alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5

 

Spousal Consent Letter granted by Sijia Chen

 

Whereas:

 

1.                  I, Sijia CHEN, (ID card No.: ######), am the spouse of the natural person Min FENG. Min FENG (ID card No.: ######) directly and indirectly holds 100% equity of Hangzhou Hanyi E-commerce Co., Ltd through Hangzhou Xinghui Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd.

 

2.                  With respect to the aforementioned underlying equity indirectly held by Min FENG, Hangzhou Hanyi E-commerce Co., Ltd entered into the Exclusive Call Option Agreement, Equity Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement with Hangzhou Yihan Technology Co., Ltd and other related parties on 4th October 2018. The Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement together with the aforementioned Exclusive call Option Agreement, Equity Pledge Agreement and Proxy Agreement on Shareholders’ Voting Rights constitute the contractual control arrangement regarding Hangzhou Hanyi E-commerce Co., Ltd (the “Contractual Control Arrangement”).

 

Hereby, I confirm and irrevocably undertake as follows:

 

I confirm and undertake that the aforementioned underlying equity of Hangzhou Hanyi E-commerce Co., Ltd directly and indirectly held by Min FENG through Hangzhou Xinghui Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd remains to be owned by him. I have no rights and interests in such underlying equity, including the rights gained from the Contractual Control Arrangement. In the future, I will never claim any right over the aforementioned underlying equity and the Contractual Control Arrangement.

 

Furthermore, I confirm that Min FENG may execute documents related to the Contractual Control Arrangement and make further modification to or terminate the Contractual Control Arrangement without needing my authorization or consent. I undertake to sign all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure that documents of the Contractual Control Arrangement, which are revised from time to time, may be appropriately performed.

 

If, for any reason, I obtain all or part of the aforementioned equity, I unconditionally agree to be a party of the transactional documents related to the Contractual Control Arrangements and be bound by the agreements thereunder.

 











 

This letter will take effect immediately upon its execution by me and will be continuously effective. 

 

Undertaker’s Signature:

 

	
/s/ Sijia CHEN
    	
 
    
	
4 October 2018
In Re Dion WILLIAMS, petitioner.

No. 17-7010.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 16, 2018.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION1



Pursuant to Section 906
of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Reynolds C. Bish, the Chief Executive Officer of Captiva Software Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:



1.            The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



Date: November 12, 2003



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ REYNOLDS C. BISH                    
|                                        
|Reynolds C. Bish Chief Executive Officer



---

1This Certification accompanies the Report in accordance with § 906 of the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Cynthia DAVIS, et al., petitioners, v. VALSAMIS, INC.

No. 18-1002.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SUMMARY CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE 9
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1998 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               5,064
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      289,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        633,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,313,594
<PP&E>                                           4,595,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,161,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,805,562
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           141,744
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,213,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,161,275
<SALES>                                          2,920,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,325,823
<CGS>                                            1,273,831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,046,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 136,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,854,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,854,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,854,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.15)
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 14, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 14, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0172. BRITTANY LYNN SCHOOLER v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15CR0179
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 15, 2017

Order 

Clerk

December 15, 2017

155361(51)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155361

v COA: 329016

Mason CC: 15-002928-FC

BENJAMIN MICHAEL BENTZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before December 22, 2017.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 87 FR 26251, May 3, 
2022.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Thursday, May 5, 
2022 at 2:00 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, May 
5, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10020 Filed 5-5-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Christian WALKER, petitioner, v. Jerry HOWELL, Warden.

No. 17-9506.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
DISMISS; Opinion Filed July 15, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00730-CV

IN RE ARTY LOGISTICS & TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Relator

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-08112

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Fillmore 

Opinion by Justice Moseley

Relator filed this mandamus proceeding after the trial court ordered it to produce certain 

portions of its insurer’s claim file. On July 10, 2013, the parties notified the Court that they had 

settled the underlying lawsuit and filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding. We 

GRANT the motion and DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

130730F.P05

/Jim Moseley/

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-51181 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. MAXIMIANO ALONSO, also known as Base, also known as Alonso Maximiano, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-115-2
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to repr e s e n t Maximiano Alonso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United State s v . Flores , 632 F.3d 229 ( 5th Cir. 2011). Alonso has not filed a response. We have revie w e d c o u nsel’s brief and the relevant portio n s o f the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-51181 Document: 00511640739 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011No. 10-51181

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-51181 Document: 00511640739 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
EXHIBIT 23.1


                               KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA




                                                                 January 7, 2004



To Whom It May Concern:


The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of this report of
November  25, 2003  accompanying  the  audited  financial  statements  of Domain
Registration,  Corp., as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002, in the Form
10KSB/A with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
________________________
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC











P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452, Fax: (702)
436-4218, e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att.net
Christina WONG, petitioner, v. Ellen ANDERSON, et al.

No. 16-1321.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1301 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1301

    To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the listing of liquefied 
            petroleum gas under section 112(r) of that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 1999

   Mr. Blunt (for himself, Mrs. Emerson, Ms. Danner, Mr. Tauzin, Mr. 
Talent, Mr. Graham, Mr. Smith of Michigan, Mr. Bachus, and Mr. Skelton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the listing of liquefied 
            petroleum gas under section 112(r) of that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that:
            (1) The Environmental Protection Agency has included 
        propane under the Risk Management Program (RMP).
            (2) Propane is not toxic, yet the RMP is intended to reduce 
        risks associated with toxic chemical accidents.
            (3) Propane is listed in section 241 of the Clean Air Act 
        and section 301 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 as a clean 
        alternative fuel.
            (4) Including propane in the RMP will degrade air quality 
        of stifling development of propane as an alternative fuel and 
        causing propane users to switch to less environmentally 
        desirable fuels.
            (5) Facilities storing propane are already regulated in all 
        50 States by Safety Standard 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 
        published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).
            (6) The inclusion of propane in the RMP duplicates the 
        extensive safety infrastructure in all 50 states through 
        building and fire codes.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF CLEAN AIR ACT.

    Section 112(r)(3) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(3)) is 
amended by inserting the following before the next-to-last sentence 
thereof: ``Liquefied petroleum gas shall not be included on any such 
list.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interland, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen L. Shulman,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                     |  |                                                                                                           
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2003 |  |                                                                                                           
|                     |  | /s/ Allen L. Shulman

Allen L. Shulman
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
and General Counsel
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David A. Rawden, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Allied Holdings, Inc;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     January 14, 2005   /s/ David A. Rawden     *Date*   *David A. Rawden*   *Executive Vice President*   *and Chief Financial Officer*
Kenneth Darcell QUINCE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9401.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Jonathan HAYHOE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5279.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Hosea Latron SWOPES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7233.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
In Re Donivan DIAZ, petitioner.

No. 18-8208.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
John M. BARONE, petitioner, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

No. 18-783.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09746]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-015]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed April 26, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through May 2, 2022 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.
EIS No. 20220061, Final, BLM, WY, Proposed RMP Amendment and Final EIS 
for Wild Horse Management in the Rock Springs and Rawlins Field 
Offices, Wyoming, Review Period Ends: 06/06/2022, Contact: Kimberlee 
Foster 307-352-0256.
EIS No. 20220062, Revised Draft, USACE, MS, Memphis Metropolitan 
Stormwater--North DeSoto County Feasibility Study, DeSoto County, 
Mississippi, Comment Period Ends: 06/20/2022, Contact: Andrea 
Carpenter-Crowther 901-544-0817.

    Dated: May 2, 2022.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2022-09746 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Jose J. HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. M. Eliot SPEARMAN, Warden.

No. 18-8219.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.