alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1476 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1476

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish additional 
                   national cemeteries for veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1999

Mr. Evans (for himself, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Costello, Ms. Danner, 
 Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Doyle, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. 
  Strickland, Mrs. Kelly, and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish additional 
                   national cemeteries for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Cemetery Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish, 
in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, a 
national cemetery in each of the three areas in the United States that 
the Secretary determines to be most in need of such a cemetery to serve 
the needs of veterans and their families.
    (b) Reports.--
            (1) Initial report on implementation.--Not later than the 
        date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this 
        Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress 
        a report on the establishment of the national cemeteries under 
        subsection (a). The report shall set forth the three areas 
        identified by the Secretary for such establishment, a schedule 
        for such establishment, and an estimate of the costs associated 
        with such establishment.
            (2) Updates to initial report.--Not later than one year 
        after the date on which the report described in paragraph (1) 
        is submitted to Congress, and annually thereafter until the 
        establishment of the national cemeteries under subsection (a) 
        is complete, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
        that updates the information included in the report described 
        in paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
Jack HOLDEN, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8672.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Christopher HENRIQUEZ, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

No. 18-5375.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/11/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      219,533
COMMITMENTS
  66,150    7,660   30,416   91,201  150,911  187,767  188,987   31,766   30,546

CHANGES FROM 01/04/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,337)
  -4,189     -144   -1,198    3,003   -1,640   -2,384   -2,982       47      645

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    30.1      3.5     13.9     41.5     68.7     85.5     86.1     14.5     13.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      225)
      79       24       55       61       86      162      154
```

----

Updated January 14, 2011
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1563

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department of Defense

from being used for the deployment of ground elements of the United

States Armed Forces in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia unless that

deployment is specifically authorized by law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 1999

Mrs. FOWLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit the use of funds appropriated to the Department

of Defense from being used for the deployment of ground

elements of the United States Armed Forces in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia unless that deployment is

specifically authorized by law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Operations

5 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Limitation Act of

6 1999’’.
2

•HR 1563 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DE2 FENSE FUNDS FOR DEPLOYMENT OF UNITED

3 STATES GROUND FORCES TO THE FEDERAL

4 REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA WITHOUT SPE5 CIFIC AUTHORIZATION BY LAW.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds appropriated

7 or otherwise available to the Department of Defense may

8 be obligated or expended for the deployment of ground ele9 ments of the United States Armed Forces in the Federal

10 Republic of Yugoslavia unless such deployment is specifi11 cally authorized by a law enacted after the enactment of

12 this Act.

13 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The prohibition in

14 subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the authority

15 of the President under the Constitution to initiate mis16 sions specifically limited to rescuing United States mili17 tary personnel or citizens in the Federal Republic of Yugo18 slavia.

Æ
David PICKUP, et al., petitioners, v. Gavin NEWSOM, Governor of California, et al.

No. 18-1244.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Gregory Donel JOHNSON, petitioner, v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

No. 17-9428.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2616

JOHNNY T. BELCHER, Petitioner, versus HARMAN MINING COMPANY; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCECOMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (97-242-BLA) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 22, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny T. Belcher, Petitioner Pro Se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, ARTER & HADDEN, Washington, D.C.; Cathryn Celeste Helm, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1998). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the Board. Belcher v. Harman Mining Co. , No. 97-242-BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 23, 1997). Appellant also raises claims of constitutional deficiencies in the applicable statutory scheme. However, he fails to allege any cognizable harm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SOUNDBOARD ASSOCIATION, petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

No. 18-722.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
John Garrett SMITH, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.

No. 18-8457.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2 denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 158 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 158

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 1999

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 316 North 26th 
  Street in Billings, Montana, as the ``James F. Battin United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 316 North 26th Street in 
Billings, Montana, shall be known and designated as the ``James F. 
Battin United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James F. Battin 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Carl Lynn SCOTT, petitioner, v. Jerry GOODWIN, Warden.

No. 18-8454.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

COMPANY PRESS RELEASE
JOINT-VENTURE CONTRACT WITH QF DIGITAL

VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 12, 2000-- Further to the
press release dated May 8, 2000 under the company's previous name Vancouver's
Finest Coffee Co. (old symbol "VCFN"), China NetTV Holdings (OTCBB:CNHD - news)
is pleased to announce that its wholly owned subsidiary China NetTV Inc. has
signed a joint-venture contract with Sichuan Qianfeng Digital Audio/Video
Equipment Co. Ltd. ("QF Digital").

QF Digital will inject all its assets into the joint-venture including
production facilities and equipment, technology, as well as all contracts. China
NetTV Holdings will initially invest U.S. $1.5 million to finance the initial
production of set-top boxes to meet expected contract orders. Future investments
will be made contingent upon progress of the set-top box market.

Under the terms of the contract, China NetTV Holdings will control 51 percent of
the joint-venture. The joint-venture is being registered awaiting all necessary
government approvals.

Based in Sichuan Province (population 90+ million), QF Digital is a pioneer and
leader in China in Proprietary Digital Data Transmission Technology and
Solutions for the Television Broadcasting and Cable industries. It has
proprietary technology based on the patented ASIC "L64769QAM'", offering
complete turnkey Digital TV Broadcasting solutions consisting of:

         1. Headend Systems - Front-end systems residing at the TV or Cable
            operator that originates the Digital signal.

         2. Design and Engineering - Capabilities to be designer and builder of
            turnkey Digital TV Broadcasting systems.

         3. Set-Top Boxes - User Interface boxes that convert Digital Broadcasts
            into Analog Signals.

QF Digital occupies a prominent position in Sichuan Province and is a nationally
recognized brand name. Several contracts are currently under advanced
negotiations both inside and outside Sichuan Province. QF Digital also plans to
incorporate Smart Card and WebTV capabilities into their Set-Top Boxes.

Any forward-looking statement in this press release is made pursuant to the
"safe harbor'" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Investors are cautioned that actual results may differ substantially from
such forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not
limited to, economical and political factors, technological developments and
changes in international and local markets, as well as the inherent risks of the
technology related business.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors of China NetTV Holdings Inc.

/s/ Ernest Cheung, President
----------------------------
    Ernest Cheung, President

                                                                              56
```
  
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
OPTION AND FUTURES COMBINED POSITIONS AS OF 09/27/11          |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  Long  | Short  |Spreads |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short  |  Long  | Short
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      149,240
COMMITMENTS
  19,383   24,678   40,834   73,166   70,484  133,383  135,996   15,857   13,244

CHANGES FROM 09/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -29,724)
   2,233  -10,694   -4,076  -27,436  -11,281  -29,279  -26,051     -445   -3,673

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADER
    13.0     16.5     27.4     49.0     47.2     89.4     91.1     10.6      8.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       98)
      30       24       48       24       26       86       82
```

----

Updated September 30, 2011
Marcel HENDERSON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8526.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1598/2005

of 29 September 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 23 to 29 September 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 September 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----
AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE, et al., petitioners, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al.

No. 18-1000.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 3, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Exhibit 12



EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, LP

STATEMENT
SETTING FORTH DETAIL FOR COMPUTATION OF

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



(Millions of dollars)



|                                                |  |                         |     |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |    
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --- | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ---- | - |  | ---- | ---- | - |  | - | ---
|                                                |  | Year Ended December 31,
|                                                |  | 2004                    |     | 2003 |   |      | 2002 |  |   | 2001 |   |  | 2000
|Income (loss) before income taxes               |  | $                       | 276 |      | $ | (339 | )    |  | $ | (246 | ) |  | $    | (283 | ) |  | $ | 153
|Fixed charges:                                  |  |                         |     |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |    
|Interest expense, gross                         |  |                         | 227 |      |   | 215  |      |  |   | 205  |   |  |      | 192  |   |  |   | 185
|Portion of rentals representative of interest   |  |                         | 31  |      |   | 35   |      |  |   | 42   |   |  |      | 37   |   |  |   | 38 
|                                                |  |                         |     |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |    
|Total fixed charges before capitalized interest |  |                         | 258 |      |   | 250  |      |  |   | 247  |   |  |      | 229  |   |  |   | 223
|                                                |  |                         |     |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |    
|Earnings (losses)                               |  | $                       | 534 |      | $ | (89  | )    |  | $ | 1    |   |  | $    | (54  | ) |  | $ | 376
|Ratio of earnings (losses) to fixed charges (a) |  |                         | 2.1 |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |   |  |      |     |   |  |   | 1.7
|                                                |  |                         |     |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |    



|(a) | In 2003, 2002 and 2001, earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $339 million, $246 million and $283 million, respectively.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Exhibit 12
(LOGO)AMERICA FIRST CREDIT UNION
MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

Re: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A)  I have reviewed the activities and  performance of the Servicer during the
     preceding  fiscal year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
     Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
     to the best of these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
     its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations  under  these  Agreements
     throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or  failure of the
     servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations, a
     description  of each  default or failure and the nature and status  thereof
     has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B)  I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
     servicer in good standing;

(C)  I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
     Policy  and any other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
     Agreement,   Trust  Agreement,   Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  and/or
     Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D)  All premiums for each Hazard Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
     applicable) and Primary Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
     respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and that all such
     insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E)  All real estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
     accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance on
     any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses
     have not been paid with respect to any Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for
     the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G)  All annual reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
     required per section 6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
     respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified  By:
Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Title
March 31, 2000
Date

                                With You In Mind
P.O. BOX 9338 *  OGDEN, UT 84409 * (801) 778-8485 *  SALT LAKE CITY. UT *
(801) 966-5553 EXT. 8485 * WATS-IN-STATE AND OUT-OF-STATE 1-800-999-3961
EXT. 8485
                              www. americafirst.com
Robert CALDWELL, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-5323.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)*(per curiam )* .