alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1618 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1618

 To amend section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 
to improve the housing counseling program of the Department of Housing 
             and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 1999

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 
to improve the housing counseling program of the Department of Housing 
             and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Counseling Enhancement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    (a) Emergency Homeownership Counseling.--Section 106(c)(9) of the 
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701x(c)(9)) is 
amended by striking ``September 30, 1994'' and inserting ``September 
30, 2000''.
    (b) Prepurchase and Foreclosure Prevention Counseling 
Demonstration.--Section 106(d)(13) of the Housing and Urban Development 
Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701x(d)(12)) is amended by striking ``fiscal 
year 1994'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2000''.

SEC. 3. NOTIFICATION OF DELINQUENCY ON VETERANS HOME LOANS.

    Subparagraph (C) of section 106(c)(5) of the Housing and Urban 
Development Act of 1968 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(C) Notification.--Notification under 
                subparagraph (A) shall not be required with respect to 
                any loan for which the eligible homeowner pays the 
                amount overdue before the expiration of the 45-day 
                period under subparagraph (B)(ii).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dominos Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry J. Silverman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Harry J. SilvermanHarry J. SilvermanChief Financial Officer




Dated: March 23, 2004
On
November 20, 2009, the Board of Directors of TheStreet.com, Inc. (the “Company”)
amended Section 15.2(1) of the Company’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan to
read:






“(1)          
the acquisition by any person or group deemed a person under Sections 3(a)(9)
and 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”) (other than the
Company and its subsidiaries as determined immediately prior to that date and
any of its or their employee benefit plans) of beneficial ownership, directly or
indirectly (with beneficial ownership determined as provided in Rule 13d-3, or
any successor rule, under the Exchange Act), of a majority of the total combined
voting power of all classes of stock of the Company having the right under
ordinary circumstances to vote at an election of the Board of Directors of the
Company;”
Gustavo CISNEROS, petitioner, v. GEORGIA.

No. 16-8477.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
Jorge Edwin RIVERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8558.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
James T. BAGBY, petitioner, v. William HYATTE, Warden.

No. 18-5057.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Thomas FLORENCE, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7625.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Clifford Allen FOLLANSBEE, petitioner, v. Charles L. RYAN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9257.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Antonio SLATON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8767.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
### APPENDIX A 25162517 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2518 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2519 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2520 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2521 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2522 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2523 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2524 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2525 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2526 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2527 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2528 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2529 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2530 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2531 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2532 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2533 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2534 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2535 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2536 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2537 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2538 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2539 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2540 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2541 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2542 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2543 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2544 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2545 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2546 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2547 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2548 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS2549 S AMSONv. N AMA H OLDINGS
Muhamet AJVAZI, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-7290.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jesse R. BENTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-442.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

*1319Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Direct and Indirect Subsidiaries of Royal Invest International Corp.

|  Company Name                                                |  Parent Company                   |  Country of Incorporation |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Royal Invest Europe B.V.                                          |  Royal Invest International Corp. |  The Netherlands          |
| Royal Invest Development and Services B.V.                        |  Royal Invest International Corp. |  The Netherlands          |
| Vastgoed Beleggings Mij. Bunnik 1 B.V.                            |  Royal Invest International Corp. |  The Netherlands          |
| Royal Invest German Properties 1 B.V. (formerly Rico Staete B.V.) |  Royal Invest Europe B.V.         |  The Netherlands          |
| Alfang B.V.                                                       |  Royal Invest Europe B.V.         |  The Netherlands          |
| AmogB B.V.                                                        |  Royal Invest Europe B.V.         |  The Netherlands          |
Robert Jay HEXIMER, petitioner, v. MICHIGAN.

No. 18-5142.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
Reginald SWINTON, petitioner, v. Steven RACETTE, Superintendent, Great Meadows Correctional Facility.

No. 17-9500.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 111

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III

No. CV-15-712

 

FREDERICK LEE PITCHFORD

APPELLANT

V.

NANCY E. WRIGHT, AS ATTORNEY

IN FACT FOR ALICIA CHRISTINE

EDGIN

 APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered February 17, 2016

APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CV-14-350]

HONORABLE MELISSA BRISTOW

RICHARDSON, JUDGE

APPEAL DISMISSED

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

 Appellant Frederick Lee Pitchford, pro se, appeals the trial court’s May 28, 2015

order, which denied appellant’s recusal motion, denied appellant’s motion to dismiss for failure

to state a claim, and granted appellee’s motion for protective order to prevent Alicia Christine

Edgin from testifying in this matter due to a finding that Edgin is not a competent witness. 

Appellant argues that the trial court erred and should be reversed. We dismiss because

appellant has failed to appeal from a final order.

Subject to a few exceptions not applicable in this case, Rule 2(a) of the Arkansas Rules

of Appellate Procedure–Civil provides that this court only has jurisdiction to review cases

where a final order has been entered.1

 Whether an order is final and appealable is a matter

1Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 2(a). 
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 111

going to our jurisdiction; jurisdiction is an issue that we are obligated to raise on our own

motion.2 An order is final if it dismisses the parties from the court, discharges them from the

action, or concludes their rights to the subject matter in controversy.3

 The order must put

the judge’s directive into execution, ending the litigation, or a separable branch of it.4

 

We have held that the denial of a motion to dismiss is not a final order, as the only

matter disposed of by the order is that the case should proceed to trial.5 Additionally, Ark.

R. App. P.–Civ. 2 does not authorize an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion to

recuse.6 Thus, appellant’s first two points of appeal are not properly before us because they 

are not from a final order.

In granting appellee’s motion for a protective order, the court noted that appellant

could retain a medical doctor to conduct an examination of Edgin and offer the court another

opinion on Edgin’s competency as a witness for further consideration. The court gave

appellant until the final hearing to secure this opinion and present it to the court. The

language of the order clearly contemplates further action by appellant and the court

2Dobbs v. Dobbs, 99 Ark. App. 156, 258 S.W.3d 414 (2007). 

3Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs. v. J.N., 96 Ark. App. 319, 241 S.W.3d 293 (2006). 

4

Id.

5Evins v. Carvin, 2013 Ark. App. 185, 426 S.W.3d 549 (citing Plunk v. State, 2012

Ark. 362). 

6Manila Sch. Dist. No. 15 v. Wagner, 357 Ark. 20, 159 S.W.3d 285 (2004). 

2
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 111

concerning Edgin’s competency as a witness. As such, the order was not final as to the

protective order.7 Therefore, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice for lack of a final order.

Appeal dismissed.

VAUGHT and HOOFMAN, JJ., agree.

Frederick Lee Pitchford, pro se appellant.

No response.

7See Yarbrough v. Powell, 2015 Ark. App. 218, 459 S.W.3d 329. 

3
Alex ADAMS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-9568.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Lynce P. FOSTER, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7563.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, which was published in the 
Federal Register on May 02, 2022, 309939.
    Dr. Prasad changed the date from 05/06/22 to 05/05/22. The meeting 
is closed to the public.

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-10055 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Floyd William DAMREN, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9493.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
# Official Journal C 188A/11 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4911 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4911 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2006/C 188A/1 | Corrigendum to the corrigendum to Notice of Open Competion EPSO/AD/45/06 to constitute a reserve pool from which to recruit linguistic administrators (AD5) having Irish as their main language in the field of translation (Official Journal of the European Union C 175 A of 27 July 2006) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2006/C 188A/1

Corrigendum to the corrigendum to Notice of Open Competion EPSO/AD/45/06 to constitute a reserve pool from which to recruit linguistic administrators (AD5) having Irish as their main language in the field of translation (Official Journal of the European Union C 175 A of 27 July 2006)

(Official Journal of the European Union C 175 A of 27 July 2006)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Larry R. TART, petitioner, v. Erik A. HOOKS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety.

No. 18-8196.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
James J. MACOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.

No. 18-1072.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
(LOGO) ORIX

ORIX Real Estate
Capital Markets, LLC
Paul Smyth
1717 Main Street, 12th Floor
Dallas, TX 75201
214-237-2010



March 24, 2000


                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                            Servicer/Master Servicer


Ladies and Gentlemen:


This  Officer's  Certificate  is  provided  to you by ORIX Real  Estate  Capital
Markets, LLC ("ORECM") pursuant to the terms outlined in the applicable sections
of certain  Agreements as referenced in the attached  Exhibit A, relative to the
securitization for which ORECM serves as Servicer/Master Servicer.


The  undersigned  officer,  on behalf of ORECM,  hereby  informs you (i) that, a
review  of the  activities  of  ORECM  as  Servicer/Master  Servicer  and of its
performance   under  each   respective   agreement   has  been  made  under  the
undersigned's  supervision  for the  period of time  commencing  January 1, 1999
through December 31, 1999 or a portion  thereof,  (ii) that, to the best of such
undersigned's  knowledge,  based on such  review,  it has  fulfilled  all of its
obligations under the agreement and has maintained an effective internal control
system  relating  to  its  servicing  of  the  Mortgage  Loans  serviced  by it,
throughout  such period,  and (iii) that, the undersigned has received no notice
regarding qualification,  nor challenging the status of the REMIC's from the IRS
or any other governmental body.


Also, please find attached, an Annual Independent Public Accountant's  Servicing
Report performed by Pricewaterhouse Coopers, L.L.P. relative to the assets being
serviced by ORECM for the period beginning  January 1, 1999 through December 31,
1999.



Duplicates  of these  documents  are being  simultaneously  sent to all  parties
listed on Exhibit B for receipt by March 31, 2000.

If you have any questions or comments relative to the attached documents, please
call me at 214-237-2010.

Sincerely,

ORIX Real Estate
Capital Markets, LLC,Servicer/Master Servicer

By:
    Paul Smyth
    Managing Director, Servicing



Attachments: Annual Independent Public Accountant Servicing Report
             Exhibit A
             Exhibit B
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00723-CV

Levinson Alcoser Associates, L. P. and Levinson Associates, Inc.

v.

El Pistolon II, Ltd.

On Appeal from the

370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-3460-10-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be REVERSED and the cause 

REMANDED to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs 

of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 12, 2015
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 06/14/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       60,299
COMMITMENTS
  21,517    1,178    4,997   17,442   40,637   43,956   46,812   16,343   13,487

CHANGES FROM 06/07/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,654)
  -1,115      329    2,108    2,832    1,505    3,825    3,942     -171     -288

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    35.7      2.0      8.3     28.9     67.4     72.9     77.6     27.1     22.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       77)
      30        8       13       29       26       66       43
```

----

Updated Jun 17, 2011
Francisco ILLARRAMENDI, petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, et al.

No. 18-5136.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Blake Joseph SANDLAIN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8539.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                        Certification of CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Compressor
Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John E. Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John E. Jackson
--------------------------------
Name:   John E. Jackson
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 14, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Order entered January 4, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00961-CR

No. 05-21-00962-CR

BRIAN SYLVESTER DIGGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F20-52897-M & F20-52898-M

ORDER

The clerk’s records were filed on December 29, 2021. Missing from the 

clerk’s record in appellate number 05-21-00961-CR (trial court cause number F20-

52897-M) is the trial court’s October 27, 2021 certification of the defendant’s right 

to appeal. We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, within 

ten days of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record in 05-21-00961-

CR (trial court cause number F20-52897-M) containing the trial court’s October 

27, 2021 certification of the defendant’s right to appeal.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Freddie B. KENNEDY, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7522.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Re Vernon Shawn DANIELS, Jr., petitioner.

No. 18-7260.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice KAGANN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
CITY OF MACKINAC ISLAND, MICHIGAN, et al., petitioners, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION.

No. 18-983.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Miguel MARTINEZ, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-8285.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.