alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      16,453,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,628,865
<PP&E>                                       2,010,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,837,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,038,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       249,171
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,778,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,837,995
<SALES>                                        257,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               421,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,608,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,515,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,515,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,515,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
(LOGO) Banknorth Mortgage

Banknorth Mortgage
32 Chestnut Street
Lewiston, ME 04240

tel:800-462-3666
fax:207-755-4501


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate


Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance  of the Servicer  during the
   preceding  fiscal  year  under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
   Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and
   to the best of these Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
   its duties, responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout
   such  year,  or if there has been a default or  failure  of the  servicer  to
   perform any of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of
   each default or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported
   to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
   servicer in good standing:

C) I have confirmed  that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
   Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing
   Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
   Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance  Policy (if
   applicable)  and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
   respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that  all such
   insurance policies are in full force and effect;

E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any  other  expenses
   accrued and due,  that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
   any Mortgaged Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have
   not been paid with  respect  to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for the
   non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
   required per section 6050H,  6050J,  and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
   respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:
Jayne A Ulitas
Officer

Assistant Vice President
Title

7-7-00
Date
Mark A. GRETHEN, petitioner, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 18M143.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Rafael G. HANKISHIYEV, petitioner, v. ARUP LABORATORIES, et al.

No. 17-9412.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Del Ray SANDERS, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 18-5355.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Cause number: 01-15-00889-CV

Style: Ronke Olley and Jeff Olley v. Driftwood Hospitality Mgt II, LLC. 

Date motion filed: November 16, 2015

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee

It is ordered that Appellee’s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw our

Mediation Order dated November 6, 2015.

 Judge’s Signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 x Acting Individually

Date: November 17, 2015

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
Jesse DAVENPORT, aka Draco John Flama, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8869.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,694
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,360
<INVENTORY>                                     65,547
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,081
<PP&E>                                         517,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 661,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       269,838
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   661,269
<SALES>                                         13,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,444
<CGS>                                           10,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,074
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7263

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus LORENZO GRODE MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00226-TSE-1) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Grode Martin, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Grode Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Martin’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims- 3 - based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Martin’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         927,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,339,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,063,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   136,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,973,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,379,000
<PP&E>                                       7,944,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,777,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,255,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,010,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,480,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,255,000
<SALES>                                      3,126,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,126,000
<CGS>                                        2,404,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,404,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                230,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            230,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   230,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .057
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .057
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JENNIFER M. ROMERO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4790

)

WALMART STORES, INC., a Foreign )

Profit Corporation, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 22, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier

County; James R. Shenko, Judge.

Victor M. Arias of Arias Law Firm, P.A., 

Cape Coral, for Appellant.

Edgardo Ferreyra, Jr., and Daniel J. 

Santaniello of Luks, Santeniello, Petrillo & 

Jones, Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON,, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29162-29163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10231]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4634-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Colorado; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4634-DR), dated December 31, 2021, and 
related determinations.

[[Page 29163]]


DATES: This change occurred on April 22, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Jon K. Huss, of 
FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this 
disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Nancy M. Casper as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-10231 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# Official Journal C 446/30 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 446 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5930 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 446

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5930 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 446/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — 35th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 446/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — 35th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Kessele LIVINGSTON, petitioner, v. Lauri ESSLINGER, et al.

No. 18-7992.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I,Jack K. Heilbron, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form10-K of Presidio Property Trust, Inc.; and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

Date: June 12, 2020
  
By:
 
/s/ Jack K. Heilbron
   Jack K. Heilbron,   Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)**
Exhibit
32.2





STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The
undersigned, Frank E. Fusco, is the Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of Astoria Financial Corporation (the
“Company”).





This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
(the “Report”).





By
execution of this statement, I certify that:





(A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





(B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





May 7, 2010
                
                /s/
                Frank E. FuscoDated
                
                
                Frank
      E. Fusco
C.B., petitioner, v. Thomas N. FISCHGRUND.

No. 18-5798.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the President, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of Domain
Registration, Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set
forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 15, 2009                   /s/ Chunhua Yang
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Chunhua Yang
                                       Title: President, Chief Executive and
                                              Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 33



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Boundaries Capital, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Conrad Clemiss, President of the Company, and I, David Derby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report duly complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Conrad Clemiss
___________________________
Conrad
Clemiss, President
December 31, 2003 | /s/
David Derby
___________________________
David Derby, Chief Financial Officer
December 31, 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mario Donate LOCKHART, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-5329.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.