alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK SBIR Applications 
Developing New Technologies for Development and Integration of Novel 
Components for Open and Closed Loop Hormone Replacement Platforms 
for T1D Therapy.
    Date: May 27, 2022.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7015, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-4721, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e6edf5fabaf9fbe6e6fde7d4fafdfcbaf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85f7fce4ebabe8eaf7f7ecf6c5ebecedabe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 27, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09403 Filed 5-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Cecil DAUGHTREY, et ux., petitioners, v. Luis E. RIVERA.

No. 18-1110.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Kevin HAWKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6192.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
# L_2011171EN.01003901.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 38/2011

of 1 April 2011

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex XIII to the Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 5/2011 of 11 February 2011 (1).

| (2) | Commission Recommendation 2010/379/EU of 5 July 2010 on the risk of deficiencies detected during technical roadside inspections (of commercial vehicles) in accordance with Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Recommendation 2010/379/EU of 5 July 2010 on the risk of deficiencies detected during technical roadside inspections (of commercial vehicles) in accordance with Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) is to be incorporated into the Agreement,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Under the heading ‘
  ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE
  ’ the following point shall be inserted after point 36b (Commission Recommendation 2010/19/EU) of Annex XIII to the Agreement:

| ‘36c. | 32010 H 0379: Commission Recommendation 2010/379/EU of 5 July 2010 on the risk assessment of deficiencies detected during technical roadside inspections (of commercial vehicles) in accordance with Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 173, 8.7.2010, p. 97).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘36c.

32010 H 0379: Commission Recommendation 2010/379/EU of 5 July 2010 on the risk assessment of deficiencies detected during technical roadside inspections (of commercial vehicles) in accordance with Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 173, 8.7.2010, p. 97).’.

Article 2

The text of Recommendation 2010/379/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 2 April 2011, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2011.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The Acting President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 7.4.2011, p. 33.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 173, 8.7.2010, p. 97.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION OF HAMON FRANCIS FYTTON



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Hamon Francis Fytton, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Gold Entertainment Group, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
January 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of Gold Entertainment Group, Inc.

Prepared and Signed

December 21, 2004





By:/s/
Hamon Francis Fytton

Name: Hamon Francis Fytton

Title: Chief Financial
Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7095** 

VALETON PRATT, SR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00599

- RBS

- FBS )

Submitted : January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Ju dges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Valeton Pratt, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM: Valeton Pratt, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a ce rtificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockr ell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a consti tutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pratt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAURICIO PINON

- CERECERES,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 71285

Agency No. A201

- 157

- 151

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020 * *

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Mauricio Pinon

- Cereceres

, a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal

.

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of

law

. Fi gueroa v. Mukasey , 543 F.3d 487, 495

- 96 (9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 71285

part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Pinon

- Cereceres did not demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship

in his application for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i);

Romero

- Torres v. A shcroft , 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003) (“ [A] n ‘exceptional

and extremely unusual hardship’ determination is a subjective, discretionary

judgment that has been carved out of our appellate jurisdiction.”).

Although we retain jurisdiction to consider questions of law, see Figueroa

,

543 F.3d at 49 5

- 96

, Pinon

- Cereceres has not established any error underlying the

agency’s hardship determination

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       43,094
COMMITMENTS
   1,881    1,308        0   37,912   39,665   39,793   40,973    3,301    2,121

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,427)
    -180   -1,451        0   -3,916   -3,011   -4,096   -4,462     -331       35

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     4.4      3.0      0.0     88.0     92.0     92.3     95.1      7.7      4.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       4        3        0       26       29       30       32
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       63,978
COMMITMENTS
   4,996   21,289      389   52,547   39,842   57,932   61,520    6,046    2,458

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,081)
    -323     -299      -31   -2,733   -2,577   -3,087   -2,907        6     -174

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     7.8     33.3      0.6     82.1     62.3     90.5     96.2      9.5      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       68)
      10        6        2       36       26       47       33
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1205 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1205

          To prohibit oil and gas drilling in the Great Lakes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 1999

 Mr. Stupak (for himself, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Barrett of 
Wisconsin, Mr. Kucinich, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Bonior, Ms. Kilpatrick, Ms. 
Stabenow, Ms. Rivers, Mr. Markey, Mr. Holden, Mr. Luther, and Mr. Kind) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To prohibit oil and gas drilling in the Great Lakes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

    After the enactment of this Act no person may commence any drilling 
activity (including any slant or directional drilling) to extract oil 
or gas from lands beneath waters under the jurisdiction of the United 
States in any of the Great Lakes. The Attorney General of the United 
States may bring an action in the appropriate United States district 
court to enforce the prohibition contained in this section. As used in 
this Act, the term ``Great Lakes'' has the same meaning as provided by 
section 2 of the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 931; 70 
Stat. 242).
                                 <all>
```
Jiyao JIANG, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9391.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
GENE RAMIREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0626

Opinion filed August 21, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Gene Ramirez, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lateasha L. Powell, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion for clarification filed on May 3, 2017, is treated as a 

motion to dismiss and is granted. This proceeding is treated as a premature appeal and 

is dismissed. See Banks v. State, 916 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Baldwin v. 

Crosby, 905 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (concluding “proper remedy is to file a 
2

motion in the circuit court seeking [removal of lien and restoration of funds collected], 

secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any 

final order in the proceedings below”).

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Marc A. STEPHENS, et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY, et al.

No. 17-9444.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14976-000]

                    Take notice that Lock[+TM]                      Hydro Friends Fund XXIII, LLC, permittee for the proposed George B. Stevenson Dam Hydropower Project, has requested that its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on December 6, 2019 and would have expired on November 30, 2023.[1]                                          The project would have been located at the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources' George B. Stevenson Dam on First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron County, Pennsylvania.                

                    The preliminary permit for Project No. 14976 will remain in effect until the close of business, June 2, 2022. But, if the Commission is closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the close of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.[2]                                          New applications for this site may not be submitted until after the permit surrender is effective.                

Dated: May 3, 2022.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             169 FERC ¶ 62,139 (2019).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2021).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-09899 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, et al., petitioners, v. Richard VOS, et al.

No. 18-672.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Safe Travel Care, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Schultz, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert L. Schultz

Robert L. Schultz

Chief Executive Officer

April 19, 2005
IB

House Calendar No. 184

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1605

[Report No. 106–536]

To designate the United States courthouse building located at 402 North

Walnut Street and Prospect Avenue in Harrison, Arkansas, as the

‘‘Judge J. Smith Henley Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

MARCH 23, 2000

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to

be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse building located

at 402 North Walnut Street and Prospect Avenue in

Harrison, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Judge J. Smith Henley

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1605 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse building located at 402

3 North Walnut Street and Prospect Avenue in Harrison,

4 Arkansas, is hereby designated as the ‘‘Judge J. Smith

5 Henley Federal Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse building referred to in section 1 shall

10 be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge J. Smith

11 Henley Federal Building’’.

12 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

13 The Federal building and United States courthouse lo14 cated at 402 North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas,

15 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J. Smith Henley

16 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

17 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

18 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

19 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

20 building and United States courthouse referred to in section

21 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J. Smith Henley

22 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to designate

the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 402 North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas,

as the ‘J. Smith Henley Federal Building and United

States Courthouse’.’’.

House Calendar No. 184

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1605

[Report No. 106–536]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse building

located at 402 North Walnut Street and Prospect Avenue in Harrison, Arkansas, as the‘‘Judge J. Smith Henley Federal Building’’.

MARCH 23, 2000

Reported with amendments, referred to the House

Calendar, and ordered to be printed
James E. MASON, Jr., petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-7782.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.