alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6335

JAMAR A. CANNON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN; SERGEANT S. BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 00359

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : August 28, 2018 Decided: August 31, 2018

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jamar A. Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jamar A. Cannon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We h ave reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cannon v. Hull , No.
1:16

- cv
- 00359

- LMB

- TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Anthony K. ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Jerry HOWELL, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8354.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

*2021Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Howard A. CARTER, petitioner, v. Kathleen G. KANE, et al.

No. 17-9374.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

April 1, 2014

145773

ESTATE OF BARBARA JOHNSON, by

JOEDEANNA JOHNSON, Successor

Personal Representative,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145773

COA: 297066

Wexford CC: 07-020602-NH

ROBERT F. KOWALSKI, M.D.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN d/b/a MERCY

HOSPITAL CADILLAC, FOUR SEASONS

EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., and

MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted, and the briefs and oral 

argument of the parties having been considered by the Court, we REVERSE in part the 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the March 2, 2010 judgment of the 

Wexford Circuit Court. The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court abused 

its discretion in excluding from evidence correspondence between counsel for the 

plaintiff and the claims representative for Dr. Urse’s liability insurer. The trial court 

reasonably found that there was no evidence that Dr. Urse was aware of the 

correspondence, or that by executing the affidavit he was intending to confirm, or 

respond to, the facts of the case as understood by the plaintiff’s counsel. The 

correspondence at issue was not admissible under MRE 104(b) because the plaintiff 

failed to offer evidence of a condition of fact that would permit the introduction of the 

conditional evidence. Specifically, the correspondence was properly excluded under 

MRE 104(b) based on the plaintiff's failure to establish, as a factual condition precedent 

to admissibility, that Dr. Urse was aware of the correspondence. As such, the trial court 

did not abuse its discretion in failing to admit the correspondence into evidence.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 1, 2014

t0325

2

Clerk

In light of our holding, we also VACATE that portion of the Court of Appeals 

judgment holding that the trial court abused its discretion in not admitting Dr. Urse’s 

affidavit. Given that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit the 

correspondence, the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that any error in not admitting 

the affidavit was harmless because the trial court allowed the contents of the affidavit into 

evidence, allowed the plaintiff’s counsel to discuss its contents during closing argument, 

and instructed the jury to consider whether the affidavit contradicted Dr. Urse’s 

testimony.
----

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 The undersigned, Zhihai Mao, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA TRANSINFO TECHNOLOGY CORP. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 

 1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 31st day of March, 2010. 

/s/ Zhihai Mao                                                                            Zhihai Mao Chief Financial Officer *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China TransInfo Technology Corp. and will be retained by China TransInfo Technology Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 167

To reaffirm the off-budget status of the old-age, survivors, and disability

insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. KLINK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To reaffirm the off-budget status of the old-age, survivors,

and disability insurance program under title II of the

Social Security Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Preser5 vation Act’’.
2

•HR 167 IH

1 SEC. 2. OFF-BUDGET STATUS OF SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST

2 FUNDS.

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the re4 ceipts and disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Sur5 vivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability

6 Insurance Trust Fund shall not be counted as new budget

7 authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit or surplus for pur8 poses of—

9 (1) the budget of the United States Govern10 ment as submitted by the President,

11 (2) the congressional budget, or

12 (3) the Balanced Budget and Emergency Defi13 cit Control Act of 1985.

14 SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

15 FROM SURPLUS AND DEFICIT TOTALS.

16 The receipts and disbursements of the old-age, sur17 vivors, and disability insurance program established under

18 title II of the Social Security Act and the revenues under

19 sections 86, 1401, 3101, and 3111 of the Internal Reve20 nue Code of 1986 related to such program shall not be

21 included in any surplus or deficit totals required under

22 the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 or chapter 11 of

23 title 31, United States Code.
3

•HR 167 IH

1 SEC. 4. CONFORMITY OF OFFICIAL STATEMENTS TO BUDG2 ETARY REQUIREMENTS.

3 Any official statement issued by the Office of Man4 agement and Budget or by the Congressional Budget Of5 fice of surplus or deficit totals of the budget of the United

6 States Government as submitted by the President or of

7 the surplus or deficit totals of the congressional budget,

8 and any description of, or reference to, such totals in any

9 official publication or material issued by either of such Of10 fices, shall exclude all receipts and disbursements under

11 the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program

12 under title II of the Social Security Act and the related

13 provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (includ14 ing the receipts and disbursements of the Federal Old-Age

15 and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Dis16 ability Insurance Trust Fund).

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                           SUBSIDIARIES OF ALLOY, INC.



                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                       SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JANUARY 31, 2003


1.     DX Company, Inc. (Delaware).

2.     Triple Rewards, Inc. (Delaware).

3.     MPM Holding, Inc. (Delaware).

4.     GFLA, Inc. (California).

5.     Old Glory Boutique Distributing, Inc. (Connecticut).

6.     Canal Park Trust (Massachusetts).

7.     Armed Forces Communications, Inc. (New York).

8.     Alloy Marketing and Promotions, LLC (Delaware).

9.     Alloy Merchandise, LLC (Delaware).

10.    Dan`s Competition, LLC (Delaware).

11.    Skate Direct, LLC (Delaware).

12.    360 Youth, LLC (Delaware).

13.    The Staffing Authority, LLC (Delaware).


<PAGE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1415

To authorize appropriations for the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage

Corridor in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 14, 1999

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Blackstone River Valley

National Heritage Corridor in Massachusetts and Rhode

Island, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Section 10(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to establish

5 the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor

6 in Massachusetts and Rhode Island’’ approved November

7 10, 1986 (Public Law 99–647; 16 U.S.C. 461 note), is

8 amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(b) DEMONSTRATION FUNDS.—There are author10 ized to be appropriated from fiscal years 1998 through
2

•HR 1415 IH

1 2007 not more than $15,000,000 to carry out the provi2 sions of section 8(c). Such funds shall remain available

3 until expended.’’.

Æ
II

Calendar No. 397

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1377

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported by Mr. THOMPSON, with an amendment and an amendment to the

title

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

at 13234 South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illinois,

as the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 13234 South Baltimore Avenue in Chicago, Illi6 nois, is hereby designated as the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post

7 Office Building’’.
2

•HR 1377 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post Office Building’’.

6 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

7 The facility of the United States Postal Service, located

8 at 9308 South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60617, is

9 designated as the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post Office Build10 ing’’.

11 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

12 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

13 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

14 referred to in section 1 shall be considered to be a reference

15 to the ‘‘John J. Buchanan Post Office Building’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9308

South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘John J.

Buchanan Post Office Building’.’’.

Calendar No. 397

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1377

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service at 13234 South Baltimore Avenue in

Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘John J. Buchanan PostOffice Building’’.

NOVEMBER 4, 1999

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the

title
Bernard T. CANETE, petitioner, v. BARNABAS HEALTH SYSTEM, et al.

No. 18-71.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Meek, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Codatek Corp., for the annualperiod ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Codatek Corp.

By:/s/ Michael Meek          Michael Meek, Chief Financial Officer,          Chief Executive Officer, President & Director

Date:  February 1, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PET FOOD WAREHOUSE, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
NOVEMBER 2, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                       4,415,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,243,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,670,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,326,000
<PP&E>                                      11,891,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,688,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,941,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,268,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,487,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,941,000
<SALES>                                     47,588,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,022,000
<CGS>                                       31,619,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,041,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,254,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               107,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                666,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            666,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   666,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Tamara ZIVOT, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-5185.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1615 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1615

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the designation of a 
 portion of the Lamprey River in New Hampshire as a recreational river 
                to include an additional river segment.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1615

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the designation of a 
 portion of the Lamprey River in New Hampshire as a recreational river 
                to include an additional river segment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lamprey Wild and Scenic River 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. LAMPREY RECREATIONAL RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) Additional Segment.--The paragraph entitled ``Lamprey River, 
New Hampshire'' in section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``11.5-mile segment extending from the 
        southern Lee town line'' and inserting ``23.5-mile segment 
        extending from the Bunker Pond Dam in Epping''; and
            (2) by striking ``towns of'' and inserting ``towns of 
        Epping,''.
    (b) Management.--Section 405 of division I of the Omnibus Parks and 
Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 
4149; 16 U.S.C. 1274 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``Epping,'' before 
        ``Durham''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (c).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 25, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. (“IVI Foundation”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ThinkRF, Kanata, Ontario, CANADA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IVI Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001, IVI Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 2, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 15, 2021 (86 FR 19901).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-10275 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001081197
<NAME> GLOBESPAN, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          24,657
<SECURITIES>                                    12,011
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                       337
<INVENTORY>                                     10,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,731
<PP&E>                                          11,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,991
<SALES>                                         56,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,220
<CGS>                                           20,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>