alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1375 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1375

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce the maximum 
       financial risk permitted for physicians participating in 
        Medicare+Choice plans and encourage payment for quality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 1999

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce the maximum 
       financial risk permitted for physicians participating in 
        Medicare+Choice plans and encourage payment for quality.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCING THE MAXIMUM FINANCIAL RISK FOR PHYSICIANS 
              PARTICIPATING IN MEDICARE+CHOICE PLANS.

    Section 1852(j)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
22(j)(4)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (iii) as clause (iv); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following new 
        clauses:
                            ``(iii) The organization does not operate 
                        the plan in a manner that places a physician or 
                        physician group at a financial risk that 
                        exceeds 20 percent as of January 1, 2001, 15 
                        percent as of January 1, 2002, and 10 percent 
                        as of January 1, 2003, of potential payments.
                            ``(iv) Potential payments mean the maximum 
                        payments possible to physicians or physician 
                        groups including payments for services they 
                        furnish directly, and additional payments based 
                        on use and costs of referral services, such as 
                        withholds, bonuses, capitation, or any other 
                        compensation to the physician or physician 
                        group.
                            ``(v) Potential payments do not include 
                        bonuses and other compensation that are based 
                        on the quality of care furnished, improved 
                        outcomes, preventive care rates, patient 
                        satisfaction or committee participation.''
                                 <all>
```
Modesta R. SABENIANO, petitioner, v. CITIBANK, N.A., et al.

No. 18-105.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
                           EXHIBIT 27
                                
                    FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            (in thousands except per share amounts)


          
   <S>                                                           
                                                  <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS

   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997

   <PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1997

   <CASH>                                             $     1,075
   <SECURITIES>                                                 0
   <RECEIVABLES>                                                0
   <ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
   <INVENTORY>                                                  0
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         1,583
   <PP&E>                                                 328,561
   <DEPRECIATION>                                         (7,126)
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         332,690
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   10,048
   <BONDS>                                                118,934
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
   <PREFERRED>                                             50,000
   <COMMON>                                                   223
   <OTHER-SE>                                             149,817
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           332,690
   <SALES>                                                      0
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        19,827
   <CGS>                                                        0
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (8,229)
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (3,032)
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                                          8,515
   <INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      8,515
   <DISCONTINUED>                                               0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
   <CHANGES>                                                    0 
   <NET-INCOME>                                       $     8,515
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                                      $      0.61
   <EPS-DILUTED>                                      $      0.59

</TABLE>
Amanda E. LEWIS, petitioner, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 17-9382.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas H. King, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allied Holdings, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     September 8, 2006   /s/Thomas H. King     *Date*   *Thomas H. King*    *Executive Vice President*    *and Chief Financial Officer*
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

                        LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                                                             OWNERSHIP
            COMPANY               PLACE OF INCORPORATION     INTEREST
--------------------------------  ------------------------  ------------
Delta Galil USA. Inc.             Delaware, U.S.A.              100%
Delta Galil Europe Ltd.           U.K.                          100%
Delta Galil Holland B.V.          Holland                       100%
Delta Textile Egypt  - Free       Egypt                         100%
Zone S.A.E.
Century Wear Corporation (WLL)    Jordan                         50%(1)
Dominion Hosiery Inc.             Canada                        100%
Delta Galil Hungary KFT           Hungary                       100%
Sport Socks Co. Ltd               Ireland                       100%
Delta Textile Marketing Ltd.      Israel                        100%
Delta Textile (New York) Ltd.     New York, U.S.A.              100%
Delta Elastic Tapes Industries,   Israel                         90%
Ltd.
Auburn Hosiery Mills Inc.         USA                           100%

        ----------------------------------
(1)     Delta Galil effectively controls this joint venture as a result of
        holding an additional controlling share.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/24/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      495,002
COMMITMENTS
  59,154   10,199  108,447  300,569  353,697  468,170  472,344   26,832   22,658

CHANGES FROM 05/17/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -36,380)
   5,159   -6,033   -8,900  -29,298  -23,221  -33,038  -38,154   -3,342    1,774

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    12.0      2.1     21.9     60.7     71.5     94.6     95.4      5.4      4.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      128)
      35       20       46       62       62      118      111
```

----

Updated May 27, 2011
In re LaShawn ANDERSON, petitioner.

No. 18-8110.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the Human Rights Defense Center, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. PAUL R. BABEU, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pinal County, Arizona; PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA; TONYA DELGADO, Sgt., in her individual and official capacities; ALYSSA ROMERO; LAURENDA HENSLEY-SALISBERRY; CHERYL MCBIRNIE; JOHN JOHNSTON; LAUREN MCVICKER, Detention Aides, in their individual capacities; LORETTA VALDEZ; DALTON GAY; ERICA CHAVEZ; DENA KELLY, in their individual capacities; AMADO MARTINEZ, Sgt., in his individual and official capacities; LEONARD ARNOLD, Sgt., in his individual and official capacities; DAVID LINDERHOLM, Training Specialist, in his individual and official capacities; FRANCES HAWKINS, Lt., in her individual and official capacities; DENNIS RUSHING; No. 13-15965 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01761-GMS

MEMORANDUM * 

# FILED

JAN 22 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.MATTHEW HULL, Lt., in his individual and official capacities; DARREN RUSHING, Lt., in his individual and official capacities; VERNITA GANT, Lt., in her individual and official capacities; MICHELE MCNEELY, Lt., in her individual and official capacities; GILBERT HOYOS, Lt., in his individual and official capacities; TERRY JOHNSON, Captain, in his individual and official capacities; JAYME VALENZUELA, Captain, in his individual and official capacities; RUBEN MONTANO, Captain, in his individual and official capacities; JAMES KIMBLE, Deputy Chief, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: ALARCÓN, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Prison Legal News appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for a permanent injunction against the defendant s, who operate the Pinal County Jail. Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a )(1) and we review for abuse of discretion. Cummings v. Connell , 316 F.3d 886, 897 (9th Cir. 2003). Finding none, we affirm.“Perhaps the most significant single component in the judicial decision whether to exercise equity jurisdiction a nd grant permanent injunctive relief is the court's discretion.” Charles Alan Wright et al., 11A Fed. Pract. & Proc. § 2942 & n.3 (2d ed. 2013) (collecting cases). Here, the district court took the extraordinarily cautious step of seeki ng additional briefing and evidence on the motion before concluding that a perman ent injunction was unnecessary. In light this attention and the extraordinary de ference we must show, we cannot find an abuse of discretion here.
AFFIRMED
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 03/08/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      200,767
COMMITMENTS
  57,978    7,784   33,574   74,223  130,223  165,775  171,581   34,992   29,186

CHANGES FROM 03/01/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,435)
  -1,543      -23   -3,188       71   -1,223   -4,660   -4,434      225       -1

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    28.9      3.9     16.7     37.0     64.9     82.6     85.5     17.4     14.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      215)
      72       23       55       69       91      165      156
```

----

Updated March 11, 2011
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with The Beard Company’s (the “Company”) Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herb Mee, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  May 21, 2007 | By:  /s/ Herb Mee, Jr.       Herb Mee, Jr.       President and Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 04/12/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      209,341
COMMITMENTS
  60,890    8,752   33,645   84,246  134,793  178,781  177,190   30,559   32,151

CHANGES FROM 04/05/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      3,516)
  -4,393      410   -2,694    7,899    1,813      812     -471    2,704    3,987

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    29.1      4.2     16.1     40.2     64.4     85.4     84.6     14.6     15.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      205)
      68       23       58       69       85      164      148
```

----

Updated April 15, 2011
#### MILTON C. WOLF v. STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and Another.1

June 4, 1909.

Nos. 16,106—(130).

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to enjoin the State Board of Medical Examiners and W. S. Fullerton, M. D., its secretary, from revoking the license of plaintiff to practice medicine. The case was tried before Kelly, J., who made findings and ordered judgment that plaintiff take nothing by his complaint, that the restraining order pendente lite be dissolved and that defendant Fullerton recover his costs. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings and set aside the conclusions of law, he appealed.

Appeal dismissed.

*C. D. & It. D. O’Brien,*for appellant.

*W. B. Duxbury,*for respondents.

1

 Reported in 121 N. W. 395.

Rer Curiam.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the findings of fact, to set aside the conclusions of law, and for judgment in his favor. The order is not appealable. Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth, supra, page 83, 121 N. W. 212.

Appeal dismissed.
Javier Flores GAYTAN, petitioner, v. Michael HARDEE.

No. 18-1079.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 22, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Hector SANTILLAN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8213.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1


                        LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                                               PLACE OF         OWNERSHIP
                COMPANY                     INCORPORATION       INTEREST
        -------------------------------  ------------------   ------------
        Delta Galil USA. Inc.             Delaware, U.S.A.        100%

        Auburn Hosiery Mills Inc.         USA                     100%

        Burlen Corporation                USA                     100%

        Delta Galil Europe Ltd.           U.K.                    100%

        Delta Galil Holland B.V.          Holland                 100%

        Delta Textile Egypt  - Free       Egypt                   100%

        Zone S.A.E.

        Century Wear Corporation (WLL)    Jordan                  50%(1)

        Dominion Hosiery Inc.             Canada                  100%

        Sport Socks Co. Ltd               Ireland                 100%

        Delta Textile Marketing Ltd.      Israel                  100%

        Delta Textile (New York) Ltd.     New York, U.S.A.        100%


------------------
(1)     Delta Galil effectively controls this joint venture as a result of
        holding an additional controlling share.
John WATSON, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 17-5738.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 30, 2017.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```
  
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/06/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      160,051
COMMITMENTS
  63,333    8,204   22,849   53,105  105,448  139,287  136,501   20,764   23,550

CHANGES FROM 08/30/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -9,756)
     475     -837   -5,199   -3,184   -2,482   -7,909   -8,519   -1,848   -1,238

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    39.6      5.1     14.3     33.2     65.9     87.0     85.3     13.0     14.7

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      186)
      58       27       51       55       75      138      137
```

----

Updated September 9, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cindy J. McPike, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 28, 2007



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cindy J. McPike                              
|Cindy J. McPike                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer