alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/20/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      178,964
COMMITMENTS
  17,150   35,372   44,910  100,602   81,765  162,662  162,047   16,302   16,917

CHANGES FROM 09/13/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     13,072)
     519    1,566    6,228    5,495    4,902   12,242   12,696      830      376

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
     9.6     19.8     25.1     56.2     45.7     90.9     90.5      9.1      9.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      104)
      26       26       50       30       31       92       91
```

----

Updated September 23, 2011
Alimamy BARRIE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8556.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Kevin Khaaliq BEAMON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5089.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 22, 2014

No. 04-14-00105-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF BILLYE M. HORMUTH, Deceased,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-4120

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Reconsideration is 

GRANTED. The motion for Reconsideration is due on November 3. 2014.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                 |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  May 24, 2010 | By:  /s/ William M. Beard                             |
|                          | William M. Beard                                                     |
|                          |     Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

----
Cahlan CLAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5301.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Roszetta McNEILL, petitioner, v. WAYNE COUNTY THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, et al.

No. 18-7894.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

 (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for per share amounts)

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for basic and diluted EPS is
given in the following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     Amount per
Three months ended September 30, 1999            Income             Shares             Share
-------------------------------------          ----------          ----------        ----------
<S>                                            <C>                 <C>               <C>
Basic EPS                                      $    7,797          25,033,932          $0.31
Effect of Dilutive Options                                          1,017,164
Diluted EPS                                    $    7,797          26,051,096          $0.30

Three months ended September 30, 1998
-------------------------------------
Basic EPS                                      $   11,061          25,033,932          $0.44
Effect of Dilutive Options                                          1,440,960
Diluted EPS                                    $   11,061          26,474,892          $0.42


Nine months ended September 30, 1999
------------------------------------
Basic EPS                                      $   25,926          25,033,932          $1.04
Effect of Dilutive Options                                          1,037,404
Diluted EPS                                    $   25,926          26,071,336          $0.99

Nine months ended September 30, 1998
------------------------------------
Basic EPS                                      $   62,009          25,030,303          $2.48
Effect of Dilutive Options                                          1,595,241
Diluted EPS                                    $   62,009          26,625,544          $2.33
</TABLE>


                                      -28-
Exhibit  99.2

                            PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the Annual Report of Rubincon Ventures Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for  the  year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted Reimchen, Chief Executive
Officer,  President  and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                             /s/   "Ted  Reimchen"
                             ---------------------
               Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and  Director


Date:  May 5, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                             EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                      Type of Entity                  Jurisdiction
----                                      --------------                  ------------
<S>                                       <C>                             <C>
Equistar Mont Belvieu Corporation         Corporation                     Delaware
Equistar Chemicals de Mexico, Inc.        Corporation                     Delaware
Equistar Transportation Company, LLC      Limited liability company       Delaware
Quantum Pipeline Company                  Corporation                     Illinois
Equistar Funding, LLC                     Limited liability company       Delaware
PD Glycol                                 Limited partnership             Texas
Equistar Funding Corporation              Corporation                     Delaware
EC Plastics Unlimited Liability Company   Unlimited liability company     Nova Scotia
Equistar Bayport, LLC                     Limited liability company       Delaware
Equistar Polypropylene, LLC               Limited liability company       Delaware
</TABLE>
S.R., petitioner, v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, et al.

No. 18-7030.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.
ANTHONY WHITEHURST,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3714

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 1, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

Anthony Whitehurst, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Johnny Allen MARTIN, petitioner, v. Gregory McLAUGHLIN, Warden.

No. 18-5216.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
In re Michael Brandon SAMRA, petitioner.

No. 18-9031 (18A1120).

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 2019.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the *2050Court denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1542

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for screening

retinal eye examinations under the Medicare Program for individuals

diagnosed with diabetes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 22, 1999

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdicton of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for screening retinal eye examinations under the Medicare Program for individuals diagnosed with diabetes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Diabetic Eye

5 Exam Benefit Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 1542 IH

1 SEC. 2. SCREENING RETINAL EYE EXAMINATIONS FOR IN2 DIVIDUALS WITH DIABETES.

3 (a) COVERAGE OF SCREENING RETINAL EYE EXAMI4 NATIONS.—Section 1861(s)(2)(S) of the Social Security

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(S)) is amended—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ after ‘‘(S)’’, and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new

8 clause:

9 ‘‘(ii) screening retinal eye examinations fur10 nished to individuals diagnosed with diabetes, but

11 only if the physician who is managing the individ12 ual’s diabetic condition certifies that such examina13 tions are needed under a comprehensive plan of care

14 related to the individual’s diabetic condition; and’’.

15 (b) WAIVER OF DEDUCTIBLE.—The first sentence of

16 section 1833(b) (42 U.S.C. 1395l(b)), as amended by sec17 tion 4101(b), is amended—

18 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘(6)’’, and

19 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the

20 following: ‘‘, and (7) such deductible shall not apply

21 with respect to screening retinal eye examinations

22 (as described in clause (ii) of section

23 1861(s)(2)(S))’’.
3

•HR 1542 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to screening retinal eye examina3 tions performed on or after February 1, 2000.

Æ
Steven Anthony WALCOTT, Jr., petitioner, v. Pat NAQUIN, et al.

No. 18-8153.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jason BRANUM and Bryan Brunsting, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-1682.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 06/28/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      172,207
COMMITMENTS
  49,469   12,978   24,106   75,550  105,486  149,125  142,570   23,082   29,638

CHANGES FROM 06/21/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -10,314)
  -3,505    2,583   -1,128   -5,174  -10,374   -9,807   -8,919     -507   -1,395

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.7      7.5     14.0     43.9     61.3     86.6     82.8     13.4     17.2

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      168)
      52       25       45       63       68      135      123
```

----

Updated July 1, 2011
II

Calendar No. 912

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1460

[Report No. 106–464]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported by Mr. CAMPBELL, without amendment

AN ACT

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and

Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to

decrease the requisite blood quantum required for membership in the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo tribe.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1460 RS

1 That section 108(a)(2)(i) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and

2 Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g–7) is amended by striking ‘‘1 3 ⁄8’’

and inserting ‘‘1 4 ⁄16’’.

Calendar No. 912

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1460

[Report No. 106–464]

A BILL

To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama

and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to decrease the requisite blood quantumrequired for membership in the Ysleta del SurPueblo tribe.

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported without amendment
Johnathan MASTERS, petitioner, v. KENTUCKY.

No. 18-7286.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 19, 2019.

Motion of Student Press Law Center, et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky denied.
Deontray Vershon TATE, petitioner, v. Jeff TITUS, Warden.

No. 18-8695.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Hoffman, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Amendment; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2009 |  |                                                                                    
|                     |  | /s/    ROBERT E. HOFFMAN Robert E. Hoffman, VP, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Jennifer N. NERE, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 18-8625.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.
Otis SYKES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5373.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Robert R. YERTON, Jr., petitioner, v. Jason BRYANT, Warden.

No. 18-7322.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tandy Leather Factory,
      Inc.
      for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the United States Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Wray Thompson, as
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Shannon L. Greene, as Treasurer and
      Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





|i. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|ii. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company
              as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
              Report.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







August
      12, 2005    By: /s/
      Wray Thompson


**Wray Thompson**


**** **Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer**


August
      12, 2005    By: /s/
      Shannon L. Greene


**Shannon
      L.
      Greene**


**Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00702-CR & 04-14-00703-CR

Charlotte A. LEAL,

Appellant

v.

The 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2013CR5723 & 2103CR5724

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 19, 2014

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On October 3, 2014, the trial court denied appellant Charlotte Leal’s “Motion to Suppress

Blood Evidence.” Five days later, on October 8, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal. We 

conclude we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

The right to appeal in a criminal case is a statutorily created right. See McKinney v. State, 

207 S.W.3d 366, 374 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. 44.02 art. (West 

2006) (providing right of appeal for defendant); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (rules for appeal by 

defendant). As a general rule, appellate courts may consider appeals by criminal defendants only 
04-14-00702-CR & 04-14-00703-CR

after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.). 

Intermediate appellate courts have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders absent express 

authority. Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright, 969 S.W.2d 

at 589.

Orders denying pretrial motions to suppress are not appealable interlocutory orders. See 

Wright, 969 S.W.2d at 589 (identifying types of appealable interlocutory orders). Therefore, we 

have no jurisdiction over this appeal, and order the appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 28014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP)--SIP22-005, Building Resilience Against Climate 
Effects (BRACE): Enhancing Practical Guidance To Support Climate and 
Health Adaptation Planning; Amended Notice of Closed Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Disease, 
Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel 
(SEP)--SIP22-005, Building Resilience Against Climate Effects (BRACE): 
Enhancing Practical Guidance to Support Climate and Health Adaptation 
Planning; May 4, 2022, 11 a.m.-6 p.m., EDT, in the original FRN.
    The meeting was published in the Federal Register on March 1, 2022, 
Volume 87, Number 40, page 11444.
    The meeting is being amended to change the meeting date and time 
and should read as follows:
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--SIP22-005, Building Resilience 
Against Climate Effects (BRACE): Enhancing Practical Guidance to 
Support Climate and Health Adaptation Planning.
    Date: May 19, 2022.
    Time: 3 p.m.-6 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting is closed to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 41 CFR 102-3.150(b), less 
than 15 calendar days' notice is being given for this amended closed 
meeting due to an unforeseen medical emergency and exceptional 
circumstances that led to an anomaly of programmatic matters and the 
necessity to resolve issues, reschedule, and convene as soon as 
possible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaya Raman, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F80, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6511, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ce7faedb9ccefe8efa2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167d6077235675727538717960">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-10023 Filed 5-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>