alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5
                                   ASSIGNMENT

     This Assignment ("Assignment") is entered into this 27th day of January,
2000 by and between Harry J. Tiffany, III ("Assignor") and CardXX, Inc., a
Nevada corporation ("Assignee").

                                    RECITALS

     A. Assignor is the owner and inventor of certain technology and
intellectual property ("IP") as described on Exhibit A attached hereto.

     B. Assignee desires to acquire rights to the IP upon the terms and
conditions set forth herein.

     C. Assignee is granting Assignor a security interest by a separate Security
Agreement of even date herewith (the "Security Agreement") in the IP to secure
the payment of the amounts due from Assignee to Assignor under this Assignment.

IT IS AGREED:

     1. Assignment. In consideration of the issuance and delivery of 700,000
shares of Assignee's common stock and a payment of $600,000 to be paid by
Assignee to Assignor on or before March 31, 2000 together with an additional
payment of $200,000 to be paid on or before January 1, 2001 (together with
interest on such cash payments from the date each payment is due until paid at
the rate of 10% per annum), Assignor hereby grants to Assignee and Assignee
hereby accepts an assignment of the IP. Assignor has supplied Assignee with
drawings, specifications, instructions, manuals and other documentation
pertaining to the IP which Assignee is currently using in the conduct of its
business. Assignor makes no express or implied warranties of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose and Assignee accepts the IP as is.

     2. Ownership. Assignor hereby represents and warrants that, to the best of
Assignor's knowledge and belief, Assignor is the legal and beneficial owner of
the IP free and clear of all liens or other encumbrances, pledges, assignments,
licenses and shop rights.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Assignment is made the date first above written.


                                        /s/ Harry J. Tiffany, III
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Harry J. Tiffany, III
Abukar Osman BEYLE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8467.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John R. Weale, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IPC Holdings, Ltd.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) [Omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release No. 33-8238]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: April 29, 2004       /s/ John R. Weale   John R. Weale Chief Financial Officer
27
Kevin C. ROTKISKE, petitioner, v. Paul KLEMM, et al.

No. 18-328.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR RAMIREZ-DIAZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72091

Agency No. A079-649-733

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Salvador Ramirez-Diaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of his request for a continuance. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a

FILED

JUL 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
continuance, and review de novo claims of due process violations. Sandoval-Luna

v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez-Diaz’s request

for a further continuance because he did not demonstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.29; Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009) (factors

considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance constitutes an abuse

of discretion include the nature of the evidence excluded as a result of the denial).

Accordingly, Ramirez-Diaz’s claim that he was denied a full and fair hearing

and deprived of his statutory right to counsel must fail. Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d

1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due

process claim). 

We reject Ramirez-Diaz’s contention that the BIA’s decision was

insufficient, where the agency invoked the applicable “good cause” legal standard

and cited pertinent legal authorities. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th

Cir. 2010) (agency need not “write an exegesis on every contention”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 

2 13-72091
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EDGAR Online, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg D. Adams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/    GREG D.
ADAMS                         
|                     |  |     |  | Greg D. Adams Chief Financial Officer and COO
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1280 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1280

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1999

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOY HANDGUNS

        The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall promulgate a rule 
in accordance with section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 
U.S.C. 2058) to declare as a banned hazardous product under section 8 
any toy which in size, shape, or overall appearance resembles a real 
handgun.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: July 28, 2006 /s/ James P. Bryce     Name:      James P. Bryce    Title:      Chief Executive Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)and is not being filed as part of the Report.
28
In Re LaShawn ANDERSON, petitioner.

No. 18-8110.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Mark O. WRIGHT, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-5027.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
John C. KILLINGBECK, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7824.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1492

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to provide for parity between private

entities and public entities with respect to civil actions against the entities

that arise from the ownership or operation of public water systems.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 20, 1999

Mr. GARY MILLER of California introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to provide for parity

between private entities and public entities with respect

to civil actions against the entities that arise from the

ownership or operation of public water systems.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC WATER SYS4 TEMS; PARITY BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRI5 VATE ENTITIES.

6 Part E of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C.

7 300j et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing section:
2

•HR 1492 IH

1 ‘‘CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS;

2 PARITY BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTITIES

3 ‘‘SEC. 1459. With respect to a civil action commenced

4 in Federal or State court against a private entity for a

5 claim arising from the ownership or operation by the enti6 ty of a public water system, the action shall be dismissed

7 in any circumstance in which the action would have been

8 dismissed if the private entity were a public entity that,

9 in the Federal or State jurisdiction involved, owned or op10 erated the public water system. This section applies not11 withstanding any other provision of Federal or State

12 law.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


Alloy, Inc.
151 West 26th Street
New York, NY 10001
Phone: 212.244.4307
Fax: 212.244.4311


May 1, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549-0408


LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Alloy, Inc. has
obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen")
stating that the January 31, 2002, audit was subject to their quality control
system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working
on the audit and availability of national office consultation. Availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

Very truly yours,


Alloy, Inc.

/s/ Samuel A. Gradess

Samuel A. Gradess
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
# Official Journal L 382/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 382 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6316 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 382

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6316 November 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1701 of 10 November 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1702 of 10 November 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 4 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1703 of 13 November 2020 on uniform conditions for the transmission of time series for the new regional breakdown pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 7 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1701 of 10 November 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1702 of 10 November 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

4

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1703 of 13 November 2020 on uniform conditions for the transmission of time series for the new regional breakdown pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

7

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
The RITZ-CARLTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Krishna NARAYAN, et al.

No. 17-694.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Hawaii denied.
Derrick SCOTT, petitioner, v. Allen STARK, et al.

No. 18-8365.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/17/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       54,876
COMMITMENTS
  21,072      997    2,096   18,605   38,274   41,773   41,367   13,103   13,509

CHANGES FROM 05/10/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:       -826)
     661     -534      -23   -1,560      287     -922     -270       96     -556

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    38.4      1.8      3.8     33.9     69.7     76.1     75.4     23.9     24.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       69)
      31        4        9       26       24       59       35
```

----

Updated May 20, 2011
# Den Europæiske Unions C 522A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 522A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 64. årgang28. december 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 522A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

64. årgang28. december 2021

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| 2021/C 522 A/01 | Berigtigelse til bekendtgørelse om ledig stilling PE/269/S — direktør (ansættelsesgruppe AD, lønklasse 14) — Generaldirektoratet for Sikkerhed og Beskyttelse — Direktoratet for Teknologi og Information ( EUT C 505 A af 15.12.2021 ) | 1 |

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

2021/C 522 A/01

Berigtigelse til bekendtgørelse om ledig stilling PE/269/S — direktør (ansættelsesgruppe AD, lønklasse 14) — Generaldirektoratet for Sikkerhed og Beskyttelse — Direktoratet for Teknologi og Information ( EUT C 505 A af 15.12.2021 )

( EUT C 505 A af 15.12.2021 )

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

| 28.12.2021 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 522/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2021

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 522/1

---

Berigtigelse til bekendtgørelse om ledig stilling PE/269/S — direktør (ansættelsesgruppe AD, lønklasse 14) — Generaldirektoratet for Sikkerhed og Beskyttelse — Direktoratet for Teknologi og Information

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 505 A af 15. december 2021
  )

(2021/C 522 A/01)

Side 7 og 8: Fodnoterne efter fodnote 5 (fodnote 1, 6, 7, 8 og 9) renummereres og bliver henholdsvis fodnote 6, 7, 8, 9 og 10.

---
Nathaniel BRENT, et al., petitioners, v. WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al.

No. 18-1045.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00244-CV

RUSSELL CALDWELL D/B/A 

RW CALDWELL CONSTRUCTION,

Appellant

v.

JACKIE WRIGHT,

Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 85781

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s Exhibits 77, 81, and 82, and Defendant’s Exhibit 119 were not included 

in the reporter’s record in this appeal. A notation in the exhibit volume of the reporter’s 

record indicates the exhibits were large and unable to be scanned.

Original exhibits are kept by the trial court clerk but upon the reporter’s request, 

are given to the reporter for use in preparing the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.
Caldwell v. Wright Page 2

34.6(g)(1). After copying the exhibits for inclusion in the reporter’s record, the reporter 

must return the exhibits to the trial court clerk. Id. If a person other than the trial court 

clerk possesses an original exhibit, we may order that person to deliver the exhibit to the 

trial court clerk. Further, on the motion of any party or on our own initiative, we may 

direct the trial court clerk to deliver to this Court any original exhibit. Id. (g)(2).

Because the trial court clerk retains possession of the original exhibits after the 

reporter has copied the exhibits to be used in the reporter’s record, see TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(g)(1), the trial court clerk should currently be in possession of all the original exhibits. 

Accordingly, the trial court clerk is ordered to send the original of Plaintiff’s Exhibits 77, 

81, and 82 and Defendant’s Exhibit 119 to this Court within 14 days from the date of this 

order. See id. (g)(2).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, and

Justice Davis

Order issued and filed May 5, 2016
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, James R. Zarley, the Chief Executive Officer of ValueClick, Inc. (the "Company") certify for the purposes of 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Dated: March 26, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/JAMES R. ZARLEYJames R. Zarley
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>




                               ULTRATECH STEPPER, INC.
                                           
                                     EXHIBIT 11.1
                                           
               STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                           

Shares used in the net income per common share computation are the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive common share
equivalents.

Shares used in the per share computation are as follows:

                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                   ---------------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)      March 31, 1997    March 31, 1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted average common shares outstanding            20,413            19,866

Common equivalent shares from stock
  options granted (using the treasury
    stock method)                                      1,115             1,359
                                               --------------     -------------

Number of shares used in per share
calculations                                          21,528            21,225
                                               --------------     -------------
                                               --------------     -------------

Net income                                            $4,533            $8,641
                                               --------------     -------------
                                               --------------     -------------

Net income per share                                   $0.21             $0.41
                                               --------------     -------------
                                               --------------     -------------






                                         21