alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1589

To amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994

to provide for the establishment of school violence prevention hotlines.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1999

Mr. WISE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities

Act of 1994 to provide for the establishment of school

violence prevention hotlines.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF SCHOOL VIOLENCE PRE4 VENTION HOTLINES UNDER THE SAFE AND

5 DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES

6 ACT OF 1994.

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Section 4116(b) of the Safe

8 and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994 (20

9 U.S.C. 7116(b)) is amended—
2

•HR 1589 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

2 end;

3 (2) by redesignating paragraph (10) as para4 graph (11); and

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘(10) the establishment (by a partnership con8 sisting of the local educational agency, schools, law

9 enforcement officials, and appropriate community

10 groups) of school violence prevention hotlines to in11 form law enforcement officials when threats of vio12 lence are made at school; and’’.

13 (b) DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS TO LOCAL EDU14 CATIONAL AGENCIES CONTAINING EXISTING OR PRO15 POSED HOTLINES.—Section 4113(d)(2)(A) of such Act

16 (20 U.S.C. 7113(d)(2)(A)) is amended—

17 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;

18 (2) in clause (ii)—

19 (A) by striking ‘‘30 percent’’ and inserting

20 ‘‘25 percent’’; and

21 (B) by striking the period at the end and

22 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

23 (3) by adding at the end the following:

24 ‘‘(iii) 5 percent of such amount to local

25 educational agencies that have established, or
3

•HR 1589 IH

1 propose to establish, school violence prevention

2 hotlines described in section 4116(b)(10).’’.

Æ
Suzan EVANS, Individually and as Wife and Next of Kin of Scott Evans, Deceased, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 18-323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Carlos D. VILLAVICENCIO, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 18-6038.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40611 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE MARTIN REYES-TOBIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-98-8-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Jose Martin Reyes-Tobias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reyes-Tobias has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
# Official Journal C 270/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 270 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 611 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 270

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 611 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 270/01 | Initiation of proceedings (Case M.8677 — Siemens/Alstom) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 270/01

Initiation of proceedings (Case M.8677 — Siemens/Alstom) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 270/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 270/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 270/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9013 — Amey Group/CAL/CAHPL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2018/C 270/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9039 — Bain Capital/Vista/Aptean Public Sector/Superion/TriTech) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2018/C 270/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9007 — Porsche/Schuler/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2018/C 270/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8969 — FSN Capital V/Saferoad Holding) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2018/C 270/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9013 — Amey Group/CAL/CAHPL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2018/C 270/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9039 — Bain Capital/Vista/Aptean Public Sector/Superion/TriTech) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

2018/C 270/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9007 — Porsche/Schuler/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2018/C 270/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8969 — FSN Capital V/Saferoad Holding) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, v. Steven MAIZES, et al.

No. 18-617.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1291 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 577
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1291

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2000

                                Recieved

                              May 24, 2000

                          Read the first time

                              May 25, 2000

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet service 
                   providers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Access Charge Prohibition 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON PROVIDERS OF INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.

    Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(l) Prohibition of Charges on Internet Service Providers.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (b)(4) or (d) 
        or any other provision of this title, the Commission shall not 
        impose on any provider of Internet access service (as such term 
        is defined in section 231(e)) any contribution for the support 
        of universal service that is based on a measure of the time 
        that telecommunications services are used in the provision of 
        such Internet access service.
            ``(2) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection 
        shall preclude the Commission from imposing access charges on 
        the providers of Internet telephone services, irrespective of 
        the type of customer premises equipment used in connection with 
        such services.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 577

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1291

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet service 
                   providers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 25, 2000

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
NUMBER 13-11-00311-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

McALLEN HOSPITALS, L. P. 

D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant,

v.

SYLVIA CAVAZOS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, McAllen Hospitals, L.P. d/b/a McAllen Medical Center, perfected an 

appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, 

Texas, in cause number CL-09-1820-D. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the 

appeal on grounds the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing any action against 
2

appellee. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice of 

appellant to refile in the future.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for 

rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

9th day of February, 2012.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1368 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1368

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
  from being used for the deployment of ground elements of the United 
 States Armed Forces in Kosovo unless that deployment is specifically 
                           authorized by law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 1999

 Mr. Goodling (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Norwood, Mr. 
   Petri, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Campbell, Mr. 
 Gekas, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Ganske, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Barr of Georgia, and 
  Mr. Wamp) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense 
  from being used for the deployment of ground elements of the United 
 States Armed Forces in Kosovo unless that deployment is specifically 
                           authorized by law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) United States national security interests in Kosovo do 
        not rise to a level that warrants the introduction of ground 
        troops by the United States.
            (2) Kosovo is a province of the Republic of Serbia, a 
        sovereign state.
            (3) An Act of Congress is necessary for the introduction of 
        the Armed Forces of the United States into hostilities, or 
        situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly 
        indicated by the circumstances, when such action is not 
        required for the defense of the United States, its Armed 
        Forces, or its nationals.
            (4) The lessons of the United States military involvement 
        in Vietnam and Bosnia clearly argue that the costs and duration 
        of any such deployment will be much heavier and much longer 
        than initially foreseen.
            (5) The Congress and the American people have the greatest 
        pride in the members of the Armed Forces and strongly support 
        them.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR 
              DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED STATES GROUND FORCES IN KOSOVO 
              WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORIZATION BY LAW.

    None of the funds appropriated or otherwise available to the 
Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the deployment 
of ground elements of the United States Armed Forces in Kosovo unless 
such deployment is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1432 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1432

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to provide long-term nursing care at public expense to 
   any veteran with a service-connected disability of 50 percent or 
                                greater.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 1999

Mrs. Kelly (for herself, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mr. Cooksey, Mr. Sanders, 
Mr. Shows, Mr. Gary Miller of California, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. 
    Barr of Georgia, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, and Mr. Metcalf) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to provide long-term nursing care at public expense to 
   any veteran with a service-connected disability of 50 percent or 
                                greater.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Nursing Home Care Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE LONG-TERM NURSING CARE TO VETERANS WITH 
              SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES OF 50 PERCENT OR GREATER.

    (a) Requirement.--(1) Paragraph (1) of section 1710(a) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``care and medical services, 
and may furnish nursing home care,'' in the matter preceding 
subparagraph (A) and inserting ``care, medical services, and nursing 
home care''.
    (2) Paragraph (4) of that section is amended by inserting ``, and 
the requirement in paragraph (1) that the Secretary furnish nursing 
home care,'' after ``medical services''.
    (b) Care in Non-Department Nursing Homes.--Section 1720(a)(3)(B) of 
such title is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: 
``or for a veteran with a service-connected disability of 50 percent or 
greater''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS` CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.) 333-90681, 333-39416, 333-43888, 333-76490, 333-73166, 333-66658,
333-83358, 333-81648, 333-48372 on Form 10-K of Alloy, Inc. of our report dated
May 1, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Alloy, Inc. as of
January 31, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive (loss) income, consolidated statements of changes in shareholders`
(deficit) equity, and cash flows for the year ended January 31, 2003 which
report appears in the January 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Alloy, Inc.
Our report refers to the adoption in 2002 of the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."


                                           /s/ KPMG LLP

                                           KPMG LLP


New York, New York
May 1, 2003



<PAGE>
William FYKES, petitioner, v. WEST VIRGINIA.

No. 18-8001.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
John M. BARONE, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18-783.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Tom W. Ward, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this 10-Q Report of Exabyte Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Dated: November 9, 2005

/s/  TOM W. WARD                                                      

Tom W. Ward

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Patricio PALADIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7668.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
SAM FRANCIS FOUNDATION, et al., petitioners, v. SOTHEBY'S, INC., et al.

No. 18-1167.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Deandre ANDERSON, petitioner, v. Daniel LESATZ, Warden.

No. 18-7683.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Jerome MARTIN, petitioner, v. Randall HAAS, Warden.

No. 17-6605.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 8, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Elizabeth CRUZ, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-9526.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*188Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Matthew PETERSON, et ux., petitioners, v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DIVISION OF CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIES, et al.

No. 18-7953.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1437

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. BALLENGER (for himself, Mr. HALL of Texas, and Mr. STENHOLM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Regu5 latory Enforcement Fairness Implementation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS VIOLATIONS.

7 Section 17 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act

8 of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 666) is amended by redesignating sub9 sections (k) and (l) as subsections (l) and (m), respec10 tively, and by inserting after subsection (j) the following:
2

•HR 1437 IH

1 ‘‘(k) In the case of any small business concern em2 ployer (as defined in section 3(a)(10) of the Small Busi3 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(10) and regulations there4 under) any penalty which would otherwise be assessed

5 under subsection (c) shall be waived if the employer abates

6 the violation within the time set for abatement under sec7 tion 9(a).’’.

Æ