alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    05-437              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.	CiItTyY oOfF ReEnNoO	   APPELLANT	

	V.

ArRvVeElL CoOrRpPoOrRaAtTiIoOnN aAnNdD B. StToOrRmM PhHiIlLlLiIpPsS OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEES

 TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED	

	----------

	FROM THE 415TH415TH DISTRICT         PROBATE COURT  NO. 2 OF PARKER                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the parties’ appellant’s’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss aAppealNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(12), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants [ [oOR the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL DB:  garGARDNER, DAUPHINIOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:    September 28, 2006  October 45, 2006September 268, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than June 13, 2022.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis*                     (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@stls.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Montgomery Bancorporation, Inc., Sikeston, Missouri;*                     to acquire Meramec Valley Bank, Valley Park, Missouri.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-10186 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210P
```

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Sokol, President of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
         ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  February 9, 2004

                               /s/ David L. Sokol
                              --------------------
                                 David L. Sokol
                             Chief Executive Officer
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41017

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE ALBERTO GARCIA-MEJIA, also known as Jose Alberto Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-837-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Alberto Garcia-Mejia

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. 

Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), which held that the 

sentence enhancement provided for in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a 

conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to commit a federal drug 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-41017 Document: 00513012951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-41017

trafficking offense. The unopposed motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-41017 Document: 00513012951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
Karyea WILLIAMS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8654.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Benny L. WILLIS, petitioner, v. Kenneth ROSS, et al.

No. 18-8635.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1491

___________ Federico Catalan Lamprea, * * Petitioner, * * v. * Petition for Review of an * Order of the Board of John Ashcroft, Attorney General, * Immigration Appeals. * Respondent. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: March 8, 2004 Filed: March 29, 2004

___________ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federico Lamprea, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). In his asylum application, Lamprea claimed that members of the New People’s Army (NPA) had tortured him mentally and physically for a number of years before he came to the United States because he wanted to withdraw his financial support for their cause, and that they would kill him if he was forced to return to the Philippines.-2- After careful review of the record, we deny the petition because substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the IJ’s conclusions. See Menendez-Donis v. Ashcroft , 02-3692, 2004 WL 307451, at *3 (8th Cir. Feb. 19, 2004) (standard of review). The IJ concluded Lamprea was not entitled to asylum because he had not demonstrated either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. Lamprea did not establish that the abduction incident and harassment he experienced in the Philippines was on account of his political opinion or any other characteristic that provides a basis for asylum, see Regalado-Garcia v. INS , 305 F.3d 784, 787-88 (8th Cir. 2002), and the government presented relevant evidence to show that it is possible to resettle within the Philippines to avoid credible NPA threats, see Perinpanathan v. INS , 310 F.3d 594, 599 n.1 (8th Cir. 2002). As Lamprea did not establish a clear probability of persecution or a likelihood of torture upon his return to the Philippines, his claims for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture also failed. See Kratchmarov v. Heston , 172 F.3d 551, 555 (8th Cir. 1999) (withholding-of-removal standard is more onerous than asylum standard, and requires showing clear probability of persecution); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2) (burden is on applicant to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured upon removal to proposed country). Accordingly, we deny the petition.

______________________________
In Re Curtis EVANS, petitioner.

No. 18-8006.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EIF HOLDINGS,
INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT'S
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                                 Page 14 of 14
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,262,314
<SECURITIES>                                 3,462,697
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,461,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                   318,536
<INVENTORY>                                    190,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,289,725
<PP&E>                                      15,341,332
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,445,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,802,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,360,541
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,019,246
<OTHER-SE>                                 (13,224,838)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,802,621
<SALES>                                     10,453,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,453,400
<CGS>                                        7,808,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,808,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,885,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             536,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                277,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            257,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   257,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 16, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60826 Conference Calendar

EVAN DOSS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RONALD MCALPIN, Office of the United States Trustee, EILEEN SHAFFER BAILEY; UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:02-CV-193-WS

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Evan Doss, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint against Eileen Shaffer Bailey, bankruptcy trustee for the estate of the Evan Doss, Jr., Corporation; Ronald McAlpin, Assistant United States Trustee; and the Office of the United States Trustee. Doss’s complaint alleged that Bailey and McAlpin engaged in “fraud, misrepresentation, and collusion” in their assignment of assets belonging to the bankruptcy estate of the Evan Doss, Jr., Corporation; that they wrongfully assignedNo. 03-60826 -2-

** 512 U.S. 477 (1994) certain corporate bankruptcy assets; and that their mishandling of the corporate bankruptcy estate caused Doss to be convicted of bankruptcy fraud. Although the district court dismissed Doss’s complaint for lack of standing and on grounds of res judicata, we note that Doss’s complaint implicates the validity of his criminal conviction and that it is, therefore, barred under Heck v. Humphrey
. ** See Randell v. Johnson , 227 F.3d 300, 301 (5th Cir. 2000). We AFFIRM the dismissal of Doss’s complaint as premature under Heck
. See Bickford v. Int’l Speedway Corp ., 654 F.2d 1028, 1031 (5th Cir. 1981). As this complaint is Doss’s third attempt to litigate the legality of the bankruptcy proceedings of the Evan Doss, Jr., Corporation, we WARN Doss that future meritless filings concerning this issue will result in the imposition of sanctions.
AFFIRMED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 11.1



                        IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
                    COMPARISON OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

 (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   
                                                    Quarter ended March 31,
                                                    -----------------------
                                                   1997                1996
                                                   ----                ----
    
                                               (unaudited)         (unaudited)
   
PRIMARY
    

Net income                                       $27,512             $27,044

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding    25,000,000          25,000,000

   
Dilutive Effect of Share Options               1,283,459           1,140,361

                                              ----------        ------------

    
   
    Total                                     26,283,459          26,140,361
    
                                              ----------        ------------

   
Net income per Common Share                        $1.05               $1.03
    

       
   
FULLY DILUTED                                        Quarter ended March 31,
                                                    -----------------------
                                                   1997                1996
                                                   ----                ----
                                               (unaudited)         (unaudited)

Net Income                                        $27,512            $27,044


Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding     25,000,000         25,000,000



Dilutive Effect of Share Options                1,346,576          1,140,361

                                               -----------------------------
Total                                          26,346,576         26,140,361
    
                                               -----------------------------


   
Net Income per Common Share                        $1.04              $1.03
    





                                       11
Frederick A. McSHAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8688.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-12608, 333-13716, 333-102247 and
333-138899) pertaining to securities offered under the employee stock option
plans of Delta Galil Industries Ltd. of our report dated March 30, 2007 relating
to the consolidated financial statements of Delta Galil Industries Ltd., which
appear in Delta Galil Industries Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2006. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated March 30, 2007, relating to the financial statement schedule,
which appears in such Annual Report on Form 20-F.




                                                   /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman
Tel-Aviv, Israel                                    Kesselman & Kesselman
March 30, 2007                                Certified Public Accountant (Isr.)
                                              A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers
                                                    International Limited
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Studio II Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Cheung Ming, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  Date:  June 29, 2010 /s/Cheung Ming     Chief Executive Officer
Jerry Lee WILLIAMS, Jr., petitioner, v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden.

No. 18-8135.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

______________________ 

2013-1133

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination 

No. 90/010,890.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SCOTT A. MCKEOWN, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, 

Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued 

for appellant. With him on the brief was ALEXANDER B.

ENGLEHART. 

MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, Office of the 

Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of 

Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on 

the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and

COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CLEVENGER, and TARANTO,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 16, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk
ANGELEX, LTD., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1017.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Edward SPEARS, petitioner, v. R & R CLEANING SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-8342.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dungannon International (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Ciccozzi,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
30th day of November 2004.


/s/ Gary Ciccozzi
-----------------------------
Gary Ciccozzi
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of API Nanotronics Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Pudles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stephen Pudles     
|Stephen Pudles         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 27, 2009