Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2022 / Notices 29361 

3 33 CFR 81.5. 

4 33 U.S.C. 1605(c). 

5 33 CFR 81.18. 

6 33 U.S.C. 1605(a); 33 CFR 81.9. 

apply for a certificate of alternative 

compliance (COAC) and may instead 

meet alternative requirements.3

For vessels of special construction or 

purpose, the cognizant Coast Guard 

District Office in which the vessel is 

being built or operated determines 

whether the vessel for which the COAC 

is sought complies as closely as possible 

with the 72 COLREGS, and the Chief of 

the Prevention Division decides 

whether to issue the COAC which must 

specify the required alternative 

installation. If the Coast Guard issues a 

COAC, under the governing statute 4 and 

regulations,5 the Coast Guard must 

publish notice of this action. Once 

issued, a COAC remains valid until 

information supplied in the COAC 

application or the COAC terms become 

inapplicable to the vessel. 

The Fourteenth District Prevention 

Division, U.S. Coast Guard, certifies that 

the CGMA CGM DAKA (IMO 9436070) 

is a vessel of special construction or 

purpose, and that, with respect to the 

position of the forward cargo crane 

creating a blind sector 1,000 meters 

immediately ahead of the bow of the 

vessel over a range of approximately 1– 

2 degrees, it is not possible to comply 

fully with the requirements of the 

provisions enumerated in the 72 

COLREGS, without interfering with the 

normal operation, construction, or 

design of the vessel. The U.S. Coast 

Guard Fourteenth District Prevention 

Division further finds and certifies that 

the construction and placement of the 

forward cargo crane creating a blind 

sector 1,000 meters immediately ahead 

of the bow of the vessel over a range of 

approximately 1–2 degrees, are in the 

closet possible compliance with the 

applicable provisions of the 72 

COLREGS.6

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 CFR 81.18. 

Dated: April 25, 2022. 

Ulysses S. Mullins, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Prevention 

Division, Fourteenth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2022–10246 Filed 5–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2020–0101; 

FXES11140100000–223–FF01E0000] 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

and Habitat Conservation Plan for 

Thurston County, Washington 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), announce the 

availability of a final environmental 

impact statement (FEIS), which analyzes 

a proposed habitat conservation plan 

(HCP) developed by Thurston County, 

Washington (applicant, or the County). 

This FEIS was prepared jointly by the 

Service and Thurston County to satisfy 

both the National Environmental Policy 

Act and the Washington State 

Environmental Policy Act. The HCP was 

submitted by the applicant in support of 

an application for an incidental take 

permit (ITP) under the Endangered 

Species Act. The applicant is seeking 

authorization for the incidental take of 

six species, which is expected to result 

from various County-permitted 

development activities, as well as 

construction and maintenance of 

County-owned or County-managed 

infrastructure, over the next 30 years. 

DATES: The Service’s ITP decision will 

occur no sooner than 30 days after 

publication of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency’s notice of 

availability of the FEIS in the Federal 

Register, and will be documented in a 

record of decision. 

ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of 

the documents by any of the following 

methods: 

• Internet: https://

www.regulations.gov (Docket No. FWS– 

R1–ES–2020–0101) or at https://

www.fws.gov/wafwo/. 

• Phone: You may call Kevin 

Connally, at 360–753–9440, to request 

alternative formats of the documents. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kevin Connally, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service, Washington Fish and Wildlife 

Office (see ADDRESSES); telephone: 360– 

753–9440; email: Kevin_Connally@

fws.gov. Individuals in the United States 

who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, 

or have a speech disability may dial 711 

(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

Individuals outside the United States 

should use the relay services offered 

within their country to make 

international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), 

announce the availability of a final 

environmental impact statement (FEIS) 

addressing Thurston County’s 

(applicant or County) proposed habitat 

conservation plan (HCP). In accordance 

with the requirements of the 

Endangered Species Act, as amended 

(ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), the 

applicant is seeking an incidental take 

permit (ITP) authorizing take of the 

threatened Yelm pocket gopher 

(Thomomys mazama yelmensis), 

Olympia pocket gopher (T. mazama 

pugetensis), Tenino pocket gopher (T. 

mazama tumuli), and Oregon spotted 

frog (Rana pretiosa); the endangered 

Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly 

(Euphydryas editha taylori); and the 

Oregon vesper sparrow (Pooecetes 

gramineus affinis), which is under 

review to determine if Federal listing 

under the ESA is warranted (hereafter, 

‘‘covered species’’). 

If issued, the ITP would authorize 

take of the covered species that may 

occur incidental to various Countypermitted development activities, as 

well as construction and maintenance of 

County-owned or County-managed 

infrastructure, for a period of 30 years. 

The applicant would avoid, minimize, 

and mitigate impacts to covered species, 

and would fully offset the impact of 

taking. In support of the ITP 

application, the applicant prepared the 

HCP, which describes the steps the 

applicant would take to avoid, 

minimize, and mitigate impacts to 

covered species associated with the 

above activities in accordance with HCP 

and ITP requirements. Mitigation would 

be achieved through the permanent 

conservation and maintenance of 

covered species habitat. The HCP also 

describes, without limitation, the life 

history and ecology of the covered 

species, the impact of the anticipated 

taking on covered species, adaptive 

management procedures, monitoring 

procedures, changed circumstances, and 

funding assurances for HCP 

implementation. 

This Final EIS provides updates, as 

needed, to information presented in the 

draft EIS, including revisions in 

response to issues raised in comments 

received during the public review 

period for that document. No substantial 

changes to the proposed action or other 

alternatives were made that are relevant 

to environmental concerns, and no 

significant new circumstances or 

information relevant to the impacts of 

the alternatives analyzed in the draft EIS 

were found. 

This FEIS was prepared consistent 

with the Department of the Interior 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
29362 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2022 / Notices 

NEPA regulations (43 CFR part 46); 

longstanding Federal judicial and 

regulatory interpretations; and 

Administration priorities and policies, 

including Secretary’s Order No. 3399 

requiring bureaus and offices to use ‘‘the 

same application or level of NEPA that 

would have been applied to a proposed 

action before the 2020 Rule went into 

effect.’’ 

The FEIS will also be used by 

Thurston County to satisfy the 

requirements of the Washington State 

Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), as 

provided in Revised Code of 

Washington 43.21C, and SEPA 

implementing regulations found at 

Washington Administrative Code 197– 

11. 

Background 

Thurston County is seeking an ITP to 

cover a variety of activities for which 

the County issues permits or approvals, 

and activities the County otherwise 

carries out under its jurisdiction. The 

covered activities include: 

• Residential development; 

• Development of accessory 

structures; 

• Installation, repair, or alteration of 

septic systems; 

• Commercial and industrial 

development; 

• Public service facility construction; 

• Transportation projects; 

• Transportation maintenance and 

other work within County-owned road 

rights-of-way; 

• Landfill and solid waste 

management; 

• Water resources management; 

• Management of mitigation sites; and 

• County parks, trails, and land 

management. 

The covered activities would not 

include mining or forestry. The 

proposed covered activities are 

described further in the FEIS and in the 

HCP. 

The HCP includes measures to avoid, 

minimize, and mitigate impacts to 

covered species, along with an analysis 

of projected impacts to covered species. 

It is not practical to express the 

anticipated take (or to monitor takerelated impacts) in terms of number of 

individuals of each species; therefore, 

the HCP uses habitat, measured as 

habitat area or as ‘‘functional-acre’’ 

values, as a surrogate for quantifying 

impacts to each covered species and 

related conservation outcomes. The 

functional-acre approach weights 

habitat acreage with values for the 

covered species’ distribution, habitat 

condition, and landscape. This 

approach provides greater weight to 

both impacts and mitigation occurring 

in or near areas that are a priority for 

conservation of the covered species. 

Through the HCP, the county would 

permit or conduct covered activities that 

cause take of covered species, monitor 

the amount and extent of take, and 

establish mitigation on permanently 

protected sites to fully offset impacts of 

the taking on covered species. The HCP 

conservation program includes 

performance standards for conservation 

lands and measures to minimize the 

impacts of the activities on each species. 

Development and maintenance 

activities covered by the HCP will 

impact Mazama pocket gopher 

subspecies, when the activities occur 

within habitat in the ranges of the 

covered species. Fewer HCP-covered 

development and maintenance activities 

will impact the Oregon spotted frog, the 

Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly, and the 

Oregon vesper sparrow, because they 

have relatively localized ranges in 

Thurston County and, as a consequence, 

they are likely to be exposed to fewer 

instances of the covered activities. 

Measures to minimize impacts of the 

taking on covered species include 

reducing the extent of habitat impacts 

through within-site project design, along 

with additional species-specific 

measures for each group of covered 

activities, as described in the HCP. To 

mitigate for unavoidable impacts to 

covered species, Thurston County 

proposes to permanently protect and 

manage habitat occupied by covered 

species by establishing new permanent 

habitat reserves, acquiring permanent 

conservation easements on working 

lands, and enhancing and permanently 

maintaining habitat quality on existing 

reserves (collectively ‘‘conservation 

lands’’). The addition of conservation 

lands to the HCP conservation lands 

network would occur incrementally 

during HCP implementation at a pace 

that meets or exceeds the impacts to 

each covered species. 

The HCP includes funding 

assurances, monitoring, an adaptive 

management process, and changed 

circumstance provisions to help ensure 

that the conservation program achieves 

the biological goals for the covered 

species. Annual reports would confirm 

the amount, type, and location of 

impacts and mitigation, as well as the 

status of monitoring, adaptive 

management, changed circumstances, 

and funding. The proposed conservation 

program and expected effects of HCP 

implementation on the covered species 

and their habitats are described in 

greater detail in the HCP and in the 

FEIS. If the ITP is approved, the HCP is 

expected to be implemented for 30 

years, and lands conserved in 

accordance with the HCP would be 

permanently maintained for the covered 

species. 

Endangered Species Act 

Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ‘‘take’’ 

of fish and wildlife species listed as 

endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C. 

1538 and 16 U.S.C. 1533, respectively). 

The ESA implementing regulations 

extend, under certain circumstances, the 

prohibition of take to threatened species 

(50 CFR 17.31). Under section 3 of the 

ESA, the term ‘‘take’’ means to ‘‘harass, 

harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, 

trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to 

engage in any such conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 

1532(19)). The term ‘‘harm’’ is defined 

by regulation as ‘‘an act which actually 

kills or injures wildlife. Such act may 

include significant habitat modification 

or degradation where it actually kills or 

injures wildlife by significantly 

impairing essential behavioral patterns, 

including breeding, feeding, or 

sheltering’’ (50 CFR 17.3). 

Under section 10(a) of the ESA, the 

Service may issue permits to authorize 

incidental take of listed fish and 

wildlife species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is 

defined by the ESA as take that is 

incidental to, and not the purpose of, 

carrying out an otherwise lawful 

activity. Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA 

contains provisions for issuing ITPs to 

non-Federal entities for the take of 

endangered and threatened species, 

provided the following criteria are met: 

• The taking will be incidental; 

• The applicant will, to the maximum 

extent practicable, minimize and 

mitigate the impact of such taking; 

• The applicant will ensure that 

adequate funding for the plan will be 

provided; 

• The taking will not appreciably 

reduce the likelihood of the survival 

and recovery of the species in the wild; 

and 

• The applicant will carry out any 

other measures that the Service may 

require as being necessary or 

appropriate for the purposes of the HCP. 

Anticipated Permits and Authorizations 

In addition to the requested ITP, 

Thurston County will manage covered 

activities to comply with all other 

applicable laws, including, without 

limitation, Washington State 

endangered and protected species 

regulations; the Washington State 

Growth Management Act, which 

includes State and local protection of 

historic and cultural resources 

implemented through the County’s 

comprehensive plan; the Washington 

State Shoreline Management Act; the 

Washington State Hydraulic Code; 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2022 / Notices 29363 

Thurston County critical area 

ordinances; State and local 

requirements for administrative 

procedures; and other regulations. 

Individual projects conducted under the 

HCP will undergo individual review by 

the County for compliance with local 

codes, and further public review, as 

appropriate, through the Washington 

SEPA. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

In compliance with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.), the Service prepared a 

FEIS, in which we analyze the effects of 

the proposed action and a reasonable 

range of alternatives to the proposed 

action. The environmental 

consequences of each alternative, 

including the effects of those 

alternatives when combined with 

reasonably foreseeable future actions 

and environmental trends, were 

analyzed to determine if significant 

impacts to the human environment 

would occur. Three alternatives are 

analyzed in detail in the FEIS. 

Alternative 1—No-Action Alternative: 

The Service would not issue incidental 

take authorization to the County, and 

the County would not implement the 

HCP. The County would continue to 

conduct, permit, and approve activities 

on a case-by-case basis in compliance 

with Federal, State, and local 

requirements, including the Thurston 

County Critical Areas code. The County 

and individual project proponents 

would continue to evaluate each project 

to ensure avoidance of unauthorized 

take of listed species. The County would 

not implement a coordinated, Countywide conservation program for ESAlisted species. This alternative is the 

current situation in Thurston County. 

Alternative 2—Proposed Action: The 

Service would, in accordance with 

applicable law, issue the requested ITP 

to Thurston County for the incidental 

take of covered species by the covered 

activities. The County would implement 

the Thurston County HCP and its 

conservation program, including, 

without limitation, implementation of 

measures to minimize effects of covered 

activities, mitigation measures to fully 

offset the impacts of the taking on 

covered species, and monitoring and 

reporting. The County would also 

ensure funding for HCP 

implementation. Under the proposed 

action, the County would mitigate for 

the impacts of the taking on covered 

species, in part, through the execution 

of conservation easements on working 

agricultural lands, the enhancement of 

existing conservation reserves, and the 

establishment and management of new 

conservation reserves. The proposed 

action is the Service’s agency-preferred 

alternative because it provides a 

practical approach for durable 

conservation outcomes in the permit 

area. 

Alternative 3—Modified HCP: The 

Service would, in accordance with 

applicable law, issue an ITP to Thurston 

County with the same permit area, 

permit term, covered species, and 

covered activities, and many of the HCP 

elements described in the proposed 

action. This alternative explores 

whether the HCP could be modified to 

provide higher conservation value to 

covered species by acquiring new 

habitat reserves and managing them to 

achieve the highest habitat quality. 

Under this alternative, the County 

would mitigate for the impacts of the 

taking on covered species solely through 

the establishment and management of 

new conservation reserves. The County 

would not execute conservation 

easements on working agricultural 

lands, or include the enhancement of 

existing conservation reserves in the 

mitigation strategy. Under this 

alternative, fewer acres of new 

conserved habitat may be needed to 

fully offset the impacts of the taking to 

covered species. 

Public Involvement 

The Service published a notice of 

intent to prepare an EIS, opening public 

scoping periods on March 20, 2013 (78 

FR 17224), and on October 16, 2020 (85 

FR 65861). A public meeting was held 

during the 2013 public scoping period, 

and two public meetings were held 

during the 2020 public scoping period. 

Additionally, Thurston County 

conducted numerous stakeholder 

meetings during development of the 

HCP between 2013 and 2021. In 

consideration of comments, 

information, alternatives, and analyses 

received through public scoping, the 

Service and the County jointly prepared 

a DEIS and opened concurrent 45-day 

public comment periods on the DEIS 

and draft HCP on September 24, 2021 

(86 FR 53111; Washington Department 

of Ecology SEPA# 202105300), under 

NEPA, ESA section 10(c), and SEPA, as 

applicable. Two virtual public meetings 

were held during the comment period. 

The comment period ended on 

November 8, 2021. Considering all 

comments received by the Service and 

County together, a total of 33 public 

comments were received during the 

DEIS comment period, including 

duplicates. 

In preparation of the FEIS, the Service 

and the County considered all of the 

public comments on the DEIS together, 

in accordance with the requirements of 

NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and 

pursuant to the Council on 

Environmental Quality’s implementing 

NEPA regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500– 

1508. 

EPA’s Role in the EIS Process 

The EPA is charged with reviewing all 

Federal agencies’ EISs and commenting 

on the adequacy and acceptability of the 

environmental impacts of proposed 

actions. Therefore, EPA is publishing a 

notice in the Federal Register 

announcing this FEIS, as required under 

section 309 of the Clean Air Act. EPA’s 

notices are published on Fridays. EPA 

serves as the repository (EIS database) 

for EISs prepared by Federal agencies. 

You may search for EPA comments on 

EISs, along with EISs themselves, at 

https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/ 

public/action/eis/search. 

Public Review 

We are not requesting public 

comments on the FEIS and HCP, but any 

written comments received will become 

part of the public record associated with 

this action. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can request in your comment that 

we withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. All submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

made available for public disclosure in 

their entirety. 

Next Steps 

The Service will evaluate the permit 

application, associated documents, and 

public comments in reaching a final 

decision on whether the application 

meets the requirements of an ITP (16 

U.S.C. 1539(a)(2)(B)). We will evaluate 

whether the proposed permit action 

would comply with section 7 of the ESA 

by conducting an intra-Service 

consultation (16 U.S.C. 1536). We will 

complete the required procedures under 

section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108). We 

will issue a record of decision and issue 

or deny the ITP no sooner than 30 days 

after publication of the EPA’s notice of 

availability of the FEIS in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with applicable 

timeframes established in 40 CFR 

1506.11. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
29364 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2022 / Notices 

Authority 

We provide this notice in accordance 

with the ESA and its implementing 

regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32) 

and NEPA and its implementing 

regulations (40 CFR 1506.6). 

Robyn Thorson, 

Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09596 Filed 5–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R4–ES–2022–N002; 

FXES11130900000C2–201–FF09E32000] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Status 

Reviews for 35 Southeastern Species 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; 

request for information. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, are initiating 5-year 

status reviews for 35 species under the 

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended. A 5-year review is an 

assessment of the best scientific and 

commercial data available at the time of 

the review. We are requesting 

submission of any such information that 

has become available since the previous 

status review for each species. 

DATES: To consider the information in 

our reviews, we must receive your 

comments or information on or before 

July 12, 2022. However, we will 

continue to accept new information 

about any listed species at any time. 

ADDRESSES: For instructions on how and 

where to request or submit information, 

see Request for New Information under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

General Information: Aaron Valenta, via 

phone at (404) 679–4144, via email at 

aaron_valenta@fws.gov, or via U.S. mail 

at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 

Century Boulevard, Atlanta, GA 30345. 

Species-Specific Information and 

Submission of Comments: Please refer to 

Request for New Information under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

Individuals in the United States who 

are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or 

have a speech disability may dial 711 

(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access 

telecommunications relay services. 

Individuals outside the United States 

should use the relay services offered 

within their country to make 

international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are 

initiating 5-year status reviews under 

the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for 

15 animal species and 20 plant species. 

A 5-year status review is based on the 

best scientific and commercial data 

available at the time of the review; 

therefore, we are requesting submission 

of any such information that has become 

available since the last review for the 

species, particularly information on the 

status, threats, and recovery of the 

species that may have become available. 

Why do we conduct 5-year reviews? 

Under the ESA, we maintain Lists of 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants (which we collectively refer 

to as the List) in title 50 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations at 50 CFR 17.11(h) 

(for wildlife) and 50 CFR 17.12(h) (for 

plants). Listed wildlife and plants can 

also be found at: http://ecos.fws.gov/ 

tess_public/pub/listedAnimals.jsp and 

http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public/pub/ 

listedPlants.jsp, respectively. Section 

4(c)(2)(A) of the ESA requires us to 

review each listed species’ status at least 

once every 5 years. Our regulations at 50 

CFR 424.21 require that we publish a 

notice in the Federal Register 

announcing species under active 

review; however, we may review the 

status of any species at any time based 

upon a petition or other information 

available to us. For additional 

information about 5-year reviews, refer 

to our fact sheet at: https://

www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/ 

recovery-overview.html. 

Which species are under review? 

This notice announces 5-year status 

reviews for the species listed in the 

table below. 

Common name/scientific name Contact person, email, 

phone 

Status 

(endangered or 

threatened) 

States where the species is 

known to occur 

Final listing rule 

(Federal Register 

citation and 

publication date) 

Contact’s mailing address 

ANIMALS 

Amphibians 

Waterdog, Black Warrior 

(=Sipsey Fork) (Necturus 

alabamensis).

Evan Collins, alabama@

fws.gov, 251–441–5181.

Endangered ..... Alabama ............................... 83 FR 257; 1/3/ 

2018.

USFWS, 1208B Main Street, 

Daphne, AL 36526. 

Birds 

Blackbird, yellow-shouldered 

(Agelaius xanthomus).

Jose ́ Cruz-Burgos, caribbean_es@fws.gov, 787– 

510–5206.

Endangered ..... Puerto Rico ........................... 41 FR 51019; 11/ 

19/1976.

USFWS, P.O. Box 491, 

Boquero ́n, PR 00622. 

Hawk, Puerto Rican sharpshinned (Accipiter striatus 

venator).

Iva ́n Llerandi-Roma ́n, caribbean_es@fws.gov, 787– 

510–5206.

Endangered ..... Puerto Rico ........................... 59 FR 46710; 9/9/ 

1994.

USFWS, P.O. Box 491, 

Boquero ́n, PR 00622. 

Nightjar, Puerto Rican 

(Caprimulgus noctitherus).

Jose ́ Cruz-Burgos, caribbean_es@fws.gov, 787– 

510–5206.

Endangered ..... Puerto Rico ........................... 38 FR 14678; 6/4/ 

1973.

USFWS, P.O. Box 491, 

Boquero ́n, PR 00622. 

Fishes 

Darter, boulder (Etheostoma 

wapiti).

Todd Shaw, cookeville@

fws.gov, 931–528–6481.

Endangered ..... Alabama, Tennessee ........... 53 FR 33996; 9/1/ 

1988.

USFWS, 446 Neal Street, 

Cookeville, TN 38501. 

Darter, pearl (Percina aurora) Matt Wagner, mississippi_

field_office@fws.gov, 601– 

321–1130.

Threatened ...... Mississippi ............................ 82 FR 43885; 9/20/ 

2017.

USFWS, 6578 Dogwood 

View Pkwy., Jackson, MS 

39213. 

Madtom, pygmy (Noturus 

stanauli).

Kerri Dikun, cookeville@

fws.gov, 931–528–6481.

Endangered ..... Tennessee ............................ 58 FR 25758; 4/27/ 

1993.

USFWS, 446 Neal Street, 

Cookeville, TN 38501. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1