alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/21/10          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      226,865
COMMITMENTS
  69,171    6,816   37,485   89,957  152,766  196,613  197,067   30,252   29,798

CHANGES FROM 12/14/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        103)
  -3,663     -345      138    3,628    2,420      103    2,213        0   -2,110

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.5      3.0     16.5     39.7     67.3     86.7     86.9     13.3     13.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      224)
      81       24       60       67       93      164      168
```

----

Updated December 27, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6827

CLOREY EUGENE FRANCE,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00250-JAB-LPA)

Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: October 2, 2014

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clorey Eugene France, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Babb, 

Assistant Attorney General, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clorey Eugene France appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for mandamus. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. France v. North 

Carolina, No. 1:13-cv-00250-JAB-LPA (M.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2014). 

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lapis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Miron
Markovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lapis Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

August 12, 2004                                      /s/ Miron Markovitz
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Miron Markovitz
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          327064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2274990
<ALLOWANCES>                                     82000
<INVENTORY>                                    7333428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11017217
<PP&E>                                         2770921
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1344606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                17897711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9716808
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         23648
<OTHER-SE>                                     7959325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  17897711
<SALES>                                        6459892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6459892
<CGS>                                          3896081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3896081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2397342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              201338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (34025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (36185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (36185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# TIME AND DATE: 

9 a.m. ET on May 11, 2022.

# PLACE: 

Charles Suber Banquet Hall, Young Harris College, 1 College Street, Young Harris, Georgia.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Meeting No. 22-02

The TVA Board of Directors will hold a public meeting on May 11, 2022, in the Charles Suber Banquet Hall at the Rollins Campus Center on the campus of Young Harris College, 1 College Street, Young Harris, Georgia. The meeting will be called to order at 9 a.m. ET to consider the agenda items listed below. TVA management will answer questions from the news media following the Board meeting.

On May 10, in the Charles Suber Banquet Hall at the Rollins Campus Center, the public may comment on any agenda item or subject at a board-hosted public listening session which begins at 2 p.m. ET and will last until 4 p.m. Preregistration is required to address the Board.

## Agenda

1. Approval of minutes of the February 10, 2022 Board Meeting

2. Report of the Audit, Finance, Risk, and Cybersecurity Committee

3. Report of the Operations and Nuclear Oversight Committee

4. Report of the External Stakeholders and Regulation Committee

A. Industrial Power Supply Arrangement

5. Report of the People and Governance Committee

A. Board Code of Conduct

B. Annual Compensation Plan Review Amendment

C. Corporate Goals

6. Information Items

A. Arrangements with a new industrial customer

B. Creation of a new non-firm transmission service

7. Report from President and CEO

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For more information: Please call Jim Hopson, TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Anyone who wishes to comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

Dated: May 4, 2022.

Edward C. Meade,

Agency Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2022-10002 Filed 5-5-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-13-00369-CR 

VAL WAYNE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 46th District Court 

Hardeman County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 4226, Honorable Dan Mike Bird, Presiding 

 

December 12, 2013 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant Val Wayne Williams appeals his conviction for evading arrest or 

detention with a vehicle. He was sentenced on March 13, 2013.1 Appellant filed his 

notice of appeal on October 9, 2013. Therefore, the notice appeared to be late. This 

circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant and opportunity was granted him 

 

1 We note that the appellate record contains two separate judgments concerning the matter on 

appeal. One judgment is dated February 27, 2013 and imposed sentence on that date; and the second 

judgment dated March 13, 2013 also imposed sentence on the same day. We, further, note that a motion 

for new trial was filed on March 8, 2013 and the indictment was amended on March 13, 2013. The 

judgment entered on March 13, 2013 was the result of a plea bargain. 
2

to show why we have jurisdiction. He was also afforded the opportunity to file with the 

court, a trial court certification showing he had the right to appeal as the one on file 

showed the matter was the result of a plea bargain, and therefore he had no right to 

appeal. Appellant filed a response addressing the trial court certification and requested 

appointed counsel but failed to address the late notice of appeal. 

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence 

is imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion 

for new trial is filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant did file a motion for new trial; 

therefore, the deadline for perfecting an appeal here lapsed in June of 2013. Again, the 

notice at bar was not filed until October of 2013.

A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. 

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can 

take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being 

untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.

Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
John BORG, et al., petitioners, v. TOWN OF WESTPORT CONNECTICUT, et al.

No. 17-486.

Supreme Court of the United States

Dec. 11, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1651 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 Union Calendar No. 112
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1651

                          [Report No. 106-197]

 To amend the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967 to extend the period 
 during which reimbursement may be provided to owners of United States 
  fishing vessels for costs incurred when such a vessel is seized and 
                     detained by a foreign country.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 1999

  Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself, Mr. Saxton, and Mr. Faleomavaega) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                               Resources

                             June 23, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To amend the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967 to extend the period 
 during which reimbursement may be provided to owners of United States 
  fishing vessels for costs incurred when such a vessel is seized and 
                     detained by a foreign country.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fishermen's Protective Act 
Amendments of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR REIMBURSEMENT UNDER FISHERMEN'S 
              PROTECTIVE ACT OF 1967.

    (a) In General.--Section 7(e) of the Fishermen's Protective Act of 
1967 (22 U.S.C. 1977(e)) is amended by striking ``2000'' and inserting 
``2003''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--Section 7(a)(3) of the Fishermen's 
Protective Act of 1967 (22 U.S.C. 1977(a)(3)) is amended by striking 
``Secretary of the Interior'' and inserting ``Secretary of Commerce''.
                                     





                                                 Union Calendar No. 112

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1651

                          [Report No. 106-197]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967 to extend the period 
 during which reimbursement may be provided to owners of United States 
  fishing vessels for costs incurred when such a vessel is seized and 
                     detained by a foreign country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 23, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
In Re Raymond L. ROGERS, petitioner.

No. 17-9443.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1 See *173*Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 10/04/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      146,895
COMMITMENTS
  18,323   24,636   37,355   76,467   67,792  132,145  129,783   14,750   17,112

CHANGES FROM 09/27/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,345)
  -1,060      -42   -3,479    3,301   -2,692   -1,238   -6,213   -1,107    3,868

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.5     16.8     25.4     52.1     46.1     90.0     88.4     10.0     11.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      101)
      33       24       45       26       28       85       85
```

----

Updated October 7, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: L.K. AND E.K.,

MINOR CHILDREN

PETITION OF: D.K., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 158 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of November , 2020, the “Petition for Allowance of Appeal

Nunc Pro Tunc ,” treated as a Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal

Nunc Pro Tunc , is DENIED.
Mizell CAMPBELL, Jr., petitioner, v. THE FLORIDA BAR.

No. 18-8678.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
SEALED APPELLANT, petitioner, v. SEALED APPELLEE.

No. 18M153.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Study Section.
    Date: June 30-July 1, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Stephanie Johnson Webb, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 208-V, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7992, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e5d5a4b5e464f40474b00594b4c4c6e40474600494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f4c4b5a4f575e51565a11485a5d5d7f51565711585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 4, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09964 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_____________

No. 96-1153WA

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Darrell Edward Carter, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: June 28, 1996

 Filed: July 5, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Edward Carter appeals the district court's denial of Carter's

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Carter contends the government's seizure and

administrative forfeiture of his two vehicles, in proceedings he did not

contest, constituted punishment for his drug offenses and thus barred his

later criminal prosecution and conviction. Carter's contention is

foreclosed by the contrary holdings of the United States Supreme Court and

this court. See United States v. Ursery, No. 95-345, 1996 WL 340815, at

*3 (U.S. June 24, 1996); United States v. Sykes, 73 F.3d 772, 773-74 (8th

Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3821 (U.S. June 10, 1996). We thus

affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 3, 2006By:
    
    /s/ LEE E. BECKELMANName:
    
    Lee E. BeckelmanTitle:
    
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Jared KING, petitioner, v. Karen CREED, et al.

No. 18-8081.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
William Henry PAIGE, Jr., petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

No. 17-9419.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
David H. BROOKS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1683.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Dominick A. OCCHICONE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9497.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Trevor RANSFER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8277.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.