alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6068

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY EARL HARDRICK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-02-7; CA-03-556-BO) Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: February 10, 2005 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Earl Hardrick, Appellant Pro Se. Winnie Jordan Reaves, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Earl Hardrick seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hardrick has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1749

MARY E. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANNAPOLIS LIFE CARE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a

Ginger Cove; LIFE CARE SERVICES CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-3056-S)

Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Thomas Sampson, SEMMES,

BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mary E. Brown appeals the district court's order granting

summary judgment to Defendants in this action under Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3 (1994).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Brown v. Annapolis Life Care, Inc., No. CA95-3056-S (D. Md. May 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTI) D

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF GARY D. RICE FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE

BAR OF MONTANA

JUL 2 7 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of hilontana

ORDER

Gary D. Rice has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State

Bar olMontana. Rice was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing to comply

Nvith the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31,

2021. Attached to the Petition is a letter from the State Bar stating that Rice has now

completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year. The Petition states that Rice is not

currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not comrnitted any acts or omissions

sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Gary D. Rice for reinstatement to

active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Rice shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this 'a-4- day of July, 2021.

Chief Justic

S24 Al JUL 

07/27/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
2

(4? Justic s

742— ZA---N..._
Calvette BROWN, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

No. 17-9488.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30280) and the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-104127) pertaining to the Amended andRestated 1998 Incentive and Non-qualified Stock Option Plan of iParty Corp.,the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-159839) pertaining tothe 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-139951)pertaining to the offer and sale of iParty Corp. common stock of our reportdated March 23, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statementsof iParty Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 26, 2009.

 

 
|                  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|
| Boston, Massachusetts |                           |
| March 23, 2010   |                           |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Domain
Registration, Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set
forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 11, 2008                   /s/ Hui Ping Cheng
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Hui Ping Cheng
                                       Title: President, Chief Executive and
                                              Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Philadelphia Consolidated Holding
Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Craig P. Keller, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Craig P. Keller
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-77851, 333-32436) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Portal Software, Inc. of our report
dated February 16, 2000, except for paragraph 4 of Note 4, as to which the date
is March 13, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Portal Software, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended January 31, 2000.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
April 27, 2000
Exhibit 11

                           InterCounty Bancshares, Inc.
               Computation of Consolidated Earnings Per Common Share
           For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 and 1997
                 (in thousands, except shares and per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                For the Three Months       For the Nine Months
                                 Ended September 30,       Ended September 30,
                                    1998        1997          1998       1997
<S>                            <C>         <C>           <C>        <C>
Net income                     $    1,311 $    1,364    $    3,846 $    3,712
                                =========  =========     =========  =========
Weighted average common
  shares issued                 1,550,776  1,545,983     1,550,991  1,544,808

  Less-Unreleased common 
   shares held by ESOP              9,682     11,861        10,216     12,424
                                ---------  ---------     ---------  ---------
  Weighted average number
   of shares outstanding
   used in the calculation
   of basic earnings per
   common share                 1,541,094  1,534,122     1,540,775  1,532,384

  Add - Dilutive effect of
   stock options (1)               41,981     47,404        41,024     49,576
                                ---------  ---------     ---------  ---------
Adjusted weighted average 
number of shares outstanding 
used in the calculation of 
diluted earnings per common 
share                           1,583,075  1,581,526     1,581,799  1,581,960
                                =========  =========     =========  =========
Basic earnings per common
 share                               $.86       $.89         $2.50      $2.42

Diluted earnings per common
 share                                .83        .86          2.43       2.35

<FN>
(1)  There is presently no active trading market for the Company's shares, nor
are the prices at which common shares have been traded published by any
national securities association or quotation service.  Fair value for earnings
per common share purposes was assumed to be $49.00 at September 30, 1998, and
$35.00 at September 30, 1997.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Jesus ROSALES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-8232.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of PayStar Corporation and the
state of incorporation for each subsidiary.  Each of the subsidiaries is
wholly owned by PayStar Corporation.

          Name of Subsidiary                 State of Incorporation

     1.   PayStar Communications, Inc.       Nevada
     2.   PayStar Financial Services, Inc.   Nevada
     3.   PayStar InfoStations, Inc.         Nevada
     4.   PayStar Prepaid Services, Inc.     Nevada
     5.   PayStar.com, Inc.                  Nevada
     6.   U.S. Cash Exchange, Inc.           Nevada
     7.   SHS Communications, Inc.           California
     8.   Position Industries, Inc.          California
     9.   GlobalCash, Inc.                   Nevada
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09825]



[[Page 27203]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be conducted. The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, June 9, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 
or (510) 907-5274.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Thursday, 
June 9, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Matthew O'Sullivan. For more information 
please contact Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274, 
or write TAP Office, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612-5217 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 3, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-09825 Filed 5-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    MATTHEW C. DIAMOND
|Matthew C. Diamond       
|Chief Executive Officer  

Dated: April 12, 2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement
accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into any filing of Alloy, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-11011

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DESHAWN MCCARTER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:17-CR-285-1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Deshawn McCarter appeals his 37-month sentence imposed following his 

guilty plea for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). 

Raising one issue on appeal, McCarter argues that the district court 

erred in finding that his prior California robbery conviction is a “crime of 

violence” sufficient to qualify him for a base offense level of 20 pursuant to 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 19, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-11011 Document: 00515422048 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2020
No. 19-11011

2

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). According to McCarter, his California robbery 

conviction does not qualify as a crime of violence because it criminalizes a 

broader range of conduct than generic robbery or generic extortion. McCarter 

acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by United States v. TellezMartinez ̧ 517 F.3d 813 (5th Cir. 2008), but raises the issue to preserve it for 

further review. The Government filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance agreeing that the issue is foreclosed and, in the alternative, a 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

As the Government argues, and McCarter concedes, the sole issue raised 

on appeal is foreclosed by Tellez-Martinez, 517 F.3d at 814-15, wherein we held 

that the relevant statute, California Penal Code § 211, fell within the “generic 

or contemporary meaning of robbery as understood by this court” and thus 

qualified as a crime of violence under the former U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). 

See United States v. Montiel-Cortez, 849 F.3d 221, 226-27 nn.10-20 (5th 

Cir. 2017); see also United States v. Flores-Vasquez, 641 F.3d 667, 670 n.1 (5th 

Cir. 2011) (noting that a prior conviction that qualifies as a “crime of violence” 

under the former § 2L1.2, also qualifies as a crime of violence under § 4B1.2).

Because the issue is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). 

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The 

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED.

 Case: 19-11011 Document: 00515422048 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2020
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/30/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       38,878
COMMITMENTS
   2,498      490        0   34,384   38,370   36,882   38,860    1,996       18

CHANGES FROM 08/23/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -1,768)
    -198      -50      -20     -205     -651     -423     -721   -1,345   -1,047

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     6.4      1.3      0.0     88.4     98.7     94.9    100.0      5.1      0.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       52)
       6        1        0       29       28       35       29
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/30/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:       52,244
COMMITMENTS
   5,536    6,447        0   40,345   43,183   45,881   49,630    6,363    2,614

CHANGES FROM 08/23/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,600)
   1,490    4,048        0   -2,423   -3,387     -933      661   -1,667   -3,261

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    10.6     12.3      0.0     77.2     82.7     87.8     95.0     12.2      5.0

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       60)
      13        3        0       30       22       43       25
```

----

Updated September 2, 2011
Abraham ESTREMERA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-9509.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 12.1

Computation of Ratio of Earnings To Fixed Charges

Successor Company



Predecessor
CompanyYears Ended December 31,

Period from
March 15 to
December 31,
2004



Period from
January 1 to
March 14,
20042008

2007

2006

2005Net (loss) before income taxes

$
(170,311
)
$
(23,480
)
$
(17,046
)
$
(433
)
$
(16,814
)


$
(12,453
)Fixed charges:Interest expense


23,023


25,155


20,668


18,741


13,597




2,513Interest factor of operating rents


441


413


409


356


271




70Total fixed charges

$
23,464

$
25,568

$
21,077

$
19,097

$
13,868



$
2,583Adjusted earnings (loss)

$
(146,847
)
$
2,088

$
4,031

$
18,664

$
(2,946
)


$
(9,870
)Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


(a
)

(a
)

(a
)

(a
)

(a
)



(a
)


---

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Time-Sensitive Obesity 
PAR Review.
    Date: May 24, 2022.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 2 Democracy, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Michele L. Barnard, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7353, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, (301) 594-8898, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7959685999685939ab7928f838596d9999e93939cd9999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="036162716d6271676e43667b7771622d6d6a6767682d6d6a6b2d646c75">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 27, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-09382 Filed 4-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>