alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4474-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4474-DR), dated January 17, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on April 28, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Robert V. Fogel, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of James R. McPherson as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-10227 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Jeffrey A. JACOBI, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 18-1188.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-56472, 333-77851, 333-32436) pertaining to the 2000
Supplemental Stock Option Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, and 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of Portal Software, Inc. of our report dated February 15,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Portal
Software, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
January 31, 2001.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
April 19, 2001
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/23/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      166,998
COMMITMENTS
  20,506   35,546   38,016   88,255   72,199  146,777  145,761   20,221   21,237

CHANGES FROM 08/16/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -32,175)
  -5,589    8,620  -20,232   -3,258  -19,458  -29,079  -31,070   -3,096   -1,105

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.3     21.3     22.8     52.8     43.2     87.9     87.3     12.1     12.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      104)
      28       26       52       24       24       91       86
```

----

Updated August 26, 2011
**CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT**
 
 **OF**
 
 **AMENDED
AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**
 
 **OF**
 
 **EDGAR®
ONLINE®, INC.**
 
 EDGAR
Online, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware (the “Corporation”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:
 
 FIRST : The
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by deleting the first paragraph of Article IV thereof in its present
form and substituting therefor in the following form:
 
 “The
total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation has
authority to issue is Fifty-one Million (51,000,000) shares, consisting of two
classes: Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per
share, and One Million (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
per share.”
 
 SECOND : The
amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation set forth in this Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by
the Board of Directors and Stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware and the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment as
of this 8 th day of
June, 2004.
  **EDGAR
      ONLINE, INC.**By:
    /s/
      Susan
      StrausbergSusan
      StrausbergChief
      Executive Officer and President
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, David L.
Sokol , certify
that:
 
 1.
    
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofMidAmerican
      Energy Holdings Company;2.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
February 28, 2005
 /s/
David L. Sokol
 David L.
Sokol
 Chairman
and C hief
Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT3.1.3**

 

**CERTIFICATEOF AMENDMENT****OF THEAMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATIONOFULTRATECH STEPPER, INC.,**

a Delaware Corporation

 

Ultratech Stepper, Inc., a corporation organized andexisting under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the“Corporation”) DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

 

FIRST:  Theoriginal Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with theSecretary of State of Delaware on September 21, 1992 (at such time the name ofthe Corporation was UTS Acquisition Corporation).  The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filedwith the Secretary of State of Delaware on October 6, 1993 and was amended by aCertificate of Amendment filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on May17, 1995, a Certificate of Designation filed with the Secretary of State ofDelaware on February 13, 1997 and a Certificate of Amendment filed with theSecretary of State of Delaware on June 17, 1998.

 

SECOND:  Theamendment of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Certificate ofIncorporation set forth below was duly adopted in accordance with theprovisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State ofDelaware by the directors and stockholders of the Corporation.

 

THIRD:  ArticleI of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entiretyas follows:

 

“The name of this Corporation is Ultratech, Inc.”

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused thisCertificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporationto be executed by Arthur W. Zafiropoulo, its authorized officer, on this 10thday of June, 2003.

 

 
|   | /s/ Arthur W. Zafiropoulo                                     |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Arthur W. Zafiropoulo                                         |
|   | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive  Officer and President |

 

----
March 7, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARCUS DEWAYNE CHAMBERS, Appellant

NO. 14-11-01117-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Jose COBIAN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8963.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District denied.
Shannon HYLAND, petitioner, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 18-24.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
1 Judge Graves did not participate in the poll. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-11098
DIANE G REED, Real party in Interest, Plaintiff ! Appellee Cross-Appellant

vs. CITY OF ARLINGTON, Defendant ! Appellant Cross-Appellee

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

- - - - - ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion September 16, 2010, 5 Cir., 2010, ____ F.3d ____)

(February 22, 2011) BEFORE: JONES, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA,

BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 1 BY THE COURT: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D February 22, 2011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk
John MAGUIRE, et al., petitioners, v. Anika EDREI, et al.

No. 18-810.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Patricia A. GRANT, petitioner, v. Claudio Gabriel ALPEROVICH, et al.

No. 17-9477.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jeremiah W. BALIK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7870.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30968 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RAYMOND BRUMFIELD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 52

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Raymond Brumfield has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Brumfield has filed response s and a motion for the appointment of counsel . We

have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein , as well as Brumfield ’ s response s . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 8, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30968 Document: 00514864973 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2019No. 17

- 30968

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue fo r appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Brumfield’s motion for appointment of counsel is

DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998). Case: 17-30968 Document: 00514864973 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50327

Conference Calendar

 

STEPHEN E. NICHOLSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY LYNCH, Sheriff; JOHNNY MYNAR; JIMMY STONE; 

ED HARRINGTON; UNNAMED PARA-LEGAL SERVICE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CV-120

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stephen E. Nicholson, Texas prisoner # 1126089, seeks leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for

failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The

district court denied Nicholson’s motion for leave to proceed IFP

on appeal and certified that the appeal was not taken in good

faith. Nicholson challenges the district court’s certification

decision pursuant to Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-50327

-2-

1997). Nicholson has not addressed the merits of the district

court’s certification decision. Accordingly, his request for IFP

status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 The district court’s dismissal of his complaint and this

court’s dismissal of his appeal count as two strikes under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87

(5th Cir. 1996). Nicholson has had at least one other civil

rights complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim, and we

dismissed as frivolous his appeal of that dismissal. Nicholson

v. McLennan County Comm’rs Court, No. 04-50356, slip op. (5th

Cir. August 17, 2004) (unpublished). Nicholson has accumulated

four strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Adepegba,

103 F.3d at 387. Nicholson is therefore BARRED from proceeding

IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated

or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) SANCTIONS

IMPOSED.
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK, et al., petitioners, v. SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, et al.

No. 18-1106.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Justin GRIMSRUD, petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 18-657.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
NUMBER 13-09-00281-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

CHRISTINA PEREZ, Appellant,

v.

CORPUS CHRISTI HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Christina Perez, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 08-61256-5.

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the trial
2

court granted a motion for new trial and the appeal is not necessary. Appellant requests

that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 9th day of July, 2009.
Jose Salvador LANTIGUA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES

No. 18-8390.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of SkyBridge Wireless, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period
ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, James Wheeler, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

|Date: February 14, 2005 |  | BY: /S/ James Wheeler
James WheelerChief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                        |                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                        | /s/ Stanley              Wu |
|   | Name:              Stanley Wu               |
|   | Title:              Chief Executive Officer |

----