alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Raynard Reginald BROWN, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-7684.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.0

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
The Keith Companies, Inc.:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-83097) on Form S-8 of The Keith Companies, Inc. of our report dated
February 4, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The Keith
Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity (deficit), and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-
K of The Keith Companies, Inc.

                                          KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
March 27, 2000
MONOCACY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY       EXHIBIT 11.0


                      Information used in the computation
                         of net income per common share





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Six Months Ended             Three Months Ended
                                                                June 30,                       June 30,
                                                          1998          1997            1998          1997
                                                          ----          ----            ----          ----
<S><C>
Basic:

Net income                                            $1,687,374    $1,245,664       $653,156       $578,423
                                                      ==========    ==========       ========       ========
Weighted average common shares outstanding             1,797,177     1,782,458      1,799,019      1,784,310
                                                       =========     =========      =========      =========

Net income per common share - basic                         $.94          $.70           $.36           $.33
                                                            ====          ====           ====           ====


Diluted:

Net income                                            $1,687,374    $1,245,664       $653,156       $578,423
                                                      ==========    ==========       ========       ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding             1,797,177     1,782,458      1,799,019      1,784,310
Adjustment for common stock equivalents                   50,881        29,407         50,881         29,978
                                                      ----------    ----------      ---------      ---------

Weighted average common shares outstanding             1,848,058     1,811,865      1,849,900      1,814,288
                                                       =========     =========      =========      =========

Net income per common share - diluted                       $.91          $.69           $.35           $.33
                                                            ====          ====           ====           ====
</TABLE>


                                       12
Frank MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8627.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Warren Scott TAYLOR, petitioner, v. VIRGINIA.

No. 18-8084.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
Markentz BLANC, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5212.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Jerry Allen HORN, petitioner, v. KANSAS.

No. 18-8147.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kansas denied.
##### 



Exhibit 11.1
 IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
   SharesNet Income (Loss)
    
    outstanding and
    
    Amount per(unaudited)
    
    equivalents
    
    ShareQuarter ended September 30, 2006:Basic EPS (available to common shareholders)
    
    $
    110,636
    
    
    
    63,646,666
    
    
    $
    1.74Diluted EPS
    
    $
    114,965
    
    
    
    71,855,963
    
    
    $
    1.60Quarter ended September 30, 2005:Basic EPS
    
    $
    (656,570
    )
    
    
    48,385,232
    
    
    $
    (13.57
    )Diluted EPS (no effect of options: anti-dilutive)
    
    $
    (656,570
    )
    
    
    48,385,232
    
    
    $
    (13.57
    )Nine months ended September 30, 2006Basic EPS (available to common shareholders)
    
    $
    273,493
    
    
    
    63,629,883
    
    
    $
    4.30Diluted EPS
    
    $
    286,434
    
    
    
    71,828,779
    
    
    $
    3.99Nine months ended September 30, 2005Basic EPS
    
    $
    (548,564
    )
    
    
    48,354,839
    
    
    $
    (11.34
    )Diluted EPS (no effect of options: anti-dilutive)
    
    $
    (548,564
    )
    
    
    48,354,839
    
    
    $
    (11.34
    )
 23
Frank Martin JACOBS, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 17-9024.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**§ 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Bruce Fetter, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of St. John Knits International, Incorporated; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: January 27, 2004
Exhibit 10.2

  

   

  

   

  

  
    Written Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation

     

    Each non-employee director is paid during each year a cash retainer of $55,000 (except the Lead Director, who receives a $60,000 retainer),
        plus grants of shares of the company’s common stock valued at $55,000 ($60,000 for the Lead Director).  The stock is granted under the company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and is immediately vested when granted.  The cash retainer and stock grants
        are paid on a quarterly basis on the first business day of October, January, April and July of each year during the director’s service on the board of directors.  The amount of cash paid each quarter is 25% of the yearly cash retainer, and the
        number of shares granted each quarter is the number of shares valued at 25% of the yearly stock grant amount, to be determined with reference to the closing price of the company’s common stock on the quarterly grant date, with partial shares
        rounded to the nearest whole number of shares.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Gary J. Yusko      
|Gary J. Yusko          
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 1, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 11, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 11, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0092. FIRST KEY HOMES OF GEORGIA, LLC et al. v. KOBREE ROBINSON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

21A03630
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Howard Thomson, Chief Financial Officer of Worldbid
Corporation (the Registrant), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, for
      the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                                    



| | By:    | /s/ Howard Thomson     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON         
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | August 14, 2006        





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1494

KOFI AMAKONA,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: March 18, 2010 Decided: May 17, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kofi Amakona, Petitioner Pro Se. Carol Federighi, Senior 

Litigation Counsel, Theo Nickerson, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kofi Amakona, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for 

relief from removal. 

Amakona challenges the determination that he failed to 

establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a 

determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must 

show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no 

reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of 

persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 

(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude 

that Amakona fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary 

result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Amakona cannot 

meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. 

Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. 

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we uphold 

the finding below that Amakona did not demonstrate eligibility 

for protection under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 

C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2), (3) (2009). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Titan Energy Worldwide, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey W. Flannery, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 1 ; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: March 20, 2014





/s/ Jeffrey W. Flannery
 Jeffrey W. Flannery
 Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer




1 As disclosure herein the Company’s Consolidated Financial statements included in this filing have not been audited by an independent accountant with professional standards for conducting such audit. Accordingly, the Company’s is not in compliance with rules and regulation of S-X,
Ikemefula Charles IBEABUCHI, petitioner, v. Mikel STEINFELD.

No. 18-7957.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Michael HOPSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7802.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud
Accountability Act of 2002, Geoffrey G. Ribar hereby certifies to the best of
his knowledge as follows:

     He is the duly appointed Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of
Asyst Technologies, Inc., a California corporation (the "COMPANY").

     The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the
"PERIODIC REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 12th
day of November, 2002.

                                                 /s/ Geoffrey G. Ribar
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       GEOFFREY G. RIBAR, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT,
                                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Carl J. WAGNER, petitioner, v. Tammy FORD, Warden.

No. 17-9514.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 192/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 192 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5721 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 192

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5721 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 192/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7260 — CPPIB/G&M/Enagas/Tecgas) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 192/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7260 — CPPIB/G&M/Enagas/Tecgas) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2014/C 192/02 | Council Decision of 16 June 2014 appointing half of the members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 192/03 | Euro exchange rates | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2014/C 192/02

Council Decision of 16 June 2014 appointing half of the members of the Management Board of the European Food Safety Authority

2

European Commission

2014/C 192/03

Euro exchange rates

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 192/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7222 — Enercon Independent Power Producer/Gothaer Leben Renewables/Skogberget Vind) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |
| 2014/C 192/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7181 — BNP Paribas Fortis / Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 192/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7222 — Enercon Independent Power Producer/Gothaer Leben Renewables/Skogberget Vind) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

2014/C 192/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7181 — BNP Paribas Fortis / Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I,
Todd G. Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Ditech Networks, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: July 1, 2009

/s/TODD G. SIMPSON, PHD Todd G. Simpson, PhD Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks