alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09996]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Computer and 
Information Science and Engineering (#1115).
    Date and Time: May 16, 2022-11:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (Eastern); May 17, 
2022-11:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. (Eastern)
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual).
    Virtual meeting attendance only; to attend the virtual meeting, 
please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d5e50584e4e5c507d534e5b135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="beddd3dbcdcddfd3fed0cdd890d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Persons: KaJuana Mayberry, National Science Foundation, 
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8900; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5beb8b4acb7b0a7a7ac95bba6b3fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b00060a12090e1919122b05180d450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and counsel 
on major goals and policies pertaining to Computer and Information 
Science and Engineering programs and activities.

Agenda

<bullet> NSF and CISE update
<bullet> NASEM report on responsible computing research
<bullet> NSF activities towards geography of innovation

    Reason for Late Notice: Due to the unforeseen scheduling 
complications and the necessity to proceed with CISE updates and the 
NASEM reports to the committee.

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-09996 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Syed Nazim ALI, petitioner, v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.

No. 18-7925.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,350
<INVENTORY>                                    101,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               297,876
<PP&E>                                         620,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 961,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       392,037
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   961,944
<SALES>                                         30,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,177
<CGS>                                           24,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    00
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,773
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Arthur W. Zafiropoulo, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                       the QuarterlyReport of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October2, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

•                       the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Arthur W. Zafiropoulo* |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Arthur Zafiropoulo         |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    |

 

----

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Ultratech, Inc. and will beretained by Ultratech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

----
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, petitioner, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al.

No. 18-670.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 11
                 Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                          Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
                                            March 31, 1998     March 31, 1997
                                          ------------------ -------------------
Basic Net Income(Loss) per Common Share:
Numerator:
   Net income(loss) for the period               $ (389,186)         1,114,242
   Series A Preferred Stock Dividends               (75,000)           -
                                                     ------           --------
   Net income(loss) attributable to 
     common shares                                $ (464,186)         1,114,242
                                                 ===========         =========
Denominator:
   Actual common shares outstanding:
      Beginning of period                          1,897,780          1,771,127
       End of period                               1,897,780          1,771,127
       Weighted average for the period
        (Based on the actual time which 
          the incremental shares, if any,
           were outstanding)                       1,897,780          1,771,127
                                                    =========          =========

Basic net income(loss) per common share           $    (0.24)              0.63
                                                        =====              =====


Diluted Net Income(Loss) per Common Share:
Numerator:
  Net income(loss) attributable to common  
   shares                                          $ (464,186)        1,114,242
                                                  ===========          =========
Denominator:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding        1,897,780         1,771,127
  Effect of common share equivalents resulting 
    from "in-the-money" stock options outstanding
    during the period                                     -  *           50,867
                                                    -----------       ---------

  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares used to calculate
    diluted net income(loss)  per common share      1,897,780         1,821,994
                                                    =========         =========

Diluted net income(loss) per common share            $  (0.24)             0.61
                                                        =====             =====


*    Note: The assumed conversion of the convertible debentures and the Series A
     preferred  stock  and the  effect  of  "in-the-money"  stock  options  were
     excluded from the 1998  computation of diluted net  income(loss)  per share
     because the effects are antidilutive.
LeShawn LAWSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6310.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Order filed, September 02, 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00482

- CV

____________ KEN BIGHAM AND TRACY HOLLISTER , Appellant

V.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVI RONMENTAL LLC, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th Dist rict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 55020



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 13, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On July 22, 2016, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Michelle Tucker , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this o rder

. No further extension will beentertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Michelle Tucker does not tim ely file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Lamar C. CHAPMAN, III, petitioner, v. Barack Hussein OBAMA.

No. 18-8335.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

*1608Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Angel L. ZENQUIS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9586.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Ronald Xie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KT of China NetTV Holdings,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  April 21, 2004


/s/ Ronald Xie
-----------------------
Ronald Xie,
President, CEO & Director
EXHIBIT 32.2


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Form  10-KSB of DOMAIN  REGISTRATION,  CORP.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Scott Curtis  Nilson,  Treasurer,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Director of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 14, 2006


/s/ SCOTT CURTIS NILSON
______________________________________
Scott Curtis Nilson
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DOMAIN REGISTRATION CORP. AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY DOMAIN  REGISTRATION  CORP.  AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Juan Ramone LOPEZ, petitioner, v. Jeff NOBLE, Warden.

No. 18-7781.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
John TEDESCO, petitioner, v. MONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al.

No. 18-6509.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      133,931
COMMITMENTS
  21,633   16,257   29,346   66,735   74,841  117,714  120,444   16,217   13,487

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -13,772)
   2,925   -5,442   -1,697  -14,746   -5,276  -13,518  -12,415     -254   -1,357

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    16.2     12.1     21.9     49.8     55.9     87.9     89.9     12.1     10.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       81)
      26       23       29       22       23       67       63
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/18/10                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:       96,971
COMMITMENTS
   2,403    9,777    3,531   78,042   68,787   83,976   82,095   12,995   14,876

CHANGES FROM 05/11/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,157)
   1,327      708     -972    4,962    7,159    5,317    6,895    3,840    2,262

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     2.5     10.1      3.6     80.5     70.9     86.6     84.7     13.4     15.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       50)
       3       16       10       25       29       36       47
```

----

Updated May 27, 2010
Leonard Burton JONES, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-8308.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Compressor
Company (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John
E. Jackson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ John E. JacksonName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)Date:
    
    November  4, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing. 48
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 08/16/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      199,173
COMMITMENTS
  26,095   26,926   58,248   91,513   91,657  175,856  176,831   23,317   22,342

CHANGES FROM 08/09/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        118)
   1,294    1,782    7,443  -10,802   -8,731   -2,065      494    2,183     -376

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.1     13.5     29.2     45.9     46.0     88.3     88.8     11.7     11.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      111)
      38       20       59       30       30      103       96
```

----

Updated August 19, 2011
Evangelisto RAMOS, petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-5924.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted, and G. Ben Cohen, Esq., of New Orleans, Louisiana, is appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40335

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MITCHELL LYNN NEWTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-CR-51-1

_______________________________________

November 19, 1997

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mitchell Lynn Newton appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine

base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Newton contends that the district court erred by

enhancing his base offense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 for reckless

endangerment during flight. 
We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the district court’s

application of § 3C1.2 was not clearly erroneous. Newton, while resisting arrest, “recklessly created

a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person . . . .” when he accelerated his

vehicle in reverse toward a police officer. See § 3C1.2. 

AFFIRMED.