alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1497

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 20, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business

AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Act with respect to the

women’s business center program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1497 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Business

3 Centers Sustainability Act of 1999’’.

4 SEC. 2. PRIVATE NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

5 Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656)

6 is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (a)—

8 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and

9 (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and

10 (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the

11 following:

12 ‘‘(2) the term ‘private nonprofit organization’

13 means an entity described in section 501(c) of the

14 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that is exempt from

15 taxation under section 501(a) of such Code;’’; and

16 (2) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘nonprofit’’

17 after ‘‘private’’.

18 SEC. 3. INCREASED MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT AND RE19 VIEW OF WOMEN’S BUSINESS CENTERS.

20 Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656)

21 is amended—

22 (1) by striking subsection (h) and inserting the

23 following:

24 ‘‘(h) PROGRAM EXAMINATION.—

25 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administration shall—
3

HR 1497 RFS

1 ‘‘(A) develop and implement procedures to

2 annually examine the programs and finances of

3 each women’s business center established pur4 suant to this section, pursuant to which each

5 such center shall provide to the

6 Administration—

7 ‘‘(i) an itemized cost breakdown of ac8 tual expenditures for costs incurred during

9 the preceding year; and

10 ‘‘(ii) documentation regarding the

11 amount of matching assistance from non12 Federal sources obtained and expended by

13 the center during the preceding year in

14 order to meet the requirements of sub15 section (c) and, with respect to any in-kind

16 contributions described in subsection (c)(2)

17 that were used to satisfy the requirements

18 of subsection (c), verification of the exist19 ence and valuation of those contributions;

20 and

21 ‘‘(B) analyze the results of each such ex22 amination and, based on that analysis, make a

23 determination regarding the viability of the pro24 grams and finances of each women’s business

25 center.
4

HR 1497 RFS

1 ‘‘(2) EXTENSION OF CONTRACTS.—In deter2 mining whether to extend or renew a contract with

3 a women’s business center, the Administration—

4 ‘‘(A) shall consider the results of the most

5 recent examination of the center under para6 graph (1); and

7 ‘‘(B) may withhold such extension or re8 newal, if the Administration determines that—

9 ‘‘(i) the center has failed to provide

10 any information required to be provided

11 under clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph

12 (1)(A), or the information provided by the

13 center is inadequate; or

14 ‘‘(ii) the center has failed to provide

15 any information required to be provided by

16 the center for purposes of the report of the

Administration under subsection (j), or the
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 3.9

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         GENERAC PORTABLE PRODUCTS, INC.



        Generac Portable Products, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Corporation"),

        DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

        FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation on June 9, 2000,
duly adopted resolutions setting forth a proposed amendment of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling for it to be submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

                RESOLVED, that the Corporation's Restated Certificate of
        Incorporation be, and the same hereby is, amended by deleting ARTICLE
        FOURTH in its entirety and replacing it in its entirety to read as
        follows:

                FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of capital
        stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Thirty-Two
        Thousand (32,000), of which Twelve Thousand (12,000) shares shall be
        Common Stock, with a par value of one cent ($0.01) per share, and Twenty
        Thousand (20,000) shall be Preferred Stock, with a par value of one cent
        ($0.01) per share.



        SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly
called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law at which meeting the number of shares as required by
statute were voted in favor of said amendment.

        THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

        FOURTH: That said amendment shall be effective on the date this
Certificate of Amendment is filed and accepted by the Delaware Secretary of
State.


<PAGE>   2


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by Eric R. Wilkinson, its President, and Richard A. Aube, its Secretary,
this 28th of June, 2000.


                                         By:        /s/ Eric R. Wilkinson
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Eric R. Wilkinson
                                                    President

                                         Attest:    /s/ Richard A. Aube
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Richard A. Aube
                                                    Secretary
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/21/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      171,924
COMMITMENTS
  53,449   10,017   18,903   77,144  113,340  149,496  142,260   22,428   29,664

CHANGES FROM 06/14/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,825)
  -3,091     -882      744     -145   -4,848   -2,492   -4,986   -1,333    1,161

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.1      5.8     11.0     44.9     65.9     87.0     82.7     13.0     17.3

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      179)
      58       23       52       63       71      142      133
```

----

Updated June 24, 2011
Jose AMADOR and Diana Mekaeil, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7219.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,719
<INVENTORY>                                    143,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               385,312
<PP&E>                                         796,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                 107,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,271,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       481,531
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,271,468
<SALES>                                         92,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,581
<CGS>                                           69,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,410
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
Marcos LOPEZ-GUZMAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8632.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Cedrick Euron DRAPER, petitioner, v. MUY PIZZA SOUTHEAST LLC, dba Pizza Hut.

No. 18-8008.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
John LAAKE, petitioner, v. TURNING STONE RESORT CASINO.

No. 18-7404.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Phillip B. LEISER, et al., petitioners, v. Donald W. LEMON, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia, et al.

No. 18-1205.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

*2618Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Paul William HILTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9053.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Ferlando ESCO, petitioner.

No. 18-5236.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
# Official Journal C 179A/2 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 179A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 582 June 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 179A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 582 June 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2015/C 179A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/277/14 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of audit | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2015/C 179A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/277/14 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of audit

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MONTANA NIXON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 155 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
- 606 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S 296 N ebraska R eport STATE v . ARTIS Cite as 296 Neb. 606



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### .

T

areik 

### Q. A rtis 

### , appella ___ N.W.2d ___
Filed May 5, 2017. No. S-16-464.

suppleme n tal opi n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: L or 

### A

. M aret 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinio modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, Sarah E. Marfisi, and Nathan A. Liss for appellee.

H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., W right 

### , M iller



### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , K el c h 

### , and F u n ke 

### ,

P er 

### C uriam 

### Case No. S-16-464 is before this court on the appel

lee’s motion for rehearing concerning our opinion in State v. Artis

. 1 

### We overrule the motion, but we modify the original opinion as follows: In the section entitled “V. ANALYSIS,” under subheading “ 2. P lai n 

### E rror 

### ,” subsection “(a) Arti Sentence Is Indeterminate,” we withdraw the third and fourth sentences of the single paragraph of that subsection, which now reads:

1 State v. Artis, ante p. 172, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2017). Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/27/2017 12:10 AM CDT- 607 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S 296 N ebraska R eport STATE v . ARTIS Cite as 296 Neb. 606



### (a) Artis’ Sentence

Is Indeterminate [9-12] The State has mischaracterized Artis’ sentence of “not less than 2 years, nor more than 2 years” as a determinate sentence. A determinate sentence is imposed when the defendant is sentenced to a single term of years, such as a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment. See State v. White , 256 Neb. 536, 590 N.W.2d 863 (1999). In contrast, when imposing an indeterminate sentence, a sentencing court ordinarily articulates either a minimum term and maximum term or a range of time for which a defendant is to be incarcerated. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (Reissue 2016); State v. White, supra . In Nebraska, the fact that the minimum term and maximum term of a sentence are the same does not affect the sentence’s status as an indeter

minate sentence. See, State v. Marrs , 272 Neb. 573, 723 N.W.2d 499 (2006); State v. Urbano , 256 Neb. 194, 589 N.W.2d 144 (1999). Thus, we conclude that Artis’ sen

tence for his Class IV felony is an indeterminate sentence in which the minimum and maximum terms are the same. Such sentence complies with L.B. 1094’s requirement that the court impose an indeterminate sentence for a Class IV felony when that sentence is imposed consecutively with a Class IIA felony, and we therefore find no plain error in this regard. 2 

### The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modif 

### M otio n for reheari n g overru

2 Id. at 179-80, ___ N.W.2d at ___.
Exhibit 99(a)


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with The Beard Company's (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William M. Beard,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


Date:  11-13-2002                            By: WILLIAM M. BEARD
                                                 William M. Beard
                                                 Chairman of the Board and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
REPUBLIC OF KOREA'S DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION, et al., petitioners, v. BAE SYSTEMS SOLUTION & SERVICES, INC.

No. 18-19.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                          34,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,357
<INVENTORY>                                    126,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               252,796
<PP&E>                                         248,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          270,639
<BONDS>                                        274,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,861
<SALES>                                        537,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               537,314
<CGS>                                          179,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  497,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 11.1
 IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
   SharesNet Income
    
    outstanding and
    
    Amount per(unaudited)
    
    equivalents
    
    ShareQuarter
ended March 31, 2006:Basic EPS (available to common shareholders)
    
    $
    58,413
    
    
    
    63,612,760
    
    
    $
    0.91Diluted EPS
    
    $
    62,647
    
    
    
    72,618,979
    
    
    $
    0.86Quarter
ended March 31, 2005:Basic EPS
    
    $
    43,955
    
    
    
    48,330,812
    
    
    $
    0.91Diluted EPS
    
    $
    43,955
    
    
    
    48,429,102
    
    
    $
    0.91
 21
Ezekiel FLOWERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9250.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/29/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       41,728
COMMITMENTS
  14,426    1,356    2,347   12,976   25,842   29,749   29,545   11,979   12,183

CHANGES FROM 11/22/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,976)
  -1,795      288     -442      470   -2,429   -1,767   -2,583     -209      607

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    34.6      3.2      5.6     31.1     61.9     71.3     70.8     28.7     29.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       46)
      12        3       11       22       18       40       32
```

----

Updated December 2, 2011
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael Cooperman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, tomy knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 12, 2010 | /s/  Michael Cooperman   |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                   | Michael  Cooperman       |
|                                   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Matthew Ryan MURDOCH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8755.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-80365) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan and 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of NextCard, Inc., of our report dated on January
26, 2000, except as to Note 18, as to which the date is March 1, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of NextCard, Inc. included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California
March 27, 2000