alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pablo SAN MARTIN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-34.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Tammy Lynn VALDES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-6543.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Peter MATHIS, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7360.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 4.7


 


BENEFICIAL OWNER ELECTION FORM


 


INSTRUCTIONS


 


To [____________]:


 


The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed materials referred to therein relating to the offering of ordinary shares, par value NIS 3.00 (the “Ordinary Shares”), of Eltek Ltd. (the “Company”).


 






 With respect to any instructions to exercise (or not to exercise) Subscription Rights, the undersigned acknowledges that this form must be completed and returned such that it will actually be received by you by 5:00 p.m., New York City Time (midnight, Israeli time), on April 9, 2019. 


 




This will instruct you whether to exercise Subscription Rights to purchase Ordinary Shares distributed with respect to the Ordinary Shares held by you for the account of the undersigned, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the prospectus supplement and the related “Instructions as to Use of Subscription Rights Certificates.”


 


Box 1. ☐  Please DO NOT EXERCISE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS for Ordinary Shares.


 


Box 2. ☐  Please EXERCISE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS for Ordinary Shares as set forth below.


 


The number of Subscription Rights for which the undersigned gives instructions for exercise under the Basic Subscription Right should not exceed the number of Subscription Rights that the undersigned is entitled to exercise.


 


	
 

	
Number of Ordinary Shares

	
 

	
 

	
Per Share Subscription Price

	
 

	
Payment

	
 


	
Subscription Right:

	
 

	
x

	
$

	




 1.464 



	
=

	
$

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	 	 	 	 	 	
 

	
 


	
Over-Subscription Right:

	
 

	
x

	
$

	




 1.464 



	
=

	
$

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	 	 	 	 	 	
 

	
 


	
Total Payment Required:

	
 

	 	 	 	 	
$

	
 

	
 










Box 3. ☐  Payment in the following amount is enclosed $_____________ .


 


Box 4. ☐  Please deduct payment from the following account maintained by you as follows:


 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Type of Account

	
 

	
Account No.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Amount to be deducted:

	
$

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Date:

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
Signature(s)


	
 

	
 

	 
	
 

	
 

	
Please type or print name(s) below
Kevin KERR, petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-8011.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, John J. Limbert, the President and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Limbert                  
|                      |  |  |  | John J. Limbert                      
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Primo C. NOVERO, petitioner, v. DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC, et al.

No. 18-8444.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**          The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Allied Holdings, Inc.,certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2005, which accompanies this certification fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. Theforegoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.          This9th day of December 2005.         /s/ Hugh E. Sawyer         *Hugh E. Sawyer*    *President and Chief Executive Officer*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference inany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/26/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      193,109
COMMITMENTS
  27,270   35,506   36,894  106,742  108,341  170,905  180,740   22,204   12,369

CHANGES FROM 04/19/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -21,815)
  -2,988    1,815   -2,065  -16,485  -18,030  -21,537  -18,279     -277   -3,535

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    14.1     18.4     19.1     55.3     56.1     88.5     93.6     11.5      6.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      114)
      38       32       46       23       24       94       85
```

----

Updated April 29, 2011
Anthony GRANDISON, petitioner, v. MARYLAND.

No. 18-8476.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN
THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       40
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   127
<PP&E>                                             330
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (66)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               92
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                         302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       401
<SALES>                                             88
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    88
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1195)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.6

NASD OTCBB: CTVH August 14, 2002

REPRICING OF SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS

The Board of Directors of China NetTV Holdings ("the Company") announces that
the Company has reduced the exercise price of the Series "A" Share Purchase
Warrants (3.2 million) from $0.60 to $0.10 and extended the terms of the Series
"A" Share Purchase Warrants outstanding (3.2 million) for two years to the
earlier of:

(i) August 15, 2004; and

(ii) The 90th day after the day on which the weighted average trading price of
the Company's shares exceed $0.13 per share for 10 consecutive trading days.

Upon exercise of the Purchase Warrant at $0.10, the holder will receive one
Common Share of the Company and an Additional Warrant exercisable at $0.15. The
term of the Additional warrant will be adjusted accordingly to expire one year
after the occurrence of either (i) or (ii) as described above. The Share
Purchase Warrants were originally issued in a private placement commencing in
July 2000.

Any forward-looking statement in this press release is made pursuant to the
"safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Investors are cautioned that actual results may differ substantially from
such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic and political factors,
technological developments and changes in international and local markets, as
well as the inherent risks of the technology related business.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CHINA NETTV HOLDINGS INC.

"Signed"
--------
Ernest Cheung, President
For further information, please contact: Ernest Cheung (604) 689-4407
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 07/19/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      227,572
COMMITMENTS
  24,064   40,606   47,870  122,960  110,669  194,894  199,145   32,677   28,427

CHANGES FROM 07/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,582)
  -4,719   -8,949    2,520   -3,239    2,814   -5,438   -3,615    2,856    1,033

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    10.6     17.8     21.0     54.0     48.6     85.6     87.5     14.4     12.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      125)
      43       30       61       28       27      107      103
```

----

Updated July 22, 2011
WELL LUCK COMPANY, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-534.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Marvin WADDLETON, III, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5161.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Slip Op. 99-1 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

: AMERICAN SILICON TECHNOLOGIES, : ELKEM METALS COMPANY, GLOBE : METALLURGICAL, INC., and : SKW METALS & ALLOYS, INC., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE : Court No. 97-02-00268 UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : : CARMARGO CORREA METAIS, S.A. and : COMPANHIA FERROLIGAS : MINAS GERAIS-MINASLIGAS, : : Defendant-Intervenors. : :

JUDGMENT Upon finding that the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Silicon Metal from Brazil; Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review , 62 Fed. Reg. 54,094 (October 17, 1997)(“ Amended Final Results” ) correct all outstanding errors alleged by plaintiffs and upon due consideration of all other papers and proceedings had herein, it is hereby: ORDERED that the Amended Final Results are affirmed in all respects; and it is furtherCourt No. 97-02-00268 Page 2

ORDERED that all other issues having been decided, this case is dismissed.

_______________________________ R. KENTON MUSGRAVE JUDGE Dated: January 5, 1999 New York, New York
Kenya Ali HYATT, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-6777.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas H. King, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allied Holdings, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       August 14, 2006    /s/ Thomas H. King   *Date*   *Thomas H. King*      *Executive Vice President*      *and Chief Financial Officer*
Edward Jaimaal PRICE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-58.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 11.0

                    MONOCACY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                      Information used in the computation
                         of net income per common share

                                                  Three Months Ended
                                                        March 31,
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 1998              1997
                                                 ----              ----
Basic:

Net income                                     $1,034,218         $667,241
                                               ==========         ========
Weighted average common shares outstanding      1,795,314        1,809,678
                                                =========       ==========

Net income per common share - basic                  $.58             $.37
                                                     ====             ====

Diluted:

Net income                                     $1,034,218         $667,241
                                               ==========         ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding      1,795,314        1,809,678
Adjustment for common stock equivalents            50,475           29,696
                                               ----------        ---------

Weighted average common shares outstanding      1,845,789        1,839,374
                                                =========        =========

Net income per common share - diluted                $.56             $.36
                                                     ====             ====
                                       12
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1375

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce the maximum

financial risk permitted for physicians participating in Medicare+Choice

plans and encourage payment for quality.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce

the maximum financial risk permitted for physicians participating in Medicare+Choice plans and encourage payment for quality.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCING THE MAXIMUM FINANCIAL RISK

4 FOR PHYSICIANS PARTICIPATING IN

5 MEDICARE+CHOICE PLANS.

6 Section 1852(j)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 1395w–22(j)(4)(A)) is amended—
2

HR 1375 IH

1 (1) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv);

2 and

3 (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following

4 new clauses:

5 ‘‘(iii) The organization does not oper6 ate the plan in a manner that places a

7 physician or physician group at a financial

8 risk that exceeds 20 percent as of January

9 1, 2001, 15 percent as of January 1, 2002,

10 and 10 percent as of January 1, 2003, of

11 potential payments.

12 ‘‘(iv) Potential payments mean the

13 maximum payments possible to physicians

14 or physician groups including payments for

15 services they furnish directly, and addi16 tional payments based on use and costs of

17 referral services, such as withholds, bo18 nuses, capitation, or any other compensa19 tion to the physician or physician group.

20 ‘‘(v) Potential payments do not in21 clude bonuses and other compensation that

22 are based on the quality of care furnished,

23 improved outcomes, preventive care rates,
3

HR 1375 IH

1 patient satisfaction or committee participa2 tion.’’

Æ
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00236

- CR

Jerry Shad Robbins

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 43rd District Court

o f Parker County (CR13

- 0283 )

February 26, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Sue Walker

__________________ Justice Sue Walker
Anthony T. JACKSON, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8338.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District denied.
Order 

December 14, 2007 

133626 

133627 

TRENDA JONES, Successor 

Personal Representative of the

Estate of Jamar Cortez Jones,

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

BOOKER T. JONES and 

MARGARET A. JONES, 

Co-Personal Representatives

of the Estate of Jamar Cortez 

Jones, Deceased, 

Plaintiffs, 

v 

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER 

and SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL,

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

DANNY F. WATSON, M.D., and 

WILLIAM M. LEUCHTER, P.C.,

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

 SC: 133626, 133627 

 COA: 262343, 262347 

Wayne CC: 03-327528-NH 

By order of September 24, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 

2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the Court, the case 

having been decided on November 28, 2007, ___ Mich ___ (2007), the application is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, REINSTATE the order of the 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

Wayne Circuit Court denying the defendants' motion for summary disposition, and 

REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent 

with this order and the order in Mullins. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED 

because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. 

l1211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 14, 2007 

Clerk