27568 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 89 / Monday, May 9, 2022 / Notices 

1See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, Preliminary Successor-inInterest Determination, and Partial Rescission; 

2019–2020, 86 FR 60792 (November 4, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results). 

2The petitioner is the Coalition of American 

Flange Producers. 

3See Chandan’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Stainless-steel 

Flanges from India (A–533–877–AR2): Case Brief,’’ 

dated January 7, 2022; see also Echjay’s Letter, 

‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from India,’’ dated January 

7, 2022; and Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated 

January 7, 2022. 

4See KDT’s Letter, ‘‘KDT’s Rebuttal to Petitioners 

Case Brief,’’ dated January 19, 2022; see also 

Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated January 

20, 2022; and Chandan’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief on 

behalf of Chandan Steel,’’ dated January 21, 2022. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2019– 

2020,’’ dated February 15, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Flanges from 

India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020,’’ dated May 3, 

2022 (Issues and Decision Memorandum) which is 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice. 

7 Id. 

8 Id. 

9 Id. 

10With more than one respondent under 

examination, Commerce normally calculates: (A) A 

weighted average of the estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins calculated for the examined 

respondents; (B) a simple average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins calculated for 

the examined respondents; and (C) a weighted 

average of the estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins calculated for the examined respondents 

using each company’s publicly-ranged U.S. sale 

values for the merchandise under consideration. 

Commerce then compares (B) and (C) to (A) and 

selects either the (B) or (C) rate based on the rate 

closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for 

companies not selected for individual examination. 

See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 

In this review, Commerce based the rate for 

companies not selected for individual examination 

on the publicly-ranged sales data of the mandatory 

respondents. For an analysis of the data, see 

Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Stainless Steel 

Flanges from India: Calculation of Margin for 

Respondents Not Selected for Individual 

Examination,’’ dated May 3, 2022. 

11See Appendix II for a full list of these 

companies. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–877] 

Stainless Steel Flanges From India: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that exporters/ 

producers of stainless steel flanges from 

India made sales of subject merchandise 

at prices below normal value during the 

period of review (POR) October 1, 2019, 

through September 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable May 9, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benito Ballesteros or Christopher 

Maciuba, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425 or 

(202) 482–0413, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce selected two companies, 

Chandan Steel Limited (Chandan) and 

Kisaan Die Tech Private Limited (KDT), 

for individual examination. On 

November 4, 2021, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results and invited 

interested parties to comment.1 On 

January 7, 2022, Chandan, Echjay 

Forgings Private Limited (Echjay), and 

the petitioner 2 submitted case briefs.3

From January 19 to 21, 2022, KDT, the 

petitioner, and Chandan submitted 

rebuttal briefs.4 On February 15, 2022, 

we extended the deadline for issuance 

of these final results to May 3, 2022.5

For a complete description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6 Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is stainless steel flanges from India. For 

a complete description of the scope of 

this order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.8 Attached to 

this notice, in Appendix I, is a list of the 

issues which parties raised. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties and record 

information, we made certain changes to 

the margin calculations for Chandan 

and KDT. For a discussion of these 

changes, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.9

Rate for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation, for guidance. 

Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 

the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an 

amount equal to the weighted-average of 

the estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins established for 

exporters and producers individually 

investigated, excluding any zero or de 

minimis margins, and any margins 

determined entirely {on the basis of 

facts available}.’’ 

For the final results, Commerce 

calculated estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins for Chandan and KDT 

that are not zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts otherwise available. 

Accordingly, Commerce has continued 

to calculate the rate for companies not 

selected for individual examination 

using a weighted average of the margins 

calculated for Chandan and KDT 

weighted by each respondent’s publiclyranged total U.S. sale values.10

Final Results of Administrative Review 

The final estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins are listed below for 

the POR, October 1, 2019, through 

September 30, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Chandan Steel Limited ......... 3.66 

Kisaan Die Tech Private Limited .................................... 1.27 

Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 11 .. 3.40 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for the final results within 

five days of the publication of this 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 89 / Monday, May 9, 2022 / Notices 27569 

12See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Notice 

of Court Decision Not in Harmony with the Final 

Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice 

of Amended Final Determination, 86 FR 50325 

(August 30, 2021). 

13We find that BFN Forgings Private Limited is 

the successor-in-interest to Bebitz Flanges Works 

Private Limited. See IDM. This determination is 

unchanged from the Preliminary Results. See 

Preliminary Results PDM at ‘‘Preliminary 

Successor-In-Interest Determination’’ for full 

discussion. 

14We also initiated a review of this company 

under the name ‘‘Jay Jagdamba Ltd.’’ We are treating 

these companies as the same entity for purposes of 

this segment of the proceeding. 

notice in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise covered by this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for 

Chandan and KDT, we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of the sales. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will assign an assessment rate based on 

the methodology described in the ‘‘Rate 

for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination’’ section, above. 

We intend to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of the final 

results of this administrative review for 

all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Chandan, KDT, 

and the companies not selected for 

individual examination will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered by this review but 

covered in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

by this review, a previous review, or the 

original LTFV investigation, but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

merchandise; (4) the case deposit rate 

for all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 7.00 percent,12 the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation. These cash deposits, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: May 3, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Successor-in-Interest Determination 

V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

General Issue 

Comment 1: Whether to Reject the 

Petitioner’s Rebuttal Factual Information 

(RFI) 

Chandan-Specific Issues 

Comment 2: Whether Chandan Properly 

Reported Finishing Stage 

Comment 3: Whether Chandan Properly 

Reported Quantity 

Comment 4: Whether Chandan Properly 

Reported All Sales of Foreign Like 

Product 

Comment 5: Whether to Allow Certain 

Reported Billing Adjustments 

Comment 6: Whether Chandan Received 

Full Payment from Certain U.S. 

Customers 

Comment 7: Whether Chandan Properly 

Reported Its Inventory Movement 

Schedule 

Comment 8: Whether Chandan Properly 

Reported Its Steel Grades 

Comment 9: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available (AFA) to Chandan EchjaySpecific Issue 

Comment 10: Whether to Treat Echjay as 

a Non-Examined Respondent KDTSpecific Issues 

Comment 11: Application of AFA for 

Failure to Properly Report Certain Sales 

Comment 12: Application of AFA for 

Failure to Timely Report Certain 

Affiliates 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Not 

Selected for Individual Examination 

Ae Engineers & Exporters 

Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd. 

BFN Forgings Private Limited (former name 

Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited) 13

Broadway Overseas Ltd. 

Dongguan Good Luck Furniture Industrial 

Co., Ltd. 

DSV Air and Sea Pvt. Ltd. 

DSV Logistics 

G.I. Auto Pvt. Ltd. 

Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd. 

Jay Jagdamba Forgings Private Limited 

Jay Jagdamba Limited 14

Jay Jagdamba Profile Private Limited 

Katariya Steel Distributors 

Lotus CNC Components 

Motor Aids 

Shree Jay Jagdamba Flanges Private Limited 

Transworld Enterprises 

Transworld Group 

Viraj Profiles Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09911 Filed 5–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES