alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**          The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AlliedHoldings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. Theforegoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.          This 8th day of September, 2006.         /s/Thomas H. King         *Thomas H. King*    *Executive Vice President and*    *Chief Financial Officer*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference inany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.
Wayne D. RAMSAY, petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-1100.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Wilberth Medina GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5173.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Omar QAZI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5155.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Compensation
   Quarterly Performance:
 Annual Performance:
  Stock Options
  Benefits




---



##### 



Severance Agreement
  1)
    
    Twelve months of base salary in effect at the time of
termination. This shall be paid in a lump sum as soon as
administratively feasible after the later of the date of termination or
the date the release of claims has become irrevocable.2)
    
    A pro-rata bonus based on number of months worked in the
fiscal year prior to a qualifying termination and the Companys actual
performance against annual objections. This pro-rata bonus shall be paid
no later than 2.5 months after the close of the fiscal year in which the
qualifying termination occurs.
  Digi International Employment Agreement
 This Employment
Agreement must be signed prior to your first day of employment.
   2




---



##### 



http://myvci.com/digiinternationalinc full legal
name including middle initial
 Commencement Date
  Contingent Offer
  November 2, 2010
 Digi International Inc.
 /s/ Tracy RobertsTracy RobertsVP, Human Resources & Information Technology
 Offer accepted:
 /s/ Steven E. Snyder
    
    11/5/10
    
    11/30/10Steven E. Snyder
    
    Date
    
    Start Date
  3




---



##### 



DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
 EMPLOYMENT, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION,
AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENT
  At-Will Employment
 Confidential Information
 Company Information
 Former Employer Information
 Third Party Information
 Conflicting Employment
 Returning Company Documents Exhibit A
  4




---



##### 



Notification of New Employer
 Covenant Not to Compete
 Non-solicitation
 Non-solicitation of Employees
 Non-solicitation of Business
 Representations
 Arbitration and Equitable Relief
 Arbitration
   et seq.
   5




---



##### 



Equitable Remedies
 Consideration
 General Provisions
 Governing Law; Consent to Personal Jurisdiction
 Entire Agreement
 Severability
 Successors and Assigns
  /s/ Steven E. SnyderSignatureSteven E. Snyder Witness:
    
    /s/ Pamela Snyder  6
Edward Vincent RAY, Jr., petitioner, v. Jamilah A. JEFFERSON, et al.

No. 18-5154.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Ilife.com, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-87955) on Form S-8 of ilife.com, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of ilife.com, Inc. and subsidiary as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, redeemable stock and stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 1999, the six months ended December 31, 1998 and
the year ended June 30, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of ilife.com, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 19, 2000
Frank L. HERRINGTON, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 17-9521.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 25, 2014

NO. 03

- 12

- 00090

- CV

In the Interest of R. N. P. and E. A. P.

APPEAL FROM 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND ROSE

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on January 11, 2012. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ argum ents, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s order. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Harry AUSTIN, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18-5364.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Veeramuthu P. GOUNDER, petitioner, v. COMMUNICAR, INC., et al.

No. 18-1020.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of China TransInfo Technology Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Zhihai Mao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Zhihai MaoZhihai
                Mao
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*




March
      18,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China TransInfo Technology Corp. and will be retained by China TransInfo
      Technology Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





The
      forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and
      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
Adelfo PAMATMAT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8131.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1665

To allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land for addition

to the Wilderness Battlefield in Virginia, as previously authorized by

law, by purchase or exchange as well as by donation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 4, 1999

Mr. BATEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To allow the National Park Service to acquire certain land

for addition to the Wilderness Battlefield in Virginia,

as previously authorized by law, by purchase or exchange

as well as by donation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION TO WILDERNESS BATTLEFIELD, VIR4 GINIA.

5 (a) REMOVAL OF CONDITION ON BATTLEFIELD AD6 DITION.—Section 2(a)(2) of Public Law 102–541 (16

7 U.S.C. 525k note; 106 Stat. 3565) is amended by striking

8 ‘‘: Provided,’’ and all that follows through ‘‘Interior’’.
2

•HR 1665 IH

1 (b) AUTHORIZED METHODS OF ACQUISITION.—

2 (1) ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LANDS BY DONA3 TION.—Section 3(a) of Public Law 101–214 (16

4 U.S.C. 425l(a)) is amended by adding at the end the

5 following new sentence: ‘‘However, the lands des6 ignated ‘P04–04’ on the map referred to in section

7 2(a) numbered 326–40072E/89/A and dated Sep8 tember 1990 may be acquired only by donation.’’.

9 (2) REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON ACQUISITION

10 OF ADDITION.—Section 2 of Public Law 102–541

11 (16 U.S.C. 525k note; 106 Stat. 3565) is amended

12 by striking subsection (b).

13 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 2(a) of Pub14 lic Law 101–214 (16 U.S.C. 425k(a)) is amended by strik15 ing ‘‘Spotslyvania’’ and inserting ‘‘Spotsylvania’’.

Æ
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/18/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      581,352
COMMITMENTS
  59,918   20,708  125,055  374,067  420,469  559,040  566,232   22,312   15,120

CHANGES FROM 01/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -8,186)
  -4,095   -2,642  -13,563    8,066   10,205   -9,592   -6,000    1,406   -2,186

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.3      3.6     21.5     64.3     72.3     96.2     97.4      3.8      2.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      123)
      28       26       46       62       62      114      112
```

----

Updated January 21, 2011
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/31/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      460,609
COMMITMENTS
  64,863    8,651   88,653  279,037  341,795  432,553  439,099   28,056   21,510

CHANGES FROM 05/24/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      1,977)
   6,403   -2,877     -876   -6,301    5,510     -774    1,757    2,751      220

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    14.1      1.9     19.2     60.6     74.2     93.9     95.3      6.1      4.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      133)
      42       12       46       68       64      127      111
```

----

Updated June 3, 2011
Alimamy BARRIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8010.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Winifred JIAU, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7222.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/08/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       63,856
COMMITMENTS
  22,222    2,286    6,436   21,708   40,238   50,366   48,960   13,490   14,896

CHANGES FROM 03/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,602)
     288   -1,665   -1,007      389      500     -330   -2,172   -1,272      570

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.8      3.6     10.1     34.0     63.0     78.9     76.7     21.1     23.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      35        7       12       24       23       64       40
```

----

Updated March 11, 2011
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/26/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      195,915
COMMITMENTS
  58,779    7,946   27,157   82,675  131,821  168,610  166,924   27,305   28,991

CHANGES FROM 04/19/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -9,996)
   3,763       97   -5,652   -5,252   -1,572   -7,140   -7,127   -2,856   -2,870

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.0      4.1     13.9     42.2     67.3     86.1     85.2     13.9     14.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      206)
      66       27       59       68       85      165      151
```

----

Updated April 29, 2011
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7845** 

GEORGE HARRIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN RATLEDGE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:14

- hc

- 02083

- FL )

Submitted : April 20, 2015 Decided: April 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. George Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Harris , a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court ’ s order d ismissing wi thout prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Ratledge , No. 5:14

- hc

- 02083

- FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
|   | **Corrected**            |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | **Exhibit A**            |
|   |                     |
|   | **Schedule of Advances** |
|   |                     |
|   |  

**Date**         | **Amount of**

**Advance** |
|   | October 7, 2005          | $     400,000.00 |
|   | November 4, 2005         | 700,000.00 |
|   | January 24, 2006         | 250,000.00 |
|   | February 2, 2006         | 625,000.00 |
|   | February 8, 2006         | 750,000.00 |
|   | February 22, 2006        | 865,000.00 |
|   | March 8, 2006            | 1,015,000.00 |
|   | March 22, 2006           | 766,834.56 |
|   | March 23, 2006           | 123,165.44 |
|   | April 12, 2006           | 415,000.00 |
|   | May 4, 2006              | 940,000.00 |
|   | May 23, 2006             | 835,000.00 |
|   | June 21,2006             | 655,000.00 |
|   | July 3, 2006             | 660,000.00 |
|   | July 26, 2006            | 600,000.00 |
|   | August 14, 2006          | 675,000.00 |
|   | August 28, 2006          | 530,000.00 |
|   | September 29, 2006*      | (2,800,000.00) |
|   | October 2, 2006          | 965,000.00 |
|   |                     |  

Total

$ 8,970,000.00

 

 

 

________________

 

 

*To reflect the conversion of $2,800,000 of the previous advances to equity in Beard Pinnacle, LLC.

 

 

 

 

/s/ HMJ

 

 

 

(Exhibit A as amended effective October 2, 2006)

(Initials)

 

 

 

 

  |
Aquilino GUIZAMANO-CORTES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5221.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2056

STEPHEN GRANVILLE RULE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (CA-99-184-1)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 30, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Granville Rule, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Flynn,

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Granville Rule appeals from the district court’s order

affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny

Rule’s claim for disability benefits. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rule v.

Massanari, No. CA-99-184-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Aug. 17, 2001; entered

Aug. 22, 2001). We deny Rule’s motion to mediate and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Donald Keith RUNNELS, petitioner, v. Presley BORDELON, Warden.

No. 18-5139.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)**
     The undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AlliedHoldings, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the informationcontained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Allied Holdings, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. Theforegoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
     This23rd day of May, 2005.      /s/ Thomas H. King      *Thomas H. King*   *Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer*  
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto Allied Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Allied Holdings, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference inany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specificreference in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the annual report on form 10-K of Empire Global Corp.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Vic
Dominelli, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 2, 2010                  By: /s/ Vic Dominelli
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Vic Dominelli
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.