alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Zvi Alon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered
by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/ Zvi AlonName:

Zvi AlonTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDated:

August 9, 2007
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Manuel Javier Perez

, * From the 385th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR37715

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00247

- CR * September 30 , 2013

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
In Re Andre David LEFFEBRE, petitioner.

No. 18-8243.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS
                ------------------------------------------------
                  BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
                  ---------------------------------------------

     Each director who is not an employee of the Registrant receives an annual
retainer fee of $20,000, plus $1,000 for each Board of Directors and Board
committee meeting attended. The non-employee Chairman of the Board receives a
retainer fee of $90,000 (in lieu of any other annual retainer, committee chair
or attendance fees), and non-employee directors chairing standing committees of
the Board each receive an additional annual retainer fee of $5,000. Under the
Registrant's Omnibus Stock Plan, non-employee directors may elect to receive, in
lieu of all or a portion of the foregoing fees, shares of the Registrant's
common stock based on the fair market value of the stock on the date the fees
would have been paid. Each non-employee director is also reimbursed for all
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that such director and his or her spouse
incurs attending Board meetings and functions, and is authorized, subject to
certain requirements and limitations, to use the Registrant's fractionally-owned
aircraft for personal travel.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Timothy K. Montgomery, Chief Executive Officer of DitechCommunications Corporation (the “Company”), and William J. Tamblyn, theChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the bestof his knowledge:

*1.*     TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2005,and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, (the “PeriodicReport”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

*2.*     Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13thDay of July, 2005.
|        | /s/  TIMOTHY  K. MONTGOMERY |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Timothy K. Montgomery            |
|   | *CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER*             |
|        | /s/  WILLIAM J. TAMBLYN     |
|   | William J. Tamblyn               |
|   | *CHIEF  FINANCIAL OFFICER*            |

 

The foregoing certification is not filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-K or as aseparate disclosure document and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-K), irrespectively of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergisoft Holding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ann
Crossman, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Ann Crossman
----------------
Ann Crossman
Treasurer and Controller
August 14, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 26, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50249

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO DAVID BALDERAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(DR-02-CR-113-1-WWJ)

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gilberto David Balderas appeals his jury trial convictions for

two counts of harboring illegal aliens (8 U.S.C. §

1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)) and for one count of conspiracy to harbor

illegal aliens (8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I)). Balderas contends

that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions

because it proved, at most, that he provided illegal aliens with

temporary shelter. Because Balderas did not move for a judgment of

acquittal at the close of the evidence, our review is limited to
2

determining whether there was a “manifest miscarriage of justice”.

See United States v. Johnson, 87 F.3d 133, 136 (5th Cir. 1996),

cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1192 (1997). 

An individual violates 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) if he

knowingly “conceals, harbors, or shields from detection” an illegal

alien. Because affording shelter to an illegal alien is conduct

which by its nature tends to substantially facilitate the alien’s

remaining in the United States illegally, providing shelter to

illegal aliens constitutes harboring illegal aliens under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii). See United States v. Cantu, 557 F.2d 1173,

1180 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1063 (1978); see also

United States v. Acosta De Evans, 531 F.2d 428, 430 (9th Cir.),

cert. denied, 429 U.S. 836 (1976); United States v. Lopez, 521 F.2d

437, 440 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 995 (1975). 

There was no manifest miscarriage of justice, because the

record is not “devoid of evidence” pointing to Balderas’ guilt nor

is the evidence so tenuous that Balderas’ convictions are shocking.

See United States v. Laury, 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 516 U.S. 857 (1995). For example, there was evidence that:

next to Balderas’ residence was a red light that could function as

a signal to aliens; Balderas’ wife let a group of aliens into their

home; she informed Balderas that there were illegal aliens staying

there; and he told her he did not care. 

AFFIRMED
Glenn S. SOLBERG, petitioner, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST CO. OF WILLISTON, et al.

No. 18-8060.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied. Petitioner allowed *1595until May 6, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                              IBIZ TECHNOLOGY CORP.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of iBiz Technology  Corp. (the Company)
on Form  10-KSB/A for the  period ended  October  31,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Kenneth
W.  Schilling,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to IBiz Technology  Corp. and will be retained by IBiz Technology Corp.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.

Date:  March 2, 2004


/s/ Kenneth W. Schilling
----------------------------------------------------
Kenneth W. Schilling
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40895 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JOSE REFUGIO PACHECO, also known as Refugio

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 281

- 28

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Refugio Pacheco has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Refugio Pacheco has f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Refugio

Pacheco ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
March 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40895 Document: 00513908350 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2017No. 15

- 40895

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40895 Document: 00513908350 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2017
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08264]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE CULTURE AND ARTS 
DEVELOPMENT


Request for Nominations to the Board of Trustees

AGENCY: Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts 
Development (aka Institute of American Indian Arts).

ACTION: Notice; request for nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board directs the Administration of the Institute of 
American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development, 
including soliciting, accepting, and disposing of gifts, bequests, and 
other properties for the benefit of the Institute. The Institute 
provides scholarly study of and instruction in Indian art and culture 
and establishes programs which culminate in the awarding of degrees in 
the various fields of Indian art and culture. The Board consists of 
thirteen members appointed by the President of the United States, by 
and with the consent of the U.S. Senate, who are American Indians or 
persons knowledgeable in the field of Indian art and culture. This 
notice requests nominations to fill two expiring terms on the Board of 
Trustees.

ADDRESSES: Institute of American Indian Arts, 83 Avan Nu Po Road, Santa 
Fe, New Mexico 87508.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Robert Martin, President, 505-424-
2301.

    Dated: April 6, 2022.
Robert Martin,
President.
[FR Doc. 2022-08264 Filed 4-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-W4-P
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/27/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      137,302
COMMITMENTS
  38,935   20,760   23,794   56,736   69,281  119,465  113,835   17,837   23,467

CHANGES FROM 12/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -190)
  -1,448   -3,019      785      -46    2,461     -709      227      519     -417

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.4     15.1     17.3     41.3     50.5     87.0     82.9     13.0     17.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      159)
      46       26       37       56       54      122      106
```

----

Updated December 30, 2011
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130747 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROSIA MITCHELL-CRENSHAW, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Successor Personal Representative Justices of the Estate of Floyd L. Mitchell,

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130747 

 COA: 263057 

Oakland CC: 2004-060421-NH 

LONNIE JOE, JR., M.D., and

BERNARD KOLE, M.D.,

 Defendants, 

and 

PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND 

MEDICAL CENTER,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of October 17, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 

2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-6). On order of the Court, the 

case having been decided on April 9, 2008, 480 Mich 1159 (2008), the application is 

again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OneSource Information Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Martin Kahn, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 29, 2004

                                            /s/ Martin Kahn
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Martin Kahn
                                            Interim Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chairman of the Board of Directors
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 09/20/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      405,572
COMMITMENTS
  40,132   16,918   79,253  261,509  292,427  380,894  388,598   24,678   16,974

CHANGES FROM 09/13/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -34,367)
   5,270     -129  -13,016  -19,231  -18,642  -26,977  -31,787   -7,390   -2,580

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.9      4.2     19.5     64.5     72.1     93.9     95.8      6.1      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      121)
      33       19       37       59       61      107      106
```

----

Updated September 23, 2011
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                     IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
       RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

 (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for share amounts)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") is given in
the following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Amount per
                                                                     ----------
Three months ended March 31, 2001         Income        Shares         Share
---------------------------------         ------        ------         -----
<S>                                       <C>           <C>            <C>
Basic EPS                                 $ 23,905      25,060,623     $0.95
Effect of Dilutive Options                               1,209,066
Diluted EPS                               $ 23,905      26,269,689     $0.91

Three months ended March 31, 2000
---------------------------------
Basic EPS                                 $  9,811      25,033,932     $0.39
Effect of Dilutive Options                                  67,638
Diluted EPS                               $  9,811      25,101,570     $0.39
</TABLE>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      13
Honorable James E. Barlow OpinionNo. C-445

Criminal District Attorney Bexar County Re: Whether the failure of a San Antonio, Texas candidate for office to file the expense reports requiredby the Election Code constitutesa criminDear Mr. Barlow: al offense.

In your letter requestingan opinion of this office, you ask the foilowing question:

~"Does the total failure of a candidate to file ,theexpense reports required, by the Election Code constitutea crplnal offense?"'
Article 14.08 of the Electio&‘&de, Vernon's Civil Statutes, requires that candidatesfiie'sworn~ statementswith regard to their gifts, loans, expens~es, debts, etc.; and Section (g) of that ,Art+le provides:

"(g) If any candidatefails to file such sworn statementat the'tlmeprovided herein or swears falsely therein, he shall .be subject upon convictionto a fine not less than One Hundred Dollars ($100)nor more~than Five ThousandDolXa'rs ($5,000), 'or be Imprisoned in the penitentiarynot less than one (1) nor more than five (5) years; or be both so fined and imprisoned."

The caption of the legislationenacting the Election Code reads':,

"AN ACT to adopt and establish 'anelection code for the State of Texas, to revise and recodify Title 50 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1925 of Texas, and all amendments thereto, to repeal all Acts In conflict here-, with, provided, however, that nothing in this Act shall be construedas repealing or in apy way affecting the legality of any penal provision of the existing law, and further provided that nothing in this Act shall in any
-2!ii-. .

Honorable James E. Barlow, Page 2 (C-445) 2

. wise alter. amend. or reoeal House Bill No. 43, Acts, Regular-Session, Fifty-second

Legislature;providinga saving clause;providing an appropriation; providing the effective date; and declaringan emergency."

In Ex Parte Meyer, 357 S.W.2d 754 (Tkx.Crim.1962), the above nenal arovislonof the ElectionCode was declared invaliddue to the fact that the captiongave no notice that penal provisionswere to be found in the tact. The' Court cites Article 3, Section 35 of the Texas Constitution which prohibits the inclusion in a bill of any subjectnot expressed in the title.

We are unable to find any other statutoryauthority whereby the failure of a candidateto file expense reports ,would'constitute

a criminal offense, as Articles 252 and 262- 269, Vernon's Penal Code were repealedby the Acts of 1959, 34, Chapter.22,Section 1.

SUMMARY .>

The total failure of a candidateto file the expense reports requiredby the Election Code does not constitute'scrimfinaloffense. Ex Parte.Meyer,357 S.W.2d 754 (Tex.Crim.1962).

Yours very truly,

WAGGONERCARR ,Attorney'General

of Texas

By: VL

BSC/lh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE ,, W. V. Geppert, Chairman Mary K. Wall Malcolm Quick Paul Phy George Gray

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone

-2115-