alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1589 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1589

To amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994 to 
 provide for the establishment of school violence prevention hotlines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 1999

   Mr. Wise introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act of 1994 to 
 provide for the establishment of school violence prevention hotlines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF SCHOOL VIOLENCE PREVENTION HOTLINES UNDER 
              THE SAFE AND DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES ACT OF 
              1994.

    (a) Establishment.--Section 4116(b) of the Safe and Drug-Free 
Schools and Communities Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 7116(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (9), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
            ``(10) the establishment (by a partnership consisting of 
        the local educational agency, schools, law enforcement 
        officials, and appropriate community groups) of school violence 
        prevention hotlines to inform law enforcement officials when 
        threats of violence are made at school; and''.
    (b) Distribution of Funds to Local Educational Agencies Containing 
Existing or Proposed Hotlines.--Section 4113(d)(2)(A) of such Act (20 
U.S.C. 7113(d)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) by striking ``30 percent'' and inserting ``25 
                percent''; and
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(iii) 5 percent of such amount to local 
                educational agencies that have established, or propose 
                to establish, school violence prevention hotlines 
                described in section 4116(b)(10).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: July 30, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ John Weale         
|                     |  | Name:  |  | John R. Weale          
|                     |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report.
Nylondajazz SHARNESE, petitioner, v. Jose LOPEZ, et al.

No. 17-9595.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District denied.
Restituto D. BARRAQUIAS, petitioner, v. Robert WILKIE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 18-5428.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon 2005). 

NO. 07-04-0058-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JUNE 22, 2006

______________________________

GREGORY SHAWN BRYANT AND LINSEY KAY BRYANT,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE 

OF KENNALEE D’LIN BRYANT, A DECEASED MINOR, APPELLANTS

v.

ERIC NICHOLAS LEVY, M.D., AMARILLO AREA HEALTHCARE

SPECIALISTS, L.L.P., NORTHWEST TEXAS HEALTHCARE

SYSTEM, INC., APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 89,510-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., REAVIS, J., and BOYD, S.J.1

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

For the reasons expressed in this court’s original opinion, I remain convinced that

all the motions for rehearing should be denied. To the majority’s decision to grant the
2

motion for rehearing filed by Eric Nicholas Levy, M. D., and the Amarillo Area Healthcare

Specialists, L.L.P. (AAHS), I respectfully dissent.

John T. Boyd

 Senior Justice
Matthew G. ALDEN, Jr., petitioner, v. MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 18-7130.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied.
Lenard JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Richard WINFREY, Jr.

No. 18-1024.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN MATEO COUNTY, et al.

No. 18-545.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Motion of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed January 5, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1151

Lower Tribunal No. 10-30306

________________

Victor Lerner, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Ino Halegua, et al.,

Appellees.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria de 

Jesus Santovenia, Judge.

Charlip Law Group, L.C., and David H. Charlip, for appellants.

Jones & Adams, P.A., and Matthew L. Jones, and Daniel Haydar, Joel 

S. Perwin, P.A., and Joel S. Perwin, for appellees.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. 

MILLER, J.
2

Appellants challenge a final judgment executed following the rendition 

of a jury verdict and an accounting bench trial. Observing that “[a] verdict is 

clothed with a presumption of regularity and is not to be disturbed if 

supported by the evidence,” Sweet Paper Sales Corp. v. Feldman, 603 So. 

2d 109, 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), the trial court is not permitted to “sit as a 

seventh juror with veto power,” Laskey v. Smith, 239 So. 2d 13, 14 (Fla. 

1970), and here, the amount awarded by the jury bore “a reasonable relation 

to the amount of damages proved and the injury suffered” and was “such 

that it could be adduced in a logical manner by reasonable persons,” § 

768.74(5)(d),(e), Fla. Stat. (2021), we find no error in the denial of additur or 

new trial. Further, we affirm the accounting award in all respects. See Spring 

v. Ronel Refin., Inc., 421 So. 2d 46, 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (“If, after the jury 

verdict, there are unrelated equitable issues remaining, the trial court may 

then consider those claims.”), disapproved of on other grounds by Jaye v. 

Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1998); Ashemimry v. Ba Nafa, 778 

So. 2d 495, 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“Where a fiduciary or trust relationship 

exists, an action for an accounting is considered equitable in nature without 

regard to other considerations.”). 

Affirmed.
Jimmy Lee WREN, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-7916.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Paul Alfred BROWN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5021.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

*203Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1542 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1542

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   screening retinal eye examinations under the Medicare Program for 
                  individuals diagnosed with diabetes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 1999

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                 jurisdicton of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
   screening retinal eye examinations under the Medicare Program for 
                  individuals diagnosed with diabetes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Diabetic Eye Exam Benefit 
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. SCREENING RETINAL EYE EXAMINATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH 
              DIABETES.

    (a) Coverage of Screening Retinal Eye Examinations.--Section 
1861(s)(2)(S) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(S)) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(i)'' after ``(S)'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
            ``(ii) screening retinal eye examinations furnished to 
        individuals diagnosed with diabetes, but only if the physician 
        who is managing the individual's diabetic condition certifies 
        that such examinations are needed under a comprehensive plan of 
        care related to the individual's diabetic condition; and''.
    (b) Waiver of Deductible.--The first sentence of section 1833(b) 
(42 U.S.C. 1395l(b)), as amended by section 4101(b), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' before ``(6)'', and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, and (7) such deductible shall not apply with 
        respect to screening retinal eye examinations (as described in 
        clause (ii) of section 1861(s)(2)(S))''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to screening retinal eye examinations performed on or after 
February 1, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 1, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                          12,447
<SECURITIES>                                        90
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,054
<INVENTORY>                                     30,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,918
<PP&E>                                         127,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,434
<SALES>                                        100,890
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,890
<CGS>                                           77,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (195)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (191)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,217)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)


</TABLE>
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 150

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to convey National

Forest System lands for use for educational purposes,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 150 RFS

1 SECTION. 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education Land Grant

3 Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM

5 LANDS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.

6 (a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—Upon application, the

7 Secretary of Agriculture may convey National Forest Sys8 tem lands for use for educational purposes if the Secretary

9 determines that—

10 (1) the entity seeking the conveyance will use

11 the conveyed land for a public or publicly funded ele12 mentary or secondary school, to provide grounds or

13 facilities related to such a school, or for both pur14 poses;

15 (2) the conveyance will serve the public interest;

16 (3) the land to be conveyed is not otherwise

17 needed for the purposes of the National Forest Sys18 tem; and

19 (4) the total acreage to be conveyed does not

20 exceed the amount reasonably necessary for the pro21 posed use.

22 (b) ACREAGE LIMITATION.—A conveyance under this

23 section may not exceed 80 acres. However, this limitation

24 shall not be construed to preclude an entity from submit25 ting a subsequent application under this section for an ad-
3

•HR 150 RFS

1 ditional land conveyance if the entity can demonstrate to

2 the Secretary a need for additional land.

3 (c) COSTS AND MINERAL RIGHTS.—A conveyance

4 under this section shall be for a nominal cost. The convey5 ance may not include the transfer of mineral rights.

6 (d) REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS.—When the Secretary

7 receives an application under this section, the Secretary

8 shall—

9 (1) before the end of the 14-day period begin10 ning on the date of the receipt of the application,

11 provide notice of that receipt to the applicant; and

12 (2) before the end of the 120-day period begin13 ning on that date—

14 (A) make a final determination whether or

15 not to convey land pursuant to the application,

16 and notify the applicant of that determination;

17 or

18 (B) submit written notice to the applicant

19 containing the reasons why a final determina20 tion has not been made.

21 (e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If at any time after

22 lands are conveyed pursuant to this section, the entity to

23 whom the lands were conveyed attempts to transfer title

24 to or control over the lands to another or the lands are

25 devoted to a use other than the use for which the lands
4

•HR 150 RFS

1 were conveyed, without the consent of the Secretary, title

2 to the lands shall revert to the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives June 8, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10017]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2014-N-1721; FDA-2005-N-0101; FDA-2021-N-0386; FDA-
2012-N-0294; and FDA-2018-N-3404]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approvals

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of 
information collections that have been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of 
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-
12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-3794, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information 
collections approved recently by OMB under section 3507 of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control 
number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information 
collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements 
for the information collections are available on the internet at 
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. An Agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

        Table 1--List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            OMB control    Date approval
           Title of collection                  No.           expires
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investigational New Drug Regulations....       0910-0014       3/31/2025
Prescription Drug User Fee Program......       0910-0297       3/31/2025
Medical Device Reporting................       0910-0437       3/31/2025
Food Additives; Food Contact Substances        0910-0495       3/31/2025
 Notification System....................
Generic Drug User Fee Program...........       0910-0727       3/31/2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: May 4, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10017 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

E.B. ENDRES, INC.,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPH & RITA SCHWEMMLEIN,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 79 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Resource Related Research Projects (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         May 20, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandip Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 292-0189,                         *sandip.bhattacharyya@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 27, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-09432 Filed 5-2-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Joel S. ELLIOTT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8358.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1584Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Lamar PERRYMAN, petitioner, v. GEORGIA, et al.

No. 18-8412.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.