alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list C 53/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 53 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 651. februar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 53

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 651. februar 2022

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2022/C 53/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 31. januar 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2022/C 53/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 31. januar 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 1.2.2022 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2022

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 53/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

31. januar 2022

(2022/C 53/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1156 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 128,79 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4419 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,83153 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,4890 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0404 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 143,20 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 10,0085 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 24,372 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 357,19 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5892 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,9475 |
| TRY | turška lira | 14,9310 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5820 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4233 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,6994 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6983 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5110 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 349,08 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,3734 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,0963 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5293 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 036,76 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,6693 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 56,985 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 86,7251 |
| THB | tajski bat | 37,144 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,0030 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 23,1856 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 83,3655 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1156

JPY

japonski jen

128,79

DKK

danska krona

7,4419

GBP

funt šterling

0,83153

SEK

švedska krona

10,4890

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0404

ISK

islandska krona

143,20

NOK

norveška krona

10,0085

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

24,372

HUF

madžarski forint

357,19

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5892

RON

romunski leu

4,9475

TRY

turška lira

14,9310

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5820

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4233

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,6994

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6983

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5110

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 349,08

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,3734

CNY

kitajski juan

7,0963

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5293

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 036,76

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,6693

PHP

filipinski peso

56,985

RUB

ruski rubelj

86,7251

THB

tajski bat

37,144

BRL

brazilski real

6,0030

MXN

mehiški peso

23,1856

INR

indijska rupija

83,3655

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1779

To amend title 10, United States Code, to make changes to the overseas

special supplemental food program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 12, 1999

Mr. GOODLING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to make changes

to the overseas special supplemental food program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Overseas Special Sup5 plemental Food Program Amendments of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO OVERSEAS SPECIAL SUPPLE7 MENTAL FOOD PROGRAM.

8 (a) PROGRAM REQUIRED.—Subsection (a) of section

9 1060a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
2

•HR 1779 IH

1 striking ‘‘AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may’’

2 and inserting ‘‘PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of

3 Defense shall’’.

4 (b) FUNDING SOURCE.—Subsection (b) of such sec5 tion is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(b) FUNDING MECHANISM.—The Secretary of De7 fense shall use funds available for the Department of De8 fense to carry out the program under subsection (a).’’.

9 (c) PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION.—Subsection (c) of

10 such section is amended—

11 (1) in paragraph (1)(B) to read as follows:

12 ‘‘(B) In determining income eligibility standards for

13 families of individuals participating in the program under

14 this section, the Secretary of Defense shall, to the extent

15 practicable, use the criterion described in subparagraph

16 (A).’’;

17 (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end be18 fore the period the following: ‘‘, particularly with re19 spect to nutrition education and counseling’’; and

20 (3) by adding at the end the following:

21 ‘‘(3) The Secretary of Agriculture shall provide tech22 nical assistance to the Secretary of Defense, if so re23 quested by the Secretary of Defense, for the purpose of

24 carrying out the program under subsection (a).’’.
3

•HR 1779 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 17 of the

2 Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786) is amended

3 by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(q) The Secretary of Agriculture shall provide tech5 nical assistance to the Secretary of Defense, if so re6 quested by the Secretary of Defense, for the purpose of

7 carrying out the overseas special supplemental food pro8 gram established under section 1060a(a) of title 10,

9 United States Code.’’.

Æ
** **

**PROMISSORY NOTE**

US$34,000.00                                                                                                                          May 3, 2016

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, **PALTARNATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP** (the “**Borrower**”), promises to pay to theorder of **DAVID N. SIEGEL REVOCABLE TRUST 2009**(the “**Lender**”)the principal sum of **THIRTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS (US$34,000.00)**in lawful currency of the United States (the “**PrincipalSum**”), together with interest thereon as herein provided.

The Principal Sum or such amount as shallremain outstanding from time to time and shall bear interest, thereon,calculated daily, at a rate of **ten percent (10%) per annum** as of theissue dates of May 3, 2016.  In the event of any partial repayment made on thePrincipal Sum, such payments shall be applied firstly towards accrued interestand then towards the Principal Sum.

The Principal Sum and all accrued and unpaidinterest at the rate aforesaid will become due and payable on **May 3, 2017**(the “**Term**”).  Extension of time of payment of all or any part of theamount owing hereunder at any time or times and failures of the Lender toenforce any of their rights or remedies hereunder shall not release theBorrower from its obligations hereunder or constitute a waiver of the rights ofthe Lender to enforce any rights and remedies therein.

On default in payment of any sum duehereunder for the Principal Sum or interest or after 15 days’ notice of Defaultto the Borrower, the unpaid balance of the Principal Sum and all accruedinterest thereon shall at the option of the Lender forthwith become due andpayable.

This Promissory Note shall be governed bythe laws of the State of Delaware.

The undersigned will have the privilege of prepaying in whole orin part the Principal Sum and accrued interest.

Presentment, protest, notice of protest andnotice of dishonour arehereby waived.

 

**DAVID N. SIEGEL REVOCABLE TRUST 2009****PALTARNATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

 

/s/David N. Siegel                                                  /s/John R. Hislop                                            DAVID N. SIEGEL, Trustee                                   JOHN R. HISLOP,President

 

** **
Ian R. DAVIS, petitioner, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden.

No. 18-7188.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
John L. LOTTER, petitioner, v. NEBRASKA.

No. 18-8415.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
# Publicatieblad C 522A/28 d

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 522A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 64e jaargang28 december 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 522A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

64e jaargang28 december 2021

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificaties |
| 2021/C 522 A/01 | Rectificatie van de aankondiging van aanwerving PE/269/S — Directeur (m/v) (functiegroep AD, rang 14) — Directoraat-generaal Beveiliging en Veiligheid — Directoraat Technologie en Informatie ( PB C 505 A van 15.12.2021 ) | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

Rectificaties

2021/C 522 A/01

Rectificatie van de aankondiging van aanwerving PE/269/S — Directeur (m/v) (functiegroep AD, rang 14) — Directoraat-generaal Beveiliging en Veiligheid — Directoraat Technologie en Informatie ( PB C 505 A van 15.12.2021 )

( PB C 505 A van 15.12.2021 )

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

Rectificaties

| 28.12.2021 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 522/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2021

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 522/1

---

Rectificatie van de aankondiging van aanwerving PE/269/S — Directeur (m/v) (functiegroep AD, rang 14) — Directoraat-generaal Beveiliging en Veiligheid — Directoraat Technologie en Informatie

(
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 505 A van 15 december 2021
  )

(2021/C 522 A/01)

| 1. | Bladzijden 7 en 8, de voetnoten na voetnoot 5: de nummers 1, 6, 7, 8 en 9 worden vernummerd tot 6, 7, 8, 9 en 10. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Bladzijde 7, punt ii) (Vereiste beroepservaring): |
| --- | --- |

2.

| in plaats van: | “twaalf jaar, ten minste deels op de bevoegdheidsterreinen van het directoraat en met inbegrip van minimum zes jaar in een Europese en/of internationale omgeving en minimum zes jaar in leidinggevende functies in een grote divisie.”, |
| --- | --- |

in plaats van:

“twaalf jaar, ten minste deels op de bevoegdheidsterreinen van het directoraat en met inbegrip van minimum zes jaar in een Europese en/of internationale omgeving en minimum zes jaar in leidinggevende functies in een grote divisie.”,

| lezen: | “ten minste twaalf jaar, ten minste deels op de bevoegdheidsterreinen van het directoraat en met inbegrip van minimum zes jaar in een Europese en/of internationale omgeving en minimum zes jaar in leidinggevende functies in een grote divisie.”, |
| --- | --- |

lezen:

lezen:

“ten minste twaalf jaar, ten minste deels op de bevoegdheidsterreinen van het directoraat en met inbegrip van minimum zes jaar in een Europese en/of internationale omgeving en minimum zes jaar in leidinggevende functies in een grote divisie.”,

---
#### Elvin P. EVANS, Appellee, v. MO-KAN TEAMSTERS PENSION PLAN c/o Carl Rippeto, Fund Administrator, Appellant.

No. 80-1732.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1981.

Decided Aug. 13, 1981.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 9,1981.

*901Stanford C. Madden (argued), Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

Albert J. Yonke (argued), Yonke, Shack-elford & Arnold, P. C., Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, awarding Elvin P. Evans pension benefits and attorneys’ fees from the Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Plan. After a careful review of the records and briefs, we affirm the district court. *See Elvin P. Evans v. Mo-Kan Teamsters Pension Fund,*519 F.Supp. 9 (W.D.Mo. 1980). We do so because we agree with the district court that the ambiguity in the trust and pension plan documents regarding the geographical scope of the fund, coupled with the consistent treatment of the contributions made for plaintiff as valid and proper payment, evidences an interpretation of the pension plan contracts including plaintiff in the plan.

In affirming the district court we note that the ambiguities present in the plan’s documents and booklets can be clarified so that employees will be fully and fairly apprised of their rights and the fiscal integrity of the fund will be insured for the future.

Affirmed.
Daryl SHARP, petitioner, v. Timothy DOLAN.

No. 18-8184.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Affirmed and Plurality and Concurring Opinion s filed August 31 , 2021.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00645

- CV

CRYSTAL DOLGENER , Appellant

V.

STEVEN DOLGENER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial C ourt Caus e N o. 2019

- 2799 8

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the judgment and join in the portion s of the opinion except as to

issues one, two, three, and ten.

Regarding issues one, two, and three, the court analy z es the legal and factual

suffi ci enc y of th e evidence that family vio lence has occurred and was directed at

each “ protected person

. ” While I agree with the cour t ’ s analysis on each issue, it is

not necessary to r each all of those issue s in order to uphold the p r otective order

.

W hat is required is l e gal and factual suffi ci enc y of the evidence of family violence2

generall y . Und er the facts of this case, overruling any one of issues one, two

, or

three renders the remaining issue s moot. Th e court ’ s opinion should not be read to

sugge s t otherwis e.

Regar di ng issue ten, the court does not discuss Crystal ’ s decision to wait

until the protective order was rendered before filing her moti on to tran sfe r the

protective

- order proceeding f rom the 280th District C ourt to the 2 4 5 t h Di str i ct

Court

. That would appear to be a si g nificant fact.

I con cur in th e judgment and otherwise join in the court ’ s opinion.

/s/ Charles A. Spain

J ust i ce

Panel consists of Ju stices Spain, Hassan, and P oissant

. ( Spain, J., concur ring,

jo in ed by H a ssan, J. )

.
Bradford G. PETERS, as Executor of the Estate of Andrew J. McKelvey, Deceased, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-1177.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 17, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Joshua Mitch JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

No. 18-8973.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Joyce Ann SMITH, petitioner, v. CITY OF PRINCETON, TEXAS, et al.

No. 18-7791.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e J a ne A . R e s t ani , Judge of the U ni t e d S t a t e s C ourtof ** I nt e rna t i ona l T r a de , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LAZARO NA ZARI O V AI L- DI AZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74634 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 385- 916 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r5, 2010 S a n F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: H A L L and T H O M A S , C i rc ui tJudg es , and R E S T A N I, Judg e. ** L a z a r o N a z a r i o V a i l - D i a z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or r e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( “ B I A ” ) de c i s i on a f f i rm i ng the im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e n ia l o f h is ap p lic a tio n s f

o ra s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e . W e de nythe pe t i t i on. 

# FI LED NO V 17 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

T h e B I A p r o p e r lyr e

je c te dV a il- D ia z ’s a s y lu m c la im a s tim e - b arr e d . V a ilD i a z di d notf

i l e a n appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um w i thi n the s t a tut or i l ym anda t e d pe r i od o f o n e y ea r. 8 U .S .C . § 1 1 5 8 (a )( 2 )( B ). S ub stan ti al ev id en ce su p p o rts th e B IA ’s concl usi on thatV ai l -D i az had n otprov en the extra ordi naryci rc um st ance s n e c e s s a ryto ju s tif

yth e la te f

ilin g . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e a ls o s up p o rts th e B I A ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility d et erm i n at i o n . V ai l -D i az’ s t est i m o n y w as i n co n si st en to n n u m ero u s o ccasi o n s, and tho se i ncon si st enci es w entt o the heartof hi s c l ai m . In addi t i on , w hen read as a w ho l e, the re cord dem on strat es fr equentchanges i n V ai l -D i az ’ s s t ory w hen asked f orc l a r i f i c a t i on aboutthe de t a i l s , w hi c h s upport s the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha the w a s notc r e di bl e . T he r e f or e , the B I A di d note rri n r e j e c t i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f or w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e a ls o s up p o rts th e B I A ’s c o n c lu s io n th a t V ia l- D ia z d id no tes t abl i sh i tw as m ore l i kel y than n otthathe w ou l d b e t ortured up on hi s r eturn to G u a te m a la , a n dth u s in e lig ib le f o rr e lie f u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e . 8 C . F . R . § 1 20 8. 16 (c )( 2). V i al -D i az has r eturned t o G uat em al a num er ou s t i m es s i nc e he l e f

t , a nd hi s w i f

e a nd c hi l dr e n c ont i nue t o l i ve the r e unha rm e d. P E T I T I ON DE NI E D.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of First Asia Holdings Limited. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the Report), I, Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  January 13, 2012 /s/ Ms Luk Lai Ching Kimmy     Chief Executive Officer
Steven Lawrence WRIGHT, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-8916.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1583

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent law the

$5,000 first-time homebuyer credit for the District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1999

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

permanent law the $5,000 first-time homebuyer credit

for the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 $5,000 Homebuyer Credit Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT FOR DISTRICT OF

7 COLUMBIA MADE PERMANENT.

8 Subsection (i) of section 1400C of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to first-time homebuyer credit
2

•HR 1583 IH

1 for District of Columbia) is amended by striking ‘‘, and

2 before January 1, 2001’’.

Æ
Timmy W. DOUCET, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-8944.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DANIEL DAVID VERMETTE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-215

LT Case No. 2014-CF-3669

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed May 10, 2022

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County, 

Peter M. Brigham, Judge. 

Daniel David Vermette, Crestview, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Simmons v. State, 332 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2022). 

COHEN, EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Frederick L. ALLEN, et al., petitioners, v. Roy A. COOPER, III, Governor of North Carolina, et al.

No. 18-877.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 24, 2019.

Motion of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10.3(Q)


                                 EXHIBIT 10.3(Q)

                     AMENDMENT DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 2000
                    TO PROMISSORY NOTE DATED JANUARY 18, 1995
                          FROM H & L CONCEPTS, INC. TO
                                ROBERT M. FELDMAN





                                      -25-
<PAGE>   2





                      AMENDMENT OF COGNOVIT PROMISSORY NOTE

         The undersigned hereby agree to modify the Cognovit Promissory Note
dated January 18, 1995, from H & L Concepts, Inc. to Robert M. Feldman, a copy
of which is attached hereto, to extend the date for the commencement of payment
of principal and interest to February 1, 2001, with interest accrued through
December 31, 2000 being added to principal.

         All other terms of the note shall remain in full force and effect as
written.

February 1, 2000                         /s/Robert M. Feldman
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         ROBERT M. FELDMAN


                                         H & L CONCEPTS, INC., Maker


                                         By /s/Burton Schildhouse
                                            ----------------------------------


                                                HEALTH & LEISURE, INC.,
                                         Guarantor

                                         By /s/Burton Schildhouse
                                            ----------------------------------



                                      -26-
<PAGE>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-85399) of Network Access Solutions Corporation of
our report dated March 7, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report dated March 7, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedules,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 17, 2000