alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Uradni list C 17/2022

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 17 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6513. januar 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 17

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6513. januar 2022

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2022/C 17/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 12. januar 2022 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2022/C 17/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 12. januar 2022

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 13.1.2022 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 17/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2022

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 17/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

12. januar 2022

(2022/C 17/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1370 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 131,19 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4414 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,83338 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,2640 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,0486 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 147,00 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 9,9270 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 24,423 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 355,98 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,5359 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,9453 |
| TRY | turška lira | 15,5922 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5762 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4261 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 8,8630 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6775 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5358 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 353,27 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,5645 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,2379 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5240 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 295,93 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,7595 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 58,080 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 84,7559 |
| THB | tajski bat | 37,936 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,3458 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 23,1852 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 84,0285 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1370

JPY

japonski jen

131,19

DKK

danska krona

7,4414

GBP

funt šterling

0,83338

SEK

švedska krona

10,2640

CHF

švicarski frank

1,0486

ISK

islandska krona

147,00

NOK

norveška krona

9,9270

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

24,423

HUF

madžarski forint

355,98

PLN

poljski zlot

4,5359

RON

romunski leu

4,9453

TRY

turška lira

15,5922

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5762

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4261

HKD

hongkonški dolar

8,8630

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6775

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5358

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 353,27

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,5645

CNY

kitajski juan

7,2379

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5240

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 295,93

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,7595

PHP

filipinski peso

58,080

RUB

ruski rubelj

84,7559

THB

tajski bat

37,936

BRL

brazilski real

6,3458

MXN

mehiški peso

23,1852

INR

indijska rupija

84,0285

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
William M. TURNER, petitioner, v. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, et al.

No. 18-1208.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 20, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-8011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN EDWIN BOTELHO-PEREZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-02-124)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 20, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, Appellant Pro Se. John Evan

DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Edwin Botelho-Perez, a federal inmate, appeals

the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his

sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. BotehloPerez, No. CR-02-124 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                 <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              21,926               11,583
<SECURITIES>                                             0                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      253,335               97,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0                    0
<INVENTORY>                                              0                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    25,559               15,216
<PP&E>                                              11,549               11,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (6,758)              (5,150)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,987,961            2,989,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              302,900               73,850
<BONDS>                                                  0                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0                    0
<COMMON>                                            20,037               19,361
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,665,024            2,688,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,987,961            2,989,118
<SALES>                                                  0                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0                    0
<CGS>                                                    0                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      640,215              370,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (640,215)            (370,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (640,215)            (370,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0                    0
<CHANGES>                                                0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (640,215)            (370,360)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.030)               (.038)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.030)               (.038)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

Partnership Policy Committee
Northern Border Partners, L.P.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-72351) of Northern Border Partners, L.P. and Subsidiaries
(the Partnership) of our report dated September 6, 2002 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Northern Border Partners, L.P. and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in partners' equity for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern Border
Partners, L.P.

Our report refers to the Partnership's adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, which was subsequently amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No.
138.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
September 27, 2002
In Re Charles A. DREAD, petitioner.

No. 18-7063.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
```
 
 
WHEAT - KANSAS CITY BOARD OF TRADE                                   Code-001612
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 01/18/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      213,352
COMMITMENTS
  66,222    7,423   29,115   83,934  146,127  179,271  182,665   34,081   30,687

CHANGES FROM 01/11/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -6,181)
      72     -237   -1,301   -7,267   -4,784   -8,496   -6,322    2,315      141

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.0      3.5     13.6     39.3     68.5     84.0     85.6     16.0     14.4

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      218)
      77       23       51       62       84      159      147
```

----

Updated January 21, 2011
Raquel HINOJOSA, et al., petitioners, v. Petra HORN, et al.

No. 18-461.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 18, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```
 
 
VIX FUTURES - CBOE FUTURES EXCHANGE                                  Code-1170E1
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/30/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($1000 X INDEX)                                      OPEN INTEREST:      162,292
COMMITMENTS
  21,671   35,068   38,616   87,934   74,284  148,221  147,968   14,071   14,324

CHANGES FROM 08/23/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -4,706)
   1,165     -478      600     -321    2,085    1,444    2,207   -6,150   -6,913

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    13.4     21.6     23.8     54.2     45.8     91.3     91.2      8.7      8.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      103)
      34       22       47       28       24       93       80
```

----

Updated September 2, 2011
```
 
 
WHEAT - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                                   Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 08/30/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       43,029
COMMITMENTS
  12,154      817    4,237   13,386   27,589   29,777   32,643   13,252   10,386

CHANGES FROM 08/23/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -3,870)
     313     -377     -522   -3,597   -2,473   -3,806   -3,372      -64     -498

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    28.2      1.9      9.8     31.1     64.1     69.2     75.9     30.8     24.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       58)
      19        3       13       26       18       51       34
```

----

Updated September 2, 2011
##### 



Exhibit 11.1 IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except for share amounts) A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is given in
the following table: Net (Loss)
    
    SharesIncome
    
    outstanding and
    
    Amount per(unaudited)
    
    equivalents
    
    ShareQuarter
ended September 30, 2004Basic EPS
    
    $
    (17,798
    )
    
    
    48,305,708
    
    
    $
    (0.37
    )Diluted EPS (No effect of options: anti-dilutive)
    
    $
    (17,798
    )
    
    
    48,305,708
    
    
    $
    (0.37
    )Quarter
ended September 30, 2003Basic EPS
    
    $
    62,132
    
    
    
    48,214,793
    
    
    $
    1.29Diluted EPS
    
    $
    62,132
    
    
    
    48,300,348
    
    
    $
    1.29Nine
months ended September 30, 2004Basic EPS
    
    $
    129,978
    
    
    
    48,276,603
    
    
    $
    2.69Diluted EPS
    
    $
    129,978
    
    
    
    48,362,411
    
    
    $
    2.69Nine
months ended September 30, 2003Basic EPS
    
    $
    195,248
    
    
    
    48,194,170
    
    
    $
    4.05Diluted EPS
    
    $
    195,248
    
    
    
    48,280,373
    
    
    $
    4.04
```

```

----

Updated August 19, 2011
Stephen Patrick BLACK, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

No. 18-5029.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied.
LEI YIN, petitioner, v. BIOGEN, INC., fka Biogen-IDEC.

No. 18-6965.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
cytk-ex1049_468.htm



[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Exhibit 10.49

 

AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO COLLABORATION 

AND OPTION AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment No. 8 to the Agreement (this “Amendment No. 8”) is entered into as of November 30, 2016 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Cytokinetics, Incorporated (“Cytokinetics” or “CK”), a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business at 280 East Grand Ave., South San Francisco, California 94080 and Amgen Inc., a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California 91320 (“Amgen”).

 

WHEREAS, Cytokinetics and Amgen are parties to that certain Collaboration and Option Agreement dated December 29, 2006, as amended (the “Agreement”);

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Milestone Event with respect to  initiation of the [*] Phase III clinical trial of omecamtiv mecarbil (also known as CK-452) as a [*] Compound;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, CK and Amgen, intending to be legally bound, agree to amend the Agreement as set forth below.    


	
1.
	
Definitions.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meaning ascribed in the Agreement.  





	
2.
	
Phase III Initiation Milestone.  The Parties hereby agree that, with respect to Table 13.3.1 of the Agreement and CK-452 as a [*] Compound [*], the Milestone Event for Phase III Initiation for CK-452 as a [*] Compound shall be deemed to have occurred on the Amendment Effective Date.




Except as expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. This Amendment No. 8 constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties as to its subject matter, and supersedes and merges all prior negotiations, representations, agreements and understandings regarding the same.

 

{Signatures follow on the next page}

 






 

 



Amgen Inc.

 

By:  /s/ Sean E. Harper

Name: Sean E. Harper

Title:  EVP Research & Development 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 8 as of the Amendment Effective Date.  
Cytokinetics, Inc.

 

By:  /s/ Robert I. Blum

Name: Robert I. Blum

Title:  President and CEO
James Michael MURPHY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-1155.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Timothy L. Smith, the President and Chief Executive Officer of NB&T Financial Group, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NB&T Financial Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                     
|---------------------- |  | --------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Timothy L. Smith
|                       |  | Timothy L. Smith
Exhibit 10.53




---



##### 



5% of the employee premium dependents 15% of the dependent
premium




---



##### 



/s/ Pete Mangan

Pete Mangan
Director, Finance
    
    
    
    /s/ David White

David White
Sr. V.P/CFO
 Agreed
and Accepted:
  /s/ Aaron Tachibana

Aaron Tachibana
    
    
    
    6-2-04

Date6-7-04
[intended start date]
 Attachments:
    
    Proprietary Information Agreement
Agreement to Arbitrate Disputes and Claims
Code of Business Conduct
Aaron MURRAY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8626.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Compressor
Company (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John E.
Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ John E. JacksonName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    May 7, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.