alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001080892
<NAME> GENERAC PORTABLE PRODUCTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (548)
<INVENTORY>                                     58,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,536
<PP&E>                                          32,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,875)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,916
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,489
<SALES>                                        398,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               398,096
<CGS>                                          290,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  353,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,424
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,539
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1476

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish additional national

cemeteries for veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1999

Mr. EVANS (for himself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. COSTELLO, Ms. DANNER,

Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. DOYLE, Mrs. JONES of Ohio,

Mr. STRICKLAND, Mrs. KELLY, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish

additional national cemeteries for veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Cemetery Act

5 of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

8 shall establish, in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38,

9 United States Code, a national cemetery in each of the
2

•HR 1476 IH

1 three areas in the United States that the Secretary deter2 mines to be most in need of such a cemetery to serve the

3 needs of veterans and their families.

4 (b) REPORTS.—

5 (1) INITIAL REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION.—

6 Not later than the date that is 120 days after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of

8 Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a report

9 on the establishment of the national cemeteries

10 under subsection (a). The report shall set forth the

11 three areas identified by the Secretary for such es12 tablishment, a schedule for such establishment, and

13 an estimate of the costs associated with such estab14 lishment.

15 (2) UPDATES TO INITIAL REPORT.—Not later

16 than one year after the date on which the report de17 scribed in paragraph (1) is submitted to Congress,

18 and annually thereafter until the establishment of

19 the national cemeteries under subsection (a) is com20 plete, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a re21 port that updates the information included in the re22 port described in paragraph (1).

Æ
Levar BROWN, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-5167.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Brian WRIGHT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8388.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ronald BEDFORD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7993.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
SEALED APPELLANT, petitioner, v. SEALED APPELLEE.

No. 17-9417.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

```

----

Updated April 1, 2011
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1580

To prohibit the sale of guns that have not been approved by the Secretary

of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 27, 1999

Ms. LOFGREN (for herself, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Ms. WATERS, Mrs.

MINK of Hawaii, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode

Island, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Ms. LEE, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr.

MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the sale of guns that have not been approved

by the Secretary of the Treasury, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save a Child Act of

5 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITIONS WITH RESPECT TO UNAPPROVED

7 GUNS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, it shall be unlawful, with such exceptions for
2

•HR 1580 IH

1 law enforcement and other legitimate purposes as the Sec2 retary of the Treasury by rule provides, to sell, purchase,

3 or possess any firearm (as defined in section 921 of title

4 18, United States Code) that is not approved by the Sec5 retary. The Secretary shall not approve for the purposes

6 of this section the Intratec TEC-9 and similar weapons.

7 (b) PENALTY.—Whoever possesses a firearm in viola8 tion of subsection (a) shall be fined under title 18, United

9 States Code, or imprisoned for 5 years, or both.

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

11 30 days after the date the Secretary first makes rules

12 under subsection (a).

Æ
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 27 June 2006         

amending Decision 2006/148/EC on introducing preventive vaccination against highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 and related provisions for movements in France

(notified under document number C(2006) 2875)

(Only the French text is authentic)

(2006/438/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (1), and in particular Article 57(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The first subparagraph of Article 2(1) of Decision 2006/148/EC shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.   The plan for preventive vaccination, providing for vaccination until 30 June 2006, against highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1, submitted by France to the Commission on 21 February 2006, and its amendment of 20 April 2006, is approved (the preventive vaccination plan).’

Article 2

Addressee

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 10, 14.1.2006, p. 16.

(2)OJ L 55, 25.2.2006, p. 51.

----
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Howard Thomson, Chief Financial Officer of Worldbid Corporation
  (the “Registrant”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant,
        for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | */s/ Howard
      Thomson*
| | ------ | --------------------------
| |        |                           
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON            
| |        |                           
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer   
| |        |                           
| | Date:  | August 11, 2005           

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# Official Journal C 204A/28 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 204A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6028 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 204A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6028 June 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 204 A/01 | European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Publication of a vacancy for a Director-General Function (grade AD 15) — Brussels — Engagement of a Temporary Agent Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — COM/2017/10373 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2017/C 204 A/01

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Publication of a vacancy for a Director-General Function (grade AD 15) — Brussels — Engagement of a Temporary Agent Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — COM/2017/10373

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Corey LEA, petitioner, v. Sonny PERDUE, Secretary of Agriculture.

No. 18-1250.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JOHN E. JACKSONName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    August 1, 2006
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7465

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOSEPH ABDUL HENDRIX , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. ( 1:10

- cr - 00067

- MR

- WCM

- 2 )

Submitted : December 21, 2020 Decided: January 15, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Joseph Abdul Hendrix , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Abdul Hendrix seek s to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of his motion for compassionate release . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C . § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) ( internal quotation marks omitted). Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the claims raised in Hendrix’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of his compassionate release motion

. Id. at 696

- 97. Specifically , the court did not address Hendrix’s assertion that he had exhausted his remedies under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1), nor did the court address whether immediate release was appropriate under that section, instead addressing only Hendrix’s alternative request to serve the remainder of his sentence in a halfway house or on home confinement . We conclude that t he order Hendrix seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable inte rlocutory or collateral order

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court for consideration of the unresolved clai ms . Id. at 699. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a re adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 7, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00700-CV

HOME TAX SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellant

V.

DEREK B. HORNE, ET AL., Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-06754-2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

The docketing statement and clerk’s record in this case have not been filed.

By postcard dated June 2, 2022, we informed appellant the docketing statement in 

this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement 

within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

On August 19, 2022, we sent a letter informing appellant the clerk’s record had not 

been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed 

appellant to provide, within ten days, verification it had either paid for or made 

arrangements to pay for the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so 
–2–

would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant

has not filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

220700f.p05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HOME TAX SOLUTIONS LLC, 

Appellant

No. 05-22-00700-CV V.

DEREK B. HORNE, ET AL., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-06754-

2020.

Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. 

Justices Molberg and Partida-Kipness 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 7

th day of October, 2022.
EXHIBIT 10.29

ALLOY, INC.

COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Listed below are the current annual base salaries for our named executive officers. Salary increases for fiscal year ending January 31, 2008 and
bonuses for services rendered during fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 have not yet been determined.



|                                      |  |        |         |    
|------------------------------------- |  | ------ | ------- | ---
|Named Executive Officer               |  | Salary |        
|Matthew C. Diamond,                   |  | $      | 420,000 |    
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman  |  |        |         |    
|                                      | 
|James K. Johnson, Jr.,                |  | $      | 420,000 |    
|President and Chief Operating Officer |  |        |         |    
|                                      | 
|Gary J. Yusko,                        |  | $      | 242,000 |    
|Chief Financial Officer               |  |        |         |    
|                                      | 
|Gina R. DiGioia, Esq.,                |  | $      | 200,000 |    
|Chief Legal Officer and Secretary     |  |        |         |    
|                                      | 
|Robert Bell,                          |  | $      | 402,000 | (1)
|Chief Technology Officer              |  |        |         |    

---

|(1) | Effective September 1, 2006, we increased Mr. Bells salary from $337,000 to the amount stated above. $100,000 of his base salary is paid by us as deferred
compensation pursuant to an agreement between Mr. Bell and us to pay the premiums on certain life insurance policies, the beneficiaries of which are selected by Mr. Bell.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marvin FRITZ, petitioner, v. Sherry BURT, Warden.

No. 17-9541.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Veronica HOLLOWELL and Vivian Epps, petitioners.

No. 18-1008.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1489 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1489

To clarify boundaries on maps related to the Coastal Barrier Resources 
                                System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1999

 Mr. Jones of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify boundaries on maps related to the Coastal Barrier Resources 
                                System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              MAPS.

    (a) In General.--The 7 maps subtitled ``NC-03P'', relating to the 
Coastal Barrier Resources System units designated as Cape Hatteras 5A 
through 5G, that are included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal 
Barrier Resource System'' and referred to in section 4(a) of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), are hereby replaced 
by 7 other maps relating to those units entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
Resources System, NC-03P'' and dated __________.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal 
Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6



COMMENCEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS COMMENCEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Commencement Agreement") is entered into by and between NS Two Oliver LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company ("Landlord") and Tufin Software North America, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant") as of Dec. 18      , 2017.
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Office Lease Agreement dated as of August 22, 2017 (the "Lease");
WHEREAS, the Lease relates to the premises (the "Premises") measuring approximately 3,214 rentable square feet located on the seventh (7th) floor of the building commonly known and numbered as 2 Oliver Street, Boston, MA (the "Building"); and
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant wish to memorialize their understanding with respect to the Commencement Date and certain other terms set forth in the Lease.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein reserved and contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree as follows:
		
	1.
	The Commencement Date is October 1, 2017.


		
	2.
	The Rent Commencement Date is January 1, 2018.


		
	3.
	The Expiration Date is December 31, 2023.


		
	4.
	This Commencement Agreement, each and all of the provisions hereof, shall inure to the benefit, or bind, as the case may require, the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns, subject to the restrictions upon assignment and subletting contained in the Lease.


		
	5.
	Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Lease.




[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have caused this Commencement Agreement to be
executed, as a document under seal, as of the date set forth above.
LANDLORD:
NS Two Oliver LLC,
a Massachusetts limited liability company
	
		
	By:
	Synergy Financial LLC.

	 
	a Massachusetts limited liability company,

	 
	Property Manager and Authorized Agent

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ David Greaney

	 
	David Greaney, Manager

	 
	Hereunto duly authorized




TENANT:
Tufin Software North America., Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
	
		
	By:
	/s/ Ruvi Kitov

	Name:
	Ruvi Kitov

	Title:
	CEO & President

	 
	Hereunto duly authorized














[COUNTERPART SIGNATURE PAGE]