alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                               CFO Certification


I, Sheridan Westgarde, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of Aquatic
Cellulose International Corporation (the "Company");

         2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Annual report; and

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual report.

         4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Annual report is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

         5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2004

/S/ SHERIDAN WESTGARDE
------------------------
Sheridan Westgarde
Chief Financial Officer
Joseph CHHIM, petitioner, v. GOLDEN NUGGETT LAKE CHARLES, L.L.C.

No. 18-7601.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 29182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Undersea Technology Innovation Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 5, 2022, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Undersea Technology Innovation 
Consortium (``UTIC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, The NOMAD Group LLC, Morristown, NJ, has been added as a 
party to this venture.
    Also, Aviation & Missile Solutions LLC, Huntsville, AL; Gibbs & 
Cox, Inc., Arlington, VA; ATI Engineering Services LLC, Johnstown, PA; 
Cross Domain Systems, Inc., Medford, MA; Lynntech, Inc., College 
Station, TX; and Xilectric, Inc., Fall River, MA, have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and UTIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 9, 2018, UTIC filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
November 2, 2018 (83 FR 55203).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 2, 
2022. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13757).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-10223 Filed 5-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Mario Devant CHEERS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8792.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AND THE
NOTES THERETO) CONTAINED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           501,638
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      77,557
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 579,195
<CASH>                                          12,912
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           5,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 651,839
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 43,218
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             43,069
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                     559,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   651,839
<PREMIUMS>                                      89,635
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             22,438
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               4,030
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      33,379
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     12,248
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             7,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,009
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,009
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.33
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                             ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Ilife.com, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-87955) on Form S-8 of ilife.com, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of ilife.com, Inc. and subsidiary as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, redeemable stock and stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 1999, the six months ended December 31, 1998 and
the year ended June 30, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of ilife.com, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 14, 2000
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 13, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00618-CV

MOHAMED ISMAEEL, Appellant

V.

AMANY GALAL ALY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-25046

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 29, 2014. On November 5, 

2014, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Donovan.
1 TheHonorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2910

___________ Norvell Daniels, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 22, 2000 Filed: December 5, 2000

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Norvell Daniels appeals the district court's 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and his motions for recusal and reassignment of judge. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion because the relief Daniels requested was raised in a prior appeal and thus didnot present any new grounds for relief. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus. , 862 F.2d-2-

161, 169-70 (8th Cir. 1988). We further conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions for recusal and reassignment. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas H. King, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allied Holdings, Inc;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        May 23, 2005   /s/ Thomas H. King       *Date*   *Thomas H. King*     *Executive Vice President*     *and Chief Financial Officer*
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1497

___________________________

Stephen Klick lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: November 7, 2022 Filed: November 10, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Stephen Klick appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. We find that substantial evidence in the record as a

1 The Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).whole supports the adverse decision. See Galloway v. Kijakazi, 46 F.4th 686, 689

(8th Cir. 2022) (standard of review). Specifically, the ALJ’s determination that Klick did not have the medically determinable impairment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during the relevant period was supported. See Gallus v. Callahan, 117 F.3d 1061, 1064-65 (8th Cir. 1997) (substantial evidence supported ALJ’s finding that claimant did not have medically determinable mental impairment; while one provider had assigned diagnosis, it was not supported by record, and other providers had concluded claimant did not have impairment). While the evidence showed that Klick’s psychologist diagnosed “other trauma- and stressor-related disorder” in 2019, we conclude that the ALJ’s failure to include this diagnosis among Klick’s severe impairments was harmless error, as the ALJ thoroughly evaluated all of the medical evidence relating to his mental impairments in determining his residual functional capacity (RFC), and as Klick has not identified any symptoms or limitations arising from this condition that the ALJ did not consider. See Warburton v. Apfel, 188 F.3d 1047, 1050-51 (8th Cir. 1999) (finding ALJ’s decision adequate where, although record did not contain precise diagnosis of claimant’s mental impairment, ALJ adequately captured effects of impairment in RFC determination); Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment). We also find no merit to Klick’s argument that the district court erred in declining to consider his new evidence. See Baker v. Barnhart, 457 F.3d 882, 891 (8th Cir. 2006) (upon judicial review of Commissioner’s decision denying disability benefits, evidence outside administrative record is generally precluded from consideration by court). The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
Teddy MOORE, petitioner, v. Christopher BRAMWELL, et al.

No. 18-133.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department denied.
Samuel GIANCARLO, et al., petitioners, v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 18-4.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Jamie Todd BJERKE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-6993.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/19/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      516,820
COMMITMENTS
  63,058   15,107  107,772  319,085  375,756  489,915  498,635   26,905   18,185

CHANGES FROM 04/12/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -51,478)
   7,640   -5,798  -21,663  -36,151  -18,044  -50,174  -45,505   -1,304   -5,973

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    12.2      2.9     20.9     61.7     72.7     94.8     96.5      5.2      3.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      136)
      39       20       46       67       64      129      111
```

----

Updated April 22, 2011
TERMINATION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 26th day of September, 2008,

BETWEEN:

NATION ENERGY INC., a body

corporate, having an office in the City of

Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia,

(hereinafter called the "Nation")

- and -

ENCANA OIL & GAS PARTNERSHIP, a body

corporate, having an office in the City of

Calgary, in the Province of Alberta,

(hereinafter called the "EnCana")

WHEREAS a Joint Operating Agreement dated April 3, 2003, originally made among Nation
Energy Inc., High Point Resources Inc. and Olympia Energy Inc., (hereinafter called "the Agreement")
exists between the parties; and



WHEREAS by a Sate Agreement effective June 1, 2008 Nation assigned their entire interest to EnCana; and

NOW THEREFORE this agreement witnesseth that for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Nation and EnCana agree as follows:

1,

The Agreement is hereby terminated, effective June1, 2008.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in accordance with their respective requirements for execution as of the date first above written.

NATION ENERGY INC.

ENCANA OIL & GAS PARTNERSHIP



|John R. Hislop |  | Steve Brown
|---------------- |  | -------------



Steve Brown

Group Lead, A&D/Contracts

Canadian Foothills Division























C015628

TERMINATION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 26th day of September, 2008.

BETWEEN:

NATION ENERGY INC.,a body

corporate, having an office in the City of

Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia,

(hereinafter called the "Nation")

-and -

NETCO ENERGY INC.,a body

corporate, having an office in the City of

Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia,

(hereinafter called the "Netco")

WHEREAS a Farmin Agreementdated January 1, 2007,originally made among Nation Energy

Inc. and Netco Energy Inc.,(hereinafter called "the Agreement") exists between the parties; and



WHEREAS by a Sale Agreement effective June 1, 2008 Nation and Netco assigned their entire interest to EnCana; and

NOW THEREFORE this agreement witnesseth that for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Nation and Netco agree as follows:

1.

The Agreement is hereby terminated, effective June 1,2008.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in accordance with their respective requirements for execution as of the date first above written.



|NATION ENERGY INC. |  | NETCO ENERGY INC.
|------------------ |  | -----------------
|John R. Hislop   |  | Michael Schoen
Bruce PACE, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 18-5078.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25052-25053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Science Board's Awards and Facilities Committee hereby 
gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction 
of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Friday, April 29, 2022, from 12:00-2:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda of the teleconference is: 
Committee Chair's Opening Remarks; Schedule of Future Information, 
Context, and Action Items; Approval of Prior Minutes; Context Item: 
Inclusion of Leadership-Class Computing Facility in a Future MREFC 
Budget; Context Item: NOIRLab Operations & Maintenance Award; Context 
Item: Mag Lab Operations & Maintenance Award; Written Context Item: 
Regional Class Research Vessel Management Reserve.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Michelle McCrackin, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c61616f6f7e6d6f674c627f6a226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abc6c6c8c8d9cac8c0ebc5d8cd85ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>, (703) 292-7000. Meeting

[[Page 25053]]

information and updates may be found at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-09040 Filed 4-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>