alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          51,632
<SECURITIES>                                    64,894
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,414)
<INVENTORY>                                     73,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,988
<PP&E>                                          65,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       248,466
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,282
<SALES>                                        250,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,593
<CGS>                                          135,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,959)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,556
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        2,402,260
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4,605,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (200,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     917,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             19,991,213
<PP&E>                                        6,465,739
<DEPRECIATION>                               (3,837,993)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               27,546,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         8,628,689
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         300
<COMMON>                                          9,603
<OTHER-SE>                                   17,873,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 27,546,143
<SALES>                                       8,264,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              8,264,964
<CGS>                                         4,276,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 4,276,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,323,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (57,244)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,722,311
<INCOME-TAX>                                    300,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1,422,311
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,422,311
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .15
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1330 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1330

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the mandatory 
minimum penalties provided for possessing, brandishing, or discharging 
    a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug 
                           trafficking crime.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

  Mrs. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the mandatory 
minimum penalties provided for possessing, brandishing, or discharging 
    a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug 
                           trafficking crime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN THE MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES PROVIDED FOR 
              POSSESSING, BRANDISHING, OR DISCHARGING A FIREARM DURING 
              AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF VIOLENCE OR DRUG 
              TRAFFICKING CRIME.

    Section 924(c)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``5'' and inserting ``10'';
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``7'' and inserting ``15''; 
        and
            (3) in clause (iii), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``20''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.34


AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE
TRANSITION SERVICES AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the Transition Services Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2017 (“Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of September 29, 2018, by and between NACCO Industries, Inc. (“NACCO”) and Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (“HBBHC”).  Capitalized words not defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.


RECITALS:


WHEREAS, NACCO and HBBHC are parties to the Agreement, pursuant to which NACCO and its Subsidiaries provide Transition Services upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement; and


WHEREAS, NACCO and HBBHC desire for NACCO and its Subsidiaries to continue to provide certain Transition Services beyond the Initial Transition Period during a Subsequent Transition Period.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the covenants and agreements set forth herein, NACCO and HBBHC hereby agree as follows:


AGREEMENT:


1.    Schedule A to the Agreement hereby is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


Schedule A
Transition Services To Be Performed by NACCO and Its Subsidiaries
	
				
	Description of Transition Service 
	Monthly Fee(s) 
	Contact Person / Successor Contact Person*
	Expiration Date

	General Accounting Support, including SEC
	$5,000
	E. Loveman / M. Sovacool
	October 31, 2018

	Tax Compliance and Consulting Support
	$5,000
	F. Brown / J Francis
	November 30, 2018

	Compensation Support
	$10,000 for October, 2018


$5,000 for November, 2018
	S. Fry/T. Maxwell
	November 30, 2018




* NACCO may designate a successor contact person upon written notice to Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
2.    The Transition Period for each Transition Service set forth in the Schedule A added to the Agreement pursuant to this Amendment shall terminate as of the respective expiration date set forth in such Schedule A.


3.    Except as amended by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the signatories hereto has caused this Agreement to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of the date first above written.
	
			
	 
	NACCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Elizabeth I. Loveman

	 
	Name:
	Elizabeth I. Loveman 

	 
	Title 
	Vice President and Controller

	 
	 

	 
	HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS HOLDING COMPANY

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Gregory H. Trepp

	 
	Name:
	Gregory H. Trepp

	 
	Title 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1262

To provide that existing facilities located on the Pentwater River in Michigan,

are not required to be licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under part 1 of the Federal Power Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 24, 1999

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To provide that existing facilities located on the Pentwater

River in Michigan, are not required to be licensed by

the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under part

1 of the Federal Power Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL POWER ACT LICENSE NOT REQUIRED

4 FOR CERTAIN EXISTING FACILITIES ON THE

5 PENTWATER RIVER, MICHIGAN.

6 Notwithstanding section 23(b) or section 4(e) of the

7 Federal Power Act, it shall not be unlawful for the city
2

•HR 1262 IH

1 of Hart in Michigan to operate, maintain, repair, recon2 struct, replace, or modify—

3 (1) any dam which, as of the date of the enact4 ment of this Act, is owned and operated by the City,

5 and located on the Pentwater River in Oceana Coun6 ty, Michigan, or

7 (2) any water conduit, reservoir, power house,

8 and other works incidental to such dam.

9 No license shall be required under part 1 of the Federal

10 Power Act for the dam, water conduit, reservoir, power

11 house, or other project works referred to in the preceding

12 sentence and, subject to compliance with State laws, per13 mission is hereby granted for such facilities to the same

14 extent as in the case of facilities for which permission is

15 granted under the last sentence of section 23(b) of that

16 Act.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

h0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144035

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144035

COA: 302919

Saginaw CC: 03

- 022745

- FC

CHARLES HENRY ARTHUR

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER
           PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,  AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                 SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


I,  Miron  Markovitz,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Lapis  Technologies,  Inc.  on  Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended  March  31,  2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in  all  material  respects  the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Lapis  Technologies,  Inc.

                                                  /s/ Miron  Markovitz
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Miron  Markovitz
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May  24,  2004


                                       20
<PAGE>
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron Markovitz,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lapis Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
   August
      18, 2009
                  /s/Miron
      MarkovitzMiron
      MarkovitzChief
      Financial Officer(Chief AccountingOfficer)
. . . 

T~EECATTOHNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

PRICE DANIEL 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

January 16, 1952 

Hon. Qeorge L. Murphy Opinion No. V-1387 

County Auditor 

Johnson County Rez Authority of the ComCleburne, Texas missioners' Court to 

require the County 

Auditor to handle pay 

roll deductions, accounts, and reports 

3overing social security 

Dear Mr. Murphy% for county employees. 

Your request for an opinion from this offlee contains the following question; 

Does the Commissioners1 Court of 

Johnson County, Texas have the authority 

to order the County Auditor of Johnson 

County to make the necessary payroll deductlons, accounts and reports for the 

program set up under House Bill 603, ch. 

:&&Acts of the 52nd Legislature, R.S. 

1951, ch. 

to social 

provldesr 

Section g of H.B. 603, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 

500, p. 1480 (Art. 692, V.C.S.), relating 

security for county end municipal employees, 

*When the governing body of a county 

or munlcipallty elects to enter Into an 

agreement with a Ftate agency, it shall become the duty of the county treasurer In 

the respective counties, end of the person 

or am-sons who hold comnarable nositlons In 

the munlclpalltles, to iisess aid collect 

the required contributions of the various 

employees in the respective counties or munlclpalltles, and transmit the same to the 

State agency. Each plan approved by the 

State agency will specify the responsible 

personnel of the undertaking county or municipality who will be charged with the duty 

’ . 

. 

Hon. George L. Murphy, page 3 (V-1387) 

salary, and notify the county auditor and the county 

clerk of these computations. The county auditor and 

the county clerk In laauIng the warrants for the 

compensation of the various county employees, should 

make the necessary deductions as set by the asseaaments of the county treasurer. 

You are accordingly advised that the commissioners' court has no authority to designate any 

officer other than the county treasurer as the reapons:ble agent to assess and collect the required payments 

of the-~varlous county employees, and the commissioners' 

court cannot order the county auditor to perform these 

duties. 

SUMMARY 

A commissioners' court cannot order 

the county auditor to assess, collect, and 

transmit the payments under the new soclel 

security plan. This la the duty of the 

county treasurer. Sec. 9, H.B. 603 Acts 

R S 1951, ch. 500, p. 1480 (Art. 

Z~~~,Li%Is. j.‘, 

It Is the duty of the county auditor 

to supervise, compare, and audit the funds 

paid under H.B. 603, end to certify the accounts and make the reports to the proper 

authority. Art. 1651, V.C.S. 

yours very truly, 

APPROVED1 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

County Affairs Division 

E. Jacobson 

Reviewing Assistant 

Charles D. Mathews 

First Assistant 

PRICE DAHIEL 

Attorney General 

By ~~~:~./,..l~~l~,~~/' _~ 

Rib&t H.'Hdghea 

Assistant 

RHHYmh
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., petitioner, v. Doris ALBRECHT, et al.

No. 17-290.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 4, 2017.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                   SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF DOMINO'S, INC.


Domino's Pizza LLC                                            Michigan
Domino's Franchise Holding Co.                                Michigan
Domino's Pizza PMC, Inc.                                      Michigan
Domino's Pizza California LLC                                 California
Domino's Pizza International, Inc.                            Delaware
Domino's Pizza International Payroll Services, Inc.           Florida
Domino's Pizza Government Services Division, Inc.             Texas
Domino's Pizza NS Co.                                         Canada
Domino's Pizza of Canada                                      Canada
Domino's Pizza of France S.A.S.                               France
Dutch Pizza Beheer B.V.                                       Netherlands
Tommy Ray HULL, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7140.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David A. Rawden, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allied Holdings,Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   October 21, 2004 */s/David A. Rawden*   *Date* *David A. Rawden* *Executive Vice President* *and Chief Financial Officer*
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

A.D. Cross, Jr.

, * From the County Court at Law

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 1

- 997

- 17

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 326

- CR * November 19 , 20 20

The State of Texas

, * Memorand um Opinion by Wright

, S. C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China NetTV Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ernest
Cheung, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

By:  /S/ Ernest Cheung
     ---------------------------------------
Ernest Cheung
President, CEO AND CFO
December 16, 2002

                                       29