Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2022 / Notices 28003 

8Additionally, you may file your comments 

electronically by using the eComment feature, 

which is located on the Commission’s website at 

www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and 

Filings. Using eComment is an easy method for 

interested persons to submit brief, text-only 

comments on a project. 

the proceeding, as well as your interest 

in the proceeding. For an individual, 

this could include your status as a 

landowner, ratepayer, resident of an 

impacted community, or recreationist. 

You do not need to have property 

directly impacted by the project in order 

to intervene. For more information 

about motions to intervene, refer to the 

FERC website at https://www.ferc.gov/ 

resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp. 

All timely, unopposed motions to 

intervene are automatically granted by 

operation of Rule 214(c)(1). Motions to 

intervene that are filed after the 

intervention deadline are untimely and 

may be denied. Any late-filed motion to 

intervene must show good cause for 

being late and must explain why the 

time limitation should be waived and 

provide justification by reference to 

factors set forth in Rule 214(d) of the 

Commission’s Rules and Regulations. A 

person obtaining party status will be 

placed on the service list maintained by 

the Secretary of the Commission and 

will receive copies (paper or electronic) 

of all documents filed by the applicant 

and by all other parties. 

Comments 

Any person wishing to comment on 

the project may do so. The Commission 

considers all comments received about 

the project in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken. To 

ensure that your comments are timely 

and properly recorded, please submit 

your comments on or before July 5, 

2022. The filing of a comment alone will 

not serve to make the filer a party to the 

proceeding. To become a party, you 

must intervene in the proceeding. 

How To File Protests, Interventions, and 

Comments 

There are two ways to submit 

protests, motions to intervene, and 

comments. In both instances, please 

reference the Project docket number 

CP22–354–000 in your submission. 

(1) You may file your protest, motion 

to intervene, and comments by using the 

Commission’s eFiling feature, which is 

located on the Commission’s website 

(www.ferc.gov) under the link to 

Documents and Filings. New eFiling 

users must first create an account by 

clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ You will be 

asked to select the type of filing you are 

making; first select General’’ and then 

select ‘‘Protest’’, ‘‘Intervention’’, or 

‘‘Comment on a Filing’’; or 8

(2) You can file a paper copy of your 

submission by mailing it to the address 

below. Your submission must reference 

the Project docket number CP22–354– 

000. 

To mail via USPS, use the following 

address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 

20426. 

To mail via any other courier, use the 

following address: Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, 

Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic filing of submissions (option 

1 above) and has eFiling staff available 

to assist you at (202) 502–8258 or 

FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. 

Protests and motions to intervene 

must be served on the applicant either 

by mail or email (with a link to the 

document) at: Michael E. McMahon, 

Senior Vice President and General 

Counsel, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC 

(Texas Gas), 9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 

2800, Houston, Texas 77046; by phone: 

(713) 479–3480; or email: 

Mike.McMahon@bwpipelines.com . Any 

subsequent submissions by an 

intervenor must be served on the 

applicant and all other parties to the 

proceeding. Contact information for 

parties can be downloaded from the 

service list at the eService link on FERC 

Online. 

Tracking the Proceeding 

Throughout the proceeding, 

additional information about the project 

will be available from the Commission’s 

Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208– 

FERC, or on the FERC website at 

www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link 

as described above. The eLibrary link 

also provides access to the texts of all 

formal documents issued by the 

Commission, such as orders, notices, 

and rulemakings. 

In addition, the Commission offers a 

free service called eSubscription which 

allows you to keep track of all formal 

issuances and submittals in specific 

dockets. This can reduce the amount of 

time you spend researching proceedings 

by automatically providing you with 

notification of these filings, document 

summaries, and direct links to the 

documents. For more information and to 

register, go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ 

esubscription.asp. 

Dated: May 4, 2022. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09998 Filed 5–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket Nos. RD22–1–000 and IC22–7–000] 

Commission Information Collection 

Activities (FERC–725K); Comment 

Request; Extension 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection 

and request for comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission 

(Commission or FERC) is soliciting 

public comments on the requested 

renewal and revision of FERC–725K 

(Mandatory Reliability Standard for the 

SERC Region), which will be submitted 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review. 

The Commission published a 60-day 

notice in the Federal Register on March 

4, 2022 (87 FR 12440), and received no 

comments on the 60-day notice. 

DATES: Comments on the collection of 

information are due June 9, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments on 

FERC 725K to OMB through 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, 

Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission Desk Officer. Please 

identify the OMB Control Number 

1902–0260 (Mandatory Reliability 

Standard for the SERC Region) in the 

subject line. Your comments should be 

sent within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. 

Please submit copies of your 

comments (identified by Docket No. 

IC22–7–000 and the form) to the 

Commission as noted below. Electronic 

filing through http://www.ferc.gov, is 

preferred. 

• Electronic Filing: Documents must 

be filed in acceptable native 

applications and print-to-PDF, but not 

in scanned or picture format. 

• For those unable to file 

electronically, comments may be filed 

by USPS mail or by hand (including 

courier) delivery. 

Æ Mail via U.S. Postal Service only, 

addressed to: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, Secretary of the 

Commission, 888 First Street NE, 

Washington, DC 20426. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
28004 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2022 / Notices 

1 Due to expiration dates in 2019 for many of the 

Commission’s financial forms, the renewal work for 

several of the forms was in process or pending at 

OMB during the 2019 Forms Refresh rulemaking 

effort in Docket No. RM19–12–000. The 

simultaneous OMB processes required the 

assignment of alternate temporary information 

collection numbers (e.g., 60A) at the NOPR and/or 

final rule stages. Accordingly, FERC Form No. 60A 

represents the additional burden associated with 

the final rule in RM19–12–000. Revisions to the 

Filing Process for Comm’n Forms, Order No. 859, 

167 FERC ¶ 61,241 (2019). 

2 Delegated Letter Order approving Joint Petition 

requesting to update the regional Reliability 

Standard PRC–006–SERC–03 under RD22–1 (dated 

12/14/2021) filed by the North American Electric 

Reliability Corporation (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/ 

eLibrary/filelist?accession_num=20220218-3010). 

3 16 U.S.C. 824o. 

4 16 U.S.C. 824o(d)(3). 

5 Id. § 824o(d)(2). 

6Letter Order Approving the Joint Petition 

Requesting Certain Approvals in connection with 

the Dissolution of FRCC, 167 FERC ¶ 61,095, (2019). 

7North American Electric Reliability Corporation 

(NERC), Docket No. RD17–9–000 (Oct. 16, 2017) 

(delegated letter order). 

Æ Hand (including courier) delivery 

to: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, 

Rockville, MD 20852. 

Please reference the specific 

collection number(s) and/or title(s) in 

your comments. 

Instructions: OMB submissions must 

be formatted and filed in accordance 

with submission guidelines at: 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Using the search function under the 

‘‘Currently Under Review field,’’ select 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; 

click ‘‘submit’’ and select ‘‘comment’’ to 

the right of the subject collection. FERC 

submissions must be formatted and filed 

in accordance with submission 

guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov. For 

user assistance contact FERC Online 

Support by email at ferconlinesupport@

ferc.gov, or by phone at (866) 208–3676 

(toll-free). 

Docket: Users interested in receiving 

automatic notification of activity in this 

docket or in viewing/downloading 

comments and issuances in this docket 

may do so at http://www.ferc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ellen Brown may be reached by email 

at DataClearance@FERC.gov and 

telephone at (202) 502–8663. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1

Title: FERC–725K, Mandatory 

Reliability Standard for the SERC 

Region. 

OMB Control No.: 1902–0260. 

Type of Request: Request for comment 

on the revised information collection 

requirements resulting from Docket No. 

RD22–1–000 2 and the three-year 

extension of FERC–725K. 

Abstract: Section 215 of the Federal 

Power Act (FPA) 3 requires a 

Commission-certified Electric 

Reliability Organization (ERO) to 

develop mandatory and enforceable 

Reliability Standards, which are subject 

to Commission review and approval. 

Once approved, the Reliability 

Standards may be enforced by NERC, 

subject to Commission oversight, or by 

the Commission independently. 

Reliability Standards that NERC 

proposes to the Commission may 

include Reliability Standards that are 

proposed by a Regional Entity to be 

effective in that region. In Order No. 

672, the Commission noted that: 

As a general matter, we will accept the 

following two types of regional differences, 

provided they are otherwise just, reasonable, 

not unduly discriminatory or preferential and 

in the public interest, as required under the 

statute: (1) A regional difference that is more 

stringent than the continent-wide Reliability 

Standard, including a regional difference that 

addresses matters that the continent-wide 

Reliability Standard does not; and (2) a 

regional Reliability Standard that is 

necessitated by a physical difference in the 

Bulk-Power System. 

When NERC reviews a regional 

Reliability Standard that would be 

applicable on an interconnection-wide 

basis and that has been proposed by a 

Regional Entity organized on an 

interconnection-wide basis, NERC must 

rebuttably presume that the regional 

Reliability Standard is just, reasonable, 

not unduly discriminatory or 

preferential, and in the public interest.4

In turn, the Commission must give ‘‘due 

weight’’ to the technical expertise of 

NERC and of a Regional Entity 

organized on an interconnection-wide 

basis.5 As stated in the NERC Petition, 

in 2008, SERC commenced work on 

Reliability Standard PRC–006–SERC– 

01. NERC also began work on revising 

PRC–006–0 at a continent-wide level. 

The SERC standard has been developed 

to be consistent with the NERC UFLS 

standard. PRC–006–SERC–02 was 

developed due to periodic review of the 

standard and PRC–006–1 clearly defines 

the roles and responsibilities of parties 

to whom the standard applies. 

On February 18, 2022 FERC issued 

the Delegated Letter Order in Docket No. 

RD22–1–000 approving the NERC 

petition’s request (Joint Petition of the 

North American Electric Reliability 

Corporation and SERC Reliability 

Corporation for Approval of Proposed 

Regional Reliability Standard PRC–006– 

SERC–03), which modifies the 

information collection of FERC–725K. 

The collection follows the NERC 

Petition request in Docket No. RD22–1– 

000 which proposes to update the 

reliability standard for the SERC region 

from PRC–006–SERC–02 to PRC–006– 

SERC–03. As stated in the NERC 

Petition submitted on December 14, 

2021, the updated reliability standard 

provides additional flexibility for 

planning coordinators to adjust island 

boundaries to perform more accurate 

studies; address the transition of the 

Florida Reliability Coordinating Council 

(FRCC) registered entities to SERC 

following the dissolution of the FRCC 

on July 1, 2019; and to clarify technical 

requirements within the UFLS settings 

that are unique to the Florida peninsula. 

When FRCC was dissolved and the 

registered entities located in the Florida 

peninsula would eventually became 

subject to SERC’s regional Reliability 

Standard PRC–006–SERC–02. 

The PRC–006–1 standard identifies 

the Planning Coordinator (PC) as the 

entity responsible for developing 

underfrequency load shedding (UFLS) 

schemes within their PC area. The 

regional standard (PRC–006–SERC–03) 

adds specificity not contained in the 

NERC standard for a UFLS scheme in 

the SERC Region. The added specificity 

that PRC–006–SERC–03 provides 

effectively mitigates the consequences 

of an underfrequency event. 

The purpose of regional Reliability 

Standard PRC–006–SERC–03 is to 

establish consistent and coordinated 

requirements for the design, 

implementation, and analysis of 

automatic UFLS programs among all 

SERC applicable entities. The regional 

Reliability Standard PRC–006–SERC–03 

incorporates revisions to: (i) Provide 

more flexibility for Planning 

Coordinators to adjust island boundaries 

in order to perform more accurate and 

complete studies; (ii) address the 

transition of Florida Reliability 

Coordinating Council (‘‘FRCC’’) 

registered entities to SERC following the 

dissolution of FRCC as a regional entity 

on July 1, 2019; 6 (iii) clarify a technical 

term used in the regional Reliability 

Standard; and (iv) align requirement 

language with the current continentwide NERC Reliability Standard, PRC– 

006–5. 

Currently effective regional Reliability 

Standard PRC–006–SERC–02 was 

approved by the Commission on 

October 16, 2017 7 and became effective 

for registered entities in the SERC region 

on January 1, 2018. Following the 

addition of FRCC’s registered entities to 

SERC in 2019, SERC initiated a project 

to review PRC–006–SERC–02. SERC’s 

Dynamics Working Group identified the 

need to revise the regional Reliability 

Standard to account for UFLS settings 

that are unique to the Florida peninsula. 

As part of this project, SERC also 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2022 / Notices 28005 

8NERC petition identified on page 8. 

9NERC petition identified on page 9. 

10 ‘‘Burden’’ is defined as the total time, effort, or 

financial resources expended by persons to 

generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 

information to or for a Federal agency. For further 

explanation of what is included in the information 

collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal 

Regulations 1320.3. 

identified other opportunities to 

enhance the regional standard. SERC 

proposed to modify its UFLS Standard, 

PRC–006–SERC–02. Requirements R1 

and R7 of the currently effective 

standard are removed in the updated 

regional Reliability PRC–006–SERC–03, 

but the numbering for the remaining 

Requirements is unchanged in the 

interest of administrative convenience.8

SERC proposed to remove 

Requirement R1, which says: 

Each Planning Coordinator shall 

include its SERC subregion as an 

identified island in the criteria (required 

by the NERC PRC standard on UFLS) for 

selecting portions of the BPS that may 

form islands.9

SERC proposed the retirement of 

Requirement R7, which sets specific 

data requirements for Planning 

Coordinators (PCs) to provide SERC. 

SERC no longer plans to maintain a 

database of this information; therefore, 

it proposed to retire R7, that removes 

the requirement for SERC to maintain a 

UFLS database. SERC notes that this 

requirement is no longer needed 

because the continent-wide UFLS 

standard requires PCs to maintain a 

UFLS database. 

Type of Respondents: Entities 

registered with the North American 

Electric Reliability Corporation within 

the SERC region. 

Estimate of Annual Burden: 10 Our 

estimate below regarding the number of 

respondents is based on the NERC 

compliance registry as of January 7, 

2022. According to the NERC 

compliance registry, there are 28 

planning coordinators (PC) and 175 

generator owners (GO) within the SERC 

Region. The individual burden 

estimates are based on the time needed 

for planning coordinators and generator 

operators to meet the requirements of 

both the regional SERC requirement and 

the national reliability requirements. 

The estimates include the costs to 

document and store data, run studies, 

assess UFLS design, and analyze results 

from design, development, and updating 

of the UFLS programs to be compliant 

with the SERC and NERC standards. 

Additionally, generator owners must 

provide a detailed set of data and 

documentation to SERC within 30 days 

of a request to facilitate post event 

analysis of frequency disturbances. 

These burden estimates are consistent 

with estimates for similar tasks in other 

Commission-approved Reliability 

Standards. 

There are two burden tables below, 

the first showing the reduction in 

burden following RD22–1–000, and the 

second showing the estimated burden of 

the collection. The Commission 

estimates the annual reporting burden 

and cost for the Reliability Standard 

PRC–006–SERC–3 as: 

FERC–725K—MODIFICATIONS DUE TO DLO IN DOCKET NO. RD22–1 

[Reduction in burden] 

Reliability standard and associated 

requirement 

Number of 

respondents 

Annual 

number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average burden & cost 

per response 

Total annual burden & 

total annual cost 

Cost per 

respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1) * (2) =(3) (4) (3) * (4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

PRC–006–SERC–3 

PCs: Provide Documentation and 

Data to SERC.

28 1 ............................ 16 hrs.; $1,392 ........... 448 hrs.; $38,976 ............ $1,392 

Total Reduction due to RD22–1 ........................ ........................ ............................ ..................................... 448 hrs.; $38,976 ............ ..............................

FERC–725K—MANDATORY RELIABILITY STANDARD FOR THE SERC REGION

[Renewal] 

Number of 

respondents 11

Annual 

number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average burden & cost 

per response 12

Total annual burden 

hours & total annual cost 

Cost per 

respondent 

($) 

(1) (2) (1) * (2) = (3) (4) (3) * (4) = (5) (5) ÷ (1) 

PCs: Design and Document Automatic 

UFLS Program.

28 1 28 8 hrs.; $696.00 ........... 224 hrs.; $19,488.00 ....... $696.00 

GOs: Provide Documentation and Data 

to SERC.

175 1 175 16 hrs.; $1,392.00 ...... 2800 hrs.; $243,600.00 ... 1,392.00 

GOs: Record Retention ......................... 175 1 175 4 hrs.; $348.00 ........... 700 hrs.; $60,900 ............ 348.00 

Total ................................................ ........................ ........................ ............................ ..................................... 3,724 hrs. $323,988 13 ..... ........................

11Between previous information collection there is an increase in the number of PCs and GOs which largely reflect entities from the former FRCC and SPP regions 

now applicable PRC–006–SERC–03. 12The estimated hourly cost (salary plus benefits) provided in this section is based on the salary figures and benefits of the average 2021 FERC FTE costs 

($180,703 per year, or $87.00 per hour), which we estimate is comparable for salary plus benefits costs of a utilities staff. 13The total hours reflect the total hours required for the collection following the reduction in burden from RD22–1–000. 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(1) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden and cost of the collection 

of information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility 

and clarity of the information collection; 

and (4) ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including the use 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

I I I 
28006 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2022 / Notices 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Dated: May 4, 2022. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09999 Filed 5–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL –9817–01–OA] 

Public Meeting of the Science Advisory 

Board Drinking Water Committee 

(DWC) Augmented for the Contaminant 

Candidate List 5 Review 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Science Advisory Board 

(SAB) Staff Office announces one public 

meeting of the Science Advisory Board 

Drinking Water Committee (DWC) 

Augmented for the Contaminant 

Candidate List 5 (CCL 5) Review. The 

purpose of the meeting is for the 

Committee to discuss their draft report 

reviewing EPA’s Draft Fifth Drinking 

Water Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 

5) (86 FR 37948) and three associated 

support documents: Technical Support 

Document for the Draft Fifth 

Contaminant Candidate List (CCL 5)— 

Contaminant Information Sheets; 

Technical Support Document for the 

Draft Fifth Contaminant Candidate List 

(CCL 5)—Chemical Contaminants; and 

Technical Support Document for the 

Draft Fifth Contaminant Candidate List 

(CCL 5)—Microbial Contaminants. 

DATES: The public meeting for the 

Science Advisory Board DWC 

Augmented for the CCL 5 Review to 

review its draft document will be held 

on June 6, 2022, from 12:30 p.m.—5:00 

p.m. (Eastern Time). 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be 

conducted virtually. Please refer to the 

SAB website at https://sab.epa.gov for 

information on how to attend the 

meeting. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any 

member of the public who wants further 

information concerning this notice may 

contact Carolyn Kilgore, Designated 

Federal Officer (DFO), via telephone 

(202) 564–0230, or email at 

Kilgore.Carolyn@epa.gov. General 

information about the SAB, as well as 

any updates concerning the meetings 

announced in this notice can be found 

on the SAB website at https://

sab.epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The SAB was established 

pursuant to the Environmental 

Research, Development, and 

Demonstration Authorization Act 

(ERDDAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365, 

to provide independent scientific and 

technical advice to the EPA 

Administrator on the scientific and 

technical basis for agency positions and 

regulations. The SAB is a Federal 

Advisory Committee chartered under 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. The SAB will 

comply with the provisions of FACA 

and all appropriate SAB Staff Office 

procedural policies. Pursuant to FACA 

and EPA policy, notice is hereby given 

that the Science Advisory Board DWC 

Augmented for the CCL 5 5 Review will 

hold a public meeting to discuss their 

draft report reviewing EPA’s Draft Fifth 

Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate 

List and associated support documents. 

Availability of Meeting Materials: All 

meeting materials, including the agenda 

will be available on the SAB web page 

at https://sab.epa.gov. 

Procedures for Providing Public Input: 

Public comment for consideration by 

EPA’s federal advisory committees and 

panels has a different purpose from 

public comment provided to EPA 

program offices. Therefore, the process 

for submitting comments to a federal 

advisory committee is different from the 

process used to submit comments to an 

EPA program office. Federal advisory 

committees and panels, including 

scientific advisory committees, provide 

independent advice to the EPA. 

Members of the public can submit 

relevant comments pertaining to the 

committee’s charge or meeting 

materials. Input from the public to the 

SAB will have the most impact if it 

provides specific scientific or technical 

information or analysis for the SAB to 

consider or if it relates to the clarity or 

accuracy of the technical information. 

Members of the public wishing to 

provide comment should follow the 

instruction below to submit comments. 

Oral Statements: In general, 

individuals or groups requesting an oral 

presentation at a meeting conducted by 

telephone will be limited to three 

minutes. Each person making an oral 

statement should consider providing 

written comments as well as their oral 

statement so that the points presented 

orally can be expanded upon in writing. 

Persons interested in providing oral 

statements should contact the DFO, in 

writing (preferably via email) at the 

contact information noted above by May 

31, 2022, to be placed on the list of 

registered speakers. 

Written Statements: Written 

statements will be accepted throughout 

the advisory process; however, for 

timely consideration by SAB members, 

statements should be submitted to the 

DFO by May 24, 2022, for consideration 

at the June 6, 2022, meeting. Written 

statements should be supplied to the 

DFO at the contact information above 

via email. Submitters are requested to 

provide a signed and unsigned version 

of each document because the SAB Staff 

Office does not publish documents with 

signatures on its websites. Members of 

the public should be aware that their 

personal contact information, if 

included in any written comments, may 

be posted to the SAB website. 

Copyrighted material will not be posted 

without explicit permission of the 

copyright holder. 

Accessibility: For information on 

access or services for individuals with 

disabilities, please contact the DFO, at 

the contact information noted above, 

preferably at least ten days prior to the 

meeting, to give the EPA as much time 

as possible to process your request. 

Thomas H. Brennan, 

Director, Science Advisory Board Staff Office. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09945 Filed 5–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0879; FRL–9801–01– 

OCSPP] 

Environmental Modeling Public 

Meeting; Notice of Virtual Public 

Meeting 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA will hold a virtual 

Environmental Modeling Public 

Meeting (EMPM) on Tuesday, June 23, 

2022, with participation by phone and 

webcast only. The EMPM provides a 

public forum for EPA and its 

stakeholders to discuss current issues 

related to modeling pesticide fate, 

transport, exposure, and ecotoxicity for 

pesticide risk assessments in a 

regulatory context. This Notice 

announces the meeting and provides 

information on its theme which is a 

focus on the Endangered Species Act 

and practical solutions to avoid, 

minimize or offset potential effects to 

Federally Listed endangered and 

threatened species and designated 

critical habitats from pesticides. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1