alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/28/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      166,241
COMMITMENTS
  49,784   12,539   20,503   73,872  104,511  144,159  137,553   22,082   28,688

CHANGES FROM 06/21/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -5,683)
  -3,665    2,522    1,600   -3,272   -8,829   -5,337   -4,707     -346     -976

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.9      7.5     12.3     44.4     62.9     86.7     82.7     13.3     17.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      167)
      57       18       43       58       65      130      118
```

----

Updated July 1, 2011
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
 GEORGE FOREMAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of George Foreman Enterprises, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jeremy AndersonJeremy AndersonChief Financial OfficerAugust 25, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MICHAEL ANSON HARRELL,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 353 MAL 2013

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
Clinical Trials Review Study Section.
    Date: June 23-24, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Keary A. Cope, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 
209-A, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 827-7912, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#67040817020c06270a060e0b49090e0f49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="01626e71646a60416c60686d2f6f68692f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 4, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09962 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### No. 82-167 INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE 

### STATE OF MONTANA 1982

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and A~pellant,

vs

# . WILLIAM 

### PRZYBYLOWICZ, Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and for the County of Ravalli Honorable James R. 

### Wheelis,Judgepresiding. Counsel of Record: For Appellant: Hon. Mike Greely,Attorney General, Helena,Montana Robert B. Brown,County Attorney, Hamilton,Montana For Respondent: Smith,Connor and VanValkenberg, Missoula, Montana Fred Van Valkenberg, Missoula, Montana

Submitted onbriefs: September 30, 

### 1982 Decided: December 9,1982PER CURIAPI: On October 7, 1961, 

### a jury convicted defendant, William Pryzbylowicz and his wife, Heidi, of criminal 

### mischief and arson. Defendant, BillPryzbylowicz, orallymoved at the November 27, 1981, sentencing hearing to have his verdicts 

### set aside and the charges againsthimself dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence to support the verdicts. The court took defendant's motion under advisement and proceeded to sentence each defendant to eight years inprison and suspended the sentences. In order to be properiy before the District Court, defendant's motion should have been made pursuant tosection 46-16-702(2), MCA, motion for a new trial. That sectionrequires that such a motion be inwriting, be specificregarding thegrounds therefor, be made within thirtydays following the verdice and that reasonable notice of themotion be given the State. None of those requirements were 

### met here. The motion to dismiss the charges and set aside teh verdicts against Bill Pryzbylowicz was made orally, fifty-seven days after entry of the verdicts. l\lo notice of the motion was given the State. Therefore, defendant's motion was not properly before the court, and the court should not have ruled on 

### it. It 

### is irrelevant that the State failed to complain of the procedural process employed by defendant prior to the State's appeal tothisCourt. The procedural errorwas such that the motion should never have been before the District Court.The January 26, 1982, order of the Fourth Judicial 

### District Court 

### is vacated. This 

### case 

### is remanded 

### to thatcourt for reinstatement of the jury verdict against defendant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0544 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LEIGH CANAL
- HUGHES,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 9 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 5 2024

09/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0544
Maurice ANDERSON, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 17-9274.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/04/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      550,240
COMMITMENTS
  37,246   14,088  113,517  376,107  400,934  526,870  528,539   23,370   21,701

CHANGES FROM 04/27/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     20,860)
   3,918      972   -3,435   17,687   21,391   18,169   18,927    2,691    1,933

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     6.8      2.6     20.6     68.4     72.9     95.8     96.1      4.2      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      108)
      23       14       33       61       68       98      103
```

----

Updated May 7, 2010
**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF HOMESOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC.PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

                I, R. Andrew White, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of HOME SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA,INC. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report onForm 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003 and filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Report") by the Companyfully complies with the requirements of that section.

                I further certify that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial operations and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|   | /s/ R. ANDREWWHITE                                                                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | R.Andrew White      ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer      Date:  May 15, 2003 |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                        Certification of CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Hanover Compressor
Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John E.
Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John E. Jackson
--------------------------------------
Name:   John E. Jackson
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:   August 5, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of (S)
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

TERRY NORRIS, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-0968 

LT Case No. 2010-CF-00604

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed June 14, 2022

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Sumter County, 

Mary Hatcher, Judge.

Terry Norris, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, HARRIS and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.47





SECOND AMENDMENT


TO


AMENDED AND
RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





This Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this
Second Amendment), dated September 24, 2002, is entered into by and between St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation (Company), and Kelly A. Gray, an individual (Executive), and amends terms of that certain
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 14, 1998, as amended, between the Company and Executive (the 1998 Agreement). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows (all capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 1998 Agreement).





1.
Section II.1 of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect an increase in the Base Salary from $500,000 to $650,000, effective as of November 5, 2001.





2. Section II.6 of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect an increase in the Modeling Fee from $400,000 to $500,000, effective as of July 29, 2002.





3. Section IV.5(e) of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect that twice Executives Base Salary shall be equal to $1,300,000.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.





Company  St. John Knits,
Inc., a California corporationBy:

/s/    Bob GrayBob Gray Chief Executive Officer








Executive/s/    Kelly A. GrayKelly A. Gray
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/08/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       47,856
COMMITMENTS
  15,230    1,058    3,121   14,969   31,906   33,320   36,085   14,536   11,771

CHANGES FROM 11/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      5,216)
   2,254      -62      747      -82    2,046    2,919    2,731    2,297    2,485

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.8      2.2      6.5     31.3     66.7     69.6     75.4     30.4     24.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
      17        2       17       22       19       48       37
```

----

Updated November 14, 2011
Fulgencio ARIAS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9275.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OneSource Information Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel J. Schimmel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Daniel J. Schimmel

Daniel J. Schimmel
Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2003
Anthony Eudean WOOLLIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8366.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Rohan McDERMOTT, petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden.

No. 18-8567.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 23

- 1611

___________________________

Catalina Lux Satin

Petitioner

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

Respondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

Submitted: November 14, 2023 Filed: November 30, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER

, BENTON, and KELLY , Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Catalina Lux Satin petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding the decision of an immigration judge (IJ) to deny her asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court denies the petition.-2- Lux Satin’s challenge to the IJ’s jurisdiction, claiming an invalid Notice to Appear under Pereira v. Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), is foreclosed by circuit precedent. See Ali v. Barr , 924 F.3d 983, 986 (8 th Cir. 2019)

.

This court finds no error in the determination that Lux Satin failed to establish a nexus between her proposed particular social group (PSG) and the harm she feared
in Guatemala. See Silvestre

- Giron v. Barr , 949 F.3d 1114, 1119 & n.3 (8th Cir. 2020) (nexus is a factual determination reviewed for substantial evidence and will not be reversed unless the record evidence is so compelling that no reasonable fact

finder could fail to find in petitioner's favor).

Because Lux Satin failed to establish a nexus, the agency did not err in denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the
CAT. See Tino v. Garland , 13 F.4th 708, 710 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (where substantial evidence supported determination that noncitizen failed to demonstrate nexus between persecution and PSG, failure was dispositive of asylum claim); Guled v. Mukasey , 515 F.3d 872, 881

- 82 (8th Cir. 2008) (noncitizen who does not meet
well

- founded fear standard f or asylum cannot meet higher "clear probability of persecution" standard for withholding of removal; separate analysis for CAT claim is required only when there is evidence noncitizen may be tortured for reasons unrelated to asylum and withholding of removal claims).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# Official Journal L 326/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 326 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6120 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 326

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6120 December 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1974 of 14 December 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1975 of 14 December 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 as regards air operations requirements for sailplanes and electronic flight bags | 53 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1976 of 14 December 2018 laying down detailed rules for the operation of sailplanes pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 64 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1974 of 14 December 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1975 of 14 December 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 as regards air operations requirements for sailplanes and electronic flight bags

53

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1976 of 14 December 2018 laying down detailed rules for the operation of sailplanes pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council

64

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PAUL M. WOLSKI, BY NANCY HUDACK,

Respondent

v.

YVONNE WORMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 323 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.