alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30968

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAYMOND BRUMFIELD,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:17-CR-52-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Raymond Brumfield has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Brumfield has filed responses and a motion for the appointment of counsel. We 

have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Brumfield’s responses. We concur with counsel’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30968 Document: 00514864973 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
No. 17-30968

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Brumfield’s motion for appointment of counsel is 

DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

 Case: 17-30968 Document: 00514864973 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/08/2019
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of China New Media Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.





Dated:  October 13, 2010


/s/ Guojun WangGuojun Wang

Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)





/s/ Hongwei LiuHongwei LiuChief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
                       This schedule contains summary financial
                       information  extracted from Form 10-Q for the period
                       ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
                       entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                  854599
<NAME>                 THE GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<CASH>                                    $  41,681
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                93,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4,688
<INVENTORY>                                  32,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            175,628
<PP&E>                                      375,908
<DEPRECIATION>                              165,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              416,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       125,069
<BONDS>                                     212,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (133,784)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                416,505
<SALES>                                     115,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            115,736
<CGS>                                        82,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                82,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              11,658
<INCOME-TAX>                                  4,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           7,123
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  7,123
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        



</TABLE>
Josiaha R. WILLS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-7854.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


The undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Buckhead America Corporation for the
       quarterly  period  ended June 30, 2002 as filed  August 19, 2002 with the
       Securities and Exchange Commission,  fully complies with the requirements
       of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
       U.S.C. 78m); and

2.     The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
       material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
       Buckhead America Corporation.


Date:  August 19, 2002                    /s/ Douglas C. Collins
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Douglas C. Collins
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          of Buckhead America Corporation


Date:  August 19, 2002                    /s/ Robert B. Lee
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Robert B. Lee
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          of Buckhead America Corporation





1500921v1
TRI-CITIES HOLDINGS LLC, et al., petitioners, v. TENNESSEE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION, et al.

No. 17-1635.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Franklyn D. PRILLERMAN, petitioner, v. John HUGGINS, et al.

No. 17-9453.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Donna J. HOCKMAN, petitioner, v. Phyllis BASKERVILLE, Warden.

No. 18-7640.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-1012

_____________________________

DEVONTAE PAYNE,

Petitioner,

v.

MAJOR JEFF CLOUTIER, Director, 

Alachua County Department of 

the Jail,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

April 22, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

BILBREY, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Stacy A. Scott, Public Defender, and Caleb Wood, Assistant Public 

Defender, Gainesville, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Australian Oil & Gas Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E.
Geoffrey Albers, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Australian Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Australian Oil & Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated: March 21, 2005                               /s/ E. Geoffrey Albers
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    E. Geoffrey Albers
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Arthur Zafiropoulo, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  theQuarterly Report of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedOctober 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.

 
| By:                              | /s/ ARTHUR ZAFIROPOULO |   |
|----------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Name: Arthur Zafiropoulo         |
| Title: *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

I, Bruce Wright, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  theQuarterly Report of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedOctober 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.

 
| By:                              | /s/ BRUCE WRIGHT |   |
|----------------------------------|------------------|--------|
| Name: Bruce Wright               |
| Title: *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Ultratech, Inc. and will be retained by Ultratech, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
Order issued: December /0,2012

In The

( ourt of Appeal 

No. 05-124)0594-CV

S. AMINAH N. MOMIN AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF

714 LONE RIDGE WAY, MURPHY, TEXAS 75094, Appellants

BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BANK

OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE,

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY LOAN TRUST 2007o8XS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 003-00q71-2012

ORDER

By order dated December 3, 2012, the Court ordered Denise Condran, Official Court Reporter for the

County Court at Law No. 3 of Collin County, Texas, to file either:. (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification

that no hearin~ were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not requested or made payment

arrangements for the record. We cautioned appellant that if the Court received verification of no request or no

payment, we would order the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. By letter dated December 4, 2012,

Denise Condran informed the Court that she has not received either payment or a letter of designation for the record.

Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. See TEX. IL API’. P. 37.3(c).

Appellants’ brief is due on or before January 9,
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________
No. 13

- 10061

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11

- cr

- 00410

- RWS

- RGV

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee Cross Appellant,

versus
HELEN E. HAMPTON,

Defendant

- Appellant Cross Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ (February 3, 2014) Case: 13-10061 Date Filed: 02/03/2014 Page: 1 of 22 Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and RIPPLE
, * Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A ppellant Helen Hampton was convicted for violations of 1 8 U.S.C. § 1709,
theft of mail matter by a Postal Service employee; 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1),
attempting to conceal documents or other objects with the intent to impair their
availability for use in an official proceeding; and 18 U.S.C. § 1519 , knowingly
altering or destroying a record, document, or other tangible object with intent to
impede the investigation of a United States agency

. She appeals her conviction

and raises the following issues : (1) the District Court abused its discretion in its
jury charge regarding the elements of 18 U.S.C. § 1512; (2) the United States

failed to provide sufficient evidence to support Hampton’s conviction under each

of the three statutes ; and (3) the District Court erred in den ying Hampton’s motion
to suppress evidence and statements gathered by Office of Inspector General
agents on the night of November 30, 2010

. After entertaining oral argument and
considering the parties’ briefs, we find no merit in the appeal an d therefore her

convictions are affirmed

.

AFFIRMED.

* H onorable Kenneth F. Ripple, United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation

. Case: 13-10061 Date Filed: 02/03/2014 Page: 2 of 2
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**
**AUSTIN** .:with the Comt,v Clerk. Toe Coxzissioners’ Court sI.,s,ll approve such eoccnnt for such amunt se thw **find** to be correct, sad order a drsft to be issued upon the County Trsasurer in favor of such Judge or Justice for the aaount so approved. Provided the Commissioners’ Cow-t shall not pfg auy account or trisl **fees** in any aase **trlsd** and in which an naqulttsl is had unless the Stat? of Texas VRI~

represented In the trial of said c8use by the Caunty **Attornay,** or hir usihmnt, Criqinml IN&flat Attorn~ or MS urfstmnt, Ma the cutlfi~to Ol'sda Attorney ir atfuhd to

### #ala Mooant owti~ to the fmt that saia asxs+ vu tr1.d. Md the stats of sarr vu mprmsM2ma, allat&t la hir Jnagawt than w8 8mfw 

### aiantcviaonoo

Ln

### uiacmusteadatrlal ofWI.*
Artiol* 1074,‘codq d urialMl Recoaun pswladt thati

Axti~le lO’74, Code of Criminal Proaednm* Shwo Queta 6oa.h not vlth the qwaetLon 02 **fees** to be paId to the Mw $udgo, or the Judgeof the court at &u, of the &etloa of thr poaosr but rather tith thb nWer of costs to be Ohmmd aad a+ l eUrd m,$ainst the aSfS&Iit aomictid in a Crfminst aattOX&. It pnwldar that the trial fee in the county smut or a acrantf a& at lav ahdl **be** $6.00, nnd the trial fee in the justice aat& &allbe $4.00. And that "the sme to be collected and paid over in the

saw manrisr as ia the owe 

### of **a** jury fee.” This meaus that IJU& fw of$ 4.00

l hsll be paid over to the county treaeursr end out **of** moh mu the jnetiae of the peace ahall receive the ena **of** $3.00 la eonntia of less them 20,000 population **and** the mm of $2.50 in caqltiea **of** more thaa 20,000 polmletion, ae provided by Article 1062. C. C. F.~ In like manner 

### the $6.00 fee shall be paid over 

### to tha calnty treutuer 

### andout of such @ii the ccxtnt~ &id@ or the

### ~~t&uatirr~rwdntho~~~.00roplp

### ridrd is mm0 u#a, a. 0. ‘r.

amTot- 2s. lam. tua 

### aepwhat bo+ln a lmttor 

### oplnlaaBe. o-l%66vrlttan 

### ar nr. Yapa &wtmn&* lurf*tsat rttolc 

### aq aamral, to 

### Hen.Loo0; aaeklw, aoaatpAttolaq, zopeta&mat& slam, tht 

### uun 189900ai0t bt~0018mw0 usa mautfdk lq?~~ofarialMlmaoan?s.

Tararmk&at* &wl ti8t 

### it la the aptntarof thlr Be&w& fl$aw&&t’ PQ~ oeafllet botmm Artlok.la6a aDcAttlch E+rcaawaEathat.M~aosab ocaoel. otG;rulmwaure sata tha f*e 4w e ownty JsAm0 or l Jpscr 6f tha oaap* oaut 

## at-la, Ma 

## *ti+la ,qfthe peaccia orlmhlal OUY ml&+ fiully aiapoama of befar thQm* '.

Ton are fnrther aavi8ma th& Artlole m4r .aoaeef as ?neod8ro4ouaotae6Adtl~the~ttonolfoq 

## teb0pLtatsu-m ~~,orr~dt~~~oarrrbrt~,~tb,jruticr 

### d thepaMe. 

## butrather of 

## oMt8to &o dtW#M 8M u8ud wt th adrobat aamieted In 

### a m*rlaJ rotlen+

irarting that the~forrgoiag smswm acraih&W* m rada
Derrick JONES, petitioner, v. James M. LeBLANC, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al.

No. 18-7923.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 36A/20 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 36A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5020 February 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 36A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5020 February 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2007/C 036A/01 | Notice to readers | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2007/C 036A/01

Notice to readers

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 036A/02 | Notice of open competitions to constitute a reserve pool of linguist administrators:





  — | EPSO/AD/86-87/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Czech |
| — | EPSO/AD/88-89/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Latvian |
| — | EPSO/AD90-91/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Slovak |
| — | EPSO/AD/92-93/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Slovene |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2007/C 036A/02

Notice of open competitions to constitute a reserve pool of linguist administrators:





  —

EPSO/AD/86-87/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Czech

EPSO/AD/86-87/07

—

EPSO/AD/88-89/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Latvian

EPSO/AD/88-89/07

—

EPSO/AD90-91/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Slovak

EPSO/AD90-91/07

—

EPSO/AD/92-93/07 — Conference interpreters (AD5-AD7) with main language Slovene

EPSO/AD/92-93/07

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Guy GAMBLE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9587.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Steven D. WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. Jason KENT, Warden.

No. 17-9213.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mario Lee BROWN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5158.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Danny R. MOORE, petitioner, v. Gene BEASLEY, Warden.

No. 18-8489.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:              March 26,              2008 |   |   |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |                                           |   |   |   |
|   |                                           |   |   |   |
| By:    | /s/ Jean-Christophe                Hadorn |   |   |        |
|   | Jean-Christophe              Hadorn            |   |   |        |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer         |   |   |        |

----