alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1915

CONRAD N. FREUND, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH MITAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-107-7) Submitted: November 20, 2000 Decided: January 5, 2001Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel C. Summerlin, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZELGROVE, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Michaux Raine, III, RAINE & PERDUE, P.L.C., Rocky Mount, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Mitan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and entering a civiljudgment against him for $147,056.67. On appeal, Mitan only alleges that the district court erred in finding that it had personal jurisdiction over him; he raises no issues related to the amount or propriety of the judgment itself. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Freund v. Mitan , No. CA-98-107-7 (W.D. Va. June 7, 1999) (denyingmotion to dismiss for reasons as stated from the bench). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00771

- CV

Kent B. HOFFMAN , et al., Appellants

v.

Andrew M. THOMSON , et al., Appellees

From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas Trial Court No. M

- 17

- 0008

- CV

- C, Consolidated M

- 17

- 0034

- CV

- B Honorable Janna K. Whatley, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION
, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the appeal by appellants Ti anpeng Gu and Xiangrui Kong as Trustees of the Tianpeng Gu and Xiangrui Kong Living Trust, Tianpeng Gu, Individually, Xiangrui Kong, Individually, Yujie Pan, Dan He as Trustee of the Dan He Living Trust, LFF Management L.P., Yu Min Chen, Ya Miin Chen, Chi & Xiao Ltd., and J. Liu Property, LLC (collectively the “Kong Appellants”) is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED February 26, 2020.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000424

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

GK, Petitioner-Appellee, v.

MW, Defendant-Appellant, and

CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(FC-P NO. 16-1-6296)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief

were due on or before August 3, 2020, and September 2, 2020,

respectively;

(2) Self-represented Defendant-Appellant MW failed to

file either document or request an extension of time;

(3) On March 9, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice informing MW that the time for filing the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the

matter would be called to the court's attention on March 21,

2022, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of

the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and MW could request relief from default by

motion; and

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000424

13-APR-2022

07:51 AM

Dkt. 23 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) MW has not taken any further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 13, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

2
<PAGE>   1
            PHILADELPHIA CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
          (Dollars and Share Data in Thousands, except Per Share Data)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     As of and For the Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                   1998            1997(1)
                                                                   ----            -------
<S>                                                  <C>                        <C>
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                        12,263           12,133

Weighted Average Share Equivalents  Outstanding                    2,791            2,570
                                                                 -------          -------

Weighted Average Shares and Share
 Equivalents Outstanding                                          15,054           14,703
                                                                 =======          =======


Net Income                                                       $ 4,518          $ 3,622
                                                                 =======          =======

Basic Earnings per Share                                         $  0.37          $  0.30
                                                                 =======          =======

Diluted Earnings per Share                                       $  0.30          $  0.25
                                                                 =======          =======
</TABLE>


(1)  1997 share information restated to reflect a two-for-one split of the
     Company's common stock distributed in November 1997.

                                       13
Daniel L. TAPPEN, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9387.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION1



Pursuant to the
requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Reynolds C. Bish, the Chief
Executive Officer, and Rick E. Russo, the Chief Financial Officer, of Captiva Software Corporation (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.          The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.The information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the
Periodic Report.



|                                         |  | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date:            November 9, 2004        |  | 
|                                         | 
|/s/ REYNOLDS C. BISH                     |  | 
|Reynolds C. Bish Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                                         | 
|/s/ RICK E. RUSSO                        |  | 
|Rick E. Russo Chief Financial Officer    |  | 



---



1This
Certification accompanies the Form 10Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/08/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      155,152
COMMITMENTS
  46,231   20,811   25,212   58,010   78,248  129,453  124,271   25,699   30,881

CHANGES FROM 11/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,578)
  -2,306      199   -1,971   -1,045   -2,543   -5,322   -4,315    2,744    1,737

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.8     13.4     16.2     37.4     50.4     83.4     80.1     16.6     19.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      166)
      56       27       49       59       57      128      125
```

----

Updated November 14, 2011
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  of our report  dated  March 19,  2003,  on the
financial statements of Centrex,  Inc. (the "Company") at December 31, 2002, for
the period from  inception  (October 6, 1998) to December 31, 2002,  and for the
years  ended  December  31, 2002 and 2001,  included in this Form 10-KSB  Annual
Report of Centrex, Inc. as of December 31, 2002, into the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File numbers 333-98957, 333-73972 and 333-65448) and the
Company's  Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File number 333-101593) and Form
SB-2MEF (File number 333-102646).

Our report, dated March 19, 2003, contains an explanatory  paragraph that states
that Centrex,  Inc. is a development stage company with insufficient revenues to
fund development and operating  expenses,  which raises  substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going  concern.  The  financial  statements  do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


TULLIUS TAYLOR SARTAIN & SARTAIN LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 14, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10002]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m. ET on May 11, 2022.

PLACE: Charles Suber Banquet Hall, Young Harris College, 1 College 
Street, Young Harris, Georgia.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Meeting No. 22-02

    The TVA Board of Directors will hold a public meeting on May 11, 
2022, in the Charles Suber Banquet Hall at the Rollins Campus Center on 
the campus of Young Harris College, 1 College Street, Young Harris, 
Georgia. The meeting will be called to order at 9 a.m. ET to consider 
the agenda items listed below. TVA management will answer questions 
from the news media following the Board meeting.
    On May 10, in the Charles Suber Banquet Hall at the Rollins Campus 
Center, the public may comment on any agenda item or subject at a 
board-hosted public listening session which begins at 2 p.m. ET and 
will last until 4 p.m. Preregistration is required to address the 
Board.

Agenda

1. Approval of minutes of the February 10, 2022 Board Meeting
2. Report of the Audit, Finance, Risk, and Cybersecurity Committee
3. Report of the Operations and Nuclear Oversight Committee
4. Report of the External Stakeholders and Regulation Committee
    A. Industrial Power Supply Arrangement
5. Report of the People and Governance Committee
    A. Board Code of Conduct
    B. Annual Compensation Plan Review Amendment
    C. Corporate Goals
6. Information Items
    A. Arrangements with a new industrial customer
    B. Creation of a new non-firm transmission service
7. Report from President and CEO

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For more information: Please call 
Jim Hopson, TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, 
Tennessee. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing 
may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda 
Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: May 4, 2022.
Edward C. Meade,
Agency Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2022-10002 Filed 5-5-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT**


**TO
      18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**






Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Annual
      Report of Bankrate, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended
      December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
      its
      results of operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended
      December 31, 2005.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.






March
                16, 2006
            /s/Thomas
                R. EvansThomas
                R. EvansPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/07/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      182,847
COMMITMENTS
  56,650   11,111   19,875   77,273  120,148  153,798  151,134   29,049   31,713

CHANGES FROM 05/31/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,247)
  -1,842     -136      867       79   -3,444     -896   -2,713    4,143    5,960

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.0      6.1     10.9     42.3     65.7     84.1     82.7     15.9     17.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      188)
      63       23       53       56       73      144      134
```

----

Updated June 10, 2011
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cole National Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report. Date: September 7, 2004 /s/ Larry PollockName: Larry Pollock

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Lawrence E. HyattName: Lawrence E. Hyatt

Title: Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
BMP FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-985.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

d0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144636 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144636 

 COA: 301543 

Allegan CC: 09-016354-FH 

JOSHUA DEAN HAVEMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1615 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 499
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1615

                          [Report No. 106-269]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 1999

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             April 12, 2000

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the designation of a 
 portion of the Lamprey River in New Hampshire as a recreational river 
                to include an additional river segment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lamprey Wild and Scenic River 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. LAMPREY RECREATIONAL RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    (a) Additional Segment.--The paragraph entitled ``Lamprey River, 
New Hampshire'' in section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``11.5-mile segment extending from the 
        southern Lee town line'' and inserting ``23.5-mile segment 
        extending from the Bunker Pond Dam in Epping''; and
            (2) by striking ``towns of'' and inserting ``towns of 
        Epping,''.
    (b) Management.--Section 405 of division I of the Omnibus Parks and 
Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 
4149; 16 U.S.C. 1274 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ``Epping,'' before 
        ``Durham''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (c).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 12, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 499

106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1615

                          [Report No. 106-269]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to extend the designation of a 
 portion of the Lamprey River in New Hampshire as a recreational river 
                to include an additional river segment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 12, 2000

                       Reported without amendment
```
Dominique Dontae LASKER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8302.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1578Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41126 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
OSCAR FIGUEROA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 128

- 1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Oscar Figueroa appeals his conviction and sentence for attempting to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(b). He argues that the district court abused its discretion and violated his right to a fair trial by requir ing him to be escorted into the courtroom by two bailiffs in front of the jury panel for purely logistical reasons with no safety justification. He contends that his case is analogous to the case of a defendant forced to wear

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 30 , 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41126 Document: 00514010867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2017No. 16

- 41126

2 shackles or prison clothing t o trial and is inherently prejudicial, mandating
reversal. Figueroa’s argument is unpersuasive. The Supreme Court has held that noticeable use of security personnel in a courtroom during trial is not an inherently prejudicial practice , which, like shackl ing, is permissible only when justified by an essential state interest. See Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U.S. at 560,
56 8

- 72. In that case, the Court upheld the district court’s use of four uniformed and armed state troopers and other officers seated in the fi rst row of the spectator section behind the defendant throughout trial as not inherently prejudicial because the officers were “unlikely to be taken as a sign of anything other than a normal official concern for the safety and order of the proceedings.” I d. at 571. In the instant case, the fact that Figueroa was brought into the courtroom followed by two officers, who it appears were neither uniformed nor armed, on a single occasion at the beginning of the proceedings was likewise not inherently prejudici al as the jurors were unlikely to assume anything other than that the officers’ presence was reflective of the normal official concern for the safety and order of the proceedings. See id. at
571

- 72. Furthermore, Figueroa cannot show any actual prejudice resulting from the procedure given the overwhelming evidence of his guilt. See id. at
572. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-41126 Document: 00514010867 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2017