Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2022 / Notices 26343 

1See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 69225 (December 7, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Non-Alloy 

Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020,’’ dated March 

23, 2022. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel 

Pipe from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 4 Id. 

5With two respondents under examination, 

Commerce normally calculates (A) a weightedaverage of the dumping margins calculated for the 

examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the 

dumping margins calculated for the examined 

respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the 

dumping margins calculated for the examined 

respondents using each company’s publicly-ranged 

U.S. sale quantities for the merchandise under 

consideration. Commerce then compares (B) and (C) 

to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most 

appropriate rate for all other producers and 

exporters. See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof 

from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 

6This company is also known as Hyundai Steel 

Corporation; Hyundai Steel; and Hyundai Steel 

(Pipe Division). 

7See Appendix II for a full list of these 

companies. 

Dated: April 26, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09523 Filed 5–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–809] 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

the producers/exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

(CWP) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) at less than normal value during 

the period of review (POR), November 1, 

2019, through October 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable May 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dusten Hom, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5075. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 7, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.1 The review 

covers 24 producers and/or exporters of 

subject merchandise. We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. On March 23, 2022, 

Commerce extended the deadline for 

issuing these final results until April 27, 

2022.2 A summary of the events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Results, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for these final results, are discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

and tube. Imports of the product are 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under subheadings 

7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 

7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 

7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 

7306.30.5090. While the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description is dispositive. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are listed in Appendix I to this 

notice and addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

For reasons explained in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, we made 

no changes for the final results of 

review. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that HiSteel Co., Ltd 

(HiSteel) had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. No party 

commented on this issue and because 

we have not received any information to 

contradict our preliminary finding, we 

continue to find that HiSteel did not 

have any shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR and intend 

to issue appropriate instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

based on the final results of this review. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ In this review, 

we calculated weighted-average 

dumping margins for the mandatory 

respondents, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) 

and Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai 

Steel), that are 4.07 and 1.97 percent, 

respectively, and we have assigned to 

the non-selected companies a rate of 

3.21 percent, which is the weightedaverage dumping margin of Husteel and 

Hyundai Steel, weighted by their 

publicly ranged U.S. sales values.5

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exists for the period November 1, 2019, 

through October 31, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Husteel Co., Ltd .......................... 4.07 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
26344 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 4, 2022 / Notices 

8See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

9See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, 

the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and 

Venezuela, and Amendment to Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Circular 

Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 

49453 (November 2, 1992). 

10This company is also known as Dongbu Steel 

Co., Ltd. 

11This company is also known as Miju Steel 

Manufacturing. 

12This company is also known as Nexteel. 

13This company is also known as Seah Steel 

Corporation. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company 6 .......... 1.97 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable 

to the Following Companies 

Other Respondents 7 .................. 3.21 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed in connection with these 

final results to parties in this proceeding 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. For any individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis, 

we calculated importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of the examined sales to that 

importer, and we will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this. 

Where either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Husteel or 

Hyundai Steel, for which they did not 

know that the merchandise was 

destined to the United States, and for all 

entries attributed to HiSteel, for which 

we found no shipments during the POR, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate those 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.8

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for companies subject to 

this review will be the rates established 

in these final results of the review; (2) 

for merchandise exported by producers 

or exporters not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation but the producer 

is, then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

period for the producer of the 

merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate 

for all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 4.80 percent,9 the allothers rate established in the 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: April 26, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. No Shipments 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Existence of Particular Market 

Situation (PMS) 

Comment 2: Constructed Export Price 

(CEP) Offset 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Not 

Individually Examined 

1. Aju Besteel 

2. Bookook Steel 

3. Chang Won Bending 

4. Dae Ryung 

5. Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine 

Engineering (Dsme) 

6. Daiduck Piping 

7. Dong Yang Steel Pipe 

8. Dongbu Steel 10

9. Eew Korea Company 

10. Hyundai Rb 

11. Kiduck Industries 

12. Kum Kang Kind 

13. Kumsoo Connecting 

14. Miju Steel Mfg.11

15. Nexteel Co., Ltd.12

16. Samkang M&T 

17. Seah Fs 

18. Seah Steel 13

19. Steel Flower 

20. Vesta Co., Ltd. 

21. Ycp Co. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09553 Filed 5–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES