alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 3 OF THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         650,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,829,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                   195,204
<INVENTORY>                                 22,120,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,109,112
<PP&E>                                      21,962,369
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,069,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,176,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,522,948
<BONDS>                                     34,153,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,103
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,061,343
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,176,984
<SALES>                                     27,377,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,377,422
<CGS>                                       24,252,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,252,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,716,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,111,228)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (675,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,435,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,435,928)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
Patricia A. GRANT, petitioner, v. Claudio Gabriel ALPEROVICH, et al.

No. 17-9477.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Konstantinos ZOGRAFIDIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9408.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Anthony Garson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of China NetTV Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of March 24, 2005 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  Mat 27, 2005



/s/ Anthony Garson
-----------------------
Anthony Garson,
President, CEO & Director
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
Marc Pintar, Interim Chief Financial Officer of PTS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March
  31, 2010/s/ Marc
  Pintar
Marc Pintar
Interim Chief Financial Officer
Elvis Renteria Camilo LOPEZ, petitioner, v. James KEY, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections Center.

No. 17-9245.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Daniel Jon PETERKA, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9496.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Exhibit 32.2**Certification pursuant to****Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)**I, Edward J. Puisis, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dayton Superior Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2005(the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) andThe information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 14, 2005                                                  /s/ Edward J. Puisis   Edward J. Puisis   Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
Jennifer STRANG, petitioner, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY GENERAL RETIREMENT PLAN, et al.

No. 17-528.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Dagoberto ONTIVEROS, petitioner, v. Michael PACHECO, Warden, et al.

No. 18-8690.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Edward J. ZAKRZEWSKI, II, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-8090.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

*2044Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class          Interest        Principal           Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>             <C>               <C>             <C>
A1           1219307.19       8708933.14                0       235152502.28
A2              5474205                0                0         1094841000
A3           3999961.86      10329736.92                0       789662635.98
A4            915473.55       -915473.54                0       184010183.99
A5              1375000                0                0          275000000
APO                   0         10019.31                0         4798440.47
AR               204.12              100                0                  0
B1            150563.13         27820.01                0        30084803.95
B2            157406.89         29084.54                0        31452295.05
B3             41062.68          7587.27                0         8204946.54
B4             27375.11          5058.19                0         5469964.37
B5             13687.55          2529.09                0         2734982.18
B6             20557.94           1548.8          2249.75         4107788.78


</TABLE>
Doris MOREL, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9451.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Ricardo GLOVER, petitioner, v. WISCONSIN.

No. 18-7380.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District II denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3073

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Tony Muhammad, *

*

Appellant. *

___________ Appeals from the United States

District Court for the Southern

No. 08-3075 District of Iowa.

___________ *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Tony Muhammad, also known as *

Tony Curtis, also known as *

“Baby Tony”, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 19, 2009

Filed: November 24, 2009

___________
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tony Muhammad appeals the district court’s1

 denial of relief under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines. Muhammad

was indicted in two separate cases for conspiring to distribute cocaine base, but he

entered a plea agreement covering both indictments and was sentenced to concurrent

228-month prison terms. The district court appointed counsel to represent

Muhammad in bringing a section 3582(c)(2) motion, and denied a reduction.

Muhammad’s filings were docketed in both criminal cases, and were denied by the

district court in both cases. His notices of appeal are docketed as two consolidated

appeals. Because Muhammad was sentenced based on a binding plea agreement, the

district court lacked authority to reduce his sentence under section 3582(c)(2). See

United States v. Scurlark, 560 F.3d 839, 841-43 (8th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed.

______________________________
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Davinder Singh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date: November 8, 2018 |    | /s/ Davinder Singh      |    |
|------------------------|--------------|-------------------------|--------------|
|              |    | Davinder Singh          |    |
|              |    | Chief Financial Officer |         |

 

** **
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1566 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1566

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
  from being used for the deployment of ground elements of the United 
 States Armed Forces in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia unless that 
             deployment is specifically authorized by law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1999

Mrs. Fowler (for herself, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Blunt, and Mr. 
  Chambliss) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
  from being used for the deployment of ground elements of the United 
 States Armed Forces in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia unless that 
             deployment is specifically authorized by law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Operations in the Federal 
Republic of Yugoslavia Limitation Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR 
              DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED STATES GROUND FORCES TO THE FEDERAL 
              REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATION BY 
              LAW.

    (a) In General.--None of the funds appropriated or otherwise 
available to the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for 
the deployment of ground elements of the United States Armed Forces in 
the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia unless such deployment is 
specifically authorized by a law enacted after the enactment of this 
Act.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall 
not apply with respect to the initiation of missions specifically 
limited to rescuing United States military personnel or citizens in the 
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
                                 <all>
```
Robert L. CLARK, petitioner, v. Christopher M. CARR, Attorney General of Georgia.

No. 18-8206.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/23/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       46,899
COMMITMENTS
  11,841    1,194    4,759   16,983   30,062   33,583   36,015   13,316   10,884

CHANGES FROM 08/16/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,806)
    -292   -1,048     -881   -3,076   -1,154   -4,249   -3,083    1,443      277

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    25.2      2.5     10.1     36.2     64.1     71.6     76.8     28.4     23.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       63)
      17        7       13       32       20       56       36
```

----

Updated August 26, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854663
<NAME> RMI TITANIUM
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             723
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,897
<INVENTORY>                                     94,637
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,705
<PP&E>                                         136,136
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,767
<BONDS>                                          6,630
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           208
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,999
<SALES>                                        177,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,386
<CGS>                                          146,134
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (244)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (607)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,375
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,375
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
        

</TABLE>
Parley Drew HARDMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8616.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Blueprint





 






 


 



Exhibit 10.61


 



CONFIDENTIAL


October
31, 2018  


 


 


Matthew
Roberts


6241
Glade Ave., Apt. L319


Woodland
Hills, CA 91367


 


 


RE:
Offer of Employment as Chief Scientific Officer (“CSO”)
and SVP of Innovation


 


 


Dear
Matthew,


 


ChromaDex, Inc., a
subsidiary of ChromaDex, Corp., is pleased to extend you an offer
of full-time employment for the position of CSO and SVP of
Innovation at our Los Angeles facility. This position will report
to Rob Fried, CEO.


If you
accept this offer, your employment will be “at-will.”
This means that either you or the company can end the employment
relationship at any time, for any reason, without notice. Due to
the nature of this position, this offer is contingent upon a full
background check.


 


If you
accept this offer, your employment will commence on or about
November 5, 2018. Your salary will be two hundred thousand dollars
($200,000) per year and paid biweekly. You will also be eligible
for up to a fifty percent (50%) annual bonus of earned salary based
on accomplishment of objectives which will be discussed with you at
a later date.


 


In
addition, you will be awarded a one-time initial grant of an option
to purchase three hundred, fifty thousand (350,000) shares of
ChromaDex common stock, at an exercise price reflecting the market
price of ChromaDex common stock on the date of the grant, with
one-third of the shares vesting on the one-year anniversary and the
remaining shares vesting in a series of 24 equal monthly
installments thereafter.


 


ChromaDex offers
paid time off (PTO) and other company benefits to eligible
employees upon completion of the introductory period as outlined in
the Employee Handbook. You will be eligible for 21 days of PTO per
year accrued on a biweekly basis, pursuant to ChromaDex’s
standard PTO policy for executives, including a waiting-time
period.


 


By
assuming this full-time role, the current consultant agreement in
place between you and ChromaDex will terminate as of November 4,
2018. Additionally, by assuming this full-time role, your position
on the ChromaDex Scientific Advisory Board will also terminate as
of November 4, 2018, including any compensation and/or benefits
provided pursuant to that position.


 


If you
accept this offer of employment, please sign return a copy of this
letter back to Jordan Gropack at JordanG@chromadex.com
as soon as possible.


 


 


 


 







For any
questions pertaining to this offer of employment, please feel free
to contact Jordan or myself.


 


Respectfully,


 


/s/ Rob
Fried


 


Rob
Fried


CEO


ChromaDex


 


I
understand and agree that if I accept the offer of employment with
ChromaDex, that I will be an “at-will” employee, which
means that either I or the company can terminate the employment
relationship at any time, with or without notice, reason, or
cause.


  





	


Signature:
/s/ Matthew
Roberts         





	
 
Date:         
Oct 31,
2018





Original: Human  Resources

cc:
Manager/Supervisor 







 









 






-1-
Emanuel L. FINCH, Sr., petitioner, v. Bradley GRAHAM, et al.

No. 18-8644.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Steinar MYHRE, petitioner, v. SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH REFORM MOVEMENT AMERICAN UNION INTERNATIONAL MISSIONARY SOCIETY, et al.

No. 17-9452.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 15**

**ACCOUNTANTS’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT**

We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the March 23, 1995 and the April 19, 2006, Registration Statements on Form S-8 of NB&TFinancial Group, Inc. (formerly known as InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated August 12, 2010 included with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, this report should not be considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

Cincinnati, Ohio 

August 12, 2010
Marlon BLACHER, petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-7837.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.