alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
 
CRUDE OIL, LIGHT SWEET - ICE FUTURES EUROPE                          Code-067411
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 12/27/11                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 1,000 BARRELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:      392,513
COMMITMENTS
  45,664   23,281   84,527  214,824  245,746  345,015  353,554   47,498   38,959

CHANGES FROM 12/20/11 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:     -2,438)
   6,294    2,734   -1,855   -2,162    4,146    2,277    5,025   -4,715   -7,463

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    11.6      5.9     21.5     54.7     62.6     87.9     90.1     12.1      9.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      116)
      30       20       40       59       57      109      100
```

----

Updated December 30, 2011
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 2

- 98 V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHELLE DAVIS , on behalf of her
minor child, A.D

. ,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 3 , 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On February 1, 2022

, Michelle Davis filed a petition for compensation on behalf

of her minor child

, A.D

., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2 Petitioner allege d that A.D

. suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus vaccination on February 18 , 2019

. ECF N o. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the petitioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g ). O n October 1 , 202 2

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to withdraw

the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Offic e.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2 s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Phillip CAMILLO-AMISANO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8159.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 1, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEROY DAVIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 384

[ April 9, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 82

- 004054 CF10B

.

Leroy Davis, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, F ORST and K LINGENSMIT H

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Janice FRANCE, petitioner, v. Sharon PATRICK.

No. 17-1684.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
---

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of China Valves Technology, Inc.

|Name of Subsidiary                                                                           | Jurisdiction of | % Owned               | Principal Business
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | --------------------- | ------------------
|                                                                                             | Organization    |                       |                   
|China Valves Technology (Changsha) Valve Co., Ltd                                            | PRC             | 100% Indirectly       | Manufacturing     
|Yangzhou Rock
      Valve Lock Technology Co., Ltd.                                          | PRC             | 100%
      Indirectly | Manufacturing     
|Henan Kai Feng High Pressure Valve Co., Ltd.                                                 | PRC             | 100% Indirectly       | Manufacturing     
|Zhengzhou City
      ZhengDie Valve., Ltd.                                                   | PRC             | 100%
      Indirectly | Manufacturing     
|Tai Zhou Tai De Valve Co., Ltd.                                                              | PRC             | 100% Indirectly       | Manufacturing     
|Shanghai Pudong
      Hanwei Valve Co., Ltd                                                  | PRC             | 100%
      Indirectly | Manufacturing     
|Henan Tonghai Fluid Equipment Co., Ltd.                                                      | PRC             | 100% Indirectly       | Holding Company   
|Shanghai Han Huang Co., Ltd                                                                  | PRC             | 100% Indirectly       | Holding Company   
|Hong Kong Han Xi Co., Ltd                                                                    | Hong Kong       | 100% Indirectly       | Holding Company   
|China Valves
      Technology Holdings Co. (formerly China Fluid Equipment Holdings Limited) | Hong
      Kong | 100%
      Directly   | Holding Company   

---
Calvin WHITE, petitioner, v. ILLINOIS.

No. 17-7147.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 22, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District denied.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL FORD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut

corporation; LONG TERM DISABILITY

PLAN OF BROWN AND SHARPE

MANUFACTURING COMPANY,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-56522

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-03665-GW-E

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 2, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, FISHER and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In this ERISA action, Michael Ford appeals the district court’s judgment in

favor of the appellees, holding that defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance

FILED

FEB 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Company (“Hartford”), the plan administrator, did not abuse its discretion in

terminating benefits under the Long Term Disability Plan of Brown & Sharpe

Manufacturing Company. While the case was pending in the district court, the

Supreme Court decided Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn, 128 S. Ct. 2343

(2008). The district court called for supplemental briefs on the Supreme Court

decision, but then concluded that Glenn did not require an analysis that materially

differed from that which was appropriate under prior Ninth Circuit law with

respect to application of the abuse of discretion standard. 

The district court, however, did not have the benefit of our intervening

opinion in Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co., 588 F.3d 623, 631-

32 (9th Cir. 2009), however, which held that MetLife — consistent with our en

banc decision in Abatie v. Alta Health and Life Ins. Co., 458 F.3d 955, 966-69 (9th

Cir. 2006) (en banc) — overruled in relevant part a significant prior line of Ninth

Circuit cases applying the abuse of discretion standard of review, including Jordan

v. Northrop Grumman Corp. Welfare Benefit Plan, 370 F.3d 869 (9th Cir. 2004)

and Bendixen v. Standard Insurance Co., 185 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 1999). While the

parties were asked to discuss Montour in oral argument, they were not able to brief

it to this court. 
3

Because the district court relied on overruled articulations of the abuse of

discretion standard, and because neither this court nor the district court has had the

benefit of full briefing and study of the current state of this circuit’s law under

now-controlling Supreme Court and circuit authority, we reverse the judgment and

remand the case to the district court to apply that authority in the first instance. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Dana GRAY, petitioner, v. V. ROMERO, et al.

No. 18-8326.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 13, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES
13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)

I, Rick Russo, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Captiva Software
Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

| |                         | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | Date:  August 13, 2003  | 
| |                         | 
| | /s/ RICK E. RUSSO       | 
| |                         | 
| | Rick E. Russo           | 
| | Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Arthur Zafiropoulo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·                  the QuarterlyReport of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedJuly 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

·                  the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.
| By:      |   | /s/ ARTHUR ZAFIROPOULO    |   |   |
|----------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:    |   | Arthur Zafiropoulo        |   |   |
| *Title:* |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |

 

I, Bruce Wright, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·                  the QuarterlyReport of Ultratech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedJuly 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

·                  the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ultratech, Inc.
| By:      |   | /s/ BRUCE WRIGHT          |   |   |
|----------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:    |   | Bruce Wright              |   |   |
| *Title:* |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |   |

----

*                    Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Ultratech, Inc. and will be retained by Ultratech, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                         (5,332)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  374,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,500
<INVENTORY>                                    620,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,179,144
<PP&E>                                       4,080,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,391,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,537,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,744
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,712,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,391,890
<SALES>                                      1,723,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,752,421
<CGS>                                        1,646,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,030,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (312,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (312,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (23,844)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (336,074)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Ricardo GONZALEZ, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.

No. 17-9575.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Jason VICKS, et ux., petitioners, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et al.

No. 17-1659.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Compressor
Company (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John E.
Jackson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ John E. JacksonName:
    
    John E. JacksonTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    August 9, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
Charles Edward COOPER, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-8508.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Ricky Lee SMITH, petitioner, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security.

No. 17-1606.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 25, 2019.

Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General granted, and the time is divided as follows: 15 minutes for petitioner, 15 minutes for the Solicitor General, and 30 minutes for Court-appointed *amicus curiae* in support of the judgment below.
Kyrt M. WENTZELL, et al., petitioners, v. BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED, et al.

No. 18-95.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 1, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Yusef ALLEN, petitioner, v. Steven JOHNSON, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

No. 18-8576.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Daniel E. WHITE, petitioner, v. Jayden H. HUNYH, nka Jayden Scacco.

No. 18-1098.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 29, 2019.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Utah denied.
Mitchell R. SWARTZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al.

No. 18-961.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 15, 2019.

Petition for rehearing denied.
Huimin SONG, et al., petitioners, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, et al.

No. 17-808.

Supreme Court of the United States

Feb. 20, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cole National Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.


Date: December 15, 2003
                                    /s/ Larry Pollock
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Larry Pollock
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


                                    /s/ Lawrence E. Hyatt
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Lawrence E. Hyatt
                                    Title:  Chief Financial Officer



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.