alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Fong Lee, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Tundra Resources, Inc., for theannual period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Tundra Resources, Inc.

By:/s/ Fong Lee          Fong Lee, Chief Financial Officer,          Chief Executive Officer, President & Director

Date:  January 24, 2005
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 12/06/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      148,494
COMMITMENTS
  18,753   17,700   32,493   81,997   86,783  133,243  136,976   15,251   11,518

CHANGES FROM 11/29/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      9,885)
  -1,682   -1,960    2,927    8,735    8,845    9,980    9,812      -95       73

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.6     11.9     21.9     55.2     58.4     89.7     92.2     10.3      7.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       82)
      28       21       28       26       24       71       60
```

----

Updated December 9, 2011
Robert Joe LONG, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9380.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Baboucar B. TAAL, petitioner, v. ST. MARY'S BANK, et al.

No. 18-5369.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1517

To provide for the test and evaluation by the Armed Forces of the Mobile

Expeditionary Accurate Night Vision Compatible Portable Airfield Lighting System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 21, 1999

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide for the test and evaluation by the Armed Forces

of the Mobile Expeditionary Accurate Night Vision Compatible Portable Airfield Lighting System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEST AND EVALUATION OF FEASIBILITY OF

4 USING MOBILE AIRFIELD LIGHTING SYSTEMS

5 FOR IMPROVED AND UNIMPROVED AIR6 FIELDS.

7 (a) MEANPALS DEFINED.—In this section, the

8 term ‘‘MEANPALS’’ means a Mobile Expeditionary Accu9 rate Night Vision Compatible Portable Airfield Lighting
2

•HR 1517 IH

1 System that is designed to use enhanced vision tech2 nologies, such as laser guidance systems, to provide accu3 rate runway centerline lineup cues and approach informa4 tion for up to 10,000 foot runways at both improved and

5 unimproved aircraft landing sites.

6 (b) ARMY TEST AND EVALUATION.—Of the amount

7 authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2000 for re8 search, development, test, and evaluation for the Army,

9 $1,300,000 shall be available for test and evaluation by

10 the Army of two MEANPALS at one location that serves

11 both fixed wing aircraft and helicopters.

12 (c) MARINE CORPS TEST AND EVALUATION.—Of the

13 amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2000

14 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Ma15 rine Corps, $650,000 shall be available for test and eval16 uation by the Marine Corps of one MEANPALS that

17 could be used by Marine Corps aircraft as well as for the

18 direction of amphibious landing craft and ground vehicles.

19 (d) AIR FORCE TEST AND EVALUATION.—Of the

20 amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2000

21 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Air

22 Force, $1,950,000 shall be available for test and evalua23 tion by the Air Force Reserve or the Air National Guard

24 of three MEANPALS at three separate locations.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1293

To amend title 46, United States Code, to provide equitable treatment with

respect to State and local income taxes for certain individuals who

perform duties on vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. BAIRD (for himself, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. EVANS, Ms. LEE, Mr. LIPINSKI,

Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. METCALF, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. SHOWS, Mr.

SIMPSON, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. TERRY, and Mr. WISE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and

in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title 46, United States Code, to provide equitable

treatment with respect to State and local income taxes

for certain individuals who perform duties on vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transportation Em5 ployee Fair Taxation Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1293 IH

1 SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS EM2 PLOYED ON VESSELS WITH RESPECT TO

3 STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAXES.

4 Section 11108 of title 46, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence;

7 and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(b)(1) An individual described in paragraph (2)

10 shall not be subject to the income tax laws of a State or

11 political subdivision of a State with respect to employment

12 or work referred to in paragraph (2), other than the State

13 and political subdivision in which the individual resides.

14 ‘‘(2) An individual referred to in paragraph (1) is—

15 ‘‘(A) any individual engaged on a vessel to per16 form assigned duties in more than one State as a

17 pilot licensed under section 7101 of this title or li18 censed or authorized under the laws of a State; or

19 ‘‘(B) any individual who performs regularly as20 signed duties while engaged as a master, officer, or

21 crewman on a vessel operating on the navigable wa22 ters of more than one State.’’.

Æ
In Re Derrell L. GILCHRIST, petitioner.

No. 18-8619.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      251
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (55)
<INVENTORY>                                        247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,048
<PP&E>                                           9,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,515)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              889
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,756
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (16)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,112)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,112)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  ***In
        connection with the Annual Report of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michal L. Gayler,
        Interim Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:***
  (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  /s/
                  Michal L. Gayler**Michal
                  L. Gayler****Interim
                  Vice President-Finance****and
                  Chief Financial Officer****April
                  16, 2007**
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14b of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. §1350, has been provided to
        Ascendant Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Ascendant Solution, Inc.
        and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
        This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not
        deemed
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
        by reference into any filing of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. under the Securities
        Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ***,*** as
        amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective
        of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.




-91-
EXHIBIT 23


ANDERSEN ANDERSEN & STRONG, L.C.                  941 East 3300 South, Suite 202
--------------------------------                      Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND BUSINESS CONSULTANTS     Telephone 801 486-0096
Member SEC Practice Section of the AICPA                        Fax 801 486-0098



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

CHINA NETTV HOLDINGS INC.

We hereby consent to the use of our report dated November 2, 2000 in the Annual
Report of China NetTV Holdings Inc. filed in Form 10-KSB in accordance with
Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.



Salt Lake City, Utah                             s/ Andersen Andersen and Strong
November 2, 2000



                                                                              54
# Official Journal C 12/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 12 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6511 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 12

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6511 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 12/01 | Notice for the attention of the person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/798/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/23, and Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/21 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic | 1 |
| 2022/C 12/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/798/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 apply concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic | 3 |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 12/03 | New national sides of the 2-euro commemorative circulation coins issued by the euro-area Member States to celebrate 35 years of the Erasmus programme | 4 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 12/01

Notice for the attention of the person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/798/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/23, and Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/21 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic

1

2022/C 12/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2013/798/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 apply concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic

3

European Commission

2022/C 12/03

New national sides of the 2-euro commemorative circulation coins issued by the euro-area Member States to celebrate 35 years of the Erasmus programme

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 12/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10546 – ICG/CEIT) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 9 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 12/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10546 – ICG/CEIT) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Patriot  Gold Corp.  on Form
10-KSB/A for the period  ending May 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ronald C. Blomkamp,
Chief Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.





By:  /s/    Ronald C. Blomkamp
Ronald C. Blomkamp
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

July 16, 2004



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134643 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134643 COA: 276063 Genesee CC: 90-043068-FH FELIX ERNESTO SOSA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1635

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a member

of the uniformed services shall be treated as using a principal residence

while away from home on qualified official extended duty in determining

the exclusion of gain from the sale of such residence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1999

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that a member of the uniformed services shall be treated

as using a principal residence while away from home

on qualified official extended duty in determining the

exclusion of gain from the sale of such residence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1635 IH

1 SECTION 1. UNIFORMED SERVICE MEMBER TREATED AS

2 USING PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE WHILE AWAY

3 FROM HOME ON QUALIFIED OFFICIAL EX4 TENDED DUTY IN DETERMINING EXCLUSION

5 OF GAIN ON SALE OF SUCH RESIDENCE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 121(d) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules) is amend8 ed by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(9) DETERMINATION OF USE DURING PERIODS

10 OF QUALIFIED OFFICIAL EXTENDED DUTY WITH

11 UNIFORMED SERVICES.—

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A taxpayer shall be

13 treated as using property as a principal resi14 dence during any period—

15 ‘‘(i) the taxpayer owns such property,

16 and

17 ‘‘(ii) the taxpayer (or the taxpayer’s

18 spouse) is serving on qualified official ex19 tended duty as a member of a uniformed

20 service (within the meaning of section

21 101(3) of title 37, United States Code),

22 but only if the taxpayer owned and used the

23 property as a principal residence for any period

24 before the period of qualified official extended

25 duty.
3

•HR 1635 IH

1 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED OFFICIAL EXTENDED

2 DUTY.—For purposes of this paragraph—

3 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘quali4 fied official extended duty’ means any pe5 riod of extended duty during which the

6 member of a uniformed service is under a

7 call or order compelling such duty at a

8 duty station which is at least 50 miles

9 from the property described in subpara10 graph (A) or compelling residence in Gov11 ernment furnished quarters while on such

12 duty.

13 ‘‘(ii) EXTENDED DUTY.—The term

14 ‘extended duty’ means any period of active

15 duty pursuant to a call or order to such

16 duty for a period in excess of 90 days or

17 for an indefinite period.’’

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 this section shall apply to sales or exchanges after May

20 6, 1997.

Æ
Deanne BREKHUS, petitioner, v. CITY OF BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA.

No. 17-9523.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

I,  Marc  Seely,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Zow,  Inc.;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  are  responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

        a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures to ensure that
        material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
        consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made known to us by others within those
        entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report is
        being  prepared;

        b)  evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
        this  annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

        c)  presented  in  this  annual  report  our  conclusions  about  the
        effectiveness  of  the  disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
        evaluation  as  of  the  Evaluation  Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most  recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
functions):

        a)  all  significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
        for  the  registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in internal
        controls;  and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's internal
        controls;  and

6.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have indicated in this
annual  report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other  factors  that  could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the  date  of  our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

Date:  April  14,  2004


/s/  Marc  Seely
-  -----------------------
Marc  Seely
Chief  Executive  Officer
Robert GRAHAM, petitioner, v. Melissa HAINSWORTH, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset, et al.

No. 18-5143.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Luzenski Allen COTTRELL, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 17-9449.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.