alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-91, 433-01

EX P ART E JOS HUA B EA VE R-GAINE S, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. 21998-B I N THE 104TH DI STRI CT COURT

F ROM TA YL OR COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t pl eade d gui l

t y t o po s s es s i o n o f m ari

j uan a i n a drug f ree zo n e an d was s en

t en ced

t o f i v e y ears ’ i

m pri s o n m en t

. A ppl i can t di d n o t f i l e a di rect appea l

. A

ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n

f o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f o r w a r d e d i

t t o t h i s

Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t co n t en ds t h at h i s pl ea was i

n v o l un t ary b eca us e t ri al co un s el f

ai l ed t o adv i s e h i

m o f

t h e co rr ect paro l e el i gi

b i l i t y f o r a co n v i ct i o n wi t h a drug f

ree zo n e f i n di n g. Ba s ed o n t h e reco rd, t h e

t ri al co urt h a s det erm

i n ed t h at t ri al co un s el ’ s perf o rm an ce was def

i ci en t an d t h at A

ppl i can t wo ul d

h av e i n s i s t ed o n a t ri al b ut f

o r co un s el ’ s def

i ci en t perf o rm an ce.

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. Hill v. Lockhar t

, 474 U.S

. 52 (1985) ; E x par te A r

gent

, 393 S. W

. 3d 7812

(T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2013). T h e j udgm

en t i n caus e n um b er 21998 i

n t h e 104t h Di s t ri ct Co urt o f T ay l o r

C o u n t y i s s et as i de, an d A

ppl i can t i s rem an ded t o t h e cus t o dy o f t h e Sh eri f f o f T ay l o r Co u nt y t o

an s wer t h e ch arges as s et o ut i n t h e i n f o rm at i o n

. T h e t ri al co urt s h al l i s s ue an y n ece s s ar y b en ch

warran t wi t h i n t en day s f

ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: J an

uary 13, 2021

Do n o t pub l i s h
Michael A. YOUNG, petitioner, v. Carol CHAPDELAINE, Warden; Michael A. Young, petitioner, v. Carol Chapdelaine, Warden; and Michael A. Young, petitioner, v. Carol Chapdelaine, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7321.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 33A/7 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 33A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 517 February 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 33A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 517 February 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
| 2008/C 033A/01 | Notice of open competition: Deputy Director — Reference: EF/TA/07/03 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

2008/C 033A/01

Notice of open competition: Deputy Director — Reference: EF/TA/07/03

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                     
|--------------------- |  | --------------------
|Date: August 11, 2005 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith
|                      |  | Timothy L. Smith    



21
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elliot Noss, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14,  2009 |   | /s/  Elliot Noss                       |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Elliot  Noss                           |
|                             |   | Chief  Executive Officer and President |

 

----
David E. PONDER, petitioner, v. AVALON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-8255.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)I, Eric R. Zimmerman, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dayton Superior Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        August 10, 2007 /s/ Eric R. Zimmerman   Eric R. Zimmerman   President and Chief Executive Officer
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/30/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      162,292
COMMITMENTS
  21,671   35,068   38,616   87,934   74,284  148,221  147,968   14,071   14,324

CHANGES FROM 08/23/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,706)
   1,165     -478      600     -321    2,085    1,444    2,207   -6,150   -6,913

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.4     21.6     23.8     54.2     45.8     91.3     91.2      8.7      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      103)
      34       22       47       28       24       93       80
```

----

Updated September 2, 2011
Iveth RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ, petitioner, v. READYONE INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 18-1011.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District denied.
Warren Darrell RIVERS, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-5246.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Vertis ANTHONY, petitioner, v. Louis BOYD, Warden, et al.

No. 18-7248.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Taliyah TAYLOR, petitioner, v. Amy LAMANNA, Acting Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility.

No. 18-5068.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Roy Allen GREEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8435.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, which whom Justice GINSBURG joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in *Brown v. United States,* 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) ( Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 26782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09600]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-548 and 731-TA-1298 (Review)]


Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From India

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty 
orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from India would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2021 (86 FR 
54470) and determined on January 4, 2022, that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (87 FR 17336, March 28, 2022).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on April 29, 2022. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5320 (April 2022), 
entitled Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India: Investigation 
Nos. 701-TA-548 and 731-TA-1298 (First Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 29, 2022.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-09600 Filed 5-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/14/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      483,458
COMMITMENTS
  65,188   14,690   99,206  287,390  345,561  451,784  459,457   31,674   24,001

CHANGES FROM 06/07/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     15,921)
   5,241   -6,828   12,864    2,679   13,976   20,784   20,012   -4,863   -4,091

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.5      3.0     20.5     59.4     71.5     93.4     95.0      6.6      5.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      144)
      48       16       50       70       66      136      120
```

----

Updated Jun 17, 2011
Henry M. JAGOS, et ux., petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 18-1270.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Prentiss Anthony CRUMBLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9524.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7625
RICKY WAYNE BOBLETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; PATRICK GURNEY; DANIEL MAHON; WARDEN, DWCC, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-71-R) Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Wayne Boblett, A ppellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boblett v. Angelone , No. CA-95-71-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 5, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ESTATE OF LEONARD P. KRAPPA, 

DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH HIS 

ADMINISTRATOR, LEONARD A. KRAPPA 

AND MARGARET KRAPPA, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND IN HER OWN RIGHT

v.

MARK LYONS, D.O.; FRANK PIRO, M.D.; 

JONATHAN C. SULLUM, M.D.; JUAN C. 

BARRERA, M.D.; JAMES FRANGOS, M.D.; 

LOUIS DEGENNARO, M.D.; AND 

COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER

PETITION OF: COMMUNITY MEDICAL 

CENTER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 323 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED. Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File Reply to Answer is DENIED.

Justice Wecht files a concurring statement.
Patrick Bernard INGRAM, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-9406.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**ACCOUNTANTS’CONSENT**

The Board of DirectorsBankrate, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation byreference in the registration statement (No.333-87955) on Form S-8 of Bankrate, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, relating to the balance sheets of Bankrate, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Bankrate, Inc.

 

|                                   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ KPMGLLP                            |   |   |        |
| West Palm Beach, FloridaMarch 28, 2003 |   |   |   |

 64
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1212 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1212

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To protect producers of agricultural commodities who applied for a Crop 
 Revenue Coverage PLUS supplemental endorsement for the 1999 crop year.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1212

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To protect producers of agricultural commodities who applied for a Crop 
 Revenue Coverage PLUS supplemental endorsement for the 1999 crop year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROP INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR PRODUCERS WHO APPLIED FOR CROP 
              REVENUE COVERAGE PLUS.

    (a) Eligible Producers.--This section applies with respect to a 
producer eligible for insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) who applied for the supplemental crop insurance 
endorsement known as Crop Revenue Coverage PLUS (referred to in this 
section as ``CRCPLUS'') for the 1999 crop year for a spring-planted 
agricultural commodity.
    (b) Additional Period for Obtaining or Transferring Coverage.--
Notwithstanding the sales closing date for obtaining crop insurance 
coverage established under section 508(f)(2) of the Federal Crop 
Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(f)(2)) and notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation shall provide 
a 14-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, but not 
to extend beyond April 12, 1999, during which a producer described in 
subsection (a) may--
            (1) obtain from any approved insurance provider a level of 
        coverage for the agricultural commodity for which the producer 
        applied for the CRCPLUS endorsement that is equivalent to or 
        less than the level of federally reinsured coverage that the 
        producer applied for from the insurance provider that offered 
        the CRCPLUS endorsement; and
            (2) transfer to any approved insurance provider any 
        federally reinsured coverage provided for other agricultural 
        commodities of the producer by the same insurance provider that 
        offered the CRCPLUS endorsement, as determined by the 
        Corporation.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Fidencio VALDEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-7637.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.