alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Thomas H. King, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AlliedSystems Holdings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         November 14, 2007  /s/Thomas H. King   *Date* *Thomas H. King *    *Executive Vice President*
11.  Computation of per share earnings.

                         EVERCLEAR INTERNATIONAL, INC..
                       (Formerly Shaw International, Inc.)
                          (A Development Stage Company)
                            Weighted Average Analysis

-------------- ---------------------------------- -------- --------------


                                  Cumulative
                        Common      Common         Days  Weighted
                        Shares      Shares          365  Average
   31-Dec
    2001
--------------
               1-Jan-01         11,230,000         365    11,230,000
                           0    11,230,000          0              0
                        ------------------------- ------ -------------
Shares Issued '01          0
                        ========
Cumulative Shares '01           11,230,000        365
                                ===========     ========

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding 11,230,000
                                                     ===========

 Earning (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders                 (28,108)
                                                             --------------

 Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share                                 (0.0025)
                                                             ==============

----------------------------------- ----------------- --------------

                                       Cumulative
                           Common        Common       Days    Weighted
                           Shares        Shares        366    Average
   31-Dec
    2000
--------------
                 1-Jan-00                 5,230,000    268    3,829,617
                25-Sep-00   6,000,000    11,230,000    98     3,006,940
                            ----------  ------------  ------- -----------

Shares Issued '00           6,000,000
                            ==========
Cumulative Shares '00                    11,230,000    366
                                         ==========    =====

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding    6,836,557
                                                      ===============

Earning (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders                      (10,019)
                                                               --------------

             Basic Earnings (Loss) Pe                                (0.0015)
                                                               ==============

 NOTE :  EARNING PER SHARE = EARNING (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON
         STOCKHOLDERS / WEIGHTED SHARES OUTSTANDING
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                         JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                          <C>
Informatica GmbH                             Germany
Informatica Software Limited                 United Kingdom
Informatica Software Ltd.                    Canada
Influence Software                           California
Informatica Software (Switzerland) AG        Switzerland
Informatica International, Inc.              Delaware
Informatica Cayman Ltd.                      Cayman Islands
Zimba                                        California
IS Informatica Software Ltda.                Brazil
Informatica Belgie N.V.                      Belgium
Informatica Nederland B.V.                   The Netherlands
Informatica France S.A.                      France
Striva Corporation                           Delaware
Striva Technology Inc.                       California
Striva Technology Limited                    United Kingdom
</table>
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 05/03/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      215,051
COMMITMENTS
  28,803   40,403   41,541  118,679  116,723  189,023  198,668   26,029   16,384

CHANGES FROM 04/26/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     21,942)
   1,533    4,897    4,648   11,937    8,383   18,118   17,928    3,825    4,015

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.4     18.8     19.3     55.2     54.3     87.9     92.4     12.1      7.6

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      122)
      41       34       52       27       27      105       93
```

----

Updated May 6, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the unaudited
September 30, 1996 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         354,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,449,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,418
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,088,768
<PP&E>                                       2,221,943
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,370,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,700,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,219,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,424
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,229,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,700,183
<SALES>                                        990,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,782,578
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  950,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,568,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,782,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,782,621)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,782,621)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.62)
        

</TABLE>
Charles William FINNEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9588.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Nathaniel BOWENS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-7612.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 4, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Deloitte & Touche


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 1800
50 South Main Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84144-0458
Telephone: (801) 328-4706
Facsimile: (801) 355-7515

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT

To the Supervisory Committee of America First Credit Union:

We have examined  management's  assertion  about  America  First Credit  Union's
(AFCU's)  compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers  (USAP)as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included
in the accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for AFCU's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on management's  assertion about AFCU's  compliance  based on
our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about AFCU's  compliance with the minimum
servicing  standards  and  performing  such other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on AFCU's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In  our  opinion,   managements   assertion's   that  AFCU   complied  with  the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31,1999 is fairly stated , in all material respects.

Deloitte & Touche

March 24,2000
Scott PETERS, petitioner, v. Kahlia SATKIEWICZ, et al.

No. 17-9459.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tucows Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Cooperman,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14,  2009 |   | /s/  Michael Cooperman   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                             |   | Michael  Cooperman       |
|                             |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ R.H. Dillon

Print Name: R.H. DillonTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 6, 2009/s/ James F. Laird

Print Name: James F. LairdTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 6, 2009
#### In re STAFF MORTGAGE & INVESTMENT CORPORATION, formerly known as Staff Realty Corporation, dba Sondo Diagnostic Corporation, and dba Century Seventy-Two Corporation, Bankrupt. Victoria S. BAIDA, et al.,1 Appellants, v. C. Douglas WIKLE, Trustee for the estate of Staff Mortgage & Investment Corporation, etc., Appellee.

No. 80-5089.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 5, 1981.

Decided Aug. 21, 1981.

Isaac M. Pachulski, Stutman, Treister & Glatt, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

John Wilson, Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and BILBY,* District Judge.

1

. Victoria Baida; Alexandria Mamey; Paul Blumberg, Trustee for the Blumberg Trust; Ro-salee Cheevers; Hazel Esposito; John Daniel, dec’d.; Margaret Daniel; Stanley R. Doering; Floranne Doering; Katharina Donovan; Karin Brunswick; Singleton G. Edwards; Jessie L. Edwards; Marie Ellison; Wallace R. Evans; Bettie R. Evans; Mary S. Fisher; Elizabeth R. Larsen; Robert Pumphrey; Alex J. Gorles; Edith J. Hanes; Jean Hanes; Zella H. Woerner; Clarence A. Harman; Olive M. Harman; Carl H. Hauser; Jessie R. Hauser; Eloise Hertzberg; Laurence Leonard; Dorothy D. Jeffries (now Hamma); Myrtle May Dittrick; Harold M. Meyer; Edith S. Meyer; Clarence L. Miles; Mary P. Miles; Clarice E. Morton; Henry Morton (dec’d); Pamela Re; Lora M. Pollitt; Arthur J. Rauch; Rosalind Rauch; Larry R. Reed; Dorris G. Reed; Lillian A. Repensky; Joan M. Spreitzer; Carole A. Kendzora; Leoda Richards; Luke F. Smith; Susan Smith; William L. Timm; Barbara S. Timm; Mary A. Usher; Louise Way; Mildred S. Inhofe; Barbara Kidd; Dorothy L. Ward; Donald H. Ward; Margaret D. Courtney; William Chezeskny; and Helan Chezeskny.

*

 The Honorable Richard M. Bilby, United States District Judge, District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

In the absence of any facts which would permit us to significantly and properly distinguish *Heinecke Instruments Company v. Republic Corporation,*543 F.2d 700 (9th Cir. 1976), *In re Staff Mortgage, etc.; Huffman v. Wikle,*550 F.2d 1228 (9th Cir. 1977), *In re Bruce Farley Corporation; Starr v. Bruce Farley Corporation,*612 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1980), and *In re Staff Mortgage, etc.; Greiner v. Wilke,*625 F.2d 281 (9th Cir. 1980) (and there are none), the judicial panels of this court are bound by the principles announced and followed in those decisions. This is true whether we apply “law of the case,” *“stare decisis,”*or “collateral estop-pel” principles. *(See Greiner v. Wilke, supra,*at 282-283, applying *stare decisis*principles.)

Contrary to appellants’ assertion, the issue of “general intangibles” as applied to the instruments involved here and in the cases cited above, has been presented to and decided by this court adversely to appellants’ claims. *Greiner v. Wilke, supra,*at 284, footnotes 1, 2, and 3.

The extensive and fruitless litigation and relitigation of these same issues in this bankruptcy proceeding must come to a halt.

*968The judgments below are

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 10.13****THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC.****SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF 2005 DISCRETIONARY CASH BONUS PLAN**     On March 4, 2005, the Compensation Committee adopted adiscretionary cash bonus plan. Executive officers are eligibleto participate in the discretionary bonus plan. Under thediscretionary plan, the Compensation Committee may award annualcash bonuses to executive officers if the Company meets orexceeds a financial performance target established by theCompensation Committee with respect to any year. At its meetingon March 4, 2005, the Compensation Committee established aperformance target for 2005 based on income from operations(after taking into account any amounts paid under thediscretionary bonus plan for the year). Whether any bonus isawarded, and the amount of any bonus awarded, is at thediscretion of the Compensation Committee once the Company hasmet or exceeded its financial performance target.
Malcolm Roy EVANS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8427.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
IN DELIVERY MONTH EUA - GREEN EXCHANGE                               Code-006GEC
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 11/22/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1000 EUA)                              OPEN INTEREST:       67,672
COMMITMENTS
     746    2,162   11,003   54,863   53,477   66,612   66,642    1,060    1,030

CHANGES FROM 11/15/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        513)
    -281      126       59       -5     -412     -227     -227      740      740

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
     1.1      3.2     16.3     81.1     79.0     98.4     98.5      1.6      1.5

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       21)
       3        6        4        6       11       10       20
```

----

Updated November 28, 2011
Vincent GREEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8267.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

*1576Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Kenneth HARTLEY, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9498.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-12846

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00219-RBD-DCI-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TODD JOSEPH SIMMERMAN,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 3, 2021)

Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-12846 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Charles Taylor, appointed counsel for Todd Simmerman in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Simmerman’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-12846 Date Filed: 03/03/2021 Page: 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1379

To amend the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, to make a technical correction relating to an emergency supplemental appropriation for international narcotics control and

law enforcement assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 13, 1999

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999, to make a technical

correction relating to an emergency supplemental appropriation for international narcotics control and law enforcement assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1379 IH

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO EMER2 GENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION

3 FOR INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL

4 AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE.

5 Chapter 3 of title V of division B of the Omnibus

6 Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropria7 tions Act, 1999 (Public Law 105–277), is amended by

8 striking ‘‘For’’ and inserting ‘‘Notwithstanding section 10

9 of Public Law 91–672 and section 15 of the State Depart10 ment Basic Authorities Act of 1956, for’’.

Æ
Order filed July 24, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00344-CV

NO. 14-14-00351-CV

NO. 14-14-00352-CV

NO. 14-14-00368-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF X.I.M., P.M., E.C., D.C., E.C., AND Y.C., 

CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2002-50811, 2011-10644, 2011-42185, & 2011-01184J

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); 

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel certified to this court 

that he provided appellant with a copy of the Anders brief and the record, and advised 

appellant of her right to file a pro se brief in response.
If appellant desires to file a pro se brief in response to counsel’s Anders brief, 

appellant’s pro se brief shall be due on or before August 25, 2014.

PER CURIAM