alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1615 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1615

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 1999

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the designation of a 
 portion of the Lamprey River in New Hampshire as a recreational river 
                to include an additional river segment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lamprey Wild and Scenic River 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. LAMPREY RECREATIONAL RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) Additional Segment.--The paragraph entitled ``Lamprey River, 
New Hampshire'' in section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``11.5-mile segment extending from the 
        southern Lee town line'' and inserting ``23.5-mile segment 
        extending from the Bunker Pond Dam in Epping''; and
            (2) by striking ``towns of'' and inserting ``towns of 
        Epping,''.
    (b) Management.--Section 405 of division I of the Omnibus Parks and 
Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 
4149; 16 U.S.C. 1274 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``Epping,'' before 
        ``Durham''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (c).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11

COUNTY SEAT STORES, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


                                                13 Weeks        26 Weeks 
                                                  Ended           Ended
                                                August 1,       August 1,
                                                  1998            1998
                                              -----------      -----------
BASIC and DILUTED:

 Net loss                                     $   (15,033)     $   (27,797)
                                              ===========      ===========

 Weighted average shares outstanding               20,000           20,000
                                              ===========      ===========

 Loss per common share, basic and diluted     $     (0.75)     $     (1.39)
                                              ===========      ===========
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 152 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 152

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that housing 
 assistance provided under the Native American Housing Assistance and 
  Self-Determination Act of 1996 shall be treated for purposes of the 
 low-income housing credit in the same manner as comparable assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that housing 
 assistance provided under the Native American Housing Assistance and 
  Self-Determination Act of 1996 shall be treated for purposes of the 
 low-income housing credit in the same manner as comparable assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ASSISTANCE DISREGARDED IN 
              DETERMINING WHETHER BUILDING IS FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED FOR 
              PURPOSES OF THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 42(i)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to determination of whether 
building is federally subsidized) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or native american housing assistance'' 
        after ``home assistance'' in the subparagraph heading, and
            (2) by inserting ``or the Native American Housing 
        Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (as in effect on 
        October 1, 1997)'' after ``this subparagraph)'' in clause (i).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to periods after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification Pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)**
     The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of AlliedHoldings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, whichaccompanies this certification fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained inthe periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates andfor the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is madepursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall not berelied upon for any other purpose.
     This7th day of January, 2005.    */s/ Hugh E. Sawyer*  *Hugh E. Sawyer* *President and Chief Executive Officer*
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to Allied Holdings, Inc.and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall itbe deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in suchfiling.
40
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL MARTINEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73637 

Agency No. A091-607-548 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 

Rafael Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration 

judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our 

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73637 

Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and 

dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency properly denied cancellation of removal, where Martinez failed 

to establish that he was not convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1229b(a)(3); Pereida v. Wilkinson, 141 S.Ct. 754, 766 (2021) (an inconclusive 

conviction record is insufficient to meet applicant’s burden of proof to show 

eligibility for relief ). We lack jurisdiction to consider Martinez’s contention that 

the record does not establish that he was convicted under California Health and 

Safety Code Sections 11351 and 11352. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 

677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to 

the agency). Thus, Martinez’s cancellation of removal claim fails.

In light of this disposition, we need not reach Martinez’s contention that he 

was lawfully admitted for permanent residence. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 

F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (the courts are not required to decide issues that are

unnecessary to the results).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
Marc Pintar, Interim Chief Executive Officer of PTS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: July
  13, 2010/s/ Marc
  Pintar
Marc Pintar
Interim Chief Executive Officer
Edwin APONTE, petitioner, v. Eric TICE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield, et al.

No. 18-5015.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
John A. ANDERSON, petitioner, v. John F. WALRATH, Warden.

No. 18-977.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Gregory D. KILPATRICK, petitioner, v. Jessie FIELDS.

No. 18-5819.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Jonathan JUDKINS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8221.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
Frank A. WALLS, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9510.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# Official Journal L 225/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 225 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5730 July 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 225

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5730 July 2014

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Council Regulations (EC) No 1683/95 and (EC) No 539/2001 and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( OJ L 182, 29.6.2013 ) | 91 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 610/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code), the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, Council Regulations (EC) No 1683/95 and (EC) No 539/2001 and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( OJ L 182, 29.6.2013 )

( OJ L 182, 29.6.2013 )

91

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Kayle Barrington BATES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA, et al.

No. 17-9161.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
acls_Ex10_13


		
			Exhibit 10.13
		

		
			Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
		

		
			Non‐Employee Director Cash Compensation at March 11, 2019
		

		
			This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to cash compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) and each of its non‐employee directors. Axcelis provides both cash retainers to its non‐employee directors, as follows:
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Annual Cash Retainers, paid quarterly in advance

					
						 

				
	
					
						Board Member Retainer

					
					
						$50,000

				
	
					
						Independent Chairman Premium

					
					
						$20,000

				
	
					
						Committee Chair Retainers

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Audit Committee Chairman

					
					
						$20,000

				
	
					
						Compensation Committee Chairman

					
					
						$15,000

				
	
					
						Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman

					
					
						$10,000

				
	
					
						Technology and Product Development Committee Chairman

					
					
						$10,000

				
	
					
						Committee Member (not Chairman) Retainers

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Audit Committee Member

					
					
						$10,000

				
	
					
						Compensation Committee Member

					
					
						$7,500

				
	
					
						Nominating and Governance Committee Member

					
					
						$5,000

				
	
					
						Technology and Product Development Committee Member

					
					
						$5,000

				



		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			
		

		
			Non‐employee directors also receive reimbursement of out‐of‐pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.  Non‐employee directors do not receive any Company‐paid perquisites.
		

		
			 
		

		
			The Board of Directors may, from time to time, form committees in addition to the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Technology and Product Development Committees and set compensation for service on such additional committees.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00913-CR

Tam-Monta Lamont Eugene HASTINGS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR8107

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED February 20, 2019.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
**Exhibit 3.5**

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

**OF**

**NORTHERN PLAINS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, LLC**

The undersigned, an authorizednatural person, for the purpose of forming a limited liability company, under the provisions and subject to the requirements of the State of Delaware (particularly Chapter 18, Title 6 of the Delaware Code and the acts amendatory thereof andsupplemental thereto, and known, identified, and referred to as the “Delaware Limited Liability Company Act”), hereby certifies that: 

**FIRST**: The name of the limited liability company formed hereby (hereinafter called the “Limited Liability Company”) is Northern Plains Natural Gas Company, LLC. 

**SECOND**: The address of the registered office and the name and address of the registered agent of the Limited Liability Company required to bemaintained by Section 18-104 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act are The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 

**THIRD**: This Certificate of Formation shall be effective on the date of filing. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of Northern Plains Natural Gas Company, LLC on November 15, 2004.

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

**OF**

**NORTHERN PLAINS NATURAL GASCOMPANY, LLC**

It is hereby certified that: 

1. The name of the limited liability company (hereinafter called the “Limited Liability Company”) is Northern Plains Natural Gas Company, LLC. 

2. The certificate of formation of the Limited Liability Company is hereby amended by striking out the FIRST article thereof in its entirety and bysubstituting in lieu of said article the following new article: 

“FIRST: The name of the company is ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Formation of Northern Plains NaturalGas Company, LLC as of the 15th day of May, 2006. 

 
By: /s/ David Kyle David Kyle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Authorized Person
Michael A. MAPS, petitioner, v. Katherine FERNANDEZ-RUNDLE, et al.

No. 17-5868.

Supreme Court of the United States

Nov. 13, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41232

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR AUGUSTO VASQUEZ-SANTOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-278-1

--------------------

August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appointed counsel for Cesar Augusto Vasquez-Santos, the

Federal Public Defender, has requested leave to withdraw as

counsel and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vasquez-Santos has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
No. 01-41232

-2-

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
Francisco Frank APODACA, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8741.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6998

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PATRICK LAMAR HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-297)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lamar Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lamar Harris appeals from the district court’s

orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for

reduction of sentence and denying his motion for reconsideration.

Harris asserts that he is entitled to a reduction of sentence based

on Amendment 591 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. This Amendment

requires a sentencing court to apply the offense guideline

referenced in the Statutory Index in Appendix A based on the

statute of conviction, rather than a defendant’s actual conduct.

See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual App. C, Amend. 591 (2004);

United States v. Rivera, 293 F.3d 584, 586-87 (2d Cir. 2002).

Because Harris was sentenced under the correct guideline for his

convicted offenses, we affirm the orders of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Ricky THOMPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8481.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/18/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      224,206
COMMITMENTS
  65,709    7,432   35,714   87,262  148,746  188,685  191,892   35,521   32,315

CHANGES FROM 01/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,997)
      -5     -227     -559   -6,933   -4,554   -7,498   -5,341    2,500      343

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.3      3.3     15.9     38.9     66.3     84.2     85.6     15.8     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      220)
      74       27       57       70       91      168      160
```

----

Updated January 21, 2011