alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1513 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1513

  To allow Federal employees to take advantage of the transportation 
    fringe benefit provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that are 
                 available to private sector employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 1999

Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Nadler) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow Federal employees to take advantage of the transportation 
    fringe benefit provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that are 
                 available to private sector employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CASH PAYMENT TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FOR PARKING SPACES.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee 
Flexibility Act of 1999''.
    (b) In General.--Section 7905 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2)(C) by inserting ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (3) by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (4); and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as 
                follows:
            ``(A) a qualified transportation fringe as defined in 
        section 132(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (C) in subparagraph (C) by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) taxable cash payment to an employee in lieu of an 
        agency-provided parking space.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEAH S. CALDWELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; et 

al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-17066 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01357-TLN-AC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Leah S. Caldwell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing her action alleging, among other violations, claims under the Civil 

Rights Act of 1866 and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-17066 

district court’s dismissal of an action as frivolous. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 

25, 33 (1992). We affirm. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Caldwell’s 

action as frivolous because the action lacked an arguable basis either in law or in 

fact. See id. at 31-33 (discussing the meaning of “frivolousness”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Caldwell’s 

complaint without leave to amend because amendment would be futile. See 

Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) 

(setting forth standard of review and explaining that a district court may dismiss 

without leave to amend when amendment would be futile).

We reject as without merit Caldwell’s contentions that the district court

should have disqualified itself, or permitted discovery or an evidentiary hearing. 

Caldwell’s motion to update the appellees is denied. 

AFFIRMED.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/01/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      195,802
COMMITMENTS
  59,989    7,656   30,417   72,025  129,588  162,431  167,661   33,371   28,141

CHANGES FROM 02/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -14,785)
  -1,624     -396   -2,273  -10,446   -8,745  -14,343  -11,414     -442   -3,371

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.6      3.9     15.5     36.8     66.2     83.0     85.6     17.0     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      203)
      74       18       47       59       83      151      137
```

----

Updated March 4, 2011
Exhibit






EXECUTION VERSION
CONSENT OF GRANTOR
Dated: January 30, 2019





Reference is made to the First Lien/First Lien Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2016, among Barclays Bank PLC (as successor in interest to Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch), as Collateral Agent, Barclays Bank PLC, as Authorized Representative under the Credit Agreement, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Initial Other Authorized Representative (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented, waived, or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Intercreditor Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Intercreditor Agreement.


The Grantor listed on Annex 1 hereto has read the foregoing Intercreditor Agreement and consents thereto. The Grantor agrees that it will not take any action that would be contrary to the express provisions of the foregoing Intercreditor Agreement, agrees to abide by the requirements expressly applicable to it under the foregoing Intercreditor Agreement and agrees that, except as otherwise provided therein, no First-Priority Secured Party shall have any liability to the Grantor for acting in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing Intercreditor Agreement. The Grantor confirms that the foregoing Intercreditor Agreement is for the sole benefit of the First-Priority Secured Parties and their respective successors and assigns, and that the Grantor is not an intended beneficiary or third party beneficiary thereof except to the extent otherwise expressly provided therein.


The Grantor agrees to take such further action and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments (in recordable form, if requested) as the Collateral Agent may reasonably request to effectuate the terms of and the lien priorities contemplated by the Intercreditor Agreement.


This Consent of Grantor shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Notices delivered to the Grantor pursuant to this Consent of Grantor shall be delivered in accordance with the notice provisions set forth in the Intercreditor Agreement.


[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]






























Doc#: US1:12559990v3










Annex I (Supplement No. 6)


	
		
	Grantor
	Jurisdiction of Organization

	Advanced Cabling Systems, LLC
	Arkansas






































































































A-1










IN WITNESS HEREOF, this Consent of Grantor is hereby executed by the Grantor as of the date first written  above.




	
						
	 
	 
	 
	ADVANCED CABLING SYSTEMS, LLC

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	  /s/ P. Gray Finney
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	Name:  P. Gray Finney
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	Title: Senior Vice President, 
Chief Legal Officer and 
Secretary


















































































[Signature Page to Consent of Grantor]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001080360
<NAME>                        Digital Video Display Techonology Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         2,079
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,090
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          791,679
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (558,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,190
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,261
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               708,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             19,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (717,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (717,113)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.031)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.031)



</TABLE>
Anthony DeNOMA, petitioner, v. John R. KASICH, Governor of Ohio, et al.

No. 17-9517.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                          34,077
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,404
<INVENTORY>                                    162,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,765
<PP&E>                                         235,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,720
<BONDS>                                        289,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   640,172
<SALES>                                        764,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               764,551
<CGS>                                          261,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  719,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,291
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (12,183)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Richard R. HUBBARD, petitioner, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC., et al.

No. 17-1711.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4010
<PP&E>                                           91275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (5600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  102015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            90100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                       10915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    102015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (12083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (12083)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
Ernest KING, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-8676.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

*1255Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Alex BAAH, petitioner, v. AT&T CORP., et al.

No. 17-6846.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Jeffrey Lee ATWATER, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9499.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0000909724
<NAME>                     The Leather Factory, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>               1


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                    jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                               392,554
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      2,289,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         150,000
<INVENTORY>                                                        8,211,813
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 11,644,596
<PP&E>                                                             3,174,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     2,245,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    17,492,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              8,226,748
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                              23,696
<OTHER-SE>                                                         9,053,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      17,492,447
<SALES>                                                            7,405,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   7,405,557
<CGS>                                                              3,834,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      3,834,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   2,778,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   169,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     617,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         233,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  383,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         383,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.04



</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

20 1 3 WY 155

October Term, A.D. 20 1 3

December 18, 2013

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL

RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING

STATE BAR,

Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT M. POWERS, WSB #6

- 3188,

Respondent. D

- 13

- 0008



### ORDER OF PUBLIC CENSURE

[¶1] Th is matter came before the Court upon a “Report and Recommendation for

Public Censure ,” filed herein November 14 , 20 1 3

, by the Board of Professional
Responsibility for the Wyoming State Bar , pursuant to Section 16 of the Disciplinary
Code for the Wyoming State Bar (stipulated discipline). The Court, after a careful review
of the Board of Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation and the file,
finds that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, confirmed and adopted
by the Court

, and that Respondent Scott M. Powers should be publicly censured for his

conduct . It is, therefore,

[¶2] ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the Board of Professional Responsibility’s
Report and Recommendation for Public Censure , which is atta ched hereto and
incorporated herein, shall be, and the same hereby is, approved, confirmed, and adopted
by this Court; and it is further

[¶3] ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that Scott M. Powers is hereby public ly censure d

for his conduct , which is described in the Report and Recommendation for Public

Censure

. The public censure shall include issuance of a press release consistent with the

one set out in the Report and Recommendation for Public Censure ; and it is further[¶4] ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 26 of the Disciplinary Code for the
Wyoming State Bar, M r

. Powers shall reimburse the Wyoming State Bar the amount of

$ 50

. 00 , representing the costs incurred in handling this matter

, as well as pay the

administrative fee of $500.0 0. M r

. Powers shall pay the total amount of $ 550

. 00 to the
Clerk of the Board of Professional Responsibility on or before Janu ary 3 1 , 20 1 4 ; and it is

further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall docket this Order of Public Censure,
along with the incorporated Report and Recommendation for Public Censure

, as a matter coming regularly before this Court as a public record; and it is further

[¶6] ORDERED that, purs uant to Section 4( a ) (iv) of the Disciplinary Code for the
Wyoming State Bar, this Order of Public Censure, along with the incorporated Report

and Recommendation for Public Censure

, shall be published in the Wyoming Reporter
and the Pacific Reporter ; and it is further

[¶7] ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court cause a copy of th is Order of Public
Censure to be served upon Respondent Scott M. Powers

.

[¶8] DATED this 1 8 th day of D e cember , 20 1 3

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

M AR ILYN S

. K IT E

Chief Justice
Alvin DAVIS, Jr., petitioner, v. LOUISIANA.

No. 18-8118.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit denied.
Eileen L. ZELL, petitioner, v. Katherine M. KLINGELHAFER, et al.

No. 18-1005.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Charles Ray HOOPER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8816.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
DEMETRIC JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3636

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 11, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Frank E. Sheffield, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.