’ s withholding of re

m ova l c l a im , the a ge nc y found B artolo-Se b a stia

n fa ile d to e sta

blish a c le ar proba

bility that he r life or fre e dom would be thre at e ne d on a c c o unt of a prote c te d ground. W

h e n the IJ a nd B IA issue d the ir de c isions in this c a se the y did not ha

ve the be ne fit of this c ourt’ s de c isions in H

e nrique z -Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ), C ordoba v . Holde r , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th C ir. 2013), a nd Pirir-Boc v . Holde r , 750 F.3d 1077 (9th C ir. 2014), or theB IA’ s de c isions in Matte r of M-E-V-G- , 26 I. & N. De c . 227 (B IA 2014), a nd Matte r of W -G-R- , 26 I. & N. De c . 208 (B IA 2014). Thus, were m and B a rtolo-Se ba stia

n’ s withholding of rem ova l c la im to de te rm i ne the im

pa c t, if a ny , of the se de c isions. Se e IN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (pe r c uriam ). In light of this re m and, we do not re a c h B artoloSe ba stia n’ s re m a ining c ha lle n ge s to the a ge n c y ’ s de nia l of he r withholding of re m ova l c la im

at this time . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .

2 1 1 - 7 0 9 1 2
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tugboat International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christos Papadimas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of February 2003.


/s/ Christos Papadimas
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         154,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,996,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,151,777
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,796,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,796,346
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,806
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,941
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    19.94
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of International Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Amit S. Dang, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 6, 2011
/s/ Amit S. DangAmit S. DangPresident, Chief Executive Officer, andChief Financial Officer
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 11/29/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      138,609
COMMITMENTS
  20,435   19,660   29,566   73,262   77,938  123,263  127,164   15,346   11,445

CHANGES FROM 11/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      4,678)
  -1,198    3,403      220    6,527    3,097    5,549    6,720     -871   -2,042

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.7     14.2     21.3     52.9     56.2     88.9     91.7     11.1      8.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      25       20       28       23       23       66       59
```

----

Updated December 2, 2011
Ex-99.4
Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
Certificatesholders.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   Class          Interest          Principle             Losses          Ending Balance
   -----          --------          ---------             ------          --------------
<S>               <C>               <C>                           <C>      <C>
IA1               4,342,056.81      27,259,184.71                 0.00     $67,005,372.33
IAIO                737,901.79               0.00                 0.00              $0.00
IB1                 304,252.22         136,749.25                 0.00      $4,770,803.99
IB2                  62,950.20          28,293.59                 0.00        $987,085.54
IB3                  47,211.14          21,219.54                 0.00        $740,290.70
IB4                  20,985.38           9,432.08                 0.00        $329,059.74
IB5                  15,733.04           7,071.38                 0.00        $246,701.12
IB6                  40,877.58          18,126.50           159,697.34        $570,869.71
IIA1              2,304,939.89      44,049,891.28                 0.00     $15,274,608.27
IIB1                164,416.69       1,162,129.63                 0.00      $1,699,822.56
IIB2                101,449.80         717,067.32                 0.00      $1,048,839.34
IIB3                 52,470.47         370,871.70                 0.00        $542,466.27
IIB4                 31,483.46         222,531.15                 0.00        $325,491.63
IIB5                 10,496.39          74,190.57                 0.00        $108,517.01
IIB6                 24,490.39         173,102.83                 0.00        $253,193.94
IIIA1             3,869,687.92      58,510,484.29                 0.00     $28,137,220.80
IIIB1               262,178.76         993,949.47                 0.00      $3,041,930.93
IIIB2               131,092.61         496,986.99                 0.00      $1,521,002.95
IIIB3                58,261.24         220,874.94                 0.00        $675,976.31
IIIB4                33,981.96         128,829.42                 0.00        $394,275.76
IIIB5                14,570.16          55,237.12                 0.00        $169,050.31
IIIB6                33,987.88         128,851.92                 0.00        $394,344.65
R1                      186.70               0.00                 0.00              $0.00
R2                        0.00               0.00                 0.00              $0.00
</TABLE>