alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,972,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,473,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,482,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,860,375
<PP&E>                                       2,923,774
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,189,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,557,156
<BONDS>                                        712,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,229
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,909,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,189,283
<SALES>                                     15,252,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,252,559
<CGS>                                       15,850,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,850,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,505,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,081,061)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,190,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,891,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,891,061)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.77)
        

</TABLE>
David V. PERRY, petitioner, v. Bruce KRIEGMAN.

No. 18-92.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Wayland Lynn DILTS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-8207.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Kevin NEYSMITH, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 18-8487.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than May 24, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *MA@mpls.frb.org.*

                    1.                     *The Williams Family 2021 Irrevocable Trust Agreement and James L. Williams III, individually, and as trustee, both of Casselton, North Dakota;*                     to join the Williams Family Group, a group acting in concert, to retain voting shares of First Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of BankNorth, both of Arthur, North Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 4, 2022.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-09930 Filed 5-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Peter Chin, Chief Executive Officer of PTS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: April 15, 2009/s/ Peter Chin
Peter Chin
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golden Key International
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lysander
M. Marrero, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: September 11, 2008            By: /s/ Lysander M. Marrero
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lysander M. Marrero
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shalL not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.70

     Surrendered to SBS Trust Deed Network with request for reconveyance.

                                 STRAIGHT NOTE

$300,000.00                   Orange, California               October 28, 1999

Upon demand after Due date, for value received, I, the undersigned, promise to
pay to TIME OUT, L.L.C., or order, at such place as designated by beneficiary
the sum of THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/100 Dollars, with interest from January
12, 2000 until paid, at the rate of 8% per cent per annum, payable INTEREST
ONLY, or more, in monthly installments of $2,000.00, or more, commencing
February 12, 2000, and continuing monthly thereafter until on or before January
12, 2001, at which time the entire unpaid principal balance plus accrued
interest, if any, shall become immediately due and payable.

[JC]

Should interest not be so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the
principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount
equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted
by law.  Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest
when due, then the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately
due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be
commenced to collect this note or any portion thereof, such sum as the Court may
deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorney's fees.  Principal and
interest payable in lawful money of the United States of America.  This note is
secured by a certain DEED OF TRUST to SBS TRUST DEED NETWORK, a California
corporation, as TRUSTEE.

LLO-Gas, Inc., a Delaware corp.

By:  /s/ John Castellucci
   -----------------------------------
     John Castellucci, CEO/Chairman


                               S.B.S. TRUST DEED
                               -----------------
                                 N E T W O R K
Patrick CHRISTIAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al.

No. 17-9494.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 7, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00700

- CV

HOME TAX SOLUTIONS L LC , Appellant

V. DEREK B. HORNE, ET A L. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429

- 06754

- 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle The docketing statement and clerk’s reco rd in this case have not been filed.

By postcard dated June 2, 2022, we informed appellant the docketing statement in

this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement

within ten days might result in the dismissal of th is appeal without further notice.

On August 19, 2022, we sent a letter inform ing appellant the clerk’s record had not

been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed

appellant to provide, within ten days, verification it had e ither paid for or made

arrangements to pay for the record. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so– 2

–

would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant

has not f iled the docketing statement

, provided the required doc umentation, or

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 3 7.3(b ); 42.3(b), (c).

220700f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HOME TAX SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellant

No. 05

- 22

- 00700

- CV V.

DEREK B. HORNE, ET AL., Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429

- 06754

- 2020. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Molberg and Partida

- Kipness participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 7 th day of October

, 2022

.
Jason Anthony JOHNSON, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9580.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
James MOWERY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7977.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Lancaster City Annexation Case.

Argued November 30, 1955.

Before Stearns, Jones, Bell, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*William B.*Arnold, for appellant.

*537January 3, 1956:

*John B. Bengier,*Assistant City Solicitor, with him *Bernard M. Zimmerman,*City Solicitor, *Louis 8. Mag, W. O. Johnstone, Jr.*and *Brown & Zimmerman,*for appellees.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

These annexation proceedings have to do with the annexation of land, in which appellants claim that there was no physical contiguity of the annexed land at the time of enactment of the ordinance.

This appeal is dismissed on the authority of *Lancaster City Annexation Case (No. 4),*374 Pa. 543, 98 A. 2d 33, in which the same question was decided adversely to the appellants.

The order of the court below is affirmed; costs to be paid by the appellant.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q**I, James F. Laird, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report out conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditorsand the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2006 /s/ James F. Laird   James F. Laird   Chief Financial Officer   
22
|   | ENTITY                                 |   | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | BankingMyWay.com, LLC                  |   | Wisconsin                     |   |
|   | Bankers Financial Products Corporation |   | Wisconsin                     |   |
|   | KKL Acquisition Holdings I, LLC        |   | Delaware                      |   |
|   | KKL Acquisition Holdings II, LLC       |   | Delaware                      |   |
|   | Casting Community Media, Inc.          |   | Delaware                      |   |
|   | Stockpickr LLC                         |   | Delaware                      |   |
|   | SP-TSC Holdings LLC                    |   | Delaware                      |   |
|   | Independent Research Group LLC         |   | Delaware                      |   |

----
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/20/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      394,951
COMMITMENTS
  39,370   20,547   86,382  216,986  241,600  342,738  348,529   52,213   46,422

CHANGES FROM 12/13/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -38,862)
  -2,522   -1,442  -46,356  -21,865  -24,243  -70,743  -72,041   31,881   33,179

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.0      5.2     21.9     54.9     61.2     86.8     88.2     13.2     11.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      110)
      27       17       40       58       56      105       97
```

----

Updated December 23, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAURICIO PINON-CERECERES, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71285 

Agency No. A201-157-151 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2020**

Before: MURGUIA, CHRISTEN, and BADE, Circuit Judges. 

Mauricio Pinon-Cereceres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of 

law. Figueroa v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 487, 495-96 (9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss in 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-71285 

part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that 

Pinon-Cereceres did not demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship 

in his application for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); 

Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[A]n ‘exceptional 

and extremely unusual hardship’ determination is a subjective, discretionary 

judgment that has been carved out of our appellate jurisdiction.”).

Although we retain jurisdiction to consider questions of law, see Figueroa, 

543 F.3d at 495-96, Pinon-Cereceres has not established any error underlying the 

agency’s hardship determination.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**
 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Stanley Shuster, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Grand Havana Enterprises, Inc.;
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: February 9, 2005
 
 By:
/s/ Stanley ShusterName:
Stanley ShusterIts:
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., petitioners, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, et al.

No. 18-280.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion of respondents to hold briefing schedule in abeyance denied.