alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Gary LAWRENCE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9431.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Lazina KING, et al., petitioners, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.

No. 18-686.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Frank ODOM, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
# Diario Oficial C 6A/6 de

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 6A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 65.° año6 de enero de 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 6A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

65.° año6 de enero de 2022

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2022/C 6 A/01 | Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposición general — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua irlandesa (GA) ( DO C 466 A de 18.11.2021 ) | 1 |

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2022/C 6 A/01

Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposición general — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua irlandesa (GA) ( DO C 466 A de 18.11.2021 )

( DO C 466 A de 18.11.2021 )

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 6.1.2022 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 6/1

---

Corrección de errores de la convocatoria de oposición general — EPSO/AD/396/21 — Juristas lingüistas (AD 7) de lengua irlandesa (GA)

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 466 A de 18 de noviembre de 2021
  )

(2022/C 6 A/01)

En la página 1, bajo el título:

| donde dice: | «Plazo de presentación de candidaturas: 21 de diciembre de 2021 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas», |
| --- | --- |

donde dice:

«Plazo de presentación de candidaturas: 21 de diciembre de 2021 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas»,

| debe decir: | «Plazo de presentación de candidaturas: 25 de enero de 2022 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas». |
| --- | --- |

debe decir:

debe decir:

«Plazo de presentación de candidaturas: 25 de enero de 2022 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas».

En la página 5, en el último párrafo:

| donde dice: | «Las candidaturas deberán presentarse en línea en el sitio web de la EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities a más tardar el
  21 de diciembre de 2021 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas», |
| --- | --- |

donde dice:

donde dice:

«Las candidaturas deberán presentarse en línea en el sitio web de la EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities a más tardar el

21 de diciembre de 2021 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas»,

| debe decir: | «Las candidaturas deberán presentarse en línea en el sitio web de la EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities a más tardar el
  25 de enero de 2022 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas». |
| --- | --- |

debe decir:

debe decir:

«Las candidaturas deberán presentarse en línea en el sitio web de la EPSO https://epso.europa.eu/job-opportunities a más tardar el

25 de enero de 2022 a las 12.00 horas, hora de Bruselas».

---
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners, v. NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-966.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 12, 2019.

Motion of United States House of Representatives for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted. Joint motion of respondents for enlargement of time for oral argument and for divided argument granted in part, and the time is divided as follows: 40 minutes for petitioners, 20 minutes for respondents New York, et al., 10 minutes for respondents New York Immigration Coalition, et al., and 10 minutes for United States House of Representatives as *amicus curiae* .
## C OURT O F 

## A P P E A L S F OR T HE



## F I R S T 

## D I S T R I C T O F 

## T E X A S AT 

## H OU S T ON



# O RDE R 

# W ITHD RA W I N G 

# M ED IA T I O N 

# O RDER



## C a use n umbe r : 01

- 1 5

- 00889

- CV

S t y l e : Ronke Oll e y a nd J e ff Oll e y v. D r iftwood H ospita l i t y M g t II, L L C.

D a te mot i on filed: Nov e mber 16, 2015

T y pe o f Motion: Obj ec t i on to M e diation

P a r t y f i l i n g mo t ion: App e l l e e



## It is ordered that Ap p elle e ’ s object i on to m e diation is grante d

. W e withdraw our

Mediation Order d a ted Nov e m ber 6, 2015.

Judge’s Signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

x Acting Individually

D a te: November 1 7 , 2015

* A

b s e n t e m e r ge nc y o r a st a t e me n t t h a t t h e m o t i o n is u n o p p o s e d

, m u st w a it ten d a y s be f

o re ac t in g o n m o t io n exce p t f o r

m o t io n to ex te n d t i m

e to f i l e a b r i e f

. S e e T E X

. R. A P P

. P

. 1 0

. 3 ( a ).

N o t e : S i n g le j u s t ice m a y g r a n t o r d e n y a n y r e qu e st f o r r e l i e f p r op e rly s ou g h t b y m o t ion

, exce p t in a c i v il ca se a si n g le j u stice

s hou l d n o t: ( 1 ) ac t o n a p e t i t i o n f o r a n ex tra o r d i n a ry w r it o r ( 2 ) d i s m iss o r o t h e r w ise d e te r m

i n e a n a pp ea l o r a m o t io n

f o r r e h ea ri n g

. T E X

. R. A P P

. P

. 1 0

. 4 ( a ).
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27172-27173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Study Section.
    Date: June 9-10, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge I, 6705 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 205-H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7969, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d2d141309081e1e141a3d1315111f1453131415531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6a69f98828395959f91b6989e9a949fd8989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and

[[Page 27173]]

Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 2, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09716 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 10/11/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      450,586
COMMITMENTS
  36,734   16,452  102,276  287,216  312,875  426,226  431,603   24,360   18,983

CHANGES FROM 10/04/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     13,757)
  -3,351   -6,152   11,246    7,547    7,382   15,442   12,476   -1,685    1,281

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     8.2      3.7     22.7     63.7     69.4     94.6     95.8      5.4      4.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      134)
      29       25       47       65       69      120      121
```

----

Updated October 14, 2011
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1596

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with respect to research

on breast cancer, for the increased involvement of advocates in decisionmaking at the National Cancer Institute.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with

respect to research on breast cancer, for the increased

involvement of advocates in decisionmaking at the National Cancer Institute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Involvement

5 in Breast Cancer Research Act’’.
2

•HR 1596 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED INVOLVEMENT OF ADVOCATES IN DECI2 SION MAKING REGARDING RESEARCH ON

3 BREAST CANCER.

4 Section 417(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42

5 U.S.C. 285a–6(c)) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following paragraph:

7 ‘‘(3) INVOLVEMENT OF ADVOCATES IN DECI8 SIONMAKING.—

9 ‘‘(A) The Director of the Institute shall, to

10 the extent practicable, provide for the increased

11 involvement (relative to fiscal year 1999) of ad12 vocates in decisionmaking at the Institute re13 garding research on breast cancer.

14 ‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph, the

15 term ‘advocate’ means an individual who is ac16 countable to, represents, and reports back to

17 organizations that represent those affected by

18 breast cancer.

19 ‘‘(C) The Director of the Institute shall

20 prepare a report on the manner in which sub21 paragraph (A) has been carried out. The report

22 shall be included in the first report under sec23 tion 407 that the Director submits after the ex24 piration of the one-year period beginning on the
3

•HR 1596 IH

1 date of the enactment of the Consumer Involve2 ment in Breast Cancer Research Act.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Elliot Noss, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 14, 2010 | /s/ Elliot Noss                       |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                              | Elliot Noss                           |
|                              | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

1

----
Juan Bosco ALVAREZ, petitioner, v. Debbie ASUNCION, Warden.

No. 18-8430.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
Stanley Shuster, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended March 27, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Grand Havana Enterprises,
Inc.
 
  By: /s/ Stanley ShusterName: Stanley
      ShusterIts: Chief
      Executive and Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ULTRATECH
STEPPER INC., FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,156
<SECURITIES>                                   136,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,176
<INVENTORY>                                     32,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               251,939
<PP&E>                                          28,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 282,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,569
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   282,605
<SALES>                                         36,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,733
<CGS>                                           16,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.211
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.211
        

</TABLE>
Order entered January 14, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00874
- CR DAMON JAMES WILSON, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F13
- 30651
- U 

### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appel lant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This ap peal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Ronald Lee BLAKE, petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.

No. 18-1143.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      147,341
COMMITMENTS
  44,084   26,024   19,741   62,265   73,576  126,090  119,341   21,251   28,000

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -9,788)
  -2,108    1,612   -2,886   -2,856   -7,044   -7,850   -8,318   -1,938   -1,470

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    29.9     17.7     13.4     42.3     49.9     85.6     81.0     14.4     19.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      165)
      50       32       40       60       54      127      116
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

 (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for basic and diluted EPS is
given in the following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                               Amount per
Three months ended June 30, 1998                                             Income             Shares            Share
--------------------------------                                             ------             ------            -----

<S>                                                                          <C>             <C>                   <C>
Basic EPS                                                                    $22,156         25,033,932            $0.89
Effect of Dilutive Options                                                                    1,668,657
Diluted EPS                                                                  $22,156         26,702,589            $0.83

Three months ended June 30, 1997

Basic EPS                                                                    $25,528         25,005,701            $1.02
Effect of Dilutive Options                                                                    1,383,372
Diluted EPS                                                                  $25,528         26,389,073            $0.97

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Six months ended June 30, 1998

Basic EPS                                                                    $50,948         25,028,489            $2.04
Effect of Dilutive Options                                                                    1,672,380
Diluted EPS                                                                  $50,948         26,700,869            $1.91

Six months ended June 30, 1997

Basic EPS                                                                    $53,040         25,002,851            $2.12
Effect of Dilutive Options                                                                    1,347,692
Diluted EPS                                                                  $53,040         26,350,543            $2.01
</TABLE>




                                       16
Jerry Preston McNEIL, petitioner, v. Scott MARSH, et al.

No. 18-6.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Third Division denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6598
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN MICHAEL CERCEO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-91-416-A, CA-96-1182-AM) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Michael Cerceo, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Raymond Reitinger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cerceo , Nos. CR-91-416-A; CA-96-1182-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Arthur SANCHEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7232.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.