alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Zvi Alon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/ Zvi AlonName:

Zvi AlonTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Michael
Peckham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetManage, the Periodic Report, for the period ended June 30,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company
at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



By:

/s/ Michael PeckhamName:

Michael PeckhamTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Laurence Arthur BATES, et ux., petitioners, v. VILLAGE OF PENTWATER, MICHIGAN.

No. 17-1651.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
Vicky Ware BEY, petitioner, v. Joseph PONTE, et al.

No. 18-8290.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Jerry Lynn LOFTON, petitioner, v. MISSISSIPPI.

No. 18-8120.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER]   1,000
Part II.  Other information,   Item 6a.
Exhibit 11.1

                              INPUT SOFTWARE, INC.
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              Six Months Ended    Six Months Ended
                                 June 30,            June 30,
                             ------------------- -------------------
                               1999      1998      1999      1998
                             --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S>                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)...........     $185      $219      $312   ($2,391)
                             ========= ========= ========= =========

Shares used in basic EPS
 calculation................    4,475     5,953     4,592     6,163

Dilutive effect of stock
 options....................        9        83        10        53
                             --------- --------- --------- ---------
Shares used in diluted EPS
 calculation................    4,484     6,036     4,602     6,216
                             ========= ========= ========= =========

Basic EPS...................    $0.04     $0.04     $0.07    ($0.39)

Diluted EPS.................    $0.04     $0.04     $0.07    ($0.39)
                             ========= ========= ========= =========

</TABLE>
Options outstanding at June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998 of 1.5 million a
1.3 million respectively, were not included in the computation of dilut
EPS decause exercise price was greater than the average market price.
Gary Ray BOWLES, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9348.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
- 606 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

296 Nebraska Report

STATE v. ARTIS

Cite as 296 Neb. 606

State of Nebraska, appellee, v.

Tareik Q. Artis, appella

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed May 5, 2017. No. S-16-464.

supplemental opin

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: Lor

A. Maret, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinio

modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, Sarah E. Marfisi, 

and Nathan A. Liss for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel,

Kelch, and Funke,

Per Curiam

Case No. S-16-464 is before this court on the appellee’s motion for rehearing concerning our opinion in State v. 

Artis.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we modify the original 

opinion as follows: In the section entitled “V. ANALYSIS,” 

under subheading “2. Plain Error,” subsection “(a) Arti

Sentence Is Indeterminate,” we withdraw the third and fourth 

sentences of the single paragraph of that subsection, which 

now reads:

1 State v. Artis, ante p. 172, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2017).

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

07/27/2017 12:10 AM CDT
- 607 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

296 Nebraska Report

STATE v. ARTIS

Cite as 296 Neb. 606

(a) Artis’ Sentence 

Is Indeterminate

[9-12] The State has mischaracterized Artis’ sentence 

of “not less than 2 years, nor more than 2 years” as a 

determinate sentence. A determinate sentence is imposed 

when the defendant is sentenced to a single term of years, 

such as a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment. See State v. 

White, 256 Neb. 536, 590 N.W.2d 863 (1999). In contrast, 

when imposing an indeterminate sentence, a sentencing 

court ordinarily articulates either a minimum term and 

maximum term or a range of time for which a defendant 

is to be incarcerated. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (Reissue 

2016); State v. White, supra. In Nebraska, the fact that the 

minimum term and maximum term of a sentence are the 

same does not affect the sentence’s status as an indeterminate sentence. See, State v. Marrs, 272 Neb. 573, 723 

N.W.2d 499 (2006); State v. Urbano, 256 Neb. 194, 589 

N.W.2d 144 (1999). Thus, we conclude that Artis’ sentence for his Class IV felony is an indeterminate sentence 

in which the minimum and maximum terms are the same. 

Such sentence complies with L.B. 1094’s requirement that 

the court impose an indeterminate sentence for a Class IV 

felony when that sentence is imposed consecutively with 

a Class IIA felony, and we therefore find no plain error in 

this regard.2

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modif

 Motion for rehearing overru

2 Id. at 179-80, ___ N.W.2d at ___.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeline, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles R. Osenbaugh, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| Date:  August   9, 2006 |   | /s/ Charles   R. Osenbaugh              |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                         |
|                              |   | Charles R.   Osenbaugh,                 |
|                              |   | President   and Chief Financial Officer |
Jeriton Lavar CURRY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7679.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 15

                          ACCOUNTANTS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the March 23, 1995 Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (formerly known as
Intercounty Bancshares, Inc.) of our report dated May 3, 2002 included with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002. Pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified within the
meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

May 3, 2002
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 01/04/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      149,094
COMMITMENTS
   5,457   26,853   29,920   92,719   72,811  128,096  129,583   20,999   19,511

CHANGES FROM 12/28/10 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      7,293)
   2,034    5,105     -152    2,779     -712    4,661    4,241    2,632    3,052

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     3.7     18.0     20.1     62.2     48.8     85.9     86.9     14.1     13.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      16       28       34       22       30       61       76
```

----

Updated January 7, 2011
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: July 28, 2006 /s/ John Weale     Name:      John R. Weale    Title:      Chief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)and is not being filed as part of the Report.
29
Eric Earl HOUK, petitioner, v. IOWA.

No. 17-9396.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Iowa denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 150

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to convey

cational purposes, and for other purposes.National Forest System lands for use for edu-
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 150

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to convey National

Forest System lands for use for educational purposes,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 150 EH

1 SECTION. 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Education Land Grant

3 Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM

5 LANDS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.

6 (a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—Upon application, the

7 Secretary of Agriculture may convey National Forest Sys8 tem lands for use for educational purposes if the Secretary

9 determines that—

10 (1) the entity seeking the conveyance will use

11 the conveyed land for a public or publicly funded ele12 mentary or secondary school, to provide grounds or

13 facilities related to such a school, or for both pur14 poses;

15 (2) the conveyance will serve the public interest;

16 (3) the land to be conveyed is not otherwise

17 needed for the purposes of the National Forest Sys18 tem; and

19 (4) the total acreage to be conveyed does not

20 exceed the amount reasonably necessary for the pro21 posed use.

22 (b) ACREAGE LIMITATION.—A conveyance under this

23 section may not exceed 80 acres. However, this limitation

24 shall not be construed to preclude an entity from submit25 ting a subsequent application under this section for an ad-
3

•HR 150 EH

1 ditional land conveyance if the entity can demonstrate to

2 the Secretary a need for additional land.

3 (c) COSTS AND MINERAL RIGHTS.—A conveyance

4 under this section shall be for a nominal cost. The convey5 ance may not include the transfer of mineral rights.

6 (d) REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS.—When the Secretary

7 receives an application under this section, the Secretary

8 shall—

9 (1) before the end of the 14-day period begin10 ning on the date of the receipt of the application,

11 provide notice of that receipt to the applicant; and

12 (2) before the end of the 120-day period begin13 ning on that date—

14 (A) make a final determination whether or

15 not to convey land pursuant to the application,

16 and notify the applicant of that determination;

17 or

18 (B) submit written notice to the applicant

19 containing the reasons why a final determina20 tion has not been made.

21 (e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If at any time after

22 lands are conveyed pursuant to this section, the entity to

23 whom the lands were conveyed attempts to transfer title

24 to or control over the lands to another or the lands are

25 devoted to a use other than the use for which the lands
4

•HR 150 EH

1 were conveyed, without the consent of the Secretary, title

2 to the lands shall revert to the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives June 8, 1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB&T Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006, dated the date of this Certification (the Report), I, Craig F. Fortin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ Craig F. Fortin                              
|                        |  | Craig F. Fortin                                  
|                        |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
----

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 September 2006 — Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union

(Case C-310/04) (1)

(Actions for annulment - Agriculture - Chapter 10a of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, inserted by Article 1(20) of Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 - Amendment of the support scheme for cotton - Condition that the area is maintained at least until the boll opening - Compliance with Protocol 4 on cotton annexed to the Act of Accession of the Hellenic Republic to the European Communities - Concept of production aid - Obligation to state reasons - Misuse of powers - General principles of proportionality and protection of legitimate expectations)

(2006/C 281/10)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez, Agent)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Balta and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Nolin and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Chapter 10a of Title IV of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003, inserted by Council Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 of 29 April 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and adapting it by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union (OJ 2004 L 161, p. 48) — Alteration of the support scheme in the cotton sector — Aid to producers divided into two parts (single payment and aid linked to cotton production)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 228, 11.9.2004.

----
ZOCDOC, INC., petitioner, v. Radha GEISMANN.

No. 18-1125.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Lourdes Margarita GARCIA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8482.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Samuel William MAINES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8775.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Angel GALAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8521.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Exhibit 11

                            NB&T Financial Group, Inc.
               Computation of Consolidated Earnings Per Common Share
          For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 and 2000
                 (in thousands, except shares and per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                For the Three Months      For the Nine Months
                                 Ended September 30,      Ended September 30,
                                    2001        2000          2001       2000

                            <c>        <c>           <c>        <c>

Net income (loss)              $    1,388 $     (132)   $    4,369 $    2,719
                                =========  =========     =========  =========
Weighted average common
  shares issued                 3,123,308  3,204,345     3,168,952  3,194,260

  Less-Unreleased common
   shares held by ESOP              6,785     11,357         8,227     12,301
                                ---------  ---------     ---------  ---------
  Weighted average number
   of shares outstanding
   used in the calculation
   of basic earnings per
   common share                 3,116,523  3,192,988     3,160,725  3,181,959

  Add - Dilutive effect of
   stock options (1)               15,526     14,668        14,409     12,007
                                ---------  ---------     ---------  ---------
Adjusted weighted average
number of shares outstanding
used in the calculation of
diluted earnings per common
share                           3,132,049  3,207,656     3,175,134  3,169,952
                                =========  =========     =========  =========
Basic earnings per common
 share                               $.45      $(.04)        $1.38       $.85

Diluted earnings per common
 share                                .45       (.04)         1.38        .84

<FN>
(1)  There is presently no active trading market for the Company's shares,
nor are the prices at which common shares have been traded published by any
national securities association or quotation service.  Fair value for
earnings per common share purposes was assumed to be $18.75 at June 30, 2001,
and $16.75 at September 30, 2000.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Sandy ANNABI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1251.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Ada Albors GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. William M. STERN, et al.

No. 18-8193.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District denied.
Henry E. GOSSAGE, petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD.

No. 18M149.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran denied.
# Official Journal C 87/13 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 87 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5813 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 87

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5813 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 087/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 1994 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2015/C 087/02 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  ) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 087/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 1994 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

1

2015/C 087/02

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (
  1
  )

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

9

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2015/C 087/03 | Corrigendum to Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC ( OJ C 54, 13.2.2015 ) | 12 |

Corrigenda

2015/C 087/03

Corrigendum to Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC ( OJ C 54, 13.2.2015 )

( OJ C 54, 13.2.2015 )

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Kelvin REED, petitioner, v. TENNESSEE.

No. 18-8721.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division denied.