alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Mark J. Gendregske, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AlliedSystems Holdings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         November 14, 2007  /s/ Mark J. Gendregske   *Date* Mark J. Gendregske     *Chief Executive Officer and President*
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1524V

UNPUBLISHED

STEPHANIE LASZKOW,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 17, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On October 2, 2019, Stephanie Laszkow filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered shoulder injuries related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on 

September 21, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit 

of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 17, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent states that “[Respondent] believes that [P]etitioner’s alleged 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

injury is consistent with a SIRVA, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 5. 

Respondent further agrees that “[P]etitioner suffered residual effects of her injury for more 

than six months.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
# Úradný vestník C 41/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 41 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6527. januára 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 41

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6527. januára 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2022/C 41/01 | Výmenný kurz eura — 26. januára 2022 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2022/C 41/01

Výmenný kurz eura — 26. januára 2022

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 27.1.2022 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 41/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2022

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 41/1

---

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

26. januára 2022

(2022/C 41/01)

1 euro =

| | Mena | Výmenný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Americký dolár | 1,1277 |
| JPY | Japonský jen | 128,86 |
| DKK | Dánska koruna | 7,4420 |
| GBP | Britská libra | 0,83458 |
| SEK | Švédska koruna | 10,4493 |
| CHF | Švajčiarsky frank | 1,0386 |
| ISK | Islandská koruna | 145,60 |
| NOK | Nórska koruna | 10,0115 |
| BGN | Bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Česká koruna | 24,531 |
| HUF | Maďarský forint | 359,67 |
| PLN | Poľský zlotý | 4,5864 |
| RON | Rumunský lei | 4,9451 |
| TRY | Turecká líra | 15,2877 |
| AUD | Austrálsky dolár | 1,5727 |
| CAD | Kanadský dolár | 1,4173 |
| HKD | Hongkongský dolár | 8,7791 |
| NZD | Novozélandský dolár | 1,6865 |
| SGD | Singapurský dolár | 1,5162 |
| KRW | Juhokórejský won | 1 350,03 |
| ZAR | Juhoafrický rand | 17,0858 |
| CNY | Čínsky juan | 7,1293 |
| HRK | Chorvátska kuna | 7,5290 |
| IDR | Indonézska rupia | 16 185,31 |
| MYR | Malajzijský ringgit | 4,7268 |
| PHP | Filipínske peso | 57,728 |
| RUB | Ruský rubeľ | 89,2650 |
| THB | Thajský baht | 37,169 |
| BRL | Brazílsky real | 6,1084 |
| MXN | Mexické peso | 23,1845 |
| INR | Indická rupia | 84,4288 |

Mena

Výmenný kurz

USD

Americký dolár

1,1277

JPY

Japonský jen

128,86

DKK

Dánska koruna

7,4420

GBP

Britská libra

0,83458

SEK

Švédska koruna

10,4493

CHF

Švajčiarsky frank

1,0386

ISK

Islandská koruna

145,60

NOK

Nórska koruna

10,0115

BGN

Bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

Česká koruna

24,531

HUF

Maďarský forint

359,67

PLN

Poľský zlotý

4,5864

RON

Rumunský lei

4,9451

TRY

Turecká líra

15,2877

AUD

Austrálsky dolár

1,5727

CAD

Kanadský dolár

1,4173

HKD

Hongkongský dolár

8,7791

NZD

Novozélandský dolár

1,6865

SGD

Singapurský dolár

1,5162

KRW

Juhokórejský won

1 350,03

ZAR

Juhoafrický rand

17,0858

CNY

Čínsky juan

7,1293

HRK

Chorvátska kuna

7,5290

IDR

Indonézska rupia

16 185,31

MYR

Malajzijský ringgit

4,7268

PHP

Filipínske peso

57,728

RUB

Ruský rubeľ

89,2650

THB

Thajský baht

37,169

BRL

Brazílsky real

6,1084

MXN

Mexické peso

23,1845

INR

Indická rupia

84,4288

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

---
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/01/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      621,079
COMMITMENTS
  51,108   25,439  139,993  401,221  431,625  592,322  597,057   28,757   24,022

CHANGES FROM 02/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     13,179)
  -1,326    4,929    4,661    4,405   -2,488    7,740    7,103    5,439    6,076

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     8.2      4.1     22.5     64.6     69.5     95.4     96.1      4.6      3.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      138)
      37       24       52       66       68      131      122
```

----

Updated March 4, 2011
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**760 CA 10-02319**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

BARBARA MILLER AND RICHARD HUGO MILLER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

LAURIEANN BUCK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

LOTEMPIO & BROWN, P.C., BUFFALO (PATRICK J. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (ARTHUR A. HERDZIK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered October 6, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order granted the motion of defendant Town of Cheektowaga for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.


We  consent  to the  incorporation  of our report  dated  April 8, 2004,  on the
financial statements of Hydro Environmental  Resources,  Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2003,  which is included in this Form 10-KSB,  and to the reference
to our Firm under the caption "Experts" in the Form 10-KSB.






CORDOVANO AND HONECK, P.C.
Cordovano and Honeck, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
May 21, 2004



































                                      -23-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR ITS FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         153,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,500
<INVENTORY>                                    572,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,792,591
<PP&E>                                       4,971,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                 371,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,680,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,276,506
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,374
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,720,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,680,532
<SALES>                                        740,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               943,558
<CGS>                                          260,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               948,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (259,530)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (259,530)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (259,530)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/04/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      436,829
COMMITMENTS
  40,085   22,604   91,030  279,669  305,493  410,784  419,127   26,045   17,702

CHANGES FROM 09/27/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     12,608)
     155    1,764   10,910    8,581    5,702   19,646   18,376   -7,038   -5,768

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     9.2      5.2     20.8     64.0     69.9     94.0     95.9      6.0      4.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      130)
      27       27       44       66       68      118      117
```

----

Updated October 7, 2011
Brandon Lee MOON, petitioner, v. COUNTY OF EL PASO, TEXAS, et al.

No. 18-1193.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

*2617Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1602

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of

depreciable business assets which may be expensed, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the amount of depreciable business assets which may

be expensed, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN EXPENSE TREATMENT FOR

4 SMALL BUSINESSES.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Paragraph (1) of section

6 179(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

7 dollar limitation) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(1) DOLLAR LIMITATION.—The aggregate cost

9 which may be taken into account under subsection

10 (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed $60,000.’’
2

•HR 1602 IH

1 (b) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF SECTION 179 PROP2 ERTY AT WHICH PHASEOUT BEGINS.—Paragraph (2) of

3 section 179(b) of such Code (relating to reduction in limi4 tation) is amended by striking ‘‘$200,000’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘$300,000’’.

6 (c) INCREASE IN SECTION 280F LIMITATION ON

7 AUTOMOBILES WHICH ARE EXPENSED UNDER SECTION

8 179.—

9 (1) Paragraph (1) of section 280F(d) of such

10 Code is amended to read as follows:

11 ‘‘(1) COORDINATION WITH SECTION 179.—

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in

13 subparagraph (B), any deduction allowable

14 under section 179 with respect to any listed

15 property shall be subject to the limitations of

16 subsections (a) and (b), and the limitation of

17 paragraph (3) of this subsection, in the same

18 manner as if it were a depreciation deduction

19 allowable under section 168.

20 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR AUTOMOBILES.—

21 In the case of any deduction allowable under

22 section 179 with respect to a passenger auto23 mobile, the limitation under subsection (a) for

24 the 1st taxable year of the recovery period shall

25 be increased by $15,700.’’
3

•HR 1602 IH

1 (2) Subparagraph (A) of section 280F(d)(7) of

2 such Code is amended—

3 (A) by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and in4 serting ‘‘subsections (a) and (d)(1)(B)’’, and

5 (B) by striking ‘‘such subsection’’ and in6 serting ‘‘such subsections’’.

7 (3) Subclause (II) of section 280F(d)(7)(B)(i)

8 of such Code is amended by inserting ‘‘(October of

9 1998 in the case of the dollar amount contained in

10 subsection (d)(1)(B))’’ after ‘‘October of 1987’’.

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall apply to property placed in service in

13 taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.

Æ
null

Other

1628.28
Wylmina HETTINGA, petitioner, v. Timothy P. LOUMENA.

No. 18-8554.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                     
|------------------ |  | --------------------
|Date: May 13, 2004 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith
|                   |  | Timothy L. Smith    



21
A00A0196.

#### POETTER v. THE STATE.

(536 SE2d 576)

Miller, Judge.

On April 8, 1988, Louis Jerome Poetter pled guilty to nineteen counts of sodomy and one count of simple battery in the Superior Court of Douglas County, for which felony offenses he was sentenced to concurrent twenty-year terms, provided that, after serving eight years, Poetter would be eligible for *probation.*Effective January 23, 1996, the State Board of Pardons & Paroles ordered that Poetter be *paroled*“until the expiration of the confinement sentence(s).” Poetter planned to reside in Gwinnett County with his wife, and the Board’s order specified that Poetter would be supervised by Parole Officer B. Crosby in Lawrenceville. One of the special conditions of the Board’s parole order was that Poetter would not return to Douglas County. On April 23, 1999, the Superior Court of Douglas County issued an order under the original indictment number, reciting that the court deemed it “appropriate for the actual supervision of [Poetter] to be maintained by and through the Adult Probation Department of the Department of Corrections in Douglas County,” and ordering that Poetter’s parole supervision be transferred from Gwinnett County to *676Douglas County. This order contains the certificate of the Douglas County District Attorney that he mailed a copy of the order to defendant, his counsel, the chiefs of Adult Probation in Gwinnett and Douglas Counties, the clerks of the respective superior courts, and an assistant attorney general.

Decided June 29, 2000.

*Thomas E. Maddox, Jr.,*for appellant.

*David McDade, District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

Poetter’s direct appeal to the Supreme Court of Georgia was transferred to the Court of Appeals. In three related enumerations of error, Poetter complains of the transfer of his parole supervision from Gwinnett County to Douglas County without notice.

An appellate court may hear and consider evidence outside the record as transmitted from the court below that an appeal has become moot.1 As a friend of the court, the Attorney General submits this appeal is moot because Poetter’s probation supervision has already been administratively transferred from Gwinnett County to Douglas County. This finding of fact is made in an order of the Gwinnett Superior Court in Poetter’s habeas corpus petition, Civil Action No. 99A3349-5, which order is attached as an exhibit to the Attorney General’s brief. Where the appellant either admits the existence of the fact of mootness as claimed by the appellee or fails to deny the existence of the same, the appeal will be dismissed.2 Poetter has not denied the administrative transfer of his supervision. We therefore conclude the issues raised in this appeal are moot, subjecting Case No. A00A0196 to dismissal under OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (3).3

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Pope, P. J., and Smith, P. J., concur.*

1

*Atlanta &c. R. Co. v. Blanton,*80 Ga. 563, 565 (1) (6 SE 584) (1888).

2

*Kappers v. DeKalb County Bd. of Health,*214 Ga. App. 117, 118 (446 SE2d 794) (1994).

3

Id.