Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 26141 

The new information collections in 47 

CFR 20.23(b)(4) afford wireless 

providers an opportunity to object to the 

certification filing made after individual 

site-testing is complete, while requiring 

objections to be served on the DCFO and 

the CIS operator. Section 20.23(b)(5) 

requires that CIS operators retest and 

recertify their systems at least every 

three years and comply with the same 

requirements as for initial selfcertification. This requirement will 

enable the Bureau to ensure the ongoing 

accuracy and reliability of a given CIS 

at a particular facility. Section 

20.23(b)(7) requires that a CIS operator 

retain records for at least five years and 

provide them upon request to the 

Bureau, which will support the Bureau’s 

efforts to identify issues with CIS 

operations, resolve interference issues, 

and resolve complaints related to 

misidentification of contraband devices. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(c)(1)–(2) include the requirement 

that individuals that seek to be 

recognized on the Commission’s DCFO 

list must send a letter to the Contraband 

Ombudsperson in order for the 

Commission to approve that person for 

the qualified DCFO list and provide 

certainty to wireless providers that 

disabling requests are made by duly 

authorized individuals. Qualifying 

requests that include the required 

information will be used by wireless 

carriers to prevent use of contraband 

devices on their network and on other 

wireless provider networks. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(c)(3) and (c)(3)(iii)–(iv) provide 

that, upon receiving a disabling request 

from a DCFO, the wireless provider 

must verify the request, may conduct 

customer outreach, either reject or grant 

the request and must notify the DCFO 

whether it is accepting or rejecting the 

request. This process ensures that a 

wireless provider responds to a DCFO 

within a reasonable timeframe—while 

giving the provider an opportunity to 

determine if there is an error—and to 

give the DCFO time to respond quickly 

if the request has been rejected. The 

wireless provider may contact the 

customer of record to notify them of the 

disabling and involve them in the 

process. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(c)(4) provide that a wireless 

provider may reverse a disabled device 

where it determines that the device was 

erroneously identified as contraband, 

and the wireless provider must notify 

the DCFO of the reversal. The wireless 

provider may choose to involve the 

DCFO in the review and reversal 

process. The DCFO must also provide 

notice to the Contraband Ombudsperson 

of the number of erroneously disabled 

devices. This process ensures the 

integrity of the contraband device 

disabling process by giving the wireless 

provider the opportunity to reverse a 

disabled device—with the ability to 

extend review to the DCFO—and by 

creating safeguards to make sure that the 

process is efficient and reliable. 

The new collections in 47 CFR 

20.23(d) regarding notification from 

CMRS licensees to MAS operators of 

technical changes to their network are 

required so that MAS operators are 

given sufficient time to make necessary 

adjustments to maintain the 

effectiveness of their interdiction 

systems. In order to ensure that issues 

regarding notification to solutions 

providers of more frequent, localized 

wireless provider network changes are 

appropriately considered, CMRS 

licensees and MAS operators must 

negotiate in good faith to reach an 

agreement for notification for those 

types of network adjustments not 

covered by the notice requirement. 

CMRS licensees must provide notice of 

technical changes associated with an 

emergency immediately after the 

exigency to ensure that MAS operators 

continue to be notified of network 

changes that could impact MAS 

effectiveness. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09203 Filed 5–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

[Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2022–0021; 

FF09E22000 FXES1113090FEDR 223] 

RIN 1018–BG60 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Removing Siderastrea 

glynni From the List of Endangered 

and Threatened Wildlife 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), in 

accordance with the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), 

are amending the List of Endangered 

and Threatened Wildlife (List) by 

removing the coral Siderastrea glynni. 

This amendment is based on a 

previously published determination by 

the National Marine Fisheries Service 

(NMFS) of the National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration, 

Department of Commerce, which has 

jurisdiction for this species. 

DATES: This rule is effective May 3, 

2022. 

Applicability date: The delisting of S. 

glynni was effective January 31, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: This rule and the NMFS 

proposed and final rules may be found 

online at https://www.regulations.gov in 

Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2022–0021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Maclin, Chief, Branch of 

Delisting and Foreign Species, U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service, MS: ES, 5275 

Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041– 

3803; 703–358–2646. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with the Act (16 U.S.C. 

1531 et seq.) and Reorganization Plan 

No. 4 of 1970 (35 FR 15627; October 6, 

1970), NMFS has jurisdiction over the 

marine taxon specified in this rule. 

Under section 4(a)(2) of the Act, NMFS 

must decide whether a species under its 

jurisdiction should be classified as an 

endangered or threatened species. 

Under section 4(a)(2)(B) of the Act, if 

NMFS determines that a species should 

be removed from the List (delisted), or 

that a species’ status should be changed 

from an endangered to a threatened 

species, then NMFS is required to 

recommend the status change to the 

Service. NMFS makes these 

determinations via its rulemaking 

process. If the Service concurs with the 

recommended status change, then the 

Service will implement the status 

change by publishing a final rule to 

amend the List in title 50 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 

17.11(h). 

On May 4, 2021, NMFS published a 

proposed rule (86 FR 23657) to remove 

S. glynni from the Federal List of 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. 

NMFS solicited public comments on the 

proposed rule through July 6, 2021. On 

December 30, 2021, NMFS published a 

final rule (86 FR 74378) to remove S. 

glynni from the Federal List of 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. 

The delisting of S. glynni was 

effective January 31, 2022. In the 

December 30, 2021, final rule (86 FR 

74378), NMFS addressed all public 

comments received in response to the 

proposed rule. By publishing this final 

rule, we are simply taking the necessary 

administrative step to codify these 

changes in the List at 50 CFR 17.11(h). 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
26142 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 3, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

Administrative Procedure Act 

Because NMFS provided an 

opportunity for public comment on the 

proposed rule for this taxon, and we 

concur with the NMFS action, we find 

good cause that the notice and public 

comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) 

are unnecessary for this action. We also 

find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) 

to make this rule effective immediately. 

The NMFS rule removed protection 

under the Act for this species and 

removed the species from the List at 50 

CFR 224.101(h); this rule is an 

administrative action to remove the 

species from the List at 50 CFR 17.11(h). 

The public would not be served by 

delaying the effective date of this 

rulemaking action. 

Required Determinations 

National Environmental Policy Act 

We have determined that an 

environmental assessment, as defined 

under the authority of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, need 

not be prepared in connection with 

regulations adopted pursuant to section 

4(a) of the Act. We outlined our reasons 

for this determination in the Federal 

Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 

49244). 

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 

Endangered and threatened species, 

Exports, Imports, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, 

Transportation. 

Regulation Promulgation 

Accordingly, we amend part 17, 

subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the 

CFR, as set forth below. 

PART 17—ENDANGERED AND 

THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 17 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531– 

1544; and 4201–4245, unless otherwise 

noted. 

§ 17.11 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 17.11 in paragraph (h) in 

the List of Endangered and Threatened 

Wildlife under Corals by removing the 

entry for ‘‘Coral, (no common name) 

(Siderastrea glynni)’’. 

Martha Williams, 

Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–09424 Filed 5–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1