alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1609 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1609

   To amend Public Law 105-188 to provide for the mineral leasing of 
                   certain Indian lands in Oklahoma.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1999

Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend Public Law 105-188 to provide for the mineral leasing of 
                   certain Indian lands in Oklahoma.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINERAL LEASING OF CERTAIN INDIAN LANDS IN OKLAHOMA.

    Public Law 105-188 (112 Stat. 620 and 621) is amended--
            (1) in the title, by inserting ``and certain former Indian 
        reservations in Oklahoma'' after ``Fort Berthold Indian 
        Reservation''; and
            (2) in section 1--
                    (A) by striking the section heading and inserting 
                the following:

``SECTION 1. LEASES OF CERTAIN ALLOTTED LANDS.'';

                and
                    (B) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by striking clause (i) 
                and inserting the following:
                            ``(i) is located within--
                                    ``(I) the Fort Berthold Indian 
                                Reservation in North Dakota; or
                                    ``(II) a former Indian reservation 
                                located in Oklahoma of--
                                            ``(aa) the Comanche Indian 
                                        Tribe;
                                            ``(bb) the Kiowa Indian 
                                        Tribe;
                                            ``(cc) the Apache Tribe;
                                            ``(dd) the Fort Sill Apache 
                                        Tribe of Oklahoma;
                                            ``(ee) the Wichita and 
                                        Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, 
                                        Keechi, Waco, and Tawakonie) 
                                        located in Oklahoma;
                                            ``(ff) the Delaware Tribe 
                                        of Western Oklahoma; or
                                            ``(gg) the Caddo Indian 
                                        Tribe; and''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

   FINANCIAL FEDERAL CORPORATION DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND


NEW YORK, NY:  March 3, 2009 - Financial Federal Corporation
(NYSE:FIF) today announced its Board of Directors declared a
$0.15 per share quarterly dividend on its common stock.  The
dividend is payable April 10, 2009 to stockholders of record at
the close of business on March 20, 2009.  The dividend rate is
the same as the prior quarter.


Financial Federal Corporation is an independent financial services
company specializing in financing construction, road transportation
and refuse equipment through installment sales and leasing programs
for dealers, manufacturers and end users nationwide.  Please visit
www.financialfederal.com for more information.


CONTACT:  Steven F. Groth
          Chief Financial Officer
          (212) 599-8000
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**   **NAME** **JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION**Informatica GmbH Germany   Informatica Software Limited United Kingdom   Informatica Software Limited Hong Kong   Informatica Software Ltd. Canada   Informatica Japan KK Japan   Informatica Software (Switzerland) AG Switzerland   Informatica International, Inc. Delaware   Informatica Cayman Ltd. Cayman Islands   InformaticaInternational do Brasil Ltda. Brazil   Informatica Belgie N.V. Belgium   Informatica Nederland B.V. The Netherlands   Informatica France S.A.S. France   Striva Corporation Delaware   Striva Technology Inc. California   Striva Technology Limited United Kingdom   Informatica Business Solutions Private Ltd. India   Informatica Australia PTY Limited Australia   Informatica International, Inc. — Singapore  Branch Singapore   Informatica International, Inc — Beijing China“Representative Office”     Informatica International, Inc — Informatica  Taiwan Co., Ltd. — InvestedCompany Taiwan
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Zvi Alon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the
period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/ Zvi AlonName:

Zvi AlonTitle:

Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive OfficerDated:

October 31, 2005




I, Michael
Peckham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the period ended
September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/ Michael R. PeckhamName:

Michael R. PeckhamTitle:

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Finance and SecretaryDated:

October 31, 2005
Bodey COOK, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8227.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50685

Summary Calendar

 

GEORGE D. IVEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HASSEL R. TERRY, Warden; ET AL,

Defendants,

HASSEL R. TERRY, Warden; JIMMY R. LAWSON, Major; BENNY BOYKIN, 

Captain; RODNEY GERBERT, Administrative Technician IV; REX 

MOORE, Grievance Inspector II, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

 

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-99-CV-385

--------------------

June 13, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

George D. Ivey, Texas state prisoner # 824316, appeals from

the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants

on his civil rights claims. Because no fact issue existed on the
No. 01-50685 

-2-

question whether the defendants had the requisite knowledge of a

substantial risk of harm, the district court did not err in

granting summary judgment for the defendants on Ivey’s failure-toprotect claim. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075

(5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). Ivey’s conclusory allegations and

unsubstantiated assertions were not sufficient to satisfy his

summary judgment burden as to his claims that the defendants lied

in an attempt to “cover up” the assault. See id.

Ivey has provided no controlling authority for his argument

that the district court had an affirmative duty to advise him as to

his burden in responding to the defendants’ summary judgment motion

with affidavits or otherwise. He has identified no error in the

district court’s grant of summary judgment without allowing the

parties to conduct further discovery. See Izen v. Catalina, 256

F.3d 324, 330 (5th Cir. 2001) (citing Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S.

226 (1991)). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in implicitly

denying Ivey’s motion to file a second amended complaint. See FED.

R. CIV. P. 15(a); Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Inv. Corp., 660 F.2d 594,

597 (5th Cir. 1981). Ivey has identified a no more than a mere

clerical error in the district court’s assertion, in its summary

judgment order, that Ivey was incarcerated at the “Hughes Unit” of

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division.

This apparent clerical error does not, standing alone, cast any
No. 01-50685 

-3-

doubt on the propriety of the district court’s grant of summary

judgment for the defendants. 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Annual Report of BioPharm Asia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wenzhong Qin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 11, 2010
/s/ Wenzhong QinWenzhong Qin

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Blake Anthony Monakino v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 361

- CR

Trial court case number: 1397016

Trial court: 174th Judicial District Court of Harris County

On August 4, 2015, this Court granted appellant’s “ Motion F o r Order Requiring

Clerk To Comply W ith T his Court’s Previous Order of April 16, 2015 ,” noting that the

reporter had timely complied with this Court’s Order of Abatement, issued on April 16,

2015, but that the trial clerk ha d not yet fil ed the requested supplemental clerk’s record

containing the amended certification clarifying appellant’s right of appeal

. On September

29 , 2015, a compliant supplemental clerk’s record with the trial court’s amended

certification stating that this is not a plea

- bargain case and that appellant has the right of

appeal, signed on August 13, 2015, was filed in this Court.

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on this Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this

order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 38.6(a), (d). The State’s appellee’s brief, if any, is

ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days from the filing of appellant’s brief. See id.

38.6(b).

Furthermore, b ecause appellant is represented by counsel, his pro se letter

- motion

, filed on September 14, 2015, requesting the amended certification of his r ight of appeal

and a tape recording, is D ISMISSED

. See Scheanette v. State , 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2

(Tex. Crim. A pp. 2004) (no entitlement to hybrid representation).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: October 8, 2015
Exhibit 31.1

CODATEK CORP.CERTIFICATIONS*

I, Michael Meek, certify that;

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB ofCodatek Corp.

2.             Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.             The registrant's other certifying officer and I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based onour evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.             The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.             The registrant's other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other facts that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   February 1, 2005

/s/ Michael Meek    Michael Meek, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,    President and Director

*Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant. See Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14.  The required certification must be in the exact form set forth above.
Blake SANDLAIN, petitioner, v. C. JOHNSON, Warden.

No. 18-8215.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2021

No. 04-20-00374-CR

Robert Francis BILUNAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19-83

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due by November 5, 2020, and after receiving two thirtyday extensions of time, his brief was currently due by January 4, 2021. On that day, appellant 

filed a motion requesting an additional thirty days to file his brief. After consideration, we 

GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file his brief by February 2, 2021.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
James VALENTINE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6926.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Michael Paul HENDRIX, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 17-9233.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District denied.
Edmon McCLINTON, petitioner, v. ARKANSAS.

No. 17-9578.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1605 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 847
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1605

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2000

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

           September 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

       Reported by Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 402 North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas, as the ``J. Smith 
        Henley Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 402 
North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Smith Henley Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``J. Smith Henley Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                                                       Calendar No. 847

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1605

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 402 North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas, as the ``J. Smith 
        Henley Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```
Order filed, March 10, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01101-CV

____________

PLEASANT HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

Appellant

V.

THE APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD OF HARRIS COUNTY AND HARRIS 

COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-72430

CORRECTED ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 10, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On January 28, 2014, this court ordered the court reporter to file the 

record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the 

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Cynthia Berry, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be 

entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Cynthia Berry does not timely file the record as ordered, 

we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the 

reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/07/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      244,663
COMMITMENTS
  28,040   45,204   54,870  139,127  124,401  222,037  224,475   22,626   20,188

CHANGES FROM 05/31/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      2,305)
  -3,518   -4,306    4,207    2,725      418    3,414      319   -1,109    1,986

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    11.5     18.5     22.4     56.9     50.8     90.8     91.7      9.2      8.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      134)
      46       34       65       28       29      118      108
```

----

Updated June 10, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09515]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 03/03-0249]


Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption 
Under Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of 
Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P., 
950 West Valley Road, Wayne, PA 19087, a Federal Licensee under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Argosy 
Investment Partners IV, L.P. proposes to provide financing to Joliet 
Holdings, LLC, c/o MTN Capital Partners, 60 East 42nd Street, New York, 
NY 10165.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a) and 
(d) of the Regulations because Odyssey Capital Group, L.P., an 
Associate of Argosy Investment Partners IV, L.P., owns more than ten 
percent of Joliet Holdings, LLC, and therefore this transaction is 
considered a financing of an Associate requiring prior SBA approval.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 
20416.

Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-09515 Filed 5-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P