alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1379

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, to make a technical

correction relating to international narcotics control assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1379 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Western Hemisphere

3 Drug Elimination Technical Corrections Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS RELATING

5 TO RESOURCES FOR ILLICIT NARCOTICS IN

6 CERTAIN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Subtitle

8 B of title VIII of division C of the Omnibus Consolidated

9 and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999

10 (Public Law 105–277), is amended by adding at the end

11 the following:

12 ‘‘SEC. 826. FURTHER MISCELLANEOUS ADDITIONAL RE13 SOURCES.

14 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be ap15 propriated for the Department of State for fiscal year

16 1999 such sums as may be necessary to carry out section

17 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C.

18 2291).

19 ‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Amounts appro20 priated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in

21 subsection (a) are in addition to amounts made available

22 to carry out section 481 of such Act under any other provi23 sion of law.’’.

24 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Title VIII of divi25 sion C of such Act (Public Law 105–277) is amended in
3

HR 1379 RFS

1 the table of contents in section 801(b) by adding at the

2 end of the item relating to subtitle B the following:

‘‘Sec. 826. Further miscellaneous additional resources.’’.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall take effect as if included in subtitle B

5 of title VIII of division C of such Act (Public Law 105–

6 277).

Passed the House of Representatives April 20, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**






Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
      Report of Bankrate, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended
      December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
      its
      results of operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended
      December 31, 2005.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.






March
                16, 2006
            /s/
                Robert J. DeFrancoRobert J. DeFrancoSenior
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.15

 



 

	
Renee Martek
    	
One La-Z-Boy Drive
    
	
Director of Talent Acquisition
    	
Monroe MI 48162
    
	
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
    	
734-770-4602
    


 

May 17, 2018

 

Melinda Whittington 
 609 Maple Avenue 
 Lake Bluff, IL 60044

 

RELOCATION

 

All relocation expenses must be treated as income to you and will be grossed-up by Payroll for tax purposes.

 

Incidental Moving Expense: The Company will pay you a sum of $50,000 to assist in covering expenses incurred as a result of moving (utility hook up, deposits, etc.). This payment will be paid in a single lump sum as soon as practical after your start date, and will be grossed-up by Payroll for tax purposes.

 

Information on Gross-Up for Taxes: Most relocation reimbursements are reported as regular income and are not tax deductible. The Company will provide tax assistance in the form of a “gross-up” to offset most of the tax liability created by relocation reimbursement income. The tax assistance calculation takes into account US Federal and State taxes. The calculation and payment is made at the time of the expense reimbursement.

 

The Company aims to keep you reasonably whole with respect to tax liabilities incurred as a result of the relocation, but given the individual nature of the tax calculation and IRS restrictions that may apply to deductibility of certain items, you may incur some tax liability not covered by the tax assistance policy calculation. The Company recommends that you consult a personal tax advisor to discuss the tax implications of the move.

 

Repayment Agreement: If, within 24 months of your move, you resign (other than for “Good Reason” as defined in La-Z-Boy Incorporated Severance Plan for Named Executive Officers) or the Company terminates your employment for dishonesty, fraud, illegality, moral turpitude, reckless misconduct, willful and habitual neglect of duties, or serious and reckless or intentional violation of company policies, all relocation expenses reimbursed or paid for by the Company will be due and payable to the Company, and you agree to pay the Company for them, on demand.

 

By signing below, you acknowledge that you understand this letter and agree to the repayment provision set forth immediately above.

 

 

	
/s/ Melinda Whittington
    	
 
    	
May 18, 2018
    
	
Melinda Whittington
    	
 
    	
Date
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT OF RULE 205 O F THE

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF

DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT :

:

:

:

: NO. 192

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of December, 201 9 , upon the recommen dation of the

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ; the proposal having been

submitted without publication in the interests of justice and efficient administration

pursuant to Pa.R .J.A. No. 103(a)(3) :

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constit u tion of

Pennsylvania that Rule 205 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement is

amended in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and

shall be effective in 30 days

.

Material to be added i s bold ed and underlined.

Material to be deleted is bold ed and in brackets.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JESUS ALBERTO MADRID-FELIX, a.k.a.

Jesus Madrid Felix, a.k.a. Jesus A. MadridFelix, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10082 

D.C. No. 2:16-cr-01280-SPL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Jesus Alberto Madrid-Felix appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-10082 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Madrid-Felix’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are 

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We 

have provided Madrid-Felix the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No 

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Madrid-Felix waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
ALLCO FINANCE LIMITED, petitioner, v. Robert J. KLEE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, et al.

No. 17-737.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

*927Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hanover CompressorCompany (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Chad C.Deaton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.   /s/ Chad C. Deaton Name: Chad C. DeatonTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2004
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
Syed Nazim ALI, petitioner, v. INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC.

No. 18-7706.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1603 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1603

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for permanent 
  eligibility of former members of the Selected Reserve for veterans 
                             housing loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1999

 Mr. Evans (for himself and Mr. Stump) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for permanent 
  eligibility of former members of the Selected Reserve for veterans 
                             housing loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Selected Reserve Housing Loan 
Fairness Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT ELIGIBILITY FOR HOUSING LOANS FOR FORMER MEMBERS OF 
              THE SELECTED RESERVE.

    Section 3702(a)(2)(E) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by striking out ``For the period beginning on October 28, 1992, and 
ending on September 30, 2003, each veteran'' and inserting in lieu 
thereof ``Each veteran''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27203-27204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, June 14, 2022, at 3:00 
p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information, please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111

[[Page 27204]]

Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at 
the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include various 
IRS issues.

    Dated: May 3, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-09826 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
In Re Derek WARDLAW, petitioner.

No. 18-5025.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Jose Wilson GUZMAN, petitioner, v. Raymond MADDEN, Warden.

No. 17-9321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1580 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1580

    To prohibit the sale of guns that have not been approved by the 
           Secretary of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1999

 Ms. Lofgren (for herself, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Ms. Waters, Mrs. 
 Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Lantos, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, 
    Ms. Millender-McDonald, Ms. Lee, Mr. Conyers, and Mr. McGovern) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the sale of guns that have not been approved by the 
           Secretary of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save a Child Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITIONS WITH RESPECT TO UNAPPROVED GUNS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it 
shall be unlawful, with such exceptions for law enforcement and other 
legitimate purposes as the Secretary of the Treasury by rule provides, 
to sell, purchase, or possess any firearm (as defined in section 921 of 
title 18, United States Code) that is not approved by the Secretary. 
The Secretary shall not approve for the purposes of this section the 
Intratec TEC-9 and similar weapons.
    (b) Penalty.--Whoever possesses a firearm in violation of 
subsection (a) shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or 
imprisoned for 5 years, or both.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect 30 days after 
the date the Secretary first makes rules under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Tracey E. GEORGE, et al., petitioners, v. Tre HARGETT, Tennessee Secretary of State, et al.

No. 18-76.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Amaury VILLA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8325.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 118/19 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 118 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4819 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 118

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4819 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 118/1 | Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 15.3.2005 to 15.4.2005(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 118/1

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 15.3.2005 to 15.4.2005(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6448
JOHN W. TODD, a/k/a Kristopher S. Kollyns, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. MCMILLAN, Former head social worker, Broad River Correctional Institute of the SCDC; PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, SCDC; GEORGE MARTEN, III, Warden, BRCI; RALPH S. BEARDSLEY, Unit Manager, BR R&E, SCDC; AL WATERS, Chief, Internal Affairs, SCDC; BILL WHITE, DeputyWarden, BRCI, SCDC; ROBERT BAXLEY, Investigator, BRCI, SCDC; DR. BAKER, Head doctor, BRCI, SCDC; FITTS FREEMAN, Contraband Officer, ACI, SCDC, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-2119-3-20-BC) Submitted: May 7, 1996 Decided: May 30, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 John W. Todd, Appel lant Pro Se. Laura Callaway Hart, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; Charles Elford Carp enter, Jr., Deborah Harrison Sheffield, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Columbia, South Carolina; Jeffrey Lawrence Payne, TURNER, PADGETT, GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Florence, South Carolina; Benjamin Davis McCoy, HOWSER, NEWMAN & BEASLEY, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Todd appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion awarding summary judgment to eight of the nine named Defendants and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Todd v. McMillan , No. CA-91-2119-3-20-BC (D.S.C. Nov. 15, 1993). With respect to Todd's claim against defendant McMillan, we have reviewed the record and the proceedings before the districtcourt and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
99.4
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the
Form 10-K/A of
Stanford Management Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended August 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Reynan Ballan, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary-Treasurer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
  1.    The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
  2.     The information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.
    Date:
February 8,
2010                                                      REYNAN
BALLAN
 Reynan Ballan
 Secretary-Treasurer, Chief
 Financial Officer and
Director
  
 
 -1-
Exhibit 10.8

    

    

    Current Director Fee Arrangements

    

    

    Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.
          ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $1,500 per regular monthly meeting attended, which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under
          Bancorp's 2018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $3,000 per regular monthly meeting attended. The directors of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals. The directors
          of Bancorp and its subsidiaries serving on the Audit Committee are paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended, except for the chairman of the Audit Committee, who is paid a fee of $350 per meeting attended.  Director Brown serves on the Bank’s
          Compliance Committee and is paid a fee of $300 per meeting attended.  The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/01/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      579,840
COMMITMENTS
  55,849   27,996  113,720  382,940  414,934  552,509  556,650   27,331   23,190

CHANGES FROM 02/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,585)
     428    5,103      495    2,493   -2,990    3,416    2,608    5,169    5,977

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.6      4.8     19.6     66.0     71.6     95.3     96.0      4.7      4.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      137)
      33       27       51       66       68      130      121
```

----

Updated March 4, 2011