alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.52




                    Certificate of Amendment to Option Grants

      Stephen S. Schwartz ("Executive"), Chief Executive Officer and President
of Asyst Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") was previously granted on January
24, 2001 certain performance-based options to purchase 150,000 shares of Common
Stock of the Company (Option Grant No. 3415) (the "Performance Grant"). The
Performance Grant, by its original terms, would terminate as of April 24, 2006.

       The Board of Directors of the Company, by and through its Compensation
Committee at a regularly scheduled and duly noticed Committee meeting as of
August 18, 2004, did amend (and by this document and the minutes of the meeting
confirms such amendment) Section 5 of the Performance Grant to adjust the
termination date to January 23, 2011 (10 years from the date of grant). In all
other respects, the terms and conditions of the Performance Grant would remain
the same and be subject otherwise to the terms and conditions of the Company's
equity compensation plan from which the Performance Grant originally issued.

      The vesting of shares pursuant to the Performance Grant does not
constitute an express or implied promise of continuing employment or engagement
as an employee, consultant or otherwise with the Company, or any of its
subsidiaries, for the vesting period or for any period, and shall not interfere
with the Company's right or the Executive's right to terminate the employment,
consulting or other relationship at any time, for any reason, with or without
cause.

Dated: Effective August 18, 2004         /s/ Anthony E. Santelli
                                         _______________________________________
                                         Anthony E. Santelli
                                         Chair, Compensation Committee
                                         Asyst Technologies, Inc.

Acknowledged:

/s/ Steve Debenham
_________________________________
Steve Debenham
Secretary
Asyst Technologies, Inc.

August 18, 2004
James WERE, petitioner, v. OHIO.

No. 18-7809.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
David CLUM, Jr., petitioner, v. Gene BEASLEY, Warden.

No. 18-8860.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence J. Blanford, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010                    
|                                     
|/s/ Lawrence J. Blanford             
|Lawrence J. Blanford*                
|President and Chief Executive Officer

* A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and will be retained by Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Enrico M. PONZO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8602.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
#### Brown, Appellant, *v.*Gloeckner.

*319Argued October 10, 1955.

Before Steen, C. J., Stbabne, Jones, Mtjsmanno and Aenold, JJ.

*Reuben*Fingold, with him *A. S. Fingold,*for appellant.

*320November 30, 1955:

*David R. Levin,*for appellees.

*William L. Jacob,*for appellees.

. *Harry Menzer,*with him *Sachs, Pervin & Kaufman,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Pee Cueiam,

The decree entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County at No. 3136 January Term, 1955, in Equity, is hereby affirmed on the opinion of President Judge McNaugher. Costs on the appellant.
Andre Martello BARTON, petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General.

No. 18-725.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/14/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      185,925
COMMITMENTS
  56,229   11,148   24,547   80,356  120,367  161,132  156,062   24,794   29,863

CHANGES FROM 06/07/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,308)
    -474        0   -1,184      648   -1,913   -1,009   -3,096   -5,299   -3,212

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    30.2      6.0     13.2     43.2     64.7     86.7     83.9     13.3     16.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      192)
      60       28       55       67       81      154      145
```

----

Updated Jun 17, 2011
Dennis DeCIANCIO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5253.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00839-CV

Marilyn STEWART,

Appellant

v.

FIESTA CITY REALTORS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CV-05536

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

VACATED. No costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant because she qualifies as indigent under 

TEX. R. APP. P. 20. 

SIGNED October 3, 2018.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-40124

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Timothy Andrew Hernandez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:22-CR-947-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Timothy 

Andrew Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. 

_____________________

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion 

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set 

forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40124 Document: 00516885272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023
No. 23-40124

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2.

We note, however, that there is an apparent clerical error in the 

written judgment with respect to the date that the offense ended. Thus, we 

REMAND for correction of the clerical error in the written judgment in 

accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

Case: 23-40124 Document: 00516885272 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2023
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00366-CV 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF MARTHA VILLAGOMEZ AND 

LEONEL ALAMO AND IN THE INTEREST OF L.A., A CHILD 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 11,931-L2, Honorable Matthew C. Martindale, Presiding 

 

January 8, 2020 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant Martha Villagomez has filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of her

appeal. The Court finds the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking 

relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court has been 

delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. Because the motion 

does not address costs, costs will be taxed against appellant. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). 

No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam
Robert E. YOUNG, petitioner, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General.

No. 18-8684.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1594

CHRISTOPHER J. ODINKEMELU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JORJA WILLIAMS; MYRTLE FOUST; VERONICA MCLEAN;

KAREN JONES; ALICIA OAKLEY RESENDIZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-00-750-1)

Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher J. Odinkemelu, Appellant Pro Se. Peter George Pappas,

Brian Stephen Clarke, ADAMS, KLEEMEIER, HAGAN, HANNAH & FOUTS,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher J. Odinkemelu appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Odinkemelu v.

Williams, No. CA-00-750-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2001). Defendants’

motion for sanctions is granted, and Defendants are awarded reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. In addition, we enjoin Odinkemelu

from filing any further civil actions in this court until such time

as these monetary sanctions are paid, and unless a district court

judge certifies that his claim is not frivolous. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Norm Blair, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Golden Key
     International, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of July, 2007.


/s/ Norm Blair
------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/03/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      215,008
COMMITMENTS
  28,803   40,403   41,541  118,641  116,718  188,985  198,662   26,023   16,346

CHANGES FROM 04/26/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,941)
   1,532    4,897    4,649   11,933    8,384   18,114   17,930    3,827    4,011

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.4     18.8     19.3     55.2     54.3     87.9     92.4     12.1      7.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      122)
      41       34       51       27       27      105       92
```

----

Updated May 6, 2011
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David A. Rawden, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AlliedHoldings, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   January 7,2005 */s/ David A. Rawden**Date* David A. Rawden *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer* * *
39
Danica ZOVKO, et al., petitioners, v. NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD.

No. 18-74.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
The Keith Companies, Inc.:

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-61312 and 333-83097) on Form S-8 of The Keith Companies, Inc. of our
report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of The Keith Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2003,
and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K
of The Keith Companies, Inc.

                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

Orange County, California
March 8, 2004
Michael ELLIS, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-5371.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Company's
Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      20,119,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,005,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,114,000
<INVENTORY>                                 62,348,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           142,970,000
<PP&E>                                     150,673,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              98,362,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             240,635,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       61,383,000
<BONDS>                                    121,696,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,247,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               240,635,000
<SALES>                                    133,205,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           176,186,000
<CGS>                                       97,903,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              135,738,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            35,363,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               231,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,113,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,619,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,602,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,221,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,221,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Elicia BAILEY, petitioner, v. Jeremy GASAWAY.

No. 18-8611.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District denied.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
Marc Pintar, Interim Chief Financial Officer of PTS, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: July
  13, 2010/s/ Marc
  Pintar
Marc Pintar
Interim Chief Financial Officer