<PAGE>

Exhibit 99

Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) provides a safe
harbor for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide
prospective information about their companies, so long as those statements are
identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary
statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in the statement. NB&T Financial Group,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) desires to take advantage of the safe
harbor provisions of the Act. Certain information, particularly information
regarding future economic performance and finances and plans and objectives of
management, contained or incorporated by reference in the Company's Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 is forward-looking. In some cases,
information regarding certain important factors that could cause actual results
of operations or outcomes of other events to differ materially from any such
forward-looking statement appear together with such statement. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to other risks and uncertainties
affecting the financial institutions industry, including, but not limited to,
the following:

Interest Rate Risk

The Company's operating results are dependent to a significant degree on its net
interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans,
investments and other interest-earning assets and interest expense on deposits,
borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. The interest income and
interest expense of the Company change as the interest rates on interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities change. Interest rates may change
because of general economic conditions, the policies of various regulatory
authorities and other factors beyond the Company's control. In a rising interest
rate environment, loans tend to prepay slowly and new loans at higher rates
increase slowly, while interest paid on deposits increases rapidly because the
terms to maturity of deposits tend to be shorter than the terms to maturity or
prepayment of loans. Such differences in the adjustment of interest rates on
assets and liabilities may negatively affect the Company's income.

Possible Inadequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon a number of
relevant factors, including, but not limited to, trends in the level of
nonperforming assets and classified loans, current and anticipated economic
conditions in the primary lending area, past loss experience, possible losses
arising from specific problem loans and changes in the composition of the loan
portfolio. While the Company's Board of Directors believes that it uses the best
information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen
market conditions could result in material adjustments, and net earnings could
be significantly adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the final determination.

Loans not secured by one- to four-family residential real estate are generally
considered to involve greater risk of loss than loans secured by one- to
four-family residential real estate due, in part, to the effects of general
economic conditions. The repayment of commercial loans and multifamily
residential and nonresidential real estate loans generally depends upon the cash
flow from the operation of the business or property, which may be negatively
affected by national and local economic conditions. Construction loans may also
be negatively affected by such economic conditions, particularly loans made to
developers who do not have a buyer for a property before the loan is made. The
risk of default on consumer loans increases during periods of recession, high
unemployment and other adverse

                                       18

<PAGE>

economic conditions. When consumers have trouble paying their bills, they are
more likely to pay mortgage loans than consumer loans. In addition, the
collateral securing such loans, if any, may decrease in value more rapidly than
the outstanding balance of the loan.

Competition

The National Bank and Trust Company (the Bank) competes for deposits with other
commercial banks, savings associations and credit unions and issuers of
commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money market mutual
funds. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates and
convenience of office location. In making loans, the Bank competes with other
commercial banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, consumer finance
companies, credit unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other
lenders. Competition is affected by, among other things, the general
availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current
interest rate levels and other factors which are not readily predictable. The
size of financial institutions competing with the Bank is likely to increase as
a result of changes in statutes and regulations eliminating various restrictions
on interstate and inter-industry branching and acquisitions. Such increased
competition may have an adverse effect upon the Bank.

Legislation and Regulation That May Adversely Affect the Company's Earnings

The Bank is subject to regulation, examination and oversight by the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC), special examination by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FRB) and some regulation, oversight
and special examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance corporation (the FDIC).
As a bank holding company, NB&T Financial Group, Inc. is also subject to
regulation and examination by the FRB. Such supervision and regulation of the
Bank and the Company are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and
not for the maximization of shareholder value and may affect the ability of the
Company to engage in various business activities. The assessments, filing fees
and other costs associated with reports, examinations and other regulatory
matters are significant and may have an adverse effect on the Company's net
earnings.

The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates for deposit
insurance of members of the Bank Insurance fund (the BIF) and the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (the SAIF). The FDIC has established a risk-based
assessment system for both SAIF and BIF members. Under such system, assessments
may vary depending on the risk the institution poses to its deposit insurance
fund. Such risk level is determined by reference to the institution's capital
level and the FDIC's level of supervisory concern about the institution.

                                       19