alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23.3








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-93403, No. 333-38114, No. 333-85392) of our report dated March
      27,
      2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ascendant
      Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the Annual
      Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004.





/s/
                Ernst & Young, LLP





Ernst
      & Young, LLP


Dallas,
      Texas


January
      17, 2006







**-73-**
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-51107 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Leobardo Rodriguez-Loaza, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:21-CR-694-1 

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Leobardo Rodriguez-Loaza appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). 

For the first time on appeal, Rodriguez-Loaza contends that the recidivism 

enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it permits a sentence 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

March 30, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-51107 Document: 00516260550 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/30/2022
No. 21-51107 

2 

above the otherwise-applicable statutory maximum established by § 1326(a), 

based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury 

beyond a reasonable doubt. While Rodriguez-Loaza acknowledges this 

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 

(1998), he nevertheless seeks to preserve it for possible Supreme Court 

review. In addition, Rodriguez-Loaza has filed an unopposed motion for 

summary disposition. 

This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions such as 

Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v.

Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). Thus, Rodriguez-Loaza is 

correct that his argument is foreclosed, and summary disposition is 

appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969). 

Rodriguez-Loaza’s motion is GRANTED and the district court’s 

judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 21-51107 Document: 00516260550 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/30/2022
Ronald Palmer HEATH, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9475.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 452ND DISTRICT COURT OF EDWARDS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on April 1, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Clevan Meyers, Appellant

V.

Newfield Exploration Company, Appellee

No. 04-15-00007-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 3725

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred

them.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 1, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-15-00007-CV

Clevan Meyers

v.

Newfield Exploration Company

(NO. 3725 IN 452ND DISTRICT COURT OF EDWARDS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

FILING

INDIGENT

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

$10.00

$447.00

$50.00

$100.00

$25.00

$20.00

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

LLOYD A MUENNINK

MR. MUENNINK

LLOYD A MUENNINK

LLOYD A MUENNINK

LLOYD A MUENNINK

LLOYD A MUENNINK

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this June 1, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit 23.2   CONSENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    To the Board of Directors and Shareholders DAG Media, Inc.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
      Statements of DAG Media, Inc. on Forms S-8 (#333-82374 and #333-127424) of
      our report dated March 23, 2007, on the consolidated balance sheet of Dag
      Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related
      consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash
      flows for the year then ended, and the adjustments to the 2005 financial statements to retrospectively apply the change in accounting for discontinued operations of the Jewish directories, as described in Note 1,  as appearing in the annual report on Form
      10-KSB of DAG Media, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.    /s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.  Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C. New York, New York  March 23, 2007
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of China New Media Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated: September 28, 2011


/s/ Guojun WangGuojun Wang

Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Honorable James E. Barlow Opinion No. C-445 

Criminal District Attorney 

Bexar County Re: Whether the failure of a 

San Antonio, Texas candidate for office to 

file the expense reports 

required by the Election 

Code constitutes a criminDear Mr. Barlow: al offense. 

In your letter requesting an opinion of this office, 

you ask the foilowing question: 

~"Does the total failure of a candidate 

to file ,the expense reports required, by the 

Election Code constitute a crplnal offense?"' 

Article 14.08 of the Electio&‘&de, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes, requires that candidates fiie'sworn~ statements with 

regard to their gifts, loans, expens~es, debts, etc.; and Section (g) of that ,Art+le provides: 

"(g) If any candidate fails to file 

such sworn statement at the'tlme provided 

herein or swears falsely therein, he shall 

.be subject upon conviction to a fine not 

less than One Hundred Dollars ($100) nor 

more~than Five Thousand DolXa'rs ($5,000), 

'or be Imprisoned in the penitentiary not 

less than one (1) nor more than five (5) 

years; or be both so fined and imprisoned." 

The caption of the legislation enacting the Election 

Code reads':, 

"AN ACT to adopt and establish 'an election code for the State of Texas, to revise 

and recodify Title 50 of the Revised Civil 

Statutes of 1925 of Texas, and all amendments 

thereto, to repeal all Acts In conflict here-, 

with, provided, however, that nothing in this 

Act shall be construed as repealing or in apy 

way affecting the legality of any penal provision of the existing law, and further provided that nothing in this Act shall in any 

-2!ii- 
. . 

Honorable James E. Barlow, Page 2 (C-445) 2 

. 

wise alter. amend. or reoeal House Bill No. 

43, Acts, Regular-Session, Fifty-second Legislature; providing a saving clause; providing an appropriation; providing the effective date; and declaring an emergency." 

In Ex Parte Meyer, 357 S.W.2d 754 (Tkx.Crim. 1962), 

the above nenal arovislon of the Election Code was declared 

invalid due to the fact that the caption gave no notice that 

penal provisions were to be found in the tact. The' Court cites 

Article 3, Section 35 of the Texas Constitution which prohibits the inclusion in a bill of any subject not expressed in 

the title. 

We are unable to find any other statutory authority 

whereby the failure of a candidate to file expense reports 

,would 'constitute a criminal offense, as Articles 252 and 262- 

269, Vernon's Penal Code were repealed by the Acts of 1959, 34, 

Chapter.22, Section 1. 

SUMMARY .> 

The total failure of a candidate to 

file the expense reports required by the 

Election Code does not constitute's crimfinal offense. Ex Parte.Meyer, 357 S.W.2d 

754 (Tex.Crim. 1962). 

Yours very truly, 

WAGGONERCARR 

,Attorney'General of Texas 

By: VL 

BSC/lh 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE ,, 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Mary K. Wall 

Malcolm Quick 

Paul Phy 

George Gray 

APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: Stanton Stone 

-2115-
Charlton BRADSHAW, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-6794.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
James Anthony BARNETT, Jr., petitioner, v. ALAMANCE COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE DETENTION CENTER, et al.

No. 18-8192.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000909724
<NAME>                        THE LEATHER FACTORY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                                      US DOLLARS

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                          1
<CASH>                                                             560,269
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    2,636,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       125,000
<INVENTORY>                                                      8,333,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                12,063,436
<PP&E>                                                           3,113,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   2,069,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  18,066,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            9,414,929
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            23,648
<OTHER-SE>                                                       8,376,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    18,066,324
<SALES>                                                         19,678,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                19,678,118
<CGS>                                                           11,060,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   11,060,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 7,546,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 581,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    499,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       312,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                187,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       187,082
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.02



</TABLE>
Marcus CHATMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9565.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northern Border
Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Jerry L. Peters, as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Partnership, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


Dated: November 7, 2005                 /s/ Jerry L. Peters
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jerry L. Peters
                                        Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.
H. R. 1605

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 402

North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas, as the ‘‘J. Smith Henley Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 402 North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘J. Smith Henley Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘J. Smith Henley Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Matthew C. Diamond 
|Matthew C. Diamond     
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 1, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       66,154
COMMITMENTS
  22,118    3,392    7,832   21,324   38,825   51,274   50,049   14,880   16,105

CHANGES FROM 02/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,843)
  -2,687      384    1,926     -590   -5,925   -1,351   -3,615   -2,492     -228

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.4      5.1     11.8     32.2     58.7     77.5     75.7     22.5     24.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       84)
      40        7       15       27       25       70       45
```

----

Updated February 25, 2011
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/19/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       61,126
COMMITMENTS
  19,502    1,042    4,939   24,103   40,630   48,544   46,611   12,582   14,515

CHANGES FROM 04/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -564)
    -650      -15      429     -635     -386     -856       28      292     -592

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.9      1.7      8.1     39.4     66.5     79.4     76.3     20.6     23.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       76)
      30        4       18       31       27       67       48
```

----

Updated April 22, 2011
Tara KING, et al., petitioners, v. Phil MURPHY, Governor of New Jersey, et al.

No. 18-1073.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Neil GILLESPIE, petitioner, v. REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.

No. 18-7225.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied.
Jerome M. KRASKEY, petitioner, v. N. GROSCHEN.

No. 17-9594.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
David Lemoe TUA, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-5007.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One denied.
Dustin MATTHEWS, petitioner, v. Roseann ROBLES.

No. 18M140.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Bankrate, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statement (No. 333-87955) on Form S-8 of Bankrate, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows of Bankrate, Inc. and subsidiariesfor the year ended December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Bankrate, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 13, 2009 

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 

Certified Public Accountants